Abstract
Despite root microecology playing critical role in plant growth and fidelity, relatively few studies have focused on the link between the microbial communities and root metabolome in the aquatic macrophytes under heavy metal (HM) pollution. Using high-throughput metagenomic sequencing, targeted metabolomics and community-level physiological profile analyses, we investigated the symbiotic associations between Phragmites australis with rhizospheric bacterial communities under differing acid mine drainage (AMD) pollution. Results indicated that AMD pollution and root localization significantly affected root metabolome profiles. Higher accumulation of adenosine monophosphate, inosine, methionine, carnitine and dimethylglycine were observed in the rhizosphere under AMD than non-AMD habitat. Overall, the bacterial diversity and richness, and functional (metabolic) diversity were lower under high-AMD pollution. While non-AMD site was enriched with members of phylum Firmicutes, Proteobacteria were the most abundant taxa in the rhizosphere and endosphere under AMD-polluted sites. Further, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (Rhizobium, Delftia, Bradyrhizobium, and Mesorhizobium) and metal-tolerant bacteria (Bacillus, Arthrobacter, Massilia and Methylocystis) were most abundant in AMD-polluted than non-AMD habitat. Finally, pH, TDS (total dissolved solids), Cu, Cr, Fe, and Zn content were the key environmental factors that strongly contributed to the spatial perturbation of rhizospheric metabolites, proteobacterial and acidobacterial taxa. Overall, the study linked the differential endospheric and rhizospheric bacterial community and metabolite profiles in P. australis under AMD environment and provided insights into HM adaptability and phytoremediation potential.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00284-021-02748-7.
Introduction
Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud., a common perennial emergent aquatic macrophytes, has emerged as one of the key species extensively applied in the natural and artificial wetland pollution control such as reclamation of acid mine drainage (AMD)-polluted and mine tailings wastewater [1]. There is extensive literature on P. australis interactions with the rich endophytic and epiphytic bacterial and fungal communities [2–4], much of which suggests that their symbiotic interactions play a key role in the plant fitness or invasion success under different environmental conditions [4].
Under AMD contaminated ecosystems, symbiotic interactions between P. australis rhizosphere with members of phyla Proteobacteria, Nitrospirae, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, and Bacteroidetes predominates. Members of these phyla may include the beneficial plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) belonging to genus Arthrobacter, Streptomyces, Mycobacterium and Devosia [2, 5], metal-resistant aerobic microbes such as Microbacterium hydrocarbonoxidans, Achromobacter xylosoxidans and some species of Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. [6, 7], among others. PGPRs could greatly enhance the host plant growth, invasiveness, and sequestration of heavy metals (HM) through processes such as indole acetic acid (IAA) production, siderophore production, phosphate solubilization, and induced systemic resistance [8].
Interactions between plants and their associated microbiota also alters the production of both primary and secondary metabolites such as amino acids, organic acids, phenolic compounds, proteins and polysaccharides, that are important towards HM stress response. For example, significant increase in the levels of adenosine, adenine, guanine, lysine, leucine, glycine, alanine, arginine and jasmonic acid with concomitant decrease in glutamic acid and methionine in the roots of several plants under metal stress have been reported [9, 10]. Amino acids such as glycine, glutamine, serine, methionine, lysine, arginine, and proline are associated with HMs. Specifically, glycine is a precursor in the biosynthesis of glutathione (GSH), an important chelator of HM in cells, whereas proline play an important role in reducing free radicals formation and enhancing the level of GSH [11, 12]. In contrast, organic acids such as malate, citrate, and oxalate have been reported to be involved in the transportation of metals through xylem, and are involved in storage, transportation, sequestration and chelation of ions in vacuole and cytosols, and detoxification of HMs [9, 13]. For instance, the main organic acids that chelate HMs in plants include citric acid, malic acid, and oxalic acid [12, 14]. Despite the importance of plant-derived metabolites in the rhizosphere, relatively little is known about their spatiotemporal distribution and dynamics [15]. This is partly attributable to the fact that metabolomic study, particularly under natural systems, is still challenging as plant root exudation is a dynamic process involving diverse primary and secondary metabolites, with complex and cryptic signaling pathways. However, recent advances in disciplines of biological sciences such as metabolomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, ionomics etc., have started providing evidence that plants integrate information related to nutrient availability, external abiotic and biotic signals to plant–microbe interactions belowground via metabolites perturbations [16]. These interactions are key to their fitness or invasion success under different environmental conditions. Unfortunately, current understanding of the complex interactions between rhizosphere compartments, biogeography, the microbiome and its microbiome-reprogrammed systemic root exudation in P. australis under the multiple stress of low pH, sulfates and HM pollution, is still limited.
Under AMD-contaminated wetland ecosystem, spatially defined root exudation plays a key role in the rhizobiome assembly with the establishment of distinct fungal communities associated with specific root parts of P. australis [3]. Based on Baas-Becking hypothesis that “everything is everywhere, but the environment selects” [17], it is envisaged that deeper coverage of P. australis adaptation under AMD systems would further reveal pertinent bacterial community associations and adaptation to HM and nutrient-enriched rhizosphere. A better knowledge on the root rhizosphere continuum, metabolites–microbial community dynamics and metal interactions is also needed to develop robust and/or improved P. australis-based phytorhizoremediation of AMD-polluted environments.
In this study, an integrated targeted metabolomics and metagenomics was used to evaluate the differential primary metabolome exudation profiles and the concomitant bacterial community assemblages in the root system of P. australis under differing AMD pollution. Biolog Ecoplates™ based CLPP analysis was also used to infer microbial metabolic/functional diversity within and among rhizosphere soil communities in the different AMD polluted sites. The study aimed to answer the question, how does the root physiology including root exudates shape P. australis rhizomicrobiome assembly and functional diversity, its adaptability and HM sequestration capacity under AMD pollution?
Materials and Methods
Site Description and Sample Collection
Roots of P. australis plants, surrounding sediment soils and water were sampled from two mine tailing dams, Lancaster 3 (S26°07.820′, E27°46.680′) and Wuinze 17 (S26°07.171′, E27°43.305′), located in Gauteng province, South Africa. Based on HM pollution levels, Lancaster 3 and Wuinze 17 sites were grouped as high-AMD and mid-AMD polluted environments, respectively. Samples were also collected from Florida Lake (S26°10.625′, E027°54.220′), a reclaimed recreational freshwater dam in the same gold mining belt of Roodepoort, Gauteng, South Africa, as a non-AMD site. Summary of the typical characteristics including selected physicochemical parameters of the sampling sites is provided in Supplementary Table S1. Sampling and fractionation of the root system into rhizosphere and the root endosphere for metagenomic experiments were performed as described by Kalu et al. [3].
Targeted Metabolomic Analyses
To extract primary metabolites, 10 g of fresh rhizosphere soil and root samples were ground in 1 ml 75%:25% v/v methanol:water solution using pestle and mortar. The mixture was transferred into a clean tube, vortexed briefly, then sonicated for 10 min before being centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (800 μl) was filtered through a 0.22-μm filter membrane syringe, before the filtrate was lyophilized using a freeze dryer, dissolved in water, and analyzed for key metabolites of central metabolic pathways, including organic acids, amino acids, nucleotides, vitamins and signalling molecules by UHPLC–MS/MS.
The UHPLC-MS/MS analyses were performed using a Nexera LC system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) coupled to a LCMS-8040 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) using Shim-pack Velox® PFPP (pentafluorophenylpropyl) column (150 × 2.1 mm, 3 μm; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) and an octadecylsilylated silica column (InertSustain C18, 150 × 2.1 mm, 3 μm; GL Sciences, Tokyo, Japan) for cationic and anionic analyses modes, respectively, as described previously [3].
Illumina 16S rDNA High-Throughput Sequencing
Faecal/Soil Total DNA™ extraction kit (Zymo Research Corporation, CA, USA) was used to extract environmental DNA from ground root endosphere and rhizospheric soils according to manufacturer’s instructions and stored at − 20 °C prior to further analysis. For each sample, DNA was extracted in triplicates and pooled together. 16S rRNA gene fragments libraries preparation using 27F and 518R primer pairs, fused with MiSeq adapters and heterogeneity spacers was done according to protocol described by Ogola et al. [18]. Resultant libraries were sequenced by paired end (300 bp reads) sequencing v.3 chemistry along with its multiplex sample identifiers on the Illumina MiSeq Platform according to standard protocol.
Raw Fastq files from Illumina sequencing have been deposited at the NCBI sequence read archive (SRA) as BioProject ID PRJNA742387. The sequences were curated using the mothur v1.40.5 pipeline implemented in Nephele (v2.2.8) [19]. Sequences were assigned to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using a dissimilarity cutoff = 0.03 and classified to representative microbial taxa against the nonredundant SILVA v132 ribosomal RNA database.
Catabolic Activity of Bacterial Communities
The metabolic fingerprint of rhizospheric soil bacterial communities referred to as community-level physiological profile (CLPP) was determined using Biolog Ecoplates™ system (Biolog Inc., Hayward, CA, USA) as described by Mendes et al. [20]. Absorbance was measured at 590 nm with a VarioSkan Flash (Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) absorbance scanner at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h after incubation.
Statistical Analyses
For metabolomic data, the corrected peak area values were subjected pareto-scaling normalization before multivariate statistical analysis by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and heatmap analysis. A supervised differential metabolite abundance analysis was also performed using ALDEx2 package [21]. ALDEx2 uses the centred log-ratio (clr) transformation and Dirichlet Monte-Carlo instances to infer biological and sampling variation, calculating the expected Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) based on a Wilcoxon Rank Sum test and Welch’s t-test, a Kruskal–Wallis test, a generalized linear model, or a correlation test.
The plot_richness function of phyloseq package was used to calculate alpha diversity indices such as Chao1, Shannon, Simpson, ACE for the bacterial community datasets as described by Ogola et al. [18]. The dominant OTUs at different taxonomic levels were used to generate stacked bar charts and heatmap using ggplot2 and heatmap.2 packages in R, respectively. To delineate the core microbiome in the environmental samples, the “amp_venn” function of ampVis2 package were used. β-diversity based on non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination of Weighted UniFrac distance between samples of across AMD habitats was also performed using metaMDS function of the vegan package of R.
To analyze the CLPP data, negative OD values were initially adjusted to zero and absorbance values of 0.2 or higher were considered positive to reduce the number of false positives. Data was also adjusted according to the modified Gompertz equation [22]. Carbon-consumption kinetics such as average well colour development (AWCD), substrate average well colour development (SAWCD), substrate richness (SR), and Shannon diversity index (H′) were calculated as described previously [20].
Results
Metabolome Profile in P. australis Root Under AMD Pollution
A total of 73 metabolites (18 and 55 features in anionic and cationic mode analyses, respectively) was identified based on the multiple reaction monitoring transitions and retention times of standard compounds (Supplementary Materials Table S2). These included amino acids, nucleotide/nucleosides, carbohydrates, organic acids, vitamins, and other known plant metabolites. PCA showed that rhizospheric samples were well separated from endosphere samples along PC1 axis, accounting for 37.4% variation (Fig. 1a). In contrast, no clear separation in the ordination space of endospheric samples was observed in terms AMD pollution gradient. Rhizospheric samples also exhibited a clear separation according to sampling sites. This suggests that the impact of AMD pollution on P. australis metabolite perturbations is more pronounced in the rhizospheric than endospheric root compartment.
PCA loadings analysis identified 43 potentially significant (P < 0.1) metabolites that exerted greater influence on separation of samples in the ordination space (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Material Table S3). Separation along the PC1 axis identified 18 features (metabolites) that showed high variation by root localization (rhizosphere vs. endosphere). This included methionine, ophthalmic acid, niacinamide, guanosine, choline, symmetric dimethylglycine and adenosine among others. In contrast, separation along the PC2 axis identified 14 features that showed high variation by sampling site (AMD pollution gradient) (Supplementary Materials Table S3). Heatmap showing both the hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) and differential abundance of the 43 significant metabolites revealed overall clustering of samples in the ordination space according to root localization (Fig. 1c).
Differential analysis based on ALDEx2 analysis also identified 8 metabolites overrepresented in P. australis rhizosphere (Fig. 2a, c, Supplementary Material Table S4). In contrast, 9 metabolites (four nucleoside/nucleotides, two amino acids and their derivatives, and dopa) were found to be reduced in the rhizosphere samples but overrepresented in endosphere samples. To further identify metabolites significantly contributing to the separation of the rhizosphere according sampling site (Fig. 1a), samples were grouped into non-AMD and AMD sites (Mid- and High-AMD) before subjecting to ALDEx2 analysis. The effect size plot of non-AMD vs. AMD sites is presented in Fig. 2b. Notably, 5 metabolites each were significantly overrepresented in non-AMD and AMD site samples, respectively. Further decomposition of the samples into non-AMD, mid-AMD and high-AMD sites showed that adenosine monophosphate (AMP), inosine, methionine, carnitine and dimethylglycine accumulation was higher in both mid-AMD (log2FC = 5.8–15.9) and high-AMD (log2FC = 2.7–15.9) than in non-AMD environment (Fig. 2d). However, non-AMD vs. mid-AMD and non-AMD vs. high-AMD analyses revealed that uridine, dopa, asymmetric dimethylglycine, adenosine and phenylalanine accumulation was reduced under AMD polluted environment.
Variation of P. australis Root Bacterial Community Under AMD Pollution
Overall, a total of 161,506 high-quality reads (5227 to 47,137) were obtained from all the six samples based on the 16S rRNA gene-based community analysis (Table 1). Good’s coverage across the samples was > 98%. Thus, the sampling depth was enough to estimate the diversity enclosing all major bacterial groups inhabiting the endosphere and rhizosphere under different AMD environments.
Table 1.
Indices† | Rhizosphere | Endosphere | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-AMD | Mid-AMD | High-AMD | Non-AMD | Mid-AMD | High-AMD | |
Target reads | 19,863 | 42,634 | 16,709 | 29,936 | 47,137 | 5227 |
Observed OTUs | 620 | 1283 | 229 | 2146 | 853 | 457 |
ACE | 1228 | 2355 | 244 | 2310 | 1009 | 483 |
Chao1 | 672 | 1110 | 223 | 2045 | 716 | 465 |
Shannon | 2.38 | 2.87 | 0.86 | 4.75 | 2.99 | 3.97 |
Simpson | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.77 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.07 |
Good’s coverage (%) | 98.6 | 99.3 | 99.6 | 99.4 | 99.8 | 98.9 |
†Diversity indices (observed OTUs, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) were based on rarefied datasets of 5227 sequences representing the lowest number of reads in a sample
Changes in OTU Number, Richness, and Diversity of Bacterial Communities
The number of OTUs and alpha diversity indices are shown in Table 1. A total of 5588 OTUs (ranging between 229 and 2146) were obtained from all the six samples. Both species richness (OTU, Chao1, and ACE) and diversity estimates (Shannon and Simpson index) differed between the sampling sites showing a decreased trend under high-AMD habitat (Table 1). However, mid-AMD site had comparatively higher species richness and diversity of bacterial taxa than other habitats. Overall, the biodiversity indices separated the AMD habitat from the non-AMD site.
Dynamics in Microbial Community Structure
A total of 30 phyla, 91 classes, 197 orders, 429 families and 1483 genera were identified in the bacterial community. Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, Acidobacteria and Bacteriodetes were the most abundant phyla (Fig. 3a), with discernible variations in the bacterial taxa according to root compartments and AMD habitat observed. The non-AMD site had higher abundance of phylum Firmicutes, accounting for 60% and 90% of taxa in rhizosphere and endosphere, respectively. In contrast, Proteobacteria constituted the major phylum in AMD sites accounting for ~ 90% abundance of taxa in rhizosphere and endosphere. Clostridia, β-proteobacteria, Bacilli, α-proteobacteria, Actinobacteria_c, Planctomycetia and γ-proteobacteria were the most abundant classes (Fig. 3b). Strikingly, β-proteobacteria was most abundant in high-AMD rhizosphere. However, high-AMD sites and non-AMD endosphere shared similar abundance of the class Clostridia, while α-proteobacteria were relatively more abundant in mid-AMD habitat.
The relative abundance at the genera level (Fig. 3c) showed variations across the three habitats and root compartments. Mid-AMD and non-AMD rhizosphere samples clustered together, with order Bacillales (genus Exiguobacterium), Burkholderiales (genus Massilia), Actinomycetales (genus Arthrobacter) and Planctomycetales (unclassified Planctomyceteae PAC000036) being the most abundant. In contrast, high-AMD and non-AMD endosphere samples clustered together, with genus Clostridium as the most abundant taxa. Interestingly, only high-AMD site endosphere exhibited higher abundance (9.92%) of the genus Methylocystis. In contrast, high abundance of genus Rhizobium (53.7%) and Delftia (14.5%) was detected in mid-AMD samples.
Root Core Microbiome are Differentially Enriched According to AMD Pollution
A total of 42 and 60 OTUs (7.9 and 11% of OTUs in the rhizosphere and root endosphere, respectively) were obtained as the core microbiota, representing ~ 96 and 95.9% of the total reads generated for the rhizosphere and root endosphere, respectively (Fig. 4a, b). Interestingly, 13 OTUs assigned to Chromatiales DQ378269, and genus Moraxella, Stenotrophomonas, Rhizobium, Aquamicrobium, Bradyrhizobium, Comamonas, Herbaspirillum), Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus were identified as unique taxa in high-AMD rhizosphere. In contrast, only 1 (unclassified Exiguobacteriaceae) and 13 OTUs were unique taxa in non-AMD and mid-AMD rhizosphere, respectively. In the endosphere, 12 OTUs representing 85.7% of the total reads were shared across the three habitats as core microbiome (Fig. 4b). These were mainly assigned to the genus Clostridium, Delftia, Mesorhizobium, Methylocystis, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Sporobacter, Xanthobacter, Bacillus, and Bradyrhizobium. Conversely, endosphere also had very low abundance (representing < 4.1% of the total reads generated for the endosphere) of unique taxa in the three habitats.
Correlation Between AMD Physicochemical Indices, Rhizospheric Metabolites and Bacterial Community
NMDS ordination plot revealed significant variation in metabolite profile and bacterial community between rhizospheric samples across the AMD habitats (Fig. 4c). The NMDS stress of 0.079 confirmed that metabolite profile and bacterial community could be accurately described only in two dimensions. Vector fitting of the environmental parameters against the ordination plot of NMDS revealed that metabolite profile and bacterial composition discrimination on the first and second axis. This was mainly explained by pH (r2 = 0.823, P < 0.001), TDS (r2 = 0.367, P = 0.012) and Fe (r2 = 0.186, P = 0.031). Other environmental parameters involved in metabolite profile and bacterial composition discrimination on the second axis were Cr (r2 = 0.465, P = 0.006), Cu (r2 = 0.197, P = 0.042), and Zn (r2 = 0.131, P = 0.039). Lower pH, higher TDS and HM concentrations was positively associated with significant accumulation of AMP, inosine, methionine, carnitine and dimethylglycine with concomitant increase in the abundance of proteobacterial taxa (mainly γ- and β-proteobacteria) and Acidobacterial OTUs (Fig. 4c). However, these factors were negatively associated with abundance of members of phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteria OTUs and uridine, dopa, asymmetric dimethylglycine, adenosine and phenylalanine accumulation.
Effect of AMD Pollution on Rhizospheric Bacteria Catabolic Activity
CLPP results revealed a clear distinction between carbon degradation profile of rhizospheric microbiota of P. australis under high AMD habitat and other sites (Fig. 5a, PERMANOVA F = 5.12, P = 0.0103). Further, both mid- and non-AMD rhizospheric communities also exhibited significant (P < 0.01) overall efficient utilization of carbon sources and higher metabolic activity and diversity than high-AMD soils based AWCD analysis, SR, Shannon diversity indices and SAWCD index (Fig. 5c).
Overall, high-AMD samples exhibited significantly (P < 0.05) very low efficiency in the utilization of all groups of carbon sources. In contrast, 6 Amino acids, 10 carbohydrates and 4 polymers were efficiently utilized by both mid- and non-AMD rhizospheric communities. However, a significant lower utilization of phenolics (2-hydroxy benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy benzoic acid) and esters (pyruvic acid methyl ester) was observed for mid-AMD samples. Collectively, these results suggest that the rhizosphere microbial community under low AMD pollution are metabolically more versatile than under high AMD pollution.
Discussion
Rhizosphere and Endosphere Metabolic Profile Differ Across AMD Pollution Gradient
Under metalliferous environment, plant species secrete a cocktail of small to high molecular organic and inorganic molecules in the rhizosphere. These secretions not only create a nutrient-rich microenvironment that may select for specialized metal-tolerant microbial communities [6], but may also participate directly or indirectly in HM metal detoxification process [13]. In this study, differential perturbation of primary metabolome profiles was observed between P. australis rhizosphere and endosphere compartments. Interestingly, only the rhizospheric microenvironment exhibited spatially distinct metabolome according to AMD pollution gradient (Fig. 1a). Specifically, 18 metabolites ranging from compatible osmolytes such as sugars, amino acids, organic acids, vitamins and pyridine nucleotides showed differential spatial exudation by root localization (rhizosphere vs. endosphere). Similarly, several studies have reported higher accumulation of sugars and sugar alcohols [12], amino acids and its derivatives [23], vitamins [12, 24] and pyridine nucleotides [12]. These molecules act as important protective responses to abiotic stress by terrestrial and aquatic plants. Huang et al. [25] also reported that two aquatic macrophytes Z. latifolia and P. australis diffuse oxygen and primary and secondary metabolites into rhizosphere. The modified root environment plays an important role in the selection and proliferation of symbiotic microbial communities. Toyama et al. [26] also reported that P. australis can release up to 70 mg of dissolved organic carbon per g root wet weight per day, which represents a large carbon resource for rhizosphere bacteria.
Under conditions of metal toxicity, plants reprogram metabolic processes related to plant growth and development, inducing higher levels of amino acids, its derivatives and organic acids [14]. In this study, ALDEx2 analysis revealed significant elevation in the abundance of ophthalmic acid, guanosine, niacinamide, histamine, methionine, thymidine and choline in the rhizosphere (Fig. 2a, c). In contrast, adenosine, symmetric dimethylglycine, isoleucine, guanosine monophosphate, dopa, adenine, asymmetric dimethylglycine, tyrosine and cytidine were enriched in the endosphere (Fig. 2). These results reflect storage of different metabolites in dissimilar tissues and cell types depending on their functionalities. Amino acids in plants may contribute to the detoxification process by regulating ion transport, chelating ions, and N metabolism under HM stress [12]. Association between elevated methionine and niacinamide and the signaling, sequestration and transportation of HMs such as Fe, Cu, Zn, and Cd has previously been reported [12]. Ophthalmic acid or γ-glutamyl-l-2-aminobutyryl-glycine (a tripeptide analogue of GSH) is a common oxidative stress marker in both plants and animals [27]. In contrast, quaternary ammonium compounds (choline and N,N-dimethylglycine) have been linked to the synthesis of membrane phospholipids and neurotransmitters key to various biological functions in plants [28]. Pyrimidine metabolite (thymidine) have also been implicated in signaling pathways linked to progressive drought-stress tolerance in bread wheat [29]. Elevated ophthalmic acid, guanosine, niacinamide, histamine, methionine, thymidine and choline (Fig. 2), therefore, suggest their likely importance in the root-sediment interface of P. australis under AMD pollution.
Clear differences in the rhizosphere exudates between the sites was also observed (Fig. 1), providing evidence that metabolite profiles are shaped by AMD habitat. Based on ALDEx2 analysis (Fig. 2b, d), differential abundance of several metabolites was observed between non-AMD and AMD sites. AMP, inosine, methionine, carnitine, and dimethylglycine were overrepresented in both mid and high-AMD sites. In support of these results, NMDS plot also revealed significant higher correlation between lower pH, higher TDS and HM concentrations (Cu, Cr, Fe, and Zn) and rhizospheric abundance of the aforementioned metabolites (Fig. 4c). In general, aquatic macrophytes have the ability to influence the surrounding water pH by their roots through either release of OH− or HCO3− or CO32−, release of organic anions and inactivation of H+-ATPase, to increase pH [9]. A link between increase in pH due to organic acids exudation and Cr stress in rice rhizosphere has been previously reported [9]. In two wetland species, Eriophorum angustifolium and Eriophorum scheuchzeri, root-mediated pH changes has been associated with the bioavailability of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn from AMD and mine tailings [30]. On the other hand, rhizospheric overproduction of ammonium compounds such as methionine, carnitine and dimethylglycine may represent a major driver for root nutrient foraging strategies under low fertility AMD soils. The resultant plant ammonium nutrition may promote sugars exudation [31]. Furthermore, increased carnitine exudation may imply its role in promoting the fidelity of P. australis growth and cell division under AMD environment by imparting the antioxidative and protective effect against the genotoxic effect of HM stress [32]. These results indicate that under increasing AMD pollution different compartments of P. australis roots exude differential primary metabolites key to growth and root fidelity towards HM stress and detoxification.
Rhizosphere and Endospheric Bacterial Community Structure Differ by AMD Pollution Gradient
Previous reports have demonstrated that the microbial community structure of root-associated microbiomes is affected by the plant compartment [33]. Consistent with these results, species richness and diversity indices of bacterial community for rhizosphere and endosphere of P. australis differed significantly in this study. However, dependence on sampling sites, with these indices decreasing with increasing AMD pollution was observed (Table 1). Surprisingly, lower bacterial diversity was observed for the rhizosphere than endosphere samples. We have previously reported a strikingly higher fungal diversity in the endosphere than rhizosphere compartments [3]. In contrast, several studies have reported reduced microbial diversity nearer to roots, with further reduction in the endosphere [4, 6]. However, the impact of pH and HM pollution was observed for rhizophere than endosphere. These results may imply that local P. australis root microenvironment has a complex effect on both bacterial and fungal community, selecting for more endophytic metal tolerant groups under AMD-stress conditions.
In general, the rhizosphere provides an environment for plant–microbes interaction due to the richness of nutrients necessary for the growth of both plants and microbes. Overall, OTUs assigned to phylum Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, Acidobacteria and Bacteriodetes (Fig. 3a) were the abundant P. australis root communities. Members of Proteobacteria (Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria), Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes have been reported to be dominant and ubiquitous in the rhizosphere of P. australis under diverse habitats [2, 7] and other terrestrial and aquatic plants [37]. As r-strategy organisms, Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria are capable of utilizing a broad range of root-derived carbon substrates [25]. This may explain, in part, their high abundances in the rhizospheric compartment. The high abundance of Actinobacteria, whose members are known to produce a wide variety of antibiotics, could contribute to pathogen resistance. On the other hand, enrichment of Bacteriodetes may indicate their importance in decomposing high molecular weight organic matter [38].
The phylum Firmicutes was dominant in both rhizosphere and endosphere of P. australis in non-AMD site. At lower taxonomic levels, the high abundance of potentially obligate anaerobes belonging to genus Clostridium and Exiguobacterium in non-AMD site rhizosphere and endosphere relate to the regulation of oxygen. In support of current findings, Huang et al. [25], reported that members of Firmicutes were enriched in Z. latifolia and P. australis rhizosphere sediments and bulk under freshwater ecosystem. In freshwater sediment bacterial communities, it is hypothesized that oxygen availability is a major determinant of community composition. Hernández et al. [37] also reported high abundance of members of genus Clostridium, an obligate anaerobes possessing strictly anaerobic fermentative metabolism, in anaerobic habitat of rice fields. In contrast, Exiguobacterium is a cosmopolitan bacterial genus that includes many extremophiles capable of surviving in both marine and nonmarine environments worldwide, including plant rhizosphere and freshwater sediments [39]. OTUs belonging to Rhizobium, Delftia, Bradyrhizobium and Mesorhizobium accounted for the major genera in rhizosphere and root endosphere of P. australis under AMD pollution. Both nitrogen-fixing rhizobial symbionts [8, 40] and diazotrophic Delftia [41] are known plant growth promoting (PGP) microbes, and HMs, organic and inorganic bioremediators in the rhizosphere. HM tolerant rhizobial strains have been reported from nutrient-poor contaminated sites to effectively carry out symbiotic nitrogen fixation, while legume–rhizobia symbiosis is widely known to detoxify HM and improves the quality of contaminated soils [40]. On the other hand, studies have shown that Delftia strains can resist HMs such as Zn, Hg, Pb, and Cr(VI) [42] and can transform HM into less toxic compounds [41, 43].
The two AMD environment rhizosphere samples also showed the abundance of bacteria in the order Bacillales (genus Exiguobacterium), Burkholderiales (genus Massilia), Actinomycetales (genus Arthrobacter) and Planctomycetales (unclassified Planctomyceteae PAC000036). Arthrobacter species has been reported to resist and bioaccumulate metals such as Cd, Co, Zn, Cr, and Hg due to their ability to accumulate chromate reductase (ChrR, YieF, NemA and LpDH) and NADPH-specific mercuric reductases (MerA) in the cytoplasm [44]. Similarly, tolerance of Bacillus and Massilia strains to Cd stress has previously been attributed to either binding of Cd2+ as cadmium phosphate and simultaneous increase in K+ uptake in the presence of Cd2+ ions [45]. One unique observation of this study was higher abundance of genus Methylocystis in the endosphere samples from high AMD polluted environment (Fig. 3c). As methanotrophs, Methylocystis strains have high ability to oxidize the greenhouse gas methane accounting to high denitrification activity in eutrophic waters similar to AMD wetland [46]. Further, Shi et al. [47] has also reported that at least eight genera of methanotrophs including Methylocystis possess both Hg(II) and As(V) reductases key to their tolerance to the two toxic HM and their bioremediation in polluted water. Therefore, aforementioned microbes colonizing the rhizosphere and endosphere gives clues to their potential roles in the nutrient uptake to promote the growth and HM stress tolerance of the P. australis under AMD environment.
Multivariate analyses showed clustering of both bacterial community based on AMD pollution, root compartments (endosphere vs. rhizospere) and associated root exudation (Fig. 4c). Specifically, lower pH, higher TDS and HM concentrations (Cu, Cr, Fe, and Zn) contributed significantly to lower bacterial diversity, particularly under heavy AMD pollution load. However, pH exhibited a significant stronger positive correlation with change in bacterial structure and diversity than other environmental factors (Fig. 4c). These results are consistent with other studies that indicate pH constitute a key determinant of bacterial community structure in different habitats [7, 34]. Mendez-Garcia et al. [35] also reported the strong correlation between the TDS, conductivity, Fe and other HM, and the microbial structure, and biomass in polluted AMD soils. Aguinaga et al. [36] also reported differential bacterial community structure and diversity dependent on suspended metal concentrations, sediment metal concentrations and other water chemistry parameters (pH and conductivity), and plant presence under wetland environment. This imply that increasing HM pollution and lower reduces microbial diversity and richness, and metabolic activity structure of the P. australis rhizosphere under AMD pollution [36]. Interestingly, lower pH, higher TDS and HM concentrations (Cu, Cr, Fe, and Zn) also strongly contributed to spatial perturbation of metabolites such as AMP, inosine, methionine, carnitine, and dimethylglycine with concomitant increase in the abundance of γ- and β-proteobacteria and Acidobacterial OTUs (Fig. 4c). In contrast, negative correlation was observed between these factors, Firmicutes and Actinobacterial OTUs as well as uridine, dopa, asymmetric dimethylglycine, adenosine, and phenylalanine accumulation. In summary, the results of present study give a snapshot on how P. australis utilize root exudation to improve its fitness in AMD-polluted wetland ecosystem to modulate the surrounding rhizospheric soil physical and chemical conditions to enhance nutrient uptake, and elicit symbiotic microbiome assembly responses.
Catabolic Activity of Bacterial Community Exhibited AMD Pollution-Dependent Gradient
Complementing the metagenomic analyses, CLPP indices such as AWCD and SAWCD showed significant differences in the metabolic potential/carbon utilization capacity of the rhizospheric microbiota of P. australis according to AMD gradient (Fig. 5a). In addition, SR and Shannon diversity indices (H′), showed that both mid-AMD and non-AMD had higher metabolic activities than the high AMD site (Fig. 5b, c). Comparatively, mid-AMD site exhibited higher but not significant SR and H′, indicating that mild AMD pollution had appreciable effect in modulating the bacterial community richness and carbon degradation profile. In support of these findings, Chaerun et al. [48] observed increased activity, biomass, and functional diversity of the microbial communities in polluted soils compared unpolluted with elevated salinity, sodocity, and HM soils. Thus, the major changes in the chemical and physical properties of wetland due to AMD pollution have lasting impacts on the microbial communities of P. australis rhizosphere. These results suggests that rhizospheric effect maybe a key factor in the recruitment of symbiotic microbiome. The concomitant rhizospheric enrichment contributes to plant fidelity and the HM bioremediation under AMD polluted environment.
Overall, indices related to the structure of microbial catabolic activity under high-AMD pollution showed discernible decrease indicative of stress response (Fig. 5). Similar to our findings, Xiao et al. [49] has reported that HM (Cd and Pb) pollution negatively impacts on microbial growth, diversity and enzyme activity in soil. It suffices to speculate that extreme HM pollution towards the upper limit for cellular life significantly reduces P. australis rhizospheric bacterial community size and functional activity. This supports the hypothesis that the masking of rhizospheric effect under the high metal conditions become the bigger constraint in shaping the bacterial community structure and metabolic diversity.
Conclusion
Our study characterized the unexplored link between bacterial community structure and metabolic diversity, and root exudation of P. australis under AMD-polluted environment. Overall, AMD pollution significantly affected the root primary metabolomic profile, the impact being more pronounced in the rhizosphere than endosphere. Elevated abundance of ophthalmic acid, guanosine, niacinamide, histamine, methionine, thymidine and choline imply their importance in the root-sediment interface of P. australis under AMD pollution. In the rhizosphere, elevation of AMP, inosine, methionine, carnitine, and dimethylglycine, and their correlation with pH, TDS and HM content (Cu, Cr, Fe, and Zn) under mid and high-AMD sites provides clues on their potential contribution towards P. australis growth, and root fidelity related to HM stress response and detoxification. In addition, novel strategies that promote P. australis growth, and root fidelity under AMD habitat based on rhizosphere microecology and root metabolomics analyses were highlighted. Under AMD pollution, P. australis not only remold their root metabolite exudation profile vital for the recruitment of beneficial rhizosphere bacteria (e.g., Bacillus, Rhizobium, Delftia, Bradyrhizobium and Mesorhizobium) for promotion of plant growth under pH and HM stress, but also induce some microbial taxa (e.g., Delftia, Massilia, Arthrobacter, Bacillus, and Methylocystis) key to HM detoxification processes. This study, therefore, provides insights on the understanding of novel auxiliary strategies utilised by P. australis to confer HM adaptability, sequestration and bioremediation capacity. A theoretical basis for further application and enhancing P. australis phytorhizoremediation efficiency has also been provided. However, this study focused only on the primary root exudates (metabolites) that were all assumed to be of plant origin. This may limit the overall understanding of the complex and multifaceted plant–microbe–metal interactions. Hence, a more comprehensive picture on the specific roles of root- and microbiome-specific metabolites in promoting P. australis growth and health under AMD-polluted environment need to be further explored incorporating the metatranscriptomic, metaproteomic, ionomics and other omics technologies. In addition, the aforementioned microbial taxa also need to be identified clearly and researched further.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the managers of the Jo’burg Parks, Mintails Mogale Gold Mine and Sibanye Gold Mine for granting permission to collect samples for the study.
Author Contributions
CMK and KN conceptualized and designed the study. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by CMK, HJOO and RS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CMK, and all authors critically revised all versions of the manuscript. Resources and supervision were provided by MT and KN. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Fund was provided by National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant No. 129095).
Data Availability
Data Associated with this study has been deposited at the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.com) as BioProject ID PRJNA742387. All other data generated are included within the article and supplementary materials.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
Chimdi Mang Kalu, Henry Joseph Oduor Ogola, Ramganesh Selvarajan, Memory Tekere and Khayalethu Ntushelo declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The ethical clearance (2015/CAES/090) for the study was obtained from University of South Africa College of Agriculture and Environmental Science Research Ethics Committee (CEAS-REC).
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Guo L, Cutright TJ. Remediation of AMD contaminated soil by two types of reeds. Int J Phytoremediation. 2015;17:391–403. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2014.910170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.He R, Zeng J, Zhao D, et al. Contrasting patterns in diversity and community assembly of Phragmites australis root-associated bacterial communities from different seasons. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e00379–e420. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00379-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kalu CM, Ogola HJO, Selvarajan R, et al. Fungal and metabolome diversity of the rhizosphere and endosphere of Phragmites australis in an AMD-polluted environment. Heliyon. 2021;7:e06399. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bowen JL, Kearns PJ, Byrnes JEK, et al. Lineage overwhelms environmental conditions in determining rhizosphere bacterial community structure in a cosmopolitan invasive plant. Nat Commun. 2017;8:433. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00626-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li Y, Yuan L, Xue S, et al. The recruitment of bacterial communities by the plant root system changed by acid mine drainage pollution in soils. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2020 doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnaa117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Borymski S, Cycoń M, Beckmann M, et al. Plant species and heavy metals affect biodiversity of microbial communities associated with metal-tolerant plants in metalliferous soils. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1425. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pietrangelo L, Bucci A, Maiuro L, et al. Unraveling the composition of the root-associated bacterial microbiota of Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1650. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shameer S, Prasad T. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable agricultural practices with special reference to biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Growth Regul. 2018;84:603–615. doi: 10.1007/s10725-017-0365-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zeng F, Chen S, Miao Y, et al. Changes of organic acid exudation and rhizosphere pH in rice plants under chromium stress. Environ Pollut. 2008;155:284–289. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pidatala VR, Li K, Sarkar D, et al. Comparative metabolic profiling of vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides) and maize (Zea mays) under lead stress. Chemosphere. 2018;193:903–911. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Siripornadulsil S, Traina S, Verma DPS, Sayre RT. Molecular mechanisms of proline-mediated tolerance to toxic heavy metals in transgenic microalgae. Plant Cell. 2002;14:2837–2847. doi: 10.1105/tpc.004853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ahanger MA, Gul F, Ahmad P, Akram NA, et al. Chapter 3—environmental stresses and metabolomics—deciphering the role of stress responsive metabolites. In: Ahmad P, Ahanger MA, Singh VP, et al., editors. Plant metabolites and regulation under environmental stress. Academic Press; 2018. pp. 53–67. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rauser WE. Structure and function of metal chelators produced by plants. Cell Biochem Biophys. 1999;31:19–48. doi: 10.1007/BF02738153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Feng Z, Ji S, Ping J, Cui D. Recent advances in metabolomics for studying heavy metal stress in plants. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2021;143:116402. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sugiyama A. The soybean rhizosphere: metabolites, microbes, and beyond—a review. Spec Issue Plant Microbiome. 2019;19:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Korenblum E, Dong Y, Szymanski J, et al. Rhizosphere microbiome mediates systemic root metabolite exudation by root-to-root signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:3874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912130117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.De Wit R, Bouvier T. ‘Everything is everywhere, but, the environment selects’; what did Baas Becking and Beijerinck really say? Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:755–758. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01017.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ogola HJO, Selvarajan R, Tekere M. Local geomorphological gradients and land use patterns play key role on the soil bacterial community diversity and dynamics in the highly endemic indigenous afrotemperate coastal scarp forest biome. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:281. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.592725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weber N, Liou D, Dommer J, et al. Nephele: a cloud platform for simplified, standardized and reproducible microbiome data analysis. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:1411–1413. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mendes LW, de Chaves MG, de Fonseca MC, et al. Resistance breeding of common bean shapes the physiology of the rhizosphere microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2252–2252. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fernandes A, Macklaim J, Linn T, et al. ANOVA-like differential gene expression analysis of single-organism and meta-RNA-seq. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vandepitte V, Quataert P, de Rore H, Verstraete W. Evaluation of the Gompertz function to model survival of bacteria introduced into soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1995;27:365–372. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)00158-W. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reddy PS, Jogeswar G, Rasineni GK, et al. Proline over-accumulation alleviates salt stress and protects photosynthetic and antioxidant enzyme activities in transgenic sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;94:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yusuf MA, Kumar D, Rajwanshi R, et al. Overexpression of γ-tocopherol methyl transferase gene in transgenic Brassica juncea plants alleviates abiotic stress: physiological and chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA—Bioenergy. 2010;1797:1428–1438. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huang R, Zeng J, Zhao D, et al. Sediment microbiomes associated with the rhizosphere of emergent macrophytes in a shallow, subtropical lake. Limnol Oceanogr. 2020;65:S38–S48. doi: 10.1002/lno.11325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Toyama T, Furukawa T, Maeda N, et al. Accelerated biodegradation of pyrene and benzo [a] pyrene in the Phragmites australis rhizosphere by bacteria–root exudate interactions. Water Res. 2011;45:1629–1638. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Servillo L, Castaldo D, Giovane A, et al. Ophthalmic acid is a marker of oxidative stress in plants as in animals. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA. 2018;1862:991–998. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang J, Rozwadowski K, Bhinu VS, et al. Manipulation of sinapine, choline and betaine accumulation in Arabidopsis seed: towards improving the nutritional value of the meal and enhancing the seedling performance under environmental stresses in oilseed crops. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2008;46:647–654. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Itam M, Mega R, Tadano S, et al. Metabolic and physiological responses to progressive drought stress in bread wheat. Sci Rep. 2020;10:17189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74303-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stoltz E, Greger M. Cottongrass effects on trace elements in submersed mine tailings. J Environ Qual. 2002;31:1477–1483. doi: 10.2134/jeq2002.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Canarini A, Kaiser C, Merchant A, et al. Root exudation of primary metabolites: mechanisms and their roles in plant responses to environmental stimuli. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:157. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Oney-Birol S. Exogenous L-carnitine promotes plant growth and cell division by mitigating genotoxic damage of salt stress. Sci Rep. 2019;9:17229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53542-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yamamoto K, Shiwa Y, Ishige T, et al. Bacterial diversity associated with the rhizosphere and endosphere of two halophytes: Glaux maritima and Salicornia europaea. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2878. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xie Y, Fan J, Zhu W, et al. Effect of heavy metals pollution on soil microbial diversity and bermudagrass genetic variation. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:755. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Méndez-García C, Peláez AI, Mesa V, et al. Microbial diversity and metabolic networks in acid mine drainage habitats. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:475. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aguinaga OE, McMahon A, White KN, et al. Microbial community shifts in response to acid mine drainage pollution within a natural wetland ecosystem. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1445. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hernández M, Dumont MG, Yuan Q, Conrad R. Different bacterial populations associated with the roots and rhizosphere of rice incorporate plant-derived carbon. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:2244–2253. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03209-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fenchel T, Blackburn H, King GM, Blackburn TH. Bacterial biogeochemistry: the ecophysiology of mineral cycling. Cambridge: Academic press; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dechao Z, Zhaolu Z, Yangjie L, et al. Comparative genomics of exiguobacterium reveals what makes a cosmopolitan bacterium. J mSystems. 2021;6:e00383. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00383-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Checcucci A, Bazzicalupo M, Mengoni A. Enhancing cleanup of environmental pollutants. Cham: Springer; 2017. Exploiting nitrogen-fixing rhizobial symbionts genetic resources for improving phytoremediation of contaminated soils; pp. 275–288. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Braña V, Cagide C, Morel MA. Microbial models: from environmental to industrial sustainability. Singapore: Springer; 2016. The sustainable use of Delftia in agriculture, bioremediation, and bioproducts synthesis; pp. 227–247. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dorian AB-H, Landy IR-B, Enrique D-P, Luis F-L. Zinc and lead biosorption by Delftia tsuruhatensis: a bacterial strain resistant to metals isolated from mine tailings. J Water Resour Prot. 2012;4:207–216. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2012.44023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Caravaglia L, Cerdeira S, Vullo D. Chromium (VI) biotransformation by-and-Proteobacteria from natural polluted environments: a combined biological and chemical treatment for industrial wastes. J Hazard Mater. 2010;175:104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bafana A, Krishnamurthi K, Patil M, Chakrabarti T. Heavy metal resistance in Arthrobacter ramosus strain G2 isolated from mercuric salt-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater. 2010;177:481–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hrynkiewicz K, Złoch M, Kowalkowski T, et al. Strain-specific bioaccumulation and intracellular distribution of Cd2+ in bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere, ectomycorrhizae, and fruitbodies of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:3055–3067. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3489-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Knief C, Dunfield PF. Response and adaptation of different methanotrophic bacteria to low methane mixing ratios. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1307–1317. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00814.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shi L-D, Chen Y-S, Du J-J, et al. Metagenomic evidence for a methylocystis species capable of bioremediation of diverse heavy metals. Front Microbiol. 2019;9:3297. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chaerun SK, Pangesti NP, Toyota K, Whitman WB. Changes in microbial functional diversity and activity in paddy soils irrigated with industrial wastewaters in Bandung, West Java Province, Indonesia. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011;217:491–502. doi: 10.1007/s11270-010-0603-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xiao L, Yu Z, Liu H, et al. Effects of Cd and Pb on diversity of microbial community and enzyme activity in soil. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29:551–558. doi: 10.1007/s10646-020-02205-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data Associated with this study has been deposited at the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.com) as BioProject ID PRJNA742387. All other data generated are included within the article and supplementary materials.
Not applicable.