Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Chemistry logoLink to Frontiers in Chemistry
. 2021 Dec 23;9:796690. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.796690

Electrochemical Bromination of Glycals

Zhao-Xiang Luo 1,†, Miao Liu 1,†, Tian Li 1, De-Cai Xiong 1,2,*, Xin-Shan Ye 1,*
PMCID: PMC8732377  PMID: 35004613

Abstract

Herein, the convenient one-step electrochemical bromination of glycals using Bu4NBr as the brominating source under metal-catalyst-free and oxidant-free reaction conditions was described. A series of 2-bromoglycals bearing different electron-withdrawing or electron-donating protective groups were successfully synthesized in moderate to excellent yields. The coupling of tri-O-benzyl-2-bromogalactal with phenylacetylene, potassium phenyltrifluoroborate, or a 6-OH acceptor was achieved to afford 2C-branched carbohydrates and disaccharides via Sonogashira coupling, Suzuki coupling, and Ferrier rearrangement reactions with high efficiency. The radical trapping and cyclic voltammetry experiments indicated that bromine radicals may be involved in the reaction process.

Keywords: electrochemistry, bromination, glycals, 2-bromoglycals, cross-coupling, ferrier rearrangement

Introduction

Carbohydrates mainly exist in the form of glycoconjugates, polysaccharides, oligosaccharides, and monosaccharides and play a pivotal role in a broad range of important biological processes including cell proliferation, host–pathogen interactions, cell adhesion, hormone function, and the immune response (Kiessling and Kraft, 2013; Wang et al., 2020). Chemical synthesis can afford both naturally occurring important carbohydrates and biologically active carbohydrate mimetics in sufficient quantities, providing a powerful tool to understand the biological functions of carbohydrates (Muthana et al., 2009; Panza et al., 2018; Li and Ye, 2020).

Organic electrosynthesis is of current interest as one of the most promising methods for the efficient, sustainable, and green synthesis of medicinally significant compounds (Francke and Little, 2014; Horn et al., 2016; Liang and Zeng, 2020; Meyer et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2021). In recent years, the electrochemical synthesis of oligosaccharides has been successfully demonstrated through the activation of different types of glycosyl donors, such as thio-, seleno-, and telluro-glycosides (Nokami et al., 2015; Manmode et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020). In addition, our group has been involved in the electrochemical transformation of glycals to obtain significant synthetic carbohydrate compounds (Liu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021). Along with the use of MnBr2 as the redox mediator, the electrochemical trifluoromethylation of glycals has been realized (Liu et al., 2021). In the exploration of this reaction, we found that 2-bromoglycals could also be isolated when the equivalent of Bu4NBr was added. Inspired by this surprising result, we turned our focus to the electrochemical bromination of glycals (Scheme 1).

SCHEME 1.

SCHEME 1

Open in a new tab

Electrochemical transformation of glycals.

Over the past few decades, 2-bromoglycals have been widely employed as important synthons in combination with metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions to access 2C-branched carbohydrates and their analogs (Leibeling et al., 2010a; Leibeling et al., 2010b; Leibeling and Werz, 2012; Dharuman and Vankar, 2014; Martin et al., 2015). Due to the importance of 2-bromoglycals, the development of a novel, practical, and environmentally friendly method for the synthesis of 2-bromoglycals is still of high interest. The most common way to obtain 2-bromoglycals consists of two steps using Br2, which is toxic and unstable, as the brominating source (Leibeling et al., 2010a). An alternative approach involves the one-step synthesis of 2-bromoglycals from glycals using N-bromosuccinimide and silver nitrate (Dharuman and Vankar, 2014). We herein report a one-step electrochemical bromination of glycals using commercially available, stable, and safe Bu4NBr as the bromine source in an undivided cell under metal-catalyst-free and oxidant-free reaction conditions.

Results and Discussion

Initially, we began our investigation with 6-O-benzyl-3,4-dideoxy-glycal 1a as the model substrate for electrochemical bromination using Pt as the anode and cathode in an undivided cell. Unfortunately, no desired 2-bromo-3,4-dideoxy-glycal 3a was detected using KBr (Ye and Shreeve, 2004; Zhao and Lu, 2018) or NaBr (Alberto et al., 2014) as the “Br” reagent (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). To our delight, the product 3a could be obtained in 10% isolated yield when 1a was treated with 1.5 equiv of Bu4NBr (Yoshimitsu et al., 2009; Kamon et al., 2012) in dry CH3CN at room temperature under a constant electric current of 2 mA (Table 1, entry 3). The yield was increased slightly when the reaction temperature was increased to 50°C (Table 1, entry 4). Further raising the temperature to 75°C was beneficial to this transformation, leading to the formation of 3a in 35% yield (Table 1, entry 5), and the yield could be increased to 40% when the amount of Bu4NBr was increased to 2.0 equiv (Table 1, entry 6). It was found that the addition of base, such as K2CO3 or Na2CO3, could further improve the reaction yield (Table 1, entries 7 and 8). Surprisingly, when the bromination reaction was conducted with NaSO2CF3 as the additive, the desired product 3a was isolated in 67% yield (Table 1, entry 9). Altering the amount of NaSO2CF3 to 2.0 equiv led to an increased yield of 82% (Table 1, entry 10). Comparatively, when other solvents such as CH3CN/H2O (3:1), 1,2-dimethoxyethane, or ClCH2CH2Cl, were used instead of dry CH3CN, lower yields were achieved (Table 1, entries 11–13). Extensive screening experiments revealed that either changing electrode materials or modifying the reaction current were not effective for improving the yield of 3a (Table 1, entries 14–18). Moreover, the yield of 3a was decreased drastically when the electrochemical bromination reaction was performed in an air atmosphere (Table 1, entry 19). Finally, the control experiment confirmed that the role of electricity was essential, as the reaction could not proceed in the absence of an electric current (Table 1, entry 20).

TABLE 1.

Optimization of reaction conditions a .

graphic file with name fchem-09-796690-fx1.jpg
Entry Electrode “Br” reagent Additive Solvent T (°C) Yield (%) b
1 Pt (+)/Pt (−) KBr (1.5 equiv) — CH3CN Rt 0 (0)
2 Pt (+)/Pt (−) NaBr (1.5 equiv) — CH3CN Rt 0 (0)
3 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (1.5 equiv) — CH3CN Rt 10 (0)
4 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (1.5 equiv) — CH3CN 50°C 18 (14)
5 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (1.5 equiv) — CH3CN 75°C 35 (10)
6 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) — CH3CN 75°C 40 (13)
7 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) K2CO3 (1.2 equiv) CH3CN 75°C 43 (4)
8 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) Na2CO3 (1.2 equiv) CH3CN 75°C 54 (6)
9 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (1.2 equiv) CH3CN 75°C 67 (0)
10 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) CH3CN 75°C 82 (0)
11 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) CH3CN/H2O (3/1) 75°C 15 (0)
12 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) 1,2-Dimethoxyethane 75°C 46 (7)
13 Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) ClCH2CH2Cl 75°C Trace (0)
14 C (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) CH3CN 75°C 71 (0)
15 Pt (+)/C (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) CH3CN 75°C 32 (3)
16 C (+)/C (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) CH3CN 75°C 33 (7)
17 c Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) CH3CN 75°C 58 (0)
18 d Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) CH3CN 75°C 54 (0)
19 e Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) CH3CN 75°C Trace (0)
20 f Pt (+)/Pt (−) Bu4NBr (2.0 equiv) NaSO2CF3 (2.0 equiv) CH3CN 75°C NR (97)
Open in a new tab
a

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.05 mmol), “Br” reagent, Additive, Solvent (4.0 ml), Electrode, constant current = 2.0 mA, T, 4 h, in an undivided cell, under an argon atmosphere.

b

Yield of the isolated product, the yield of recovered starting material was represented in the parentheses.

c

I = 1.0 mA

d

I = 3.0 mA

e

Under an air atmosphere.

f

No electricity.

With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, we then evaluated the substrate scope of the electrochemical bromination of various types of glycals with Bu4NBr (Table 2). First, 3,4-dideoxy-glycals with electron-withdrawing groups were examined. Substrates with an acetyl or benzoyl group provided the respective brominated products 3b and 3c in good yields. In addition, benzyl (Bn), p-methoxybenzyl (PMB), tert-butyldimethylsilyl (TBS), and methyl (Me) substituted glucals could also be converted into the corresponding products 3d–g. Similarly, galactals bearing Bn, PMB, or TBS groups were found to be amenable to the electrochemical reaction, providing the desired products 3h–j in 56–73% yields. And the scalability of this electrochemical bromination was further showed by an efficient conversion of compound 1h on a 250 mg scale in 57% isolated yield. Peracetylated and perbenzoylated galactals could also undergo the electrochemical transformation to afford 2-bromo-galactals 3k–l, albeit in slightly low yields. Notably, bromination of peracetylated L-rhamnal proceeded smoothly to deliver compound 3m in 89% yield. Under the same conditions, the L-rhamnal, L-arabinal, and D-xylal equipped with Bn or PMB groups were also able to furnish the corresponding brominated products 3n–s in moderate to excellent yields. Furthermore, benzylated lactal 1t underwent this reaction to afford the desired product 3t in 72% yield.

TABLE 2.

Substrate scope of glycals a , b , c , d , e .

graphic file with name fchem-09-796690-fx2.jpg
Open in a new tab
a

Reaction conditions: glycals (0.05 mmol), NaSO2CF3 (0.10 mmol, 2.0 equiv), Bu4NBr (0.10 mmol, 2.0 equiv), dry CH3CN (4.0 ml) in an undivided cell with Pt as the anode and cathode, constant current = 2.0 mA, 75°C, under argon atmosphere, 4 h.

b

Yield of the isolated product.

c

glycals (0.10 mmol), NaSO2CF3 (0.20 mmol, 2.0 equiv), Bu4NBr (0.30 mmol, 3.0 equiv), dry CH3CN (5.0 ml) in an undivided cell with Pt as the anode and cathode, constant current = 2.0 mA, 75°C, under argon atmosphere, 6 h.

d

glycals (0.60 mmol), NaSO2CF3 (1.20 mmol, 2.0 equiv), Bu4NBr (1.20 mmol, 2.0 equiv), dry CH3CN (50.0 ml) in an undivided cell with Pt as the anode and cathode, constant current = 2.0 mA, 75°C, under argon atmosphere, 30 h.

e

glycals (0.05 mmol), NaSO2CF3 (0.10 mmol, 2.0 equiv), Bu4NBr (0.15 mmol, 3.0 equiv), dry CH3CN (4.0 ml) in an undivided cell with Pt as the anode and cathode, constant current = 2.0 mA, 75°C, under argon atmosphere, 6 h.

To demonstrate the potential applicability of 2-bromoglycals, the reaction of 2-bromogalactal 3h with different substrates was carried out (Scheme 2). First, we explored the utility of 2-bromogalactal 3h in the synthesis of 2C-substituted carbohydrates, which exist in many natural products (Yin and Linker, 2012; Dubbu et al., 2018; Darbem et al., 2020). Compound 3h reacted with phenylacetylene 4a in the presence of Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI and Et3N to afford the coupled product 5a in 80% yield (Koester and Werz, 2012). The reaction of 3h with potassium phenyltrifluoroborate 4b also proceeded smoothly to provide the corresponding product 5b in 79% yield (Molander and Fumagalli, 2006). Moreover, disaccharide 5c was successfully synthesized in the promotion of BF3·Et2O in 72% yield with excellent α-selectivity via the Ferrier rearrangement reaction (Dharuman et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2019).

SCHEME 2.

SCHEME 2

Open in a new tab

Reaction of 2-bromogalactal (3h) with different substrates (4a–c).

To gain insight into the mechanism of this electrochemical bromination, radical trapping experiments were performed. As expected, the reaction was completely shut down when 3.0 equiv of the radical scavenger 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) was added under the standard reaction conditions, indicating that radical chemistry was likely involved in the reaction (Scheme 3A) (Makai et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2019). Furthermore, another experiment using 1,1-diphenylethylene (6) was also conducted under the standard reaction conditions, and (2-bromoethene-1,1-diyl)dibenzene (7) was successfully detected in the GC–MS, confirming the participation of the bromine radical in the reaction system (Scheme 3B) (Chen et al., 2020; Kale et al., 2021). We observed that the reaction mixture gradually turned brown during the reaction process, indicating that Br2 might be generated. The 2-bromoglycal 3h was resubmitted to the standard reaction conditions for 20 h with the recovery of 3h in a 78% yield. In addition, cyclic voltammetry experiments were carried out to investigate the redox behavior of the reaction. The cyclic voltammetry measurements of Bu4NBr indicated two obvious oxidative peaks at 1.07 and 1.37 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) (Figure 1, red curve), which likely corresponded to Br3 –/Br– and Br3 –/Br2 redox couples, respectively (Damljanovic et al., 2011; Bennett et al., 2016; Kang et al., 2016). The first oxidative peak was associated with the oxidation of Br– to the bromine radical. The bromine radical then integrated into Br2, which could combine with Br– to form Br3 –. The second oxidative peak was attributed to the oxidation of Br3 – to Br2. An increase in the oxidative peak current was observed when Bu4NBr and 1d were combined, which was attributed to a catalytic current, resulting from the chemical reaction of the electrochemically-generated Br2 and glucal 1d (Figure 1, blue curve).

SCHEME 3.

SCHEME 3

Open in a new tab

In the radical trapping experiments, experiment (A) was performed with glycal (0.05 mmol) and TEMPO (0.15 mmol, 3.0 equiv) under standard reaction condition: NaSO2CF3 (0.10 mmol, 2.0 equiv), Bu4NBr (0.10 mmol, 2.0 equiv), dry CH3CN (4.0 ml) in an undivided cell with Pt as the anode and cathode, constant current = 2.0 mA, 75 oC, under argon atmosphere, 4 h. Besides, experiment (B) was performed with 1,1-diphenylethylene (0.15 mmol) under standard reaction condition as well.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Cyclic voltammetry measurements of Bu4NBr and 1d. Conditions: glassy carbon disk electrode (diameter is 3.0 mm, PTFE shroud) as the working electrode, platinum wire as the counter electrode, Ag/AgCl electrode (3.5 M KCl solution) as the reference electrode, Bu4NOTf (0.10 M in MeCN), under an argon atmosphere, cyclic voltammogram at 0.05 V s−1 with Bu4NBr (5 mM) or Bu4NBr (5 mM) and 1d (5 mM).

Mechanism

Based on the above results and previous reports (Yuan et al., 2019; Gou et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021), a plausible reaction mechanism for the electrochemical bromination of glycals was depicted in Scheme 4. A bromine anion was oxidized to the bromine radical on the anode and subsequently molecular Br2. This was then attacked by glycal to yield the intermediate I. Finally, the brominated product was obtained by the deprotonation of II, which would be stabilized by acetonitrile. NaSO2CF3 might be used as the electrolyte to increase the conductivity of the reaction solution and a proton scavenger to generate strong acid for cathode reduction; besides, it may be an anion to stabilize the glycosyl cation. At the same time, H+ was reduced to produce hydrogen on the cathode.

SCHEME 4.

SCHEME 4

Open in a new tab

Plausible reaction mechanism for the electrochemical bromination of glycals.

Conclusion

In summary, we performed the one-step electrochemical bromination of various glycals with electron-withdrawing and electron-donating protective groups using commercially available, nontoxic Bu4NBr as the brominating source under metal-catalyst-free and oxidant-free reaction conditions. The synthetic applicability of 2-bromoglycals has been demonstrated by providing the corresponding 2C-substituted carbohydrates and disaccharides via palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions and the Ferrier rearrangement reaction. The readily available substrates and ease of handling make this methodology a practical tool to access diversified brominating synthons for the preparation of biologically relevant carbohydrates.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author Contributions

Z-XL and ML contributed equally to this work. Z-XL, ML, and TL performed the experiments. Z-XL and ML carried out the mechanistic studies. Z-XL, ML, D-CX, and X-SY analyzed and discussed the research results. D-CX and X-SY designed the experiments. Z-XL, ML, and D-CX wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21772006, 91853122), the Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (BJJWZYJH01201910001001), the open fund of State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Nanjing University, China (Grant no. KF-GN-202106), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.796690/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (4.1MB, docx)

References

  1. Alberto E. E., Muller L. M., Detty M. R. (2014). Rate Accelerations of Bromination Reactions with NaBr and H2O2 via the Addition of Catalytic Quantities of Diaryl Ditellurides. Organometallics 33, 5571–5581. 10.1021/om500883f [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett B., Chang J., Bard A. J. (2016). Mechanism of the Br −/Br2 Redox Reaction on Platinum and Glassy Carbon Electrodes in Nitrobenzene by Cyclic Voltammetry. Electrochimica Acta 219, 1–9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.129 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen D., Li J., Cui P., Shan Y., Zhao Y., Qiu G. (2020). Tandem Oxidative Radical Halogenated Addition of Alkynyl Imines: Regioselective Synthesis of 3-Haloquinolines. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 169–175. 10.1002/ejoc.201901395 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Damljanović I., Stevanović D., Vukićević M., Vukićević R. D. (2011). Electrochemical Bromochlorination of Peracetylated Glycals. Carbohydr. Res. 346, 2683–2687. 10.1016/j.carres.2011.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darbem M. P., Esteves H. A., Oliveira I. M., Stefani H. A. (2020). α,β‐Unsaturated 2‐Ketoglycosides via Pd‐Catalyzed Carbonylative Heck Reaction of 2‐Iodoglycals. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 5220–5226. 10.1002/ejoc.202000846 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dharuman S., Gupta P., Kancharla P. K., Vankar Y. D. (2013). Synthesis of 2-Nitroglycals from Glycals Using the Tetrabutylammonium Nitrate-Trifluoroacetic Anhydride-Triethylamine Reagent System and Base-Catalyzed Ferrier Rearrangement of Acetylated 2-Nitroglycals. J. Org. Chem. 78, 8442–8450. 10.1021/jo401165y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dharuman S., Vankar Y. D. (2014). N-Halosuccinimide/AgNO3-Efficient Reagent Systems for One-step Synthesis of 2-Haloglycals from Glycals: Application in the Synthesis of 2C-Branched Sugars via Heck Coupling Reactions. Org. Lett. 16, 1172–1175. 10.1021/ol500039s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubbu S., Verma A. K., Parasuraman K., Vankar Y. D. (2018). Stereoselective Synthesis of 1,2-Annulated-C-Aryl Glycosides from Carbohydrate-Derived Terminally Unsubstituted Dienes and Arynes: Application towards Synthesis of Sugar-Fused- or Branched- Naphthalenes, and C-Aryl Glycosides. Carbohydr. Res. 465, 29–34. 10.1016/j.carres.2018.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Francke R., Little R. D. (2014). Redox Catalysis in Organic Electrosynthesis: Basic Principles and Recent Developments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 2492–2521. 10.1039/c3cs60464k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gou X.-Y., Li Y., Luan Y.-Y., Shi W.-Y., Wang C.-T., An Y., et al. (2021). Ruthenium-Catalyzed Radical Cyclization/meta-Selective C-H Alkylation of Arenes via σ-Activation Strategy. ACS Catal. 11, 4263–4270. 10.1021/acscatal.1c00359 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Horn E. J., Rosen B. R., Chen Y., Tang J., Chen K., Eastgate M. D., et al. (2016). Scalable and Sustainable Electrochemical Allylic C-H Oxidation. Nature 533, 77–81. 10.1038/nature17431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kamon T., Shigeoka D., Tanaka T., Yoshimitsu T. (2012). Intramolecular Iron(II)-catalyzed Aminobromination of Allyl N-Tosyloxycarbamates. Org. Biomol. Chem. 10, 2363–2365. 10.1039/c2ob07190h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kang L.-S., Luo M.-H., Lam C. M., Hu L.-M., Little R. D., Zeng C.-C. (2016). Electrochemical C-H Functionalization and Subsequent C-S and C-N Bond Formation: Paired Electrosynthesis of 3-Amino-2-Thiocyanato-α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Derivatives Mediated by Bromide Ions. Green. Chem. 18, 3767–3774. 10.1039/c6gc00666c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kiessling L. L., Kraft M. B. (2013). A Path to Complex Carbohydrates. Science 341, 357–358. 10.1126/science.1241788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Koester D. C., Werz D. B. (2012). Sonogashira-Hagihara Reactions of Halogenated Glycals. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 8, 675–682. 10.3762/bjoc.8.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leibeling M., Koester D. C., Pawliczek M., Kratzert D., Dittrich B., Werz D. B. (2010a). Hybrids of Sugars and Aromatics: A Pd-Catalyzed Modular Approach to Chromans and Isochromans. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18, 3656–3667. 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leibeling M., Koester D. C., Pawliczek M., Schild S. C., Werz D. B. (2010b). Domino Access to Highly Substituted Chromans and Isochromans from Carbohydrates. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 199–201. 10.1038/nchembio.302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leibeling M., Werz D. B. (2012). Winding up Alkynes: A Pd-Catalyzed Tandem-Domino Reaction to Chiral Biphenyls. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 6138–6141. 10.1002/chem.201200175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li B.-H., Ye X.-S. (2020). Recent Advances in Glycan Synthesis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 58, 20–27. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liang S., Zeng C.-C. (2020). Organic Electrochemistry: Anodic Construction of Heterocyclic Structures. Curr. Opin. Electrochemistry 24, 31–43. 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.06.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu M., Liu K. M., Xiong D. C., Zhang H., Li T., Li B., et al. (2020). Stereoselective Electro‐2‐deoxyglycosylation from Glycals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 15204–15208. 10.1002/anie.202006115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu M., Luo Z.-X., Li T., Xiong D.-C., Ye X.-S. (2021). Electrochemical Trifluoromethylation of Glycals. J. Org. Chem. 86, 16187–16194. 10.1021/acs.joc.1c01318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Makai S., Falk E., Morandi B. (2020). Direct Synthesis of Unprotected 2-Azidoamines from Alkenes via an Iron-Catalyzed Difunctionalization Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 21548–21555. 10.1021/jacs.0c11025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Manmode S., Matsumoto K., Nokami T., Itoh T. (2018). Electrochemical Methods as Enabling Tools for Glycosylation. Asian J. Org. Chem. 7, 1719–1729. 10.1002/ajoc.201800302 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Martin A., Arda A., Désiré J., Martin-Mingot A., Probst N., Sinaÿ P., et al. (2015). Catching Elusive Glycosyl Cations in a Condensed Phase with HF/SbF5 Superacid. Nat. Chem 8, 186–191. 10.1038/nchem.2399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Meyer T. H., Choi I., Tian C., Ackermann L. (2020). Powering the Future: How Can Electrochemistry Make a Difference in Organic Synthesis? Chem 6, 2484–2496. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.08.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Molander G. A., Fumagalli T. (2006). Palladium(0)-Catalyzed Suzuki−Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reactions of Potassium Aryl- and Heteroaryltrifluoroborates with Alkenyl Bromides. J. Org. Chem. 71, 5743–5747. 10.1021/jo0608366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Muthana S., Cao H., Chen X. (2009). Recent Progress in Chemical and Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Carbohydrates. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 573–581. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.09.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nokami T., Isoda Y., Sasaki N., Takaiso A., Hayase S., Itoh T., et al. (2015). Automated Electrochemical Assembly of the Protected Potential TMG-Chitotriomycin Precursor Based on Rational Optimization of the Carbohydrate Building Block. Org. Lett. 17, 1525–1528. 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Panza M., Pistorio S. G., Stine K. J., Demchenko A. V. (2018). Automated Chemical Oligosaccharide Synthesis: Novel Approach to Traditional Challenges. Chem. Rev. 118, 8105–8150. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Prabhakar Kale A., Nikolaienko P., Smirnova K., Rueping M. (2021). Intramolecular Electrochemical Oxybromination of Olefins for the Synthesis of Isoxazolines in Batch and Continuous Flow. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 3496–3500. 10.1002/ejoc.202100640 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang J., Deng C., Zhang Q., Chai Y. (2019). Tuning the Chemoselectivity of Silyl Protected Rhamnals by Temperature and Brønsted Acidity: Kinetically Controlled 1,2-Addition vs Thermodynamically Controlled Ferrier Rearrangement. Org. Lett. 21, 1103–1107. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang Y., Carder H. M., Wendlandt A. E. (2020). Synthesis of Rare Sugar Isomers through Site-Selective Epimerization. Nature 578, 403–408. 10.1038/s41586-020-1937-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu Y., Xu S., Wang H., Shao D., Qi Q., Lu Y., et al. (2021). Directing Group Enables Electrochemical Selectively Meta-Bromination of Pyridines under Mild Conditions. J. Org. Chem. 86, 16144–16150. 10.1021/acs.joc.1c00923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ye C., Shreeve J. n. M. (2004). Structure-Dependent Oxidative Bromination of Unsaturated C−C Bonds Mediated by Selectfluor. J. Org. Chem. 69, 8561–8563. 10.1021/jo048383x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yin J., Linker T. (2012). Recent Advances in the Stereoselective Synthesis of Carbohydrate 2-C-Analogs. Org. Biomol. Chem. 10, 2351–2362. 10.1039/c2ob06529k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yoshimitsu T., Ino T., Futamura N., Kamon T., Tanaka T. (2009). Total Synthesis of the β-Catenin Inhibitor, (−)-Agelastatin A: A Second-Generation Approach Based on Radical Aminobromination. Org. Lett. 11, 3402–3405. 10.1021/ol9012684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yuan Y., Yang J., Lei A. (2021). Recent Advances in Electrochemical Oxidative Cross-Coupling with Hydrogen Evolution Involving Radicals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 10058–10086. 10.1039/d1cs00150g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yuan Y., Yao A., Zheng Y., Gao M., Zhou Z., Qiao J., et al. (2019). Electrochemical Oxidative Clean Halogenation Using HX/NaX with Hydrogen Evolution. Iscience 12, 293–303. 10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang H. Y., Liu M., Wu X., Liu M., Xiong D. C., Ye X. S. (2020). Photo-/Electro-Driven Carbohydrate-Based Reactions. Prog. Chem. 32, 1804–1823. 10.7536/pc200608 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhao M., Lu W. (2018). Catalytic Bromination of Alkyl sp3 C-H Bonds with KBr/Air under Visible Light. Org. Lett. 20, 5264–5267. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (4.1MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Articles from Frontiers in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES