Abstract
Vascular tortuosity as an indicator of retinal vascular morphological changes can be quantitatively analyzed and used as a biomarker for the early diagnosis of relevant disease such as diabetes. While various methods have been proposed to evaluate retinal vascular tortuosity, the main obstacle limiting their clinical application is the poor consistency compared with the experts’ evaluation. In this research, we proposed to apply a multiple subdivision-based algorithm for the vessel segment vascular tortuosity analysis combining with a learning curve function of vessel curvature inflection point number, emphasizing the human assessment nature focusing not only global but also on local vascular features. Our algorithm achieved high correlation coefficients of 0.931 for arteries and 0.925 for veins compared with clinical grading of extracted retinal vessels. For the prognostic performance against experts’ prediction in retinal fundus images from diabetic patients, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve reached 0.968, indicating a good consistency with experts’ predication in full retinal vascular network evaluation.
Keywords: Fundus photography, vascular tortuosity, multiple subdivision
Impact statement
Since the vascular tortuosity of retinal vessels has been proven to be an early indicator for the early diagnosis, various quantification methods have been proposed but can be hardly applied into clinical application due to low consistency with experts’ assessment. We reported here a quantitative vascular tortuosity analysis algorithm based on multiple subdivision of vessel segments incorporating a learning curve function of the curve bending number. Our results showed high correlation with experts’ prediction in vascular tortuosity of retinal fundus images, demonstrating that the proposed method shows promise for automatic and objective vascular tortuosity evaluation of retinal fundus images in clinical applications.
Introduction
The retina is one of the few tissues throughout the body where blood vessels can be non-invasively observed in vivo with photographic techniques like fundus photography or optical coherence angiography (OCTA), providing cost-efficient and highly repeatable access for studying the microcirculation and the hemodynamic of blood flow.1,2 Retinal vessels are thought to reflect the general status of the microvasculature in human body as the eye itself is one of the target organs affected by vascular diseases. 3 Analyzing the vascular system in the eye fundus can resolve common symptoms including neovascularization, occurrence of pathological structures, or vascular morphological alteration. 4 To perform quantitative evaluation of retinal vascular system, various studies have been conducted to extract vessel morphological parameters including vessel diameter, density, branching, tortuosity, etc. and assess their relationship with systemic and ocular diseases.5,6
Since the early diagnosis and effective treatment are important to most of the diseases, retinal vascular tortuosity variation has been identified as one of earliest indicators to a number of relevant diseases such as diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, stroke, and ischemic heart disease.4,7 Vascular tortuosity is defined by the degree of being tortuous of blood vessels (curved and twisted, having many turns). While it is crucial to ensure repeatable and reliable evaluation of vascular tortuosity, it is difficult to describe and annotate with words due to the lack of a precise and standardized protocol and its manual evaluation is often tedious and introduces a high inter and intra operator variability.8,9 Thus, automatic and precise quantification of retinal vascular tortuosity is of great significance.
To quantify retinal vascular tortuosity, various numbers of computational approaches have been proposed and applied,10–23 mostly based on retinal fundus images as it is the most widely accessible retinal imaging method. One common vascular tortuosity measurement method introduced by Hart et al. is calculating the ratio of the length to the chord of blood vessel segment centrelines, 13 based on which some other length-based calculations have also been developed and applied to clinical studies in subsequent researches.14–16 Hart et al. also applied the concept of total curvature, 17 which was later introduced with changes by Bhuiyan et al. considering numerical derivative for the calculus of the total curvature 18 and Trucco et al. generalizing the vessel skeleton curvature measurement. 19 Other changes like average angular transformation and integral of curvature squared have also been introduced for the curvature-based calculation of retinal vascular tortuosity. 20
Nevertheless, most of the computational retinal vascular tortuosity measurement methods tend to evaluate the vascular tortuosity in a relatively global way while failed to evaluate the actual turns and twists within the vessel segment.21–23 Moreover, since the retinal vascular tortuosity evaluation in clinical practice is mostly based on the experts’ experience, computational methods do not always match the clinical concept of tortuosity. 24 In order to perform better quantitative retinal vascular evaluation with improved mathematical metrics while being robust enough to compare with those perceived by ophthalmologists: Grisan et al. proposed an approach based on partitioning each vessel segment into sub-segments of constant-sign curvature and combining together each calculation; 25 Onkaew et al. developed an alternative method by using the curvature calculated from improved chain code algorithm taking the number of inflection point of a vessel segment into account; 26 Ramos et al. proposed a novel computational tortuosity assessment incorporating clinically domain-related anatomical information, providing more adjusted evaluation to the specialists’ perception. 27
In this study, in order to be more in line with manual assessment, we demonstrated a novel retinal vascular tortuosity quantification method based on multiple subdivision of retinal vessels. With automatic retinal vessel network segmented and split into single vessel segments, multiple subdivision algorithm is applied to divide single vessel into overlapping sub-segments corresponding to the continuous changing chord lengths. The tortuosity index of a single vessel segment is calculated as the maximum of the accumulated absolute tangent angle difference of the sub-segments multiplied by a transformed sigmoid learning curve function of the inflection point numbers of the vessel segment curvature sign, giving prominence to local vascular turns and twists. The performance of our newly defined vascular tortuosity measurement algorithm was compared with traditional arc length to chord length ratio method introduced by Hart et al. 13 and tortuosity evaluation method developed by Grisan et al. 25 in analyzing the RET-TORT public data of retinal vessels. Tortuosity analysis and prognostic performance against expert observers’ evaluation were also demonstrated on a clinical fundus image dataset of diabetic patients.
Materials and methods
Dataset
Considering the relation between retinal vascular tortuosity and diabetes,14,28,29 in this study, we included 104 retinal fundus images of diabetic patients ranging from non-visible vascular abnormality to severe vascular tortuosity without other obvious pathological structures like exudates, hemorrhages, microaneurysms, etc. The fundus images were taken by a fundus camera (Topcon, TRC-50DX, Japan) with 50° field of view. All the data used have been anonymized. The experimental procedures adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki [1983] and were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, China (protocol number: 2017KYPJ104). Three mid-level or higher ophthalmologists actively involved in daily clinical practice were asked to give their perspectives in three different rounds regarding whether the retinal vascular network is tortuous or not. While there is no standard guide for retinal tortuosity evaluation presented, for manual evaluation of the retinal vascular tortuosity, ophthalmologists typically integrate the information on how many times a vessel turns and twits and how large the amplitude turning amplitude is based on their daily clinical experience. Note that, in retinal fundus image, straight vessels typically present a smooth semi-circular or parabolic shape due to the hemispherical shape of the retina. The rating scale is defined as zero for negative and one for positive, respectively. To establish a unified criteria for the characterization of quantitative retinal vascular tortuosity assessments, the result for each ophthalmologist is marked as their own opinion being consistent for more than twice on every fundus image, and the final ground truth for the dataset is formed by the same opinion of more than two ophthalmologists.
Vessel segmentation
Before performing computational retinal vascular tortuosity analysis, the first step is to segment the vascular network from the retinal fundus image and extract the vessel segments as shown in Figure 1. For vessel network and optic disc segmentation, a multi-path recurrent U-Net network architecture combining a convolutional neural network and a recurrent neural network is used. 30 In this algorithm, the applied multi-branching of the encoding path and the decoding path ensure more effective semantic features extraction, and the multi-path recurrent U-Net combines the recurrent neural network further improves the target features by sequencing the multi-path output features in time, thus ensuring more accurate retinal vessel and optic disc segmentation. The original retinal fundus image of 2656 × 1992 pixels is firstly rescaled to 512 × 512 pixels before feeding into the network. With the retinal vascular network and the optic disc segmented, the optic disc area is subtracted from segmented vascular network to remove the twisted overlapping optic disc vessels that may interfere future tortuosity analysis. Then the resulted prediction image is padded to the original image size obtaining binary vascular network image (Figure 1(b)). A thinning process with fast parallel algorithm 31 is further applied to the binary vascular networks to extract the central vessel skeleton. Finally, based on the geometrical and topological properties of the blood vessels, bifurcation and crossover points of the vessels are detected and eradicated at vessel skeleton centerline pixels with more than two neighbors, reconnected for crossover vessels and branches with similar vessel diameter, 32 splitting the skeletonized vascular network into single vessel segments readily for tortuosity evaluation (Figure 1(c)).
Figure 1.
Vessel segmentation process and flow chart depicting steps for retinal vessels tortuosity assessment. (a) The original fundus image, (b) the segmented retinal vascular network, (c) the extracted single vessel segments readily for tortuosity evaluation, and (d) flow chart depicting steps for vascular tortuosity assessment. (A color version of this figure is available in the online journal.)
Multiple subdivision-based vascular tortuosity assessment
The common mathematical model proposed by Hart et al. for measuring vascular tortuosity is defined by the ratio of the length of the curve to the chord length
| (1) |
where is the length of the curve, calculated by all the points from the beginning to the end of a vessel segment, and is the length of the underlying chord, which is actually the Euclidean distance between the starting and ending points of a vessel segment. However, this method is insufficient to reflect the small variations of vessel segments. To address the number of twists and local winding, Grisan et al. proposed modifications by subdividing each vessel segment into sub-segments of constant-sign curvature and combining them together for global evaluation as follows
| (2) |
where is the length of vessel segment, and represent the arc length and chord length of sub-segment , and is the total number of sub-segments. Nevertheless, the main drawbacks are its scale dependency and it is indistinguishable for curves with only one curvature changing point. 25
To better match manual evaluation concept of vascular tortuosity focusing not only global but also various local features while being scale independent, based on the concept of multiple subdivision that has been widely applied to fractal patterns,33,34 we propose a multiple subdivision-based method for vessel tortuosity index analysis by sequentially splitting single vessel segment into overlapping sub-segments with continuous increasing equal chord length and calculate the accumulated absolute tangent angle difference of sub-segments corresponding to different chord lengths. The detailed concept is illustrated in Figure 2. For the first division, with minimum unit chord length ( = 1 pixel), a single vessel is subdivided into parts (Figure 2(a)). The split points of the sub-segments of the first division are marked as , , . For the second division, segmentation is performed sequentially from each split point ( , , ) with chord length of , until the left segment chord length is less than , extracting vessel sub-segments (Figure 2(b)). By this analogy, for the subsequent nth division, kn sub-segments of the vessel are extracted starting from split points ( , , ) with multiple unit chord length of , until the single vessel segment chord length is smaller than . To analyze the vascular tortuosity, the accumulated absolute tangent angle difference of all the corresponding sub-segments of each division is calculated, and the maximum value of the accumulated absolute tangent angle difference is extracted.
| (3) |
where n is the sequence number of the multiple division, kn is the corresponding numbers of vessel sub-segments, and are the tangent angle values at the endpoints of the ith sub-segment in the nth division. Note that for nth division, .
Figure 2.
Schematic demonstrating the principle of multiple subdivision method for the overlapping split of extracted vessel segment for vascular tortuosity computation. (a) For the first division, the curve is continuously subdivided with fixed chord length , and the accumulated absolute tangent angle differences of the split sub-segments’ endpoints are calculated. (b) The second division is performed with fixed chord length at each split point of the first division with the sub-segments overlapped with each other. (c) The third division is performed with fixed chord length at each split point of the first division. (A color version of this figure is available in the online journal.)
Considering that the number of local turns and twists of a vessel play an important role in matching the computational tortuosity evaluation to the manual concept as Grisan et al. described, 25 a learning curve model represented by a modified logistic function35,36 of the inflection point numbers of the vessel segment curvature sign is further introduced into the tortuosity index calculation, incorporating the artificial evaluation nature of fast and rapid tortuosity increase with the increase of curvature inflection point numbers but trends to reach a limit when the number is too large. The final tortuosity index of a single vessel segment is defined as
| (4) |
where is the number of the inflection points at which the second derivative of vessel segment centerlines vanishes, and is identified by detecting changes in the sign of curvature 37
| (5) |
where is the arc length that is greater than 0. The sign change of curvature C depends on the difference of the tangent angle between adjacent split points. The coefficients of the logistic function in tortuosity index are selected to optimize the correlation between our computational tortuosity index and the human observer results on the evaluation of vascular tortuosity as shown in the latter validation part of the paper. To quantify a retinal fundus image, its global tortuosity index is calculated as the averaged tortuosity indices of all the single vessel segments from the extracted vessel network.
Validation and experiments
To validate the performance of our newly defined multiple subdivision-based vascular tortuosity algorithm, a publicly available dataset of retinal vessels with clinical annotations of vascular tortuosity, RET-TORT, 25 is used. Established by the University of Padova, RET-TORT contains extracted retinal vessel images of 30 arteries and 30 veins, which are ranked independently by their tortuosity. With our automatic tortuosity analysis method, the tortuosity indices of all the arteries and veins are calculated. The performance of our algorithm is demonstrated using Spearman’s rank correlation with SPSS (SPSS Inc., SPSS Statistics V25, USA) between the automatic results and the clinical annotations of the vascular tortuosity. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. The correlation coefficient of the multiple subdivision-based vascular tortuosity index is also compared with those of the traditional vascular tortuosity introduced by Hart et al. (formula (1)) and the previous established tortuosity index developed by Grisan et al. (formula (2)).
Since the assessment of the whole retinal vascular network tortuosity is important for the clinical need in aiding diagnosis, tortuosity analysis and its prognostic performance evaluation are performed on our own clinical fundus image dataset. With the ground truth of whether the retinal fundus images are tortuous or not defined by the ophthalmologists, all the 104 included fundus image are processed by the aforementioned algorithm, acquiring their global tortuosity indices . To evaluate the prognostic performance of our multiple subdivision-based tortuosity index against the experts’ prediction, the association between and clinical experts’ grading ground truth is established using Spearman's rank correlation with SPSS (SPSS Inc., SPSS Statistics V25, USA), statistical significance was accepted at P ≤ 0.05. An ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis is also performed by using the tortuous/non-tortuous classification as the target ground truth. Thus, the ROC curve can be built from the reciprocal relation between sensitivity and specificity calculated for all the possible threshold values for the calculated tortuosity index 38 The ROC analysis is also conducted in SPSS (SPSS Inc., SPSS Statistics V25, USA).
Results
Validation results
Table 1 shows the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients results from the correlation of our tortuosity index with the clinician’s grading for the 30 arteries and 30 veins in the RET-TORT. The correlation coefficients for tortuosity indices and are also shown in Table 1 for comparison. 25 Our multiple subdivision-based tortuosity index has achieved a high correlation coefficients of 0.931 for arteries and 0.925 for veins in the RET-TORT, indicating better while balanced correlation with experts’ evaluation in vascular tortuosity. Though our correlation coefficient for arteries is a little bit lower than , we have much better correlation results for the veins.
Table 1.
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients of the tortuosity indices ( ) with the clinical grading for the RET-TORT dataset.
Representative vessels extracted from retinal fundus images (Figure 3, left column) and vascular tortuosity analysis results are shown in Figure 3, demonstrating the correspondence of the vessel morphology to the newly defined vascular tortuosity index. As the results show, the larger degree of the vascular curving and the more local turns and twists, the higher the tortuosity index .
Figure 3.
Vascular tortuosity index of representative vessels extracted from fundus images. The extracted fundus images of vessels are shown in the left column, the corresponding binarized single vessel segments are shown in the middle column. The tortuosity indices of the single vessels are displayed in the right column. Scale bar: . (A color version of this figure is available in the online journal.)
Full fundus image analysis results
Figure 4 shows the global tortuosity analysis results of three representative fundus images. The original fundus images are shown in the left column, and the corresponding segmented vessel network are shown in the middle column. The global tortuosity indices of the images are displayed in the right column. For fundus image with obvious tortuous vascular network, the global vascular tortuosity index is much larger.
Figure 4.
Global vascular tortuosity index of representative fundus images. The original fundus images are shown in the left column, the corresponding segmented vessel network is shown in the middle column. The acquired global tortuosity indices of the images are displayed in the right column. (A color version of this figure is available in the online journal.)
The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the global tortuosity indices and clinical experts’ grading ground truth reaches 0.82. Figure 5 shows the ROC curve of the global tortuosity index for the vascular network tortuosity classification against the ground truth defined by experts’ prediction. The prognostic performance accuracy of our multiple subdivision-based global tortuosity index evaluated by calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.968, indicating a high prognostic performance.
Figure 5.

Prognostic performance demonstrated by ROC curve of the global tortuosity index for the vascular network tortuosity classification against the ground truth defined by experts’ prediction. AUC: the area under the ROC curve. (A color version of this figure is available in the online journal.)
Discussion
In this study, we reported a multiple subdivision-based algorithm for the vascular tortuosity analysis of retinal fundus images. Our algorithm showed good correlation (0.931 for arteries and 0.925 for veins) with experts’ grading of vascular tortuosity in extracted retinal vessels. The prognostic performance of the algorithm against experts’ prediction in evaluating vascular tortuosity of full retinal fundus images achieved a high AUC of 0.968.
Compared with the pre-published retinal vascular tortuosity methods either considering single vessel segment as a whole or dividing into fixed sub-segments, we introduced for the first time the concept of multiple subdivision into vascular tortuosity analysis by splitting vessel segment with continuous changing chord length into overlapping sub-segments, being more in line with human assessment considering not only global but also focusing on local vascular features within various vision field scale. Moreover, a learning curve function of the inflection point numbers of the vessel segment curvature sign was also incorporated mimicking the visual perception of fast vascular tortuosity increase with the number of local turns but trend to reach a rooftop in the end. Although the correlation coefficient with the clinician’s grading of our algorithm in the arteries tortuosity analysis is slightly lower than Grisan et al. (0.931 for τ and 0.949 for ), we have a much better correlation coefficient in the evaluation of the veins (0.925 for τ and 0.853 for ), achieving the highest averaging correlation coefficient in processing the same dataset compared with the pre-published methods described in Table 1 in Grisan et al. 25 In the prognostic performance evaluation against experts’ evaluation on the vascular tortuosity of full retinal fundus images taken from diabetic patients, our algorithm also showed a higher AUC (0.968) compared with the methods developed by Hart et al. (0.66), 17 Trucco et al. (0.65), 19 Grisan et al. (0.80), 25 and Onkaew et al. (0.72) 26 as demonstrated in Figure 4 in Ramos et al. 27 While our algorithm is proposed for the vascular tortuosity analysis of retinal fundus images, it can also be applied to OCTA images if the vascular network segmented properly. Nevertheless, the main challenge would remain on the proper vessel segmentation since OCTA images contains massive and dense capillaries. 37
Conclusions
In conclusion, our multiple subdivision-based algorithm has achieved a good performance in evaluating the vascular tortuosity of retinal fundus images. Since previous studies have shown differences in the degree of twisting between arteries and veins,39,40 future work focusing on the measurement of vascular tortuosity on the basis of retinal arterial and venous classification would provide richer information for the evaluation of retinal fundus images.
Footnotes
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS: Conceptualization, GW, PX, and JY; Investigation and Data Collection, ML, ZL and ZD; Methodology, GW, KM and PX; Software, GW; Writing - original draft, GW, PX; Writing—review and editing, GW, ML, ZD, KM, PX and JY; Supervision, PX and JY.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
FUNDING: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the grant from the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2019B010152001) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870633, 81901788).
DATA AVAILABILITY: The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the first author upon request.
ORCID iDs: Gengyuan Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7416-3975
Meng Li https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-8713
Zhaoqiang Yun https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6367-4403
Peng Xiao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2860-0249
References
- 1.Taylor HR, Keeffe JE. World blindness: a 21st century perspective. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85:261–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nagiel A, Sadda SVR, Sarraf D. A promising future for optical coherence tomography angiography. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133:629–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stanton AV, Wasan B, Cerutti A, Ford S, Marsh R, Sever PP, Hughes AD. Vascular network changes in the retina with age and hypertension. J Hypertens 1995; 13:1724–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Koreen S, Gelman R, Martinez-Perez ME, Jiang L, Berrocal AM, Hess DJ, ChiangM F. Evaluation of a computer-based system for plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology 2007; 114:e59–e67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cheung CY, Tay WT, Ikram MK, Ikram MK, Ong YT, De Silva DA, Chow KY, Wong TY. Retinal microvascular changes and risk of stroke: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Stroke 2013; 44:2402–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nguyen TT, Wang JJ, Wong TY. Retinal vascular changes in pre-diabetes and prehypertension: new findings and their research and clinical implications. Diabetes Care 2007; 30:2708–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Heitmar R, Lip GYH, Ryder RE, Blann AD. Retinal vessel diameters and reactivity in diabetes mellitus and/or cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2017; 16:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Benitez-Aguirre P, Craig ME, Sasongko MB, Jenkins AJ, Wong TY, Wang JJ, Donaghue KC. Retinal vascular geometry predicts incident retinopathy in young people with type 1 diabetes: a prospective cohort study from adolescence. Diabetes Care 2011; 34:1622–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Crosby-Nwaobi R, Heng LZ, Sivaprasad S. Retinal vascular calibre, geometry and progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmologica 2012; 228:84–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Capowski JJ, Kylstra JA, Freedman SF. A numeric index based on spatial frequency for the tortuosity of retinal vessels and its application to plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity. Retina 1995; 15:490–500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wallace DK. Computer-assisted quantification of vascular tortuosity in retinopathy of prematurity (an american ophthalmological society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2007; 105:594–615 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bullitt E, Gerig G, Pizer SM, Lin W, Aylward SR. Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003; 22:1163–71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hart WE, Goldbaum M, Côté B, Kube P, Nelson MR. Measurement and classification of retinal vascular tortuosity. Int J Med Inform 1999; 53:239–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sasongko MB, Wong TY, Nguyen TT, Cheung CY, Shaw JE, Wang JJ. Retinal vascular tortuosity in persons with diabetes and diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia 2011; 54:2409–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Martinez-Perez ME, Highes AD, Stanton AV, Thorn SA, Chapman N, Bharath AA, Parker KH. Retinal vascular tree morphology: a semi-automatic quantification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002; 49:912–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goh KG, Hsu WL, Lee M, Wang H. ADRIS: an automatic diabetic retinal image screening system. Stud Fuzziness Soft Comput 2001; 60:181–210 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hart WE, Goldbaum M, Cote B, Kube P, Nelson MR. Automated measurement of retinal vascular tortuosity. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997;459–63 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bhuiyan A, Nath B, Ramamohanarao K, Kawasaki R, Wong TY. Automated analysis of retinal vascular tortuosity on color retinal images. J Med Syst 2012; 36:689–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Trucco E, Azegrouz H, Dhillon B. Modeling the tortuosity of retinal vessels: does caliber play a role? IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010; 57:2239–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hughes AD, Martinez-Perez E, Jabbar AS, Hassan A, Witt NW, Mistry PD, Chapman N, Stanton AV, Beevers G, Pedrinelli R, Parker KH, Thom SA. Quantification of topological changes in retinal vascular architecture in essential and malignant hypertension. J Hypertens 2006; 24:889–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ikram MK, Cheung CY, Lorenzi M, Klein R, Jones TLZ, Wong TYA. Retinal vascular caliber as a biomarker for diabetes microvascular complications. Diabetes Care 2013; 36:750–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Han H. Twisted blood vessels: symptoms, etiology and biomechanical mechanisms. J Vasc Res 2012; 49:185–97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Annunziata R, Kheirkhah A, Aggarwal S, Hamrah P, Trucco E. A fully automated tortuosity quantification system with application to corneal nerve fibres in confocal microscopy images. Med Image Anal 2016; 32:216–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lisowska A, Annunziata R, Loh GK, Karl D, Trucco E. An experimental assessment of five indices of retinal vessel tortuosity with the RET-TORT public dataset. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2014:5414–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grisan E, Foracchia M, Ruggeri A. A novel method for the automatic grading of retinal vessel tortuosity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008; 27:310–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Onkaew D, Turior R, Uyyanonvara B, Akinori N, Sinthanayothin C. Automatic retinal vessel tortuosity measurement using curvature of improved chain code. In: International conference on electrical, control and computer engineering, Kuantan Malaysia, 21--22 June 2011, pp.183--6. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/INECCE.2011.5953872
- 27. Ramos L, Novo J, Rouco J, Romeo S, Álvarez MD, Ortega M. Retinal vascular tortuosity assessment: inter-intra expert analysis and correlation with computational measurements. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dougherty G, Johnson MJ, Wiers MD. Measurement of retinal vascular tortuosity and its application to retinal pathologies. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010; 48:87–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cheung CY, Sabanayagam C, Law AK, Kumari N, Ting DSW, Tan G, Wong TY. Retinal vascular geometry and 6 year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia 2017; 60:1770–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jiang Y, Wang F, Gao J, Cao S. Multi-path recurrent U-Net segmentation of retinal fundus image. Appl Sci 2020; 10:3777 [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang TY, Suen CY. A fast parallel algorithm for thinning digital patterns. Commun ACM 1984; 27:236–9 [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ghanaei Z, Pourreza H, Banaee T. Automatic graph-based method for classification of retinal vascular bifurcations and crossovers. In: 6th international conference on computer and knowledge engineering, Mashhad Iran, 20--21 October 2016, pp.229--34. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICCKE.2016.7802145
- 33.Steacy SJ, Sammis CG. An automaton for fractal patterns of fragmentation. Nature 1991; 353:250–2 [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gadde SGK, Anegondi N, Bhanushali D, Chidambara L, Yadav NK, Khurana A, Roy AS. Quantification of vessel density in retinal optical coherence tomography angiography images using local fractal dimension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57:246–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bull SB, Mak C, Greenwood CMT. A modified score function estimator for multinomial logistic regression in small samples. Comput Stat Data An 2002; 39:57–74 [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kyurkchiev N, Markov S. On the Hausdorff distance between the heaviside step function and Verhulst logistic function. J Math Chem 2016; 54:109–19 [Google Scholar]
- 37.Khansari MM, O’Neill W, Lim J, Shahidi M. Method for quantitative assessment of retinal vessel tortuosity in optical coherence tomography angiography applied to sickle cell retinopathy. Biomed Opt Express 2017; 8:3796–806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 2006; 27:861–74 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Campbell JP, Ataer-Cansizoglu E, Bolon-Canedo V, Bozkurt A, Erdogmus D, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Chiang MF. Expert diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity from computer-based image analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016; 134:651–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gelman R, Martinez-Perez ME, Vanderveen DK, Moskowitz A, Fulton AB. Diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity using retinal image multiscale analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46:4734–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




