Skip to main content
PLOS Biology logoLink to PLOS Biology
. 2021 Dec 20;19(12):e3001496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001496

CNNM proteins selectively bind to the TRPM7 channel to stimulate divalent cation entry into cells

Zhiyong Bai 1, Jianlin Feng 2, Gijs A C Franken 3, Namariq Al’Saadi 1,4, Na Cai 1, Albert S Yu 2, Liping Lou 1, Yuko Komiya 1, Joost G J Hoenderop 3, Jeroen H F de Baaij 3, Lixia Yue 2, Loren W Runnels 1,*
Editor: Raimund Dutzler5
PMCID: PMC8726484  PMID: 34928937

Abstract

Magnesium is essential for cellular life, but how it is homeostatically controlled still remains poorly understood. Here, we report that members of CNNM family, which have been controversially implicated in both cellular Mg2+ influx and efflux, selectively bind to the TRPM7 channel to stimulate divalent cation entry into cells. Coexpression of CNNMs with the channel markedly increased uptake of divalent cations, which is prevented by an inactivating mutation to the channel’s pore. Knockout (KO) of TRPM7 in cells or application of the TRPM7 channel inhibitor NS8593 also interfered with CNNM-stimulated divalent cation uptake. Conversely, KO of CNNM3 and CNNM4 in HEK-293 cells significantly reduced TRPM7-mediated divalent cation entry, without affecting TRPM7 protein expression or its cell surface levels. Furthermore, we found that cellular overexpression of phosphatases of regenerating liver (PRLs), known CNNMs binding partners, stimulated TRPM7-dependent divalent cation entry and that CNNMs were required for this activity. Whole-cell electrophysiological recordings demonstrated that deletion of CNNM3 and CNNM4 from HEK-293 cells interfered with heterologously expressed and native TRPM7 channel function. We conclude that CNNMs employ the TRPM7 channel to mediate divalent cation influx and that CNNMs also possess separate TRPM7-independent Mg2+ efflux activities that contribute to CNNMs’ control of cellular Mg2+ homeostasis.


Magnesium is essential for cellular life, but how is it homeostatically controlled? This study shows that proteins of the CNNM family bind to the TRPM7 channel to stimulate divalent cation entry into cells, independent of their function in regulating magnesium ion efflux.

Introduction

More and more it is recognized that cells are molecular machines, with intricate components working seamlessly together to regulate its multitude of activities. Magnesium and other divalent cations are among the cells most essential molecules. With an intracellular concentration of 14 to 20 mM, Mg2+ is the second most abundant cation after K+ [1,2]. Bound to ATP and other macromolecules within the cells, it has been estimated that at least 600 enzymatic reactions are directly or indirectly regulated by Mg2+ [3]. Consequently, dysfunction of magnesium regulation has been linked to many human diseases including cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, muscle cramps, T-cell immunodeficiency, and Parkinson disease [3]. Unlike Ca2+, whose cytosolic concentration can vary 10- to 100-fold, the free concentration of Mg2+ in cells is comparably steady, hovering between 0.4 and 1.2 mM in concentration. The mechanisms by which intracellular Mg2+ homeostasis is maintained is complex, relying on the activities of transporters and ion channels whose regulation and coordination is still poorly understood.

The ubiquitously expressed TRPM7 was the first identified channel with its own kinase domain and is also notable for its permeability to Mg2+ [4]. Loss-of-function analysis have revealed that TRPM7 is essential for Mg2+ uptake in multiple cell lines [59] and significantly contributes to embryonic development and organogenesis [1012]. As a divalent-selective channel, TRPM7 has also been found required for cellular and bodily uptake of Zn2+ [13,14]. Influx of Ca2+ through the channel has been also been found necessary for cell migration [15] and invadosome formation [16]. Dysregulation of TRPM7 contributes to the pathophysiology of a large variety of disorders, especially cancer [17,18], cardiovascular defects [19,20], and neuronal injury caused by stroke and traumatic brain injury [2123]. Despite its medical importance, regulation of the channel in vivo is poorly understood, and few interacting proteins have been identified.

Members of the CNNM family have also been linked to the regulation of Mg2+ homeostasis. In humans and mouse, the CNNM family, previously referred to as ancient conserved domain proteins (ACDPs), has 4 members, CNNM1, CNNM2, CNNM3, and CNNM4, which are differentially expressed throughout the body [24,25]. CNNMs are transmembrane membrane proteins that contain a Bateman module composed of 2 cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) motifs [2628]. The Bateman module of CNNMs bind to Mg2+-ATP [28], which has been demonstrated to cause significant structural changes in the Bateman module [26], affecting the orientation of the domain with the CNNM transmembrane region [29]. CNNMs have also been found to be regulated by members of the phosphatases of regenerating liver (PRLs) family, which also bind to the Bateman module [3032]. Recently, ARL15, which can also bind to CNNMs, was also found to influence CNNM function by affecting its glycosylation [33].

Like TRPM7, CNNMs have been associated with important physiological and pathological activities. CNNM2 is involved in the regulation of sperm motility and blood pressure regulation [34,35]. The isoform is also highly expressed in brain, with mutations in CNNM2 associated with schizophrenia [36,37], brain malformations, and epilepsy [34,38]. CNNM3 and CNNM4 have been associated with oncogenesis through their physical association with PRLs [30,31]. More recently, up-regulation of CNNM4 has been shown to contribute to the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [39]. In addition, CNNMs have been recognized as having important functions in polarized epithelial cells in the kidney and intestine. Mutations in CNNM2 cause hypomagnesemia [40]. CNNM4 has been demonstrated to be required for basolateral mediated Mg2+ transport in the intestine [41].

Despite CNNM proteins’ obvious clinical importance, identifying the specific functional activity of these proteins has been the subject of intense debate [42,43]. Evidence that CNNMs mediate Mg2+ efflux is particularly strong for CNNM2 and CNNM4, which have robust Mg2+ efflux activities compared to CNNM1 and CNNM3 [28]. Consistent with these experiments, CNNM2 has been found to be a direct transporter that extrudes Mg2+ ions from the basolateral side of polarized epithelial cells [40,41]. Yet, other experiments have found evidence that Mg2+ uptake can also be stimulated by CNNM2 [38], while still another study alternatively concluded that CNNM2 is not directly involved in membrane transport but instead acts as either intracellular Mg2+ sensor or as Mg2+ homeostatic mediator of other not-yet-identified transcellular transporters that alternatively regulate divalent cation influx and efflux processes [44]. In addition to CNNM2, CNNM3, when bound to the protein tyrosine phosphatase of regenerating liver 2 (PRL-2), has also been reported to mediate Mg2+ uptake [31,32]. Thus, CNNMs have been implicated in both cellular Mg2+ influx and efflux, and despite their physiological and pathological importance, their specific functional activities and how they are controlled remain unclear.

Here, we seek to resolve the controversy in the field by providing evidence that CNNMs have the capacity to influence 2 opposite sides of one essential activity in cells—Mg2+ transport. Our experiments demonstrate that CNNMs employ the TRPM7 channel to accomplish divalent cation influx and that in the absence of the channel, CNNM2 and CNNM4, in particular, can potently lower intracellular Mg2+ levels. The identification of CNNMs as a regulatory factor for the TRPM7 channel opens up new opportunities for understanding the channel’s in vivo regulation as well as for probing the new found functional relationship between CNNMs and TRPM7.

Results

CNNMs interact with TRPM7 and regulate its activity

To identify interacting proteins of the TRPM7 ion channel, we conducted mass spectrometry analysis of FLAG-tagged mouse TRPM7 from a tetracycline-inducible HEK-293 cell line (LTRPC7 cells herein referred to as 293-TRPM7 cells) maintained in the absence of tetracycline to keep channel expression low [4,45]. HEK-293T cells were used as a negative control. The mass spectrometry experiment uncovered CNNM proteins as potential TRPM7-interacting proteins, as well as PTP4A1 (PRL-1) and ARL15, which are known CNNM binding proteins (S1 Table) [30,31,33]. Since CNNM proteins and TRPM7 have both been associated with the regulation of Mg2+ homeostasis, we were motivated to investigate the relationship between these proteins. To evaluate the interaction between CNNMs and TRPM7 uncovered by our mass spectrometry experiments, we first validated the ability of the proteins to interact. Immunoprecipitation of HA-tagged TRPM7 (HA-TRPM7) that was transiently transfected into HEK-293T cells coimmunoprecipitated all transiently expressed FLAG-tagged CNNM isoforms (Fig 1A). TRPM6, a close homologue with channel and kinase domains, also interacts with CNNM proteins (S1 Fig). Interestingly, our experiments revealed that overexpression of CNNM2 and CNNM4 with TRPM7 significantly decreased the channel’s protein expression (Fig 1A), which reduced that amount of CNNM2 or CNNM4 that copurified with TRPM7. Overexpression of CNNM2 and CNNM4 also decreased the expression of other proteins, indicating that this effect is nonspecific. For example, coexpression of CNNM2 or CNNM4 with GFP also reduced GFP protein expression (S2 Fig). Since CNNM2 and CNNM4 have been reported to have robust Mg2+ export activities [28], it is possible that overexpression of these protein interfered with protein translation because of their ability to lower of cellular Mg2+ levels. Using antibodies specific to CNNM3 and CNNM4, 2 isoforms that were identified in the mass spectrometry screening, we found that immunoprecipitation of overexpressed HA-TRPM7 coimmunoprecipitated native CNNM3 and CNNM4 proteins (Fig 1B), indicating that when the channel is overexpressed in HEK-293 cells, it forms complexes with the endogenous CNNM3 and CNNM4 proteins. The interaction of TRPM7 with CNNMs is specific, as another TRP channel family member, TRPM2, did not interact with the native CNNM3 and CNNM4 proteins (Fig 1B). We also found that when overexpressed, HA-TRPM7 has the capacity to bind native CNNM proteins in other cell lines (Hela, opossum kidney proximal tubule (OK), RPTEC/TERT1, and HAP1) and that endogenous TRPM7 interacts with native CNNM4 in ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells (S3 Fig). Thus, the interaction between TRPM7 and CNNMs can be observed in multiple cell systems. Both TRPM7 and CNNM proteins have been reported to localize and function at the plasma membrane [28,46,47]. Consistent with published data, we observed that HA-TRPM7 and FLAG-tagged CNNM3 can be found colocalized in HEK-293T cells at the cell border (S4 Fig), although considerable TRPM7 staining can also be found intracellularly. To further assess these proteins’ association, we employed proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID), a recently developed method that allows the identification of proteins in the close vicinity (10 to 30 nm) of a protein of interest in living cells [48]. We employed the optimized Escherichia coli BirA biotin ligase (TurboID) to engineer a fusion protein between CNNM3 and TurboID (CNNM3-FLAG-TurboID) [49]. CNNM3-TurboID efficiently labeled TRPM7 with biotin compared to a negative control EYFP-FLAG-TurboID, adding evidence that CNNM3 is vicinal to TRPM7 when the 2 proteins are coexpressed in HEK-293 cells (S5 Fig).

Fig 1. CNNMs interact with TRPM7 and regulate its activity.

Fig 1

(A) HA-TRPM7 was coexpressed with FLAG-tagged CNNM1-4 in HEK-293T cells, and the channel was immunoprecipitated with HA-agarose. CNNM1 and CNNM3 strongly interacted with TRPM7. CNNM2 and CNNM4 also interacted with TRPM7, but lowered TRPM7 expression nonspecifically. CNNMs were not coimmunoprecipitated from HEK-293T cells N.T. with HA-TRPM7. Supplementation of the growth medium with 20 mM MgCl2 boosted TRPM7 expression, revealing the channel’s capacity to interact with CNNM2 and CNNM4. (B) FLAG-tagged TRPM7 robustly coimmunoprecipitated native CNNM3 and CNNM4, whereas FLAG-TRPM2 did not. (C) A Zinc influx assay using the FluoZin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor TRPM7 function in intact 293-TRPM7 cells (293-M7 cells), which express FLAG-tagged TRPM7 upon tetracycline treatment. Coexpression of CNNMs with TRPM7 increased intracellular free Zn2+ more than expression of TRPM7 alone. The T-REx-293 cell line (293), which expresses the Tet Repressor protein, was used as the negative control. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. White scale bar = 100 μM. (D) Quantification of the results from (C). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (E) Western blot showing expression of TRPM7 in the sample from (C). (F) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to further demonstrate that cells coexpressing CNNMs with TRPM7 have a higher rate of Zn2+ influx compared to 293-TRPM7 cells expressing TRPM7 or CNNMs alone. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salt solution; N.T., not transfected.

We next sought to determine the functional significance of the interaction of CNNM proteins with TRPM7. Since CNNM proteins have been reported to influence both Mg2+ influx and efflux, we took advantage of the fact that TRPM7 is divalent selective, with highest permeability to Zn2+, to assay TRPM7-mediated divalent cation influx [50]. Application of 30 μM ZnCl2 to the extracellular solution of HEK-293 cells stably overexpressing TRPM7 (293-TRPM7) readily produced a detectable increase in intracellular free Zn2+, as monitored by the zinc indicator FluoZin-3 (Fig 1C–1F). We observed significantly higher Zn2+ influx in cells coexpressing CNNMs with TRPM7 than in cells that express TRPM7 alone (Fig 1C–1F). Coexpression of TRPM7 with CNNM2 and CNNM4 produced the greatest stimulation of TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake. By transfecting modest concentrations of CNNM cDNA, we were able to minimize CNNM-mediated interference with TRPM7 protein expression (Fig 1E). Interestingly, we observed that overexpression of either CNNM2 or CNNM4 in wild-type (WT) HEK-293 cells produced a small but detectable increase in Zn2+ uptake (Fig 1C–1F). To determine whether native TRPM7 was required for this CNNM-mediated Zn2+ influx activity, we expressed CNNM2 in HEK-293T TRPM7 knockout (KO) cells (293TΔM7) and measured Zn2+ uptake [14]. The absence of TRPM7 in HEK-293T cells prevented a CNNM2-dependent increase in intracellular Zn2+ (S6A–S6D Fig), indicating that the endogenous TRPM7 channel is the major contributor of CNNM2-mediated Zn2+ influx. To confirm these results, we tested whether CNNM2 stimulated Zn2+ influx in another cell line in which TRPM7 had been knocked out (HAP1 TRPM7 KO cells) [6]. Similarly, KO of TRPM7 in HAP1 cells blocked a CNNM2-dependent increase in intracellular Zn2+ (S7 Fig), indicating CNNMs when overexpressed can stimulate native TRPM7 channel function in different cell types. To further investigate the requirement of the TRPM7 channel for CNNM stimulation of Zn2+ uptake, we tested whether coexpression of the TRPM7-E1047K channel-inactive pore mutant with CNNM2 affected Zn2+ influx [51]. For these experiments, we used HA-tagged TRPM7 (WT) and TRPM7-E1047K HEK-293 expressing cells made using the Flp-In system to allow isogenic tetracycline-inducible protein expression [47,51]. Coexpresssion of CNNM2 with WT TRPM7, but not TRPM7-E1047K, produced an increase in Zn2+ uptake, indicating the TRPM7’s pore is required for CNNM2 stimulation of TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ influx (S6E–S6H Fig). To further confirm the contribution of the channel to CNNM-mediated divalent cation influx, we employed the TRPM7 channel inhibitor NS8593 [52]; our results show that CNNM-mediated TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ influx can also be blocked by this compound (S6D Fig).

TRPM7 is blocked intracellularly by Mg2+ and Mg-ATP [4]. This prompted us to investigate whether CNNM stimulation of TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ influx could be explained by the lowering of intracellular Mg2+ due to CNNM’s Mg2+ export activity. Both expression of CNNM4 as well as the Mg2+ exporter SLC41A1 [53] modestly suppressed the increase in intracellular Mg2+ levels caused by overexpression of TRPM7 in 293-TRPM7 cells (S8A–S8C Fig). However, only CNNM4 robustly stimulated Zn2+ influx through the channel (S8A, S8D and S8G Fig), indicating that activation of TRPM7 channel function is specific to CNNMs.

Native CNNMs influence TRPM7 function in intact cells

Overexpression of CNNMs in HEK-293 cells profoundly stimulated TRPM7 channel function (Fig 1C–1F). We next asked whether endogenous CNNM3 and CNNM4, the most abundant CNNM isoforms found interacting with TRPM7 from our mass spectrometry experiment, affect TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ influx in 293-TRPM7 cells. CRISPR/Cas-9 was employed to KO CNNM3, CNNM4, and both isoforms together from 293-TRPM7 cells (293-M7-ΔCNNM3, 293-M7-ΔCNNM4, and 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4). Two independent clones were created for each line and validated for loss of CNNM isoforms by SDS-PAGE and western blotting (Fig 2D) as well as by genomic sequencing (see Methods). Unlike TRPM7 KO HAP1 and DT40 cells [6,8], 293-M7-ΔCNNM3, 293-M7-ΔCNNM4, and 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells do not require Mg2+ supplementation to sustain cell proliferation. In addition, KO of CNNMs did not affect TRPM7 protein levels (Fig 2D), nor surface expression of the channel (Fig 2E), as assessed by cell surface biotinylation experiments. We found that KO of CNNM3 from 293-TRPM7 reduced Zn2+ influx roughly by half, compared to the 293-TRPM7 parental cell line, whereas KO of CNNM4 caused more of a substantial decrease in TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ influx (Fig 2A and 2B, S9 Fig). KO of both CNNM3 and CNNM4 together did not further decrease TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ influx below that observed in 293-M7-ΔCNNM4 cells (Fig 2A and 2B, S9 Fig). This result indicates that while CNNM3 contributes to TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx, native CNNM4 appears to be the more potent regulator of the TRPM7 channel in HEK-293 cells. We conducted gain-of-function experiments to investigate whether reexpression CNNM3, CNNM4, CNNM3, and CNNM4 together could recover Zn2+ influx (Fig 2A and 2B). Reexpression of CNNM3 in 293-M7-ΔCNNM3 cells was able to stimulate TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ influx to levels similar to control 293-M7 cells (Fig 2A–2C). Whereas, reexpression of CNNM4 in 293-M7-ΔCNNM4 cells increased TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ influx beyond the level observed for control 293-M7 cells (Fig 2A–2C). Interestingly, reexpression CNNM3 in 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells did not fully bring TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ influx to a level similar to control 293-M7 cells, whereas expression of CNNM4 by itself in 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells again raised TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ influx above the level obtained in 293-M7 cells (Fig 2A–2C). Coexpression of CNNM3 and CNNM4 in 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells caused the greatest increase in Zn2+ uptake (Fig 2A–2C). Taken together, these data indicate that both native CNNM3 and CNNM4 isoforms contribute to regulation of TRPM7 in 293-TRPM7 cells.

