Abstract
A mild visible light-induced palladium-catalyzed alkyl Heck reaction of diazo compounds and N-tosylhydrazones is reported. A broad range of vinyl arenes and heteroarenes with high functional group tolerance, as well as a range of different diazo compounds, can efficiently undergo this transformation. This method features Brønsted acid-assisted generation of hybrid palladium C(sp3)-centered radical intermediate, which allowed for new selective C–H functionalization protocol.
Keywords: diazo compounds, Heck reaction, palladium, radicals, reaction mechanisms
Graphical Abstract
A mild visible light-induced palladium-catalyzed alkyl Heck reaction of diazo compounds and N-tosylhydrazones is reported. This method features Brønsted acid assisted generation of hybrid palladium C(sp3)-centered radical intermediate and broad reaction scope, highlighting the diverse applicability and the potential utility of this protocol in late-stage functionalization.
Since the first publication on synthesis of ethyl diazoacetate by Curtius in 1883,[1] diazo compounds have been recognized among the most versatile reagents in organic synthesis.[2] One of the most common reactions of diazo compounds is cyclopropanation of alkenes, which occurs through metal-carbene complex[3] or free carbene intermediates (Scheme 1a).[4] In addition, the formation of carbon-centered radicals from diazo compounds with release of dinitrogen has been reported, but most processes still exhibit carbene-like reactivity, producing cyclopropanes in reactions with alkenes.[5] Their ability to generate free radical intermediate for alternative functionalizations with alkenes has rarely been explored.[6] In 2016, Gryko and co-workers pioneered light-induced cobalt(I)-catalyzed alkylation of alkenes with diazoacetate (Scheme 1b).[6b] This method is efficient for Heck-type (A) alkylation of disubstituted electron-rich alkenes. However, in reactions with monosubstituted alkenes, substantial amounts of inseparable Giese-type reduced product B is produced, which limits synthetic usefulness of the method. Later, Doyle group reported that the product B can selectively be produced via Ru-photocatalysis (Scheme 1c).[6d] To date, no methods exist for selective Heck-type C–H alkylation of synthetically important monosubstituted alkenes with diazo compounds. Herein, we report a mild, selective, and general visible light-induced Pd-catalyzed Brønsted acid-assisted Heck reaction of diazo compounds and their convenient precursors, N-tosylhydrazones, with vinyl arenes and heteroarenes, which proceeds via hybrid palladium C(sp3)-centered radical intermediate (Scheme 1d).
Recently, the photoinduced palladium catalysis has become an emerging field of study.[7] Thus, we[8] and others[9] have established mild and efficient methods for visible light-induced palladium-catalyzed alkyl-Heck reaction of various alkyl electrophiles, proceeding via hybrid palladium C(sp3)-centered radical species. In our ongoing search for new precursors for hybrid Pd radical species,[8] we aimed at engaging diazo compounds in this chemistry, which would allow for a substantial broadening of the scope of electrophiles in alkyl Heck reaction.
To this end, we examined reaction of ethyl diazoacetate (1a) with styrene (2a) under our standard palladium(II) acetate/Xantphos catalytic system[8] with Cs2CO3.
However, no desired Heck product 3a was observed under these conditions (Table 1, entry 1). To our surprise, 15% of product 3a was formed when base additive was removed (entry 2). We hypothesized that the formation of traces amount of acetic acid from palladium acetate is crucial for the reaction to occur, which was later validated using Pd(PPh3)4 as catalyst with and without exogenous acetic acid (entries 4, 5). The addition of triphenylphosphine as monodentate ligand[10] further improved reaction efficiency (entry 3). Encouraged by these results, we began optimizing this novel visible light-induced Brønsted acid-assisted alkyl Heck reaction of diazo compounds by screening different additives.[11] In the turnover-enabling step of the Heck reaction, an exogenous base (e.g., Et3N, Cs2CO3) is typically employed to convert H−Pd(II)−X back to the active Pd(0) catalyst while simultaneously forming an equivalent of the base·HX waste.[12] Considering this sequence in reverse, we envisioned that base·HX species could be used as practical Brønsted acid surrogate, which would serve as hydrogen donor in the reduction with diazo compounds. This would then promote both, the generation of hybrid palladium C(sp3)-centered radical species, and a catalytic turnover. Thus, different base·HX precursors were extensively tested (entries 6, 7). Various ammonium halides were identified to be superior additives. Among them, more soluble and inexpensive 4-chloro-piperidine hydrochloride produced the desired coupling product 3a in 80% yield (entry 7). Control experiments demonstrated both Pd catalyst and Xantphos ligand are essential for this transformation (entries 8–11), and thermal reaction under dark gave only traces of product (entry 12).
Table 1:
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Entry | [Pd] | L1, L2 | Additives | Yield [%][a] |
1 | Pd(OAc)2 | Xantphos | Cs2CO3 | 0 |
2 | Pd(OAc)2 | Xantphos | - | 15 |
3 | Pd(OAc)2 | Xantphos, PPh3 | - | 21 |
4 | Pd(PPh3)4 | Xantphos | - | traces |
5 | Pd(PPh3)4 | Xantphos | AcOH (10 mol%) | 26 |
6 | Pd(OAc)2 | Xantphos, PPh3 | NH4Cl | 56 |
7 | Pd(OAc)2 | Xantphos, PPh3 | 4-Chloro-piperidine hydrochloride | 80 [b] |
8 | Pd(OAc)2 | dtbdppf, PPh3 | 4-Chloro-piperidine hydrochloride | 0 |
9 | Pd(OAc)2 | rac-BINAP, PPh3 | 4-Chloro-piperidine hydrochloride | 0 |
| ||||
10 | - | Xantphos, PPh3 | 4-Chloro-piperidine hydrochloride | 0 |
11 | Pd(OAc)2 | - | 4-Chloro-piperidine hydrochloride | traces |
12 | Pd(OAc)2 | Xantphos, PPh3 | 4-Chloro-piperidine hydrochloride | traces[c] |
0.1 mmol scale; 1a:2a = 1:2. Determined by GC/MS using pentadecane as internal standard.
0.25 mmol scale, isolated yields. Standard condition A.
50, 80 or 120 °C, no light.
With the optimized conditions in hand, the scope of diazo compounds was examined first (Scheme 2). It was found that monosubstituted diazo esters (3a-3g), including bulky ester, such as tert-butyl (3b), proven to be capable substrates for this coupling reaction. A diverse array of diazo amides was fully compatible with the present protocol, providing the corresponding products 3h-3l in moderate to high yields. Notably, sensitive protic functional groups such as primary alcohol (3f-3g) and secondary amide (3l) were tolerated under these reaction conditions, without formation of potential competing X–H insertion product. In addition, selected donor/acceptor substituted diazo esters (3m-3n) gave good yields without formation of cyclopropane or carbene dimer products. Importantly, silylated diazo ester also proved to be a viable substrate to produce allylsilane 3o. Finally, we were pleased to find that the present Heck coupling was compatible with various natural alcohol derivatives (3p-3s), highlighting the broad applicability and the potential utility of this protocol in late-stage functionalization.
Next, the generality of alkenes in this methodology was examined. Para-substituted styrenes with a broad range of functional groups were readily tolerated, providing the corresponding products 3v-3aa in moderate to good yields. Meta- and ortho-substituted styrenes also gave the corresponding products 3ac-3ah with good efficiency. Heck reactions with vinyl heteroarenes proceeded uneventfully, efficiently producing alkenes possessing naphthalene (3ai), dihydrobenzofuran (3aj), benzodioxole (3ak), pyridine (3al), quinoline (3am), and pyrimidine (3an) rings. In addition, reaction of 1a with vinyl derivative of estrone generated product 3ao, highlighting the applicability of this visible light-induced Heck reaction protocol in complex settings. Finally, silyl enol ether also proved to be capable coupling partner, affording the ketone product 3ap[10c] upon the in situ hydrolysis of the formed alkylated silyl enol ether. However, acrylates (3au-3aw) were unreactive under current conditions, presumably due to electronic mismatch with electrophilic radicals generated from diazo compounds, while 2-phenylacrylic ester (3av) gave pyrazoline, as a result of [3+2] cycloaddition,[13] instead of Heck product.
Motivated by the successful employment of diazo compounds in the Heck reaction, we sought of more practical precursors for this transformation. Thus, we turned attention to N-tosylhydrazones,[14] which can be easily accessed from simple ketones. Upon exposure to a base, N-tosylhydrazones could in situ be transformed into diazo compounds, thus serving as their convenient surrogates.[15] We rationalized that the required base·HX species under basic conditions can be generated through deprotonation of N-tosylhydrazones in the presence of exogenous halide counterion[16] additive. After extensive screening of reaction parameters,[11] we were delighted to find conditions, which allowed to efficiently perform alkyl Heck reaction of N-tosylhydrazone 4a with 2a (Table 2, entry 1). Control experiments indicated that both visible light irradiation and Pd catalyst were necessary (entries 2, 3). The reaction efficiency was substantially lower in the absence of base or iodide additive (entries 4, 5). Reactions in the presence of tetrabutylammonium bromide (entry 6), or in absence of diphenylsilane (entry 7) were also less efficient.
Table 2:
| ||
---|---|---|
Entry | Deviation from standard conditions | Yield [%][a] |
1 | None | 80[b] |
2 | Without Pd(OAc)2 | 0 |
3 | Dark | traces |
4 | Without DIPEA | 19 |
5 | Without NaI | traces |
6 | NBu4Br (2 equiv) | 58 |
7 | Without Ph2SiH2 | 45 |
0.1 mmol scale; 4a:2a = 1:1.1. Determined by GC/MS using pentadecane as internal standard.
0.25 mmol scale, isolated yields
Next, the scope of alkyl Heck reaction of N-tosylhydrazones with alkenes was investigated (Scheme 3). Thus, N-tosylhydrazones possessing various primary and secondary alkyl substituents proved to be capable substrates for this reaction (5a-5e). Reactions with styrenes bearing electron-rich and electron-poor substituents at the para-, ortho-, and meta-positions on the aromatic ring furnished products 5f-5k in moderate to good yield. Heteroaryl groups were also amenable to this catalytic process, affording the corresponding products 5l-5n in good yields. Notably, α-substituted styrenes, as well as indene, were reactive in this Heck coupling process (5o-5q).
Then, a series of mechanistic experiments were performed. The radical nature of this transformation was confirmed by employment of radical clock and radical traps (Scheme 4). Thus, reaction of ethyl diazoacetate 1a with 6, possessing a cyclopropyl substituent,[17] produced bicyclic product 7, as a result of ring opening of methylenecyclopropyl radical A into a homoallylic radical B and its subsequent cyclization at the aryl ring. Likewise, methylenecyclopropyl radical intermediate C, generated from N-tosylhydrazone 4f, upon visible light irradiation, rearranged into benzylic radical D, which upon ß-hydrogen loss produced linear diene 8 in 17% yield. It was also shown that both modes of this reaction (with 1a and 4a) were inhibited in the presence of radical traps, such as TEMPO.[11]
The performed isotope-labeling experiments with deuterated Brønsted acid, DPd(PPh3)2Cl, and N-deuterated tosylhydrazone unambiguously supported these to be the hydrogen sources in this alkyl Heck reaction.[11] A potential mechanism operating via cyclopropanation followed by ring opening was ruled out by independent synthesis of the corresponding cyclopropane and resubjecting it to the standard reaction conditions, under which no product was formed.[11]
Based on the above mechanistic studies and literature reports,[8, 9] the following plausible mechanism is proposed for this novel alkyl-Heck reaction of diazo compounds and N-tosylhydrazones. Path a begins with an oxidative addition of HX with Pd(0) to generate active HPdXL2 species,[18] which via a denitrogenative reaction with diazo compound produces Pd-carbene intermediate A. A subsequent hydride shift yields palladium species B, which upon light induced homolysis of the C–Pd bond results in a hybrid alkyl Pd-radical species C. Alternatively, the latter could be formed either via a single electron transfer (SET) to diazonium ions 1’, a protonated form of diazo compound (path b),[19] or proton coupled electron transfer (PCET) directly from diazo compounds (path c).[6d] Next, the addition of alkyl radical C to a styrene takes place, resulting in the hybrid benzylic radical D. The endgame follows the classical Heck reaction mechanism, including β-H-elimination to produce the reaction product and reduction of HPd(II)X with the base to close the catalytic cycle.[8, 9] It should be mentioned that the isotope-labelling studies cannot rule out any of these scenarios. Accordingly, at this point, all these pathways for hybrid alkyl Pd-radical species C generation considered feasible. Evidently, more detailed mechanistic studies are required to set a precise mechanism for this novel transformation.
In conclusion, we developed a visible light-induced palladium-catalyzed Heck reaction of diazo compounds and N-tosylhydrazones, with vinyl arenes and heteroarenes, leading to synthetically valuable allylic products. The mechanistic studies support the Brønsted acid-assisted generation of hybrid palladium C(sp3)-centered radical intermediate, thus expanding the boundaries of direct functionalization of alkenes using diazo compounds and N-tosylhydrazones. This method substantially expands the scope of substrates for alkyl Heck reaction. It is anticipated that this mild visible light-induced protocol will find use in synthesis and will stimulate development of new C–H functionalization methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Institute of Health (GM120281), National Science Foundation (CHE-1955663), and Welch Foundation (Chair, AT-0041) for financial support.
References
- [1].Curtius T, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges 1883, 16, 2230–2231. [Google Scholar]
- [2].a) Hodgson DM, Pierard FYTM, Stupple PA, Chem. Soc. Rev 2001, 30, 50–61; [Google Scholar]; b) Davies HML, Manning JR, Nature 2008, 451, 417–424; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Davies HML, Denton JR, Chem. Soc. Rev 2009, 38, 3061–3071; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Davies HML, Morton D, Chem. Soc. Rev 2011, 40, 1857–1869; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Ford A, Miel H, Ring A, Slattery CN, Maguire AR, McKervey MA, Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 9981–10080; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Cheng Q-Q, Deng Y, Lankelma M, Doyle MP, Chem. Soc. Rev 2017, 46, 5425–5443; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Xia Y, Qiu D, Wang J, Chem. Rev 2017, 117, 13810–13889; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Ciszewski ŁW, Rybicka-Jasińska K, Gryko D, Org. Biomol. Chem 2019, 17, 432–448; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Zhu D, Chen L, Fan H, Yao Q, Zhu S, Chem. Soc. Rev 2020, 49, 908–950; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Yang Z, Stivanin ML, Jurberg ID, Koenigs RM, Chem. Soc. Rev 2020, 49, 6833–6847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].a) Doyle MP, Protopopova MN, Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 7919–7946; [Google Scholar]; b) Maas G, Chem. Soc. Rev 2004, 33, 183–190; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Reisman SE, Nani RR, Levin S, Synlett 2011, 2011, 2437–2442; [Google Scholar]; d) Liu L, Zhang J, Chem. Soc. Rev 2016, 45, 506–516; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Chanthamath S, Iwasa S, Acc. Chem. Res 2016, 49, 2080–2090; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Ebner C, Carreira EM, Chem. Rev 2017, 117, 11651–11679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].a) Jurberg ID, Davies HML, Chem. Sci 2018, 9, 5112–5118; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang Z, Yadagiri D, Gevorgyan V, Chem. Sci 2019, 10, 8399–8404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].a) Chen Y, Zhang XP, J. Org. Chem 2004, 69, 2431–2435; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Dzik WI, Zhang XP, de Bruin B, Inorg. Chem 2011, 50, 9896–9903; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Li P, Zhao J, Shi L, Wang J, Shi X, Li F, Nat. Commun 2018, 9, 1972; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Lee W-CC, Wang D-S, Zhang C, Xie J, Li B, Zhang XP, Chem 2021, 7, 1588–1601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].a) Jiang J, Liu J, Yang L, Shao Y, Cheng J, Bao X, Wan X, Chem. Commun 2015, 51, 14728–14731; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Giedyk M, Goliszewska K, Proinsias K. ó, Gryko D, Chem. Commun 2016, 52, 1389–1392; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) te Grotenhuis C, van den Heuvel N, van der Vlugt JI, de Bruin B, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 140–145; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2018, 130, 146–151; [Google Scholar]; d) Su Y-L, Liu G-X, Liu J-W, Tram L, Qiu H, Doyle MP, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 13846–13855; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Zhao J, Li P, Xu Y, Shi Y, Li F, Org. Lett 2019, 21, 9386–9390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].a) Chuentragool P, Kurandina D, Gevorgyan V, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2019, 58, 11586–11598; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2019, 131, 1808–1812; [Google Scholar]; b) Kurandina D, Chuentragool P, Gevorgyan V, Synthesis 2019, 51, 985–1005; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhou W-J, Cao G-M, Zhang Z-P, Yu D-G, Chem. Lett 2019, 48, 181–191; [Google Scholar]; d) Kancherla R, Muralirajan K, Sagadevan A, Rueping M, Trends Chem 2019, 1, 510–523; [Google Scholar]; e) Cheng W-M, Shang R, ACS Catal 2020, 10, 9170–9196; [Google Scholar]; f) Cheung KPS, Kurandina D, Yata T, Gevorgyan V, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 9932–9937; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Huang H-M, Bellotti P, Pflüger PM, Schwarz JL, Heidrich B, Glorius F, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 10173–10183; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Bellotti P, Koy M, Gutheil C, Heuvel S, Glorius F, Chem. Sci 2021, 12, 1810–1817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].a) Kurandina D, Parasram M, Gevorgyan V, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 14212–14216; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2017, 129, 14400–14404; [Google Scholar]; b) Kurandina D, Rivas M, Radzhabov M, Gevorgyan V, Org. Lett 2018, 20, 357–360; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Chuentragool P, Yadagiri D, Morita T, Sarkar S, Parasram M, Wang Y, Gevorgyan V, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2019, 58, 1794–1798; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2019, 131, 1808–1812. [Google Scholar]
- [9].a) Wang G-Z, Shang R, Cheng W-M, Fu Y, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 18307–18312; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wang G-Z, Shang R, Fu Y, Org. Lett 2018, 20, 888–891; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Koy M, Sandfort F, Tlahuext-Aca A, Quach L, Daniliuc CG, Glorius F, Chem. Eur. J 2018, 24, 4552–4555; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Koy M, Bellotti P, Katzenburg F, Daniliuc CG, Glorius F, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59, 2375–2379; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2020, 132, 2395–2399; [Google Scholar]; e) Lee GS, Kim D, Hong SH, Nat. Commun 2021, 12, 991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].a) Kvasovs N, Iziumchenko V, Palchykov V, Gevorgyan V, ACS Catal 2021, 11, 3749–3754; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Cheng W-M, Shang R, Fu Y, Nat. Commun 2018, 9, 5215; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhao B, Shang R, Wang G-Z, Wang S, Chen H, Fu Y, ACS Catal 2020, 10, 1334–1343. [Google Scholar]
- [11]. See Supporting Information for details.
- [12].a) Heck RF, Acc. Chem. Res 1979, 12, 146–151; [Google Scholar]; b) Beletskaya IP, Cheprakov AV, Chem. Rev 2000, 100, 3009–3066; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Hills ID, Fu GC, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 13178–13179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Shao Y, Tong J, Zhao Y, Zheng H, Ma L, Ma M, Wan X, Org. Biomol. Chem 2016, 14, 8486–8492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].a) Xia Y, Wang J, Chem. Soc. Rev 2017, 46, 2306–2362; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Xia Y, Wang J, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 10592–10605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Bamford WR, Stevens TS, J. Chem. Soc 1952, 4735–4740. [Google Scholar]
- [16].Ratushnyy M, Kvasovs N, Sarkar S, Gevorgyan V, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59, 10316–10320; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2020, 132, 10402–10406. [Google Scholar]
- [17].a) Newcomb M, Toy PH, Acc. Chem. Res 2000, 33, 449–455; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Baldwin JE, Chem. Rev 2003, 103, 1197–1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].a) Petrone DA, Franzoni I, Ye J, Rodríguez JF, Poblador-Bahamonde AI, Lautens M, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 3546–3557; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Hu Y, Shen Z, Huang H, ACS Catal 2016, 6, 6785–6789; [Google Scholar]; c) Armbruster RW, Morgan MM, Schmidt JL, Lau CM, Riley RM, Zabrowsky DL, Dieck HA, Organometallics 1986, 5, 234–237. [Google Scholar]
- [19].a) Huang X, Webster RD, Harms K, Meggers E, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 12636–12642; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ciszewski ŁW, Durka J, Gryko D, Org. Lett 2019, 21, 7028–7032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.