Abstract
Protein ubiquitination shows remarkable topological and functional diversity through the polymerization of ubiquitin via different linkages. Deciphering the cellular ubiquitin code is of central importance to understand the physiology of the cell. However, our understanding of its function is rather limited due to the lack of specific binders as tools to detect K29-linked polyubiquitin. In this study, we screened and characterized a synthetic antigen-binding fragment, termed sAB-K29, that can specifically recognize K29-linked polyubiquitin using chemically synthesized K29-linked diubiquitin. We further determined the crystal structure of this fragment bound to the K29-linked diubiquitin, which revealed the molecular basis of specificity. Using sAB-K29 as a tool, we uncovered that K29-linked ubiquitination is involved in different kinds of cellular proteotoxic stress response as well as cell cycle regulation. In particular, we showed that K29-linked ubiquitination is enriched in the midbody and downregulation of the K29-linked ubiquitination signal arrests cells in G1/S phase.
Protein ubiquitination is a dynamic posttranslational modification involved in nearly all aspects of eukaryotic cells1–3. Ubiquitin, a 76-amino acid protein, can be covalently attached to its substrate through an isopeptide bond between its C-terminal carboxyl group and the ε-amino group of a lysine residue on the substrate, initiating the process of ubiquitination. The substrate protein can be modified by either a single (monoubiquitination) or a chain of ubiquitin molecules (polyubiquitination). To form a ubiquitin chain, the second and subsequent ubiquitin are conjugated to one of the seven lysine residues or the amino group of the first methionine residue on the preceding ubiquitin (Fig. 1a). Hence, eight types of ubiquitin chain linkages exist in vivo, which makes polyubiquitination an extremely diverse posttranslational modification1. Recently, branched and heterotypic ubiquitin chains were also discovered in eukaryotic cells, further expanding the complexity of ubiquitination4–6. Ubiquitin chains with different linkages have different topologies and structures, creating a multitude of distinct signals, known as the ubiquitin code.
Deciphering cellular ubiquitin code is of central interest in ubiquitin studies7–9. For instance, K48-linked polyubiquitin chains adopt a closed conformation and target their substrate proteins to the proteasome for degradation10–12. In contrast, K63-linked polyubiquitin chains adopt an open conformation and regulate proteasome-independent signaling pathways such as DNA repair, inflammatory signaling, and endocytosis13. Other types of polyubiquitin chains, regarded as atypical, have also been reported to adopt distinct structures and perform specific cellular functions14,15. For example, M1-linked ubiquitin precipitates in immune response16–18. K6-linked ubiquitin regulates Mitophagy19–22. K11-linked ubiquitin is involved in cell cycle regulation and protein degradation22,23. K27-linked ubiquitin regulates autoimmunity, innate immune response and tumorigenesis24–26. K33-linked ubiquitin mediates protein trafficking and signal transduction of cell surface receptors27,28. Remarkably, the function of K29-linked ubiquitin is much less understood compared to the other topologies, although it has been reported involving in protein degradation and the regulation of a viral infection29,30. It is worth noting that, according to a recent quantitative study in eukaryotic cells31, the abundance of K29-linked ubiquitin is the highest among the atypical linkage types, close to K63-linked ubiquitin, and follow only K48-linked ubiquitin. The limited knowledge of K29-linked ubiquitin is largely due to a lack of linkage-specific detection tools. Previously, recombinant TRABID NZF1-Halo fusions coupled with vOTU treatment have been used to study K29-linked polyubiquitin chains32. However, the procedure involved using vOTU, a deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB), to remove other linkages and therefore had limited applications. All the other homotypic ubiquitin chains have linkage-specific detection tools33. K48 and K63 linkage-specific antibodies were developed and used to reveal the role of polyubiquitin editing in the attenuation of innate immune signaling34. K11 linkage-specific antibody was developed and used to demonstrate the critical role of K11-linked polyubiquitin in the degradation of mitotic proteins22. Linear (M1) linkage-specific antibody was developed and used to uncover the role of linear chains in immune responses 35. Linkage-specific “affimer” reagents that recognize K6- and K33-linked polyubiquitin chains were developed and used to show the role of HUWE1 in the generation of K6-linked polyubiquitinated mitofusin-233. For heterotypic polyubiquitin chains, a bispecific antibody that recognizes K11/K48-linked chains was developed and used to show that mitotic regulators, misfolded nascent polypeptides, and pathological Huntingtin variants are endogenous substrates of K11/K48-linked polyubiquitination36.
In this study, we developed and characterized a synthetic antigen-binding fragment (sAB) that can specifically recognize K29-linked ubiquitin chains at nanomolar concentrations by screening a phage display library. We determined the crystal structure of the sAB in complex with K29-linked diubiquitin (diUb) and elucidated the specific interactions between the two components around the isopeptide bond. Through a series of experiments, including pull-down assays, mass spectrometry and immunofluorescent imaging, we revealed the interaction landscape of K29-linked ubiquitination which showed that it is widely involved in protein homeostasis, stress response, and cell cycle regulation. Interestingly, we observed that K29-linked ubiquitination is enriched in puncta under several proteotoxic cellular stresses including unfolded protein response, oxidative stress and heat shock response. Moreover, we found that K29-linked ubiquitination was particularly enriched in the midbody at the telophase of mitosis. The knockdown of K29-linked ubiquitination by a specific DUB led to arrest of the cell cycle at G1/S phase. In summary, we have established that K29-linked ubiquitin chains are important players in stress response and cell cycle signaling pathways.
RESULTS
Selection of K29-specific sAB from a phage display library
sABs have been successfully developed as linkage-specific binders for M1-, K11-, K48-, and K63-linked ubiquitin, as mentioned above. They are functionally and structurally similar to antigen-binding fragments (Fabs) and can be selected from a synthetic phage display library 37. To obtain a K29-linked ubiquitin-specific binder, biotinylated K29-linked diUb without any other linkages is required. Therefore we chose to chemically synthesize biotinylated K29-linked diUb following previously developed methods 38. A polyethylene glycol (PEG) linker was introduced between the diUb and biotin moieties. The synthetic route is briefly summarized (Extended Data Fig.1a). We conducted reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to verify the mass of the product (Extended Data Fig.1b). Next, we refolded the product using a standard dialysis method and collected the circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of the final product (Extended Data Fig.1c). The CD spectrum of the synthesized K29-linked diUb showed an ellipticity near identical to that of the ubiquitin monomer (monoUb), suggesting correct folding of the diUb 39.
We subsequently generated a K29-linked diUb-specific sAB from a phage display library, known as Library E, based on a humanized antibody Fab scaffold 40. This in vitro technique allows for exquisite control over sAB selection conditions 41. We took advantage of this methodology by using an excess of monoUb in solution to generate a linkage-specific binder, which we termed sAB-K29 and characterized further as described below.
Structural characterization of sAB-K29
To enable crystal screening of K29-linked diUb and sAB complex at a high concentration, a large quantity of K29-linked diUb was required. We therefore used the enzymatic preparation method 32. Although the linkage of the diUb is not as pure as the chemical approach, only K29-linked diUb could form a complex with sAB-K29. Specifically, ubiquitin was mixed with UBA1, UBE2L3, and UBE3C for polyubiquitin chain formation. The resulting polyubiquitin was a mixture of mainly K48- and K29-linked chains. vOTU, a DUB that does not cleave K29-linked chains, was introduced to the mixture to remove the K48-linked chains. Finally, K29-linked diUb was separated from monoUb and polyubiquitin using anion exchange chromatography (Extended Data Fig. 2a). To obtain the complex of sAB-K29 and K29-linked diUb, we mixed purified K29-linked diUb with sAB-K29 at a molar ratio of 1.5:1 and ran the mixture through gel filtration (Extended Data Fig. 2b & c). The stable complex was subjected to crystallization screening (see methods for details). Diffraction-quality crystals appeared from a reservoir solution containing 0.1 M phosphate-citrate and 40% v/v PEG 300 (Extended Data Fig. 2d). Diffraction data to 2.9 Å resolution were collected at the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Lab (Supplementary Table 1).
The complex structure shows a 1:1 stoichiometry of sAB-K29 and K29-linked diUb (Fig. 1b). There are three binding interfaces between the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of sAB-K29 and diUb (Fig. 1c). The left interface (black box) involves the heavy chain of sAB-K29 (CDR-H1 and H2) and the distal ubiquitin molecule. The right interface (gray box) involves the light chain of sAB-K29 (CDR-L1 and L3) and the proximal ubiquitin molecule. The middle interface (red box) involves both chains (CDR-H2, H3 and L3) and the linker between the two ubiquitin molecules. Hydrogen bonding networks and van der Waals interactions mainly contributed by tyrosine and serine residues dominate the interfaces (Fig. 1c). Each of the three interfaces recognizes an essential piece of the diUb, namely, the proximal ubiquitin, distal ubiquitin, and linker. Together, they form the basis for specific recognition. Notably, the patch containing I44 on both ubiquitin molecules is not involved in the binding interface. Only the patch containing I36 of the distal ubiquitin molecule is involved in the interaction with the heavy chain of sAB-K29 (Extended Data Fig. 2e). Compared to the crystal structure of K29-linked diUb (PDB accession code: 4S22), the diUb in this complex adopts a more compact conformation, with the proximal ubiquitin molecule rotated approximately 60 degrees compared to that in the other structure (Extended Data Fig. 2f). Compared to the crystal structure of K29-linked diUb in complex with the NZF1 domain of TRABID (PDB accession code: 4S1Z), the diUb in 4S1Z is in a compact conformation similar to that in this study, but the proximal ubiquitin is rotated about 90 degree. The NZF1 domain of TRABID binds at a different interface, primarily recognizing the I44 patch of the distal ubiquitin (Extended Data Fig. 2g). K33-linked diUb (PDB accession code: 4XYZ) was also superimposed onto the diUb in this study. The proximal ubiquitin of K33-linked diUb adopts a different orientation, which would not allow sAB-K29 to bind (Extended Data Fig. 2h).
In vitro characterization of sAB-K29
We first performed single-point competitive phage enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using M13 phage-displayed sAB-K29. The signal decreased when K29-linked diUb, but not K27- or K33-linked diUb, was used as the competitor in solution, suggesting its specificity towards K29-linked diUb (Extended Data Fig. 3a). Next, we tested the specificity of sAB-K29 against diUb of all linkage types (100 ng) by Western blot. sAB-K29 recognized only K29-linked diUb and showed no cross-reactivity with other linkage types even after long exposure (Fig. 2a). We further performed Western blot against serially diluted K29-linked diUb from 25 ng to 0.78 ng. The results suggested that sAB-K29 is at least 320-fold more sensitive for K29-linked diUb than the other diUbs tested (Fig. 2b). We measured the binding affinity of sAB-K29 and K29-linked diUb using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and ELISA. By SPR, the dissociation constant (KD) was measured to be 3.13 ± 1.52 nM (Fig. 2c), which was in agreement with the EC50 of 1.46 ± 0.68 nM measured by ELISA (Fig. 2d).
Next, we tested whether sAB-K29 can be used to detect K29-linked polyubiquitin chains. We mixed ubiquitin with UBA1, UBE2L3, and UBE3C and monitored assembly of the polyubiquitin chain using Western blot. UBE3C is known to produce a mixture of mainly K48- and K29-linked polyubiquitin chains 42. K29R mutant ubiquitin, which cannot form K29-linked polyubiquitin chains, was included as a control. The results of Western blot showed that sAB-K29 specifically recognized K29-linked polyubiquitin chains (middle panel, Fig. 2e), although the K29R mutant did not prevent the assembly of other linkages of polyubiquitin chains, as detected with a commercial anti-ubiquitin antibody (right panel, Fig. 2e) and in a Coomassie blue stained gel (left panel, Fig. 2e). A single-point mutation in the heavy chain of sAB-K29, Y112A, could not recognize the K29-linked polyubiquitin chain under normal conditions, as shown by Western blot (Extended Data Figs. 3b & c). We further assembled K11-, K48- and K63-linked polyubiquitin chains using UBE2S, E2–25K, and Ubc13/Mms2, respectively, and monitored the reactions using SDS-PAGE and Western blot. Again, sAB-K29 could detect only the K29-linked polyubiquitin chains produced by the UBE3C system, not polyubiquitin chains with other types of linkages (Extended Data Figs. 3d & e). Together, these results suggested that sAB-K29 can be used as a tool to specifically detect K29-linked polyubiquitin chains in vitro.
Pull-down and proteomic analysis using sAB-K29
To further investigate the function of K29-linked ubiquitination in cells, we introduced a biotin tag at the C-terminus of the heavy chain of sAB-K29 using sortase-catalyzed ligation 43. A polyethylene glycol (PEG) linker between the biotin moiety and sAB-K29 was introduced to increase the flexibility. Using biotinylated sAB-K29, we first performed pull-down experiments against monoUb and diUb of all linkage types. The results showed that K29-linked diUb was specifically pulled down (Fig. 3a). Next, we tested whether the pull-down assay would work in a crowded environment by mixing HeLa cell lysate with K29-linked diUb, K48-linked diUb, and monoUb and performed Western blot using an anti-ubiquitin antibody. Only K29-linked diUb was pulled down with high-molecular-weight endogenous species (Fig. 3b), suggesting that biotinylated sAB-K29 can be used as a specific tool for cellular pull-down assays.
To elucidate the function of K29-linked ubiquitination, we conjugated biotinylated sAB-K29 to magnetic streptavidin beads and used the beads to capture K29-linked ubiquitinated proteins from HeLa cell lysates. The enriched proteins were eluted with 8 M urea and subjected to label-free mass spectrometry analysis. Biotinylated sAB specifically recognizing bacteria maltose-binding protein (sAB-MBP) was used in a control experiment (Extended Data Fig. 4a). Significant hits, including K29-linked substrates and co-purified components (Supplementary Table 2), from the mass spectrometry results with a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 were converted to gene IDs and subjected to gene ontology (GO) analysis. GO enrichment analysis for cellular components showed that K29-linked ubiquitination is present in the spliceosome, proteasome, nuclear body, stress granules, and in particular several important complexes involved in mitosis, including the chromosome, mitotic spindle, and midbody (Extended Data Fig. 4b). GO enrichment analysis for biological processes indicated that the hits were enriched in RNA processing, transcriptional regulation, protein homeostasis, the stress response, and cell cycle regulation (Figs. 3c & d, Extended Data Fig. 4c, see supplemental materials for details). The last three categories were further investigated in this study. Specifically, among hits enriched in the protein homeostasis category, VCP (also known as p97 or Cdc48, an ATPase associated with various activity (AAA) involved in the processing of ubiquitinated proteins) and its diverse cofactors, two major autophagic adapters, and many proteasome subunits were identified (Extended Data Fig. 4c). Among hits enriched in the stress response category, stress granule components and some heat shock and oxidative stress responsive proteins were identified (Fig. 3c). Among hits enriched in the cell cycle category, proteins that control different stages of the cell cycle, including those involved in DNA replication, spindle assembly, chromatin condensation and midbody formation, were identified (Fig. 3d).
Proteotoxic stress induced K29-linked ubiquitination
To further investigate the results of mass spectrometry and GO analysis, we costained HeLa cells for K29-linked ubiquitin with VCP, the 20S proteasome (the core machinery involved in cellular protein degradation), and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit B (EIF3B, enriched in stress granules) using sAB-K29 and the corresponding antibodies. The results showed that K29-linked polyubiquitin was widely distributed in the cytoplasm and nucleus and generally colocalized with VCP and the 20S proteasome (Fig. 4a, Extended Data Fig. 5a and b), as well as EIF3B in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4a). In addition, K29-linked polyubiquitin formed bright puncta in the cytoplasm of some cells (arrowheads, Fig. 4a). It was also found in some large cytoplasmic droplets and costained with VCP and the 20S proteasome, but not EIF3B or K48-linked polyubiquitin (arrows, Fig. 4a and Extended Data Fig. 5c).
To further explore this phenomenon, we treated HeLa cells with CuET (bis-(diethyldithiocarbamate)-copper), a drug that targets NPLOC4 44,45 (also known as Npl4, the most common adapter of VCP); MG132, a proteasome inhibitor; and sodium arsenite, in which CuET and MG132 lead to unfolding protein response and sodium arsenite triggers the stress response. All three compounds dramatically increased the level of K29-linked and K48-linked polyubiquitination in the cell lysate, but only slightly increased K63-linked polyubiquitination, as shown by Western blot analysis (Fig. 4b and Extended Data Fig. 5d). The cellular VCP level did not change much upon treatment with CuET or MG132 (Extended Data Fig. 5j). We also performed immunofluorescent staining experiments after the treatments. Many more K29-linked polyubiquitin puncta were observed after CuET treatment, and these puncta colocalized with VCP (Fig. 4c). Stress granules that stained positive with sAB-K29 were observed after treatment with MG132 or sodium arsenite, which colocalized with the 20S proteasome or EIF3B, respectively (Fig. 4c). We further performed these experiments under milder stress conditions, and observed that K29-linked polyubiquitin was still colocalized with VCP and 20S proteasome at a lower concentration of CuET and MG132, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 5f–g). However, at a lower concentration of sodium arsenite, much less stress granules were formed and K29-linked polyubiquitin was not colocalized with EIF3B (Extended Data Fig. 5h). Finally, we confirmed that the staining was specific, since no signal was observed when a control sAB-MBP was used (Extended Data Fig. 5e).
To further investigate the involvement of K29-linked polyubiquitination in the stress response, we treated HeLa cells with heat shock by exposure to 45 °C, which can also lead to stress granule formation, as previously described 46. We found that K29-linked polyubiquitin colocalized with both EIF3B and G3BP1 in the resulting stress granules (Fig. 4d). G3BP1, another biomarker of cytosolic stress granules 47, was identified as a hit from our mass spectrometry results (Fig. 3e). Interestingly, we found that stress granules from sodium arsenite treatment were VCP positive, whereas heat shock for 30 minutes resulted in VCP-negative stress granules (Extended Data Fig. 5i). Together, our experiments suggest that K29-linked ubiquitination is upregulated in the proteotoxic stress response and enriched in the granular structures formed after exposure to stress.
Reducing K29-linked ubiquitination led to cell cycle arrest
As shown by the results of mass spectrometry and GO analysis, many cell cycle-related proteins and complexes were identified (Fig. 3d). To further investigate this phenomenon, we designed a method to reduce the level of K29-linked ubiquitination in cultured cells. A reduction in K29-linked ubiquitination was achieved by transfecting the cells with a truncated human DUB, TRABID (residue range 245–697, noted as Tra hereafter) (Extended Data Fig. 6a). According to previous studies, the Tra construct preferentially targets K29-linked ubiquitin chains, although it shows minimal activity against K33- and K63-linked ubiquitin chains 42,48. As expected, HeLa cells transfected with the Tra construct showed significantly decreased levels of K29-linked polyubiquitinated proteins compared to those cells transfected with catalytic inactive mutant (C443S) of Tra (Tra-CIM) construct and the empty vector, as detected by sAB-K29 (Fig. 5a). We also tested the level of K63-linked polyubiquitinated proteins and total ubiquitinated proteins using commercially available antibodies. No significant difference between Tra and vector transfection was observed (Extended Data Fig. 6b).
Next, we performed cell cycle analysis of HeLa cells transfected with either the Tra construct or Tra-CIM construct using flow cytometry. Among HeLa cells transfected with the Tra construct, 38.9% of the cells showed a reduced level of K29-linked ubiquitination, as detected by sAB-K29, whereas only 5.1% of the cells transfected with the Tra-CIM were found in the same region (Q1, Fig. 5b). The reduced level of K29-linked ubiquitination in the Q1 cells was due to expression of the Tra construct as shown by the signal of cMyc channel (Fig. 5a and Extended Data Fig. 6c). Cell cycle analysis of Q1 cells transfected with the Tra construct showed that ~73% of the cells were in G1 phase, ~24% of cells were in S phase, and only ~3.2% of cells were in G2 phase, which was significantly different from the cell cycle distribution of Q2 cells transfected with the Tra (Extended Data Fig. 6f), Tra-CIM (Fig. 5b & c) and normal HeLa cells (Extended Data Fig. 6e). In the cell cycle analysis of HeLa cells transfected with either the Tra construct or the empty vector construct, we observed a similar G1/S arrest phenomenon in cells showing reduced level of K29-linked ubiquitination (Extended Data Fig. 6d, Fig. 7a and b). We further tested A549 cells with the same experimental setup and observed similar results (Extended Data Fig. 7c and d). Together, these results suggest that K29-linked ubiquitination is essential for cell cycle progression. A reduction in the level of K29-linked ubiquitination arrested the cells in G1 phase. Interestingly, cellular levels of some key regulators including cyclin A, CDC27, STAT3, and cyclin D1 were not affected by reducing K29-linked ubiquitination (Extended Data Fig. 8a–d).
Many components of proteasome were identified from our proteomic analysis, suggesting that K29-linked ubiquitination is involved in protein degradation (Extended Data Fig. 4c). To test whether it has a non-degradative role, we treated HeLa cells with puromycin, an antibiotic drug that can be incorporated into nascent chains during translation, and found that HeLa cells with a reduced level of K29-linked ubiquitination did not show an obvious accumulation of nascent chains (Extended Data Fig. 8e–g), which suggested that K29-linked ubiquitination may play other roles besides being a signal for degradation.
K29-linked ubiquitination is involved in midbody assembly
To further investigate the relevance of K29-linked ubiquitination to cell cycle regulation, we performed immunofluorescent staining of HeLa cells at different stages of the cell cycle using sAB-K29 (Fig. 6a). As shown by the results of Western blot, K29-linked ubiquitination occurred in all stages of mitosis, but the level of K29-linked ubiquitination was slightly reduced in cells during mitosis compared to asynchronized cells (Extended Data Fig. 9a). Unexpectedly, the K29-linked ubiquitination signal was especially enriched around the midbody in telophase. Based on localization of the K29-linked polyubiquitin signal and the morphology of the daughter cells, we further divided telophase into four stages termed telophase 1–4 (Extended Data Fig. 9b). At telophase 1, the K29-linked polyubiquitin signal formed a bright dot in the middle of two daughter cells. A dark zone appeared at telophase 2. The daughter cells and K29-linked polyubiquitin signal were further apart in telophase 3. Finally, the K29-linked polyubiquitin signal formed a dim ring in the midbody at telophase 4, which was visualized by three-dimensional stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (3D STORM, Extended Data Fig. 9c, Supplementary Videos 1 and 2). The positional and morphological changes in the K29-linked polyubiquitin signal during telophase suggest that the modification was dynamic and tightly regulated. We also performed immunofluorescent staining following a pre-extraction protocol to remove weakly bound proteins and found that the K29-linked polyubiquitin signal was still enriched around the midbody at telophase, indicating that K29-linked ubiquitination occurs on strongly interacting or covalently modified midbody components (Extended Data Fig. 9d–f).
To test whether K29-linked ubiquitination at the midbody is a degradation signal, we performed immunofluorescent costaining using sAB-K29. K29-linked polyubiquitin colocalized with neither the 20S proteasome (Fig. 6b) nor K48-linked polyubiquitin (Fig. 6c) around the midbody at telophase, indicating that K29-linked ubiquitination around the midbody may not function as a degradation signal. Previously, VCP was reported to participate in midbody assembly 49; therefore, we tested the colocalization of VCP with K29-linked polyubiquitin by costaining and observed their colocalization at telophase 1 and 2 but not late telophase 4 (Fig. 6d). Therefore, K29-linked ubiquitination may be a specific signal for VCP-mediated midbody assembly, but this hypothesis requires further investigation.
To identify the substrates of K29-linked ubiquitination in the midbody, we sought to perform immunoprecipitation (IP) under denaturing conditions to minimize the presence of noncovalently bound proteins. We first tested the specificity of sAB-K29 under various denaturing conditions and found that biotinylated sAB-K29 could specifically pull down K29-linked diUb in 1 M urea (Extended Data Fig. 10a & b). Next, we synchronized HeLa cells to telophase to maximize the abundance of the midbody and lysed the cells using 8 M urea. The lysate was further diluted in 1 M urea, followed by IP using biotinylated sAB-K29. The enriched proteins were separated on an SDS-PAGE gel and subjected to label-free quantitative mass spectrometry analysis. Several midbody proteins, such as TBK1, PLK1, INCENP, and MKLP1, were enriched with respect to the control (Extended Data Fig. 10c). Through immunofluorescent costaining, we observed that TBK1, PLK1 and INCENP colocalized with the K29-linked polyubiquitin signal (top row, Extended Data Fig. 10d). Interestingly, MKLP1 did not colocalize with the K29-linked polyubiquitin signal at telophase 2, but with the progression of cytokinesis, it gradually colocalized with the ring structure consisting of K29-linked polyubiquitin formed at telophase 4 (bottom row, Extended Data Fig. 10d). We also performed immunofluorescent staining for a well-known midbody regulator, Aurora B, which did not show up as a hit in our mass spectrometry analysis. As expected, the K29-linked polyubiquitin signal colocalized with Aurora B in the midbody (Extended Data Fig. 10e), suggesting that sAB-K29 pulled down only K29-linked ubiquitinated substrates under denaturing conditions. We further validated these results by IP and Western blot. We used antibodies against TBK1, PLK1, INCENP and MLKP1 to pull down proteins in the lysate of HeLa cells synchronized to telophase and used sAB-K29 to detect K29-linked ubiquitination (Extended Data Fig. 10f). Alternatively, we used sAB-K29 to pull down proteins in the cell lysate and used antibodies against the respective proteins for Western blot (Extended Data Fig. 10f). As expected, in both experiments, polyubiquitinated substrates with a high molecular weight were observed. In summary, we identified TBK1, PLK1, INCENP and MLKP1 as potential substrates of K29-linked ubiquitination during midbody assembly. From the mass spectrometry results, several components of the cullin family E3 ligases, including CUL1, CUL3, CUL4A, and CUL4B, were identified (Extended Data Fig. 10c). Further investigations are required to reveal their roles in K29-linked ubiquitination.
DISCUSSION
K29-linked ubiquitination is one of the most abundant polyubiquitin linkage type following K48-linked ubiquitination which serves as a signal for proteasome-mediated degradation. The cellular function of K29-linked ubiquitination is not clear because it is the only linkage type that does not have a specific binder as a tool for detection 33. In this study, we filled in this gap by developing and characterizing a linkage-specific sAB against K29-linked polyubiquitin, named sAB-K29, using synthetic K29-linked diUb. We determined the crystal structure of sAB-K29 in complex with recombinant K29-linked diUb and elucidated its binding specificity at the atomic level. Using sAB-K29 as a tool, we discovered that K29-linked ubiquitination is mainly involved in RNA processing, the stress response, and cell cycle regulation. A reduction in K29-linked polyubiquitin by transfection of a DUB construct preferentially hydrolyzing K29 and K33 linkages42 resulted in cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, we found that the K29-linked polyubiquitin signal was specifically enriched around the midbody during telophase of mitosis and identified potential substrates of this type of modification.
K29-linked ubiquitination was enriched around the midbody during telophase of mitosis. This modification was dynamic, as the localization and structure changed over the progression of mitosis (Fig. 6a). We identified multiple midbody proteins that could be substrates of K29-linked ubiquitination from IP experiments under denaturing conditions. The fact that VCP, but not the proteasome, colocalized with the K29-linked polyubiquitin signal again suggested a nondegradative role for this modification. VCP is an ATPase involved in processing various ubiquitinated cellular proteins 50. Our results suggested that VCP was widely associated with K29-linked ubiquitination under normal conditions, during stress, or during cell division. Therefore, it may serve as a key processor for this modification. The exact role of K29-linked ubiquitination in midbody assembly requires further investigation.
Online Methods
Generation of K29-linked diubiquitin
K29-linked diubiquitin was generated as reported before 32. Briefly, 2 mM wildtype ubiquitin was mixed with 1 μM UBA1, 10 μM Ubch7, and 10 μM UBE3C in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM ATP, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP), at 30 °C overnight. The reaction mixture was then incubated with 2 mM vOTU and 5 mM DTT at 30 °C overnight to remove non K29-linked ubiquitin chains. K29-linked diubiquitin was purified by cation exchange using a Source S column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 4.5. The column was eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl up to 1M. The peaks corresponding to diubiquitin were pooled and further purified by gel filtration using a Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in 25 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 0.5 mM TCEP.
Generation of polyubiquitin chains
Polyubiquitin chains were generated as reported before 42. Briefly, wildtype ubiquitin or K29R mutant was mixed with UBA1 and specific combinations of E2 and E3 enzymes in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM ATP, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM TCEP. Specifically Ubch7/UBE3C was used to generate a mixture of polyubiquitin containing K29-linked chains; Ube2s, Ube25K, and Ubc13/Mms2 were used to generate K11-, K48- and K63-linked polyubiquitin chains, respectively. The reactions were monitored by Western blot.
Synthesis of biotinylated K29-linked diUb
Biotinylated K29-linked diUb was synthesized using hydrazide-based native chemical ligation and microwave-assisted solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) as reported before38. Briefly, biotinylated K29-linked diUb was divided into three peptide segments, namely fragment Ub[Met1-Phe45]-NHNH2, fragment Ub[Cys46-Gly76]-NH2, and fragment Ub[Cys(Acm)46-Gly75]-G-[Met1-Lys29-Phe45]-NHNH2 (Extended Data Fig. 1). Ala46 of each Ub subunit was temporarily mutated to Cys for native chemical ligation. The isopeptide bond at Lys29 of fragment Ub[Cys(Acm)46-Gly75]-G-[Met1-Lys29-Phe45]-NHNH2 was constructed using the orthogonal building block Fmoc-Lys(Alloc)-OH rather than normal Fomc-Lys(Boc)-OH51. An acetamidomethyl (Acm) group was used to protect the thiol group of N-terminal Cys of to avoid oligomerization or self-cyclization. All the peptides were synthesized using standard Fmoc SPPS protocols under microwave conditions (CEM Liberty Blue). The insertion of PEG linker was constructed using the building block Fmoc-mini-PEG, and biotin was directly condensed to the N termini. Fragment Ub[Cys(Acm)46-Gly75]-G-[Met1-Lys29-Gly76]-NH2 was synthesized by hydrazide-based native chemical ligation of fragment Ub[Cys(Acm)46-Gly75]-G-[Met1-Lys29-Phe45]-NHNH2 with Ub[Cys46-Gly76]-NH2 followed by Acm deprotection. Finally, fragment Ub[Met1-Phe45]-NHNH2 and fragment Ub[Cys(Acm)46-Gly75]-G-[Met1-Lys29-Gly76]-NH2 were ligated to generate the full-length diUb, which was subjected to desulfurization to convert Cys46 in the two Ub units into Ala46.
Purification of synthetic antibody fragment (sAB)
Plasmids containing sAB-K29 or sAB-MBP were transformed to E. coli BL21(DE3) cells for over-expression. Cells were collected and lysed in the Lysis Buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)). The cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation and run through a protein G-sepharose column equilibrated in the lysis buffer. The sABs were eluted using the Elution Buffer (0.1 M glycine, pH 2.7) and then cation-exchanged using a Mono S column equilibrated in Buffer A (50 mM sodium acetate pH 5.0). The proteins were eluted using a linear gradient of the sodium ions by mixing with Buffer B (50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.0, 2M NaCl).
Purification of proteins used for in vitro ubiquitination assay
Plasmids containing UBA1 (homo sapiens), UBCH7 (homo sapiens), vOTU (the viral ovarian tumor DUB encoded by Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever virus) were transformed to E. coli BL21(DE3) cells. UBA1 was over-expressed by IPTG induction, UBCH7 and vOTU were over-expressed by autoinduction following the established protocol 52. UBE3C was transformed to E. coli Rosseta 2 (DE3) cells and over-expressed by IPTG induction. The purification procedures followed the established protocols 32,42. Briefly, E. coli cell pellets were resuspended in Lysis Buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 300 mM KCl, 20 mM imidazole and 1 mM DTT with 1mM PMSF added freshly. Subsequently, cells were lysed by sonication, and the lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 16500 rpm for 30 min. Then the supernatants were flowed through a Ni-NTA gravity column twice at 4 °C. Beads were washed with Wash Buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 25 mM imidazole. Finally, the His-tagged proteins were eluted in Elution Buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 400 mM imidazole and 1 mM DTT. For His-SUMO-Ube3c, SUMO protease (Ulp1p) were added to the eluate, and dialyzed in the buffer containing 25 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 0.5 mM TCEP. The proteins were further purified by a Superdex 200 gel filtration column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in the buffer containing 25 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 0.5 mM TCEP.
Crystallization of sAB-K29 and K29-linked diubiquitin complex
Complex of sAB-K29 and K29-linked diubiquitin was formed by mixing purified sAB-K29 and K29-linked diubiquitin (1:1.5), followed by size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 75 column equilibrated in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl. Crystals were grown using the hanging drop method and appeared in 1 week at 21 °C from a 1:1 mixture of protein (18 mg/mL) and reservoir solution (0.1 M phosphate-citriate, 40% v/v Polyethylene glycol 300). Crystals were harvested and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen without any cryo-protectant.
Data collection and structure determination
X-ray diffraction data were collected at the Northeastern Collaborative Access Team beamline (24-ID-E) at the Advanced Photon Source (Supplemental Table 1). The diffraction data were integrated and scaled using XDS/XSCALE 53. The structure was determined by molecular replacement using PHASER 54 in PHENIX 55 and a Fab search model. The model was built using COOT 56 and was refined using PHENIX. Coordinates and structure factor amplitudes have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession number 7KEO. Structure figures were made using PyMOL (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Schrödinger).
Western blot
Western blots were performed using the standard protocol and analyzed by Image Lab (BIO-RAD). Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG, F(ab)2 fragment specific (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 109–036-006) was used as the secondary antibody (1:5000) when using sAB-K29 as the primary binder (0.2–2 μg/mL). Other primary antibodies are diluted as followed: Anti K63-Ub (Sigma,1:1000); Anti Ub (Abcam, 1:1000); Anti β-Actin (Santa Cruz, 1:1000), Anti GAPDH (Santa Cruz, 1:2000), Anti c-Myc (Genscript, 0.3 μg/mL), Anti VCP (Santa Cruz, 1:1000), Anti INCENP (Abcam,1:3000), Anti MKLP1 (Abcam,1:1000), Anti TBK1 (CST,1:1000), Anti PLK1 (Abcam, 1 μg/mL).
Phage display
Four rounds of biopanning using Fab Library E (kind gift of A. Koide) were performed as follows using a protocol adapted from previous studies 40,41. The first round of selection was performed manually using 300 nM of biotinylated K29-linked diubiquitin immobilized onto 250 μL of Streptavidin Paramagnetic Particles (Promega). Following washing with Selection Buffer (SB; 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% BSA, 0.05% Tween-20), the beads were incubated with Library E for one hour at room temperature (RT). The beads were then washed three times with SB and used to directly infect log-phase E. coli XL-1 blue cells. Following infection, 2XYT media supplemented with ampicillin and M13 helper phage was added and phage were amplified overnight. To increase the stringency of selection, three additional rounds of sorting were performed in the presence of 1.5-μM of mono-ubiquitin as a competitor in solution. Further, the concentration of K29-linked diubiquitin was reduced each round as follows: 150 nM in round 2, 75 nM in round 3, and 15 nM in round 4. These three rounds were performed at RT semi-automatically using a Kingfisher magnetic beads handler. The overnight-amplified elution pool from each preceding round of selection was used as the input for the following round of sorting.
Single-point competitive phage ELISA
Elution pools from rounds 3 and 4 were used to infect log-phase E. coli XL-1 blue cells and plated onto LB-agar supplemented with ampicillin. Twenty-four colonies from each pool were picked and sequenced at the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center DNA Sequencing facility. DNA sequencing determined that 47 out of 48 colonies corresponded to a single clone, and both clones were tested for binding to K29-linked diubiquitin by ELISA. All ELISA were performed in 96-well plates (Nunc) coated with 2 μg/mL Neutravidin and blocked with phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% BSA. The plates were washed with ELISA Buffer (EB; 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20) and 25 nM of K29-linked Di-Ub (in EB) was immobilized onto the plates. Amplified phage for both clones were diluted 20X into EB either in the absence or presence of competitors: non-biotinylated K29-linked diubiquitin, mono-ubiquitin, K27-linked diubiquitin, and K33-linked diubiquitin. Phage dilutions with and without competitors were added to target-immobilized ELISA plates, allowed to bind for 15 minutes, washed, and then incubated with an anti-M13 HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (GE Healthcare) for 30 minutes. Following washing with EB, bound phage were detected using TMB substrate kit (Thermo). Specificity was determined by comparing the ELISA signal with and without competition. Each assay was performed in triplicate. Based on ELISA signal, only the most abundant clone from sequencing was found to be specific to K29-linked diubiquitin. This Fab, named sAB-K29, was then subcloned into the expression vector RH2.2 (kind gift of S. Sidhu) using the In-Fusion Cloning Kit (Takara) and sequence-verified.
Characterization of binding affinity
The binding of sAB-K29 to K29-linked diubiquitin was verified by multi-point ELISA 57,58 and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). ELISA were performed using plates prepared as above. Biotinylated constructs of K29-, K27-, and K33-linked diubiquitin were immobilized individually onto ELISA plates at 25 nM final concentrations. Twelve serial dilutions of sAB-K29, starting at 1 μM concentration, were prepared in EB and each Fab dilution was bound to wells containing either immobilized targets or no targets (to determine any background signal). Following washing with EB, bound Fab was detected by incubation with an anti-Fab HRP-conjugated secondary (Jackson) and TMB substrate kit, as above. The quenched absorbance signal was measured and plotted as a function of the log of Fab concentration. EC50 values were then calculated in GraphPad using a variable slope model and assuming sigmoidal dose response. Each assay was performed in triplicate and the mean signal was used to fit the dose response curve.
SPR experiments were performed using a MASS-1 instrument (Bruker) with a His-capture sensor chip (XanTec). His-tagged constructs of K29, K27, and K33-linked diubiquitin were immobilized onto sensor chips following coating of the experimental and reference channels with 0.5 mM NiSO4. His-tagged proteins (ligands) were immobilized only in the experimental channels. After optimization of the amount of immobilized ligands based on response units (RUs), a series of sAB-K29 concentrations was injected into both the experimental and reference channels. sAB-K29 was injected over a 60s-association phase, followed by a 600s dissociation time 58. Following each injection, the chip surface was regenerated using 350 mM EDTA and 50 mM NaOH, and ligands were subsequently immobilized for the following injection. For each ligand, all experiments were performed on single channels for consistency. Fab injections were then double-reference subtracted using the reference channel signal and a buffer-only experimental channel injection. The double-reference subtracted curves were then fit with one-to-one Langmuir binding models in Scrubber to determine kinetic binding parameters.
Generation of biotinylated sAB-K29 using sortase enzyme
LPETGG-His6 tag was introduced to the C-terminus of the heavy chain of sAB-K29. Purified sAB-K29-LPETGG-His6 (20 μM) and synthesized biotin peptide (biotin-AEEA-GGGGG, 100 μM) were incubated with His-tagged sortase (10 μM) in sortase buffer (10 mM CaCl2, 50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) for 30 minutes at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then incubated with Ni-NTA beads to remove the remaining His-tagged sAB-K29 and sortase. Biotinylated sAB-K29 in flow through was further purified using Protein A column to remove the biotin peptide.
Immunoprecipitation for mass spectrometry
Biotinylated sAB-K29 (100 μg) was incubated with 1 mL streptavidin-magnetic beads (Promega, Z5482) prewashed three times with PBS buffer in a thermo shaker for 3 h at 25 °C. The beads containing immobilized sAB-K29 were then incubated with 5 mg of HeLa cell lysate in RIPA lysis buffer (P0013B, Beyotime) on a rotation wheel at 4 °C overnight. The beads were washed 3 times with the wash buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, and 0.5 % Triton, followed by 3 times with the wash buffer without Triton. The bound proteins were eluted with 100 μl 8M Urea for 1h at 25 °C in a thermo shaker. Similar procedures were followed for immunoprecipitation under the denaturing condition (denature IP), except that 5 mg of synchronized HeLa cell lysate in 8 M Urea with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, 4693116001) was diluted by PBS buffer to a final urea concentration of 1 M before incubating with the conjugated beads. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and eluted fractions were pooled and analyzed by SDS-PAGE or Western blot.
Sample preparation for label-free mass spectrometry
Eluted protein fractions were incubated in 20 μl 4 × LDS loading buffer (NP0007, Thermo Fisher) for 5 min at 95 °C. Proteins were separated on 4%-12% gradient gels (NP0336Box, Thermo Fisher) and stained with Coomassie blue R-250 (161-0436, Bio-Rad). For in-gel digestion, each gel lane was cut into 6 bands which were then cut into smaller (around 1 cm) fragments. Gel pieces were de-stained in 50 mM NH4HCO3/ACN (1:1, v/v). After washing with 50 mM NH4HCO3, proteins were reduced by the addition of 25 mM DTT in 50 mM NH4HCO3 for 60 min at 55 °C followed by alkylation in 55 mM iodoacetamide in 50 mM NH4HCO3 for 60 min at 37 °C. After washing in 50 mM NH4HCO3/ACN (1:1, v/v) and dehydration in ACN, proteins were digested overnight at 37 °C with trypsin (1:50, w/w) (V5280, Promega). Peptides were extracted from the gel in 50% ACN/0.1% formic acid, followed by vacuum drying and re-dissolved by 20 μl 0.1 % formic acid for LC-MS analysis.
Mass spectrometry data collection
Tryptic peptides were separated on an UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano System (Thermo Scientific, USA) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min using a 120 min gradient from 5% ACN, 0.1% formic acid to 45% ACN, 0.1% formic acid followed by a washing step at 100% ACN. Each of the 3 independent biological replicates was measured as technical duplicates. Mass spectra were collected on a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each analysis was operated in data dependent top-speed mode with dynamic exclusion set at 30 s and a total cycle time of 3 s. Full scan MS spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 120000 (at m/z 200) with an automatic gain control ion target value of 4e5 and a maximum injection time of 50 ms. The most intense precursors with charge states of 2-7 and intensities greater than 5e3 were selected for MS/MS experiments using higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) with 27 % collision energy. Isolation was performed in the quadrupole with an automatic gain control ion target value of 2e3 and a maximum injection time of 300 ms.
Mass spectrometry data analysis and quantification
Raw data from LC-MS/MS measurements were analyzed using MaxQuant version 1.6.5.0 with default settings and label-free quantification (LFQ) enabled. For protein identification, the human reference proteome downloaded from the UniProt database (download date: 2019-07-01) and an integrated database of common contaminants was used. Identified proteins were filtered for reverse hits and common contaminants at a false discovery rate of 5%. Further data processing was performed using Perseus software (version 1.5.8.5) and R software (version 3.6.1). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD024428 and PSD0244425.
Immunofluorescence staining and imaging
HeLa cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at room temperature for 20 min, washed three times with PBS. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 10% normal goat serum, 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were then stained for 2 h at room temperature with the primary binder / antibody. After that, the cells were washed three times with PBS containing 0.1% TritonX-100, following by staining for 1 h with the secondary antibody. Finally, cells were washed three times with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, and mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen). Alexa Fluor 488 or 647 conjugated F(ab′)2 fragment goat anti-human IgG, F(ab′)2 fragment specific (Jackson ImmunoResearch) was used as the secondary antibody (1:500) when using sAB-K29 as the primary binder (2 μg/mL). Other primary antibodies are diluted as followed: Anti AuroraB (Fisher,1:500); Anti α-Tubulin (Genscript, 1:50-1:100); Anti ɑ-Tubulin (proteintech, 1:200); Anti c-Myc (Genscript, 0.5 μg/mL); Anti EIF3B (Santa Cruz, 1:100); Anti INCENP (Santa Cruz,1:100), Anti MKLP1(Santa Cruz, 1:100); Anti Proteasome 20S core subunits (Fisher, 1:250); Anti K48-Ub (Abcam, 1:200); Anti VCP (Santa Cruz,1:200); Anti G3BP1 (proteintech,1:500); Anti pTBK1 (cell signaling,1:50); Anti PLK1 (Santa Cruz,1:50). Images were collected by a Leica SP5 2-photon laser scanning confocal microscope and analyzed by Image J (Fiji).
Super-resolution microscopy
sAB-K29 was labeled with Alexa Fluor 647 (A647, Invitrogen A20006) following the instructions of Alexa Fluor Protein Labeling Kits (Thermo Fisher). Unreacted free dye was removed using P-6 Gel Columns (Bio-Rad). The labeling efficiency is about 1 Alexa Fluor 647 dye per antibody. 3D STORM imaging was conducted as previously described 59 on an inverted microscope using a 647 nm laser and a 405 nm laser and data were recorded by an EMCCD camera. For 3D imaging, a cylindrical lens was placed in the emission beam path. Each STORM image was reconstructed from about 5,000 image frames. Imaging buffer was composed of 10 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris (pH 8), 10% glucose, 50 U/mL glucose oxidase (Sigma Aldrich G2133-10KU), 404 U/mL catalase (EMD Millipore 219001) and 20mM cysteamine (Sigma Aldrich 30070-10G). 3D Image reconstruction and visualization was conducted as previously described 60.
Cellular stress assays
HeLa cells were treated with CuET (at 1 μM or 0.5 μM, 4h, this paper), MG132 (20 μM or 10 μM, 4h, Sigma-Aldrich) NaAsO2 (500 μM, 1h or 250 μM, 4h, Sigma), Cycloheximide (100 μg/ml, 6h, Sigma), Puromycine (1 μg/ml,2h, GoldBio), α-Amanitin (5 μg/ml, 24h, MCE), or 45 °C heat shock for 30 min. K29-ubquitin chains was detected by Western blot or immunofluorescence microscopy.
Cell synchronization
HeLa cells were first synchronized in G1/S-phase with 2 mM thymidine for 24h, followed by PBS wash and releasing to fresh DMEM/10% FBS media for 3h. After that, cells were treated with 50 ng/ml nocodazole for 12h and arrested in prometaphase. For progression through mitosis, cells were harvested via pipetting, washed with PBS twice, and released into fresh media. Cell lysates were taken at indicated time points and analyzed via Western blot.
Flow cytometry
Cells were transfected with the Tra construct (human TRABID, 245-697), the Tra-CIM (human TRABID, 245-697, C443S) or pCMV vector using lipofectamine 3000 for 24-27 h before harvesting and washing with PBS. The cells were fixed with either 1% or 4% PFA for 15 min at room temperature, followed by washing with PBS and permeabilization with 70% ethanol at 4 °C overnight. Nonspecific binding was blocked with 2% BSA. The cells were then incubated with Anti-c-myc antibody conjugated with PE (sc-40, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:40) and either sAB-K29 as primary antibody (3 ug/mL), and Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated F(ab′)2 fragment goat anti-human IgG, F(ab′)2 fragment specific (Jackson Immuno Research) as secondary antibody, or sAB-K29 directly labeled with Alexa Fluor 647 for 1h at room temperature, followed by washing with PBS. Finally, the cells were incubated with Hoechst dye at room temperature for 15 min, followed by washing with PBS. The data was acquired by a LSRFortessa X-20 cell analyzer (BD) and analysis by flowjo (10.5+ & 10.6.2). Gating for cells transfected with different plasmids was performed identically across each experiment using flowjo (10.5+ & 10.6.2) (Extended Data Fig. 7e).
Mammalian cell culture
HeLa cells and A549 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). Cells were tested for mycoplasma contamination. Plasmids were transfected using lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen).
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Funding for this work was, in part, provided by the Catalyst Award from the Chicago Biomedical Consortium. This work was supported by Chicago Biomedical Consortium Catalyst Award C-086 to M.Z. We thank the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFA0505200), NSFC (91753205) for financial support. We thank Prof. Haiteng Deng, Xianbin Meng and Meng Han in the Proteomics Facility at Technology Center for Protein Sciences, Tsinghua University, for help in mass spectrometry analysis. We thank Vytas Bindokas in the Integrated Light Microscopy Core Facility and David Leclerc in the Flow Cytometry Core Facility at the University of Chicago for help in fluorescent imaging and flow cytometry.
Footnotes
Author Contributions Statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability
The atomic model of K29-linked diUb in complex with sAB-K29 has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under the accession code 7KEO [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/unreleased/7KEO]. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD024428 and PSD0244425 [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/]. Source data are provided with this paper.
REFERENCES
- 1.Komander D & Rape M The Ubiquitin Code. Annu. Rev. Biochem 81, 203–229 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Swatek KN & Komander D Ubiquitin modifications. Cell Res. 26, 399–422 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yau R & Rape M The increasing complexity of the ubiquitin code. Nat. Cell Biol 18, 579–86 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lopez-Mosqueda J & Dikic I Deciphering functions of branched ubiquitin chains. Cell 157, 767–9 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meyer HJ & Rape M Enhanced protein degradation by branched ubiquitin chains. Cell 157, 910–21 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haakonsen DL & Rape M Branching Out: Improved Signaling by Heterotypic Ubiquitin Chains. Trends Cell Biol. 29, 704–716 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Swatek KN, Usher JL, Kueck AF, Gladkova C, Mevissen TE, Pruneda JN, Skern T & Komander D Insights into ubiquitin chain architecture using Ub-clipping. Nature 572, 533–537 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gautam AKS & Matouschek A Decoding without the cipher. Nat. Chem. Biol 15, 210–212 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miura G Unraveling the chain. Nat. Chem. Biol 13, 1139 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.de la Pena AH, Goodall EA, Gates SN, Lander GC & Martin A Substrate-engaged 26S proteasome structures reveal mechanisms for ATP-hydrolysis-driven translocation. Science 362, 6418 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ding Z, Xu C, Sahu I, Wang Y, Fu Z, Huang M, Wong CC, Glickman MH & Cong Y Structural snapshots of 26S proteasome reveal tetraubiquitin-induced conformations. Mol. Cell 73, 1150–1161 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dong Y, Zhang S, Wu Z, Li X, Wang WL, Zhu Y, Stoilova-McPhie S, Lu Y, Finley D and Mao Y Cryo-EM structures and dynamics of substrate-engaged human 26S proteasome. Nature 565, 49–55 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang G, Gao Y, Li L, Jin G, Chao JI & Lin HK K63-linked ubiquitination in kinase activation and cancer. Front. Oncol 2, 5 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ikeda F & Dikic I Atypical ubiquitin chains: new molecular signals. ‘Protein Modifications: Beyond the Usual Suspects’ review series. EMBO Rep. 9, 536–542 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kulathu Y & Komander D Atypical ubiquitylation - the unexplored world of polyubiquitin beyond Lys48 and Lys63 linkages. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13, 508–23 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Keusekotten K, Elliott PR, Glockner L, Fiil BK, Damgaard RB, Kulathu Y, Wauer T, Hospenthal MK, Gyrd-Hansen M, Krappmann D, Hofmann K … & Komander D OTULIN antagonizes LUBAC signaling by specifically hydrolyzing Met1-linked polyubiquitin. Cell 153, 1312–1326 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aalto AL et al. Aalto AL, Mohan AK, Schwintzer L, Kupka S, Kietz C, Walczak H, Broemer M & Meinander A Cell Death and Differ. 26, 860–876 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Van Wijk SJ, Fricke F, Herhaus L, Gupta J, Hötte K, Pampaloni F, Grumati P, Kaulich M, Sou YS, Komatsu M, Greten FR, … & Dikic I Linear ubiquitination of cytosolic Salmonella Typhimurium activates NF-kappa B and restricts bacterial proliferation. Nat. Microbiol 2, 1–10(2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Durcan TM, Tang MY, Pérusse JR, Dashti EA, Aguileta MA, McLelland GL, Gros P, Shaler TA, Faubert D, Coulombe B & Fon EA USP8 regulates mitophagy by removing K6-linked ubiquitin conjugates from parkin. EMBO J. 33, 2473–2491 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cunningham CN, Baughman JM, Phu L, Tea JS, Yu C, Coons M, Kirkpatrick DS, Bingol B & Corn JE USP30 and parkin homeostatically regulate atypical ubiquitin chains on mitochondria. Nat. Cell Biol 17, 160–169 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gersch M et al. Mechanism and regulation of the Lys6-selective deubiquitinase USP30. Nat Struct Mol Biol 24, 920–930 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Matsumoto ML, Wickliffe KE, Dong KC, Yu C, Bosanac I, Bustos D, Phu L, Kirkpatrick DS, Hymowitz SG, Rape M, Kelley RF … & Dixit VM K11-linked polyubiquitination in cell cycle control revealed by a K11 linkage-specific antibody. Mol. Cell 39, 477–484 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xu P, Duong DM, Seyfried NT, Cheng D, Xie Y, Robert J, Rush J, Hochstrasser M, Finley D & Peng J Quantitative Proteomics Reveals the Function of Unconventional Ubiquitin Chains in Proteasomal Degradation. Cell 137, 133–145 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu J, Han C, Xie B, Wu Y, Liu S, Chen K, Xia M, Zhang Y, Song L, Li Z, Zhang T … & Cao X Rhbdd3 controls autoimmunity by suppressing the production of IL-6 by dendritic cells via K27-linked ubiquitination of the regulator NEMO. Nat. Immunol 15, 612–622 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xue B, Li H, Guo M, Wang J, Xu Y, Zou X, Deng R, Li G & Zhu H TRIM21 Promotes Innate Immune Response to RNA Viral Infection through Lys27-Linked Polyubiquitination of MAVS. J. Virol 92, e00321–18 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee YR, Chen M, Lee JD, Zhang J, Lin SY, Fu TM, Chen H, Ishikawa T, Chiang SY, Katon J, Zhang Y … & Pandolfi PP Reactivation of PTEN tumor suppressor for cancer treatment through inhibition of a MYC-WWPI inhibitory pathway. Science 364, 6441 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huang H, Jeon MS, Liao L, Yang C, Elly C, Yates III JR & Liu YC K33-Linked Polyubiquitination of T Cell Receptor-zeta Regulates Proteolysis-Independent T Cell Signaling. Immunity 33, 60–70 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yuan WC, Lee YR, Lin SY, Chang LY, Tan YP, Hung CC, Kuo JC, Liu CH, Lin MY, Xu M, Chen ZJ, … & Chen RH. K33-Linked Polyubiquitination of Coronin 7 by Cul3-KLHL20 Ubiquitin E3 Ligase Regulates Protein Trafficking. Mol. Cell 54, 586–600 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Karim M, Biquand E, Declercq M, Jacob Y, van der Werf S & Demeret C Nonproteolytic K29-Linked Ubiquitination of the PB2 Replication Protein of Influenza A Viruses by Proviral Cullin 4-Based E3 Ligases. mBio 11, e00305–20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu C, Liu WX, Ye YH & Li W Ufd2p synthesizes branched ubiquitin chains to promote the degradation of substrates modified with atypical chains. Nat. Commun 8, 14274(2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tsuchiya H, Burana D, Ohtake F, Arai N, Kaiho A, Komada M, Tanaka K & Saeki Y Ub-ProT reveals global length and composition of protein ubiquitylation in cells. Nat. Commun 9, 524–524 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kristariyanto YA, Rehman SAA, Campbell DG, Morrice NA, Johnson C, Toth R and Kulathu Y K29-selective ubiquitin binding domain reveals structural basis of specificity and heterotypic nature of k29 polyubiquitin. Mol. Cell 58, 83–94 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Michel MA, Swatek KN, Hospenthal MK & Komander D Ubiquitin Linkage-Specific Affimers Reveal Insights into K6-Linked Ubiquitin Signaling. Mol. Cell 68, 233–246 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Newton K, Matsumoto ML, Wertz IE, Kirkpatrick DS, Lill JR, Tan J, Dugger D, Gordon N, Sidhu SS, Fellouse FA, Komuves L … & Dixit VM Ubiquitin chain editing revealed by polyubiquitin linkage-specific antibodies. Cell 134, 668–678 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Matsumoto ML, Dong KC, Yu C, Phu L, Gao X, Hannoush RN, Hymowitz SG, Kirkpatrick DS, Dixit VM & Kelley RF Engineering and structural characterization of a linear polyubiquitin-specific antibody. J. Mol. Biol 418, 134–144 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yau RG, Doerner K, Castellanos ER, Haakonsen DL, Werner A, Wang N, Yang XW, Martinez-Martin N, Matsumoto ML, Dixit VM & Rape M Assembly and Function of Heterotypic Ubiquitin Chains in Cell-Cycle and Protein Quality Control. Cell 171, 918–933 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Miersch S, Li Z, Hanna R, McLaughlin ME, Hornsby M, Matsuguchi T, Paduch M, Sääf A, Wells J, Koide S and Kossiakoff A Scalable high throughput selection from phage-displayed synthetic antibody libraries. J. Vis. Exp 51492 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pan M, Gao S, Zheng Y, Tan X, Lan H, Tan X, … & Liu L Quasi-Racemic X-ray Structures of K27-Linked Ubiquitin Chains Prepared by Total Chemical Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc 138, 7429–35 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pan M, Zheng Q, Gao S, Qu Q, Yu Y, Wu M, … & Liu L Chemical Synthesis of Structurally Defined Phosphorylated Ubiquitins Suggests Impaired Parkin Activation by Phosphorylated Ubiquitins with a Non-Phosphorylated Distal Unit. CCS Chemistry 1, 476–489 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Miller KR, Koide A, Leung B, Fitzsimmons J, Yoder B, Yuan H, … & Collins EJ T cell receptor-like recognition of tumor in vivo by synthetic antibody fragment. PLoS One 7, e43746 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Paduch M, Koide A, Uysal S, Rizk SS, Koide S, & Kossiakoff AA Generating conformation-specific synthetic antibodies to trap proteins in selected functional states. Methods 60, 3–14 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Michel MA, Elliott PR, Swatek KN, Simicek M, Pruneda JN, Wagstaff JL, … & Komander D Assembly and specific recognition of k29- and k33-linked polyubiquitin. Mol. Cell 58, 95–109 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li YM, Li YT, Pan M, Kong XQ, Huang YC, Hong ZY, & Liu L Irreversible site-specific hydrazinolysis of proteins by use of sortase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 53, 2198–2202 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Skrott Z, Mistrik M, Andersen KK, Friis S, Majera D, Gursky J, … & Bartek J Alcohol-abuse drug disulfiram targets cancer via p97 segregase adaptor NPL4. Nature 552, 194–199 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pan M, Zheng Q, Yu Y, Ai H, Xie Y, Zeng X, … & Zhao M (2021). Seesaw conformations of Npl4 in the human p97 complex and the inhibitory mechanism of a disulfiram derivative. Nat. Commun 12, 121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jolly C, Usson Y & Morimoto RI Rapid and reversible relocalization of heat shock factor 1 within seconds to nuclear stress granules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6769–6774 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tsai WC, Gayatri S, Reineke LC, Sbardella G, Bedford MT, & Lloyd RE Arginine Demethylation of G3BP1 Promotes Stress Granule Assembly. J. Biol. Chem 291, 22671–22685 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Licchesi JD, Mieszczanek J, Mevissen TE, Rutherford TJ, Akutsu M, Virdee S, … & Komander D An ankyrin-repeat ubiquitin-binding domain determines TRABID’s specificity for atypical ubiquitin chains. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 19, 62–71 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ramadan K, Bruderer R, Spiga FM, Popp O, Baur T, Gotta M, & Meyer HH Cdc48/p97 promotes reformation of the nucleus by extracting the kinase Aurora B from chromatin. Nature 450, 1258–1262 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Meyer H, Bug M & Bremer S Emerging functions of the VCP/p97 AAA-ATPase in the ubiquitin system. Nat. Cell Biol 14, 117–123 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Methods-only references
- 51.Qu Q, Pan M, Gao S, Zheng QY, Yu YY, Su JC, … & Hu HG A Highly Efficient Synthesis of Polyubiquitin Chains. Adv. Sci. (Weinh) 5, 1800234–1800234 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Studier FW Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr Purif. 41, 207–234 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kabsch W XDS. Acta. Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr 66, 125–132 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sliwiak J, Jaskolski M, Dauter Z, McCoy AJ & Read RJ Likelihood-based molecular-replacement solution for a highly pathological crystal with tetartohedral twinning and sevenfold translational noncrystallographic symmetry. Acta. Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr 70, 471–80 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Adams PD et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta. Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr 66, 213–21 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Emsley P & Cowtan K Coot: Model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta. Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr 60, 2126–2132 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dominik PK et al. Conformational Chaperones for Structural Studies of Membrane Proteins Using Antibody Phage Display with Nanodiscs. Structure 24, 300–309 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mukherjee S et al. Engineered synthetic antibodies as probes to quantify the energetic contributions of ligand binding to conformational changes in proteins. J. Biol. Chem 293, 2815–2828 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fei J, Singh D, Zhang Q, Park S, Balasubramanian D, Golding I, … & Ha T RNA biochemistry. Determination of in vivo target search kinetics of regulatory noncoding RNA. Science 347, 1371–1374 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Park S, Zhang J, Reyer MA, Zareba J, Troy AA, & Fei J Conducting Multiple Imaging Modes with One Fluorescence Microscope. J. Vis. Exp (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The atomic model of K29-linked diUb in complex with sAB-K29 has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under the accession code 7KEO [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/unreleased/7KEO]. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD024428 and PSD0244425 [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/]. Source data are provided with this paper.