Significance
Two classes of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, MHC class I and MHC class II, constitute the basis of our elaborate, adaptive immune system as antigen-presenting molecules. They perform distinct, critical functions: especially, MHC class I in case of antivirus and antitumor defenses, and MHC class II, in case of effective antibody responses. This important class diversification has long been enigmatic, as vestiges of the evolutionary molecular changes have not been found. The revealed ancient MHC category represents a plausible intermediate group between the two classes, and the data suggest that class II preceded class I in molecular evolution. Fundamental understanding of the molecular evolution of MHC molecules should contribute to understanding the basis of our complex biological defense system.
Keywords: major histocompatibility complex, MHC class divergence, MHC class I, MHC class II, molecular evolution
Abstract
Two classes of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, MHC class I and class II, play important roles in our immune system, presenting antigens to functionally distinct T lymphocyte populations. However, the origin of this essential MHC class divergence is poorly understood. Here, we discovered a category of MHC molecules (W-category) in the most primitive jawed vertebrates, cartilaginous fish, and also in bony fish and tetrapods. W-category, surprisingly, possesses class II–type α- and β-chain organization together with class I–specific sequence motifs for interdomain binding, and the W-category α2 domain shows unprecedented, phylogenetic similarity with β2-microglobulin of class I. Based on the results, we propose a model in which the ancestral MHC class I molecule evolved from class II–type W-category. The discovery of the ancient MHC group, W-category, sheds a light on the long-standing critical question of the MHC class divergence and suggests that class II type came first.
The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II groups each constitute a multigene family created by gene duplications and subsequent diversifications, with divergent members possessing distinct functions (1, 2). The classical MHC class I and class II molecules play central roles in our immune system by presenting antigens to T lymphocytes (2, 3). Classical MHC class I molecules present peptide antigens to T cell receptors (TCRs) on CD8+ T lymphocytes, whereas classical MHC class II molecules present peptide antigens to TCR on CD4+ T lymphocytes. After the interaction with the peptide antigen/MHC molecular complex, CD8+ T lymphocytes play important roles in the destruction of target cells (e.g., virus-infected cells or tumor cells), while CD4+ T lymphocytes play vital roles in helping or regulating antigen-presenting immune cells, including B lymphocytes, which can become antibody-secreting cells (3). Thus, the MHC class divergence is directly linked with our basic immune functions. However, despite decades of MHC research, there has been little progress in understanding the origin of this critical MHC class divergence (4–15).
MHC class I and class II genes have been identified not only in bony fish and tetrapods (2, 16) but also in cartilaginous fish, the most primitive jawed vertebrates (17–21). Authentic MHC class I– or class II–like genes have not been demonstrated in the extant jawless fish which possess distinct forms of immune defense. Therefore, the ancestral, antigen-presenting MHC molecule may have arisen, followed by its class diversification, in the common ancestor of jawed vertebrates, in concert with the appearance of their antibody and TCR antigen recognition systems (2).
The MHC molecules of the two classes show similarity to each other in their sequences and three-dimensional structures (3). Both classes possess a pair of membrane-distal extracellular domains (peptide-binding domains in the case of the classical MHC molecules) that together form a unique structure composed of an eight-stranded β-sheet topped by two α-helix components and a pair of membrane-proximal extracellular domains that each form an immunoglobulin (Ig)-like, C1-set (22) domain structure. However, the two classes display different combinatorial architectures of these four extracellular domains. A class I molecule is composed of a heavy chain with three extracellular domains (α1 and α2 for the membrane-distal domains; α3 for the membrane-proximal, Ig-like domain) and a noncovalently associated, single, Ig-like domain β2-microglobulin (β2-m). In contrast, a class II molecule is composed of two structurally similar chains, α and β, each consisting of two extracellular domains, namely, a membrane-distal domain and a membrane-proximal, Ig-like domain (α1 and α2, respectively, for α-chain; β1 and β2 for β-chain). Furthermore, a class I heavy chain and class II α- and β-chains each possess a connecting peptide (CP)/transmembrane (TM)/cytoplasmic (CY) region. Therefore, a class I molecule has a single CP/TM/CY region while a class II molecule has two.
Based on the similarities in the sequences and presumed structures between class I and class II, and on considerations of parsimony, creation of class I from class II was proposed previously (4, 7, 8, 10, 11). From different standpoints, the possible creation of class II from class I was also discussed (6, 9). However, findings of MHC molecules with features which suggest a specific direction of class diversification were not reported thus far (12–15). In the present study, we discovered a category of MHC molecules which possesses dual nature regarding the two MHC classes and, therefore, appears to be critical for the elucidation of the class diversification.
Results and Discussion
An Ancient MHC Group, W-category, Revealed.
Previously, we reported an MHC-like genomic fragment from cartilaginous fish (banded houndshark), which constituted a single, Ig-like, C1-set domain exon of an MHC molecule (23). The deduced, single-domain sequence was shown to possess MHC class I–like sequence features (23) and to have some clustering affinity with the class I group in a phylogenetic tree (10). Subsequently, as we succeeded in isolating the authentic classical MHC class I genes from banded houndshark (17), this single-exon sequence became an enigma. In the present study, from banded houndshark, we succeeded in isolating class II α-chain–type and β-chain–type genes, the latter including a full-length sequence that overlaps the above-mentioned single, Ig-like domain exon reported previously (23) and found these genes to be genetically linked in the genome (see the section Like MHC class II, W-category α- and β-chain Genes Exist as a Pair in the Genome and Their Gene Products Appear to Form a Heterodimer). Rigorous searches in genomic and transcriptomic databases and the isolation of relevant sequences eventually revealed that there exists a previously unrecognized, ancient category of MHC genes in jawed vertebrates (see SI Appendix, Table S1 for an overview). The molecules of this category possess a class II–type domain architecture but at the same time show unique class I sequence features. We named this group “W-category” in reference to the possession of a highly characteristic tryptophan (“W” in single-letter amino acid code) in the α-chain Ig-like domain. We revealed the existence of W-category genes in all major groups of jawed vertebrates, namely, cartilaginous fish, bony fish, and tetrapods, and representative animals are shown in Fig. 1 and SI Appendix, Table S1. However, in many other jawed vertebrates (e.g., euteleosts among teleost fish, frogs among amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals), the W-category genes have not been identified thus far and may have been lost in evolution.
W-category Possesses Class II Domain Architecture.
In Fig. 2 A and B, we show representative, deduced amino acid sequences of the W-category isolated from banded houndshark, W-category α-chain (WA) and W-category β-chain (WB), corresponding to an α-chain and a β-chain of class II–type molecules, respectively (SI Appendix, Figs. S1 and S2 and Datasets S1–S3 for sequence comparisons of WA and WB; SI Appendix, Figs. S3 and S4 for the genomic and expression analyses of the banded houndshark W-category genes, respectively). The domain architectures of both WA and WB are typical for MHC class II chains, each consisting of a signal peptide, a membrane-distal domain, and a membrane-proximal, Ig-like domain plus CP/TM/CY regions. Predicted distributions of WA and WB secondary structures are also characteristic for MHC molecules. The assignments of the W-category sequences as an α-chain or as a β-chain are supported by the presence of respective, chain-specific residues including those in the Ig-like domains and unique glycines in the TM regions [(24); Datasets S1–S3]. Further sequence features highlighted in Fig. 2 A and B are addressed in Figs. 2C, 3, and 4 (see the sections W-category Possesses Class I Sequence Features, Class I Interdomain Sequence Features Shared by W-category, and Additional Class I Features of W-category).
W-category Possesses Class I Sequence Features.
Amino acid sequence comparisons between W-category and other MHC molecules revealed striking, class I–like sequence features of W-category molecules (Figs. 2C and 3). Previous analyses comparing class I and class II molecules (e.g., refs. 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 25–28) recognized the following pairs of phylogenetically related domains based on sequences and unique, geometrical, structural positions (SI Appendix, Fig. S5): Iα1 with IIAα1, Iα2 with IIBβ1, Iα3 with IIBβ2, and β2-m with IIAα2. Within this phylogenetic context, the present study revealed special sequence similarities between W-category and class I molecules that distinguish them from class II in the first half of the membrane-distal domains (red and blue residues in Fig. 2 and Dataset S1) and the membrane-proximal, Ig-like domains (red and blue residues in Fig. 3 and SI Appendix, Figs. S5–S7 and Dataset S2). Importantly, many of the residues specifically shared between W-category and class I molecules can be found at the interdomain interfaces of an MHC class I molecule (Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Figs. S5 and S6).
Class I Interdomain Sequence Features Shared by W-category.
Class I interdomain sequence features at the domain interfaces, which are remarkably shared by W-category, are described here. Except for the β-sheet–forming interface between the two membrane-distal domains (α1 and α2), class I molecules have three interdomain interfaces: α1α2/β2-m, α1α2/α3, and α3/β2-m [(29); Fig. 4], and in all these three interfaces, W-category shares sequence features with class I as described in this section.
For the α1α2/β2-m interface of class I, the most pronounced residue specifically shared by WAα2 and β2-m is tryptophan (W)-61 (indicated by a filled square in Fig. 3 and a red residue in Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Fig. S5 and Dataset S2). In an MHC class I molecule, this residue W61 constitutes the central major part of this interface, projecting from β2-m into a pleat of the α1α2 β-sheet [(25, 29, 30); Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Fig. S5]. W61 of β2-m interacts with as many as six residues of the α2 domain (29), which include W-category/class I–characteristic A32, G35, and D37 (Figs. 2C, Right and 4) and W-category/class I/class II–shared Q6 (Fig. 4). W61 forms conserved hydrogen bonds with D37 and Q6 of the α2 domain. In addition to W61, at the same interface, the highly conserved L55 and F57 of β2-m interact with class I α1 V30 (also found in W-category; Figs. 2C and 4) and α2 Q6 (Fig. 4), respectively. At the corresponding positions of these β2-m residues, W-category WAα2 possesses L55 and F/Y57, respectively, thus resembling β2-m (Figs. 3 and 4 and SI Appendix, Fig. S5 and Dataset S2). Compared to class I, conventional (hitherto published classical and nonclassical) class II possesses distinct and not well-conserved features at the corresponding interface (class II α1β1/α2), for example, class II lacks highly conserved residues at the IIAα2 positions corresponding to F57 and W61 of β2-m [(31); SI Appendix, Fig. S5 and Datasets S1 and S2]. Thus, W-category possesses class I–specific sequence features at this α1α2/β2-m interface.
For the α1α2/α3 interface of class I, Iα3 possesses glycine (G)-61 (Figs. 3 and 4 and SI Appendix, Fig. S5 and Dataset S2), which is mostly shared by W-category WBβ2, while a conventional class II molecule invariably possesses W61 at the corresponding position of IIBβ2 domain (Fig. 3 and SI Appendix, Fig. S5 and Dataset S2). In class II molecules, the invariant W61 of IIBβ2 makes an important contribution at the corresponding class II α1β1/β2 interface (31, 32), interacting with several residues highly conserved in class II but not conserved in the corresponding positions of W-category and class I (Fig. 2C and Dataset S1 and SI Appendix, Fig. S5). Thus, W-category WBβ2 domain resembles class I α3 domain in mostly possessing G61 (Dataset S2) and in not possessing the W61 residue, which is important for conventional class II molecules.
For the α3/β2-m interface of class I, Iα3 possesses P57 which interacts with Y8 of β2-m through an evolutionarily conserved hydrogen bond (Figs. 3 and 4 and SI Appendix, Fig. S6 and Dataset S2). Like class I, W-category possesses both P57 and Y8 in the corresponding domains, WBβ2 and WAα2, respectively, while class II possesses neither conserved P57 in IIBβ2 nor a well-conserved Y8 in IIAα2.
In short, W-category remarkably possesses class I–specific sequence features in all three corresponding interdomain interfaces described in this section.
Additional Class I Features of W-category.
In addition to the interdomain features, W-category also exhibits other class I–specific features. One pronounced example is the absence of a tryptophan residue at position 37 of Ig-like domain of WAα2 and of β2-m (indicated by an open square in Fig. 3). At this position, a tryptophan (W) is highly conserved among Ig superfamily members, and it is located within the central core of the domain. Instead of a tryptophan, WAα2 and β2-m possess F/L37 and L37, respectively (Fig. 3 and Dataset S2 and SI Appendix, Fig. S5), whereas the corresponding IIα2 domain in class II invariably possesses a tryptophan (Fig. 3 and Dataset S2). Other than the above-listed residues, W-category and class I share several additional class I–specific residues, and those are included in Figs. 2C and 3 and SI Appendix, Fig. S7. Besides unique similarities in conserved residues, W-category and class I also exhibit shared class I–specific features in regard to deletions/insertions at three regions of the membrane-distal domains that show apparent class I/class II disparity in sequence length (SI Appendix, Fig. S21 and Dataset S1).
Like MHC Class II, W-category α- and β-chain Genes Exist as a Pair in the Genome and Their Gene Products Appear to Form a Heterodimer.
The genomic structures of WA and WB genes of various animals are similar to those of α- and β-chain genes of MHC class II (Fig. 5A and SI Appendix, Fig. S8). In banded houndshark, WA and WB genes are present in the same linkage group in the genome (SI Appendix, Figs. S9 and S10), and the recent whole-genome, shotgun-sequencing data of a great white shark revealed a gene cluster of three presumable pairs of WA/WB genes (SI Appendix, Fig. S11). In cases of the teleost fish and the lobe-finned fish coelacanth, WA and WB genes exist as a single pair closely connected to each other in the genome, suggesting that their gene products form a heterodimer-like conventional MHC class II molecules [(2, 3); Fig. 5B and SI Appendix, Figs. S11 and S12 and SI Appendix].
In accordance with these observations, we found specific interaction between W-category α- (WA) and β- (WB) chains and cell surface expression of these chains using recombinant proteins of tiger salamander (Fig. 6 and SI Appendix, Figs. S13 and S14 and SI Appendix). We observed specific glycosylation processing for the recombinant WA and WB chains only when both WA and WB chains of tiger salamander were simultaneously introduced into cultured cells (Fig. 6 A, d and B, d). In case of WA chain, this Glycopeptidase F–sensitive glycosylation appeared to include Endoglycosidase H–resistant, advanced complex glycan structure (Fig. 6 C, d and D, d), suggesting intracellular processing of WA chain through the Golgi system. Furthermore, we conducted cell surface expression analyses of the tagged recombinant W-category chains using flow cytometry (Fig. 6 E and F) and low but reproducible binding of anti-FLAG antibody to FLAG-tagged WA (Fig. 6 E, d), and significant binding of anti-PA (representing a dodecapeptide of human podoplanin) antibody to PA-tagged WB (Fig. 6 F, d) could be observed on the cell surface, only in the presence of both tiger salamander WA and WB.
The Mhc region forms an ancient linkage group in which many gene duplications took place, and the classical MHC class I (heavy chain) and class II genes are known to be closely linked even in sharks (33). Likewise, the β2-m (class I light chain) gene was found to be closely linked with the Mhc region in sharks, in contrast to the situation known for many other species [(28); SI Appendix, Fig. S15 with a different shark species; SI Appendix]. In the present study, a pair of W-category chain genes were also found in the Mhc region (SI Appendix, Fig. S12A and SI Appendix), in the case of coelacanth (34, 35). Even though the W-category gene pairs of other species are situated in diverse genomic environments, presumably because of many genomic changes, including gene translocations and chromosomal rearrangements (SI Appendix, Figs. S9–S12), some surrounding sequences can be classified as Mhc region related (SI Appendix, Figs. S11 and S12). Thus, the Mhc region is the presumable place of evolutionary origin of W-category genes.
W-category α2 Domain Clusters with Class I β2-m in Phylogenetic Tree Analyses.
We conducted a phylogenetic tree estimation for the evolutionary history of MHC molecules using Ig-like domains of representative MHC molecules, including W-category (Fig. 7), because these domains form the best-conserved parts among these molecules. Importantly, WAα2 and β2-m sequences cluster together with a significant bootstrap value upon phylogenetic tree analysis (Fig. 7), which is consistent with the observation that WAα2 and β2-m share a number of unique amino acid residues (see the sections W-category Possesses Class I Sequence Features, Class I Interdomain Sequence Features Shared by W-category, and Additional Class I Features of W-category). The clustering of WAα2 and β2-m, observed with the amino acid sequence data (shown in Fig. 7), was also obtained with the DNA sequence data (SI Appendix, Fig. S16) and was obtained using different methods for estimating phylogenetic trees (e.g., maximum likelihood [Fig. 7] and neighbor joining [SI Appendix, Fig. S17]). A similar analysis that additionally included the nonclassical class II DM molecules and some nonclassical class I molecules also produced similar clustering of WAα2 and β2-m (SI Appendix, Fig. S18). On the other hand, for the Iα3/IIBβ2 group to which W-category WB β2 domains belong, we did not obtain results with high-branching resolution (Fig. 7 and SI Appendix, Figs. S16–S18), which is similar to the previous observations for this group (e.g., refs. 10 and 28).
W-category as a Multigene Family.
Like the MHC class I and the conventional MHC class II groups, W-category exhibits the nature of a multigene family, namely, it includes divergent subgroups (Figs. 3 and 7 and SI Appendix, Figs. S1, S2, and S16–S18 and Datasets S1–S3). As multigene families, the MHC class I and the conventional MHC class II groups each contain divergent members. Some members do not bind any ligands in their grooves, and some nonclassical class I molecules bind lipids (e.g., in case of CD1) or small metabolites (e.g., in case of MR1) instead of peptides. In humans, the MHC class I molecules, ranging from classical HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C to nonclassical HLA-E, HLA-F, HLA-G, CD1, MR1, HFE, and FcRn, can possess very divergent heavy chains but commonly possess β2-m as a light-chain component (2). The human class II molecules include classical HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DR and nonclassical HLA-DO and HLA-DM (2). Like many nonclassical class I and class II, the various W-category subgroups identified in the present study do not possess complete sets of peptide-interacting residues conserved either in the classical MHC class I or in the classical MHC class II molecules and do not show the high, allelic polymorphism characteristic of classical MHC molecules (Dataset S1 and SI Appendix, Figs. S19 and S20 and SI Appendix). However, the W-category subgroup found in the teleost fish exhibits an amino acid conservation profile at expected groove positions (SI Appendix, Figs. S21 and S22 and Table S4 and SI Appendix) that resembles that of the MHC-Z molecules, an ancient nonclassical class I group, which shares important, peptide-binding motifs with classical MHC class I (36–38). Thus, probably like class I and class II groups, W-category also includes at least some members which possess grooves with ligand-binding capacity (SI Appendix, Fig. S22). Therefore, it is feasible that, as a multigene family, in ancient times W-category may have contained a peptide-binding molecule that played an intermediate role in the MHC class divergence.
Implications of W-category for the MHC Class Divergence.
In the present study, we revealed W-category as an ancient MHC group, in addition to MHC class I and conventional MHC class II. Fig. 8 shows simplified figures of the protein domains (Fig. 8A) and the genomic structures (Fig. 8B) of these three kinds of MHC groups based on the major findings in this study: namely, 1) W-category exhibits class II–type domain architectures; 2) W-category exhibits class I characteristics, including class I–specific interdomain sequence features; and 3) W-category α2 domain exhibits a clustering with β2-m in the phylogenetic tree analyses. The overall characteristics of W-category appear to be remarkably appropriate for those of an intermediate molecule between class I and class II in the MHC class diversification. For decades, we have been searching for such molecules and finally we found W-category.
When W-category is incorporated into a model of the MHC class divergence, logically, both evolutionary directions can be considered, one from class I to W-category that possesses class II domain architecture (class I first model) and another from W-category to class I (class II first model) (SI Appendix, Fig. S23). For a class I first model, the formation of a class I–like molecule by transferring a complete peptide-binding region of a heat-shock protein (such as HSP70) to a β2-m–like, single, Ig-like domain and the following creation of a class II–type molecule from a class I molecule were previously proposed (9). However, the domain structure of HSP70 and the interactive mode of bound peptides turned out to be quite different from those of the MHC molecules, and a plausible explanation for this evolutionary direction has not been presented (15). Importantly, the phylogenetic topology of the WAα2/β2-m/IIAα2 domain group observed in the present study (Fig. 7 and SI Appendix, Figs. S16–S18) is not compatible with a class I first model (SI Appendix, Fig. S23).
For a class II first model, the creation of a class I heavy-chain gene from a pair of class II α- and β-chain genes was previously proposed (7, 15), based on sequence similarity and considerations of parsimony, and then further discussed by other researchers (8, 10, 11). In this case, a simple recombination event between the genes for the two chains was assumed, which placed the α1 domain exon of class II α-chain into the upstream of β1 plus β2 domain exons of class II β-chain, producing a class I heavy-chain–like domain architecture with three linked extracellular domains. The remaining part of class II α-chain containing α2 domain was speculated to become β2-m, losing most of the CP/TM/CY region (7, 8, 10, 15). However, hitherto no special class II–type candidate for an immediate class I precursor has been elucidated for decades (15). W-category possesses both class II domain architectures and class I–specific interdomain interfaces (Figs. 4 and 8A), and the phylogenetic analyses of the WAα2/β2-m/IIAα2 domain group (Fig. 7 and SI Appendix, Figs. S16–S18) support a class II first model.
Based on our results, we propose a model in which the ancestral class I heavy chain and β2-m genes were created from a pair of W-category α-chain and β-chain genes (Fig. 8 B and C). After the recombination at the DNA level, which presumably occurred in the Mhc region and transformed the class II–type domain architecture of W-category into the class I type, the interdomain interfaces at the protein level were preserved by the newly formed ancestral class I molecule. Thus, the incorporation of W-category into the class II first model allows the formation of the ancestral class I with a simple, exon-shuffling event, without further requirements for elaborate changes at the interdomain interfaces.
Future studies should include structural and functional investigations of various W-category molecules and additional searches for W-category members. Since classical MHC class I and class II and W-category can be identified in both cartilaginous fish and bony fish/tetrapods, it is concluded that the ancient common ancestor of these animal groups possessed all three MHC groups. The discovery of W-category provides a stunning addition of one fascinating MHC group in jawed vertebrates and casts a light on the understanding of MHC class divergence.
Materials and Methods
Detailed information is provided in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods. All animals were handled according to the Guidelines for the Management of Laboratory Animals in Fujita Health University. DNA, RNA, and genomic and complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries were prepared basically using standard protocols. Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) reactions, PCR sequencing, and Southern blot analyses were conducted basically using standard protocols. Linkage analyses with banded houndshark were performed essentially as described previously (17). Database searches, analyses of DNA and amino acid sequences, and alignments of amino acid sequences were conducted basically using standard methods. Phylogenetic tree analyses were conducted mainly with the maximum-likelihood method. For recombinant protein studies, Chinese hamster ovary–K1 cells were used, and vector construction and transfection, analyses of proteins, and flow cytometry were described in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods. The references for the structural comparisons and the analysis of the conservation profile of a W-category subgroup were described in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods and SI Appendix.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant Number JP26440201 and was also funded by the Norwegian Research Council program FriPro Project Number 274635.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. P.P. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
2Deceased February 11, 2020.
See online for related content such as Commentaries.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2108104118/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability
All the DNA sequence data determined in the present study have been deposited and archived, and are available in the DNA DataBank of Japan and GenBank under the accession numbers listed in SI Appendix, Table S3. All other data in this study are included in the article and/or supporting information.
References
- 1.Nei M., Rooney A. P., Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 121–152 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Trowsdale J., Knight J. C., Major histocompatibility complex genomics and human disease. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 14, 301–323 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wieczorek M., et al. , Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class I and MHC Class II proteins: Conformational plasticity in antigen presentation. Front. Immunol. 8, 292 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kaufman J. F., Auffray C., Korman A. J., Shackelford D. A., Strominger J., The class II molecules of the human and murine major histocompatibility complex. Cell 36, 1–13 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hood L., Kronenberg M., Hunkapiller T., T cell antigen receptors and the immunoglobulin supergene family. Cell 40, 225–229 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martin L. H., Calabi F., Milstein C., Isolation of CD1 genes: A family of major histocompatibility complex-related differentiation antigens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 9154–9158 (1986). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kaufman J., Vertebrates and the evolution of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II molecules. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 81, 131–144 (1988). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lawlor D. A., Zemmour J., Ennis P. D., Parham P., Evolution of class-I MHC genes and proteins: From natural selection to thymic selection. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 8, 23–63 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Flajnik M. F., Canel C., Kramer J., Kasahara M., Which came first, MHC class I or class II? Immunogenetics 33, 295–300 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hughes A. L., Nei M., Evolutionary relationships of the classes of major histocompatibility complex genes. Immunogenetics 37, 337–346 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Klein J., O’hUigin C., Composite origin of major histocompatibility complex genes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 3, 923–930 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Klein J., Nikolaidis N., The descent of the antibody-based immune system by gradual evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 169–174 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Porcelli S. A., Bird genes give new insights into the origins of lipid antigen presentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 8399–8400 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Flajnik M. F., Du Pasquier L., “Evolution of the immune system” in Fundamental Immunology, 7th ed., W. E. Paul Ed.(Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013), pp. 67–128. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kaufman J., Unfinished business: Evolution of the MHC and the adaptive immune system of jawed vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 36, 383–409 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hashimoto K., Nakanishi T., Kurosawa Y., Isolation of carp genes encoding major histocompatibility complex antigens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 6863–6867 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Okamura K., Ototake M., Nakanishi T., Kurosawa Y., Hashimoto K., The most primitive vertebrates with jaws possess highly polymorphic MHC class I genes comparable to those of humans. Immunity 7, 777–790 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bartl S., Baish M. A., Flajnik M. F., Ohta Y., Identification of class I genes in cartilaginous fish, the most ancient group of vertebrates displaying an adaptive immune response. J. Immunol. 159, 6097–6104 (1997). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cannon J. P., Haire R. N., Litman G. W., Identification of diversified genes that contain immunoglobulin-like variable regions in a protochordate. Nat. Immunol. 3, 1200–1207 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kasahara M., Vazquez M., Sato K., McKinney E. C., Flajnik M. F., Evolution of the major histocompatibility complex: Isolation of class II A cDNA clones from the cartilaginous fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 6688–6692 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bartl S., Weissman I. L., Isolation and characterization of major histocompatibility complex class IIB genes from the nurse shark. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 262–266 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Williams A. F., Barclay A. N., The immunoglobulin superfamily—Domains for cell surface recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 6, 381–405 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hashimoto K., Nakanishi T., Kurosawa Y., Identification of a shark sequence resembling the major histocompatibility complex class I α 3 domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 2209–2212 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cosson P., Bonifacino J. S., Role of transmembrane domain interactions in the assembly of class II MHC molecules. Science 258, 659–662 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bjorkman P. J., et al. , Structure of the human class I histocompatibility antigen, HLA-A2. Nature 329, 506–512 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brown J. H., et al. , A hypothetical model of the foreign antigen binding site of class II histocompatibility molecules. Nature 332, 845–850 (1988). Correction in: Nature 333, 786 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brown J. H., et al. , Three-dimensional structure of the human class II histocompatibility antigen HLA-DR1. Nature 364, 33–39 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ohta Y., et al. , Primordial linkage of β2-microglobulin to the MHC. J. Immunol. 186, 3563–3571 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Saper M. A., Bjorkman P. J., Wiley D. C., Refined structure of the human histocompatibility antigen HLA-A2 at 2.6 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 219, 277–319 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fremont D. H., Matsumura M., Stura E. A., Peterson P. A., Wilson I. A., Crystal structures of two viral peptides in complex with murine MHC class I H-2Kb. Science 257, 919–927 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Murthy V. L., Stern L. J., The class II MHC protein HLA-DR1 in complex with an endogenous peptide: Implications for the structural basis of the specificity of peptide binding. Structure 5, 1385–1396 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li X.-L., Teng M.-K., Reinherz E. L., Wang J.-H., Strict major histocompatibility complex molecule class-specific binding by co-receptors enforces MHC-restricted αβ TCR recognition during T lineage subset commitment. Front. Immunol. 4, 383 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ohta Y., et al. , Primitive synteny of vertebrate major histocompatibility complex class I and class II genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 4712–4717 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Amemiya C. T., et al. , The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496, 311–316 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Saha N. R., et al. , Genome complexity in the coelacanth is reflected in its adaptive immune system. J. Exp. Zoolog. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 322, 438–463 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kruiswijk C. P., Hermsen T. T., Westphal A. H., Savelkoul H. F. J., Stet R. J. M., A novel functional class I lineage in zebrafish (Danio rerio), carp (Cyprinus carpio), and large barbus (Barbus intermedius) showing an unusual conservation of the peptide binding domains. J. Immunol. 169, 1936–1947 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sato A., Sültmann H., Mayer W. E., Klein J., Mhc class I gene of African lungfish. Immunogenetics 51, 491–495 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Grimholt U., et al. , A comprehensive analysis of teleost MHC class I sequences. BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 32 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All the DNA sequence data determined in the present study have been deposited and archived, and are available in the DNA DataBank of Japan and GenBank under the accession numbers listed in SI Appendix, Table S3. All other data in this study are included in the article and/or supporting information.