Abstract
Introduction
The use of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum injection as a minimally invasive procedure for correction of Dupuytren’s deformity is well reported in the literature. We report our experience and long-term outcome of this procedure performed in a single secondary care centre.
Methods
We prospectively evaluated 143 fingers that underwent Dupuytren’s deformity correction using CCH injection. Early side effects, degree of correction, recurrence, and patient-reported outcomes were noted.
Results
Early local complications were resolved in two weeks' duration. No major complications were encountered. More than 80% achieved immediate full correction of deformity and at an average follow-up of five years, 23% of patients had a recurrence. Around 92% were very satisfied with the procedure.
Conclusion
CCH is a safe and effective minimally invasive method to achieve correction of palmar Dupuytren’s deformity and is associated with a high patient satisfaction rate.
Keywords: outcome, complication, recurrence, collagenase clostridium histolyticum, dupuytren’s
Introduction
Dupuytren’s disease is a progressive proliferative disorder affecting predominantly the palmar tissue of the hand, causing progressive flexion deformity of the fingers. Men with Northern European ancestry are more commonly affected. Other risk factors include advancing age, diabetes, anti-epilepsy medication, alcoholism and smoking [1]. Various genetic factors are also reported in the literature like mitochondrial mutations, the role of HLA system and Wnt signaling pathway [2-4]. In spite of advances, there is no cure for Dupuytren’s disease and correction of Dupuytren’s deformity is the mainstay of the treatment.
Historically, surgical treatment has remained the most successful modality for correction of Dupuytren’s deformities with open fasciectomy or needle fasciotomy more popularly performed. Needle fasciotomy is associated with very high recurrence rates and is not suitable for proximal interphalangeal joint contractures due to proximity to the digital neurovascular structures [5,6]. Limited fasciectomy has a lower recurrence rate compared to needle fasciotomy but carries the risk of injury to neurovascular structures, wound healing problems, skin necrosis and infection [6].
Enzymatic fasciotomy has been reported in the literature previously [7]. Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) is the first minimally invasive modality for treatment of Dupuytren’s contractures approved in Europe and the USA. Early results are encouraging and the aim of this study is to discuss the long term outcomes and patient-reported outcomes of CCH in the correction of Dupuytren’s deformity correction.
Materials and methods
This was a service evaluation project. This product was licenced for use by European Medicines Agency in March 2011 (EMEA/H/C/002048).
Study design
This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of all consecutive patients with Dupuytren’s contracture treated with CCH by a single surgeon at an NHS district general hospital from January 2013 to December 2016.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Only those with deformity of more than 30° at the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) and more than 20° at the proximal interphalangeal joints (PIPJ) with well palpable cord in one or two fingers were included in this study. Patients undergoing repeat injections, previous surgeries on the same finger and failed follow-up (those who did not attend follow-up appointments after two reminders or moved out of the area) were excluded from the study.
Data collection
All patients were evaluated for demographic data, the number of fingers involved, joints involved and extent of deformity before injection. The degree of the deformity was recorded by a senior author with the help of a goniometer. All patients received CCH injection according to the location of deformity on Day 1. The procedure involved a standard dose of CCH (Xiapex, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB) along the cord with a 24G needle at one or two sites depending on the number of joints involved. They were reviewed for manipulation after 24 hours. The site of injection was evaluated for local complications of CCH injection and correction was achieved with gentle stretching over five to ten seconds after administration of local anaesthesia. Immediate complications were noted and its resolution was monitored in subsequent visits. All patients were provided with a thermoplastic extension splint for night use for three months. The splint was moulded again to a correct fit at two to four weeks as local swelling settled. Skin tears were treated with serial dressings. All patients were provided supervised physiotherapy by a hand therapist. They were followed up at one, two, six, 12 weeks, six months, 12 months and yearly after. Complete correction of the deformity was defined as residual deformity of <5°. Recurrence was defined occurrence of >20° of deformity after treatment. All patients were evaluated for early complications, the extent of correction, residual deformity and recurrence rate. Besides, patient-reported outcomes were measured using QuickDASH scoring system, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
Results
Out of the total 139 patients, one died two years after the procedure from medical causes and 13 were lost to follow up. These were excluded from the study. This study included 125 patients with 143 fingers; 18 patients had a concurrent finger treated in the same sitting; 97 fingers had isolated metacarpophalangeal joint involvement while 46 had metacarpophalangeal joint and proximal interphalangeal joint involvement. The average age of the patients was 69.3 years. Of the patients, 109 were male with 56% right-side involvement, 45% had a family history of the disease and the average duration of the disease was 36.3 months (Table 1).
Table 1. Demographic data.
Average age in years (range) | 69.3 (54 – 84) |
Sex, M:F (%) | 87.2 : 12.8 |
Laterality, Right:Left (%) | 56 : 44 |
Family history, n (%) | 56/125 (44.8%) |
Average duration of disease in months (range) | 36.3 (9 – 75) |
All patients had an immediate complication of pain, swelling and bruising of the skin after the injection; 45% had pruritis, 25% had blisters, 20% regional lymph node enlargement and 17% skin tears. No patient had tendon or ligament tears (Table 2) (Figure 1).
Table 2. Complications.
Complication | n (%) |
Pain, swelling, bruising | 143/143 (100%) |
Pruritis | 64/143 (44.75%) |
Blisters | 36/143 (25.17%) |
Regional lymphnodes enlargement | 29/143 (20.27%) |
Skin tears | 24/143 (16.78%) |
Tendon/ligament injury | 0/143 (0%) |
The average initial deformity was 43.6° (36.5° MCPJ and 48.2° for PIPJ) which was corrected to an average 4.6° after manipulation. Around 88.1% had full correction of the deformity at the (MCPJ) and 76% at the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ). Of the residual deformity, 67% was in PIPJ, 28% in MCPJ and 5% in both MCPJ and PIPJ. The recurrence rate at an average follow-up period of 61.4 months was 23% (33/143). Seven out of 97 patients with only MCPJ experienced recurrence. On the other hand, out of the 46 patients who had correction at both MCPJ and PIPJ, 26 had recurrence with all at PIPJ and two with associated MCPJ recurrence. In the recurrence group, only five patients required intervention in the form of limited fasciectomy. All patients who underwent surgery for recurrence had a family history of disease. Around 85.1% of patients reported QuickDASH score 0-25, 8.7% reported a score of 25 - 50 and 7.2% reported a score of >50 indicating poor outcome. About 92% of patients were very satisfied with the outcome (Table 3).
Table 3. Results.
Parameter | |
Initial deformity average, ° (range) | 43.6 (28.5 – 74.5) |
MCPJ, ° (range) | 36.5 (28.5 – 74.5) |
PIPJ, ° (range) | 48.2 (30.6 – 46.1) |
Correction average, ° (range) | 4.6 (0 – 25.6) |
MCPJ, ° (range) | 3.7 (0 – 15.5) |
PIPJ, ° (range) | 8.7 (0 – 19.8) |
Full correction, n(%) | |
MCPJ, n(%) | 126/143 (88.1%) |
PIPJ, n(%) | 35/46 (76%) |
Average follow-up, months (range) | 61.4 (42 – 73) |
Recurrence, n(%) | 33/143 (23%) |
MCPJ, n(%) | 7/143 (4.8%) |
PIPJ, n(%) | 8/46 (17.3%) |
PROMS (QuickDASH score) | |
Average score (range) | 18.5 (0 – 75) |
0 – 25, n(%) | 121/143 (84.6%) |
26 - 50, n(%) | 12/143 (8.3%) |
>50, n(%) | 10/143 (6.9%) |
Very satisfied, n%) | 132/143 (92.3%) |
Discussion
The study of the digestive activity of filtrates from Clostridium histolyticum on equine Achilles was reported in the 1930s. In the late 1990s, its potential therapeutic use in Dupuytren’s disease was reported [8]. Commercial CCH available today comprise a fixed-ratio mixture of two purified collagenolytic enzymes, Clostridial type I collagenase (AUX-I) and Clostridial type II collagenase (AUX-II) [9]. Both have different cleavage sites and catalytic activity and therefore increase enzymatic activity when combined together. CORD I (Collagenase Option for Reduction of Dupuytren) and CORD II were pre-licencing phase III trials that confirmed superior outcome following CCH injection compared to placebo in reducing the Dupuytren’s deformity to <5 ° [10,11]. Similarly, JOINT I and II were open-label studies that reported better outcomes with CCH injection in Dupuytren’s deformity [12].
Multiple studies have shown benefits of CCH in the correction of Dupuytren’s deformity [13-17]. The extent and rate of correction reported in the literature is highly variable but overall correction at MCPJ was better than PIPJ across most of them [10,18]. Correction of 88% at MCPJ and 76% at PIPJ in this study is better than studies with two-year follow-up which showed 80% resolution of MCP deformities and half in PIPJ deformities [19,20].
Local complications of swelling and bruising are very common and usually settle in a few days [21]. In our study, all patients had local complications without any long-term effects. Rare major complications in the form of deep tendon injury, pulley rupture, complex regional pain syndrome, sensory abnormalities, haemorrhage after the procedure and deep vein thrombosis have been reported in the literature [11,20,23]. None of the patients in this series reported any major complications.
CORDLESS (CORD Long-Term Evaluation of Safety Study) was a follow-up study of the patients from CORD and JOINT studies [24]. Recurrence was defined as deformity of > 20 ° in a previously corrected finger. At three years' follow up 35% recurrence was observed with intervention in 8%, while at five-year recurrence at MCPJ and PIPJ was 40 and 66% respectively. Very few studies in the literature have reported long-term outcomes. Watt et al. reported recurrence in 75% of cases at eight years' follow up but the series included only eight patients [25]. The rate of recurrence in this study at an average follow-up of 61 months is 23% with 56% at PIPJ. These results are better than those reported in the literature and we believe that this is due to adherence to strict inclusion criteria [24,25]. All patients were examined for suitability of CCH injection by a senior author and only those patients with a well-palpable cord in one or two digits with deformity >30° at the metacarpophalangeal joint and 20° at the proximal interphalangeal joint were included in the study. Those not suitable for CCH injection were offered surgical intervention.
Multiple studies have studied patient-reported outcomes with the majority reporting good outcomes in >80% [24-27]. QuickDASH score used in this study reported good outcomes in >90% of patients and 92% were very satisfied with the procedure [28].
We appreciate the limitations of this study. Firstly, this is a single-centre and single-surgeon series. This theoretically may have introduced an unconscious selection bias but we do believe that the clearly defined and objective inclusion criteria helped to reduce this significantly. Besides, the criteria for residual deformity or recurrence were similar to those used in the literature. Being a single-centre study, all cases could be monitored in greater detail and heterogeneity of multiple clinicians was avoided. Secondly, 67% of the patients had isolated MCPJ involvement. It could be argued that this may have contributed to better outcomes but we believe that PIPJ deformities are less associated with a distinct palpable cord and therefore were more likely to be excluded from the study.
Conclusions
To conclude, this study provides good long-term results and patient-reported outcomes of CCH injection in the correction of Dupuytren’s deformity. The local side effects are common without long-term effects and serious complications are rare. The results also indicate that in a carefully selected cohort with a well-palpable cord, CCH is a safe and very effective minimally invasive alternative in the correction of Dupuytren’s deformity with good patient satisfaction rates.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. N/A issued approval -. This was a service evaluation project and no ethical approval was needed. This product was licenced for use by European Medicines Agency in March 2011 (EMEA/H/C/002048).
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.Dupuytren disease: Anatomy, pathology, presentation, and treatment. Rayan GM. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:189–198. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200701000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Identification of a novel mitochondrial mutation in Dupuytren's disease using multiplex DHPLC. Bayat A, Walter J, Lambe H, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15622243/ Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:134–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Role of the HLA System in the Pathogenesis of Dupuytren's Disease. McCarty S, Syed F, Bayat A. Hand (N Y) 2010;5:241–250. doi: 10.1007/s11552-009-9255-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wnt signaling and Dupuytren's disease. Dolmans GH, Werker PM, Hennies HC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:307–317. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1101029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Percutaneous needle fasciotomy in Dupuytren's contracture: is it a viable technique? Pereira A, Massada M, Sousa R, Silva C, Trigueiros M, Lemos R. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22523924/ Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78:30–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial on treatment in Dupuytren's disease: percutaneous needle fasciotomy versus limited fasciectomy. van Rijssen AL, Ter Linden H, Werker PM. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:469–477. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aea95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Enzymic fasciotomy. Hueston JT. Hand. 1971;3:38–40. doi: 10.1016/0072-968x(71)90010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Collagenase in the treatment of Dupuytren's disease: an in vitro study. Starkweather KD, Lattuga S, Hurst LC, et al. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21:490–495. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80368-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Briefing document for collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500) in the treatment of advanced Dupuytren's disease. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1182129/000119312509191187/dex991.htm 2009
- 10.Injectable collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Dupuytren's contracture. Hurst LC, Badalamente MA, Hentz VR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:968–979. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Injectable collagenase Clostridium histolyticum: a new nonsurgical treatment for Dupuytren's disease. Gilpin D, Coleman S, Hall S, Houston A, Karrasch J, Jones N. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:2027–2038. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Efficacy and safety of collagenase clostridium histolyticum injection for Dupuytren contracture: short-term results from 2 open-label studies. Witthaut J, Jones G, Skrepnik N, Kushner H, Houston A, Lindau TR. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Efficacy and safety of collagenase treatment for Dupuytren's disease: 2-year follow-up results. Van Beeck A, Van den Broek M, Michielsen M, Didden K, Vuylsteke K, Verstreken F. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2017;36:346–349. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2017.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Collagenase clostridium histolyticum in Dupuytren's contracture: a systematic review. Smeraglia F, Del Buono A, Maffulli N. Br Med Bull. 2016;118:149–158. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Early results of the use of collagenase in the treatment of Dupuytren's contracture. Considine S, Heaney R, Hirpara KM. Ir J Med Sci. 2015;184:323–327. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1111-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Short-term efficacy and safety of collagenase injection for Dupuytren's contracture: Therapy protocol for successful outcomes in a clinical setting. Sakai A, Zenke Y, Menuki K, Yamanaka Y, Tajima T, Tsukamoto M, Uchida S. J Orthop Sci. 2019;24:434–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Comparison between collagenase injection and partial fasciectomy in the treatment of Dupuytren's contracture. Tay TK, Tien H, Lim EY. Hand Surg. 2015;20:386–390. doi: 10.1142/S0218810415500288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Efficacy and safety of injectable mixed collagenase subtypes in the treatment of Dupuytren's contracture. Badalamente MA, Hurst LC. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:767–774. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Collagenase injections for Dupuytren's disease: prospective cohort study assessing 2-year treatment effect durability. Lauritzson A, Atroshi I. BMJ Open. 2017;7:0. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.A single injection of collagenase clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of moderate Dupuytren's contracture: a 2 year follow-up of 47 patients. McFarlane J, Syed AM, Sibly TF. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016;41:664–665. doi: 10.1177/1753193415597421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dupuytren contracture recurrence following treatment with collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CORDLESS study): 3-year data. Peimer CA, Blazar P, Coleman S, et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Isolated and spontaneous correction of proximal interphalangeal joint contractures in Dupuytren's disease: an exploratory analysis of the efficacy and safety of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum. Hayton MJ, Bayat A, Chapman DS, Gerber RA, Szczypa PP. Clin Drug Investig. 2013;33:905–912. doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0139-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.The efficacy and safety of concurrent collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections for 2 Dupuytren contractures in the same hand: a prospective, multicenter study. Gaston RG, Larsen SE, Pess GM, et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:1963–1971. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.06.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dupuytren contracture recurrence following treatment with Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CORDLESS Collagenase Option for Reduction of Dupuytren Long-Term Evaluation of Safety Study): 5-Year data. Peimer CA, Blazar P, Coleman S, Kaplan FT, Smith T, Lindau T. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:1597–1605. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Collagenase injection as nonsurgical treatment of Dupuytren's disease: 8-year follow-up. Watt AJ, Curtin CM, Hentz VR. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:534-9, 539.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Functional outcome of collagenase injections compared with fasciectomy in treatment of Dupuytren's contracture. Naam NH. Hand (N Y) 2013;8:410–416. doi: 10.1007/s11552-013-9540-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Efficacy and safety of concurrent collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections for multiple Dupuytren contractures. Coleman S, Gilpin D, Kaplan FT, et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–608. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]