Skip to main content
Population Health Management logoLink to Population Health Management
. 2021 Dec 3;24(6):681–690. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0065

Social Needs, Chronic Conditions, and Health Care Utilization among Medicaid Beneficiaries

Amy McQueen 1,,2,, Linda Li 2,, Cynthia J Herrick 1, Niko Verdecias 2, Derek S Brown 2, Darrell J Broussard 3, Rachel E Smith 3, Matthew Kreuter 2
PMCID: PMC8713253  PMID: 33989068

Abstract

Health care organizations are increasingly assessing patients' social needs (eg, food, utilities, transportation) using various measures and methods. Prior studies have assessed social needs at the point of care and many studies have focused on correlates of 1 specific need (eg, food). This comprehensive study examined multiple social needs and medical and pharmacy claims data. Medicaid beneficiaries in Louisiana (n = 10,275) completed a self-report assessment of 10 social needs during July 2018 to June 2019. Chronic health conditions, unique medications, and health care utilization were coded from claims data. The sample was predominantly female (72%), Black (45%) or White (32%), had a mean age of 42 years, and at least 1 social need (55%). In bivariate analyses, having greater social needs was associated with greater comorbidity across conditions, and each social need was consistently associated with mental health and substance use disorders. In multivariable logistic analyses, having ≥2 social needs was positively associated with emergency department (ED) visits (OR = 1.39, CI = 1.23 – 1.57) and negatively associated with wellness visits (OR = 0.87, CI = 0.77 – 0.98), inpatient visits (OR = 0.87, CI = 0.76 – 0.99), and 30-day rehospitalization (OR = 0.66, CI = 0.50 – 0.87). Findings highlight the greater concomitant risk of social needs, mental health, and substance use. Admission policies may reduce the impact of social needs on hospitalization. Chronic disease management programs offered by health plans may benefit from systematically assessing and addressing social needs outside point-of-care interactions to impact health outcomes and ED utilization. Behavioral health care management programs would benefit from integrating interventions for multiple social needs.

Keywords: Medicaid, low-income population, health status disparities, chronic disease, patient care

Introduction

Health care organizations have begun to explore how to capture social determinants of health (SDOH) from patients by using different measures.1 Most measures focus on social needs such as food, housing, utilities, transportation, and physical safety. Such measures then inform “social prescriptions” or “linkage” interventions that connect individuals with community organizations to address individual social needs.2,3

Several conceptual models and frameworks have been proposed that explain the mechanisms for how social needs negatively impact health outcomes: through increased stress and competing demands for resources, which affects adherence to medication and physician visits,4,5 and through health behaviors, physiologic functioning, and psychosocial factors.6–10 When needs such as food, shelter, safety, and money for necessities are unmet, fulfilling them supersedes addressing other life challenges, including modifying unhealthy behaviors.11,12 Previous studies have shown that social needs can increase psychological stress, sleep disturbances, and physical and mental health problems,13–15 and reduce the likelihood of engaging in health-promoting behaviors, which may explain higher rates of emergency department (ED) use and hospitalization.16–18

Although many previous studies have focused on a particular social need (eg, food insecurity), this approach ignores other concomitant needs (eg, paying for utilities, transportation). Thus, a growing number of studies are examining multiple social needs and their cumulative impact on health-related outcomes.19–22 Examining multiple needs may identify clusters or patterns in the needs and/or outcomes experienced by subgroups of patients. Examining multiple needs also allows for the evaluation of a dose-response or cumulative relationship between social needs and health outcomes.

Efficiently identifying patients with social needs is a challenge for meeting population health management goals. Underreporting and biased reporting are known problems across all data sources. Until more systematic data recording is standard practice, researchers are accessing various data sources to estimate the relationship between social needs and health. Previous studies have used national survey data,17,23 social needs screenings administered at the point of care,24–26 notes in electronic health records (EHRs),27 or EHR data linked to other administrative and scheduling data.28 To extend previous studies, the present study examined 10 patient-reported social needs of Medicaid beneficiaries seeking medical care across the state of Louisiana, linked to their medical and pharmacy claims data.

The primary objectives of this comprehensive study were to describe: (1) the number and type of social needs reported, (2) their variability across demographic subgroups, and (3) their associations with chronic conditions, number of medications, and health care utilization among a sample of adult Medicaid beneficiaries in Louisiana. It was hypothesized that having more social needs would be associated with more chronic diseases and health care utilization. Mixed findings in the literature regarding associations between sex and age with social needs did not support specific hypotheses in this study.

Methods

Target population and setting

When this study began in 2018, Louisiana Healthcare Connections (LHCC) was the largest Medicaid managed care plan in the state with a network of more than 11,000 providers and 196 hospitals providing health coverage to 479,817 members. Of all LHCC members, nearly half (48%) were adults aged 18–75 years; of those, 65% were female, and most were Black (45%) or White (33%), with 21% of members having missing data for race. Adult Medicaid beneficiaries were covered through State Expansion (58%), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF; 23%), Supplemental Security Income, non-duals only (SSI; 10%), or behavioral health only (9%) plans. Eligibility for these coverage types is determined by age, income, and health conditions, and follows the mandatory and optional eligibility policies of the state and federal government.

Analysis sample

A nonrandom sample of adult LHCC members (18–75 years old) who completed an SDOH self-report assessment as part of LHCC's standard service and outreach from the health plan between July 10, 2018, and June 28, 2019, were eligible for analysis (N = 10,275). Members could be screened for SDOH while completing new member packets, if requesting assistance or service, as part of outreach calls after an ED or hospital visit, and when being screened for chronic conditions or offered services. Claims data were limited to the 12 months prior to the date each member completed the SDOH assessment. Of the 10,267 with complete SDOH data, 9826 (96%) members had at least 1 medical claim and 9239 (90%) had at least 1 pharmacy claim in the prior 12 months. Anyone without claims was included in analyses as having no conditions, prescriptions, and health care utilization.

Measures by data source

Data for this study were obtained from 4 LHCC sources: (1) self-report member assessments, (2) inpatient calendar, (3) medical claims, and (4) pharmacy claims.

Self-report assessments

As part of standard service, LHCC staff make outreach telephone calls to members to complete assessments. Assessments also may be completed during routine interactions between members and LHCC staff if the assessments have not already been completed within the past 90 days.

SDOH assessment

LHCC adopted and administered the same social needs questions developed for and used in prior Washington University studies, including a pilot survey among 109 LHCC Medicaid members with type 2 diabetes.29–31 Ten items assessed the likelihood that each participant's personal safety, housing, food, transportation, child care (if applicable), and various financial needs would be met in the next month (Table 1). Response options ranged from 1 = very unlikely to 4 = very likely. One item measured neighborhood safety and response options ranged from 1 = very safe to 4 = very unsafe. One item assessing space in the home included 3 response options: not enough space, about the right amount, too much space. To create dichotomous needs variables, needs were considered met when they were very unlikely to unlikely to arise in the next month, or when neighborhoods were rated as very safe or safe or when participants had about the right amount or too much space; all other responses identified unmet needs. The total unmet needs score was a sum (0–10) of the dichotomous unmet needs. Also reported are categories of the sum score, such as 0, 1, ≥2 social needs.

Table 1.

Number and Type of Unmet Social Needs Reported by Medicaid Beneficiaries (N = 10,267)

Unmet needs % or M (SD)
Total number (sum) M = 1.10 (SD = 1.41)
Percent with 0, 1, ≥2 unmet needs 44.7% 28.5% 26.8%
Not enough money to deal with unexpected expenses 45.7%
Trouble finding or paying for childcare if you need it 40.9%a
Not enough money for necessities such as food, shelter, and clothing 13.7%
Unable to pay for utilities such as gas, water, and electricity 11.4%
Not enough space for everyone in your home 9.5%
No reliable transportation 8.7%
Unsafe neighborhood 6.3%
Not sure self and others in your home will not get enough to eat 5.6%
No place to stay 3.3%
Someone will threaten to hurt you physically 3.2%
a

Only 579 respondents needed childcare of the 3954 who had children younger than age 18 years living at home and 237 reported trouble finding or paying for childcare.

M, mean; SD, standard deviation.

Administrative claims data

Administrative data are collected by LHCC for the purpose of reimbursement and differ from clinical care data recorded by providers in patients' medical records. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes were used to identify diagnoses, whereas Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) or procedure codes were used to identify outpatient procedures or services.

Medical claims

Chronic conditions

Presence of a diagnosis was defined as having ≥1 inpatient claims or ≥2 outpatient claims associated with relevant ICD-10 codes.32,33 For each of the 30 chronic conditions in the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI),34 dichotomous variables were created indicating presence or absence of each diagnosis in the medical claims for each patient in the 12 months prior to completing the SDOH assessment. A sum score of the 30 conditions for a continuous measure also was created. Although not included in the ECI, diagnoses for tobacco dependence were documented in the same way. The ECI includes obesity and substance use, which like tobacco use, may be related to lifestyle factors and health behaviors affected by social needs.

Wellness visit (none, any) in the 12 months prior to completing the SDOH assessment was calculated from any preventive medicine services CPT codes 99381-99397.

ED utilization in the 12 months prior to completing the SDOH assessment was calculated by counting the number of unique ED service claim dates.

Hospitalization in the 12 months prior to completing the SDOH assessment was calculated by counting the number of unique visits based on a managed inpatient calendar linked to inpatient authorizations and claims data. Although the identification of inpatient visits may include both planned and unplanned hospitalizations, those related to pregnancy and childbirth were specifically excluded. For people with an inpatient visit, length of stay was coded as 1–2 days reflecting shorter inpatient stays compared with >2 days to reflect longer stays. For people with an inpatient visit, any vs. no rehospitalization within 30 days was coded by comparing the unique admission dates determined for hospitalization. Similarly, for people with an inpatient visit, admission dates for hospital and ED visits were compared to code those who had any vs. no hospitalizations that originated in the ED within 1–2 days prior to hospitalization admission dates. Such hospitalizations may better identify unplanned inpatient visits.

Pharmacy claims

The number of unique drug types prescribed in the 12 months prior to completing the SDOH assessment was calculated by counting the number of unique product names. Similarly, the number of unique drug prescribers was created using the National Provider Identifier. Although count measures will capture multiple prescriptions being taken for a single disease type, these measures did not adjust for prescribing interval, which might overestimate total medication burden over the 12-month period.

Data acquisition and analysis

University members of the research team worked closely with LHCC to obtain all necessary approvals and secure access to the health plan's limited data sets. The study also was approved by Institutional Review Boards of Washington University and the Louisiana Department of Health and Human Services. All analyses were completed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and a virtual desktop interface.

Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the social needs of the adult Medicaid population as well as their demographics, health conditions, and health care utilization. Bivariate analyses were used to examine associations with the number and type of social needs. Group differences were compared using chi-square tests or logistic regression for categorical outcome variables, and analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc analyses for continuous outcome variables to determine significant differences within categories of social needs. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine social needs' influence on dichotomous health care utilization outcomes (any vs. none) after controlling for participants' age, sex, race (White, Black, other, unknown), having a child at home, Medicaid eligibility groups, and sum ECI. Nonsignificant demographic covariates and utilization outcomes in bivariate analyses (P > .05) were not included in multivariable analyses.

Results

To address the first study objective, Table 1 reports the number and type of social needs reported by the analysis sample of adult Medicaid beneficiaries. More than half the sample (55%) reported at least 1 social need (mean = 1.1). The most common needs reported were not having enough money to deal with unexpected expenses, trouble finding or paying for childcare among those who had children at home and needed childcare, not enough money for necessities, and unable to pay for utilities (Table 1).

The second objective was to explore differences in social needs by demographic subgroups. The analysis sample was predominantly female (72%), Black (45%) or White (32%), and had a mean age of 42 years (Table 2). Members who were older, male, Black, did not have children living at home, or received Medicaid through SSI Disability reported more social needs. Members eligible through Medicaid expansion had greater social needs than those with Medicaid through TANF. There were no differences in social needs between members based on whether or not they had medical claims in the past year. Supplementary Table S1 (available with the article online) shows bivariate associations of individual social needs by demographics, Medicaid eligibility groups, and utilization outcomes.

Table 2.

Sample Characteristics and Their Associations with Unmet Social Needs

  Unmet social needs
Total N M (SD) 0 M (SD) 1 M (SD) 2+ M (SD) F P value
Age Mean (SD) 10267 41.7 (14.8) 4586 39.1 (15.4) 2927 43.6 (14.5) 2754 43.9 (13.6) <.0001
  Total N % 0 % 1 % 2+ % χ2 P value
Sex
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Male
2887
28.1
1176
40.7
830
28.8
881
31.5
 
 Female
7380
71.9
3410
46.2
2097
28.4
1873
25.4
 
Race
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Black
4650
45.3
2008
43.2
1314
28.3
1328
28.6
 
 White
3290
32.0
1567
47.6
973
29.6
750
22.8
 
 Other
215
2.1
110
51.2
62
28.8
43
20.0
 
 Unknown
2112
20.6
901
42.7
578
27.4
633
30.0
 
Children at home
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.0011
 Yes
3954
38.5
1850
46.8
1110
28.1
994
25.1
 
 No
6310
61.5
2736
43.4
1815
28.8
1759
27.9
 
Medicaid eligibility
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
Medicaid expansion
5668
55.2
2495
44.0
1635
28.9
1538
27.1
 
TANF
2054
20.0
1094
53.3
489
23.8
471
22.9
 
SSI non dual
2248
21.9
861
38.3
710
31.6
677
30.1
 
Behavioral health only
297
2.9
136
45.8
93
31.3
68
22.9
 
History with health plan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.2866
Any claims past 12 mos
9826
95.7
4373
44.5
2808
28.6
2645
26.9
 
No claims past 12 mos 441 4.3 213 48.3 119 27.0 109 24.7  

M, mean; mos, months; SD, standard deviation; SSI, Supplemental Security Income; TANF, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.

The third objective was to examine patterns of associations of social needs with chronic conditions, medications, and health care utilization. Members who had prescriptions for a greater number of unique drug types or had a larger number of physicians writing their prescriptions reported greater social needs (Table 3). Post hoc tests showed that the significant differences in medications and conditions were between having no social needs and having any social needs; no incremental differences were observed between 1 and ≥2 needs.

Table 3.

Associations Between Unmet Social Needs and Chronic Diseases, All Claims in the Past Year

  Unmet social needs
N M (SD) 0 M (SD) 1 M (SD) 2+ M (SD) F P value
Sum Prescriptions 10267 11.63 (9.65) 4586 10.37 (9.02) 2927 12.52 (9.95) 2754 12.77 (10.10) <.0001
Number of Unique Prescribers 10267 4.48 (3.65) 4586 4.10 (3.41) 2927 4.68 (3.67) 2754 4.90 (3.93) <.0001
Sum ECI 10267 2.80 (2.63) 4586 2.42 (2.56) 2927 3.06 (2.69) 2754 3.18 (2.58) <.0001
  N % 0 % 1 % 2+ % χ2 P value
Cardiovascular Diseases
Congestive heart failure
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.0109
 Yes
821
8.00
326
39.7
259
31.6
236
28.8
 
 No
9446
92.0
4260
45.1
2668
28.2
2518
26.7
 
Cardiac arrhythmias
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
1605
15.6
626
39.0
496
30.9
483
30.1
 
 No
8662
84.4
3960
45.7
2431
28.1
2271
26.2
 
Hypertension
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
4816
46.9
1870
38.8
1511
31.4
1435
29.8
 
 No
5451
53.1
2716
49.8
1416
26.0
1319
24.2
 
Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders
Diabetes Type 1 & 2 without complications
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
2320
22.6
916
39.5
734
31.6
670
28.9
 
 No
7947
77.4
3670
46.2
2193
27.6
2084
26.2
 
Diabetes Type 1 & 2 with complications
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
1981
19.3
796
40.2
646
32.6
539
27.2
 
 No
8286
80.7
3790
45.7
2281
27.5
2215
26.7
 
Obesity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.0046
 Yes
1761
17.2
725
41.2
541
30.7
495
28.1
 
 No
8506
82.9
3861
45.4
2386
28.1
2259
26.6
 
Fluid and electrolyte disorders
.0018
 Yes
1436
14.0
584
40.7
421
29.3
431
30.0
 
 No
8831
86.0
4002
45.3
2506
28.4
2323
26.3
 
Hypothyroidism
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.0094
 Yes
781
7.6
345
44.2
255
32.7
181
23.2
 
 No
9486
92.4
4241
44.7
2672
28.2
2573
27.1
 
Other chronic conditionsa
Neurological disorders
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
707
6.9
265
37.5
241
34.1
201
28.4
 
 No
9560
93.1
4321
45.2
2686
28.1
2553
26.7
 
Chronic pulmonary disease
<.0001
 Yes
1986
19.3
732
36.9
633
31.9
621
31.3
 
 No
8281
80.7
3854
46.5
2294
27.7
2133
25.8
 
Liver disease
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.0007
 Yes
795
7.7
304
38.2
248
31.2
243
30.6
 
 No
9472
92.3
4282
45.2
2679
28.3
2511
26.5
 
Chronic peptic ulcer disease
.0310
 Yes
122
1.2
41
33.6
38
31.2
43
35.3
 
 No
10145
98.8
4545
44.8
2889
28.5
2711
26.7
 
HIV/AIDS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
337
3.3
113
33.5
97
28.8
127
37.7
 
 No
9930
96.7
4473
45.1
2830
28.5
2627
26.5
 
Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases
.0022
 Yes
304
3.0
106
34.9
100
32.9
98
32.2
 
 No
9963
97.0
4480
45.0
2827
28.4
2656
26.7
 
Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders
Psychoses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
708
6.9
216
30.5
212
29.9
280
39.6
 
 No
9559
93.1
4370
45.7
2715
28.4
2474
25.9
 
Depression
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
2555
24.9
877
34.3
794
31.1
884
34.6
 
 No
7712
75.1
3709
48.1
2133
27.7
1870
24.3
 
Alcohol abuse
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
617
6.0
201
32.6
173
28.0
243
39.4
 
 No
9650
94.0
4385
45.4
2754
28.5
2511
26.0
 
Drug abuse
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
1112
10.8
351
31.6
307
27.6
454
40.8
 
 No
9155
89.2
4235
46.3
2620
28.6
2300
25.1
 
Tobacco dependenceb
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<.0001
 Yes
2488
24.3
918
36.9
736
29.6
834
33.5
 
 No 7779 75.8 3668 47.2 2191 28.2 1920 24.7  
a

Hematologic and oncologic diagnoses in the ECI, including lymphoma, metastatic cancer, solid tumor without metastasis, blood loss anemia, deficiency anemias, coagulation deficiency, and weight loss, were not significantly associated with social needs and were removed from the table. Additionally, peripheral vascular disease, valvular disease, pulmonary circulation disorder, renal failure, and paralysis were not significantly associated with social needs and were removed from the table.

b

Not included in the ECI.

ECI, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index; M, mean; SD, standard deviation.

Although not all individual chronic conditions were associated with having greater social needs, many were (Table 3). Consistent associations were found between having social needs and metabolic, cardiac, and pulmonary conditions including diabetes, hypertension, obesity, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, and chronic pulmonary disease. Renal failure, pulmonary circulation disorder, and valvular disease were not associated with having social needs. Greater social needs also were consistently positively associated with mental health and substance abuse conditions including depression, psychoses, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, and tobacco dependence.

Table 4 illustrates the pattern of bivariate associations between individual social needs and specific chronic conditions. The top 3 most prevalent chronic conditions from the ECI in this sample are reported, plus tobacco dependence. Two social needs – not having money for unexpected expenses and rating one's neighborhood as unsafe – were associated with each of the 4 selected conditions. All social needs (except childcare needs, which applied to only a small subset of the sample) were consistently positively associated with depression and tobacco dependence, whereas differences emerged for the 2 physical health conditions (ie, diabetes, hypertension). Housing instability (16.5%) vs. no instability (26.2%) was inversely related to having diabetes, but positively and more strongly associated with depression and tobacco dependence (Table 4). Some of the largest differences were found among smokers, who had greater food, housing, and personal safety needs.

Table 4.

Bivariate Associations Between Type of Social Need and the Top 3 Elixhauser Comorbidity Index Conditions Plus Tobacco Dependence

  N Diabetes, type I & II
Hypertension
Depression
Tobacco dependence
Yes (%) No (%) χ2 P =  Yes (%) No (%) χ2 P =  Yes (%) No (%) χ2 P =  Yes (%) No (%) χ2 P = 
Enough food       .5537     .0063     <.0001     <.0001
 Need 572 24.8 75.2   52.5 47.5   33.0 67.0   35.5 64.5  
 No Need 9695 25.9 74.1   46.6 53.4   24.4 75.6   23.6 76.4  
Pay utilities       .5015     .0002     <.0001     <.0001
 Need 1169 26.7 73.3   52.1 47.9   32.8 67.2   30.9 69.1  
 No Need 9098 25.8 74.2   46.2 53.8   23.9 76.1   23.4 76.6  
Necessities       .6276     <.0001     <.0001     <.0001
 Need 1405 26.4 73.6   53.2 46.8   33.5 66.5   32.1 67.9  
 No Need 8882 25.8 74.2   45.9 54.1   23.5 76.5   23.0 77.0  
Unexpected expenses       <.0001     <.0001     <.0001     <.0001
 Need 4692 29.8 70.2   54.3 45.7   30.5 69.5   28.1 71.9  
 No Need 5575 22.6 77.5   40.7 59.3   20.1 79.9   21.0 79.0  
Childcare       .6472     .6472     .6277     .8762
 Need 237 6.3 93.7   19.8 80.2   20.3 79.8   21.1 78.9  
 No Need 342 62.5 58.8   19.9 80.1   21.9 78.1   21.6 78.4  
Enough space in home       .2707     .0894     <.0001     .0159
 Need 979 24.4 75.6   44.3 55.7   31.3 68.7   27.4 72.6  
 No Need 9288 26.0 74.0   47.2 52.8   24.2 75.8   23.9 76.1  
Housing stability       <.0001     .3925     <.0001     <.0001
 Need 334 16.5 83.5   47.0 53.0   41.3 58.7   40.7 59.3  
 No Need 9933 26.2 73.8   44.6 55.4   24.3 75.7   23.7 76.3  
Reliable transportation       .5249     <.0001     <.0001     <.0001
 Need 889 26.8 73.2   54.0 46.0   33.3 66.7   36.3 63.7  
 No Need 9378 25.8 74.2   46.2 53.8   24.1 75.9   23.1 76.9  
Neighborhood safety       .0028     .0020     .0202     .0061
 Need 648 30.9 69.1   52.8 47.2   28.7 71.3   28.7 71.3  
 No Need 9619 25.5 74.5   46.5 53.5   24.6 75.4   23.9 76.1  
Personal harm       .0007     .2633     .0003     <.0001
 Need 326 17.8 82.2   43.9 56.1   33.4 66.6   33.7 66.3  
 No Need 9941 26.1 73.9   47.0 53.0   24.6 75.4   23.9 76.1  

Social needs were significantly associated with health care utilization in bivariate analysis; however, having ≥2 social needs was associated with more ED visits, inpatient visits, and inpatient visits that started in the ED, but fewer wellness visits and 30-day rehospitalization (Supplementary Table S2). There was no difference in social needs when comparing short (1–2 days) vs. longer (>2 days) hospital stays.

Table 5 shows the independent association of social needs with utilization outcomes, even after controlling for demographics, Medicaid eligibility groups, and chronic conditions. Adjusted odds of having a wellness visit were lower among those with ≥2 more social needs, whereas the odds of having ED visits were greater for those with any social needs. Those with ≥2 social needs had lower odds of having inpatient visits and rehospitalization within 30 days. Supplementary Table S1 shows that in bivariate analyses of individual social needs, most individual social needs were consistently and positively associated with ED visits, whereas fewer of the individual social needs were significantly positively associated with inpatient visits and inpatient visits preceded by an ED visit. Only transportation needs were negatively associated with rehospitalization within 30 days.

Table 5.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Results Examining the Association of Social Needs with Dichotomous Utilization Outcomes Controlling for Demographics and Comorbidity

Covariates Wellness visit ED visit Inpatient visit ED-inpatient visits 30 day rehospitalization
Age 0.99 (0.99–0.99) 0.97 (0.96 - 0.97) 1.00 (1.00 – 1.01) 0.99 (0.98 – 1.00) 0.97 (0.96 – 0.98)
Sex: Male (1) vs Female (0) 0.41 (0.36–0.46) 0.89 (0.79 - 0.99) 1.92 (1.71 – 2.16) 1.22 (0.99 – 1.50) 1.45 (1.15 – 1.82)
Race          
White (referent) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Black 1.01 (0.91–1.12) 1.24 (1.11 – 1.38) 0.95 (0.84 – 1.08) 1.13 (0.89 – 1.42) 0.80 (0.62 – 1.05)
Other 0.90 (0.65–1.26) 0.80 (0.59 – 1.08) 0.72 (0.44 – 1.17) 2.60 (0.76 – 8.94) 0.64 (0.20 – 2.03)
Unknown 0.94 (0.82–1.07) 1.12 (0.98 – 1.28) 1.35 (1.16 – 1.56) 1.12 (0.87 – 1.46) 1.14 (0.85 – 1.51)
Child at home: 1.06 (0.95–1.17) 1.41 (1.26 – 1.58) 1.08 (0.94 – 1.24) 1.09 (0.85 – 1.41) 0.95 (0.72 – 1.26)
Medicaid eligibility groups          
TANF (referent) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Expansion 1.11 (0.98–1.26) 1.29 (1.13 – 1.47) 1.22 (1.02 – 1.47) 1.16 (0.82 – 1.64) 1.02 (0.67 – 1.55)
SSI 1.16 (0.98–1.37) 1.18 (0.99 - 1.41) 1.05 (0.85 – 1.30) 1.32 (0.90 – 1.93) 1.19 (0.76 – 1.86)
Behavioral health only 0.34 (0.22–0.55) 0.19 (0.13 – 0.28) 0.56 (0.35 – 0.91) 0.46 (0.20 – 1.04) 1.24 (0.47 – 3.28)
Sum Elixhauser Comorbidity Index 1.07 (1.05–1.09) 1.69 (1.64 – 1.74) 1.65 (1.61 – 1.70) 1.18 (1.13 – 1.23) 1.37 (1.31 – 1.44)
Social Needs          
 0
1
≥2
1.00
0.94 (0.84–1.05)
0.87 (0.77–0.98)
1.00
1.17 (1.04 – 1.31)
1.39 (1.23 – 1.57)
1.00
0.97 (0.85 – 1.10)
0.87 (0.76 – 0.99)
1.00
0.91 (0.72 – 1.14)
1.23 (0.96 – 1.58)
1.00
0.85 (0.66 – 1.10)
0.66 (0.50 – 0.87)

Bolded text indicates statistical significance (P < .05).

ED, emergency department; SSI, Supplemental Security Income; TANF, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.

Discussion

This study used a unique data linkage of patient-reported data regarding social needs with administrative claims data for a statewide sample of Medicaid beneficiaries to provide valuable new insights about multiple social needs and a range of health outcomes. In addition to observing associations with an increased number of social needs in total, this study also found that certain social needs had different patterns of association with chronic conditions, which may inform social needs screening and intervention efforts across chronic disease management programs. This study found that social needs were related to fewer wellness visits and more ED visits, but were not related to hospitalization, which may illustrate differences in how admissions are determined (self-referral vs. physician ordered).

Whether examining individual social needs or an accumulation of multiple social needs, this study found consistent significant associations: social needs were greater among Medicaid beneficiaries with a history of substance abuse, tobacco dependence, and mental health disorders.

Such conditions are associated with psychosocial stress, and symptom management is improved by intensive lifestyle intervention, which may be impractical when social needs are predominant.35 For example, key tasks such as self-monitoring, medication adherence, and dietary and physical activity behaviors needed to manage certain conditions are more difficult in the face of competing priorities such as social needs.36

Across a range of chronic physical conditions, this study found many positive associations with level of social needs, which is consistent with a previous study using clinic notes and billing information.28 However, several exceptions were observed. For example, hypothyroidism was associated with lower social needs in this population. This may be evident because hypothyroidism is a condition that is easily treated with a generic medication and is most often related to autoimmunity or surgical removal of the thyroid, conditions that are not expected to be worsened by lifestyle or stress. Perhaps surprisingly, there was no association between social needs and renal failure, but this likely is related to the relatively small numbers of individuals with this condition in the data. Additionally, the most severely affected individuals with renal failure, those with end-stage renal disease on dialysis, qualify for Medicare, and dual eligibles were not included in the study population.

Even though level of social needs was consistently related to many chronic conditions, differences emerged when examining individual social needs for specific conditions. Although not having money for unexpected expenses was consistently associated with multiple health conditions, social needs related to food, utilities, and necessities were not associated with having diabetes. Future multivariable or stratified analyses may better elucidate the relationships between social needs and health outcomes among patients with diabetes and other comorbid conditions, which are certainly affected by age as well. Both diabetes and hypertension often require adherence to multiple medications, are often comorbid with each other, and are associated with other medical conditions including depression. Management of diabetes in particular is associated with high costs, and trade-offs between medication use and social needs may be complicated.37,38 It is possible that Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes in this sample were already receiving support from assistance programs (eg, needymeds.org) or care management services, which may impact their social needs.

There is a growing interest in the role of social needs in health care utilization. Medicaid beneficiaries with social needs and children at home were less likely to have preventive wellness visits, which may reflect challenges in scheduling and adhering to planned primary care visits and/or preference for seeing a physician only after a health problem is experienced. In past research, food insecurity in a national survey population (most had private health insurance) was associated with ED visits and inpatient admissions.39 However, another study found significant associations of food insecurity with ED visits and pharmaceutical utilization, but not inpatient admissions.40 Housing insecurity in a national sample of safety net patients with diabetes was positively associated with a composite measure of ED visits and inpatient admissions.23 Bivariate analyses in the present study showed consistent associations between individual social needs and ED visits, but not as many individual social needs were related to inpatient admissions, even those that started in the ED. Pregnancy-related hospital admissions were excluded, but future analyses should specifically examine disease-related or unplanned admissions as they are likely to be more related to social needs than elective procedures requiring hospitalization.

Limitations

All data collection methods for identifying social needs have potential problems with underreporting or under-recording of unmet needs. Self-report data are no different and present study results likely underestimate the total number and type of needs experienced by members. Outreach efforts will not engage all members and response bias likely exists. Thus, the present study results may not generalize to all members of the health plan or all Medicaid beneficiaries in the United States. However, the sample provides adequate power to detect even small effects of social needs on study outcomes. The decision to examine claims for a 12-month period vs. all available years of claims data may have reduced the total number and type of medical conditions and visits experienced by study participants, especially among individuals who cycle in and out of Medicaid coverage or health plan membership. Although the temporal ordering does not allow for making causal claims about the effects of social needs and health conditions and health outcomes on each other, a substantial number of significant associations were found between social needs and chronic conditions, health care utilization, and characteristics of the sample.

Conclusion

This study involved a large team of university researchers and health plan collaborators to create a novel database linking patients' self-reported social needs assessment data with objective medical and pharmacy claims data representing patients' use of health care services irrespective of specific physicians or clinic sites across the state of Louisiana. Although a small percent of the total health plan population completed this novel social needs assessment, the sample includes members with a range of social needs, medical conditions, utilization rates, and demographics. This linked data set provided a unique opportunity to examine the broad influence of social needs across health-related outcomes.

Future research should examine multiple needs simultaneously to determine consistent associations between individual or clusters of social needs with specific health outcomes to inform targeted intervention efforts. Additionally, future analyses may determine the relative influence of different social needs on specific health outcomes. Expanding the focus to specific health outcomes such as medication adherence, rehospitalization for certain conditions, and use of preventive services, will be useful for further elucidating the effect of social needs on health broadly. Such research is necessary to strengthen conceptual models and inform future interventions to ameliorate the negative impact of social needs on health. Immediate applications of these results include the expansion of social needs interventions in chronic disease management programs, especially care management for patients with mental health and substance use disorders. Health plans have a unique opportunity to support population health through systematic outreach to screen for social needs outside the point of care, then provide referrals to social services, application support for assistance programs, care coordination to increase preventive care and decrease emergency care, and follow-up to close gaps.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data
Supp_TableS1.docx (29.3KB, docx)
Supplemental data
Supp_TableS2.docx (27.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We thank Louisiana Healthcare Connection and Centene Corp. employees who supported this project, especially Karyn Quinn, Kendra Case, Gina Rabalais, C. Deepak R. Baddam, and Marc Hall.

Authors' Contributions

All authors contributed to the writing, reviewing, and revising of the manuscript content. Drs. McQueen, Herrick, and Kreuter contributed to the study design and interpretation of results. Ms. Li conducted all data management and data analyses. Mr. Broussard and Ms. Smith contributed to data collection, data sharing, and interpretation. Drs. Verdecias and Brown contributed to defining measures and interpreting results.

Author Disclosure Statement

Mr. Broussard and Ms. Smith are employed by Louisiana Healthcare Connections. The authors declare no other personal or financial conflicts of interest.

Funding Information

This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 1R01DK115916-01. Dr. Herrick is also supported by a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant, K23HD096204.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table S1

Supplementary Table S2

References

  • 1. Moen M, Storr C, German D, Friedmann E, Johantgen M. A review of tools to screen for social determinants of health in the United States: a practice brief. Popul Health Manag 2020;23:422–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Soraghan CJ, Boyle G, Dominguez-Villoria L, Feighan J, Robinson D. Challenges of implementing a social prescription service in the clinic: social prescribing in the LAMP project. IEEE Int Symp Technol Soc 2015:1–6. DOI: 10.1109/ISTAS.2015.7439434 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Alderwick HAJ, Gottlieb LM, Fichtenberg CM, Adler NE. Social prescribing in the U.S. and England: Emerging interventions to address patients' social needs. Am J Prev Med 2018;54:715–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine. Accounting for social risk factors in Medicare payment: identifying social risk factors. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gurewich D, Garg A, Kressin NR. Addressing social determinants of health within healthcare delivery systems: a framework to ground and inform health outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35:1571–1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Beck AF, Cohen AJ, Colvin JD, et al. . Perspectives from the Society for Pediatric Research: interventions targeting social needs in pediatric clinical care. Pediatr Res 2018;84:10–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Brown AF, Ettner SL, Piette JD, et al. . Socioeconomic position and health among persons with diabetes mellitus: a conceptual framework and review of the literature. Epidemiol Rev 2004;26:63–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. McQueen A, Roberts C, Garg R, et al. . Specialized tobacco quitline and basic needs navigation interventions to increase cessation among low income smokers: Study protocol for a randomized control trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2019;80:40–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Solar O, Irwin A. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2 (Policy and Practice). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's health 2014. Australia: Australia's Health Series Canberra, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mullainathan S, Shafir E. Scarcity: why having too little means so much. New York, NY: Times Books, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kerner JF, Dusenbury L, Mandelblatt JS. Poverty and cultural diversity: challenges for health promotion among the medically underserved. Annu Rev Public Health 1993;14:355–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Melchior M, Caspi A, Howard L, et al. . Mental health context of food insecurity: a representative cohort of families with young children. Pediatrics 2009;124:e564–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Taylor SE, Repetti RL, Seeman TE. Health psychology: What is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin? Annu Rev Psychol 1997;48:411–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lynch J, Kaplan G, Shema S. Cumulative impact of sustained economic hardship on physical, cognitive, psychological, and social functioning. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1889–1895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kushel M, Gupta R, Gee L, Haas J. Housing instability and food insecurity as barriers to health care among low-income Americans. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:71–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Cole MB, Nguyen KH. Unmet social needs among low-income adults in the United States: Associations with health care access and quality. Health Serv Res 2020;55:873–882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nevathe AS, Zhong F, Lei VJ, et al. . Hospital readmission and social risk factors identified from physician notes. Health Serv Res 2018;53:1110–1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bisgaier J, Rhodes KV. Cumulative adverse financial circumstances: associations with patient health status and behaviors. Health Soc Work 2011;36:129–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Berkowitz SA, Meigs JB, DeWalt D, et al. . Material need insecurities, control of diabetes mellitus, and use of health care resources. Results of the Measuring Economic Insecurity in Diabetes Study. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:257–265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kalousova L, Xiao B, Burgard SA. Material hardship and sleep: results from the Michigan Recession and Recovery Study. Sleep Health 2019;5:113–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kreuter M, Thompson T, McQueen A, Garg R. Addressing social needs in health care settings: evidence, challenges, and opportunities for public health. Annu Rev Public Health (in press). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Berkowitz SA, Kalkhoran S, Edwards ST, Essien UR, Baggett TP. Unstable housing and diabetes-related emergency department visits and hospitalization: A nationally representative study of safety-net clinic patients. Diabetes Care 2018;41:933–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Billioux A, Verlander K, Anthony S, Alley D. Standardized screening for health-related social needs in clinical settings: The accountable health communities screening tool. Discussion Paper, National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC.2017. https://nam.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Standardized-Screening-for-Health-Related-Social-Needs-in-Clinical-Settings.pdf Accessed on January 21, 2020.
  • 25. Andermann A. Screening for social determinants of health in clinical care: moving from the margins to the mainstream. Public Health Rev 2018;39:17p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Morone J. An integrative review of social determinants of health assessment and screening tools used in pediatrics. J Pediatr Nurs 2017;37:22–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Hatef E, Rouhizadeh M, Tia I, et al. . Assessing the availability of data on social and behavioral determinants in structured and unstructured electronic health records: A retrospective analysis of a multi-level health care system. JMIR Med Inform 2019;7:e13802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Vest JR, Grannis SJ, Haut DP, Halverson P, Menachemi N. Using structured and unstructured data to identify patients' need for services that address the social determinants of health. Int J Med Inform 2017;107:101–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kreuter MW, McQueen A, Boyum S, Fu Q. Unmet basic needs and health intervention effectiveness in low-income populations. Prev Med Oct 2016;91:70–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. McQueen A, Kreuter MW, Herrick CJ, Li L, Brown DS, Haire-Joshu D. Associations among unmet social needs, health and healthcare utilization, and desire for navigation services among US Medicaid beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes. Health Soc Care Community (in press). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kreuter MW, Garg RC, Li L, et al. How do social needs cluster among low-income individuals? Popul Health Manage (in press). DOI: 10.1089/pop.2020.0107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. . Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43:1130–1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Chronic conditions data warehouse. Condition categories. https://www2.ccwdata.org/web/guest/condition-categories Accessed December 3, 2019.
  • 34. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998;361:8–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Beutel TF, Zwerenz R, Michal M. Psychosocial stress impairs health behavior in patients with mental disorders. BMC Psychiatry 2018;18:375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. van Houtum L, Rijken M, Groenewegen P. Do everyday problems of people with chronic illness interfere with their disease management? BMC Public Health 2015;15:1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Herrick CJ, Humble S, Hollar L, et al. . Cost-related medication non-adherence, cost coping behaviors, and cost conversations among individuals with and without diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 2020;1–3. 10.1007/s11606-020-06176-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Cohen RA, Cha AE. Strategies used by adults with diagnosed diabetes to reduce their prescription drug costs, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief 2019;349:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Berkowtz SA, Seligman HK, Meigs JB, Basu S. Food insecurity, healthcare utilization, and high cost: A longitudinal cohort study. Am J Manag Care 2018;24:399–404. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Dean EB, French MT, Mortensen K. Food insecurity, health care utilization, and health care expenditures. Health Serv Res 2020;55(Suppl 2):883–893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data
Supp_TableS1.docx (29.3KB, docx)
Supplemental data
Supp_TableS2.docx (27.6KB, docx)

Articles from Population Health Management are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES