Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Dec 29;16(12):e0261529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261529

Determinants of severity among hospitalised COVID-19 patients: Hospital-based case-control study, India, 2020

Sanjay P Zodpey 1, Himanshu Negandhi 1, Vineet Kumar Kamal 2, Tarun Bhatnagar 2, Parasuraman Ganeshkumar 2, Arvind Athavale 3, Amiruddin Kadri 4, Amit Patel 5, A Bhagyalaxmi 4, Deepak Khismatrao 6, E Theranirajan 7, Getrude Banumathi 8, Krishna Singh 3, P Parameshwari 8, Prasita Kshirsagar 9, Rita Saxena 10, Sanjay G Deshpande 11, Kadloor Satyanand 6, Saurabh Hadke 11, Simmi Dube 10, Sudarshini Subramaniam 7, Surabhi Madan 5, Swapnali Kadam 9, Tanu Anand 12, Kathiresan Jeyashree 2, Manickam Ponnaiah 2, Manish Rana 13, Manoj V Murhekar 2,*, DCS Reddy 14
Editor: Raffaele Serra15
PMCID: PMC8716035  PMID: 34965276

Abstract

Background

Risk factors for the development of severe COVID-19 disease and death have been widely reported across several studies. Knowledge about the determinants of severe disease and mortality in the Indian context can guide early clinical management.

Methods

We conducted a hospital-based case control study across nine sites in India to identify the determinants of severe and critical COVID-19 disease.

Findings

We identified age above 60 years, duration before admission >5 days, chronic kidney disease, leucocytosis, prothrombin time > 14 sec, serum ferritin >250 ng/mL, d-dimer >0.5 ng/mL, pro-calcitonin >0.15 μg/L, fibrin degradation products >5 μg/mL, C-reactive protein >5 mg/L, lactate dehydrogenase >150 U/L, interleukin-6 >25 pg/mL, NLR ≥3, and deranged liver function, renal function and serum electrolytes as significant factors associated with severe COVID-19 disease.

Interpretation

We have identified a set of parameters that can help in characterising severe COVID-19 cases in India. These parameters are part of routinely available investigations within Indian hospital settings, both public and private. Study findings have the potential to inform clinical management protocols and identify patients at high risk of severe outcomes at an early stage.

Introduction

COVID-19 pandemic has caused over 2.4 million deaths and over 111 million cases worldwide by 24th February 2021 [1]. Due to widespread transmission, several countries were burdened with high case load and deaths. Critical care resources have been stretched across some countries [2, 3]. The fatalities reported by countries and regions also varied widely.

While the available data on absolute number of deaths is fairly reliable, the calculation of mortality rates and comparing them across countries is difficult because countries widely differ in their screening and testing criteria. The analysis of 72,314 cases using data from the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention [4], indicated most cases to be mild (81%; i.e., non-pneumonia and mild pneumonia), whereas 14% were severe (i.e., dyspnea, respiratory frequency ≥30/min, blood oxygen saturation ≤93%, the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio <300, and/or lung infiltrates >50% within 24 to 48 hours), and 5% were critical (i.e., respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction or failure). India rapidly scaled up hospital and critical care resources and a proactive public health response targeting surveillance, wearing masks, limiting movement in the early phase of the epidemic along with an intensive information dissemination campaign. The mortality attributed to COVID-19 in India was relatively low compared to the rest of the world. India had reported 1,19,71,624 cases and 1,61,552 deaths till 28 March 2021 with lowest case fatality ratio of 1.5% globally [5].

The determinants of severity can guide clinical management; proactively screening for their presence could prioritize COVID-19 patients for intensive care treatment and thereby allocate scarce medical resources appropriately. Risk factors for the development of severe disease and death have been widely reported across several studies [6], and vulnerable groups include older adults, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, hypertension, and cancer. Obesity and smoking were also associated with increased risks in some studies [6]. Lymphopenia is a predictor of disease progression [7]. Cytokine storm is also associated with disease severity [8].

Knowledge of characteristics of people at high risk of experiencing a poor outcome from the infection could help in care provision [9]. We conducted this study to identify the determinants of severe COVID-19 disease in India using a case-control study design.

Methods

Study design and setting

We did a hospital-based case-control study among laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients of age≥18 years, newly admitted to nine designated COVID-19 hospitals (both public and private), from six cities across India during September—November 2020. The study centres included BJ Medical College, Ahmedabad; Care Institute of Medical Sciences (CIMS Hospital), Ahmedabad; Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal; Chirayu Medical College & Hospital, Bhopal; Symbiosis Hospital and Research Centre, Pune; Rajiv Gandhi Medical College and CSMH, Kalwa, Thane; Madras Medical College, Chennai; Chengalpattu Medical College, Chengalpattu; and Datta Meghe Medical College, Wanadongari, Nagpur.

Cases (severe disease, at admission) and controls (mild disease at admission) were defined as per the Government of India’s COVID-19 case management guidelines (version 5; issued on 03/07/2020) (S1 Table) [10]. The working definition of severe COVID-19 disease included death and/or development of severe disease requiring ICU admission and/or ventilator support.

Sample size

Assuming an exposure rate of risk factors as 9% among controls (prevalence of hypertension in India) [11], anticipated Odds Ratio (OR) of 2.3 [12], at 5% level of significance and 90% power, we estimated a sample size of 244 cases and controls, each.

Selection of study participants

Cases and controls were identified from the admission records of study hospitals and those found to fulfil the eligibility criteria were selected consecutively until the desired sample size was achieved.

Data collection

We did face-to face interviews with the patients using a structured questionnaire to collect data on socio-demographic details, concurrent disease conditions and clinical symptomatology. For concurrent disease conditions questions were included about duration, severity and medication. If the patient was unable to respond, the close family members of the patient were interviewed. Data pertaining to clinical and laboratory variables were extracted from the hospital records using a data abstraction form. All information pertained to the duration between development of symptoms and the time of admission of the patients in the study hospitals.

Data analysis

Categorical and continuous variables were represented as frequency (percentage) and median (Interquartile range (IQR)), respectively. Between cases and controls, categorical variables were compared using Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test, whichever applicable. Non-normally distributed continuous variables (examined using Shapiro-Wilk test) were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The quantification of association was represented as crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using simple and multiple logistic regression analysis, respectively. Factors with p-value <0.25 in simple logistic regression analysis and/or clinical relevance, with the exclusion of those operating through a common clinical pathway or indicating similar pathology, were selected for the inclusion in the final model based on multiple logistic regression analysis, after checking for collinearity using variance inflation factor (VIF). Each factor was adjusted for relevant and measured confounders identified using directed acyclic graphs and -2 log likelihood ratio test. Data analysis was done using Stata V.15.1 software.

Ethical issues

Written informed consent was obtained from study participants. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Indian Institute of Public Health—Delhi. The protocol was also approved by the institutional ethics committees of all study sites.

Results

We included 244 patients with severe COVID-19 disease (Cases) and 245 with mild to moderate COVID-19 disease (Controls). Compared to the controls, a significantly higher proportion of cases were more than 60 years old, had lower monthly household income, less educated, and possessed a below poverty line (BPL) card. (Table 1).

Table 1. Background characteristics of cases and controls with COVID-19 in India, 2020.

Characteristics Cases Controls p-value
N n/ Median %/IQR N n/ Median %/IQR
Age (years) 244 58.9 (48.1–66.6) 245 45.7 (31.9–56.0)
18–45 45 18.5 118 48.2 <0.001
46–60 85 34.8 87 35.5
>60 114 46.7 40 16.3
Gender 244 245
 Male 165 67.6 175 71.4 0.361
 Female 79 32.4 70 28.6
Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) 242 25.7 (23.0–29.3) 245 25.5 (23.0–28.1)
≤27.5 156 64.5 172 70.2 0.177
>27.5 86 35.5 73 29.8
Average monthly household income (INR) 223 20,000 (10,000–40,000) 238 25,000 (10,000–50,000) 0.007
Years of education 244 10 (5–12) 245 12 (10–15) * <0.001
Possess BPL card 244 79 32.4 245 43 17.5 <0.001
Migrant 242 28 11.6 245 35 14.3 0.372
Current smoker 241 40 16.6 244 41 16.8 0.952
H/o BCG vaccination 236 158 66.9 242 196 80.9 <0.001

IQR–inter quartile range

The most common symptoms at admission were fever, shortness of breath, cough and myalgia. A significantly higher proportion of cases reported cough and presented with hypertension, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Cases also had a significantly higher proportion of multiple comorbidities compared to the controls. (Table 2).

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of cases and controls at the time of admission in India, 2020.

Characteristics Cases (n = 244) Controls (n = 245) p-value
n % n %
Presenting symptoms
Temperature > 37.8 °C (100 °F) 201 82.4 198 80.8 0.656
Cough 169 69.2 128 52.2 <0.001
Myalgia/ pain & aches in the body 93 38.1 103 42.0 0.376
Sore throat 50 20.5 63 25.7 0.171
Headache 24 9.8 57 23.7 <0.001
Diarrhoea 13 5.3 26 10.6 0.031
Runny nose 15 6.1 21 8.6 0.305
Vomiting 15 6.1 15 6.1 0.991
Seizures 6 2.4 1 0.4 0.056
Co-morbidities
Hypertension 119 48.7 58 23.7 <0.001
Diabetes mellitus 99 40.6 48 19.6 <0.001
Chronic Kidney Disease 13 5.3 1 0.4 <0.001
Cardiovascular disease 8 3.3 4 1.6 0.239
Asthma 4 1.6 4 1.6 0.995
Chronic lung disease 3 1.2 3 1.2 0.996
Chronic Heart Disease 4 1.6 2 0.8 0.408
Others 33 13.5 37 15.1 0.618
Number of comorbidities
None 79 32.4 137 55.9 <0.001
Single 70 28.7 64 26.1
Multiple 95 38.9 44 17.9

A significantly higher proportion of cases compared to controls had abnormal laboratory parameters at the time of admission, except for blood group, creatinine kinase and vitamin D. (Table 3).

Table 3. Laboratory parameters of cases and controls with COVID-19 at the time of admission in India, 2020.

Characteristics Cases Controls p-value
N n % N n %
Blood group 239 245
A 53 22.2 56 22.9 0.795
B 85 35.6 21 8.6
AB 25 10.5 82 33.5
O 76 31.8 86 35.1
Abnormal parameters
Leucocytosis (TWBC>11000 /mm3) 244 115 47.1 245 35 14.3 <0.001
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate >30 mm/hr 244 129 52.9 245 95 38.78 0.002
Prothrombin time > 14 sec 244 146 59.8 244 100 40.9 <0.001
Activated partial thromboplastin time >40 sec 244 51 20.9 244 37 15.16 0.099
Serum ferritin >250 ng/mL 244 195 79.9 245 83 33.9 <0.001
D-dimer >0.5 ng/mL 244 171 70.1 245 83 33.9 <0.001
Pro-calcitonin >0.15 μg/L 244 89 36.5 245 17 6.9 <0.001
Fibrin degradation product >5 μg/mL 237 167 70.5 233 105 45.0 <0.001
Serum triglyceride >150 mg/dL 244 109 44.7 245 84 34.3 0.019
C-reactive protein >5 mg/L 244 219 89.7 245 126 51.4 <0.001
Lactate dehydrogenase >150 U/L 243 238 97.9 245 229 93.5 0.015
Creatinine kinase >200 U/L 244 52 21.3 237 47 19.8 0.688
Interleukin-6 >25 pg/mL 244 142 58.2 245 79 32.2 <0.001
Fasting blood sugar >125 mg/dL 244 131 53.7 245 70 28.6 <0.001
Serum homocysteine >15 mcmol/L 244 77 31.6 238 131 55.0 <0.001
Serum calcium < = 8.5 mg/dL 243 120 49.4 237 62 26.2 <0.001
Vitamin D < = 5 ng/mL 244 7 2.9 239 3 1.3 0.213
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ≥3 239 206 86.2 238 97 40.8 <0.001
Deranged Liver Function Test 244 117 52.0 245 51 20.8 <0.001
Deranged Renal Function Test 244 93 38.1 245 23 9.4 <0.001
Deranged Serum electrolytes 244 103 42.2 245 38 15.5 <0.001

TWBC: Total White Blood Cell Count.

On univariate analysis, age of 60 years and above, duration before admission more than five days, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, leucocytosis, elevated levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, prothrombin time, serum ferritin, d-dimer, pro-calcitonin, fibrin degradation products, c-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, interleukin-6, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and deranged liver function tests, renal function tests and serum electrolytes were associated with severe COVID-19 disease. After adjusting for known confounders, factors associated with severe COVID-19 were age above 60 years, duration before admission >5 days, pre-existing diabetes, chronic kidney disease, leucocytosis, prothrombin time > 14 sec, serum ferritin >250 ng/mL, d-dimer >0.5 ng/mL, pro-calcitonin >0.15 μg/L, fibrin degradation products >5 μg/mL, C-reactive protein >5 mg/L, lactate dehydrogenase >150 U/L, interleukin-6 >25 pg/mL, NLR ≥3, and deranged liver function, renal function and serum electrolytes. (Table 4).

Table 4. Factors associated with severity among hospitalised COVID-19 patients, India, 2020.

Factors Unadjusted OR (95% CI) p-value Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Age > = 60 years 4.5 (2.9–6.8) <0.001 -
Male gender 0.8 (0.6–1.2) 0.361 -
BMI >27.5 1.3 (0.9–1.9) 0.177 1.1 (0.7–1.8) a
Duration before admission >5 days 1.5 (1.1–2.2) 0.027 1.5 (1.0–2.2) b
Asthma 1.0 (0.2–4.0) 0.995 -
Chronic lung disease 1.0 (0.2–5.0) 0.996 -
Diabetes mellitus 2.8 (1.9–4.2) <0.001 1.8 (1.1–2.9) c
Chronic Heart Disease 2.0 (0.4–11.1) 0.418 -
Cardiovascular disease 2.0 (0.6–6.9) 0.249 -
Hypertension 3.1 (2.1–4.5) <0.001 1.5 (0.9–2.3) e
Chronic Kidney Disease 13.7 (1.8–105.8) 0.012 8.7 (1.1–71.6) d
Leucocytosis 5.3 (3.5–8.3) <0.001 5.2 (3.3–8.2) f
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate >30 mm/hr 1.8 (1.2–2.5) 0.002 1.4 (0.9–2.0) g
Prothrombin time > 14 sec 2.1 (1.5–3.1) <0.001 1.9 (1.3–2.9) h
Activated partial thromboplastin time >40 sec 1.5 (0.9–2.3) 0.100 1.2 (0.7–2.0) h
Serum ferritin >250 ng/mL 7.8 (5.1–11.7) <0.001 6.2 (4.0–9.7) i
D-dimer >0.5 ng/mL 4.6 (3.1–6.7) <0.001 3.8 (2.6–5.6) j
Pro-calcitonin >0.15 μg/L 7.7 (4.1–13.4) <0.001 5.5 (3.1–9.9) k
Fibrin degradation products >5 μg/mL 2.9 (1.9–4.2) <0.001 3.1 (2.1–4.6) l
C-reactive protein >5 mg/L 8.3 (5.1–13.4) <0.001 6.7 (4.0–11.1) m
Lactate dehydrogenase >150 U/L 3.3 (1.2–9.2) 0.021 4.6 (1.5–14.2) n
Creatinine kinase >200 U/L 1.1 (0.7–1.7) 0.688 -
Interleukin-6 >25 pg/mL 2.9 (2.0–4.2) <0.001 2.4 (1.6–3.8) o
Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio ≥3 9.1 (5.8–14.2) <0.001 5.2 (3.1–8.9) p
Deranged Liver Function Test 3.5 (2.3–5.2) <0.001 2.8 (1.8–4.3) q
Deranged Renal Function Test 5.9 (3.6–9.8) <0.001 3.8 (2.2–6.4) r
Deranged Serum electrolytes 4.0 (2.6–6.1) <0.001 2.3 (1.4–3.7) s

Adjusted for:

a—age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, liver function test, renal function test;

b—age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease;

c—age, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, liver function test, renal function test;

d—age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease;

e—age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, renal function test;

f—diabetes, chronic kidney disease;

g—diabetes, chronic kidney disease, renal function test;

h—liver function test, renal function test;

i—serum electrolytes, liver function test, renal function test;

j—liver function test, prothrombin time;

k—leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate;

l—chronic kidney disease, prothrombin time;

m—leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate;

n—liver function test, leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein;

o—leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein;

p—age, body mass index, leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase;

q—age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, renal function test;

r—age, diabetes, hypertension;

s—chronic kidney disease, liver function test, renal function test

Discussion

We identified older age, co-morbidities (diabetes, chronic kidney disease) and laboratory parameters (leucocyte count, prothrombin time, serum ferritin, d-dimer, pro-calcitonin, fibrin degradation products, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, liver function, renal function and serum electrolytes) as determinants of severe disease at the time of admission among COVID-19 patients.

Diabetes has been recognized as important in the prediction of severe disease of COVID-19. Diabetes in patients with COVID-19 was associated with a two-fold increase in mortality and severity of COVID-19, compared to non-diabetics in a meta-analysis [13]. Jain et al., studied the predictive symptoms and comorbidities for severe COVID-19 and intensive care unit admission. They concluded that elderly patients with comorbidities are more vulnerable to severe disease [14]. A systematic review by Del Sole et al included 12 studies with 2794 patients where 596 patients with severe disease. They reported patients with severe disease were older in age and had diabetes than patients with non-severe disease [15].

Del Sole identified that increased procalcitonin (OR: 8.21, 95% CI 4.48–15.07), increased D-Dimer (OR: 5.67, 95% CI 1.45–22.16) and thrombocytopenia (OR: 3.61, 95% CI 2.62–4.97) predicted severe infection [15]. A meta-analysis by Coomes and Haghbayan [16] reported that IL-6 levels are significantly elevated and associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

A study in a north Indian tertiary care centre used retrospective data to conclude that more than half of patients admitted to the hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection had an abnormal liver function which was found to be associated with raised levels of inflammatory markers [17]. These patients had significantly higher proportions of patients with abnormal liver function were elderly and males and were at higher risk of progressing to severe disease. Organ specific manifestations, which include the liver and the kidney along with their possible mechanism of injury have been available in literature [18]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published studies indicate that COVID-19 incidence was higher in people receiving maintenance dialysis than in those with CKD not requiring kidney replacement therapy or those who were kidney or pancreas/kidney transplant recipients [19]. In patients with COVID-19, acute Kidney Injury (AKI) may have an inflammatory etiology mediated by a cytokine storm [20]. CKD and COVID-19 may have a higher incidence of death than people with CKD without COVID-19. [19]

Elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase were suggested to be associated right from the early studies on COVID-19 severity. Work by Wang and Wang reported that compared to survival cases, patients who died during hospitalization had higher plasma levels of D-dimer, creatinine, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, lactate, and lower percentage of lymphocytes (LYM [%]), platelet count and albumin levels [21]. Similarly, a multicentre retrospective cohort study from Wuhan to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 included age (Hazard Ratio for per year increment: 1.05), severity at admission (Hazard Ratio for per rank increment: 2.91), dyspnea (Hazard Ratio: 2.18), cardiovascular disease (Hazard Ratio: 3.25), and levels of lactate dehydrogenase (Hazard Ratio: 4.53), total bilirubin (Hazard Ratio: 2.56), blood glucose (Hazard Ratio: 2.56), and urea (Hazard Ratio: 2.14) [22].

Other parameters that we found to be associated with severe Covid-19 at admission such as leucocytosis, prothrombin time, serum ferritin, fibrin degradation products, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and serum electrolytes operate through a clinical pathway or indicate pathology similar to others described above.

Our study had certain limitations. There is potential for selection bias in this hospital-based study. The cases were poorer and less educated than the controls, which indicates a difference in the source population to which cases and controls belonged to. The location and type of participating hospitals could have influenced the selection of study participants. Misclassification of case-control status is unlikely as we used the standardized criteria for classification of severe cases across the study sites. There is a likelihood of misclassification of laboratory parameters, albeit minimal, on account of testing by different laboratories across the study sites. However, all laboratories were assured to have quality control mechanisms in place.

Conclusions

We have identified a set of parameters characterizing severe Covid-19 that are part of routinely available investigations within Indian hospital settings, both public and private. Knowledge of these risk factors has the potential to triage COVID-19 patients at the time of admission in terms of severity of disease and adequate management of the same.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Definition of severe and mild disease as per Government of India’s COVID-19 case management guidelines.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the role of the Epidemiology and Surveillance Working Group of the ICMR, constituted by the COVID-19 National Task Force of Government of India, for its review of the protocol and project implementation.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The study was funded by the Indian Council for Medical Research under RFC No. ECD/NTF/8/2020-21/COVID dated 10.07.2020. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: Independent consultant Dr. DCS Reddy is an independent consultant and had neither commercial nor competing interest. He contributed to designing, technical review of the study methods and review of the manuscript. We have mentioned this in the revised manuscript.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Definition of severe and mild disease as per Government of India’s COVID-19 case management guidelines.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES