Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: Leukemia. 2021 Jun 30;36(1):283–287. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01335-w

Germline POT1 Variants Can Predispose to Myeloid and Lymphoid Neoplasms

Tristan L Lim 1, David B Lieberman 2, Adam R Davis 2, Alison W Loren 3,9, Ryan Hausler 3, Ashkan Bigdeli 2, Yimei Li 4, Jacquelyn Powers 3,9, Anna Raper 7; Regeneron Genetics Center5, Shannon A Carty 6, Katherine L Nathanson 7,9, Adam Bagg 2, Elizabeth O Hexner 3,9, Kara N Maxwell 3,9, Jennifer JD Morrissette 2, Daria V Babushok 3,8,9
PMCID: PMC8716670  NIHMSID: NIHMS1716876  PMID: 34193977

TO THE EDITOR:

Since the introduction of myeloid neoplasms with germline predisposition as a new category by the World Health Organization(1), the list of genes linked to predisposition to hematologic malignancies has continued to grow. Recently, germline variants in a shelterin complex component Protection of Telomeres 1 (POT1) have been implicated in several familial cancer syndromes, including familial chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and, more recently, a Li-Fraumeni-like multicancer predisposition, suggesting the spectrum of POT1-related malignancies remains incompletely characterized(25). A highly conserved protein, POT1, is recruited to single-stranded telomeric DNA through its interaction with ACD shelterin complex subunit and telomerase recruitment factor (TPP1), where it functions to regulate telomere length and prevent induction of DNA damage response(6). However, the role of POT1 variants in hematologic neoplasms beyond CLL remains unknown. To explore the role of POT1 variants in hematologic neoplasms, we analyzed POT1 variants in 3,323 consecutive patients who were evaluated for cytopenias or hematologic malignancies at the University of Pennsylvania.

The case population consisted of 3,323 consecutive patients who had clinical MPS testing for variants associated with hematologic malignancies during evaluation of cytopenias or hematologic malignancies from April 2015 to October 2018. Comprehensive description of study methodology is provided in the Supplement, including Supplemental Tables S1S5. The variant pathogenicity was determined using ACMG criteria(7). Germline/somatic status was assigned using clinicopathological data and confirmed in non-hematopoietic tissues when available. The prevalence of germline POT1 predicted loss-of-function (pLOF) variants in cases was compared to cancer-free controls from the Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB) and Genome Aggregate Database (gnomAD)(8,9).

From 3,323 evaluated patients, 2,744 patients (83%) had a hematologic malignancy with 1,401 patients with lymphoid, 1,225 patients with myeloid, and 118 patients with both lymphoid and myeloid malignancies, whereas 579 patients (17%) did not have a hematologic malignancy. Fifty-seven patients, all with hematologic malignancies, had 52 distinct POT1 variants classified as pathogenic (n = 8), likely pathogenic (n = 2), or variants of uncertain significance (VUS, n = 42); only these variants were included in subsequent analyses (Supplemental Figure 1). The prevalence of these POT1 variants was significantly higher in patients with hematologic malignancies (57 of 2744, 2.1%) than in those with non-neoplastic blood conditions (0 of 579, 0%) (OR 24.8, 95% CI 1.5-402, p < 0.001). This association is largely due to somatic POT1 variants, which comprised 54% of the identified variants. Thirty-nine percent were germline or presumed germline, and another 7% had an indeterminate germline/somatic status.

Of the 19 unique germline POT1 variants, 13 were missense and located within mapped functional protein domains, whereas 6 were classified as pLOF (Figure 1A). Germline enrichment analyses using only pLOF variants revealed that patients with hematological malignancies had a ~4 to 8-fold increased odds of having a germline (n = 4) or presumed germline (n = 3) pLOF POT1 variant compared to cancer-free individuals in gnomAD (OR = 7.6, 95% CI 3.3-16.7, p < 0.001) or PMBB (OR = 4.2, 95% CI 1.2-15.2, p = 0.020). Germline (n = 3) and presumed germline (n = 3) pLOF POT1 variants were ~6 to 12-fold more common in patients with lymphoid neoplasms compared to cancer-free individuals in gnomAD (OR 11.8, 95% CI 4.9-27.8, p < 0.001) and PMBB (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.8-24.4, p = 0.005). Interestingly, in patients with myeloid neoplasms, confirmed germline pLOF POT1 variants also occurred at a ~4 to 7-fold enrichment compared to the cancer-free populations (gnomAD: OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.7-20.2, p = 0.012, PMBB: OR 3.6, 95% CI 0.7-16.7, p = 0.10) (Table 1).

Figure 1. POT1 variants in hematologic neoplasms.

Figure 1.

(A) A schematic diagram of the identified POT1 variants. Variants identified in patients with lymphoid neoplasms are depicted below the protein structure in green, and variants identified in patients with myeloid neoplasms are plotted above the protein diagram in red. pLOF variants are shown as open circles. Variants previously identified in the literature are signified with a border that is color-coded with a previously described familial POT1 cancer type (melanoma, purple; CLL, brown; glioma, black). Germline variants are plotted closest to the protein diagram with a dashed line connected to the POT1 protein structure, whereas somatic and indeterminate variants are plotted in the outside rows and are not connected by dashed lines. Indeterminate variants are marked with a central black circle. The germline pLOF variant p.D617Efs*9, identified in a patient with a myeloid neoplasm and located near the C-terminus of the POT1 protein in the TPP1 binding domain, has been previously associated with familial glioma (3). Previous studies identified variants in that region in several POT1-associated familial CLL kindreds and have demonstrated that they result in disruption of POT1 interaction with TPP1, loss of DNA binding, increased telomere fragility, and significantly increased telomere lengths (2,13). Four additional variants (p.I78T, p.D224N, p.R363*, and c.1164-1G>A) were previously reported in association with familial POT1 syndromes, whereas 14 were newly identified in our study. (B) A schematic representation of disease-associated variants in genes associated with hematologic malignancies in patients with POT1 variants. Only genes with at least one disease-associated gene variant are shown in the figure; all genes assessed for disease-associated variants are listed in Supplemental Table S2. The malignancies in each of the affected patients are listed next to each patient’s study number: myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBCL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), plasmacytoma (PLC), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), multiple myeloma (MM), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic lymphoproliferative disorder of natural killer cells (CLPNK), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), JAK2+ V617F Clonal Hematopoiesis (JAK2 CH), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), high grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL). Abnormal cytogenetics (AC) are indicated by a gray tile. Synchronous malignancies are denoted with a comma, whereas transformations are marked with an arrow. C) Pedigrees of patients with germline POT1 variants and myeloid neoplasms. Black arrows indicate the index case in the pedigree, and symbols are colored depending on key malignancy features (red quadrant, germline POT1 variant cancer; blue quadrant, myeloid malignancy; yellow quadrant, lymphoid malignancy; green quadrant, POT1-associated cancer). Ages at cancer diagnosis (when available), POT1 variant, and tumor type are listed below the individual symbol.

Table 1.

Patients with germline POT1 variants.

Subject Age at Diagnosis, Years Sex Diagnosis Other Cancers POT1 Variant Chr Position Consequence VAF Domain Pathogenicity Cytogenetics Disease-Associated Co-Varaints Germline Status
PENN01 59 F MDS - c.C1802T
p.P601L
chr 7:124464119 Missense 0.53 TPP1 LP Normal TET2, EZH2, ASXL1 Presumed Germline
PENN02 73 F MPN (MF) Chronic Lymphoproliferative Disorder of NK Cells c.1107delT
p.Y369*
chr 7:124482917 Stop Gained 0.49 TPP1 P - JAK2, TET2 Germline
PENN04 60 F MPN (CML) Follicular Thyroid Cancer, Giant Cell Tumor of Bone c.T233C
p.I78T
chr 7:124510987 Missense 0.52 OB1 VUS t(9;22) TET2 Germline
PENN07 54 F MPN (ET) Intradural Meningioma, Monoclonal B Cell Lymphocytosis c.10-2A>C
p.?
chr 7:124532436 Splice Site 0.51 OB1 LP Normal JAK2 Germline
PENN09 68 M MPN (MF) → AML Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Prostate Cancer, Colon Adenoma c.T977C
p.V326A
chr 7:124487025 Missense 0.48 TPP1 VUS del(13q) JAK2, SF3B1 Germline
PENN10 44 M AML - c.G703A
p.V235I
chr 7:124493192 Missense 0.49 OB2 VUS −Y, t(8;21) NRAS Germline
PENN11 51 M JAK2 V617F+ Clonal Hematopoiesis Brain Oligodendroglioma c.G1183A
p.G395S
chr 7:124481213 Missense 0.46 TPP1 VUS Normal JAK2 Presumed Germline
PENN12 81 M CMML Basal Cell Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma c.A1280C
p.K427T
chr 7:124481116 Missense 0.50 TPP1 VUS Normal TET2, SRSF2 Germline
PENN15 72 M MDS Renal Cell Carcinoma c.G753A
p.M251I
chr 7:124493142 Missense 0.50 OB2 VUS Normal STAG2 Germline
PENN16 87 M MPN (PV) Skin Cancer, Prostate Cancer c.A1870G
p.I624V
chr 7:124464051 Missense 0.51 TPP1 VUS Normal DNMT3A, NPM1, FLT3 Germline
PENN17 60 M AML - c.A1205G
p.Q402R
chr 7:124481191 Missense 0.50 TPP1 VUS −Y, t(8;21) None Presumed Germline
PENN19 44 F CMML → AML - c.1851_1852del
p.D617Efs*9
chr 7:124464069 Stop Gained 0.52 TPP1 P Normal DNMT3A, PTPN11, FLT3, RUNX1 Germline
PENN20 64 M AML/MDS - c.T449C
p.L150S
chr 7:124493075 Missense 0.53 OB-FOLD VUS Complex TP53 Germline
PENN25 59 F CLL Bilateral Breast Cancer c.C342G
p.I114M
chr 7:124503608 Missense 0.53 OB1 VUS −X, del(13q) None Presumed Germline
PENN26 48 F CLL - c.1713_1717del
p.E572Sfs*4
chr 7:124465381 Frameshift 0.49 TPP1 P del(13q) None Presumed Germline
PENN27 67 M Hairy Cell Leukemia - c.1164-1G>A
p.?
chr 7:124481233 Splice Site 0.53 TPP1 P Normal None Germline
PENN28 63 M CLL - c.T233C
p.I78T
chr 7:124510987 Missense 0.49 OB1 VUS +12, +19 None Presumed Germline
PENN29 59 F CLL - c.G526A
p.G176R
chr 7:124503424 Missense 0.48 OB2 VUS +X, del(13q) None Presumed Germline
PENN32 56 M CLL Metastatic Melanoma c.G670A
p.D224N
chr 7:124499043 Missense 0.48 OB2 VUS del(11q), del(13q NOTCH1, BIRC3 Germline
PENN35 72 M CLL Melanoma c.C1087T
p.R363*
chr 7:124482937 Stop Gained 0.49 TPP1 P del(13q) None Presumed Germline
PENN36 71 M Marginal Zone Lymphoma Prostate, Lung c.G526A
p.G176R
chr 7:124503424 Missense 0.51 OB2 VUS Normal TET2 Germline
PENN38 65 F CLL - c.1164-1G>A
p.?
chr 7:124481233 Splice Site 0.51 TPP1 P Borderline +12 FBXW7, BIRC3 Presumed Germline

Chr, chromosome, Variant allele frequency (VAF), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), essential thrombocythemia (ET), myelofibrosis (MF), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), polycythemia vera (PV), natural killer (NK), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), Female (F), Male (M), TPP1 binding domain (TPP1), oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide DNA-binding domains 1 (OB1) and 2 (OB2), oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide fold (OB-FOLD). Pathogenicity assessment categories of variant of uncertain significance (VUS), likely pathogenic (LP), and pathogenic (P) are determined using ACMG criteria (7). pLOF variants are bolded. Italicized variants have been previously reported in literature. Chromosomal coordinates are based on GRCh37 (hg19) genome assembly.

PENN12 had erythrocytosis and a positive JAK2 V617F variant but did not meet formal 2016 WHO criteria for a specific MPN subtype.

Clinicopathological analyses, detailed fully in the Supplement, revealed distinctive spectra of lymphoid and myeloid malignancies (Supplemental Table S1). All patients with germline or presumed germline POT1 variants and lymphoid neoplasms presented with indolent lymphoid neoplasms, approximately half with diagnoses other than CLL. Consistent with prior studies(4), both germline (n = 6) and somatic (n = 13) POT1 variants in patients with lymphoid malignancies were most frequently associated with CLL. Lymphoid neoplasms in patients with germline POT1 variants had no other disease-associated variants detected by MPS (median 0, range 0-2), compared to a median of one variant in patients with somatic POT1 variants (range 0-6). The most frequent co-occurring variants were in TP53, observed in five patients with somatic POT1 alterations (Figure 1B).

For patients with germline POT1 variants and myeloid neoplasms, the most common diagnosis was myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) (n = 6) at 1.2% prevalence of germline POT1 variants in 492 MPN patients in our cohort. In contrast, somatic POT1 variants in patients with myeloid malignancies were seen predominantly in AML (n = 6). Patients with myeloid malignancies and germline POT1 variants had a median of two pathogenic variants in other cancer-associated genes (range 0-6). The most commonly mutated genes in patients with germline POT1 variants were TET2 and JAK2, each identified in five patients. In patients with somatic POT1 variants and myeloid malignancies, additional hematologic malignancy-associated pathogenic variants were observed at a median of three variants (range 0-6), with NRAS most commonly mutated in four patients (Figure 1B).

Patients with germline POT1 variants had a median of two (range 1-4) distinct cancer diagnoses per patient. Four patients had malignancies previously reported in patients with germline POT1 variants (melanoma, oligodendroglioma, and follicular thyroid cancer)(2,3,5). Sixteen patients (73%) had a family history of malignancy, with hematologic, lung, and skin cancers being most common. Within the families of patients with myeloid malignancies and germline POT1 variants, myeloid malignancies occurred as part of a broader spectrum of POT1-associated familial cancers. The affected patients and their families frequently had a strong cancer history with multiple types, including known POT1-associated neoplasms and other cancers (Figure 1C). For example, patient PENN07 was diagnosed with monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis and JAK2 V617F-positive MPN at the age of 55 years and had a family history of CLL, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, neuroendocrine cancer, glioblastoma, and several benign tumors.

Notably, among patients with germline POT1 variants and myeloid neoplasms, none were noted to have classical mucocutaneous features of short telomere syndromes, such as nail dystrophy or oral leukoplakia, and none had bone marrow failure prior to the development of myeloid malignancy. One patient did have severe pulmonary pathology suggestive of telomere dysfunction: patient PENN19 died at the age of 45 years from pulmonary complications after a myeloablative Cyclophosphamide/Total Body Irradiation-conditioned allogeneic stem cell transplant (Supplemental Figure S2).

In sum, in this first comprehensive analysis of POT1 variants in a hematologic malignancy population, we have shown that germline variants in POT1 are among the growing list of hematologic malignancy predisposition syndromes and newly found that they are associated with increased risk of not just lymphoid but also myeloid malignancies. POT1 variants were ~25-fold enriched in patients with hematologic malignancies compared to nonmalignant conditions, expanding upon prior reports of POT1 as a tumor driver in solid malignancies(5).

The association of germline POT1 variants with chronic lymphoproliferative (e.g., CLL) and myeloproliferative neoplasms is likely not coincidental and probably reflects the synergy between telomere shortening and dysfunction in these neoplasms and the telomere elongation caused by POT1 variants. Genome-wide association studies have identified 17 genetic loci associated with increased risk of MPN, including two polymorphisms within the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) locus, previously associated with increased leukocyte telomere lengths(10,11). While POT1 was not among the 17 identified MPN risk loci, the authors estimated that the identified 17 loci explain only ~18% of familial relative risk for MPN acquisition, suggesting that other, more rare, germline predisposition factors not identified in the analysis may jointly explain the remaining risk. Our findings suggest that germline POT1 variants predispose to MPNs through a mechanism similar to TERT variants, by increasing telomere lengths and protecting MPN hematopoietic cells from premature cell senescence. In contrast to germline POT1 variants, somatic POT1 variants likely emerge as a compensatory event in response to telomere attrition, allowing POT1-mutant malignant cells to bypass telomere shortening-induced DNA damage response.

Although short telomere syndromes (STS) carry an increased risk of MDS/AML (12), heterozygous POT1 variants do not cause STS but instead have been linked to abnormally long telomeres(2,13). Accordingly, patients with germline POT1 variants in our cohort did not have recognized features of STS. One notable clinical finding in a patient with germline POT1 variant was severe pulmonary toxicity after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant. Although we are not able to definitively link POT1-associated telomere dysfunction to this patient’s pulmonary toxicity, the type and unusual severity of pulmonary failure is very reminiscent of pulmonary transplant toxicity seen in STS patients(14). Future studies of SCT outcomes in germline POT1 variant carriers will help better assess potential transplant-related complications and safety of myeloablative conditioning in this patient population.

In conclusion, our data provide the first evidence for an association between germline POT1 variants and myeloid neoplasms and expand our understanding of the role of telomere regulation in hematologic neoplasms. Our findings suggest that patients with identified pathogenic POT1 variants merit evaluation for their germline/somatic status and surveillance for any underlying malignancies(15) and underscore the importance of recognizing germline hematologic malignancy predisposition.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Appendix
Supplemental Table S3
Supplemental Table S5

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by an Alpha Omega Alpha Carolyn L. Kuckein Student Research Fellowship to TLL and by NIH K08 HL132101 to DVB. The authors are grateful to Ping Lin for technical assistance with germline variant validation and clinical care and the Center of Personalized Diagnostics teams for patient care.

Footnotes

DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Bleau MM, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Robles-Espinoza CD, Harland M, Ramsay AJ, Aoude LG, Quesada V, Ding Z, et al. POT1 loss-of-function variants predispose to familial melanoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(5):478–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bainbridge MN, Armstrong GN, Gramatges MM, Bertuch AA, Jhangiani SN, Doddapaneni H, et al. Germline Mutations in Shelterin Complex Genes Are Associated with Familial Glioma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(1):1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Speedy HE, Kinnersley B, Chubb D, Broderick P, Law PJ, Litchfield K, et al. Germ line mutations in shelterin complex genes are associated with familial chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2016;128(19):2319–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shen E, Xiu J, Lopez GY, Bentley R, Jalali A, Heimberger AB, et al. POT1 mutation spectrum in tumour types commonly diagnosed among POT1-associated hereditary cancer syndrome families. J Med Genet. 2020;57(10):664–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schmutz I, De Lange T. Shelterin. Curr Biol. 2016;26(10):R397–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dewey FE, Murray MF, Overton JD, Habegger L, Leader JB, Fetterolf SN, et al. Distribution and clinical impact of functional variants in 50,726 whole-exome sequences from the DiscovEHR study. Science (80-). 2016;354(6319). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581:434–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bao EL, Nandakumar SK, Liao X, Bick AG, Karjalainen J, Tabaka M, et al. Inherited myeloproliferative neoplasm risk affects haematopoietic stem cells. Vol. 586, Nature. 2020. 769–775 p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giaccherini M, Macauda A, Sgherza N, Sainz J, Gemignani F, Maldonado JMS, et al. Genetic polymorphisms associated with telomere length and risk of developing myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood Cancer J. 2020;10(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schratz KE, Haley L, Danoff SK, Blackford AL, DeZern AE, Gocke CD, et al. Cancer spectrum and outcomes in the Mendelian short telomere syndromes. Blood. 2020;135(22):1946–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ramsay AJ, Quesada V, Foronda M, Conde L, Martínez-Trillos A, Villamor N, et al. POT1 mutations cause telomere dysfunction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2013;45:526–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gadalla SM, Sales-Bonfim C, Carreras J, Alter BP, Antin JH, Ayas M, et al. Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with Dyskeratosis Congenita. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(8):1238–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Henry M, Osborne J, Else T. POT1 Tumor Predisposition. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Mirzaa G, et al. , editors. GeneReviews [Internet]. Seattle: University of Washington; 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Appendix
Supplemental Table S3
Supplemental Table S5

RESOURCES