Abstract
Gram‐negative bacteria use type VI secretion systems (T6SSs) to deliver toxic effector proteins into neighboring cells. Cargo effectors are secreted by binding noncovalently to the T6SS apparatus. Occasionally, effector secretion is assisted by an adaptor protein, although the adaptor itself is not secreted. Here, we report a new T6SS secretion mechanism, in which an effector and a co‐effector are secreted together. Specifically, we identify a novel periplasm‐targeting effector that is secreted together with its co‐effector, which contains a MIX (marker for type sIX effector) domain previously reported only in polymorphic toxins. The effector and co‐effector directly interact, and they are dependent on each other for secretion. We term this new secretion mechanism “a binary effector module,” and we show that it is widely distributed in marine bacteria.
Keywords: Antibacterial, Immunity, T6SS, Toxin, Vibrio
Subject Categories: Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction; Signal Transduction
Gram‐negative bacteria use type VI secretion systems to inject toxins. Here, a new mode of T6SS delivery is reported, where a MIX domain‐containing co‐effector mediates the secretion of a second protein with toxic activity.

Introduction
One of the most diverse bacterial toxin delivery systems is the type VI secretion system (T6SS); it targets toxins, termed effectors, into either bacteria or eukaryotic neighboring cells in a contact‐dependent manner (Mougous et al, 2006; Pukatzki et al, 2006, 2007; Hood et al, 2010). Effectors possessing antibacterial activities are encoded together with a cognate immunity protein that prevents self‐intoxication by physically binding the effector and antagonizing its activity at its subcellular destination (i.e., in the cytoplasm, membrane, or periplasm; Russell et al, 2011, 2012).
Type VI secretion system effectors are loaded onto a secreted tail tube composed of stacked hexameric rings of Hcp proteins, which are capped by a spike complex comprising a VgrG trimer and a PAAR repeat‐containing protein (hereafter, referred to as PAAR) that sharpens the tip of this structure (Shneider et al, 2013; Nazarov et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2017). The tail tube is propelled out of the cell by a contracting sheath structure that engulfs it inside the secreting bacterium (Basler et al, 2012). Effectors are deployed once the tail tube has penetrated a recipient cell.
Several mechanisms mediating the translocation of T6SS effectors into recipient cells have been characterized. The first characterized mechanism was the delivery of specialized effectors (also known as “evolved effectors”; Pukatzki et al, 2007), a term referring to the three secreted tail tube components of the T6SS (Hcp, VgrG, and PAAR) when they are fused to a C‐terminal toxin domain (Pukatzki et al, 2007; Shneider et al, 2013; Ma et al, 2017). A second type of effectors, known as cargo effectors, are toxin domain‐containing proteins that noncovalently attach to one of the three secreted tail tube components (Hachani et al, 2014; Bondage et al, 2016; Flaugnatti et al, 2016, 2020; Jana et al, 2019; Wettstadt et al, 2019).
Many cargo effectors and PAAR‐containing specialized effectors require cognate adaptor proteins. Adaptors function as chaperones that bind the effector and contribute to its stability and loading onto the T6SS tail tube. Four adaptor domains (DUF4123, DUF1795, DUF2169, and DUF2875) have been experimentally validated (Alcoforado Diniz & Coulthurst, 2015; Liang et al, 2015; Unterweger et al, 2015; Bondage et al, 2016; Cianfanelli et al, 2016; Quentin et al, 2018; Berni et al, 2019; Ahmad et al, 2020); co‐adaptors have also been reported to occasionally participate in this process (Burkinshaw et al, 2018). Moreover, Hcp serves as a chaperone for several effectors that are loaded inside the Hcp tube (Silverman et al, 2013). Adaptors are commonly encoded adjacent to the effector, although there have been reports of adaptors encoded at a distant genetic locus (Ahmad et al, 2020). Importantly, the adaptors are not secreted, and the mechanism ensuring their intracellular retention and their dissociation from the effector remains unclear.
Members of the Vibrionaceae family are Gram‐negative bacteria prevalent in aquatic ecosystems (Boyd et al, 2015); they include established and emerging pathogens of humans and marine animals, such as V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. alginolyticus, and V. vulnificus (Newton et al, 2012; Horseman et al, 2013; Le Roux et al, 2015; Baker‐Austin et al, 2018; Grimes, 2020). Many vibrios harbor at least one T6SS in their genome (Dar et al, 2018). These T6SSs are employed in interbacterial competition, anti‐eukaryotic toxicity (virulence or antagonizing predation), or both (Pukatzki et al, 2006; MacIntyre et al, 2010; Salomon et al, 2013, 2015; Ray et al, 2017; Speare et al, 2018; Hubert & Michell, 2020). Vibrio parahaemolyticus, a widespread emerging pathogen, is a major cause of seafood‐borne gastroenteritis (Newton et al, 2012; Zhang & Orth, 2013) and of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) in shrimp (Tran et al, 2013; Lai et al, 2015). Pathogenic isolates of this bacterium encode a T6SS, termed T6SS1 (Yu et al, 2012; Salomon et al, 2013; Li et al, 2017), whose closely homologous systems are widespread in vibrios and other marine bacteria (Salomon et al, 2015; Ray et al, 2017; Dar et al, 2018). The activities and effector repertoires of this T6SS have been investigated in several Vibrio strains. Notably, in all four V. parahaemolyticus isolates in which T6SS1 has been experimentally investigated, as well as in the investigated homologous T6SSs in V. alginolyticus 12G01 and in V. proteolyticus NBRC 13287, a tricistronic operon is found at the beginning of the T6SS cluster (Salomon et al, 2014a, 2015; Ray et al, 2017; Jana et al, 2019; Fridman et al, 2020). This tricistronic operon, corresponding to vp1388‐vp1390 in the V. parahaemolyticus‐type strain RIMD 2210633 (Fig 1A), was implicated in interbacterial competition (Salomon et al, 2014a). Interestingly, both VP1388 and VP1390, as well as their V. alginolyticus and V. proteolyticus homologs, are secreted in a T6SS1‐dependent manner (Salomon et al, 2014a, 2015; Ray et al, 2017). VP1389, encoded by the middle gene of the tricistronic operon, and its homologs contain an N‐terminal signal peptide for periplasmic localization (Fig 1A).
Figure 1. vp1388‐90 homologous operons are widespread in T6SS‐encoding marine bacteria.

-
ASelected examples of the genetic structure of vp1388‐90 homologous operons. SP, signal peptide; MIX, Marker for type sIX effector.
-
BDistribution of vp1388‐90 homologous operons in bacteria. A phylogenetic tree of bacteria encoding homologous operons, based on the DNA sequences of rpoB. The presence or absence of T6SS in each genome is denoted in the inner rings (black and dark green). Intermediate bars indicate the number of complete (triad) and partial (dyad or truncated) homologous operons identified in each genome. An external ring denotes the group to which the bacterial strains belong. V. parahaemolyticus (Vpara) were annotated separately (red), as were Aliivibrios (pink).
Previously, we proposed that VP1388, containing a MIX (Marker for type sIX effector) domain that indicates a secreted T6SS substrate, is a T6SS effector and that VP1389 is an immunity protein (Salomon et al, 2014a); deletion of both genes renders a prey strain sensitive to T6SS1‐mediated attacks by a parental competitor, for which VP1388 is required. Expression of VP1389 in trans in the prey restores immunity. However, the roles of the third operon‐encoded protein, VP1390, and the antibacterial activity mediated by this operon have remained unknown.
Here, we investigated the roles and activities of the proteins encoded by this T6SS‐associated operon. Importantly, we found that both VP1388 and VP1390 are required for the antibacterial activity mediated by the tricistronic operon, and that their secretion is co‐dependent. Furthermore, we demonstrated that VP1388 and VP1390 interact directly and are loaded together on the T6SS spike. Lastly, we revealed that VP1390, rather than VP1388, mediates antibacterial toxicity in the periplasm; its activity resulted in distinct morphological changes that led to cell lysis. We propose that VP1390 is a newly identified antibacterial T6SS effector that uses a novel secretion mechanism, whereby the MIX domain‐containing VP1388 serves as its secreted co‐effector.
Results
Homologous operons of vp1388‐vp1390 are widespread in marine bacteria
Prior to characterizing the functions of the three operon‐encoded proteins, VP1388, VP1389, and VP1390, we first set out to determine the operon’s distribution and conservation. To this end, we identified homologs of these three proteins in available bacterial genomes and investigated their genomic neighborhoods. Operons that encode homologs of all three proteins (hereafter, referred to as triads) were found in genomes of 1,375 marine bacterial strains harboring T6SS, mostly belonging to the vibrionaceae family (Fig 1 and Datasets EV1 and EV2). Many of these bacteria are established or emerging pathogens of humans and marine animals, such as V. parahaemolyticus (Letchumanan et al, 2014), V. vulnificus (Baker‐Austin & Oliver, 2018), V. coralliilyticus (Ben‐Haim et al, 2003), V. harveyi (Zhang et al, 2020), and V. crassostreae (Bruto et al, 2017); some are symbionts of marine animals, such as Allivibrio fischeri (Visick et al, 2021). In a subset of genomes (e.g., Aliivibrio), more than one copy of the operon was detected. Often, multiple copies of the putative immunity protein, homologous to VP1389, were present within the operon or flanking it (Fig 1A and Dataset EV2). These additional copies may represent orthologs that have been acquired via horizontal gene transfer or that have evolved to protect against non‐kin toxins, since they often bear more sequence similarity to proteins encoded by other bacterial strains than to their neighbors. Notably, ˜65% of the homologous operons were found in proximity to T6SS core proteins, usually at the edges of T6SS gene clusters (Dataset EV3), indicating their association with this secretion system.
Interestingly, homologs of VP1388 were almost exclusively found in triads. When an operon was truncated at the end of a contig or it included pseudogenes at the edge, thus hampering our ability to confidently determine the genetic composition of the operon, it was denoted as “Truncated/pseudo” (Fig 1B). Nevertheless, a handful of instances in which VP1388 was found alone or only with a VP1390 homolog were detected (denoted as “Others” in Fig 1B). Interestingly, we also found various genomes in which a VP1388 homolog is absent (e.g., in Pseudoalteromonas, Bermanella, and Desulfoluna); however, VP1390 and VP1389 homologs are present (denoted as “Dyads”; Fig 1B). This observation suggests a link between VP1390 and VP1389. Remarkably, genomes encoding dyads did not encode a T6SS that is similar to V. parahaemolyticus T6SS1, as opposed to the vast majority of genomes encoding a triad.
Only VP1389 is required for immunity against T6SS1‐mediated toxicity
In a previous work, we showed that VP1389 was required for immunity against T6SS1‐mediated aggression (Salomon et al, 2014a). However, we did not directly investigate whether VP1388 and VP1390 play a role in immunity. To test this, we deleted each of the three genes, vp1388, vp1389, and vp1390, individually and determined the ability of each mutant to defy intoxication by a wild‐type attacker during competition. As shown in Fig 2A, only vp1389 was necessary for immunity against a T6SS1‐mediated attack, whereas neither vp1388 nor vp1390 was required. Notably, deletion of vp1388 resulted in slightly lower prey growth; however, this was not due to T6SS1‐mediated toxicity of the attacker (Fig EV1). Surprisingly, VP1390 expression was absent in the Δvp1389 mutant (Fig EV2A). We reasoned that this deletion resulted in a polar effect; if VP1390 plays a role in antibacterial toxicity, as investigated below, then this polar effect could explain how we were able to obtain a mutation in a putative immunity gene without it being killed by its neighboring kin. Taken together, these results indicate that the two secreted proteins, VP1388 and VP1390, do not play a role in immunity against T6SS1.
Figure 2. VP1388 and VP1390 are required for antibacterial toxicity, not immunity.

-
A–CViability counts of the indicated V. parahaemolyticus (A, B) or E. coli (C) prey strains before (0 h) and after (4 h) co‐incubation with the indicated V. parahaemolyticus attackers on media containing 3% NaCl at 30°C. In A and B, media also contain 0.1% arabinose to induce expression from plasmids. In A, prey strains contain either an empty plasmid (pEmpty) or a plasmid for arabinose‐inducible expression of VP1389 (pVP1389). In B and C, prey strains contain an empty plasmid that provides a selection marker, and the attackers are derivatives of a ∆hns mutant (parental). In B, the attackers contain an empty plasmid, or plasmids for the arabinose‐inducible expression of VP1388 (pVP1388) or VP1390 (pVP1390). Data are shown as the mean ± SD, n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical significance between samples at the 4 h timepoint by an unpaired two‐tailed Student’s t‐test is denoted above. A significant difference was considered as P < 0.05. DL, assay detection limit. ∆hcp1 was used as a T6SS1− control strain. The experiment was performed at least three times with similar results; results of a representative experiment are shown.
Figure EV1. Deletion of vp1388 does not affect bacterial immunity against T6SS1‐mediated attacks.

Viability counts of V. parahaemolyticus ∆vp1388 prey before (0 h) and after (4 h) co‐incubation with the indicated V. parahaemolyticus attackers on media containing 3% NaCl at 30°C. Prey contains an empty plasmid providing a selection marker. Data are shown as the mean ± SD, n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical significance between samples at the 4 h timepoint by an unpaired two‐tailed Student’s t‐test is denoted above. A significant difference was considered as P < 0.05. ns, no significant difference. ∆hcp1 was used as a T6SS1− control strain. The experiment was performed three times with similar results; results of a representative experiment are shown.
Figure EV2. Generating a vp1388 mutant with no polar effect on VP1390 expression.

-
AExpression of VP1390 and VP1388 from V. parahaemolyticus mutant strains. Samples were treated with 20 µM phenamil to activate surface sensing in media containing 3% NaCl at 30°C for 5 h. Loading control (LC) is shown for total protein lysates. Arrows denote bands corresponding to VP1390 and VP1388.
-
BThe growth of V. parahaemolyticus mutants in media containing 3% NaCl at 30°C, as measured by OD600 readings. Data are shown as the mean ± SD, n = 4 technical replicates. WT, wild‐type.
Data information: The experiments were performed at least three times with similar results; results of a representative experiment are shown in each panel.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Generating a vp1388 − mutant that does not affect VP1390 expression
Before performing additional experiments to investigate the role of VP1388 and VP1390, we determined whether the single gene deletions in vp1388 and vp1390, which we used in Fig 2A, affected the expression of the protein encoded by the other gene. Although deletion of vp1390 did not affect the expression of VP1388, deletion of vp1388 resulted in elevated expression of VP1390 (Fig EV2A). Since we did not wish to conduct subsequent experiments with a mutant in which the VP1390 expression levels are drastically elevated, we generated an alternative vp1388 mutant in which the region encoding the MIX domain (corresponding to amino acids 242–423; Salomon et al, 2014a) was deleted. The resulting mutant, hereafter termed Δvp1388−MIX , exhibited no detectable expression of VP1388 but retained VP1390 levels comparable to those of the wild‐type strain (Fig EV2A). Since the antibody used to detect VP1388 expression recognizes an epitope found outside of the deleted region, we suspect that this deletion affected the stability of the vp1388 transcript or the protein, thus resulting in lack of detectible protein expression. Neither Δvp1388−MIX nor the other single‐gene deletion mutants revealed any growth defects (Fig EV2B). Therefore, Δvp1388−MIX was selected to serve as a vp1388− strain in subsequent experiments.
VP1388 and VP1390 are both required for operon‐mediated toxicity
We previously showed that VP1388 is required for T6SS1‐mediated intoxication of a vp1388‐vp1389 deletion prey (Salomon et al, 2014a). Since we found no evidence of VP1390 playing a role in immunity, we hypothesized that it plays a role in the toxic activity mediated by the tricistronic operon. Indeed, competition assays revealed that both vp1388 − (Δvp1388−MIX ) and vp1390 − (Δvp1390) mutants were unable to intoxicate the sensitive Δvp1389 prey, whereas expression of either VP1388 or VP1390 in trans from a plasmid complemented the mutation (Fig 2B). Notably, the attacker strains that were used for these assays were generated in a background in which hns, encoding a negative regulator of T6SS1 (Salomon et al, 2014b; Fridman et al, 2020), was deleted (Δhns) to ensure maximal activation of T6SS1 and to eliminate possible fluctuations between experiments in the amplitude of T6SS1 activation by external conditions. The growth of Δhns derivatives was comparable to that of their parental strain (Fig EV3). Importantly, neither the vp1388− mutant nor the vp1390− mutant was impaired in its ability to intoxicate an E. coli prey, which unlike a Δvp1389 prey, is expected to be sensitive to toxicity mediated by other T6SS1 effector and immunity modules (Fig 2C). These results indicate that VP1388 and VP1390 are both required for the toxic activity mediated by the tricistronic operon, but not for overall T6SS1 activity.
Figure EV3. Mutants in vp1388 and vp1390 do not affect bacterial growth in a ∆hns background.

The growth of V. parahaemolyticus mutants in media containing 3% NaCl at 30°C, as measured by OD600 readings. Data are shown as the mean ± SD, n = 4 technical replicates. WT, wild‐type. The experiment was performed three times with similar results; results of a representative experiment are shown.
VP1388 and VP1390 interact and are loaded onto the T6SS together
Since both VP1388 and VP1390 are secreted by T6SS1 (Salomon et al, 2014a) and are required for T6SS1‐mediated toxicity (Fig 2B), and since they are genetically linked (Fig 1), we hypothesized that the two proteins physically interact. Indeed, immunoprecipitation assays of proteins co‐expressed in E. coli confirmed that VP1390 specifically binds VP1388, whereas neither VP1390 nor VP1388 interacted with a control protein (Fig 3A).
Figure 3. VP1388 and VP1390 are loaded together on the T6SS spike and are secreted co‐dependently.

-
AVP1388 binds VP1390. Immunoprecipitation using α‐FLAG antibodies from E. coli cells co‐expressing the indicated C‐terminal FLAG‐ and Myc‐tagged proteins from arabinose‐inducible plasmids.
-
BVP1388 and VgrG1 co‐precipitate with VP1390. Immunoprecipitation using α‐FLAG antibodies from V. parahaemolyticus ∆hns/∆hcp1/∆vp1390 derivatives harboring plasmids for the arabinose‐inducible expression of FLAG‐tagged sfGFP or VP1390. Cells were grown in MLB media supplemented with chloramphenicol to maintain the plasmids, and 0.1% arabinose. Endogenous VP1388 and VgrG1 were detected using α‐VP1388 and α‐VgrG1 antibodies, respectively.
-
CExpression (cells) and secretion (media) of VP1388, VP1390, and VgrG1 from the indicated V. parahaemolyticus ∆hns‐derived strains harboring an empty plasmid (pEmpty) or plasmids for the arabinose‐inducible expression of VP1388 (pVP1388) or VP1390 (pVP1390). Samples were grown in media containing 3% NaCl and supplemented with 0.1% arabinose at 30°C. RNA polymerase β (RNAp) was used as a nonsecreted protein loading control. Arrows denote the bands at the expected size of VP1388 or VP1390, as indicated in the appropriate panels.
Data information: The experiments were performed at least three times with similar results; results of a representative experiment are shown in each panel.
Source data are available online for this figure.
For T6SS‐mediated delivery, VP1388 and VP1390 must be loaded onto the T6SS tail tube. Considering their size, we reasoned that these proteins are not loaded into the narrow Hcp tube (Silverman et al, 2013), but rather, onto the spike comprising the VgrG and PAAR proteins (Nazarov et al, 2017). Therefore, we set out to determine whether VP1388 and VP1390 bind the T6SS1 spike in V. parahaemolyticus. To this end, we employed a strain in which hcp1 was deleted; this was intended to prevent T6SS1‐mediated secretion, which may result in losing a protein signal, while presumably retaining the assembly of the T6SS baseplate and spike (Brunet et al, 2015). As shown in Fig 3B, immunoprecipitated VP1390, but not sfGFP that was used as a control, interacted with both VP1388 and VgrG1. This result suggests that VP1388 and VP1390 are loaded on the T6SS spike together.
VP1388 and VP1390 are secreted co‐dependently
We revealed that VP1388 and VP1390 interact, which led us to investigate whether their secretion is co‐dependent. To this end, we monitored the secretion of VP1388 in the absence of VP1390 and vice versa. As shown in Fig 3C, the secretion of VP1388 was abolished in the Δvp1390 strain and the secretion of VP1390 was abolished in the Δvp1388−MIX strain; however, their expression was still detected in the absence of their counterpart, suggesting that they are not obligatory for each other’s expression and stability. Complementation of VP1388 or VP1390 from a plasmid restored their counterpart’s secretion. Notably, the absence of VP1388 or VP1390 did not affect the overall activity of T6SS1, since the secretion of the hallmark secreted spike protein, VgrG1, was retained in the Δvp1388−MIX and Δvp1390 strains (Fig 3C). Taken together, these results indicate that VP1388 and VP1390 form a heterocomplex that is required for their respective secretion via T6SS.
VP1390 is an antibacterial toxin
Next, we set out to characterize the antibacterial activity of this operon and to determine which of the two secreted proteins mediates it. To this end, we investigated whether VP1388, VP1390, or both mediate antibacterial toxicity. Since the immunity protein, VP1389, contains an N‐terminal signal peptide for periplasmic localization (Fig 1A), we reasoned that the toxin will target this compartment. To support this premise, we tested whether VP1389 lacking its predicted signal peptide (VP1389∆SS, amino acids 18‐375; predicted by SignalP‐5.0; Almagro Armenteros et al, 2019) can protect a ∆vp1389 prey against a T6SS1‐mediated attack. As shown in Fig EV4A, removal of the signal peptide abrogated VP1389’s ability to antagonize a T6SS1‐mediated attack during bacterial competition, even though both the wild‐type VP1389 and VP1389∆SS appear to express at a comparable level (Fig EV4B). This result suggests that the toxic activity mediated by either VP1388 or VP1390 occurs in the prey periplasm. Next, we expressed VP1388 and VP1390, fused to an N‐terminal PelB signal peptide (for periplasmic localization), in the surrogate host E. coli and monitored their effect on bacterial growth. Surprisingly, VP1390, but not VP1388, was toxic to E. coli (Fig 4A). Expression of both VP1388 and VP1390 was detected by immunoblotting (Fig EV4C). Notably, Expression of VP1390 in the E. coli cytoplasm (without a PelB signal peptide) proved dramatically less toxic compared to the detrimental effect caused by expression of periplasm‐destined VP1390 (Fig EV4D and E). Taken together, these results suggest that VP1390 is the toxin responsible for the operon‐mediated toxicity, and that it functions in the bacterial periplasm. In support of this notion, VP1390 specifically interacted with the immunity protein, VP1389, when both were co‐expressed in V. parahaemolyticus, as expected from an effector and immunity pair (Fig 4B). Notably, since over‐expression of VP1389 itself was toxic in E. coli, we were unable to directly examine its ability to antagonize the toxicity mediated by VP1390 in this host.
Figure EV4. VP1390 mediates toxicity in the periplasm.

-
AViability counts of V. parahaemolyticus ∆vp1389 prey before (0 h) and after (4 h) co‐incubation with the indicated V. parahaemolyticus attackers on media containing 3% NaCl and 0.001% arabinose at 30°C. Prey cells contain an empty plasmid (pEmpty) or a plasmid for expression of C‐terminal Myc‐tagged VP1389 (pVP1389) or its truncated version lacking the first 17 amino acids (pVP1389∆SS). Data are shown as the mean ± SD, n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical significance between samples at the 4 h timepoint by an unpaired two‐tailed Student’s t‐test is denoted above. A significant difference was considered as P < 0.05. ∆hcp1 was used as a T6SS1− control strain.
-
BThe arabinose‐inducible expression of C‐terminal Myc‐tagged VP1389 or VP1389∆SS in V. parahaemolyticus ∆vp1389 strains described in A was detected using α‐Myc antibodies. Loading control (LC) is shown for total protein lysates.
-
CThe expression of C‐terminal Myc‐tagged sfGFP, VP1388, and VP1390 fused to an N‐terminal PelB signal peptide (perisfGFP, periVP1388, and periVP1390, respectively) was detected upon expression from an arabinose‐inducible plasmid in E. coli, using α‐Myc antibodies. Loading control (LC) is shown for total protein lysates.
-
DToxicity in E. coli. E. coli strains containing plasmids for the arabinose‐inducible expression of sfGFP (used as a control) or VP1390 fused to an N‐terminal PelB signal peptide (perisfGFP or periVP1390, respectively), or VP1390 (cytoVP1390) were spotted at 10‐fold serial dilutions onto LB agar plates supplemented with kanamycin (to maintain plasmids) and either 0.2% glucose, to repress protein expression, or 0.001% arabinose, to induce protein expression. Plates were incubated over‐night at 30°C or 37°C, as indicated.
-
EThe expression of C‐terminal Myc‐tagged proteins described in D was detected upon expression from an arabinose‐inducible plasmid in E. coli, using α‐Myc antibodies. Loading control (LC) is shown for total protein lysates.
Data information: The experiments were performed at least three times with similar results; results of a representative experiment are shown in each panel. In C and E, bands corresponding to the protein expressed at the expected size are denoted by red asterisks.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Figure 4. VP1390 is a periplasm‐targeting toxin that leads to cell lysis.

-
AToxicity of periplasm‐targeted proteins in E. coli. E. coli strains containing plasmids for the arabinose‐inducible expression of sfGFP (used as a control), VP1388 or VP1390 fused to an N‐terminal PelB signal peptide (perisfGFP, periVP1388, and periVP1390, respectively) were spotted at 10‐fold serial dilutions onto LB agar plates supplemented with kanamycin (to maintain plasmids) and either 0.2% glucose, to repress protein expression, or 0.001% arabinose, to induce protein expression. Plates were incubated over‐night at 30°C or 37°C, as indicated.
-
BVP1389 interacts with VP1390. Co‐immunoprecipitation of FLAG‐tagged VP1390 or BC3020 using Myc‐tagged VP1389 when co‐expressed in V. parahaemolyticus Δvp1389 (input). Precipitated proteins (output) were detected by immunoblotting using α‐Myc and α‐FLAG antibodies.
-
CVP1390 induces cell lysis in E. coli. Time‐lapse microscopy of E. coli cells expressing periplasm‐targeted sfGFP, VP1388, or VP1390 (perisfGFP, periVP1388, and periVP1390, respectively) from an arabinose‐inducible plasmid, grown on LB agarose pads supplemented with kanamycin (to maintain the plasmid), 0.2% arabinose (to induce expression), and propidium iodide (PI; pink). Merging of the phase contrast and PI channels are shown. Scale bar = 2 µm.
Data information: The experiments were performed at least three times with similar results; results of a representative experiment are shown in each panel.
Source data are available online for this figure.
To investigate the nature of the toxic activity mediated by VP1390, we monitored the morphological changes that occur in E. coli expressing VP1390. As shown in Fig 4C and Movie EV1, E. coli expressing periplasm‐targeted VP1390, but not VP1388 or sfGFP, lysed and exhibited massive blebbing. Lysis was determined by changes in cell appearance as observed in the phase contrast channel, and by entry of the membrane‐impermeable fluorescent DNA dye, propidium iodide (PI). We also observed that cells expressing the periplasmic VP1390 divide slower than cells expressing VP1388 or sfGFP; this was apparent even prior to PI entry (Movie EV1).
Triad induces T6SS1‐mediated cell lysis in septating prey cells
To determine whether the lysis observed in E. coli expressing VP1390 is also mediated by the tricistronic operon during T6SS1‐mediated competition, we monitored GFP‐expressing, sensitive V. parahaemolyticus ∆vp1389 prey cells during incubation with a T6SS1+/VP1390+ (∆hns), a T6SS1−/VP1390+ (∆hns/∆hcp1), or a T6SS1+/VP1390− (∆hns/∆vp1390) attacker. As shown in Fig 5 and Movie EV2, ∆vp1389 prey cells expressing GFP often lysed after contacting a T6SS1+/VP1390+ attacker cell. Frequently (62.17 ± 9.59% of lysed cells), lysis occurred in cells nearing completion of septation. Furthermore, when lysing cells were not crowded, a bleb containing cytoplasmic content (as indicated by the presence of GFP in it) often emerged from the septum prior to lysis and the entry of propidium iodide (Fig EV5). Similar phenotypes were not observed in prey cells that were co‐incubated with a T6SS1− or a VP1390− attacker, indicating that the lysis resulted from the T6SS1 triad activity. Taken together, these results indicate that VP1390 is the toxin component of the vp1388‐vp1390 tricistronic operon, and that it leads to cell lysis upon delivery to the prey periplasm.
Figure 5. Operon‐mediated toxicity results in prey cell lysis.

Time‐lapse microscopy of competition between V. parahaemolyticus ∆hns (T6SS+/VP1390+), ∆hns/∆hcp1 (T6SS−/VP1390+), or ∆hns/∆vp1390 (T6SS+/VP1390−) attackers and V. parahaemolyticus ∆vp1389 prey that express GFP. Attacker and prey were mixed (2:1 ratio) and spotted on LB agarose pads supplemented with propidium iodide (PI; pink). Merging of the phase contrast, GFP (green), and PI (pink) channels, as well as the PI channel alone are shown. Scale bar = 5 µm. The experiment was performed three times with similar results; results of a representative experiment are shown.
Figure EV5. Lysis of sensitive prey cells is preceded by a bleb originating from the septum.

Representative image from time‐lapse microscopy of competition between V. parahaemolyticus ∆hns (T6SS+/VP1390+) attackers and V. parahaemolyticus ∆vp1389 prey cells that express GFP, as shown in Fig 5. Attacker and prey were mixed (2:1 ratio) and spotted on LB agarose pads supplemented with propidium iodide (PI; pink). Merging of the phase contrast, GFP (green) and PI (pink) channels, as well as the PI or GFP channels alone are shown. Scale bar = 2 µm.
Discussion
In this work, we characterized the role of the three proteins encoded in the V. parahaemolyticus T6SS‐associated operon, vp1388‐90, which was previously shown to mediate T6SS‐dependent bacterial competition (Salomon et al, 2014a). Our results revealed a new mechanism underlying T6SS secretion in which VP1388, a MIX domain‐containing protein, serves as a co‐effector enabling the T6SS‐mediated co‐secretion of a novel antibacterial toxin, VP1390. We showed that VP1388 and VP1390 interact with each other and are loaded on the T6SS spike; we also showed that they depend on each other for T6SS‐mediated secretion. Therefore, we propose that VP1388 and VP1390 exemplify a previously undescribed mechanism of T6SS secretion, which we termed “a binary effector module.”
In previous works, we and others described diverse examples of polymorphic antibacterial and anti‐eukaryotic T6SS toxins that contain a MIX domain (Miyata et al, 2011; Salomon et al, 2014a, 2015; Bernal et al, 2017; Ray et al, 2017; Dar et al, 2018). The MIX‐containing VP1388, however, does not appear to exert antibacterial toxicity as would be expected if it was the toxin responsible for the T6SS‐dependent antibacterial toxicity mediated by T6SS1. Since VP1388 is required for secretion of VP1390, which does mediate antibacterial toxicity, we concluded that VP1388 plays another role for MIX domain‐containing proteins as co‐effectors, enabling the loading and secretion of toxins via T6SS. We hypothesize that VP1388 serves as a tether that connects the toxin, VP1390, to the T6SS spike, possibly to VgrG (Fig 6). Nevertheless, although we have made numerous attempts to decipher the molecular mechanism that is used by VP1388 to enable VP1390 secretion, the results have been inconclusive and prevent us from shedding more light on the mechanism in detail at this stage.
Figure 6. Model of T6SS binary effector delivery.

The toxin, VP1390, and its co‐effector, VP1388, are loaded together onto the T6SS spike and are delivered into the periplasm of a neighboring prey cell. If the prey cell expresses the cognate immunity protein, VP1389, then it can antagonize the attack (kin). Otherwise, the VP1390 toxin acts in the prey periplasm, leading to cell lysis (non‐kin). IM, inner membrane; PG, peptidoglycan; OM, outer membrane; Cyto, cytoplasm.
Proteins known as adaptors or chaperones were shown to interact with cognate effectors and T6SS tail tube components to stabilize and mediate the loading of effectors onto the T6SS (Manera et al, 2021). Nevertheless, we contend that VP1388 is not an adaptor or chaperone per se. First, VP1388 is secreted in a T6SS‐dependent manner, whereas adaptors are not. An exception to this is the secreted tail tube component Hcp, which acts as a chaperone that stabilizes and delivers certain effectors (Silverman et al, 2013). However, Hcp, unlike VP1388, is a conserved and essential T6SS structural component. Second, VP1390 was stably expressed in V. parahaemolyticus even in the absence of VP1388, and it was toxic when expressed alone in E. coli. We cannot, however, rule out the possibility that VP1388 stabilizes at least some structural part of VP1390, which enables its proper loading onto the T6SS spike. Intriguingly, the absence of a VP1388 homolog in some bacterial species that encode VP1389 and VP1390‐homologous dyads suggests that in these bacteria, a different mechanism may be used to load the VP1390 homologs onto the T6SS spike for secretion.
VP1390 is a previously unrecognized antibacterial T6SS effector. It bears no resemblance to previously described toxins, aside from the OmpA_C‐terminal‐like domain, which is predicted to bind peptidoglycan (Koebnik, 1995). Indeed, we showed that VP1390 exerts its toxicity in the bacterial periplasm, leading to cell lysis. Notably, E. coli cells expressing periplasmic VP1390 divided slower than their control counterparts, suggesting that VP1390 affects the cell even before PI uptake and lysis occur. The morphological phenotypes observed during T6SS‐mediated competition against V. parahaemolyticus prey lacking the periplasm‐targeted immunity protein, VP1389, in which the cytosolic content was excreted in a bleb that often originated from the septum of cells nearing completion of division, suggest that VP1390 targets the peptidoglycan integrity. This is also supported by the lysis phenotype observed when VP1390 is expressed in the periplasm of E. coli. Future work will determine whether VP1390 indeed targets the peptidoglycan, and if so, whether it directly modifies the cell wall or whether it does so indirectly by manipulating proteins that regulate the cell wall.
The widespread nature of homologous tricistronic operons in marine bacteria, including human and animal pathogens, and their association with T6SSs emphasize their importance to the competitive fitness of these bacteria. Since many of these marine bacteria are established and emerging pathogens, better understanding the role of these genes will contribute to our ability to combat them. It remains to be determined whether other MIX domain‐containing proteins serve as co‐effectors in binary effector modules rather than as toxins per se.
In conclusion, in this work, we revealed a previously undescribed T6SS effector secretion mechanism, whereby a co‐effector that contains a MIX domain, previously thought to only be present in polymorphic toxins, enables the delivery of a toxin. We also characterized VP1390, a novel antibacterial toxin that induces bacterial cell lysis by a yet to be determined mechanism.
Materials and Methods
Strains and media
For a complete list of strains used in this study, see Appendix Table S1. Escherichia coli strains were grown in 2xYT broth (1.6% [wt/vol] tryptone, 1% [wt/vol] yeast extract, and 0.5% [wt/vol] NaCl) or Lysogeny broth (LB) at 37°C. Media were supplemented with kanamycin (30 μg/ml) or chloramphenicol (10 μg/ml) when appropriate to maintain plasmids. Vibrio parahaemolyticus was grown in MLB broth (LB containing 3% [wt/vol] NaCl) or on marine minimal media (MMM) agar plates (1.5% [wt/vol] agar, 2% [wt/vol] NaCl, 0.4% [wt/vol] galactose, 5 mM MgSO4, 7 mM K2SO4, 77 mM K2HPO4, 35 mM KH2PO4, and 2 mM NH4Cl) at 30°C. Media were supplemented with kanamycin (250 μg/ml) or chloramphenicol (10 μg/ml) when appropriate to maintain plasmids.
Plasmid construction
For a complete list of plasmids used in this study, see Appendix Table S2. Primers used for amplification are listed in Appendix Table S3. For protein expression, the coding sequences (CDS) of the operon genes encoding NP_797767.1 (VP1388), NP_797768.1 (VP1389), and NP_797769.1 (VP1390) were amplified from V. parahaemolyticus strain RIMD 2210633 genomic DNA. The CDS of superfolder GFP (sfGFP) was amplified from the plasmid sfGFP‐N1 (Addgene). Amplicons were inserted into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of pBAD/Myc‐His, pBAD33.1 or their derivatives using the Gibson assembly method (Gibson et al, 2009) or by restriction digestion and ligation.
Plasmids were introduced into E. coli using electroporation or the Zymo Research MIX & Go kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Transformants introduced with arabinose‐inducible plasmids were grown on agar plates supplemented with 0.2% (wt/vol) glucose to repress unwanted expression from the Pbad promotor during the subcloning steps. Plasmids were introduced into V. parahaemolyticus via conjugation. Transconjugants were grown on MMM agar plates supplemented with appropriate antibiotics to maintain the plasmids.
Construction of deletion strains
For in‐frame deletions of the vp1388 region encoding the MIX domain, vp1389, and vp1390 from V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 genome, 1 kb upstream and 1 kb downstream of each gene or region to be deleted were amplified and cloned into pDM4, a CmROri6k suicide plasmid (O’Toole et al, 1996) using restriction digestion and ligation. These plasmids were transformed into electrocompetent E. coli S17‐1 (λ pir) or DH5α (λ pir), and transferred into V. parahaemolyticus via conjugation. Transconjugants were first selected on MMM agar plates supplemented with chloramphenicol, and then transferred to MMM agar plates supplemented with sucrose (15% [wt/vol]) for counter‐selection and loss of the SacB‐containing pDM4. Deletions were confirmed by PCR. Construction of pDM4 plasmids for deletion of vp1388 and hns (vp1133) was described previously (Salomon et al, 2014a, b).
Bacterial competition assays
Attacker and prey bacterial strains were grown overnight in MLB (V. parahaemolyticus) or LB (E. coli) broth supplemented with antibiotics when plasmid maintenance was required. Bacterial cultures were then normalized to OD600 = 0.5, and mixed at a 4:1 (attacker:prey) ratio. The mixtures were spotted on agar assay plates (MLB supplemented with 0.1% or 0.001% [wt/vol] L‐arabinose to induce expression from plasmids, as indicated) in triplicates and incubated at 30°C for 4 h. Colony‐forming units (CFU) of prey spotted at t = 0 h were determined by plating 10‐fold serial dilutions on selective agar plates. After 4 h (t = 4 h), bacterial spots were scraped from assay agar plates into 1 ml of LB media. Next, 10‐fold serial dilutions were spotted as described for t = 0 h, and prey CFU were calculated. Assays were repeated three times with similar results; the results from a representative experiment are shown.
Endogenous expression of VP1388 and VP1390 in Vibrio parahaemolyticus
Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains were grown overnight in MLB broth at 30°C. Overnight cultures were normalized to OD600 = 0.18 in 5 ml MLB supplemented with 20 μM phenamil (an inhibitor of the polar flagella used to mimic surface sensing activation) to induce the expression of the T6SS1 genes (Salomon et al, 2013). After 5 h, 1.0 OD600 units of cells were pelleted and resuspended in (2X) Tris‐Glycine SDS sample buffer (Novex, Life Sciences). Samples were boiled, and cell lysates were resolved on Mini‐PROTEAN TGX Stain‐Free™ precast gels (Bio‐Rad) and transferred onto 0.2 μm nitrocellulose membranes. For immunoblotting, primary antibodies specific for VP1388 or VP1390 (α‐VP1388 polyclonal antibody raised in rabbit against peptide CLAEDLQPVDKETQM, and α‐VP1390 polyclonal antibody raised in rabbit against peptide EDENNDKTYPSWHSC, respectively; the cysteines at the edge of the peptides were added during the peptide synthesis process and are not found in the endogenous protein; GenScript) were used at 1:1000 concentration. Protein signals were visualized in a Fusion FX6 imaging system (Vilber Lourmat) using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents.
Expression of VP1389 in trans in Vibrio parahaemolyticus
Vibrio parahaemolyticus Δvp1389 strains carrying arabinose‐inducible plasmids for expression of VP1389 or VP1389∆SS (pVP1389 or pVP1389∆SS, respectively), or an empty plasmid (pEmpty), were grown overnight in MLB media supplemented with kanamycin at 30°C. Overnight cultures were normalized to OD600 = 0.18 in fresh MLB media supplemented with 0.1% (wt/vol) L‐arabinose and kanamycin. Cultures were grown for 5 additional hours at 30°C, and 1.0 OD600 units were precipitated and resuspended in (2X) Tris‐Glycine SDS sample buffer (Novex, Life Sciences). Samples were resolved on Mini‐PROTEAN TGX Stain‐Free™ precast gels (Bio‐Rad) and immunoblotted using α‐Myc antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 9E10, mouse mAb; sc‐40; 1:1,000 dilution) as described above.
Vibrio growth assays
Overnight cultures of V. parahaemolyticus strains were normalized to OD600 = 0.01 in MLB broth and transferred to 96‐well plates (200 μl per well; n = 4 technical replicates). The 96‐well plates were incubated in a microplate reader (BioTek SYNERGY H1) at 30°C with constant shaking at 205 cpm. OD600 reads were acquired every 10 min. At least two biological replicates were performed, and results of a representative experiments are shown.
Toxicity in Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli strains carrying the indicated arabinose‐inducible expression plasmids were grown in 2xYT broth supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics and 0.2% (wt/vol) glucose at 37°C. Overnight cultures were washed twice with fresh 2xYT broth to remove residual glucose. Cultures were then normalized to OD600 = 1 in 2xYT media supplemented with antibiotics. Next, 10‐fold serial dilutions (dilutions 10−1–10−5) were spotted (5 μl) onto LB agar plates supplemented with antibiotics (to maintain plasmids) and 0.2% (wt/vol) glucose (to repress expression from the Pbad promoter) or 0.001% (wt/vol) L‐arabinose (to induce protein expression). Plates were incubated overnight at 30°C or 37°C, as indicated. The following morning, plates were imaged using a Fusion FX6 imaging system (Vilber Lourmat).
Protein expression in Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli strains containing arabinose‐inducible plasmids for C‐terminal Myc‐tagged protein expression were grown in 2xYT broth supplemented with appropriate antibiotics and 0.2% (wt/vol) glucose at 37°C. Overnight cultures were washed twice with fresh 2xYT broth to remove residual glucose. Cultures were then normalized to OD600 = 0.5 in 3 ml 2xYT broth supplemented with appropriate antibiotics and grown for 2 h at 37°C. After 2 h, 0.1% (wt/vol) L‐arabinose was added to the media to induce protein expression, and cultures were grown for 2 additional hours at 37°C. Following induction, 0.5 OD600 units of cells were pelleted and resuspended in (2X) Tris‐Glycine SDS sample buffer (Novex, Life Sciences). Samples were boiled, and cell lysates were resolved on TGX Stain‐Free™ precast gels (Bio‐Rad) and analyzed as mentioned above. For immunoblotting, α‐Myc antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 9E10, mouse mAb; sc‐40) were used at 1:1,000 dilution.
Escherichia coli immunoprecipitation assays
To identify the direct interaction between VP1388 and VP1390, E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells harboring pBAD33.1‐based plasmids encoding C‐terminal FLAG‐tagged PoNi (B5C30_RS14460) (Jana et al, 2019) or VP1390, together with pBAD/Myc‐His‐based plasmids encoding VP1388 or PoNeD335A (B5C30_RS14465) mutant (Jana et al, 2019) were grown overnight in 2xYT media supplemented with kanamycin and chloramphenicol at 37°C. Overnight cultures were diluted 1:100 in 50 ml fresh 2xYT media supplemented with appropriate antibiotics, and grown at 37°C for 2 h. After 2 h, 0.1% (wt/vol) L‐arabinose was added to induce protein expression, and cultures were further grown at 30°C for 4 h. Next, 200 OD600 units were pelleted by centrifugation at 3,500 g for 10 min at 4°C. Then, cell pellets were resuspended in 3 ml of Lysis buffer C (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris‐HCl pH = 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.5% [vol/vol] NP‐40) supplemented with 0.1 mM PMSF, and were lysed using a high‐pressure homogenizer (Multi cycle cell disruptor, Constant Systems). Cell debris was removed by centrifuging at 15,000 g for 20 min at 4°C. Next, 500 μl of supernatant were mixed with 10 μl of DYKDDDDK Tag antibody (D6W5B rabbit mAb #14793; Cell Signaling Technology; it binds to the same epitope as Sigma's Anti‐FLAG M2 Antibody; it is referred to as α‐FLAG) and incubated for 1 h at 4°C with constant rotation. Next, protein A and protein G magnetic beads (12.5 μl each) were mixed and prewashed with Lysis buffer C, and then mixed with the samples and incubated for an additional hour at 4°C with constant rotation. Beads were washed eight times with Lysis buffer C (200 μl each time). Finally, the beads were collected, and bound proteins were eluted by adding 100 μl of (2X) Tris‐Glycine SDS Sample Buffer supplemented with 5% β‐mercaptoethanol, followed by heating at 70°C for 5 min. Samples were analyzed by immunoblotting as mentioned above. HRP‐conjugated α‐Light Chain‐specific secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) were used to avoid detecting the primary antibodies’ heavy chains.
Vibrio immunoprecipitation assays
To detect loading of VP1390 and VP1388 on the T6SS spike, V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 Δhns/Δhcp1/Δvp1390 carrying the indicated pBAD33.1‐based plasmids for expression of sfGFP or VP1390 with a C‐terminal FLAG tag were grown overnight in MLB broth supplemented with chloramphenicol at 30°C. Overnight cultures were normalized to OD600 = 0.18 in 50 ml MLB broth supplemented with antibiotics and 0.1% (wt/vol) L‐arabinose (to induce protein expression), and were grown at 30°C for 4 h. After 4 h, 140 OD600 units were pelleted at 3,500 g for 10 min at 4°C. Then, 3.5 ml of Lysis buffer A (50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris‐HCl pH = 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% [vol/vol] NP‐40) supplemented with 0.1 mM PMSF were added to cell pellets, which were then incubated with rotation at 4°C for 15 min to resuspend the cells. Cells were then lysed using a high‐pressure homogenizer (Multi cycle cell disruptor, Constant Systems). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 15,000 g for 20 min at 4°C. Next, 490 μl of supernatant were incubated with 10 μl of DYKDDDDK Tag antibody (α‐FLAG) for an hour at room temperature (RT). Protein A and protein G magnetic beads (25 μl and 10 μl, respectively), prewashed with wash buffer A were added to samples and incubated with constant rotation for an additional hour at RT. Then, samples were washed three times with wash buffer A, and the beads were collected. Bound proteins were eluted by adding 50 μl of (2X) Tris‐Glycine SDS Sample Buffer supplemented with 5% β‐mercaptoethanol, followed by heating at 70°C for 5 min. Samples were analyzed by immunoblotting as mentioned above. HRP‐conjugated α‐Light Chain‐specific secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoReserach) were used to avoid detecting the primary antibodies’ heavy chains.
To detect the binding of VP1389 to VP1390, V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 Δvp1389 (which does not express endogenous VP1389 or VP1390, as shown in Fig EV2A) carrying pBAD/Myc‐His‐based plasmids, either empty or encoding VP1389, together with pBAD33.1‐based plasmids encoding C‐terminally FLAG‐tagged VP1390 or BC3020 (accession number NP_832766.1; used as control), were grown overnight in MLB broth supplemented with chloramphenicol and kanamycin at 30°C. Overnight cultures were normalized to OD600 = 0.18 in 50 ml MLB broth supplemented with antibiotics and 0.1% (wt/vol) L‐arabinose (to induce protein expression), and were grown at 30°C for 3 h. After 3 h, 100 OD600 units were pelleted at 3,500 g for 10 min at 4°C. Next, 3 ml of Lysis buffer B (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris‐HCl pH = 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% [vol/vol] NP‐40) supplemented with 0.1 mM PMSF were added to cell pellets, and cells were lysed, as detailed above. Cell debris was removed as mentioned above. Next, 500 μl of supernatant were transferred to tubes containing 25 μl of prewashed magnetic α‐Myc beads (Myc‐tag [9B11] mouse mAb magnetic beads conjugated #5698; Cell Signaling Technology) and incubated at 4°C for 2 h. Then, samples were washed three times with wash buffer B, and bound proteins were eluted by adding 50 μl of (2X) Tris‐Glycine SDS Sample Buffer supplemented with 5% β‐mercaptoethanol, followed by heating at 70°C for 5 min. Samples were analyzed by immunoblotting as mentioned above.
Secretion assays
Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains were grown overnight in MLB broth supplemented with antibiotics to maintain plasmids, when needed. Cultures were normalized to OD600 = 0.18 in 5 ml MLB supplemented with antibiotics and 0.1% L‐arabinose (wt/vol) to induce expression from Pbad promoters. After 5 h, 1.0 OD600 units were collected for expression fractions (cells). The cell pellets were resuspended in (2X) Tris‐Glycine SDS sample buffer (Novex, Life Sciences). For secretion fractions (media), 10 OD600 units were filtered (0.22 μm), and proteins were precipitated from the media using deoxycholate and trichloroacetic acid (Bensadoun & Weinstein, 1976). Cold acetone was used to wash the protein precipitates twice. Then, protein precipitates were resuspended in 20 μl of 10 mM Tris‐HCl pH = 8, followed by the addition of 20 μl of (2X) Tris‐Glycine SDS Sample Buffer supplemented with 5% β‐mercaptoethanol. Next, 0.5 μl of 1 N NaOH was added to maintain a basic pH. Expression and secretion samples were boiled and then resolved on Mini‐PROTEAN or Criterion™TGX Stain‐Free™ precast gels (Bio‐Rad) and analyzed as mentioned above. For immunoblotting, primary antibodies were used at 1:1000 concentration. The following antibodies were used: DYKDDDDK Tag Antibody (α‐FLAG), Direct‐BlotTM HRP anti‐E. coli RNA Sigma 70 (mouse mAb #663205; BioLegend; it is referred to as α‐RNAp), custom‐made α‐VgrG1 (Li et al, 2017), α‐VP1388 (described above), and α‐VP1390 (described above). α‐RNAp was used to determine equal loading of samples and to exclude cell lysis. Protein signals were visualized in a Fusion FX6 imaging system (Vilber Lourmat) using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents.
Microscopy
To determine the effect of protein expression in E. coli, overnight E. coli MG1655‐derivative sAJM.1506 cells carrying pPER5‐based plasmids were diluted 100‐fold into 3 ml of fresh LB broth supplemented with kanamycin and 0.2% (wt/vol) glucose. After 2 h of incubation at 37°C, cells were washed and normalized to OD600 = 0.5. Next, 1 μl of each culture was spotted on LB agarose pads (1% [wt/vol] agarose supplemented with 0.2% [wt/vol] L‐arabinose) onto which 1 μl of the membrane‐impermeable DNA dye, propidium iodide (PI; 1 mg/ml; Sigma‐Aldrich) had been pre‐applied. After the spots had dried (1–2 min at RT), the agarose pads were mounted, facing down, on 35 mm glass bottom CELLview™ cell culture dishes (Greiner). Cells were then imaged every 5 min for 4 h under a fluorescence microscope, as detailed below. The stage chamber (Okolab) temperature was set to 37°C.
To assess the T6SS1‐dependent toxic effect of the tricistronic operon on sensitive prey during bacterial competition, V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 Δvp1389 prey cells harboring a plasmid for the constitutive expression of GFP (Ritchie et al, 2012) were competed against V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 attacker strain Δhns (T6SS1+/VP1390+), Δhns/Δhcp1 (T6SS1−/VP1390+), or Δhns/Δvp1390 (T6SS1+/VP1390−). Bacteria were grown overnight in MLB broth at 30°C. Overnight attacker and prey cultures were diluted 100‐fold into 3 ml of fresh MLB broth and grown for 2 h at 30°C. After 2 h, attacker and prey cultures were normalized to OD600 = 2.5 and mixed in a 2:1 (attacker:prey) ratio. Cell mixtures and PI were spotted onto agarose pads and processed as detailed above. Bacteria were imaged every 4 min for 1 h. The stage chamber temperature was set to 30°C.
The following setup was used for imaging: a Nikon Eclipse Ti2E inverted motorized microscope with a CFI PLAN apochromat DM 100X oil lambda PH‐3 (NA, 1.45) objective lens, a Lumencor SOLA SE II 395 light source, and ET‐dsRED (#49005, CHROMA, to visualize the PI signal) and ET‐EGFP (#49002, CHROMA, to visualize the GFP signal) filter sets and a DS‐QI2 Mono cooled digital microscope camera (16 MO). The obtained images were further processed and analyzed using Fiji ImageJ suite (Schindelin et al, 2012).
Construction of position‐specific scoring matrices for VP1388, VP1389, and VP1390
The position‐specific scoring matrices (PSSMs) of VP1388, VP1389, and VP1390 were constructed using full‐length sequences from Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 (BAC59651.1, BAC59652.1, and BAC59653.1, respectively). The PSSM of a distant homolog of VP1389 was constructed using the full‐length sequence from Vibrio parahaemolyticus ISF‐77‐01 (WP_047482080.1). Five iterations of PSI‐BLAST were performed against the RefSeq protein database. In each iteration, a maximum of 500 hits with an expect value threshold of 10−6 and a query coverage of 70% were used.
Identification of homologous operons of vp1388‐90
Homologous operons of vp1388‐vp1390 were identified by searching for homologs of VP1388 and VP1390 in bacterial genomes. A local database containing the RefSeq bacterial nucleotide and protein sequences was generated (last updated on December 25, 2020). RPS‐BLAST was used to identify VP1388 and VP1390 homologs in the local database. The results were filtered using an expect value threshold of 10−15 and a subject coverage of 70%. Subsequently, the genomic neighborhood was analyzed as described before (Dar et al, 2018; Fridman et al, 2020). Duplicated protein accessions appearing in the same genome in more than one genomic accession were removed if the same downstream protein existed at the same distance. The obtained list represented all occurrences of the VP1388 and VP1390 homologs in bacterial genomes. A list of homologous operons was generated by collecting all occurrences of VP1388 homologs and the occurrences of VP1390 homologs that were not found within 5 genes downstream of VP1388.
Identification of VP1388‐VP1390 triads and dyads
The list of homologous operons was analyzed. For VP1388 homologs, the following rules were applied: (i) if a VP1390 homolog was identified 2–5 genes downstream of the VP1388 homolog, it was termed “triad”; (ii) if a VP1389 homolog was identified 1 gene downstream of the VP1388 homolog, it was termed “other”; (iii) otherwise, it was termed “truncated/pseudo.” For VP1390 homologs, the following rules were applied: (i) if a VP1388 homolog was identified 2–5 genes upstream of the VP1390 homolog, it was termed “triad”; (ii) if a VP1389 homolog was identified 1 gene upstream of the VP1390 homolog and all of the 2–5 genes upstream existed and were unrelated to VP1388, it was termed “dyad”; (iii) if a VP1388 was identified 1 gene upstream of the VP1390 homolog, it was termed “other”; (iv) if all of the 5 genes upstream and downstream existed and were unrelated to VP1388 and VP1389, indicating that the VP1390 homolog was an orphan, it was termed “other”; (v) otherwise, it was termed “truncated/pseudo.” All annotations were assessed manually. Changes were noted in the appropriate Dataset [Link], [Link], [Link].
Identification of bacterial genomes encoding T6SS
RPS‐BLAST was employed to identify the T6SS core components, as described before (Jana et al, 2019). Briefly, the proteins were aligned against 11 COGs that were previously shown to specifically predict T6SS (Boyer et al, 2009). Bacterial genomes encoding at least 9 out of the 11 T6SS core components were identified.
BLASTX was employed to identify Vibrio parahaemolyticus T6SS1‐like cluster proteins in bacterial genomes, as described before (Fridman et al, 2020). Briefly, translated nucleotide sequences were aligned against the 24 T6SS1 cluster proteins of Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 (NP_797770.1 to NP_797793.1). The minimal similarity percentage (the bit‐score value divided by two times the specific lengths of the cluster proteins) of each protein was defined as 50%. Bacterial genomes encoding at least 12 out of the 24 T6SS1 cluster proteins were regarded as harboring a Vibrio parahaemolyticus T6SS1‐like cluster. Genomes containing less than 17 of the 24 genes were also evaluated manually.
Construction of the phylogenetic tree of bacterial strains containing VP1388 and VP1390
Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using the MAFFT server (mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/). DNA sequences of rpoB coding for DNA‐directed RNA polymerase subunit beta were aligned using MAFFT v7 FFT‐NS‐2 (Katoh et al, 2002, 2018). Partial and pseudogene sequences were not included in the analysis. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbor‐joining method (Saitou & Nei, 1987) with the Jukes‐Cantor substitution model (JC69). The analysis included 1,543 nucleotide sequences and 3,912 conserved sites.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9 and Microsoft Excel. Unpaired two‐tailed Student’s t‐test was used, unless otherwise indicated. Differences of P < 0.05 were considered significant.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: YD, BJ, EB, and DS; Methodology: YD, BJ, EB, and DS; Investigation: YD, BJ, and EB; Supervision: DS; Writing—original draft: DS; Writing—review & editing: YD, BJ, EB, and DS.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Appendix
Expanded View Figures PDF
Dataset EV1
Dataset EV2
Dataset EV3
Movie EV1
Movie EV2
Source Data for Expanded View
Source Data for Figure 3
Source Data for Figure 4
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Salomon lab for technical assistance and helpful discussions. This project received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant agreement no. 714224), and the Israel Science Foundation (ISF; grant no. 920/17) to DS. Figure 6 and the visual synopsis that accompanies this manuscript online were created using BioRender.com.
EMBO reports (2022) 23: e53981.
Contributor Information
Eran Bosis, Email: bosis@braude.ac.il.
Dor Salomon, Email: dorsalomon@mail.tau.ac.il.
Data availability
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings reported here are available within the manuscript and its associated files. No primary datasets were generated or deposited during this study.
References
- Ahmad S, Tsang KK, Sachar K, Quentin D, Tashin TM, Bullen NP, Raunser S, McArthur AG, Prehna G, Whitney JC (2020) Structural basis for effector transmembrane domain recognition by type vi secretion system chaperones. Elife 9: 1–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alcoforado Diniz J, Coulthurst SJ (2015) Intraspecies competition in Serratia marcescens is mediated by type VI‐secreted Rhs effectors and a conserved effector‐associated accessory protein. J Bacteriol 197: 2350–2360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Almagro Armenteros JJ, Tsirigos KD, Sønderby CK, Petersen TN, Winther O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H (2019) SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat Biotechnol 37: 420–423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker‐Austin C, Oliver JD (2018) Vibrio vulnificus: new insights into a deadly opportunistic pathogen. Environ Microbiol 20: 423–430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker‐Austin C, Oliver JD, Alam M, Ali A, Waldor MK, Qadri F, Martinez‐Urtaza J (2018) Vibrio spp. infections. Nat Rev Dis Prim 4: 1–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basler M, Pilhofer M, Henderson GP, Jensen GJ, Mekalanos JJ (2012) Type VI secretion requires a dynamic contractile phage tail‐like structure. Nature 483: 182–186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ben‐Haim Y, Zicherman‐Keren M, Rosenberg E (2003) Temperature‐regulated bleaching and lysis of the coral Pocillopora damicornis by the novel pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 4236–4242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bensadoun A, Weinstein D (1976) Assay of proteins in the presence of interfering materials. Anal Biochem 70: 241–250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernal P, Allsopp LP, Filloux A, Llamas MA (2017) The Pseudomonas putida T6SS is a plant warden against phytopathogens. ISME J 11: 972–987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berni B, Soscia C, Djermoun S, Ize B, Bleves S (2019) A type VI secretion system trans‐kingdom effector is required for the delivery of a novel antibacterial toxin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Front Microbiol 10: 1218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bondage DD, Lin J‐S, Ma L‐S, Kuo C‐H, Lai E‐M (2016) VgrG C terminus confers the type VI effector transport specificity and is required for binding with PAAR and adaptor–effector complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113: E3931–E3940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boyd EF, Carpenter MR, Chowdhury N, Cohen AL, Haines‐Menges BL, Kalburge SS, Kingston JJ, Lubin JBB, Ongagna‐Yhombi SY, Whitaker WB (2015) Post‐genomic analysis of members of the family vibrionaceae. Microbiol Spectr 3: 1–26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boyer F, Fichant G, Berthod J, Vandenbrouck Y, Attree I (2009) Dissecting the bacterial type VI secretion system by a genome wide in silico analysis: what can be learned from available microbial genomic resources? BMC Genom 10: 104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brunet YR, Zoued A, Boyer F, Douzi B, Cascales E (2015) The type VI secretion TssEFGK‐VgrG phage‐like baseplate is recruited to the TssJLM membrane complex via multiple contacts and serves as assembly platform for tail tube/sheath polymerization. PLOS Genet 11: e1005545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruto M, James A, Petton B, Labreuche Y, Chenivesse S, Alunno‐Bruscia M, Polz MF, Le Roux F (2017) Vibrio crassostreae, a benign oyster colonizer turned into a pathogen after plasmid acquisition. ISME J 11: 1043–1052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burkinshaw BJ, Liang X, Wong M, Le ANH, Lam L, Dong TG (2018) A type VI secretion system effector delivery mechanism dependent on PAAR and a chaperone‐co‐chaperone complex. Nat Microbiol 3: 632–640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cianfanelli FR, Alcoforado Diniz J, Guo M, De Cesare V, Trost M, Coulthurst SJ (2016) VgrG and PAAR proteins define distinct versions of a functional type VI secretion system. PLoS Pathog 12: 1–27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dar Y, Salomon D, Bosis E (2018) The antibacterial and anti‐eukaryotic Type VI secretion system MIX‐effector repertoire in Vibrionaceae. Mar Drugs 16: 433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flaugnatti N, Le TTH, Canaan S, Aschtgen M‐S, Nguyen VS, Blangy S, Kellenberger C, Roussel A, Cambillau C, Cascales E et al (2016) A phospholipase A 1 antibacterial Type VI secretion effector interacts directly with the C‐terminal domain of the VgrG spike protein for delivery. Mol Microbiol 99: 1099–1118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flaugnatti N, Rapisarda C, Rey M, Beauvois SG, Nguyen VA, Canaan S, Durand E, Chamot‐Rooke J, Cascales E, Fronzes R et al (2020) Structural basis for loading and inhibition of a bacterial T6 SS phospholipase effector by the VgrG spike. EMBO J 39: e104129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fridman CM, Keppel K, Gerlic M, Bosis E, Salomon D (2020) A comparative genomics methodology reveals a widespread family of membrane‐disrupting T6SS effectors. Nat Commun 11: 1085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, Smith HO (2009) Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6: 343–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimes DJ (2020) The Vibrios: Scavengers, Symbionts, and Pathogens from the Sea. Microb Eco 803: 501–506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hachani A, Allsopp LP, Duke Y, Filloux A (2014) The VgrG proteins are ‘à la carte’ delivery systems for bacterial type VI effectors. J Boil Chem 289: 17872–17884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hood RD, Singh P, Hsu FS, Güvener T, Carl MA, Trinidad RRS, Silverman JM, Ohlson BB, Hicks KG, Plemel RL et al (2010) A type VI secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa targets a toxin to bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 7: 25–37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horseman MA, Bray R, Lujan‐Francis B, Matthew E (2013) Infections caused by Vibrionaceae. Infect Dis Clin Pract 21: 222–232 [Google Scholar]
- Hubert CL, Michell SL (2020) A universal oyster infection model demonstrates that Vibrio vulnificus type 6 secretion systems have antibacterial activity in vivo . Environ Microbiol 22: 4381–4393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jana B, Fridman CM, Bosis E, Salomon D (2019) A modular effector with a DNase domain and a marker for T6SS substrates. Nat Commun 10: 3595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 3059–3066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2018) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform 20: 1160–1166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koebnik R (1995) Proposal for a peptidoglycan‐associating alpha‐helical motif in the C‐terminal regions of some bacterial cell‐surface proteins. Mol Microbiol 16: 1269–1270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lai H‐C, Ng TH, Ando M, Lee C‐T, Chen I‐T, Chuang J‐C, Mavichak R, Chang S‐H, Yeh M‐D, Chiang Y‐A et al (2015) Pathogenesis of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) in shrimp. Fish Shellfish Immunol 47: 1006–1014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Roux F, Wegner KM, Baker‐Austin C, Vezzulli L, Osorio CR, Amaro C, Ritchie JM, Defoirdt T, Destoumieux‐Garzón D, Blokesch M et al (2015) The emergence of Vibrio pathogens in Europe: Ecology, evolution and pathogenesis (Paris, 11–12 March 2015). Front Microbiol 6: 1–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Letchumanan V, Chan K‐G, Lee L‐H (2014) Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a review on the pathogenesis, prevalence, and advance molecular identification techniques. Front Microbiol 5: 705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li P, Kinch LN, Ray A, Dalia AB, Cong Q, Nunan LM, Camilli A, Grishin NV, Salomon D, Orth K (2017) Acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease‐causing Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains maintain an antibacterial type VI secretion system with versatile effector repertoires. Appl Environ Microbiol 83: e00737–817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang X, Moore R, Wilton M, Wong MJQ, Lam L, Dong TG (2015) Identification of divergent type VI secretion effectors using a conserved chaperone domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112: 9106–9111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma J, Pan Z, Huang J, Sun M, Lu C, Yao H (2017) The Hcp proteins fused with diverse extended‐toxin domains represent a novel pattern of antibacterial effectors in type VI secretion systems. Virulence 8: 1189–1202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacIntyre DL, Miyata ST, Kitaoka M, Pukatzki S (2010) The Vibrio cholerae type VI secretion system displays antimicrobial properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 19520–19524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manera K, Kamal F, Burkinshaw B, Dong TG (2021) Essential functions of chaperones and adaptors of protein secretion systems in Gram‐negative bacteria. FEBS J 288: 111–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyata ST, Kitaoka M, Brooks TM, McAuley SB, Pukatzki S (2011) Vibrio cholerae requires the type VI secretion system virulence factor vasx to kill dictyostelium discoideum. Infect Immun 79: 2941–2949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mougous JD, Cuff ME, Raunser S, Shen A, Zhou M, Gifford CA, Goodman AL, Joachimiak G, Ordoñez CL, Lory S et al (2006) A virulence locus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa encodes a protein secretion apparatus. Science 312: 1526–1530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nazarov S, Schneider JP, Brackmann M, Goldie KN, Stahlberg H, Basler M (2017) Cryo‐EM reconstruction of Type VI secretion system baseplate and sheath distal end. EMBO J 37: e201797103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newton A, Kendall M, Vugia DJ, Henao OL, Mahon BE (2012) Increasing rates of vibriosis in the United States, 1996–2010: review of surveillance data from 2 systems. Clin Infect Dis 54: S391–S395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Toole R, Milton DL, Wolf‐Watz H (1996) Chemotactic motility is required for invasion of the host by the fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum . Mol Microbiol 19: 625–637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pukatzki S, Ma AT, Sturtevant D, Krastins B, Sarracino D, Nelson WC, Heidelberg JF, Mekalanos JJ (2006) Identification of a conserved bacterial protein secretion system in Vibrio cholerae using the Dictyostelium host model system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 1528–1533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pukatzki S, Ma AT, Revel AT, Sturtevant D, Mekalanos JJ (2007) Type VI secretion system translocates a phage tail spike‐like protein into target cells where it cross‐links actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104: 15508–15513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quentin D, Ahmad S, Shanthamoorthy P, Mougous JD, Whitney JC, Raunser S (2018) Mechanism of loading and translocation of type VI secretion system effector Tse6. Nat Microbiol 3: 1142–1152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ray A, Schwartz N, Souza Santos M, Zhang J, Orth K, Salomon D, de Souza SM, Zhang J, Orth K, Salomon D (2017) Type VI secretion system MIX‐effectors carry both antibacterial and anti‐eukaryotic activities. EMBO Rep 18: e201744226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ritchie JM, Rui H, Zhou X, Iida T, Kodoma T, Ito S, Davis BM, Bronson RT, Waldor MK (2012) Inflammation and Disintegration of Intestinal Villi in an Experimental Model for Vibrio parahaemolyticus‐Induced Diarrhea. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell AB, Hood RD, Bui NK, Leroux M, Vollmer W, Mougous JD (2011) Type VI secretion delivers bacteriolytic effectors to target cells. Nature 475: 343–349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell A, Singh P, Brittnacher M, Bui N, Hood R, Carl M, Agnello D, Schwarz S, Goodlett D, Vollmer W et al (2012) A widespread bacterial type VI secretion effector superfamily identified using a heuristic approach. Cell Host Microbe 11: 538–549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor‐joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Boil Evol 4: 406–425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salomon D, Gonzalez H, Updegraff BL, Orth K (2013) Vibrio parahaemolyticus Type VI secretion system 1 Is activated in marine conditions to target bacteria, and is differentially regulated from system 2. PLoS One 8: e61086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salomon D, Kinch LN, Trudgian DC, Guo X, Klimko JA, Grishin NV, Mirzaei H, Orth K (2014a) Marker for type VI secretion system effectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111: 9271–9276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salomon D, Klimko JA, Orth K (2014b) H‐NS regulates the Vibrio parahaemolyticus type VI secretion system 1. Microbiology 160: 1867–1873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salomon D, Klimko JA, Trudgian DC, Kinch LN, Grishin NV, Mirzaei H, Orth K (2015) Type VI secretion system toxins horizontally shared between marine bacteria. PLoS Pathog 11: 1–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schindelin J, Arganda‐Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B et al (2012) Fiji: an open‐source platform for biological‐image analysis. Nat Methods 9: 676–682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shneider MM, Buth SA, Ho BT, Basler M, Mekalanos JJ, Leiman PG (2013) PAAR‐repeat proteins sharpen and diversify the type VI secretion system spike. Nature 500: 350–353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silverman JM, Agnello DM, Zheng H, Andrews BT, Li M, Catalano CE, Gonen T, Mougous JD (2013) Haemolysin coregulated protein is an exported receptor and chaperone of type VI secretion substrates. Mol Cell 51: 584–593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Speare L, Cecere AG, Guckes KR, Smith S, Wollenberg MS, Mandel MJ, Miyashiro T, Septer AN (2018) Bacterial symbionts use a type VI secretion system to eliminate competitors in their natural host. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115: E8528–E8537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tran L, Nunan L, Redman R, Mohney L, Pantoja C, Fitzsimmons K, Lightner D (2013) Determination of the infectious nature of the agent of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome affecting penaeid shrimp. Dis Aquat Organ 105: 45–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Unterweger D, Kostiuk B, Ötjengerdes R, Wilton A, Diaz‐Satizabal L, Pukatzki S (2015) Chimeric adaptor proteins translocate diverse type VI secretion system effectors in Vibrio cholerae. EMBO J 34: 2198–2210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Visick KL, Stabb EV, Ruby EG (2021) (2021) A lasting symbiosis: how Vibrio fischeri finds a squid partner and persists within its natural host. Nat Rev Microbiol 1910(19): 654–665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J, Brackmann M, Castaño‐Díez D, Kudryashev M, Goldie KN, Maier T, Stahlberg H, Basler M (2017) Cryo‐EM structure of the extended type VI secretion system sheath‐tube complex. Nat Microbiol 2: 1507–1512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wettstadt S, Wood TE, Fecht S, Filloux A (2019) Delivery of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa phospholipase effectors PldA and PldB in a VgrG‐ And H2–T6SS‐dependent manner. Front Microbiol 10: 1718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Y, Yang H, Li J, Zhang P, Wu B, Zhu B, Zhang Y, Fang W (2012) Putative type VI secretion systems of Vibrio parahaemolyticus contribute to adhesion to cultured cell monolayers. Arch Microbiol 194: 827–835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L, Orth K (2013) Virulence determinants for Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection. Curr Opin Microbiol 16: 70–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X‐H, He X, Austin B (2020) Vibrio harveyi: a serious pathogen of fish and invertebrates in mariculture. Mar Life Sci Technol 23: 231–245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
