Abstract
Laser-induced graphene (LIG) is a class of three-dimensional (3D) porous carbon nanomaterial. It can be prepared by direct laser writing on some polymer materials in the air. Because of its features of simplicity, fast production, and excellent physicochemical properties, it was widely used in medical sensing devices. This minireview gives an overview of the characteristics of LIG and LIG-driven sensors. Various methods for preparing graphene were compared and discussed. The applications of the LIG in biochemical sensors for ions, small molecules, microRNA, protein, and cell detection were highlighted. LIG-based physical physiological sensors and wearable electronics for medical applications were also included. Finally, our insights into current challenges and prospects for LIG-based medical sensing devices were presented.
Graphical abstract

Keywords: Laser-induced graphene (LIG), Medical sensors, Electric/electrochemical sensors, Wearable electronics, Diseases diagnosis, POCT
Introduction
Sensors are a type of promising diagnostic tools for laboratory medicine [1]. Sensors-driven point-of-care testing (POCT) plays a unique role in the personalized health monitoring, diseases diagnosis, and global public health events warning [2]. It enables home testing, community testing, and large-scale preliminary screening without the support of large medical instruments. It is worth mentioning that the COVID-19 epidemic has attracted more attention to medical sensors which have potentials to timely track symptomatic infection or asymptomatic infection and remotely monitor isolated patients [3]. Hence, developing ultrasensitive and low-cost medical sensors is extremely important.
The development of medical sensors strongly depends on the advances of nanomaterials [4, 5]. Graphene has excellent physical and chemical properties, such as high carrier mobility rate, high thermal conductivity, excellent mechanical properties, and larger specific surface area [6–9]. These performances enable it widely applied in sensors, optics, biology, medicine, energy storage, and other fields. Graphene has been extensively applied in medical sensors such as field-effect transistors (FETs) biosensor [10], artificial throat [11], artificial skin [12], wearable human–machine interface [12, 13], and artificial muscle [14]. Laser-induced graphene (LIG), which was introduced in 2014 by Lin and coworkers, has attracted widespread attention in recent years [15, 16]. It is a type of three-dimensional (3D) porous carbon nanomaterial fabricated by direct laser writing with carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers on polymer materials in the air. It was also named laser-ablated graphene (LAG), laser-scribed graphene (LSG), or laser-derived graphene (LDG) [17]. The morphology of the LIG can be easily controlled by a computer, which is of great significance to the development of highly sensitive electric/electrochemical sensors and wearable electronics for medical biomarkers detection. Polyimide (PI) and its complexes are commonly employed for preparing the LIG. Polyetherimide (PEI), potato skin wood, cork, coconut, cloth, and polysulfone (PSU) are also reported as the base polymer materials for engraving 3D porous graphene [18–20]. In the process of LIG preparation, infrared CO2 laser (commonly, the wavelength of the excitation light is 10.6 μm) [21] is commonly used. The main principle is that during the laser scanning of the base polymer material, the nitrogen-carbon bonds, carbon–oxygen bonds, and carbon–oxygen bonds of the base material are broken, and then rearranged to form a 3D porous graphene structure [22]. In addition to the infrared CO2 laser, ultraviolet (UV) laser [23] and visible laser [24] have been confirmed to prepare the LIG.
With worldwide research efforts, LIG-driven sensors have been successfully applied in different fields, including clinical diagnostics, food safety, and environmental monitoring [25]. It was also applied in energy storage micro-supercapacitors (MSCs) [24, 26], cell culture [27], and fuel cell [28]. Meanwhile, LIG possesses characteristics such as flexibility, chemical resistance, and porosity, which makes useful as a porous channel or electrode material in microfluidic devices [29]. The various applications of LIG are shown in Fig. 1. It is foreseeable that this advanced material will soon bring a new generation of medical sensing device, which will have exciting characteristics and applications [30].
Fig. 1.

Applications of LIG in various biosensors and physical physiological sensors
Several LIG-related review articles have been published. Ye and coworkers told a comprehensive story about LIG from its discovery to wide range of applications, including sensors, electrocatalysts, and microfluidics [31]. You and coworkers summarized and discussed the LIG-based flexible electronics [32]. However, this review is mainly focusing on the LIG-driven medical sensors for health monitoring and diseases diagnosis. Applications of the LIG-driven sensors for POCT and in vitro diagnosis (IVD) are emphasized.
Various preparation methods and characteristics of graphene
The existing methods for preparing graphene include mechanical stripping [33], thermal decomposition [34], epitaxial growth [35], chemical vapor precipitation (CVD) [36, 37], and wet chemical methods [38]. Heat-intensive processing techniques such as silicon carbide thermal decomposition and CVD can be used to grow graphene with almost no defects and high crystal quality [39]. However, the high-temperature conditions limit the types of substrates that can be used for directly growing graphene. Hence, additional processes are usually required to transfer graphene on substrates that are not resistant to high temperatures (such as plastics). The wet chemical method is time-consuming and it requires series of oxidation and reduction steps, extensive washings, and centrifugations. The prepared graphene is less control over the number of sheets and amount of oxygen functionalities. What’s more, aqueous solutions of graphene tend to restack to yield the graphite. These existing methods are often plagued by cumbersome manufacturing processes, high energy consumption, and/or low productivity. In addition, the inability to achieve large-area graphene on divers substrates associated with these traditional methods inevitably limits graphene’s widespread adoption.
In 2014, Lin and coworkers successfully prepared 3D porous graphene (also known as LIG) by direct writing of a commonly accessible CO2 infrared laser system on the commercial PI [15]. The 3D porous graphene has a high specific surface area (≈ 340 m2·g−1), high thermal stability (> 900 ℃), and excellent electrical conductivity (5 ~ 25 S·cm−1). The whole process can be carried out in the air, without any solvent, expensive machine, and costly materials. The method of engraving PI by laser avoids complicated wet chemical methods, and can directly prepare patterned structures, laying a good foundation for the wider application of graphene.
For the laser writing or engraving, various process parameters, such as laser wavelength, power, frequency, time, pulse width, and scanning speed, are all of great significance. A satisfactory LIG-based device is often the result of the synergy of multiple laser parameters. As shown in Figs. 2 and 3, by adjusting the laser parameters, different processing effects can be obtained [40].
Fig. 2.
A The relationship between laser power and laser scanning speed to achieve LIG. In the orange area, no obvious carbonization occurs in the PI film, while in the light green region, the whole PI material was burned away. When the laser parameters are in the white space, LIG with different morphology and properties could be achieved. B Raman spectra of LIG under different laser conditions. C The correlation between the length of the laser power and the LIG crystal width. D The surface resistance of LIG and the ratio of ID/IG dependence on laser energy density. Reprinted with permission from ref. [40], Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 3.
A–H Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the LIG on PI film prepared with various laser parameters with scale bar 1 μm. I–L The cross-section SEM images of the LIG at different laser parameters, with scale bar 100 μm (K) and 10 μm (L). Reprinted with permission from ref. [40], Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd.
Doping heteroatom in the LIG is an effective way to improve its sensing properties. Nitrogen [41] and boron [42] have been utilized as doping heteroatoms to tailor the electrochemical performance of the LIG and to enhance its surface wettability and electrical conductivity. Chen’s group proposed a method for preparing phosphorus-doped (P-doped) LIG electrodes on the H3PO4-doped polyimide (PI)/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) composite flexible film [43]. Figure 4A presents the schematic diagram of the production process of the P-doped LIG interdigitated array electrodes. It was demonstrated that P-doped LIG has enhanced affinity to electrolyte ions on the electrode surface. As a result, the electrode possesses an improved electrochemical performance. The study provides a convenient and potentially efficient method for preparing free-standing heteroatom-doped porous graphene electrodes, which would have broad application in various flexible/wearable electronic devices. A facile methods for the in situ preparation of metal sulfide (MS)-graphene (G) nanocomposite, PbS-G and CdS-G, on indium-tin oxide (ITO) glass was demonstrated by scalable direct laser writing in ambient atmosphere [44]. Through the CO2 laser irradiation of a metal-complex containing polyethersulfone layer on ITO glass, both the formation of LIG and crystallization of laser-induced MS (LIMS) were achieved within one step (Fig. 4B). The fabricated LI-MS-G@ITO possesses the porous architecture of the polyethersulfone-derived LIG, in which the LIMS nanocrystals uniformly decorate the 3D porous graphene sheets with excellent dispersion, showing a stable and fast photocurrent response and good reproducibility.
Fig. 4.
A Schematic diagram of preparing the P-doped LIG interdigitated array electrodes. Reprinted with permission from ref. [43], Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd. B Schematic diagram of preparing the LI-CdS-G@ITO photoelectrode. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], Copyright 2019 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Through the modification or functionalization of the LIG, the detection of analytes can be achieved sensitively and selectively. The adsorption of analytes on the LIG electrode surface will change the electrode impedance, surface area, and other parameters, and the electrical signals will respond to the variety of parameters [45, 46].
LIG-based sensors
The LIG has been more and more prevalent for developing sensors. It shows great potential in biochemical sensors and physical physiological sensors. These sensors have great potential in monitoring the normal life activities of the human body. Some of them can be used as wearable devices to monitor human biomarkers continuously. In this section, the wearable devices were listed independently.
An biochemical sensor is an analytical device that can convert biological or chemical reactions into measurable physical signals, and can provide quantitative assessment of analyte concentration [47]. The basic principle of the biochemical sensor is to combine the identification of analytes and the signal that can be detected [48]. In past years, due to its extraordinary electrical and optical properties, the graphene has been employed in the field of biochemical sensor such as ionic species detection [49], glucose monitoring [50], microRNA detection [51], DNA detection [52], and folic acid detection [37]. However, reliable and scalable biochemical sensor manufacturing and transformation methods are in high demand to fill the existing gap between laboratory research and commercialization [53]. Direct laser writing will be an ideal fabrication technology and the LIG can be an alternative sensing material or device.
Sensors for ions and small molecules
Potentiometric ion sensing is one of the oldest and most well-known forms of chemical sensing that is useful for a variety of applications including clinical diagnostics. Kucherenko et al. reported LIG electrodes functionalized with ion-selective membranes for monitoring the concentrations of NH4+ and K+ in urine samples. This electrochemical LIG sensor exhibits a broad sensing range (0.1–150 mM for NH4+ and 0.3–150 mM for K+) with high stability across a wide range of pH (3.5 to 9.0) in aqueous solutions [54].
Dopamine (DA) is an important information transmitter in the mammalian central nervous system. The continuous overproduction of DA can cause irritability, uncontrollable emotion, extreme hyperactivity, and rapid nerve reflex. Even very low levels can lead to Huntington’s chorea or Parkinson’s disease [55, 56]. Hence, it is necessary to develop rapid, low-cost, and accurate detection devices for the DA. A Pt-Au nanoparticles (NPs) functionalized LIG/PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane) electrode was reported for detecting the DA in a neutral solution and in human urine [57]. The LIG-based sensor exhibited an excellent sensitivity of approximately 865.80 mA/mM cm−2 and a limit of detection (LOD) 75 nM. Meanwhile, it was demonstrated that it showed acceptable selectivity for interfering substances such as uric acid (UA) and ascorbic acid (AA).
The determination of urea is closely related to the human body’s kidney function [58], cardiovascular function [59], and environment [60]. Sharma et al. [61] developed a LIG-based pH sensor for urea detection. The sensor is flexible and compatible with catheters. It can successfully detect urea concentrations as low as M and with the response time of less than 1 min. By comparing the direct connection of urease on the surface of LIG and the electrodeposition of chitosan hydrogel film on the surface of LIG, it was found that the electrostatic and covalent immobilization strategy of chitosan can increase the amount of immobilized urease. These ureases can catalyze the hydrolysis of urea into CO2 and ammonia [62], which can be easily detected with the LIG-based pH sensor. This makes the large-scale usage of the urea sensor possible.
Diabetes is a major health concern in the modern society. The monitoring of the blood glucose is crucial to provide treatment and control plans for patients. Tehrani et al. reported an enzyme-free and sensitive glucose sensor based on Cu NCs (copper nanocubes)-decorated LIG [63]. In the glucose concentration range of 0.25 μM to 4 mM, the sensor showed a linear response with a LOD of 250 nM and an excellent sensitivity of 4532.2 μA mM−1 cm2. The amperometric readout time was within 3 s. The sensor was demonstrated to have a great potential for glucose detection in sweat, saliva, tears, and urine. The porous LIG with an abundance of crystallographic defects and large surface area enhances the electroplating process of the Cu NCs (as the catalyst for oxidation of glucose) and increases loading of the highly reactive Cu NCs as well as accessibility of glucose molecules. N-doped LSG electrodes decorated with MXene/Prussian blue (Ti3C2Tx/PB) composite via a simple spray-coating process were designed for sensitive detection of three analytes including glucose, lactate, and ethanol [64]. The Ti3C2Tx/PB-modified N-LSG electrodes were functionalized with corresponding catalytic enzymes. The enzyme/Ti3C2Tx/PB/N-LSG electrodes exhibited remarkably enhanced electrochemical activity toward the detection of these analytes with a performance on par with previously reported on-chip carbon-based biosensors.
The detection of other small molecules, macromolecules, and cells based on LIG is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Overview of various biochemical sensors based on the LIG
| Sensor configuration | Functionalization method | Matrix | Analyte | Sensitivity | Concentration range | LOD | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIG-ISEs | Ionophores | Urine | NH4+ | 51 mV dec−1 | 0.1–150 mM | 30 μM | [54] |
| K+ | 53 mV dec−1 | 0.3–150 mM | 100 μM | ||||
| Pt-LIG | Enzyme | DMEM | 248.4 mA | 0.5–5 mM | 0.1 mM | [74] | |
| LIG/PDMS electrode | Pt-Au NPs | Human urine | Dopamine | 865.80 mA mM−1 cm−2 |
0.95–3.45 mM 5–30 mM |
75 nM | [57] |
| PEDOT-LSG | NA | NA | Dopamine | 0.220 ± 0.011 µA μM−1 | 1–150 μM | 0.33 µM | [75] |
| LIG/chitosan | Urease enzyme | NA | Urea | NA | NA | 0.1 mM | [61] |
| LIG | Cu NCs | NA | Glucose | 4532.2 μA | 0.25 μM–4 mM | 250 nM | [63] |
| LIG fibers | Au@Ni | Sweat | Glucose | 3500 μA mM−1 cm−2 | 0–30 mM | 1.5 μM | [76] |
| (PEDOT:PSS)-LIG | Pt@Pd | Perspiration | Glucose | NA | 10 μM–9200 μM | 3 μM | [77] |
| Ti3C2Tx/PB/N-LSG | Enzyme | Sweat | Glucose | 49.2 μA mM−1 cm−2 | 10 μM − 5.3 mM | 0.3 μM | [64] |
| Lactate | 21.6 μA mM−1 cm−2 | 0–20 mM | 0.5 μM | ||||
| Alcohol | 5.78 μA mM−1 cm−2 | 0–50 mM | NA | ||||
| LIG | Antibody-PPA | Sweat | Cortisol | NA | 0.43–50.2 ng/mL | 0.22 μM | [78] |
| LIG | MIP | Aquaculture | CAP | NA | 1 nm–10 mM | 0.62 nM | [22] |
| LIG | Cu-DAO | Food | Biogenic amines | 23.3 μA | NA | 11.6 μM | [79] |
| N-doped LIG | NA | NA | MicroRNA | NA | NA | 10 fM | [40] |
| LSG | Aptamer | Serum | Thrombin | − 2.41 ± 0.16 μA cm−2 | 1–100 pM | 1 pM | [67] |
| PtNPs/PAAMI-LAG | Antibody | Serum | IgG | NA | 0.012–15 and 15–352 ng mL−1 | 6 pg mL−1 | [69] |
| AuNSs-LIG | Antibody | Serum | SARS-CoV-2 S protein | NA | 5.0 − 500 ng mL−1 | 2.9 ng mL−1 | [70] |
| LIG | Antibody | Chicken broth | Salmonella | NA | 25 to 105 CFU mL−1 | 13 ± 7 CFU mL−1 | [80] |
Au NSs gold nanostructure; CAP chloramphenicol; DAO diamine oxidase; DMEM Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium; EBT eriochrome black T; LAG laser-ablated graphene; LSG laser-scribed graphene; MIP molecular imprinted polymers; NA not available; NCs nanocubes; NPs nanoparticles; PAAMI polyelectrolyte polyallylamine; PEDOT:PSS poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene)-poly(styrene sulfonate);PPA 1H-pyrrole propionic acid; PVC polyvinyl chloride; ISEs ion-selective electrodes
Sensors for nucleic acids
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small noncoding RNAs (about 21–23 nucleotides in length) which regulate gene expression at translational or posttranslational levels. They were demonstrated as a type of significant biomarkers for various diseases [65]. Recently, a LIG-based biosensor for preeclampsia specific miRNA detection was reported [40]. The authors demonstrated that the nitrogen (N) atoms in the precursor PI have been partially incorporated into the LIG in the form of polyrolic N (1.6 to 4.4%) and graphitic N (from 2.4 to 4.5%). The self‑N-doped porous LIG possesses enhanced conductivity as an electrochemical sensor and improved sensitivity to nucleic acids. Combining with the miRNA extraction and magnetic isolation procedures, the limit of detection (LOD) of the miRNA was down to 10 fM and it showed an excellent reproducibility. The study suggested that the self-N-doped LIG has great potential as a simple and low-cost biosensor platform for the detection and analysis of nucleic acids.
Sensors for protein
Thrombin is a vital therapeutic biomarker for diseases associated with coagulation abnormalities. It is a serine protease which can convert soluble fibrinogen into insoluble strands of fibrin [66]. Recently, a reliable and sensitive LIG biosensor functionalized by aptamer was demonstrated to thrombin in serum [67]. The LIG electrodes with enhanced electrochemically active area were manufactured by a laser direct-write process on PI foils. A universal immobilization approach is established by anchoring 1-pyrenebutyric acid to the LIG and subsequently covalently attaching an aptamer against the thrombin as a specific bioreceptor to the carboxyl groups (Fig. 5). The incubation time of the aptamer and the thrombin is just 30 min. The developed LIG biosensor showed relatively low LOD of 1 pM in buffer and 5 pM in the serum. The resulting sensitivity was − 2.41 ± 0.16 μA·cm−2 per logarithmic concentration unit.
Fig. 5.
Schematic diagram of preparing LIG-based aptamer interdigitated array electrodes. Reprinted with permission from ref. [67], Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society
Immunoglobulin (IgG) plays a critical role in certain disease. The abnormal of the IgG concentration may affect the function of organs and cause a failure to prevent infections [68]. Park’s group reported an electrochemical immunosensor using cationic polyelectrolyte polyallylamine (PAAMI)–anchored LAG as the electrode [69]. The addition of the PAAMI gave abundant clipping sites for fixing antibodies through introducing the amino group. Meanwhile, it increases the stability of the LAG flakes by electrostatic adsorption. Then, Pt nanoparticles were employed to decorate the PAAMI@LAG by the electrodeposition method and thus offered a fast electron transfer rate. The developed immunosensor was utilized to detect the IgG as a proof of concept. Under optimized conditions, the immunosensor showed a linear range of 0.012–15 and 15–352 ng mL−1 with a LOD of 6 pg mL−1.
The global pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues. Instant detection and timely isolation are still the most effective management and control strategy. Hence, there is the urgent need for developing rapid, accurate, and low-cost diagnostic devices. An electrochemical immunosensor based on three-dimensional (3D) gold nanostructures decorated LSG was reported for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis [70]. This electrode was functionalized with antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) antigen following a proper surface modification step (Fig. 6). The analytical performance of the electrochemical immunosensor was evaluated applying the standard solution of S protein in the range of 5.0 − 500 ng/mL with a LOD of 2.9 ng/mL. The LSG-based electrochemical immunosensor can offer faster readout time compared to commercial diagnostic tools and provide a promising alternative method for affordable and rapid POCT devices.
Fig. 6.
Schematic diagram of preparing LSG-based immunosensor for SARS-CoV-2 S protein detection. Reprinted with permission from ref. [70], Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society
Sensors for cells
Graphene has a relatively large surface area and can provide a stable interface for eucaryotic cells and microorganisms [71, 72]. A study reported the usage of LSG as a novel electrode material for cell monitoring based on the impedance measurement [73]. The prepared LSG electrodes showed 25 times larger interface capacitance than standard flat gold electrodes because of their foam-like 3D topography. The LSG electrodes can be prepared in customized sizes from micrometer to centimeter with tunable surface topography and they can be easily integrated to by roll-to-roll manufacturing lines. Furthermore, the LSG electrodes were demonstrated to have excellent compatibility for cell attachment.
A LIG-based electrochemical immunosensor was developed for the detection of Salmonella typhimurium. The LIG electrodes were fabricated by laser induction on the polyimide film in ambient conditions, which circumvents the need for high-temperature, vacuum environment, and metal seed catalysts commonly associated with graphene-based electrodes fabricated via chemical vapor deposition processes. After functionalization with Salmonella antibodies, the LIG biosensors were able to detect live Salmonella in chicken broth across a wide linear range of 25 to 105 CFU mL−1 and with a low LOD of 13 ± 7 CFU mL−1. These results were acquired with an average response time of 22 min without the need for sample preconcentration or redox labeling techniques.
Sensors for physical physiological markers
The monitoring of physical physiological signals (such as the human humidity and breathing rhythm) has a critical role in chronic disease management (CCM), elderly care management, and personalized medicine. Interdigitated array electrodes are mostly used transducers of electrical/electrochemical sensors [81]. Recently, LIG-based interdigitated array electrodes (IDEA) were developed by laser direct writing technology [82]. The graphene oxide (GO)–coated IDEA was applied to develop a humidity sensor with low hysteresis, high sensitivity (3215.25 pF/% RH), and long-term stability (variation less than 1%). The IDEA images shown in Fig. 7A–C are cross-sectional images of electrodes without and with graphene oxide layer, respectively. GO was introduced as a sensitive material because of its unique 2D structure and super-permeability to H2O molecules. Under low humidity conditions, H2O molecules bond to active sites of GO by forming double hydrogen bonds, and with the humidity increasing, H2O molecules bond to active sites of GO in the single hydrogen bond. Hence, it greatly increases the mobility of H2O molecules. The increased activity induced H2O molecules to move, and the moving H2O molecules are ionized into hydrogen ions in an electric field, which can act as charge carriers. Then, they move on the GO layer, resulting in a significant increase in capacitance under high humidity conditions. Thanks to its flexibility, the LIG-IDEA-based humidity sensor could be easily employed as a wearable device for the in situ monitoring of the human breath humidity (the real object is shown in Fig. 7D). The results of human humidity and breathing rhythm are shown in Fig. 7E and F, which shows that the LIG-IDEA humidity sensor can detect breathing rhythm very well.
Fig. 7.
A The image of the LIG interdigitated array electrodes. B Side view of the LIG electrodes. C SEM image of the cross-section of the electrodes with GO coated. D The application of the LIG-based sensor in face masks. E The capacitive response of the sensor to human breathing. F Capacitance response based on different distances between face and the sensor. Reprinted with permission from ref. [82], Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V
A temperature sensor and a flow sensor were developed by Marengo and coworkers based on the LIG [83]. The resistance of the temperature sensor reduces with the temperature increase. Thanks to the piezoresistive properties of the LIG, a flow sensor was fabricated. After a patterned LIG was engraved on the PI film, the copper tape was pasted on both contact points and conductive silver glue was used to connect the copper and the LIG, which can improve the stability of the contact points. Then, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was evenly coated on the electrode to prevent the LIG electrode from being interfered by ions. The results revealed that the LIG-based flow sensor has an excellent performance to response the flow rates (0, 1500, 2500, 3500, 4500 rpm).
Wearable devices
In recent years, wearable sensing devices have attracted more attention, such as sweat biosensors [84] and electronic skin [85]. Graphene holds great promise for developing soft and flexible electronic products. The LIG artificial physical physiological device has the advantages of one-step molding, high efficiency, brilliant flexibility, and low cost, and has a broad and unexceptionable application. Multi-functional instruments based on LIG show great potential in medical monitoring and timely warning. Based on the excellent mechanical and thermal effects of graphene, scholars have proposed an integrated multi-functional device for sensing and alarm on the basis of double-layer asymmetric structure. When the detectable signal reaches the threshold conditions for real-time measurement by the ultrasensitive strain sensor, it can generate enough heat to warn the body. Advances in laser processing technology will definitely drive the rapid development of graphene electronic skin and wearable devices.
Tao and coworkers demonstrated that LIG has a high thermal conductivity and a low heat capacity, which makes it an ideal material for thermal sound sources [86]. Moreover, the porous structure of the LIG is sensitive to weak vibration and is suitable for sound detection. When working as a sound source, the LIG artificial throat can produce broadband sound in frequencies ranging from 100 Hz to 40 kHz. A thinner LIG will produce a higher sound pressure level (SPL). As a sound detector, the LIG artificial throat exhibits unique responses to different sounds and throat vibration modes. LIG can identify buzzes, screams, and coughs with different pitch and volume. When the device applies a low bias voltage, the vibration of the throat will cause changes in the device resistance, resulting in current fluctuations. The artificial throat also can produce sound. When an alternating voltage was applied to the device, the periodic joule heat causes the air to expand, resulting in sound waves. Therefore, the device can act as both sound source and detector. Cough, buzzing, or screeching can cause vibrations in the larynx, which can be detected by the LIG artificial throat, and the LIG artificial throat produces a controlled sound accordingly (Fig. 8A and B). When graphene is deformed, its resistance will also change [87, 88]. Drawing lessons from the principle of the above sound sensor, we can design some equipment according to some deformations that must occur in the daily life activities of the human body, such as heart pulse, breathing rhythm, and finger movement. Different gestures can cause different deformations in different positions of the hand. Placing multiple sensors on the hand may enable communication between aphasia and normal people. Park et al. improved the stretchability of LIG and made wearable devices for monitoring glucose in sweat, pH value, and electrocardiogram [89]. Wearable electrochemical-physiological sensors are integrated, pointing out the direction for future integrated devices.
Fig. 8.
A LIG has the ability of emitting and detecting sound in one device. B The LIG-based artificial throat can detect the movement of throat and generate controllable sound. Reprinted with permission from ref. [11], Copyright 2017 Springer Nature. C Anti-virus mask based on graphene. D The general production process of anti-viral graphene masks. Reprinted with permission from ref. [90], Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. E Comparison of antibacterial ability between LIG, ACF, and MBF. SEM images of (a, b) LIG, (c, d) ACF, and (e, f) MBF after 1-h and 8-h incubation. Reprinted with permission from ref. [91], Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society
Interestingly, LIG-based masks were developed which can be used for sterilization. Scholars processed the graphene inside the mask to achieve a super-hydrophobic state, which can kill virus under the sunlight [90]. The schematic diagram and production process of the antibacterial LIG-based mask are shown in the Fig. 8C and D. Another research group reported LIG-based face masks which can kill bacteria by its photothermal effect [91]. By comparing with conventional masks on the market, the bacteria on conventional masks are still alive after 8 h, while the sterilization rate of the LIG-based mask reached an amazing number 99.998% within 10 min. The antibacterial abilities of LIG, activated carbon fiber (ACF), and melt-blown fabrics (MBF) are shown in the Fig. 8E. The LIG-based mask can block and kill germs more effectively, making the mask safer and more beneficial to the natural environment.
In daily life, wearable devices with timely alarm functions are expected to help people avoid potential dangers. At present, various types of flexible wearable sensor devices are widely studied and applied to different physiological signal monitoring. However, to achieve the early warning function, they usually need to integrate additional early warning devices, such as light-emitting diodes and buzzers, which will increase the complexity of the system. Scholars have proposed a method based on a two-layer asymmetric pattern structure by combining the mechanical and thermal properties of porous graphene [92]. The porous graphene of different patterns is transferred to a flexible and stretchable PDMS substrate, and the device is lifted by patterning. At the same time, it is proposed to use device heating for direct warning, and finally realize the application of integrated sensing and alarm multi-functional flexible devices. Figure 9A presents schematic diagram of integrated device synthesis, Fig. 9B shows a schematic diagram of principle, Fig. 9C, D, and E describe the mechanical performance, pulse monitoring performance, and thermal performance of the developed sensor, respectively. This research provided a novel method for developing multi-functional wearable devices which would be beneficial for health monitoring and timely warning. Figure 9F shows the device has good performance for the temperature warning.
Fig. 9.
A Schematic diagram of the preparation of LIG-based wearable device, B schematic diagram of the measuring principle, C mechanical performance, D pulse monitoring performance, E thermal performance, and F early warning test results of the developed sensor. Reprinted with permission from ref. [92], Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society
Conclusions and perspectives
This review mainly discusses the application of LIG in medical sensors. There is no doubt that the LIG has drawn a great attention from biomedical sensor field and it is making great strides forward. However, the study in this field still stays in the beginning stage. It still faces challenges. The interactions between lasers and polymer materials are a non-equilibrium, nonlinear, and multi-scale process. At present, the mechanism of the interaction between laser and polymer materials is still not fully explored. It is necessary to reveal the interaction mechanism between photons and lattices or electrons. Besides, the LIG is not robust enough as a substrate for electrophoretic coating or surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) because of the porous graphene that may be peeled off or scorched under a relatively high voltage or laser.
There are plenty of ways to extend this research area. The performance of LIG, such as stability, conductivity, and electrocatalytic activity, can be further improved by controlling the morphology, porosity, and surface functionalization. Optimizing its composition through doping heteroatom is an imaginative approach for developing more robust LIG-based medical sensors. In addition, current readout method using LIG as transducer is limited, and it mainly relies on the electrochemical measurement. Other readout methods, such as SERS, fluorescence, and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), should be explored and demonstrated. Further development of LIG-based biosensors, especially wearable biomedical sensors, for detecting biomarkers (including RNAs, DNAs, proteins, virus, and whole cells) is highly encouraged. In all, it can be concluded that continued efforts in graphene laser direct manufacturing will drive rapid advances in the biomedical fields.
Funding
The study was supported by the National Natural Science Funds of China (81871567, 82030065 and 82102502) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M693763).
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Jianlei Liu and Haijie Ji contributed equally
Contributor Information
Feiyun Cui, Email: fcui100@foxmail.com.
Qin Zhou, Email: zhouqin@hrbmu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Cui F, Zhou Z, Zhou HS. Review—measurement and analysis of cancer biomarkers based on electrochemical biosensors. J Electrochem Soc. 2020;167:037525. doi: 10.1149/2.0252003JES. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pendley BD, Lindner E. Medical sensors for the diagnosis and management of disease: the physician perspective. ACS Sensors. 2017;2:1549–1552. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cui F, Zhou HS. Diagnostic methods and potential portable biosensors for coronavirus disease 2019. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;165:112349. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maduraiveeran G, Sasidharan M, Ganesan V. Electrochemical sensor and biosensor platforms based on advanced nanomaterials for biological and biomedical applications. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;103:113–129. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Su S, Sun Q, Gu X, Xu Y, Shen J, Zhu D, Chao J, Fan C, Wang L. Two-dimensional nanomaterials for biosensing applications. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2019;119:115610. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.07.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang L, Liang J, Huang Y, Ma Y, Wang Y, Chen Y. Size-controlled synthesis of graphene oxide sheets on a large scale using chemical exfoliation. Carbon. 2009;47:3365–3368. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.07.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Luo J, Cote LJ, Tung VC, Tan AT, Goins PE, Wu J, Huang J. Graphene oxide nanocolloids. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:17667–17669. doi: 10.1021/ja1078943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen D, Tang L, Li J. Graphene-based materials in electrochemistry. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:3157–3180. doi: 10.1039/b923596e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ambrosi A, Chua CK, Latiff NM, Loo AH, Wong CHA, Eng AYS, Bonanni A, Pumera M. Graphene and its electrochemistry – an update. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45:2458–2493. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00136J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chauhan N, Maekawa T, Kumar DNS. Graphene based biosensors—accelerating medical diagnostics to new-dimensions. J Mater Res. 2017;32:2860–2882. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2017.91. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tao L-Q, Tian H, Liu Y, Ju Z-Y, Pang Y, Chen Y-Q, Wang D-Y, Tian X-G, Yan J-C, Deng N-Q, Yang Y, Ren T-L. An intelligent artificial throat with sound-sensing ability based on laser induced graphene. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14579. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen S, Jiang K, Lou Z, Chen D, Shen G. Recent developments in graphene-based tactile sensors and e-skins. Adv Mater Technol. 2018;3:1700248. doi: 10.1002/admt.201700248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lim S, Son D, Kim J, Lee YB, Song JK, Choi S, Lee DJ, Kim JH, Lee M, Hyeon T. Transparent and stretchable interactive human machine interface based on patterned graphene heterostructures. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25:375–383. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201402987. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang Q, Tan L, Chen Y, Zhang T, Wang W, Liu Z, Fu L. Human-like sensing and reflexes of graphene-based films. Adv Sci. 2016;3:1600130. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin J, Peng Z, Liu Y, Ruiz-Zepeda F, Ye R, Samuel EL, Yacaman MJ, Yakobson BI, Tour JM. Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers. Nat Commun. 2014;5:1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ye R, James DK, Tour JM. Laser-induced graphene: from discovery to translation. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1803621. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lahcen AA, Rauf S, Beduk T, Durmus C, Aljedaibi A, Timur S, Alshareef HN, Amine A, Wolfbeis OS, Salama KN. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors using laser-derived graphene: a comprehensive review. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;168:112565. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chyan Y, Ye R, Li Y, Singh SP, Arnusch CJ, Tour JM. Laser-induced graphene by multiple lasing: toward electronics on cloth, paper, and food. ACS Nano. 2018;12:2176–2183. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b08539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Singh SP, Li Y, Zhang J, Tour JM, Arnusch CJ. Sulfur-doped laser-induced porous graphene derived from polysulfone-class polymers and membranes. ACS Nano. 2018;12:289–297. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b06263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Han X, Ye R, Chyan Y, Wang T, Zhang C, Shi L, Zhang T, Zhao Y, Tour JM. Laser-induced graphene from wood impregnated with metal salts and use in electrocatalysis. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2018;1:5053–5061. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.8b01163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang L, Su J, Song Y, Ye R. Laser-induced graphene: en route to smart sensing. Nanomicro Lett. 2020;12:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-00496-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cardoso AR, Marques AC, Santos L, Carvalho AF, Costa FM, Martins R, Sales MGF, Fortunato E. Molecularly-imprinted chloramphenicol sensor with laser-induced graphene electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;124:167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Carvalho AF, Fernandes AJ, Leitão C, Deuermeier J, Marques AC, Martins R, Fortunato E, Costa FM. Laser-induced graphene strain sensors produced by ultraviolet irradiation of polyimide. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1805271. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201805271. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang Z, Song M, Hao J, Wu K, Li C, Hu C. Visible light laser-induced graphene from phenolic resin: a new approach for directly writing graphene-based electrochemical devices on various substrates. Carbon. 2018;127:287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Soares RR, Hjort RG, Pola CC, Parate K, Reis EL, Soares NF, McLamore ES, Claussen JC, Gomes CL. Laser-induced graphene electrochemical immunosensors for rapid and label-free monitoring of Salmonella enterica in chicken broth. ACS Sens. 2020;5:1900–1911. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.9b02345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cai J, Lv C, Watanabe A. Laser direct writing of high-performance flexible all-solid-state carbon micro-supercapacitors for an on-chip self-powered photodetection system. Nano Energy. 2016;30:790–800. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dukes JD, Whitley P, Chalmers AD. The MDCK variety pack: choosing the right strain. BMC Cell Biol. 2011;12:1–4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-12-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ye R, Peng Z, Wang T, Xu Y, Zhang J, Li Y, Nilewski LG, Lin J, Tour JM. In situ formation of metal oxide nanocrystals embedded in laser-induced graphene. ACS Nano. 2015;9:9244–9251. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Griesche C, Hoecherl K, Baeumner AJ. Substrate-independent laser-induced graphene electrodes for microfluidic electroanalytical systems. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2021;4:3114–3121. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.1c00299. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lahcen AA, Rauf S, Beduk T, Durmus C, Aljedaibi A, Timur S, Alshareef HN, Amine A, Wolfbeis OS, Salama KN. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors using laser-derived graphene: a comprehensive review. Biosens Bioelectrons. 2020;168:112565. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ye R, James DK, Tour JM. Laser-induced graphene: from discovery to translation. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1803621. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.You R, Liu Y-Q, Hao Y-L, Han D-D, Zhang Y-L, You Z. Laser fabrication of graphene-based flexible electronics. Adv Mater. 2020;32:1901981. doi: 10.1002/adma.201901981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cui G, Bi Z, Zhang R, Liu J, Yu X, Li Z. A comprehensive review on graphene-based anti-corrosive coatings. Chem Eng J. 2019;373:104–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang Z-L, Xu D, Huang Y, Wu Z, Wang L-M, Zhang X-B. Facile, mild and fast thermal-decomposition reduction of graphene oxide in air and its application in high-performance lithium batteries. Chem Commun. 2012;48:976–978. doi: 10.1039/C2CC16239C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Berger C, Song Z, Li X, Wu X, Brown N, Naud C, Mayou D, Li T, Hass J, Marchenkov AN. Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. Science. 2006;312:1191–1196. doi: 10.1126/science.1125925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bae S, Kim H, Lee Y, Xu X, Park J-S, Zheng Y, Balakrishnan J, Lei T, Kim HR, Song YI. Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010;5:574–578. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.He L, Pagneux Q, Larroulet I, Serrano AY, Pesquera A, Zurutuza A, Mandler D, Boukherroub R, Szunerits SJB. Label-free femtomolar cancer biomarker detection in human serum using graphene-coated surface plasmon resonance chips. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;89:606–611. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pei S, Cheng H-M. The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon. 2012;50:3210–3228. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Choi W, Lahiri I, Seelaboyina R, Kang YS, Sciences M. Synthesis of graphene and its applications: a review. J Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci. 2010;35:52–71. doi: 10.1080/10408430903505036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wan Z, Umer M, Lobino M, Thiel D, Nguyen N-T, Trinchi A, Shiddiky MJA, Gao Y, Li Q. Laser induced self-N-doped porous graphene as an electrochemical biosensor for femtomolar miRNA detection. Carbon. 2020;163:385–394. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.03.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mamleyev ER, Heissler S, Nefedov A, Weidler PG, Nordin N, Kudryashov VV, Länge K, MacKinnon N, Sharma S. Laser-induced hierarchical carbon patterns on polyimide substrates for flexible urea sensors. npj Flex Electron. 2019;3:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41528-018-0047-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Peng Z, Ye R, Mann JA, Zakhidov D, Li Y, Smalley PR, Lin J, Tour JM. Flexible boron-doped laser-induced graphene microsupercapacitors. ACS Nano. 2015;9:5868–5875. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rao Y, Yuan M, Luo F, Wang Z, Li H, Yu J, Chen X. One-step laser fabrication of phosphorus-doped porous graphene electrodes for high-performance flexible microsupercapacitor. Carbon. 2021;180:56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ge L, Hong Q, Li H, Liu C, Li F. Direct-Laser-Writing of Metal Sulfide-Graphene Nanocomposite Photoelectrode toward Sensitive Photoelectrochemical Sensing. Adv Func Mater. 2019;29:1904000. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201904000. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dosi M, Lau I, Zhuang Y, Simakov DS, Fowler MW, Pope MA. Ultrasensitive electrochemical methane sensors based on solid polymer electrolyte-infused laser-induced graphene. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:6166–6173. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b22310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wei J, Sun Z, Luo W, Li Y, Elzatahry AA, Al-Enizi AM, Deng Y, Zhao D. New insight into the synthesis of large-pore ordered mesoporous materials. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:1706–1713. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Szunerits S, Boukherroub R. Graphene-based biosensors. Interface Focus. 2018;8:20160132. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Farré M, Barceló D (2020) Microfluidic devices: biosensors, Chemical Analysis of Food, Elsevier, pp 287-351
- 49.Ge L, Hong Q, Li H, Liu C, Li F. Direct-laser-writing of metal sulfide-graphene nanocomposite photoelectrode toward sensitive photoelectrochemical sensing. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1904000. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201904000. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Viswanathan S, Narayanan TN, Aran K, Fink KD, Paredes J, Ajayan PM, Filipek S, Miszta P, Tekin HC, Inci F. Graphene–protein field effect biosensors: glucose sensing. Mater Today. 2015;18:513–522. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wan Z, Umer M, Lobino M, Thiel D, Nguyen N-T, Trinchi A, Shiddiky MJ, Gao Y, Li Q. Laser induced self-N-doped porous graphene as an electrochemical biosensor for femtomolar miRNA detection. Carbon. 2020;163:385–394. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.03.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Haque MH, Gopalan V, Yadav S, Islam MN, Eftekhari E, Li Q, Carrascosa LG, Nguyen N-T, Lam AK, Shiddiky MJ. Detection of regional DNA methylation using DNA-graphene affinity interactions. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;87:615–621. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xu G, Jarjes ZA, Wang H-W, Phillips AR, Kilmartin PA, Travas-Sejdic J. Detection of neurotransmitters by three-dimensional laser-scribed graphene grass electrodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:42136–42145. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b16692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kucherenko IS, Sanborn D, Chen B, Garland N, Serhan M, Forzani E, Gomes C, Claussen JC. Ion-selective sensors based on laser-induced graphene for evaluating human hydration levels using urine samples. Adv Mater Technol. 2020;5:1901037. doi: 10.1002/admt.201901037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Umapathi S, Masud J, Coleman H, Nath M. Electrochemical sensor based on CuSe for determination of dopamine. Microchim Acta. 2020;187:440. doi: 10.1007/s00604-020-04405-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Senel M, Dervisevic E, Alhassen S, Dervisevic M, Alachkar A, Cadarso VJ, Voelcker NH. Microfluidic electrochemical sensor for cerebrospinal fluid and blood dopamine detection in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Anal Chem. 2020;92:12347–12355. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hui X, Xuan X, Kim J, Park JY. A highly flexible and selective dopamine sensor based on Pt-Au nanoparticle-modified laser-induced graphene. Electrochim Acta. 2019;328:135066. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rysz J, Gluba-Brzózka A, Franczyk B, Jabłonowski Z, Ciałkowska-Rysz A. Novel biomarkers in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease and the prediction of its outcome. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:1702. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jujo K, Minami Y, Haruki S, Matsue Y, Shimazaki K, Kadowaki H, Ishida I, Kambayashi K, Arashi H, Sekiguchi H. Persistent high blood urea nitrogen level is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2017;4:545–553. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Naz MY, Sulaiman SA. Slow release coating remedy for nitrogen loss from conventional urea: a review. J Control Release. 2016;225:109–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mamleyev ER, Heissler S, Nefedov A, Weidler PG, Nordin N, Kudryashov VV, Länge K, MacKinnon N, Sharma S. Laser-induced hierarchical carbon patterns on polyimide substrates for flexible urea sensors. npj Flex Electron. 2019;3:2. doi: 10.1038/s41528-018-0047-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dhawan G, Sumana G, Malhotra B. Recent developments in urea biosensors. Biochem Eng J. 2009;44:42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2008.07.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tehrani F, Bavarian B. Facile and scalable disposable sensor based on laser engraved graphene for electrochemical detection of glucose. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27975. doi: 10.1038/srep27975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lei Y, Alshareef AH, Zhao W, Inal S. Laser-scribed graphene electrodes derived from lignin for biochemical sensing. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2020;3:1166–1174. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.9b01795. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Huang W. MicroRNAs: biomarkers, diagnostics, and therapeutics. In: Huang J, Borchert GM, Dou D, Huan J, Lan W, Tan M, Wu B, editors. Bioinformatics in MicroRNA research. New York: Springer New York; 2017. pp. 57–67. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Li X, Wu Y, Niu J, Jiang D, Xiao D, Zhou C. One-step sensitive thrombin detection based on a nanofibrous sensing platform. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:5161–5169. doi: 10.1039/C9TB01098J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fenzl C, Nayak P, Hirsch T, Wolfbeis OS, Alshareef HN, Baeumner AJ. Laser-scribed graphene electrodes for aptamer-based biosensing. ACS Sensors. 2017;2:616–620. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Schroeder HW, Jr, Cavacini L. Structure and function of immunoglobulins. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:S41–S52. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Barman SC, Zahed MA, Sharifuzzaman M, Ko SG, Yoon H, Nah JS, Xuan X, Park JY. A polyallylamine anchored amine-rich laser-ablated graphene platform for facile and highly selective electrochemical IgG biomarker detection. Adv Func Mater. 2020;30:1907297. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201907297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Beduk T, Beduk D, de Oliveira Filho JI, Zihnioglu F, Cicek C, Sertoz R, Arda B, Goksel T, Turhan K, Salama KN, Timur S. Rapid point-of-care COVID-19 diagnosis with a gold-nanoarchitecture-assisted laser-scribed graphene biosensor. Anal Chem. 2021;93:8585–8594. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Nguyen P, Berry V. Graphene interfaced with biological cells: opportunities and challenges. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:1024–1029. doi: 10.1021/jz300033g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Le JD, Pinto Y, Seeman NC, Musier-Forsyth K, Taton TA, Kiehl RA. DNA-templated self-assembly of metallic nanocomponent arrays on a surface. Nano Lett. 2004;4:2343–2347. doi: 10.1021/nl048635+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Puetz P, Behrent A, Baeumner AJ, Wegener J. Laser-scribed graphene (LSG) as new electrode material for impedance-based cellular assays. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2020;321:128443. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128443. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhang Y, Zhu H, Sun P, Sun C-K, Huang H, Guan S, Liu H, Zhang H, Zhang C, Qin K-R. Laser-induced graphene-based non-enzymatic sensor for detection of hydrogen peroxide. Electroanalysis. 2019;31:1334–1341. doi: 10.1002/elan.201900043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Xu G, Jarjes ZA, Desprez V, Kilmartin PA, Travas-Sejdic J. Sensitive, selective, disposable electrochemical dopamine sensor based on PEDOT-modified laser scribed graphene. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;107:184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhu J, Liu S, Hu Z, Zhang X, Yi N, Tang K, Dexheimer MG, Lian X, Wang Q, Yang J. Laser-induced graphene non-enzymatic glucose sensors for on body measurements. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;193:113606. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zahed MA, Barman SC, Das PS, Sharifuzzaman M, Yoon HS, Yoon SH, Park JY. Bioelectronics, Highly flexible and conductive poly (3, 4-ethylene dioxythiophene)-poly (styrene sulfonate) anchored 3-dimensional porous graphene network-based electrochemical biosensor for glucose and pH detection in human perspiration. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;160:112220. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Torrente-Rodríguez RM, Tu J, Yang Y, Min J, Wang M, Song Y, Yu Y, Xu C, Ye C, IsHak WW. Investigation of cortisol dynamics in human sweat using a graphene-based wireless mHealth system. Matter. 2020;2:921–937. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Vanegas DC, Patiño L, Mendez C, de Oliveira DA, Torres AM, Gomes CL, McLamore ES. Laser scribed graphene biosensor for detection of biogenic amines in food samples using locally sourced materials. Biosensors (Basel) 2018;8:42. doi: 10.3390/bios8020042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Soares RRA, Hjort RG, Pola CC, Parate K, Reis EL, Soares NFF, McLamore ES, Claussen JC, Gomes CL. Laser-induced graphene electrochemical immunosensors for rapid and label-free monitoring of Salmonella enterica in chicken broth. ACS Sensors. 2020;5:1900–1911. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.9b02345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Heo JI, Shim DS, Teixidor GT, Oh S, Madou MJ, Shin H. Carbon interdigitated array nanoelectrodes for electrochemical applications. J Electrochem Soc. 2011;158:J76. doi: 10.1149/1.3531952. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lan L, Le X, Dong H, Xie J, Ying Y, Ping J. One-step and large-scale fabrication of flexible and wearable humidity sensor based on laser-induced graphene for real-time tracking of plant transpiration at bio-interface. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;165:112360. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Marengo M, Marinaro G, Kosel J (2017) Flexible temperature and flow sensor from laser-induced graphene, 2017 IEEE SENSORS, IEEE, pp 1-3
- 84.Lee H, Song C, Hong YS, Kim MS, Cho HR, Kang T, Shin K, Choi SH, Hyeon T, Kim D-H. Wearable/disposable sweat-based glucose monitoring device with multistage transdermal drug delivery module. Sci Adv. 2017;3:e1601314. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Liu Y-Q, Chen Z-D, Mao J-W, Han D-D, Sun X. Laser fabrication of graphene-based electronic skin. Front Chem. 2019;7:461. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tao L-Q, Tian H, Liu Y, Ju Z-Y, Pang Y, Chen Y-Q, Wang D-Y, Tian X-G, Yan J-C, Deng N-Q. An intelligent artificial throat with sound-sensing ability based on laser induced graphene. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Rahimi R, Ochoa M, Yu W, Ziaie B. Highly stretchable and sensitive unidirectional strain sensor via laser carbonization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:4463–4470. doi: 10.1021/am509087u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Luo S, Hoang PT, Liu T. Direct laser writing for creating porous graphitic structures and their use for flexible and highly sensitive sensor and sensor arrays. Carbon. 2016;96:522–531. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Xuan X, Kim JY, Hui X, Das PS, Yoon HS, Park J-Y. A highly stretchable and conductive 3D porous graphene metal nanocomposite based electrochemical-physiological hybrid biosensor. Biosens Bioelectrons. 2018;120:160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.07.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zhong H, Zhu Z, Lin J, Cheung CF, Lu VL, Yan F, Chan C-Y, Li G. Reusable and recyclable graphene masks with outstanding superhydrophobic and photothermal performances. ACS Nano. 2020;14:6213–6221. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Huang L, Xu S, Wang Z, Xue K, Su J, Song Y, Chen S, Zhu C, Tang BZ, Ye R. Self-reporting and photothermally enhanced rapid bacterial killing on a laser-induced graphene mask. ACS Nano. 2020;14:12045–12053. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c05330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Huang Y, Tao L-Q, Yu J, Wang Z, Zhu C, Chen X. Integrated sensing and warning multifunctional devices based on the combined mechanical and thermal effect of porous graphene. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:53049–53057. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c13909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]








