Abstract
Metasurfaces are engineered nanostructured interfaces that extend photonic behaviorof natural materials, and they spurred many breakthroughs in multiple fields, includingquantum optics, optoelectronics and biosensing. Recent advances in metasurfacenanofabrication enable precise manipulation of light–matter interactions atsubwavelength scales. However, current fabrication methods are costly and timeconsuming and have a small active area with low reproducibility due to limitations inlithography, where sensing nanosized rare biotargets require a wide active surfacearea for efficient binding and detection. Here, we introduce a plastic-template tunablemetasurface with a large active area, with periodic metal-dielectric layers to exciteplasmonic Fano resonance transition providing multi-modal and multiplex sensing ofsmall biotargets, such as proteins and viruses. The tunable Fano resonance feature of themetasurface is enabled via chemical etching steps to manage nanoperiodicity of theplastic template decorated with plasmonic layers and surronding dielectric medium. This metasurface integrated with microfluidics further enhances the light-matter interactions over a wide sensing area, extending data collection from 3-D to 4-D by tracking real-time biomolecular binding events. Overall, this work resolves cost and complexity related large-scale fabrication challenges and improves multi-layer sensitivity of detection in biosensing applications.
Keywords: Tunable Fano-resonance, metasurface, microfluidic, biosensing, point-of-care diagnostic
Metasurfaces are engineered nanostructured interfaces comprising thin layers of plasmonic or dielectric materials [1] at subwavelength thicknesses that manipulate light by spatially arranged meta-atoms. Those meta-atoms can directly change light properties such as phase, amplitude, and polarization, thus, extending photonic behavior of natural materials [2]. Metasurfaces offer unusual optical phenomena [3] such as optical magnetism [4], negative reflections [5], electromagnetic-induced transparency [6], bi-anisotropy [7] and Fano-resonance [8, 9]. In particular, metasurfaces enable optical control by passing through nanostructured arrays to induce a rapid change of phase and light polarization [10]. These structures also enable a change of induced light angular momentum [11], spins and/or quantum states, and provide applications in flat lenses [12], holograms [13], invisible clocks [14] and photonic devices [15]. The light controlling capability of metasurfaces is strongly dependent on engineered nanostructures, especially their shape and material composition [16]. Metasurfaces of different dimensions have been fabricated using various nanofabrication methods including nano-discs by template stripping [17], rod antenna by nanoimprint [18], retroreflector by electron-beam (e-beam) [19], split-ring resonators by nanosphere/ion-beam milling [20], complex three-dimensional (3D) structures by self-assembly approaches[21] and colloidal synthesis[22]. However, apart from advanced applications, the ability to fabricate cost-effective metasurfaces at a large-scale remains a challenge. A plasmonic metasurface with Fano-resonances and asymmetric spectral lines originating from the response of isolated metal atoms, i.e., a unique feature of a quantum system was described recently [23, 24]. Metasurfaces are used in a variety of fields, including solar energy harvesting [25], spectroscopy [26], sensing [27], and broadband light manipulation [28]. Importantly, applications of plasmonic metasurface Fano-resonances are crucial in bio-molecular sensing because they greatly increase the sensitivity. This is achieved by a large spectral shift in resonance frequency in response to interference of two or more molecular oscillations and small perturbations [23]. However, current Fano-resonant metasurfaces [8, 23] require complex nanofabrication [6, 29] as well as optical sensing techniques [29] that requires expensive and bulky equipment (e.g., Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers) [26]. This critically limits the use of Fano-resonant metasurfaces for point-of-care (POC) biosensing applications.
Detecting and quantifying the interactions of metamaterials with biological entities require a large active area. To address these challenges, others have presented commercial optical disc surfaces as cost-effective bio/chemical sensing platforms [30, 31]. Since the biotargets are small and rare in quantity, these platforms require further improvements in resonant characteristics. However, tuning the resonant characteristics of the metamaterial through (i) ‘etching’ a plastic template to control ‘nanoperiodicity’ of the structure, coupled to (ii) precise ‘deposition’ of multi-layer plasmonic materials to engineer the plasmonic Fano-resonance on a plastic-templated metasurface has not been demonstrated. Here, we show that these tuning processes uniquely enable biosensing applications in detection of nano-thick multi-biolayers and nanosized biotargets such as virions using off-the-shelf, broadly available, inexpensive commercial optical disc surfaces. The Fano-resonant surface integrated with microfluidic real-time measurements did not only help to capture bio-targets, but also helped to confine their light-matter interactions within the sensing microenvironment that can be further extended from the 3-D collection of the optical information to 4-D by tracking the biosensing process over time. Our results indicate that this metasurface offers a portable, cost-effective, disposable plasmonic sensing platform for detection and quantification of multiple molecule layers and virions. Comparing with other techniques, plastic-templated fabrication is easy and enables a large scale, reproducible production of wide-area metasurfaces. We show that plastic-templated metasurface demonstrates tunable Fano-resonances due to the coupling/interference between waveguides and surface plasmon polarization (SPP) modes [32, 33]. As a result, the metasurface is able to provide maximum sensitivity, S = 377.69 nm/RIU and figure of merit, FOM = 25, where sensing performance is comparable with the reported Fano-resonance sensor’s response in the visible range [34–37]. Our results show real-time, layer-by-layer binding of proteins, antibodies and virus particles achieved by monitoring continuous spectral shifting of asymmetrical Fano-resonant frequency. We demonstrate (1) multiplex read-out from multiple parallel channels or locations on the same channel; (2) specific binding and spectral measurement of antibody-tethering proteins (protein G) and antibodies (anti-gp120 HIV) on a layer-by-layer surface chemistry; (3) comprehensive selection of a polyclonal gp120 antibody capable of targeting multiple HIV-1 subtypes (A, B, C, D, E and BC); (4) multi-modal sensing of both multiple types of bio-molecules and viruses; (5) detection and quantification of a target protein (recombinant gp120 HIV); (6) capture and detection of virus particles (HIV-1, molecular clone YU2), and (7) an inexpensive portable optical platform to detect down to 40 copies/μL of HIV-1. These results demonstrate that plastic-templated metasurfaces can be used in bio-sensing applications. Overall, our findings suggest that this metasurface platform can potentially improve clinical diagnostics of diseases such as cancer and HIV/AIDS at resource-limited settings due to its portability and cost-effective features.
The commercial Digital-Versatile Discs (DVD) surface design has a built-in, uniform periodic grating with periodicity (˄) ~750 nm, width (W) ~450 nm, and height ~23–25 nm [31] (Figure 1a). To demonstrate the plasmonic response, we have coated the plastic-templated surface grating with multi-layers, including titanium (Ti), silver (Ag), and gold (Au) materials through electron beam evaporation technique. We removed unwanted plastic, metals, and photoresist (PR) layers of DVDs to obtain plastic-templated surface grating. Finally, cleaned and chemically etched surface grating was coated with 10 nm Ti, 30 nm Ag, and 15 nm Au layers (optimized based on numerical modelling). Further details regarding surface preparation, chemical etching (30, 60, and 90 sec.) and microfluidic chip assembly steps are illustrated in Fig. 2a and experimental section. As a result, the final surface comprises dielectric-metal layers capable of exciting multiple optical modes based on grating (waveguide) dimensions [38]. These surfaces were then integrated with a microfluidic chip for bio-molecular detection in real-time (Figure 1b). The assembled microfluidic chip showed a diffractive rainbow pattern that can be also seen by naked eye (Figure 1c). The device can be disposed of after single use in clinical or POC settings, where targets can be infectious and biohazardous to avoid contamination; or it can be chemically treated on-chip to completely remove the surface chemistry for re-use in future experimentation in non-biological analytical chemistry applications. To evaluate plasmonic behavior of the chip, we performed bulk sensing with a variation in the glycerol concentration (Figure S1a-c, Figure S2). The surface sensing with layer-by-layer surface chemistry allowed to monitor the binding of mono- and multi-layers of biomolecules and virus particles at the atomic scale (Figure 1d). The fabrication steps are illustrated in Figure 2a. The fabricated surface showed bright rainbow scattering with the broadband light illumination (Figure 2b(i)). The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image showed a uniform pattern with a periodicity of 750 nm (Figure 2b(ii)). The atomic force microscopy (AFM) image confirmed the 3-D surface profile of the surface (Figure 2b(iii)). Uniform grating periodicity on the surface enabled efficient light excitation and coupling of surface plasmon resonance [39].
Figure 1:
Fano-resonant plastic-templated metasurface and a portable microfluidic sensor. a Optical disc surface consists of dielectric surface-grating used as a metasurface sensor. The surface was coated with Ti (10nm), Ag (30nm), and Au (15nm) multi-layers to fabricate plastic-templated metasurface. b Schematic diagram depicts the microfluidic chip consisting of three layers (plasmonic surface, DSA, and PMMA). c Fabricated metasurface chip is connected with tubing at inlet and outlet ports. d The plastic-templated metasurface based bio-sensing measures the layer-by-layer functionalization of biomolecules and target HIV-1 capture.
Figure 2:
Plastic-templated metasurface fabrication, surface profile and structure-dependent plasmonic Fano resonance modeling. a Plastic-templated metasurface fabrication is based on subsequent steps: (i) removal of top plastic, (ii) removal of PR and metal-coating, (iii) surface cleaning, (iv) chemical etching, (v) plasmonic layer coating, and finally (vi) microfluidic chip assembly. b The fabricated metasurface shows bright rainbow patterns (i); scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image shows uniform surface gratings (ii); and atomic force microscopy (AFM) image depicts 3D profile of coated surface (iii). c WG and SPP modes are present in the plasmonic waveguide (PWG) grating surface. d SPP mode response of the metasurface with dielectric medium (DM) RI varying from 1.33 to 1.42 RIU. We have shown plasmonic field distribution at peak resonance frequency, fpeak =560 nm in water medium. e Plasmonic Fano resonance response of metasurface is tuned by changing the thickness of silver (Ag) layer.
Near-field electromagnetic excitation of the metasurface resulted in both parallel and anti-parallel currents corresponding to the transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) modes [40]. Plastic-templated metasurface waveguides can support multiple TE and TM modes based on waveguide dimension and effective refractive index changes[41]. As refractive index of the surrounding medium increases, effective refractive index value will increase to generate multiple modes and mode-hybridization will occur[42]. For plasmonic waveguide based structures guided modes propagate the light that passes through the metal waveguide, termed as ‘WG mode’. Moreover, surface plasmon polarization (SPP) modes are generated that propagate along the interface between metal-dielectric interfaces, defined as ‘SPP modes’ that can be classified as super (bright), and subradiant (dark) modes dependent on coupling strength between incident light from free-space to metasurfaces [43]. Normally, SPP modes can be considered as guided modes that leak-out energy outside the waveguide or not confined to the metasurfaces due to effective RI variation and inherent loss of the metal coating.
Due to the symmetrical metal grating, the subradiant mode will be dominant on the surface [26]. During near-field excitation, WG and SPP modes are excited at the same time. However, based on RI of the dielectric medium, light can be strongly coupled inside the waveguide or leakage to the surrounding medium (Figure 2c). Computational modeling of dielectric-metal interface showed strong dependency on the SPP modes with medium RI variations (Figure 2d). The asymmetric decay of SPP modes increased as we increased the RI of the medium (from 1.33 to 1.42). Therefore, WG modes can leaked to the metal-dielectric interface and contributed to the interference with the SPP modes[33]. Maximum field-decay occurred with the higher RI of dielectric medium (n=1.42) compared to the lower values (n=1.33). Similarly, the field-decay property was also observed with WG modes due to the variations in medium RI (Figure S1d). However, the WG mode field decay is lower compared with SPP modes with RI variations.
The plastic-templated metasurface can be considered to function as a plasmonic nanocircuit at optical frequency where each of multi-layer elements with characteristic impedance contributes to the resonance frequency[44]. Accordingly, the plasmonic resonance of surface can be defined with the following equation:
| (1) |
where P0 is the periodicity of grating surface; εs and εm are permittivity of metal and dielectric medium; and j and k are grating orders [31]. To confirm diffraction patterns, the metal-coated surface was illuminated using a monochromatic light source. The first-order of diffraction pattern was clearly observed (Figure S3-4). When the parameters of grating period (P0 = 750 nm) and diffraction orders (i=j=1) were kept constant, the resonance frequency was strongly dependent on the material property of the metal and dielectric medium. Moreover, plasmonic response of the plastic-templated metasurface shows asymatical Fano shape. Fano response occurs (based on Ugo Fano in 1961) due to interference between continuum states (background process) and excitation of discrete states (resonant process)[24]. Fano resonance of periodic metasurface due to electromagnetic modes, material losses, and their coupling onto the resonance line shape[45]. For our plastic-templated metasurface, asymmetric Fano shape occurs in the reflection spectra due to interference between guided modes from the grating surface (waveguides), which act as a background process and the surface plasmon polarization (SPP) modes from metal-dielectric interfaces that can act as a resonant process[32, 33]. The Fano-resonance profile of our plastic-templated metasurface can be approximated by following equation[46]:
| (2) |
where, BC is the background term, Am is the amplitude, is the resonant bandwidth (BW), and is the Fano parameters. The value of q is used to define asymmetric property of the Fano profile, which is based on coupling/interference between the background (continuum state) and resonant process (discrete state). Therefore, three special shape of Fano responses are anti-resonances (= 0, no coupling to the discrete state), asymmetric resonance (, coupling between discrete and continuum states), and Lorentzian shape resonance (, no coupling to the continuous state). There is no general procedure to design a system with desired q parameter. In addition, q parameter depends on incident light, geometry, and materials properties of a Fano system [8]. Therefore, we have further evaluated the plasmonic response of surfaces by altering material types and coating thicknesses since the metal property (the refractive index or permittivity) of a medium has a strong relationship with its thickness, shape or dimension [36, 47]. By employing a finite element method (FEM), we computationally assessed the effect of variations in metal layer thicknesses to predict plasmonic responses and the observed plasmonic Fano-resonance shift (Figure S5a). Further, when the thickness of silver layer (tAg) was changed from 5 to 40 nm whereas the thickness of gold (tAu = 10 nm) and titanium (tTi = 10 nm) were kept constant, the plasmonic Fano-resonance peak had blue-shifted from 707.47 to 558.27 nm, respectively (Figure 2e). Similarly, we also observed blue-shifts in plasmonic Fano-resonance dip from 682.22 nm to 528.73 nm, respectively (Figure 2e). The maximum peak/dip resonance shift (Δλres = 41.82/44.20 nm) was observed when the lower thickness of the silver layer (tAg = 5 nm) was used. In particular, when the thickness of the silver layer was approximately 30 nm and more, the resonance peak and dip remained constant at 558.27 and 530.25 nm, respectively. Therefore, we kept the silver thickness as 30 nm and titanium thickness as 10 nm in further simulations. We have also altered the thickness of gold (tAu) and titanium (tTi) and measured dip and peak of the plasmonic Fano-resonance shifts (Figure S5b,c). Alteration in titanium thickness did not provide any significant changes in the resonance peak or dip. Then, we have simultaneously altered the thickness of titanium, silver and gold, and observed similar blue-shift trends as found in the silver thickness variations (Figure S5d). Therefore, the variation of tAg had the dominant effect in the maximum resonance wavelength shifts compared to other metal layers with minimum thickness variations (5 nm). As earlier reported [48], the plasmonic response of Ag-nanostructure is stronger than that of Au, Ti, and other plasmonic materials. Moreover, we compared computational simulations with experimental data and observed the same plasmonic responses for the thickness variations of metal layers (Figure S6a,b). Moreover, asymatric Fano response tunning due q-value variation through periodic metal surfaces structural parameters (width, height, and thickness) variation are also reported previously [49].
To observe the plasmonic Fano response of the surface with RI variations of dielectric medium, a handheld, portable (weight < 0.5 lb) sensing platform was designed and assembled as shown in Figure 3a, b. Briefly, the broadband light is emitted from the source, passes through a series of optical components and illuminates the microfluidic-integrated chip. The reflected light is measured through a customized spectrometer (see the Supporting Information). During the system characterization, the plasmonic Fano-resonance responses of the plastic surface was measured and acquired using the normal white-light illumination (Figure 3c). A dip resonance reflection (λ0) was observed at 750 nm with 15 nm of spectral line-width or full width at half maximum (FWHM) in air medium. The resonance spectra showed good agreement with computational modeling, and the 3dB bandwidth decreased to 5.24 nm. Overall reflection spectra increased by approximately 10% due to higher light absorption during experiments. To prove Fano response of the plastic-templated metasurface, we have fitted reflection spectral line with Fano equation and calculated available parameters following equation (2) (Fig. S7). For air (n=1.0) medium fitting parameter [BC, ωc, Am, BW, q] are [0.92±003, 758.49, −0.479±0.0047, 11.20±0.215, −2.42±03]. Similarly, for water medium, fitting parameter [BC, ωc, Am, BW, q] are [0.102±001, 547.94±0.35, 0.064±0.001, 12.85±0.79, 10]. Furthermore, medium-dependent plasmonic Fano-resonance tuning response was observed due to the coupling/interference between the WG and SPP modes. Experimental data and computation modeling of the associated asymmetrical plasmonic Fano-resonance response had a similar peak and dip resonance at approximately 560 and 525 nm, respectively (Figure 3c). However, there is a big different at shorter wavelengths for the reflection in air medium between simulation and experiments conditions. This may be due to light absorption at shorter wavelengths and unable to provide exact experiment environments during modeling.
Figure 3:
Bulk RI-sensing on a portable set-up and computational modeling. a Portable set-up measures the plasmonic Fano response of plastic-templated metasurface. b Conceptual block-diagrams of the optical set-up and ray-tracing of the light-transmission and reflection from the metasurface. c Computational and experiment results demonstrating plasmonic Fano resonance tuning from the metasurfaces with medium (air and water) variations. d Plasmonic Fano resonance is tuned using a range of glycerol dilutions in water (2.5–70% v/v). e Plasmonic Fano resonance wavelength shifts as a function of RI variation. Dotted lines indicate the linearity response during simulation and experiment. f Real-time dip and peak plasmonic response to the variation in glycerol concentration.
Optical sensing performance is generally characterized using both spectral shifts (Δλ) and spectral line-width (FWHM) due to the RI variations (Δn) [39]. This is related to the sensor sensitivity (S = Δλ/Δn) [31, 34] and figure of merit (FOM = S/FWHM) [34, 50]. To observe bulk sensitivity, we have also varied the concentration of glycerol (from 2.5% to 70%, v/v), corresponding to the RI variations from 1.336 to 1.428 RIU (Figure 3d,e and S1c,d). Due to the changes in RI, asymmetric Fano-resonance caused a peak red-shift from 553.44 to 585.85 nm, as well as in the dip from 524.32 to 553.22 nm. Similarly, Fano-resonance shifts with RI variations were also observed at transmission-mode due to the semi-transparent property of fabricated surface (Figure S6c, d). A linear fit of the resonance wavelength shifting for RI variations demonstrated the sensor sensitivity as 377.69 nm/RIU and FOM as 25 based on Δλ = 9.82 nm, Δn = 0.026 RIU, and FWHM = 15nm values, respectively. Computational modeling confirmed the wavelength shifts of the asymmetric Fano-resonance with different glycerol solutions and correlated with experimental data (Figure S1e and S3e).
Additionally, we evaluated the effect of etching process (1:4 mixture of acetone and isopropanol, with etching periods: 30, 60, and 90 seconds) on the plasmonic Fano-resonance response of plastic-templated metasurfaces. Bulk sensing response was measured in real-time with respect to the peak and dip of the Fano-resonance with 60 seconds (sec) etching process (Figure 3f). Both peak and dip resonances were correlated with RI variations in 2.5% to 70 % glycerol solutions. As a result, the peak of Fano-resonance provided higher wavelength shifting compared to the dip. Based on the glycerol concentration experiments, we found that 60 sec etched surfaces provided higher wavelength shifts than 30 and 90 sec etching (Figure S6d and S8a, b). Our sensor performance (S and FOM) was comparable with the other reported localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) platforms in the visible range [34–37].
As Fano-resonance is based on the interference of two or more oscillations, a small perturbation can produce a large spectral shift in the resonance frequency [23, 51]. To observe this effect, we applied layer-by-layer surface chemistry on the plastic-templated metasurface and monitored real-time biomolecular binding. Chemical steps to capture mono- and multi-biomolecular layers are summarized using a conceptual block diagram in Figure 4a. Briefly, our goal was to optimize the chemical steps to effectively capture recombinant gp120 HIV protein (rec-gp120). Gp120 is an HIV envelope glycoprotein located on the surface of HIV-1 particles [52]. The chemistry steps include N-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC)/N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), protein G, anti-gp120 HIV antibody and rec-gp120 HIV protein. These steps were evaluated on plastic metasurfaces etched for 30, 60 or 90 sec (Figure 3b). The chemistry details are provided in the Supplementary Information (Table S1). Results showed that the 60 sec etching period provided the maximum cumulative wavelength shift of 0.16, 0.36, 1.36, and 1.955 nm for EDC/NHS, protein G, anti-gp120 and rec-gp120, respectively (Figure 3c). As the complexity of the biomolecule layer increased, the resonance wavelength shifted to the higher values. The dependence of the resonance wavelength shift (Δλ) on the molecular layer binding thickness (d) was related to the following equation:
| (3) |
where m is the sensitivity factor (in nm/RIU); n layer and n medium are the refractive indices of the molecule layer (RIU) and dielectric medium; d is the thickness of molecule layer (nm); l is electromagnetic decay length (nm) [35]. In our experiment, m = 377.69 nm/RIU, n layer (~1.48) [53], having higher value compared to the n medium (1.33). Therefore, layer-by-layer binding of these biomolecules resulted in red-shifts (higher wavelength values). The binding responses of metasurfaces etched for 30 and 90 sec periods are shown in Figure S9. To optimize the concentration of protein G, we evaluated a range of concentrations from 75 to 1000 μg/mL and observed cumulative resonance wavelength shifts from 0.032 ± 0.003 to 0.204 ± 0.017 nm (Figure 4d; and S10). The lowest concentration of protein G (50 μg/mL) did not provide any signal (data not presented). Protein G data is represented with I-shaped Box-Whisker plots. Through non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test, we observed a statistically difference between 75 and 1000 μg/mL concentrations (n=3, p<0.05). Since there was no statistical difference between 500 and 1000 μg/mL (n=3, p>0.05), we selected the protein G concentration of 500 μg/mL for further experiments.
Figure 4:
Surface sensitivity of plastic-templated metasurface for layer-by-layer modifications. a Summary of surface chemistry steps. b Resonance peak wavelength shifts demonstrated on surfaces etched for 30, 60 and 90 sec. c Layer-by-layer binding response of bio-molecules on the 60 sec etched surface is monitored in real-time. d-f Resonance wavelength shifts as a function various concentrations of protein G, anti-gp120 antibody and rec-gp120 protein are represented via Box-Whisker plots. I-shaped box indicates 25th and 75th, red-line median, and whiskers the 95th and 5th percentiles. Dots represent data points for each concentration. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test was performed to evaluate the collected data for each concentration at Protein G, anti-gp120 antibody and rec. gp120 protein experiments. The minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum of each concentration were presented in Supplementary Table 1. In Protein G experiment, statistical difference was observed between 75 and 1000 μg/mL concentrations (n=3, p<0.05). In anti-gp120 antibody experiments, statistical difference was observed between 30 and 75 μg/mL concentrations (n=3, p<0.05). In rec-gp120 protein experiments, statistical difference was observed between 25 and 200 μg/mL concentrations (n=3, p<0.05).
On the HIV-1 virus surface, there are several viral proteins that can serve as targets in HIV-1 capture and detection. As an envelope protein, gp120 has discontinuous conserved epitopes (V1–V5 loops) assisting the virus entry to CD4+T lymphocytes [54]. Therefore, we used this protein as a target protein on the virus surface, and tested the binding of anti-gp120 antibodies to recombinant gp120 proteins. A panel of ten gp120 recombinant proteins representing a broad range of HIV subtypes (A, B, C, D, E and RC) was tested. Recombinant gp120 proteins were obtained through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program and also from commercial sources. This panel of recombinant gp120 proteins was applied to authenticate reactivity of anti-gp120 antibodies using Western Blot analysis (Figure S11a and Table S2). Twenty anti-gp120 monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies were tested for cross reactivity with multiple HIV subtypes. Two best antibodies were selected: a mouse monoclonal antibody (#2343 ID6 clone, NIH AIDS Reagent Program) and a rabbit polyclonal antibody (#11233-RP02, Sino Biological) see Figure S11a and Table S2. The polyclonal anti-gp120 antibody was strongly reactive with all 10 gp120 recombinant proteins in the panel, see Figure S13a and Table S2. Therefore, the polyclonal antibody was selected for further experiments.
Multiple concentration of the polyclonal anti-gp120 antibody were evaluated (15 to 75 μg/mL) on the plastic metasurface. The recorded shifts ranged from 0.25 ± 0.08 to 0.8 ± 0.02 nm (Figure 4e and S11). No signal change was detected at the antibody concentration of 15 μg/mL (data not presented). Anti-gp120 antibody data is demonstrated with I-shaped Box-Whisker plots. Through non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test, we observed a statistical difference between 30 and 75 μg/mL concentrations (n=3, p<0.05). Since there was no statistical difference between 50 and 75 μg/mL (n=3, p>0.05), we selected the anti-gp120 antibody concentration of 50 μg/mL for further experiments. The concentrations of rec. gp120 protein ranging from 25 to 200 μg/mL were tested (Figure 4f and S12). Similarly, rec-gp120 protein data is demonstrated with I-shaped Box-Whisker plots. Through non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test, we observed a statistically difference between 25 and 200 μg/mL concentrations (n=3, p<0.05). In summary, our plastic-templated metasurface was able to sense multiple biomolecular layers and capture rec-gp120 proteins efficiently based on the capability of the higher order plasmonic modes to cover larger distance into the dielectric medium and efficiently interact with bio-analyte layers.
To capture HIV-1 particles, we modified plastic metasurfaces using the optimized concentrations of 11-Mercaptoundecanoic acid (11-MUA), EDC/NHS, protein G and the polyclonal anti-gp120 antibody. To model a viral load assay, we diluted the stock HIV-1 YU2 solution using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The stock concentration of HIV-1 YU2 was 400 virus copies per μL and the corresponding concentration of the HIV p24 gag protein was 20 picogram per μL. We decided to continue using the polyclonal anti-gp120 antibody to make the system versatile to multiple HIV-1 subtypes. We used the plastic-templated surfaces to capture pseudo HIV particles and also HIV virus particles (Figure S13). We evaluated the effect of surface chemistry on HIV-1 detection, and designed three experimental sets: (1) surface chemistry (no incubation, real-time) and HIV detection (no incubation, real-time); (2) surface chemistry (no incubation, real-time) and HIV detection (with a 1-hour incubation in real-time); and (3) surface chemistry (with incubation) and real-time HIV detection (with a 1-hour incubation in real-time). For HIV sampling, we introduced HIV solution for an hour via a syringe pump with a flow rate of 5 μL/min. The details in surface chemistry and HIV sampling are described in Table S3. In the experimental set-1, HIV detection provided 0.207 ± 0.133 nm shift without any incubation steps at both surface chemistry and HIV sampling (Figure S13c). In the experimental set-2, we observed 0.26 ± 0.008 nm shift when we incubated HIV sample for an hour after we introduced the sample to the chip (Figure 5a). In the experimental set-3, incubation steps were included on both the surface chemistry and the HIV capture where we incubated the same HIV sample for an hour after introducing it to the plasmonic chip (Figure 5b). The set-3 provided a strongly increased wavelength shift (0.92 ± 0.06 nm) indicating that the incubation step in the chemistry enhanced the signal and provided a wider detection range compared to sets 1 and 2 (Figure 5c). Further, allowing the viruses incubate on the active surface area of the metasurface allowed the viruses to interact longer with the surface, hence enabling more interactions between the target and the surface for a better detection protocol that is reflected as a higher shift in the resonance and more efficient capture of HIV-1 particles. Dose response was tested by measuring cumulative binding on the nanoplasmonic surface using 3 dilutions of the HIV-1 virus YU2 stock in PBS (40, 80 and 200 copies/μL. All HIV dilutions provided red-shifts in the peak wavelength (Figure 5d). The HIV virus was captured at different locations on the chip (both the top and edge side of the metasurface grating) demonstrating that the entire surface was efficiently functionalized with the anti-gp120 antibody (Figure 5e). This indicated that both waveguide and plasmonic modes may contribute to surface plasmon Fano resonance and enable efficient biosensing. Together, these results suggest that the metasurface chip we present here has potential for a high impact on HIV viral load testing.
Figure 5:
Detection and capture of HIV-1 particles. a, b Real-time detection of HIV-1 YU2 molecular clone is demonstrated for the experimental set-2 and 3. c Different experimental sets evaluated the effect of extended incubation time on sensing performance. d Cumulative resonance wavelength shifting is demonstrated usingdifferent HIV-1 concentrationse SEM images of captured HIV-1 particles on both the (i) edge and (ii) top layer of grating surface due to SPP and waveguides modes.
In summary, we introduce plastic-templated metasurfaces with a large active area, having periodic metal-dielectic layers to excite plasmonic Fano resonance modes providing multi-modal and multiplex sensing. Our approach will able to resolve cost and complexity related with large-scale metasurface fabrication, and enhance sensitivity of layer-by-layer real-time binding of mono- and multi-layer protein, antibody, and virus particles on a cost-effective, disposable, portable platform. Briefly, we designed and developed a plasmonic metasurface, and demonstrated efficient Fano resonance modes and specific detection of protein G, gp120 HIV protein and HIV viral particles. We also showed that biosensing properties of these metasurfaces can be monitored using a simple, cost-effective and portable platform to quantify binding of specific proteins and virus particles in real-time. The plasmonic Fano resonance mode multiplexing capability demonstrated here has potential to be generally applied to detect specific proteins, viruses and cells.
The metasurface demonstrated here is cost-effective and can be mass produced. The metasurface preparation method shown here moves the fabrication process from the traditionally used silicon substrate to plastic, leveraging the nanoperiodicity that has been already perfected in the commercial surface. This innovative change in fabrication approach reduces the manufacturing cost by approximately 100 times, enables reproducibility over a large surface area and makes possible to control electromagnetic field at nanoscale regions with a high precision. In conclusion, plastic-templated metasurfaces demonstrated here have potential to offer a wide range of applications including biochemical sensing, optoelectronics and optical spectroscopy devices.
Experimental Section
Preparation of plastic-templated metasurfaces:
DVD surface consists of top plastic surface, metal-coating, photoresist layers, surface grating and polycarbonate-plastic layers. Briefly, we prepared metasurfaces by removing the coating on DVD surface, unwanted metal-coating and photoresist (PR) layers using step-by-step physical and chemical processes. Fabrication steps: (1) Top coating layer of DVD was removed using a knife; (2) metal-coating was removed using air-flow; (3) surface was cleaned using a 1:1 mixture of ethanol (EtOH) and methanol (MetOH)at 60˚C and (4) the surface was etched using a 1:4 mixture of acetone and isopropanol for different etching periods (30, 60 and 90 sec). After the cleaning step, (5) DVD surface grating was coated with 10 nm titanium (Ti), 30 nm silver (Ag) and 15 nm gold (Au) layers through electron beam evaporation technique (AJA international, Inc., MA 02066, USA). For 10nm Ti layer, we have used 8.3KV voltage, 60mA current and 0.5A/Sec deposition rate. For 30nm Ag layer, 8.3KV voltage, 96 mA current, and 1A/Sec deposition rate are used. Similarly, 15nm Au coating thickness was obtained from 8.3KV, 175mA current and 1A/Sec deposition rate parameters. (6) Finally, the plasmonic surface was further washed before the microfluidic chip assembly using the 1:1 mixture of EtOH and MetOH.
Sensitivity and binding properties:
To measure bulk sensitivity and observe the binding response of biomolecules, we used glycerol diluted in deionized (DI) water (2.5% to 70.0% v/v). The metasurface was functionalized using layer-by-layer surface chemistry. To evaluate functionalized surface sensitivity, the coated metasurface was modified using 10 mM 11-MUA (450561, Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, US) overnight to create carboxyl groups. Afterwards, the surface was cleaned using 1:1 mixture of EtOH and MetOH and dried using filtered air. Then the surface was assembled using plastic layers to construct microfluidic chip. The microfluidic chip consisted of 2 layers: (1) A polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA, thickness: 3.2 mm, MacMaster Carr, Elmhurst, IL) as the top layer with inlet and oulet ports. (2) A double-sided adhesive (DSA) layer (thickness: 50 μm, iTapestore, Scotch Plains, NJ) to create microchannels and assemble the chip with surface. The PMMA and DSA surfaces were cut using a CO2 laser cutter (VL-200, VersaLaser, Arizona, US).
HIV gp120 protein and virus capture:
Multilayer immunocapture method was used to capture gp120 HIV protein and HIV viral particles on the metasurfaces in 3 steps: (1) Protein G layer: After MUA modification, a 1:1 mixture of 100 mM EDC (03450 Fluka – Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, US) and 100 mM NHS (130672 Aldrich – Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, US) was flowed through the channel to create succinamide groups. The surfaces were then washed with 100 μL PBS flow via inlet ports. The succinamide groups reacted with amine groups in protein G (#21193, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Missouri, US). This step was followed by a 100 μL PBS wash. (2) Anti-gp120 antibody layer: 100 μL of anti-gp120 (immunoaffinity purified rabbit polyclonal IgG, 1 mg/mL, #11233-RP02, Sino Biological, Pennsylvania, US) was captured on the protein G layer and the surface was washed using 100 μL PBS. (3) HIV capture: The functionalized metasurface was used to capture recombinant gp120 proteins and HIV-1 particles. After the capture events, the surfaces were washed with 100 μL of PBS. All the steps were monitored in real-time. Recombinant gp120 proteins representing HIV subtypes A, B, C, D, E and RC were obtained from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Sino Biological Inc. and Immune Technology Corp. (New York, NY). To model a viral load assay, we used a stock solution of HIV-1 YU2 molecular clone (400 HIV-1 virus copies per μL based on 20 pg of HIV Gag pP24 protein per μL as determined via ELISA, see Virus production and quantification section below). The stock solution of HIV-1 YU2 was provided by Dr. Timothy Henrich.
Portable optical set-up:
A portable, customized optical setup was developed to measure the plasmonic responses of the metasurface gratings. Briefly, the portable setup consists of light-emitting-diode (LED), AA battery (3.7 volts), convex lens, optical linear polarizer, slit (Ø 0.9 – 12 mm), beam splitter (50:50), objective lens (x4), and a customized spectrometer (Ocean optics, HR4000+ (custom), Resolution: ~0.02 nm FWHM, detection range: 380–870 ). Broadband light from a light emitting diode (LED) source was focused through an input convex lens that passed through a linear polarizer, slit (50 μm), a beam splitter (50 : 50) and finally illuminated to the microfluidic metasurface through an objective (x4). The light reflected from the metasurface chip returns to the same objective by passing through the beam splitter and output convex lens. Finally, the response is measured in real-time by using a portable spectrometer. Analyte was flowed through the channel using a syringe pump setup (withdraw mode) to change the refractive index (RI) of the dielectric medium. The resultant Fano-resonance wavelength shifting was measured through the spectrometer using MATLAB interfaced omindrive software. Real-time plasmonic response of the metasurface sensor was measured through the peak-wavelength shifts vs analyte flow time (sec).
Simulations:
The light reflection guiding property from the plastic-templated metasurface was modeled using a finite element-based computational software (COMSOL Multiphysics, CST Studio Suite). The model is based on the 3-D geometry of grating structure (width = 450 nm, height = 25 n, and periods = 730 nm). Taking advantage of planar symmetry in the x-y plane and periodic grating structures, we have modeled a single unit cell, with periodic boundary conditions, an input port for light excitation and an output port to measure the light. Similar, single unit cell simulation of periodic metasurface was also previously reported in the literature [55]. The grating structure was made using polycarbonate (n = 1.58) coated with titanium (Ti), silver (Ag), and gold (Au) materials. A broadband light source illuminated the unit grating surface from the top. Light reflection from the grating surface with medium RI variation (from 1.33 to 1.42) was collected from the entrance of the incident beam.
Virus production and quantification:
HIV particles were prepared from HIV-1 YU2, a CCR5-using molecular clone that productively infects primary lymphocytes, monocytes and macrophages. pYU2 plasmid was obtained from Dr. Beatrice Hahn and Dr. George Shaw (NIH AIDS Reagent Program, cat# 1350). Briefly, 293T cells were transfected with pYU2 using the X-tremeGENE™ 9 DNA transfection reagent following the manufacturer protocol (Millipore Sigma). Cells were incubated at 37º C for 48–72 hours in DMEM plus 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin and streptomycin. Supernatants were removed, clarified by passage through a 0.45μM mesh filter, aliquoted and frozen at −80 º C for future use. Viral stocks were quantified using real-time PCR amplification of HIV-1 RNA as previously reported [27] and HIV-1 P24 gag protein was detected using the Alliance HIV-1 p24 ELISA kit (Perkin Elmer) following the manufacturer protocol.
Western blotting:
HIV recombinant proteins were analyzed using 7.5% Criterion SDS-PAGE gels (Bio-Rad cat# 5678025) and Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer Packs (Nitrocellulose, Bio-Rad cat# 170–4159). Criterion gels made possible QC monitoring across the workflow: total protein was UV imaged in the gel and on the nitrocellulose blot to evaluate molecular integrity and transfer efficiency. The gp120 HIV protein was detected using ECL sandwich immunoassay with the same antibody as used in the metasurface system (rabbit polyclonal anti-gp120 cat# 11233-RP02 Sino Biological, PA, USA), goat anti-rabit HRP conjugate (cat# 111–035-045, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) and West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat # 34096). The chemiluminescent signal was recorded as a series of exposures (typically 1s −30 min) using a digital camera (Chemidoc MP, BioRad).
Statistical Analysis:
Statistical assesements were performed using GraphPad Prism software. Details on the statistical analysis were indicated in the figure captions.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (NIH), numbers R01 DE024971, R44 DE021672, and R01 AI120683. We would like to thank Dr. Sencer Ayas for his technical support.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or from the author.
Contributor Information
Dr. Rajib Ahmed, Bio-Acoustic MEMS in Medicine (BAMM) Laboratory, Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.
Dr. Mehmet Ozgun Ozen, Bio-Acoustic MEMS in Medicine (BAMM) Laboratory, Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.
Dr. Merve Goksin Karaaslan, Bio-Acoustic MEMS in Medicine (BAMM) Laboratory, Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States
Dr. Cecilia A. Prator, Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States
Cassandra Thanh, Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States.
Shreya Kumar, Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States.
Leonel Torres, Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States.
Nikita Iyer, Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States.
Sadie Munter, Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States.
Dr. Sarka Southern, Gaia Medical Institute, 505 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States
Timothy J. Henrich, Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States
Dr. Fatih Inci, Bio-Acoustic MEMS in Medicine (BAMM) Laboratory, Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.
Utkan Demirci, Bio-Acoustic MEMS in Medicine (BAMM) Laboratory, Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.
References
- [1].Zang X, Dong F, Yue F, Zhang C, Xu L, Song Z, Chen M, Chen PY, Buller GS, Zhu Y, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707499; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Su B, Wu Y, Tang Y, Chen Y, Cheng W, Jiang L, Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].High AA, Devlin RC, Dibos A, Polking M, Wild DS, Perczel J, de Leon NP, Lukin MD, Park H, Nature 2015, 522, 192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Karimullah AS, Jack C, Tullius R, Rotello VM, Cooke G, Gadegaard N, Barron LD, Kadodwala M, Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 5610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Linden S, Enkrich C, Wegener M, Zhou J, Koschny T, Soukoulis CM, Science 2004, 306, 1351; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Yen T-J, Padilla W, Fang N, Vier D, Smith D, Pendry J, Basov D, Zhang X, Science 2004, 303, 1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Smith DR, Padilla WJ, Vier D, Nemat-Nasser SC, Schultz S, Physical review letters 2000, 84, 4184; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Shelby RA, Smith DR, Schultz S, Science 2001, 292, 77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Yang Y, Kravchenko II, Briggs DP, Valentine J, Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Marqués R, Medina F, Rafii-El-Idrissi R, Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 144440. [Google Scholar]
- [8].Limonov MF, Rybin MV, Poddubny AN, Kivshar YS, Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 543. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Zeng S, Sreekanth KV, Shang J, Yu T, Chen CK, Yin F, Baillargeat D, Coquet P, Ho HP, Kabashin AV, Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Kildishev AV, Boltasseva A, Shalaev VM, Science 2013, 339, 1232009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Karimi E, Schulz SA, De Leon I, Qassim H, Upham J, Boyd RW, Light Sci. Appl. 2014, 3, e167. [Google Scholar]
- [12].Williams C, Montelongo Y, Wilkinson TD, Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1700811. [Google Scholar]
- [13].Butt H, Montelongo Y, Butler T, Rajesekharan R, Dai Q, Shiva‐Reddy SG, Wilkinson TD, Amaratunga GA, Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, OP331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Ni X, Wong ZJ, Mrejen M, Wang Y, Zhang X, Science 2015, 349, 1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Xiong K, Emilsson G, Maziz A, Yang X, Shao L, Jager EW, Dahlin AB, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Meinzer N, Barnes WL, Hooper IR, Nature Photonics 2014, 8, 889; [Google Scholar]; Boltasseva A, Atwater HA, Science 2011, 331, 290; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Wang C, Zhang W, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Gao P, Luo Y, Luo X, Micromachines 2016, 7, 118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Zhou W, Odom TW, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Vecchi G, Giannini V, Rivas JG, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 146807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Arbabi A, Arbabi E, Horie Y, Kamali SM, Faraon A, Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 415. [Google Scholar]
- [20].Decker M, Feth N, Soukoulis CM, Linden S, Wegener M, Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 085416; [Google Scholar]; Nikolaenko AE, De Angelis F, Boden SA, Papasimakis N, Ashburn P, Di Fabrizio E, Zheludev NI, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 153902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Biener J, Nyce GW, Hodge AM, Biener MM, Hamza AV, Maier SA, Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 1211. [Google Scholar]
- [22].Yang P, Zheng J, Xu Y, Zhang Q, Jiang L, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Khanikaev AB, Wu C, Shvets G, Nanophotonics 2013, 2, 247. [Google Scholar]
- [24].Fano U, Phys. Rev. 1961, 124, 1866. [Google Scholar]
- [25].Wu C, Neuner B III, John J, Milder A, Zollars B, Savoy S, Shvets G, Opt J. 2012, 14, 024005. [Google Scholar]
- [26].Wu C, Khanikaev AB, Adato R, Arju N, Yanik AA, Altug H, Shvets G, Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Henrich TJ, Hanhauser E, Hu Z, Stellbrink H-J, Noah C, Martin JN, Deeks SG, Kuritzkes DR, Pereyra F, AIDS (London, England) 2015, 29, 867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Wu C, Khanikaev AB, Shvets G, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 107403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Yesilkoy F, Arvelo ER, Jahani Y, Liu M, Tittl A, Cevher V, Kivshar Y, Altug H, Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 390. [Google Scholar]
- [30].Dou X, Phillips BM, Chung P-Y, Jiang P, Optics letters 2012, 37, 3681; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Dou X, Chung P-Y, Jiang P, Dai J, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 041116; [Google Scholar]; Radu A, Ussembayev YY, Jahn M, Schubert U, Weber K, Cialla-May D, Hoeppener S, Heisterkamp A, Popp J, RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 44163. [Google Scholar]
- [31].Ahmed R, Ozen MO, Inci F, Karaaslan MG, Henrich TJ, Demirci U, “Real-time biosensing of proteins on a DVD nanoplasmonic grating”, presented at Plasmonics in Biology and Medicine XVI, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Yang L, Wang J, Yang L.-z., Hu Z-D, Wu X, Zheng G, Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Hayashi S, Nesterenko DV, Sekkat Z, J. Phys. D 2015, 48, 325303. [Google Scholar]
- [34].Kuznetsov AI, Evlyukhin AB, Gonçalves MR, Reinhardt C, Koroleva A, Arnedillo ML, Kiyan R, Marti O, Chichkov BN, Acs Nano 2011, 5, 4843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Anker JN, Hall WP, Lyandres O, Shah NC, Zhao J, Van Duyne RP, in Nanoscience and Technology: A Collection of Reviews from Nature Journals, World Scientific, 2010, 308. [Google Scholar]
- [36].Chen H, Kou X, Yang Z, Ni W, Wang J, Langmuir 2008, 24, 5233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Miroshnichenko AE, Kivshar YS, Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 6459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Li Z, Kim M-H, Wang C, Han Z, Shrestha S, Overvig AC, Lu M, Stein A, Agarwal AM, Lončar M, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Ruffato G, Zacco G, Romanato F, in Plasmonics-Principles and Applications, IntechOpen, 2012.
- [40].Rodríguez-Fortuño FJ, Marino G, Ginzburg P, O’Connor D, Martínez A, Wurtz GA, Zayats AV, Science 2013, 340, 328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Ahmed R, Rifat AA, Sabouri A, Al-Qattan B, Essa K, Butt H, Opt. Commun. 2016, 370, 183. [Google Scholar]
- [42].Oulton RF, Sorger VJ, Genov D, Pile D, Zhang X, Nat. Photonics 2008, 2, 496. [Google Scholar]
- [43].Zhang S, Genov DA, Wang Y, Liu M, Zhang X, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 047401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Engheta N, Science 2007, 317, 1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Gallinet B, Martin OJ, Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 235427. [Google Scholar]
- [46].Li H-J, Wang L-L, Zhai X, J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 243101. [Google Scholar]
- [47].El-Brolossy T, Abdallah T, Mohamed MB, Abdallah S, Easawi K, Negm S, Talaat H, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 2008, 153, 361. [Google Scholar]
- [48].Albrecht G, Ubl M, Kaiser S, Giessen H, Hentschel M, ACS Photonics 2018, 5, 1058. [Google Scholar]
- [49].Lee K-L, Huang J-B, Chang J-W, Wu S-H, Wei P-K, Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Yang Y, Kravchenko II, Briggs DP, Valentine J, arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.3901 2014.
- [51].Luk’yanchuk B, Zheludev NI, Maier SA, Halas NJ, Nordlander P, Giessen H, Chong CT, Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Yoon V, Fridkis-Hareli M, Munisamy S, Lee J, Anastasiades D, Stevceva L, Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Vörös J, Biophys. J. 2004, 87, 553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Li Y, Migueles SA, Welcher B, Svehla K, Phogat A, Louder MK, Wu X, Shaw GM, Connors M, Wyatt RT, Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 1032; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Zhou T, Xu L, Dey B, Hessell AJ, Van Ryk D, Xiang S-H, Yang X, Zhang M-Y, Zwick MB, Arthos J, Nature 2007, 445, 732; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Wu X, Yang Z-Y, Li Y, Hogerkorp C-M, Schief WR, Seaman MS, Zhou T, Schmidt SD, Wu L, Xu L, Science 2010, 329, 856; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Wyatt R, Kwong PD, Desjardins E, Sweet RW, Robinson J, Hendrickson WA, Sodroski JG, Nature 1998, 393, 705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Hu C, Wu X, Tong R, Wang L, Huang Y, Wang S, Hou B, Wen W, NPG Asia Materials 2018, 10, 417; [Google Scholar]; Chen S, Li Z, Liu W, Cheng H, Tian J, Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1802458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





