Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Jan 10;172(3):381–384. doi: 10.1007/s10517-022-05397-3

Study the Differences between the Parameters of Learning and Exploratory Activities in Adult Male Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and Baboon Hamadryas (Papio hamadryas)

A E Anikaev 1,, N V Meishvili 1, V G Chalyan 1, E N Anikaeva 1
PMCID: PMC8743158  PMID: 35001311

Abstract

We studied exploratory activity and learning ability in sexually mature male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas). The interspecies differences were analyzed by the following parameters: the level of exploratory activity, diversity of exploratory activity, concentration on the object, learning ability, training levels, and dynamics of learning. The studied group of hamadryas baboons showed higher levels of exploratory activity and learning ability than the group of rhesus monkeys.

Key Words: rhesus monkeys, hamadryas baboons, exploratory activity, variety of exploratory activities, training

Footnotes

Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 172, No. 9, pp. 380-384, September, 2021

References

  • 1.Anikaev AY, Chalyan VG, Meishvili NV. Comparative research of cognitive capabilities of Hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in the solution of problems on manipulation. Vestn. Mosk. Univer. Ser. 23: Antropologiya. 2013;(4):93-102. Russian.
  • 2.Anikaev AE, Chalyan VG, Meishvili NV. Parameters of Experimental Activity in the Study of the Cognitive Abilities of Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and Baboons (Papio hamadryas) Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2020;168(6):793–796. doi: 10.1007/s10517-020-04804-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anikaev AE, Chalyan VG, Meishvili NV. Research of learning skills of different developments in Hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas). Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deayat. 2020;70(1):71-85. 10.31857/S0044467720010037. Russian.
  • 4.Zorina ZA, Smironva AA. History and methods of experimental study of animal thinking. Modern Experimental Psychology. Barabanshchikov VA, ed. Moscow, 2011. P. 61-87. Russian.
  • 5.Curiosity and Exploration. Keller H, Schneider K, Henderson B, eds. Springer-Verlag, 2014. 10.1007/978-3-642-77132-3
  • 6.Hassett JM, Siebert ER, Wallen K. Sex differences in rhesus monkey toy preferences parallel those of children. Horm. Behav. 2008;54(3):359–364. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Johnsen DO, Johnson DK, Whitney RA. History of the use of nonhuman primates in biomedical research. Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research. Abee CR, Mansfield K, Tardif S, Morris T, eds. Academic Press, 2012. P. 1-33. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381365-7.00001-7
  • 8.Marsh HL, Vining AQ, Levendoski EK, Judge PG. Inference by exclusion in lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus), a hamadryas baboon (Papio hamadryas), capuchins (Sapajus apella), and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) J. Comp. Psychol. 2015;129(3):256–267. doi: 10.1037/a0039316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Neff EP. More monkey models for studying COVID-19. Lab. Anim. (NY). 2021;50(2):44. 10.1038/s41684-021-00717-y [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Rajalingham R, Schmidt K, DiCarlo JJ. Comparison of object recognition behavior in human and monkey. J. Neurosci. 2015;35(35):12127–12136. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0573-15.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.St Claire MC, Ragland DR, Bollinger L, Jahrling PB. Animal models of ebolavirus infection. Comp. Med. 2017;67(3):253–262. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Washburn DA, Smith JD, Shields WE. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) immediately generalize the uncertain response. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2006;32(2):185–189. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES