Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 1;15:1312. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1312

Table 1. Clinical and genomic characteristics of patients’ treatment based on MTB discussion.

Patient Diagnosis Genomic alteration MTB recommendation PFS (months) Best response
1 NSCLC EGFR K745-E746ins Afatinib 29.25 SD
2 NSCLC GNAS p.Q227L Trametinib 10.75 PD
3 CRC ERBB2 Trastuzumab/pertuzumab 1.58 PD
4 NSCLC ALK Alectinib 38.08 PR
5 Pancreatic adenocarcinoma ATM Olaparib 9.67 PR
6 Urothelial STK11 Everolimus 1.55 PD
7 CRC BRCA1 Olaparib Never done PR
8 Ductal carcinoma (breast) ERBB2 Trastuzumab Pertuzumab 13.58 PD
9 CUP KIT Avapritinib 17.00 PD
10 NSLC EGFR Osimertinib 37.75 PR
11 mCRPC AR amplification Abiraterone Never done PR
12 NSCLC ALK fusion Lorlatinib 23.83 PD
13 CUP ERBB2 Trastuzumab/pertuzumab 15.25 PD
14 Ductal carcinoma (breast) FGF19 amplification Infigratinib Never done SD
15 Bone sarcoma FGFR1 amplification Pazopanib 7.42 SD
16 Cholangiocarcinoma IDH1 Ivosidenib Never done SD
Median PFS: 15.25 months

NSCLC, Non-small cell lung carcinoma; CRC, Colorectal carcinoma; CUP, Carcinoma of unknown primary; mCRPC, Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer; SD, Stable disease; PD, Progressive disease; PR, Partial response; PFS, Progression-free survival; AR, androgen receptor.