Abstract
Body mass index, race/ethnicity, and payer status are associated with operative mortality in congenital heart disease (CHD). Interactions between these predictors and impacts on longer term outcomes are less well understood. We studied the effect of body mass index, race/ethnicity, and payer on 1-year outcomes following elective CHD surgery and tested the degree to which race/ethnicity and payer explained the effects of body mass index. We hypothesized that body mass index might be a potentially modifiable risk factor for post-operative outcomes. Patients aged 2–25 years who underwent elective CHD surgery at our center from 2010 to 2017 were included. We assessed 1-year unplanned cardiac re-admissions, re-interventions, and mortality. Step-wise, multivariable logistic regression was performed.
Of 929 patients, 10.4% were underweight, 14.9% overweight, and 8.5% obese. Non-white race/ethnicity comprised 40.4% and public insurance 29.8%. Only 0.5% died prior to hospital discharge with one additional death in the first post-operative year. Among patients with continuous follow up, unplanned re-admission and re-intervention rates were 14.7% and 12.3%, respectively. In multivariable analyses adjusting for type of surgery and surgeon, obese, overweight, and underweight patients had higher odds of re-admission than normal weight patients (OR 1.40, p=0.026; OR 1.77, p<0.001; OR 1.44, p=0.008). Underweight patients had more than twice the odds of re-intervention compared with normal weight (OR 2.12, p<0.001). These associations persisted after adjusting for race/ethnicity, payer, and surgeon.
Pre-operative obese, overweight, and underweight body mass index were associated with unplanned re-admission and/or re-intervention one-year following elective CHD surgery, even after accounting for race/ethnicity and payer status. body mass index may be an important modifiable risk factor prior to CHD surgery.
Keywords: congenital heart disease, cardiac surgical outcomes, body mass index, race, payer
Introduction
Childhood obesity is epidemic in the United States, affecting nearly one in four children.1 Children and young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are similarly affected.2–5 Moreover, some patients with CHD have impaired growth trajectories and are at risk for being underweight.6,7 The effect of body mass index on pediatric CHD surgical outcomes has centered on short-team outcomes to date.8–11 More recent data in CHD patients on both ends of the weight spectrum have found higher rates of major morbidity and longer lengths of stay in the immediate post-operative period.10–13 Studies exploring adult cardiac surgical outcomes have reported that the impact of body mass index extends through the first post-operative year.14,15 However, the impact of body mass index on morbidity and mortality surgery beyond the initial post-operative period among pediatric and young adult patients undergoing elective CHD has not been explored.
The interplay among body mass index, race/ethnicity, and payer status is complex.1,16 Multiple studies have demonstrated associations among race/ethnicity, payer, and adverse short-term outcomes in CHD patients.17,18 However, the degree to which race/ethnicity and payer may explain the effect of body mass index—or body mass index may explain the effects of race/ethnicity and payer—has yet to be explored in the context of CHD post-operative outcomes.
We hypothesized that body mass index might be a potentially modifiable risk factor explaining some of the disparities in outcomes following CHD surgery. We aimed to assess associations between body mass index and one-year unplanned re-admission and re-intervention rates and mortality in children and young adults following elective CHD surgery and to evaluate the impact of race/ethnicity and payer status on these associations.
Materials and methods
Study Population
We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study, including patients 2 to 25 years of age who underwent elective CHD surgery from January 1st, 2010 to July 1st, 2017 at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. We excluded patients from 0 to 2 years of age because growth in this time period can be reflective of the intra-uterine environment, and body mass index categories have not been recommended for clinical use in this age category.19–22 We chose to focus on elective CHD surgical cases in which patients and providers have the potential to adjust pre-operative body mass index. To avoid potential confounding, patients with significant pre-operative risk factors defined in accordance with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Congenital Heart Surgery Database (pre-operative mechanical circulatory support, shock, mechanical ventilation to treat cardiorespiratory failure, major neurological deficit, and renal dysfunction requiring dialysis)23; patients with pre-operative albumin <3 g/dL whose weight could be confounded with edema; and patients with extra-cardiac anomalies and/or underlying genetic syndromes that impact growth trajectory and outcomes24–27 were excluded.
If patients were expected to undergo multiple surgical procedures, we included the index case that met our age criterion. Mortality was all-cause. Morbidity included one-year unplanned re-admissions and re-interventions.
Data Sources
Patients were identified using our institutional clinical registry. Information regarding demographics, clinical characteristics, re-admission, re-intervention, and one-year survival were obtained through administrative records and manual chart review. To ensure 100% data capture for mortality, survival status for patients lost to follow-up were obtained from the National Death Index, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.29
Data Collection
Demographic data obtained from administrative records included age, sex, race/ethnicity, and payer status. Age was categorized to reflect developmental stages of pre-school, early school-age, middle-school, adolescent, and young adult as follows: 2–4 years, 5–8 years, 9–13 years, 14–18 years, and 19–25 years. Race/ethnicity was defined as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, Asian, or other. Individuals with unreported or missing race were categorized as other. Primary payer was recorded as public (Medicaid, Medicaid-managed care, Children’s Health Insurance Program, and Title V), private (commercial or employer-based), or self-pay.
Patient characteristics abstracted from the patient record included body mass index at index CHD surgery, pre-operative risk factors, type of operation, and surgeon. Standard body mass index definitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were applied.20 For subjects <18 years of age, obesity was defined by body mass index ≥95th percentile, overweight as 85th to 95th percentile, normal as 5th to 85th percentile, and underweight as ≤5th percentile. In those ≥18 years of age, obesity was defined as body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, overweight as 25–30 kg/m2, normal as 18.5–24.9 kg/m2, and underweight as <18.5 kg/m2. The type of operation was characterized into surgical risk categories as per the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.30
The primary outcomes of interest were unplanned re-admission and re-intervention within the first post-operative year. Unplanned re-admissions included treatment for post-operative infections, pleural or pericardial effusions, heart failure, arrhythmias, unplanned diagnostic cardiac catheterizations, or other cardiac symptoms (i.e., chest pain, desaturations, etc.). Re-interventions included unplanned interventional cardiac catheterizations or re-operations. If multiple unplanned re-admissions or re-interventions occurred within the first post-operative year, only the first was included for analysis.
All-cause in-hospital and one-year mortality were obtained from the clinical registry and National Death index.
Statistical Analysis
Data were described using standard descriptive and univariable statistics. Variables with p-values <0.100 on univariable analyses were tested in multivariable models. Multilevel, logistic regression was performed to assess the effects of age, sex, Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category, body mass index, race/ethnicity, and payer on 1-year unplanned re-admission or re-intervention. Variables were entered in a forward, step-wise fashion, examining effects of body mass index on outcomes first in unadjusted models and then adjusting for age, sex, Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category; race/ethnicity; payer; and race/ethnicity and payer. We calculated the percent attenuation of the magnitude of the effects of body mass index with model building and tested for interactions and effect modification. Standard errors were initially clustered by surgeon. In sensitivity analyses, surgeon was also tested as a fixed effect. Variables with p values ≤0.050 were considered statistically significant.
Some patients who undergo surgery at our institution are referred from outside cardiologists and are not routinely followed at our center. To test the possibility that our findings regarding re-admission and re-intervention were biased by patients lost to follow-up, we first compared baseline characteristics and re-admission and re-intervention between patients followed continuously at our institution and patients followed by outside cardiologists. We then re-tested our models, restricting the population to only those patients with continuous follow-up through the first post-operative year.
Statistical analyses were performed using STATA software, version 15 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). This study was approved by the Columbia University Irving Medical Center Institutional Review Board and a waiver of informed consent was obtained.
Results
A total of 929 patients, aged 2 to 25 years, were admitted to our institution for elective CHD surgery during the study period. Table 1 describes baseline and operative characteristics of the cohort. Our cohort included 10.4% (n=97) underweight, 14.9% (n=139) overweight, and 8.5% (n=79) obese patients. By race/ethnicity, non-Hispanic white comprised 59.6% (n=554) of the patients, non-Hispanic black 10.8% (n=100), and Hispanic 22.5% (n=209). The majority of patients were privately insured (69.5%, n=646); 29.8% (n=277) had public insurance; and <1.0% (n=6) were self-pay.
Table 1. Baseline patient and operative characteristics.
STAT surgical risk category is defined as per the Society of Thoracic Surgeons European Association for Cardio Thoracic Surgery. The p-value indicates comparison across the weight categories.
| Entire Cohort (n=929) | Underweight (n=97) | Normal (n=614) | Overweight (n=139) | Obese (n=79) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient age (years) | <0.001 | |||||
| 2 – 4 | 315 (33.9%) | 44 (45.4%) | 217 (35.3%) | 33 (23.7%) | 21 (26.6%) | |
| 5 – 8 | 180 (19.4%) | 24 (24.7%) | 129 (21.0%) | 16 (11.5%) | 11 (13.9%) | |
| 9 – 13 | 153 (16.5%) | 12 (12.4%) | 97 (15.8%) | 28 (20.1%) | 16 (20.2%) | |
| 14 – 18 | 176 (19.0%) | 8 (8.3%) | 112 (18.2%) | 36 (25.9%) | 20 (25.3%) | |
| 19 – 25 | 105 (11.3%) | 9 (9.3%) | 59 (9.6%) | 26 (18.7%) | 11 (13.9%) | |
| Sex (Male) | 510 (54.9%) | 44 (45.4%) | 336 (54.8%) | 85 (61.2%) | 45 (57.0%) | 0.120 |
| Race/ethnicity | 0.042 | |||||
| Non-Hispanic white | 554 (59.6%) | 48 (49.5%) | 371 (60.4%) | 93 (66.9%) | 42 (53.2%) | |
| Non-Hispanic black | 100 (10.8%) | 16 (16.5%) | 66 (10.8%) | 8 (5.8%) | 10 (12.7%) | |
| Hispanic | 209 (22.5%) | 20 (20.6%) | 134 (21.8%) | 31 (22.3%) | 24 (30.4%) | |
| Asian | 51 (5.5%) | 11 (11.3%) | 31 (5.1%) | 6 (4.3%) | 3 (3.8%) | |
| Other | 15 (1.5%) | 2 (2.1%) | 12 (2.0%) | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| STAT category | 0.732 | |||||
| 1 | 442 (47.6%) | 42 (43.3%) | 296 (48.2%) | 66 (47.5%) | 38 (48.1%) | |
| 2 | 341 (36.7%) | 38 (39.2%) | 221 (36.0%) | 54 (38.9%) | 28 (35.4%) | |
| 3 | 64 (6.9%) | 8 (8.3%) | 47 (7.7%) | 5 (3.6%) | 4 (5.1%) | |
| 4 | 77 (8.3%) | 9 (9.3%) | 47 (7.7%) | 12 (8.6%) | 9 (11.4%) | |
| 5 | 5 (0.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (0.5%) | 2 (1.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Payer | 0.337 | |||||
| Private | 646 (69.5%) | 66 (68.0%) | 433 (70.5%) | 100 (71.9%) | 47 (59.5%) | |
| Public | 277 (29.8%) | 30 (30.9%) | 177 (28.8%) | 39 (28.1%) | 31 (39.2%) | |
| Self-Pay | 6 (0.7%) | 1 (1.0%) | 4 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.3%) |
Patients who were underweight were more likely to be non-Hispanic black (p=0.031) and to have public insurance (p=0.001). Patients who were overweight or obese did not significantly differ by race/ethnicity or payer type.
Mortality
One-year mortality data were available for 100% (n=929) of patients. In-hospital mortality was low at 0.5% (n=5), and all occurred in normal weight patients. One additional patient experienced out-of-hospital death two months following truncal valve repair. There were no other deaths at one-year among these elective cases.
Re-admission
One-year clinical data were available for 68.7% (n=634) of patients surviving to hospital discharge. The availability of follow-up data did not differ by body mass index category, Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category, race/ethnicity, payer, or surgeon.
In the first post-operative year, 14.7% (n=93) of patients with available follow-up data had an unplanned re-admission, representing 15.7% (n=11) of underweight patients, 12.7% (n=52) of normal weight, 22.8% (n=21) of overweight, and 15.0% (n=9) of obese patients. The most common reasons for re-admission were pleural or pericardial effusions, which comprised 49.5% of re-admissions (Table 2). Of the 93 re-admitted patients, 16.1% (n=15) underwent multiple re-admissions in the first post-operative year.
Table 2.
Unplanned re-admission in the first post-operative year by weight category.
| Reason for re-admission | Underweight (n=11) | Normal weight (n=52) | Overweight (n=21) | Obese (n=9) | Total (n=93) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pleural or pericardial effusion | 6 (13.0%) | 27 (58.7%) | 8 (38.1%) | 5 (5.6%) | 46 (49.5%) |
| Post-operative infection | 2 (40.0%) | 2 (40.0%) | 1 (10.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (5.4%) |
| Arrhythmia | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (44.4%) | 4 (44.4%) | 1 (11.1%) | 9 (9.7%) |
| Heart failure | 2 (25.0%) | 3 (37.5%) | 2 (25.0%) | 1 (12.5%) | 8 (8.6%) |
| Diagnostic cardiac catheterization | 1 (14.2%) | 5 (71.4%) | 1 (14.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (7.5%) |
| Other cardiac symptoms | 0 (0.0%) | 11 (61.1%) | 5 (27.8%) | 2 (11.1%) | 18 (19.3%) |
Table 3 demonstrates the multivariable models for re-admission by body mass index category. In unadjusted analyses, overweight and obese patients had significantly higher odds of re-admission (OR 1.92 [1.42–2.59], p<0.001 and OR 1.39 [1.09–1.77], p=0.008, respectively) compared with normal weight patients. Adjusting for age, sex, Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category, and surgeon minimally impacted the magnitude of the effects of being overweight or obese. Importantly, the effect of being overweight or obese persisted after adjusting for race/ethnicity and payer status (OR 1.75 [1.39–2.20], p<0.001 and OR 1.26 [1.04–1.53], p=0.021, respectively).
Table 3. Odds of unplanned re-admission by weight category.
We adjusted for age at admission as a categorical variable, sex, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons European Association for Cardio Thoracic Surgery (STAT) surgical risk category. Results were clustered by surgeon. All odds ratios are compared to normal weight. The reference group for age is 9–13 years, for sex is male, for race is non-Hispanic white, and for payer is private.
| Underweight | Overweight | Obese | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p-value | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p-value | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p-value | |
| Unadjusted | 1.38 | 0.99–1.92 | 0.054 | 1.92 | 1.42–2.59 | <0.001* | 1.39 | 1.09–1.77 | 0.008* |
| Adjust for age, sex, STAT surgical category, surgeon | 1.44 | 1.10–1.88 | 0.008* | 1.77 | 1.39–2.25 | <0.001* | 1.40 | 1.04–1.89 | 0.026* |
| Adjust for age, sex, STAT surgical category surgeon, payer | 1.40 | 1.09–1.80 | 0.009* | 1.91 | 1.37–2.69 | <0.001* | 1.29 | 1.08–1.53 | 0.005* |
| Adjust for age, sex, STAT surgical category surgeon, race | 1.38 | 1.09–1.75 | 0.006* | 1.98 | 1.37–2.86 | <0.001* | 1.26 | 0.97–1.63 | 0.086 |
| for age, sex, STAT surgical category surgeon, race and payer | 1.44 | 1.09–1.88 | 0.009* | 1.75 | 1.39–2.20 | <0.001* | 1.26 | 1.04–1.53 | 0.021* |
Underweight patients did not have significantly higher odds of unplanned re-admission in unadjusted analyses (OR 1.38 [0.99–1.92], p=0.054). However, they had significantly higher odds in adjusted analyses that also persisted with race/ethnicity and payer status in the model (OR 1.44 [1.09–1.88], p=0.009).
Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic patients had more than twice the odds of unplanned re-admission as non-Hispanic white patients (OR 2.04 [1.22–3.42], p=0.007), after accounting for body mass index, age, sex, Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category, and surgeon. Payer was not significantly associated with re-admission in adjusted models. There were no significant interactions among body mass index, payer, and race/ethnicity. Our results did not differ meaningfully when restricting to only patients followed within our institution or when including surgeon as a fixed effect.
Re-intervention
The one-year unplanned re-intervention rate among patients with follow-up data at our institution was 12.3% (n=78), including 17.1% (n=12) of underweight, 10.5% (n=43) of normal weight, 16.3% (n=15) of overweight, and 13.3% (n=8) of obese patients. The unplanned re-interventions included 38 interventional cardiac catheterizations for stent placement, ballooning, coiling or device placement, and 40 re-operations, including 14 valve-related surgeries, 10 mediastinal explorations/sternal revisions, 6 pacemaker placements, 5 conduit or patch-related operations, and 5 vascular or lymphatic surgeries. Twenty of the re-interventions occurred during the index admission. Of the 78 patients, 16.7% (n=13) underwent multiple re-interventions in the first post-operative year.
Table 4 demonstrates the multivariable models for re-intervention by body mass index category. In unadjusted analyses, underweight and obese patients had significantly higher odds of re-intervention within the first post-operative year compared with normal weight patients (OR 1.87 [1.35–2.59], p<0.001 and OR 1.49 [1.06–2.11], p=0.022, respectively). Adjusting for age, sex, Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category, surgeon, payer, and race/ethnicity did not attenuate the effect of underweight on the odds of re-intervention (OR 2.16 [1.44–3.22], p<0.001). The effect of obesity did not persist in the adjusted models.
Table 4. Odds of unplanned re-intervention by weight category.
We adjusted for age at admission as a categorical variable, sex, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons European Association for Cardio Thoracic Surgery (STAT) surgical risk category. Results were clustered by surgeon. All odds ratios are compared to normal weight. The reference group for age is 9–13 years, for sex is male, for race is non-Hispanic white, and for payer is private.
| Underweight | Overweight | Obese | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p-value | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p-value | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p-value | |
| Unadjusted | 1.87 | 1.35–2.59 | <0.001* | 1.60 | 0.96–2.67 | 0.070 | 1.49 | 1.06–2.11 | 0.022* |
| Adjust for age, sex, STAT surgical category, surgeon | 2.12 | 1.46–3.09 | <0.001* | 1.37 | 0.84–2.25 | 0.210 | 1.44 | 0.98–2.11 | 0.065 |
| Adjust for age, sex, STAT surgical category surgeon, payer | 2.11 | 1.34–3.32 | <0.001* | 1.34 | 0.81–2.21 | 0.248 | 1.36 | 0.96–1.93 | 0.083 |
| Adjust for age, sex, STAT surgical category surgeon, race | 2.14 | 1.49–3.08 | <0.001* | 1.39 | 0.86–2.23 | 0.178 | 1.27 | 0.87–1.87 | 0.219 |
| Adjust for age, sex, STAT surgical category surgeon, race and payer | 2.16 | 1.44–3.22 | <0.001* | 1.38 | 0.84–2.20 | 0.217 | 1.29 | 0.86–1.87 | 0.236 |
Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic patients had a significantly higher odds of re-intervention compared with non-Hispanic white patients (OR 1.74 [1.27–2.39], p=0.001). Publicly insured patients also had a significantly higher odds of re-intervention as compared with privately insured (OR 1.69 [1.15–2.47], p=0.007). Race/ethnicity and payer were highly associated, and significance could not be ascertained when entered into the model jointly. There were no significant interactions among body mass index, payer, and race/ethnicity. Our results did not differ meaningfully when restricting to only patients followed within our institution or when including surgeon as a fixed effect.
Discussion
In this study of nearly 1,000 children and young adults undergoing elective CHD surgery, we found that overweight and obese patients were significantly more likely to be re-admitted within one year compared with normal weight patients and that underweight patients were more likely to be both re-admitted and to undergo unplanned re-interventions. Further, we found that these effects were not sufficiently explained by differences in patient age or sex, Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category, surgeon, race/ethnicity, or payer status. Therefore, the data support our hypothesis that body mass index is a potentially modifiable risk factor.
To our knowledge, the higher risk of unplanned re-admission in overweight and obese children following elective CHD surgery has not been previously reported. This may be due to several factors. First, it is plausible that the impact of body mass index has become more apparent as the proportion of CHD patients who are overweight and obese has increased. Moreover, the selection of elective cases without genetic syndromes or extra-cardiac anomalies and the greater duration of follow-up through one year may have unmasked the higher risk of overweight and obesity as compared to prior literature.13,31 While the adult cardiac surgery literature suggests that an “obesity paradox” may exist, wherein obesity plays a protective role in post-operative outcomes, we did not uncover this phenomenon in the pediatric CHD population.14,32–36 In contrast, our data suggest that counseling aimed at pre-operative weight optimization, in conjunction with referral to nutrition specialists, may mitigate post-operative risk. Obesity is known to trigger inflammatory cascades, which may incite specific issues post-operatively, such as the development of fluid collections or infection and may, therefore, partly explain the unplanned re-admissions37,38. As the survival of pediatric patients with CHD continues to improve, lifestyle factors will become increasingly important not only for post-operative outcomes but also for long-term morbidity and mortality.39,40
Our finding that underweight body mass index is also a pre-operative risk factor for unplanned re-admission and re-intervention following CHD surgery is supported by the existing literature, which demonstrates worse immediate post-operative adverse outcomes.13,41 In children, it is known that pre-operative nutritional status impacts the recovery process.42 Underweight is also associated with increased resource utilization and poorer in-hospital survival in patients requiring intensive care admission, including for CHD.43–47 The adult cardiac surgery literature suggests that the increased risk of underweight status persists through the first two post-operative years, and we similarly found increased risk up to one year following the surgery.15,31,32 Adult guidelines recommend pre-operative nutritional screening and weight optimization, and pediatric guidelines may also be warranted, which have already proven to be useful in the single ventricle population.48,49
As the direction of the relationship between body mass index and socioeconomic factors was unknown, we studied whether race/ethnicity and payer status might be driving the observed effects of body mass index. Our data suggest that while black/Hispanic and publicly insured patients are more likely to be underweight, the negative effects of weight appear largely independent of race/ethnicity and payer.
The poorer outcomes among minority and economically disadvantaged populations with CHD have been well-described, but the mechanism is not yet understood.17,18,50–53 Some studies have argued that discrepancies in outcomes in non-white patients following cardiac surgery is driven by hospital quality or regional differences.54–56 Our study controlled for systems-level effects by including only patients operated on at a single center and tested surgeon-level fixed effects. Nevertheless, we found an increased odds of re-admission and/or re-intervention among black/Hispanic and publicly insured patients compared with white, privately insured patients. Minority and publicly insured CHD populations may therefore be a potentially attractive target to pilot community health interventions to optimize weight status.
Our study had several limitations. First, our study was retrospective, which limits our ability to imply causality. Our study included patients from a single center. While this had the advantage of reducing confounding from systems-level disparities and providers, it also reduced our statistical power and may limit our generalizability. In addition, only 69% of patients were followed longitudinally at our institution. The National Death Index was used to capture all death through the first post-operative year and to ensure that loss to follow-up was not secondary to mortality. As a regional quaternary care referral center, most patients would be expected to have returned to our institution if re-admission or re-intervention were required. Moreover, follow-up at our institution did not significantly differ by body mass index category, race/ethnicity, payer, or surgeon, thereby minimizing the likelihood that selection bias was significantly driving our results. However, it remains possible that our study may over-estimate re-admission and re-intervention rates as such episodes of care would be associated with increased follow-up. Finally, body mass index is an imperfect indicator of weight status. Differences in body mass index distribution by race/ethnicity and difficulty in predicting adiposity in young children have been well-described.13,57,58 Nevertheless, while it may mischaracterize a small subset of patients, body mass index is generally considered a reasonable proxy for weight status.
Conclusion
Pre-operative body mass index is associated with unplanned re-admission and re-intervention in children and young adults one year following elective CHD surgery. Specifically, overweight and obese patients had more re-admissions, and underweight patients had more re-admissions and re-interventions. The effects of body mass index were independent of race/ethnicity and payer status; suggesting that body mass index may be a modifiable pre-operative risk factor. Efforts to normalize pre-operative body mass index and the effect of these interventions on post-operative outcomes should be further explored.
Financial support:
Dr. Anderson receives salary support from the National Institutes of Health/National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (K23 HL133454).
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
Ethical standards: This study was approved by the institutional review board at Columbia University Irving Medical Center.
References
- 1.Trasande L, Liu Y, Fryer G, Weitzman M. Effects of childhood obesity on hospital care and costs, 1999–2005. Health Aff. 2009;28(4):1999–2005. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pinto NM, Marino BS, Wernovsky G, et al. Obesity Is a Common Comorbidity in Children With Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease. Pediatrics. 2007;120(5):e1157–e1164. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schwartz S, Olsen M, Woo JG, Madsen N. Congenital heart disease and the prevalence of underweight and obesity from age 1 to 15 years: data on a nationwide sample of children. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017;1(1):e000127. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lerman JB, Parness IA, Shenoy RU. Body Weights in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease and the Obesity Frequency. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(4):638–642. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.10.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shustak RJ, McGuire SB, October TW, Phoon CKL, Chun AJL. Prevalence of obesity among patients with congenital and acquired heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33(1):8–14. doi: 10.1007/s00246-011-0049-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Daymont C, Neal A, Prosnitz A, Cohen MS. Growth in children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34(5):1296–1297. doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0719-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Freud LR, Webster G, Costello JM, et al. Growth and Obesity Among Older Single Ventricle Patients Presenting for Fontan Conversion. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2015;6(4):514–520. doi: 10.1177/2150135115598212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Garcia R, Aggarwal S. Impact of Obesity on Peri-Operative Short Term Outcomes in Adolescent With Congenital Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(13):978. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(16)30979-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shamszad P, Rossano JW, Marino BS, Lowry AW, Knudson JD. Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus Adversely Affect Outcomes after Cardiac Surgery in Children’s Hospitals. Congenit Heart Dis. 2016;11(5):409–414. doi: 10.1111/chd.12325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.B MW, E MG, H GD, et al. The Impact of Obesity on Postoperative Outcomes in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Pulmonary Valve Replacement. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015;10(5):E197–E202. doi: 10.1111/chd.12266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zaidi AN, Bauer JA, Michalsky MP, et al. The Impact of Obesity on Early Postoperative Outcomes in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. Congenit Heart Dis. 2011;6(3):241–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2011.00522.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bharmanee A Aggarwal S. Does obesity in children with congenital heart disease impact the short-term surgical outcomes? Congenit Heart Dis. 2013;8(5):485. [Google Scholar]
- 13.O’Byrne ML, Kim S, Hornik CP, et al. Effect of Obesity and Underweight Status on Perioperative Outcomes of Congenital Heart Operations in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults. Circulation. 2017;136(8):704–718. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.116.026778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Johnson AP, Parlow JL, Whitehead M, Xu J, Rohland S, Milne B. Body Mass Index, Outcomes, and Mortality Following Cardiac Surgery in Ontario, Canada. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(7):1–13. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zittermann A, Becker T, Gummert JF, Börgermann J. Body mass index, cardiac surgery and clinical outcome. A single-center experience with 9125 patients. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;24(2):168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Ogden CL, Dietz WH. Racial and ethnic differences in secular trends for childhood body mass index, weight, and height. Obesity. 2006;14(2):301–308. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Anderson BR, Fieldston ES, Newburger JW, Bacha EA, Glied SA. Disparities in Outcomes and Resource Use After Hospitalization for Cardiac Surgery by Neighborhood Income. Pediatrics. 2018;141(3):e20172432. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Peterson JK, Chen Y, Nguyen DV., Setty SP. Current trends in racial, ethnic, and healthcare disparities associated with pediatric cardiac surgery outcomes. Congenit Heart Dis. 2017;12(4):520–532. doi: 10.1111/chd.12475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Touwslager RNH, Gielen M, Derom C, et al. Determinants of Infant Growth in Four Age Windows: A Twin Study. J Pediatr. 2011;158(4):566–572.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Barlow SE, Expert Committee. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007;120 Suppl:S164–92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2329C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Furlong KR, Anderson LN, Kang H, et al. body mass index-for-Age and Weight-for-Length in Children 0 to 2 Years. Pediatrics. 2016;138(1):e20153809–e20153809. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Growth chart training: Using the WHO growth charts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jacobs JP, O’Brien SM, Pasquali SK, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database mortality risk model: Part 2 - Clinical application. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(3):1063–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.07.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cronk C, Crocker AC, Pueschel SM, et al. Growth charts for children with Down syndrome: 1 month to 18 years of age. Pediatrics. 1988;81(1):102–110. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/81/1/102.abstract [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Greenwood RD, Rosenthal A, Parisi L, Fyler DC, Nadas AS. Extracardiac abnormalities in infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 1975;55(4):485–492. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/124046 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eskedal L, Hagemo P, Eskild A, Aamodt G, Seiler KS, Thaulow E. A population-based study of extra-cardiac anomalies in children with congenital cardiac malformations. Cardiol Young. 2004;14(6):600–607. doi: 10.1017/S1047951104006043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Alsoufi B, Gillespie S, Mahle WT, et al. The Effect of Noncardiac and Genetic Abnormalities on Outcomes Following Neonatal Congenital Heart Surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;28(1):105–114. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Natale V, Rajagopalan A. Worldwide variation in human growth and the World Health Organization growth standards: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2014;4(1):1–11. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Death Index. Published 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/factsheets/factsheet_ndi.htm
- 30.O’Brien SM, Clarke DR, Jacobs JP, et al. An empirically based tool for analyzing mortality associated with congenital heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138(5):1139–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reeves BC, Ascione R, Chamberlain MH, Angelini GD. Effect of body mass index on early outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(4):668–676. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00777-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mariscalco G, Wozniak MJ, Dawson AG, et al. Body Mass Index and Mortality Among Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. Circulation. 2016;135(9):850–863. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.116.022840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.R MAJ, F SA, S LW, et al. Is obesity a predictor of mortality, morbidity and readmission after cardiac surgery? Can J Surg. 2004;47(1):34–38. http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L38233094 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ao H, Wang X, Xu F, et al. The impact of body mass index on short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery graft bypass. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):1–6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sood A, Abdollah F, Sammon JD, et al. The Effect of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes After Major Surgery: Results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2005–2011. World J Surg. 2015;39(10):2376–2385. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3112-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Carnethon MR, Khan SS. An Apparent Obesity Paradox in Cardiac Surgery. Circulation. 2017;135(9):864–866. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.026856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Milner JJ, Beck MA. The impact of obesity on the immune response to infection. Proc Nutr Soc. 2012;71(2):298–306. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112000158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Greenberg AS, Obin MS. Obesity and the role of adipose tissue in inflammation and metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(2):461S–465S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.2.461S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ladouceur M, Iserin L, Cohen S, Legendre A, Boudjemline Y, Bonnet D. Key issues of daily life in adults with congenital heart disease. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;106(6–7):404–412. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Coats AJ, Adamopoulos S, Radaelli A, et al. Controlled trial of physical training in chronic heart failure. Exercise performance, hemodynamics, ventilation, and autonomic function. Circulation. 1992;85(6):2119–2131. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.85.6.2119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sochet AA, Ayers M, Quezada E, et al. The importance of small for gestational age in the risk assessment of infants with critical congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young. 2013;23(6):896–904. doi: 10.1017/S1047951113001960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Wiley JS. Nutritional depletions in critically ill children: associations with physiologic instability and increased quantity of care. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 9(3):309–313. doi: 10.1177/0148607185009003309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sharma K, Raszynski A, Totapally BR. The impact of body mass index on resource utilization and outcomes of children admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit. SAGE Open Med. 2019;7:205031211982550. doi: 10.1177/2050312119825509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Anton-Martin P, Papacostas M, Lee E, Nakonezny PA, Green ML. Underweight Status Is an Independent Predictor of In-Hospital Mortality in Pediatric Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2016;42(1):014860711667318. doi: 10.1177/0148607116673185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.de Souza Menezes F, Leite HP, Koch Nogueira PC. Malnutrition as an independent predictor of clinical outcome in critically ill children. Nutrition. 2012;28(3):267–270. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2011.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Narendra K; Bagri Bipin; Jose Satish; Shah Tsultem; Bhutia Sushil; Kabra R. Impact of Malnutrition on the Outcome of Critically Ill Children. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12098-015-1738-y [DOI] [PubMed]
- 47.Ross F, Latham G, Joffe D, et al. Preoperative malnutrition is associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes after paediatric cardiac surgery. Cardiol Young. 2017;27(9):1716–1725. doi: 10.1017/S1047951117001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hill A, Nesterova E, Lomivorotov V, et al. Current evidence about nutrition support in cardiac surgery patients—what do we know? Nutrients. 2018;10(5). doi: 10.3390/nu10050597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Stoppe C, Goetzenich A, Whitman G, et al. Role of nutrition support in adult cardiac surgery: A consensus statement from an International Multidisciplinary Expert Group on Nutrition in Cardiac Surgery. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1690-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nembhard WN, Salemi JL, Ethen MK, Fixler DE, DiMaggio A, Canfield MA. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Risk of Early Childhood Mortality Among Children With Congenital Heart Defects. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):e1128–e1138. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Oster ME, Strickland MJ, Mahle WT. Racial and ethnic disparities in post-operative mortality following congenital heart surgery. J Pediatr. 2011;159(2):222–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.01.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pace ND, Oster ME, Forestieri NE, Enright D, Knight J, Meyer RE. Sociodemographic Factors and Survival of Infants With Congenital Heart Defects. Pediatrics. 2018;142(3):e20180302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bucholz EM, Sleeper LA, Newburger JW. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and outcomes following the norwood procedure: An analysis of the pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial Public data set. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(3):1–9. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Benavidez OJ, Gauvreau K, Jenkins KJ. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mortality Following Congenital Heart Surgery. Pediatr Cardiol. 2006;27(3):321–328. doi: 10.1007/s00246-005-7121-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Khera R, Vaughan-Sarrazin M, Rosenthal GE, Girotra S. Racial Disparities in Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery: the Role of Hospital Quality. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015;17(5):29. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0587-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rangrass G, Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB. Explaining Racial Disparities in Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):223. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nightingale CM, Rudnicka AR, Owen CG, Cook DG, Whincup PH. Patterns of body size and adiposity among UK children of South Asian, black African-Caribbean and white European origin: Child Heart And health Study in England (CHASE study). Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(1):33–44. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Vanderwall C, Randall Clark R, Eickhoff J, Carrel AL. body mass index is a poor predictor of adiposity in young overweight and obese children. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):4–9. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0891-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]