Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Jan 8;13(1):123. doi: 10.1016/j.acvdsp.2020.10.257

Pulmonary Embolism in Covid-19 patients: A French Multicentre Cohort Study

C Fauvel 1,, O Weizman 2,3, A Trimaille 4, D Mika 5, N Pace 2, A Douair 6, E Barbin 7, A Fraix 2, O Bouchot 6, O Benmansour 7, G Godeau 8, Y Mecheri 7, R Le Bourdon 9, C Yvorel 10, B Duceau 3, W Sutter 3, V Waldmann 3,11, G Bonnet 3,11, A Cohen 12, T Pezel 13
PMCID: PMC8719940

Abstract

Background

While pulmonary embolism (PE) appears to be a major issue in Covid-19, data remain sparse.

Purpose

We aimed to describe the risk factors and baseline characteristics of patients with PE in a large cohort of Covid-19 patients.

Methods

In a retrospective multicentric observational study, we included consecutive hospitalised patients for Covid-19. Patients without computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)-proven PE diagnosis, those who were directly admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), and those still hospitalised without PE experience were excluded.

Results

Among 1240 patients (58.1% men, mean age 64 ± 17 years), 103 (8.3%) patients had PE confirmed by CTPA. The ICU transfer requirement and mechanical ventilation requirement were significantly higher in the PE group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). In an univariable analysis, traditional venous thromboembolic risk factors were not associated with PE (P > 0.05), while patients under therapeutic-dose anticoagulation before hospitalisation or prophylaxis-dose anticoagulation introduced during hospitalisation had lower PE occurrence (OR 0.40, 95%CI(0.14-0.91); P = 0.04 and OR 0.11, 95%CI(0.06-0.18); P < 0.001, respectively). In a multivariable analysis, the following variables (also statistically significant in univariable analysis) were associated with PE: male gender (OR 1.03, 95%CI(1.003-1.069); P = 0.04), anticoagulation with prophylaxis-dose (OR 0.83, 95%CI(0.79-0.85), P < 0.001) or therapeutic-dose (OR 0.87, 95%CI(0.82-0.92), P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (OR 1.03, 95%CI(1.01-1.04), P = 0.001) and time from symptom onset to hospitalisation (OR 1.02, 95%CI(1.006-1.038), P = 0.002) (Table 1).

Conclusion

Pulmonary embolism risk factors in Covid-19 context do not include traditional thromboembolic risk factors but rather independent clinical and biological findings at admission, including a major contribution to inflammation.


Table 1.

Multivariable analysis for prediction of PE occurrence.

Odds Ratio 95 %CI P value
Male 1.03 1.003-1.069 0.04
Age 1.00 1.00-1.00 0.52
Smoking 0.96 0.91-1.00 0.08
Malignancy 0.98 0.93-1.03 0.46
Venous thromboembolic disease 1.03 0.96-1.09 0.43
Time from illness onset to hospitalisation, days 1.02 1.006-1.038 0.002
C-reactive protein 1.03 1.01-1.04 0.001
Anticoagulation prophylaxis-dose 0.83 0.79-0.85 < 0.001
Anticoagulation therapeutic-dose 0.87 0.82-0.92 < 0.001

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.


Articles from Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases. Supplements are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES