Skip to main content
International Breastfeeding Journal logoLink to International Breastfeeding Journal
. 2022 Jan 3;17:2. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00444-7

Skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding practices in Nigeria: a study of socioeconomic inequalities

Michael Ekholuenetale 1, Amadou Barrow 2,, Amit Arora 3,4,5,6,7
PMCID: PMC8725355  PMID: 34980169

Abstract

Background

The effects of breastfeeding practices on children’s health are undoubtedly of great interest. However, inequalities in breastfeeding practices and mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact (SSC) exist in many resource-constrained settings. This study examined the regional prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC in Nigeria.

Methods

Data on 2936 infants under six months were extracted from the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) to determine EBF. In addition, data on 21,569 children were analysed for early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC. Concentration index and curves were used to measure socioeconomic inequalities in EBF, early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC.

Results

The prevalence of EBF, early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC were 31.8, 44.2 and 12.1% respectively. Furthermore, Ogun state had the highest prevalence of EBF (71.4%); while Bayelsa state had the highest prevalence of SSC (67.8%) and early initiation of breastfeeding (96.2%) respectively. Urban dwellers had higher prevalence of EBF, SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding across household wealth quintile and by levels of mothers’ education in contrast to their rural counterparts. We quantified inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF, and SSC according to household wealth and maternal education. The study outcomes had greater coverage in higher household wealth, in contrast to the lower household wealth groups; early initiation of breastfeeding (concentration index = 0.103; p = 0.002), EBF (concentration index = 0.118; p < 0.001), and SSC (concentration index = 0.152; p < 0.001) respectively. Furthermore, early initiation of breastfeeding (concentration index = 0.091; p < 0.001), EBF (concentration index = 0.157; p < 0.001) and SSC (concentration index = 0.156; p < 0.001) had greater coverage among mothers with higher educational attainment.

Conclusion

Low prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF and SSC were identified. We recommend that health promotion programs targeted and co-designed with disadvantaged mothers are critical to meet global breastfeeding targets. Also, future researchers should conduct further studies especially clinical control trials and qualitative studies to unravel the possible reasons for differences in the indicators.

Keywords: Breastfeeding, Early initiation of breastfeeding, Infant feeding, Skin-to-skin contact (SSC), Socioeconomic inequalities

Background

Optimal breastfeeding practices have large recognition for health benefits [1, 2]. World Health Organization (WHO) recommends early initiation of breastfeeding for newborn within the first hour of birth [3]. This is also referred to as timely breastfeeding. It is recommended that infants be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life [2]. On the other hand, exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is the practice whereby an infant receives only breast milk for the first six months, with no other liquids or solid food, except oral rehydration solutions, drops and syrups [3, 4].

Early initiation of breastfeeding is associated with mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact (SSC), which reduces the risk of hypothermia [5], and strengthens maternal bonding with the infant [6]. The findings from a previous intervention study led to the development of guidelines that allowed early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC be included in the policy of newborn care [7]. In recent years, efforts have been made to improve newborn and infant feeding practices, including International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes [8], Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) [3] and Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) [9]. WHO has provided a set of indicators to evaluate infant and young child feeding and determine the progress of breastfeeding advancement efforts. As a result, there has been an increased attention on infant and young child feeding pattern to ascertain optimal breastfeeding practices [2].

The WHO defined SSC as when a newborn is placed on the mother’s abdomen or chest in direct ventral-to-ventral skin-to-skin contact [10]. Early SSC is defined as beginning from any time after delivery to 23 h after birth and should be uninterrupted for at least 60 min [10]. SSC improves the newborn’s maintenance of blood glucose levels, temperature regulation and metabolic adaptation [11]. At birth, the newborn has a reduced capacity to generate heat due to metabolic activities. It is against this backdrop that maintenance of temperature is required for newborn at delivery. During SSC, there is a transfer of heat from the mother to her child, wherewith the mother’s body temperature activates the child’s sensory nerves, which in turn results in the child’s relaxation and reduces the tone of the sympathetic nerves [11].

Approximately 37% of children under six months are exclusively breastfed in resource-constrained settings [12]. Sub-optimal breastfeeding has been reported to be responsible for 1.4 million childhood deaths and about 10% of total disease burden among under 5 children [13]. Optimal breastfeeding practices are crucial in improving the health of children, and are associated with reduction in the risk of childhood morbidity and mortality [3, 14]. Early initiation of breastfeeding can reduce neonatal mortality [15]. Albeit, the prevalence of early initiation of breastfeeding is only about 50% in many resource-constrained settings [15]. The guideline for breastfeeding practices include the initiation of breastfeeding for all newborns within the first hour of life, while EBF is practiced for infants less than 6 months [2, 16]. Interestingly, SSC plays a mediating role in early initiation of breastfeeding [5].

High prevalence of hypothermia is recorded in settings with large number of newborn deaths, where hypothermia has become a major concern to improve the survival of newborn [17]. There is need for thermal care as newborns are commonly susceptible to hypothermia without prejudice to tropical climates. Newborns have thin skin, a large body surface area, little insulating fat and easily overwhelmed thermoregulatory mechanisms [18]. In the absence of thermal protection, newborns are unable to maintain body temperature, while preterm babies become most-at-risk of the adverse effects [19]. Several estimates of hypothermia in African settings are limited to hospital studies and ranged between 44 and 85% [20]. Besides the benefits to the newborn, SSC has been linked with many benefits for mothers. For instance, secretion of oxytocin in mothers who practice SSC strengthens uterine contractions, which aids the placenta to separate and the duration of the third stage of labour is shortened [21]. As a simple and cost-effective mechanism, SSC is recommended to improve post-delivery care and potentially save the lives of newborns and mothers [22]. Though WHO recommends SSC, the separation of mothers and newborns exists in many health facilities where newborns are often placed under warmers or in cots [23].

Evidence-based studies have reported that EBF and early initiation of breastfeeding are associated with large gains and improve childhood survival, as well as support the recommendations to start breastfeeding immediately after childbirth [24]. Despite the numerous advantages of optimal breastfeeding practices [25], the rates of EBF and early initiation of breastfeeding in several resource-constrained settings remains worrisome. Using nationally representative data, previous studies reported a low EBF prevalence of 16.4% [4], while another study reported EBF prevalence of 14% and early initiation of breastfeeding prevalence of 38% [26] and 34.7% [27] respectively. Moreover, only 10% of newborns in Nigeria received SSC [28]. These reports are worrisome and an urgent call to improve infant health care is required.

Breastfeeding practices and SSC benefit newborns in many ways, by providing warmth and nutrients to facilitate growth and enhance immunity [5, 29]. Understanding the patterns of breastfeeding practices is essential to prioritise filling the knowledge gaps for childhood survival [30]. Nonetheless, there are disparities in the coverage of infant feeding practices across geographical regions, household wealth status and parental educational level. Studies have reported that women from higher family income households, those with higher levels of education or those with partners having higher education or executive occupations were more likely to have optimal breastfeeding practices, when compared with those from low family income households, with no formal education, those whose partners have no formal education or unemployed respectively [26, 31]. Women with no formal education or low household wealth index have poor breastfeeding indicators, when compared to women with some level of education [32, 33]. Similarly, a previous study reported disparities in early initiation of breastfeeding across geographical regions in Nigeria, as North-Central region had the highest early initiation of breastfeeding rates [34] compared to other regions. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study in Nigeria that has examined regional prevalence or wealth-related and education inequalities in EBF, early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC using socioeconomic analytical tools. In light of the above, this study aims to examine the regional prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF, and SSC in Nigeria.

Methods

Data sources

We analysed a cross-sectional data extracted from Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) 2018. MEASURE DHS provided technical input in the process of data collection and is supported by the National Population Commission (NPC). NDHS is a vital source of data on EBF, early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC especially as it consists of a nationally representative sample of households. Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data was collected through a stratified multistage cluster sampling technique. The procedure for stratification approach divides the population into groups by geographical region and commonly crossed by place of residence – urban versus rural. A multi-level stratification approach was used to divide the population into first-level strata and then subdivide the first-level strata into second-level strata, and so on. A two-level stratification in DHS is region and urban/rural stratification. DHS data is available in the public domain and accessed upon approval from DHS. The details of DHS data has been reported in a previous study [35]. Data on 2936 children under six months was extracted for the EBF analysis. In addition, data on 21,569 children was analysed for early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC respectively.

Response rate

NDHS 2018 selected a total of 41,668 households for the sample, of which 40,666 were occupied. Of the occupied households, 40,427 were successfully interviewed, yielding a response rate of 99%. In the households interviewed, 42,121 women aged 15–49 were identified for individual interviews. Interviews were completed with 41,821 women, yielding a response rate of 99% [36].

Selection and measurement of variables

Outcomes

  1. Early initiation of breastfeeding: In this study, early initiation of breastfeeding was defined as children who were put to breast within 1 h of birth. We coded as “1” if a child was put to breast early and “0” if a child was put to breast after 1 h of birth.

  2. Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF): We defined EBF as infants aged 0–6 months who were fed exclusively with breast milk. We coded as “1” if a child was exclusively breastfed and “0” if otherwise.

  3. Skin-to-skin contact (SSC): We defined SSC as when a child was put on mother’s chest and bare skin immediately after birth. We coded as “1” if a child had SSC and “0” if otherwise.

Explanatory factors

Women’s educational attainment was categorised as: no formal education, primary school, secondary school, and higher education.

Household wealth quintile was computed by DHS using principal components analysis (PCA) to assign the wealth indicator weights. In their computation, they assigned scores and standardised the wealth indicator variable using household assets including; wall, floor, roof and wall type; whether a household had improved versus unimproved sanitation amenities and water source; whether a household had essential assets such as electricity, radio, television, cooking fuel, refrigerator, furniture amongst others. Furthermore, the factor loadings and z-scores were calculated. For each household, they multiplied the indicator values by factor loadings and summed to produce the household’s wealth index value. The standardised z-score was disentangled to classify the overall scores to wealth quintiles; poorest, poorer, middle, richer and richest [37]. Household wealth quintiles and mothers’ educational attainment were used as measures of socioeconomic status similar to previous studies [38].

Residential status was classified as urban versus rural.

Geographical region and states were measured as:

  • North Central: Benue, Federal Capital Territory, Kogi, Kwara, Nasarawa, Niger, Plateau;

  • North East: Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Taraba, Yobe; North West: Jigawa, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Sokoto,Zamfara;

  • South East: Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, Imo

  • South South: Akwa-Ibom, Bayelsa, Cross River, Edo, Delta, Rivers;

  • South West: Ekiti, Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Osun, Oyo.

Ethical consideration

This study was based on an analysis of population-based data that exist in public domain and available online with all identifier information removed. The authors were granted access to use the data by MEASURE DHS/ICF International. DHS Program is consistent with the standards for ensuring the protection of respondents’ privacy. ICF International ensures that the survey complies with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulations for the respect of human subjects. The DHS project sought and obtained the required ethical approval from the National Health Research Ethics Committee (NHREC) in Nigeria before the surveys were conducted. No further consent was required for this study.

Statistical analysis

Stata Version 14 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) was used for data analysis. Stata survey module (‘svy’) was used with adjustment for the sample design. Percentage and Chi-square tests were used for summary statistics and bivariate analysis respectively. To determine socioeconomic inequalities in EBF, early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC, we used concentration index and present it graphically with the concentration curve. When the concentration index value is positive or the curve lies below the diagonal line (line of equality), it indicates that EBF, early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC coverage is greater among high socioeconomic groups. Conversely, when concentration index value is negative or the curve is above the line of equality, it indicates that EBF, early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC coverage is higher among low socioeconomic groups. The concentration index was used to decipher socioeconomic inequalities using Erreygers adjustment. The statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05.

Results

We estimated the prevalence of EBF (31.8%), early initiation of breastfeeding (44.2%) and SSC (12.1%) respectively.

Table 1 shows that Benue (65.3%), Ondo and Osun (66.7%), Ekiti (69.6%), and Ogun (71.4%) had the leading prevalence of EBF respectively. Furthermore, Oyo (45.4%) and Bayelsa (67.8%) reported the highest prevalence of SSC in Nigeria. In addition, Niger (74.9%), Kogi (78.4%), Ogun (78.6%) and Bayelsa (96.2%) reported the highest prevalence of early initiation of breastfeeding respectively. Similar differences were obtained across geographical zones.

Table 1.

Summary statistics from 36 States + Federal Capital Territory on exclusive breastfeeding, early initiation of breastfeeding and skin-to-skin contact between mother and newborn; NDHS, 2018

State Exclusive breastfeeding Skin-to-skin contact Early initiation of breastfeeding
n % n % n %
North Central
 Benue 72 65.3 599 20.2 591 64.3
 Federal Capital Territory 71 46.5 519 6.7 529 64.7
 Kogi 53 18.9 411 8.0 402 78.4
 Kwara 54 51.9 466 5.2 456 61.6
 Nasarawa 72 48.6 537 13.0 527 23.5
 Niger 120 12.5 786 3.7 754 74.9
 Plateau 63 46.0 521 1.7 515 52.4
 Total estimate 505 39.0 3839 8.4 3774 60.3
P < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001*
North East
 Adamawa 86 16.3 620 32.7 606 20.3
 Bauchi 129 24.8 893 15.1 882 14.0
 Borno 67 7.5 670 6.4 663 51.3
 Gombe 124 30.7 816 22.9 798 20.7
 Taraba 104 30.8 709 2.5 698 11.6
 Yobe 101 40.6 766 9.1 734 51.8
 Total estimate 611 26.5 4474 14.7 4381 27.7
P < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001*
North West
 Jigawa 118 9.3 901 37.6 879 11.3
 Kaduna 147 19.7 895 6.4 866 34.5
 Kano 168 12.5 1247 8.2 1210 40.4
 Katsina 146 25.3 929 17.1 914 39.9
 Kebbi 96 14.6 824 5.5 794 28.2
 Sokoto 104 20.2 703 0.4 672 14.3
 Zamfara 128 39.8 804 2.5 790 52.9
 Total estimate 907 20.3 6303 11.5 6125 32.5
P < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001*
South East
 Abia 55 21.8 386 6.5 387 47.8
 Anambra 93 34.4 536 9.0 537 39.3
 Ebonyi 93 47.3 609 7.6 603
 Enugu 49 24.5 360 2.2 349 47.0
 Imo 52 15.4 438 2.7 422 47.4
 Total estimate 342 31.6 2329 6.0 2298 43.4
P < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001*
South South
 Akwa-Ibom 49 30.6 377 13.8 365 57.3
 Bayelsa 45 35.6 373 67.8 366 96.2
 Cross River 36 41.7 307 11.7 301 65.1
 Edo 45 37.8 306 7.5 297 63.0
 Delta 40 25.0 328 8.5 335 44.8
 Rivers 48 33.3 423 9.5 435 52.6
 Total estimate 263 33.8 2114 20.4 2099 63.0
P < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001*
South West
 Ekiti 46 69.6 353 8.8 345 52.2
 Lagos 59 59.3 555 8.7 577 57.7
 Ogun 42 71.4 364 0.8 359 78.6
 Ondo 54 66.7 400 7.3 391 48.1
 Osun 39 66.7 371 5.7 366 64.5
 Oyo 68 51.5 467 45.4 453 73.3
 Total estimate 308 63.0 2510 13.7 2491 62.3
P < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001*

*Significant at P < 0.05; P value was obtained using Chi-square test

Table 2 presents the percentages of EBF, SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding across household wealth quintile and maternal education. Urban dwellers had higher EBF, SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding across household wealth quintile and levels of mother’s education, in contrast to their rural counterparts. The concentration index quantified the degree of wealth-related and maternal education inequalities in EBF, SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding. Overall, the study outcomes had greater coverage in households with higher wealth, in contrast to households with lower wealth; EBF (concentration index = 0.118; p < 0.001), SSC (concentration index = 0.152; p < 0.001) and early initiation of breastfeeding (concentration index = 0.103; p = 0.002) respectively. Furthermore, EBF had greater coverage among mothers with higher educational attainment, compared with children from mothers with lower educational attainment (concentration index = 0.157; p < 0.001), SSC (concentration index = 0.156; p < 0.001) and early initiation of breastfeeding (concentration index = 0.091; p < 0.001). In addition, the concentration indices between urban and rural residence were compared to determine if there were differences. Based on the results, statistical significance were obtained in EBF, SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding for maternal educational attainment. However, for household wealth, the difference between urban and rural residence was only statistically significant for early initiation of breastfeeding.

Table 2.

Prevalence and concentration index of exclusive breastfeeding, early initiation of breastfeeding and skin-to-skin contact between mother and newborn in Nigeria

Exclusive breastfeeding Skin-to-skin contact Early initiation of breastfeeding
Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total
Household wealth quintile
 Poorest (%) 51.1 24.8 26.6 5.2 8.1 7.9 46.7 31.5 32.8
 Poorer (%) 28.0 23.7 24.3 9.4 10.7 10.5 45.0 38.2 39.2
 Middle (%) 37.4 26.8 30.7 12.5 12.5 12.5 46.5 48.8 47.9
 Richer (%) 37.6 41.7 39.3 15.4 13.4 14.6 49.7 53.5 51.2
 Richest (%) 47.9 34.8 45.0 18.0 17.4 17.9 55.5 55.0 55.4
 Overall (%) 40.4 27.4 31.8 14.5 10.8 12.1 50.3 40.8 44.2
Concentration index 0.061 0.083 0.118 0.125 0.121 0.152 0.042 0.114 0.103
 Standard error 0.021 0.021 0.015 0.015 0.013 0.010 0.006 0.006 0.004
P-valueα 0.004* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001*
Rural-urban comparison
 z-stat 0.73 −0.18 8.55
 Difference in concentration index values 0.022 −0.004 0.073
P-valueβ 0.464 0.855 < 0.001*
Mother’s education
 No formal education (%) 30.7 21.3 22.9 11.6 8.2 8.8 43.7 34.3 35.9
 Primary (%) 32.0 27.0 28.6 12.3 11.4 11.8 50.2 44.5 46.5
 Secondary (%) 45.8 37.2 41.5 14.2 15.6 14.9 51.7 51.7 51.7
 Higher (%) 45.8 52.5 48.1 21.7 17.1 20.4 54.9 51.8 54.0
 Overall (%) 40.4 27.4 31.8 14.5 10.8 12.1 50.3 40.8 44.2
Concentration index 0.086 0.149 0.157 0.109 0.157 0.156 0.037 0.097 0.091
 Standard error 0.021 0.019 0.014 0.015 0.012 0.010 0.006 0.005 0.004
P-valueα < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001*
Rural-urban comparison
 z-stat 2.26 2.46 7.43
 Difference in concentration index values 0.063 0.048 0.060
P-valueβ 0.033* 0.014* < 0.001*

*Significant at p < 0.05; SE standard error; P-valueα and P-valueβ were obtained using Concentration Index for overall inequalities across socioeconomic groups and measuring rural versus urban differences, respectively

Figure 1 (exclusive breastfeeding by household wealth level (a) urban-rural and (b) overall), Fig. 2 (mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact by household wealth level (a) urban-rural and (b) overall) and Fig. 3 (early initiation of breastfeeding by household wealth level (a) urban-rural and (b) overall) show the household wealth inequalities for EBF, SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding. The greater the degree of inequality, the more the curves sag away from the axis of equality. The areas between the curve and the line of inequality were maximal among rural children for EBF, SSC, and early initiation of breastfeeding, indicating that differences in household wealth level were greater. This is in line with the findings of the concentration index model.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Exclusive breastfeeding by household wealth level (a) urban-rural and (b) overall

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact by household wealth level (a) urban-rural and (b) overall

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Early initiation of breastfeeding by household wealth level (a) urban-rural and (b) overall

Figure 4 (exclusive breastfeeding by mothers’ education (a) urban-rural and (b) overall), Fig. 5 (mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact by mothers’ education (a) urban-rural and (b) overall) and Fig. 6 (early initiation of breastfeeding by mothers’ education (a) urban-rural and (b) overall) show mother’s educational attainment inequalities for EBF, SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding. The greater the degree of inequality, the more the curves deviate from the line of equality. As the areas between the curve and the line of disparity were maximal, disparities in mothers’ educational achievement differed among children based on breastfeeding practices and SSC. This clearly showed that those with higher educational attainment had higher EBF, SSC, and early initiation of breastfeeding.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Exclusive breastfeeding by mothers’ education (a) urban-rural and (b) overall

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact by mothers’ education (a) urban-rural and (b) overall

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Early initiation of breastfeeding by mothers’ education (a) urban-rural and (b) overall

Discussion

The findings from this study bring to limelight the prevalence and socioeconomic differences in EBF, early initiation of breastfeeding and SSC which need urgent attention in Nigeria. Ogun state had the highest prevalence of EBF (71.4%); while Bayelsa state had the highest prevalence of SSC (67.8%) and early initiation of breastfeeding (96.2%) respectively. Urban dwellers had higher prevalence of early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF, and SSC across household wealth quintile and by levels of mothers’ education in contrast to their rural counterparts. The study outcomes had greater prevalence in higher household wealth and among mothers with higher educational attainment.

Despite the known benefits of breastfeeding, the findings of this study showed that less than half of women (44.2%) and about one-thirds (31.8%) initiated breastfeeding in the first hour of birth and practiced EBF respectively. However, these data show some improvement over results of previous studies in Nigeria. For example, using the 2003 data, EBF rates of about 16.4% was reported in Nigeria [4], and in another study using 2008 data reported early initiation of breastfeeding rate of 38% and EBF rate of 14% [26]. In the results from 2013 data, the proportion of infants who initiated breastfeeding within the first hour of birth was 34.7% [27]. These rates including the findings of this study highlight significant gaps in achieving the target of 90% of women to exclusively breastfeed their infants in the first 6 months of life - a practice that is associated with 10% reduction of under-5 deaths [39]. The low prevalence among educated women may be attributed to early resumption for those who work in the private sector. Though some governments have approved six months maternity leave for mothers in their employment, however, for mothers in the private sector, they do not have that privilege.

The impact of SSC in providing an appropriate and affordable childhood care is well known. Moreover, it can easily be practiced, even in primary health care centres and has the potential to save newborns’ and mothers’ lives amongst other benefits [5]. Albeit, just over one-tenth of women (12.1%) practiced SSC in Nigeria in the present study. This finding is similar to a previous report of 10% SSC prevalence in Nigeria [28]. The practice of SSC in other African countries varies widely. In Gambia, the prevalence of SSC was reported to be 35.7% [40] whereas SSC is rarely practiced in Tanzania (< 1%) [41], Uganda and Mali (both approximately 2%) [42]. In Ethiopia, approximately 9 to13% mother and newborn SSC were reported in previous studies [43, 44] and the prevalence of SSC in Ghana is reported to be approximately 10% [45]. These results are concerning and highlight the low prevalence of SSC in Sub-Saharan African countries given the benefits of SSC in thermoregulation and prevention of newborn deaths [17].

In a previous study in African countries including Nigeria, it has been reported that maternal beliefs such as vernix caseosa was related to poor maternal behaviours which acts as a significant barrier to practice SSC. Based on the findings, early bathing of the newborn is a common practice in Nigeria due to a deep-rooted belief that delay in bathing the newborn may result in body odour. It is concerning that when asked about keeping the baby warm, respondents across study sites rarely mentioned the recommended thermal care practices (SSC), suggesting that these were not perceived as salient [46]. Such beliefs and norms may be responsible for low prevalence of SSC in the general population.

In this study, there was a social gradient reported in study outcomes. A higher socioeconomic status would help to improve early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF and SSC by enhancing accessibility to health information which could positively influence health care seeking behaviours [47]. In this study, we found that women who had formal education or those in higher household wealth had higher coverage of early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF and SSC. These findings are similar to previous studies which report formal maternal education to significantly improve SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding [7, 32, 33]. A simple and cost effective educational intervention achieved the inclusion of SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding as part of standard maternal health care continuum [7]. In this study, mothers from higher socio-economic class had higher coverage of EBF in contrast to their disadvantaged counterparts. This is in agreement with previous studies which found an association between household wealth, maternal education and breastfeeding, as only one-tenth of mothers who practiced EBF came from poor households and without formal education, in contrast to their counterparts [4, 29, 4850]. It is worth noting women from higher socioeconomic status have higher levels of health literacy and have easier access to resources and act more positively to health promotion messages.

The improvement in breastfeeding practices among educated mothers, indicates the substantial impact of mother’s education on infant health, well-being and development. This is consistent with the findings from previous studies whereby elementary education became the basic threshold needed to gain health information, as well as provided women, specifically the disadvantaged, with self-confidence and the autonomy required to act appropriately. Conversely, women with no formal education are known to have poor knowledge and attitude towards optimal breastfeeding practices. It is recommended frequent contact of women and their partners with healthcare providers may enhance information on optimal breastfeeding practices [51]. Therefore, stakeholders in public health are obliged to design interventions or policies to aid disadvantaged mothers, for example those with poor or no formal education to access health facility for information (for example, during antenatal visit) to promote optimal breastfeeding practices in Nigeria.

Strength and limitation

The present study uses a nationally representative data covering a large sample size from the 2018 NDHS to reach plausible conclusions on breastfeeding practices and SSC. Furthermore, this study has become the foremost to examine socioeconomic inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF and SSC using vital socioeconomic tools. The results from this study fill the knowledge gap for socioeconomic inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF and SSC. Nonetheless, there is a potential for recall bias which could lead to overestimation or underestimation of the outcome variables. Mothers were asked how their child was fed in the preceding 24 h and their responses may not be completely accurate. Furthermore, the definition of EBF was based on a 24-h recall, and the day-to-day variability might lead to recall or measurement bias. In addition, DHS does not collect data on household income or expenditure, which are the traditional indicators to measure wealth status. The assets-based wealth index was used as a proxy indicator for household socioeconomic status which may not be complete accurate representation of socio-economic status.

Conclusion

There was low prevalence in early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF and SSC. Moreover, these practices were influenced by mother’s educational attainment and household wealth quintiles. Notably, women with formal education and those with higher household wealth quintile had higher rates of early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF and SSC compared to their counterparts. There is an urgent need to address socioeconomic inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF and SSC. Health promotion programs targeted and co-designed with disadvantaged mothers in Nigeria are critical to meet global breastfeeding targets. We recommend future researchers to conduct further studies especially clinical control trials and qualitative studies to unravel the possible reasons for regional differences in the indicators (early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF and SSC).

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the MEASURE DHS project for the approval and access to the original data.

Abbreviations

BFHI

Baby friendly hospital initiative

EBF

Exclusive breastfeeding

ICF

Inner city fund

IYCF

Infant and young child feeding

NDHS

Nigeria demographic and health survey

NHREC

National health research ethics committee

NPC

National population commission

PCA

Principal components analysis

SE

Standard error

SSC

Mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact

WHO

World Health Organization

Authors’ contributions

ME and AA contributed to the conceptualization and manuscript preparation, the study design, review of literature and wrote the results. ME, AA and AB conducted data analysis, discussed the findings and critically reviewed the manuscript for its intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

Data for this study were sourced from Demographic and Health surveys (DHS) and available here: http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is a secondary data analysis of the NDHS, which is publicly available, approval was sought from MEASURE DHS/ICF International and permission was granted for this use. The original DHS data were collected in conformity with international and national ethical guidelines. Written consent was obtained from mothers/caregivers and data were recorded anonymously at the time of data collection during the NDHS 2018. More details regarding DHS data and ethical standards are available at: http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Belfort MB, Rifas-Shiman SL, Kleinman KP, Guthrie LB, Bellinger DC, Taveras EM, Gillman MW, Oken E. Infant feeding and childhood cognition at ages 3 and 7 years: effects of breastfeeding duration and exclusivity. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(9):836–844. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization . Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: conclusions of a consensus meeting held 6–8 November 2007 in Washington D.C., USA. Washington, D.C.: World Health Organization (WHO); 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization . Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Agho KE, Dibley MJ, Odiase JI, Ogbonmwan SM. Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Safari K, Saeed AA, Hasan SS, Moghaddam-Banaem L. The effect of mother and newborn early skin-to-skin contact on initiation of breastfeeding, newborn temperature and duration of third stage of labor. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13006-018-0174-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liben ML, Yesuf EM. Determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding in Amibara district, northeastern Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J. 2016;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13006-016-0067-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sanchez-Espino LF, Zuniga-Villanueva G, Ramirez-GarciaLuna JL. An educational intervention to implement skin-to-skin contact and early breastfeeding in a rural hospital in Mexico. Int Breastfeed J. 2019;14(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13006-019-0202-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organization . International code of marketing of breast-milk substitutes. Geneva: Albany, N.Y: World Health Organization ; obtainable from WHO publications centre; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.World Health Organization, UNICEF. Baby-friendly hospital initiative: revised, updated and expanded for integrated care. 2009. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK153471/. Accessed 23 May 2021. [PubMed]
  • 10.Guideline: protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259386/9789241550086-eng.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2021. [PubMed]
  • 11.Jonas W, Wiklund I, Nissen E, Ransjö-Arvidson A-B, Uvnäs-Moberg K. Newborn skin temperature two days postpartum during breastfeeding related to different labour ward practices. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83(1):55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, Murch S, Sankar MJ, Walker N, Rollins NC, Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, de Onis M, Ezzati M, Mathers C, Rivera J, Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet. 2008;371(9608):243–260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61690-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ogbo FA, Nguyen H, Naz S, Agho KE, Page A. The association between infant and young child feeding practices and diarrhoea in Tanzanian children. Trop Med Health. 2018;46(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41182-018-0084-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Takahashi K, Ganchimeg T, Ota E, Vogel JP, Souza JP, Laopaiboon M, Castro CP, Jayaratne K, Ortiz-Panozo E, Lumbiganon P, Mori R. Prevalence of early initiation of breastfeeding and determinants of delayed initiation of breastfeeding: secondary analysis of the WHO global survey. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):44868. doi: 10.1038/srep44868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dickson KE, Simen-Kapeu A, Kinney MV, Huicho L, Vesel L, Lackritz E, de Graft Johnson J, von Xylander S, Rafique N, Sylla M, Mwansambo C, Daelmans B, Lawn JE, Lancet Every Newborn Study Group Every newborn: health-systems bottlenecks and strategies to accelerate scale-up in countries. Lancet. 2014;384(9941):438–454. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60582-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ellis M, Manandhar N, Shakya U, Manandhar DS, Fawdry A, Costello AM. Postnatal hypothermia and cold stress among newborn infants in Nepal monitored by continuous ambulatory recording. Arch Dis Child - Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996;75(1):F42–F45. doi: 10.1136/fn.75.1.F42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kumar V, Shearer JC, Kumar A, Darmstadt GL. Neonatal hypothermia in low resource settings: a review. J Perinatol. 2009;29(6):401–412. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lunze K, Hamer DH. Thermal protection of the newborn in resource-limited environments. J Perinatol. 2012;32(5):317–324. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lunze K, Bloom DE, Jamison DT, Hamer DH. The global burden of neonatal hypothermia: systematic review of a major challenge for newborn survival. BMC Med. 2013;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kiss A, Mikkelsen JD. Oxytocin--anatomy and functional assignments: a minireview. Endocr Regul. 2005;39(3):97–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Boundy EO, Dastjerdi R, Spiegelman D, Fawzi WW, Missmer SA, Lieberman E, et al. Kangaroo mother care and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. Pediatr. 2016;137(1). 10.1542/peds.2015-2238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Ferrarello D, Hatfield L. Barriers to skin-to-skin care during the postpartum stay. MCN Am J Matern Nurs. 2014;39(1):56–61. doi: 10.1097/01.NMC.0000437464.31628.3d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smith ER, Hurt L, Chowdhury R, Sinha B, Fawzi W, Edmond KM, on behalf of the Neovita Study Group Delayed breastfeeding initiation and infant survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leung AKC, Sauve RS. Breast is best for babies. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(7):1010–1019. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ogbo FA, Agho KE, Page A. Determinants of suboptimal breastfeeding practices in Nigeria: evidence from the 2008 demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1595-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Berde AS, Yalcin SS. Determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding in Nigeria: a population-based study using the 2013 demograhic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0818-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Singh K, Khan SM. Carvajal–Aguirre L, Brodish P, Amouzou a, Moran a. the importance of skin–to–skin contact for early initiation of breastfeeding in Nigeria and Bangladesh. J glob Health. 2017;7(2). 10.7189/jogh.07.020505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Bui QT-T, Lee H-Y, Le AT-K, Van Dung D, Vu LT-H. Trends and determinants for early initiation of and exclusive breastfeeding under six months in Vietnam: results from the multiple indicator cluster surveys, 2000–2011. Glob Health Action. 2016;9(1):29433. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.29433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Debes AK, Kohli A, Walker N, Edmond K, Mullany LC. Time to initiation of breastfeeding and neonatal mortality and morbidity: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(S3):S19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu W, Wu JC-L, Chiang T. Variation in the association between socioeconomic status and breastfeeding practices by immigration status in Taiwan: a population based birth cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0732-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Neves PAR, Barros AJD, Gatica-Domínguez G, Vaz JS, Baker P, Lutter CK. Maternal education and equity in breastfeeding: trends and patterns in 81 low- and middle-income countries between 2000 and 2019. Int J Equity Health. 2021;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01357-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ogbo FA, Page A, Agho KE, Claudio F. Determinants of trends in breast-feeding indicators in Nigeria, 1999–2013. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(18):3287–3299. doi: 10.1017/S136898001500052X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Adewuyi EO, Zhao Y, Khanal V, Auta A, Bulndi LB. Rural-urban differences on the rates and factors associated with early initiation of breastfeeding in Nigeria: further analysis of the Nigeria demographic and health survey, 2013. Int Breastfeed J. 2017;12(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13006-017-0141-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Corsi DJ, Neuman M, Finlay JE, Subramanian S. Demographic and health surveys: a profile. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1602–1613. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF. Nigeria demographic and health survey 2018. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland: NPC and ICF; 2019. Available: https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR359/FR359.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2021.
  • 37.Rutstein SO, Staveteig S. DHS methodological reports no. 9. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF International; 2014. Making the demographic and health surveys wealth index comparable. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bado AR, Sathiya SA. Women’s education and health inequalities in under-five mortality in selected sub-Saharan African countries, 1990–2015. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jones G, Steketee RW, Black RE, Bhutta ZA. Morris SS; Bellagio child survival study group. How many child deaths can we prevent this year? Lancet. 2003;362(9377):65–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13811-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ekholuenetale M, Onikan A, Ekholuenetale CE. Prevalence and determinants of mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact in the Gambia: a secondary data analysis. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2020;95(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s42506-020-00050-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Penfold S, Hill Z, Mrisho M, Manzi F, Tanner M, Mshinda H, Schellenberg D, Armstrong Schellenberg JRM. A large cross-sectional community-based study of newborn care practices in southern Tanzania. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Waiswa P, Peterson S, Tomson G, Pariyo GW. Poor newborn care practices - a population based survey in eastern Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Callaghan-Koru JA, Estifanos AS, Sheferaw ED, de Graft-Johnson J, Rosado C, Patton-Molitors R, Worku B, Rawlins B, Baqui A. Practice of skin-to-skin contact, exclusive breastfeeding and other newborn care interventions in Ethiopia following promotion by facility and community health workers: results from a prospective outcome evaluation. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105(12):e568–e576. doi: 10.1111/apa.13597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Callaghan-Koru JA, Seifu A, Tholandi M, de Graft-Johnson J, Daniel E, Rawlins B, Worku B, Baqui AH. Newborn care practices at home and in health facilities in 4 regions of Ethiopia. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13(1):198. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hill Z, Tawiah-Agyemang C, Manu A, Okyere E, Kirkwood BR. Keeping newborns warm: beliefs, practices and potential for behaviour change in rural Ghana. Tropical Med Int Health. 2010;15(10):1118–1124. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02593.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Adejuyigbe EA, Bee MH, Amare Y, Omotara BA, Iganus RB, Manzi F, Shamba DD, Skordis-Worrall J, Odebiyi A, Hill ZE. “Why not bathe the baby today?”: a qualitative study of thermal care beliefs and practices in four African sites. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0470-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dutta MJ. Health information processing from television: the role of health orientation. Health Commun. 2007;21(1):1–9. doi: 10.1080/10410230701283256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Woldeamanuel BT. Trends and factors associated to early initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding and duration of breastfeeding in Ethiopia: evidence from the Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. Int Breastfeed J. 2020;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13006-019-0248-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rahman MA, Khan MN, Akter S, Rahman A, Alam MM, Khan MA, et al. Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding practice in Bangladesh: Evidence from nationally representative survey data. Joe W, editor. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0236080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mgongo M, Mosha MV, Uriyo JG, Msuya SE, Stray-Pedersen B. Prevalence and predictors of exclusive breastfeeding among women in Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania: a population based cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J. 2013;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-8-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ukegbu AU, Ukegbu PO, Onyeonoro UU, Ubajaka CF. Determinants of breastfeeding patterns among mothers in Anambra state, Nigeria. South Afr J Child Health. 2011;5:112–6 Available: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sajchh/article/view/73429. Accessed 23 May 2021. [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data for this study were sourced from Demographic and Health surveys (DHS) and available here: http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.


Articles from International Breastfeeding Journal are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES