Abstract
Introduction
Hypoalbuminemia is recognized as an indication of protein-energy depletion in several disease states. According to many studies, hemodialysis (HD) patients who have decreased baseline serum albumin levels exhibit a poor prognosis. However, serum albumin does not stay at a constant level with the progress of the disease, considering that only a baseline value may not precisely reflect prognostic value. The study objective was to ascertain whether there is a link between serum albumin trajectories and all-cause mortality in incident HD patients.
Methods
Retrospective cohort analysis was conducted in the HD unit at the University of Health Sciences, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Nephrology Clinic between June 19, 2010, and December 29, 2017. A total of 408 individuals aged 18 years or older, who had at least one measurement of serum albumin at baseline, were enrolled. The outcome was all-cause death. Time-dependent Cox regression and joint model were used to investigate the associations between serum albumin trend in time and the risk of all-cause mortality.
Results
Mean (SD) age was 62.17 (12.33) years, and 50.7% were male. At baseline, the mean (SD) albumin level was 3.59 (0.27). A faster decrease (per 1-SD increase in negative slope) in serum albumin levels was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.08-2.84; p=0.023) in a fully adjusted joint model with slope parameterization. Also, an annual 1-SD increase in albumin level declined the hazard of all-cause mortality by 22% (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.92; p=0.008) in a fully adjusted joint model with value parameterization. Similar results were obtained from time-dependent Cox models.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that longitudinal albumin evaluation, including the rate of change as a slope parameter, may be valuable for risk stratification of patients receiving HD.
Keywords: hemodialysis, trajectory, joint model, serum albumin, all-cause death
Introduction
The prevalence of protein-energy wasting (PEW) combined with inflammation as relevant prognostic factors are high in hemodialysis (HD) patients, ranging from 18%-75% across observational studies [1,2]. Earlier studies also reported that serum albumin was positively correlated with PEW indicators such as mid-arm circumference, lean body mass, and subjective global assessment score in HD patients [3,4], as in patients with chronic kidney diseases [5,6]. On the other hand, established risk factors for cardiovascular disease alone could not address the elevated death rates in these patient populations [7,8]. In this context, serum albumin concentration has also been shown to be an independent marker in predicting mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [9-12].
Evidence is scarce on the relationship between the temporal evolution of serum albumin levels and survival in HD patients. Some studies reported that time-varying levels of albumin using averages, trimonthly alterations, or measurements in limited periods had a prognostic value as in baseline levels [13-15]. However, the time-varying trend could not be adequately addressed by evaluating only baseline exposure measurements or re-measuring the predictor after a first follow-up time frame only, that is, not at periodic intervals during the course of a longer-term follow-up, or using the difference between two measures for disease outcome. Furthermore, analysis using the time-dependent Cox model would yield biased predictions of biomarker impact, distorting their true explanatory power [16-20]. No study so far has assessed the association between the speed of change in albumin level and mortality risk in HD patients. We, therefore, aimed to assess whether serum albumin changes over time, as level or slope (change rate) parameter, are predictors of survival independent of other covariates in HD patients by modeling longitudinal and survival data simultaneously.
Materials and methods
Setting and patients
We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of participants receiving maintenance hemodialysis at least three times per week for three months at an outpatient dialysis facility in The University of Health Sciences, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Nephrology Clinic. The study began on the day of the initial clinic visit, represented as the first assessment date of laboratory data and dialysis prescription. Patients were observed with regularity at least once a month, depending on the patient's status. They were attended from June 19, 2010, to December 29, 2017, and followed for a total of eight years, or until an endpoint event occurred or data was censored due to loss to follow-up, migration to another facility, kidney transplantation, or the study's termination on January 1, 2019. The hospital's database was employed for collecting clinical and biochemical data from electronic records or patient folders. Individuals had to be 18 years old or older and to have a minimum of one serum albumin testing at commencement. We excluded individuals who had stopped hemodialysis within three months of starting treatment (n=26), had malignancy (n=19), or had cirrhosis of the liver (n=7). After excluding those subjects, a total of 408 patients remained for final analysis. The Ethics Committee of the hospital approved the study, conducting in agreement with the ethical standards specified in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Outcome, primary predictor, and covariates
The endpoint was all-cause mortality, defined as the time from the start of the study to dying. The serum albumin trajectory over time was the main predictor of interest. We measured the average albumin level at the commencement of the study (the first calendar quarter) and every quarter after that. Each patient's first (baseline) quarter was the calendar quarter in which the subject had been on dialysis for over three months. We determined the following demographic and clinical features at the baseline period: age, gender, dialysis vintage, vascular access form, and coexisting disorders. The body mass index (BMI) was figured out by dividing the post-hemodialysis bodyweight (kg) by the square of stature. Hemoglobin, ferritin, serum creatinine, single-pool Kt/V, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), phosphorus, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were all tested in the central lab and registered at various time intervals throughout the research duration, once monthly (albumin, phosphorus, hemoglobin, and creatinine) and every three months (CRP, ferritin, and PTH). Blood was drawn before the dialysis session, except for the post-dialysis serum urea nitrogen used to detect urea kinetics.
Baseline age was used for analysis, and dialysis vintage was the duration between hemodialysis commencement and the date of censoring or death in each subject. Single-pool Kt/V for urea was determined as a dialysis dosage indication using the urea kinetic model. Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or higher/diastolic pressure of 90 mmHg or higher, or a pair of hypertension diagnoses and antihypertensive medication usage. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was diagnosed if antidiabetic medications were used, overnight fasting blood glucose was higher than 126 mg/dL, or HbA1C was higher than six percent. Cardiovascular disease was defined as a history of myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, coronary artery stenosis, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, or cerebrovascular disease.
Statistical methods
Box plots and histograms were used to assess the spread of continuous variables. Continuous data with normal distribution were presented as a mean and standard deviation, whereas skewed distributions were displayed as a median and 25th-75th percentile. As appropriate, the chi-square test, a one-way ANOVA test, or the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to evaluate baseline disparities. Because CRP, PTH, ferritin, and dialysis vintage were positively skewed, they were scaled using their interquartile ranges (IQR) in all regression analyses so that a one-unit change corresponded to one IQR increase in its value, and predictions were generated using these models. A natural scale was used to model the remaining variables. Subjects were divided into tertiles for analysis using the gradient of blood albumin levels.
First, the hazard function of all-cause mortality was estimated with time-dependent Cox models, and the hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence intervals, and p-values were obtained. Next, a joint longitudinal-survival model was used to evaluate the association between albumin trajectory and mortality risk. The method examines the impact of a biomarker's rate of change on the likelihood of developing an outcome. The first derivative of the link between albumin trajectories and the hazard ratio of the clinical outcome showed the relative change in the hazard of outcome for a 1-SD rise in albumin change rate (decrease rate) or 1-SD increase in albumin per year. These models have previously been thoroughly studied in the literature [21,22]. Statistical adjustments with baseline variables were as follows: (i) crude model; (ii) age and sex; (iii) BMI, hemoglobin, ferritin, and dialysis vintage (iv) creatinine, single-pool Kt/V, phosphorus, PTH, and CRP; (v) vascular access type, presence of DM, hypertension, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and other comorbidities. We also used the joint model's longitudinal and survival components to predict conditional survival expectations for two patients, intending to show graphical illustrations.
Multiple imputations using chained equations with 10 repetitions were also applied to overcome missingness in baseline data, avoiding patients from being ruled out owing to the missing data. Age, gender, single-pool Kt/V, BMI, hemoglobin, and comorbidities were the covariates without missing data in the model. Ferritin (n=2), phosphorus (n=5), PTH (n=23), and CRP (n=10) were the parameters that necessitated imputing. All analyses were carried out with the R statistical program and the "JMbayes2" and "MICE" packages (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). All tests were two-tailed, with P values less than 0.05 deemed statistically meaningful.
Results
Baseline and longitudinal characteristics
Four hundred and eight patients were included in the study. The overall population’s mean (SD) age was 62.17 (12.33) years, and 50.7% were male, with a mean (SD) baseline BMI of 25.32 (5.25) kg/m2. 36.3 percent of the subjects had DM diagnosis, 70.1% had HT, and 33.6% had CVD. At baseline, the mean (SD) albumin level was 3.59 (0.27). Table 1 presented the baseline characteristics and laboratory data of all 408 incident dialysis patients when beginning HD, categorized by tertiles of serum albumin gradients.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study cohort according to overall and tertiles of slopes of serum albumin.
Normally distributed continuous variables are presented as mean (standard deviation), and non-normally distributed variables as median (25th–75th percentile). Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. BMI - body mass index; AVF - arteriovenous fistula; PTH - parathyroid hormone; CRP - C-reactive protein; Kt/V - measurement of dialysis adequacy (K=dialyzer clearance [L/hour], t=time [hour], V=distribution volume of urea [L]). *The body-mass index is the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters.
| Overall | Tertile 1 | Tertile 2 | Tertile 3 | p-value | |
| < -0.002 | (-0.002, 0.002] | > 0.002 | |||
| n | 408 | 136 | 136 | 136 | |
| Age, years | 62.17 (12.33) | 65.04 (12.61) | 61.12 (11.86) | 60.37 (12.07) | 0.003 |
| Male, n (%) | 207 (50.7) | 71 (52.2) | 70 (51.5) | 66 (48.5) | 0.814 |
| Baseline BMI*, kg/m2 | 25.32 (5.25) | 24.41 (5.38) | 25.49 (5.27) | 26.06 (4.99) | 0.031 |
| Dialysis vintage, years | 4.10 [2.10, 7.43] | 4.45 [2.25, 7.20] | 4.10 [2.18, 8.20] | 3.95 [2.00, 7.45] | 0.720 |
| Vascular access (AVF), n (%) | 189 (46.3) | 53 (39.0) | 67 (49.3) | 69 (50.7) | 0.106 |
| Comorbidities | |||||
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 148 (36.3) | 41 (30.1) | 50 (36.8) | 57 (41.9) | 0.129 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 286 (70.1) | 101 (74.3) | 99 (72.8) | 86 (63.2) | 0.098 |
| Cardiovascular disease, n (%) | 137 (33.6) | 49 (36.0) | 47 (34.6) | 41 (30.1) | 0.565 |
| Others, n (%) | 42 (10.3) | 13 (9.6) | 15 (11.0) | 14 (10.3) | 0.923 |
| Hemoglobin, g/dl | 11.07 (2.07) | 11.23 (2.23) | 10.91 (2.04) | 11.07 (1.94) | 0.436 |
| Ferritin, µg/L | 287.30 [158.07, 485.50] | 298.15 [161.80, 515.70] | 276.15 [149.68, 462.92] | 287.55 [169.25, 479.70] | 0.499 |
| Phosphorus, mg/dL | 5.04 (1.60) | 4.99 (1.67) | 5.04 (1.68) | 5.10 (1.44) | 0.842 |
| PTH, µg/L | 216.50 [113.80, 408.45] | 220.25 [119.07, 415.22] | 191.00 [96.15, 409.20] | 221.60 [107.08, 400.65] | 0.704 |
| Serum albumin, g/dL | 3.59 (0.27) | 3.40 (0.23) | 3.60 (0.21) | 3.77 (0.24) | <0.001 |
| CRP, mg/L | 5.40 [2.70, 9.62] | 5.85 [3.18, 10.12] | 4.95 [2.68, 9.33] | 4.65 [2.48, 9.50] | 0.218 |
| Serum creatinine, mg/dL | 7.60 (2.08) | 7.55 (1.92) | 7.73 (1.96) | 7.52 (2.34) | 0.669 |
| Single-pool Kt/V | 1.25 (0.18) | 1.23 (0.18) | 1.27 (0.20) | 1.23 (0.18) | 0.080 |
Four thousand and four hundred seventy-seven tests with a median count (25th, 75th percentile) of nine (5, 15.25) per patient, over a median (25th, 75th percentile) follow-up of 2.16 (1.13, 3.73) years, were used to assess albumin changes between the baseline and the end of the follow-up time. The albumin slope varied from -0.016 to 0.023 each year using the longitudinal part of the joint model. During the course of the study, 188 (46%) subjects died from cardiac (n = 95) issues, malignancy (n = 5), infection (n = 46), and unidentified reasons (n = 42). When transitioning from tertile one (rapid decliners) to tertile three of the serum albumin slope, there was a tendency of decreasing age and rising baseline BMI (Table 1). There were no differences in other baseline variables among tertiles.
Temporal patterns of albumin and mortality
Figure 1 depicts case investigations showing the use of the joint longitudinal-survival model. The model measured the likelihood of all-cause death based on two patients’ longitudinal albumin values. The slope of the albumin in subject 94 was steeper than in subject 63. The subject with a flatter slope (right panel) has better-expected survival chances than the subject with a faster rate of albumin decline (left panel). The crude and multivariate time-dependent Cox results and joint models with a hazard ratio (HR) estimates for the relationship between all-cause mortality and two longitudinal measures of albumin (level and slope in joint models) adjusted for the different baseline variables are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Associations between serum albumin trajectories and the all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients.
Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented per one-unit annual increase in albumin estimated by time-dependent Cox model. They are also presented per one-standard deviation annual increase in albumin for level parametrization, and per one-standard deviation annual increase in the rate of decrease (more negative slope) in albumin for slope parametrization, estimated by joint longitudinal-survival model. The model links linear mixed effect (LME) models for the trajectories of the biomarker with Cox proportional hazard models for the time-to-event data. Crude model: Cox model unadjusted, LME model adjusted for sampling time; Model 1: Cox and LME models adjusted for age, sex; Model 2: Cox and LME models adjusted for Model 1 plus body mass index, hemoglobin, ferritin, and dialysis vintage; Model 3: Cox and LME models adjusted for Model 2 plus creatinine, single-pool Kt/V, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, and C-reactive protein; Model 4: Cox and LME models adjusted for Model 3 plus vascular access type, presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and other comorbidities.
| Time-dependent Cox model | Joint model (level) | Joint model (slope) | ||||
| HR (%95 CI) | p-value | HR (%95 CI) | p-value | HR (%95 CI) | p-value | |
| Crude model | 0.32 (0.19 – 0.55) | <0.001 | 0.71 (0.56 – 0.89) | 0.006 | 2.92 (1.58 – 5.42) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 0.34 (0.20 – 0.59) | <0.001 | 0.73 (0.64 – 0.85) | <0.001 | 2.61 (1.24 – 7.29) | 0.008 |
| Model 2 | 0.37 (0.22 – 0.62) | <0.001 | 0.76 (0.66 – 0.88) | <0.001 | 1.82 (1.18 – 3.12) | 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 0.39 (0.23 – 0.66) | <0.001 | 0.76 (0.65 – 0.89) | 0.002 | 1.70 (1.13 – 2.69) | 0.010 |
| Model 4 | 0.41 (0.24 – 0.70) | 0.001 | 0.78 (0.66 – 0.92) | 0.008 | 1.63 (1.08 – 2.84) | 0.023 |
Figure 1. Conditional survival predictions derived from the joint longitudinal and survival modeling from two patients.
Conditional survival predictions derived from the joint longitudinal and survival modeling from two patients; one without (right panel: subject 63) and one with (left panel: subject 94) significant negative trends of the serum albumin. Higher all-cause mortality probability was observed for the patient with a progressive decline of the albumin levels. The other patient showed no progression throughout the study period (right panel). The solid blue and red lines with %95 confidence intervals represent fitted mean trajectory and survival probability, respectively.
Using the time-dependent Cox model, higher albumin levels were associated with lower mortality risk in the crude model (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55; p<0.001). Adjusting for all confounders in the multivariate model did not change the prognostic effect of albumin on survival time (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.70; p<0.001). Crude joint model for current value (level) parameterization, in which longitudinal submodel was adjusted for sampling time, and survival submodel was adjusted for baseline albumin levels, showed that annual 1-SD increase in albumin level was associated with a decreased hazard of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.89; p<0.006). In a multivariate model, significance was robust to additional adjustments for baseline clinical features and laboratory biomarkers. A yearly 1-SD increase in the rate of albumin decline (faster decliners/more negative slope) was associated with a greater risk of all-cause death (HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.58-5.42; p<0.001). The impact of slope on mortality was attenuated but remained significant after all variables were included in the joint model (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.58-5.42; p=0.023) (Table 2).
Discussion
In this observational cohort study of hemodialysis patients, we identified that a decline in serum albumin over time or a faster drop (higher negative slope) in its levels during the follow-up was related to a greater risk of all-cause mortality applying a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards and joint longitudinal-survival model. The analyses covered all available albumin measurements for hemodialysis patients having routine care in our outpatient dialysis unit, and therefore provide convincing evidence for the convenience of albumin trajectories as potential indicators for patient prognosis. In multivariate models, adjusting for additional potential confounders displayed no substantial influence on this relationship, arguing that the association is independent of these possible confounding variables. The data suggest that temporal alterations in serum albumin play a crucial role in caring for hemodialysis patients at risk. Closer monitoring might give a chance for specialists to appreciate the focus on preventive approaches and reduce the tendency of potential complications.
Albumin levels were a strong predictor of death in several studies in patients with chronic kidney disease. An earlier report with a 1.25-year follow-up found that initial blood albumin levels were a powerful indicator of death in chronic HD patients [11]. A two-year observational study found a significantly increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality with trimonthly varying serum albumin values [13]. Zitt et al. found an association between time-varying serum albumin and all-cause mortality using the time-dependent cox model in 235 incident HD patients [14]. Another 10-year study found that the low baseline blood albumin level was an independent prognostic factor of death in incident dialysis patients [23]. A recent study investigated the association of two-year serum albumin levels in a longitudinal three-year period by utilizing the serum albumin to reach a rate of 3.5 g/dL and the time-averaged albumin level with mortality. The study showed that HD patients who approached the target serum albumin levels more frequently and had higher time-averaged albumin levels over two years had a survival advantage in the subsequent three-year period [15]. Our findings correspond to previous studies highlighting the importance of time-dependent albumin, but it also provides additional relevant information that its gradient (slope) also is correlated with all-cause mortality risk. We can assume that there is a rapid increase in the intensity of already existing inflammation and oxidative stress in these patients over time.
A time-to-event study with a particular biomarker is needed for seeing individual risk. However, it would give limited information on a disease's clinical history. Heretofore, the predictive value of serum albumin was outlined by changes in a single evaluation, mean levels over a limited period- or time-varying levels handled in the Cox model. Nevertheless, applying a baseline exposure implies that the predictor stays unchanged over the research process, which would be uncommon in long-term studies. The Cox model with time-dependent predictors, on the other hand, takes into account variations in levels of exposure throughout the study. The model assumes that time-dependent covariates are measured without mistake. Moreover, it admits that the value of a covariate at a later time point is unaffected by the event. The second argument does not apply to endogenous variables (clinical biomarkers) since a frequently observed marker such as albumin is directly connected to the mortality pathway [24,25].
As a result, we utilized a combined modeling method to explore the relationship between a longitudinal biomarker trajectory and a time-to-event outcome [26]. We hypothesized that serial serum albumin levels throughout the study period with its rate of change (slopes) would be related to all-cause mortality and useful for patient monitoring and prognostic prediction. Contrasting prior research, ours emphasizes the importance of assessing albumin levels as a function of time using a slope parameterization (decline rate). This issue is addressed by the joint modeling technique, which assumes that the outcomes were computed with an error. Furthermore, adjustment for baseline values has been proposed to minimize the effect of regression to the mean, and the longitudinal submodel with the random intercept term fulfills this function [27]. Last, a joint model is appropriate if repeated data have been collected at various intervals and are unequal in number amongst participants [18].
The advantage of repeated assessments is that a physician can use biomarker levels to assess the probability of adverse outcomes and may change the therapy before an event happens in the future [24]. Our results must be evaluated in light of the study's shortcomings. To begin, residual confounding or other unmeasured inflammation-related variables may have contributed to the emergence of the clinical result. Second, the reasons for hypoalbuminemia in our investigation were unknown. Some factors may have contributed to hypoalbuminemia, including residual urine with proteinuria, hypervolemia, and liver problems. Finally, because the cohort originates from people living in a particular geographical location, the conclusions may not be generalized to different groups.
Conclusions
Overall, our finding suggests that temporal decreasing of patient-specific albumin levels could predict health outcomes in individuals with incident HD. Patients with a rapidly decreasing rate of albumin over time were more likely to die than those with a steady or slowly declining rate. These patient-specific temporal patterns have the potential benefit, which could be employed for individualized prognosis and therapy plans.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Kayseri City Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee issued approval 474
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.A proposed nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for protein-energy wasting in acute and chronic kidney disease. Fouque D, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple J, et al. Kidney Int. 2008;73:391–398. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Association of morbidity with markers of nutrition and inflammation in chronic hemodialysis patients: a prospective study. Ikizler TA, Wingard RL, Harvell J, Shyr Y, Hakim RM. Kidney Int. 1999;55:1945–1951. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00410.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Surrogate nutrition markers, malnutrition, and adequacy of nutrition support. Seres DS. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20:308–313. doi: 10.1177/0115426505020003308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lean body mass estimation by creatinine kinetics. Keshaviah PR, Nolph KD, Moore HL, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1994;4:1475–1485. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V471475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Death risk predictors among peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients: a preliminary comparison. Lowrie EG, Huang WH, Lew NL. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26:220–228. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90177-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mortality risk in hemodialysis patients and changes in nutritional indicators: DOPPS. Pifer TB, McCullough KP, Port FK, Goodkin DA, Maroni BJ, Held PJ, Young EW. Kidney Int. 2002;62:2238–2245. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00658.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cardiovascular risk in uraemic patients-is it fully explained by classical risk factors? Zoccali C. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15:454–457. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.4.454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors in dialysis patients compared with the general population: the CHOICE study. Longenecker JC, Coresh J, Powe NR, Levey AS, Fink NE, Martin A, Klag MJ. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:1918–1927. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000019641.41496.1e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.The urea reduction ratio and serum albumin concentration as predictors of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Owen WF Jr, Lew NL, Liu Y, Lowrie EG, Lazarus JM. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1001–1006. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Serum albumin level and risk for mortality and hospitalization in adolescents on hemodialysis. Amaral S, Hwang W, Fivush B, Neu A, Frankenfield D, Furth S. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:759–767. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02720707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Serum albumin is a strong predictor of death in chronic dialysis patients. Iseki K, Kawazoe N, Fukiyama K. Kidney Int. 1993;44:115–119. doi: 10.1038/ki.1993.220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Association between serum albumin and mortality in dialysis patients is partly explained by inflammation, and not by malnutrition. de Mutsert R, Grootendorst DC, Indemans F, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT, Dekker FW. J Ren Nutr. 2009;19:127–135. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Revisiting mortality predictability of serum albumin in the dialysis population: time dependency, longitudinal changes and population-attributable fraction. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kilpatrick RD, Kuwae N, McAllister CJ, Alcorn H Jr, Kopple JD, Greenland S. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:1880–1888. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Interaction of time-varying albumin and phosphorus on mortality in incident dialysis patients. Zitt E, Lamina C, Sturm G, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:2650–2656. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03780411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.An association between time-varying serum albumin level and the mortality rate in maintenance haemodialysis patients: a five-year clinical cohort study. Chen JB, Cheng BC, Yang CH, Hua MS. BMC Nephrol. 2016;17:117. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0332-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.An introduction to joint models-applications in nephrology. Chesnaye NC, Tripepi G, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Zwinderman AH, Jager KJ. Clin Kidney J. 2020;13:143–149. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.A primer in longitudinal data analysis. Fitzmaurice GM, Ravichandran C. Circulation. 2008;118:2005–2010. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.714618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.An introduction to mixed models and joint modeling: analysis of valve function over time. Andrinopoulou ER, Rizopoulos D, Jin R, Bogers AJ, Lesaffre E, Takkenberg JJ. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1765–1772. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.02.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Personalized dynamic risk assessment in nephrology is a next step in prognostic research. Brankovic M, Kardys I, Hoorn EJ, Baart S, Boersma E, Rizopoulos D. Kidney Int. 2018;94:214–217. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Temporal patterns of 14 blood biomarker candidates of cardiac remodeling in relation to prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure - the Bio‐SHiFT study. Bouwens E, Brankovic M, Mouthaan H, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:0. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Flexible parametric joint modelling of longitudinal and survival data. Crowther MJ, Abrams KR, Lambert PC. Stat Med. 2012;31:4456–4471. doi: 10.1002/sim.5644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Joint modeling of two longitudinal outcomes and competing risk data. Andrinopoulou ER, Rizopoulos D, Takkenberg JJ, Lesaffre E. Stat Med. 2014;33:3167–3178. doi: 10.1002/sim.6158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Malnutrition (subjective global assessment) scores and serum albumin levels, but not body mass index values, at initiation of dialysis are independent predictors of mortality: a 10-year clinical cohort study. Chan M, Kelly J, Batterham M, Tapsell L. J Ren Nutr. 2012;22:547–557. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2011.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rizopoulos D. New York: CRC Press; 2012. Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data with applications in R. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: an illustration using CD4 count and mortality in a cohort of patients initiated on antiretroviral therapy. Mchunu NN, Mwambi HG, Reddy T, Yende-Zuma N, Naidoo K. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:256. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-04962-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Basic concepts and methods for joint models of longitudinal and survival data. Ibrahim JG, Chu H, Chen LM. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2796–2801. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:215–220. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

