Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28225. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028225

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus tacrolimus-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy

A meta-analysis

Lifeng Gong a,b, Min Xu a,b, Wei Xu a,b,∗, Weigang Tang a,b, Jingkui Lu a,b, Wei Jiang a,b, Fengyan Xie a,b, Liping Ding a,b, Xiaoli Qian a,b
Editor: Maya Saranathan
PMCID: PMC8702145  PMID: 34941086

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) monotherapy versus TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) patients.

Methods:

Databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database were searched from inception to January 10, 2021. Eligible studies comparing TAC monotherapy and TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy in IMN patients were included. Data were analysed using Review Manager Version 5.3.

Results:

Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. One randomized controlled trial and six cohort studies involving 372 patients were identified. Compared with TAC monotherapy, TAC-corticosteroid had a higher total remission at the sixth month (odd ratio (OR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.78, P < .01). The two therapy regimens had similar complete remission rates (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43–1.48, P = .47) at the sixth month and similar relapse rates (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.70–2.92, P = .32). TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy had a higher incidence of infection (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18–0.81, P = .01). The two therapy regimens had similar incidences of gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.34–2.70, P = .93), abnormal aminotransferase (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.34–2.38, P = .84), and glucose intolerance (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.32–1.07, P = .08).

Conclusion:

TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy had a higher total remission rate at the sixth month but had a higher incidence of infection than TAC monotherapy in the treatment of IMN. The two therapeutic regimens had similar relapse rates.

Keywords: corticosteroid, idiopathic membranous nephropathy, meta-analysis, tacrolimus

1. Introduction

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is one of the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults.[1] Approximately 30% to 40% of IMN patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome will progress to end-stage renal disease within 10 years.[2–4] Cyclophosphamide (CTX) combined with corticosteroids has been recommended as an initial therapy for IMN according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).[5] Among IMN patients with contraindications to CTX, cyclosporine and tacrolimus (TAC) were recommended as alternative therapy regimens for IMN.[6] Compared to cyclosporine, TAC showed a stronger immunosuppressive effect and fewer side effects.[7,8] Some meta-analyses showed that TAC combined with corticosteroids also had a satisfactory effect on IMN compared with CTX combined with corticosteroids.[9,10] However, corticosteroids still exhibited adverse effects. In recent years, some studies have compared TAC monotherapy with TAC combined with corticosteroids for IMN concerning efficacy and safety, and the results were controversial. Our meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and drug safety between TAC monotherapy and TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy for IMN.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Search strategy

Our meta-analysis has been reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Assessing the methodological quality of systematic review guidelines. Our meta-analysis was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Registration number: CRD42021231540). Ethical Approval is not applicable.

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database from inception to January 10, 2021. The combined text and MeSH terms included idiopathic membranous nephropathy, corticosteroid, and TAC. In addition, the cited papers and relevant references were searched manually to identify eligible studies. There was no language restrictions.

2.2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were defined as follows:

  • (i)

    randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort, or case-control studies;

  • (ii)

    studies of biopsy-confirmed IMN patients with nephrotic syndrome and serum creatinine level of <133 μmol/L; and

  • (iii)

    studies designed to compare TAC monotherapy with TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy.

The primary endpoint of this review was partial remission (PR), complete remission (CR), and total remission (TR). Secondary endpoints were relapse and drug-related adverse effects.

The exclusion criteria were:

  • (i)

    case series, comments, reviews;

  • (ii)

    lack of relevant outcomes data;

  • (iii)

    secondary membranous nephropathy, malignant tumor, infection (hepatitis B or C virus infection, tuberculosis, and syphilis), diabetes mellitus, pregnancy or lactating, and active gastrointestinal bleeding.

2.3. Data extraction and quality assessment

Data were extracted independently by two investigators using standard data extraction forms. In the case of disagreement, a third investigator was consulted. We extracted characteristics including first author, year of publication, location, study design, follow-up period, age, sex, sample size, specific drug treatment program, and all the outcomes (definitions of CR, PR, and relapse are shown in Table 1). TR is defined as either CR or PR. Relapse was defined as proteinuria >3.5 g/d in patients who had achieved CR or PR. The Cochrane assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of RCTs.[11] The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of nonrandomized studies.[12]

Table 1.

Definition of complete remission, partial remission, and relapse.

Study Complete remission Partial remission Relapse
Liang Ludan[13] Proteinuria <0.3 g/d with normal serum ALB and SCr Proteinuria <3.5 g/d, which had declined to ≤50% of the baseline value with serum ALB elevated and stable SCr Proteinuria >3.5 g/d after remission
Lin Jiaqun[14] Proteinuria <0.3 g/d with normal serum ALB (≥35 g/L) and SCr Proteinuria 0.3–3.5 g/d, which had declined to ≤50% of the baseline value with serum ALB ≥30 g/L and stable SCr –
Shang Shunlai[15] Proteinuria <0.3 g/d at least twice per week with normal serum ALB and SCr Proteinuria 0.3–3.5 g/d, which had declined to ≤50% of the baseline value with normal or improved serum albumin and stable SCr Proteinuria >3.5 g/d and more than 50% higher than the lowest urinary protein level after remission
Yao Zhuane[16] Proteinuria <0.3 g/d with normal serum ALB and SCr Proteinuria <3.5 g/d, which had declined to≤50% of the baseline value with serum ALB elevated and stable SCr Proteinuria >3.5/d g/d in patients who had achieved CR or PR
Zhu Aimin[17] Proteinuria <0.3 g/d with normal serum ALB (≥35 g/L) and SCr Proteinuria had declined to ≤30% of the baseline value with stable renal function –
Zhang Xiaojuan[18] Proteinuria <0.3 g/d, confirmed by two values at least one week apart, with normal serum ALB and renal function Proteinuria <3.5 g/d, which had declined to≤50% of the baseline value, confirmed by two values at least one week apart, with serum ALB elevated and stable SCr Proteinuria >3.5 g/d in patients who had achieved CR or PR
Zhang Xiaoxiao[19] Proteinuria <0.3 g/d with stable renal function Proteinuria 0.5–3.0 g/d, which had declined to ≤50% of the baseline value with stable renal function Proteinuria >3.0 g/d in patients who had achieved CR or PR
Open in a new tab

ALB = serum albumin, CR = complete remission, PR = partial remission, SCr = serum creatinine.

2.4. Statistical analysis

We performed the data analysis by using Review Manager Version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration). Heterogeneity between studies was assessed by using I2 statistics. We considered I2 > 50% and P < .10 to imply significant heterogeneity. Homogeneous data were analyzed using the fixed-effects model. Heterogeneous data were analyzed using the random-effects model. We presented categorical variables as odds ratios (ORs). Summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Overall effects were determined by the using Z-test. A P value <.05 was considered significant. Publication bias was assessed using sensitivity analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Study selection and characteristics

A flow diagram of the selection process is shown in Figure 1. Finally, seven studies from China were included in this analysis.[13–19] Of the seven studies, one was an RCT, and six were cohort studies. Five studies were published in Chinese journal. Overall, 177 patients were included in the TAC monotherapy group, and 195 patients were included in the TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy group. The follow-up period was from 6 to 12 months. The risk of bias in the included RCTs was moderate. The cohort studies achieved scores of ≥6 points, which were considered to be of high quality. The baseline characteristics of these studies are listed in Table 2. Specific drug treatment programs are listed in Table 3. The Cochrane assessment is listed in Table 4, and the NOS assessment is listed in Table 5.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Flow diagram of the literature search.

Table 2.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Study (year) Country Study design Follow-up period (mo) Sample size Mean age (years) Male/Female SCr (μmol/L) Proteinuria (g/d) ACEI and/or ARB treatment
Liang Ludan 2014[13] China Cohort study 6 TAC: 7 TAC+corticosteroid: 19 58.4±6.0 57.8±2.6 3/4 11/8 68.4 ± 9.1 72.4 ± 4.9 - +
Lin Jiaqun 2015[14] China Cohort study 6 TAC: 12 TAC+corticosteroid: 14 54.2 ± 9.4 45.8 ± 11.6 11/1 11/3 81.8 ± 14.7 78.6 ± 16.8 5.3 ± 0.9 5.0 ± 1.2 +
Shang Shunlai 2018[15] China Cohort study 10 TAC: 33 TAC+corticosteroid: 24 42.0 ± 15.3 43.3 ± 14.6 13/20 14/10 72.4 ± 19.8 77.3 ± 23.8 – ?
Yao Zhuane 2017[16] China Cohort study 6 TAC: 18 TAC+corticosteroid: 13 48.3 ± 13.2 42.2 ± 11.4 8/10 8/5 54.2 ± 14.9 79.4 ± 31.0 4.9 ± 1.0 9.2 ± 4.9 +
Zhu Aimin 2020[17] China RCT 6 TAC: 22 TAC+corticosteroid: 25 52.8 ± 9.7 53.2 ± 11.6 16/6 18/7 87.2 ± 10.2 87.0 ± 11.2 7.2 ± 0.7 7.2 ± 0.8 ?
Zhang Xiaojuan 2019[18] China Cohort study 12 TAC: 40 TAC+corticosteroid: 46 32.9 ± 6.4 33.5 ± 6.1 25/15 27/19 69.9 ± 12.2 68.9 ± 13.4 5.56 6.54 +
Zhang Xiaoxiao 2019[19] China Cohort study 6 TAC: 45 TAC+corticosteroid: 54 55.1 ± 11.1 51.9 ± 13.0 27/18 17/37 68.9 ± 16.8 74.4 ± 18.5 5.3 ± 2.8 6.5 ± 3.2 +
Open in a new tab

ACEI = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB = angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blocker, RCT = randomized controlled trials, SCr = serum creatinine, TAC = tacrolimus.

+: patient was treated by ACEI and/or ARB; ?: no description.

Table 3.

Specific drug treatment program.

Study TAC monotherapy regimens TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy regimens
Liang Ludan[13] Oral TAC 0.05 mg/kg/d (the trough blood concentration of 4–10 ng/mL for 6 mo) Oral TAC regimen was the same as TAC monotherapy regimen; oral prednisone initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg/d
Lin Jiaqun[14] Oral TAC 0.05 mg/kg/d (the trough blood concentration of 4–8 ng/mL) with gradual tapering after remission (the trough blood concentration was maintained at 2–5 ng/mL) Oral TAC regimen was the same as TAC monotherapy regimen; oral prednisone initial dose of 0.5–1 mg/kg/d for 2 mo with gradual tapering
Shang Shunlai[15] Oral TAC 0.045 to 0.06 mg/kg (the trough blood concentration of 4–8 ng/mL for 6 mo) with gradual tapering Oral TAC regimen was the same as TAC monotherapy regimen; oral methylprednisolone initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg/d for 2 mo with gradual tapering
Yao Zhuane[16] Oral TAC 0.05 mg/kg/d (the trough blood concentration of 4–10 ng/mL for 6 mo) Oral TAC regimen was the same as TAC monotherapy regimen; oral prednisone 0.8–1 mg/kg/d with gradual tapering
Zhu Aimin[17] Oral TAC 0.05 mg/kg/d (the trough blood concentration of 5–10 ng/mL) Oral TAC regimen was the same as TAC monotherapy regimen; oral prednisone 30–40 mg with gradual tapering
Zhang Xiaojuan[18] Oral TAC 0.05–0.1 mg/kg/d (the trough blood concentration of 5–10 ng/mL for 6 mo) with gradual tapering Oral TAC regimen was the same as TAC monotherapy regimen; oral prednisone initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg/d for 2–3 mo with gradual tapering
Zhang Xiaoxiao[19] Oral TAC 0.1 mg/kg/d (the trough blood concentration of 5–10 ng/mL for 6 mo) Oral TAC regimen was the same as TAC monotherapy regimen; oral prednisone initial dose of 1 mg/kg/d with gradual tapering
Open in a new tab

TAC = tacrolimus.

Table 4.

Quality assessment of randomized control trial.

Study Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding of participants and personnel Incomplete outcome data Selective reporting Other bias
Zhu Aimin ? ? ? + + ?
Open in a new tab

The randomized control trial was evaluated using the Cochrane assessment tool. +, low risk of bias; ?, unclear risk of bias; -, high risk of bias.

Table 5.

Quality assessment of cohort studies.

Studies Selection Comparability Outcome Score
Liang Ludan ∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗ 8
Lin Jiaqun ∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗ 8
Shang Shunlai ∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗ 8
Yao Zhuane ∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗ 8
Zhang Xiaojuan ∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗ 8
Zhang Xiaoxiao ∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗ 6
Open in a new tab

The cohort studies were evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale, which are comprised of the study of selection (representativeness of the exposed group, representativeness of the nonexposed group, ascertainment of exposure, demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study), group comparability (controls for the most important factor, controls for any additional factor), outcome measures (assessment of outcome, was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur, adequacy of follow up of cohorts), a total of nine points. ∗, 1 point.

3.2. Meta-analysis results

3.2.1. CR at the sixth month

Data about CR at the sixth month were reported in all articles: 23/175 (13.1%) for the TAC group and 28/190 (14.7%) for the TAC-corticosteroid group. The heterogeneity between the two studies was not substantial (P = .40, I2 = 3%), so finally, the fixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning CR at the sixth month (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43–1.48, P = .47) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of CR at the sixth month between TAC group and TAC-corticosteroid group. CR = complete remission, TAC = tacrolimus.

3.2.2. TR at the sixth month

Data about TR at the sixth month were reported in all articles: 104/175 (59.4%) for the TAC group and 140/190 (73.7%) for the TAC-corticosteroid group. The heterogeneity between the two studies was not substantial (P = .97, I2 = 0%), so finally, the fixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. TR at the sixth month of TAC-corticosteroid group was higher than TAC group, but the difference was statistically significant (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31–0.78, P < .01) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of TR at the sixth month between TAC group and TAC-corticosteroid group. TAC = tacrolimus, TR = total remission.

3.2.3. Relapse rate

Data on the relapse rate were reported in five articles: 25/103 (24.2%) for the TAC group and 12/78 (20.5%) for the TAC-corticosteroid group. The heterogeneity between the two studies was not substantial (P = .82, I2 = 0%), so finally, the fixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. The relapse rate of the TAC-corticosteroid group was lower than that of the TAC group, but the difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.70–2.92, P = .32) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of relapse rate between TAC group and TAC-corticosteroid group. TAC = tacrolimus.

3.2.4. Drug-related adverse effects

Data about drug-related adverse effects were reported in six articles. Incidences of infection (7.3%, 10/137), gastrointestinal symptoms (4.6%, 6/130), abnormal aminotransferase (3.9%, 6/155), and glucose intolerance (13.5%, 21/155) were in TAC group. Incidences of infection (17.8%, 28/157), gastrointestinal symptoms (5.1%, 7/138), abnormal aminotransferase (4.7%, 8/170), and glucose intolerance (22.4%, 38/170) were in TAC-corticosteroid group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups concerning gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.34–2.70, P = .93), abnormal aminotransferase (OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.34–2.38, P = .84), and glucose intolerance (OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.32–1.07, P = .08). The incidences of infection in the TAC-corticosteroid group were all higher than those in the TAC group (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18–0.81, P = .01). All forest plots of drug-related adverse effects are listed in Figs. 5–8.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of infection between TAC group and TAC-corticosteroid group. TAC = tacrolimus.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of glucose intolerance between TAC group and TAC-corticosteroid group. TAC = tacrolimus.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of gastrointestinal symptoms between TAC group and TAC-corticosteroid group. TAC = tacrolimus.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of abnormal aminotransferase between TAC group and TAC-corticosteroid group. TAC = tacrolimus.

3.3. Sensitivity analyses

Sensitivity analyses for all outcomes after the two therapy regimens were used to judge the dependability of the results. Deleting the study of Yao Zhuane or Zhang Xiaojuan at a time, the results of meta-analysis showed glucose intolerance of TAC-corticosteroid group was higher than TAC group. Deleting the study of Zhang Xiaoxiao, the results of the meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups concerning infection.

4. Discussion

IMN is the most common nephritic syndrome in adults and causes antibody-mediated damage to glomerular podocytes.[20] TAC, a calcineurin inhibitor, mainly binds to a particular intracellular receptor called FK-506-binding protein 12 to inhibit calcineurin phosphatase, thereby inhibiting cytokines such as IL-2. Consequently, TAC can inhibit the growth and differentiation of T cells, thereby reducing the immune damage of podocytes.[21] TAC monotherapy or TAC combined with corticosteroids was effective in treating IMN patients. Clinicians need a therapeutic regimen with a stronger effect and fewer side effects. Our meta-analysis revealed that TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy had a higher TR at the sixth month than TAC monotherapy for IMN. The two therapy regimens had similar relapse rates. TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy had a higher incidence of infection.

Sustained remission of nephrotic syndrome is very important for patients with IMN and can reduce complications and prevent progression to end-stage renal disease. In previous studies, CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy had a TR of nearly 70% for IMN at the sixth month.[22] Our study found that TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy had a TR of 73.7% at the sixth month, which was similar to CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy. TAC monotherapy had a lower TR of 59.4% at the sixth month. However, in previous studies concerning TAC monotherapy versus CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy for IMN, TAC monotherapy had an average TR of nearly 70%.[23–25] The follow-up time was short, with most studies limited to only 6 months, which can influence the response rate. Some patients may have PR or CR after 6 months. In the included studies of Shang Shunlai and Zhang Xiaojuan, after TAC monotherapy or combination therapy, the TR at the tenth to twelfth month was higher than the TR at the sixth month.[15,17] However, TAC monotherapy had similar TR compared with TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy at the tenth to twelfth month.[15,17] More studies are needed to prove that TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy may have stronger immunosuppressive effects than TAC monotherapy for IMN.

A low relapse rate is beneficial for IMN patients. Relevant literature has reported that TAC treatment for IMN has a higher relapse rate after drug withdrawal than CTX.[26,27] In our meta-analysis, compared with TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy for IMN patients, TAC monotherapy did not significantly increase the relapse rate. For patients with recurrence, the use of TAC is still effective. However, the follow-up time of most studies is short. We do not know about the recurrence rate of these included patients after longer follow-up, especially after drug withdrawal. There are low levels of evidence that prolonged TAC treatment with a low blood concentration is beneficial to sustained remission and reducing the relapse rate.[28]

Long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy can increase the incidence of drug-related adverse effects, so clinicians should evaluate the beneficial and adverse effects when prescribing treatment regimens for IMN patients. Infection, gastrointestinal symptoms, abnormal aminotransferase, and glucose intolerance were the main drug-related adverse effects of TAC monotherapy and TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy. Our meta-analysis revealed that TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy had a higher incidence of infection than TAC monotherapy. Additional use of corticosteroids enhances the anti-inflammatory effect and increases the risk of infection. Most types of infection are respiratory infections, which are all controllable. There were 2 cases of severe pneumonia in the TAC combined corticosteroid treatment group and no severe pneumonia in the TAC monotherapy group. The dose of corticosteroids was reduced in one patient due to severe pneumonia, which did not lead to recurrence. A previous meta-analysis showed that TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of infection than intravenous CTX combined with corticosteroid therapy.[29] Our study found that TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy did not increase the risk of gastrointestinal symptoms, abnormal aminotransferase, and glucose intolerance. However, after the sensitivity analyses deleted the individual study, the results showed that TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy might increase the risk of glucose intolerance and might not increase the risk of infection. The reason may be related to the dose size of TAC and corticosteroids in the individual study.

According to KDIGO guidelines, TAC monotherapy is recommended as an alternative therapy regimen for IMN, and CTX combined with corticosteroids has been recommended as an initial therapy. There are no guidelines to determine whether TAC monotherapy or TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy is better. In our meta-analysis, compared with TAC monotherapy, TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy may have stronger immunosuppressive effects and at the same time increase the risk of complications of immunosuppressive treatment. For young patients with severe IMN, CTX contraindications, and low risk of potential complications from the use of TAC and corticosteroids, TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy may be attempted to help improve TR, which is very helpful for long-term prognosis. Clinicians need to prescribe individualized treatment regimens for patients with IMN. More studies are needed to verify this hypothesis further, especially with regard to the recurrence rate.

There were some limitations in our meta-analysis. First, IMN has the possibility of spontaneous remission. KDIGO guidelines suggested that immunosuppressive therapy can be given to IMN patients with urine protein >4 g/24 h and no decrease in urine protein after 6 months of conservative treatment.[6] However, in the majority of studies, immunosuppressants were used as soon as IMN was detected without six months of conservative treatment. Second, in some included studies, IMN patients were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blocker antihypertensive drugs. Since angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blocker drugs have the effect of reducing proteinuria, they will affect the interference results. Third, in the included studies, there were some differences concerning the specific drug regimen and definition of outcomes, which may cause a risk of bias. Moreover, it may also increase the risk of bias because only studies from China were included and only one RCT was included.

5. Conclusions

Our meta-analysis revealed that TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy had a higher TR at the sixth month but had a higher incidence of infection than TAC monotherapy for IMN. The two therapy regimens had similar relapse rates. To further confirm this conclusion, additional large multicenter randomized controlled trials are necessary.

Author contributions

Data curation: Wei Xu, Weigang Tang, Wei Jiang, Fengyan Xie, Liping Ding, Xiaoli Qian.

Investigation: Lifeng Gong, Min Xu, Jingkui Lu.

Methodology: Lifeng Gong, Min Xu, Wei Xu.

Software: Wei Xu, Weigang Tang, Jingkui Lu.

Supervision: Lifeng Gong, Min Xu, Wei Xu.

Writing – original draft: Wei Xu, Wei Jiang, Fengyan Xie, Liping Ding, Xiaoli Qian.

Writing – review & editing: Wei Xu, Wei Jiang, Fengyan Xie, Liping Ding, Xiaoli Qian.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CIs = confidence intervals, CNI = calcineurin inhibitors, CR = complete remission, CTX = cyclophosphamide, IMN = idiopathic membranous nephropathy, KDIGO = Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes, OR = odds ratios, PR = partial remission, RCTs = randomized controlled trials, TAC = tacrolimus, TR = total remission.

How to cite this article: Gong L, Xu M, Xu W, Tang W, Lu J, Jiang W, Xie F, Ding L, Qian X. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus tacrolimus-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2021;100:51(e28225).

LG and MX contributed equally to this work.

This work was supported by the Young Talent Development Plan of Changzhou Health Commission and Science and Technology Project (Social Development) (No. WS202011).

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • [1].Haas M, Meehan SM, Karrison TG, et al. Changing etiologies of unexplained adult nephrotic syndrome: a comparison of renal biopsy findings from 1976–1979 and 1995–1997. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30:621–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].du Buf-Vereijken PW, Branten AJ, Wetzels JF, et al. Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: outline and rationale of a treatment strategy. Am J Kidney Dis 2005;46:1012–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Schieppati A, Mosconi L, Perna A, et al. Prognosis of untreated patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med 1993;329:85–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Hladunewich MA, Troyanov S, Calafati J, et al. The natural history of the non nephrotic membranous nephropathy patient. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:1417–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerulonephritis Work Group. Chapter 7: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int Suppl 2012;2:186–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Eknoyan G. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl 2012;2:143–53. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Grimm M, Rinaldi M, Yonan NA, et al. Superior prevention of acute rejection by tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine in heart transplant recipients—a large European trial. Am J Transplant 2006;6:1387–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Choudhry S, Bagga A, Hari P, et al. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53:760–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Zhu LB, Liu LL, Yao L, et al. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide for primary membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis. Drugs 2017;77:187–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Li YC, Huang J, Li X, et al. A comparison of cyclophosphamide versus tacrolimus in terms of treatment effect for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis. Nefrologia 2019;39:269–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Furlan AD, Malmivaara A, Chou R, et al. 2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group. Spine 2015;40:1660–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Liang LD. Tacrolimus monotherapy in treatment of nephrotic idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Master's thesis of Zhejiang University 2014;01–43. [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Lin JQ. Efficacy comparison of tacrolimus monotherapy and tacrolimus combined with glucocorticoids therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Master's thesis of Fujian Medical University 2015;01–46. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Shang SL, Cai GY, Duan SW, et al. Retrospective analysis of tacrolimus combined with Tripterygium wilfordii polyglycoside for treating idiopathic membranous nephropathy. BMC Nephrol 2018;19:182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Yao ZE. Four kinds of immunosuppressant therapy on the clinical effect of the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Master's thesis of China Medical University 2017;01–34. [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Zhang XJ, Ji CF, Yuan JZ, et al. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based treatment for nephrotic idiopathic membranous nephropathy in young adults: a retrospective study. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2019;35:633–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Zhang XX. Comparison of the efficacy of tacrolimus monotherapy, tacrolimus combined with hormone, cyclophosphamide combined with hormone in the treatment of idiopathic membranous. Master's thesis of Tianjin Medical University 2019;01–40. [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Zhu AM, Chen QX, Mi X, et al. Clinical analysis of tacrolimus combined with medium-dose glucocorticoid in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. China Foreign Med Treat 2020;39:115–7. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Debiec H, Guigonis V, Mougenot B, et al. Antenatal membranous glomerulonephritis due to anti-neutral endopeptidase antibodies. N Engl J Med 2002;346:2053–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Rauch MC, San Martín A, Ojeda D, et al. Tacrolimus causes a blockage of protein secretion which reinforces its immunosuppressive activity and also explains some of its toxic side-effects. Transpl Immunol 2009;22:72–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Qiu TT, Zhang C, Zhao HW, et al. Calcineurin inhibitors versus cyclophosphamide for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 clinical trials. Autoimmun Rev 2017;16:136–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Liang Q, Li H, Xie X, et al. The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy in adult-onset nephrotic syndrome caused by idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Ren Fail 2017;39:512–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Hu XY, Wang LW, Yang ZJ, et al. Clinical analysis of tacrolimus monotherapy in treating idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Henan Med Res 2020;29:995–9. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Chen Q, Min JJ, Dai ZQ, et al. Clinical efficacy of tacrolimus monotherapy in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Guangdong Med J 2019;40:2774–81. [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Chen M, Li H, Li XY, et al. Tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in treatment of nephrotic idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Med Sci 2010;339:233–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].He L, Peng Y, Liu H, et al. Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with combination of low-dose tacrolimus and corticosteroids. J Nephrol 2013;26:564–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Praga M, Barrio V, Juarez GF, et al. Tacrolimus monotherapy in membranous nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int 2007;71:924–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Liu D, Yang Y, Kuang F, et al. Risk of infection with different immunosuppressive drugs combined with glucocorticoids for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol 2019;70:354–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES