Abstract
Background:
Methotrexate and leflunomide are classic treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however, which is the best choice for patients of RA is still an important question clinically, and this meta-analysis is used to systematically evaluate and compare their efficacy and safety.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Cochrance Library, Embase, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, WanFang Data databases. The retrieval time was from the establishment to September 7, 2021. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis of the included studies was performed using RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 12.0 software.
Results:
The clinical efficacy and safety of leflunomide and methotrexate are evaluated by American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70, DAS28, total effective rate, adverse reaction rate, morning stiffness, swollen joint count, tender joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and rheumatoid factor.
Conclusion:
The results of this meta-analysis will provide reliable evidence clinical efficacy and safety for RA. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are still needed to provide more reliable evidence for the treatment of RA.
PROSPERO number:
CRD42021270980
Keywords: leflunomide, meta-analysis, methotrexate, rheumatoid arthritis
1. Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by progressive synovitis, pannus neoplasia,[1] articular cartilage erosion, and bone destruction.[2] The incidence rate of RA in China is about 0.45% to 1.0%, and the disability rate in 5 years is as high as 43.5%, which could be aggravated with the prolongation of the disease course.[3] Both the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations (updated in 2019) and the 2018 Chinese guidelines for the treatment of RA clearly indicate that traditional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are the cornerstone drugs for the treatment of RA.[4,5] Methotrexate (MTX) and leflunomide (LEF) are recognized as the first choice disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for the treatment of RA at home and abroad,[4,5] with definite clinical efficacy.
However, MTX and LEF have certain hepatotoxicity[6] and many other adverse reactions, such as decreased white blood cells and diarrhea.[7] Therefore, we use meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of these 2 drugs for a better therapeutic method of RA.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Ethics statement
All analyses were based on previously published studies, this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors, thus ethical approval and patient consent are not applicable.
2.2. Search strategy and selection criteria
This meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Chinese databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and English databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library were searched. The retrieval time was from the establishment to September 7, 2021. The search terms were included: “rheumatoid arthritis” OR “RA” AND “methotrexate” OR “MTX” AND “leflunomide” OR “LEF” AND “clinical trial” OR “randomized controlled trial.”
The inclusion criteria were as follows:
-
(1)
Participants: RA patients, and the diagnostic criteria referred to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for RA[8];
-
(2)
Interventions: The experimental group was treated with MTX;
-
(3)
Comparators: the control group was treated with LEF;
-
(4)
Outcomes: The primary outcomes were ACR20/50/70, DAS28, total effective rate, and adverse reaction rate; the secondary outcomes were morning stiffness, swollen joint count, tender joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and rheumatoid factor;
The exclusion criteria were as follows:
-
(1)
Repeated published studies;
-
(2)
The data is incomplete, the outcome effect is not clear, and the data cannot be extracted for analysis;
-
(3)
Animal experiments, cell experiments and the review literature;
-
(4)
Clinical case reports;
-
(5)
The control group was combined with other treatments.
2.3. Data extraction and quality assessment
Two researchers independently performed the data extraction and quality assessment according to the screening criteria, and cross-checked them. If there are conflicts of opinions, resolve them through collective discussion in the research team. In the process of literature screening, the literature with irrelevant titles were excluded, and the abstracts and full texts should be further read to determine the final included literature. Basic information was extracted from the included studies (first author, year of publication, number of patients, interventions, and course of treatment). The primary outcomes were ACR20/50/70, DAS28, total effective rate, and adverse reaction rate; the secondary outcomes were morning stiffness, swollen joint count, tender joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and rheumatoid factor. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.[9]
2.4. Statistical analysis
RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Odds ratio was calculated for the dichotomous variable, mean difference was calculated for the continuous variable. All of them were expressed with 95% confidence interval. I2 and chi-square tests were used to assess the heterogeneity. The results were shown in the forest plot. For all outcomes, Egger and Begg test were used to detect publication bias.
3. Results
3.1. Literature search results
The screening process is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of study selection.
3.2. Publication bias analysis
Begg and Egger test are used to evaluated the publication bias analysis of this study.
3.3. Grading the quality of evidence
The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system will be used to appraise the quality of evidence from the studies obtained. The levels of it will be divided into high, moderate, low, very low.
4. Discussion
Studies have shown that MTX is an inhibitor of folate reductase, and its mechanisms in the treatment of RA are as follows:
-
(1)
It mainly inhibits the reduction of dihydrofolate reductase into tetrahydrofolate, which blocks the transfer of -C group during the biosynthesis of purine nucleotides and pyrimidine nucleotides, inhibits DNA synthesis, and then inhibits the proliferation of synovial cells.[10]
-
(2)
Regulating the balance of Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg, thus to inhibit chronic synovitis.[11,12]
-
(3)
Regulating adenosine-related pathways and inhibiting synovitis of RA.[13]
-
(4)
Inhibiting the expression of MMP-1, MMP-2, and other MMPs, so as to inhibit the destruction of joint bone.[13]
-
(5)
MTX can inhibit bone destruction by upregulating serum OPG, decreasing the expression of RANKL, competitively inhibiting the binding of RANK and RANKL, and regulating the RANKL/RANK/OPG pathway.[14]
The mechanisms of LEF in the treatment of RA are as follows:
-
(1)
The metabolite A771726 inhibits the synthesis of pyrimidines by inhibiting mitochondrial dihydrofolate dehydrogenase, then leading to the proliferation of T cells.[15]
-
(2)
A771726 inhibits the infiltration of synovitis by inhibiting p38 MAPK pathway.[16]
-
(3)
Inhibiting bone erosion by acting on AHR-CRP signal.[17]
-
(4)
Inhibiting the expression of MMP-1, MMP-9, and other MMPs, thereby inhibiting the destruction of joint bone.[18,19] It can be seen that MTX and LEF work through different targets to improve clinical symptoms.
Pharmacokinetic studies have found that after oral administration of MTX, the absorption rate is fast with a half-life of 7 to 10 hours, and a large amount of MTX accumulates in the liver. The continuous use of a small dose may cause the elevation of alanine aminotransferase, which leads to drug-induced liver damage.[20] Oral administration of LEF also has a fast absorption rate and it changes to A771726 in the liver. Continuous use of LEF may cause elevation of alanine aminotransferase, thus leading to drug-induced liver damage.[21] LEF is cheaper than MTX, so it is considered that LEF is more worthy of being adopted in the clinical treatment of RA.
It is suggested that RCTs should be conducted with the following considerations in the future:
-
(1)
Invite experts of RCTs methodology and evidence-based medicine to participate in the design of standardized and rigorous high-quality RCTs research protocols;
-
(2)
Register in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry or ClinicalTrials.gov prior to implementation of the RCTs.
Author contributions
Data curation: Weiyu Qi, Yu Xia.
Software: Weiyu Qi, Yu Xia.
Supervision: Xin Li.
Writing – original draft: Weiyu Qi.
Writing – review & editing: Jian-Zhong Cao.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Rheumatology, LEF = leflunomide, MTX = methotrexate, RA = rheumatoid arthritis.
How to cite this article: Qi W, Xia Y, Li X, Cao J. Clinical efficacy and safety of methotrexate compared with leflunomide in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2021;100:51(e28285).
The data used in the article are obtained from public databases. The literature, data extraction, and analyses are all described in the article. The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
The authors thank for the funding support from the Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81803993).
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
References
- [1].Sun YQ, Liu J, Huang D, et al. Therapeutic effect and mechanism of different Tripterygium wilfordii preparations on patients with rheumatoid arthritis accompanying anemia. Chin J Immunol 2020;36:360–4. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Testa D, Calvacchi S, Petrelli F, et al. One year in review 2021: pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2021;39:445–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Yuan HY, Zhang XL, Zhang XH, et al. Analysis of patents on anti-rheumatoid arthritis therapies issued in China. Expert Opin Ther Pat 2015;25:909–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Smolen JS, Landewe RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:685–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Chinese Rheumatology Association. 2018 Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Chin J Internal Med 2018;57:242–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Wang W, Zhou H, Liu L. Side effects of methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Eur J Med Chem 2018;158:502–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Cannon GW, Holden WL, Juhaeri J, et al. Adverse events with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD): a cohort study of leflunomide compared with other DMARD. J Rheumatol 2004;31:1906–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ Clin Res 2015;349:g7647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Kawami M, Honda N, Hara T, et al. Investigation on inhibitory effect of folic acid on methotrexate-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition focusing on dihydrofolate reductase. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2019;34:396–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Avdeeva A, Rubtsov Y, Dyikanov D, et al. Regulatory T cells in patients with early untreated rheumatoid arthritis: phenotypic changes in the course of methotrexate treatment. Biochimie 2020;174:09–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Bossennec M, Rodriguez C, Hubert M, et al. Methotrexate restores CD73 expression on Th1.17 in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients and may contribute to its anti-inflammatory effect through ado production. J Clin Med 2019;8:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Jekic B, Maksimovic N, Damnjanovic T. Methotrexate pharmacogenetics in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacogenomics 2019;20:1235–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Kanagawa H, Masuyama R, Morita M, et al. Methotrexate inhibits osteoclastogenesis by decreasing RANKL-induced calcium influx into osteoclast progenitors. J Bone Miner Metab 2016;34:526–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Keen HI, Conaghan PG, Tett SE. Safety evaluation of leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2013;12:581–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Vergne-Salle P, Leger DY, Bertin P, et al. Effects of the active metabolite of leflunomide, A77 1726, on cytokine release and the MAPK signalling pathway in human rheumatoid arthritis synoviocytes. Cytokine 2005;31:335–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Liang C, Li J, Lu C, et al. HIF1alpha inhibition facilitates leflunomide-AHR-CRP signaling to attenuate bone erosion in CRP-aberrant rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Commun 2019;10:4579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Litinsky I, Paran D, Levartovsky D, et al. The effects of leflunomide on clinical parameters and serum levels of IL-6, IL-10, MMP-1 and MMP-3 in patients with resistant rheumatoid arthritis. Cytokine 2006;33:106–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Kullich WC, Mur E, Aglas F, et al. Inhibitory effects of leflunomide therapy on the activity of matrixmetalloproteinase-9 and the release of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2006;24:155–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Inoue K, Yuasa H. Molecular basis for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2014;29:12–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Chan V, Charles BG, Tett SE. Population pharmacokinetics and association between A77 1726 plasma concentrations and disease activity measures following administration of leflunomide to people with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005;60:257–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]