Fig 2. CNNMs are required for TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx.

Fig 2

(A) A Zinc influx assay using the FluoZin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor TRPM7 function in intact cells under the same conditions described in Fig 1. KO of CNNM3, CNNM4, and both CNNM3 and CNNM4 from 293-TRPM7 cells (293-M7-ΔCNNM3, 293-M7-ΔCNNM4, and 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4) reduced TRPM7 channel function, which could be rescued to varying degrees by reexpression of CNNM3 and/or CNNM4. The T-REx-293 cell line (293), which expresses the Tet Repressor protein, was used as the negative control. All the cells in the assay were treated with tetracycline to induce TRPM7 expression. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the results from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. Images taken 5 to 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. (C) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate that 293-TRPM7 cells lacking CNNMs have a reduced rate of Zn2+ influx compared to 293-TRPM7 expressing TRPM7. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. (D) CRISPR/Cas-9 was used to KO CNNM3, CNNM4, and both CNNM3&4 from 293-TRPM7 cells, which express TRPM7. Western blotting of 2 independent clones showed specific KO of CNNM isoforms and similar expression of TRPM7 among the lines. Note that the antibody used to detected CNNM4 detects an unrelated protein as indicated. (E) Cell surface biotinylation of 293-TRPM7 WT and 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells demonstrated that surface level of TRPM7 in the 2 cell lines is similar. Shown are SA purified (SA purified) proteins, the input lysate for each cell type, and the proteins not bound to SA (SA unbound). (F) Zinc influx assay using the FluoZin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor TRPM7 function in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Overexpression of PRL-2 stimulates TRPM7 channels function, which requires to varying degrees CNNM3 and CNNM4. White scale bar = 100 μM. (G) Western blot demonstrating expression of TRPM7 (Anti-FLAG) and PRL-2 under the conditions described in (F). (H) Quantification of the results from (F). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (I) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate that PRL overexpression stimulates an increased rate of Zn2+ influx compared to 293-TRPM7 expressing TRPM7 and that CNNM3 and CNNM4 are required for this activity. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salt solution; KO, knockout; PRL, phosphatase of regenerating liver; PRL-2, phosphatase of regenerating liver 2; SA, streptavidin agarose.

PRLs stimulate TRPM7 channel function

It has been reported that CNNMs are key partners of PRLs in an evolutionarily conserved complex that regulates the intracellular Mg2+ concentration [30,31]. PRL’s association with CNNMs has been reported to increase intracellular Mg2+ levels to stimulate cell proliferation and metastasis, although the exact mechanisms remain poorly understood [30,32]. These results motivated us to investigate whether PRLs could affect TRPM7 channel function. Overexpression of PRL-2 stimulated TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake (Fig 2F–2I), whereas overexpression of the PRL-2 harboring the R107E mutation, whose equivalent mutation in PRL-3 abolishes the binding of PRL-3 to CNNM3 [54], did not (S10 Fig). All 3 PRL isoforms are similarly capable of stimulating TRPM7 (S10 Fig). To test whether CNNMs are involved in PRL stimulation of TRPM7 channel function, we investigated the ability to stimulate TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake in CNNM-KO cell lines. Loss of CNNM4 and CNNM3, especially CNNM4, significantly reduced the stimulation of TRPM7 channel function by PRL-2 overexpression (Fig 2F–2I). Thus, CNNMs affect the ability of overexpressed PRL proteins to stimulate the TRPM7 channel.

CNNMs have TRPM7-dependent and TRPM7-independent activities

The functions of CNNMs are the subject of debate [42,43], with some investigators reporting CNNMs to be direct transporters that extrude Mg2+ ions [40,41]. Other investigators have alternatively concluded that CNNMs are not directly involved in membrane transport but instead act as either intracellular Mg2+ sensors or as Mg2+ homeostatic mediators of other not-yet-identified transcellular transporters that alternatively regulate divalent cation influx and efflux processes [44]. To more directly evaluate the impact of KO of CNNM3 and CNNM4 on Mg2+ influx, we employed a Mg2+ uptake assay using the 25Mg isotope. Overexpression of TRPM7 greatly stimulated Mg2+ uptake (Fig 3A) compared to control cells. Deletion of CNNM3 and CNNM4 from 293-TRPM7 cells, profoundly disrupted TRPM7-mediated Mg2+ uptake, which could be restored by reexpression of CNNM4, thus confirming TRPM7 as the conduit for CNNM-mediated Mg2+ influx (Fig 3A). Next, we evaluated whether KO of TRPM7 affected CNNMs ability to lower intracellular Mg2+ levels. A similar decrease in intracellular Mg2+ was observed in response to overexpression of CNNM2 or CNNM4 in WT HEK-293 cells compared to TRPM7-KO HEK-293 cells (293T(ΔM7)) (Fig 3B–3D), indicating that CNNM2 and CNNM4 do not require TRPM7 to lower intracellular Mg2+cells. To directly monitor CNNM-mediated Mg2+ influx, we took advantage of the discovery that CNNM4 requires external Na+ to extrude intracellular Mg2+ [41]. By replacing NaCl with NMDG-Cl in the external cell buffer (Hanks’ balanced salt solution, HBSS), we were able to disrupt CNNM4 efflux activity and monitor CNNM4-mediated Mg2+ influx (Fig 3E). When HBSS containing NMDG-Cl was exchanged for normal HBSS bathing HEK-293T cells overexpressing CNNM4, we were able to observe direct Mg2+ influx as detected by an increase in Mag-Fluo-4 fluorescence. An increase in Mg2+ influx, however, was not observed in nontransfected cells, or 293T(ΔM7) cells expressing CNNM4, or 293T WT cells overexpressing CNNM4 challenged with the TRPM7 channel inhibitor NS8593 (Fig 3E). Collectively, these data indicate that CNNMs employ TRPM7 to mediate Mg2+influx and that the Mg2+-lowering activities of CNNMs occur independently of the TRPM7 channel. To further rule out that CNNMs directly contribute to divalent cation influx, we took advantage of the fact that CNNM proteins have been associated with various congenital diseases and that several disease-related missense mutants have been shown to abolish Mg2+ efflux activity. We screened several mutant forms of CNNMs proteins that had previously been reported to disrupt Mg2+ efflux activity indirectly (CNNM2-T568I, CNNM2ΔCBS, CNNM4ΔCBS, CNNM4-F631K, and CNNM4ΔCNBH) or directly by disrupting the putative CNNM Mg2+binding site (CNNM2-G356A, CNNM2-E357A, CNNM4-S196P, CNNM4-S200Y, and CNNM4-N250A) [28,55,56]. Many of the tested mutants altered both the ability of CNNM2 and CNNM4 to stimulate TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx and lower intracellular Mg2+ (S11 Fig). Interestingly, one of the CNNM Mg2+binding site mutants, CNNM4-S196P, which is reportedly associated with Jalili syndrome [57], completely disrupted CNNM4’s capacity to lower intracellular Mg2+ without interfering with CNNMs ability to stimulate TRPM7-dependent divalent cation influx, as monitored by our Zn2+ influx assay (S11 Fig). Indeed, TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx mediated by the CNNM4-S196P mutant was significantly higher than that produced by WT CNNM4. Thus, many of the disease-related CNNM mutations affect both CNNM-mediated divalent cation influx and cation influx activities. The fact that the CNNM4-S196P mutant disrupted the Mg2+-lowering activity of CNNM4 without affecting CNNM-stimulated divalent cation influx, however, adds further evidence that CNNMs Mg efflux activity is independent of its divalent cation influx activity. Thus, CNNM-stimulated influx of divalent cations occurs through TRPM7, while efflux of Mg2+ is believed to be achieved by direct binding of Mg2+ to CNNMs, which is supported by recent structural studies of the related CorB and CorC proteins [29,56].

Fig 3. CNNMs have TRPM7-dependent and independent activities.

Fig 3

(A) A 25Mg uptake assay was employed to assay TRPM7 channel function and its dependence on CNNMs. Moreover, 293-TRPM7 cells have significantly higher 25Mg uptake than the negative control T-REx-293 cell line (293), which expresses the Tet Repressor protein. Compared to 293-TRPM7 cells, 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 exhibited significantly lower 25Mg uptake, which was increased by reexpression of CNNM4. * = p < 0.05 and *** = p < 0.001, 1-way ANOVA plus Tukey post hoc. (B) Similar levels of free Mg2+ were detected in HEK-293T (293T(WT)) and HEK-293T TRPM7 KO (293T(ΔM7)) cells using the Mag-Fluo4 Mg2+ indicator. White scale bar = 100 μM. Overexpression of CNNM2 or CNNM4 substantially reduced cytosolic Mg2+ in both cell lines to similar degrees. (C) Quantitation of the results from (B). n = 50. *** indicates a p-value of less than 0.001. (D) Mag-Fura-2 was also employed to compare the Mg2+ levels between 293T(WT), 293T(ΔM7), and 293T(ΔM7) transfected with CNNM2 or CNNM4. Images of the cells were taken using a 510-nm filter from excitation at 340 nm versus 380 nm on an inverted Olympus IX70 fluorescence microscope, and the ratio of fluorescence intensity of the cells from excitation at the 340 nm versus 380 nm wavelengths (30 cells) was quantified. *** indicates a p-value of less than 0.001. (E) 293T(WT), 293T(WT) transfected with CNNM4, 293T(WT) transfected with CNNM4 and treated with the TRPM7 channel inhibitor NS85903 (10 μM), and 293T(ΔM7) cells transfected with CNNM4 were loaded with Mag-Fluo4. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were measured for 1 minute before the extracellular solution bathing the cells was replaced with a Na+ free solution (replacing NaCl with NMDG-Cl) to inhibit Na+-dependent Mg2+ extrusion by CNNM4. Replacement of the buffer occurred between 50 and 100 seconds after imaging began as indicated. Overexpression of CNNM4 increased the Mg2+ levels in 293T(WT) but not 293T(ΔM7) cells, and the increase in Mg2+ in 293T(WT) cells caused by CNNM4 overexpression could be blocked by NS8593, which was continually present in the imaging medium and was initially added just prior to imaging. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. WT, wild-type.

CNNMs modulate TRPM7 channel activity

To more directly assess the impact of CNNMs on TRPM7 channel function, we employed electrophysiological analysis. When expressed in WT HEK-293 cells, whole-cell recordings of TRPM7 yield whole-cell currents exhibiting a significant outward current and a characteristic small inward current [4,58]. To assess the impact of CNNMs on TRPM7 conductance, we evaluated the current amplitude in 293-TRPM7 and 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells with and without reexpression of CNNM4 using an intracellular solution without Mg2+ or Mg-ATP. Under these conditions, TRPM7’s current–voltage relationship was unchanged, but TRPM7 whole-cell currents were significantly reduced in 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells compared to the parental 293-TRPM7 cells (Fig 4B and 4C). When CNNM4 was reexpressed in 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells, using stable episomal expression of CNNM4 to keep CNNM4 protein levels low (see Methods), the recorded TRPM7 currents increased. We additionally tested whether native TRPM7 would be similarly reduced by loss of CNNM3 and CNNM4. To accomplish this, we knocked out CNNM3 and CNNM4 from T-REx-293 cell line, which we have previously used to express TRPM7-specific shRNAs to knockdown native TRPM7 current [47]. KO of CNNM3 and CNNM4 together from T-REx-293 cells (293-ΔCNNM3/4) significantly reduced native TRPM7 current amplitudes compared to WT cells (293) (Fig 4F and 4G). Thus, in the absence of CNNMs, TRPM7 channel activity is severely reduced, consistent with the reduced Zn2+ influx (Figs 2A, 2B and 4E) and Mg2+ uptake (Fig 3A) observed in 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells. Collectively, our experiments indicate that CNNMs modulate TRPM7 channel activity and that the CNNM-TRPM7 complex constitutes a novel influx pathway for Mg2+ as well as other divalent cations.

Fig 4. Functional assessment of CNNMs on TRPM7 channel activity.

Fig 4

TRPM7 currents were recorded in 293-TRPM7 cells (n = 30), 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells (n = 30), and 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells (n = 40) with stable episomal expression of CNNM4 to keep CNNM4 protein levels low so that it would not interfere with TRPM7 protein expression. (A) Western blot demonstrating CNNM4 expression in the cell groups used in (B–D). (B) Representative TRPM7 whole-cell currents from the 3 cell lines recorded with an internal pipette solution containing 0 Mg2+/Mg-ATP to achieve full TRPM7 channel activity. (C) Average current density of the different groups from (A). (D) Zinc influx assay using the FluoZin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor TRPM7 function in cells from (B,C). White scale bar = 100 μM. Shown are images taken at a time point 5 to 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. (E) Quantification of results from (D). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (F) Native TRPM7 currents were recorded in the T-REx-293 Cell Line (293), which was the parental cell line of 293-ΔCNNM3/4 cells. Shown are representative TRPM7 whole-cell currents from the 2 cell lines recorded with an internal pipette solution containing 0 Mg2+/Mg-ATP to achieve full TRPM7 channel activity. (G) Average current density of the different groups from (F) (n = 16 per group). Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data.

Discussion

In the 1970s, Harry Rubin postulated that Mg2+ is the key factor that regulates cell proliferation, mainly because of the importance of Mg2+ for numerous vital cellular activities [59]. It was not until decades later that the molecular foundation for how vertebrate cellular Mg2+ homeostasis is controlled began to be elucidated, beginning with the startling discovery that the TRPM7 ion channel is required for cell proliferation and Mg2+ homeostasis in DT40 B cells [8]. More recently, CNNM3 and CNNM4 were found to be regulated by PRL phosphatases to increase cellular Mg2+ levels to stimulate cancer cell growth [3032]. By combining cell biology, biochemistry, genetic, and electrophysiology techniques, here, we have uncovered that CNNMs are bifunctional, directly regulating Mg2+ efflux, while at the same time capable of employing the TRPM7 channel to stimulate divalent cation entry into cells.

Our experiments indicate that CNNMs have both Mg2+ import and export activities, with CNNM-mediated Mg2+ import occurring when CNNM proteins assemble into macromolecular complexes with the TRPM7 ion channel. In the absence of TRPM7, CNNMs remain capable of lowering intracellular Mg2+, which a recent structural study reports occurs through direct physical binding of the cation to CNNMs transmembrane domain [56]. Thus, CNNMs regulate opposing activities, acting to extrude Mg2+ out of the cells and, as our data have shown, functioning in complex with TRPM7 to stimulate cellular uptake of Mg2+ as well as other divalent cations. These data point to a model in which CNNMs function as a signaling hub through which cellular Mg2+ homeostasis is maintained through simultaneous regulation of both cellular Mg2+ influx and Mg2+ efflux activities, with Mg2+ entry occurring through TRPM7. Mg-ATP, PRLs, and ARL15, which bind to CNNMs, likely regulate both influx and efflux activities of CNNMs. For example, PRLs were previously reported to prevent CNNM4-dependent Mg2+ efflux activity [30]. Our experiments have revealed that PRL proteins stimulate TRPM7-mediated divalent cation influx into cells. Collectively, these results suggest that increases in cellular Mg2+ may be achieved through inhibition of CNNM-dependent Mg2+ efflux and stimulation of divalent cation influx through TRPM7. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that expression of PRL proteins is affected by external Mg2+ availability [60], with increases in PRL mRNA levels occurring when external Mg2+ levels are decreased. Expression of TRPM7 mRNA has also been reported to be regulated by Mg2+ [61], potentially through regulated translation of the full-length protein [62]. Thus, changes in Mg2+ availability could influence cellular magnesium homeostasis by regulating protein levels of PRLs and TRPM7 [60,61]. Adding further complexity to CNNM and TRPM7 regulation is the protein ARL15, which was recently shown to bind to CNNMs and influence its glycosylation [33]. Overexpression of ARL15 in renal carcinoma cells decreased cellular Mg2+ uptake, whereas KO of the protein increased it [33]. While our manuscript was under review, a preprint appeared on the bioRxiv server, reporting that macromolecular complexes of TRPM7, CNNMs, PRLs, and ARL15 can be detected in rodent brain [63]. The article, which was recently accepted for publication, demonstrated that heterologous overexpression of ARL15 with TRPM7 in HEK-293 cells suppressed TRPM7 channel activity [64]. Using the Zn2+ influx assay, we similarly found that overexpression of ARL15 inhibited TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx (S12 Fig). Conversely, we also find that knockdown of ARL15 in HEK-293 cells increased TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx (S12 Fig). Thus, PRLs and ARL15 appear to have opposing actions on TRPM7 function. Although these proteins’ role in the regulation of CNNM-TRPM7 still remain poorly understood, the present data suggests that in vivo regulation of CNNM-TRPM7 is complex and is likely subject to many layers of regulation, which could vary depending on the expression patterns and levels of the individual proteins in different cells and organ systems.

Indeed, our experiments have demonstrated that native CNNMs can regulate endogenous TRPM7 channel function in nonpolarized cells (Fig 4F and 4G). We also discovered that a complex between the proteins can be detected in multiple cell types, including the endogenous TRPM7 and CNNM4 proteins in ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells (S3 Fig). An intriguing question for future investigation is whether TRPM7 and CNNM proteins function together in polarized epithelial cells. In this cell type, TRPM7 is presumed to localize to the apical membrane, whereas CNNMs have been reported to localize to basolateral membranes [30,40,6567]. Whether CNNMs have the potential to also localize to apical membranes of polarized epithelial cells has not been extensively investigated. We therefore examined the capacity of CNNM1-4s to localize to apical versus basolateral membranes in OK cells, a proximal tubule epithelial cell line. To varying degrees, CNNMs could be detected on both apical and basolateral membranes of OK cells, with CNNM2 more easily found on the apical membrane than CNNM4 (S13 Fig). CNNM1 and CNNM3 could be detected in both membrane compartments of OK cells. A similar trend for the cellular distribution of CNNM2 and CNNM4 was also observed when the 2 proteins were expressed in other polarized epithelial cell lines, including Caco-2 (S14 Fig), and immortalized mouse primary proximal tubule epithelial cells (RPTEC/TERT1) (S15 Fig). These experiments indicate that CNNMs, to varying degrees, have the potential to localize to apical membranes where TRPM7 is believed to function. While additional studies are required to investigate the potential function of a CNNM-TRPM7 complex in polarized epithelial cells, existing data already suggest in some cell types the 2 proteins can found together in specialized compartments. For example, CNNM4 is found expressed in TRPM7-positive odontoblasts, where both TRPM7 and CNNM4 are localized to the odontoblastic process [68].

Last, our experiments support a model in which CNNMs can function as a regulatory subunit of the TRPM7 channel. As far as we know, despite the importance of the TRP channel family with approximately 28 members in vertebrates, very few of these channels have been shown to possess regulatory subunits, which is rare among ion channel families. Immunoprecipitation experiments indicate a robust interaction between TRPM7 and CNNM proteins. Interestingly, CNNMs also bind to TRPM6, suggesting that CNNMs could potentially influence Mg2+ influx through TRPM6 homomeric or TRPM6/TRPM7 heteromeric channels, although this remains to be investigated. Conversely, our results suggest that the composition of CNNM-TRPM7 complexes may also be diverse in vivo. In HEK-293 cells, KO of CNNM3 and CNNM4 significantly reduced TRPM7-dependent divalent cation influx and whole-cell currents, without affecting TRPM7 protein or channel surface levels. These data indicate that both native CNNM3 and CNNM4 are involved in regulating TRPM7 channel in HEK-293 cells, raising the question of whether they do so individually or together as a complex. Interestingly, we find that CNNMs are capable of forming heteroligomers, with native CNNM3 and CNMM4 forming a complex together (S16 Fig). The function of CNNM heteroligomers has not been investigated and whether they cooperatively regulate TRPM7 remains to be determined in future work. However, the discovery that TRPM7 has the potential to interact with multiple CNNM isoforms in vitro, as well as in native rodent brain [64], has uncovered a potential mechanism by which diverse control of the channel could be achieved in different tissues and cell types by varying the isoforms that makeup the CNNM-TRPM7 complex. We speculate that given Mg2+ homeostasis profound impact on so many essential cellular activities, from cell metabolism to cell proliferation, and TRPM7’s channel influence on disease events from cancer to stroke, CNNM-TRPM7 complexes of varying composition will likely be found contributing to diverse physiological and pathological processes. We conclude that CNNMs are dual function proteins, mediating Mg2+ efflux, while at the same time functioning as novel homeostatic factors of TRPM7 to stimulate the influx of Mg2+ and other divalent cations through the channel. Future work will be devoted to unraveling how the activities of CNNM-TRPM7 complexes and their associated binding proteins are controlled and employed in vivo.

Methods

Plasmids and adenovirus constructs

Expression plasmids for FLAG-tagged human CNNM1, mouse CNNM2, human CNNM3, and human CNNM4 in the pCMV-4A were previously described [28] and were a kind gift of Dr. Hiroaki Miki (Osaka University, Japan). Expression plasmids for Myc-DDK tagged human PRL-1, PRL-2, and PRL-3 in the pCMV6-Entry vector was purchased from Origene (Rockville, Maryland, United States of America). The PRL-2(R107E) mutant was made using Quikchange (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions; primers are available upon request. The 3xHA-TurboID-NLS_pcDNA3 was a gift from Alice Ting (Addgene plasmid # 107171; http://n2t.net/addgene:107171; RRID:Addgene_107171). To create pCuO-MCS-CNNM3-FLAG-TurboID, COOH-terminal FLAG-tagged human CNNM3 and the TurboID coding sequence from 3xHA-TurboID-NLS_pcDNA3 was subcloned into the CuO-MCS vector (System Biosciences, Mountain View, California, USA), which allows for cumate-inducible sustained transgene expression in cells, using the Cold Fusion Cloning Kit (System Biosciences). The primers to introduce CNNM3 by PCR from the pCMV4A vector were 5′-CAT CGC GAC GTT TAA ACA TGG CGG CGG CGG TAG CT-3′ and 5′-CAG CCG GTG GTC TTC TCG TCC ATC TTA TCG TCG TCA TCC TTG TAA TCC TCG AG-3′. The primer sequences to introduce TurbioID from 3xHA-TurboID-NLS_pcDNA3 were 5′-CTC GAG GAT TAC AAG GAT GAC GAC GAT AAG AAA GAC AAT ACT GTG CCT-3′ and 5′-GGC GAT CGC TGT ACA GCA TGC CTA CTT TTC GGC AGA CCG CAG ACT GAT-3′. Similarly, pCuO-MCS-CNNM4-FLAG was created by PCR and the Cold Fusion Cloning Kit. The primers used were 5′-GGC CGG CCA TCG CGA CGT TTA AAC ATGG CGC CGG TGG GCG GGG GC-3′ and 5′-GGC GAT CGC TGT ACA GCA TGC CTA CTT TTC GGC AGA CCG CAG ACT GAT-3. To create pcDNA6-EFYP-FLAG-TurboID, EYFP (Takara Bio USA, San Jose, California, USA) was first cloned into pcDNA6-V5-HisB vector in frame in the NheI and HindIII sites using the following primers: 5′-CAT CAT GCT AGC CTA CCG GTC GCC ACC ATG GTG-3′ and 5′-CAT CAT AAG CTT GTC CAT GCC GAG AGT GAT CCC-3′. Next, the TurboID sequence from 3xHA-TurboID-NLS_pcDNA3 was subcloned by PCR, to introduce an NH2-terminal FLAG tag and the TurboID, into the pcDNA6-V5-HisB vector containing EYFP using the following primers: 5′- CAT CAT CAT GGA TCC ATG GAC TAC AAG GAC GAC GAT GAC AAG AAA GAC AAT ACT GTG CCT-3′ and 5′-CAT CAT CAT GAA TTC CTA CTT TTC GGC AGA CCG CAG ACT GAT-3′. Recombinant adenoviruses expressing FLAG-CNNM2 (Ad-FLAG-CNNM2) and FLAG-CNNM4 (Ad-FLAG-CNNM4) were made using the ViraPower Adenoviral Expression system (Invitrogen, California, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. First, FLAG-CNNM2 and FLAG-CNNM4 were subcloned into the pENTR-D vector using the following forward primers, respectively, 5′-CAC CAT GGC GCC GGT GGG CGG GGG C-3′ and 5′-CAC C ATGATTGGCTGTGGCGCTTGTGAACCCG-3′ and the same reverse primer 5′-GGC GAT CGC TGT ACA GCA TGC CTA CTT TTC GGC AGA CCG CAG ACT GAT-3. FLAG-CNNM2 and FLAG-CNNM4 in the pENTR vectors were then was then transferred to the destination vector pAd/CMV/V5-DEST using the Gateway system. pAd/CMV/V5-SR-TRPM7 recombinant adenovirus (Ad-TRPM7-HA), which expresses HA-tagged mouse TRPM7, was previously described [69]. pcDNA5-FRT-TO-HA-TRPM7 was previously described [47]. pcDNA5-FRT-TO-HA-TRPM6 was a gift of Dr. Lixia Yue (UCONN Health Center). We engineered mutation in mouse CNNM2 and human CNNM4 in the pCMV-4A vector (CNNM2-T568I, CNNM2ΔCBS(469–578), CNNM4ΔCBS(396–505), CNNM4-F631K, CNNM4ΔCNBH(512–775), CNNM2-G356A, CNNM2-E357A, CNNM4-S196P, CNNM4-S200Y, and CNNM4-N250A) using site-directed mutagenesis.

Cell lines

All cells were maintained in a Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), high glucose media with 10% FBS in a humidified 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator unless otherwise specified below. The 293T cell line was purchased from ATCC (CRL-3216, Manassas, Virginia, USA). Moreover, 293T cells deficient in TRPM7 (29T3-ΔM7) were previously described [70] and were grown in DMEM with 10% FBS supplemented with 10 mM MgCl2 and were a gift of Dr. David Clapham (HHMI, Janelia Research Campus). The LTRPC7 cell line [4], herein referred to as 293-TRPM7 cells, expresses FLAG-tagged mouse TRPM7 under tetracycline control and was generously provided by Dr. Andrew Scharenberg (University of Washington). To avoid cell detachment due to TRPM7 overexpression in the functional studies, LTRPC7 (293-TRPM7) cells were plated on polylysine coated plates or coverslips. The LTRPC7 cells were used for all the functional studies, with the exception of the Zn2+ imaging experiments conducted in S6 Fig, which were conducted using mouse HA-tagged TRPM7 WT (293-M7(WT)) and mouse HA-tagged TRPM7-E1047K (293-M7(E1047K)) cell lines that we developed in previous studies [47,51]. Furthermore, 293-M7(WT) and 293-M7(E1047K) express HA-tagged mouse TRPM7 and the E1047K mutation specifically targets the pore of the channel, rendering it inactive [51]. WT HAP1 cells and TRPM7-deficient HAP1 cells were a kind gift of Dr. Vladimir Chubanov and have been previously described [6]. HAP1 cells were maintained in improved minimal essential media (IMEM) with 10% FBS and TRPM7-deficient cells were maintained in IMEM with 10% FBS containing 10 mM MgCl2. Hela cells were a gift of Dr. Stephen Zheng (Rutgers University). ZR-75-1 cells were a gift from Dr. Leroy Liu (Rutgers University). LLC-PK1 cells were a gift of Dr. Goufeng You (Rutgers University). The OK cell line was provided by Dr. Judith A. Cole (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis). The OK cells were cultured in DMED/F12 medium supplemented with 5% of FBS. RPTEC/TERT1 cells were from ATCC (CRL-4031) and were grown according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

CNNM3 and CNNM4 knockout cell lines

The LTRPC7 cells lines expressing TRPM7 and deficient in CNNM3, CNNM4, or CNNM3 and CNNM4 (293-M7-ΔCNNM3, 293-M7-ΔCNNM4, and 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells) were created using the Alt-R CRISPR/Cas-9 System from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, Iowa, USA). The T-REx-293 Cell Line (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), which is a Flp-In cell line that expressed the Tet Repressor protein, was used to create 293-ΔCNNM3/4 cells. The Alt-R CRISPR/Cas-9 guide RNAs for CNNM3 and CNNM4 were 5′-AltR1/rArUrGrGrUrUrGrUrArGrArArArCrGrArGrUrGrArGrUrUrUrUrArGrArGrCrUrArUrGrCrU/AltR2/-3′ and 5′-/AltR1/rCrArArGrUrCrGrUrGrUrGrGrGrArCrGrArArCrCrGrUrUrUrUrArGrArGrCrUrArUrGrCrU/AltR2/-3. The guide RNAs were transfected into LTRPC7 cells and T-REx-293 cells with Alt-R CRISPR crRNA, Alt-R CRISPR/Cas-9 tracrRNA and recombinant Alt-R S. pyogenes Cas9 Nucleus V3. Two days following transfection, the cells were serially diluted. Colonies were screened for loss of protein expression using antibodies specific for CNNM3 (NBP2-32134, Novus Biologicals Centennial, Colorado, USA) and CNNM4 (ab191207; Abcam Cambridge, UK). All of the CNNM KO cell lines produced were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and did not require Mg2+ supplementation to sustain cell proliferation. The genotypes of individual cell lines were further confirmed by PCR amplification of genomic DNA to verify targeting of the targeted locuses. Moreover, 293-M7-ΔCNNM3 cells have a deletion of “ACTC” from nucleotides 1,147 to 1,150 of the consensus CDS for CNNM3 (CCDS2025.1). Furthermore, 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells have a deletion of “ACTCGTTTCTACAACCATC” from nucleotides 1,147 to 1,165 of the consensus CDS for CNNM3 (CCDS2025.1). For both 293-M7-ΔCNNM4 and 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4, there is a deletion of “CGAA” from 179–182” from nucleotides 1,147 to 1,150 of the consensus CDS for CNNM4 (CCDS 2024.2). In addition, 293-ΔCNNM3/4 cells have a deletion of “ACTCGTTTCTACAACCATC” from nucleotides 1,147 to 1,165 of the consensus CDS for CNNM3 (CCDS2025.1); these cells also have a deletion of “CGAA” from 179 to 182” from nucleotides 1,147 to 1,150 of the consensus CDS for CNNM4 (CCDS 2024.2).

Immunoprecipitation and detection of protein

For analysis of protein expression, cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (50 mM TRIS (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Igepal 630, 1% sodium deocycholate, and 0.1% SDS) containing protease inhibitors. For immunoprecipitation experiments, cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM TRIS (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 1% Igepal 630). All biochemical procedures were conducted on ice or at 4°C. Membrane proteins were solubilized by incubating the lysis mixture at 4°C for 30 minutes to ensure effective solubilization of TRPM7. This was verified in control experiments by centrifuging lysates for 45 minutes at 100,000 × g and analyzing for the presence of TRPM7 in the supernatant by SDS-PAGE and western blotting. The proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and western blotting using standard protocols. For the immunoprecipitation experiments, 10-cm dishes of cells were lysed with 1 ml of lysis buffer, and the samples were then cleared by centrifugation at 15,600 × g for 10 minutes. Supernatants (lysates) were subjected to immunoprecipitation as follows. HA-TRPM7 proteins were immunoprecipitated overnight using 40 μL of HA-agarose (Roche Life Sciences, Indiana, USA). FLAG-TRPM7 proteins were immunoprecipitated overnight using 40 μL of M2 FLAG-agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA). Native TRPM7 was immunoprecipitated overnight using 2 μg Anti-TRPM7 antibody from Alomone Labs (#ACC-047; Jerusalem, Israel) bound to 40 μL Protein A agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, USA). For the immunoprecipitation experiments, beads were washed 3 times with lysis buffer, the bound proteins were eluted with 40 μL Laemmli sample buffer, and the protein resolved by SDS-PAGE and western blotting using standard procedures.

Anti-β-actin (sc-47778; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used to detect β-actin as loading control. Similarly, antibodies targeting vinculin and alpha-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich) were used to monitor protein loading for western blotting. The Anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to detect FLAG-TRPM7. The rat monoclonal antibody Anti-HA antibody (clone 3F10, Roche Life Sciences) was used to detect HA-tagged TRPM7. The TRPM7-specific PLIKC47 antibody (α-C47), which recognizes residues 1,816 to 1,863 from rat TRPM7, has been previously described [46]. Overexpressed PRL-2 was detected using the Anti-PRL-2 antibody, clone 42 (Millipore Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany), or Anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). ARL15 was detected using the Anti-ARL15 antibody (Proteintech, Rosemont, Illinois, USA). Knockdown of ARL15 was achieved using Silencer Select Predesigned siRNAs targeting ARL15 (siRNA IDs: s29264 and s29266) compared to Silencer Select Negative Control #1 siRNA (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Transient transfection of siRNAs was accomplished using LipofectamineRNAiMAX at a 10 nM final concentration for 48 hours following the manufacturer’s instructions. Transient transfection of DNA was conducted using TurboFect Transfection Reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York, USA), or Lipofectamine 3000 (Themo Fisher Scientific). For the coimmunoprecipitation experiments in Fig 1, HEK-293T cells were transiently transfected. pcDNA5-FRT-TO-HA-TRPM7 and pCMV-4A-FLAG-CNNM1-4 constructs were used. For the coimmunoprecipitation experiments in S1 Fig, pcDNA5-FRT-TO-HA-TRPM7 and pCMV-4A-FLAG-CNNM1-4 constructs were used. For the coimmunoprecipitation experiments in S3 Fig, Ad-HA-TRPM7 was employed to virally express HA-TRPM7 in OK, HAP1, and RPTEC/TERT1 cells. For the coimmunoprecipitation experiments involving Hela cells, pcDNA5-FRT-TO-HA-TRPM7 was transiently transfected into these cells.

Immunocytochemistry

Cells were seeded onto polylysine-coated glass coverslips placed into 24-well plates and then transfected or virally transduced as specified in the figure legends. Cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. Moreover, 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS was used to permeabilized the cells at 25°C for 5 minutes, and then 5% FBS in PBS were used for blocking at 30°C for 1 hour. Next, cells were incubated in appropriate primary antibodies for 1 hour at 30°C. To detect HA-TRPM7, we used either a rat monoclonal antibody anti-HA antibody (3F10; Roche Life Sciences) or a rabbit monoclonal antibody anti-HA (C29F4) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, Massachusetts, USA), depending on the experiment. To detect NHERF-1, we used the NHERF-1 mouse monoclonal antibody (sc-271552) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. To detect the Na+/K+-ATPase, we used the mouse monoclonal antibody against Na+/K+-ATPase (sc-21712) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. For detection of overexpressed FLAG-CNNM proteins, we employed either the M2 anti-FLAG antibody mouse monoclonal antibody (F1804) from Sigma-Aldrich or the anti-FLAG rabbit monoclonal antibody (D6W5B) from Cell Signaling. After three 5-minute washing steps with 5% FBS in PBS, Alexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Fluor 568 were used as secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) used to stain the nucleus. After 3 washes with 5% FBS in PBS and 3 washes with PBS, the coverslips with cells were mounted onto glass slide with Aqua Poly/Mount (Polyscience, Warrington, Pennsylvania, USA). Images were taken by a Yokogawa CSUX1-5000 microscope under 63× magnification using 488 nm and 561 nm wavelengths at the Rutgers RWJMS CORE Confocal facility.

Mass spectrometry

We conducted mass spectrometry analysis of TRPM7 purified from the LTRPC7 cell line, described above, grown intentionally in the absence of tetracycline to keep FLAG-TRPM7 protein levels as low as possible and at equilibrium inside the cells. A 10-cm dish of LTRPC7 cells without tetracycline was used for purification of FLAG-TRPM7. A 10-cm dish of HEK-293T cells were used as a negative control. The experiment under the same conditions was repeated once to give 2 biological replicates. Cells were lysed with 1 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM TRIS (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 1% Igepal 630) and were solubilized by incubating the lysis mixture at 4°C for 1 hour. LTRPC7 and control HEK-293-T cell lysates were then subjected to immunoprecipitation overnight using 40 μL of M2 FLAG-agarose. The beads were washed 3 times with PBS with 1% Tween-20, the bound proteins were eluted with 40 μL Laemmli sample buffer. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-TRPM7 was verified by SDS-PAGE and western blotting using standard procedures. For mass spectrometry analysis, we employed a protocol we previously employed [45]. The samples were resolved in a Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gel. The excised gel band was subjected to in-gel reduction, alkylation, tryptic digestion, and peptide extraction with a standard protocol. Peptides were solubilized in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and analyzed by Nano LC-MS/MS with Dionex Ultimate 3000 RLSC Nano System interfaced with a Velos-LTQ-Orbitrap (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or a QExactive HF (Thermo Fisher Scientific) based on instrument availability. Samples were loaded onto a self-packed 100 μm × 2 cm trap (Magic C18AQ, 5μm 200 Å; Michrom Bioresources, Pennsylvania, USA) and washed with Buffer A (0.2% formic acid) for 5 minutes with a flow rate of 10 μl/min. We employed a trap brought in line with the analytical column (Magic C18AQ, 3 μm 200 Å, 75 μm × 50 cm; Michrom Bioresources). Peptides were fractionated at 300 nL/min using a segmented linear gradient 4% to 15% Buffer B (0.2% formic acid in acetonitrile) in 35 minutes, 15% to 25% Buffer B in 65 minutes, and 25% to 50% Buffer B in 55 minutes. Mass spectrometry data were acquired using a data-dependent acquisition procedure with a cyclic series of a full scan acquired with a resolution of 60,000 (Velos-LTQ-Orbitrap) or 120,000 (QExactive HF) followed by MS/MS of the 20 most intense ions and a dynamic exclusion duration of 30 seconds for both instruments. Proteome Discoverer was used for database search and analysis. Data were searched against most updated SwissProt database using MASCOT (v 2.3). Precursor ion mass error tolerance was set to ±10 ppm (Velos-LTQ-Orbitrap) or +/− 7 ppm (QExactive HF) and fragment mass error tolerance to ±0.4 Da (Velos-LTQ-Orbitrap) and +/− 20 ppm (QExactive HF). Cysteine carbamidomethylation was set as a complete modification, acetylation on N-terminus of protein, oxidation on methionine, phosphorylation on serine, and threonine and tyrosine were set as variable modifications. Site localization was analyzed using PTMRS. Only spectra of high confidence (false discovery rate [FDR] were set at 0.01 for PSM) were reported [45]. Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD026635. S1 Table shows the proteins that were identified from the LTRPC7 cells but not the control cells in both experimental samples.

Cell surface biotinylation

A 10-cm dish of cells were biotinylated for 30 minutes at 25°C in 0.5 mg/mL sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-biotin (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were washed with PBS 3 times and then lysed in RIPA buffer. Moreover, 10% (v/v) of the sample was taken as input control, and the rest of the protein lysates were incubated overnight with Pierce Streptavidin Agarose (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The next day, unbound protein was collected, and the beads were washed 3 times with lysis buffer. The collected samples were subsequently subjected to SDS-PAGE and western blotting.

Proximity labeling

We employed the method developed by Branon and colleagues for proximity labeling using CNNM3 [49]. Briefly, pCuO-MCS-CNNM3-FLAG-TurboID or pcDNA6-EFYP-FLAG-TurboID, functioning as a negative control, were transiently transfected into the LTRPC7 cell line [4], which expresses FLAG-tagged mouse TRPM7 under tetracycline control. Biotin at a concentration of 500 μM was added to extracellular media for 10 minutes in initiate proximity labeling, followed by washing of the cells with PBS solution and cell lysis using RIPA buffer. Biotinylated proteins were purified using Pierce Streptavidin Agarose (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and labeling of FLAG-TRPM7 was assessed by SDS-PAGE and western blotting using the ANTI-FLAG M2 antibody.

Zinc influx assay

We adapted a protocol from the one employed by Inoue and colleagues to measure Zn2+ influx by TRPM7 [71]. Cells were plated into 24-well dishes coated with polylysine to aid comparison between individual samples by fluorescence microscopy. Before labeling, cells were washed with HBSS containing 0.137 M NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 0.25 mM Na2HPO4, 6 mM glucose, 0.44 mM KH2PO4, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgSO4, and 4.2 mM NaHCO3. Cells were then labeled with the Zinc indicator FluoZin-3 (2.5 μM) in HBSS following manufacturer instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cells were then washed once with HBSS and then placed back into HBSS before images were quickly acquired on an inverted Olympus IX70 fluorescence microscope with a 10X phase contrast objective (Olympus Neoplan 10/0.25 Ph, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Cells were visually inspected for uneven dye loading prior to imaging. To stimulate Zn2+ influx, ZnCl2 (30 μM ZnCl2) in HBSS was introduced to cells. For static measurements, images of cells from the different samples were taken at a specific time point 5 to 10 minutes after the addition of 30 μM ZnCl2. In control experiments, uneven incorporation of the probe was not observed, and cells not challenged 30 μM ZnCl2 had an extreme low fluorescence compared to unlabeled cells. For time course measurements, images of cells were acquired on the inverted Olympus IX70 fluorescence microscope every 30 seconds. Moreover, 30 μM ZnCl2 was added between 40 and 50 seconds after imaging began in most experiments. Fluorescence intensity from individual cells were quantified using Fiji [72].

Measurement of intracellular Mg2+

We used Mag-Fluor-4 and Mag-Fura-2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to assess differences in intracellular Mg2+ levels between different cell samples. Cells were plated in 24-well dishes to aid comparison between individual samples. For experiments with Mag-Fluo-4, cells in the 24-well dish were labeled with the Mg2+ indicator at a concentration of 2.5 μM following manufacturer instruction (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cells were then washed twice with HBSS and then incubated with HBSS and images from the different samples were quickly acquired on an inverted Olympus IX70 fluorescence microscope with a 10X phase contrast objective (Olympus Neoplan 10/0.25 Ph). Fluorescence intensity was quantified (50 or 100 cells per field) using Fiji [72]. For experiments using Mag-Fura-2, the Olympus IX70 microscope was equipped with a FURA filter set, including Dual exciter ER340ex—ET380ex—400lpx4–510/80m, a filter cube, a filter wheel with internal shutter, and an upgraded filter/shutter control card installed into a refurbished LUDL controller system. Cells were plated into 24-well dishes with a glass bottom plate coated with polylysine. Cells were labeled with Mag-Fura-2 (4 μM) and BAPTA-AM (25 μM) to reduce any contribution of intracellular free Ca2+ to the measurements, in a modified Tyrode solution containing 10 mM Hepes, 110 NaCl, 5 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM KCl, 1.8mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 1.0 mM NaH2PO4, 5 mM Glucose, 10 mM sodium pyruvate, and MEM nonessential amino acids solution (10 mM glycine, alanine, asparagine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, proline, and serine). Cells were washed once with the Tyrode solution and then imaged in the same buffer. Images of the cells were taken using a 510 nm filter from excitation at 340 nm versus 380 nm on the inverted Olympus IX70 fluorescence microscope, and the ratio of fluorescence intensity of the cells from excitation at the 340 nm versus 380 nm wavelengths was quantified using Fiji [72].

25Mg uptake assay

HEK-293 cells were seeded in the morning at ±60% confluence and then transfected at the end of the day (5 μg DNA per Petri dish with Lipofectamine 2000 at 1:2 DNA:Lipofectamine 2000 ratio) with mock or CNNM4 constructs. The next day, cells were reseeded on poly-L-lysine (Sigma, St Louis, Missouri, USA) coated 12-well plates and simultaneously induced with 5 μg/mL tetracycline. Mg2+ uptake was determined using a stable 25Mg isotope (Cortecnet, Voisins Le Bretonneux, France), which has a natural abundance of ±10%. Cells were washed with basic uptake buffer (125 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM Na2HPO4, 0.5 mM Na2SO4, 15 mM HEPES/NaOH, pH 7.5) and subsequently placed in basic uptake buffer containing 1 mM 25Mg (purity ±98%) for 10 minutes. After washing 3 times with ice-cold PBS, the cells were lysed in HNO3 (≥65%, Sigma) and subjected to ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) analysis.

Electrophysiological recordings

The voltage-clamp technique was used to evaluate the whole-cell currents of TRPM7 expressed in HEK-293 cells as described [51]. Briefly, whole-cell current recordings of TRPM7-expressing cells were elicited by voltage stimuli lasting 250 ms delivered every 1 second using voltage ramps from –100 to +100 mV. Data were digitized at 2 or 5 kHz and digitally filtered offline at 1 kHz. The internal pipette solution for macroscopic current recordings contained (in mM) 145 Cs-methanesulfonate, 8 NaCl, 10 EGTA, and 10 HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.2 with CsOH. The extracellular solution for whole-cell recordings contained (in mM) 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose, pH adjusted to 7.4 (NaOH). For rescue experiments, transient transfection of pCMV-4A-CNNM4 expressed CNNM4 at high levels, which reduced TRPM7 protein expression, made measurement of whole-cell currents too variable for rescue experiments. Placing CNNM4 in vectors with weak promoters still caused too much variability, presumably because of the negative effect of CNNM4 on TRPM7 protein expression. To overcome this problem, pCuO-MCS-CNNM4-FLAG was employed to achieve sustained and modest reexpression of CNNM4 in 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4 cells, with CNNM4 expression induced upon application of cumate to the cell media. To achieve sustained episomal expression, cells transfected with pCuO-MCS-CNNM4-FLAG and then were selected by application of puromycin to the growth media. Surviving cells were used for the rescue experiments shown in Fig 4A–4D.

Statistical analysis

Unless otherwise indicated, statistical analysis used 1-way ANOVA plus Student t test (2 tailed). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Error bars indicate standard error.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Mass spectrometry reveals TRPM7-interacting proteins.

For identification of TRPM7 interacting proteins by LC-MS/MS, purified TRPM7 was resolved in a Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gel, and each gel band was subjected to in-gel reduction, alkylation, tryptic digestion, and peptide extraction with a standard protocol. Peptides were solubilized in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and analyzed by Nano LC-MS/MS with Dionex Ultimate 3000 RLSC Nano System interfaced with a Velos-LTQ-Orbitrap (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or a QExactive HF (Thermo Fisher Scientific) based on instrument availability. Shown are results from samples immunopurified from LTRPC7 cells in the absence of tetracycline to keep TRPM7 expression levels low and from control cells (293T). The table shows proteins that were identified in 2 experimental replicates of samples from LTRPC7 cells but not in in control 293T cells.

(XLSX)

S1 Raw Images. Unprocessed images of blots from Figs 1, 2 and 4 and S1, S3, S5, S6, S8, S10S12 and S16 Figs.

(PDF)

S1 Data. Underlying data for Figs 14 and S2 and S6S12 Figs.

(XLSX)

S1 Fig. CNNMs interact with TRPM6.

HA-TRPM6 was coexpressed with FLAG-tagged CNNM1-4 in HEK-293T cells, and the channel was immunoprecipitated with HA-agarose. CNNM1 and CNNM3 strongly interacted with TRPM6. An interaction between TRPM6 with CNNM2 and CNNM4 was not observed. CNNMs were not immunoprecipitated in HEK-293T cells N.T. with HA-TRPM6. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. N.T., not transfected.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Expression of CNNMs suppress expression of EGFP.

(A) EGFP was cotransfected with CNNM1-4 in HEK-293T cells and GFP protein expression was assessed by fluorescence microscopy. Coexpression of CNNM2 and CNNM4 with GFP significantly reduced GFP protein expression, most likely as a result of a decrease in intracellular Mg2+. (B) 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. TRPM7 interacts with native CNNMs in different cell lines.

(A–D) HA-TRPM7 was overexpressed in the indicated cells and was the immunoprecipitated with HA-agarose. Native CNNM3 and CNNM4 coimmunoprecipitated with HA-TRPM7 transiently transfected into Hela cells. In OK cells transiently transfected with HA-TRPM7, only native CNNM3 was detected as interacting with HA-TRPM7. In HAP1 cells, both CNNM3 and CNNM4 could be weakly be coimmunoprecipitated with HA-TRPM7, which was expressed by viral transduction using the Ad-TRPM7-HA adenovirus. Note that the lower band in the lysate of the CNNM4 blot is a nonspecific band. In RPTEC/TERT cells transduced with Ad-TRPM7-HA, native CNNM3 coimmunoprecipitated with overexpressed HA-TRPM7. (E) Native TRPM7 is highly expressed in ZR-75-1 cells. Immunoprecipitation of native TRPM7 efficiently immunoprecipitated native CNNM4. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. OK, opossum kidney proximal tubule.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Localization of TRPM7 and CNNM3 in HEK-293T cells.

(A) Confocal images taken from HEK-293T cells transfected with FLAG-CNNM3. Shown are images of FLAG-CNNM3 and the endogenous Na/K-ATPase, a plasma membrane marker. CNNM3 is often found at the plasma membrane colocalized with the Na/K-ATPase. (B) Confocal images taken from HEK-293T cells transfected with HA-TRPM7 and FLAG-CNNM3.TRPM7 can be found colocalized with CNNM3 at the cell border but is also observed intracellularly. Dashed white boxes indicate regions of interest that were enlarged. Scale bar = 20 μM.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. CNNM3 is vicinal to TRPM7.

Proximity-dependent BioID is a recently developed method that allows the identification of proteins in the close vicinity (10 to 30 nm) of a protein of interest in living cells. We used the optimized E. coli BirA biotin ligase (TurboID) to create a fusion protein between CNNM3 and FLAG-tagged TurboID (CNNM3-FLAG-TurboID). As a negative control, we used EYFP fused to FLAG-tagged TurboID (YFP-FLAG-TurboID). CNNM3-TurboID and YFP-TurboID were transfected into 293-TRPM7 cells expressing FLAG-TRPM7. The top blot shows equal expression of TRPM7 in the lysate. In cells expressing TRPM7 with CNNM3-FLAG-TurboID treated with biotin, SA was able to efficiently purify biotinylated TRPM7. By contrast, for cells expressing the TRPM7 with the negative control YFP-TurboID, no biotinylated TRPM7 was purified with the SA. Blots show expression of CNNM3-TurboID and YFP-TurboID in cell lysates and following purification with SA. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. BioID, biotin identification; SA, streptavidin agarose.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. The TRPM7 channel and its pore is required for CNNM-mediated divalent cation entry in HEK-293 cells.

(A) Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Overexpression of CNNM2 (0.15 μg CNNM2 DNA) in WT HEK-293T cells 293T(WT) elicited an increase cellular Zn2+. By contrast, overexpression of CNNM2 (using 0.6 μg instead of 0.15 μg CNNM2 DNA) in HEK-293T cells deficient in TRPM7 293T(ΔM7) did not increase cellular Zn2+. Shown are images taken at a time point 5 to 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. These data indicate that the native TRPM7 channel is required for CNNM-mediated divalent influx in HEK-293 cells. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the results from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (C) Western blot showing expression of CNNM2 in the cells used for the experiment described in (A). (D) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to evaluate how CNNM2 overexpression affects the rate of Zn2+ influx compared in 293T(WT) versus 293T(ΔM7) cells. The TRPM7 channel inhibitor NS8593 (10 μM) was employed to further investigate whether the CNNM2-mediated increase in Fluo-Zin-3 fluorescence upon CNNM2 overexpression in 293T(WT) was dependent on TRPM7 channel function. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. (E) Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. HA-tagged mouse TRPM7 (WT) and TRPM7-E1047K HEK-293 expressing cells 293-M7(E1047K) were used for these experiments (see Methods). Overexpression of CNNM2 with WT TRPM7, but not the TRPM7-E1047K pore-inactive mutant increased Zn2+ uptake. However, no Zn2+ uptake was observed when a channel-inactive mutant was coexpressed with CNNM2. White scale bar = 100 μM. (F) Quantification of the results from (E). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (G) Western blot showing expression of TRPM7 and CNNM2 from the experimental samples described in (E). (H) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate rate of Zn2+ influx in 293, 293(M7), and 293M7(E1047K) cells transfected with CNNM2. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salt solution; WT, wild-type.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. The TRPM7 channel is required for CNNM-mediated divalent cation entry in HAP1 cells.

(A) A Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point 5 to 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Overexpression of CNNM2 in WT HAP1 cells HAP1(WT) using a recombinant adenovirus expressing FLAG-CNNM2 elicited an increase in cellular Zn2+. By contrast, overexpression of CNNM2 in HAP1 cells deficient in TRPM7 HAP1(ΔM7) did not significantly increase cellular Zn2+. Expression of LacZ was used as a negative control. These data indicate that the native TRPM7 channel is required for CNNM-mediated divalent influx in HAP1 cells. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the data in (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. WT, wild-type.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. CNNM4 but not SLC41A1 stimulates TRPM7-mediated divalent cation entry.

(A) A Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. In parallel experiments, intracellular Mg2+ levels were assessed using the Mag-Fluo-4 Mg2+ indicator. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of Mag-Fluo-4 results from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100.* indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (C) Separate control experiments were performed using the Mag-Fura-2 dye to show that the magnesium levels of 293-TRPM7 cells expressing CNNM4 as well as SLC41A1 decreased compared to 293-TRPM7 cells alone. Plotted is the ratio of the fluorescence intensity at 510 nm from 340 nm versus 380 nm excitation. 30 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 30. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (D) Quantification of Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator fluorescence intensity from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100.* indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (E) Western blot evaluating expression of CNNM4, SLC41A1, and TRPM7 in the indicated cell lines. (F) Confocal images taken from HEK-293T cells transfected with MYC-SLC41A1 and FLAG-CNNM3. SLC41A1 can be found colocalized with CNNM3 at the cell border but is also observed intracellularly, which may be due to the effects of its overexpression. Scale bar = 20 μM. (G) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate rate of Zn2+ influx in the different cell lines. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salt solution.

(TIF)

S9 Fig. KO of CNNMs in independent cells lines show similar loss of TRPM7 function.

(A) Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor TRPM7 function in independent cell lines in which CNNM3, CNNM4, and both CNNM3 and CNNM4 were deleted by CRISPR/Cas-9 from 293-TRPM7 cells (293-M7-ΔCNNM3, 293-M7-ΔCNNM4, 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Similar loss of TRPM7 function was observed among the 2 independent lines tested, with deletion of CNNM3 and CNNM4 producing the largest loss-of-function. All the cells in the assay were treated with tetracycline to induce TRPM7 expression. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the results from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. KO, knockout.

(TIF)

S10 Fig. PRL isoforms stimulate TRPM7-mediated divalent cation entry.

(A) Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Coexpression of the PRL isoforms PRL-1, PRL2, and PRL-3 all stimulated TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the data from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (C) Western blot demonstrating expression levels of TRPM7 and PRL isoforms in the experimental samples from (A). (D) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate rate of Zn2+ influx in the different cell lines. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. (E) Coexpression of WT PRL-2 (PRL-2(WT)) but not the CNNM-binding deficient mutant PRL-2(R017E) stimulates TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake. White scale bar = 100 μM. (F) Quantification of the data from (E). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (G) Western blot demonstrating expression levels of TRPM7, PRL-2(WT), PRL-2(R107E) in the experimental samples from (E). (H) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate rate of Zn2+ influx in the different cell lines. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salt solution; PRL, phosphatase of regenerating liver; WT, wild-type.

(TIF)

S11 Fig. Effect of mutants that disable CNNM Mg2+ efflux activity on TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx.

(A) A Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Coexpression of mutational variants of CNNM2 known to disrupt CNNM2 Mg2+ efflux activity also affected TRPM7-mediated increases in intracellular free Zn2+ to varying degrees. (B) Quantification of the data from (A). A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (C) Separate control experiments were performed using the Mag-Fura-2 dye to show that the magnesium levels of 293-TRPM7 cells expressing CNNM2 are decreased compared to 293-TRPM7 cells alone and that CNNM2 mutants used in (A) do not effectively lower intracellular Mg2+ levels as effectively as WT CNNM2. Plotted is the ratio of the fluorescence intensity at 510 nm from 340 nm versus 380 nm excitation. A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (D) Western blot validating expression of TRPM7 and CNNM2 WT and mutants. Vinculin is shown as a loading control. (E) A Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Coexpression of mutational variants of CNNM4 known to disrupt CNNM4 Mg2+ efflux activity also affected TRPM7-mediated increases in intracellular free Zn2+ to varying degrees. Strikingly, the CNNM4(S196P) mutant, which is reported to disrupted Mg2+ binding to the CNNM4 transmembrane domain, enhanced Zn2+ influx compared to WT CNNM4 and the other tested variants. (F) Quantification of the data from (E). A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (G) Separate control experiments were performed using the Mag-Fura-2 dye to show that the magnesium levels of 293-TRPM7 cells expressing CNNM4 are decreased compared to 293-TRPM7 cells alone and that CNNM4 mutants used in (E) do not effectively lower intracellular Mg2+ levels as effectively as WT CNNM4. Plotted is the ratio of the fluorescence intensity at 510 nm from 340 nm versus 380 nm excitation. A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (H) To validate the impact of the CNNM4 mutants on Zn2+ influx, separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate the rate of Zn2+ influx in the different cell lines. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. (I) Western blot validating expression of TRPM7 and CNNM4 WT and mutants. Vinculin is shown as a loading control. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salt solution; WT, wild-type.

(TIF)

S12 Fig. Effect of ARL15 overexpression and knockdown on TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx.

(A) Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Coexpression of the ARL15 protein suppressed TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake compared to nontransfected cells. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the data from (A). A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (C) Zinc influx assay using Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Coexpression of siRNAs targeting the ARL15 protein increased TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake compared to a control siRNA. White scale bar = 100 μM. (D) Quantification of the data from (A). A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (E) Western blot validating ability of 2 independent siRNAs targeting ARL15 to knockdown expression of ARL15 compared to the nonsilencing control. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data.

(TIF)

S13 Fig. Localization of overexpressed FLAG-CNNM isoforms in OK cells.

Shown are confocal microscopy images taken of the top (apical), middle, and bottom of cells. FLAG-tagged CNNM proteins were stained with the rabbit monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. NHERF-1, an apical membrane marker that localizes to microvilli on polarized epithelial cells, was stained using a mouse monoclonal antibody. FLAG-CNNM isoforms were transiently transfected in OK cells and stained following a standard protocol (see Methods). Shown are the localization for (A) CNNM1, (B) CNNM2, (C) CNNM3, and (D) CNNM4. Scale bar = 20 μM. OK, opossum kidney proximal tubule.

(TIF)

S14 Fig. Localization of overexpressed FLAG-CNNM isoforms in Caco-2 cells.

Shown are confocal microscopy images taken of the top (apical), middle, and bottom of cells. FLAG-CNNM2 and FLAG-CNNM4 were stained with the rabbit monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. NHERF-1, an apical membrane marker that localizes to microvilli on polarized epithelial cells, was stained with a mouse monoclonal antibody. FLAG-CNNM2 and FLAG-CNNM4 isoforms were virally transduced into Caco-2 cells and stained following a standard protocol (see Methods). Shown are the localization for (A) CNNM2 and (B) CNNM4. Scale bar = 20 μM.

(TIF)

S15 Fig. Localization of overexpressed FLAG-CNNM isoforms in RPTEC/TERT1 cells.

Shown are confocal microscopy images taken of the top (apical), middle, and bottom of cells. FLAG-CNNM2 and FLAG-CNNM4 were stained with the rabbit monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. NHERF-1, an apical membrane marker that localizes to microvilli on polarized epithelial cells, was stained with a mouse monoclonal antibody. FLAG-CNNM2 and FLAG-CNNM4 isoforms were virally transduced into RPTEC/TERT1 cells and stained following a standard immunofluorescence protocol (see Methods). Shown are the localization for (A) CNNM2 and (B) CNNM4. Scale bar = 20 μM.

(TIF)

S16 Fig. CNNM isoforms form specific heteroligomers.

(A) FLAG-CNNM1 and FLAG-CNNM2 were individually expressed in HEK-293T cells. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM1 effectively immunopurified native CNNM4, whereas native CNNM3 was immunopurified to a lesser degree. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM2 immunopurified native CNNM3 but not native CNNM4. (B) FLAG-CNNM3 and FLAG-CNNM4 were individually expressed in HEK-293T cells. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM4 efficiently immunopurified native CNNM1, whereas immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM3 did not immunopurify native CNNM1. (C) FLAG-CNNM3 was expressed in HEK-293T cells. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM3 was able to coimmunopurify native CNNM4. (D) FLAG-CNNM4 was expressed in HEK-293T cells. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM4 was able to coimmunopurify native CNNM3. (E) Immunoprecipitation of native CNNM3 is able to coimmunopurify native CNNM4. Anti-myc antibody was used as a negative control for immunoprecipitation. Indicated is the nonspecific band derived from the antibody used for the immunoprecipitation. Below this band is CNNM4, as indicted by the arrow. (F) Immunoprecipitation of native CNNM4 is able to coimmunopurify native CNNM3. The anti-myc antibody was used as a negative control for immunoprecipitation. Indicated is the nonspecific band derived from the antibody used for the immunoprecipitation. Below the nonspecific band is CNNM3, as indicted by the arrow. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Hiroaki Miki (Osaka University, Japan), Dr. Andrew Scharenberg (University of Washington), Dr. Vladimir Chubanov (University of Munich), and Dr. David Clapham (Janielia Research Campus, HHMI) for sharing their reagents.

Abbreviations

ACDP

ancient conserved domain protein

BioID

biotin identification

CBS

cystathionine beta-synthase

DMEM

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium

FDR

false discovery rate

HBSS

Hanks’ balanced salt solution

IMEM

improved minimal essential media

KO

knockout

NASH

nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

OK

opossum kidney proximal tubule

PRL

phosphatase of regenerating liver

PRL-2

phosphatase of regenerating liver 2

WT

wild-type

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information Files. Additional supplementary data for the mass spectrometry experiments have been deposited into the ProteomeXchange database (Accession Number: PXD026635) and are publicly available.

Funding Statement

Research was supported by a grant from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, to L.Y. and L.W.R. (R01HL147350). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Grubbs RD, Maguire ME. Magnesium as a regulatory cation: criteria and evaluation. Magnesium. 1987;6(3):113–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Romani AM. Cellular magnesium homeostasis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2011;512(1):1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2011.05.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.de Baaij JH, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ. Magnesium in man: implications for health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2015;95(1):1–46. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00012.2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nadler MJ, Hermosura MC, Inabe K, Perraud AL, Zhu Q, Stokes AJ, et al. LTRPC7 is a Mg.ATP-regulated divalent cation channel required for cell viability. Nature. 2001;411(6837):590–5. doi: 10.1038/35079092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baldoli E, Maier JA. Silencing TRPM7 mimics the effects of magnesium deficiency in human microvascular endothelial cells. Angiogenesis. 2012;15(1):47–57. doi: 10.1007/s10456-011-9242-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chubanov V, Ferioli S, Wisnowsky A, Simmons DG, Leitzinger C, Einer C, et al. Epithelial magnesium transport by TRPM6 is essential for prenatal development and adult survival. Elife. 2016;5:e20914. doi: 10.7554/eLife.20914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ryazanova LV, Rondon LJ, Zierler S, Hu Z, Galli J, Yamaguchi TP, et al. TRPM7 is essential for Mg(2+) homeostasis in mammals. Nat Commun. 2010;1:109. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schmitz C, Perraud AL, Johnson CO, Inabe K, Smith MK, Penner R, et al. Regulation of vertebrate cellular Mg2+ homeostasis by TRPM7. Cell. 2003;114(2):191–200. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00556-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zierler S, Yao G, Zhang Z, Kuo WC, Porzgen P, Penner R, et al. Waixenicin A inhibits cell proliferation through magnesium-dependent block of transient receptor potential melastatin 7 (TRPM7) channels. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(45):39328–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.264341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jin J, Desai BN, Navarro B, Donovan A, Andrews NC, Clapham DE. Deletion of Trpm7 disrupts embryonic development and thymopoiesis without altering Mg2+ homeostasis. Science. 2008;322(5902):756–60. doi: 10.1126/science.1163493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jin J, Wu LJ, Jun J, Cheng X, Xu H, Andrews NC, et al. The channel kinase, TRPM7, is required for early embryonic development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(5):E225–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120033109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu W, Su LT, Khadka DK, Mezzacappa C, Komiya Y, Sato A, et al. TRPM7 regulates gastrulation during vertebrate embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 2011;350(2):348–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.11.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mittermeier L, Demirkhanyan L, Stadlbauer B, Breit A, Recordati C, Hilgendorff A, et al. TRPM7 is the central gatekeeper of intestinal mineral absorption essential for postnatal survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(10):4706–15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810633116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abiria SA, Krapivinsky G, Sah R, Santa-Cruz AG, Chaudhuri D, Zhang J, et al. TRPM7 senses oxidative stress to release Zn(2+) from unique intracellular vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(30):E6079–E88. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707380114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wei C, Wang X, Chen M, Ouyang K, Song LS, Cheng H. Calcium flickers steer cell migration. Nature. 2009;457(7231):901–5. doi: 10.1038/nature07577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Visser D, Langeslag M, Kedziora KM, Klarenbeek J, Kamermans A, Horgen FD, et al. TRPM7 triggers Ca(2+) sparks and invadosome formation in neuroblastoma cells. Cell Calcium. 2013;54(6):404–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2013.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trapani V, Arduini D, Cittadini A, Wolf FI. From magnesium to magnesium transporters in cancer: TRPM7, a novel signature in tumour development. Magnes Res. 2013;26(4):149–55. doi: 10.1684/mrh.2014.0354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yee NS. Role of TRPM7 in Cancer: Potential as Molecular Biomarker and Therapeutic Target. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2017;10(2). doi: 10.3390/ph10020039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sah R, Mesirca P, Mason X, Gibson W, Bates-Withers C, Van den Boogert M, et al. Timing of myocardial trpm7 deletion during cardiogenesis variably disrupts adult ventricular function, conduction, and repolarization. Circulation. 2013;128(2):101–14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sah R, Mesirca P, Van den Boogert M, Rosen J, Mably J, Mangoni ME, et al. Ion channel-kinase TRPM7 is required for maintaining cardiac automaticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(32):E3037–46. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311865110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Aarts M, Iihara K, Wei WL, Xiong ZG, Arundine M, Cerwinski W, et al. A key role for TRPM7 channels in anoxic neuronal death. Cell. 2003;115(7):863–77. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)01017-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sun HS, Jackson MF, Martin LJ, Jansen K, Teves L, Cui H, et al. Suppression of hippocampal TRPM7 protein prevents delayed neuronal death in brain ischemia. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(10):1300–7. doi: 10.1038/nn.2395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xu HL, Liu MD, Yuan XH, Liu CX. Suppression of cortical TRPM7 protein attenuates oxidative damage after traumatic brain injury via Akt/endothelial nitric oxide synthase pathway. Neurochem Int. 2018;112:197–205. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2017.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang CY, Shi JD, Yang P, Kumar PG, Li QZ, Run QG, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel gene family of four ancient conserved domain proteins (ACDP). Gene. 2003;306:37–44. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(02)01210-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang CY, Yang P, Shi JD, Purohit S, Guo D, An H, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of the mouse Acdp gene family. BMC Genomics. 2004;5(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-5-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Corral-Rodriguez MA, Stuiver M, Abascal-Palacios G, Diercks T, Oyenarte I, Ereno-Orbea J, et al. Nucleotide binding triggers a conformational change of the CBS module of the magnesium transporter CNNM2 from a twisted towards a flat structure. Biochem J. 2014;464(1):23–34. doi: 10.1042/BJ20140409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.de Baaij JH, Stuiver M, Meij IC, Lainez S, Kopplin K, Venselaar H, et al. Membrane topology and intracellular processing of cyclin M2 (CNNM2). J Biol Chem. 2012;287(17):13644–55. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.342204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hirata Y, Funato Y, Takano Y, Miki H. Mg2+-dependent interactions of ATP with the cystathionine-beta-synthase (CBS) domains of a magnesium transporter. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(21):14731–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.551176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen YS, Kozlov G, Moeller BE, Rohaim A, Fakih R, Roux B, et al. Crystal structure of an archaeal CorB magnesium transporter. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4028. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24282-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Funato Y, Yamazaki D, Mizukami S, Du L, Kikuchi K, Miki H. Membrane protein CNNM4-dependent Mg2+ efflux suppresses tumor progression. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(12):5398–410. doi: 10.1172/JCI76614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hardy S, Uetani N, Wong N, Kostantin E, Labbe DP, Begin LR, et al. The protein tyrosine phosphatase PRL-2 interacts with the magnesium transporter CNNM3 to promote oncogenesis. Oncogene. 2015;34(8):986–95. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kostantin E, Hardy S, Valinsky WC, Kompatscher A, de Baaij JH, Zolotarov Y, et al. Inhibition of PRL-2.CNNM3 Protein Complex Formation Decreases Breast Cancer Proliferation and Tumor Growth. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(20):10716–25. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.705863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zolotarov Y, Ma C, Gonzalez-Recio I, Hardy S, Franken GAC, Uetani N, et al. ARL15 modulates magnesium homeostasis through N-glycosylation of CNNMs. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03832-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Accogli A, Scala M, Calcagno A, Napoli F, Di Iorgi N, Arrigo S, et al. CNNM2 homozygous mutations cause severe refractory hypomagnesemia, epileptic encephalopathy and brain malformations. Eur J Med Genet. 2019;62(3):198–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yamazaki D, Funato Y, Miyata H, Ikawa M, Miki H. Complementary role of CNNM2 in sperm motility and Ca(2+) influx during capacitation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;474(3):441–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ohi K. Influences of schizophrenia risk variant rs7914558 at CNNM2 on brain structure. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;206(4):343–4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.206.4.343b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rose EJ, Hargreaves A, Morris D, Fahey C, Tropea D, Cummings E, et al. Effects of a novel schizophrenia risk variant rs7914558 at CNNM2 on brain structure and attributional style. Br J Psychiatry. 2014;204(2):115–21. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Arjona FJ, de Baaij JH, Schlingmann KP, Lameris AL, van Wijk E, Flik G, et al. CNNM2 mutations cause impaired brain development and seizures in patients with hypomagnesemia. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(4):e1004267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Simon J, Goikoetxea-Usandizaga N, Serrano-Macia M, Fernandez-Ramos D, Saenz de Urturi D, Gruskos JJ, et al. Magnesium accumulation upon cyclin M4 silencing activates microsomal triglyceride transfer protein improving NASH. J Hepatol. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.01.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stuiver M, Lainez S, Will C, Terryn S, Gunzel D, Debaix H, et al. CNNM2, encoding a basolateral protein required for renal Mg2+ handling, is mutated in dominant hypomagnesemia. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(3):333–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yamazaki D, Funato Y, Miura J, Sato S, Toyosawa S, Furutani K, et al. Basolateral Mg2+ extrusion via CNNM4 mediates transcellular Mg2+ transport across epithelia: a mouse model. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(12):e1003983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Arjona FJ, de Baaij JHF. CrossTalk opposing view: CNNM proteins are not Na(+) /Mg(2+) exchangers but Mg(2+) transport regulators playing a central role in transepithelial Mg(2+) (re)absorption. J Physiol. 2018;596(5):747–50. doi: 10.1113/JP275249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Funato Y, Furutani K, Kurachi Y, Miki H. CrossTalk proposal: CNNM proteins are Na(+) /Mg(2+) exchangers playing a central role in transepithelial Mg(2+) (re)absorption. J Physiol. 2018;596(5):743–6. doi: 10.1113/JP275248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sponder G, Mastrototaro L, Kurth K, Merolle L, Zhang Z, Abdulhanan N, et al. Human CNNM2 is not a Mg(2+) transporter per se. Pflugers Arch. 2016;468(7):1223–40. doi: 10.1007/s00424-016-1816-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cai N, Bai Z, Nanda V, Runnels LW. Mass Spectrometric Analysis of TRPM6 and TRPM7 Phosphorylation Reveals Regulatory Mechanisms of the Channel-Kinases. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42739. doi: 10.1038/srep42739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Runnels LW, Yue L, Clapham DE. The TRPM7 channel is inactivated by PIP(2) hydrolysis. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4(5):329–36. doi: 10.1038/ncb781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Su LT, Agapito MA, Li M, Simonson WT, Huttenlocher A, Habas R, et al. TRPM7 regulates cell adhesion by controlling the calcium-dependent protease calpain. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(16):11260–70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512885200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Varnaite R, MacNeill SA. Meet the neighbors: Mapping local protein interactomes by proximity-dependent labeling with BioID. Proteomics. 2016;16(19):2503–18. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201600123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Branon TC, Bosch JA, Sanchez AD, Udeshi ND, Svinkina T, Carr SA, et al. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(9):880–7. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Monteilh-Zoller MK, Hermosura MC, Nadler MJ, Scharenberg AM, Penner R, Fleig A. TRPM7 provides an ion channel mechanism for cellular entry of trace metal ions. J Gen Physiol. 2003;121(1):49–60. doi: 10.1085/jgp.20028740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li M, Du J, Jiang J, Ratzan W, Su L-T, Runnels LW, et al. Molecular Determinants of Mg2+ and Ca2+ Permeability and pH Sensitivity in TRPM6 and TRPM7. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(35):25817–30. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608972200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chubanov V, Mederos y Schnitzler M, Meissner M, Schafer S, Abstiens K, Hofmann T, et al. Natural and synthetic modulators of SK (K(ca)2) potassium channels inhibit magnesium-dependent activity of the kinase-coupled cation channel TRPM7. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;166(4):1357–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01855.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Arjona FJ, Latta F, Mohammed SG, Thomassen M, van Wijk E, Bindels RJM, et al. SLC41A1 is essential for magnesium homeostasis in vivo. Pflugers Arch. 2019;471(6):845–60. doi: 10.1007/s00424-018-2234-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhang H, Kozlov G, Li X, Wu H, Gulerez I, Gehring K. PRL3 phosphatase active site is required for binding the putative magnesium transporter CNNM3. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00147-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chen YS, Kozlov G, Fakih R, Funato Y, Miki H, Gehring K. The cyclic nucleotide-binding homology domain of the integral membrane protein CNNM mediates dimerization and is required for Mg(2+) efflux activity. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(52):19998–20007. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Huang Y, Jin F, Funato Y, Xu Z, Zhu W, Wang J, et al. Structural basis for the Mg(2+) recognition and regulation of the CorC Mg(2+) transporter. Sci Adv. 2021;7(7). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe6140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Parry DA, Mighell AJ, El-Sayed W, Shore RC, Jalili IK, Dollfus H, et al. Mutations in CNNM4 cause Jalili syndrome, consisting of autosomal-recessive cone-rod dystrophy and amelogenesis imperfecta. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(2):266–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Runnels LW, Yue L, Clapham DE. TRP-PLIK, a bifunctional protein with kinase and ion channel activities. Science. 2001;291(5506):1043–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1058519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rubin H. Central role for magnesium in coordinate control of metabolism and growth in animal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975;72(9):3551–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hardy S, Kostantin E, Wang SJ, Hristova T, Galicia-Vazquez G, Baranov PV, et al. Magnesium-sensitive upstream ORF controls PRL phosphatase expression to mediate energy metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(8):2925–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815361116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Qiao W, Wong KHM, Shen J, Wang W, Wu J, Li J, et al. TRPM7 kinase-mediated immunomodulation in macrophage plays a central role in magnesium ion-induced bone regeneration. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2885. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23005-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nikonorova IA, Kornakov NV, Dmitriev SE, Vassilenko KS, Ryazanov AG. Identification of a Mg2+-sensitive ORF in the 5’-leader of TRPM7 magnesium channel mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(20):12779–88. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kollewe A, Chubanov V, Tseung FT, Haupt A, Müller CS, Bildl W, et al. The molecular appearance of native TRPM7 channel complexes identified by high-resolution proteomics. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.07.09.451738. doi: 10.7554/eLife.68544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kollewe A, Chubanov V, Tseung FT, Correia L, Schmidt E, Rössig A, et al. The molecular appearance of native TRPM7 channel complexes identified by high-resolution proteomics. Elife. 2021;10. doi: 10.7554/eLife.68544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Franken GAC, Seker M, Bos C, Siemons LAH, van der Eerden BCJ, Christ A, et al. Cyclin M2 (CNNM2) knockout mice show mild hypomagnesaemia and developmental defects. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87548-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hirata Y, Funato Y, Miki H. Basolateral sorting of the Mg(2)(+) transporter CNNM4 requires interaction with AP-1A and AP-1B. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;455(3–4):184–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Islam Z, Hayashi N, Inoue H, Umezawa T, Kimura Y, Doi H, et al. Identification and lateral membrane localization of cyclin M3, likely to be involved in renal Mg2+ handling in seawater fish. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys 2014;307(5):R525–37. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00032.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Won J, Kim JH, Oh SB. Molecular expression of Mg(2+) regulator TRPM7 and CNNM4 in rat odontoblasts. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;96:182–8. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Su LT, Liu W, Chen HC, Gonzalez-Pagan O, Habas R, Runnels LW. TRPM7 regulates polarized cell movements. Biochem J. 2011;434(3):513–21. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Abiria SA, Krapivinsky G, Sah R, Santa-Cruz AG, Chaudhuri D, Zhang J, et al. TRPM7 senses oxidative stress to release Zn2+ from unique intracellular vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(30):E6079–E88. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707380114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Inoue K, Branigan D, Xiong ZG. Zinc-induced neurotoxicity mediated by transient receptor potential melastatin 7 channels. J Biol Chem. 2010. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.040485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

29 Jun 2020

Dear Dr Runnels,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "CNNM Proteins Regulate the TRPM7 Channel to Control Cellular Divalent Cation Entry" for consideration as a Short Report by PLOS Biology.

Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editorial staff as well as by an academic editor with relevant expertise and I am writing to let you know that we would like to send your submission out for external peer review.

However, before we can send your manuscript to reviewers, we need you to complete your submission by providing the metadata that is required for full assessment. To this end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. Please click 'Revise Submission' from the Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire.

Please re-submit your manuscript within two working days, i.e. by Jul 01 2020 11:59PM.

Login to Editorial Manager here: https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology

During resubmission, you will be invited to opt-in to posting your pre-review manuscript as a bioRxiv preprint. Visit http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/preprints for full details. If you consent to posting your current manuscript as a preprint, please upload a single Preprint PDF when you re-submit.

Once your full submission is complete, your paper will undergo a series of checks in preparation for peer review. Once your manuscript has passed all checks it will be sent out for review.

Given the disruptions resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, please expect delays in the editorial process. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience caused and will do our best to minimize impact as far as possible.

Feel free to email us at plosbiology@plos.org if you have any queries relating to your submission.

Kind regards,

Ines

--

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

ialvarez-garcia@plos.org

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road

Cambridge, CB4 3DN

+44 1223–442810

Decision Letter 1

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

13 Aug 2020

Dear Dr Runnels,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "CNNM Proteins Regulate the TRPM7 Channel to Control Cellular Divalent Cation Entry" for consideration as a Short Report at PLOS Biology. Your manuscript has been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors, by an Academic Editor with relevant expertise, and by three independent reviewers.

The reviews of your manuscript are appended below. You will see that the reviewers find the work potentially interesting. However, based on their specific comments and following discussion with the Academic Editor, I regret that we cannot accept the current version of the manuscript for publication. We remain interested in your study and we would be willing to consider resubmission of a comprehensively revised version that thoroughly addresses all the reviewers' comments. We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript would be sent for further evaluation by the reviewers.

***IMPORTANT:

Having discussed the reviews with the Academic Editor, we think you should add more data to address the issues raised by the reviewers. A mere response/rebuttal to the criticism will be insufficient for eventual publication. This is particularly important in light of the comments made by reviewers 1 and 3. We think, in agreement with the Academic Editor, that the quantitative interpretation of ion concentration is substantial as it requires reevaluation and repetition of numerous experiments. Another important concern is related to the claim that both proteins would reside on opposite sides of polarized epithelia and thus not come into contact under physiological conditions.

We appreciate that these requests represent a great deal of extra work, and we are willing to relax our standard revision time to allow you six months to revise your manuscript. We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 6 months. Depending on the amount of new data you add during revision, we will reconsider whether your manuscript should be handled as a Short Report or as a Full Research Article.

If you find it useful, we would be happy to discuss with the Academic Editor a revision proposal that includes your planned experiments.”

Please email us (plosbiology@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns, or would like to request an extension. At this stage, your manuscript remains formally under active consideration at our journal; please notify us by email if you do not intend to submit a revision so that we may end consideration of the manuscript at PLOS Biology.

**IMPORTANT - SUBMITTING YOUR REVISION**

Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Please submit the following files along with your revised manuscript:

1. A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

*NOTE: In your point by point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context of each review. Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. The entire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point should be responded to individually, point by point.

You should also cite any additional relevant literature that has been published since the original submission and mention any additional citations in your response.

2. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. This should be uploaded as a "Related" file type.

*Resubmission Checklist*

When you are ready to resubmit your revised manuscript, please refer to this resubmission checklist: https://plos.io/Biology_Checklist

To submit a revised version of your manuscript, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' where you will find your submission record.

Please make sure to read the following important policies and guidelines while preparing your revision:

*Published Peer Review*

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*PLOS Data Policy*

Please note that as a condition of publication PLOS' data policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability) requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions arrived at in your manuscript. If you have not already done so, you must include any data used in your manuscript either in appropriate repositories, within the body of the manuscript, or as supporting information (N.B. this includes any numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.). For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5

*Blot and Gel Data Policy*

We require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare them now, if you have not already uploaded them. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive thus far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Gabriel Gasque

Senior Editor

in behalf of

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD,

Senior Editor,

ialvarez-garcia@plos.org,

PLOS Biology

*****************************************************

REVIEWS:

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, Bai et al. report a novel role of CNNM proteins in regulating TRPM7 cation channel. CNNM proteins are involved in Mg transport, but there has been a controversy over its precise function. The authors found that CNNM proteins bind to TRPM7 and stimulates its channel activity. TRPM7 is permeable to Mg and has been shown to play an important role in cellular and organismal Mg homeostasis. The authors claim that this study has revealed a crucial importance of CNNM proteins in regulating intracellular Mg levels by coordinating its direct role in Mg efflux and indirect role in Mg influx via TRPM7. However, the presented data are preliminary and not solid enough to support the authors' claim. In addition, there are many errors in the text. Substantial modifications and additional experiments will be needed to improve the quality of this manuscript to the level appropriate for publication in PLOS Biology. Major and minor problems are listed as follows.

Major problems:

1: The authors claim that CNNM proteins have dual functions in both Mg efflux by themselves and Mg influx by stimulating TRPM7. The idea itself sounds very attractive because it can reconcile the controversy over the function of CNNM proteins. However, the presented data clearly show that CNNM expression decreases Mg levels irrespective of the TRPM7 expression status (Fig 3C). Therefore, Mg efflux seems to be the dominant function of CNNM proteins, even if Mg influx may also be stimulated. The authors need to show that CNNM actually stimulates Mg influx in the presence of TRPM7 to validate their claim. It should also be noted that there are serious problems in Mg imaging analyses, which were used to quantify Mg levels (see the following comment no. 2).

Related to this issue, CNNM proteins are known to be associated with various congenital diseases, and several disease-related missense mutants have been shown to abolish Mg efflux activity. Using these mutant forms of CNNM proteins, the authors may be able to discriminate the activity for Mg influx via TRPM7 from that for Mg efflux. Experiments using such CNNM mutants are desirable.

2: There are serious problems in imaging analyses for Zn and Mg. As for Zn imaging, the authors show only a single fluorescence image, which was obtained at 5-10 min after the 30 microM Zn supplementation, for each sample. However, it cannot be excluded that the results just reflect uneven incorporation of the fluorescent probe. In addition, time-lapse analyses before and after the Zn addition to the medium should be performed to quantify Zn influx into cells.

Mg imaging experiments were done using Mag-Fluo4. It may be a good probe for time-lapse monitoring of the dynamic change in Mg levels in the same cell, but it is not ratiometric. Therefore, it cannot be used for quantifying absolute Mg levels, to compare different samples. For this purpose, the authors should use ratiometric probes for Mg with appropriate calibrations. Moreover, it should be noted that these Mg probes react not only with Mg but also strongly with Ca. TRPM7 channel is permeable to Ca, and thus, the results obtained by using fluorescent Mg probes need to be carefully interpreted. The authors should verify that the fluorescence signals in Mg imaging experiments properly reflect Mg levels, but not Ca levels, when analyzing TRPM7 functions.

3: CNNM proteins are mainly expressed in polarized epithelial cells in vivo and localized at their basolateral membrane, whereas TRPM proteins are localized at the apical membrane. Therefore, they are secluded from each other in epithelial cells. It is uncertain whether the authors' conclusion based on the analyses using non-polarized culture cells can be generalized. The authors should perform experiments using epithelial cells and investigate the localization, complex formation, and functional relationship of CNNM and TRPM.

4: The authors show the data of TRPM7-CNNM complex formation using culture cells ectopically expressing TRPM7. They should investigate whether endogenous TRPM7 proteins associate with endogenous CNNM proteins. Also, it should be addressed whether the complex formation status is affected by PRL expression or Mg availability, such as Mg depletion from the medium and Mg supplementation.

Minor problems:

Fig 1B: The estimated size of the bands in the IP samples seems to be larger than that in the lysate in the same gel.

Fig 1C: The authors claim that the expressed proteins co-localize at the cell border. However, the cells have become rounded and the most part is occupied by the nuclei. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the precise localization of these proteins based on the immunofluorescent images shown here. Ectopically expressed membrane proteins often aggregate intracellularly, and thus, more careful investigations, such as co-staining with plasma membrane markers with appropriate controls and quantifications, are needed.

Fig 1E: The information of the anti-TRPM7 antibody should be provided in the methods section.

Fig 2C: The CNNM4-immunoblotting result shows irregular bands in CNNM3&4-KO cells and CNNM3-KO cells. What do these signals represent? Furthermore, the authors performed immunoblotting analyses to verify these KO cells, but the changes at the genome level should be directly confirmed by DNA sequencing around the CRISPR-Cas9 target site and shown in the figure.

Fig 2E: The result is not clear enough to justify the authors' claim. In addition, no data for validating the specific labeling of membrane proteins are presented.

Fig 2F-H: Experiments using PRL-2 overexpression need appropriate controls. The results of R107E mutant shown in S9 fig should be moved here.

Fig 2G: The information of the anti-PRL-2 antibody should be provided in the methods section.

Fig 3A: The authors should perform appropriate statistical analyses to validate the claim.

S1 Table: Many candidate proteins are identified in MS analyses. The authors should explain the reason why they chose CNNM proteins for further analyses. Also, experimental details of MS analyses should also be described.

S7 fig: Immunoblotting and immunofluorescence data for SLC41A1 should be shown in the figure to verify its proper expression and localization at the plasma membrane.

Other minor errors:

Line 25: Remove "it".

Line 133: D and E should be E and F, respectively.

Line 147: Fig 1D should be Fig 1E.

Line 148: overexpression "of" either

Line 168: S7 fig 6 should be S7 fig B.

Line 174: Fig 1C,E should be Fig 1D,F.

Line 179: Remove "Fig 2A,B".

Line 244: "evaluate"

Line 251: Fig 3C should also be refferred here.

Line 283: The voltage information should be indicated.

Line 389: "were" resolved

Line 443: Experimental details of the ICP-MS analyses should be described.

Line 454: transfection "of"

Line 463: ANOVA should be used for statistical analyses. Also, two-tailed test would be appropriate.

Line 674: "LacZ" in the figure should be mentioned in the legend.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript provides convincing data supporting the hypothesis that CNNM proteins are regulatory/accessory proteins enhancing divalent ion flux through the channel domain of the TRPM7 bifunctional protein. In the absence of TRPM7, CNNMs carry an important magnesium efflux role.

While the data are comprehensive and logically presented, major confusion remains in regards to the TRPM7 species, antibody tag and expression system used. For example, it seems that three different overexpression systems were used for TRPM7 alone, and all in HEK293 cells: FLAG tag (identified as mouse TRPM7, tet-induction), HA tag (species not identified, also not described in methods as of source etc. Human?), and a third unspecified "stably overexpressing TRPM7" cell line, also not described in the methods (line 141 and beyond). What was the tag, source and overexpression system (tetracycline? Other?) of the "stably overexpressing TRPM7" system? In most cases, TRPM7 overexpression leads to cell detachment and cell loss. How did the authors counteract that in this cell line? The above has to be clarified in order to substantiate the conclusions drawn.

The single point mutation in the TRPM7 channel domain is cited from previous work by the authors, however, it would be helpful to again mention the source and species and expression system in the methods.

S5B (described line 151 and beyond) clearly shows a doubling in Zn influx in the absence of TRPM7 and overexpression of CNNM2 compared to WT alone. Is this statistically significant? This is in contrast to what is seen in HAP1 cells (S6). The text guides the reader away from this observation and instead provides a lump sum statement that endogenous TRPM7 is required for Zn influx. This might be the case for the HAP1 cells, but in HEK293 the picture might be more differentiated. Perhaps worth briefly discussing (if statistical significance is observed in HEK293)?

The primer sequences for the Turbo ID experiments need to be provided in the Supplemental Data (line 352).

Reviewer #3: In the present paper, Runnels and colleagues identify and characterize CNNM proteins as modulators of TRPM7 function and propose the concept that CNNMs may serve as regulatory subunits of TRPM7 channel complexes in the plasma membrane to fine-tune cellular magnesium entry via TRPM7.

In principle, these are very interesting observations. However, there are a number of critical issues that require further attention.

Conceptual shortcomings:

(1) The physiological relevance of the results is rather limited. In particular, the study mostly relies on proteomic data and functional experiments conducted with cultured cell lines (HEK293) and - with few exceptions - overexpressed proteins. Hence, it remains unknown whether TRPM7 interacts with CNNM and RPL proteins in native tissues.

(2) Mechanistically, the regulatory role of CNNM proteins for TRPM7 activity has been clearly defined. Several important questions remain to be addressed. Thus, it remains elusive which channel characteristics of TRPM7 are affected by CNNM or RPL proteins (open probability, kinetics of activation/rundown, sensitivity to PIP2, Mg2+ and ATP etc.). Does TRPM7 interact with CNNMs transiently or are stable complexes formed? What is the stoichiometry of such heteromeric complexes? Which domains of TRPM7 and CNNM proteins are required for the interaction to occur?

(3) The dominating theme of the Abstract, Introduction and Discussion sections is cellular Mg2+ homeostasis and possible implications of CNNM/RPL proteins in Mg2+ transport. In this regard, there is a kind of disconnect with the actual experiments performed mostly concentrating on biochemical verification of proteomic data, imaging of free Zn2+ levels and patch-clamp assessment of outward monovalent cation currents of TRPM7. As the TRPM7 channel plays a central physiological role in the transport of Zn2+ and Ca2+ (in vitro and in vivo), it appears to be somewhat premature and unjustified to claim that the experiments shown are mainly relevant for Mg2+ homeostasis.

(4) Nearly all the data shown in the manuscript indicate that CNNM/RPL proteins are not essential (required) TRPM7 function per se. For instance, Fig. 5 clearly shows that TRPM7 currents were only reduced in the absence of CNNM3 and CNNM4. Therefore, the authors should avoid claims that CNNN proteins are 'required' for or 'control' the TRPM7 channel. It would be more appropriate to use terms like 'regulate' or 'modulate'.

(5) The author correctly point out that most of the intracellular Mg2+ is bound to ATP and other metabolites and that free Mg2+ accounts for only ~10% of total Mg2+ levels. It remains unclear how to correlate the reported alterations in Mag-Fluor4 fluorescence and 25Mg2+ uptake with particular changes either in free Mg2+ levels or in total Mg2+ content of the cell. The authors regularly claim in the text that CNNM/RPL are central for cellular Mg2+ homeostasis. To this end, the authors have to provide direct evidence supporting such a conclusion.

(6) The most prominent phenotype of TRPM7-deficient cells is reduced total Mg2+ levels entailing a Mg2+-dependent proliferation block. The authors created CNNM3 and CNNM4 gene-deficient clones which are important and valuable reagents to demonstrate the physiological importance of these proteins. If CNNM proteins are indeed required for TRPM7-mediated Mg2+ uptake, CNNM-deficient cells should somehow mirror the TRPM7 null phenotype. However, the mutant cells appear to grow normally under standard cell culture conditions (the authors did not explicitly state that extra Mg2+ has to be added to the culture medium). These results have to be transparently reported and discussed accordingly.

Methodological shortcomings:

(1) TRPM7 proteome.

Proteomic procedures are not described at all. As gleaned from the short text in the footnote of Table S1, it appears that FLAG-tagged TRPM7 was pulled down using FLAG-specific antibodies in HEK293 cells overexpressing the recombinant protein. The authors have to provide a detailed and fully transparent protocol for all steps of the experiment, including cell lysis conditions, immunoprecipitation, and assessment of the yield and purity of enriched TRPM7 proteins. What was the negative control to rule out unspecific hits? How exactly were raw MS data analysed? What were the biological and technical replicates of these experiments and how as statistical analysis of the data done? How were proteomic data sets assessed qualitatively and quantitatively and what exactly were the criteria and the statistical procedure to identify hits? The authors should explain what is exactly depicted in the '293-TRPM7 peptide count' and '293- peptide count' columns of Table S1. Which proteins are considered as interaction partners of TRPM7? Most proteins are abundantly present in both columns. Are they considered as false-positive hits? What was the ratio of positive and unspecific hits? CNNM3 and CNNM4 proteins are represented by a relatively low frequency of peptides detected. How does this finding support the hypothesis that that CNNMs are relevant interaction partners of TRPM7? Finally, fully annotated proteome results have to be submitted to a publicly accessable database available for reviewers and the scientific community.

(2) IP-based assessment of TRPM7-CNNM interaction.

Many methodological issues are not described. The authors should report all procedures and reagents used for IP experiments. Also, please explain what kind of negative control is shown in Fig. 1A? Presumably, HA-TRPM7 protein was not expressed in HEK293 cells, but the corresponding figure legend does not clearly explain this point. As CNNM proteins are transmembrane proteins, incomplete solubilisation of the membrane fraction is a common limitation of IP approaches in general, i.e. pull-down of TRPM7-containing vesicles together with CNNM proteins may occur. How was the quality of the membrane solubilisation assessed for the experiments shown in Fig. 1?

(3) 'Zinc influx' assay.

In the manuscript Zn2+ imaging experiments reflect the main approach to identify the functional role of CNNM proteins. However, this is the weakest aspect of the manuscript. In many figures (Fig. 1D, 2D, 3D, 4C, S3, S5-S9), the authors used whole-frame images captured at only one time point to measure intracellular Fluo-Zin-3 fluorescence and described this approach as a 'zinc influx' assay. At best, such images can rather crudely report on the steady-state level of free cytosolic Zn2+, but cannot be interpreted as dynamic 'zinc- influx'. Thus, transient expression of CNNM proteins may affect efflux of cytosolic Zn2+ or release of Zn2+ from intracellular compartments (free Zn2+ accounts for only ~1% of the total cellular Zn2+ content). In addition, overexpression of TRPM7 or CNNMs may influence the loading efficiency of Fluo-Zin-3 rather than free Zn2+ levels. Furthermore, the authors randomly picked up cells to quantify the Fluo-Zin-3 fluorescence, but it is unlikely that CNNM cDNAs were transiently transcribed in 100% of cells. How would Fluo-Zin-3 fluorescence look like in un-transfected cells on the same dish? The conventional approach to conduct such dynamic influx studies is based on single-cell imaging over time to also work out the kinetics of changes of Fluo-Zin-3 fluorescence in transfected cells. Also, calibration of Zin-3 fluorescence against reference concentrations of Zn2+ is common practice to verify the physiological impact of alterations of Zin-3 fluorescence and to exclude numerous potential artefacts like movement of cells, bleaching of the probe, and reduced loading of the probe. TRPM7 blockers should be used to demonstrate that changes of Zn2+ uptake are indeed due to increased TRPM7 channel activity. Hence, the author's claim that CNNMs regulate TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx is not convincingly supported by the data shown.

(4) Mag-Fluo4 imaging.

As explained above for experiments with Fluo-Zin-3, single snapshots of cells loaded with Mag-Fluor4 do not provide meaningful mechanistic information about the functional role of CNNMs.

Decision Letter 2

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

10 Aug 2021

Dear Dr Runnels,

Thank you very much for submitting a revised version of your manuscript entitled "CNNM Proteins Regulate the TRPM7 Channel to Control Cellular Divalent Cation Entry" for consideration as a Short Report at PLOS Biology. This revised version of your manuscript has been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors, the Academic Editor and two of the original reviewers.

In light of the reviews (attached below), we will not be able to accept the current version of the manuscript, but we would welcome re-submission of a revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments. We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent for further evaluation by the reviewers.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 3 months.

Please email us (plosbiology@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns, or would like to request an extension. At this stage, your manuscript remains formally under active consideration at our journal; please notify us by email if you do not intend to submit a revision so that we may end consideration of the manuscript at PLOS Biology.

**IMPORTANT - SUBMITTING YOUR REVISION**

Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Having discussed these comments with the Academic Editor, we think that the points raised by reviewer 1 are generally reasonable and that you should address them the best you can, within a reasonable timeframe. If the inclusion of the other suggested CNNM mutants and of the extended localization data would be too time consuming, we would not press for those experiments. In the latter case, you should acknowledge the possibility of overexpression artefacts. Regarding the comments of reviewer 2, we think you should try to integrate the inconclusive results of the CNNM mutants in your manuscript.

Please submit the following files along with your revised manuscript:

1. A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

*NOTE: In your point by point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context of each review. Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. The entire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point should be responded to individually, point by point.

You should also cite any additional relevant literature that has been published since the original submission and mention any additional citations in your response.

2. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. This should be uploaded as a "Related" file type.

*Re-submission Checklist*

When you are ready to resubmit your revised manuscript, please refer to this re-submission checklist: https://plos.io/Biology_Checklist

To submit a revised version of your manuscript, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' where you will find your submission record.

Please make sure to read the following important policies and guidelines while preparing your revision:

*Published Peer Review*

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*PLOS Data Policy*

Please note that as a condition of publication PLOS' data policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability) requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions arrived at in your manuscript. If you have not already done so, you must include any data used in your manuscript either in appropriate repositories, within the body of the manuscript, or as supporting information (N.B. this includes any numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.). For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5

*Blot and Gel Data Policy*

We require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare them now, if you have not already uploaded them. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive thus far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Gabriel Gasque on behalf of

--

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

ialvarez-garcia@plos.org

----------------------------------------------

Reviewers’ comments

Rev. 1:

The authors have made a significant effort in this revision and responded to many of the comments on the previous version. However, there still remain several problems that have not been sufficiently addressed or left uncorrected, which are explained below.

1: The experiments using 25Mg (Fig. 3A) clearly show that Mg2+ influx is stimulated by CNNM proteins. However, the critical point of this paper is whether it is ascribed to the "stimulation of TRPM7 activity by the protein-protein interaction with CNNM". The influx of 25Mg may just reflect the TRPM7 function independent of the interaction with CNNM proteins, for maintaining intracellular Mg2+ levels. The Na+ depletion experiments (Fig. 3E) show the increase in Mg2+ levels, even when Mg2+ efflux by CNNM proteins was probably suppressed. However, such Mg2+ increase can be caused by the reverse action of the ectopically expressed CNNM4 proteins under very abnormal condition. CNNM4 normally extrudes Mg2+ in exchange for Na+ influx, but in the absence of extracellular Na+, it can extrude Na+ in exchange for Mg2+ influx in the reverse action. In general, cells have approximately 10 mM intracellular Na+, of which efflux is theoretically sufficient for a few mM level increase in intracellular Mg2+. The authors' data show that Mg2+ increase by Na+ depletion was suppressed by NS8593 (TRPM7 inhibitor) and TRPM7 knockout, but I am wondering how these treatments could suppress the reverse action of the expressed CNNM4 proteins.

Related to this problem, I suggested the authors to use congenital disease-related CNNM mutants in the previous review comment. The authors actually tested the effect of one disease-related point mutant (CNNM2 T568I) and several deletion mutants. However, domain level deletions would certainly affect the protein structure, and the T568I mutation was reported to abolish the interaction with its ligand ATP (J. Biol. Chem. 289, 14731-14739, 2014), which affects the whole structure of the CNNM proteins (Sci. Adv. 7, eabe6140, 2021; Nat. Commun. 12, 4028, 2021). Therefore, these mutants may not be appropriate for discriminating Mg2+ influx function (via TRPM7) from Mg2+ efflux function (by itself). It should be noted here that there are several other point mutations in CNNM4, which are responsible for Jalili syndrome and abolish the Mg2+ efflux function, such as S196P and S200Y, … (Sci. Adv. 7, eabe6140, 2021). In addition, recently reported structural data of its bacterial ortholog revealed that the residues are directly involved in the recognition of Mg2+ in the pore region formed in the membrane-spanning domain (Sci. Adv. 7, eabe6140, 2021). Mutations in these residues are expected to specifically affect the Mg2+ transporting function without so deleterious effects on the whole protein structure. In addition, the possibility of the reverse action of CNNM4 can be excluded using these mutants. The concept of Mg2+ influx function independent of Mg2+ efflux function is the core of this study, and thus, the authors should make the point clear by testing the effect of these congenital disease-related point mutants and showing the results.

2: The authors performed Mg2+ imaging analyses using Magfura2, but showed only the ratio values in the figure. As stated in the previous review comment, the authors should also perform appropriate calibration and show the calculated intracellular Mg2+ concentration, which is needed for proper evaluation of the data.

3: The newly added data of the localization of CNNM proteins (S11-S14) are not convincing. The authors use NHERF1 as an apical marker, but the signals do not show apical localization pattern in the presented data. In addition, localization of membrane proteins in epithelial cells are normally evaluated by vertical section images reconstituted from the stacks of confocal section images. Beautiful examples of apical localization of NHERF1 can be seen in the published papers (Mol. Membr. Biol. 18, 3-11, 2001; Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 311, F343-F351, 2016), in which the signals are observed only at the top side membrane in a large dot-like manner. In general, cell polarization requires careful handling of cell culture, and I suppose the cells did not polarize well enough for evaluating apical-basolateral localization. Normal localization of marker proteins is prerequisite for evaluating CNNM localization.

However, reading the authors' reply, I understand that further investigation in epithelial cells is not needed in this study. In that case, these preliminary data of expressed CNNM proteins and their descriptions in Discussion should be removed.

4: Ectopically expressed membrane proteins often go to unusual locations. Therefore, localization data of SLC41A1 would be essential for appropriate evaluation of the results, as requested in the previous review comment.

5: In this revision, the authors added sequence information of the CNNM knockout cell lines used in this study (lines 540-547). Several frame-shift deletions in CNNM3 are described, but no information of CNNM4 is provided.

6: In the previous review comment, I listed several minor problems as "other minor points" at the last part. The authors answered properly to most of them, but some are left uncorrected. The following is the list of my comments on the original version and the authors' reply in the rebuttal letter, which are actually not corrected despite the authors' reply. The authors used ANOVA only for analyzing the results of Fig. 3A in this revision, but there are other data that need ANOVA (Figs. 1D, 2B, 2H, 3C, 3D, 4C, 4E, S2B, S8B, S8C, S8D, S9B, S10B, and S10F).

Line 25: Remove "it". - removed

Line 244: "evaluate" - This text is now "evaluated"

Line 389: "were" resolved - "were" was added.

Line 463: ANOVA should be used for statistical analyses. Also, two-tailed test would be appropriate. We have updated the statistical tests used in our analysis.

Rev. 2:

The authors' have addressed my concerns. However, I strongly suggest to include their new negative data on the CNNM mutants (point 1 under Reviewer 1) with a short explanation why the experiments were done and a short discussion. While these data are negative, I feel it is important for the scientific community to know about negative results within the framework of a larger study such as this. It will provide context and likely spark further studies.

Decision Letter 3

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

12 Nov 2021

Dear Dr Runnels,

Thank you for submitting your revised Short Report entitled "CNNM Proteins Regulate the TRPM7 Channel to Control Cellular Divalent Cation Entry" for publication in PLOS Biology. I have now discussed the revision with the rest of the team and obtained advice from the Academic Editor.

Based on the reviews, we will probably accept this manuscript for publication, provided you satisfactorily address the remaining policy-related requests (see below).

In addition, we would like you to consider a suggestion to improve the title:

"CNNM proteins selectively bind to the TRPM7 channel to stimulate divalent cation entry into cells"

As you address these items, please take this last chance to review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the cover letter that accompanies your revised manuscript.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within two weeks.

To submit your revision, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' to find your submission record. Your revised submission must include the following:

-  a cover letter that should detail your responses to any editorial requests, if applicable, and whether changes have been made to the reference list

-  a Response to Reviewers file that provides a detailed response to the reviewers' comments (if applicable)

-  a track-changes file indicating any changes that you have made to the manuscript. 

NOTE: If Supporting Information files are included with your article, note that these are not copyedited and will be published as they are submitted. Please ensure that these files are legible and of high quality (at least 300 dpi) in an easily accessible file format. For this reason, please be aware that any references listed in an SI file will not be indexed. For more information, see our Supporting Information guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/supporting-information  

*Published Peer Review History*

Please note that you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*Early Version*

Please note that an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you opted out when submitting your manuscript. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online, uncheck the box. Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us as soon as possible if you or your institution is planning to press release the article.

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Ines

--

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD,

Senior Editor,

ialvarez-garcia@plos.org,

PLOS Biology

------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATA POLICY:

Thank you very much for submitting the data file containing the data underlying all the graphs shown in the figures. We have found several mistakes in the labels that should be amended:

Fig. S6: First Fig. S6E should be labelled S6F, and second Fig. S6E should be S6H

Fig. S8: Second Fig. S8B should be S8C, Fig. S8C should be S8D and Fig. S8F should be S8G - also please make sure you include the labels in this graph.

Fig. S11: Fig. S11E should be S11F, Fig. S11F should be S11G and Fig. S11G should be S11H

Please also make sure that the files deposited in the ProteomeXchange database (PXD026635) are made publicly available or we won't be able to proceed with production.

Decision Letter 4

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

26 Nov 2021

Dear Dr Runnels,

On behalf of my colleagues and the Academic Editor, Raimund Dutzler, I am pleased to say that we can in principle accept your Short Report entitled "CNNM proteins selectively bind to the TRPM7 channel to stimulate divalent cation entry into cells" for publication in PLOS Biology, provided you address any remaining formatting and reporting issues. These will be detailed in an email that will follow this letter and that you will usually receive within 2-3 business days, during which time no action is required from you. Please note that we will not be able to formally accept your manuscript and schedule it for publication until you have any requested changes.

Please take a minute to log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production process.

PRESS

We frequently collaborate with press offices. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. If the press office is planning to promote your findings, we would be grateful if they could coordinate with biologypress@plos.org. If you have not yet opted out of the early version process, we ask that you notify us immediately of any press plans so that we may do so on your behalf.

We also ask that you take this opportunity to read our Embargo Policy regarding the discussion, promotion and media coverage of work that is yet to be published by PLOS. As your manuscript is not yet published, it is bound by the conditions of our Embargo Policy. Please be aware that this policy is in place both to ensure that any press coverage of your article is fully substantiated and to provide a direct link between such coverage and the published work. For full details of our Embargo Policy, please visit http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/.

Thank you again for choosing PLOS Biology for publication and supporting Open Access publishing. We look forward to publishing your study. 

Sincerely, 

Ines

--

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD 

Senior Editor 

PLOS Biology

ialvarez-garcia@plos.org

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Mass spectrometry reveals TRPM7-interacting proteins.

    For identification of TRPM7 interacting proteins by LC-MS/MS, purified TRPM7 was resolved in a Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gel, and each gel band was subjected to in-gel reduction, alkylation, tryptic digestion, and peptide extraction with a standard protocol. Peptides were solubilized in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and analyzed by Nano LC-MS/MS with Dionex Ultimate 3000 RLSC Nano System interfaced with a Velos-LTQ-Orbitrap (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or a QExactive HF (Thermo Fisher Scientific) based on instrument availability. Shown are results from samples immunopurified from LTRPC7 cells in the absence of tetracycline to keep TRPM7 expression levels low and from control cells (293T). The table shows proteins that were identified in 2 experimental replicates of samples from LTRPC7 cells but not in in control 293T cells.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Raw Images. Unprocessed images of blots from Figs 1, 2 and 4 and S1, S3, S5, S6, S8, S10S12 and S16 Figs.

    (PDF)

    S1 Data. Underlying data for Figs 14 and S2 and S6S12 Figs.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Fig. CNNMs interact with TRPM6.

    HA-TRPM6 was coexpressed with FLAG-tagged CNNM1-4 in HEK-293T cells, and the channel was immunoprecipitated with HA-agarose. CNNM1 and CNNM3 strongly interacted with TRPM6. An interaction between TRPM6 with CNNM2 and CNNM4 was not observed. CNNMs were not immunoprecipitated in HEK-293T cells N.T. with HA-TRPM6. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. N.T., not transfected.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Expression of CNNMs suppress expression of EGFP.

    (A) EGFP was cotransfected with CNNM1-4 in HEK-293T cells and GFP protein expression was assessed by fluorescence microscopy. Coexpression of CNNM2 and CNNM4 with GFP significantly reduced GFP protein expression, most likely as a result of a decrease in intracellular Mg2+. (B) 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. TRPM7 interacts with native CNNMs in different cell lines.

    (A–D) HA-TRPM7 was overexpressed in the indicated cells and was the immunoprecipitated with HA-agarose. Native CNNM3 and CNNM4 coimmunoprecipitated with HA-TRPM7 transiently transfected into Hela cells. In OK cells transiently transfected with HA-TRPM7, only native CNNM3 was detected as interacting with HA-TRPM7. In HAP1 cells, both CNNM3 and CNNM4 could be weakly be coimmunoprecipitated with HA-TRPM7, which was expressed by viral transduction using the Ad-TRPM7-HA adenovirus. Note that the lower band in the lysate of the CNNM4 blot is a nonspecific band. In RPTEC/TERT cells transduced with Ad-TRPM7-HA, native CNNM3 coimmunoprecipitated with overexpressed HA-TRPM7. (E) Native TRPM7 is highly expressed in ZR-75-1 cells. Immunoprecipitation of native TRPM7 efficiently immunoprecipitated native CNNM4. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. OK, opossum kidney proximal tubule.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Localization of TRPM7 and CNNM3 in HEK-293T cells.

    (A) Confocal images taken from HEK-293T cells transfected with FLAG-CNNM3. Shown are images of FLAG-CNNM3 and the endogenous Na/K-ATPase, a plasma membrane marker. CNNM3 is often found at the plasma membrane colocalized with the Na/K-ATPase. (B) Confocal images taken from HEK-293T cells transfected with HA-TRPM7 and FLAG-CNNM3.TRPM7 can be found colocalized with CNNM3 at the cell border but is also observed intracellularly. Dashed white boxes indicate regions of interest that were enlarged. Scale bar = 20 μM.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. CNNM3 is vicinal to TRPM7.

    Proximity-dependent BioID is a recently developed method that allows the identification of proteins in the close vicinity (10 to 30 nm) of a protein of interest in living cells. We used the optimized E. coli BirA biotin ligase (TurboID) to create a fusion protein between CNNM3 and FLAG-tagged TurboID (CNNM3-FLAG-TurboID). As a negative control, we used EYFP fused to FLAG-tagged TurboID (YFP-FLAG-TurboID). CNNM3-TurboID and YFP-TurboID were transfected into 293-TRPM7 cells expressing FLAG-TRPM7. The top blot shows equal expression of TRPM7 in the lysate. In cells expressing TRPM7 with CNNM3-FLAG-TurboID treated with biotin, SA was able to efficiently purify biotinylated TRPM7. By contrast, for cells expressing the TRPM7 with the negative control YFP-TurboID, no biotinylated TRPM7 was purified with the SA. Blots show expression of CNNM3-TurboID and YFP-TurboID in cell lysates and following purification with SA. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. BioID, biotin identification; SA, streptavidin agarose.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. The TRPM7 channel and its pore is required for CNNM-mediated divalent cation entry in HEK-293 cells.

    (A) Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Overexpression of CNNM2 (0.15 μg CNNM2 DNA) in WT HEK-293T cells 293T(WT) elicited an increase cellular Zn2+. By contrast, overexpression of CNNM2 (using 0.6 μg instead of 0.15 μg CNNM2 DNA) in HEK-293T cells deficient in TRPM7 293T(ΔM7) did not increase cellular Zn2+. Shown are images taken at a time point 5 to 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. These data indicate that the native TRPM7 channel is required for CNNM-mediated divalent influx in HEK-293 cells. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the results from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (C) Western blot showing expression of CNNM2 in the cells used for the experiment described in (A). (D) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to evaluate how CNNM2 overexpression affects the rate of Zn2+ influx compared in 293T(WT) versus 293T(ΔM7) cells. The TRPM7 channel inhibitor NS8593 (10 μM) was employed to further investigate whether the CNNM2-mediated increase in Fluo-Zin-3 fluorescence upon CNNM2 overexpression in 293T(WT) was dependent on TRPM7 channel function. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. (E) Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. HA-tagged mouse TRPM7 (WT) and TRPM7-E1047K HEK-293 expressing cells 293-M7(E1047K) were used for these experiments (see Methods). Overexpression of CNNM2 with WT TRPM7, but not the TRPM7-E1047K pore-inactive mutant increased Zn2+ uptake. However, no Zn2+ uptake was observed when a channel-inactive mutant was coexpressed with CNNM2. White scale bar = 100 μM. (F) Quantification of the results from (E). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (G) Western blot showing expression of TRPM7 and CNNM2 from the experimental samples described in (E). (H) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate rate of Zn2+ influx in 293, 293(M7), and 293M7(E1047K) cells transfected with CNNM2. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salt solution; WT, wild-type.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. The TRPM7 channel is required for CNNM-mediated divalent cation entry in HAP1 cells.

    (A) A Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point 5 to 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Overexpression of CNNM2 in WT HAP1 cells HAP1(WT) using a recombinant adenovirus expressing FLAG-CNNM2 elicited an increase in cellular Zn2+. By contrast, overexpression of CNNM2 in HAP1 cells deficient in TRPM7 HAP1(ΔM7) did not significantly increase cellular Zn2+. Expression of LacZ was used as a negative control. These data indicate that the native TRPM7 channel is required for CNNM-mediated divalent influx in HAP1 cells. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the data in (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. WT, wild-type.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. CNNM4 but not SLC41A1 stimulates TRPM7-mediated divalent cation entry.

    (A) A Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. In parallel experiments, intracellular Mg2+ levels were assessed using the Mag-Fluo-4 Mg2+ indicator. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of Mag-Fluo-4 results from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100.* indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (C) Separate control experiments were performed using the Mag-Fura-2 dye to show that the magnesium levels of 293-TRPM7 cells expressing CNNM4 as well as SLC41A1 decreased compared to 293-TRPM7 cells alone. Plotted is the ratio of the fluorescence intensity at 510 nm from 340 nm versus 380 nm excitation. 30 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 30. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (D) Quantification of Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator fluorescence intensity from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100.* indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (E) Western blot evaluating expression of CNNM4, SLC41A1, and TRPM7 in the indicated cell lines. (F) Confocal images taken from HEK-293T cells transfected with MYC-SLC41A1 and FLAG-CNNM3. SLC41A1 can be found colocalized with CNNM3 at the cell border but is also observed intracellularly, which may be due to the effects of its overexpression. Scale bar = 20 μM. (G) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate rate of Zn2+ influx in the different cell lines. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salt solution.

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. KO of CNNMs in independent cells lines show similar loss of TRPM7 function.

    (A) Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor TRPM7 function in independent cell lines in which CNNM3, CNNM4, and both CNNM3 and CNNM4 were deleted by CRISPR/Cas-9 from 293-TRPM7 cells (293-M7-ΔCNNM3, 293-M7-ΔCNNM4, 293-M7-ΔCNNM3/4. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Similar loss of TRPM7 function was observed among the 2 independent lines tested, with deletion of CNNM3 and CNNM4 producing the largest loss-of-function. All the cells in the assay were treated with tetracycline to induce TRPM7 expression. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the results from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. KO, knockout.

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. PRL isoforms stimulate TRPM7-mediated divalent cation entry.

    (A) Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Coexpression of the PRL isoforms PRL-1, PRL2, and PRL-3 all stimulated TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the data from (A). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (C) Western blot demonstrating expression levels of TRPM7 and PRL isoforms in the experimental samples from (A). (D) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate rate of Zn2+ influx in the different cell lines. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. (E) Coexpression of WT PRL-2 (PRL-2(WT)) but not the CNNM-binding deficient mutant PRL-2(R017E) stimulates TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake. White scale bar = 100 μM. (F) Quantification of the data from (E). A total of 100 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 100. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (G) Western blot demonstrating expression levels of TRPM7, PRL-2(WT), PRL-2(R107E) in the experimental samples from (E). (H) Separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate rate of Zn2+ influx in the different cell lines. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salt solution; PRL, phosphatase of regenerating liver; WT, wild-type.

    (TIF)

    S11 Fig. Effect of mutants that disable CNNM Mg2+ efflux activity on TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx.

    (A) A Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Coexpression of mutational variants of CNNM2 known to disrupt CNNM2 Mg2+ efflux activity also affected TRPM7-mediated increases in intracellular free Zn2+ to varying degrees. (B) Quantification of the data from (A). A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (C) Separate control experiments were performed using the Mag-Fura-2 dye to show that the magnesium levels of 293-TRPM7 cells expressing CNNM2 are decreased compared to 293-TRPM7 cells alone and that CNNM2 mutants used in (A) do not effectively lower intracellular Mg2+ levels as effectively as WT CNNM2. Plotted is the ratio of the fluorescence intensity at 510 nm from 340 nm versus 380 nm excitation. A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (D) Western blot validating expression of TRPM7 and CNNM2 WT and mutants. Vinculin is shown as a loading control. (E) A Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Coexpression of mutational variants of CNNM4 known to disrupt CNNM4 Mg2+ efflux activity also affected TRPM7-mediated increases in intracellular free Zn2+ to varying degrees. Strikingly, the CNNM4(S196P) mutant, which is reported to disrupted Mg2+ binding to the CNNM4 transmembrane domain, enhanced Zn2+ influx compared to WT CNNM4 and the other tested variants. (F) Quantification of the data from (E). A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (G) Separate control experiments were performed using the Mag-Fura-2 dye to show that the magnesium levels of 293-TRPM7 cells expressing CNNM4 are decreased compared to 293-TRPM7 cells alone and that CNNM4 mutants used in (E) do not effectively lower intracellular Mg2+ levels as effectively as WT CNNM4. Plotted is the ratio of the fluorescence intensity at 510 nm from 340 nm versus 380 nm excitation. A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (H) To validate the impact of the CNNM4 mutants on Zn2+ influx, separate time course measurements were also acquired to demonstrate the rate of Zn2+ influx in the different cell lines. HBSS media was replaced with HBSS containing 30 μM ZnCl2 for the period indicated. The fluorescence intensity of the cells (mean of 50 cells) were quantified for each time point. (I) Western blot validating expression of TRPM7 and CNNM4 WT and mutants. Vinculin is shown as a loading control. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data. HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salt solution; WT, wild-type.

    (TIF)

    S12 Fig. Effect of ARL15 overexpression and knockdown on TRPM7-mediated Zn2+ influx.

    (A) Zinc influx assay using the Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Coexpression of the ARL15 protein suppressed TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake compared to nontransfected cells. White scale bar = 100 μM. (B) Quantification of the data from (A). A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (C) Zinc influx assay using Fluo-Zin-3 Zn2+ indicator was used to monitor the intracellular concentration of Zn2+ in intact cells. Shown are images taken at a time point between 5 and 10 minutes after application of 30 μM ZnCl2. Coexpression of siRNAs targeting the ARL15 protein increased TRPM7-dependent Zn2+ uptake compared to a control siRNA. White scale bar = 100 μM. (D) Quantification of the data from (A). A total of 50 cells were randomly selected for quantification. n = 50. * indicates a p-value of less than 0.05. (E) Western blot validating ability of 2 independent siRNAs targeting ARL15 to knockdown expression of ARL15 compared to the nonsilencing control. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images. The underlying data for this figure can be found in S1 Data.

    (TIF)

    S13 Fig. Localization of overexpressed FLAG-CNNM isoforms in OK cells.

    Shown are confocal microscopy images taken of the top (apical), middle, and bottom of cells. FLAG-tagged CNNM proteins were stained with the rabbit monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. NHERF-1, an apical membrane marker that localizes to microvilli on polarized epithelial cells, was stained using a mouse monoclonal antibody. FLAG-CNNM isoforms were transiently transfected in OK cells and stained following a standard protocol (see Methods). Shown are the localization for (A) CNNM1, (B) CNNM2, (C) CNNM3, and (D) CNNM4. Scale bar = 20 μM. OK, opossum kidney proximal tubule.

    (TIF)

    S14 Fig. Localization of overexpressed FLAG-CNNM isoforms in Caco-2 cells.

    Shown are confocal microscopy images taken of the top (apical), middle, and bottom of cells. FLAG-CNNM2 and FLAG-CNNM4 were stained with the rabbit monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. NHERF-1, an apical membrane marker that localizes to microvilli on polarized epithelial cells, was stained with a mouse monoclonal antibody. FLAG-CNNM2 and FLAG-CNNM4 isoforms were virally transduced into Caco-2 cells and stained following a standard protocol (see Methods). Shown are the localization for (A) CNNM2 and (B) CNNM4. Scale bar = 20 μM.

    (TIF)

    S15 Fig. Localization of overexpressed FLAG-CNNM isoforms in RPTEC/TERT1 cells.

    Shown are confocal microscopy images taken of the top (apical), middle, and bottom of cells. FLAG-CNNM2 and FLAG-CNNM4 were stained with the rabbit monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. NHERF-1, an apical membrane marker that localizes to microvilli on polarized epithelial cells, was stained with a mouse monoclonal antibody. FLAG-CNNM2 and FLAG-CNNM4 isoforms were virally transduced into RPTEC/TERT1 cells and stained following a standard immunofluorescence protocol (see Methods). Shown are the localization for (A) CNNM2 and (B) CNNM4. Scale bar = 20 μM.

    (TIF)

    S16 Fig. CNNM isoforms form specific heteroligomers.

    (A) FLAG-CNNM1 and FLAG-CNNM2 were individually expressed in HEK-293T cells. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM1 effectively immunopurified native CNNM4, whereas native CNNM3 was immunopurified to a lesser degree. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM2 immunopurified native CNNM3 but not native CNNM4. (B) FLAG-CNNM3 and FLAG-CNNM4 were individually expressed in HEK-293T cells. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM4 efficiently immunopurified native CNNM1, whereas immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM3 did not immunopurify native CNNM1. (C) FLAG-CNNM3 was expressed in HEK-293T cells. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM3 was able to coimmunopurify native CNNM4. (D) FLAG-CNNM4 was expressed in HEK-293T cells. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-CNNM4 was able to coimmunopurify native CNNM3. (E) Immunoprecipitation of native CNNM3 is able to coimmunopurify native CNNM4. Anti-myc antibody was used as a negative control for immunoprecipitation. Indicated is the nonspecific band derived from the antibody used for the immunoprecipitation. Below this band is CNNM4, as indicted by the arrow. (F) Immunoprecipitation of native CNNM4 is able to coimmunopurify native CNNM3. The anti-myc antibody was used as a negative control for immunoprecipitation. Indicated is the nonspecific band derived from the antibody used for the immunoprecipitation. Below the nonspecific band is CNNM3, as indicted by the arrow. Unprocessed images of blots are shown in S1 Raw Images.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponseToReviewers_6_18_21.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponsetoReviewers_FINAL.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponsetoReviewers_FINAL.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information Files. Additional supplementary data for the mass spectrometry experiments have been deposited into the ProteomeXchange database (Accession Number: PXD026635) and are publicly available.


    Articles from PLoS Biology are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES