Treatment of patients with Covid-19 with a high dose of ulinastatin

Abstract

Currently, there are no specific therapeutic agents available for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of high-dose ulinastatin for the treatment of patients with Covid-19. A total of 12 patients hospitalized with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection were treated with a high dose of ulinastatin alongside standard care. Changes in clinical manifestations, laboratory examinations and chest images were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 10 patients with severe Covid-19 and two patients with moderate Covid-19 received ulinastatin treatment. The average age of the patients was 68.0±11.9 years (age range, 48-87 years). In total, nine of the 12 patients (75.0%) had one or more comorbidities. The most common symptoms on admission were fever (8/12, 66.7%), cough (5/12, 41.7%) and dyspnea (5/12, 41.7%). The percentage of lymphocytes was decreased in 41.7% of patients (5/12) and 58.3% of patients (7/12) had elevated hypersensitive C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (mean, 49.70±77.70 mg/l). The white blood cell levels and the percentage of lymphocytes returned to normal in all of the patients, and CRP was significantly decreased and returned to normal in 83.3% of patients (10/12; mean, 6.87±6.63 mg/l) on day 7 after ulinastatin treatment. Clinical symptoms were relieved synchronously. The peripheral oxygen saturation improved and 66.7% of the patients (8/12) did not require further oxygen therapy 7 days after ulinastatin treatment. No patients required intensive care unit admission or mechanical ventilation. All patients revealed different degrees of absorption of pulmonary lesions after treatment. Compared with the standard care group, ulinastatin treatment significantly prevented illness deterioration. In conclusion, these preliminary data revealed that high-dose ulinastatin treatment was safe and exhibited a potential beneficial effect for patients with Covid-19.

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (1). Covid-19 has now become a worldwide pandemic, which poses a global health emergency (2). While the majority of patients with Covid-19 have mild to moderate symptoms, ~14% of patients may progress to severe pneumonia and exhibit considerable mortality worldwide (3). To date, 11 vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 have been approved by emergency use authorization worldwide (4); however, mutations in SARS-CoV-2 have emerged worldwide, which poses a significant challenge to the vaccines (5). Despite several agents, including bamlanivimab, remdesivir, baricitinib and tocilizumab, being recommended for use in certain patients with Covid-19, their efficacy has been reported to be unsatisfactory (4,6); therefore, effective therapeutic agents for severe Covid-19 are still urgently required.

The immunological characteristics of patients with severe Covid-19 include markedly elevated serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-1β, characterized as a cytokine storm (7,8). The cytokine storm has been hypothesized to serve a critical role in Covid-19 progression, deterioration and even death (8). Strategies to dampen inflammatory responses have therefore been proposed (9). Nafamostat, which is a serine protease inhibitor, has been reported to effectively inhibit Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus S protein-initiated membrane fusion (10). Recently, Hoffmann et al (11) reported that SARS-CoV-2 infection depended on the host cell factors ACE2 and TMPRSS2, which could be blocked by the clinically used protease inhibitors camostat mesylate and E-64d. In addition, protease inhibitors have been suggested as a promising therapeutic option to block the virus from entering host cells and to prevent future pandemics at the very beginning (12).

Ulinastatin is a glycoprotein that is extracted and purified from fresh human urine. Ulinastatin can inhibit the activity of various proteolytic enzymes and has been widely used for the treatment of acute pancreatitis (13). Moreover, ulinastatin has been demonstrated to be an important anti-inflammatory and antioxidative agent, and has been clinically used as a potential treatment for circulatory shock, severe sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (14-16). As a protease inhibitor, whether ulinastatin has beneficial effects on Covid-19 is unknown to date. The present study retrospectively observed the efficacy of high-dose ulinastatin to explore an effective therapeutic strategy for patients with Covid-19.

Patients and methods

Patients and ulinastatin administration

The present study was conducted at the Optical Valley Branch of Maternal and Child Hospital of Hubei Province (Wuhan, China), which was designated for treating patients with Covid-19 aged >14 years, between February 19, 2020 and April 5, 2020. Electronic medical records of the patients hospitalized due to Covid-19 were delivered to Changzheng hospital (Shanghai, China). The final follow-up date was April 30, 2020. All patients were diagnosed with Covid-19 according to the guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Covid-19 issued by the National Health Commission of China (version 7.0) (17). A total of 15 patients treated with standard care, including supplement oxygen, antiviral agents and antibiotics according to the Chinese guideline for the management of Covid-19(17) and 12 consecutive patients treated with ulinastatin (Techpool Bio-Pharma Co., Ltd.) in addition to standard care were enrolled for analysis. Ulinastatin was diluted with 50 ml normal saline and administered via intravenous infusion. The infusion time was within 30 min. The initial dose of ulinastatin was 1,000,000 IU every 8 h and tapered down to 500,000 IU every 8 h after 4-7 days. The total course of ulinastatin administration was ~10 days, depending on the overall status of the patients. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Changzheng Hospital and Optical Valley Branch of Maternal and Child Hospital of Hubei Province [approval no. (FYGG(L)-2020-028)].

Disease severity classification

The illness severity of Covid-19 was assessed in accordance with guidelines issued by the National Health Commission of China (version 7.0) (17). Briefly, moderate cases were defined as patients with clinical symptoms and signs of pneumonia based on CT imaging. Patients with any of the following conditions were considered severe cases: i) Respiratory distress, respiratory rate (RR) ≥30 beats/min; ii) oxygen saturation (SaO₂) level <93% while breathing ambient air; and iii) a ratio of the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) (PaO₂:FiO₂) ≤300 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa).

Data collection

Clinical information of all patients was retrieved from the hospital electronic medical record system, including electronic medical records, medication administration records, laboratory results and radiological examinations. Data were collected on patient characteristics, including age, sex, symptoms and comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), cardio-cerebrovascular diseases (CCVDs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), malignancy, chronic liver diseases, chronic kidney diseases, neuropsychiatric diseases and infectious diseases. Clinical signs (body temperature, RR, concentration of oxygen inhalation and SaO₂) were recorded daily during hospitalization. For laboratory tests, variables including white blood cell (WBC) count, lymphocyte count, hypersensitive C-reactive protein (CRP), total bilirubin (TB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and creatinine (Cr) were obtained on admission and were monitored during hospitalization. In addition, the incidence of oxygen support requirements (ambient air, low-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, noninvasive mechanical ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of hospital stay, application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy were recorded.

SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens using reverse transcription-PCR. The viral nucleic acid was closely monitored during hospitalization until discharge or death. Viral nucleic acid was monitored with nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens, where the frequency of viral nucleic acid monitoring was not unified. The criteria for discharge strictly followed the guidelines issued by the National Health Commission of China (version 7.0) (17), which required two throat-swab samples obtained at least 24 h apart negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

Statistical analysis

Data were collected into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation). Continuous variables were described as the median (interquartile range) and were compared by unpaired Student's t-test between two groups, or paired Student's t-test between groups before and after ulinastatin treatment. Repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests was used for comparisons between three groups. Categorical variables were reported as the subject number with percentage, and χ² test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare the difference in proportions. Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All statistical procedures were performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp.). Two-tailed P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

General characteristics of the patients receiving ulinastatin treatment

A total of 10 patients with severe Covid-19 and two patients with moderate Covid-19 received ulinastatin treatment (Table I). The average age of the patients was 68.0±11.9 years, ranging from 48 to 87 years. Of the 12 patients, 10 were male (83.3%) and two were female (16.7%). The most common symptoms on admission were fever (8/12, 66.7%), cough (5/12, 41.7%) and dyspnea (5/12, 41.7%), followed by fatigue (3/12, 25%) and chest distress (3/12, 25%). Other symptoms, including headache, muscle ache, dizziness and anorexia were rare (1/12, 8.3%). Nine of 12 patients (75.0%) had one or more comorbidities. Among them, hypertension was the most common comorbidity (8/12, 66.7%), followed by CCVDs (2/12, 16.7%), DM (2/12, 16.7%) and COPD (1/12, 8.3%).

Table I.

Baseline demographics of patients receiving ulinastatin treatment.

Patient no.	Sex	Age, years	Principle symptoms	Comorbidity	Disease severity	Days of admission from symptom onset	Days of initiation of ulinastatin treatment fromhospital admission
1	M	73	Fever, dyspnea, headache	Hypertension	Severe	6	1
2	F	72	Fever, cough	Hypertension, DM, CCVD	Severe	2	10
3	M	74	Fever	COPD	Moderate	8	8
4	F	87	None	Hypertension, dementia	Moderate	2	0
5	M	55	Cough, muscle ache, dyspnea, chest distress	Hypertension	Severe	9	0
6	M	72	Cough, dyspnea	Hypertension, CCVD	Severe	1	2
7	M	77	Fever, cough, dyspnea	Hypertension, DM	Severe	4	6
8	M	81	Fever, chest distress, fatigue	Hypertension	Severe	21	6
9	M	57	Fever, cough, chest distress, dyspnea	None	Severe	24	0
10	M	56	Dizziness, fatigue	None	Severe	18	1
11	M	65	Fever, fatigue, anorexia	Hypertension	Severe	19	0
12	M	48	Fever	None	Severe	6	0

M, male; F, female; DM, diabetes mellitus; CCVD, cardio-cerebrovascular disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Table II showed the results of baseline laboratory tests on admission. Two patients had an increase in WBC count, whereas one patient showed a decrease in WBC count in peripheral blood. The percentage of lymphocytes was decreased in 41.7% of patients (5/12), and 58.3% of patients (7/12) had elevated CRP levels (mean, 49.70±77.70 mg/l). Nine patients received umifenovir, lopinavir-ritonavir or oseltamivir antiviral therapy. Two patients received antifungal treatment (voriconazole) because of coinfection. Five patients (5/12, 41.7%) received short-term intravenous methylprednisolone treatment.

Table II.

Baseline clinical characteristics and other treatments of patients receiving ulinastatin treatment.

	Routine blood test			Oxygen saturation		Drugs administered
Patient no.	WBC, x109/l	L, %	CRP, mg/l	Concentration of oxygen inhalation, %	SaO2, %	Antiviral	Antibiotic	Antifungal	Corticosteroids
1	12.6	9.3	274.09	21	90	None	Moxifloxacin	None	None
2	3.0	21.1	116.65	41	94	Lopinavir-Ritonavir	Piperacillin tazobactam	None	Methylprednisolone
3	4.4	20.8	7.52	21	95	None	Moxifloxacin	None	None
4	3.8	18.0	25.97	29	96	None	None	None	None
5	4.8	6.3	45.66	41	92	Umifenovir	Moxifloxacin		Methylprednisolone
6	6.8	21.6	5.5	21	92	Ribavirin, umifenovir	Levofloxacin, cefoperazone sulbactam sodium	None	Methylprednisolone
7	5.0	29.4	20.54	21	89	Umifenovir	Moxifloxacin, cefoperazone sulbactam sodium	Voriconazole	None
8	5.2	20.5	24.36	29	92	Umifenovir	Moxifloxacin	None	Methylprednisolone
9	6.1	26.2	57.71	21	86	Oseltamivir	Moxifloxacin	None	None
10	11.9	7.4	9.51	21	86	Umifenovir	Moxifloxacin	None	None
11	5.6	20.7	1.92	21	92	Umifenovir	None	None	None
12	9.0	16.7	6.95	21	93	Umifenovir	Cefoperazone sulbactam sodium	Voriconazole	Methylprednisolone

WBC, white blood cell; L, lymphocyte; CRP, C-reactive protein; SaO₂, oxygen saturation.

Efficacy of ulinastatin treatment

The WBC levels and the percentage of lymphocytes returned to normal in all of the patients on day 7 after ulinastatin treatment (Fig. 1A and B). CRP decreased markedly and returned to normal in 83.3% of patients (10/12) on day 7 after treatment (Fig. 1C). Clinical symptoms were relieved synchronously in all of the patients. The peripheral SaO₂ improved and 66.7% of the patients (8/12; P<0.001) did not need further oxygen therapy 7 days after ulinastatin treatment (Fig. 1D and E). No patients required ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, ECMO therapy or renal replacement therapy. All of the patients were discharged from the hospital, and the mean hospitalization time was 19.3±6.2 days.

Figure 1.

Dynamic changes in clinical parameters in all patients receiving ulinastatin treatment. (A) WBC count, (B) percentage of L and (C) hypersensitive CRP levels before ulinastatin treatment, and 3 and 7 days post-ulinastatin treatment. ^**P<0.05, repeated measures ANOVA. (D) Concentration of oxygen inhalation and (E) SaO₂ before and after ulinastatin treatment. ^***P<0.001, paired Student's t-test. WBC, white blood cell; L, lymphocyte; CRP, C-reactive protein; SaO₂, oxygen saturation.

All patients revealed different degrees of absorption of pulmonary lesions after treatment, according to the findings on chest imaging. Fig. 2 shows representative images of patient 5. The chest CT scan of patient 5 showed bilateral, diffuse areas of consolidation, and the patient was then transferred to the Optical Valley Branch of Maternal and Child Hospital of Hubei Province. The patient complained of severe dyspnea on admission, with an RR of 35 beats per minute. Ulinastatin was administered at a dose of 10,000,000 IU every 8 h immediately after admission, in addition to standard therapy. The dyspnea improved considerably the following day and almost disappeared in the resting state 3 days after ulinastatin treatment. The peripheral SaO₂ reached 100% with low-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy thereafter. The bedside chest X-ray on days 5 and 13 after treatment showed that the lesions were gradually absorbed (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Dynamic changes in the chest images of patient 5 showed gradual absorption of the lesions after ulinastatin treatment.

Liver and kidney function were also monitored during hospitalization. Two patients showed slightly elevated TB levels (55.4 and 25.8 µmol/l, respectively; normal range, 3.4-20.5 µmol/l), two patients showed abnormal ALT levels (69.6 and 109.6 U/l, respectively; normal range, 0-55 U/l) and three patients showed abnormal AST levels (52.2, 51.0 and 37.2 U/l, respectively; normal range, 5-34 U/l) on admission. These parameters returned to normal after treatment, with the exception of one patient with a slightly elevated AST level (70.4 U/l) and one patient with a slightly elevated ALT level (59.2 U/l; Fig. 3A-C).

Figure 3.

Values of (A) TB, (B) ALT, (C) AST and (D) Cr before and after ulinastatin treatment in 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019. ^**P<0.05, paired Student's t-test. TB, total bilirubin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; Cr, creatinine.

Outcomes of patients treated with ulinastatin compared with standard care

A standard care group was formed by the random selection of 15 patients from the same hospital. There were no significant between-group differences regarding baseline demographics and clinical characteristics (Table III). Only one patient with moderate Covid-19 on admission progressed to severe Covid-19 during hospitalization in the ulinastatin treatment group. However, four patients with moderate Covid-19 on admission progressed to severe cases, and one patient with moderate Covid-19 and two patients with severe Covid-19 on admission deteriorated into critically severe cases during hospitalization in the standard care group (P=0.043). Furthermore, no mortality was observed in the ulinastatin treatment group, whereas four of 15 patients (26.7%) died in the standard care group (P=0.106).

Table III.

Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of patients between the ulinastatin treatment group and standard care group.

Characteristic	Ulinastatin treatment group (n=12)	Standard care group (n=15)	Statistics	P-value
Median age, years (IQR)	72.0 (56.3, 76.3)	75.0 (68.0, 83.0)	t=0.970	0.341a
Male sex, n (%)	10 (83.3)	10 (66.7)		0.408b
Comorbidities
Hypertension, n (%)	8 (66.7)	6 (40.0)	χ2=1.899	0.168c
DM, n (%)	2 (16.7)	3 (20.0)		1.000b
CCVD, n (%)	2 (16.7)	8 (53.3)		0.107b
COPD, n (%)	1 (8.3)	3 (20.0)		0.605b
Disease severity status on admission				0.696b
Mild/moderate, n (%)	3 (25.0)	5 (33.3)
Severe, n (%)	9 (75.0)	10 (66.7)
Baseline laboratory parameters
Median WBC count, x109/l (IQR)	5.4 (4.2, 8.5)	6.9 (6.2, 11.3)	t=1.446	0.161a
Median lymphocytes, % (IQR)	19.3 (8.8, 25.1)	10.9 (6.9, 22.1)	t=1.168	0.254a
Median CRP, mg/l (IQR)	25.2(5.9,58.1)	50.9 (8.6, 89.3)	t=0.189	0.851a
Transition to more severe cases, n (%)	1 (8.3)	7 (46.7)		0.043b
Oxygen therapy				1.000b
Non-invasive ventilator support, n (%)	12 (100.0)	14 (93.3)
Ventilator support, n(%)	0 (0.0)	1 (6.7)
Clinical outcome				0.106b
Discharged, n (%)	12 (100.0)	11 (73.3)
Death, n (%)	0 (0.0)	4 (26.7)

^aUnpaired student's t-test;

^bFisher's exact test;

^cχ² test. IQR, interquartile range; DM, diabetes mellitus; CCVD, cardio-cerebrovascular disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Safety

No ulinastatin infusion-related adverse events were observed. Patients with abnormal liver function on admission improved instead of deteriorating after treatment. Furthermore, the Cr levels were within reference range (64-104 µmol/l for males and 49-90 µmol/l for females) before and after ulinastatin treatment (Fig. 3D).

Discussion

The present study retrospectively assessed the efficacy of ulinastatin in patients with Covid-19. This preliminary observational study revealed that high-dose ulinastatin treatment was safe and had a potential beneficial effect on patients with Covid-19, with rapid improvement of clinical symptoms, blood parameters and absorption of pulmonary lesions.

Covid-19 is spreading rapidly around the world and this unprecedented challenge demands that clinicians identify an effective and safe treatment to protect individuals at high risk (18). Remdesivir, which has been reported to exhibit potent in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2(19), is considered the most promising antiviral drug and has been successfully used in several case series of patients with Covid-19 (20,21). Recently, the compassionate use of remdesivir without placebo for 53 patients with severe Covid-19 was reported to have 68% efficacy (22). Notably, 23% of patients had serious adverse events, and 8% of patients discontinued remdesivir treatment prematurely. Lopinavir-ritonavir, another antiviral drug, has been shown to have no benefit for hospitalized adult patients with severe Covid-19 according to a recent open-label, individually randomized, controlled trial conducted in China (23). In addition, in this previous study lopinavir-ritonavir is also associated with serious gastrointestinal side effect, where 13.8% patients had to terminate the use of the drug earlier because of adverse events (23). Notably, older patients, especially those with comorbidities, are the most vulnerable populations to severe Covid-19, with a significantly increased risk of deterioration and fatality (24-26); therefore, it is of utmost importance to identify effective therapeutics with high safety, probably from already clinically approved drugs. Ulinastatin is an intrinsic glycoprotein that has been widely used in clinical practice (14) and is considered an ideal candidate. A safety and tolerability study of ulinastatin in adult healthy volunteers revealed that intravenous infusion of 8,000,000 IU ulinastatin over a 2 h period was associated with no severe adverse effects (27). In the present study, patients received 1,000,000 IU ulinastatin every 8 h through intravenous injection, and no adverse effects were observed.

It has been reported that ~14% of patients of Covid-19 will develop into severe cases (28). Inhibition of the deterioration of the illness is of utmost importance during treatment. Potential risk factors predicting poor prognosis include older age, high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and d-dimer >1 µg/ml (24). Therefore, the application of timely, effective and safe supportive therapies seems critical for patients with several risk factors (28). In the present study, only one patient with moderate Covid-19 progressed to a severe case while receiving ulinastatin treatment, and no mortality was observed among the patients in the ulinastatin group. By contrast, seven patients deteriorated into more severe cases during hospitalization in the standard care group (P=0.043), and four of 15 patients (26.7%) died in the standard care group.

Cytokine storms have been hypothesized to serve an essential role in the pathogenesis of Covid-19, and may be associated with disease severity and fatality (7,8). Ulinastatin is an intrinsic broad-spectrum protease inhibitor, which has been shown to effectively inhibit a variety of cell proteolytic enzymes and have multifunctional therapeutic mechanisms (29). Firstly, ulinastatin has been shown to exert an inhibitory effect on the production of inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules (30). Moreover, ulinastatin may improve the stability of the lysosomal membrane, and reduce the synthesis and delivery of lysosomal enzymes, thus scavenging oxygen or hydroxyl radicals (15). In the present study, a beneficial effect of ulinastatin was observed on patients with Covid-19. Unfortunately, the present study did not investigate the changes in cytokines during treatment due to limitations of the hospital facility.

There were several limitations in the present study. Firstly, the number of patients enrolled was limited. Secondly, this was an observational and retrospective study, and other treatment factors may interfere with the outcomes. Previous studies revealed that systemic corticosteroids were frequently administered in patients with Covid-19 (3,24) and corticosteroids treatment reduced the all-cause mortality (31). In the present study, five of 12 patients (41.7%) in the ulinastatin treatment group and five of 15 patients (33.3%) in the standard care group received systemic methylprednisolone treatment. The present preliminary results revealed the promising efficacy of ulinastatin for patients with Covid-19. Thus, further randomized controlled trials are warranted.

In conclusion, the present observational data revealed that administration of high-dose ulinastatin had a potential beneficial effect on patients with Covid-19. Considering the safety of this agent, the sharply rising number of fatalities due to Covid-19 and the absence of any other approved agent, timely initiation of ulinastatin treatment is strongly recommended.

Funding Statement

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

HH, PFH, LLS, YBG and WFX analyzed and interpreted the data and had substantial contributions to conception and design of the work. QW, ZML, JZY, PMS and ZLY collected all the data from the patient's electronic medical records and analyzed the data. QW and PMS assessed the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Changzheng Hospital and Optical Valley Branch of Maternal and Child Hospital of Hubei Province, and individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.