Skip to main content
Journal of General Internal Medicine logoLink to Journal of General Internal Medicine
. 2021 May 26;37(1):64–69. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06765-x

Depressive Symptoms and Burnout Among Medical Students: a Prospective Study

Padmini D Ranasinghe 1,, Jocelynn T Owusu 2, Amanda Bertram 1, Henry Michtalik 1, Hsin-Chieh Yeh 1,3, Joseph Cofrancesco Jr 1, David Levine 1, Edgar R Miller III 1,3, Spyridon Marinopoulos 4
PMCID: PMC8739401  PMID: 34037922

Abstract

Background

Depressive symptoms and burnout are common among medical students. However, few studies have investigated their trajectory over the course of medical school.

Objective

Evaluate year-by-year changes in depressive and burnout symptoms over the course of medical school training.

Design

Prospective study.

Participants

Medical students who matriculated at a private medical school in Maryland from 2010 to 2016 (n=758).

Main Measures

Clinically significant depressive symptoms were defined as a score of ≥10 on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and burnout was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). High emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment were defined as scores of ≥ 27, ≥10, and ≤33 on the respective MBI subscales.

Key Results

At matriculation, the prevalences of significant depressive symptoms, high emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment were 4.3%, 9.4%, 8.6%, and 37.7%, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, and cohort, compared with year 1, the odds of significant depressive symptoms was significantly higher at the beginning of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years of study (ORs=2.63, 2.85, and 3.77, respectively; all ps<0.001). Compared with the 1st year, the odds of high emotional exhaustion also increased during the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years of study, (ORs=3.46, 4.79, 8.20, respectively; all ps<0.001), as did the odds of high depersonalization (ORs=3.55, 6.14, 12.53, respectively; all ps<0.001). The odds of low personal accomplishment did not significantly differ across years of study.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that symptoms of depression and burnout may increase during medical school. Because of the high prevalence of depressive symptoms and burnout in medical students, interventions earlier in the medical career pathway that aim to prevent, detect, and treat these symptoms may be of benefit to the physician community.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-06765-x.

INTRODUCTION

Students entering medical school expect to devote significant time and commitment to learning and mastering skills in order to become physicians. However, medical school can also be a period of high stress for students, which can manifest as a cluster of symptoms consistent with depression and/or psychological burnout.1, 2

Compared to college graduates, medical students have statistically significant lower levels of depressive symptoms (42.4% and 26.2%, respectively) and burnout symptoms (37.3% and 27.3%, respectively) at matriculation, suggesting that medical school may be a risk factor.3 A meta-analysis that included 167 cross-sectional and 16 longitudinal studies from around the world estimated (i.e., the pooled crude estimate) 27.2% of medical students have depressive symptoms.4 Meanwhile, the prevalence of burnout, a syndrome characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment, is 44.2–55.9% among medical students; on the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) subscales, 40.8–44.6% reported high emotional exhaustion and 35.1–37.9% reported high depersonalization. 58

Depression and burnout adversely affect the health and well-being of medical students.9 The consequences of depression and burnout in this population include suicidal ideation, substance use, relationship issues, and negative physical health outcomes.7, 10 Depression and burnout may also lead to program dropout, a decrease in empathy, problems identifying and managing conflicts, unprofessional conduct, impairment in performance, and academic dishonesty.7, 9 In the long-term, depression and burnout have been found to impact the quality of care provided to patients, with a negative effect on patient safety and quality.7, 9 As a result, this issue has found increased recognition and attention among interested parties, including the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC).

Although numerous studies describe the cross-sectional prevalence of depression and burnout among medical students, only a few longitudinal studies explore the trajectory of these symptoms during medical school. Research found that from matriculation through 4th year symptoms of depression significantly increased from 18% to 31%,11 and burnout significantly increased from 17% to 38%.2

Improving the understanding of the course of depressive symptoms and burnout among medical students may help identify key time points in the appearance of symptoms, and areas for intervention. Therefore, the objective of this study was to prospectively assess year-by-year changes in depressive symptoms and burnout across 4 years of training among medical students. The study hypothesis was that depressive symptoms and burnout would increase during each year of medical school.

METHODS

We enrolled medical students, who matriculated at a private medical school in Maryland, into a longitudinal study of health and well-being. Incoming medical students completed surveys regarding their general physical and mental health status during their medical school orientation. Subsequently, participants were invited to complete a similar follow-up survey at the beginning of each academic school year. Participants in our study comprised 7 cohorts of medical students who matriculated from 2010 to 2016 (mean number of participants per cohort at baseline: 109, range: 102–116). During this period, 840 students matriculated and were eligible to take part in this study. Of this sample, 758 (90.2%) medical students had complete data on at least one primary outcome at baseline. All participants provided informed consent and participation was voluntary. Approval for the study was obtained from the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine’s institutional review board.

Demographics

Age, gender, race/ethnicity, and marital status were collected at baseline. We re-categorized race as “White,” “Black or African American,” “Hispanic or Latino(a),” East or Southeast Asian (i.e., “East Asian,” “Southeast Asian”), or Other (i.e., “Multiracial,” “Middle Eastern,” “Other”). Participants in our sample self-reported as “single,” “married,” “engaged,” “partnered,” or “other.” We re-categorized participants who reported being “engaged,” “partnered,” or “other” as “Other.” We also categorized participants by the year they entered the study (i.e., cohort).

Depressive Symptoms

Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a 9-item instrument validated to assess depressive symptoms and their severity in the general population.12 Responses on the PHQ-9 range from 0 to 3, with a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Those with a PHQ-9 score ≥10 were categorized as having clinically significant depressive symptoms.12

Burnout

Burnout was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), a validated 22-item measure that evaluates burnout among persons working in human services.5 Participants rated the frequency of burnout symptoms on a scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (every day). Responses on items were summed to determine levels of burnout. The MBI-HSS measures three components of burnout: (1) emotional exhaustion (score range 0 to 54); (2) depersonalization (score range 0 to 30); and (3) personal accomplishment (score range 0 to 48). For each of the MBI-HSS subscales, we used the MBI-HSS cutoffs for medical occupations.5 High emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment were defined as scores of ≥ 27, ≥10, and ≤33 on the respective MBI subscales.

Statistical Analyses

We described participants’ characteristics using proportions and means. The prevalences of depressive and burnout symptoms were calculated for each year separately. We also used a non-parametric test for trend to determine whether changes in the prevalence of burnout symptoms (emotional exhaustion, personal accomplishment, depersonalization) and depressive symptoms were linear across medical school years. Participants’ burnout symptoms and depressive symptoms data from each year were tracked longitudinally. We fit generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression models, which allowed us to account for within-person correlation and to evaluate repeated-measures among participants. Additionally, GEE logistic models allowed for the comparison of the odds of each study outcome by medical school years. Medical school year was the primary predictor: first year, second year, third year, and fourth year. The primary outcomes were components of burnout (i.e., emotional exhaustion, low personal accomplishment, depersonalization) and depressive symptoms. Models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, sex, marital status, and cohort. In exploratory analyses, GEE linear models were also fit to assess burnout and depressive symptoms as continuous variables over time. We also fit logistic regression models to determine whether there existed differences in outcomes (at baseline) between those who had baseline data only (n=203; 26.8%) versus those who had any follow-up data (n=555; 73.2%). Additionally, we evaluated whether these groups significantly differed by participant characteristics using chi-squared and independent samples t-tests. An alpha <0.05 indicated statistical significance for all analyses. We performed analyses using Stata version 15.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Table 1 reports the sample size of each cohort and study attrition over time. Of the 840 eligible medical students who matriculated, 758 (90.3%) participated in the study at baseline. Among baseline participants, 507 (66.9%) participants had follow-up data on depressive symptoms or burnout at the beginning of their 2nd year (year 2). A total of 109 (14.4%) participants were ineligible to complete the survey at the beginning of their third 3rd year because they had not yet reached their third year at the time of data analysis. Of participants who were eligible (n = 649), 56.7% (n = 368) had follow-up data during their 3rd year (year 3). A total of 217 (28.6%) participants were not eligible to complete the 4th follow-up data collection at the beginning of their fourth 4th year because they had not yet reached their 4th year at the time of data analysis. Among those participants who were eligible (n = 541), 250 (46.2%) had follow-up data that corresponded with their beginning of the 4th year (year 4) of medical school.

Table 1.

Sample Size of Participants by Medical School Year and Cohort

Cohort Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
2010 105 94 76 60
2011 104 90 78 60
2012 101 79 59 29
2013 116 67 52 48
2014 115 75 60 53
2015 108 52 43 ---
2016 109 50 --- ---
Eligible sample 840 758 649 541
Final sample, n (%)A 758 (90.2%) 507 (66.9%) 368 (56.7%) 250 (46.2%)

APercentage indicates the percentage of eligible participants included in the final sample

Participant Characteristics

At baseline (i.e., year 1), the average age of participants was 23.2 years (standard deviation=2.3 years) (Table 2). Additionally, 49.1% of participants were female, 44.3% were White, and 90.7% were single.

Table 2.

Baseline Participant Characteristics

Characteristics N=758
Age in years, mean ±SD (range) 23.2 ±2.3 (20–38)
Sex, n (%)
Female 371 (49.1)
Male 385 (50.9)
Race/ethnicity, n (%)
White 328 (44.3)
East or Southeast Asian 219 (29.6)
Black or African American 58 (7.8)
Hispanic or Latino(a) 27 (3.7)
Other 108 (14.6)
Marital status, n (%)
Single 684 (90.7)
Married 39 (5.2)
Other 31 (4.1)

*Missing data (n): age = 6; sex = 2; race/ethnicity = 18; marital status = 4. SD = standard deviation

Depressive Symptoms

Among first-year medical students, the prevalence of significant depressive symptoms was 4.3%. This prevalence was 10.5%, 10.9%, and 13.9% for years 2, 3, and 4, respectively (Fig. 1). Significant depressive symptoms increased across medical school years (trend p<0.001).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Prevalence of significant depressive symptoms and domains of MBI-measured burnout scale by year.

In unadjusted models, significant depressive symptoms were associated with medical school year. After adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, sex, marital status, and cohort, progressive medical school year was still associated with increased depressive symptoms. Compared with the first year, participants had increased odds of significant depressive symptoms during the second year (OR = 2.63, p<0.001), third year (OR = 2.85, p<0.001), and fourth year (OR = 3.77, p<0.001) (Table 3). However, compared with the second year, there was not a significant difference in the odds of significant depressive symptoms during the third and fourth years. Similarly, the odds of significant depressive symptoms were not different between the third and fourth years.

Table 3.

Adjusted Association of Significant Depressive Symptoms with Medical School Year, (OR, 95% CI)

Primary Predictor OR (95% CI)A p-value
Medical school year
Year 1 1.00
Year 2 2.63 (1.65, 4.19) <0.001
Year 3 2.85 (1.72, 4.73) <0.001
Year 4 3.77 (2.20, 6.47) <0.001
Medical school year
Year 2 1.00
Year 3 1.09 (0.69, 1.71) 0.72
Year 4 1.44 (0.88, 2.35) 0.15
Medical school year
Year 3 1.00
Year 4 1.32 (0.79, 2.20) 0.28

Notes. Significant depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥10) versus PHQ-9 <10(reference category)

AAdjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, and cohort

PHQ-9 scores were also assessed as a continuous variable. At baseline, the average PHQ-9 score was 2.8 ± 3.1. After adjustment, compared with year 1, depressive symptoms (i.e., PHQ-9 scores) was significantly higher during years 2, 3, and 4 (Supplemental Table S1).

Burnout Symptoms

High emotional exhaustion increased across medical school years (trend p<0.001). The prevalence of emotional exhaustion was 9.4% among first-year students, compared to 46.2% among fourth-year students (Fig. 1). Similarly, the prevalence of high depersonalization increased across medical school years (trend p<0.001); the prevalence was 8.6% among first-year students and 52.5% among fourth-year students. Although the prevalence of low personal accomplishment was higher during year 1 compared to year 4 (37.7% vs. 31.9%), there was not a significant trend in the prevalence of low personal accomplishment across medical school years (trend p = 0.12).

In unadjusted and adjusted models, high emotional exhaustion and high depersonalization, but not low personal accomplishment, were significantly associated with medical school year. After adjustment for covariates, emotional exhaustion was associated with medical school year. Compared with the first year, participants had increased odds of emotional exhaustion during the second year (OR = 3.46, p<0.001), third year (OR = 4.79, p<0.001), and fourth year (OR = 8.20, p<0.001) (Table 4). Compared with the second year, students also had increased odds of emotional exhaustion during the third year (OR = 1.39, p=0.04) and fourth year (OR = 2.37, p<0.001). Compared with the 3rd year, students also had increased odds of emotional exhaustion during the fourth year (OR = 1.71, p=0.003).

Table 4.

Adjusted Associations of MBI-Assessed Burnout Symptoms with Medical School Year, (OR, 95% CI)

Primary predictor Outcomes (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval)
High Emotional exhaustion p-value High Depersonalization p-value Low personal accomplishment p-value
Medical school year
Year 1 1.00 1.00 1.00
Year 2 3.46 (2.45, 4.88) <0.001 3.55 (2.46, 5.11) <0.001 0.91 (0.70, 1.19) 0.49
Year 3 4.79 (3.35, 6.86) <0.001 6.14 (4.20, 8.99) <0.001 0.88 (0.66, 1.18) 0.40
Year 4 8.20 (5.54, 12.14) <0.001 12.53 (8.29, 18.96) <0.001 0.75 (0.53, 1.06) 0.10
Medical school year
Year 2 1.00 1.00 1.00
Year 3 1.39 (1.01, 1.90) 0.04 1.73 (1.26, 2.38) 0.001 0.97 (0.71, 1.32) 0.84
Year 4 2.37 (1.67, 3.37) <0.001 3.54 (2.48, 5.04) <0.001 0.82 (0.57, 1.18) 0.28
Medical school year
Year 3 1.00 1.00 1.00
Year 4 1.71 (1.20, 2.44) 0.003 2.04 (1.43, 2.91) <0.001 0.85 (0.58, 1.23) 0.39

Notes. High (subscale score ≥ 27) versus low emotional exhaustion (subscale score <27; reference category). High (subscale score ≥10) versus low depersonalization (subscale score <10; reference category). Low (subscale score ≤33) versus high personal accomplishment (subscale score>33; reference category). Models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, and cohort

High depersonalization was also associated with medical school year after adjustment. Compared with the first year, students had increased odds of high depersonalization during the second year (OR = 3.55, p<0.001), third year (OR = 6.14, p<0.001), and fourth year (OR = 12.53, p<0.001). Compared with the second year, students had increased odds of depersonalization during the third year (OR = 1.73, p=0.001) and fourth year (OR = 3.54, p<0.001). Finally, compared with the third year, students had increased odds of depersonalization during the fourth year (OR = 2.04, p<0.001).

In adjusted models, low personal accomplishment was not associated with medical school year.

Burnout symptoms were also assessed as continuous variables. At baseline, the average MBI emotional exhaustion subscale score was 14.2 ± 8.8, the average MBI depersonalization subscale score was 3.5 ± 4.1, and the average personal accomplishment score was 34.1 ± 9.6. After adjustment, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization scores significantly increased across medical school years. After adjustment, compared with year 1, personal accomplishment was significantly higher during years 3 and 4. However, personal accomplishment did not significantly differ across other years of medical school (Supplemental Table S2).

Additional Analyses

We also examined whether there were any differences between students who participated in the baseline survey only compared to students who participated in follow-up surveys. Participants with baseline data only did not significantly differ from those with follow-up data with regard to age or marital status. However, there were significant differences in sex and race/ethnicity between those with and without follow-up data. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, and cohort, those with baseline data did not differ from those with follow-up data in regard to odds of baseline depressive symptoms (OR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.23, 1.70, p = 0.36), emotional exhaustion (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.45, 1.90, p = 0.84), depersonalization (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.49, 2.11, p = 0.97), or low personal accomplishment (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.68, 1.65, p = 0.82).

DISCUSSION

This study investigated temporal trends in symptoms of depression and burnout across medical school years in a large sample of medical students. In both unadjusted and adjusted models, we found a statistically significant increase in the odds of depressive symptoms, burnout, and its domains: emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, during each year in medical school compared to matriculation (i.e., Year 1). There was no evidence of a temporal trend in the odds of low personal accomplishment in adjusted models.

Our results support prior studies that reported increases in the prevalence of depression and burnout over the course of medical school. Previous studies reported that the prevalence of depressive symptoms was 10–18% at matriculation, 25–43% at year 2, 34–40% at year 3, and 18–31% at year 4.2, 11, 13 Similarly, studies have found the prevalence of burnout increased from 17–21% at matriculation, to 35–41% at year 2, 42–59% at year 3, and to 31% at year 4 and 38% after the residency match).2, 14 Levels of depressive symptoms were lower in our study compared to previously reported longitudinal studies of medical students. The potential reasons could be that previous studies were done in smaller cohorts and the tools used to measure depressive symptoms were different. Together, previous studies suggest that burnout and depressive symptoms increase during medical school years and may decrease around graduation, however rates may not return to baseline levels. In our analysis, it is possible we did not observe a decline in symptoms because year 4 data collection was performed at the beginning of fourth year, instead of after the matching process. Potential factors that may contribute to burnout and depressive symptoms among medical students include difficulty adjusting to the medical school environment, lack of sleep and exercise, ethical conflicts, the demands of clinical training, exposure to death and suffering as a part of clinical training, workload, and student debt.9, 1517

Studies have reported that residents and early-career physicians have high prevalences of depression and burnout. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among residents is 28.8% and the prevalence of burnout among surgery residents is 69%.18, 19 Moreover, an estimated 51% of early-career physicians have burnout and 40% have depressive symptoms; however, the odds of burnout decline among experienced physicians (i.e., >30 years of practice).6, 20 Taken together, this evidence suggests that depressive and burnout symptoms may increase after matriculation to medical school and persists during residency and into early to mid-practice.6

Therefore, medical school may be a critical period to provide timely and system-level interventions that promote awareness and equip students with the skills to improve well-being and resiliency prior to entering training and clinical practice. Potential interventions that are supported by evidence include mind-body training and practices including mindfulness, introduction of well-being curriculum, changing course grading to a pass/fail system, exercise education, and a coaching program for students.2125 However, additional prospective research is needed to investigate the progression of psychological distress from medical school to residency, associated critical triggers, and the effectiveness of interventions in the medium and long-term.

This study had several limitations. First, this study was conducted at a single institution and we were unable to exclude those students who may have taken a break or took more than 4 years to complete medical school. Additionally, although we had data on 90.2% of eligible participants during their first year, only 46.2% of eligible participants completed the survey during the 4th year. This high level of attrition could be due to multiple factors. For one, the first survey was conducted in-person and follow-up surveys were completed online; additionally, follow-up surveys may have interfered with coursework. Moreover, students may have taken a year or more off for further, non-medical school studies. However, our findings are consistent with previously reported data in this population.

A major strength of our study was that it was longitudinal and followed several cohorts of medical students over time using validated measures of both depressive symptoms and burnout. Also, to our knowledge, there was no major curriculum change during the study period that may have confounded our results. Additionally, our sample size was large, and we were able to adjust for multiple important confounders. Data collection was performed consistently at the beginning of each academic year. Importantly, our study adds to the literature by prospectively investigating these associations across multiple cohorts of medical students during medical school using standardized tools.

In conclusion, our study provides evidence that depressive symptoms and burnout are prevalent among medical students and that medical school year is a strong predictor of both. This study highlights the psychological impact of medical school and the need for early interventions aimed at improving well-being among students. Future studies should examine how multidisciplinary interventions provided early in medical school may improve student well-being both during medical school and beyond. Focusing on medical student well-being may result in healthier medical students which may lead to a healthier physician workforce.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1 (43.7KB, docx)

(DOCX 43 kb)

Acknowledgements

The Johns Hopkins General Internal Medicine Clinician-Educator Mentoring and Scholarship Program provided data collection and management support for this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical students. Acad Med. 2006;81(4):354–73. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200604000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hansell MW, Ungerleider RM, Brooks CA, Knudson MP, Kirk JK, Ungerleider JD. Temporal Trends in Medical Student Burnout. Fam Med. May 2019;51(5):399-404. 10.22454/FamMed.2019.270753 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Brazeau CM, Shanafelt T, Durning SJ, et al. Distress among matriculating medical students relative to the general population. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1520–5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M, et al. Prevalence of Depression, Depressive Symptoms, and Suicidal Ideation Among Medical Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(21):2214–2236. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maslach C, Jackson S, Leiter MP. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 3rd ed. Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
  • 6.Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, et al. Burnout among U.S. medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general U.S. population. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):443–51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dyrbye LN, Massie FS, Eacker A, et al. Relationship between burnout and professional conduct and attitudes among US medical students. JAMA. 2010;304(11):1173–80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Frajerman A, Morvan Y, Krebs MO, Gorwood P, Chaumette B. Burnout in medical students before residency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 01 2019;55:36-42. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical student distress: causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(12):1613–22. doi: 10.4065/80.12.1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dyrbye L, Shanafelt T. A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents. Med Educ. Jan 2016;50(1):132-49. doi:10.1111/medu.12927 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Rosal MC, Ockene IS, Ockene JK, Barrett SV, Ma Y, Hebert JR. A longitudinal study of students’ depression at one medical school. Acad Med. Jun 1997;72(6):542-6. 10.1097/00001888-199706000-00022 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: Validity of a Brief Depression Severity Measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dyrbye LN, Wittlin NM, Hardeman RR, et al. A Prognostic Index to Identify the Risk of Developing Depression Symptoms Among U.S. Medical Students Derived From a National, Four-Year Longitudinal Study. Acad Med. 02 2019;94(2):217-226. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002437 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Santen SA, Holt DB, Kemp JD, Hemphill RR. Burnout in medical students: examining the prevalence and associated factors. South Med J. 2010;103(8):758–63. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181e6d6d4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wolf MR, Rosenstock JB. Inadequate Sleep and Exercise Associated with Burnout and Depression Among Medical Students. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41(2):174–179. doi: 10.1007/s40596-016-0526-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cook AF, Arora VM, Rasinski KA, Curlin FA, Yoon JD. The prevalence of medical student mistreatment and its association with burnout. Acad Med. 2014;89(5):749–54. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fitzpatrick O, Biesma R, Conroy RM, McGarvey A. Prevalence and relationship between burnout and depression in our future doctors: a cross-sectional study in a cohort of preclinical and clinical medical students in Ireland. BMJ Open. 05 2019;9(4):e023297. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Mata DA, Ramos MA, Bansal N, et al. Prevalence of Depression and Depressive Symptoms Among Resident Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;314(22):2373–83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lebares CC, Guvva EV, Ascher NL, O’Sullivan PS, Harris HW, Epel ES. Burnout and Stress Among US Surgery Residents: Psychological Distress and Resilience. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(1):80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Del Carmen MG, Herman J, Rao S, et al. Trends and Factors Associated With Physician Burnout at a Multispecialty Academic Faculty Practice Organization. JAMA Netw Open. 03 2019;2(3):e190554. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Agarwal G, Lake M. Personal Transition to the Profession: A Novel Longitudinal Professional Development and Wellness Medical Student Curriculum. Acad Psychiatry. 2016;40(1):105–8. doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0463-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reed DA, Shanafelt TD, Satele DW, et al. Relationship of pass/fail grading and curriculum structure with well-being among preclinical medical students: a multi-institutional study. Acad Med. 2011;86(11):1367–73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182305d81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rosenzweig S, Reibel DK, Greeson JM, Brainard GC, Hojat M. Mindfulness-based stress reduction lowers psychological distress in medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15(2):88–92. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1502_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Thompson D, Goebert D, Takeshita J. A program for reducing depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation in medical students. Acad Med. 2010;85(10):1635–9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f0b49c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Warnecke E, Quinn S, Ogden K, Towle N, Nelson MR. A randomised controlled trial of the effects of mindfulness practice on medical student stress levels. Med Educ. 2011;45(4):381–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03877.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESM 1 (43.7KB, docx)

(DOCX 43 kb)


Articles from Journal of General Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Society of General Internal Medicine

RESOURCES