Table 3.
Effects of ISPG and resistance training on biochemical assessments of serum at the end of the experiment.
| p Values for Two-Way ANOVA | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Control +Sed |
ISPG +Sed |
Control +RT |
ISPG +RT |
Main Effect of RT | Main Effect of ISPG | Interaction (RT×ISPG) |
| AST (U/L) | 66 ± 4 | 68 ± 2 | 67 ± 3 | 67 ± 5 | 0.9210 | 0.7670 | 0.8690 |
| ALT (U/L) | 56 ± 3 | 55 ± 3 | 53.5 ± 3 | 52 ± 3 | 0.1980 | 0.5280 | 0.8660 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 132 ± 3 | 130 ± 3 | 132 ± 5 | 128 ± 6 | 0.8950 | 0.4720 | 0.8250 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 130 ± 4 | 128 ± 4 | 127 ± 4 | 117 ± 4 | 0.0900 | 0.1770 | 0.3190 |
| CK (U/L) | 80 ± 5 | 81 ± 7 | 82 ± 4 | 83 ± 5 | 0.7020 | 0.8110 | 0.9620 |
| LDH (U/L) | 427 ± 37 | 511 ± 45 | 390 ± 41 | 373 ± 43 | 0.0440 * | 0.4270 | 0.2299 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 27.5 ± 0.6 a | 33.8 ± 1.5 b | 27.7 ± 0.8 a | 31.9 ± 0.9 b | 0.3980 | <0.0001 * | 0.2790 |
| CREA (mg/dL) | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 0.1350 | 0.8420 | 0.6430 |
| UA (mg/dL) | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 4.2 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 0.8300 | 0.6680 | 0.8580 |
| ALB (g/dL) | 3.1 ± 0.0 | 3.1 ± 0.0 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.0 | 0.6870 | 0.3510 | 0.8930 |
| TP (g/dL) | 5.1 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 1.0000 | 0.1430 | 0.8030 |
| GLU | 235 ± 12 | 249 ± 12 | 243 ± 17 | 286 ± 28 | 0.2210 | 0.1370 | 0.4280 |
All data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 8 mice/group. Data are the same row with different letters (a, b) differ significantly at p < 0.05 by two-way ANOVA. If any letter is the same, it means that the difference between groups is not significant. The main effect is analyzed by two-variance analysis, * p <0.05. AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TG, triacylglycerol; TC, total cholesterol; CK, creatine kinase; ALB, LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; albumin; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CREA, creatine; UA, uric acid; TP, total protein; GLU, glucose.