Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Pain logoLink to Canadian Journal of Pain
. 2017 Dec 18;1(1):237–246. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2017.1410431

Chronic pain among public safety personnel in Canada

R N Carleton a,, T O Afifi b, S Turner b, T Taillieu b, R El-Gabalawy b, J Sareen b, G J G Asmundson a
PMCID: PMC8730622  PMID: 35005358

ABSTRACT

Background: Chronic pain is highly prevalent in the general population and may be even higher among public safety personnel (PSP; e.g., correctional officers, dispatchers, firefighters, paramedics, police). Comprehensive data on chronic pain among diverse Canadian PSP are relatively sparse.

Aims: The current study was designed to provide initial estimates of chronic pain frequency and severity among Canadian PSP.

Methods: Estimates of chronic pain frequency and severity (i.e., intensity and duration) at different bodily locations were derived from self-reported data collected through an online survey. Participants included 5093 PSP (32.5% women) grouped into six categories (i.e., call center operators/dispatchers, correctional officers, firefighters, municipal/provincial police, paramedics, Royal Canadian Mounted Police [RCMP]).

Results: Substantial proportions of participants reported chronic pain, with estimates ranging from 35.3% to 45.4% across the diverse PSP categories. Across PSP categories, chronic lower back pain was the most prevalent. For some pain locations, firefighters and municipal/provincial police reported lower prevalence, but paramedics reported lower intensity, and duration, than some other PSP groups. Over 50% of RCMP and paramedics reporting chronic pain indicated that the pain was associated with an injury related to active duty.

Conclusions: Discrepancies emerged across PSP members with respect to prevalence, location, and severity. The current data suggest that additional resources and research are necessary to mitigate the development and maintenance of distressing or disabling chronic pain for Canadian PSP.

KEYWORDS: chronic pain, first responders, public safety personnel, work injuries

Introduction

Chronic pain is characterized by pain lasting longer than the typical 3-month duration for healing damaged tissue.1 The most prevalent chronic pain locations are the lower back, neck, upper extremities, and head.2 Chronic pain impacts a substantial proportion of the Canadian general population,3 with approximately one in four persons reporting chronic pain in the past month.46 Women appear more likely to report chronic pain than men and chronic pain rates appear to increase with age.7 The annual cost of chronic pain in Canada is estimated to exceed 6 billion dollars.2

Canadian public safety personnel (PSP) include persons working as correctional workers (security and non-security roles), dispatchers, firefighters, paramedics, and police officers.8 PSP work typically involves regular periods of substantial physical stress (e.g., engaging with public safety incidents such as fires, resuscitations, arrests) as well as extended periods of potential inactivity (e.g., time between duty calls).9 Exposure to potentially traumatic events (e.g., exposure to threatened or actual physical assaults, fires, or explosions10) is considered common for persons working as PSP,11,12 and researchers have substantiated an important link between trauma and chronic pain in several other populations (e.g., military).1317 Despite the costs of chronic pain, the potential physical stressors, and the potentially problematic links between trauma and pain, the available information on chronic pain among PSP remains sparse, particularly in Canada.9 Further, the extant data are typically focused on a single PSP category as opposed to a range of personnel, and the assessments used diverse data collection methods (e.g., broad sampling vs. sampling of injured persons only), tools (e.g., records review, self-report), sample sizes, pain questions, and time frames.

With respect to the limited available Canadian data, previous estimates from a large sample of Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP; = 1002) placed lifetime and past-year chronic pain prevalence at 54.9% and 41.8%, respectively, with most participants who reported chronic pain (91.5%) reporting that the pain started after joining the service18; however, the cross-sectional nature and limited scope of the data preclude firm conclusions regarding temporal sequencing and exclusion of cofounds (e.g., age). A study of Canadian paramedics (= 101) indicated that 88% reported having “musculoskeletal problems (pain, aches, or discomfort)” (p. 23) but not necessarily chronic pain.19 In a sample of Canadian firefighters (= 294), the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal disorder ranged from 20% to 45%, depending on the affected bodily area identified as problematic by participants (e.g., neck, lower extremity, arm, shoulder, hand); however, the researchers did not specifically report on chronic pain.20

There have also been international efforts to estimate the prevalence of chronic pain among PSP. Research with Irish correctional officers showed that nearly half report chronic pain.21 Researchers assessing chronic back pain in two large European samples of police (i.e., Northern Ireland, = 2000; Manchester, = 600) estimated the prevalence as ranging from 4.3% to 8.2%.22 A study using a smaller sample of U.K. police (= 80) found that chronic pain prevalence estimates ranged from 22% to 38%.23 Only 10% of Swiss paramedics (= 334) reported chronic pain during the past 12 months24; similarly, in a large sample of randomly selected Swedish paramedics (= 1500), 10% reported pain that limited their activities during the past 12 months.25 In contrast, approximately half (50.5%) of a large American paramedic sample (= 930) reported having pain for one or more days in a 2-week period.26 In an American sample of urban firefighters (= 382), approximately 13% reported pain occurring often or frequently within the prior week.27 Finally, a qualitative study of 17 American 911 dispatchers evidenced reports of somatic concerns, including chronic pain, as being common among dispatchers.28 Based on the available, albeit sparse, literature, there appear to be differences in pain reporting based on PSP population and country; accordingly, data derived from Canadian PSP are needed.

The available Canadian and international data indicate substantial variability in pain estimates and appear insufficient with respect to understanding the prevalence of chronic pain in PSP. There appears to be no Canadian data for PSP working as correctional workers, dispatchers, or municipal/provincial police officers. The apparent variability in results raises questions regarding chronic pain estimate reliability and precludes comparisons among PSP groups. The objectives of the current study were to (1) provide initial estimates of current self-reported rates of chronic pain frequency, intensity, and duration at different bodily locations across a diverse and large sample of Canadian PSP and (2) assess the perceived precipitants of PSP chronic pain, with work-related mechanisms of injury expected to be the primary perceived cause.

Materials and methods

Procedure

The current data were collected using a secured web-based self-report survey made available to PSP participants in English or French as part of a larger study.29 The research followed established guidelines for web-based surveys.30 The survey included well-established measures for screening chronic pain (details below). Authors and representatives from the Public Safety Steering Committee (PSSC) of the Canadian Institute for Public Safety Research and Treatment (CIPSRT) selected measures using a collaborative approach. Details of the PSSC, CIPSRT, and survey procedures are available elsewhere.29 The study was approved by the University of Regina Institutional Research Ethics Board (File #2016–107). Participants could access the survey from September 1, 2016, to March 31, 2017. The survey issued each participant a unique computer-generated random code that allowed for repeated nonduplicate entries, therein accommodating PSP schedules and facilitating participation.

Participation was solicited through e-mails sent to actively working PSP, including civilian members working for police and volunteer firefighters. The e-mails were sent by the CIPSRT PSSC. The PSSC includes leadership representatives from each of the national associations for PSP. The minister of public safety and emergency preparedness also provided a video invitation encouraging participation. Each of the PSSC member agencies sent the invitation e-mail to their provincial counterparts for forwarding either directly to potential participants or to their municipal counterparts for forwarding to invite potential participants. Several advocacy organizations also sent the invitation to their e-mail distribution lists. Many social media outlets also made the invitation available. Accordingly, the invitation process prohibits accurate estimations of how many persons were invited to participate. Additional data collection details are reported elsewhere.29

A total of = 8520 began the survey and answered at least the first question (i.e., “Please indicate which category of First Responders or other Public Safety Personnel you feel best describes your current occupation”). For the current study, only PSP who reported working as call center operators/dispatchers, correctional officers, firefighters, municipal/provincial police, paramedics, or RCMP were included because the sample sizes were considered large enough to provide defensible estimates; however, only = 5093 (59.8%) persons progressed far enough through the survey to be asked about the presence of chronic pain and then completed the associated sections required to be included in the current analyses.

Chronic pain

Current chronic pain experiences were assessed with items based on work done by the International Association for the Study of Pain31 and previous reviews3236; specifically, we asked participants: “Do you experience chronic pain defined by pain more days than not, lasting longer than 3 months?” Response options included “Yes” (= 1859), “Yes, but I’d rather not discuss it” (= 176), “No” (= 3030), and “Prefer not to answer” (= 28). Participants who responded to the pain question with yes were subsequently asked about location (see Table 2), intensity (0 = no pain; 10 = pain that sends you to the hospital), and duration (How many days per week, on average? For how many months? see Table 3). Participants who identified more than one location were also asked to select the location that causes the most interference (“If you indicated that you have multiple locations of chronic pain, which interferes most with your life?”). Participants were subsequently asked about the cause of the chronic pain that most interfered with their life (see Table 4). The variable for perceived cause of chronic pain (“What caused the chronic pain that most interferes with your life?”) was not mutually exclusive (i.e., instructions were to check all that apply).

Table 2.

Prevalence and location of chronic pain in total sample and by PSP category.a

  Total sample Municipal/provincial police1 RCMP2 Corrections workers3 Firefighters4 Paramedics5 Call center operators/dispatchers6 Chi-square Significant differences between PSP categories
Prevalence, % (n)                  
 Any chronic pain 40.2 (2035) 35.9 (482) 43.4 (563) 45.4 (318) 35.3 (284) 44.1 (297) 36.7 (91) 37.099*** 1 < 2, 3, 5
4 < 2, 3, 5
6 < 2, 3, 5
Chronic pain location, % (n)b,c                  
 Lower back 24.0 (1216) 22.1 (296) 26.5 (344) 26.1 (183) 18.4 (148) 28.9 (195) 20.2 (50) 33.845*** 1 < 2, 3, 5
4 < 1, 2, 3, 4
6 < 2, 5
 Shoulder 17.6 (890) 14.7 (197) 19.6 (254) 18.5 (130) 15.7 (126) 21.5 (145) 15.3 (38) 21.985*** 1 < 2, 3, 5
4 < 2, 5
6 < 5
 Neck 16.8 (849) 15.4 (207) 17.8 (231) 21.0 (147) 12.3 (99) 18.1 (122) 17.3 (43) 23.993*** 1 < 3
4 < 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
 Arm 11.1 (563) 10.6 (142) 12.5 (162) 12.6 (88) 6.7 (54) 12.5 (84) 13.3 (33) 22.561*** 4 < 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
 Leg 14.3 (726) 12.7 (171) 15.7 (204) 16.5 (116) 11.3 (91) 15.0 (101) 17.3 (43) 15.666** 1 < 2, 3
4 < 2, 3, 5, 6
 Hand 10.9 (554) 9.8 (131) 12.0 (156) 13.6 (95) 7.2 (58) 12.0 (81) 13.3 (33) 22.112*** 1 < 3
4 < 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
 Foot 12.6 (637) 11.8 (159) 14.9 (193) 15.4 (108) 7.6 (61) 12.2 (82) 13.7 (34) 30.671*** 1 < 2, 3
4 < 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
 Headaches 15.2 (769) 14.4 (193) 16.0 (207) 18.5 (130) 9.1 (73) 18.8 (127) 15.7 (39) 37.774*** 1 < 3, 5
4 < 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
 Other 7.1 (358) 5.7 (77) 8.8 (114) 6.8 (48) 5.2 (42) 9.1 (61) 6.5 (16) 17.900** 1 < 2, 5
4 < 2, 5

aPSP indicates public safety personnel; RCMP, Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

bNonmutually exclusive chronic pain locations.

cOnly calculated for respondents who reported experiencing any chronic pain, more days than not, that lasted longer than 3 months.

Different numbered superscripts indicate that public safety personnel categories differ from one another at 0.05 only. Differences across categories were tested using logistic regression models for prevalence.

*P ≤ .05; **P ≤ .01; ***P ≤ .001

Table 3.

Intensity and duration of chronic pain in total sample and by PSP category.a

  Total sample Municipal/provincial police1 RCMP2 Corrections workers3 Firefighters4 Paramedics5 Call center operators/dispatchers6 F-value Significant difference between PSP categories
Intensity, mean (SD)b,c score range 0 to 10                  
 Lower back 4.41 (2.24) 4.65 (2.30) 4.37 (2.19) 4.77 (2.28) 4.10 (2.14) 4.07 (2.27) 4.22 (1.98) 3.210** 5 < 3
 Shoulder 3.64 (2.49) 3.42 (2.70) 3.94 (2.27) 3.81 (2.73) 3.83 (2.32) 2.82 (2.23) 4.61 (2.63) 5.762*** 5 < 2, 3, 4, 6
 Neck 3.72 (2.57) 3.74 (2.77) 3.65 (2.56) 4.36 (2.49) 3.34 (2.57) 3.18 (2.33) 4.14 (2.20) 3.654** 4 < 3; 5 < 3
 Arm 1.94 (2.52) 1.78 (2.41) 1.94 (2.60) 2.24 (2.67) 2.40 (2.65) 1.29 (2.08) 2.64 (2.71) 2.385* NS
 Leg 3.05 (2.77) 3.16 (2.81) 3.15 (2.78) 3.24 (3.03) 3.34 (2.60) 2.27 (2.43) 2.86 (2.78) 2.052 (NS) NS
 Hand 1.72 (2.29) 1.64 (2.33) 1.71 (2.24) 2.29 (2.70) 1.76 (2.11) 1.09 (1.61) 1.88 (2.46) 2.549* 5 < 3
 Foot 2.31 (2.68) 2.38 (2.78) 2.42 (2.60) 2.69 (2.94) 2.30 (2.39) 1.62 (2.36) 1.91 (2.77) 1.760 (NS) NS
 Headaches 3.98 (3.16) 4.21 (3.28) 3.83 (2.97) 4.52 (3.21) 3.34 (3.10) 3.65 (3.17) 4.00 (3.30) 1.949 (NS) NS
 Other 3.89 (2.75) 3.61 (3.01) 3.78 (2.71) 4.10 (3.03) 3.88 (2.28) 4.03 (2.50) 4.94 (2.91) 0.750 (NS) NS
Duration, mean (SD)b,c days per week                  
 Lower back 5.09 (2.19) 5.16 (2.25) 5.25 (2.14) 5.06 (2.23) 4.83 (2.25) 4.97 (2.10) 4.81 (2.23) 1.005 (NS) NS
 Shoulder 4.68 (2.60) 4.53 (2.78) 5.15 (2.39) 4.72 (2.57) 4.64 (2.46) 4.00 (2.70) 4.53 (2.69) 3.544** 5 < 2
 Neck 4.55 (2.56) 4.63 (2.57) 4.62 (2.63) 5.00 (2.31) 4.19 (2.74) 4.12 (2.63) 4.47 (2.17) 1.781 (NS) NS
 Arm 3.03 (3.20) 2.94 (3.15) 3.00 (3.30) 3.61 (3.13) 3.67 (3.13) 2.27 (3.00) 2.83 (3.03) 1.564 (NS) NS
 Leg 4.25 (3.00) 4.62 (2.91) 4.22 (3.00) 4.52 (3.12) 4.26 (2.88) 3.38 (3.01) 4.32 (3.07) 2.016 (NS) 5 < 1
 Hand 2.89 (3.09) 2.81 (3.06) 2.89 (3.20) 3.44 (3.11) 3.14 (3.18) 2.29 (2.93) 2.67 (2.70) 1.043 (NS) NS
 Foot 3.46 (3.22) 3.67 (3.20) 3.68 (3.28) 3.72 (3.19) 2.90 (3.10) 2.88 (3.14) 2.85 (3.27) 1.291 (NS) NS
 Headaches 2.42 (2.28) 2.38 (2.32) 2.49 (2.32) 2.86 (2.31) 2.13 (2.36) 2.29 (2.22) 1.69 (1.61) 1.812 (NS) NS
 Other 4.91 (2.65) 5.20 (2.67) 4.96 (2.66) 4.20 (2.83) 5.18 (2.44) 4.92 (2.67) 4.50 (2.50) 0.895 (NS) NS
Duration, mean (SD)b,c,d total number of months                  
 Lower back 39.82 (37.87) 40.71 (39.04) 42.03 (38.80) 37.12 (36.29) 33.00 (34.02) 43.03 (39.55) 35.90 (31.79) 1.435 (NS) NS
 Shoulder 29.51 (33.13) 25.64 (32.99) 34.23 (34.15) 30.24 (33.36) 27.93 (33.47) 26.15 (30.78) 33.84 (32.08) 1.643 (NS) NS
 Neck 33.83 (36.05) 32.78 (36.79) 37.45 (37.66) 32.71 (33.48) 30.00 (33.77) 30.34 (36.29) 41.50 (35.38) 1.066 (NS) NS
 Arm 16.29 (28.24) 16.33 (27.32) 16.04 (28.29) 16.15 (25.90) 18.53 (35.55) 15.23 (28.96) 16.40 (23.09) 0.073 (NS) NS
 Leg 27.23 (33.63) 29.49 (35.15) 29.78 (34.69) 27.09 (35.04) 23.34 (27.24) 22.88 (33.04) 25.38 (33.31) 0.782 (NS) NS
 Hand 17.57 (30.19) 16.85 (26.42) 19.95 (34.01) 19.93 (31.34) 17.98 (32.43) 11.57 (27.10) 16.00 (21.93) 0.704 (NS) NS
 Foot 17.39 (26.71) 18.20 (28.04) 20.44 (29.20) 15.34 (22.16) 14.94 (23.76) 14.18 (25.87) 12.60 (22.50) 0.942 (NS) NS
 Headaches 28.53 (35.30) 26.37 (32.13) 30.24 (36.78) 35.41 (37.28) 20.19 (28.95) 27.99 (36.75) 25.45 (38.90) 1.479 (NS) NS
 Other 33.11 (36.09) 26.84 (32.12) 34.87 (38.55) 24.06 (26.80) 41.56 (38.33) 39.96 (38.78) 22.07 (30.88) 1.926 (NS) NS

aPSP indicates public safety personnel; RCMP, Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

bNonmutually exclusive chronic pain locations.

cOnly calculated for respondents who reported experiencing any chronic pain, more days than not, that lasted longer than 3 months.

dTo prevent outliers from skewing the mean, duration of months was limited to a range of a minimum of 0 months to a maximum of 150 months. This equated to removing the top 10% or less of the sample for each type of pain to calculate the mean and SD for the duration of months of pain.

Different numbered superscripts indicate that public safety personnel categories differ from one another at 0.05 only. NS = no significant differences between PSP categories. Differences across categories were tested using analyses of variance with Tukey’s honestly significant difference test for mean scores.

*P ≤ .05; **P ≤ .01; ***P ≤ .001.

Table 4.

Perceived cause of chronic pain in total sample and by PSP category.a

Perceived cause, % (n)b,c Total sample Municipal/provincial police1 RCMP2 Corrections workers3 Firefighters4 Paramedics5 Call center operators/dispatchers6 Chi-square Significant difference between PSP categories
Injury related to active duty 40.2 (818) 39.6 (191) 54.4 (306) 24.5 (78) 29.2 (83) 50.5 (150) 11.0 (10) 139.110*** 1 < 2, 5
3 < 1, 2, 5
4 < 1, 2, 5
6 < 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Injury related to work other than active duty 9.6 (195) 10.2 (49) 7.3 (41) 11.6 (37) 11.6 (33) 9.4 (28) 7.7 (7) 6.918 (NS) 2 < 3, 4
Injury not related to work 16.2 (329) 18.9 (91) 8.5 (48) 20.8 (66) 19.4 (55) 14.8 (44) 27.5 (25) 42.937*** 2 < 1, 3, 4, 5, 6
5 < 6
Non-injury-related disease (e.g., osteoarthritis) 11.2 (228) 10.0 (48) 7.8 (44) 14.8 (47) 11.3 (32) 12.1 (36) 23.1 (21) 24.484*** 1 < 3, 6
2 < 3, 5, 6
4 < 6
5 < 6

aPSP indicates public safety personnel; RCMP, Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

bOptions for perceived cause of pain are nonmutually exclusive.

cOnly calculated for respondents who reported experiencing any chronic pain, more days than not, that lasted longer than 3 months.

Different numbered superscripts indicate that public safety personnel categories differ from one another at 0.05 only. NS = no significant differences between PSP categories. Differences across categories were tested using logistic regression models for prevalence estimates.

*P ≤ .05; **P ≤ .01; ***P ≤ .001.

Statistical analyses

To determine the representativeness of the sample, the demographic proportions for sex, age, and provincial region in the current sample were compared to data provided by Statistics Canada for PSP using the 2011 National Household Survey and the National Occupational Classification.37 Comparative results indicated that sex and age distributions were similar across PSP groups (see previous publication29). All analyses were conducted using SPSS Version 24 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).

First, the overall demographic characteristics of the population were calculated (Table 1). Second, prevalence estimates for any chronic pain and chronic pain location were first calculated across PSP groups using cross tabulations with chi-square tests of association (Table 2). Additionally, means and standard deviations were calculated for severity factors (intensity and duration; see Table 3). Among those endorsing any chronic pain, prevalence estimates are reported for perceived cause. Logistic regression models were computed to test for differences in prevalence estimates across PSP groups for categorical variables. In the logistic regression models, the chronic pain variables were entered as the dependent variable and the PSP groups were entered as the independent variable. Differences across the PSP groups were tested by changing the reference group for the independent variable in the logistic regression models. One-way analyses of variance with Tukey’s post hoc comparisons were conducted to test for differences across PSP groups for continuous variables (Table 3). Statistical significance was determined at ≤ 0.05

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics among PSP in Canada, N = 5093.a

  % (n)
Sex  
 Male 67.5 (3425)
 Female 32.5 (1650)
Age  
 19–29 7.5 (379)
 30–39 28.0 (1419)
 40–49 36.7 (1858)
 50–59 24.5 (1241)
 60 and older 3.3 (168)
Marital status  
 Married/common-law 75.9 (3835)
 Single 10.1 (510)
 Separated/divorced/widowed 10.5 (529)
 Remarried 3.5 (179)
Ethnicity  
 White 91.6 (4615)
 Other 8.4 (423)
Education  
 High school or less 9.2 (455)
 Some postsecondary (less than 4-year college/university program) 54.2 (2694)
 University degree/4-year college or higher 36.6 (1821)
Province of residence  
 Western Canada (BC, AB, SK, MB) 52.4 (2645)
 Eastern Canada (ON, QC) 34.3 (1732)
 Atlantic Canada (PEI, NS, NB, NFL) 12.0 (607)
 Northern Territories (YK, NWT, NVT) 1.2 (61)
Urban/rural work location  
 Urban 93.9 (4663)
 Rural 6.1 (303)
Years of service  
 Less than 4 years 4.9 (245)
 4 to 9 years 17.4 (876)
 10 to 15 years 23.3 (1174)
 More than 15 years 54.4 (2743)
Public safety officer category  
 Municipal/provincial police 26.5 (1348)
 RCMP 25.6 (1305)
 Corrections workers 13.9 (710)
 Firefighters 15.8 (807)
 Paramedics 13.3 (675)
 Call center operators/dispatchers 4.9 (248)

aPSP indicates public safety personnel; RCMP, Royal Canadian Mounted Police. N for each variable differ slightly due to nonresponse.

Results

Chronic pain prevalence

The estimated proportion of Canadian PSP reporting chronic pain was 40.2%. Table 2 includes the prevalence of any chronic pain and chronic pain location across PSP categories, as well as results from the logistic regression models to test differences between PSP categories. Chronic pain estimates range from 35.3% (firefighters) to 45.4% (correctional workers). The highest prevalence of chronic pain across the sample was reported as lower back pain (24.0%), with paramedics endorsing the highest prevalence of lower back pain across PSP categories (28.9%).

Intensity and duration of chronic pain

Table 3 includes the descriptive statistics and comparative results for self-reported intensity and duration of pain. Lower back was reported as the location of most severe chronic pain (intensity and duration), with paramedics sometimes reporting significantly less intense pain than other PSP categories; nevertheless, most comparisons did not indicate statistically significant differences in severity between PSP categories. Paramedics reported experiencing shoulder pain fewer days per week than RCMP and leg pain fewer days per week than municipal/provincial police; however, there were no other statistically significant differences between PSP categories based on days per week of pain. There were no statistically significant differences between any PSP categories based on duration of pain.

Perceived cause

Table 4 includes the descriptive statistics and comparative results for self-reported perceived causes of chronic pain. There were several statistically significant differences between PSP categories for each perceived cause. A substantial proportion (40.2%) of PSP members indicated that chronic pain was from injury related to active duty, with the highest prevalence for RCMP and paramedics (both over 50%). The next highest perceived cause was injury not related to work (16.2%), with the highest prevalence for call center operators/dispatchers (27.5%). Similarly, call center operators/dispatchers reported that a substantial proportion of chronic pain was related to non-injury-related disease (23.1%).

Discussion

The current study provides the first Canadian chronic pain prevalence estimates including location and severity for various PSP categories. The results suggest that approximately 40.2% of PSP report current chronic pain, present more days than not for at least 3 months, which cannot be directly statistically compared to the general population estimates of approximately 25%46 but does appear substantially higher. The focus on current chronic pain may provide conservative estimates, and an assessment of chronic pain over the past 12 months or over a lifetime may be even higher. The largest proportion of PSP with chronic pain reported having lower back pain, which occurred on average more than 5 days per week. Importantly, almost half of all PSP participants reported that their chronic pain was related to an injury at work. Paramedics and RCMP were more likely to attribute their chronic pain to active duty–related injuries than were most other PSP groups.

The relatively high reported prevalence of chronic pain may be partially explained by the physical demands of PSP work. PSP often engage in repetitive physical activity involving substantive musculoskeletal strain coupled with extended periods of potential inactivity.9 As such, the opportunities for physical injury may be relatively higher than for the general population. The overall differences across PSP categories, as well as differences in physical locations of pain (e.g., lower back verses shoulder) across PSP categories, may be explained by differences in work requirements (e.g., different risks for physical task requirements). There is also evidence that increased physical activity may be beneficial for reducing the impact of chronic musculoskeletal pain, particularly among PSP.27,38 Accordingly, differences in opportunities to engage in regular exercise may explain some of the observed differences across PSP categories.

Beyond the physical demands, PSP are also frequently exposed to potentially traumatic events.11,12 There is an important link between mental disorders,15,39,40 particularly posttraumatic stress disorder,13,14,16,17 and chronic pain in several other populations; as such, the relatively high reports of chronic pain in PSP may be closely linked to the potentially traumatic nature of their work.29 More specifically, psychological and physiological vulnerabilities, possibly genetically influenced, may predispose people to develop both mental disorders and chronic pain when exposed to certain environmental conditions (e.g., an event that is both traumatic and painful).15 Accordingly, future research should investigate the comorbidity between chronic pain and mental disorders in PSP samples, ideally with prospective studies to assess relative causal influences and associated mechanisms (e.g., individual differences in responses to arousal, selective attention to the threat, autonomic nervous system dysregulation, endogenous opioid dysregulation15).

There were relatively few significant differences across PSP categories for self-reported intensity and duration of chronic pain. Nevertheless, across all PSP, lower back pain was reported as the most intense pain, whereas hand pain was reported as the least intense. The physical requirements of PSP work may mean that hand pain systematically excludes PSP from active service, whereas there may be possibilities for options to work around lower back pain. Lower back pain was reported as occurring most consistently in a given week, whereas headache pain occurred least frequently.

The most frequent attribution of cause for PSP chronic pain across categories was an injury related to active duty. Dispatchers stand out as a notable exception because significantly fewer attributed their chronic pain to an injury related to active duty. Nevertheless, RCMP and paramedics were more likely to attribute their chronic pain to an injury related to active duty than call center operators/dispatchers, corrections workers, firefighters, and municipal/provincial police. The differences may be explained, in part, by differences in PSP work requirements as well as differences in available resources and practical support for post-injury recovery. Whether and how such considerations interact with availability of sufficient health coverage (e.g., direct health care costs, compensation for lost time) remains important but impossible to clarify with the currently available data. In any case, additional research into the differences may produce opportunities to mitigate pain experiences for all PSP.

Limitations

The large, diverse Canadian PSP sample is an important strength of the current study, as is the use of items based on established research3136; however, there are several limitations that provide important directions for future research. First, participants were anonymous and self-selected, which means that despite proportional demographic representativeness, the results may not be generalizable. Related, the sampling method makes knowing the actual response rate and reasons for attrition impossible. Second, the current study focused exclusively on active duty, which may provide conservative estimates given that the data did not include those on disability. Third, the reliability and validity of web-based self-reports remains ambiguous41; nevertheless, the high frequencies and relatively large sample appear to justify research with more robust assessments (e.g., interviews; random sampling). Fourth, the PSP category groupings were based on previous research29,42,43 but could not account for potentially important differences within some categories (e.g., paramedics verses emergency medical technicians). Fifth, future research should simultaneously assess the interactive effects of mental health and chronic pain, given the substantial evidence of comorbidity4447 and potentially increased risk from mutually maintaining factors.13,4853

Conclusions

The current results suggest that many PSP (i.e., 40.2%) may be experiencing chronic pain. Among those, approximately 40.2% attribute pain to an injury related to active duty and 9.6% attribute pain to an injury related to work other than active duty, which emphasizes the need for prevention efforts and, when appropriate, early interventions. There were also significant differences between PSP categories that warrant further investigation to promote physical and mental wellness. Given the overlap between trauma, mental disorders, and chronic pain, additional related research appears warranted to support calls for a national action plan in support of PSP health, both mental and physical.8,54

Acknowledgments

Special thanks for recruitment support provided by (alphabetically) Badge of Life Canada, Behind the Red Serge, Canadian Association for Police Governance (CAPG), Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP), Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs (CAFC), Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research (CIMVHR), Canadian Ministry of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Canadian Police Association (CPA), Community Safety Knowledge Alliance, Correctional Service of Canada (CSC), Families of the RCMP for PTSD Awareness, First Responder Mental Health Network Collaboration, International Association of Firefighters (IAFF), Justice Institute of British Columbia, Mental Health Commission of Canada, Mood Disorders Society of Canada, Nova Scotia Operational Stress Injury Clinic–Capital Health, Paramedic Association of Canada (PAC), Paramedic Chiefs of Canada (PCC), Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), Tema Conter Trust, Union of Solicitor General Employees (USGE), and Wounded Warriors Canada.

Funding Statement

R. N. Carleton’s research is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) through a New Investigator Award (FRN: 285489). T. O. Afifi’s research is supported by a CIHR New Investigator Award and Foundation Scheme Award. R. El-Gabalawy’s research is supported by the CIHR Chronic Pain SPOR Network, and University of Manitoba Start-Up funding. This research was funded in part by the Ministry of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness through the Policy Development Contribution Program.

References

  • 1.International Association for the Study of Pain . Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Pain. 1994;(Suppl 3):1–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Phillips CJ, Schopflocher D.. The economics of chronic pain. In: Rashiq S, Schopflocher D, Taenzer P, Jonsson E, editors. Chronic pain: a health policy perspective. Weinheim (Germany): Wiley; 2008. p. 41–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reitsma ML, Tranmer JE, Buchanan DM, VanDenKerkhof EG. The epidemiology of chronic pain in Canadian men and women between 1994 and 2007: results from the longitudinal component of the National Population Health Survey. Pain Res Manag. 2012;17(3):166–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Vos T, Buchbinder R. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):2028–2037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schopflocher D, Taenzer P, Jovey R. The prevalence of chronic pain in Canada. Pain Res Manag. 2011;16(6):445–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boulanger A, Clark AJ, Squire P, Cui E, Horbay GL. Chronic pain in Canada: have we improved our management of chronic noncancer pain? Pain Res Manag. 2007;12(1):39–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McKinnon CD, Amy SA, Callaghan JP, Dickerson CR. The effect of police cruiser restraint cage configuration on shoulder discomfort, muscular demands, upper limb postures, and task performance during simulated police patrol. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(6):1414–1421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oliphant RC. Healthy minds, safe communities: supporting our public safety officers through a national strategy for operational stress injuries. Ottawa (Canada): Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Parsons JRL. Occupational health and safety issues of police officers in Canada, the United States and Europe: a review essay. Newfoundland (Canada): Memorial University; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association ; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Galatzer-Levy IR, Madan A, Neylan TC, Henn-Haase C, Marmar CR. Peritraumatic and trait dissociation differentiate police officers with resilient versus symptomatic trajectories of posttraumatic stress symptoms. J Trauma Stress. 2011;24(5):557–565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Komarovskaya I, Maguen S, McCaslin SE, Metzler TJ, Madan A, Brown AD, Galatzer-Levy IR, Henn-Haase C, Marmar CR. The impact of killing and injuring others on mental health symptoms among police officers. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(10):1332–1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Asmundson GJG, Coons MJ, Taylor S, Katz J. PTSD and the experience of pain: research and clinical implications of shared vulnerability and mutual maintenance models. Can J Psychiatry. 2002;47(10):930–937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fishbain DA, Pulikal A, Lewis JE, Gao J. Chronic pain types differ in their reported prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and there is consistent evidence that chronic pain is associated with PTSD: an evidence-based structured systematic review. Pain Med. 2016;18(4):711–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Asmundson GJG, Katz J. Understanding the co-occurrence of anxiety disorders and chronic pain: state-of-the-art. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(10):888–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thompson JM, VanTil L, Zamorski MA, Garber B, Dursun S, Fikretoglu D, Ross D, Richardson JD, Sareen J, Sudom K, Courchesne C, Pedlar D . Mental health of Canadian Armed Forces Veterans – Review of Population Studies. JMVHR. 2015;2(1):70–86. doi: 10.3138/jmvfh.3258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.VanDenKerkhof EG, VanTil L, Thompson JM, Sweet J, Hopman WM, Carley M. Sudom K . Pain in Canadian veterans: Analysis of data from the Survey on Transition to Civilian Life. Pain Res Manag. 2015;20(2):89–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brown JJ, Wells GA, Trottier AJ, Bonneau J, Ferris B. Back pain in a large Canadian police force. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(7):821–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Corbeil P, Plamondon A, Tremblay A, Prairie J, Larouche D, Hegg-Deloye S. Mesure de l’exposition du technicien ambulancier paramédical aux facteurs de risque de troubles musculosquelettiques. [Measuring the risk of musculoskeletal disorders among Paramedic Technicians] Montreal (Canada): Corporation d’urgences-santé; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Negm A, MacDermid J, KE Sinden, NJ MacIntyre. Prevalence and distribution of musculoskeletal disorders in firefighters are influenced by age and tenure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:e52. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Costello E, Bogue JE, Sarma K, McGuire BE. Chronic pain in Irish prison officers: profile and predictors of pain-related disability and depression. Pain Med (Malden, Mass). 2015;16(12):2292–2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Symonds TL, Burke C, Mathewson T. Occupational risk factors for the first-onset and subsequent course of low back trouble. A study of serving police officers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(22):2612–2620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gyi DE, Porter JM. Musculoskeletal problems and driving in police officers. Occup Med (Lond). 1998;48(3):153–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Arial M, Benoit D, Wild P. Exploring implicit preventive strategies in prehospital emergency workers: a novel approach for preventing back problems. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(4):1003–1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aasa U, Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Angquist K, Brulin C. Relationships between work-related factors and disorders in the neck–shoulder and low-back region among female and male ambulance personnel. J Occup Health. 2005;47:481–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Studnek JR, Crawford JM, Wilkins JR, Pennell ML. Back problems among emergency medical services professionals: the LEADS health and wellness follow-up study. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53:12–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Beaton R, Murphy S, Salazar M, Johnson LC. Neck, back, and shoulder pain complaints in urban firefighters: the benefits of aerobic exercise. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2002;10:57–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shuler S. Talking community at 911: the centrality of communication in coping with emotional labour. In: Shepherd GJ, Rothenbuhler EW, editors. Communication and community. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2001. p. 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Carleton RN, Afifi TO, Turner S, Taillieu T, Duranceau S, LeBouthillier DM, Sareen J, Ricciardelli R, MacPhee RS, Groll D, et al. Mental disorder symptoms among public safety personnel. Can J Psychiatry. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ashbaugh AR, Herbert CF, Butler LD, Brunet A. A new frontier: trauma research on the Internet. In: Brunet A, Ashbaugh AR, Herbert CF, editors. Internet use in the aftermath of trauma. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): IOS Press BV; 2010. p. 99–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Loeser JD, Treede RD. The Kyoto protocol of IASP basic pain terminology. Pain. 2008;137(3):473–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Katsavouni F, Bebetsos E, Malliou P, Beneka A. The relationship between burnout, PTSD symptoms and injuries in firefighters. Occup Med. (Lond). 2016;66(1):32–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steingrimsdottir OA, Landmark T, Macfarlane GJ, Nielsen CS. Defining chronic pain in epidemiological studies—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2017:158(11):2092–2107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Katz J, Rosenbloom BN, Fashler S. Chronic pain, psychopathology, and DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder. Can J Psychiatry. 2015;60(4):160–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rosenbloom BN, Khan S, McCartney C, Katz J. Systematic review of persistent pain and psychological outcomes following traumatic musculoskeletal injury. J Pain Res. 2013;6:39–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Statistics Canada . National household survey. Ottawa (Canada): Statistics Canada; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nabeel I, Baker BA, McGrail MP, Flottemesch TJ. Correlation between physical activity, fitness, and musculoskeletal injuries in police officers. Minn Med. 2007;90:40–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Lee S, Posada-Villa J, Kovess V, Angermeyer MC, Levinson D, Girolamo G, Nakane H, Mneimneh Z, et al. Mental disorders among persons with chronic back or neck pain: results from the World Mental Health Surveys. Pain. 2007;129:332–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.McWilliams LA, Cox BJ, Enns MW. Mood and anxiety disorders associated with chronic pain: an examination in a nationally representative sample. Pain. 2003;106(1–2):127–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bethlehem J. Selection bias in web surveys. Int Stat Rev. 2010;78:161–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stanley IH, Horn MA, Joiner TE. A systematic review of suicidal thoughts and behaviors among police officers, firefighters, EMTs, and paramedics. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;44:25–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Carleton RN, Afifi TO, Turner S, Taillieu T, LeBouthillier DM, Duranceau S, Sareen J, Ricciardelli R, MacPhee RS, Groll D, et al. Suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts among public safety personnel in Canada. Can Psychol. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Baumeister H, Knecht A, Hutter N. Direct and indirect costs in persons with chronic back pain and comorbid mental disorders—a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2012;73(2):79–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bernik M, Sampaio TP, Gandarela L. Fibromyalgia comorbid with anxiety disorders and depression: combined medical and psychological treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013;17(9):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Lee S, Posada-Villa J, Kovess V, Angermeyer MC, Levinson D, De Girolamo G, Nakane H, Mneimneh Z, et al. Mental disorders among persons with chronic back or neck pain: results from the World Mental Health Surveys. Pain. 2007;129(3):332–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tsang A, Von Korff M, Lee S, Alonso J, Karam E, Angermeyer MC, Borges GL, Bromet EJ, Demytteneare K, De Girolamo G, et al. Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression–anxiety disorders. J Pain. 2008;9(10):883–891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Peres JF, Goncalves AL, Peres MF. Psychological trauma in chronic pain: implications of PTSD for fibromyalgia and headache disorders. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009;13(5):350–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Asmundson GJG, Hadjistavropoulos HD. Addressing shared vulnerability for comorbid PTSD and chronic pain: a cognitive–behavioral perspective. Cogn Behav Pract. 2006;13:8–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gibson CA. Review of posttraumatic stress disorder and chronic pain: the path to integrated care. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(5):753–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Koren D, Hemel D, Klein E. Injury increases the risk for PTSD: an examination of potential neurobiological and psychological mediators. CNS Spectrum. 2006;11(8):616–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sharp TJ, Harvey AG. Chronic pain and posttraumatic stress disorder: mutual maintenance? Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21(6):857–877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Picard MC National roundtable on post-traumatic stress disorder. Paper presented at: Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU); 2016. Jan 29; Regina, SK, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Thompson, JM, Pranger T, Sweet J, VanTil L, McColl MA, Besemann M, … Pedlar D. Disability correlates in Canadian Armed Forces Regular Force Veterans. Disab Rehab. 2015;37:884–891. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.947441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Pain are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES