Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of a Human Fungal Pathogen Reveals Synteny among Geographically Distinct Species

ABSTRACT

Histoplasma capsulatum, a dimorphic fungal pathogen, is the most common cause of fungal respiratory infections in immunocompetent hosts. Histoplasma is endemic in the Ohio and Mississippi River Valleys in the United States and is also distributed worldwide. Previous studies have revealed at least eight clades, each specific to a geographic location: North American classes 1 and 2 (NAm 1 and NAm 2), Latin American groups A and B (LAm A and LAm B), Eurasian, Netherlands, Australian and African, and an additional distinct lineage (H81) comprised of Panamanian isolates. Previously assembled Histoplasma genomes are highly fragmented, with the highly repetitive G217B (NAm 2) strain, which has been used for most whole-genome-scale transcriptome studies, assembled into over 250 contigs. In this study, we set out to fully assemble the repeat regions and characterize the large-scale genome architecture of Histoplasma species. We resequenced five Histoplasma strains (WU24 [NAm 1], G217B [NAm 2], H88 [African], G186AR [Panama], and G184AR [Panama]) using Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing technology. Here, we report chromosomal-level assemblies for all five strains, which exhibit extensive synteny among the geographically distant Histoplasma isolates. The new assemblies revealed that RYP2, a major regulator of morphology and virulence, is duplicated in G186AR. In addition, we mapped previously generated transcriptome data sets onto the newly assembled chromosomes. Our analyses revealed that the expression of transposons and transposon-embedded genes are upregulated in yeast phase compared to mycelial phase in the G217B and H88 strains. This study provides an important resource for fungal researchers and further highlights the importance of chromosomal-level assemblies in analyzing high-throughput data sets.

INTRODUCTION

Histoplasma and the closely related pathogens Blastomyces, Paracoccidioides, and Coccidioides are thermally dimorphic fungi that cause fungal infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts (1). Histoplasmosis, a systemic infection caused by Histoplasma, is a significant cause of mortality in immunocompromised individuals (2). Although aggressive treatment with antifungals can be successful in clearing the infection, the mortality rate is estimated to be over 50% in some regions of the world (3, 4).

Histoplasma is endemic in the Ohio and Mississippi River Valleys in the United States and is also distributed worldwide, mostly in North America, South America, and Africa. Several Histoplasma genomes are publicly available and have been used for detailed analysis of fungal genetics. Seminal studies by Kasuga et al. classified Histoplasma isolates into at least eight geographically isolated clades: North American classes 1 and 2 (NAm 1 and NAm 2), Latin American groups A and B (LAm A and LAm B), Eurasian, Netherlands, Australian and African, as well as a distinct lineage (H81) comprised of three Panamanian isolates (5, 6). Later, six phylogenetic groups within the Latin American groups were described (7). Further phylogenetic analysis of 30 additional unassembled genomes (10 NAm 1, 11 NAm 2, 4 LAm A, 3 Panama, and 2 Africa) divided Histoplasma species into five genetically distinct lineages, and four of them have been renamed as follows: Histoplasma capsulatum (H81 lineage), Histoplasma mississippiense (NAm 1), Histoplasma ohiense (NAm 2), and Histoplasma suramericanum (LAm A) (8).

Histoplasma exists in a saprophytic hyphal form in the soil and produces asexual spores termed conidia. Once conidia are inhaled by the mammalian host, the fungus transitions into its pathogenic yeast form, which can proliferate within host macrophages and cause disease. We and others have been studying the temperature-regulated gene networks that control cell morphology and virulence in Histoplasma. We have shown that four transcriptional regulators, Ryp1, -2, -3, and -4, are major regulators of cell morphology and virulence gene expression and are required for yeast-phase growth (9–11), while the signaling mucin Msb2 is required for hyphal-phase growth (12). In these studies, we have used a wide variety of high-throughput molecular biology techniques, including transcriptional profiling, chromatin immunoprecipitation-on-chip analyses, forward genetic screens, and mapping genomic modifications, to study the biology of this important fungal pathogen. However, any chromosome-level patterns in these data were obscured due to the fragmented nature of the existing Histoplasma genome assemblies.

Emerging sequencing technology provides complete genome assemblies that can be leveraged in high-throughput analyses. Specifically, long-read sequencing tools such as Oxford Nanopore Technologies have demonstrated significant promise in the field of fungal genomics (13–16). In this study, we resequenced five strains of Histoplasma, G217B, H88, G184AR, G186AR, and WU24, which belong to four distinct populations (5). Using a combination of long-read (Oxford Nanopore [ONT]) and short-read (Illumina) sequencing, we de novo assembled all five genomes to the chromosomal level. Comparison of the assembled genomes unveiled largely syntenic regions of the chromosomes. Further examination of these genomes revealed that a region containing RYP2, a regulator of yeast-phase growth, is duplicated in the Histoplasma G186AR strain. Re-analyses of high-throughput data sets also revealed that the transposon genes, as well as genes embedded in transposon-rich regions, display more abundant transcription in the yeast phase in the G217B and H88 strains. This study highlights that complete genome assemblies allow new insights to be drawn from genomic data sets and will open opportunities for future studies of this organism.

RESULTS

Resequencing of Histoplasma strains reveals chromosomal-level genome assemblies.

Previously assembled Histoplasma genomes are highly fragmented, with the highly repetitive G217B strain having 261 contigs (see Table S1A in the supplemental material). To achieve a full assembly of the repeat regions and characterize the large-scale genome architecture of Histoplasma species, we resequenced five Histoplasma strains (WU24, G217B, H88, G186AR, and G184AR) using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) to assemble complete chromosomes followed by polishing using Illumina short reads (Table S1A and Fig. S1). The five strains are derived from four distinct populations (5), three of which have recently been proposed as distinct species (7, 8). WU24 is from the North American 1 (NAm 1) clade and renamed as Histoplasma mississippiense; G217B is from North American 2 (NAm 2) and renamed as Histoplasma ohiense; G186AR and G184AR are Panamanian from the H81 lineage and are renamed as Histoplasma capsulatum; and H88 is from the African clade (5–8).

TABLE S1

Statistics of Histoplasma genome assemblies. (A) Statistics of previous and current Histoplasma genome assemblies. Completeness of the genome assemblies was assessed using BUSCO version 4.0.4, with dataset eurotiomycetes_odb10 (53). Statistics and percentage of complete BUSCO groups are shown for previously published genomes and the assemblies reported in this study. (B) Statistics of annotation transfer for the new Histoplasma genome assemblies. Not mapped, number of transcripts that either failed to map by BLAT to the new assembly; CDS len, mapped but with a change in coding sequence length; CDS seq, mapped with a change in coding sequence; Exon length, mapped with a change in UTR length; Exon seq, mapped with a change in UTR sequence; Match, mapped with no changes to CDS or UTR. Each transcript is recorded in the leftmost applicable column, such that the sum over each row gives the total previously annotated transcripts for that genome. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB ^{(22.2KB, docx)} .

Copyright © 2022 Voorhies et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S1

Phylogeny of Gcd10p from Histoplasma and related species. The Pfam Gcd10p domain of Gcd10p was identified in each gene set from five Histoplasma strains (HcH88, HcG186AR, Hc184AR, HcG217B, HcWU24), Blastomyces dermatitidis (Bd), Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (Pb), Coccidioides immitis (Ci), and Aspergillus nidulans (An) using HMMSEARCH and aligned with HMMALIGN from HMMER3. FASTTREE2 was used to estimate a phylogeny from the resulting protein multiple alignment. Numbers indicate FASTTREE2 bootstrap estimates. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.02 MB ^{(22.9KB, pdf)} .

Copyright © 2022 Voorhies et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Our results revealed that the genomes of G186AR (31 Mb), G184AR (31 Mb), and WU24 (32 Mb) are significantly smaller than H88 (38 Mb) and G217B (40 Mb), consistent with previously observed coverage differences (8). For two of the Histoplasma strains, WU24 and H88, we achieved complete telomere-to-telomere assemblies; H88 has 6 chromosomes while WU24 has 7 chromosomes (Fig. 1). The nearly complete assemblies have 7 large contigs each, with either 12 (G186AR) or 11 (G217B and G184AR) assembled telomeres. For the G217B and G184AR assemblies, we were able to locate the 45S rDNA repeat arrays near the ends of large contigs, consistent with their subtelomeric positioning in other strains (Fig. 1). These observations are consistent with either 6 or 7 chromosomes for the G217B, G186AR, and G184AR strains.

FIG 1.

Histoplasma genomes are assembled at the chromosomal level. The newly assembled chromosomes of Histoplasma genomes are shown as black horizontal lines. Chromosomes or contigs are plotted largest to smallest. Telomeres are shown with black vertical lines at the end of each chromosome when present. Contigs from the previous assemblies are overlaid using alternating colors. Repeat regions (LTR transposons) are indicated with purple blocks below each chromosome. Genes of interest are displayed above each chromosome.

Next, we mapped existing gene annotations to the new assemblies using BLAT (17). For the G217B, H88, G186AR, and G184AR strains, 88 to 92% of the RNA-Seq based annotations (18)—using the G184AR annotations for both G184AR and G186AR—transferred exactly, and 96% of them transferred with no changes to the coding sequence (Table S1B). For WU24, 77% of the previously available gene predictions transferred exactly and 81% transferred with no changes to the coding sequence. Additionally, the mapping of the mating type locus (MTL) based on the previous MTL characterization (19–22) revealed that G217B and WU24 carry MAT1-1 allele, and thus are “+” mating type isolates, whereas G186AR, G184AR, and H88 carry MAT1-2 allele, and thus are “–” mating type isolates.

Histoplasma genomes have highly variable repetitive regions.

The genomes of Histoplasma and Blastomyces have been observed to contain a substantial, but widely variable, amount of repetitive long terminal repeat (LTR) transposon content (8, 23, 24). We annotated transposons using two complementary approaches: searching for broadly conserved features using LTRHarvest (25) and searching for protein coding regions homologous to the gag and pol open reading frames of a previously annotated Histoplasma LTR transposon using TBLASTN (26). The regions identified by the two methods had extensive overlap and were merged for further analysis. Results of our analysis revealed that the genomes of G217B and H88 are composed of 20% and 16% LTR transposon sequence, respectively, compared to 4 to 6% for the other three genomes (Fig. 1 and Table S2). This difference in repeat content is sufficient to explain nearly all of the size differences among the genomes; after removing transposon sequence, the genomes differ by at most 3 Mb (∼10% of the genome size). Visually, the transposon distribution appeared to be punctate rather than diffuse throughout the genome, which is reminiscent of the transposon distribution in Blastomyces (24). To examine this pattern further in Histoplasma, we joined transposons within 50 kb of each other. This analysis gave only 66 to 128 transposon-rich regions per genome, with the transposon-rich G217B having only 107 regions compared to 128 for the relatively transposon-poor WU24, confirming the punctate distribution of transposons within Histoplasma genomes.

TABLE S2

Analysis of repeat regions in Histoplasma genomes. Transposon statistics for the ONT genome assemblies are shown. Total, total base pairs; Repeat, number of base pairs spanned by union of TBLASTN and LTRHarvest annotations; Annealed, number of base pairs spanned by LTR-rich blocks (c.f. Fig. 3A); T-R, Total-Repeat; T-A, Total-Annealed; R%, Repeat/Total; A%, Annealed/Total; RL, number of repeat annotations (after union); AL, number of LTR-rich blocks; tgenes, number of transposon genes, rgenes, number of transposon-embedded genes; agenes, number of transposon-adjacent genes; %r, rgenes/(total genes); %a, agenes/(total genes). Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB ^{(20.3KB, docx)} .

Copyright © 2022 Voorhies et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Histoplasma strains have highly syntenic chromosomes.

Earlier studies showed that there is variability in chromosome size among Histoplasma strains (27, 28). Our results confirm these early findings and reveal that the repeat content is highly variable among the Histoplasma strains, which contributes to size differences. To investigate whether the gene order is conserved despite the chromosome size differences, we mapped the locations of orthologous genes among the Histoplasma genomes using our previous ortholog mappings for G217B, G186AR, and H88 (18) supplemented with INPARANOID (29) mappings to WU24, and assuming equivalent gene sets for the highly similar G186AR and G184AR strains. This ortholog-based synteny analysis gave results consistent with whole-genome nucleotide alignments using NUCmer from MUMmer 3 (30). Our analyses showed that the genomes of H88, WU24, G217B, and G186AR are highly syntenic, with chromosomes 2, 3, and 5 of H88 essentially being conserved, with a few rearrangements, in the other strains (Fig. 2 and Fig. S4). Additionally, chromosome 4 of H88 is conserved in G186AR and is conserved but fused to different regions in G217B (with content orthologous to H88 chromosome 1) and WU24 (with content orthologous to H88 chromosome 6). Interestingly, G184AR is more dramatically rearranged relative to G186AR, which was isolated from the same Panama population and is highly identical at the nucleotide level (Fig. 2 and Fig. S4).

FIG 2.

The Histoplasma genomes are highly syntenic. Chromosomes are sorted largest to smallest, and regions of synteny are colored according to the WU24 chromosomes in other strains. Purple bars below the chromosomes indicate the repetitive (transposon) regions.

FIG S4

Synteny of the Histoplasma genomes relative to other Histoplasma genomes. Chromosomes are sorted largest to smallest, and genes are colored according to the G217B (panel A), H88 (panel B), G186AR (panel C) and G184AR (panel D) chromosomes in other strains. Purple bars below the chromosomes indicating the repetitive regions. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 1.0 MB ^{(1,011.1KB, pdf)} .

Copyright © 2022 Voorhies et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Moreover, the locations of the transposon-rich regions are not conserved. Instead, the transposons appear to be inserted at idiosyncratic locations in each genome without large disruption of the conserved gene order (Fig. 2, Fig. S4 and S5). Nevertheless, there does appear to be conservation of transposon-adjacent context for some genes. For example, the CBP1 gene, encoding the most studied virulence factor of Histoplasma (31) has a conserved subtelomeric location that is flanked by transposons on the telomere side in WU24, G186AR, and G184AR, flanked on both sides in G217B, and embedded in a transposon-rich region in H88 (Fig. 2 and Fig. S5B). The CBP1 chromosome in WU24, G217B, and H88 also contains RYP4, a regulator of morphology and dimorphism in Histoplasma (9).

FIG S5

Many annotated genes are located in syntenically conserved regions in Histoplasma genomes. (A to D) Syntenic regions are regions with at least five genes orthologous to the WU24 region with no more than 500 kb between orthologous genes. For genomes with broken synteny (syntenic regions on distinct chromosomes or separated by more than 500 kb) the separate syntenic regions are plotted next to each other. Repetitive regions are shown as pink boxes inside the syntenic regions. (A, B) SHO1 and CBP1 are in a syntenically conserved subtelomeric region. (A) SHO1 region of WU24 aligned to syntenic regions of selected genomes. Lines connect complete orthogroups across all genomes. (B) 1 Mb CBP1-containing subtelomeric region of WU24 aligned to syntenic regions of selected genomes. Lines connect complete orthogroups across all genomes. (C) Chromosome 2 of WU24 aligned to selected genomes shows syntenic regions around sulfur assimilation genes. (D) Chromosome 5 of WU24 aligned to selected genomes shows syntenic regions around DRK1 in Onygenales. Download FIG S5, PDF file, 0.3 MB ^{(266KB, pdf)} .

Copyright © 2022 Voorhies et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

An extensive synteny analysis between Histoplasma strains reveals conservation of gene order around many annotated genes (Fig. S5). One of the most striking degrees of synteny can be observed in chromosome 3 of H88, which contains the mating type locus (19, 22) as well as most of the genes for sulfur assimilation; SRE1, a regulator of iron acquisition (32); and RYP3, a regulator of morphology and dimorphism in Histoplasma (11). This chromosome is syntenic along almost its entire length within the Histoplasma strains (Fig. S4B and S5C). In addition, high conservation of the region containing DRK1, a key regulatory gene of dimorphism in Blastomyces and Histoplasma (33), is also remarkable among the Histoplasma strains and the closely related fungal pathogens Blastomyces, Paracoccidioides, and Coccidioides (Fig. S5D).

Synteny analysis reveals duplication of a major regulator of fungal dimorphism.

Our analysis also reveals the duplication of two ∼250-kb regions in G186AR relative to G184AR. G186AR and G184AR are the two Panamanian isolates and have a median identity of 99.95% for all large (≥100 kb) alignable regions. The alignments were explored in more detail with BLASTN (Fig. 3B and C). Mapping of our G186AR Illumina reads to the G184AR assembly confirms ∼2× coverage in these regions (Fig. 3A), as does mapping of previously published G186AR Illumina reads (SRR6243650 [8]). Mapping of our G186AR ONT reads to the G184AR assembly likewise confirms the duplication; the boundaries of the duplicated regions have soft-clipping for about half of the mapped reads, as would be expected if these reads originate from the internal junction of the duplicated region (Fig. 3D and E).

FIG 3.

G186AR strain contains two duplicated regions. (A) Coverage for mapping G186AR Illumina reads onto the current G184AR assembly. (B, C) BLASTN-based dotplots for the duplicated regions. (D, E) Coverage for mapping G184AR and G186AR ONT reads onto the current G184AR assembly.

The first duplication (Fig. 3B) is a direct repeat from ∼16 kb to the left (3′) of RYP2 to ∼8 kb to the left (5′) of VEA1 (such that RYP2 is duplicated but VEA1 is not). RYP2 and VEA1 are both velvet transcription factors with roles in morphology in Histoplasma (11, 34). The duplicated region is not itself repetitive; it contains 110 gene annotations in G184AR (1 gene per 2.4 kb) and no LTR transposons (Fig. 3A).

The second duplication (Fig. 3C) is an inverted repeat. While mostly genic with ∼1 gene per 2.4 kb as for the first region, this second region does contain two sets of LTR transposons in G184AR. This duplicated region contains phospholipase B (PLB1) which was observed to have increased expression in G186AR yeast relative to G217B yeast (35). However, the same study also noted similar increased expression of phospholipase D and OLE1, which are not located in either duplicated region, so it is not clear if the copy number variation is an underlying cause of the expression difference. The yeast-enriched gene TSA1 (GenBank AAK54753), a putative cysteine peroxidase, is also in the duplicated region.

Transcripts embedded in transposon-rich regions are enriched in yeast phase.

Fungal pathogens of plants contain transposon-rich genomic regions that are enriched for virulence factors with increased transcription in the host (36). In contrast, transposon-rich regions were not enriched for differential expression in Blastomyces, a close relative of Histoplasma (24). We performed similar analysis in Histoplasma using the previously published RNA-Seq data sets (18, 35) for four genomes, G217B, H88, G186AR, and G184AR. We classified genes either as “LTR” (transposon), “in” (inside the transposon-rich regions), “near” (within 50 kb of a transposon-rich region), or “other” (the remaining genes) based on their proximity to transposon-rich regions (Fig. 4, Fig. S6 and Data Set S1). In all cases, the expression of transposon-adjacent genes is indistinguishable from transposon-distant genes (Fig. 4). In G217B and H88, genes annotated as transposons have increased expression in yeast compared to hyphae (Fig. 4). Due to the high sequence identity among transposons, we cannot distinguish whether this differential transcription occurs at some or all of the transposon loci. In G217B, the transposon-embedded genes likewise have increased expression in yeast compared to hyphae, significantly distinguishable from the transposon-adjacent and transposon-distant genes (P < 2.2e-16, Wilcoxon test). On closer inspection, this expression is distributed bimodally, with the transposon-embedded genes appearing to have expression ratios drawn either from the transposon or general distributions (Fig. 4). In H88, there is a less pronounced but still significant (P = 4.7e-15, Wilcoxon test) increase in yeast/hyphae expression for transposon-embedded genes. For the Panama strains, G186AR and G184AR, neither the transposons nor the transposon-adjacent genes have expression distributions distinguishable from the remaining genes (Fig. 4).

FIG 4.

Transposon-embedded genes show yeast-phase enriched expression patterns. (A) Schematic of transcript classification by proximity to LTR transposon; viz., “LTR” (orange), transcript overlaps transposon annotation; “in” (blue), transcript is between two transposon annotations within 50 kb of each other; “near” (green), transcript is within 50 kb of a transposon annotation; “other” (yellow), transcript does not fall into any of the previous categories. (B) Violin plots of yeast/hyphae expression ratios from (18) or (35); *, taken from the Kallisto analysis of (12), colored according to the same scheme as panel A. Significant differences by Wilcoxon rank sum test are indicated: **, P < 2.2e-16, *, P = 4.7e-15.

DATA SET S1

Histoplasma orthogroups. A table of orthogroups with one row per orthogroup from the mappings used in the synteny analysis. Columns are as follows: (1, 2) short gene names and descriptions taken from Gilmore et al. with updates from Rodriguez et al.; (3–7) systematic gene names (from the previous Broad annotation for WU24 or the Gilmore et al paired-end assembly for the other genomes); (8–12) repeat classification, as in Fig. 4A.; (13–19) mappings to previous Broad and WUSTL predicted gene sets (_pred) or the Edwards et al transcriptomes assembled from unstranded RnaSeq (_unstranded); and (20–24) locus tags for genes submitted to GenBank. Previous gene sets were mapped to the new assemblies by BLAT and then to the current gene sets based on same-strand overlap. Where two previous genes mapped to the same location due to redundant sequence, the lexically first gene was chosen. One-to-many overlaps between different gene sets were resolved by choosing the gene pair with the greatest in-frame coding sequence overlap. Download Data Set S1, TXT file, 4.1 MB ^{(4.1MB, txt)} .

Copyright © 2022 Voorhies et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S6

Repetitive regions in Histoplasma genomes. G217B (panel A), H88 (panel B), and G186AR (panel C) genome assembly with genes colored to show repeat context: light blue for genes in LTR blocks and green for genes near LTR blocks. Transposon genes are shown in orange above the chromosomes and LTR blocks are shown in dark blue below the chromosomes. Download FIG S6, PDF file, 0.9 MB ^{(926KB, pdf)} .

Copyright © 2022 Voorhies et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DISCUSSION

Advancement of sequencing technology, in particular the long reads produced by PacBio or ONT, has greatly improved our understanding of fungal genomes (13, 14, 37). Among over 1,000 publicly available fungal genomes assemblies, there are currently 137 assemblies that have employed ONT sequencing. The most significant characteristic of these assemblies is that the N₅₀ of Nanopore assemblies is about 1.4 Mb, whereas the N₅₀ of all fungal assemblies is about 140 kb, suggesting at least a 10-fold improvement in the contiguity of the genome sequences by ONT sequencing (Fig. S7).

FIG S7

Oxford Nanopore sequencing results in contiguous fungal genomes. Contig N₅₀ values are plotted for 1,395 fungal genomes compared to 137 fungal genomes assembled by Oxford Nanopore reads. Y-values are kernel density estimations of the distributions. Download FIG S7, PDF file, 0.2 MB ^{(163.7KB, pdf)} .

Copyright © 2022 Voorhies et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Histoplasma strains are important fungal pathogens with clinical significance. The previously available genomes of the most highly studied Histoplasma strains, G217B and G186AR, were highly fragmented. There are a number of analytical techniques (e.g., evolutionary and taxonomic studies, transcriptional profiling, forward and reverse genetics, and mapping chemical DNA modifications and structural genomic changes) that would benefit from fully assembled genomes. Therefore, in this study, we have utilized ONT sequencing to fully assemble Histoplasma genomes.

With additional polishing using short reads from Illumina sequencing, we assembled genomes of five Histoplasma strains (WU24, G217B, G186AR, G184AR, and H88) at the chromosomal level. The sizes of the genomes vary from 31 Mb (G186AR and G184AR) to 40 Mb (G217B). The size differences among the strains were attributable to the amount of repeat content. After accounting for the repeat content, the nonrepeat genome content (∼30 Mb) of Histoplasma is consistent with other Onygenales, such as Paracoccidioides, Blastomyces and Emmonsia (all four within family Ajellomycetaceae) and Coccidioides (within family Onygenaceae) (24, 38–40).

Having nearly complete chromosomes in hand, the first analysis we performed was investigating the synteny among Histoplasma strains, other close relatives (Blastomyces dermatitidis, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and Coccidioides immitis), and a distant relative Aspergillus nidulans. Despite the variability in the repeat content among Histoplasma strains, the four strains WU24, G217B, G186AR, and H88 are highly syntenic, whereas G184AR seems to be the most rearranged strain. This was an unexpected observation, as G186AR and G184AR are both Panamanian strains and are the most similar to each other at the nucleotide level. This indication that geographic location and nucleotide-level resemblance does not correlate with patterns of genomic rearrangement suggests that in some cases, phylogenetic divergence may not be related to large-scale rearrangement. Additional synteny analyses around the previously studied genes (viz., a virulence factor CBP1, sulfur assimilation genes, a regulator of iron acquisition SRE1, and a histidine kinase DRK1) showed a conservation of gene order throughout the Histoplasma strains. Moreover, a region around DRK1 is highly syntenic throughout the Onygenales with substantial conserved gene order even in Aspergillus (Fig. S5D). Chromosome-level assemblies revealed these cases of synteny in addition to larger-scale conserved regions that correspond to chromosomes 2, 3, 4, and 5 in H88.

Another important observation from the synteny analysis between Histoplasma strains was a duplication in G186AR of a region that contains the important developmental regulator RYP2. RYP2 was previously identified as required for yeast phase in a screen in G217B (11) and, in complex with the velvet transcription factor RYP3, directly associates with promoters of yeast-enriched genes (9). The duplicated region also contains HPD1, a yeast-enriched gene (41) which has been shown to have a role in morphology in P. brasiliensis (42) and Talaromyces marneffei (43). Despite the duplication of these regulators in the G186AR strain, the yeast and hyphal transcriptional programs of G186AR (35) are grossly similar to those of G184AR (18), where the region appears to be in single copy. However, a detailed transcriptional analysis of the transition between yeast and hyphae has not been performed in these strains and could uncover kinetic differences that correspond to the duplication of developmental regulators.

One major advantage of having fully assembled genomes is to be able to visualize and analyze whole-genome-level data (e.g., transcriptional profiling) at the chromosomal level. Mapping of existing RNA-Seq data sets for G217B, G186AR, G184AR, and H88 strains revealed that the transposon-adjacent genes are not distinguishable in their expression patterns from the transposon-distant genes. However, the transposon-embedded genes have significantly increased expression in yeast versus hyphae comparisons in two of the large, transposon-enriched Histoplasma genomes; viz., the G217B and H88 strains. While easily missed when analyzing the data relative to the previously available 261 contig G217B assembly, this large-scale pattern of transcriptional regulation is immediately apparent when plotted on the new near-chromosomal assembly. Further studies will reveal the importance of transposon-rich regions in Histoplasma. We predict that the new Histoplasma assemblies will likewise empower analysis of further genome-scale data sets going forward.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sequencing of Histoplasma strains.

Genomic DNA of H. capsulatum G217B, H88, G184AR, G186AR, and WU24 strains was harvested using phenol-chloroform extraction from yeast cultures grown to stationary phase in Histoplasma Macrophage Medium (44) at 37°C with 5% CO₂ and shaking at 150 rpm. High molecular weight (HMW) gDNA was used to construct libraries for Illumina and ONT sequencing.

For G217B, G184AR, and H88, DNA libraries were generated using a sequencing kit SQK-LSK108 and sequenced on the ONT MinION R9.4 Flow Cell (FLO-MIN106). For G217B, 207,770 reads were generated with an N₅₀ of 24.7 kb; for G184AR, 139,371 reads were generated with an N₅₀ of 30.2 kb; and for H88, 119,871 reads were generated with an N₅₀ of 24.7 kb. The raw fast5 files were basecalled using Guppy v3.2.2 (ONT) and the resulting fastq reads were utilized to build the assemblies, following the pipelines most appropriate for each strain. Preliminary genome assemblies were created prior to the release of Guppy v3.2.2 and were built using the reads basecalled with Albacore v2.1.3 (ONT). However, all final assemblies only contain data from Guppy-basecalled reads. Additional libraries were generated with the TruSeq PCR-Free kit and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq, generating paired-end 150-bp reads. Coverage for G217B, G184AR, and H88 was 28×, 16× and 25×, respectively.

For ONT sequencing of G186AR and WU24, libraries were constructed using the ligation sequencing kit (SQK-LSK109) and each library was loaded on a single flowcell (FLO-MIN106D) and run on a GridIon. Basecalling was performed with Guppy using MinKNOW 19.06.8. For WU24, a total of 578,143 reads were generated with an N₅₀ of 29.2 kb and estimated genome coverage of 202×. For G186AR, a total of 6,660,775 reads were generated with an N₅₀ of 4.8 kb and estimated genome coverage of 456×. For Illumina sequencing of G186AR and WU24, 100 ng of genomic DNA was sheared to ∼250 bp using a Covaris LE instrument and prepared for sequencing as previously described (45); libraries were pooled and sequenced on a HiSeq2000 to generate paired 100 base reads, generating 150× coverage for WU24 and 152× coverage for G186AR.

Genome Assemblies.

Several methods of genome assembly were utilized to construct the final sequences (Fig. S2). The appropriate method for each genome was selected using an iterative process during which various assembly and polishing tools designed for error-prone long reads were used in different combinations. The methods reported below reflect those that resulted in the most contiguous final genome assemblies with read coverage across any manually joined contigs. The minimap/miniasm/racon (MMR) assembly protocol referenced below entails the following: ONT reads all-vs-all mapped using minimap2 v2.13-r850 with the parameter -x ava-ont (46). Overlapping regions assembled with miniasm v0.3-r179 (47). ONT reads mapped back onto the overlap assembly using minimap2 -x map-ont. Racon v1.3.1 (48) used to build a consensus assembly from this mapping and the ONT reads.

FIG S2

Fungal genome assembly pipeline. Assembly methods for the five genomes in this study are shown. MMR and Telmore Extension methods are expanded in separate columns. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.2 MB ^{(216.1KB, pdf)} .

Copyright © 2022 Voorhies et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

G217B ONT reads basecalled with Albacore were assembled following the MMR protocol, creating assembly G217B_v1. This assembly was polished using Illumina reads with 15 rounds of Pilon v1.22 (49). Assembly G217B_v2 was created using the Guppy basecalled reads. These were first assembled using Flye v2.3.4 (50), then polished using Illumina reads with 16 rounds of Pilon. Alignment of G217B_v1 and G217B_v2 using NUCmer v3.1 (30) indicated that one more join could be made between two contigs in G217B_v2. Manually stitching this join in G217B_v2 resulted in assembly G217B_v3.

G184AR ONT reads basecalled with Albacore were assembled using wtdbg2 v2.3 and polished with Pilon using Illumina reads to create assembly G184AR_v1. Reads basecalled with Guppy were assembled following the MMR protocol and polished with Pilon using Illumina reads to create assembly G184AR_v2. G184AR_v1 was used to guide contig joins on G184AR_v2, producing assembly G184AR_v3.

H88 ONT reads basecalled with Albacore were assembled using Flye v2.3.4 to construct the genomic DNA sequence H88_v1. The mitochondrial DNA sequence H88_v2 was built from the same reads assembled using wtdbg2 v2.3, then polished with 15 rounds of Pilon using Illumina reads. These two assemblies were combined to form H88_v3. Assembly H88_v4 was created with the Guppy basecalled reads following the MMR protocol, then polished with four rounds of Pilon using the Illumina reads. H88_v3 and H88_v4 were aligned with NUCmer v3.1, which implied one join in H88_v4. This join in H88_v4 was manually assembled to create H88_v5.

Contigs from G217B_v3, G184AR_v3, and H88_v5 were then extended through the telomeres. This was accomplished by using minimap2 to align the ONT reads to the contigs. Reads containing telomeric repeats which extended past the ends of the contigs were extracted, and wtdbg2 (51) was used to assemble the telomeric ends of each chromosome.

G186AR and WU24 ONT reads were assembled into G186AR_v1 and WU24_v1 using Canu (version v1.6 with parameters genomeSize = 30000000 stopOnReadQuality=false correctedErrorRate = 0.075) (52). The resulting assemblies were inspected and refined using alignments of contig ends and spanning reads, and two assemblies, G186AR_v2 and WU24_v2, were generated using Flye (version 2.7b-b1526 with parameter–genome-size = 30000000). These alignments were used to identify and fix misassemblies (including building out the second copies of two large collapsed duplications in G186AR), extend contig ends to telomeric repeats, and make joins between contig ends. The mitochondrial contig in WU24 appears complete based on end overlap, which was trimmed. This refinement produced assemblies G186AR_v3 and WU24_v3.

To produce G217B_final, G184AR_final, H88_final, G186AR_final, and WU24_final, all five preliminary assemblies were polished first with Medaka (version 0.8.1, using only the Nanopore reads) and then the Medaka-polished contigs were polished using Illumina reads aligned with BWA mem and Pilon (version 1.22 and 1.23), with default settings for both Medaka and Pilon. G217B_final, G184AR_final, H88_final, G186AR_final, and WU24_final underwent 6, 5, 6, 3, and 3 rounds of Pilon, respectively.

Assembly quality control.

Mitochondrial DNA contigs in all assemblies were determined to be complete based on end overlap indicating circularity. Genome assembly quality and completeness was assessed using BUSCO version 4.0.4 (53) with data set eurotiomycetes_odb10.

Gene annotation.

Transcript sequences for G217B, H88, and G184AR were taken from Gilmore et al. (18). The G184AR transcripts were used for G186AR as well. Transcript sequences for WU24 were downloaded from the Broad Institute on 6/15/2011 and are available at https://histo.ucsf.edu/downloads/histoplasma_capsulatum_nam1_1_transcripts.fasta.

Transcripts were mapped to the new assemblies using BLAT version 35 invoked as blat -q = dna -t = dna -fine -noTrimA -maxIntron = 10000 -minIdentity = 98, retaining the top scoring hit for each transcript. Genes with CDS corrupted by the BLAT transfer were repaired, where possible, based on TBLASTN of the original protein sequence to the new genome assembly prior to submission to GenBank.

Transposon annotation.

Transposons were identified by mapping the translated open reading frames of a representative full-length MAGGY transposon to each genome assembly using TBLASTN from NCBI BLAST+ 2.6.0 with default parameters. Transposons were additionally identified by LTRharvest from GenomeTools 1.5.9 with default parameters. For the purpose of classifying genes by proximity to transposons, transposon-rich regions were defined as contiguous bases within 50 kb of a TBLASTN or LTRharvest identified transposon.

Synteny analysis.

Genes orthologous among G217B, H88, and G184AR were taken from Gilmore et al. Orthologs between G184AR and G186AR were assigned based on top BLAT hits to the same query sequence, as described above in “Gene annotation.” Orthologs between WU24 and the remaining genomes were assigned by INPARANOID 1.35.

Global synteny patterns were explored by coloring genes according to their chromosome in a reference genome (as in Fig. 2 and Fig. S4) and by ortholog-based dotplots (as in Fig. S3). This method gave comparable results to nucleotide based dotplots generated by NUCmer from MUMmer 3.23.

FIG S3

The Histoplasma genomes are highly syntenic. Dotplots showing genomic coordinates of orthologous genes between WU24 (y axis) and H88 (panel A), G217B (panel B), G186AR (panel C), and G184AR (panel D). Chromosomes are sorted largest to smallest, with purple lines indicating chromosome/contig boundaries. Genes are colored according to WU24 chromosome, as in Fig. 2. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.2 MB ^{(171.7KB, pdf)} .

Copyright © 2022 Voorhies et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Detailed synteny plots for a given ordered set of genomes and a given query region on the first genome (as in Fig. S5) were generated as follows. First, we identified all genes in the query region with an ortholog in all of the remaining genomes. Then, for each genome, we identified all regions with at least 5 such orthologs separated by no more than 500 kb. These regions were then plotted in alternating colors with lines connecting orthologous genes between adjacent genomes. The plotted regions were oriented to minimize crossovers between the ortholog-connecting lines.

Analysis of G186AR duplications.

Two large (∼250 kb) duplications in G186AR were initially observed as mapping artifacts in minimap2 mapping of ONT reads (as minimap2 generates incomplete mappings for reads with multiple high identity matches in the target genome). These duplications were also evident in NUCmer dotplots of G186AR versus G184AR and were explored in detail with BLASTN. Lastly, ∼2× coverage of the unduplicated G184AR regions by G186AR reads were confirmed using BWA MEM 0.7.15 for Illumina reads and minimap2 (git commit d90583b83cd81a) for ONT reads.

Fungal phylogeny analysis.

The Pfam Gcd10p domain of Gcd10p was identified in each gene set using HMMSEARCH and aligned with HMMALIGN from HMMER3. FASTTREE2 was used to estimate a phylogeny from the resulting protein multiple alignment.

Fungal genome query.

Two searches were executed on 19 October 2020 in order to determine the contig N₅₀ for all fungal genomes compared to fungal genomes sequenced using Oxford Nanopore technology. Fungal genome assemblies were queried by searching NCBI genome records with the search term fungi[Organism]. A total of 1,395 related assembly records were extracted from this search. ONT-based fungal genome assemblies were queried by searching NCBI assembly records with the search term fungi[Organism] AND nanopore[Sequencing Technology]. The output of this search was 137 total assembly records. The assembly record XML summaries were downloaded from NCBI and the contig N₅₀ values were extracted from them. The median contig N₅₀ for the 1,395 fungal assemblies was 140,278 bp. The median contig N₅₀ for the 137 Nanopore fungal assemblies was 1,400,166 bp.

Data availability.

Sequencing reads and annotated genome assemblies were submitted to GenBank under BioProjects PRJNA682643, PRJNA682644, PRJNA682645, PRJNA682647, and PRJNA682648.