The authors would like to make the following corrections to this paper [1].
Regarding the median cumulative incidence of COVID-19 among residents of the nursing homes located in the western region of the province, we made a typographical error in the original article, writing 45% instead of 45.2%. Corrections have been made to the Abstract and Results sections.
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. The median cumulative incidence of COVID-19 cases (%) [p25–p75] according to the geographical region where the nursing homes were located and according to the different infection control measures, was erroneously reported. The corrected Table 2 appears below.
Table 2.
Variable | Median Cumulative Incidence of COVID-19 Cases (%) [p25–p75] | p |
---|---|---|
Facility size | 0.930 | |
Small–medium (≤70 beds), (16) | 1.8 [0–48] | |
Large (>70 beds), (29) | 7.4 [0–36] | |
General characteristics | ||
Special care units | 0.174 | |
yes (22) | 19 [0–40] | |
no (23) | 1.1 [0–39] | |
Dementia | 0.421 | |
yes (13) | 14 [0–45] | |
no (32) | 1.6 [0–37] | |
Complex clinical problems | 0.444 | |
yes (9) | 24 [0.53–36] | |
no (36) | 1.8 [0–40] | |
Conformity to quality standards | 0.990 | |
yes (25) | 1.6 [0–42] | |
no (20) | 10 [0–32] | |
Metropolitan status | 0.567 | |
Urban (11) | 0.53 [0–36] | |
Rural (34) | 3.8 [0–42] | |
Geographical region | 0.002 | |
North (5) | 1.1 [0–44.6] | |
South (15) | 0 [0–24.2] | |
East (14) | 0.8 [0–4.8] | |
West (11) | 45.2 [24–55.9] | |
Infection control measures | ||
Specific training on infection control and prevention | 0.388 | |
yes (11) | 14 [0–47.9] | |
no (34) | 1.8 [0–28.1] | |
Presence of a committee for infection control and prevention | 0.081 | |
yes (3) | 47.9 [14–54.8] | |
no (42) | 1.8 [0–35.9] | |
Procedure for management of residents with suspected communicable diseases | 0.871 | |
yes (32) | 4.4 [0–39] | |
no (13) | 1.9 [0.5–35.9] | |
Policies for management of personnel at risk of infection | 0.341 | |
yes (23) | 1.6 [0–28] | |
no (22) | 13.5 [0–44.6] | |
Training of staff on the management of occupational exposures to biohazards | 0.952 | |
yes (32) | 3.8 [0–39.4] | |
no (13) | 1.9 [0–35.9] | |
Established infection surveillance program | 0.749 | |
yes (19) | 2.9 [0–24.5] | |
no (26) | 3.3 [0–42] | |
Training of staff on the correct hand hygiene procedure | 0.553 | |
yes (43) | 2.9 [0–38.5] | |
no (2) | 23.1 [1.6–44.6] | |
Procedure on standard and additional precautions | 0.365 | |
yes (35) | 1.6 [0–40.3] | |
no (10) | 18.6 [1.9–38.5] | |
Training of staff on the correct use of PPE | 0.301 | |
yes (33) | 4.8 [0–40.3] | |
no (12) | 0.8 [0–30] | |
Availability of hand hygiene supplies | 0.571 | |
yes (33) | 1.6 [0–35.9] | |
no (12) | 8.8 [0–44.9] | |
Training of staff on how to prevent the spread of respiratory infections | 0.269 | |
yes (21) | 4.8 [0–24.5] | |
no (24) | 2.4 [0–44.9] | |
Compliance with operations of routine and terminal cleaning/sanitation/disinfection | 0.553 | |
yes (37) | 1.9 [0–38.5] | |
no (8) | 9.4 [0.8–40] | |
Regular checks of the quality of the cleaning/sanitation/disinfection | 0.918 | |
yes (37) | 2.9 [0–35.9] | |
no (8) | 14.1 [0–43.3] | |
Official protocols/procedures on | ||
infection control and prevention | 0.123 | |
yes (19) | 24 [0–45.2] | |
no (26) | 1.6 [0–24.2] | |
Outbreak management | 0.087 | |
yes (5) | 0 [0–0] | |
no (40) | 5.4 [0–40.3] | |
Hand hygiene | 0.915 | |
yes (43) | 2.9 [0–40.3] | |
no (2) | 7.8 [1.6–14] | |
use of PPE | 0.742 | |
yes (42) | 3.8 [0–40.3] | |
no (3) | 0.5 [0–38.5] | |
Isolation measures | 0.941 | |
yes (25) | 2.9 [0–40] | |
no (20) | 3.3 [0.3–24.2] | |
Sanitation | 0.408 | |
yes (33) | 1.6 [0–40.3] | |
no (12) | 9.4 [0.8–31.4] |
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 3 as published. The percentages of nursing homes were not assigned to the correct geographical regions in the two groups of nursing homes with and without confirmed COVID-19 cases. The corrected Table 3 appears below.
Table 3.
Variable | Confirmed COVID-19 Cases | p | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes (N = 37) | No (N = 20) | ||
Residents, mean ± SD | 95.8 ± 47.8 | 80.0 ± 30.3 | 0.188 |
Beds, mean ± SD | 96.7 ± 48.0 | 84.2 ± 33.0 | 0.306 |
Facility size | 0.716 | ||
Small–medium (≤70 beds), n | 13 (35.1%) | 8 (40%) | |
Large (>70 beds), n | 24 (64.9%) | 12 (60%) | |
General characteristics | |||
Special care units | 0.169 | ||
yes, n | 20 (54%) | 7 (35%) | |
no, n | 17 (45%) | 13 (65%) | |
Dementia | 0.749 | ||
yes, n | 10 (27%) | 4 (20%) | |
no, n | 27 (73%) | 16 (80%) | |
Complex clinical problems | 0.346 | ||
yes, n | 10 (27%) | 3 (15%) | |
no, n | 27 (73%) | 17 (85%) | |
Conformity to quality standards | 0.492 | ||
yes, n | 22 (59.5%) | 10 (50%) | |
no, n | 15 (40.5%) | 10 (50%) | |
Metropolitan status | 0.683 | ||
Urban, n | 11 (29.7%) | 7 (35%) | |
Rural, n | 26 (70.1%) | 13 (65%) | |
Geographical region | 0.100 | ||
North, n | 6 (16.2%) | 2 (10%) | |
South, n | 12 (32.4%) | 9 (45%) | |
East, n | 8 (21.6%) | 8 (40%) | |
West, n | 11 (29.7%) | 1 (5%) | |
Single-occupancy rooms | |||
(% over total rooms per facility), median [p25–p75] | 18 [13–34] | 27 [12–32] | 0.620 |
Full-time equivalent nurses, median [p25–p75] | 9.8 [7.3–14] | 9 [7–10] | 0.391 |
Full-time equivalent physicians, median [p25–p75] | 1 [0.7–1.4] | 1 [1–1] | 0.732 |
Full-time equivalent aid staff, median [p25–p75] | 37 [30–64] | 38 [28–52] | 0.622 |
Finally, in the original article there was a mistake in Appendix A Table A1 as published. The percentages of nursing homes were not assigned to the correct geographical regions. The corrected Appendix A Table A1 appears below.
Table A1.
Variable | NH (N = 57) |
Participation in the Survey | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yes (N = 45) | No (N = 12) | |||
Total residents #, n Mean ± SD |
5145 90.3 ± 42.9 |
4158 92.4 ± 45.1 |
987 82.3 ± 33.7 |
0.399 * |
Total beds #, n Mean ± SD |
5263 92.3 ± 43.5 |
4273 94.9 ± 45.7 |
990 82.5 ± 33.7 |
0.305 * |
At least 1 resident COVID-19 case, n | 37 (64.9%) | 28 (75.7%) | 9 (24.3%) | 0.410 |
Incidence of COVID-19 (%), median [p25–p75] ° | 4.8 [0–40] | 2.9 [0–39] | 17 [1.2–46] | 0.605 |
Facility size | 0.697 | |||
Small–medium (≤70 beds), n | 21 (36.8%) | 16 (35.6%) | 5 (41.7%) | |
Large (>70 beds), n | 36 (63.2%) | 29 (64.4%) | 7 (58.3%) | |
General characteristics | ||||
NH with special care units, n | 27 (47.4%) | 22 (48.9%) | 5 (41.7%) | 0.656 |
NH with dementia care units, n | 14 (24.6%) | 13 (28.9%) | 1 (8.3%) | 0.142 |
NH with care units for complex clinical problems, n | 13 (22.8%) | 9 (20%) | 4 (33.3%) | 0.328 |
Conformity to structural quality standards (yes), n | 32 (56.1%) | 25 (55.6%) | 7 (58.3%) | 0.863 |
Metropolitan status | 0.025 | |||
Urban, n | 18 (31.6%) | 11 (24.4%) | 7 (58.3%) | |
Rural, n | 39 (68.4%) | 34 (75.6%) | 5 (41.7%) | |
Geographical region | 0.274 | |||
North, n | 8 (14%) | 5 (11.1%) | 3 (25%) | |
South, n | 21 (36.8%) | 15 (33.3%) | 6 (50%) | |
East, n | 16 (28.1%) | 14 (31.1%) | 2 (16.7%) | |
West, n | 12 (21.1%) | 11 (24.4%) | 1 (8.3%) |
* The p-value is related to the comparison of means. # Total number of residents and beds as of 1 March 2020. ° Cumulative incidence of confirmed COVID-19 cases among residents for the period from 1 March 2020, to 1 June 2020. Significant differences are marked in bold.
The authors state that apart from the indicated issues, the values reported in the original article are correct. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reference
- 1.Cazzoletti L., Zanolin M.E., Tocco Tussardi I., Alemayohu M.A., Zanetel E., Visentin D., Fabbri L., Giordani M., Ruscitti G., Benetollo P.P., et al. Risk Factors Associated with Nursing Home COVID-19 Outbreaks: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:8434. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]