Abstract
To investigate the pattern of chloroplast genome variation in Triticeae, we comprehensively analyzed the indels in protein-coding genes and intergenic sequence, gene loss/pseudonization, intron variation, expansion/contraction in inverted repeat regions, and the relationship between sequence characteristics and chloroplast genome size in 34 monogenomic Triticeae plants. Ancestral genome reconstruction suggests that major length variations occurred in four-stem branches of monogenomic Triticeae followed by independent changes in each genus. It was shown that the chloroplast genome sizes of monogenomic Triticeae were highly variable. The chloroplast genome of Pseudoroegneria, Dasypyrum, Lophopyrum, Thinopyrum, Eremopyrum, Agropyron, Australopyrum, and Henradia in Triticeae had evolved toward size reduction largely because of pseudogenes elimination events and length deletion fragments in intergenic. The Aegilops/Triticum complex, Taeniatherum, Secale, Crithopsis, Herteranthelium, and Hordeum in Triticeae had a larger chloroplast genome size. The large size variation in major lineages and their subclades are most likely consequences of adaptive processes since these variations were significantly correlated with divergence time and historical climatic changes. We also found that several intergenic regions, such as petN–trnC and psbE–petL containing unique genetic information, which can be used as important tools to identify the maternal relationship among Triticeae species. Our results contribute to the novel knowledge of plastid genome evolution in Triticeae.
Keywords: chloroplast genome, Triticeae, genome variation, genome size, IR expansion/contraction
Introduction
Chloroplast DNA (cp DNA) is composed of a single circular DNA molecule with a quadripartite structure and encodes multiple proteins, including components of light reactions in the photosynthesis process (Martin et al., 2002). In angiosperms, cp genomes have a very constrained size, ranging from 115 to 165 kb in length, and consist of two copies of an inverted repeat (IR) region, a large-single-copy (LSC) region, and a small single copy (SSC) region (Raubeson and Jansen, 2005; Wicke et al., 2011). Because of a uniparental mode of inheritance and high conservation in gene content and genome structure, the chloroplast genome is generally treated as a single locus (Raubeson and Jansen, 2005; Nock et al., 2011). With a smaller effective population size and being essentially recombination-free, the chloroplast genome has a shorter coalescent time than nuclear genomes (Birky et al., 1983). The cp genome is highly conserved in structure, size, and gene content within land plants (Palmer, 1985; Wicke et al., 2011), because chloroplast sequences evolve at approximately half the speed of nuclear regions (Walker et al., 2014). However, variations in some regions of the cp genome have been widely reported in plants (Krause, 2011; Weng et al., 2014; Schwarz et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2017; Bedoya et al., 2019; Shrestha et al., 2019). These advantageous features give the chloroplast genome an important value in reconstructing phylogeny, DNA barcoding for accurate identification of plant species, and tracing evolutionary history (Jansen et al., 2008; Walker et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2017; Bedoya et al., 2019; Shrestha et al., 2019). However, associations between DNA composition and cp genome divergence need to be clarified in species over a range of evolutionary time.
Comparison of whole cp genomes can explore sequence variation, permit examination of molecular evolutionary patterns associated with structural rearrangement, and elucidate genetic changes underlying those events. Previous studies on seed plants have suggested that structural rearrangement, intergenic region variation, variation in IR regions, and gene loss were principal factors driving the variation in chloroplast genome size and structure (Kugita et al., 2003; Parks et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2017). It has been reported that contractions into single copy regions with inversions have shaped certain evolutionary features for monophyletic groups (Palmer et al., 1985; Hoot and Palmer, 1994). While these described features in chloroplast genome variation enable researchers to investigate genome divergences over a broad range of evolutionary time, from early land plants to recently domesticated plants, comparisons among very distant relatives have yielded results with uncertain generality (Matsuoka et al., 2002; Zheng et al., 2017). Moreover, a comprehensive search for factors that drive the variation in genome size in a given phylogenetic framework is still lacking.
The wheat tribe (Poaceae: Triticeae), an economically important gene pool for genetic improvement of cereal and forage crops, includes about 450 diploid and polyploid species that distribute in a wide range of ecological habitats over temperate, subtropical, and tropic alpine regions (Dewey, 1984). In Triticeae, 24 major basic genomes in diploid species have been designated and recognized in 18 monogenomic genera (Löve, 1984; Wang et al., 1994). Monogenomic genera have been the focus of numerous evolutionary investigations, partly because of either their economic importance (including barley, rye, and crested-wheat grasses) or their genome donor to the speciation of polyploid species (accounting for 75% of the Triticeae species), as well as their wide variety of species richness, morphology, ecology, and distribution. Previous data from geographical distribution (Sakamoto, 1973) and morphological characteristics (West et al., 1988), and DNA information (Kellogg et al., 1996) have suggested that the first step of phylogenetic diversification in Triticeae occurred at the diploid level and then gave rise to different present-day diploid lineages. Since the tribe was originated, lineage diversification of monogenomic genus in a range of evolutionary time raised the question of how cp genomes have evolved. Comparison of cp genomic structure on several monogenomic Triticeae showed that a 737-bp deletion in Pseudoroegneria libanotica might be related to potential nuclear–cytoplasm transfer (Wu et al., 2017). Analysis of the cp genome sequence in Agropyron cristatum suggested that deletion of accD and translocation of rpl23 genes might represent an independent gene-loss event or an additional divergence in Triticeae (Chen et al., 2017). However, to better understand the pattern of variation in cp genome structure and size in Triticeae, it is critical to assess the evolutionary processes that drive cp genome variation accompanied by the diversification of Triticeae with relatively well-sampled monogenomic Triticeae genera.
Here, we carried out phylogenetic reconstructions and estimated diversification patterns using the cp genome from 34 species of 17 monogenomic genera within the Triticeae. While generic definitions within the Triticeae have been extremely variable (Barkworth, 1998), our sample represents nearly all monogenomic genera and genome types according to genome-based classifications of the tribe (Yen et al., 2005). The aims of this study were to (1) examine variation in cp genomic structure and size in monogenomic Triticeae; (2) document the process of cp genomic variation accompanied by the diversification history of monogenomic Triticeae. Knowledge of cp genomic variation over a range of evolutionary time would provide a better understanding of the evolutionary history of the Triticeae.
Materials and Methods
Data Collection
Thirty-five species, which included 34 individuals representing 17 genera and 20 basic genomes within Triticeae, were sampled (Table 1). Brachypodium distachyon was included as an outgroup. Twenty chloroplast genome sequences are highlighted in bold in Table 1, which are from Triticum–Aegilops complex, Hordeum bulbosum, Hordeum vulgare, Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum, Secale cereale, were downloaded from the NCBI published data (Saski et al., 2006; Gogniashvili et al., 2014, NCBI web, Bortiri et al., 2008; Gornicki et al., 2014; Middleton et al., 2014; Saarela et al., 2015). The remaining sequences were from our previous publications (Chen et al., 2017, 2020; Wu et al., 2017).
TABLE 1.
No. | Sequence number | Species | Accession no. | Genome | Ploidy | Origin | GeneBank | Chloroplast genome size (bp) |
1 | KJ614418 | Aegilops bicornis | Clae57 | Sb | 2× | SE Mediterranean | KJ614418 | 136,861 |
2 | KJ614416 | Aegilops longissima | TA1924 | Sl | 2× | E Mediterranean | KJ614416 | 136,875 |
3 | KY636033 | Aegilops markgrafii | AE 1381 | C | 2× | NE Mediterranean | KY636033 | 136,063 |
4 | KJ614413 | Aegilops searsii | TA1926 | SS | 2× | E Mediterranean | KJ614413 | 136,870 |
5 | KJ614419 | Aegilops sharonensis | TA1995 | Ssh | 2× | Israel, Lebanon | KJ614419 | 136,867 |
6 | KJ614406 | Aegilops speltoides | PI487232 | S | 2× | E Mediterranean | KJ614406 | 135,652 |
7 | KJ614405 | Aegilops speltoides ssp. ligustica | TA1796 | S | 2× | E Mediterranean | KJ614405 | 135,660 |
8 | KJ614412 | Aegilops tauschii | Cultivar AL8/78 | D | 2× | SW–C Asia | KJ614412 | 135,568 |
10 | KY636059 | Aegilops umbellulata | AE 153 | U | 2× | SE Europe, SW Asia | KY636059 | 136,028 |
9 | KY636056 | Aegilops umbellulata ssp. transcaucasica | AE 1070 | U | 2× | SE Europe, SW Asia | KY636056 | 136,031 |
11 | C22 | Agropyron cristatum | PI 598628 | P | 2× | Kazakhstan | KY126307 | 135,554 |
12 | K30 | Agropyron mongolicum | PI 499392 | P | 2× | Nei Monggol, China | MH285848 | 135,547 |
13 | KY636075 | Amblyopyrum muticum | PI 560125 | T | 2× | Turkey | KY636075 | 135,787 |
14 | E48 | Australopyrum retrofractum | PI 533013 | W | 2× | NEW South Wales, Australia | MH331642 | 135,417 |
15 | CRK28 | Crithopsis delileana | ND | K | 2× | Greece | MH285849 | 136,436 |
16 | DAK25 | Dasypyrum villosum | W6 7264 | V | 2× | Greece | MH285850 | 135,249 |
17 | ERK39 | Eremopyrum distans | TA 2229 | F | 2× | Afghanistan | MH285851 | 135,589 |
18 | ERK31 | Eremopyrum tririceum | Y206 | Xe | 2× | Xinjiang, China | MH285852 | 135,554 |
19 | HEK26 | Henradia persica | – | O | 2× | Iran | MH285853 | 135,659 |
20 | HEK24 | Heteranthelium piliferum | PI401352 | Q | 2× | Iran | MH285854 | 136,768 |
21 | E46 | Hordeum bogdanii | PI 531761 | H | 2× | Xinjiang, China | MH331641 | 136,968 |
22 | KM974741 | Hordeum jubatum | CAN:Saarela 18478 | H | 3× | – | KM974741 | 136,826 |
23 | EF115541 | Hordeum vulgare | Morex | I | 2× | Minnesota, United States | EF115541 | 136,462 |
24 | KC912689 | Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum | FT462 | I | 2× | Minnesota, United States | KC912689 | 136,043 |
25 | K27 | Lophopyrum elongatum | PI531718 | Ee | 2× | Tunisia | MH331643 | 135,020 |
26 | C26 | Psathyrostachys juncea | PI 430871 | Ns | 2× | Former soviet union | MH331640 | 136,597 |
27 | E47 | Pseudoroegneria libanotica | PI 228392 | St | 2× | Iran | KX822019 | 135,026 |
28 | PSK29 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | PI 232134 | St | 2× | Wyoming, United States | MH285855 | 135,165 |
29 | KC912691 | Secale cereale | Imperial | R | 2× | Turkey | KC912691 | 135,564 |
30 | TAK23 | Taeniatherum caput-medusae | PI220591 | Ta | 2× | Afghanistan | MH285856 | 136,861 |
31 | THC25 | Thinopyrum bessarabicum | PI 531712 | Eb | 2× | Estonia | MH331639 | 135,003 |
32 | LC005977 | Triticum monococcum | – | A | 2× | Turkey | LC005977 | 136,886 |
33 | KC912692 | Triticum monococcum ssp. aegilopoides | – | A | 2× | Turkey | KC912692 | 136,870 |
34 | KJ614411 | Triticum urartu | PI428335 | A | 2× | E Mediterranean, Caucasus | KJ614411 | 136,865 |
35 | EU325680 | Brachypodium distachyon | Cultivar Bd21 | – | – | – | EU325680 | 135,199 |
The GenBank accession number with bold represent previously published sequences from the GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). ND: not determined.
Comparison of 35 Chloroplast Genomes
The software mVISTA was used to compare the cp genomes using the annotation of A. cristatum as a reference (Frazer et al., 2004). The sequences were aligned with MAFFT v6.833 (Katoh and Toh, 2010) using default settings. Sequence variation, such as gene loss, divergent genes, intergenic sequence (IGS) indels, and IR contraction/expansion, were examined by MEGA 6.0 (Tamura et al., 2013). The IR expansion and contraction of cp genomes were analyzed using IRscope (Amiryousefi et al., 2018).
Phylogenetic Analysis
Phylogenetic analysis was performed using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI). ML analysis was conducted using RAxML v.8.2.104 (Stamatakis, 2014). The best model was determined by the model test-ng-0.1.6 software with a default parameter (Kozlov et al., 2019). The optimal model identified was GTR + I + G, which was used in both the ML and BI analyses. The robustness of the trees was estimated by bootstrap support (BS). Statistical support for nodes in ML analysis was estimated using 1,000 fast bootstrap replicates, each with three replicates of stepwise random taxon addition. A BS value of less than 50% was not included in the figures. The BI analysis was performed using MrBayes v3.0 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001). Four Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains (one cold and three heated), with MrBayes default heating values (t = 0.2), were run for 100,000 generations, each sampling every 100 generations. The first 250 trees were stationarily discarded as “burn-in.” The statistical confidence in nodes was estimated by posterior probabilities (PP). A PP value of less than 0.9 was not included in the figures.
Ancestral State Reconstruction
Two data matrixes, complete cp genome sequence data and concatenated non-protein coding data, were used to trace the ancestral states of genome size on the phylogenetic tree using weighted squared-change parsimony in the software Mesquite v2.5 (Maddison and Maddison, 2021). Weighted squared-change parsimony minimizes the sum of squared change along all branches of the tree, weighting branches by their length (Finarelli and Flynn, 2006). The evolutionary history of the two selected data characters was mapped over the single best ML tree based on complete cp genome sequences.
Divergence Dating
Divergence times with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using the Bayesian relaxed molecular clock method, implemented in BEAST v1.4.6 (Drummond and Rambaut, 2007). Calibration points were performed using a relaxed uncorrelated lognormal molecular clock. A complete cp genome sequence dataset was used to conduct the BEAST analysis. The lack of fossils for Triticeae precluded the direct calibration of tree topologies. Instead, dating was based on the divergence time for the basal-most split in Triticeae (Marcussen et al., 2014). Priors on Triticeae crown age (15.32 Ma ± 0.34) were set as inferred by Marcussen et al. (2014), where several macrofossils from grass (Festuca, Berriochloa, and Nassella) were used to calibrate the age of Triticeae. Tracer v1.4 (Rambaut and Drummond, 2018) was used to ensure the convergence of mixing in terms of effective sample size (ESS) values and coefficient rate. The results will be accepted if the values of the estimated sample size were larger than 200, suggesting little autocorrelation between samples. The resultant trees were analyzed using TreeAnnotator in BEAST where the “burn-in” (2,000 trees) was removed, and a maximum credibility tree was constructed. The trees were then viewed in FigTree v. 1.3.1.1
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by using the R software. Data statistics of the complete cp genome, protein coding region, and non-protein coding region of each clade were compared with Boxplot. Kruskal–Wallis test was performed on the complete cp genome, protein coding region, and non-protein coding region to determine significant differences among the clades. The relationship between divergence time and indel amount was evaluated by using Spearman’s correlation coefficient test.
Results
Phylogeny of the Triticeae Species
Chloroplast genomes contain an abundance of phylogenetic information, which has been widely used for phylogeny reconstruction at different taxonomic levels, such as order, family, genus, and species, in plants. Using chloroplast genome data, long-standing controversies related to various phylogenetically difficult groups have been resolved, supporting its importance in systematic studies. To better determine the phylogenetic position of Triticeae and further clarify the evolutionary relationships within the Triticeae tribe, phylogenetic analyses were constructed based on the 34 complete chloroplast genomes using B. distachyon as an outgroup. Phylogenetic reconstruction based on complete cp genome data resulted in a tree with high posterior probability support across most clades (Figure 1A). The ML and Bayesian analyses of complete cp genome data generated the same tree topology with BS >50% above and PP >0.9 below branches (Figure 1A). The tree illustrated that four clades (I–IV) were recognized. Clade I included the Aegilops/Triticum complex, Taeniatherum (Ta), Secale (R), Crithopsis (K), and Herteranthelium (Q), all of which are members of Mediterranean Triticeae. Clade II contained Pseudoroegneria (St), Dasypyrum (V), Lophopyrum (Ee), and Thinopyrum (Eb). Clade III consisted of Eremopyrum (F and Xe), Agropyron (P), Australopyrum (W), and Henradia (O). Clade IV comprised the Hordeum (H and I) species.
General Variation of Chloroplast Genomes in Triticeae Species
The complete genome size of 34 cp genomes in Triticeae ranged from 135,003 (Thinopyrum bessarabicum) to 136,968 bp (Hordeum bogdanii), and non-protein coding region size from 75,694 (T. bessarabicum) to 77,672 bp (H. bogdanii). The level of sequence divergence among the 34 cp genomes was compared using the mVISTA program. We found that non-protein coding regions were more highly variable than protein coding regions, and IRs had lower sequence divergence than SC regions (Supplementary Figure 1). Otherwise, large hotspot variation regions were detected in petN–rpoB, rbcL–psaI, and rpl23–ndhB. Gene loss/pseudonization, indels in protein coding genes, intron variation, and IGS indels within the cp genomes were characterized and mapped on branches of the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1A) of the Triticeae species based on complete plastid genomes (Figure 1B). One of the mutation events occurred between the rbcL gene and the psaI gene in the LSC region (Supplementary Figure 2). This region primarily contains the rpl23 gene, the accD gene, and intergenic regions. The rpl23 and accD genes were completely absent in A. cristatum, Agropyron mongolicum, Ere. triticum, Ere. distant, Australopyrum retrofractum, Henradia persica, and Aegilops tauschii. Within this region, the absence of a long IGS and the accD gene was also detected in Aegilops speltoides and Triticum monococcum ssp. aegilopoides (Supplementary Figure 3). Another gene loss event was identified between the trnL gene and the trnI gene in the IRs region (Supplementary Figure 4). These deletion regions primarily contain a ycf2 gene fragment, the ycf15 gene, and intergenic regions, and occurred in Pseudoroegneria spicata, P. libanotica, T. bessarabicum, Lophopyrum elongatum, and Dasypyrum villosum, which were grouped in clade II (Figure 1). A hot variation region was also found in the non-protein coding regions. All species in Clade II had a 529-bp deletion between the petN and trnC genes in LSC (Supplementary Figure 5). All species in clade III, A. speltoides, Aegilops speltoides ssp. ligustica and T. monococcum ssp. aegilopoides, had a 438-bp deletion between psbE and petL in LSC (Supplementary Figure 6). All species in Clade I and Hordeum jubatum contained a 172-bp deletion between trnT and trnE in LSC.
Highly Divergent Genes
The total number of protein coding genes was 76 in each cp genome of the Triticeae species. Nucleotide divergence occurred in the coding regions of rpoC2, rps3, rpl22, matK, ycf1, rps16, rpoC1, ndhH, atpF, rpl16, rpl32, ndhA, psbB, ycf3, and infA. Among these, the rpoC2 gene has a 6-bp insertion fragment in the species clustered in clades I and II, and a 42-bp insertion fragment in D. villosum (Supplementary Figures 7, 8). The Rps3 gene in H. bogdanii has a 45-bp deletion (Supplementary Figure 9). The InfA gene had a deletion of two different 18-bp fragments in L. elongatum, S. cereale, and H. jubatum (Supplementary Figures 10, 11). A 15-bp deletion in the rpl22 gene was found in L. elongatum (Supplementary Figure 12).
Inverted Repeat Contraction/Expansion
The most common events underlying changes in the plastome size of land plants included the contraction/expansion of IR. Land plants have a highly conserved chloroplast genome, but four junctions (LSC/IRB/SSC/IRA) vary in genome size and could affect IR contraction and expansion (Saski et al., 2007; Choi and Park, 2015). All IR boundaries among the sampled monogenomic Triticeae species were in a similar location, but IR size varied from 20,806 (D. villosum) to 21,589 bp (Eremopyrum distans) because of variation in the size of pseudogenes ycf2 and ycf15. Because of a ∼800-bp deletion of ycf2 and ycf15 in the clade II species, IR size varied from 20,806 (D. villosum) to 20,866 bp (P. spicata), which was much smaller than that in the other Triticeae species (>21 kb) (Figure 2).
The LSC/IRb/SSC/IRa boundary regions were compared using IRscope (Figure 2). The LSC/IRb junction was between the rpl22 gene and the rps19 gene in 31 Triticeae species, and close to the rps19 gene in the plastomes of Aegilops markgrafii, Aegilops umbellulata, Aegilops umbellulata ssp. transcaucasica, Amblyopyrum muticum, D. villosum, H. jubatum, and T. monococcum ssp. aegilopoides, varying from 17 to 36 bp. The rpl22 gene in the LSC region was close to the LSC/IRb junction in 24 out of the 31 cp genomes and varied from 28 to 42 bp apart from the LSC/IRb junction. The Rpl2 gene in H. vulgare was in IR regions 54 bp away from the LSC/IRb junction, while the rpl2 gene in H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum was in the LSC region 5 bp away from the LSC/IRb junction. The distance between rps15 and the junction of the IRb/SSC region ranged from 13 to 480 bp (except rps15 in H. vulgare that crossed the junction of the IRb/SSC region). At the junction of the SSC/IRa region, the ndhH gene crossed the SSC/IRa boundary in all the genomes with 0–1,007 bp located in the SSC region. The rps19 gene was in the IRa region in 31 of the species 1–51 bp apart from the LSC/IRa junction. The rpl2 gene was located in the IRa region 590 bp apart from the LSC/IRa junction in H. vulgare, and in the LSC region 4 bp apart from the junction in H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum.
Ancestral State Reconstruction
Sizes of complete chloroplast genomes, protein coding sequences, and non-protein coding sequences in monogenomic Triticeae are shown in Table 2. The reconstruction of character evolution revealed that the sizes of complete cp genome sequences and non-protein coding sequences of the species within clades I and IV were gradually enlarged (Figure 3). The sizes of complete genome sequences ranged from 135,564 (S. cereale) to 136,886 bp (Triticum monococcum), and from 136,043 (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum) to 136,968 bp (H. bogdanii) for the species in clades I and IV, respectively, while the sizes of complete cp genome sequences of species within clades II and III were significantly smaller than those within clades I and IV, and ranged from 135,003 bp (T. bessarabicum) to 135,249 bp (D. villosum) in clade II, and from 135,417 (A. retrofractum) to 135,659 bp (H. persica) in clade III. The sizes of protein coding sequences varied from 58,302 (A. muticum) to 61,049 bp (T. monococcum ssp. aegilopoides); from 59,098 (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum) to 59,360 bp (H. jubatum); from 59,309 (T. bessarabicum) to 59,372 bp (D. villosum); and from 59,271 (Eremopyrum tririceum) to 59,341 bp (E. distans) for the species within clades I, IV, II, and III, respectively.
TABLE 2.
No. | Species | Chloroplast genome size (bp) | Non-coding size (bp) | Coding size (bp) | Clade |
KJ614418 | Aegilops bicornis | 136,861 | 77,543 | 59,318 | Clade I |
KJ614416 | Aegilops longissima | 136,875 | 77,557 | 59,318 | Clade I |
KY636033 | Aegilops markgrafii | 136,063 | 76,745 | 59,318 | Clade I |
KJ614413 | Aegilops searsii | 136,870 | 77,552 | 59,318 | Clade I |
KJ614419 | Aegilops sharonensis | 136,867 | 77,549 | 59,318 | Clade I |
KJ614406 | Aegilops speltoides | 135,652 | 76,334 | 59,318 | Clade I |
KJ614405 | Aegilops speltoides ssp. ligustica | 135,660 | 76,343 | 59,317 | Clade I |
KJ614412 | Aegilops tauschii | 135,568 | 76,250 | 59,318 | Clade I |
KY636059 | Aegilops umbellulata | 136,028 | 76,710 | 59,318 | Clade I |
KY636056 | Aegilops umbellulata ssp. transcaucasica | 136,031 | 76,713 | 59,318 | Clade I |
KY636075 | Amblyopyrum muticum | 135,787 | 77,485 | 58,302 | Clade I |
KC912691 | Secale cereale | 135,564 | 77,109 | 58,455 | Clade I |
MH285856 | Taeniatherum caput-medusae | 136,861 | 77,537 | 59,324 | Clade I |
LC005977 | Triticum monococcum | 136,886 | 77,568 | 59,318 | Clade I |
KC912692 | Triticum monococcum ssp. aegilopoides | 136,870 | 75,821 | 61,049 | Clade I |
KJ614411 | Triticum urartu | 136,865 | 77,547 | 59,318 | Clade I |
MH285849 | Crithopsis delileana | 136,436 | 77,109 | 59,327 | Clade I |
MH285854 | Heteranthelium piliferum | 136,768 | 77,490 | 59,278 | Clade I |
Average | 136,362 | 77,053 | 59,308 | ||
KX822019 | Pseudoroegneria libanotica | 135,026 | 75,711 | 59,315 | Clade II |
MH285855 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 135,165 | 75,854 | 59,311 | Clade II |
MH285850 | Dasypyrum villosum | 135,249 | 75,877 | 59,372 | Clade II |
MH331643 | Lophopyrum elongatum | 135,020 | 75,707 | 59,313 | Clade II |
MH331639 | Thinopyrum bessarabicum | 135,003 | 75,694 | 59,309 | Clade II |
Average | 135,093 | 75,769 | 59,324 | ||
KY126307 | Agropyron cristatum | 135,554 | 76,251 | 59,303 | Clade III |
MH285848 | Agropyron mongolicum | 135,547 | 76,244 | 59,303 | Clade III |
MH331642 | Australopyrum retrofractum | 135,417 | 76,114 | 59,303 | Clade III |
MH285851 | Eremopyrum distans | 135,589 | 76,248 | 59,341 | Clade III |
MH285852 | Eremopyrum tririceum | 135,554 | 76,283 | 59,271 | Clade III |
MH285853 | Henradia persica | 135,659 | 76,353 | 59,306 | Clade III |
Average | 135,553 | 76,249 | 59,305 | ||
MH331641 | Hordeum bogdanii | 136,968 | 77,672 | 59,296 | Clade IV |
KM974741 | Hordeum jubatum | 136,826 | 77,466 | 59,360 | Clade IV |
EF115541 | Hordeum vulgare | 136,462 | 77,153 | 59,309 | Clade IV |
KC912689 | Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum | 136,043 | 76,945 | 59,098 | Clade IV |
Average | 136,575 | 77,309 | 59,266 |
Divergence Dating
Based on the complete cp genome sequences dataset, divergence times with 95% CI by using BEAST analyses generated a maternal time-calibrated tree (Figure 4). The divergence time was marked on 33 branch nodes within the ML tree. Time calibration analysis demonstrated that the time to the most recent common maternal ancestor of the Triticeae was dated to 27.63 MYA (95% CI). The maternal ancestor of Hordeum originated about 15.09 MYA (95% CI). The divergence time of maternal ancestor of species in clade III (Agropyron, Australopyrum, Henradia, and Eremopyrum) and clade II (Dasypyrum, Pseudoroegneria, Lophopyrum, and Thinopyrum) was dated to 17.16 MYA (95% CI) and 12.62 MYA (95% CI), respectively. The divergence time of the maternal ancestor of Aegilops/Triticum, Taeniatherum, Secale, Crithopsis, and Heteranthelium in clade I was 12.71 MYA (95% CI).
Statistical Analysis
The insertion and deletion of 33 divergence nodes of the phylogenomic tree are counted in Table 3. The divergence time was highly correlated with the number of variations (R = 0.87, p = 1.6e–10 < 0.05) (Figure 5A), as well as cp genome size and indel number (R = 0.37, p = 0.04) (Figure 5B). Therefore, both early and late divergence times might lead to a similar trend in the associated number of indels. The highest frequency of indels occurred about 5 MYA.
TABLE 3.
Node | Divergence time (MYA) | Indel | CP genome size |
1 | 0.66 | 28 | 136,030 |
2 | 0.65 | 77 | 135,925 |
3 | 0.84 | 115 | 135,977 |
4 | 1.67 | 182 | 136,423 |
5 | 0.03 | – | 136,873 |
6 | 0.33 | 14 | 136,871 |
7 | 1.12 | 20 | 136,868 |
8 | 2.1 | 258 | 136,328 |
9 | 7.85 | 413 | 136,464 |
10 | 0.13 | 122 | 136,878 |
11 | 0.41 | 156 | 136,874 |
12 | 8.12 | 513 | 136,383 |
13 | 0.12 | – | 135,656 |
14 | 2.22 | 143 | 136,058 |
15 | 8.98 | 625 | 136,332 |
16 | 12.4 | 656 | 136,338 |
17 | 12.71 | 780 | 136,362 |
18 | 2.27 | 71 | 135,012 |
19 | 3.19 | 178 | 135,091 |
20 | 3.89 | 190 | 135,075 |
21 | 12.62 | 226 | 135,093 |
22 | 20.49 | 977 | 136,086 |
23 | 0.85 | 39 | 135,551 |
24 | 13 | 190 | 135,561 |
25 | 4.7 | 101 | 135,572 |
26 | 13.29 | 269 | 135,532 |
27 | 17.16 | 360 | 135,553 |
28 | 21.18 | 1,239 | 135,976 |
29 | 8.7 | 51 | 136,253 |
30 | 6.37 | 139 | 136,804 |
31 | 15.09 | 343 | 136,528 |
32 | 27.03 | 1,568 | 136,043 |
33 | 27.63 | 1,702 | 136,059 |
The sizes of complete genome sequences and non-protein coding sequences of the species within clades I (Triticum/Aegilops) and IV (Hordeum) were significantly larger than those of the species within clades II (St/E/V genomes) and III (P/F/Xe/W/O genomes) (Figures 6A,C). However, the sizes of the protein coding sequences among these species were not significantly different (Figure 6B). The average sizes of complete cp genome sequences of the species within clades I–IV were 136,362, 135,093, 135,553, and 136,575 bp (Figure 6A), and protein-coding gene sequences were 59,308, 59,324, 59,305, and 59,266 bp (Figure 6B), respectively.
Discussion
Plastome size variations within major lineages are mainly attributable to a combination of three factors: differences in length of intergenic regions, changes in intron content, and contraction/expansion of IRs, which resulted in cp genome size ranging from 115 to 165 kb in the length of angiosperms (Raubeson and Jansen, 2005; Brouard et al., 2010; Wicke et al., 2011; Smith et al., 2013; Turmel et al., 2017). Previous studies have shown that the size of the cp genome of Triticeae species ranged from 134 to 137 kb (Gornicki et al., 2014; Middleton et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2017). The intergenic regions, which represent up to 68% of the genome, contribute to most of the observed genome size variation (Turmel et al., 2015). Our ancestral genome reconstruction suggests that major rearrangements occurred in four branches (clades I–IV) of monogenomic Triticeae followed by minor independent rearrangements in each genus. The sizes of complete genome sequences of the species within clades I (Triticum/Aegilops complex, Taeniatherum, Secale, Crithopsis, and Herteranthelium) and IV (Hordeum) were significantly larger than those of within clades II (Pseudoroegneria, Dasypyrum, Lophopyrum, and Thinopyrum) and III (Agropyron, Australopyrum, Eremopyrum, and Henradia).
The amounts of IGSs showed extensive fluctuations and were attributed to major plastome size variation among the 34 taxa studied (Figures 3, 6), such as the 529-bp deletion between the petN gene and the trnC gene (Supplementary Figure 5) in the species within the clade II (Pseudoroegneria, Dasypyrum, Lophopyrum, and Thinopyrum), and the 438-bp deletion between psbE and petL in the species within clade III (Agropyron, Australopyrum, Eremopyrum, and Henradia) (Supplementary Figure 6). These deletions might occur in the ancestral plastid genomes of species in clades II and III, inherited by and maintained in their offspring species. Variations in intergenic regions do not affect protein function and structure but cause variations in chloroplast genomes’ size. Intergenic regions in the cp genome have been utilized for systematic studies in diverse plants because they provide a wealth of information for distinguishing different species, such as trnL–trnF and trnH–psbA (Sha et al., 2014; Sevindik et al., 2021). Therefore, these intergenic regions (like petN–trnC and psbE–petL) can be used as an important tool to identify the maternal relationship among Triticeae species in the future.
The amount of introns, such as the intron of atpF (Supplementary Figure 16) and the intron of rpl16 (Supplementary Figure 17), also showed extensive changes, in LSC, but no obvious patterns can be discerned in a phylogenetic context. The size variations in those introns were most likely the consequence of non-adaptive processes. However, random genetic drift might also play a central role in the shaping of plastome architecture (Smith, 2016).
Inverted repeat expansion and contraction were mostly associated with cp genome size variation (McCoy et al., 2008; Wu et al., 2009). Expansion and contraction in IRs of chloroplast genomes have been widely reported in various kinds of plants (Krause, 2011; Weng et al., 2014; Schwarz et al., 2015; Shrestha et al., 2019; He et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2021). We also found that cp genomes in the 34 Triticeae species exhibited obvious different IR sizes. A ∼800-bp length variation in IR was detected between trnI and trnL, which mainly contained pseudogenes ycf2 and ycf15. Wu et al. (2017) suggested that this deletion in the cp of P. libanotica was specific in Triticeae species. We confirmed that the loss of pseudogenes ycf2 and ycf15 occurred in the cp of Pseudoroegneria, Dasypyrum, Lophopyrum, and Thinopyrum. The Lophopyrum, Thinopyrum, and Dasypyrum genomes contributed a cytoplasm genome to the Pseudoroegneria species as a result of incomplete lineage sorting and/or chloroplast capture (Chen et al., 2020). A maternal donor of the species in clade II might have lost pseudogenes ycf2, ycf15, and adjacent gene spacers, and genetically transmitted to their offspring, leading to the IR size variation that ranged from 20,806 (D. villosum) to 20,866 bp (P. spicata), which was smaller than that in the other Triticeae species (>21 kb) (Figure 2). In some plants, ycf2-encoded protein and five related nuclear-encoded FtsH comprised a 2-MD complex, which can promote ATP synthesis (Kikuchi et al., 2018). The disappearance of ycf2 might indicate that this function region has been transferred to a nuclear genome. Wu et al. (2017) found that this deletion was exactly similar (identities = 99%) to a genomic scaffold of chromosome 3B of T. aestivum, and that it possesses high similarity (identify = 98%) with cp sequences in Pooideae species, but the specific function is still unknown. Although many species in different lineages contain an intact ycf15 gene (encoding the beta subunit of acetyl-CoA carboxylase complex) and have been annotated in several sequenced chloroplast genomes, e.g., several Asterids, Magnolia (Kuang et al., 2011), and Piper (Cai et al., 2006), it is almost impossible to determine whether this gene is able to encode a functional protein or how it has evolved in angiosperms so far. The gene was first identified in the Nicotiana chloroplast genome (Shinozaki et al., 1986), and its similar expression was also reported in Solanaceae chloroplasts (Legen et al., 2002). However, the validity of ycf15 as a protein-coding gene has long been questioned (Steane, 2005; Chumley et al., 2006). Its function was disabled in some basal angiosperms such, as Amborella (Goremykin et al., 2003) and Nuphar (Raubeson et al., 2007), monocots, most rosids, and some species in other lineages. It has been wholly lost in some other lineages, such as Illicium, Acorus, Ceratophyllum, and Ranunculus during their evolution processes. Transcriptome analyses revealed that ycf15 has transcribed as a precursor polycistronic transcript that contained ycf2, ycf15, and antisense trnL-CAA. Pseudogene ycf15 was mapped by multiple transcripts, which suggested that plastid DNA posttranscriptional splicing might involve a complex cleavage of non-functional genes (Shi et al., 2013).
A similar pseudogenetic elimination also occurred in the LSC of clade III species (Agropyron, Eremopyrum, Australopyrum, and Henradia), such as the rpl23 pseudogene copy and the accD pseudogene between the rbcL gene and the psaI gene (Supplementary Figure 2). In the grass plastome, the rpl23 gene is originally located in the IR region and encodes the functional ribosomal protein L23. Present studies have indicated that rpl23 has been non-reciprocally translocated to a region downstream from rbcL (Bowman et al., 1988; Ogihara et al., 1988; He et al., 2017; Lencina et al., 2019). A non-reciprocal translocation of the rpl23 gene occurred during the differentiation of Poaceae from its unknown ancestor (Katayama and Ogihara, 1996). In this study, we detected only ∼260 bp of rpl23 at the 3′ end (complete gene size was 282 bp), which was inserted into the region between rbcL and psaI within the LSC of Triticeae species (except for Aegilops tauschii, Agropyron, Australopyrum, Eremopyrum, Henradia, and S. cereale). Meanwhile, sequence analysis detected another inserted pseudogene accD in this region, which is situated downstream of rpl23. In angiosperms, the accD gene encodes the protein of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase subunit D in the plastome. It is notable that the loss of accD is associated with hotspots of rearrangements in each of the families, introducing sensitivity to the herbicides quizalofop and sethoxydim (Konishi and Sasaki, 1994), and causing an alteration of lipid metabolism in the plants. The loss of the accD gene had been found in four lineages of angiosperms, such as grasses (Hiratsuka et al., 1989; Maier et al., 1995; Katayama and Ogihara, 1996), Campanulaceae (Cosner et al., 1997), Geraniaceae (Palmer et al., 1987; Chumley et al., 2006), and Aroideae (Henriquez et al., 2021). Katayama and Ogihara (1996) considered accD loss prior to the divergence of the Poales. However, previous studies have shown the absence of the accD pseudogene in at least one species of Triticeae (Ogihara et al., 2002), and the presence of the accD pseudogene of up to 349 bp in Secale of the Triticeae species (Aagesen et al., 2005). The highly varied pattern of accD pseudogene presence or gene absence in members of the restiid and graminid clades might be due to the pseudogene being carried as the ancestral state throughout most of the divergence of the Poales (Harris et al., 2013). The mechanism for the insertion of variable sizes in this region is uncertain. In this study, the absence of the accD gene was only detected in species of clade III, A. speltoides, and A. tauschii in Triticeae (Supplementary Figure 3). The accD gene loss might accelerate gene relocations by unknown mechanisms, and various movements of genes might induce the sequential loss of accD (Lee et al., 2007).
The monogenomic Triticeae was diverged about 12–15 MYA to generate lineages, resulting in four branches of plastome species. Our ancestral genome reconstruction suggests that ancestral plastome species of clades II and III lost redundant sequences during divergence from Triticeae. The cp DNA sizes of species in the clades II and III (Pseudoroegneria, Dasypyrum, Eremopyrum, Lophopyrum, Thinopyrum, Agropyron, Australopyrum, and Henradia) evolved toward size reduction (Figures 3, 6) because of elimination of pseudogene and loss of long fragments (>200 bp) in IGS. Compared with species in clades II and III, the cp genomes of species in clades I and IV (Aegilops/Triticum complex, Taeniatherum, Secale, Crithopsis, Herteranthelium, and Hordeum) had larger cp genome size, and retained the invalid genes and lots of redundant fragments of IGS (Figures 3, 6). The cpDNA size reduction in the species of clades II and III (Pseudoroegneria, Dasypyrum, Eremopyrum, Lophopyrum, Thinopyrum, Agropyron, Australopyrum, and Henradia) might increase the efficiency of genome replication. Genome reduction is speculated to be the result of a low-cost strategy that could facilitate rapid genome replication under disadvantageous environmental conditions (McCoy et al., 2008; Wu et al., 2009). The retained pseudogenes and replicates might participate in some nucleo-plasmic interactions to promote gene function. Although the accD, ycf2, and ycf15 genes had been lost from the plastid genome several times in angiosperms, their functions were fulfilled by nuclear copies (Nakkaew et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2017).
Environmental conditions were thought to influence organelle DNA architecture. For example, plastid genomic compaction in the endolithic ulvophyte seaweed (Ostreobium quekettii) and the palmophylalean green alga (Verdigellas peltata) was caused primarily by adaptation to low light conditions (Marcelino et al., 2016). The large size variation in major lineages and their subclades is most likely the consequence of adaptive processes since those variations are highly positively correlated with divergence time (Figure 5). Plastid genomes smaller than 120,000 bp were detected mostly in non-photosynthetic angiosperms that had a deletion of several genes during their diversification (Wicke et al., 2011, 2016). The diversification of high plant species has been found to be strongly linked to climate fluctuations (Jaramillo et al., 2006; Hoorn et al., 2010). During the late Miocene (5–10 MYA), the atmospheric CO2 level was decreased to the bottom after the mid-Miocene climate optimum (14–16 MYA) (Tripati et al., 2009), resulting in climate change from greenhouse to the icehouse. In order to adapt to an extremely cold and low CO2 concentration climate, most species will reduce metabolism to maintain survival, and correspondingly, the expression of genes related to photosynthesis would be reduced, since CO2 is required for photosynthesis. The species in the clade I from genera Aegilops, Triticum, Secale, Taeniatherum, Crithopsis, and Heteranthelium were restrictedly distributed in the Mediterranean and adjacent regions (Sakamoto, 1973; Hsiao et al., 1995), where there are hot, dry environments such as the deserts of Mediterranean regions. The sizes of complete cp genome and non-protein coding sequences in Mediterranean lineage were larger than those of other genera as the ancestral species evolved and diverged 0.03–12.71 MYA (Figure 3), and variations appeared most frequently about 5 MYA (Figure 5). The main diversification of Mediterranean lineage in Triticeae occurred about 9 MYA when Mediterranean climates are thought to have arisen. In the late Miocene, when atmospheric CO2 concentrations and temperatures were extremely low, the Mediterranean climate undoubtedly provided a good shelter for some plants. The development of the Mediterranean climate can be seen as the opening of a new and novel climatic niche, to which lineages have adapted and speciated, by accumulating morphological change in other climate zones (Yesson and Culham, 2006). It is, thus, likely that climate oscillations during the late Miocene, especially the establishment of the Mediterranean climate, might have promoted the Mediterranean lineage of Triticeae rapid diversification and adaptation, and have continued to diversify from the Quaternary to the present (Fan et al., 2013), which resulted in plastid genome and nuclear genome change to adapt to climate oscillations. We suggested that the dynamically reduced/enlarged cpDNAs of Triticeae might result from the adaptation to historical climate changes. However, we still need more molecular evidence to determine the role of natural selection in chloroplast genome evolution during the diversification of Triticeae.
Conclusion
In this study, we detected gene loss/pseudonization, indels, and intron variation, variation in cp genome sequence size, and expansion/contraction in IRs among 34 chloroplast genomes of monogenomic Triticeae species. We found that the cp genome sequence size variation was mainly caused by the size of non-protein coding sequences. The monogenomic Triticeae diverged about 12–15 MYA, which resulted in four stem branches of plastome species. Losses of a series of invalid genes or sequence fragments have no effect on genomic function in these plants, which might be an evolutionary mechanism to increase the efficiency of genome replication. According to the distribution and habitat of the species, the species in the Mediterranean region (in clade I, Aegilops/Triticum complex, Taeniatherum, Secale, Crithopsis, and Herteranthelium) might have experienced the change in the Mediterranean climate and expanded the cp genome significantly. Our results enhance the understanding of the complexity and evolution of Triticeae cp DNAs.
Data Availability Statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: the chloroplast genome sequences in this study, KJ614418, KJ614416, KY636033, KJ614413, KJ614419, KJ614406, KJ614405, KJ614412, KY636059, KY636056, KY126307, MH285848, KY636075, MH331642, MH285849, MH285850, MH285851, MH285852, MH285853, MH285854, MH331641, KM974741, EF115541, KC912689, MH331643, MH331640, KX822019, MH285855, KC912691, MH285856, MH331639, LC005977, KC912692, KJ614411, and EU325680 are available in NCBI.
Author Contributions
NC and XF designed the experiments. NC carried out the experiments, analyzed the experimental results and data, and developed the analysis tools. L-NS, Y-LW, L-JY, YZ, YW, D-DW, H-YK, H-QZ, Y-HZ, and G-LS assisted in writing the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to the American National Plant Germplasm System (Pullman, WA, United States) for providing the part seed materials.
Abbreviations
- Cp
chloroplast
- Ir
inverted repeat
- Lsc
large-single-copy
- Ssc
small single copy
- Igs
intergenic region sequence
- Ml
maximum likelihood
- Bi
Bayesian inference
- Mcmc
Markov Chain Monte Carlo
- Bs
bootstrapping.
Footnotes
Funding
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31870360) and the Second Tibetan Plateau Science Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (No. 2019QZKK0303).
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.741063/full#supplementary-material
References
- Aagesen L., Petersen G., Seberg O. (2005). Sequence length variation, indel costs, and congruence in sensitivity analysis. Cladistics 21 15–30. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00053.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amiryousefi A., Hyvonen J., Poczai P. (2018). IRscope: an online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes. Bioinformatics 34 3030–3031. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barkworth M. E. (1998). Grasses of the Tribe Hordeae in North America. 3. Comments. Botanical Electronic News 199. Avaliable online at: https://www.ou.edu/cas/botany-micro/ben/ben199.html. [Google Scholar]
- Bedoya A. M., Ruhfel B. R., Philbrick C. T., Madriñán S., Bove C. P., Mesterházy A., et al. (2019). Plastid genomes of five species of riverweeds (Podostemaceae): structural organization and comparative analysis in Malpighiales. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1035. 10.3389/fpls.2019.01035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birky C. W., Maruyama T., Fuerst P. (1983). An approach to population and evolutionary genetic theory for genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts, and some results. Genetics 103 513–527. 10.1093/genetics/103.3.513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bortiri E., Coleman-Derr D., Lazo G. R., Anderson O. D., Gu Y. Q. (2008). The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Brachypodium distachyon: sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis of eight grass plastomes. BMC Res. Notes 1:61. 10.1186/1756-0500-1-61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowman C. M., Barker R. F., Dyer T. A. (1988). In wheat ctDNA, segments of ribosomal protein genes are dispersed repeats, probably conserved by nonreciprocal recombination. Curr. Genet. 14 127–136. 10.1007/BF00569336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brouard J. S., Otis C., Lemieux C., Turmel M. (2010). The exceptionally large chloroplast genome of the green alga Floydiella terrestris illuminates the evolutionary history of the Chlorophyceae. Genome Biol. Evol. 2 240–256. 10.1093/gbe/evq014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cai Z., Penaflor C., Kuehl J. V., Leebens-Mack J., Carlson J. E., Claude W. D., et al. (2006). Complete plastid genome sequences of Drimys, Liriodendron, and Piper: implications for the phylogenetic relationships of magnoliids. BMC Evol. Biol. 6:77. 10.1186/1471-2148-6-77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen N., Chen W. J., Yan H., Wang Y., Kang H. Y., Zhang H. Q., et al. (2020). Evolutionary patterns of plastome uncover diploid-polyploid maternal relationships in Triticeae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 149:106838. 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106838 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen N., Sha L. N., Dong Z. Z., Tang C., Wang Y., Kang H. Y., et al. (2017). Complete structure and variation of the chloroplast genome of Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. Gene 640 86–96. 10.1016/j.gene.2017.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi K. S., Park S. J. (2015). The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Aster spathulifolius, (Asteraceae); genomic features and relationship with Asteraceae. Gene 572 214–221. 10.1016/j.gene.2015.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chumley T. W., Palmer J. D., Mower J. P., Fourcade H. M., Calie P. J., Boore J. L., et al. (2006). The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pelargonium× hortorum: organization and evolution of the largest and most highly rearranged chloroplast genome of land plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 2175–2190. 10.1093/molbev/msl089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cosner M. E., Jansen R. K., Palmer J. D., Downie S. R. (1997). The highly rearranged chloroplast genome of Trachelium caeruleum Cam-panulaceae: multiple inversions, inverted repeat expansion and contraction, transposition, insertions/deletions, and several repeat families. Curr Genet. 31 419–429. 10.1007/s002940050225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dewey D. R. (1984). “The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennial Triticeae,” in Gene Manipulation in Plant Improvement, ed. Gustafson J. P. (New York, NY: Columbia University Press; ), 209–279. [Google Scholar]
- Drummond A. J., Rambaut A. (2007). BEAST: bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:54. 10.1186/s12879-015-0770-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan X., Sha L. N., Yu S. B., Wu D. D., Chen X. H., Zhuo X. F., et al. (2013). Phylogenetic reconstruction and diversification of the Triticeae (Poaceae) based on single-copy nuclear Acc1 and Pgk1 gene data. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 50 346–360. 10.1016/j.bse.2013.05.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Finarelli J. A., Flynn J. J. (2006). Ancestral state reconstruction of body size in the Caniformia (Carnivora, Mammalia): the effects of incorporating data from the fossil record. Syst. Biol. 55 301–313. 10.1080/10635150500541698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frazer K. A., Pachter L., Poliakov A., Rubin E. M., Dubchak I. (2004). VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Suppl._2), W273–W279. 10.1093/nar/gkh458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goremykin V. V., Hirsch-Ernst K. I., Wölfl S., Hellwig F. H. (2003). Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 1499–1505. 10.1093/molbev/msg159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gornicki P., Zhu H., Wang J., Challa G. S., Zhang Z., Gill B. S., et al. (2014). The chloroplast view of the evolution of polyploid wheat. New Phytol. 204 704–714. 10.1111/nph.12931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo Y. Y., Yang J. X., Bai M. Z., Zhang G. Q., Liu Z. J. (2021). The chloroplast genome evolution of Venus slipper (Paphiopedilum): IR expansion, SSC contraction, and highly rearranged SSC regions. BMC Plant Biol. 21:248. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-257472/v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris M. E., Meyer G., Vandergon T., Vandergon V. O. (2013). Loss of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase (accD) gene in Poales. Plant Mol/Biol. Rep. 31 21–31. 10.1007/s11105-012-0461-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- He L., Qian J., Li X., Sun Z., Xu X., Chen S. (2017). Complete chloroplast genome of medicinal plant Lonicera japonica: genome rearrangement, intron gain and loss, and implications for phylogenetic studies. Molecules 22:249. 10.3390/molecules22020249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He S., Yang Y., Li Z., Wang X., Guo Y., Wu H. (2020). Comparative analysis of four Zantedeschia chloroplast genomes: expansion and contraction of the IR region, phylogenetic analyses and SSR genetic diversity assessment. PeerJ 8:e9132. 10.7717/peerj.9132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henriquez C. L., Mehmood F., Hayat A., Sammad A., Waseem S., Waheed M. T., et al. (2021). Chloroplast genome evolution in the Dracunculus clade (Aroideae, Araceae). Genomics 113 183–192. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiratsuka J., Shimada H., Whittier R., Ishibashi T., Sakamoto M., Mori M., et al. (1989). The complete sequence of the rice Oryza sativa chloroplast genome—intermolecular recombination between distinct transfer-RNA genes accounts for a major plastid DNA inversion during the evolution of the cereals. Mol. Gen. Genet. 217 185–194. 10.1007/BF02464880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoorn C., Wesselingh F. P., ter Steege H., Bermudez M. A., Mora A., Sevink, et al. (2010). Amazonia through time: andean uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity. Science 330 927–931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoot S. B., Palmer J. D. (1994). Structural rearrangements, including parallel inversions, within the chloroplast genome of Anemone and related genera. J. Mol. Evol. 38 274–281. 10.1007/BF00176089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsiao C., Chatterton N. J., Asay K. H., Jensen K. B. (1995). Phylogenetic relationships of the monogenomic species of the wheat tribe, Triticeae (Poaceae), inferred from nuclear rDNA (internal transcribed spacer) sequences. Genome 38 211–223. 10.1139/g95-026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Y. Y., Cho S. T., Haryono M., Kuo C. H. (2017). Complete chloroplast genome sequence of common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.) and comparative analysis within the family Poaceae. PLoS One 12:e0179055. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huelsenbeck J. P., Ronquist F. (2001). MRBAYES: bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 754–755. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jansen R. K., Wojciechowski M. F., Sanniyasi E., Lee S. B., Daniell H. (2008). Complete plastid genome sequence of the chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and the phylogenetic distribution of rps12 and clpP intron losses among legumes (Leguminosae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48 1204–1217. 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.06.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaramillo C., Rueda M. J., Mora G. (2006). Cenozoic plant diversity in the Neotropics. Science 311 1893–1896. 10.1126/science.1121380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katayama H., Ogihara Y. (1996). Phylogenetic affinities of the grasses to other monocots as revealed by molecular analysis of chloroplast DNA. Curr. Genet. 29 572–581. 10.1007/BF02426962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh K., Toh H. (2010). Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics 26 1899–1900. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kellogg E. A., Appels R., Mason-Gamer R. J. (1996). When genes tell different stories: the diploid genera of Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Bot. 21 321–347. 10.2307/2419662 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kikuchi S., Asakura Y., Imai M., Nakahira Y., Kotani Y., Hashiguchi Y., et al. (2018). A Ycf2-FtsHi heteromeric AAA-ATPase complex is required for chloroplast protein import. Plant Cell 30 2677–2703. 10.1105/tpc.18.00357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Konishi T., Sasaki Y. (1994). Compartmentalization of two forms of acetyl CoA carboxylase in plants and the origin of their tolerance toward herbicides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91 3598–3601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozlov A. M., Darriba D., Flouri T., Morel B., Stamatakis A. (2019). RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35 4453–4455. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krause K. (2011). Piecing together the puzzle of parasitic plant plastome evolution. Planta 234 647–656. 10.1007/s00425-011-1494-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuang D. Y., Wu H., Wang Y. L., Gao L. M., Zhang S. Z., Lu L. (2011). Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Magnolia kwangsiensis (Magnoliaceae): implication for DNA barcoding and population genetics. Genome 54 663–673. 10.1139/g11-026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kugita M., Kaneko A., Yamamoto Y., Takeya Y., Matsumoto T., Yoshinaga K. (2003). The complete nucleotide sequence of thehornwort (Anthoceros formosae) chloroplast genome: insight intothe earliest land plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 716–721. 10.1093/NAR/GKG155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee H. L., Jansen R. K., Chumley T. W., Kim K. J. (2007). Gene relocations within chloroplast genomes of Jasminum and Menodora (Oleaceae) are due to multiple, overlapping inversions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 1161–1180. 10.1093/molbev/msm036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Legen J., Kemp S., Krause K., Profanter B., Herrmann R. G., Maier R. M. (2002). Comparative analysis of plastid transcription profiles of entire plastid chromosomes from tobacco attributed to wild-type and PEP-deficient transcription machineries. Plant J. 31 171–188. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01349.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lencina F., Landau A. M., Petterson M. E., Pacheco M. G., Kobayashi K., Prina A. R. (2019). The rpl23 gene and pseudogene are hotspots of illegitimate recombination in barley chloroplast mutator seedlings. Sci. Rep. 9 1–13. 10.1038/s41598-019-46321-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Löve Á. (1984). Conspectus of the Triticeae. Feddes Rep. 95 425–521. 10.1002/fedr.4910950702 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Maddison W. P., Maddison D. R. (2021). Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 3.7. Avaliable online at: http://mesquiteproject.org. [Google Scholar]
- Maier R. M., Neckermann K., Igloi G. L., Kossel H. (1995). Complete sequence of the maize chloroplast genome-gene content, hotspots of divergence and fine-tuning of genetic information by transcript editing. J. Mol. Biol. 251 614–628. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marcelino V. R., Cremen M. C. M., Jackson C. J., Larkum A. W., Verbruggen H. (2016). Evolutionary dynamics of chloroplast genomes in low light: a case study of the endolithic green alga Ostreobium quekettii. Genome Biol. Evol. 8 2939–2951. 10.1093/gbe/evw206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marcussen T., Sandve S. R., Heier L., Spannagl M., Pfeifer M., Jakobsen K. S., et al. (2014). Ancient hybridizations among the ancestral genomes of bread wheat. Science 345:1250092. 10.1126/science.1250092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin T., Oswald O., Graham I. A. (2002). Arabidopsis seedling growth, storage lipid mobilization and photosynthetic gene expression are regulated by carbon: nitrogen availability. Plant Physiol. 128 472–481. 10.1104/pp.010475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsuoka T., Omata K., Kanda H., Tachi K. (2002). “A study of wave energy conversion systems using ball screws– Comparison of output characteristics of the fixed type and the floating type,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore and Polar Engineering, Kitakyushu, 581–585. [Google Scholar]
- McCoy S. R., Kuehl J. V., Boore J. L., Raubeson L. A. (2008). The complete plastid genome sequence of Welwitschia mirabilis: an unusually compact plastome with accelerated divergence rates. BMC Evol. Biol. 8:130. 10.1186/1471-2148-8-130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Middleton C. P., Senerchia N., Stein N., Akhunov E. D., Keller B., Wicker T., et al. (2014). Sequencing of chloroplast genomes from wheat, barley, rye and their relatives provides a detailed insight into the evolution of the Triticeae tribe. PLoS One 9:e0085761. 10.1371/journal.pone.0085761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakkaew A., Chotigeat W., Eksomtramage T., Phongdara A. (2008). Cloning and expression of a plastid-encoded subunit, betacarboxyltransferase gene (accD) and a nuclear-encoded subunit biotin carboxylase of acetyl-CoA carboxylase from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Plant Sci. 175 497–504. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.05.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nock C. J., Waters D. L., Edwards M. A., Bowen S. G., Rice N., Cordeiro G. M., et al. (2011). Chloroplast genome sequences from total DNA for plant identification. Plant Biotechnol. J. 9 328–333. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00558.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogihara Y., Isono K., Kojima T., Endo A., Hanaoka M., Shiina T., et al. (2002). Structural features of a wheat plastome as revealed by complete sequencing of chloroplast DNA. Mol. GenGenom 266 740–746. 10.1007/s00438-001-0606-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogihara Y., Terachi T., Sasakuma T. (1988). Intramolecular recombination of chloroplast genome mediated by a short direct-repeat sequence in wheat species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85 8573–8577. 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer J. D. (1985). “Evolution of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA in plants and algae,” in Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, ed. MacIntyre R. (New York, NY: Plenum Press; ), 131–240. 10.1007/978-1-4684-4988-4_3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer J. D., Nugent J. M., Herbon L. A. (1987). Unusual structure of geranium chloroplast DNA—a triple-sized inverted repeat, extensive gene duplications, multiple inversions, and two repeat families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 843 769–773. 10.2307/28809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parks M., Cronn R., Liston A. (2009). Increasing phylogenetic resolution at low taxonomic levels using massively parallel sequencing of chloroplast genomes. BMC Biol. 7:84. 10.1186/1741-7007-7-84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rambaut A., Drummond A. J. (2018). Tracer v1. 4: MCMC Trace Analyses Tool. Avaliable online at: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer. [Google Scholar]
- Raubeson L. A., Peery R., Chumley T. W., Dziubek C., Fourcade H. M., Boore J. L., et al. (2007). Comparative chloroplast genomics: analyses including new sequences from the angiosperms Nuphar advena and Ranunculus macranthus. BMC Genomics 8:174. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raubeson L. A., Jansen R. K. (2005). “Chloroplast genomes of plants,” in Plant Diversity and Evolution: Genotypic and Phenotypic Variation in Higher Plants, Vol. 3 ed. Henry R. J. (Cambridge, MA: CABI; ), 45–68. 10.1079/9780851999043.0045 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Saarela J. M., Wysocki W. P., Barrett C. F., Soreng R. J., Davis J. I., Clark L. G., et al. (2015). Plastid phylogenomics of the cool-season grass subfamily: clarification of relationships among early-diverging tribes. AoB Plants 7:lv046. 10.1093/aobpla/plv046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakamoto S. (1973). Patterns of phylogenetic differentiation in the tribe Triticeae. Seiken Ziho 24 11–31. [Google Scholar]
- Saski C., Lee S. B., Fjellheim S., Guda C., Jansen R. K., Luo H., et al. (2007). Complete chloroplast genome sequences of Hordeum vulgare, Sorghum bicolor and Agrostis stolonifera, and comparative analyses with other grass genomes. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 115 571–590. 10.1007/s00122-007-0567-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz E. N., Ruhlman T. A., Sabir J. S., Hajrah N. H., Alharbi N. S., Al-Malki A. L., et al. (2015). Plastid genome sequences of legumes reveal parallel inversions and multiple losses of rps16 in papilionoids. J. Syst. Evol. 53 458–468. 10.1111/jse.12179 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sevindik E., Aydoan M., Yavuz M. (2021). Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Conringia Heist. Ex Fabr. (Brassicaceae) in Turkey based on nuclear (nrITS) and chloroplast (trnL-F) DNA sequences. Notulae Sci. Biol. 13:11034. 10.15835/nsb13311034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sha L., Fan X., Zhang H., Kang H., Wang Y., Wang X., et al. (2014). Phylogenetic relationships in Leymus (Triticeae; Poaceae): evidence from chloroplast trnH-psbA and mitochondria coxII intron sequences. J. Sys. Evol. 52 722–734. 10.1111/jse.12097 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shi C., Liu Y., Huang H., Xia E. H., Zhang H. B., Gao L. Z. (2013). Contradiction between plastid gene transcription and function due to complex posttranscriptional splicing: an exemplary study of ycf15 function and evolution in angiosperms. PLoS One 8:e0059620. 10.1371/journal.pone.0059620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shinozaki K., Ohme M., Tanaka M., Wakasugi T., Hayashida N., Matsubayashi T., et al. (1986). The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. EMBO J. 5 2043–2049. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04464.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shrestha B., Weng M. L., Theriot E. C., Gilbert L. E., Ruhlman T. A., Krosnick S. E., et al. (2019). Highly accelerated rates of genomic rearrangements and nucleotide substitutions in plastid genomes of Passiflora subgenus Decaloba. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 138 53–64. 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.05.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith D. R. (2016). The mutational hazard hypothesis of organelle genome evolution: 10 years on. Mol. Ecol. 25 3769–3775. 10.1111/mec.13742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith D. R., Hamaji T., Olson B. J., Durand P. M., Ferris P., Michod R. E., et al. (2013). Organelle genome complexity scales positively with organism size in volvocine green algae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30 793–797. 10.1093/molbev/mst002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A. (2014). RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30 1312–1313. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steane D. A. (2005). Complete nucleotide sequence of the chloroplast genome from the Tasmanian blue gum, Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae). DNA Res. 12 215–220. 10.1093/dnares/dsi006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., Kumar S. (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30 2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tripati A. K., Roberts C. D., Eagle R. A. (2009). Coupling of CO2 and ice sheet stability over major climate transitions of the last 20 million years. Science 326 1394–1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turmel M., Otis C., Lemieux C. (2015). Dynamic evolution of the chloroplast genome in the green algal classes Pedinophyceae and Trebouxiophyceae. Genome Biol. Evol. 7 2062–2082. 10.1093/gbe/evv130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turmel M., Otis C., Lemieux C. (2017). Divergent copies of the large inverted repeat in the chloroplast genomes of ulvophycean green algae. Sci. Rep. 7 1–14. 10.1038/s41598-017-01144-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walker J. F., Zanis M. J., Emery N. C. (2014). Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequence and inversion variation in Lasthenia burkei (Madieae. Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 101 722–729. 10.3732/ajb.1400049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang R. R.-C., Bothmer R. V., Dvorak J., Fedak G., Linde-Laursen I., Muramatsu M. (1994). “Genome symbols in the Triticeae (Poaceae),” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Triticeae Symposium, eds Wang R. R.-C., Jensen K. B., Jaussi C. (Logan: ), 29–34. [Google Scholar]
- Weng M. L., Blazier J. C., Govindu M., Jansen R. K. (2014). Reconstruction of the ancestral plastid genome in Geraniaceae reveals a correlation between genome rearrangements, repeats, and nucleotide substitution rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31 645–659. 10.1093/molbev/mst257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- West J. G., McIntyre C. L., Appels R. (1988). Evolution and systematic relationships in theTriticeae (Poaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 160 1–28. 10.1007/BF00936706 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wicke S., Müller K. F., DePamphilis C. W., Quandt D., Bellot S., Schneeweiss G. M. (2016). Mechanistic model of evolutionary rate variation en route to a nonphotosynthetic lifestyle in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113 9045–9050. 10.1073/pnas.1607576113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wicke S., Schneeweiss G. M., Depamphilis C. W., Müller K. F., Quandt D. (2011). The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Mol. Biol. 76 273–297. 10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu C. S., Lai Y. T., Lin C. P., Wang Y. N., Chaw S. M. (2009). Evolution of reduced and compact chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) ingnetophytes: selection towards a lower cost strategy. Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 52 115–124. 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.12.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu C. S., Lin C. P., Hsu C. Y., Wang R. J., Chaw S. M. (2011). Comparative chloroplast genomes of pinaceae: insights into the mechanism of diversified genomic organizations. Genome Biol. Evol. 3 309–319. 10.1093/gbe/evr026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu D. D., Sha L. N., Tang C., Fan X., Wang Y., Kang H. Y., et al. (2017). The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pseudoroegneria libanotica, genomic features, and phylogenetic relationship with Triticeae species. Biol. Plant. 62 231–240. 10.1007/s10535-017-0759-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yesson C., Culham A. (2006). Phyloclimatic modeling: combining phylogenetics and bioclimatic modeling. Syst. Biol. 55 785–802. 10.1080/1063515060081570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng X. M., Wang J., Feng L., Liu S., Pang H., Qi L., et al. (2017). Inferring the evolutionary mechanism of the chloroplast genome size by comparing whole-chloroplast genome sequences in seed plants. Sci. Rep. 7:1555. 10.1038/s41598-017-01518-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: the chloroplast genome sequences in this study, KJ614418, KJ614416, KY636033, KJ614413, KJ614419, KJ614406, KJ614405, KJ614412, KY636059, KY636056, KY126307, MH285848, KY636075, MH331642, MH285849, MH285850, MH285851, MH285852, MH285853, MH285854, MH331641, KM974741, EF115541, KC912689, MH331643, MH331640, KX822019, MH285855, KC912691, MH285856, MH331639, LC005977, KC912692, KJ614411, and EU325680 are available in NCBI.