Skip to main content
Journal of Dental Sciences logoLink to Journal of Dental Sciences
. 2021 Sep 24;17(1):14–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.09.021

Comparison of 2,3,5,4′-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-b-D-glucoside-induced proliferation and differentiation of dental pulp stem cells in 2D and 3D culture systems—gene analysis

Yen Wu a,b,c,, Yao-Yu Chung a,c,, Yu-Tang Chin a,c, Chi-Yu Lin a,c, Po-Jan Kuo d, Ting-Yi Chen a,b,c, Tzu-Yu Lin a,b,c, Hsien-Chung Chiu d, Haw-Ming Huang a, Jiiang-Huei Jeng e,f, Sheng-Yang Lee a,b,c,
PMCID: PMC8740205  PMID: 35028016

Abstract

Background/purpose

Culture environments play a critical role in stem cell expansion. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 2,3,5,4′-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-b-D-glucoside (THSG) on the proliferation and differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) culture systems.

Materials and methods

Human DPSCs were seeded in T25 flasks for 2D cultivation. For the 3D culture system, DPSCs were mixed with microcarriers and cultured in spinner flasks. Cells in both culture systems were treated with THSG, and cell proliferation was determined using a cell counter and a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide assay. In THSG-treated DPSCs, the genes associated with proliferation, adipogenesis, neurogenesis, osteogenesis, pluripotency, oncogenesis, and apoptosis were analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reactions.

Results

The spinner flask time-dependently improved cell numbers, cell viability, and expansion rates in THSG-treated DPSCs. In both the T25 and spinner flasks, the messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of proliferation, osteogenesis, and pluripotent-related genes had a significant maximum expression with 10 μM THSG treatment. However, 0.1 μM of THSG may be the most suitable condition for triggering neurogenesis and adipogenesis gene expression when DPSCs were cultured in spinner flasks. Furthermore, the number of oncogenes and apoptotic genes decreased considerably in the presence of THSG in both the T25 and spinner flasks.

Conclusion

The spinner flask bioreactor combined with THSG may upregulate proliferation and lineage-specific differentiation in DPSCs. Thus, the combination can be used to mass-produce and cultivate human DPSCs for regenerative dentistry.

Keywords: Dental pulp stem cells; 2,3,5,4′-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-B-glucoside; Expansion

Introduction

The prospective fields of stem cell–based therapies and research have garnered increasing attention.1 Based on their self-renewal and specific-lineage differentiation, embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and adult stem cells have been used to study numerous severe diseases, such as heart disease.2 However, producing large quantities of stem cells remains an immense challenge for clinical applications.

Human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), the first isolated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from extracted human teeth, are usually regarded as medical waste after orthodontic treatment.3 Because of their immune modulating and multidifferentiation capabilities,4 DPSCs are considered possible candidates for regenerative medicine. Two clinical studies on pulp regeneration by DPSC transplantation have been reported,5,6 and the results have revealed that DPSCs may serve as promising biomaterial for dental regenerative practices. However, obtaining equivalent cell numbers is the critical concern for systemic regenerative applications. A previous study reported that approximately 1–2 × 105 DPSCs were harvested from a single adult third molar.7 Nevertheless, the clinical applications of human MSCs (hMSCs) require approximately 1–10 × 109 functional cells per patient to replace disease-induced cell loss.8 Thus, DPSC production for clinical use must be intensified.

Three-dimensional (3D) cultures were regarded as a potent approach to expand large-scale stem cell production. Presently, spinner flask bioreactors are widely used to increase cell numbers.9,10 These stirred bioreactors are typically equipped with a glass vessel and internal impeller that efficiently mixes cells and microcarriers.11, 12, 13 These spinner flask bioreactors have facilitated the proliferation of stem cells and triggered their specific-lineage differentiation.14, 15, 16 For example, Wang and colleagues observed that compared with 2-dimensional (2D) culture systems, 3D bioreactors enhanced the osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs.17 Hence, these rotary bioreactors have a pivotal role in switching stem cells. After long-term culturing in vitro, bone marrow MSCs were observed to undergo several critical transformations, such as rapid aging, phenotype changes, and stemness loss.18 Therefore, increasing the number of cell pools and maintaining a high quality of stem cells that meet therapeutic requirements are crucial.

2,3,5,4′-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-b-D-glucoside (THSG), the major component of the herbal medicine Polygonum multiflorum Thunb., is water soluble and biologically active.19 Because of its strong antioxidant capacity and free radical scavenging activity,19 THSG has protective potential to treat human diseases and disorders, including aging20 and cardiovascular diseases.21 In our prior studies, THSG has improved various capabilities of DPSCs, including proliferation,22 osteogenic

Differentiation,23 osteogenesis,24 and reprogramming potential.25 The aforementioned evidence, has demonstrated that THSG is a reliable and powerful modulator for DPSCs. Therefore, its effects on cell growth and the differentiation of DPSCs cultured in a 3D environment should be investigated.

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of THSG on the proliferation- and multilineage differentiation–related genes of DPSCs in 2D and 3D culture systems.

Materials and methods

Reagents

THSG was kindly provided by Dr Ching-Chiung Wang (Graduate Institute of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan) and was extracted and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) for cell treatment, as previously described.22,23

Cultivation of DPSCs

Human DPSCs were purchased from Lonza Bioscience (P1, PT-5025, Basel, Switzerland). According to the supplier's instructions, DPSCs were guaranteed to express CD105, CD166, CD29, CD90, and CD73 and to not express CD34, CD45, or CD133. All cells tested negative for mycoplasma, bacteria, yeast, and fungi. The cells were maintained in low-glucose Dulbecco"s modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. The culture medium was changed every 2 to 3 days. The cells at 70%–80% confluence in the T75 flask were detached and subcultured. Prior to the experiments, the cells were stored overnight in the medium without FBS.3,22,23,26

Cultivation and treatment of human DPSCs in T25 flask

Human DPSCs were cultured in low-dose DMEM to reach 80% confluence in T75 flasks. The cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and were then trypsinized, centrifuged, and suspended with low-glucose DMEM. After 105 cells with a cell density of 4000 cells/cm2 were seeded into T25 flasks, the medium was replaced with DMEM without FBS overnight for starvation. Subsequently, cells were treated with 0.1 and 10 μM THSG in low-glucose DMEM with 2.5% FBS, and the medium for treatment was refreshed daily. Then, cells were collected for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), cell counting, and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTS) assay.

Preparation of spinner flasks

To prevent the adherence of the attachment-dependent cells and proteinaceous materials to glassware, siliconizing spinner flasks are necessary, and a siliconizing reagent (Sigmacote, Sigma, city, USA) was prepared for this study. First, the siliconizing reagent was added and swirled carefully to coat the surface of all spinner flasks. Then, any excess silicon-based product was poured from the glassware, which air dried for 24 h. The siliconized spinner flasks were completely cleaned with distilled water and autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min.

Preparation of microcarriers

Cytodex 1 microcarriers purchased from GE Healthcare (Uppsala, Sweden) were prepared and sterilized according to the manufacturer's instructions. Microcarriers were washed with PBS twice and autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min. Prior to use, the microcarriers were rinsed in DMEM.

Spinner flask microcarrier culture and treatment

To create the 3D cell cultures, 25-mL spinner flasks (LEFOSCIENCE, Taipei, Taiwan) and microcarrier beads were used. In the spinner flasks, 2 × 106 cells were well mixed with 0.125 g of microcarrier beads with a surface area of 550 cm2 in low-glucose DMEM containing 10% FBS. This method was conducted using a microcarrier surface area of 22 cm2/mL and an inoculation density of 3000–4000 cells/cm2.27 After seeding, the cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 24 h for attachment. The cells were then replaced with the medium without FBS and incubated at 30 rpm overnight for starvation.28 Subsequently, cells were treated with 0.1 and 10 μM THSG in low-glucose DMEM with 2.5% FBS (Fig. 1). Half of the medium was refreshed every day, and the agitation rate remained at 30 rpm. Then, the cells were harvested for subsequent experiments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Experimental protocol for the culture system of a spinner flask with microcarriers For the 3D culture, human DPSCs were first cultured in a 10 cm dish until they reached 80%–90% confluence. (A) The cells were detached and well mixed with microcarrier beads in a tube. Then, the cell–bead mixture was placed into a spinner flask in DMEM containing 2.5% FBS. After 24 h' starvation, cells were treated with 0.1 and 10 μM THSG in low-glucose DMEM with 2.5% FBS at 30-rpm agitation. The medium was refreshed every day, and cells were collected on days 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 for further analysis. (B) Optical microscope image of DPSCs attached to cytodex1 microcarriers. Cells were observed on days 0 and 12 under a light microscope (× 100 magnification).

Cell counting

To determine the effects of THSG treatment on cell concentrations in T25 and spinner flasks, trypan blue dye exclusion assays were conducted. The cell numbers were measured at each time point. Cells were detached from the T25 flasks and microcarriers by using 0.5% trypsin/EDTA and resuspended with fresh medium. For viable cell calculation, the cells were stained with trypan blue and counted using a Countess 3 Automated Cell Counter (ThermoFisher, Washington, USA).

Cell viability test

To determine cell viability, human DPSCs were treated with 0.1 and 10 μM THSG in 2D and 3D culture systems for 3, 6, 9, and 12 days. Half of the medium with different THSG concentrations was refreshed daily. After treatment, cells were harvested from the T25 and spinner flasks at each time point. Then, cell viability was determined by incubating the cells in 100 mL of DMEM containing 1 mg/mL MTS solution (CellTiter 96″ AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay Kit; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for 2 h at 37 °C. The results of the MTS assay were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reader (Thermo Labsystems, Waltham, MA, USA) at a wavelength of 490 nm.

Real-time qPCR

To examine the effects of THSG on the mRNA expression levels of proliferation, differentiation, oncogenesis, and apoptosis genes, human DPSCs were treated with 0.1 and 10 μM THSG for 24 h mRNA extraction, complementary DNA synthesis, and qPCR were performed as described previously.22 In this study, the genes associated with proliferation (PCNA, Cyclin D1, RRM2, and SIRT1), adipogenesis (LPL and PPAR), neurogenesis (PAX6, DCX, and SOX1), osteogenesis (ALP, RUNX2, and BGLAP), pluripotency (NANOG, POU5F1, SOX2, LIN28, STAT3, and JAK2), oncogenesis (Ras, HER2, SRC, and C-Sis), and apoptosis (p53, BAD, and p21) were measured. Table 1 shows the sequences of the primers used in this study. Calculations of the relative gene expression levels, normalized to the 18S reference gene, were performed in accordance with the delta–delta Ct method, and polymerase chain reaction fidelity was determined using a melting temperature analysis.

Table 1.

Primers used for qPCR. To examine the proliferation and multi-differentiation effects of 2D and 3D systems on THSG-treated DPSC, the mRNA associated with proliferation (PCNA, Cyclin D1, RRM2, and SIRT1), adipogenesis (LPL and PPAR), neurogenesis (PAX6, DCX, and SOX1), osteogenesis (ALP, RUNX2, and BGLAP), pluripotency (NANOG, POU5F1, SOX2, LIN28, JAK2 and STAT3), oncogenesis (Ras, HER2, SRC, and C-Sis), and apoptosis (p53, BAD, and p21) were measured. All genes expression levels are normalized to 18S reference genes.

Primer Forward sequence Reverse sequence Accession No.
PCNA TCTGAGGGCTTCGACACCTA TCATTGCCGGCGCATTT TAG NM_002592.2
CCND1 CAAGGCCTGAACCTGAGGAG GATGACTCTGGAGAGGAAGCG NC_000011.10
RRM2 GGAATCCCTGAAACCCGAGG TGGCTAAA TCGCTCCACCAAG NM_001165931.
1
SIRT1 TTGGGTACCGAGATAACCTTCT TTGCATGTGAGGCTCTATCC NM_012238.4
ALP CCGCGCCCGCTATCCT GGTCAGATGTTAACTGATGTTCCAA NM_000478.5
RUNX2 CCGGAATGCCTCTGCTGTTA AACTCTTGCCTCGTCCACTC XM_011514961.
2
BGLAP GGATGACCCCCAAATAGCCC TTATACCCTCTGGGCTGTGC NM_199173.5
LPL AGTAGCAGAGTCCGTGGCTA ATTCCTGTTACCGTCCAGCC NM_000237.3
PPAR ACGAGAGTCAGCCTTTAACGAA CCACGGAGCTGATCCCAAAG NM_138711.3
PAX6 CGTGGGAGAAGTTGGAATCTGAG GAGAGTTTTCTCCACGGATGTTG NM_001310158.
1
DCX TGACTCAGCAAACGGAACCT GCGTAGAGATGGGAGACTGC NM_178153.3
SOX1 AATACTGGAGACGAACGCCG AACCCAAGTCTGGTGTCAGC NM_005986.3
NANOG ACCACGTGTTCTGGTTTCCAT AAC CTCGCTGATTAGGCTCC XM_011520852.
1
POU5F1 CCTTCGCAAGCCCTCATTTC AAATCCGAAGCCAGGTGTCC NM_002701.5
SOX2 ACAGCATGTCCTACTCGCAG GAC TTGACCACCGAACCCAT NM_ 003106.3
JAK2 TCTGGTGCCTTTGAAGACCG TACCCTTGCCAAGTTGCTGT NM_001322195.
1
STAT3 GAAACAGTTGGGACCCCTGA TACCGTGTGTCAAGCTGCTG NM_139276.2
Ras TGGTGGGGAACAAGTGTGAC CGAGGTCTCGATGTAGGGGA NM_005343.4
HER2 GCTCCTCCTCGCCCTCTT CGCAGCTTCATGTCTGTGC XM_024450641.
1
SRC TGGTGGGGAACAAGTGTGAC CGAGGTCTCGATGTAGGGGA BC_0011566.1
C-Sis CAGCGGCCTCCGGTCTT CCCAAGTTCTTGGAGTTAAGGGA M12783.1
p53 AAGTCTAGAGCCACCGTCCA CAGTCTGGCTGCCAATCCA NM_000546.5
BAD CTTTAAGAAGGGACTTCCTCGCC AAGTTCCGATCCCACCAGGA NM_004322
p21 CTGGGGATGTCCGTCAGAAC CATTAGCGCATCACAGTCGC BT006719.1
18S GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG NR_003286

PCNA: H. sapiens proliferating cell nuclear antigen, CCND1: H. sapiens cyclin D1, RRM2: H. sapiens ribonucleotide reductase M2, SIRT1: H. sapiens sirtuin 1, ALP: H. sapiens alkaline phosphatase, RUNX2: H. sapiens runt-related transcription factor 2, BGLAP: H. sapiens bone gamma-carboxyglutamate protein, LPL: H. sapiens lipoprotein lipase, PPAR: H. sapiens peroxisome proliferator activated receptor, PAX6: H. sapiens paired box 6, DCX: H. sapiens doublecortin, SOX1: H. sapiens SRY-box transcription factor 1, NANOG: H. sapiens Nanog homeobox; POU5F1/OCT4 : H. sapiens octamer-binding transcription factor 4; SOX2: H. sapiens SRY-box 2; JAK2:H. sapiens Janus kinase 2; STAT3:H. sapiens signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; Ras: H. sapiens HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase ; HER2: H. sapiens erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2; SRC: H. sapiens proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src; C- Sis: H. sapiens c-sis protooncogene; p53: H. sapiens tumor protein; BAD: H. sapiens Bcl-2-associated death promoter; p21:H. sapiens cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A; 18S: H. sapiens ribosomal RNA.

Statistical analyses

All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni's test for post hoc analysis were used to evaluate the data obtained from the cell numbers, MTS assay, and qPCR. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. A two-tailed student's t-test was conducted to evaluate expansion rate (∗P-value < 0.05, ∗∗ P- value < 0.01)

Results

Synergy of 3D cultivation and THSG enhanced cell proliferation in both T25 and spinner flasks

In the T25 flask (Fig. 2A), a substantially higher cell concentration, measured in cells/mL, was obtained at in the 10 μM THSG group at every time point (P < 0.05), when compared with that of cells in 0 and 0.1 μM THSG groups. However, no significant difference occurred in the cell numbers of the 0 and 0.1 μM THSG groups. In the spinner flask culture systems (Fig. 2B), the 10 μM THSG group had more cells than the 0 and 0.1 μM THSG groups did during 12 days of cultivation (P < 0.05) relative to the number of cells per milliliter at 0 days, the spinner flask culture had a faster expansion rate (P < 0.05, Table 2) than that of the T25 flask culture.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparisons of THSG-triggered proliferation in 2D and 3D culture systems. (A, B) Concentrations of THSG-treated human DPSCs in T25 flasks and spinner flasks. (C, D) Density of THSG-treated human DPSCs in T25 flasks and spinner flasks. (E, F) MTS assay. ∗, #, and $ indicate significantly different subsets obtained using the post hoc Bonferroni test if a significance of P < 0.05 was reached in one-way ANOVA.

Table 2.

The hDPSCs’ expansion rate in different culture system.

Days THSG ( μM)
0
0.1
10
T25 Spinner T25 Spinner T25 Spinner
0 1 ± 0.01 1 ± 0.05 1 ± 0.01 1 ± 0.05 1 ± 0.01 1 ± 0.05
3 1.24 ± 0.04 1.18 ± 0.01 1.32 ± 0.04 1.45 ± 0.03 1.8 ± 0.04 2.13 ± 0.3
6 1.5 ± 0.03 1.4 ± 0.03 1.66 ± 0.11 2.00 ± 0.02∗ 2.37 ± 0.12 3.41 ± 0.04∗
9 1.95 ± 0.05 1.85 ± 0.3 2.08 ± 0.08 3.05 ± 0.07∗ 3.5 ± 0.3 4.14 ± 0.1∗
12 2.07 ± 0.12 2.05 ± 0.06 2.3 ± 0.3 4.00 ± 0.06∗∗ 3.53 ± 0.31 5.85 ± 0.02∗∗

∗Significant differences from T25, p < 0.05; ∗∗Significant differences from T25, p < 0.01.

Similar findings were found regarding cell density, measured in cells/cm.2 The highest cell density was found in the 10 μM THSG group at every time point (P < 0.05) when compared with the cell densities of the other groups during 12 days of cultivation in T25 flasks. However, cells stopped growing after 9 days of cultivation in T25 flasks (Fig. 2C). In spinner flasks, the highest cell density was observed in the 10 μM THSG group at every time point. Cell growth in all groups occurred in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2D). Relative to the 103 cells/cm2 at 0 days, the spinner flask culture had a significantly higher expansion rate than that of the T25 flask (P < 0.05, Table 3).

Table 3.

The hDPSCs’ expansion rate in different culture system.

Days THSG ( μM)
0
0.1
10
T25 Spinner T25 Spinner T25 Spinner
0 1 ± 0.2 1 ± 0.09 1 ± 0.2 1 ± 0.09 1 ± 0.2 1 ± 0.09
3 1.24 ± 0.16 1.19 ± 0.02 1.31 ± 0.15 1.24 ± 0.09 1.8 ± 0.15 2.01 ± 0.06
6 1.5 ± 0.12 1.46 ± 0.05 1.66 ± 0.05 2.10 ± 0.04∗ 2.37 ± 0.02 3.13 ± 0.07∗
9 1.95 ± 0.06 1.92 ± 0.05 2.08 ± 0.03 3.4 ± 0.04∗ 3.25 ± 0.02 4.18 ± 0.03∗
12 2.07 ± 0.09 2.05 ± 0.07 2.3 ± 0.12 4.11 ± 0.07∗∗ 3.38 ± 0.03 5.49 ± 0.1∗∗

∗Significant differences from T25, p < 0.05; ∗∗Significant differences from T25, p < 0.01.

Both the 0.1 and 10 μM groups had significantly higher mitochondrial activity (P < 0.05) at every time point compared with that of the 0 μM group. However, the mitochondrial activity of each group in T25 flasks stopped increasing after 9 days of cultivation (Fig. 2E), and the mitochondrial activity of each group in the spinner flasks increased in a time-dependent manner and peaked on the 12th day of cultivation. Additionally, mitochondrial activity in the 0.1 and 10 μM groups was significantly higher than that of the 0 μM group (P < 0.05, Fig. 2F).

In the T25 flask cultivation, THSG significantly upregulated the expressions of the 4 proliferative genes when the concentration was greater than 0.1 μM. Furthermore, the increase pattern of all genes was dose dependent (P < 0.05; Fig. 3A), and similar mRNA expression patterns appeared in the spinner flask cultivations (P < 0.05; Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of THSG on proliferation-related genes of DPSC in 2D and 3D culture systems. The expressions of PCNA, Cyclin D1, RRM2, and SIRT1 were measured through qPCR. (A) Cells were cultured in T25 flasks. (B) Cells were cultured in spinner flasks. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. ∗, #, and $ indicate significantly different subsets obtained using the post hoc Bonferroni test if a significance of P < 0.05 was reached in one-way ANOVA.

THSG triggered differentiation genes in DPSCs in both 2D and 3D culture systems

As Fig. 4A demonstrates, 10 μM THSG significantly induced peak expressions of osteogenic genes (ALP, RUNX2, and BGLAP) when cells were incubated in T25 flasks (P < 0.05). Similarly, all osteogenic genes were enhanced slightly with 0.1 μM THSG, but they dramatically increased when treated with 10 μM THSG in spinner flasks (P < 0.05, Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Osteogenic effects of THSG on DPSCs in 2D and 3D cultures. The expressions of genes associated with osteogenesis (ALP, RUNX2, and BGLAP) were measured through qPCR. (A) Cells were cultured in T25 flasks. (B) Cells were cultured in spinner flasks. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. ∗, #, and $ indicate significantly different subsets obtained using the post hoc Bonferroni test if a significance of P < 0.05 was reached in one-way ANOVA.

In the T25 flasks, the expression of the adipogenic gene LPL peaked with 0.1 μM THSG and slightly decreased with 10 μM THSG. However, a significant increase in PPAR expression was observed in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.05; Fig. 5A). In Fig. 5B, LPL and PPAR reached peak expressions in the 0.1 μM THSG group (P < 0.05).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Adipogenic effects of THSG on DPSCs in 2D and 3D cultures. The mRNA expressions of LPL and PPAR were examined through qPCR. (A) Cells were cultured in T25 flasks. (B) Cells were cultured in spinner flasks. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. ∗, #, and $ indicate significantly different subsets obtained using the post hoc Bonferroni test if a significance of P < 0.05 was reached in one-way ANOVA.

Figure 6A indicates the mRNA expression of neurogenic genes PAX6 and DCX significantly peaked with 0.1 μM THSG then slightly decreased at a THSG concentration of 10 μM. By contrast, the expression of SOX1 increased in a dose-dependent manner. In the spinner flasks, however, 0.1 μM THSG may be the optimal concentration for inducing neurogenic genes of DPSCs (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Neuronal differentiation effects of THSG on DPSCs in 2D and 3D cultures. The. expression levels of PAX6, DCX, and SOX1 were examined through qPCR. (A) Cells were cultured. In T25 flasks. (B) Cells were cultured in spinner flasks. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. ∗, #, and $ indicate significantly different subsets obtained using the post hoc Bonferroni test if a significance of P < 0.05 was reached in one-way ANOVA.

Figure 7A demonstrates that 4 pluripotent-associated genes were significantly upregulated and peaked at 10 μM of THSG treatment in T25 flasks (P < 0.05). In the spinner flasks, however, NANOG expression was particularly high in the 0.1 μM THSG group, although a slight decrease in expression was noted in the 10 μM group (P < 0.05). Conversely, the expressions of POU5F1, SOX2, and LIN28 increased dose dependently (P < 0.05; Fig 7B). Moreover, the pluripotent regulators JAK2 and STAT3 were significantly induced in both the T25 and spinner flasks (P < 0.05; Fig. 7C).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Figure 7

Pluripotent effects of THSG on DPSCs in 2D and 3D cultures. The mRNA expressions of NANOG, POU5F1(OCT4), SOX2, and LIN28 were examined through qPCR. (A) Cells were cultured in T25 flasks. (B) Cells were cultured in spinner flasks. (C) The expression level of JAK2 and STAT3 of DPSCs treated with THSG in T25 and spinner flasks. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. ∗, #, and $ indicate significantly different subsets obtained using the post hoc Bonferroni test if a significance of P < 0.05 was reached in one-way ANOVA.

THSG failed to enhance the oncogenes and apoptotic genes in DPSCs.

In the T25 flask cultivations, THSG significantly reduced the expressions of 4 oncogenes (Fig. 8A; P < 0.05) Likewise, lower expressions of the 4 oncogenes in the spinner flasks were observed in the THSG treatment group compared with the solvent control group (Fig. 8B; P < 0.05). As Fig. 9A shows, THSG significantly reduced all apoptotic genes in DPSCs in T25 flask cultivations. In the spinner flasks, however, p53 and p21 expression decreased significantly in a dose-dependent manner. Nevertheless, no significance was found among any of the groups for the BAD genes (Fig. 9B).

Figure.8.

Figure.8

Expression levels of oncogenes on THSG-treated DPSCs in 2D and 3D cultures. The expression levels of Ras, HER2, SRC, and C-Sis were examined through qPCR. (A) Cells were cultured in T25 flasks. (B) Cells were cultured in spinner flasks. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. ∗, #, and $ indicate significantly different subsets obtained using the post hoc Bonferroni test if a significance of P < 0.05 was reached in one-way ANOVA.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Expression levels of apoptotic genes on THSG-treated DPSCs in 2D and 3D cultures. The expression levels of p53, BAD, and p21 in DPSCs were examined through qPCR. (A) Cells were cultured in T25 flasks. (B) Cells were cultured in spinner flasks. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. ∗, #, and $ indicate significantly different subsets obtained using the post hoc Bonferroni test if a significance of P < 0.05 was reached by one-way ANOVA.

Discussion

Expansion of human DPSCs for regenerative medicine is attracting much attention. In this study, the synergy of THSG and the spinner flask bioreactors revolutionized the proliferation and multidifferentiation capabilities of DPSCs.

For industrial and clinical applications, the expansion of human MSCs can be performed through 2D and 3D cultivations.29 The cell population resulting from 2D cultivation relies on adding containers to increase the culture surface. However, this increase in time, labor, and space intensive in a laboratory. Furthermore, 3D cultivation allows cell yields to reach therapeutic grades by using microcarrier–cell aggregates.29 Among all 3D bioreactors, spinner flask systems (stirred tank systems) have been extensively applied in the biopharmaceutical industry for the large-scale production of recombinant proteins.28,30 Furthermore, microcarriers and cell-assembling aggregates have been used to construct suitable environments for 2D-dependent stem cells.31 In this system, the stirred rate was the key factor for cell yield because human MSCs seeded on microcarriers are sensitive to agitation speed.28 For example, an agitation speed of less than 20 rpm in one study may have induced cell attachment to the microcarriers; therefore, the agitation speed was increased to 30 rpm for the subsequent culture.28 In the present study, an agitation speed of 30 rpm was used for DPSC cultivation.

Subsequently, THSG-induced DPSCs in spinner flasks were observed to have a faster expansion rate than that of cells in T25 flasks (Table 2, Table 3). Both 2D and 3D culture systems can improve cell growth (Fig. 1A, B, C, D), mitochondrial activity (Fig. 1E and F), and proliferative gene expression (Fig. 2A and B) in THSG-treated DPSCs. Cells stopped growing after 9 days of cultivation in T25 flasks because of the small surface area. Therefore, spinner flask bioreactors overcome the limitation of surface area to provide more space for cell yield.

Additionally, several studies have reported the osteogenic, adipogenic, and pluripotent differentiation of MSCs in 3D bioreactors.32 Although 3D culture improved the differentiation and dedifferentiation in MSCs, prolonged in vitro expansion causes various types of damage, such as rapid aging and stemless loss.28 Our previous studies have demonstrated that THSG improves self-renewal and osteogenic differentiation in DPSCs.22, 23, 24 In the present study, 10 μM THSG maximized the expression of osteogenesis (Fig. 4) and pluripotency (Fig. 7) genes in DPSCs under both T25 and spinner flask cultivation, demonstrating that both 2D and 3D culture systems may differentiate THSG-treated DPSCs into osseous and pluripotent lineages.

Researchers have reported that 3D bioreactors differentiate DPSCs into different cell types, including neural progenitor cells and adipose-like structures.32, 33, 34 In our results, 2D and 3D cultures treated with THSG induced neurogenic (Fig. 6) and adipogenic (Fig. 5) mRNA expression in DPSCs. Uniquely, the neurogenic and adipogenic effects of low-dose THSG were observed in the

Spinner flask bioreactors, possibly due to the different culture environments’ influence on these 2 lineages.

Several risk factors, including tumorigenesis and apoptosis, influence cell expansion and differentiation in subsequent cell cultures.35,36 In the current study, spinner flask cultivation significantly suppressed the expression of oncogenes (Fig. 8) and apoptosis genes (Fig. 9) in THSG-treated DPSCs, indicating that 3D culture systems did not increase the risk of tumorigenesis or apoptosis. These results reveal that spinner flask systems can serve as valuable and reliable devices for regenerative applications of THSG-treated DPSCs.

Although more evidence, such as protein analysis, for 3D-cultured DPSCs is required, this study nonetheless illustrated that the combination of a 3D bioreactor and THSG cultivation is a reliable method that promotes dental regenerative medicine.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST108-2314-B-038-033-MY2) and Wan-Fang Medical Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (109-wf-eva-20).

References

  • 1.Liu G., David B.T., Trawczynski M., Fessler R.G. Advances in pluripotent stem cells: history, mechanisms, technologies, and applications. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2020;16:3–32. doi: 10.1007/s12015-019-09935-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kwon S.G., Kwon Y.W., Lee T.W., Park G.T., Kim J.H. Recent advances in stem cell therapeutics and tissue engineering strategies. Biomater Res. 2018;22:36. doi: 10.1186/s40824-018-0148-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee S.Y., Chiang P.C., Tsai Y.H., et al. Effects of cryopreservation of intact teeth on the isolated dental pulp stem cells. J Endod. 2010;36:1336–1340. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nuti N., Corallo C., Chan B.M., Ferrari M., Gerami-Naini B. Multipotent differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells: a literature review. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2016;12:511–523. doi: 10.1007/s12015-016-9661-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nakashima M., Iohara K., Murakami M., et al. Pulp regeneration by transplantation of dental pulp stem cells in pulpitis: a pilot clinical study. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:61. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0506-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xuan K., Li B., Guo H., et al. Deciduous autologous tooth stem cells regenerate dental pulp after implantation into injured teeth. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf3227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gronthos S., Arthur A., Bartold P.M., Shi S. A method to isolate and culture expand human dental pulp stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;698:107–121. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-999-4_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Migliaccio A.R., Whitsett C., Papayannopoulou T., Sadelain M. The potential of stem cells as an in vitro source of red blood cells for transfusion. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:115–119. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sart S., Schneider Y.J., Li Y., Agathos S.N. Stem cell bioprocess engineering towards cGMP production and clinical applications. Cytotechnology. 2014;66:709–722. doi: 10.1007/s10616-013-9687-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang Y., Cheng L., Gerecht S. Efficient and scalable expansion of human pluripotent stem cells under clinically compliant settings: a view in 2013. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42:1357–1372. doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0921-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Serra M., Brito C., Correia C., Alves P.M. Process engineering of human pluripotent stem cells for clinical application. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:350–359. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Eaker S., Armant M., Brandwein H., et al. Concise review: guidance in developing commercializable autologous/patient-specific cell therapy manufacturing. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2013;2:871–883. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fan Y., Wu J., Ashok P., Hsiung M., Tzanakakis E.S. Production of human pluripotent stem cell therapeutics under defined xeno-free conditions: progress and challenges. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2015;11:96–109. doi: 10.1007/s12015-014-9544-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Inoue H., Yamanaka S. The use of induced pluripotent stem cells in drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89:655–661. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.HDi Consortium. Induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with huntington's disease show CAG-repeat-expansion-associated phenotypes. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:264–278. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.04.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Martin U. Pluripotent stem cells for disease modeling and drug screening: new perspectives for treatment of cystic fibrosis? Mol Cell Pediatr. 2015;2:15. doi: 10.1186/s40348-015-0023-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lachmann N., Happle C., Ackermann M., et al. Gene correction of human induced pluripotent stem cells repairs the cellular phenotype in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:167–182. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201306-1012OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bara J.J., Richards R.G., Alini M., Stoddart M.J. Concise review: bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells change phenotype following in vitro culture: implications for basic research and the clinic. Stem Cell. 2014;32:1713–1723. doi: 10.1002/stem.1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chin Y.T., Cheng G.Y., Shih Y.J., et al. Therapeutic applications of resveratrol and its derivatives on periodontitis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1403:101–108. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ling S., Xu J.W. Biological Activities of 2,3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-beta-D-glucoside in antiaging and antiaging-related disease treatments. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:4973239. doi: 10.1155/2016/4973239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Song F., Hua F., Li H., et al. Cardiac stem cell transplantation with 2,3,5,4'- tetrahydroxystilbehe-2-O-beta-D-glucoside improves cardiac function in rat myocardial infarction model. Life Sci. 2016;158:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lin C.Y., Chin Y.T., Kuo P.J., et al. 2,3,5,4'-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-beta-glucoside potentiates self-renewal of human dental pulp stem cells via the AMPK/ERK/SIRT1 axis. Int Endod J. 2018;51:1159–1170. doi: 10.1111/iej.12935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lin C.Y., Kuo P.J., Chin Y.T., et al. Dental pulp stem cell transplantation with 2,3,5,4'- tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-beta-D-glucoside accelerates alveolar bone regeneration in rats. J Endod. 2019;45:435–441. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lin C.Y., Tsai M.S., Kuo P.J., et al. 2,3,5,4'-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-beta-d-glucoside promotes the effects of dental pulp stem cells on rebuilding periodontal tissues in experimental periodontal defects. J Periodontol. 2021;92:306–316. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huang Y.W., Lin C.Y., Chin Y.T., et al. 2,3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-b-D-glucoside triggers the pluripotent-like possibility of dental pulp stem cells by activating the JAK2/STAT3 axis: preliminary observations. J Dent Sci. 2021;16:599–607. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lee S.Y., Huang G.W., Shiung J.N., et al. Magnetic cryopreservation for dental pulp stem cells. Cells Tissues Organs. 2012;196:23–33. doi: 10.1159/000331247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rafiq Q.A., Hanga M.P., Heathman T.R.J., et al. Process development of human multipotent stromal cell microcarrier culture using an automated high-throughput microbioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114:2253–2266. doi: 10.1002/bit.26359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tsai H.H., Yang K.C., Wu M.H., Chen J.C., Tseng C.L. The effects of different dynamic culture systems on cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4024. doi: 10.3390/ijms20164024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Christina Kroppa b., Diana Massaia b., Robert Zweigerdta b. Progress and challenges in large- scale expansion of human pluripotent stem cells. Process Biochem. 2017;59:244–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chu L., Robinson D.K. Industrial choices for protein production by large-scale cell culture. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001;12:180–187. doi: 10.1016/s0958-1669(00)00197-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Serra M., Brito C., Sousa M.F., et al. Improving expansion of pluripotent human embryonic stem cells in perfused bioreactors through oxygen control. J Biotechnol. 2010;148:208–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nath S.C., Harper L., Rancourt D.E. Cell-based therapy manufacturing in stirred suspension bioreactor: thoughts for cGMP compliance. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:599674. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.599674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yan Y., Song L., Tsai A.C., Ma T., Li Y. Generation of neural progenitor spheres from human pluripotent stem cells in a suspension bioreactor. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1502:119–128. doi: 10.1007/7651_2015_310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grimm D., Egli M., Kruger M., et al. Tissue engineering under microgravity conditions-use of stem cells and specialized cells. Stem Cell Dev. 2018;27:787–804. doi: 10.1089/scd.2017.0242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hussein S.M., Batada N.N., Vuoristo S., et al. Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature. 2011;471:58–62. doi: 10.1038/nature09871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pera M.F. Stem cells: the dark side of induced pluripotency. Nature. 2011;471:46–47. doi: 10.1038/471046a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Dental Sciences are provided here courtesy of Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China

RESOURCES