Isolated Perianal Endometrioma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Abstract

Patient: Female, 33-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Endometriosis

Symptoms: Perianal pain • swelling

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Surgery

Objective:

Unusual clinical course

Background:

Endometriosis, a common condition among women of reproductive age and infertile women, occurs when the endometrium extends outside the uterus. When this endometrial tissue grows and sheds, symptoms will develop. The presentation varies depending on the site involved; however, cyclical pain is among its most common symptoms, along with bleeding and cramping. It is frequently observed in the ovaries and fallopian tubes; in contrast, the anal canal is rarely involved. Here, we report a very unusual presentation of the disease.

Case Report:

A 33-year-old woman with a history of episiotomy presented to the Emergency Department reporting perianal swelling in the previous year. The swelling was associated with intermittent pain and difficulty passing stool. She reported no fever. On examination, there was a 3×4 cm palpable tender perianal mass extending to the anal sphincter at the 11 o’clock position. Bedside ultrasound revealed a mass. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a hemorrhagic 3×4 cm mass in the right perianal region pressing on and indenting the right aspect of the distal external sphincter. The mass was excised completely with local perianal incision over the mass at 11’o clock. Surgical pathology revealed an isolated endometrioma in the perianal area.

Conclusions:

Isolated perianal endometrioma is a rare disease, with only 21 published cases. Its diagnosis is difficult to establish, and a wide range of tests is often needed. Laparoscopic or surgical intervention may be required in cases of rectal endometriosis for an accurate diagnosis. Careful history taking and examination along with a high index of suspicion are necessary to diagnose perianal endometrioma.

Background

Endometriosis occurs when the lining of the uterus, the endometrium, grows in other places such as the fallopian tubes, along the pelvis, or in the ovaries [1]. When this lining breaks down, it usually has nowhere to go, causing heavy menstrual periods and severe cramps. Endometriosis affects approximately 10–15% of women of reproductive age [2]. It most commonly affects women aged 25–35 years. Its incidence increases to as much as 25–50% in infertile women [3]. The criterion standard diagnostic modality is histopathology obtained from laparoscopic tissue biopsy of endometriotic implants. It most commonly occurs in the ovaries, anterior or posterior cul-de-sac, the broad and uterosacral ligaments, uterus, fallopian tubes, sigmoid colon, or appendix [4].

This report describes a case of isolated perianal endometrioma. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for future research and publication.

Case Report

A 33-year-old woman with no known medical illnesses visited the Emergency Department reporting a 1-year history of swelling in the perianal area associated with intermittent pain and difficulty defecating. Upon further questioning, she realized that her pain mainly occurred during her menstrual cycle. She denied any history of fever, discharge, or bleeding. She was a para 2 with a history of 2 normal deliveries. The first delivery was 13 years ago and the last delivery was 8 years ago. Both deliveries required an episiotomy. She started to notice the symptoms and the mass 1 year ago. She had no history of contraceptive use, and she takes paracetamol, with minimal relief.

A physical examination revealed a 3×4 cm palpable tender perianal mass extending to the anal sphincter at the 11 o’clock position. No redness or discharge was observed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 3×4 cm mass in the right perianal region pressing on and indenting the right aspect of the distal external sphincter. This mass showed mixed intermediate and high signal intensity on T2W1, attributed to the hemorrhagic component. There was an associated diffusion restriction but no avid enhancement after intravenous contrast administration. No fatty components were observed. The exact nature of this mass was indeterminate. The incidental finding of a 2×2 cm anorectal polyp with stalk was seen at the right posterolateral aspect. No signs of invasion beyond the muscularis propria were noted. This polyp was seen approximately 3.1 cm above the anal verge. No mesorectal lymphadenopathy was noted.

The patient was counseled to undergo an examination under anesthesia and possible surgical excision of the mass along with anal polyp removal. She agreed to undergo surgery under general anesthesia. For the surgery, she was placed in the prone position. Examination of the anal canal showed 3 polyps, which were excised. The mucosal defect was closed using 3-0 Vicryl. Attention was then given to the perianal area, in which a cyst was found in the right ischioanal fossa. An elliptical incision was made that was very close to the external anal muscle; with careful dissection, it was separated and the cyst wall was excised. The mass was completely excised with intact capsule and a less than 1-cm margin. She was shifted back to the day surgery unit in stable condition and discharged later the same day in good condition.

A histopathological examination of the perianal cyst excision revealed a 4×4 cm endometrioma (Figures 1–3). Surgical pathology gross examination showed brown-tan skin tissues with underlining subcutaneous tissue, and the cut section revealed heterogeneous yellowish-brown fatty tissue. The anal mucosal polyps were hyperplastic. The patient was seen in the clinic, and the wound healed well. The patient was referred to the Gynecology Department for further assessment and treatment. A gynecological ultrasound revealed a retroverted uterus with no ovarian endometrioma. She was then started on a course of combined oral contraceptive pills to prevent endometriosis recurrence.

Figure 1.

Light microscopy photograph showing endometrial glands and stroma (hematoxylin and eosin stain, ×100).

Figure 2.

Light microscopy photograph of CD10 immunohistochemistry staining study showing cell membrane positivity for stromal cells (CD10 immunohistochemistry stain, ×100).

Figure 3.

Light microscopy photograph of ER immunohistochemistry staining study showing nuclear positivity for stromal cells (ER immunohistochemistry stain, ×100).

Discussion

Perianal endometriosis is extremely rare. It usually occurs in episiotomy scars, and can involve the septum that separates the vagina and anal canal, with an incidence of approximately 0.2% [5,6]. A clinician might fail to diagnose perianal endometriosis if there is no visible scar in the perineum and the patient has never undergone an episiotomy. In addition, it might be difficult to make a diagnosis if the patient does not report feeling cyclical pain; thus, it might be treated as a perianal abscess [5].

As of this writing, 21 these rare cases have been published (Table 1) [5–16]. Our case brings the grand total to 22. In the review of these cases, perianal endometriosis affected child-bearing women following obstetric or gynecological procedures, which might transplant the endometrial tissue to uncommon sites. Three reported cases revealed that perianal endometriosis mimicked the presentation of a perianal abscess located in the episiotomy scar [5,6,14]. Fifteen of 21 cases involved endometriosis attached to the anal sphincter, and 8 cases required sphincter repair during surgical removal. Because perianal abscesses are usually handled by junior surgeons, the unusual presenting features of perianal endometriosis may go unnoticed. This can lead to unnecessary operations or an inappropriate diagnosis. It is important to be highly suspicious when making a diagnosis, especially when a patient suffers from recurrent perianal pain and no pus is found. Fine-needle aspiration cytology can help make the correct diagnosis [17]. Transanal ultrasonography can aid in accurately gauging the exact endometrioma’s anatomical location and involvement of the external sphincter. Thus, painful perianal abrasions are indicative of a perianal abscess; when they recur, Crohn’s disease is usually suspected [5].

Table 1.

Literature review including cases of perianal endometriosis.

Ref no.	Country (year)	Age	Presentation	Examination	EAS involvement	History of episiotomy	Treatment
7	Canada (1976)	37	The patient presented with rectal pain, pruritus ani, and anorectal irritation of 5 months’ duration	An indurated, tender, subcutaneous nodule to the right and anterior to the anus	Yes	Not mentioned	The patient underwent excision of the nodule that involved the sphincter mechanism
7	Canada (1976)	27	The patient complained of painful bowel movements with some rectal bleeding	A tender perianal lump in the right anterior region at the end of the previous episiotomy scar	Not mentioned	Yes	A mass of 2.9 cm in maximum diameter that contained several cysts filled with chocolate- colored material was excised
7	Canada (1976)	28	The patient presented with a painful protrusion	A physical examination revealed small tags, slight anal stenosis, and small mixed hemorrhoids	Yes	Not mentioned	The lesion that was excised from the left anterior region was nestled right next to the sphincter mechanism
7	Canada (1976)	36	The patient presented with a perianal lump	A non-tender mass which was cystic, mobile, and in the right anterior aspect of the perianal tissues	Yes	Not mentioned	The structure, a cystic bluish-hued mass fixed to the external sphincter, was excised
7	Canada (1976)	37	The patient presented with perianal pain and a mass	A tender nodule was palpable deep within the sphincter mechanism in continuity with the distal end of the old episiotomy scar	Yes	Yes	The mass was excised and a sphincteroplasty was performed
8	Austria (1999)	25	The patient presented with fluctuating pain in the perianal region	A narrow episiotomy scar was noted; no inflammatory signs, nodules, or fistula orifices were found. In the right anterior position, the pain was enhanced, but no mass was discerned	Yes	Yes	A firmly rounded bluish nodule was excised. The transected specimen was a fibrotic cyst filled with a chocolate-colored fluid. The external sphincter was loosely reconstructed
9	Greece (2001)	31	The patient presented with a palpable painful lesion in the left perineal area	The woman had Painful lesion (3×3×2.5 cm) in the left perineal area good anal sphincter function, confirmed by digital examination and manometry	Yes	Yes	The endometriotic mass was completely excised under general anesthesia with portions of the episiotomy scar and external anal sphincter. The procedure was followed by overlapping sphincter reconstruction
10	Japan (2002)	39	The patient presented with a several-day history of a painful mass in the perineum	A perianal examination revealed redness and swelling in the right anterior direction. On palpation, a soft tumor was felt but there was no evidence of episiotomy scar or of fistula orifices	No	No	The mass was enucleated under local anesthesia without injury to the anal sphincter. The operation was performed uneventfully through a fusiform incision. The tumor mass had a generally clear border and was extirpated without damage to the sphincter
11	Belgrade (2005)	32	The patient was referred with a 7-year history of perianal pain and an increasingly palpable mass in an episiotomy scar	A hard 3-cm-diameter perineal nodule intimately associated with the anal sphincter in the right anterior quadrant of the anus corresponding to the episiotomy scar	Yes	Yes	The mass was dissected away from the ischiorectal fat laterally, and a wide excision was carried out, along with the excision of the involved part of the anal sphincter. Primary anal sphincter repair was performed using the apposition technique
11	Belgrade (2005)	43	The patient was referred with a 16-year history of perianal pain	A firm nodule measuring approximately 4.0×2.0 cm was palpated in the episiotomy scar intimately associated with the anal sphincter	Yes	Yes	Wide excision of the mass together with the scar tissue and partial excision of the external anal sphincter was performed, followed by primary anal sphincter repair in an overlapping fashion. The skin wound was left open to heal
12	Japan (2006)	30	The patient presented with a 1- year history of perianal pain	A hard mass measuring 2×2 cm in the right anterior perianal region adjacent to an episiotomy scar	Yes	Yes	Wide excision, including the episiotomy scar and part of the external anal sphincter, and a primary sphincteroplasty were performed under spinal anesthesia
12	Japan (2006)	43	The patient presented with a 3- year history of severe perianal pain	A digital examination revealed a bluish hard mass measuring 2×1 cm in the anterior perianal region	No	Yes	Local excision was performed under spinal anesthesia. The mass had a clear border and was extirpated without damage to the anal sphincter
5	UK (2009)	35	The patient presented on 3 occasions with a history of severe pain in the perianal area suggestive of an anal abscess	A 2 cm tender nodule in the perianal area at the 2 o’clock position	Not mentioned	Not mentioned	The area was incised and drained twice with no pus seen and an excisional biopsy performed the third time
13	Spain (2011)	43	The patient reported increased size and discomfort in the perianal area in recent weeks without associated incontinence	A 3-cm-diameter tumor in the right anal margin and in intimate contact with the external anal sphincter with a hard consistency and absence of pain on palpation; preserved sphincter function	Yes	Yes	Surgical intervention was performed involving complete excision of the perianal lesion, which was intimately adhered to some muscle fibers of the external anal sphincter that were also removed
14	Poland (2014)	39	The patient came with recurrence of endometriosis located in the episiotomy scar	A 4 cm nodule in the anterior and left lateral quadrants of the anal canal	Yes	Yes	Excision of 2 nodules dissected from the fibers of the EAS
14	Poland (2014)	33	The patient presented with a painful nodule in the episiotomy scar	A 2 cm painful nodule in the episiotomy scar	Yes	Yes	Excision of a nodule in the deeper part of the rectovaginal septum with a small portion of the anterior EAS. Repair of the EAS using the “end-to end” technique
14	Poland (2014)	42	The patient presented with an ano vaginal fistula	An anovaginal fistula located 1.5 cm from the vaginal verge and 2 cm from the anal margin	No	Yes	Excision of the fistula with its internal anal opening; anocutaneous advancement flap; suture of the vaginal opening
14	Poland (2014)	34	The patient complained of a painful perianal mass without purulent discharge or rectal bleeding suggestive of an anal abscess	Mobile and painful 4 cm nodule in the posterior right lateral quadrant of the anal canal 1 cm from the anal margin	No	Not mentioned	Excision of a firm lesion, 3×9×5 cm located in the right perianal space adjacent to the anal sphincter
6	Brazil (2017)	36	The patient presented with anal itching, pain, and drainage suggested of an anal abscess and fistula	Ultrasound showed 1.8×1.2 cm×1.7 mm irregular hypoechoic area between the 9 and 11 o’clock positions comprising perianal fat	Yes	Yes	Dissection of an irregular and large deep nodular lesion invading the deep middle third beam of the external anal sphincter muscle, the superficial middle third beam, and the subcutaneous middle third beam. The internal anal sphincter was repaired
15	Spain (2017)	45	The patient presented with a 2-year history of severe perineal pain and tenesmus	A hard, irregular, and very painful nodule measuring 3×4 cm in the right anterior perineal region	Yes	Yes	The mass was dissected and the resection medially completed from the ischiorectal space was attached, incorporating a small portion of the EAS
16	Romania (2019)	42	The patient presented with perianal pain associated with purulent secretions and bleeding	MRI and ultrasound detected a perianal abscess of about 3 cm	Yes	Yes	Incision, evacuation of the abscesses, fistulotomy, multiple sphincter and ischiorectal biopsies, and wound dressing
Our case		33	The patient presented with a 1-year history of swelling in the perianal area with intermittent pain	A 3×4 cm palpable tender perineal mass at the 11 o’clock position. No redness or discharge was seen from the mass or surrounding area	No	Yes	Incision around the cyst wall very close to an external anal muscle cyst; the lesion was excised

EAS – external anal sphincter.

Anal endometriosis cannot be diagnosed by physical examination, and imaging techniques must be utilized. Although some patients with anal endometriosis may be asymptomatic, many develop stomach problems [18]. There are no clear guidelines for evaluating patients suspected of having the condition, but the most common presenting medical features include infertility and pelvic pain [19]. However, various techniques have been advocated for its diagnosis, such as double-contrast barium enema, transvaginal ultrasonography, MRI, rectal endoscopic ultrasonography, and multislice computed tomography enteroclysis. The regularity of rectal endometriosis is unknown, but among cases of bowel permeation, approximately 90% are contained in the rectum or sigmoid colon [19], while the rest are present in the ileum, appendix, and cecum [18]. This results in changes in bowel habits, such as diarrhea, constipation, rectal bleeding, and dyschezia. When the disease is moderate or severe, intestinal symptoms may be present that may differ depending on the location and menstrual cycle [20]. The symptoms of the condition may overlap with those of others, thus delaying diagnosis or treatment. Perianal endometriosis can result from painful vulvar lumps with cyclic swelling that form subcutaneous masses with inner hemorrhaging. Although this condition is rare, patients with a history of lesions in response to the menstrual cycle should be diagnosed with endometriosis [21]. The presence of endometrial tissue in a perianal site indicates perianal endometriosis. Retrograde menstruation is considered a cause of this condition. During vaginal delivery, feasible endometriotic cells become embedded in the perineum, including the episiotomy site, which leads to endometriotic lacerations. Coelomic metaplasia and transplantation of the exfoliated endometrium may also lead to perianal endometriosis. Anal endometriosis can be successfully managed laparoscopically, as it is both safe and effective [22]. Rectal resection improves symptoms but may result in complications such as rectovaginal fistula or anastomotic leakage [23]. Management of the condition remains tentative, necessitating expert management between symptom severity and extended follow-up viability [18]. Some patients show markedly enhanced quality of life after broad surgery. Anal nodules can become detached by nodulectomy, segmental resection, mucosal skinning, and full-thickness disc resection [18]. Indications for colorectal resection are currently debated, but statistics suggest that hard-line surgery improves patient symptoms. Helpful investigations into endometriosis reported an average time of 6.7 years from the commencement of symptoms of endometriosis to surgical diagnosis [24]. Each affected woman loses many hours of work per week because of reduced effectiveness while working under this debilitative disease. Thus, it is necessary to discover and identify new endometriosis-associated biomarkers while validating existing biomarkers. This will help in the development of more accurate and noninvasive methods for the diagnosis of anal endometriosis. In addition, the varying clinical classifications of endometriosis must be considered in the assessment of prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers [24]. Several methods to diagnose and image preoperative endometriosis have been investigated, including ultrasound, MRI, and computed tomography [25]. An ideal endometriosis test would have high sensitivity to ensure that it does not miss a diagnosis or another pelvic condition that could benefit from diagnostic or operative laparoscopy. Techniques in resolution imaging continue to improve, but their accuracy at this time is inferior to that of direct laparoscopic visualization. In addition, more training in the use of imaging for endometriosis is required to achieve higher sensitivity and specificity rates. Additionally, the cost of using these procedures as a selection tool must also be considered. Therefore, the development of imaging techniques must be examined for use in diagnosis of anal endometriosis.

Data could be collected and evaluated across female populations for the phenotypic manifestation of the condition, its symptomatology, and a method found to finely characterize the differences between patients [25]. Well-designed and adequately powered controlled trials and long-term studies are also critical for the comparison of different treatment options alongside definite outcome measures. These trials could concentrate on results that are highly relevant to women, such as quality of life and live birth [25]. Genomics research will also help researchers further comprehend genetic expression in the endometrium of those who have the condition versus controls. Diet is also important in the etiology of the condition; therefore, studies should focus on diet and endometriosis risk to clarify the function of diet in changing the symptoms and underlying disease. The management of perianal endometriosis includes both surgical and medical treatments. Wide local excision that spares the anal sphincter can cure the condition, with the addition of hormonal treatment if the sites are multiple [5]. Narrow excision near the edge of the endometrioma and primary sphincteroplasty can be successfully used to manage these conditions. However, early diagnosis and treatment are important to preventing progressive involvement in the surrounding tissues, most notably the anal sphincter, to decrease the risk of postoperative fecal incontinence.

Conclusions

Isolated perianal endometrioma is difficult to diagnose and is easily missed by perianal elliptical incision. The presentation may include cyclic pain along with perianal mass. Treatment options for abdominal and pelvic locations of endometriosis range from medical to laparoscopic intervention or even laparotomy. The patient should be treated postoperatively to prevent reoccurrence. Early intervention can significantly improve patient quality of life, and the diagnosis can only be confirmed by histopathological examination.