Skip to main content
NCBI home page
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2022 Jan 6;2022:10.17912/micropub.biology.000508. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000508

Isolated THATCH domain of End4 is unable to bind F-actin independently in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Yuan Ren 1,2,§, Julien Berro 1,2,3,§
Reviewed by: Anonymous
PMCID: PMC8738963  PMID: 35024575

Abstract

Clathrin mediated endocytosis (CME) in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe critically depends on the connection between the lipid membrane and F-actin. The fission yeast endocytic protein End4 (homologous to Sla2 in budding yeast and HIP1R in human) contains a N-terminal domain that binds to PIP2 on the membrane, and a C-terminal THATCH domain that is postulated to be a binding partner of F-actin in vivo. Purified THATCH domain of the budding yeast Sla2, however, shows low affinity to F-actin in vitro. We tested if isolated THATCH domain still has low affinity to F-actin in vivo, using TEV protease (TEVp)-mediated protein cleaving to separate the THATCH domain from the rest of End4. Our results indicate that the isolated THATCH domain of End4 is unable to bind F-actin independently in vivo, consistent with the low affinity of the THATCH domain to F-actin measured from in vitro binding assays.

Figure 1. Localization of proteins in fission yeast before and after TEVp cleavage in vivo.

Figure 1. Localization of proteins in fission yeast before and after TEVp cleavage in vivo

Open in a new tab

A: mEGFP was tagged to the C-terminus of Acp1 with a seven amino acid linker (RIPGLIN). Most of the mEGFP signal is located at endocytic patches. B: mEGFP was tagged to the C-terminus of Acp1 with a TEVp recognition peptide (ENLYFQS). The mEGFP signal is localized mostly at endocytic patches similar to wild type in (A). C–D: mEGFP was tagged to the C-terminus of Acp1 with a TEVp recognition peptide, and the expression of TEVp was either inhibited (C) or induced (D). The expression of TEVp reduced the brightness of the mEGFP signal at endocytic patches in (D), suggesting successful cleavage of the mEGFP tag. E–F: mEGFP was tagged to the C-terminus of Acp1 with a mutated TEVp recognition peptide that cannot be cleaved (ENLYFAS), and the expression of TEVp was either inhibited (E) or induced (F). G: End4 was tagged at the N-terminus with mScarlet-I, and at the C-terminus with mEGFP. mScarlet-I (left panel) and mEGFP (right panel) signals co-localize at endocytic patches. H–I: End4 was tagged at the N-terminus with mScarlet-I, and at the C-terminus with mEGFP. A TEVp recognition peptide was inserted before the THATCH domain, and the expression of TEVp was either inhibited (H) or induced (I). After TEVp cleavage in (I), the THATCH domain of End4 is diffusive in the cytoplasm and the nucleus.

Description

End4 is an endocytic protein that mediates the connection between the lipid membrane and the actin cytoskeleton in fission yeast (Gottfried, Ehrlich, and Ashery 2010, 4; Iwaki et al. 2004, 4; Lacy et al. 2018, 4; Engqvist-Goldstein et al. 2001; Skruzny et al. 2012). The N-terminus of End4 binds to PIP2 on the membrane together with Ent1p, and the C-terminus of End4 shares sequence similarities to the actin binding domain of talin, and is therefore named THATCH (talin-HIP1/R/Sla2p actin-tethering C-terminal homology) (Legendre-Guillemin 2004, 4; Baggett, D’Aquino, and Wendland 2003, 4; McCann and Craig 1997; Brett et al. 2006). The crystal structures of THATCH domains from HIP1R and talin are five-helix-bundles (Brett et al. 2006; Gingras et al. 2008). The THATCH domain of Sla2 is critical for linking F-actin to the endocytic coat during CME in budding yeast (Baggett, D’Aquino, and Wendland 2003, 2; Brett et al. 2006; Abella et al. 2021). The affinity of purified THATCH domains for actin filaments has been measured in vitro by multiple groups (Brett et al. 2006; Gingras et al. 2008; Senetar, Foster, and McCann 2004). Although structurally similar, the THATCH domain from HIP1R has the lowest affinity to actin among all tested THATCH domains, in some cases not significantly higher than that of the negative control with purified GST (Senetar, Foster, and McCann 2004). This discrepancy in the actin-binding ability of the THATCH domain from in vitro and in vivo data could be explained by cryptic actin-binding sites that are activated in vivo, by a) post-translational modifications, b) the binding of other molecules, or c) force transmitted through the rest of the End4 molecule. All three binding site activation mechanisms have been found on talin, the molecule responsible for connecting the membrane to F-actin during cell adhesion through its 13 rod domains including the THATCH domain (Goult, Yan, and Schwartz 2018; Goult, Brown, and Schwartz 2021). A clear way to distinguish mechanism c) from a) and b) is through in vivo protein cleaving. By isolating the THATCH domain of End4 from the rest of End4 in the cytoplasm of the fission yeast, the native environment for possible post-translational modifications or binding partners of THATCH are preserved, but force transmission to the THATCH domain is prevented. Consequently, the cellular localization of the isolated THATCH domain is indicative of its direct affinity to F-actin in vivo.

We chose to use TEVp to perform in vivo protein cleaving, because TEVp has good specificity and only needs seven amino acids as the recognition sequence (Sanchez and Ting 2020). TEVp has been shown to work in diverse situations both in vivo and in vitro (Harder et al. 2008; Raran-Kurussi et al. 2017). The coding sequence of TEVp was integrated into the genome of fission yeast by CRISPR/Cas9(Fernandez and Berro 2016), and put under the control of the inducible promoter nmt1 (Forsburg 1993). We first verified that our approach for in vivo protein cleaving worked and did not have undesirable effects, by using TEVp to separate the mEGFP tag from a control protein. We used the Acp1 subunit of the canonical actin filament capping protein, which localizes to endocytic sites (Sun et al. 2019; Nakano and Mabuchi 2006; Berro and Pollard 2014) and has comparable cytoplasmic concentration to End4 in the fission yeast (Sirotkin et al. 2010). When Acp1 was tagged either with a regular linker or the TEVp recognition peptide, the majority of the mEGFP signal was detected at endocytic patches, which were enriched at the poles and the division plane of the fission yeast cells (Fig. 1A-C). These endocytic patches contained a large amount of F-actin(Lacy et al. 2018). When the expression of TEVp was induced, we saw a drastic decrease of mEGFP signal from endocytic patches, suggesting the removal of the mEGFP tag from Acp1 molecules (Fig. 1D). As expected, the cleavage of TEVp demonstrated good specificity, and a point mutation in the TEVp recognition peptide prevented protein cleaving (Fig. 1E, 1F).

We then inserted the TEVp recognition peptide prior to the THATCH domain of End4. In wild-type cells, End4 localizes to endocytic patches in a pattern similar to Acp1 (Fig. 1G). The insertion of the TEVp recognition peptide did not change the localization of End4 when TEVp was not expressed (Fig. 1H). When TEVp was expressed, however, the THATCH domain was no longer found at endocytic patches but became diffusive in the cytoplasm and the nucleus, while the N-terminal fragment of End4 still showed polarized localization (Fig. 1I). Failure of the isolated THACTH domain to localize to endocytic patches demonstrates that the affinity of the THATCH domain to F-actin is low in vivo, similarly to what was shown in vitro. In addition, our results demonstrate that the connection between the THATCH domain and the rest of the End4 molecule is necessary for its binding to actin filaments. We speculate that force transmission through the whole End4 protein is probably involved in exposing the cryptic F-actin binding sites.

Methods

Yeast strains and media

The S. pombe strains used in this study were made though CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing as reported in (Fernandez and Berro 2016), and the edited gene sequences were confirmed by colony PCR and sequencing. The coding sequence of TEVp was inserted into the low complex region 0.5kb upstream of pil1 locus (chromosome III, insertion after 348203) (V. Wood et al. 2002; Valerie Wood et al. 2012), under the control of the full strength nmt1 promoter (Forsburg 1993). S. pombe cells were cultured in YE5S (Yeast Extract supplemented with 0.225 g/L of uracil, lysine, histidine, adenine and leucine), and imaged in EMM5S (Edinburgh Minimum media supplemented with 0.225 g/L of uracil, histidine, adenine, lysine, and leucine) after washing with EMM5S. Yeast cells were cultured at 32 °C with 200rpm shaking overnight to reach OD595nm reading between 0.3 and 0.5. The expression of TEVp was inhibited when yeast cells were cultured in YE5S media. The expression of TEVp was induced by transferring yeast cells into EMM5S media after multiple washes, and cells were imaged after overnight culture in EMM5S to allow for enough time for TEVp mediated protein cleavage.

Microscopy

Cells were imaged at room temperature on gelatin pads (25%) on glass slides. Samples were mounted on a Nikon TiE inverted microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with a CSU-W1 Confocal Scanning Unit (Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with a CFI Plan Apo 100X/1.45NA Phase objective (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Images were captured with an iXon Ultra888 EMCCD camera (Andor, Belfast, UK). mEGFP tagged strains were excited with a 488-nm argon-ion laser and filtered with a single band pass filter 510/25. mScarlet-I tagged strains were excited with a 561-nm argon-ion laser and filtered with a single band pass filter 575/25. Fluorescent signals from the whole cell were collected by taking 21 optical sections each with 0.5µm thickness, and 2D maximum projected images were created for each strain by the Fiji distribution of ImageJ (Schindelin et al. 2012). All Acp1 strains were imaged and displayed with the same settings. For End4 strains, the mEGFP channel was imaged and displayed with the same settings, and the mScarlet-I channel was imaged and displayed with the same settings.

Reagents

Name Genotype Used in Source
SpJB366 acp1-mEGFP fex1Δ fex2Δ ade6-M216 his3-D1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 h- A This Study
SpJB524 acp1-TEVSite-mEGFP fex1Δ fex2Δ ade6-M216 his3-D1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 h- B This Study
SpJB535 nmt-TEVp acp1-TEVSite-mEGFP fex1Δ fex2Δ ade6-M216 his3-D1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 h- C, D This Study
SpJB561 mScarlet-I-end4-mEGFP fex1Δ fex2Δ ade6-M216 his3-D1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 h- G (Ren et al. 2021)
SpJB572 nmt-TEVp mScarlet-I-end4-TEVSite-end4-mEGFP fex1Δ fex2Δ ade6-M216 his3-D1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 h- H, I This Study
SpJB583 nmt-TEVp acp1-TEVSite_QP1A-mEGFP fex1Δ fex2Δ ade6-M216 his3-D1 leu1-32 ura4-D18 h- E, F This Study
Open in a new tab

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the Berro lab for helpful discussions and insights, especially Ronan Fernandez for suggesting important controls. We also thank the Yale West Campus Imaging Core for their spinning disc confocal microscope. We thank the Keck DNA Sequencing Facility at Yale for their assistance with oligo synthesis and sequencing.

Funding

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences Grant R21GM132661.

References

  1. Abella M, Andruck L, Malengo G, Skruzny M. Actin-generated force applied during endocytosis measured by Sla2-based FRET tension sensors. Dev Cell. 2021 Sep 01;56(17):2419–22426.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baggett JJ, D'Aquino KE, Wendland B. The Sla2p talin domain plays a role in endocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2003 Dec 01;165(4):1661–1674. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berro J, Pollard TD. Local and global analysis of endocytic patch dynamics in fission yeast using a new "temporal superresolution" realignment method. Mol Biol Cell. 2014 Aug 20;25(22):3501–3514. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-01-0004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brett TJ, Legendre-Guillemin V, McPherson PS, Fremont DH. Structural definition of the F-actin-binding THATCH domain from HIP1R. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan 15;13(2):121–130. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Engqvist-Goldstein AE, Warren RA, Kessels MM, Keen JH, Heuser J, Drubin DG. The actin-binding protein Hip1R associates with clathrin during early stages of endocytosis and promotes clathrin assembly in vitro. J Cell Biol. 2001 Sep 17;154(6):1209–1223. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200106089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fernandez R, Berro J. Use of a fluoride channel as a new selection marker for fission yeast plasmids and application to fast genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9. Yeast. 2016 Sep 01;33(10):549–557. doi: 10.1002/yea.3178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forsburg SL. Comparison of Schizosaccharomyces pombe expression systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jun 25;21(12):2955–2956. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.12.2955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gingras AR, Bate N, Goult BT, Hazelwood L, Canestrelli I, Grossmann JG, Liu H, Putz NS, Roberts GC, Volkmann N, Hanein D, Barsukov IL, Critchley DR. The structure of the C-terminal actin-binding domain of talin. EMBO J. 2007 Dec 20;27(2):458–469. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gottfried I, Ehrlich M, Ashery U. The Sla2p/HIP1/HIP1R family: similar structure, similar function in endocytosis? Biochem Soc Trans. 2010 Feb 01;38(Pt 1):187–191. doi: 10.1042/BST0380187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goult BT, Brown NH, Schwartz MA. Talin in mechanotransduction and mechanomemory at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2021 Oct 28;134(20) doi: 10.1242/jcs.258749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goult BT, Yan J, Schwartz MA. Talin as a mechanosensitive signaling hub. J Cell Biol. 2018 Sep 25;217(11):3776–3784. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201808061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harder B, Schomburg A, Pflanz R, Küstner K, Gerlach N, Schuh R. TEV protease-mediated cleavage in Drosophila as a tool to analyze protein functions in living organisms. Biotechniques. 2008 May 01;44(6):765–772. doi: 10.2144/000112884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Iwaki T, Tanaka N, Takagi H, Giga-Hama Y, Takegawa K. Characterization of end4+, a gene required for endocytosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 2004 Jul 30;21(10):867–881. doi: 10.1002/yea.1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lacy MM, Ma R, Ravindra NG, Berro J. Molecular mechanisms of force production in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. FEBS Lett. 2018 Jul 28;592(21):3586–3605. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Legendre-Guillemin V, Wasiak S, Hussain NK, Angers A, McPherson PS. ENTH/ANTH proteins and clathrin-mediated membrane budding. J Cell Sci. 2004 Jan 01;117(Pt 1):9–18. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McCann RO, Craig SW. The I/LWEQ module: a conserved sequence that signifies F-actin binding in functionally diverse proteins from yeast to mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 27;94(11):5679–5684. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nakano K, Mabuchi I. Actin-capping protein is involved in controlling organization of actin cytoskeleton together with ADF/cofilin, profilin and F-actin crosslinking proteins in fission yeast. Genes Cells. 2006 Aug 01;11(8):893–905. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.00987.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Raran-Kurussi S, Cherry S, Zhang D, Waugh DS. Removal of Affinity Tags with TEV Protease. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1586:221–230. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6887-9_14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ren, Yuan, Jie Yang, Huaizhou Jin, Yongli Zhang, and Julien Berro. 2021. Force Redistribution in Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis Revealed by Phase-Separating Force Sensors. bioRxiv preprint. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Sanchez MI, Ting AY. Directed evolution improves the catalytic efficiency of TEV protease. Nat Methods. 2019 Dec 01;17(2):167–174. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0665-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Senetar MA, Foster SJ, McCann RO. Intrasteric inhibition mediates the interaction of the I/LWEQ module proteins Talin1, Talin2, Hip1, and Hip12 with actin. Biochemistry. 2004 Dec 14;43(49):15418–15428. doi: 10.1021/bi0487239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sirotkin V, Berro J, Macmillan K, Zhao L, Pollard TD. Quantitative analysis of the mechanism of endocytic actin patch assembly and disassembly in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2010 Jun 29;21(16):2894–2904. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-02-0157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Skruzny M, Brach T, Ciuffa R, Rybina S, Wachsmuth M, Kaksonen M. Molecular basis for coupling the plasma membrane to the actin cytoskeleton during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 27;109(38):E2533–E2542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207011109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sun Y, Schöneberg J, Chen X, Jiang T, Kaplan C, Xu K, Pollard TD, Drubin DG. Direct comparison of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in budding and fission yeast reveals conserved and evolvable features. Elife. 2019 Dec 12;8 doi: 10.7554/eLife.50749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wood V, Harris MA, McDowall MD, Rutherford K, Vaughan BW, Staines DM, Aslett M, Lock A, Bähler J, Kersey PJ, Oliver SG. PomBase: a comprehensive online resource for fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Oct 28;40(Database issue):D695–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wood V, Gwilliam R, Rajandream MA, Lyne M, Lyne R, Stewart A, Sgouros J, Peat N, Hayles J, Baker S, Basham D, Bowman S, Brooks K, Brown D, Brown S, Chillingworth T, Churcher C, Collins M, Connor R, Cronin A, Davis P, Feltwell T, Fraser A, Gentles S, Goble A, Hamlin N, Harris D, Hidalgo J, Hodgson G, Holroyd S, Hornsby T, Howarth S, Huckle EJ, Hunt S, Jagels K, James K, Jones L, Jones M, Leather S, McDonald S, McLean J, Mooney P, Moule S, Mungall K, Murphy L, Niblett D, Odell C, Oliver K, O'Neil S, Pearson D, Quail MA, Rabbinowitsch E, Rutherford K, Rutter S, Saunders D, Seeger K, Sharp S, Skelton J, Simmonds M, Squares R, Squares S, Stevens K, Taylor K, Taylor RG, Tivey A, Walsh S, Warren T, Whitehead S, Woodward J, Volckaert G, Aert R, Robben J, Grymonprez B, Weltjens I, Vanstreels E, Rieger M, Schäfer M, Müller-Auer S, Gabel C, Fuchs M, Düsterhöft A, Fritzc C, Holzer E, Moestl D, Hilbert H, Borzym K, Langer I, Beck A, Lehrach H, Reinhardt R, Pohl TM, Eger P, Zimmermann W, Wedler H, Wambutt R, Purnelle B, Goffeau A, Cadieu E, Dréano S, Gloux S, Lelaure V, Mottier S, Galibert F, Aves SJ, Xiang Z, Hunt C, Moore K, Hurst SM, Lucas M, Rochet M, Gaillardin C, Tallada VA, Garzon A, Thode G, Daga RR, Cruzado L, Jimenez J, Sánchez M, del Rey F, Benito J, Domínguez A, Revuelta JL, Moreno S, Armstrong J, Forsburg SL, Cerutti L, Lowe T, McCombie WR, Paulsen I, Potashkin J, Shpakovski GV, Ussery D, Barrell BG, Nurse P. The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature. 2002 Feb 21;415(6874):871–880. doi: 10.1038/nature724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES