INTRODUCTION
The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with the highest death rate in the UK for over 10 years.1 There has been a marked shift of place of death into the community across the UK between March 2020 and 2021. Deaths at home increased by 67% during the first wave of the pandemic. There was a sustained increase of 33% above expected between the first two waves, and 43% above expected in the second wave.1 Nationally reported data identifies large changes in where people are dying, but little is understood about the circumstances of these deaths, the quality of end-of-life care in the community during the pandemic, or the services received.2–3
Palliative care is holistic, person-centred care focused on quality of life for people with advanced disease and their family carers. It is an approach to care that extends well beyond specialist services and is recognised as core to the role of primary care by the World Health Organization.4 Primary and community care services deliver the majority of palliative and end-of-life care for people at home and in care homes. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, they adapted rapidly as the numbers of people dying in the community increased, providing care to people with highly complex needs at home and to large numbers of care home residents at the end-of-life. The work has been challenging and associated with emotional distress for clinicians.5
PALLIATIVE CARE IN THE COMMUNITY IS A GROWING BUT SHARED CONCERN
Prior to the pandemic, the delivery of high-quality palliative and end-of-life care in the community was already a pressing concern, with increasing numbers of patients living longer with frailty, complex multimorbidity, and associated palliative care needs worldwide.6 Early identification of palliative care needs has been described as a ‘first-class ticket’ to enhanced care in the community, but general practice end-of-life care registers are largely populated by people with cancer rather than non-malignant disease.7 Specialist palliative care services, including hospices, which in the UK rely largely on voluntary sector funding, have never had capacity to provide care to all dying people.8 The COVID-19 pandemic has compounded the need for community palliative care, with more patients affected by frailty9 and more patients presenting with advanced cancer, distressing symptoms, and nearness to the end-of-life.10 The impact of disruptions in chronic disease monitoring in general practice on multimorbidity, and delayed diagnosis of other conditions including dementia, is yet to be seen.
WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP TO MEET INCREASED NEED
As the NHS in England develops Integrated Care Systems, new primary care, community, and specialist palliative care partnerships are needed to deliver novel, integrated services that make optimal use of the limited workforce to provide patient care. There is an urgent need to improve healthcare system infrastructure to support these cross-boundary, multidisciplinary approaches.11 This could include education, training, and career development models for primary care teams, including physician associates, therapists, community pharmacists, and social prescribers, as well as GPs and community nurses.
Any such developments require robust evaluation and research based in the community. Increased understanding of the new ways of working adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic is vital to identify priorities for future service delivery, for example, the mechanisms and processes that enabled or hindered the integration of services. Technological solutions that were adopted rapidly during the pandemic, including virtual consultations and online team meetings, require evaluation to understand how to ensure that these new service developments are most effective into the future. This will require greater involvement of primary care clinicians to shape, participate in, and conduct palliative care research.
The relatively small proportion of research funding received by both palliative care and primary care presents a significant shared challenge. New research partnerships across specialist and primary palliative care could bring together cross-sector clinical and methodological expertise to deliver policy-and practice-relevant research proposals. Effective implementation into clinical practice must be considered at all stages. Working in partnership would enhance the translation of new knowledge into practice, with improved understanding of current pressures across services.
KEEPING PATIENTS AND FAMILIES AT THE CENTRE OF CARE AND RESEARCH
Increasing participation and involvement for people with palliative care needs and their families in palliative care research is a national priority and key to the delivery of high-quality services for all. Ethical issues relating to the vulnerability of patients towards the end-of-life and their capacity to provide informed consent, as well as gatekeeping by clinical staff, can hinder participation in research for this population.12 Patient and public involvement (PPI) is essential to ask research questions important for patients and families, design studies that enable participation, and for the findings to impact care delivery. This requires investment in shared infrastructure for PPI more widely across organisations to strengthen and sustain this vital aspect of research design, and increase the meaningful involvement of people from diverse areas. Recruitment via primary care presents an opportunity to reach people from a wide range of socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds.
CONCLUSION
Primary care clinicians frequently describe how much they value the palliative and end-of-life care aspects of their work. Healthcare systems must recognise, prioritise, and enable this core function of primary care. The COVID-19 pandemic presents an opportunity for all those who provide palliative care to consider how best to move beyond traditional service delivery models towards more integration with primary care teams and networks, and to engage in multidisciplinary research to evaluate and inform aspects of their work. Addressing longstanding inequalities in access to palliative care depends on shared vision and purpose among all professionals and teams delivering palliative care to effectively meet patient need.
Provenance
Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.
Competing interests
The authors have declared no competing interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.O’Donnell SB, Bone AE, Finucane AM, et al. Changes in mortality patterns and place of death during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis of mortality data across four nations. Palliat Med. 2021 doi: 10.1177/02692163211040981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Higginson IJ, Brooks D, Barclay S. Dying at home during the pandemic. BMJ. 2021;373:n1437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mitchell S, Maynard V, Lyons V, et al. The role and response of primary healthcare services in the delivery of palliative care in epidemics and pandemics: a rapid review to inform practice and service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Palliat Med. 2020;34(9):1182–1192. doi: 10.1177/0269216320947623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pettus K, Moine S, Kunirova G, et al. Palliative care comes of age in the 2018 Declaration of Astana. J Palliat Med. 2019;22(3):242. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mitchell S, Oliver P, Gardiner C, et al. Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings of a UK primary care survey. BJGP Open. 2021. DOI: . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Sleeman KE, de Brito M, Etkind S, et al. The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(7):e883–e892. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30172-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Polak L, Hopkins S, Barclay S, Hoare S. The difference an end-of-life diagnosis makes: qualitative interviews with providers of community health care for frail older people. Br J Gen Pract. 2020. DOI: . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Tobin J, Rogers A, Winterburn I, et al. Hospice care access inequalities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mair FS, Foster HM, Nicholl BI. Multimorbidity and the COVID-19 pandemic — an urgent call to action. J Comorb. 2020 doi: 10.1177/2235042X20961676.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.The Lancet Oncology COVID-19 and cancer: 1 year on. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(4):411. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00148-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mitchell S, Chapman H, Fowler I, McTague L. Dying at home during covid-19: a view from primary care. BMJ. 2021;374:n1776. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kars MC, van Thiel GJ, van der Graaf R, et al. A systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2016;30(6):533–548. doi: 10.1177/0269216315616759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
