Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2022 Jan 5;12(1):e047888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047888

Characterising activity and diet compositions for dementia prevention: protocol for the ACTIVate prospective longitudinal cohort study

Ashleigh E Smith 1,✉,#, Alexandra T Wade 1,#, Timothy Olds 1, Dorothea Dumuid 1, Michael J Breakspear 2,3, Kate Laver 4, Mitchell R Goldsworthy 5,6, Michael C Ridding 7, Monica Fabiani 8,9, Jillian Dorrian 10, Montana Hunter 11, Bryan Paton 3, Mahmoud Abdolhoseini 11, Fayeem Aziz 11, Maddison L Mellow 1, Clare Collins 12, Karen J Murphy 13, Gabriele Gratton 8,9, Hannah Keage 10, Ross T Smith 14, Frini Karayanidis 11
PMCID: PMC8734009  PMID: 34987038

Abstract

Introduction

Approximately 40% of late-life dementia may be prevented by addressing modifiable risk factors, including physical activity and diet. Yet, it is currently unknown how multiple lifestyle factors interact to influence cognition. The ACTIVate Study aims to (1) explore associations between 24-hour time-use and diet compositions with changes in cognition and brain function; and (2) identify duration of time-use behaviours and the dietary compositions to optimise cognition and brain function.

Methods and analysis

This 3-year prospective longitudinal cohort study will recruit 448 adults aged 60–70 years across Adelaide and Newcastle, Australia. Time-use data will be collected through wrist-worn activity monitors and the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults. Dietary intake will be assessed using the Australian Eating Survey food frequency questionnaire. The primary outcome will be cognitive function, assessed using the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III. Secondary outcomes include structural and functional brain measures using MRI, cerebral arterial pulse measured with diffuse optical tomography, neuroplasticity using simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography, and electrophysiological markers of cognitive control using event-related potential and time frequency analyses. Compositional data analysis, testing for interactions between time point and compositions, will assess longitudinal associations between dependent (cognition, brain function) and independent (time-use and diet compositions) variables.

Conclusions

The ACTIVate Study will be the first to examine associations between time-use and diet compositions, cognition and brain function. Our findings will inform new avenues for multidomain interventions that may more effectively account for the co-dependence between activity and diet behaviours for dementia prevention.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethics approval has been obtained from the University of South Australia’s Human Research Ethics committee (202639). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed manuscripts, conference presentations, targeted media releases and community engagement events.

Trial registration number

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001659190).

Keywords: dementia, nutrition & dietetics, neurophysiology, public health


Strengths and limitations of this study.

  • The ACTIVate Study will collect comprehensive measures of lifestyle behaviours and dementia risk over time in 448 older adults aged 60–70 years.

  • Using newly developed compositional data analysis techniques, we will examine the associations between time-use and diet compositions, cognition and brain function.

  • Data will inform the development of a digital tool to help older adults obtain personalised information about how to reduce their risk of cognitive decline based on changes to time-use and diet.

  • Recruitment will be focused on older adults to maximise the potential of making an impact on dementia prevention in the next 10 years.

  • Randomised sampling of the target population was not deemed feasible and may limit the generalisability of results.

Introduction

Dementia is a broad diagnostic category that refers to a cluster of symptoms associated with neurodegenerative changes affecting the brain. It is characterised by a progressive loss of thinking and memory skills, and impacts the ability to perform everyday tasks. Worldwide, dementia is one of the leading causes of death and disability in older adults.1 2 As the population ages, rates of dementia are expected to increase substantially. In 2015, it was estimated that 46.8 million people were living with dementia.3 By 2050, this number is predicted to triple to 131.5 million.3 In the absence of effective pharmacological treatments, and with up to 40% of late-life dementia attributed to modifiable risk factors,4 prevention has moved to the forefront of dementia research.

Activity and diet compositions

Lifestyle factors such as physical inactivity, sedentary time, sleep and low diet quality are known modifiable risk factors for dementia.5–8 These factors have typically been researched as independent predictors of dementia risk and are either targeted separately in intervention studies or clustered together in multidomain trials with little consideration of how they interact.9 However, lifestyle factors are not independent of each other. In fact, physical activity, sedentary time and sleep are, by nature, co-dependent and constitute mutually exclusive and exhaustive parts of a 24-hour day. If time spent in one of these behaviours increases, time in other(s) must decrease to compensate. Time spent in these behaviours is also likely to be linked with dietary intake (for example, more time spent in front of television is associated with more snacking). In fact, dietary intake itself can also be conceptualised as a composition of distinct food groups which are co-dependent on each other.10 That is, increased consumption of one food or food group may lead to relative compensatory changes across other foods or food groups. Thus, time-use behaviours and dietary intake should be considered as inter-related compositional predictors of dementia risk. To more fully understand their role in dementia prevention and to better design interventions, it is necessary to both characterise and account for their co-dependency.

Although it makes sense to consider all daily time-use behaviours and all dietary components together, epidemiologists have largely been unable to include them in the same analytical model due to the perfect multicollinearity between parts of such compositions. Recently, an analytical approach specifically designed for the analysis of compositions, named compositional data analysis (CoDA),11 has been applied to overcome the multicollinearity issue of time-use5 6 and diet12 composition data, and to enable the inclusion of all components in the same statistical model. CoDA expresses time spent in different activities or proportions of food groups as isometric log ratios, which can then be used as variables in standard statistical analyses. CoDA can also consider subcompositions, subsets of the activity or diet composition (for example, waking hours or vegetable intake). In these models, an extra term may be included in the regression representing the subcompositional total (eg, the total number of waking hours or the total number of serves from vegetables). These analyses will tell us whether the mix of activities or dietary components in the subcomposition, independent of the total, is associated with some outcome.

A recent application of CoDA, called compositional isotemporal substitution,13 models the health effects of reallocating time from one activity domain to another (for example, swapping 30 min of sleep for 30 min of screen time). Compositional isotemporal substitution effectively generates dose–response relationships between activity compositions and health outcomes.

Likewise, it is possible to model the effects of changing the proportion and composition of food groups in the diet. Recent studies have applied CoDA and related methods to identify how proportions of macronutrients, micronutrients and food groups are associated with waist circumference, plasma lipids and lipoproteins, and glucose concentrations.10 14 Just as isotemporal substitution models the effects of time reallocations, isocaloric substitution can be used to model the effects of dietary reallocations while accounting for variance in total caloric intake.

Mechanisms of cognitive change

It is well accepted that structural and functional brain changes begin manifesting asymptomatically years before dementia is diagnosed.15–17 These changes may include accelerated brain atrophy,15 accumulation of protein aggregate in the brain,18 disrupted integrity of the cerebrovascular system19 and failure of the brain to undergo plastic reorganisation, otherwise referred to as neuroplasticity.20 Imaging techniques that characterise brain structure and function (MRI) map brain temporal dynamics (electroencephalography, EEG) and measure cerebral arterial pulse (diffuse optical tomography, Pulse-DOT),21 22 as well as non-invasive brain stimulation techniques (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS), are now at the forefront of identifying and tracking preclinical brain changes in dementia research.9 23 24

Aims

The ACTIVate Study will explore how daily time-use and diet compositions are associated with cognition to inform dementia prevention. Iterative analyses of different activity and diet compositions will be used to identify ‘best days’—optimal combinations of activities and food groups associated with the greatest possible reduction in dementia risk. Together, these analyses will inform the co-design of an interactive tool that will estimate the predicted change in cognition for changes in time-use and/or dietary behaviour.

The ACTIVate Study will also include a secondary mechanistic focus, tracking brain structure and function longitudinally. This novel approach will enable us to model the benefits of modifying either time-use or diet, or both concurrently. By tracking secondary imaging and neurophysiological measures longitudinally alongside traditional cognitive assessments, we expect to be able to detect subtle brain changes that may occur before behavioural differences become apparent.

Using longitudinal data collected from older adults over a period of 3 years, the ACTIVate Study will aim to:

  1. Explore how 24-hour time use and diet compositions are associated with changes in cognition and brain function.

  2. Identify the best duration of time-use behaviours and the best proportions and compositions of food groups to optimise cognition and brain function.

Methods

Ethics

Ethics approval was obtained from the University of South Australia and University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committees (202639). All procedures will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study design

The ACTIVate Study will employ a 3-year prospective longitudinal study design, with objective assessments at baseline, 18 and 36 months.

Participants and recruitment

Four hundred and forty-eight community-dwelling adults will be recruited from Adelaide, South Australia (n=224) and Newcastle, New South Wales (n=224). Participants will be aged 60–70 years and fluent in the English language. Exclusion criteria will include: current clinical diagnosis of dementia; Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Blind (MoCA-B) score <13/22; blindness, colour blindness or vision difficulties not corrected by glasses or contact lenses; major neurological or psychiatric diagnosis; known intellectual disability; major physical disability; previous head trauma resulting in a loss of consciousness of more than 5 min; current or previous alcohol or substance abuse or dependence; recreational drug use in the last 3 months; previous diagnosis of stroke or transient ischaemic attack; cancer treatment affecting cognitive performance (eg, chemotherapy) in the last 5 years. The following additional exclusion criteria will apply to MRI procedures: the presence of a pacemaker, metal implants, cochlear or other ear or body implants; the presence of metal fragments or other foreign bodies in the eyes, skin or body; a history of claustrophobia. Additional exclusion criteria will apply to participants in Adelaide undergoing TMS: current medications which may lower seizure threshold; a history of epilepsy, convulsions or seizures; a history of surgical procedures to the spinal cord or any spinal or ventricular derivations.25

Using a rolling convenience sampling strategy, all participants will be enrolled over an 18-month period. Study recruitment started in August 2020. We expect all participants will be enrolled by December 2021, and the study to be completed by December 2024. Paper, radio and electronic advertisements will be disseminated across the Adelaide greater metropolitan area and the Hunter Region. Existing volunteer databases will also be used. Volunteers will first undergo a phone screening interview, during which the MoCA-B will be administered to screen against dementia. Screening for other exclusion criteria will also be completed. Volunteers who meet all eligibility criteria will be invited to participate and scheduled for baseline assessments. To ensure similar inclusion/exclusion criteria are adhered to at both study sites, a weekly eligibility meeting will be conducted to discuss any potential cases with an eligibility query.

Patient and public involvement

The research team have engaged in extensive public and clinician consultation during the design of this study, including consultation with older adults, aged-care, local council, neuroscientists and dietitians. Results will be disseminated to the participants through lay-person summaries and regular newsletters. An external stakeholder advisory group will be set up, consisting of older adults, healthcare providers and local council representative to oversee study dissemination.

Measures

Primary dependent variable: cognitive function

The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) is the primary outcome of the ACTIVate Study. The ACE-III is a brief cognitive screening tool that demonstrates high internal reliability (Cronbach’s α=0.88), as well as high sensitivity (1.00) and specificity (0.96) for the detection of dementia using the cut-off score of 88/100.26 For the purpose of the ACTIVate Study, the ACE-III score will be assessed as a continuous variable. The ACE-III assesses function across five cognitive domains: memory, attention/orientation, fluency, language and visuospatial. Our pilot data also indicate that the ACE-III is sensitive to intraindividual differences in daily activity patterns. To control for possible practice effects, all three Australian versions of the ACE-III will be used, with version A administered at baseline, version B at 18 months and version C at 36 months.

Primary independent variables

Daily time-use composition

Time-use data will be captured objectively using 24-hour 7-day accelerometry with Axivity AX3 wrist-worn triaxial devices. Triaxial accelerometers measure acceleration along three planes (vertical, anteroposterior and mediolateral) and have high predictive validity for physical activity intensity.27 The AX3 has demonstrated a high level of accuracy in detecting and classifying time spent in physical activity5 and has been validated for use in older adults.28 Wrist-worn AX3 monitors have been chosen over lower limb-mounted devices due to evidence of higher levels of wear time compliance across a 24-hour period.29

While wearing the AX3, participants will be asked to maintain a self-report record of sleep and wake times and to detail any periods of removal. Raw accelerations will be condensed into 60-second data epochs and categorised into either time spent in sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, moderate physical activity or vigorous physical activity, using predefined cut-off points (46/93/418 for light, moderate and vigorous physical activity, respectively) adjusted for 100 Hz sampling frequency.30 31 Sleep duration and disturbances will be classified using an algorithm developed by van Hees et al,32 in conjunction with self-report record of non-wear, sleep and wake times.

Self-reported time-use data will be collected using the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (MARCA). The MARCA is a computerised time-use recall tool containing over 500 activities linked to an energy expenditure compendium.33 When completing the MARCA, participants will be asked to recall every activity they engaged in over the previous 2 days in 5-minute increments. Activity categories include ‘passive transport’, ‘sports and recreation’, ‘work’, ‘self-care’, ‘household chores’ and ‘screen time’. The MARCA has strong validity when compared with accelerometry data in adults (r=0.72), and excellent test–retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC: 0.99–1.00).34

Diet compositions

Diet composition will be operationalised as serves per day, between and within five food groups: (1) fruits and vegetables; (2) protein; (3) fats; (4) cereals; (5) discretionary foods. In the first step, we will determine the optimal proportion of each food group as part of the whole diet. The second step will identify the optimal composition of each food group. The compositions of each food group are presented in table 1, and are informed by the Australian Dietary Guidelines35 and previously published associations between dietary intake, cognitive function and dementia risk.36–39

Table 1.

Food group compositions

Food group Composition
Fruits and vegetables Green leafy
Cruciferous
Roots
Fruits
Protein Red meat
White meat
Fish
Plant based
Fats Saturated
Monounsaturated
Polyunsaturated
Cereals Whole grains
Refined grains
Discretionary foods Processed meats
Confectionery, chocolate and sugar-sweetened drinks
Pastries and pies
Ice cream, cream and dairy-based desserts
Alcoholic drinks

Dietary intake will be measured using the Australian Eating Survey (AES), a 120-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire designed to capture the nutrient intake of Australian adults against a contemporary list of foods that represent the current Australian food supply.40 Participants will be asked to report how frequently they consume different foods and food types over the past 6 months, with responses ranging from ‘never’ to four or more times per day’, with some beverages up to ‘seven or more glasses per day’. Foods are organised into the following categories: drinks, breads and cereals, dairy food, main meals, sweets and snacks, fruits and vegetables. The Australian Eating Survey provides accurate estimates of nutrient intake for macronutrients and micronutrients which have been validated against 4-day weighed food records,40 as well as plasma carotenoids for fruit and vegetable intake41 and erythrocyte fatty acids.42

Consumption of oils, such as extra virgin olive oil, has been associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and cognitive decline, and is therefore of interest to the current study.21–23 To estimate oil intake, an additional dietary questionnaire will be administered. The structure of the dietary oils questionnaire is based on the polyunsaturated fatty acids questionnaire developed by Swierk et al.43 Participants will be asked whether they consume different dietary oils and fats, including butter, butter blends, margarine, margarine blends, lard, vegetable oil, canola oil, sunflower oil, coconut oil and olive oil. If participants respond ‘yes’, they are prompted to indicate how much of each oil they usually consume each day, ranging from ‘less than half a tablespoon’ to ‘eight or more tablespoons’.

Exploratory secondary biological mechanisms

MRI: Adelaide and Newcastle

The MRI protocol will include T1-weighted structural scan, T2 Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (dMRI) and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and associated field maps (table 2). T1-weighted images will be used for co-registration of dMRI, rs-fMRI and optical imaging data, individual targeting of the prefrontal cortex with TMS, as well as morphometric analysis of white and grey matter volume and parcellation of different brain area volumes. T2 FLAIR will enable the analysis of deep white matter hyperintensities, combining with the T1-weighted images to create artificial myelin burden contrasts. dMRI will be used to derive white matter tract structural connectivity and rs-fMRI for analysis of functional connectivity. MRI scans will be collected on a Siemens Skyra 3T scanner in Adelaide and a Siemens Prisma 3T scanner in Newcastle, both using a 64-channel head and neck coil. MRI protocols have been calibrated across sites to ensure comparable data quality given the differences in the gradient systems and capabilities of the two different scanners. Further information regarding the MRI protocol can be found in the online supplemental file 1.

Table 2.

MRI scan parameters, duration and resolution

Sequence name Acquisition time (min:s) Matrix size (mm3) Voxel size (mm3) TE
(ms)
TR
(ms)
FA
(degree)
TI
(ms)
Site/scanner: HMRI (Newcastle), 3T Siemens Prisma, 64-channel head and neck coil
 T1 MPRAGE 5:12 256×256×208 1×1×1 2.91 2300 9 900
 T2 FLAIR 4:12 256×256×176 1×1×1 386 5000 T2 variable 1800
 Diffusion 8:52 122×122×74 2×2×2 84 4700 90/180
 rs-fMRI 8:05 86×86×60 2.4×2.4×2.4 33 829 53
Site/scanner: SAHMRI (Adelaide), 3T Siemens Skyra, 64-channel head and neck coil
 T1 MPRAGE 5:12 256×256×208 1×1×1 2.90 2300 9 900
 T2 FLAIR 4:12 256×256×176 1×1×1 386 5000 T2 variable 1800
 Diffusion 11:00 122×122×74 2×2×2 114 5700 90/180
 rs-fMRI 9:31 70×70×60 3×3×3 39 1360 53

FA (degree), Flip angle; FLAIR, Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; HMRI, Hunter Medical Research Institute; MPRAGE, Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo; rs-fMRI, resting-state functional MRI; SAHMRI, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; TE, Echo time; TI, Inversion time; TR, Repetition time.

Supplementary data

bmjopen-2020-047888supp001.pdf (16.5KB, pdf)

TMS: Adelaide site only

Concurrent TMS and EEG (TMS-EEG) and repetitive TMS will be used at the Adelaide site to investigate the secondary mechanism of prefrontal neuroplasticity,44 at baseline and 3 years. Participants will complete two sessions (at least 7 days apart), each consisting of a ~2-hour TMS-EEG protocol. EEG will be recorded at rest and while stimulating the cortex to assess neuroplasticity. Single-pulse TMS will be applied using a handheld figure-of-eight magnetic coil connected to a Magstim 200 stimulator (Magstim, Whitland, UK). A neuro-navigation system (ANTneuro visor2) loaded with individual structural MRIs will be used to localise the left superior frontal gyrus (SFG). Additionally, the neuro-navigation software will be used to calculate coil-to-cortex distance of the motor cortex and SFG. Continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) will be delivered at 70% resting motor threshold, adjusted for the difference between coil-to-cortex distance between the motor hotspot and SFG.45 To experimentally induce neuroplasticity, an inhibitory repetitive TMS paradigm, cTBS (real or sham, with session order randomised), will be applied for 40 s to the left SFG. Changes in SFG excitability from pre-cTBS to post-cTBS will be quantified as changes in the amplitude of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) in the EEG signal. TEPs will also be recorded for an equivalent amount of single-pulse TMS stimulations to the left shoulder before and after cTBS, in order to measure peripherally evoked potentials and minimise the contribution of sensory artefacts to TEPs.46 Participants will be instructed to sit quietly, keep their eyes open, and look straight ahead during each TMS-EEG recording period, and a masking noise will be applied through earphones (<70 dB in each ear) to minimise contamination of the EEG by the audible click of the TMS discharge.

DOT imaging: Newcastle site only

Cerebral arteries and arterioles become less able to flexibly contract and dilate with changing metabolic demands and challenges (ie, cerebrovascular reactivity) and their walls become stiffer (ie, arteriosclerosis or reduced arterial elasticity). This is particularly evident in the prefrontal cortex (PFC),22 which supports cognitive control processes. Reduced reactivity and elasticity of the brain’s arteries are associated with structural changes in the corresponding cortex23 and decline in associated cognitive abilities.47 Pulse‐DOT (cerebral arterial pulse measured with DOT) provides a direct measure of the regional reactivity and elasticity of cerebral arteries with high spatial resolution (by co‐registrating to individual anatomical MRI scan).

Cerebral arterial elasticity and arterial reactivity will be measured at the Newcastle site using non-invasive pulse-DOT and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measures recorded with an ISS Imagent device. Three montages (with 4 detectors and 32 sources each) will be used to cover the participant’s PFC using a custom-made foam cap with 2-minute recording per montage. The location of possible fibre positions across the scalp and fiducial points will be digitised (Polhemus 3D) to allow detector/source locations to be co-registered to the participant’s T1 anatomical MRI. ECG (500 Hz, 1–100 Hz bandpass filter) will be used to identify the R wave and synchronise recording montages and locations. Preprocessing of the AC‐intensity data will use measures established previously.27 28 We will record at rest to derive pulse relaxation function, a regional measure of arterial elasticity which is sensitive to the status of cortical arteries whose downstream branches perfuse periventricular areas, where white matter hyperintensities are most common. We will also measure cerebrovascular reactivity by recording during a breath-holding task (BHT), which induces hypercapnia in the brain.48 49 Changes in optical pulse amplitude will be obtained during different phases of the BHT, to assess reactivity to the hypercapnia challenge, using parameters and trial structure previously established.50

Secondary measures

Secondary cognitive outcomes

Neuropsychological assessments. The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) will be administered to assess executive function, memory and processing speed domains that are known to be sensitive to age-related cognitive decline and dementia.7 51 Previous studies have demonstrated that these cognitive domains can be influenced by lifestyle factors such as physical activity and diet.52–55 The chosen CANTAB tests include Motor Orientation Task; Paired Associates Learning; Verbal Recognition Memory, Immediate and Delayed; One Touch Stockings of Cambridge; Reaction Time; and Multitasking Test. Subtests of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox (Oral Reading Recognition, Oral Reading Recognition and Picture Vocabulary will be administered to assess language. A summary of cognitive assessments is presented in table 3.

Table 3.

Summary of cognitive assessments administered at baseline, 18 months and 36 months

Cognitive test/battery Individual tests Cognitive function Description Administration time
ACE-III N/A Attention, orientation, memory, fluency, language and visuospatial abilities The ACE-III is a pen and paper-based test administered by trained study personnel. Participants are asked to recall the date, season and current location; repeat back and remember three simple words; conduct serial subtraction; memorise and recall a fictional address; recall widely known historical facts; recall as many words beginning with a certain letter in 1 min; recall as many animals as they can think of in 1 min; follow a sequence of physical commands; write two grammatically correct sentences; repeat four polysyllabic words and two short proverbs; identify 12 objects shown in line drawings; read aloud five commonly mispronounced words; copy two diagrams; draw a clock; count four sets of dots and recognise four letters that are partially obscured. 25 min
CANTAB Motor Screening Task Familiarisation task The participant is instructed to touch the centre of a flashing cross that appears across the screen in different locations. 2 min
Paired Associates Learning Visual memory and learning Boxes are displayed on the screen and open in a randomised order. One or more boxes will contain a pattern. The patterns are then displayed in the middle of the screen, one at a time, and the participant is instructed to select the box in which the pattern was originally located. If the participant makes an error, the boxes are opened in sequence again to remind the participant of the locations of the patterns. 8 min
Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM)-Immediate Verbal memory and learning In the first phase, a sequence of words is displayed on the screen one at a time. The participant is then instructed to recall as many words as they can remember. In the second phase, two words are displayed on the screen. The participant is instructed to choose the word they remember from the previous list. 5 min
One Touch Stockings of Cambridge Executive function–spatial planning and working memory The screen is divided into two halves, each of which contains a display of three coloured balls arranged across three ‘stockings’. The participant is asked to determine the minimum number of moves required to match the position of balls in lower display to the upper display, moving only one ball at a time. 10 min
Reaction Time Processing speed–motor speed, response speed and accuracy A yellow spot appears in the centre of the screen and the participant is instructed to touch the spot as fast as possible. In the ‘Simple’ stage, the spot will appear in only one location for 10 trials. In the ‘Choice’ stage, the spot will appear in one of five locations for 15 trials. 3 min
Multitasking Test Executive function–attentional set shifting Arrows appear on each side of the screen and the participant is cued to indicate either the direction that the arrow is pointing, or the side of the screen on which the arrow appears. 8 min
VRM–Delayed Verbal memory and learning The second phase of VRM described above is repeated after a period of 20 min. 5 min
NIH Toolbox Oral Reading Recognition Language–reading and decoding skills A word is presented on the screen, one at a time. Participants are asked to read and pronounce each word as accurately as possible. 3 min
Picture Vocabulary Language–receptive vocabulary A word is read aloud while four images are displayed on the screen. Respondents are instructed to select picture that most closely matches the meaning of the word. 4 min

ACE-III, Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III; CANTAB, Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery; N/A, Not applicable; NIH, National Institutes of Health.

Behavioural and event-related potential (ERP) measures of cognitive control. Participants will complete a cued-trial task-switching paradigm while we record their EEG to assess proactive cognitive control processes.56 Participants will complete two choice reaction time tasks (letter and number classification) using colour cues that are mapped to each task.57 The cue validly indicates whether the letter or the number task will be performed on the upcoming target, allowing the participant to upload the task, but not activate a response until after target onset (cue-target interval 1000 ms). EEG will be recorded using a 64-channel system (ANT in Adelaide; BioSemi in Newcastle) while participants complete either each task alone (single-task blocks) or switch between the two tasks using a random cue colour sequence (mixed-task blocks).

Two indices of task-switching performance are derived: switch cost (switch—repeat trials in a mixed-task block) represents the cost of updating task set on switch trials, whereas mixing cost (repeat trials in a mixed-task vs a single-task block) represents the additional working memory load of maintaining two or more representations accessible in mixed-task blocks.58 59 Increasing age across the adult lifespan is associated with a robust mixing cost, but a less consistent effect on switch cost.60 61 Cue-locked ERP analyses show two parietally maximal difference components: switch positivity is associated with preparing to shift task set, whereas mixing positivity is associated with working memory load. Both positivities vary in amplitude and scalp distribution across the adult lifespan, with age effects on ERPs emerging much earlier than effects on behavioural indices of task switching.60 In mid-late life, mixing cost is associated with reduced microstructural integrity of fronto-parietal white matter tracts (ie, superior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior fronto-opercular tract).57 Task-switching ability has also been shown to be sensitive to variability in physical activity and nutrition.62 63

Blood pressure

Hypertension is a known modifiable risk factor for dementia.64 Blood pressure will be assessed using an OMRON Healthcare Co digital blood pressure monitor (model 1A1B Hem-7000-CIL). Participants will be seated for at least 5 min. Three measurements of blood pressure will be taken, each spaced at least 1 min apart, with the forearm rested at table height and the cuff will be placed approximately 2–3 cm above the anti-cubital fossa. Both average values for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate and difference between systolic and diastolic pressure will be calculated.

Blood chemistry

Fasting venous blood will be drawn by venepuncture by a trained phlebotomist to measure lipid profiles, glucose, inflammatory markers, erythrocyte fatty acids and genetic risk profiles. A total of 60 mL will be collected, centrifuged (4°C, 4000 rpm, 10 min) and frozen at −80°C for batch processing at the end of each data collection time point. Blood samples will be analysed in duplicate with commercial assay kits (including quality controls and calibrators) using the KONELAB 20XTi (ThermoFisher, Massachusetts, USA).

Alzheimer’s disease risk

The Australian National University - Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI) will be administered to calculate risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The ANU-ADRI is an evidence-based self-report measure of exposure to risk and protective factors associated with AD, including age, sex, education, body mass index, diabetes, depression, cholesterol, traumatic brain injury, smoking, alcohol intake, social engagement, physical activity, cognitive activity, fish intake and pesticide exposure. The ANU-ADRI has high predictive validity for incident AD and dementia.65

Subjective cognitive decline

Subjective memory complaints and self-reported cognitive change are strong predictors of cognitive decline, even when performance on cognitive tests is unimpaired.66 Therefore, the Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) will be administered to capture subjective cognitive decline. The CFI is a 14-item self-report measure of change in daily functioning with reference to functioning 1 year prior.67 The CFI has demonstrated high test–retest reliability (ICC: 0.76–0.78), and strong correlations with longitudinal Clinical Dementia Rating scores.67

Subjective sleep quality

As both objective and subjective measures of sleep are associated with increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia,68 subjective sleep quality will be captured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over seven subscores: ‘subjective sleep quality’, ‘sleep latency’, ‘sleep duration’, ‘habitual sleep efficiency’, ‘sleep disturbances’, ‘use of sleeping medication’ and ‘daytime dysfunction’. The PSQI has demonstrated high validity when compared with objective measures of sleep quality and disturbance and has high test–retest reliability.69

Quality of life

Quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D). The EQ-5D assesses health-related quality of life across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D has been validated for use in older populations with cognitive impairment.70 Further, it is widely used for the economic valuation of health interventions and has Australian-based population norms.71

Covariates

Covariates will include education, socioeconomic status, comorbidities and medications, smoking and alcohol use, body composition, hearing loss and apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4). These covariates have been selected because they are also known as dementia risk factors.4

Education, smoking and alcohol use will be determined from the ANU-ADRI questionnaire.65

Comorbidities and medication use will be collected through interview questions informed by the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing.72 Participants will be asked to confirm current health conditions, medications and supplements, including medication type, dose, duration of intake, and whether the medication was prescribed by a doctor or health professional.

Body weight will be measured using an electronic scale with volunteers wearing minimal clothing and without shoes. Height will be measured using a wall-mounted stadiometer (SECA, Hamburg, Germany) with volunteers in stockinged or bare feet. Waist and hip circumference (in centimetres) will be measured according to the protocols of the International Society for the Advancement of Kinathropometry and used to calculate waist-to-hip ratio.73 All anthropometric measures will be taken twice, and the average for each will be calculated.

Hearing loss is a significant predictor of dementia64 and will be captured using a short questionnaire, previously described Amieva et al.74 75 Participants will be asked if they currently wear hearing aids, and if they have experienced any hearing difficulties in the past 12 months. Self-reported hearing loss is highly correlated with audiometric measures74 and is associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia over a follow-up period of 25 years.74 75

The ApoE4 allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for AD.76 ApoE status will be determined through genetic risk profiling of blood samples described above.

Procedure

Participants will attend assessment visits at baseline, 18 months and 36 months. Written informed consent will be obtained at the beginning of the baseline visit at both study sites. All measures will be collected at baseline and 36 months. Only session 1 measures will be collected at 18 months. Table 4 lists the measures collected at each session. Due to logistical differences, the order of assessments may vary between Adelaide and Newcastle.

Table 4.

Schedule of assessments

Measures
Session 1 Informed consent
Blood pressure assessment
Anthropometry
Blood sample collection
Diet and lifestyle questionnaires (ANU-ADRI, AES, PSQI, EQ-5D, CFI)
Cognitive assessments (ACE-III, CANTAB, NIH Toolbox)
Activity monitor administered
Session 2 MRI
Task-switching practice
TMS-EEG (Adelaide only)
Optical imaging (Newcastle only)
Session 3 Task switching-EEG
TMS-EEG (Adelaide only)

Sessions 1, 2 and 3 will be completed at baseline and 36 months. Only session 1 will be completed at 18 months.

ACE-III, Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III; AES, Australian Eating Survey; ANU-ADRI, ANU Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Index; ANU-ADRI, Australian National University - Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index; CANTAB, Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery; CFI, Cognitive Function Instrument; EEG, electroencephalography; EQ-5D, EuroQol-5 Dimension; NIH, National Institutes of Health; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Analysis

Association between changes in 24-hour time-use and diet compositions, cognition and brain function

Primary characteristics of the sample will be presented as per Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.77 Compositional multilevel mixed-effects models, testing for interactions between time point (baseline, 18 months and 36 months) and compositions of time-use and diet will assess longitudinal associations between dependent (cognition, brain function and structure) and independent (time-use and diet compositions) variables. If significant at p<0.05, interaction terms will be included between the sets of time-use and diet composition log ratios. Fixed effects will include the time-use and diet compositions (each expressed as a set of isometric log ratios) and covariates. Dietary analyses will also include total energy intake. Random intercepts will account for repeated measures within a person, nested within study sites. A hierarchical nested model structure will allow comparison of linear and non-linear terms for time point, establishing the model of best fit. Compositional isotemporal substitution will use the above models to quantify estimated change in cognitive function when time is reallocated from one time-use behaviour to another (keeping dietary intake constant), when one food group increases by one serve at the expense of another (keeping time use constant), or when both time-use and diet are changed concurrently.

Identifying best days for cognition and brain health

Using iterative application of the compositional isotemporal substitution analyses, we will generate n-dimensional heat maps or response surfaces for within-person change in activity and diet composition and change in outcomes between sets of two time points (consecutive and distal), adjusted for covariates. The highest regions of the response surfaces will correspond to the most beneficial changes for improvement. These ‘peaks’ or contours (eg, corresponding to best 5% of outcomes) will be expressed in terms of deviations from a reference time-use or diet composition, to provide customised meaningful interpretation in min/day or servings of food groups.

Power calculation

In the absence of longitudinal data on diet and activity compositions in relation to cognitive outcomes, we powered the ACTIVate Study based on cross-sectional pilot data (age: 65±7.6 years, n=83) of a four-part time-use composition associated with ACE-III scores. Multiple regression analyses gave an R2 value of 0.20 when including covariates age and sex and compositional variables for activity. We base our power calculation on these results, and assuming three compositional parameters representing a four-part time-use composition (sleep, sedentary time, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity), and assuming seven parameters for the covariates (including four compositional parameters for a five-part diet composition). Aiming for 80% power, alpha will be adjusted to 0.01 to account for multiple comparisons. Based on these assumptions, the R package pwr78 estimates a total sample size of 236 is needed for a general linear model. This number is further inflated to account for the longitudinal design, allowing for 25% attrition over the 36-month period, and a 70% response rate at recruitment, resulting in a final sample size of 448 adults at study enrolment (224 per site).

Data management

All data collected during this study, including informed consent, will be managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the University of South Australia. REDCap is a secure, web-based software platform designed to support data capture for research.79 80 Where data files are too large to be uploaded to REDCap, files will be stored on a secure online data storage platform hosted at the University of South Australia. Only listed investigators will have access to the data.

Risks

There are small risks associated with the MRI and TMS non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms for individuals with metal in their head or body and people with a history of epilepsy. To minimise these risks, all participants will be required to complete an MRI and TMS safety screen.

Ethics and dissemination

Interested participants will provide written informed consent at study enrolment and verbally reconsent at 18 months and 3 years. If a participant is clinically diagnosed with dementia or develops a disability affecting their ability to consent after baseline assessments, a study partner will be required and will be asked to provide written informed consent. Study information will still be discussed with the participants and their chosen study partner, and if the participant decides they no longer want to participate further, they will be withdrawn from the study. All participants are free to withdraw from the study at any time with no consequence to them now or in the future.

The results of the ACTIVate Study will contribute to multiple publications and will be presented at several national and international conferences. Data will be published at multiple stages of the study to ensure findings are communicated quickly and directly.

In addition, the data for the primary dependent (cognition) and independent variables (diet and activity composition) will be used in the development of a dementia prevention tool.

Tool creation

Full description of the co-design process involved in digital tool development is beyond the scope of this protocol paper and will be published elsewhere. Briefly, using both the cross-sectional and the longitudinal data collected, we will co-develop a tool with older adults that can be used by older adults and clinicians for dementia prevention. All aspects of the tool interface will be co-designed through an iterative design process. The tool will provide customised suggestions on how to improve time-use and dietary intake. Recommendations will be tailored to an individual’s situation, allowing the user to incorporate non-negotiable constraints on behaviours, for example, long commute times to work. It will also consider constraints due to personal preference, for example, preference to modify diet rather than time-use, or a desire to keep sleep duration constant and modify waking activities only.

Data sets and availability

Once the ACTIVate Study is complete, de-identified data will be made available to other research groups upon reasonable request. To obtain an ethically compliant data set (with de-identified data), researchers will contact the corresponding author and provide evidence of institutional ethics approval for local data storage, analysis and security.

Discussion

The ACTIVate Study is the first of its kind to track time-use, diet and cognition in older adults across 3 successive years with the intention to use emerging statistical analysis techniques (CoDA) to (1) explore how changes in 24-hour time use and diet are associated with changes in cognition and (2) identify ‘best days’ for time-use and dietary intake that optimise cognition. In addition to the primary aims, each study site is leading an exploratory secondary biological mechanism focus. We tentatively expect that these secondary mechanisms will provide sensitive measures of variation in ‘best day’ compositions over time. A future aim of the ACTIVate Study is to use the data collected to co-create with older adults a fully customisable tool that can be rapidly translated into primary care settings and be used for dementia prevention.

In the absence of effective pharmacological interventions that prevent dementia, current research efforts are focused on reducing dementia risk through modifiable lifestyle factors. Indeed, up to 40% of late-life dementia is thought to be due to modifiable factors.4 Further, population estimates suggest that reducing the prevalence of each modifiable dementia risk factor by 10%–20% per decade would potentially reduce the worldwide prevalence of AD (the most common form of dementia) by between 8.8 and 16.2 million cases.81 However, to our knowledge, no studies have tracked time-use, diet, cognition and brain function (using various experimental neurophysiological techniques) longitudinally across time. Findings from this project are likely to inform new avenues for multidomain interventions that accommodate the co-dependence between time-use and diet behaviours for dementia prevention.

COVID-19 statement

Data collection for the ACTIVate Study was due to begin in March 2020. However, due to the emergence of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as a global pandemic and the potential risk posed to older participants, data collection was postponed until August 2020. Data collection procedures detailed within this paper may be modified to comply with emerging COVID-19 safe protocols including minimising the time spent in close contact with participants. Further, all investigators will undergo COVID-19-specific training and participants and investigators will wear personal protective equipment as required.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Acknowledgments

We thank Angela Walls and Shiami Luchow for their assistance setting up the MRI (protocols) at SAHMRI and HMRI, respectively.

Footnotes

Twitter: @DrAsh_Smith

AES and ATW contributed equally.

Contributors: AES, FK, MJB, KL, TO, MRG, MCR, DD, MF and JD conceptualised the study. AES, ATW, MH, HK and FK developed the cognitive measures. AES, DD and TO developed the activity measures. ATW, CC and KJM developed the dietary measures. MJB and BP developed the MRI measures. AES, MRG and MLM developed the TMS measures. AES, MRG, MLM, MH, MA, FA and FK developed the EEG measures. MF, GG, MA, FA and FK developed the optical imaging measures. TO, DD and JD developed the statistical approach. AES, KL, DD and RTS will oversee the development of the translation tool. AES and ATW prepared the manuscript. All authors reviewed manuscript drafts and approved the final version.

Funding: The ACTIVate Study is funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Boosting Dementia Research Initiative (BDRI) priority round 5 grant (GNT1171313). AES is supported by an NHMRC-ARC Dementia Research Development Fellowship (GNT1097397). DD is supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (GNT1162166) and the National Heart Foundation of Australia (1020840). MRG is supported by an Australian Research Council (ARC) fellowship (DE200100575). MLM is supported by a Dementia Australia Research Foundation PhD scholarship. CC is supported by an NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship and a University of Newcastle Faculty of Health and Medicine Gladys M Brawn Senior Research Fellowship. HK is supported by an NHMRC Boosting Dementia Research Leadership Fellowship (GNT1135676).

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Supplemental material: This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not required.

References

  • 1.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia’s Health 2018. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alzheimer’s Disease International . World Alzhzeimer report 2015: the global impact of dementia. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alzheimer’s Disease International . World Alzheimer’s Report 2015: The global impact of dementia. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet 2020;396:413–46. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sliepen M, Rosenbaum D. A comparison between three activity monitors in detecting commonly performed activities and postures of daily living. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016;24:S127–8. 10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.250 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xu W, Tan C-C, Zou J-J, et al. Sleep problems and risk of all-cause cognitive decline or dementia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020;91:236–44. 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Daffner KR. Promoting successful cognitive aging: a comprehensive review. J Alzheimers Dis 2010;19:1101–22. 10.3233/JAD-2010-1306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Opie RS, Ralston RA, Walker KZ. Adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet can slow the rate of cognitive decline and decrease the risk of dementia: a systematic review. Nutrition & Dietetics 2013;114:n/a. 10.1111/1747-0080.12016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mellow ML, Dumuid D, Thacker JS, et al. Building your best day for healthy brain aging-The neuroprotective effects of optimal time use. Maturitas 2019;125:33–40. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.04.204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Corrêa Leite ML. Compositional data analysis as an alternative paradigm for nutritional studies. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2019;33:207–12. 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aitchison J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 1982;44:139–60. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1982.tb01195.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leite MLC. Applying compositional data methodology to nutritional epidemiology. Stat Methods Med Res 2016;25:3057–65. 10.1177/0962280214560047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dumuid D, Stanford TE, Martin-Fernández J-A, et al. Compositional data analysis for physical activity, sedentary time and sleep research. Stat Methods Med Res 2018;27:3726–38. 10.1177/0962280217710835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Leite MLC, Prinelli F. A compositional data perspective on studying the associations between macronutrient balances and diseases. Eur J Clin Nutr 2017;71:1365–9. 10.1038/ejcn.2017.126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tondelli M, Wilcock GK, Nichelli P, et al. Structural MRI changes detectable up to ten years before clinical Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2012;33:825.e25–825.e36. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Drago V, Babiloni C, Bartrés-Faz D, et al. Disease tracking markers for Alzheimer's disease at the prodromal (MCI) stage. J Alzheimers Dis 2011;26 Suppl 3:159–99. 10.3233/JAD-2011-0043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hampel H, Bürger K, Teipel SJ, et al. Core candidate neurochemical and imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2008;4:38–48. 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hanseeuw BJ, Betensky RA, Jacobs HIL, et al. Association of amyloid and tau with cognition in preclinical Alzheimer disease: a longitudinal study. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:915–24. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Silvestrini M, Viticchi G, Altamura C, et al. Cerebrovascular assessment for the risk prediction of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2012;32:689–98. 10.3233/JAD-2012-121240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hill NL, Kolanowski AM, Gill DJ. Plasticity in early Alzheimer's disease: an opportunity for intervention. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2011;27:257–67. 10.1097/tgr.0b013e31821e588e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fabiani M, Low KA, Tan C-H, et al. Taking the pulse of aging: mapping pulse pressure and elasticity in cerebral arteries with optical methods. Psychophysiology 2014;51:1072–88. 10.1111/psyp.12288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tan CH, Low KA, Kong T, et al. Mapping cerebral pulse pressure and arterial compliance over the adult lifespan with optical imaging. PLoS One 2017;12:e0171305. 10.1371/journal.pone.0171305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chiarelli AM, Fletcher MA, Tan CH, et al. Individual differences in regional cortical volumes across the life span are associated with regional optical measures of arterial elasticity. Neuroimage 2017;162:199–213. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tan CH, Low KA, Chiarelli AM, et al. Optical measures of cerebral arterial stiffness are associated with white matter signal abnormalities and cognitive performance in normal aging. Neurobiol Aging 2019;84:200–7. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, et al. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009;120:2008–39. 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hsieh S, Schubert S, Hoon C, et al. Validation of the Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013;36:242–50. 10.1159/000351671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nagayoshi S, Oshima Y, Ando T, et al. Validity of estimating physical activity intensity using a triaxial accelerometer in healthy adults and older adults. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2019;5:e000592. 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Clarke CL, Taylor J, Crighton LJ, et al. Validation of the AX3 triaxial accelerometer in older functionally impaired people. Aging Clin Exp Res 2017;29:451–7. 10.1007/s40520-016-0604-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Etgen T, Sander D, Huntgeburth U, et al. Physical activity and incident cognitive impairment in elderly persons: the invade study. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:186–93. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hildebrand M, VAN Hees VT, Hansen BH, et al. Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014;46:1816–24. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hildebrand M, Hansen BH, van Hees VT, et al. Evaluation of raw acceleration sedentary thresholds in children and adults. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2017;27:1814–23. 10.1111/sms.12795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.van Hees VT, Sabia S, Anderson KN, et al. A novel, open access method to assess sleep duration using a wrist-worn accelerometer. PLoS One 2015;10:e0142533. 10.1371/journal.pone.0142533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ridley K, Ainsworth BE, Olds TS. Development of a compendium of energy expenditures for youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008;5: :45. 10.1186/1479-5868-5-45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gomersall SR, Olds TS, Ridley K. Development and evaluation of an adult use-of-time instrument with an energy expenditure focus. J Sci Med Sport 2011;14:143–8. 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.National Health and Medical Research Council . Australian dietary guidelines. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Krikorian R, Shidler MD, Nash TA, et al. Blueberry supplementation improves memory in older adults. J Agric Food Chem 2010;58:3996–4000. 10.1021/jf9029332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Morris MC, Tangney CC, Wang Y, et al. Mind diet slows cognitive decline with aging. Alzheimers Dement 2015;11:1015–22. 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Martínez-Lapiscina EH, Clavero P, Toledo E, et al. Virgin olive oil supplementation and long-term cognition: the PREDIMED-NAVARRA randomized, trial. J Nutr Health Aging 2013;17:544–52. 10.1007/s12603-013-0027-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Martínez-Lapiscina EH, Clavero P, Toledo E, et al. Mediterranean diet improves cognition: the PREDIMED-NAVARRA randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:1318–25. 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Collins CE, Boggess MM, Watson JF, et al. Reproducibility and comparative validity of a food frequency questionnaire for Australian adults. Clinical Nutrition 2014;33:906–14. 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Burrows TL, Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake assessed by food frequency questionnaire and plasma carotenoids: a validation study in adults. Nutrients 2015;7:3240–51. 10.3390/nu7053240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schumacher TL, Burrows TL, Rollo ME, et al. Comparison of fatty acid intakes assessed by a cardiovascular-specific food frequency questionnaire with red blood cell membrane fatty acids in hyperlipidaemic Australian adults: a validation study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2016;70:1433–8. 10.1038/ejcn.2016.144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Swierk M, Williams PG, Wilcox J, et al. Validation of an Australian electronic food frequency questionnaire to measure polyunsaturated fatty acid intake. Nutrition 2011;27:641–6. 10.1016/j.nut.2010.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Goldsworthy MR, Rogasch NC, Ballinger S, et al. Age-Related decline of neuroplasticity to intermittent theta burst stimulation of the lateral prefrontal cortex and its relationship with late-life memory performance. Clin Neurophysiol 2020;131:2181–91. 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.06.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stokes MG, Chambers CD, Gould IC, et al. Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:1617–25. 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Biabani M, Fornito A, Mutanen TP, et al. Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials. Brain Stimul 2019;12:1537–52. 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Erickson KI, Boot WR, Basak C, et al. Striatal volume predicts level of video game skill acquisition. Cereb Cortex 2010;20:2522–30. 10.1093/cercor/bhp293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Leoni R, et al. Assessing cerebrovascular reactivity in carotid Steno-Occlusive disease using MRI BOLD and ASL techniques. 268483. Radiology Research and Practice, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bright MG, Murphy K. Reliable quantification of BOLD fMRI cerebrovascular reactivity despite poor breath-hold performance. Neuroimage 2013;83:559–68. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tan CH, Low KA, Schneider-Garces N, et al. Optical measures of changes in cerebral vascular tone during voluntary breath holding and a Sternberg memory task. Biol Psychol 2016;118:184–94. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.05.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kerchner GA, Racine CA, Hale S, et al. Cognitive processing speed in older adults: relationship with white matter integrity. PLoS One 2012;7:e50425. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pereira T, Cipriano I, Costa T, et al. Exercise, ageing and cognitive function - Effects of a personalized physical exercise program in the cognitive function of older adults. Physiol Behav 2019;202:8–13. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wade AT, et al. A Mediterranean diet supplemented with dairy foods improves mood and processing speed in an Australian sample: results from the MedDairy randomized controlled trial. Nutr Neurosci 2018:1–13. 10.1080/1028415X.2018.1543148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (finger): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015;385:2255–63. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60461-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS, et al. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:3017–22. 10.1073/pnas.1015950108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Karayanidis F, Jamadar S. ERP measures of proactive and reactive control processes in task-switching paradigms. In: Grange J, Houghton G, eds. Task switching and cognitive control. Oxford: University Press, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jolly TAD, Cooper PS, Rennie JL, et al. Age-Related decline in task switching is linked to both global and tract-specific changes in white matter microstructure. Hum Brain Mapp 2017;38:1588–603. 10.1002/hbm.23473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kiesel A, Steinhauser M, Wendt M, et al. Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychol Bull 2020;136:849–74. 10.1037/a0019842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Karayanidis F, Jamadar S, Ruge H, et al. Advance preparation in task-switching: converging evidence from behavioral, brain activation, and model-based approaches. Front Psychol 2010;1:25. 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Karayanidis F, Whitson LR, Heathcote A, et al. Variability in proactive and reactive cognitive control processes across the adult lifespan. Front Psychol 2011;2:318. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Whitson LR, Karayanidis F, Fulham R, et al. Reactive control processes contributing to residual switch cost and mixing cost across the adult lifespan. Front Psychol 2014;5:383. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fong D-Y, Chi L-K, Li F, et al. The benefits of endurance exercise and tai chi Chuan for the task-switching aspect of executive function in older adults: an Erp study. Front Aging Neurosci 2014;6:295. 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Miller MG, Hamilton DA, Joseph JA, et al. Dietary blueberry improves cognition among older adults in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Nutr 2018;57:1169–80. 10.1007/s00394-017-1400-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. The Lancet 2017;390:2673–734. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Anstey KJ, Cherbuin N, Herath PM, et al. A self-report risk index to predict occurrence of dementia in three independent cohorts of older adults: the ANU-ADRI. PLoS One 2014;9:e86141. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M, et al. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2014;10): :844–52. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Li C, Neugroschl J, Luo X, et al. The utility of the cognitive function instrument (CFI) to detect cognitive decline in non-demented older adults. J Alzheimers Dis 2017;60:427–37. 10.3233/JAD-161294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Spira AP, Chen-Edinboro LP, Wu MN, et al. Impact of sleep on the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2014;27:478–83. 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, et al. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193–213. 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wolfs CAG, Dirksen CD, Kessels A, et al. Performance of the EQ-5D and the EQ-5D+C in elderly patients with cognitive impairments. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:33. 10.1186/1477-7525-5-33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.McCaffrey N, Kaambwa B, Currow DC, et al. Health-Related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016;14): :133. 10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Luszcz MA, Giles LC, Anstey KJ, et al. Cohort profile: the Australian longitudinal study of ageing (ALSA). Int J Epidemiol 2016;45:1054–63. 10.1093/ije/dyu196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Marfell-Jones M, et al. International standards for anthropometric assessment. Potchefstroom, RSA: North-West University, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Amieva H, Ouvrard C, Giulioli C, et al. Self-Reported hearing loss, hearing AIDS, and cognitive decline in elderly adults: a 25-year study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015;63:2099–104. 10.1111/jgs.13649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Amieva H, Ouvrard C, Meillon C, et al. Death, depression, disability, and dementia associated with self-reported hearing problems: a 25-year study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2018;73:1383–9. 10.1093/gerona/glx250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liu C-C, Liu C-C, Kanekiyo T, et al. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: risk, mechanisms and therapy. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9:106–18. 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007;335:806–8. 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Champely S. pwr: basic functions for power analysis, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap Consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208. 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, et al. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer's disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:788–94. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70136-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data

bmjopen-2020-047888supp001.pdf (16.5KB, pdf)

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES