Abstract
Dimorphic fungi of the Paracoccidioides genus are the causative agents of paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM), an endemic disease in Latin America with a high incidence in Brazil. This pathogen presents as infective mycelium at 25 °C in the soil, reverting to its pathogenic form when inhaled by the mammalian host (37 °C). Among these dimorphic fungal species, dimorphism regulating histidine kinase (Drk1) plays an essential role in the morphological transition. These kinases are present in bacteria and fungi but absent in mammalian cells and are important virulence and cellular survival regulators. Hence, the purpose of this study was to investigate the role of PbDrk1 in the cell wall modulation of P. brasiliensis. We observed that PbDrk1 participates in fungal resistance to different cell wall-disturbing agents by reducing viability after treatment with iDrk1. To verify the role of PbDRK1 in cell wall morphogenesis, qPCR results showed that samples previously exposed to iDrk1 presented higher expression levels of several genes related to cell wall modulation. One of them was FKS1, a β-glucan synthase that showed a 3.6-fold increase. Furthermore, confocal microscopy analysis and flow cytometry showed higher β-glucan exposure on the cell surface of P. brasiliensis after incubation with iDrk1. Accordingly, through phagocytosis assays, a significantly higher phagocytic index was observed in yeasts treated with iDrk1 than the control group, demonstrating the role of PbDrk1 in cell wall modulation, which then becomes a relevant target to be investigated. In parallel, the immune response profile showed increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Finally, our data strongly suggest that PbDrk1 modulates cell wall component expression, among which we can identify β-glucan. Understanding this signalling pathway may be of great value for identifying targets of antifungal molecular activity since HKs are not present in mammals.
Keywords: histidine kinase, dimorphism, Paracoccidioides, paracoccidioidomycosis, cell wall
1. Introduction
Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) is a systemic granulomatous human disease endemic in Latin America. It is caused by Paracoccidioides spp., a thermally-dimorphic fungus that presents as an infective mycelium in the environment, and it switches to a pathogenic yeast form in the mammalian host [1,2]. Its clinical manifestations occur in two distinct forms, acute or subacute and chronic [3], affecting mainly the lungs, but it is capable of spreading to other tissues [4,5]. Primary infection usually occurs by inhaling propagules (conidia) produced during the mycelial form [6]. Once inhaled, fungal propagules will be recognized by cells of the innate immune system [7]. The recognition of fungal cell wall components begins with pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) through pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs). These receptors include Toll-like receptors (TLRs), mannose receptors, complement pathway molecules and lectin family receptors (CLRs), such as dectin-1 [8]. The interaction of these molecules with fungal yeasts leads to activation of the innate immune response, consequently activating mediators involved in eliminating these pathogens and controlling the adaptive immune response [9].
However, fungi have mechanisms to prevent their elimination by the host’s immune system [10]. Several fungi that engage in morphological transitions are of great medical importance, such as Talaromyces marneffei (Penicillium marneffei), Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides immitis, Histoplasma capsulatum, Sporothrix schenckii, and Paracoccidioides spp. [11]. The transition in Paracoccidioides spp. and other dimorphic fungi is essential for the establishment of the disease [12]. This alters not only the cell morphology but also the composition of the cell wall elements. In Paracoccidioides spp. mycelium, there is a prevalence of β-1,3-glucan and β-1,6-glucan, and in the yeast form, there is a prevalence of α-1,3-glucan and chitin [13]. This ensures fungal survival in the host environment since the content of α-1,3-glucan is correlated with the degree of fungal virulence [14]. In addition, masking the presence of β-1,3-glucan molecules, a highly immunogenic structure, is recognized by the dectin-1 receptor of phagocytic cells [15]. The morphological switch is believed to be an additional evasion strategy against phagocytic cells and mechanisms for recognition of the cell wall components [15]. In this context, the fungal cell wall plays an important role in immunological recognition.
In Paracoccidioides spp., different genes are expressed according to the phase (yeast or mycelium) [16]. The mechanism of this transition has been unclear. However, genes related to the control of the mycelium-yeast transition (M-Y) have recently been identified in B. dermatitidis and H. capsulatum, including dimorphism-regulating histidine kinase (DRK1). DRK1 is mainly expressed in the yeast phase [11] of B. dermatitidis [17], S. schenckii [18], and T. marneffei [19] and, more recently, it was characterized in P. brasiliensis [20].
Histidine kinases (HKs) were discovered in the 1980s in Escherichia coli [21], and were believed to be present only in bacteria. In the 1990s, they were also discovered in plants, fungi, archaea, cyanobacteria and amoebas [22]. In fungi, the functions attributed to HKs have not been explored very well [23]. HKs are classified based on phylogenetic analyses; in fungi, there are 16 groups, determined by the C- and N-terminal regions and the domains present in each group [22,24,25]. This is a signal transduction mechanism that contains a conserved kinase domain and a conserved regulatory domain. After an extracellular stimulus, the HK domain is autophosphorylated on a histidine residue, followed by a phosphate group transfer to the regulatory domain in an aspartate residue, which catalyses a downstream reaction of the effector domain that leads to downstream signalling [26].
Among the characterized pathways in fungi, we can mention the response to osmotic stress [25], oxidative protection against phagocytic cells [27] and regulation of the dimorphism in pathogenic fungi [17,18,20,28]. In P. brasiliensis, DRK1 is known to be a group III histidine kinase essential to the dimorphic transition process [20].
Since HKs are known to regulate morphological switches in P. brasiliensis, this work aimed to characterize the PbDrk1 protein, which is involved in the transition from mycelium to yeast. This investigation is of great interest since HKs use a phosphorylation mechanism where the amino acid phosphoryl-receiving groups are aspartate and histidine residues, unlike the serine, threonine and tyrosine residues that are prevalent in mammals. Thus, knowing that these molecular sensors are absent in humans, it is extremely important to study the components that are part of these activation pathways, as they may represent potential molecular targets in the development of new antifungal agents.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Fungal Isolates and Growth Conditions
The P. brasiliensis isolate Pb18 was grown in yeast peptone dextrose modified medium (mYPD) (0.5% yeast extract, 1% peptone, and 0.5% glucose, pH 6.7) for 4 to 5 days at 37 °C and shaking at 150 rpm. For mycelium growth, viable yeast cells were cultivated in mYPD at 25 °C for 7 days at 150 rpm. Viability was assessed by Trypan blue 0.4% counting on Neubauer’s chamber, using the formula: cell viability(%) = viable cells /total cells × 100. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise mentioned.
2.2. Histidine Kinase Inhibitor Susceptibility
About 1 × 106 yeast were incubated with different concentrations (100, 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.25 µg/mL) of Fludioxonil (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), a specific inhibitor of class III histidine kinase (iDrk1). The inhibitor was solubilized in DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide). Yeasts were incubated for 24 h under constant agitation of 180 rpm at 37 °C. Each yeast culture was diluted (10, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 times) in YPDmod broth, and 10 μL of each suspension was plated to YPDmod agar medium. Plates were photographed after 7 days of growth at 37 °C. This assay was performed in biological triplicate.
2.3. Dimorphic Transition Assay
Yeast cells of Pb18 were grown in mYPD agar (pH 6.5) at 37 °C for 4 to 5 days and inoculated in mYPD broth medium (pH 6.5). Then yeasts were incubated at 25 °C for five to six days to reverse yeast to mycelium entirely. After the complete transition, yeasts were centrifuged at 3000× g and washed with PBS buffer (pH 7.2). The mycelium was then seeded in 6-well plates and 20 µM iDrk1 (Fludioxonil) was added. The samples were monitored every 24 h under an optical microscope (Zeiss) at 100× magnification. Every 24 h, the culture medium was supplemented with 20 µM fludioxonil (because of inhibitor photodegradation). With each addition, a new solution was prepared to guarantee its activity. This assay was performed in a biological duplicate.
2.4. Cell Wall Disturbing Agents Spot Test
The sensitivity of Pb18 to cell wall disruptors was investigated using the spot assay. About 1 × 106 yeasts were incubated with iDrk1 (25 µg/mL) for 24 h at 37 °C at 150 rpm. Each yeast culture was diluted (10, 50, 100, and 500 times) in YPDmod broth, and 10 μL of each suspension was applied to mYPD agar medium supplemented with different cell wall disrupting agents, such as: Congo Red (Congo Red) (2.5 µM), Calcofluor White (1 µg/mL) and sodium chloride (150 mM). The plates were incubated for seven days at 37 °C, and then photographed. This assay was performed in biological triplicate.
2.5. RNA Extraction and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Analysis
Pb18 yeasts were grown for four to five days in YPDmod pH 6.5 medium at 37 °C and 150 rpm, counted and the volume was adjusted to 30 mL at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL. Then, yeasts were incubated with 25 µg/mL of iDrk1 for 24 h at 37 °C. After this incubation period, RNA extraction was performed. Samples were centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min at 4 °C and washed 3 times with PBS (pH 7.2). Then, in 15 mL tubes, approximately 500 µL of glass beads (425–600 µm—Sigma-Aldrich, San Louis, MO, USA) and 1.5 mL of TRizol® (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) were added to the sample. The tubes were vigorously vortexed for 6 cycles of 1 min, alternating with 1 min on ice. RNA extraction was performed as previously described [29]. Quantification was performed using spectrophotometry (NanoDrop 2000/2000c, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, 500 ng of RNA was initially submitted to the DNase I enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and then to ProtoScript First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To assess gene expression by real-time quantitative PCR, the reaction was performed with SYBR® Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The endogenous expression genes for ribosomal protein 60S L34 (L34r) and 18S were used as normalizing controls. For each gene of interest and normalizer gene, a negative reaction control was also added. The samples were prepared in triplicate to a 96-well plate (0.2 mL MicroAmp™ Optical 96-Well Reaction Plate—Applied Biosystems) compatible with the equipment used, and the plate was sealed with an optical adhesive (MicroAmp™ Optical Adhesive Film—Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The equipment used was the ABI StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with the following conditions: 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 1 min at 60 °C. The dissociation curve included an additional cycle of 15 s at 95 °C, 20 s at 60 °C, and 15 s at 95 °C. The curves of oligonucleotides efficiency were evaluated from a cDNA obtained previously and serially diluted (100, 10, 1, and 0.1 ng/μL). The Ct values of each dilution point were determined and used to make the standard curve and finally calculate the primer efficiency (E = 10(−1⁄slope)−1 × 100). The relative expression was determined based on the 2−ΔΔCt method [30]. The sequences used for each gene are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Gene | Sequence (5′–3′) | Gene ID |
---|---|---|
L34 | Foward: AAAGGAACCGCACCAAAATG Reverse: AGACCTGGGAGTATTCACGG |
PADG_04402 |
18S | Foward: CGGAGAGAGGGAGCCTGAGAA Reverse: GGGATTGGGTAATTTGCGC |
ADG_12090 |
FKS1 | Forward: GTTCCCATCACCGATCCTATTT Reverse: GAAGGAGAGCAAGAAGACGATAC |
PADG_11846 |
KRE6 | Foward: TTCCGACGAGTTCAACAAAGA Reverse: CTGCGTCACTCCATACCAAATA |
PADG_07170 |
PHR2 | Foward: ACTGAGGACAAACACCATCAG Reverse: ACAGATCTGCAACGACGTAAA |
PADG_04918 |
GEL3 | Foward: CGTTGTCAGCGGAGGTATCGTC Reverse: AGGGCAGGTTCGGAGTTCAGTG |
PADG_04918 |
AGN1 | Foward: AAATGCGGCACGGAGGAGA Reverse: AAGGGTGGTATCAAGTGCCGAGT |
PADG_03169 |
CHT3 | Foward: GCGAGGAATTGGGTGATAGAA Reverse: AGGGTTGACGCTATCAGAAATAA |
PADG_08156 |
CHS2 | Foward: CCCGAACCTACTGCACTTTATC Reverse: TGCCCTTACCCGCTTTAATC |
PADG_08636 |
CHS3 | Foward: CGCTATGGTTAAGGATCCCGAGA Reverse: GCATCCAGGCAAGCAAGTAACA |
O94191_PARB |
CHS4 | Foward: ACCGGATGAGGCCACTATTACAGA Reverse: GTCTGCAATCGCTGCTCAACG |
PADG_07911 |
CHS5 | Foward: AGAGTATCAAGGCTGAGCTGGAACG Reverse: CGGAAAGGACGGCTTCGGTT |
A9XTF9_PARBR |
2.6. Quantification of Cell Wall Components
About 1 × 106 yeast cells were grown and incubated for 24 h with 25 µg/mL of iDrk1 in mYPD at 37 °C under stirring at 180 rpm. Then, yeasts were collected, homogenized in blocking solution (0.5% BSA, 5% rabbit serum, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM NaN3 in PBS, pH 7.2) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Then, yeasts were incubated with 1 µg/mL of the β-glucan binding probe for 1 h on ice. This probe corresponds to the human Dectin-1 receptor fused to the FC portion of mouse IgG1 (Sino Biological, Beijing, China). Samples were incubated with Alexa-488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) at a 1:200 ratio for 45 min on ice. Between each incubation, step cells were washed three times with wash buffer (0.5% BSA, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM NaN3 in PBS, pH 7.2). Determination of chitin oligomers was performed with the WGA (wheat germ agglutinin) marker conjugated to FITC (Sigma-Aldrich, San Louis, MO, USA), at a concentration of 25 µg/mL in 1 mL of PBS (pH 7.2). Mannan determination was performed with FITC-conjugated Concanavalin A (Sigma-Aldrich, San Louis, MO, USA), at a concentration of 25 µg/mL in 500 µL of PBS (pH 7.2). Both samples were incubated for 1 h protected from light under agitation at 800 rpm. Next, samples were centrifuged at 3000× g for 5 min at 4 °C and washed three times with 1 mL of PBS (pH 7.2). Finally, all samples were homogenized in 500 µL of PBS (pH 7.2) and analyzed by flow cytometry (BD FACSCaliburTM, Becton Dickinson) using the FL-1 detection channel. Each sample was prepared in experimental triplicate. A total of 10,000 events were counted and quantification graphs were generated from the median fluorescence intensity (MFI). The data obtained were analyzed using FlowJo software version 10.6.2 (FlowJo, LLC, FlowJo™, Ashland, OR, USA) [31].
2.7. Confocal Microscopy
To evaluate the exposion of β-glucan molecules through fluorescence confocal microscopy, cells were prepared as described on the previous section and then centrifuged and homogenized in PBS:glycerol (3:1). The slides were prepared with 30 µL of the sample, sealed and analyzed under a confocal microscope (SP8 Lightning, Leica Microsystems). Fluorescence intensity was quantified using ImageJ analysis software (version 1.53i) through corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF).
2.8. PKA Activity and cAMP Quantification
PKA activity was performed using the PKA Colorimetric Activity Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s specifications. For this purpose, 1 × 107 Pb18 cells were incubated with or without 25 µg/mL of iDrk1 or 1 mM H2O2 for 30 min in YPDmod at 37 °C and 180 rpm. Yeasts were collected and washed with PBS (pH 7.2), centrifuged for 3000× g for 10 min and homogenized in Tris-based lysis buffer contained in the kit. Lysis was assessed by adding glass beads and vigorous vortexing (5 cycles of 1 min interspersed with 1 min of incubation on ice). Samples were then centrifuged and the supernatant was recovered. For PKA activity assay, 1 mg of protein was used. Intracellular levels of cyclic AMP (cAMP) were quantified by the Cyclic AMP ELISA Kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Harbor, MI, USA). Pb18 yeasts were prepared as described above. Cellular lysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s specifications, using 10 mM HCl and glass beads. For cAMP quantification, it was used about 0.5 μg of protein. The total protein extracts quantification was performed by Bradford assay [32]. Absorbance was read at 405 nm (BioTek—Synergy HT) and data were plotted in triplicate from the standard curves absorbance values.
2.9. Glycogen Accumulation
A 10 mL suspension of 5 × 106 Pb18 yeasts/mL was incubated with or without 25 µg/mL of iDrk1 for 24 or 48 h, followed by centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 3 min (the supernatant was discarded). The pellet was homogenized in 1 mL of iodine solution (0.2% iodine and 0.4% potassium iodide) and incubated for 3 min at room temperature. The samples were again centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 3 min, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet homogenized in 30 μL of the iodine solution. The samples were plated to a 96-well plate, 200 µL of PBS (pH 7.2) was added to each well and the samples were photographed [33].
2.10. Phagocytosis Assay
In vitro phagocytosis was performed with the J774 macrophage cell line. About 2.5 × 105 viable cells were plated in a 24-well plate containing RPMI (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS. A 15 mm diameter circular sterilized coverslip was added to each well. After adhesion, macrophages were primed with 100 ng/mL of LPS 30 min before interaction with P. brasiliensis. J774 cell line is activated by LPS showing changes in morphology, such as cytoplasm expansion, contributing to a better performance in phagocytosis assays [34,35]. The interaction was carried out in a 2:1 ratio (yeast:macrophages) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Previously, yeasts were incubated in the presence or absence of iDrk1 25 µg/mL for 24 h at 37 °C. After the interaction, each well was washed with sterile PBS (pH 7.2), coverslips were stained with hematology dyes (Newprov, Paraná, Brazil) and the supernatant was recovered for cytokine assay. The phagocytic index was determined from the protocol established by Popi et al. [36]. After 48 h, wells intended to quantify colony-forming units (CFU) were washed with 1 mL of ice-cold sterile ultrapure water and vigorously homogenized. The supernatant was plated in BHI medium supplemented with 10% FBS, and incubated for seven days at 37 °C. After growth, colony-forming units were counted. This experiment was carried out in biological triplicate.
The phagocytosis assay was also assessed by flow cytometry. Samples were prepared as described above. Prior to interaction, yeasts were labeled with CFSE (CellTrace™ CFSE Cell Proliferation—Thermo Fisher). For each 1 × 107 Pb18 yeasts cells, 3 µL of CFSE (3 µg/µL) were added, with final volume of 500 µL of PBS (pH 7.2) and 0.5% BSA. Yeasts were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, then centrifuged at 3000× g for 5 min and washed three times with PBS (pH 7.2). After 24 h, the samples were washed and the cells were detached from the wells using a cell scraper and homogenized in 500 µL of PBS (pH 7.2). Data acquisition was immediately performed in a flow cytometer (BD FACSCaliburTM, Becton Dickinson) using the FL-1 detection channel. After the first acquisition, 8 µL of Trypan Blue 0.4% was added to each sample to quench the signal of yeasts that could be adhered to the cell surface instead of internalized and again, the data was acquired. A total of 10,000 events were counted for each sample and the data were analyzed using the FlowJo software version 10.6.2 (FlowJo, LLC, FlowJo™, Ashland, OR, USA) [37].
2.11. Cytokines Determination
Supernatants from the phagocytosis assay were collected. The cytokines TNFα and IL12p70 were measured using the DuoSet ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Mineápolis, MN, EUA). The assay was performed in 96-well EIA/RIA plates according to the manufacturer’s specifications with modifications. First, plates were coated with 50 µL of capture antibody and incubated at room temperature for 16 h. Wells were blocked with 200 µL of diluent solution (1% BSA in PBS pH 7.2) and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Then, 50 µL of culture supernatant were added, in triplicate, and 50 µL of the cytokine standard to perform the standard curve. Plates were then incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Next, 50 µL of Streptavidin-HRP solution (provided in the kit) were added to each well and the plate was incubated for 20 min protected from direct light. Finally, Tetramethylbenzidine (TBM) substrate was added and the plates were incubated for 20 min at room temperature, protected from light. At the end of the incubation, 50 µL of stop solution (2N H2SO4) was added. Between each incubation step, the wells were washed three times with 200 µL of wash buffer (0.05% Tween-20 in PBS pH 7.2). Absorbance was read at 430 nm (BioTek—Synergy HT).
2.12. Statistical Analysis
The data contained in this work were validated with the reproducibility of at least three independent experiments. For comparison analysis, a Student’s t-test and significance analysis were performed, as were the one-way variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s test. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Susceptibility of P. brasiliensis to Drk1 Pharmacological Inhibitors
Studies analysing the role of Drk1 in fungi [17,20] demonstrated that the use of specific inhibitors of group III histidine kinases (iprodione or fludioxonil) are efficient in promoting biological responses. Fludioxonil is a product derived from pyrrolnitrine, a compound isolated from Pseudomonas pyrrocinia [38]. The use of this inhibitor is already well established in studies with pathogenic fungi [17,39,40,41,42]. Initially, a susceptibility test was assessed with the Pb18 isolate. For this purpose, the yeasts were incubated for 24 h with different concentrations (100 to 6.25 µg/mL) of iDrk1 (fludioxonil) and then inoculated in mYPD medium. After 7 days of incubation, it was observed that there was no reduction in fungal viability at the concentrations tested (Figure 1A). Thus, based on the literature data [17], which demonstrated that a concentration of 25 µg/mL was able to inhibit the activity of Drk1 in Blastomyces dermatitidis, this concentration was established for the following experiments (Figure 1A).
3.2. Role of PbDrk1 in P. brasiliensis Cell Wall Maintenance
The transition from mycelium to yeast triggers the cell wall morphogenesis machinery, which involves synthesizing several cell wall sugars and proteins critical to survival during infection and evasion of the immune system [43]. In Penicillium marneffei pathogenic fungus, the role of DRK1 is essential for stress adaptation, hyphal morphogenesis, and cell wall integrity [44]. Previously, we showed PbDRK1 transcription to be phase-specific for the yeast form and demonstrated that PbDrk1 participates in dimorphic switching in P. brasiliensis when iprodione (another Drk1 inhibitor) is used [20]. To confirm the action of fludioxonil (iDrk1) in the P. brasiliensis yeast-mycelium switch, a dimorphic transition assay was performed. Initially, the fungus was cultivated in the mycelial form at 25 °C and then it was incubated at 37 °C in the presence or absence of iDrk1. The dimorphic transition was then followed every 24 h under an optical microscope. After 24 h at 37 °C, it was possible to observe the formation of yeasts in the distal portion of the hyphae in the control group, and at 96 h, there was a predominance of yeasts. In the group treated with iDrk1, at 96 h, there was a predominance of hyphae. Thus, the addition of fludioxonil also impairs the fungus’s ability to make the complete transition from mycelium to yeast (Figure 1B).
In addition to the already known mechanism involving the dimorphic transition [17,18,20,45], it was observed that the strain deleted for Drk1 presents with sensitivity for conidia germination [44]. Based on this evidence, Pb18 yeasts were treated with iDrk1 and inoculated in YPDmod medium containing cell wall stressing agents such as Congo red (CR), Calcofluor White (CFW), and sodium chloride (Figure 2A). CR and CFW dyes are classically used in studies involving the synthesis and organization of fungal cell wall [46]. Both molecules have two groups of sulfonic acids that exert antifungal activity [47]. The action of CFW and CR occurs through binding to nascent chitin chains, preventing the access of enzymes that promote the binding of chitin with β-1-3-glucan and β-1-6-glucan chains. As a result, the cell wall becomes weakened, which can compromise its viability [47]. Sodium chloride promotes osmotic stress and changes the structure of the cell wall [48]. After seven days of incubation, it was observed that, under all conditions, previous exposure to iDrk1 induced a fairly dramatic viability reduction, especially under osmotic stress (Figure 2A). Previous data from our group [20] showed an increase in the number of PbDRK1 transcripts when the fungus is subjected to osmotic stress. The data show that the inhibition of Drk1 results in an increased sensitivity to cell wall stressors and to osmotic stress.
3.3. Modulation of Cell Wall Gene Expression in P. brasiliensis
Previous data demonstrated that PbDRK1 is mainly expressed in the yeast phase [20]. However, the associated pathways remain poorly understood. Therefore, to investigate the possible targets regulated by PbDRK1, Pb18 yeasts were incubated in the absence or presence of iDrk1 for 24 h. Then, the RNA extraction protocol was applied, followed by a cDNA synthesis reaction. Finally, RT-qPCR analysis of several genes involved in cell wall synthesis was performed: CHT3, CHS2, CHS3, CHS4, and CHS5 (genes involved in the synthesis and maintenance of chitins) and FKS1, KRE6, PHR2, GEL3, and AGN1 (genes involved in glucan synthesis and maintenance).
As shown in Figure 2B, genes encoding chitin synthase enzymes CHT3, CHS2 and CHS3 exhibited a 3.7-, 5.8- and 2.0-fold increase, respectively, in samples treated with iDrk1. However, there were no significant changes in the CHS4 and CHS5 genes (Figure 2B). On the other hand, the CHS4 and CHS5 genes were more highly expressed in the mycelial phase of Pb18 [49]. Thus, these data suggest that iDrk1 may modulate the expression of some chitin synthesis genes.
Significant increases in the transcript levels of several genes related to β-glucan synthesis and cell wall integrity have been observed (Figure 2C). A 4-fold increase in the FKS1 gene, which encodes a β-(1,3)-glucan synthase, was observed. The KRE6 gene showed a 2.7-fold increase in expression levels when compared with the no-treatment control. This gene is important in the β-(1,6)-glucan synthesis process and for molecules that are part of the β-(1,3)-glucan net composition [13,50]. The PHR2 gene showed a 5.5-fold increase in expression levels (Figure 2C). This gene is involved in the maintenance of the cell wall and fungal virulence [51]. Finally, the expression of the GEL3 gene exhibited a fourfold increase compared to the control without treatment. This gene is part of the process of elongation of the β-(1,3)-glucan chains and cell wall integrity [52,53]. On the other hand, the AGN1 gene, which is involved in the maintenance and synthesis of α-(1,3)-glucan and highly expressed in the yeast phase [54], showed no difference in transcript levels (Figure 2C). These findings support the hypothesis that PbDrk1 could regulate negatively genes involved with the cell wall synthesis.
3.4. Modulation of the Cell Wall Components
As previously demonstrated, the inhibition of PbDrk1 was responsible for modulating the expression of genes involved in the synthesis of important cell wall components, such as FKS1. Associated with this, we observed a greater sensitivity of the fungus to cell wall disturbances when treated with iDrk1. Therefore, we decided to evaluate the levels of β-glucan, chitin and mannan in the Pb18 cell wall after treatment with iDrk1. For this purpose, β-glucan labelling was performed using the Dectin-1-Fc probe. Next, chitin levels were determined using the WGA (wheat germ agglutinin) marker conjugated with FITC [55]. This lectin molecule has an excellent affinity for N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminyl residues and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosamine oligomers. Finally, to verify the mannan levels, concanavalin A conjugated with FITC was used [31]. This molecule has a high affinity for terminal residues of α-D-mannose and α-D-glucose.
Yeasts were incubated for 24 h in the presence or absence of iDrk1. Then, labelling was performed for each fluorescent marker described above. Fluorescence analyses were obtained through flow cytometry, where 10,000 events were obtained for each sample. Quantification was performed using the median fluorescence intensity (MFI). Figure 3A,B show a significant increase in β-glucan and chitin levels after 24 h of treatment with iDrk compared to the untreated control. On the other hand, no change in mannan levels was observed. In addition to the flow cytometry measurements, β-glucan localization was also evaluated by confocal microscopy. Yeast labelling was performed as described in the previous section using the Dectin-1-Fc probe and a secondary antibody anti-mouse IgG conjugated to Alexa 488. This assay made it possible to observe an increase in labelling in the fungus previously incubated with iDrk1 compared to the control. Most of the marking was observed on the yeast surface (Figure 3C). Fluorescence quantification (Figure 3D) was obtained from the corrected total fluorescence values (CTCF). These results indicate that PbDrk inhibition increases the β-glucan levels in P. brasiliensis yeast cells.
3.5. Inhibition of PbDrk1 Induces Increased Phagocytosis of P. brasiliensis and Alters Cytokine Production by Macrophages
Fungal cell wall β-glucan is also an important pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). To avoid the innate immune response, many fungal pathogens depend on the synthesis of the cell wall α-glucan, which functions as a stealth molecule to mask the β-glucans itself or links other masking structures to the cell wall [56]. As demonstrated in the previous results, when we inhibited the PbDrk1 pathway, the Pb18 yeast underwent changes in their cell wall composition. Under normal conditions, the main components of the outermost layer of the Pb18 cell wall are α-glucan molecules [13,57]. Thus, we determined whether the increase in β-glucan would make the fungus more susceptible to recognition by cells of the immune system. To answer this question, a phagocytosis assay was performed with J774 murine macrophages. After 24 h of interaction, the supernatant was collected for subsequent cytokine dosage. In this assay, it was possible to observe that fungi treated with iDrk1 had a higher phagocytic index than the untreated control (Figure 4A). To confirm these observations, a phagocytosis assay was performed using flow cytometry [37]. The sample treatment was performed as described above, but before the cell-yeast interaction, the Pb18 yeasts were labelled with the intracellular dye CFSE. This result is similar to that observed in the previous experiment. In Figure 4B, we can see the greater signal intensity in the sample where the fungus was previously treated with iDrk1. Furthermore, we observed a reduced number of colony-forming units (CFUs) in the group treated with iDrk1 (Figure 4C). This dataset suggests that PbDrk1 inhibition of P. brasiliensis may have contributed to an increase in phagocytosis and in the susceptibility of fungal cells to macrophage elimination.
The quantification of the proinflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL-12p70 was evaluated by ELISA. Before the phagocytosis assay, J774 cells were primed with LPS. As a control, the supernatant from the macrophages activated only with LPS was analysed. In Figure 4D, we can see a significant increase in TNFα levels in the supernatant of cell cultures incubated with P. brasiliensis yeasts previously exposed to iDrk1. The same result was observed for the cytokine IL-12p70 (Figure 4E).
3.6. Regulation of cAMP-PKA and Glycogen Accumulation in P. brasiliensis
Perception of the environment is fundamental for fungal survival in the host. The cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A pathway (cAMP-PKA) is highly conserved and is involved in several biological processes, both in human pathogenic and phytopathogenic fungi [58]. In addition, it also contributes to gene expression regulation and cell wall remodeling [59]. Through stimuli external to the cell, the enzyme adenylate cyclase converts ATP to adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP), an important secondary messenger that binds to the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A (PKA). This generates a conformational change that releases PKA catalytic subunits and activates transcription factors and other signalling pathways involved in cell wall integrity, stress response and virulence [58,60,61]. Thus, Pb18 yeasts treated or not with iDrk1 for 24 h were lysed, and the protein extract was used to quantify the PKA activity and cAMP dosage. As shown in Figure 5A, it was possible to verify a reduction in PKA activity after exposure to iDrk1. As a positive control for the reaction, P. brasiliensis was subjected to oxidative stress with 300 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 30 min. This condition is known to generate an increase in PKA activity [62]. It was also possible to observe no significant difference in the dosage of cAMP levels between the treated and control samples (Figure 5B).
The cell stress response is orchestrated by connecting several pathways that converge to promote cell survival. As previously described, the cell wall integrity pathway also activates responses that bind to cAMP-PKA. Activation of PKA regulates cellular functions related to glycogen metabolism [63], and it antagonizes its intracellular accumulation [64]. Thus, Pb18 yeasts incubated in the presence or absence of iDrk1 for 24 and 48 h were stained with iodine solution and photographed (Figure 5C). The greater the accumulation of intracellular glycogen, the darker the sample becomes [33]. In Figure 5C, there was an accumulation of intracellular glycogen in relation to the control. Combined with the gene expression analysis and quantification of the cell wall components, this result suggests that iDrk1 may modulate the cell wall component synthesis, generating a cellular response that leads to a decrease in PKA activity. This decreased activity may lead to intracellular glycogen accumulation [65,66].
4. Discussion
Currently, the number of antifungal substances available for the treatment of phytopathogens is approximately nine times greater than those available for the treatment of mycoses in mammals [67]. In this scenario, it is important to emphasize the need for studies that unravel the mechanisms of fungal pathogenicity. With a better understanding of these pathways and the discovery of new targets, it will be possible to develop new drugs with antifungal potential. Thus, this study aimed to understand better the role of a histidine kinase (PbDrk1), an important regulator in the dimorphic switch and morphogenesis of the cell wall of P. brasiliensis.
We evaluated pharmacological inhibitors as a strategy to elucidate the role of PbDrk1. The inhibitors iprodione and fludioxonil (both group III histidine kinase inhibitors) are substances widely used in agriculture to combat phytopathogens [68]. Molecular biology and cell signalling studies have shown that these molecules act specifically on group III histidine kinases through interactions with HAMP domains, which are present only in this group of kinases [39,69]. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, group III histidine kinases are absent. When an orthologous gene to histidine kinase group III of Neurospora crassa is introduced, S. cerevisiae becomes sensitive to pyrrolnitrine [68,70]. Other pathogenic fungi with group III histidine kinases, such as B. dermatitidis and Candida albicans, were submitted to this inhibitor and presented various sensitivities [17]. For Pb18 yeast cells, fludioxonil was used at 100 µg/mL, showing no reduced cell viability. Thus, the concentration established in the other tests at 25 µg/mL was selected since it is an intermediate concentration and was already established in B. dermatitidis [17].
The fungal cell wall plays a fundamental role in the host-parasite interaction since its composition can influence the immune response [13]. In Paracoccidioides spp., during the dimorphic transition, the cell wall morphogenesis machinery is activated to remodel its components. In H. capsulatum and B. dermatitidis, it was shown that DRK1 acts as a regulator of dimorphism and virulence. A study carried out in B. dermatitidis silenced the DRK1 gene and demonstrated a blockade of the dimorphic transition from mycelium to yeast at 37 °C. Furthermore, this silencing impaired the expression of BAD1 (a virulence gene activated during transition) [11]. In H. capsulatum, Drk1 regulates genes specifically expressed in the yeast phase, such as CBP1, YPS-3 and AGS1 [11]. In C. albicans, the deletion of NIK1, a group III histidine kinase, makes yeast incapable of transitioning from yeast to hyphae, consequently making it less virulent [71]. In Penicillium marneffei, the deletion of the DRKA and SLNA genes was also essential for the dimorphic transition during macrophage infection and conidial germination, respectively [44].
The ability of Paracoccidioides spp. to cause PCM depends on its dimorphic transition and establishment in the host, either by the resistance and evasion of the immune response machinery or by its ability to be a facultative intracellular parasite [8]. The use of iDrk1 (fludioxonil) in P. brasiliensis cultivated in the form of mycelium prevented it from performing the dimorphic transition efficiently, confirming previous findings [20]. A study carried out in Penicillium marneffei showed the importance of DRK1 in cell wall morphogenesis. Strains deleted for this gene were not able to grow in a medium supplemented with cell wall stressors (Congo red) and osmotic stress agents (NaCl and sorbitol) [44]. In that same study, DRK1 mutant hyphal growth and conidial germination were affected, and transmission electron microscopy images showed significant thickening of the cell wall [44]. These data support the results obtained in Pb18. In this work, yeasts submitted to iDrk1 and later inoculated in culture medium supplemented with cell wall stressors had severely impaired growth.
In Paracoccidioides spp. the cell wall chitin content represents a significant fraction of the cell dry weight [49]. The CHT3, CHS2, and CHS3 genes showed significant increases compared with the control that was not treated with iDrk1. In C. albicans, it was observed that overexpression of CHT3 induces greater sensitivity to cell wall stressors, and the CHS2 gene acts as an important regulator [72,73]. In P. brasiliensis, it is known that the CHS3 gene is mainly expressed in the yeast phase [49] and is related to cell growth [74]. These results suggest that PbDrk1 inactivity may modulate the expression of some genes involved in chitin synthesis, leading to cell wall instability.
In addition to chitin, one of the main elements that comprise the cell wall of Paracoccidioides spp. are glucan molecules. As already mentioned, the predominance of β-glucan during the mycelial phase is reverted to α-glucan in the yeast phase [2]. This mechanism is seen as one strategy to evade the immune system. The level of α-glucan in the cell wall can be related to the degree of virulence [14]. Among the genes analysed, AGN1 was characterized as phase-specific in P. brasiliensis yeasts, regulating the synthesis of α-(1,3)-glucan [54]. Our data showed that PbDrk1 does not participate in the modulation of this gene. On the other hand, genes involved in the synthesis and maintenance of β-(1,3)-glucan and β-(1,6)-glucan chains, such as FKS1, KRE6, PHR2, and GEL3, showed significant increases after exposure to iDrk1. These results indicate that PbDrk1 regulates the expression of cell wall synthesis genes directly related to the dimorphic transition. The expression data were confirmed by evaluating the levels of β-glucan and chitin in Pb18 treated with a Drk1 inhibitor. The glucan modulation transition is essential for masking β-glucan molecules, as the host’s immune system directly recognizes these molecules by phagocytic cells.
In the host, the fungus is initially recognized by PRRs and PAMPs [75]. Among the receptors that may be involved, we highlight the Dectin-1 receptor that specifically binds to β-glucan [76]. Chitin molecules are also recognized by the immune system via TLR-2, inducing the production of cytokines and the recruitment of phagocytic cells by the recognition by Dectin-1 [77]. The outermost region of the P. brasiliensis cell wall comprises a thick layer of mannan [2]. This layer is believed to protect fungal cells from immunological recognition, hiding the main immunogenic molecules [78]. Confocal microscopy assays indicated an increase in β-glucan labelling. These images showed that yeasts treated with iDrk1 showed greater fluorescence intensity when labelled with the Dectin-1 receptor. Thus, the increase in β-glucan and increased expression and synthesis of chitin in cells treated with iDrk1 indicate that this pathway may be related to virulence and fungal cell wall architecture.
In parallel, the cAMP-PKA pathway also plays a role in cell wall remodeling. In Cryptococcus neoformans, PKA is involved in the phosphorylation of components that, when translocated to the nucleus, regulate the expression of genes involved in cell wall integrity [59]. In fungi, this pathway is related to cell growth, differentiation, stress response, pathogenicity, and cell wall integrity, among others [61]. In C. neoformans, it was shown that the deletion of several genes involved in cell wall integrity led to impairment of the cAMP-PKA pathway [79]. In C. albicans, this pathway plays a central regulator of its morphological transition and, consequently, pathogenicity [80]. In P. lutzii, it was reported that the specific inhibition of PKA impedes dimorphic transition [81]. Recently, Garcia et al.; (2017) showed a new insight into the signalling pathways involved in the regulation of cell wall integrity. Alterations of the β-1,3-glucan network in the fungal cell wall induced the activation of the CWI pathway and in parallel inhibited the PKA signalling [33]. Thus, when submitting Pb18 yeasts to iDrk1, we observed a reduction in PKA activity, supporting literature data on the PKA influence on cell wall gene expression and glycogen accumulation [33,59] and a possible correlation with the PbDrk1 pathway.
On the other hand, there was no significant difference in cAMP levels in the presence or absence of iDrk1. Cyclic AMP is a secondary messenger whose intracellular levels are regulated by adenylate cyclase and the phosphodiesterase enzyme balance [65]. Both are regulated by other signalling pathways and not exclusively via PKA [82]. Thus, it is possible to infer that PbDrk1 modulates PKA activity but does not correlate with cAMP levels. In this case, the maintenance of cAMP levels can be regulated by other pathways, such as calcineurin, MAP kinases, and G protein subunits [80,83]. Finally, we can infer that PbDrk1 modulates intracellular levels of intracellular glycogen via PKA. In Aspergillus fumigatus, deletion of the PKA catalytic subunit led to an increase in intracellular glycogen levels [65]. Furthermore, in S. cerevisiae, it was found that glycogen is present in two fractions, one of them in the cell cytosol in its soluble form and the other associated with cell wall components, covalently linked specifically to β-(1,3)-glucan and β-(1,6)-glucan [84]. This evidence complements the observed results of increased β-glucan exposure on the surface of P. brasiliensis after exposure to iDrk1. Together, the results obtained thus far point to the participation of PbDrk1 in the P. brasiliensis cell wall modulation.
During the immune response in a fungal infection, the action of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines is essential to determine disease progression and/or pathogen clearance [85]. Host resistance to infection by Paracoccidioides spp. is associated with a Th1 response, which induces macrophage activation and actively controls fungal dissemination [86]. The individual’s susceptibility to the disease is associated with a Th2 response [87]. It is known that the participation of the Dectin-1 receptor together with TLR in the recognition pathway of Paracoccidioides spp. triggers the production of several proinflammatory cytokines [88], such as TNFα. This molecule is produced by cells involved in the immune system, including activated macrophages and regulatory T cells, acting as central mediators in inflammation and the regulation of the immune response [89]. It is possible to observe the increased production of this cytokine by macrophages that phagocytosed yeasts exposed to iDrk1, indicating a more exacerbated proinflammatory response when compared to the control. Furthermore, a significant increase in the expression of the cytokine IL12p70 was also observed, produced by monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, and it is an important element in the activation of the Th1 response [90].
5. Conclusions
The data obtained during this work will contribute to a better understanding of a regulatory pathway that has not yet been explored in this model. The PbDrk1 protein has already been shown to be a key element in the dimorphic transition pathway [20]. It is now possible to state that it is a likely virulence factor in regulating cell wall genes. The activity of PbDrk1 negatively modulates the synthesis of molecules such as chitin and β-glucans, contributing to its masking and favouring the pathogenicity of P. brasiliensis. Histidine kinases are proteins absent in mammals, and the inhibition of their activity makes fungal cells susceptible to immune system cells. In other fungal models, the loss of this gene represents a decrease in virulence. Finally, the study of PbDrk1 and associated pathways would enable a different approach to the development of new antifungal drugs.
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to Sandro Rogério de Almeida (Universidade de São Paulo—USP, Brazil) for technical assistance and material donation to ELISA and phagocytosis experiments. We are thankful for the support of Núcleo de Microscopia Confocal Unifesp Diadema for the confocal microscopy experiments.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, W.L.B. and M.V.N.; methodology, M.V.N., Y.N.d.B., W.D.S., A.F.A.C., K.S.F., G.P.J. and P.X.; software, M.V.N., Y.N.d.B., W.D.S.; validation, M.V.N. and Y.N.d.B.; formal analysis, M.V.N.; writing—review and editing, W.L.B. and M.V.N.; supervision, W.L.B.; project administration, W.L.B. and M.V.N.; funding acquisition, W.L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), grant number 2017/04592-0 and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) grant number 141726/2017-2; 311008/2020-8 and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Shikanai-Yasuda M.A., Mendes R.P., Colombo A.L., de Queiroz Telles F., Kono A., Paniago A.M.M., Nathan A., do Valle A.C.F., Bagagli E., Benard G., et al. II Consenso Brasileiro em Paracoccidioidomicose-2017. Epidemiol. Serviços Saúde. 2018;27:e0500001. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742018000500001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chaves A.F.A., Navarro M.V., de Barros Y.N., Silva R.S., Xander P., Batista W.L. Updates in Paracoccidioides biology and genetic advances in fungus manipulation. J. Fungi. 2021;7:116. doi: 10.3390/jof7020116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Delboni Nunes N.E., Schmidt E.B., Massaroni Peçanha M.A., Zanotti R.L., Gonçalves Ferreira C.U., Lamas de Araújo M., Potratz F.F., Peçanha P.M., Batista Ferreira M.E., Delmaestro D., et al. Paracoccidioidomycosis: Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects in 546 Cases Studied in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017;97:836–844. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Almeida S.M. Central nervous system paracoccidioidomycosis: An overview. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2005;9:126–133. doi: 10.1590/S1413-86702005000200002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Almeida F.A., Neves F.F., Mora D.J., Dos Reis T.A., Sotini D.M., Ribeiro B.D.M., Andrade-Silva L.E., Nascentes G.N., Ferreira-Paim K., Silva-Vergara M.L. Paracoccidioidomycosis in Brazilian Patients With and Without Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017;96:368–372. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Goughenour K.D., Rappleye C.A. Antifungal therapeutics for dimorphic fungal pathogens. Virulence. 2016;8:211–221. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1235653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Santos L.A., Grisolia J.C., Burger E., de Araujo Paula F.B., Dias A.L.T., Malaquias L.C.C. Virulence factors of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis as therapeutic targets: A review. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2020;5:593–604. doi: 10.1007/s10482-019-01382-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Giusiano G. The Trojan Horse Model in Paracoccidioides: A Fantastic Pathway to Survive Infecting Human Cells. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10:605679. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.605679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Calich V.L.G., Mamoni R.L., Loures F.V. Regulatory T cells in paracoccidioidomycosis. Virulence. 2019;10:810–821. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1483674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Boyce K.J., Andrianopoulos A. Fungal dimorphism: The switch from hyphae to yeast is a specialized morphogenetic adaptation allowing colonization of a host. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2015;39:797–811. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nemecek J.C., Wüthrich M., Klein B.S. Global Control of Dimorphism and Virulence in Fungi. Science. 2006;312:583–588. doi: 10.1126/science.1124105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Campos C.B.L., Di Benedette J.P.T., Morais F.V., Ovalle R., Nobrega M.P. Evidence for the role of calcineurin in morphogenesis and calcium homeostasis during mycelium-to-yeast dimorphism of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Eukaryot. Cell. 2008;7:1856–1864. doi: 10.1128/EC.00110-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Puccia R., Vallejo M.C., Matsuo A.L., Longo L.V.G. The Paracoccidioides Cell Wall: Past and Present Layers Toward Understanding Interaction with the Host. Front. Microbiol. 2011;2:257. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hogan L.H., Klein B.S. Altered expression of surface alpha-1,3-glucan in genetically related strains of Blastomyces dermatitidis that differ in virulence. Infect. Immun. 1994;62:3543–3546. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.8.3543-3546.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Klein B.S., Tebbets B. Dimorphism and virulence in fungi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007;10:314–319. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Felipe M.S.S., Andrade R.V., Arraes F.B.M.M., Nicola A.M., Maranhão A.Q., Torres F.A.G.G., Silva-Pereira I., Poças-Fonseca M.J., Campos E.G., Moraes L.M.P.P., et al. Transcriptional profiles of the human pathogenic fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in mycelium and yeast cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:24706–24714. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500625200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lawry S.M., Tebbets B., Kean I., Stewart D., Hetelle J., Klein B.S. Fludioxonil Induces Drk1, a Fungal Group III Hybrid Histidine Kinase, to Dephosphorylate its Downstream Target, Ypd1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016;61:e01414-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01414-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hou B., Zhang Z., Zheng F., Liu X. Molecular cloning, characterization and differential expression of DRK1 in Sporothrix schenckii. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2013;31:99–104. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Boyce K.J., Cao C., Andrianopoulos A. Two-Component Signaling Regulates Osmotic Stress Adaptation via SskA and the High-Osmolarity Glycerol MAPK Pathway in the Human Pathogen Talaromyces marneffei. mSphere. 2016;1:e00086-15. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00086-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chaves A.F.A., Navarro M.V., Castilho D.G., Calado J.C.P., Conceição P.M., Batista W.L. A conserved dimorphism-regulating histidine kinase controls the dimorphic switching in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016;16:fow047. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fow047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mizuno T., Wurtzel E.T., Inouye M. Osmoregulation of gene expression. II. DNA sequence of the envZ gene of the ompB operon of Escherichia coli and characterization of its gene product. J. Biol. Chem. 1982;257:13692–13698. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)33502-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hérivaux A., So Y.-S., Gastebois A., Latgé J.-P., Bouchara J.-P., Bahn Y.-S., Papon N. Major Sensing Proteins in Pathogenic Fungi: The Hybrid Histidine Kinase Family. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005683. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wuichet K., Cantwell B.J., Zhulin I.B. Evolution and phyletic distribution of two-component signal transduction systems. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010;13:219–225. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Catlett N.L., Yoder O.C., Turgeon B.G. Whole-Genome Analysis of Two-Component Signal Transduction Genes in Fungal Pathogens. Eukaryot. Cell. 2003;2:1151–1161. doi: 10.1128/EC.2.6.1151-1161.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Defosse T.A., Sharma A., Mondal A.K., de Bernonville T.D., Latgé J.P., Calderone R., Giglioli-Guivarc’h N., Courdavault V., Clastre M., Papon N. Hybrid histidine kinases in pathogenic fungi. Mol. Microbiol. 2015;95:914–924. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shor E., Chauhan N. A Case for Two-Component Signaling Systems As Antifungal Drug Targets. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004632. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chauhan N., Latge J.-P., Calderone R. Signalling and oxidant adaptation in Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006;4:435–444. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Holbrook E.D., Rappleye C.A. Histoplasma capsulatum pathogenesis: Making a lifestyle switch. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2008;11:318–324. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Castilho D.G., Navarro M.V., Chaves A.F.A.A., Xander P., Batista W.L. Recovery of the Paracoccidioides brasiliensis virulence after animal passage promotes changes in the antioxidant repertoire of the fungus. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018;18:foy007. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foy007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nogueira M., Istel F., Jenull S., Walker L., Gow N., Lion T. Quantitative Analysis of Candida Cell Wall Components by Flow Cytometry with Triple-Fluorescence Staining. J. Microbiol. Mod. Tech. 2017;2:101. doi: 10.15744/2575-5498.2.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bradford M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.García R., Bravo E., Diez-Muñiz S., Nombela C., Rodríguez-Peña J.M., Arroyo J. A novel connection between the Cell Wall Integrity and the PKA pathways regulates cell wall stress response in yeast. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:5703. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06001-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Crosby L., Casey W., Morgan K., Ni H., Yoon L., Easton M., Misukonis M., Burleson G., Ghosh D.K. Murine J774 macrophages recognize LPS/IFN-g, non-CpG DNA or two-CpG DNA-containing sequences as immunologically distinct. Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. 2010;22:242–257. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Romera L.M.D., Kaihami G.H., Jannuzzi G.P., de Almeida J.R.F., de Almeida S.R. The Critical Role of Notch1–TLR 4 Signaling in the Inflammatory and Fungicidal Activity of Macrophages Against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis Strain Pb18. Mycopathologia. 2017;182:797–807. doi: 10.1007/s11046-017-0154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Popi A.F., Daniel Lopes J., Mariano M. GP43 from Paracoccidioides brasiliensis inhibits macrophage functions. An evasion mechanism of the fungus. Cell. Immunol. 2002;218:87–94. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8749(02)00576-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nuutila J., Lilius E.M. Flow cytometric quantitative determination of ingestion by phagocytes needs the distinguishing of overlapping populations of binding and ingesting cells. Cytom. Part A. 2005;65:93–102. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Arima K., Imanaka H., Kousaka M., Fukuta A., Tamura G. Pyrrolnitrin, a New Antibiotic Substance, Produced by Pseudomonas. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1964;28:575–576. doi: 10.1080/00021369.1964.10858275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brandhorst T.T., Kean I.R.L., Lawry S.M., Wiesner D.L., Klein B.S. Phenylpyrrole fungicides act on triosephosphate isomerase to induce methylglyoxal stress and alter hybrid histidine kinase activity. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5047. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41564-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cui S., Hassan R.Y.A., Heintz-Buschart A., Bilitewski U. Regulation of Candida albicans interaction with macrophages through the activation of HOG pathway by genistein. Molecules. 2016;21:162. doi: 10.3390/molecules21020162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kamei M., Yamashita K., Takahashi M., Fukumori F., Ichiishi A., Fujimura M. Deletion and expression analysis of beta-(1,3)-glucanosyltransferase genes in Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2013;52:65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McCormick A., Jacobsen I.D., Broniszewska M., Beck J., Heesemann J., Ebel F. The two-component sensor kinase TcsC and its role in stress resistance of the human-pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yoshimi A., Miyazawa K., Abe K. Function and Biosynthesis of Cell Wall α-1,3-Glucan in Fungi. J. Fungi. 2017;3:63. doi: 10.3390/jof3040063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Boyce K.J., Schreider L., Kirszenblat L., Andrianopoulos A. The two-component histidine kinases DrkA and SlnA are required for in vivo growth in the human pathogen Penicillium marneffei. Mol. Microbiol. 2011;82:1164–1184. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07878.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang Z., Hou B., Xin Y., Liu X. Protein Profiling of the Dimorphic Pathogenic Fungus, Sporothrix schenckii. Mycopathologia. 2012;173:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9456-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Roncero C., Durán A. Effect of Calcofluor white and Congo red on fungal cell wall morphogenesis: In vivo activation of chitin polymerization. J. Bacteriol. 1985;163:1180–1185. doi: 10.1128/jb.163.3.1180-1185.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ram A.F.J., Klis F.M. Identification of fungal cell wall mutants using susceptibility assays based on Calcofluor white and Congo red. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:2253–2256. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ene I.V., Walker L.A., Schiavone M., Lee K.K., Martin-Yken H., Dague E., Gow N.A.R., Munro C.A., Brown A.J.P. Cell wall remodeling enzymes modulate fungal cell wall elasticity and osmotic stress resistance. MBio. 2015;6:e00986-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00986-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Niño-Vega G.A., Munro C.A., San-Blas G., Gooday G.W., Gow N.A. Differential expression of chitin synthase genes during temperature-induced dimorphic transitions in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Med. Mycol. 2000;38:31–39. doi: 10.1080/mmy.38.1.31.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zambuzzi-Carvalho P., Tomazett P., Santos S., Ferri P., Borges C., Martins W., de Almeida Soares C., Pereira M. Transcriptional profile of Paracoccidioides induced by oenothein B, a potential antifungal agent from the Brazilian Cerrado plant Eugenia uniflora. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:227. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Degani G., Popolo L. The Glucan-Remodeling Enzyme Phr1p and the Chitin Synthase Chs1p Cooperate to Maintain Proper Nuclear Segregation and Cell Integrity in Candida albicans. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019;9:400. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bolouri Moghaddam M.-R., Vilcinskas A., Rahnamaeian M. The insect-derived antimicrobial peptide metchnikowin targets Fusarium graminearum β(1,3)glucanosyltransferase Gel1, which is required for the maintenance of cell wall integrity. Biol. Chem. 2017;398:491–498. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2016-0295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.da Silva Castro N., Maia Z.A., Pereira M., de Almeida Soares C.M. Screening for glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in the Paracoccidioides brasiliensis transcriptome. Genet. Mol. Res. 2005;4:326–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Villalobos-Duno H., San-Blas G., Paulinkevicius M., Sánchez-Martín Y., Nino-Vega G. Biochemical Characterization of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis α-1,3-Glucanase Agn1p, and Its Functionality by Heterologous Expression in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gonçales R.A., Ricci-Azevedo R., Vieira V.C.S., Fernandes F.F., de Oliveira Thomaz S.M., Carvalho A., Vendruscolo P.E., Cunha C., Roque-Barreira M.C., Rodrigues F. Paracoccin overexpression in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis enhances fungal virulence by remodeling chitin properties of the cell wall. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;224:164–174. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wagener J., Striegler K., Wagener N. α- and β-1,3-glucan synthesis and remodeling. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020;425:53–82. doi: 10.1007/82_2020_200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kanetsuna F., Carbonell L.M., Azuma I., Yamamura Y. Biochemical Studies on the Thermal Dimorphism of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. J. Bacteriol. 1972;110:208–218. doi: 10.1128/jb.110.1.208-218.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lin C.J., Wu C.Y., Yu S.J., Chen Y.L. Protein kinase A governs growth and virulence in Candida tropicalis. Virulence. 2018;9:331–347. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2017.1414132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Caza M., Kronstad J.W. The cAMP/Protein Kinase a Pathway Regulates Virulence and Adaptation to Host Conditions in Cryptococcus neoformans. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019;9:212. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bravo Ruiz G., Lorenz A. What do we know about the biology of the emerging fungal pathogen of humans Candida auris? Microbiol. Res. 2021;242:126621. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhu W., Zhou M., Xiong Z., Peng F., Wei W. The cAMP-PKA Signaling Pathway Regulates Pathogenicity, Hyphal Growth, Appressorial Formation, Conidiation, and Stress Tolerance in Colletotrichum higginsianum. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1416. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Liu Y., Yang F., Li S., Dai J., Deng H. Glutaredoxin Deletion Shortens Chronological Life Span in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via ROS-Mediated Ras/PKA Activation. J. Proteome Res. 2018;17:2318–2327. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Freitas F.Z., de Paula R.M., Barbosa L.C.B., Terenzi H.F., Bertolini M.C. cAMP signaling pathway controls glycogen metabolism in Neurospora crassa by regulating the glycogen synthase gene expression and phosphorylation. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010;47:43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Smith A., Ward M.P., Garrett S. Yeast PKA represses Msn2p/Msn4p-dependent gene expression to regulate growth, stress response and glycogen accumulation. EMBO J. 1998;17:3556–3564. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.13.3556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.de Assis L.J., Manfiolli A., Mattos E., Fabri J.H.T.M., Malavazi I., Jacobsen I.D., Brock M., Cramer R.A., Thammahong A., Hagiwara D., et al. Protein Kinase A and High-Osmolarity Glycerol Response Pathways Cooperatively Control Cell Wall Carbohydrate Mobilization in Aspergillus fumigatus. MBio. 2018;9:e01952-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01952-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schmelzle T., Beck T., Martin D.E., Hall M.N. Activation of the RAS/cyclic AMP pathway suppresses a TOR deficiency in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004;24:338–351. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.1.338-351.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fisher M.C., Hawkins N.J., Sanglard D., Gurr S.J. Worldwide emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs challenges human health and food security. Science. 2018;360:739–742. doi: 10.1126/science.aap7999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kilani J., Fillinger S. Phenylpyrroles: 30 years, two molecules and (nearly) no resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:2014. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Schumacher M.M., Enderlin C.S., Selitrennikoff C.P. The osmotic-1 locus of Neurospora crassa encodes a putative histidine kinase similar to osmosensors of bacteria and yeast. Curr. Microbiol. 1997;34:340–347. doi: 10.1007/s002849900193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Motoyama T., Kadokura K., Ohira T., Ichiishi A., Fujimura M., Yamaguchi I., Kudo T. A two-component histidine kinase of the rice blast fungus is involved in osmotic stress response and fungicide action. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005;42:200–212. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yamada-Okabe T., Mio T., Ono N., Kashima Y., Matsui M., Arisawa M., Yamada-Okabe H. Roles of three histidine kinase genes in hyphal development and virulence of the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 1999;181:7243–7247. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.23.7243-7247.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dünkler A., Wendland J.J., Dünkler A., Wendland J.J. Candida albicans Rho-type GTPase-encoding genes required for polarized cell growth and cell separation. Eukaryot. Cell. 2007;6:844–854. doi: 10.1128/EC.00201-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Preechasuth K., Anderson J.C., Peck S.C., Brown A.J.P., Gow N.A.R., Lenardon M.D. Cell wall protection by the Candida albicans class I chitin synthases. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015;82:264–276. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Barreto L., Sorais F., Salazar V., San-Blas G., Niño-Vega G.A. Expression of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis CHS3 in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae CHS3 null mutant demonstrates its functionality as a chitin synthase gene. Yeast. 2010;27:293–300. doi: 10.1002/yea.1748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.De Quaglia e Silva J.C., Della Coletta A.M., Gardizani T.P., Romagnoli G.G., Kaneno R., Dias-Melicio L.A. Involvement of the Dectin-1 Receptor upon the Effector Mechanisms of Human Phagocytic Cells against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. J. Immunol. Res. 2019;2019:1529189. doi: 10.1155/2019/1529189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Romagnolo A.G., de Quaglia e Silva J.C., Della Coletta A.M., Gardizani T.P., Martins A.T.L., Romagnoli G.G., Kaneno R., de Campos Soares A.M.V., De Faveri J., Dias-Melicio L.A. Role of Dectin-1 receptor on cytokine production by human monocytes challenged with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Mycoses. 2018;61:222–230. doi: 10.1111/myc.12725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Elieh Ali Komi D., Sharma L., Dela Cruz C.S. Chitin and Its Effects on Inflammatory and Immune Responses. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2018;54:213–223. doi: 10.1007/s12016-017-8600-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Yadav B., Mora-Montes H.M., Wagener J., Cunningham I., West L., Haynes K., Brown A.J.P., Gow N.A.R. Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition. Cell Surf. 2020;6:100042. doi: 10.1016/j.tcsw.2020.100042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Donlin M.J., Upadhya R., Gerik K.J., Lam W., VanArendonk L.G., Specht C.A., Sharma N.K., Lodge J.K. Cross talk between the cell wall integrity and cyclic AMP/protein kinase A pathways in Cryptococcus neoformans. MBio. 2014;5:e01573-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01573-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Cao C., Wu M., Bing J., Tao L., Ding X., Liu X., Huang G. Global regulatory roles of the cAMP/PKA pathway revealed by phenotypic, transcriptomic and phosphoproteomic analyses in a null mutant of the PKA catalytic subunit in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 2017;105:46–64. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sestari S.J., Brito W.A., Neves B.J., Soares C.M.A., Salem-Izacc S.M. Inhibition of protein kinase A affects Paracoccidioides lutzii dimorphism. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;113:1214–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sassone-Corsi P. The cyclic AMP pathway. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012;4:a011148. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Koschinski A., Zaccolo M. Activation of PKA in cell requires higher concentration of cAMP than in vitro: Implications for compartmentalization of cAMP signalling. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:14090. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13021-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Arvindekar A.U., Patil N.B. Glycogen: A covalently linked component of the cell wall in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2002;19:131–139. doi: 10.1002/yea.802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kurokawa C.S., Araujo J.P., Soares A.M.V.C., Sugizaki M.F., Peraçoli M.T.S. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines produced by human monocytes challenged in vitro with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Microbiol. Immunol. 2007;51:421–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2007.tb03929.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tristão F.S.M., Rocha F.A., Carlos D., Ketelut-Carneiro N., Souza C.O.S., Milanezi C.M., Silva J.S. Th17-Inducing Cytokines IL-6 and IL-23 Are Crucial for Granuloma Formation during Experimental Paracoccidioidomycosis. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:949. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Fortes M.R.P., Miot H.A., Kurokawa C.S., Marques M.E.A., Marques S.A. Immunology of paracoccidioidomycosis. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2011;86:516–525. doi: 10.1590/S0365-05962011000300014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Burger E. Paracoccidioidomycosis protective immunity. J. Fungi. 2021;7:137. doi: 10.3390/jof7020137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Davis M.R., Thompson G.R., Patterson T.F. Fungal Infections Potentiated by Biologics. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2020;34:389–411. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2020.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Thompson A., Orr S.J. Emerging IL-12 family cytokines in the fight against fungal infections. Cytokine. 2018;111:398–407. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2018.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]