Grip Strength as a Screening Index for Severe Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in Primary Care: Development of Cutoff Values Using Receiver Operating Curve Analysis

Abstract

Purpose

Early diagnosis of degenerative cervical spondylosis (DCM) is desirable because late treatment can lead to irreversible sequelae. No screening method has yet been established. Grip strength is commonly used in primary care settings to evaluate disease activity and diagnose sarcopenia. This single-center, cross-sectional study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of grip strength for cervical myelopathy (DCM) and cutoff values for primary care DCM screening using area under the curve (AUC) and sensitivity values.

Patients and Methods

The DCM group comprised 249 consecutive participants (165 males, 84 females; mean age, 65.1 years) with DCM who had undergone surgery at the affiliated hospital. The control group comprised 735 (280 males, 455 females; mean age, 65.8 years) participants undertaking a local government health checkup. Stratifying by age and sex, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were constructed for each group using minimum grip strength values for both hands. Based on ROC analysis, cut-off values were established so that the screening sensitivity would be 90% for either sex or age group, respectively.

Results

According to age group and sex (males/females [M/F]), AUC values for a diagnosis of DCM in M/F were as follows: 40–59 years, 0.92/0.87; 60–69 years, 0.94/0.89; 70–79 years, 0.89/0.91; and 80–89 years, 0.97/0.97. Calculated M/F cutoff values were 41/24.5, 27/16, 27/15, and 20/10 kg, which were similar to cutoff scores for sarcopenia in M/F patients aged 60–69 and 70–79 years. M/F sensitivities in each age groups were 0.94/0.91, 0.92/0.90, 0.95/0.96, and 0.92/0.93. M/F specificities were 0.62/0.59, 0.84/0.83, 0.61/0.71, and 0.83/0.88.

Conclusion

Grip strength had moderate-to-high diagnostic accuracy for DCM between participants in the control and DCM groups. We developed easily applicable cutoff values for primary care DCM screening with ≥90% sensitivity. In patients with sarcopenia, DCM should be differentially diagnosed in primary care.

Introduction

Early detection of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is becoming increasingly important because of the expected increase in patient numbers within aging populations, with a consequent increased risk of falls resulting in spinal cord injury and fracture.^1–5 Patients with undiagnosed DCM may consult their primary care provider when they first experience symptoms such as numbness or clumsiness in the hands and gait disturbances. Nonetheless, a diagnosis of DCM is often challenging. If DCM could be easily screened in primary care, surgery at an appropriate time point may prevent exacerbation of this disease and improve activities of daily living (ADL), contributing to the extension of healthy life expectancy in aging societies.

Clinical tests and measures to rule out DCM have included the Hoffmann test, the finger escape sign, the Babinski sign, Lhermitte’s sign, the 10-second grip and release test, and a patient-oriented questionnaire.^6–13 However, screening in primary care settings using these methods does not appear to be widespread.

We focused on grip strength in this study as it has been commonly used to assess DCM in orthopedic clinical practice. It has also been used in internal medicine to evaluate disease activity.¹⁴ Furthermore, it is increasingly being measured in primary care to evaluate sarcopenia, a condition characterized as a loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength in older adult patients.¹⁵ This test can be introduced at low cost and can be measured in advance by healthcare professionals other than doctors, to observe changes over time. Nonetheless, the diagnostic accuracy of grip strength in DCM remains unknown.

This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of grip strength for DCM using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and aimed to develop cutoff values to screen for DCM that can be easily applied in primary care settings.

Materials and Methods

Ethical Considerations

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fukushima Medical University and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained in the form of opt-out on the website.

Study Design

This single-center, cross-sectional study used prospectively collected data to validate diagnostic accuracy involving participants in a DCM group. Participants comprised those visiting the authors’ affiliated hospital and individuals in a control group who had participated in a local government health check-up program.

Study Participants

DCM Group

Patients with DCM aged 40–89 years who had undergone surgery at the authors’ affiliated hospital from May 2005 to April 2017 were consecutively included in the DCM group. Indications for surgery were determined by consensus of at least three board-certified spine surgeons. Patients with a history of cervical spine surgery, cervical trauma, pyogenic spondylitis, cerebrovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), destructive spondyloarthropathy, atlanto-axial subluxation, pseudotumor of dens, cervical spondylotic amyotrophy, cerebral palsy, or malformation of the cervical spine were excluded.

Control Group

The control group comprised individuals aged 40–89 years who had participated in a local government medical check-up program in the towns of Tateiwa, Ina, and Tadami in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, and who had undergone a cervical spine check-up. The check-up was part of an epidemiological study conducted in 2005, involving local residents with musculoskeletal disorders.¹⁶ Further, individuals with a history of cerebrovascular disease were excluded. Individuals with possible symptoms of myelopathy, such as hand numbness and clumsy hands, were also excluded from interviews and physical examinations by orthopedic surgeons to rule out individuals with a potential diagnosis of DCM. Specifically, individuals with signs and symptoms that included hand dysfunction, numbness in both hands, pain, or numbness radiating to the upper extremities, and spinal signs such as positivity for Jackson’s head compression test, the Spurling test, and Jackson’s shoulder depression test were excluded.^17,18

Grip Strength

In the DCM group, grip strength measurements were performed the day before or on the day of surgery. In the control group, measurements were taken following an examination to rule out findings suggestive of DCM.

An orthopedic surgeon performed measurements for both groups. The grip strength meter was measured using an EKJ080 (Evernew, Tokyo, Japan). This grip strength meter is an analog type and can measure every 0.5 kg. All assessors were instructed to measure participants in a standing position, except for those who were unable to stand. Bilateral grip strength was measured once, and blinding was not applied to either group.

Statistical Analyses

The mean values for grip strength in both hands were compared between the two groups in terms of sex and age using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. ROC analysis was performed for four participant parameters: minimum, maximum, mean of both hands, and left-right differences in grip strength between the two groups stratified according to sex and age group (40–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80–89 years). The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Delimited cutoff values were then set for each group according to age and sex, where sensitivity was ≥90%. Finally, sensitivity and specificity values, as well as the positive likelihood ratio (LR+), the negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of the cutoff values, were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP^® Pro software program version 15.0.0 (NC, USA).

Results

In the DCM group, 105 of 368 participants were excluded, including those with a history of cervical spine surgery (n = 31), cervical trauma (n = 9), pyogenic spondylitis (n = 2), cerebrovascular disease (n = 11), RA (n = 30), destructive spondyloarthropathy (n = 3), atlanto-axial subluxation (n = 7), pseudotumor of dens (n = 2), cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (n = 1), cerebral palsy (n = 8), and malformation of the cervical spine (n = 1). We also excluded 14 participants with missing grip strength data (Figure 1A). Finally, 249 participants (165 males, 84 females; largest age group, 70–79 years; mean age, 65.1 years) were analyzed (Table 1). The DCM group comprised 161 participants with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, 82 participants with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and 6 participants with cervical disc herniation.

Figure 1.

(A) Flow chart showing DCM group recruitment. (B) Flow chart showing recruitment of the Control group.

Abbreviations: DCM, degenerative cervical myelopathy; AAS, atlantoaxial subluxation; CDH, cervical disc herniation; CP, cerebral palsy; CSA, cervical spondylotic amyotrophy; CSM, cervical spondylotic myelopathy; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DSA, destructive spondyloarthropathy; OPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament; RA, rheumatoid arthritis.

Table 1.

Grip Strength by Each Sex and Age Group Between the Two Groups

	Age (y)	n		Grip Strength (kg)		P value
		CTRL	DCM	CTRL	DCM
Male	40–59	84	63	44.8±6.6	26.8±11.2	< 0.0001
	60–69	63	48	37.2±7.1	20.1±6.4	< 0.0001
	70–79	98	43	31.8±6.8	19.3±7.3	< 0.0001
	80–89	35	12	27.9±5.6	12.6±6.1	< 0.0001
Female	40–49	121	22	26.8±6.8	17.0±7.3	< 0.0001
	60–69	136	21	21.6±4.5	12.5±5.6	< 0.0001
	70–70	156	27	19.1±4.7	10.1±5.1	< 0.0001
	80–80	42	15	16.4±3.7	16.4±3.7	< 0.0001

Abbreviations: CTRL, control; DCM, degenerative cervical myelopathy.

In the control group, 6 of 994 individuals were excluded because of a history of cerebrovascular disease. We excluded 212 individuals because DCM could not be ruled out based on interviews and physical examinations, and 41 individuals were excluded because of missing grip strength data (Figure 1B). Finally, 735 participants (280 males, 455 females; largest age group, 70–79 years; mean age, 65.8 years) were analyzed (Table 1).

The mean grip strength values in the DCM group in terms of sex (males/ females [M/F] and age (40–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80–89 years; ±SD) were M/F 26.8 ± 11.2/17.0 ± 7.3; 20.1 ± 6.4/12.5 ± 5.6; 19.3 ± 7.3/10.1 ± 5.1; and 12.6 ± 6.1/6.3 ± 4.0 kg, respectively (Table 1), whereas the mean grip strength values in the control group were M/F 44.8 ± 6.6/26.8 ± 6.8; 37.2 ± 7.1/21.6 ± 4.5; 31.8 ± 6.8/19.1 ± 4.7; and 27.9 ± 5.6/16.4 ± 3.7 kg, respectively. In terms of sex and age, mean grip strength values were significantly lower in individuals in the DCM group than in those in the control group (P < 0.0001). Supplementary Data shows the minimum, maximum, average, and laterality of bilateral grip strength (kg) according to sex and age in the two groups.

ROC Analyses

The AUC values for minimum, maximum, average, and laterality between the two hands in grip strength are shown in Table 2. Of these, we chose the minimum value between the two hands for our ROC analysis because it showed the highest trend in the AUC.

Table 2.

AUC

Age Group (y)	40–59		60–69		70–79		80–89
Sex	M	F	M	F	M	F	M	F
Min	0.91	0.87	0.94	0.91	0.89	0.91	0.97	0.97
Max	0.91	0.81	0.91	0.88	0.89	0.9	0.98	0.93
Ave	0.93	0.84	0.94	0.89	0.89	0.91	0.98	0.96
Lat	0.61	0.69	0.66	0.6	0.65	0.52	0.49	0.56

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; M, male; F, female; Min, minimum grip strength (kg) of the two hands; Max, maximum grip strength (kg) of the two hands; Ave, average grip strength (kg) of the two hands; Lat, laterality of grip strength (kg) between the two hands.

Figure 2A–H shows the ROC curves determined for minimum grip strength relative to both hands in groups stratified according to age and sex. The age-stratified AUC values for M/F aged 40–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80–89 years were 0.91/0.87, 0.94/0.91, 0.89/0.91, and 0.97/0.97, respectively. A perfect test has an AUC of 1.0, whereas an AUC >0.9 indicates high accuracy, an AUC from 0.7 to 0.9 indicates medium accuracy, an AUC from 0.5 to 0.7 indicates low accuracy, and an AUC 0.5 indicates a chance result.¹⁹

Figure 2.

Continue.

Figure 2.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves by sex and age. The cutoff value (arrowhead) was set at ≥90%. (A) 40’s-50’s male, (B) 40’s-50’s female, (C) 60’s male, (D) 60’s female, (E) 70’s male, (F) 70’s female, (G) 80’s male, (H) 80’s female.

Cutoff values for a diagnosis of DCM in M/F aged 40–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80–89 years were set to 41/24.5, 27/16, 27/15, and 20/10 kg, respectively (sensitivity, ≥90%; Table 3). If the measured value was equal to or less than the cutoff value, it was considered to be abnormal. Sensitivities for the cutoff values for M/F were 0.94/0.91, 0.92/0.90, 0.95/0.96, and 0.92/0.93, respectively, and specificities were 0.62/0.59, 0.84/0.83, 0.61/0.71, and 0.83/0.88, respectively. LR+ values for M/F were 2.46/2.20, 5.78/5.32, 2.46/3.34, and 5.35/7.84, respectively. LR- values for M/F were 0.10/0.15, 0.10/0.12, 0.08/0.05, and 0.10/0.08, respectively. DORs for M/F were 23.6/14.2, 58.3/44.2, 32.4/64.1, and 53.2/103.6, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.

Diagnostic Characteristics of Grip Strength in Each Sex and Age Group

Sex	Age Group (y)	Cutoff Value	AUC	Sensitivity	Specificity	LR (+)	LR (-)	DOR
		(kg)
Male	40–59	41	0.92	0.94	0.62	2.46	0.1	23.6
	60–69	27	0.94	0.92	0.84	5.78	0.1	58.3
	70–79	27	0.89	0.95	0.61	2.46	0.08	32.4
	80–89	20	0.97	0.92	0.83	5.35	0.1	53.2
Female	40–59	24.5	0.87	0.91	0.59	2.2	0.15	14.2
	60–69	16	0.91	0.9	0.83	5.32	0.12	44.2
	70–79	15	0.91	0.96	0.71	3.34	0.05	64.1
	80–89	10	0.97	0.93	0.88	7.84	0.08	103.6

Note: If the measured value is equal to or less than the cutoff value, it is determined to be abnormal.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; LR (+), positive likelihood ratio; LR (-), negative likelihood ratio; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio.

Discussion

In the present study, we found that when the minimum left and right grip strength was used to diagnose participants with DCM who had undergone surgery, the AUC ranged from 0.87 to 0.97, indicating moderate to high diagnostic accuracy.¹⁹ Therefore, we consider that the minimum value of right and left grip strength can be used as a screening tool for DCM.

We examined different parameters—minimum, maximum, average, and laterality between right and left grip strength—that would be useful when screening for a diagnosis of DCM. Diagnosis using the minimum right and left-sided grip strength had the highest AUC, that is, the best diagnostic performance for identifying participants with DCM. The reason for this is that DCM generally causes bilateral muscle weakness. However, in the early stages of the disease, there are cases of unilateral weakness; therefore, this method may capture early cases. Conversely, maximum muscle strength and mean are parameters that reflect a decline in grip strength on both right and left sides, and can be considered to indicate a state in which the disease has progressed to some extent. The AUC for laterality in terms of right and left difference was low, and the ability to discriminate between the two groups was limited. Thus, if laterality is detected, cases in which both left and right grip strength have decreased are likely to be missed. Based on these findings, the minimum value of bilateral grip strength can be considered an acceptable screening tool.

This study also identified cutoff values for sex and age to screen DCM with sensitivities of ≥0.90. The cutoff values for both males and females declined sharply in those aged 40–59 years but remained approximately the same in those aged 60–79 years, at 27 kg for males and 15–16 kg for females, with a further decline in those aged 80–89 years. Interestingly, the cutoff values in the 60–69- and 70–79-year age groups were almost the same as the cutoff values for sarcopenia reported in people of Asian ethnicity (28 kg and 18 kg, respectively).²⁰ These findings suggest that if primary care physicians diagnose sarcopenia, DCM should be differentiated, especially in adults aged 60–79 years, regardless of sex.

DCM Screening Methods

Various clinical tests and measures have been used for DCM screening. The Hoffmann test has been reported to have a sensitivity of 82–94%, whereas sensitivity when blinded to history and clinical findings has been reported to be 28%.^6–8 The sensitivity of the finger escape sign has been reported to be 55%.⁷ The Babinski sign has been found to be of variable quality in different reports, and its effectiveness as a screening tool has been questioned.⁹ The sensitivity of Lhermitte’s sign has been reported to be remarkably low,^10,11 and diagnostic accuracy has not been reported for the inverted supinator reflex and clonus test. Therefore, these aforementioned methods were not considered appropriate for DCM screening.

Machino et al reported the diagnostic accuracy of the 10-second grip and release test and cutoff values for DCM diagnosis using ROC analysis.^12,21 Additionally, Kobayashi et al reported a patient-oriented screening tool for DCM.¹³ They developed their screening tool through extracting questions from the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), which is a new version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical disorders, consisting of questionnaires to be used as patient-oriented assessment, and weighting scores for extracted items.^22–25 This screening tool had a sensitivity of 93.5%. These two methods are useful tools for DCM screening; however, these tests are not widely used in primary care. It has been reported that only 5% of the generalized tests and treatments described in the guidelines are used in primary care.²⁶ Therefore, a simpler and more feasible screening method in primary care settings is needed.

Grip Strength

Grip strength was used as a screening index for DCM. Grip strength is reported to be one of the best indicators of overall limb strength, in addition to being a manageable indicator involving relatively low cost.²⁷ Grip strength is commonly used in orthopedic evaluations to assess upper limb muscle weakness due to DCM and to assess improvement post-DCM surgery.²⁸ Grip strength is also frequently assessed in internal medicine to indicate disease activity.¹⁴ Grip strength has been described as a prognostic indicator of mortality risk in a population of hospitalized older adult women.²⁹ Moreover, grip strength has gained attention as an index for evaluating age-related functional decline of motor units such as in sarcopenia.¹⁵

Screening using a grip strength test is a simple, low-cost, and quantitative method, allowing frequent measurement; thus, satisfying international standards for medical screening.³⁰ Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability of grip strength have previously been validated.³¹ Furthermore, grip strength can be measured by both physicians and non-medical staff. It may be possible to use grip strength measures not only in primary care but also during routine medical check-ups in the future.

According to previous reports, grip strength is 0.1–10.7% higher in the dominant hand.³² However, in this study, we did not use the influence of the dominant hand for the screening. There are three reasons for this:

1. Using the grip strength of the dominant hand as the cutoff value may miss the onset of the disease when the grip strength of the non-dominant hand decreases.

2. Setting cutoff values for the dominant and non-dominant hands is cumbersome and not straightforward.

3. It is difficult to determine ambidextrous patients.

Grip strength can also be decreased due to distal radius fracture, peripheral neuropathy, lateral epicondylitis of the humerus, and arthritis of the carpometacarpal joint.³³ Thus, it may be difficult to exclude these diseases in primary care. Using the cutoff values established in this study, all patients above the cutoff values would also be referred to a spine specialist for diagnosis and treatment, which is likely to have beneficial results.

Limitations

This study had several limitations. First, the DCM group comprised surgical patients who were assessed as having severe DCM. However, the diagnostic performance of DCM screening can also be considered valuable in terms of screening to detect DCM that may be severe and requires surgery. Further studies are needed to determine the accuracy of diagnosis in patients with mild DCM. Mild DCM may be missed and must be considered when performing screening. Even when results fall within the normal range, referral to a specialist should be considered for patients with suspected DCM.

Second, a question could be raised concerning the generalizability of the control group results. Participants in the control group were recruited from areas where agriculture is the primary industry. It is possible that these participants may have been more active and had higher muscle strength than those in urban areas. Furthermore, participants in the control group also comprised those who had requested cervical spine examinations during their municipal health checkups. This indicates that this group may have consisted of individuals who were highly conscious of maintaining good health. However, the control group’s grip strength in this study was not higher than the national average values reported by the Japan Sports Agency.³⁴ In addition, there have been a report that BMI correlates with grip strength,³⁵ but these relationships were not considered in this study. Given these factors, we consider the control group’s results generalizable.

Finally, differences in grip strength in terms of ethnicity should be considered when applying the results of this study. Grip strength values have been reported as being highest among those from Europe/North America, lowest among those from South Asia, South East Asia, and Africa, and intermediate among those from China, South America, and the Middle East.³⁶ Cutoff values for grip strength in patients of European ethnicity with sarcopenia have been determined to be 30 kg for males and 20 kg for females, whereas among patients of Asian ethnicity, the cutoff values have been determined to be 26 kg for males and 18 kg for females.^15,20 Therefore, it will be necessary to verify the validity of these cutoff values for DCM screening when applied to countries other than Japan in the future.

Despite these limitations, this is the first report to elucidate the diagnostic accuracy of grip strength and relevant cutoff values for DCM screening that could easily be applied in primary care settings. Future studies are needed to validate the usefulness of this screening method for the early detection of DCM.

Conclusion

We found that grip strength had sufficient diagnostic value for DCM, and we identified cutoff values for screening DCM. This screening method could be useful in primary care for patients that present with a chief complaint of numbness or difficulty using their hands, which is indicative of suspected DCM. This study also suggested that DCM should be differentiated when sarcopenia is identified in primary care.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.