Abstract
RNA regulates myriad cellular events such as transcription, translation, and splicing. To perform these essential functions, RNA often folds into complex tertiary structures in which its negatively charged ribose–phosphate backbone interacts with metal ions. Magnesium, the most abundant divalent metal ion in cells, neutralizes the backbone, thereby playing essential roles in RNA folding and function. This has been known for more than 50 years, and there are now thousands of in vitro studies, most of which have used ≥10 mM free Mg2+ ions to achieve optimal RNA folding and function. In the cell, however, concentrations of free Mg2+ ions are much lower, with most Mg2+ ions chelated by metabolites. In this Perspective, we curate data from a number of sources to provide extensive summaries of cellular concentrations of metabolites that bind Mg2+ and to estimate cellular concentrations of metabolite-chelated Mg2+ species, in the representative prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and iBMK cells. Recent research from our lab and others has uncovered the fact that such weakly chelated Mg2+ ions can enhance RNA function, including its thermodynamic stability, chemical stability, and catalysis. We also discuss how metabolite-chelated Mg2+ complexes may have played roles in the origins of life. It is clear from this analysis that bound Mg2+ should not be simply considered non-RNA-interacting and that future RNA research, as well as protein research, could benefit from considering chelated magnesium.
Keywords: Magnesium ion, Chelated magnesium, RNA folding, RNA function, near-cellular condition
Graphical Abstrct

Introduction
As a single-stranded polymer with diverse structures, RNA plays critical roles in many aspects of cellular function. For the past two decades, researchers have revealed that RNA has numerous functions beyond serving as the conduit of genetic information from DNA to proteins. For instance, RNA synthesizes proteins, regulates transcription and translation, and perform splicing.1 Equally important, RNA structures are associated with disease; for example, the COVID-19 pandemic is caused by an RNA virus, and mRNA vaccines are critical tools for fighting emerging viruses like SARS-CoV-2.2–5 It is thus essential to understand how RNA folds and functions in cells.6,7
To fold into compact structures, the negatively charged ribose–phosphate backbone needs to be neutralized. Both divalent and monovalent metal cations contribute to neutralization. As a small divalent metal cation, Mg2+ can interact strongly with the phosphate backbone, allowing RNA to adopt compact tertiary structures.8–12 RNA folding and function have been historically examined under non-physiological in vitro conditions, often with ~10 mM free Mg2+ and 0.1 – 1 M Na+, as thousands of previous studies show (see, for instance, refs 13–23). However, these conditions are not representative of the complex cellular environment, which contains smaller amounts of Na+ and higher concentrations of metabolites, proteins, and other RNAs, with very little free Mg2+ (Figure 1).24,25
Figure 1 |. Exposure of RNA to small biological molecules in cells.

(A) Illustration of a cellular environment. (B) Mg2+ ions interact with metabolites and bind to RNA such as the HDV ribozyme (Protein Data Bank entry 3NKB). (C) Crystal structure of glutamate–chelated Mg2+ on a representative coordinated Mg2+ ion.26 Panel A is reproduced with permission from ref 24. Copyright 1969 Elsevier.
In vivo-like conditions that simulate various aspects of the cell have been used to provide insight into how metal ions, metabolites, and crowders might affect RNA folding and function in real cells.25 The concentration of free Mg2+ ions, defined as Mg2+ ions that are fully coordinated by water molecules27, is much lower in vivo than typically used in vitro; for instance, in vivo concentrations of free Mg2+ are estimated to be only 0.5 – 1 mM in eukaryotic cells and 2 – 3 mM in bacterial cells, whereas typical in vitro concentrations of Mg2+, all of which are free, have been ~10 mM.25,28–35 In contrast, the concentration of bound Mg2+ ions in vivo is quite high, estimated to be 20 – 80 mM. In other words, in vitro conditions typically overrepresent the concentrations of free Mg2+ ions and underrepresent the concentrations of bound Mg2+ ions.
This imbalance between free and bound Mg2+ ions under traditional in vitro conditions has consequences for studying RNA folding and function. First, the effects of free Mg2+ ions are likely exaggerated under traditional in vitro conditions. Free Mg2+ ions stabilize RNA structures via diffuse, nonspecific interactions that neutralize the negatively charged RNA backbone.36 Additionally, free Mg2+ ions can also shed their hydration shell and form strong interactions with specific sites in RNA, which promote local structural rearrangement.37 Second, the effects of metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ions are likely underrepresented by traditional in vitro conditions. Many of the Mg2+–metabolite complexes we describe below are weak, potentially allowing the bound Mg2+ to act much like free ions. Moreover, weakly bound Mg2+ ions may actually offer advantages to RNA folding and stability as compared to free Mg2+ ions, as our research suggested. Weakly bound Mg2+ ions stabilize RNA folding, protect RNA from chemical degradation, and promote nucleic acid catalysis.27,38 Herein, we define weakly bound Mg2+ ions as those ions having a KD of > 2 mM, the approximate free concentration of Mg2+ in Escherichia coli. To add to the complexity, biological small molecules such as urea and sucrose weakly destabilize RNA secondary structure and increase folding energy, typically by ~0.5 kcal mol−1 m−1.39 Lastly, approximately 30% of the cell volume is occupied by molecular crowding from proteins and nucleic acids, and such crowding is known to enhance RNA folding and function.24,25,39–47 In sum, the cellular condition is a complex web of interactions among RNA, crowders, metal ions, and small molecules that themselves sometimes bind Mg2+. In an effort to gain insight into the role of biologically chelated magnesium ions in RNA function, we consider the network of interactions among RNA, metal ions, metabolites, and metal ion-metabolite complexes (Figure 1B).
Extensive literature describes absolute concentrations of metabolites in several organisms.48–51 Amino acids and nucleotides are the most abundant metabolites in the three organisms surveyed: E. coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and BAX−/−/BAK−/−-immortalized baby mouse kidney epithelial cells (iBMK) (Figure 2A–C). These metabolites can chelate Mg2+ ions via carboxylate or phosphate groups, producing metabolite-chelated Mg2+ (Figure 1C).27,38,52 In the top charts of Figure 2A–C, we used a pH of 7.5 and an ionic strength of 150 mM to estimate the chelated Mg2+ (CM) concentrations (see the Supporting Information). Indeed, we recently reported that cellular concentrations of metabolites and Mg2+ ions significantly promote RNA folding, stability, and catalysis.27,38,52 In this Perspective, we discuss the estimated levels of metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ions present in various cells, the promotion of RNA function by metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ions, and the implications of metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ions on the origins of life.27,38,52–54
Figure 2 |. Amino acids and nucleotides comprise the major metabolites across three organisms.

(A – C) Absolute concentrations of the top 30 metabolites (bottom chart in each panel) and estimated concentrations of chelated Mg2+ (CM) at pH 7.5 and an ionic strength of 150 mM (top) in (A) E. coli,49 (B) S. cerevisiae, and (C) BAX−/−/BAK−/−-immortalized baby mouse kidney epithelial cells (iBMK).51 Metabolite concentrations in panels A – C are summarized in Table 1. (D) Total concentrations of metal ions in E. coli.30 Panel D is reproduced with permission from ref 30. Copyright 2018 Springer Nature.
LEVELS OF METABOLITES AND METAL IONS IN CELLS
Metabolites are small molecules that have essential functions inside cells. Given how diverse life itself is, one question is how diverse metabolite levels are in various organisms. The metabolome analyses of Rabinowitz and co-workers in different cells (E. coli, S. cerevisiae, and iBMK) revealed a striking concordance in absolute metabolite concentrations among these diverse organisms.49,51 While the metabolomes of these three phylogenetically diverse organisms are similar, one should exercise caution in extrapolating them to other organisms. In an effort to understand the levels of metabolite-chelated Mg2+ present in cells, we compiled data from these studies and others, including a compendium of physical constants that describe the interactions between small molecules and metal ions called Critical Stability Constants.27,30,49,51,55
In E. coli, the 30 most abundant metabolites account for ~90% of all metabolites and are mostly amino acids, nucleotides, and their derivatives (Figure 2A). Indeed, approximately 50% of cellular metabolites are amino acids. Notably, the concentration of glutamate is exceptionally high, being 96 mM (Figure 2A). In mammalian and yeast cells, metabolites are sequestered in multiple organelles. Rabinowitz and colleagues provided absolute concentrations for metabolites in the cytoplasm and the mitochondria by constraining total metabolite concentrations by the free energy of formation of a metabolite in different compartments and total metabolite flux in a cell.51 The concentrations for the cytoplasm were compiled in our study. Even with compartmentalization, trends similar to those of E. coli are observed in S. cerevisiae and iBMK cytoplasms, where the 30 most abundant metabolites account for 95% of the total metabolites and are enriched with amino acids, nucleotides, and their derivatives (Figure 2B, C). Many metabolites can have one or more effects on biopolymers via their intermolecular forces.24 For example, single-molecule FRET experiments and biochemical analyses with several different RNAs revealed that arginine can stabilize RNA secondary structure and destabilize RNA tertiary interactions.56–58
Understanding the levels of metal ions in cells is motivated by the diverse roles metal ions, in particular Mg2+ ions, play in RNA functions. For example, hydrated magnesium hydroxide acts as a general base in the self-cleaving reaction catalyzed by the HDV ribozyme (Figure 3A).59 In addition, Mg2+ ions coordinate a nonbridging oxygen in the catalytic site of the Tetrahymena ribozyme (Figure 3B), which assists in the formation of the catalytic site and the phosphoryl transfer reaction.60
Figure 3 |. Mg2+ participates in RNA catalysis.

(A) General acid–base catalysis of the HDV ribozyme. Hydrated Mg2+ hydroxide acts as a general base to deprotonate the 2’-OH group of U–1, which results in in-line attack on the scissile phosphate. General acid C75 protonates the leaving group of G1. (B) Three Mg2+ ions assist in the formation of the transition state in the catalytic center of the Tetrahymena ribozyme.60 Panel B is reproduced with permission from ref 60. Copyright 2001 American Chemical Society.
Moreover, RNA structural analysis by chemical probing and X-ray crystallography reveal that Mg2+ is required for folding of RNA tertiary structure.61–63 In addition to its effect on RNA alone, Mg2+ assists in ribonucleoprotein functions. For example, RNase P, which cleaves the 5′-leader sequence of tRNA, uses Mg2+ ions to stabilize the structure of the RNaseP–tRNA complex and to promote catalytic activity.64 Thus, Mg2+ has integral and diverse roles in biological reactions.
The metalome analysis of Outten and co-workers provides the total (free plus bound) concentrations of metal ions in E. coli, where Mg2+ is an abundant divalent metal ion and its total concentration is estimated to be an astounding 54 mM (Figure 2D).30,32 In a different study, Moncany and Kellenberger reported that the cellular concentration of Mg2+ in E. coli is 90 – 110 mM, nearly double that of Outten et al., emphasizing the high total Mg2+ concentration in vivo and suggesting that the total Mg2+ concentration may depend on growth conditions and methods of cell collection, both of which differed in this study.28 van Eunen et al. reported a total concentration of Mg2+ in S. cerevisiae as high as 51 mM65, implying that the total Mg2+ concentration may be in a similar range in E. coli and S. cerevisiae.
CHELATION OF MG2+ BY VARIOUS METABOLITES IN CELLS
As mentioned in the previous section, cells contain a total concentration of Mg2+ ions ranging from 50 to 100 mM. The fractionation of metabolite-chelated Mg2+ complexes and their potential for influence on RNA structure and function are thus of great interest. Tyrrell and co-workers used an intracellular chelator of Mg2+ to estimate the free concentrations of Mg2+ in E. coli, where they determined it to be only ~1 mM, much lower than the total concentration of Mg2+ of 50 – 100 mM.35 This difference implies that a large fraction of Mg2+ is chelated by cellular components. Amino acids, the most abundant metabolites, have at least one carboxylate, which can interact weakly with Mg2+ (Figure.1C).55 Notably, the cellularly abundant amino acids aspartate and glutamate have two carboxylates, which facilitate Mg2+ binding at the pH at which the amine group of the amino acid is protonated.66–68 The identity and estimated concentrations of the chelated Mg2+ ions in E. coli, yeast, and the mammalian cells are provided in Figure 2A–C and Table 1; the concentrations of chelated Mg2+ ions are calculated from chemical equilibria (Table 1), as described in detail previously27,38 but taking into account the physiological pH and ionic strength (see the Supporting Information). Briefly, apparent dissociation constants for a metabolite binding to Mg2+ ions are affected by both pH and ionic strength. Protonation of metabolites at cellular pH can reduce the fraction of metabolite in a metal ion binding-competent protonation state, and screening via nonspecific ion pairing can reduce the activity of metabolites and Mg2+ ions in aqueous solution. The Supporting Information describes methods for accounting for ionic strength and pH and for calculating apparent KD values, which are in reasonable agreement with isothermal titration experiments performed at physiological pH and ionic strength (Supplementary Table 2). All data and an apparent KD calculating program are available at https://github.com/JPSieg/MetaboMgITC for reconstitution on any console. Even when the ionic strength and pH are taken into account, a majority of the 30 most abundant metabolites in E. coli, S. cerevisiae, and iBMK have an affinity for Mg2+ 55,69 and are estimated to form chelated Mg2+ complexes in cells at concentrations ranging from submillimolar to millimolar (Table 1). In E. coli cells, glutamate, glutathione, and nucleotides are the major chelators of Mg2+ (Figure 2A–C and Table 1).27,38
Table 1 |.
Absolute concentrations of metabolites and chelated Mg2+.
| Species | Metabolites | Cellular Conc. [mM] | KD for Mg2+a [mM] | Chelated Mgb [mM] | Expected Biological Effect (EBE)c (KD × [Chelated Mg]) | Chelated Mg Source |
Refs | Notes d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E.coli | L-Glutamic acid | 96 | 31.8 | 5.7 | 180.6 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | Glutathione | 16.6 | 21.5 | 1.4 | 30.4 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | Fructose 1,6-BP | 15.2 | 9.2 | 2.7 | 25.0 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | ATP | 9.63 | 0.1 | 9.2 | 0.92 | ITC in this article | 49 | |
| E.coli | UDP-GlcNAC | 9.24 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 15.2 | 38 | 38,49 | |
| E.coli | UTP | 8.29 | 0.2 | 7.6 | 1.3 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | Glucose 6-P | 7.88 | 5.1 | 2.2 | 11.4 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | GTP | 4.87 | 0.2 | 4.5 | 0.88 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | dTTP | 4.62 | 0.2 | 4.3 | 0.84 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | L-Aspartic acid | 4.23 | 135.4 | 0.062 | 8.3 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | L-Valine | 4.02 | 5651.0 | 0.0014 | 8.0 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | L-Glutamine | 3.81 | 28154.1 | 0.00027 | 7.6 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | 6-P-gluconic acid | 3.77 | 9.0 | 0.69 | 6.2 | Predicted from chemical structure | 49,55 | Used P-enolpyruvate |
| E.coli | Pyruvic acid | 3.66 | 92.0 | 0.078 | 7.2 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | diOH-ACN-P | 3.06 | 22.3 | 0.25 | 5.6 | Predicted from chemical structure | 49,55 | Used Glycerol 1-P |
| E.coli | CTP | 2.73 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 0.5 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | L-Alanine | 2.55 | 2606.4 | 0.0019 | 5.1 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | NAD | 2.55 | 9.1 | 0.5 | 4.2 | Predicted from chemical structure | 49,55 | Used UDP-GlcNAC |
| E.coli | Fructose 6-P | 2.52 | 40.8 | 0.12 | 4.8 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | UDP-glucose | 2.5 | 3.3 | 0.94 | 3.1 | 38 | 38,49 | |
| E.coli | Oxidized glutathione | 2.37 | 21.5 | 0.20 | 4.3 | Predicted from chemical structure | 49,55 | Used Glutahione |
| E.coli | uridine | 2.09 | NA | NA | NA | – | 49 | |
| E.coli | Citric acid | 1.96 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 0.9 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | UDP | 1.79 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | (S)-Malic acid | 1.68 | 26.2 | 0.12 | 3.1 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | 3-P-D-glyceric acid | 1.54 | 7.8 | 0.32 | 2.5 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | Glyceric acid | 1.41 | 159.9 | 0.017 | 2.8 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | CoA | 1.37 | 9.1 | 0.25 | 2.2 | Predicted from chemical structure | 49,55 | Used UDP-GlcNAC |
| E.coli | Citrulline | 1.35 | 2741.2 | 0.00098 | 2.7 | This article | 49,55 | |
| E.coli | L-Threonine | 1.26 | 1384.5 | 0.0018 | 2.5 | This article | 49,55 | |
|
Total conc. (E.coli) |
– | 225 | – | 48 | – | This article | – | – |
| iBMK | L-Glutamic acid | 63.8 | 31.8 | 1.0 | 31.4 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | L-Glutamine | 17.2 | 28154.1 | 0.0003 | 8.6 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | L-Aspartic acid | 14.9 | 135.4 | 0.055 | 7.4 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | UDP-GlcNAC | 8.97 | 9.1 | 0.47 | 4.3 | 38 | 38,51 | |
| iBMK | L-Alanine | 6.98 | 2606.4 | 0.0013 | 3.5 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | L-Threonine | 6.69 | 1384.5 | 0.0024 | 3.3 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | Pyruvic acid | 5.88 | 92.0 | 0.031 | 2.9 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | L-Serine | 4.86 | 8696.5 | 0.00028 | 2.4 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | ATP | 4.67 | 0.1 | 4.2 | 0.2 | ITC in this article | 51 | |
| iBMK | L-Glycine | 3.71 | 2606.4 | 0.00071 | 1.9 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used Alanine |
| iBMK | Glutathione | 3.09 | 21.5 | 0.070 | 1.5 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | N-ACN-L-aspartic acid | 2.9 | 135.4 | 0.011 | 1.4 | This article | 51,55 | Used Aspartic acid |
| iBMK | Phenylpyruvic acid | 1.77 | 92.0 | 0.0096 | 0.88 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used Pyruvic acid |
| iBMK | L-Isoleucine | 1.76 | 2358.4 | 0.00037 | 0.88 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | L-Leucine | 1.76 | 2583.3 | 0.00034 | 0.99 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | UTP | 1.76 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.25 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | diOH-ACN-P | 1.63 | 22.3 | 0.036 | 0.80 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used Glycerol 1-P |
| iBMK | UDP-glucose | 1.53 | 3.3 | 0.20 | 0.66 | 38 | 38,51 | |
| iBMK | Fructose 1,6-BP | 1.52 | 9.2 | 0.078 | 0.72 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | L-Valine | 1.51 | 5651.0 | 0.00013 | 0.75 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | (S)-Malic acid | 1.39 | 26.2 | 0.026 | 0.68 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | L-Proline | 1.23 | 2606.4 | 0.00024 | 0.61 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used Alanine |
| iBMK | L-Tyrosine | 0.938 | 2608356.6 | 1.7e-7 | 0.47 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | CTP | 0.897 | 0.2 | 0.64 | 0.13 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | L-Phenylalanine | 0.84 | 2606.4 | 0.00016 | 0.42 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used Alanine |
| iBMK | dihydro-orotate | 0.735 | 376.1 | 0.00098 | 0.37 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used Benzoic acid |
| iBMK | GTP | 0.677 | 0.2 | 0.48 | 0.097 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | Glucose 6-P | 0.675 | 5.1 | 0.060 | 0.31 | This article | 51,55 | |
| iBMK | L-Methionine | 0.639 | 2606.4 | 0.00012 | 0.32 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used Alanine |
|
Total conc. (iBMK) |
– | 165.7 | – | 9.5 | – | This article | – | – |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Glutamic acid | 39.1 | 31.8 | 0.61 | 19.2 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Glutamine | 35.5 | 28154.1 | 0.00063 | 17.7 | This article | 51 | |
| S. cerevisiae | Citrulline | 27 | 2741.2 | 0.0049 | 13.5 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Alanine | 22.3 | 2606.4 | 0.0043 | 11.1 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Arginine | 21.8 | 2535.0 | 0.0043 | 10.9 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | Pyruvic acid | 9.4 | 92.0 | 0.051 | 4.7 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | Trehalose | 8.4 | NA | NA | NA | – | 51 | |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Threonine | 6.69 | 1384.5 | 0.0024 | 3.3 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Aspartic acid | 6.29 | 135.4 | 0.023 | 3.1 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Asparagine | 5.69 | 14753.3 | 0.00019 | 2.8 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | Glucose 6-P | 5.31 | 5.1 | 0.47 | 2.4 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Lysine | 5.16 | 10776896 | 2.4e-7 | 2.6 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | CoA | 4.9 | 9.1 | 0.26 | 2.3 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used UDP-GlcNAC |
| S. cerevisiae | Ornithine | 4.49 | 10776896 | 2.0e-7 | 2.2 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used Lysine |
| S. cerevisiae | Glutathione | 4.3 | 21.5 | 0.098 | 2.1 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | Fructose 1,6-BP | 4 | 9.2 | 0.21 | 1.9 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Serine | 3.87 | 8696.5 | 0.00022 | 1.9 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Valine | 2.5 | 5651.0 | 0.00022 | 1.2 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | NAD | 2.44 | 9.1 | 0.13 | 1.2 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used UDP-GlcNAC |
| S. cerevisiae | Fructose 6-P | 2.37 | 40.8 | 0.029 | 1.2 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | ATP | 1.93 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.16 | ITC in this article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | Citric acid | 1.49 | 0.6 | 0.68 | 0.41 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | L-Proline | 1.36 | 2606.4 | 0.00026 | 0.68 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used Alanine |
| S. cerevisiae | UDP-GlcNAC | 1.02 | 9.1 | 0.053 | 0.48 | 38 | 38,51 | |
| S. cerevisiae | (S)-Malic acid | 0.925 | 26.2 | 0.017 | 0.45 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | diOH-ACN-P | 0.823 | 22.3 | 0.018 | 0.40 | Predicted from chemical structure | 51,55 | Used Glycerol 1-P |
| S. cerevisiae | Succinic acid | 0.635 | 77.8 | 0.0040 | 0.32 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | 3-P-D-glyceric acid | 0.578 | 7.8 | 0.035 | 0.27 | This article | 51,55 | |
| S. cerevisiae | UTP | 0.494 | 0.2 | 0.35 | 0.070 | This article | 51,55 | |
|
Total conc. (S. cerevisiae) |
– | 231.6 | – | 5.5 | – | This article | – | – |
Reported KD values are apparent dissociation constants at physiological pH (pH 7.5) and an ionic strength of 0.15 M. KD values were either determined with isothermal titration calorimetry or calculated as described in the Supporting Information.
Chelated Mg2+ species that have large “Expected Biological Effect” (EBE) values are anticipated to have significant interactions with RNA because the Mg2+ is weakly chelated and the concentration of the chelated species is high.
Mg2+ binding constants were not available for all metabolites in the data set. Binding constants for the closest chemical species to the metabolite of interest were used to estimate concentrations of chelated Mg2+. For example, the UDP-GlcNac constant was used as a stand in for NAD and CoA, as all three metabolites share the same nucleotide diphosphate linked to X (NUDIX) moiety, which is the basis of the NUDIX metabolites interacting with Mg2+.
The likelihood of a metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ion affecting RNA function is related to the strength of the binding interaction between Mg2+ and the metabolite and to abundance. Tightly chelated Mg2+ ions are unlikely to have any effect on RNA function. For instance, the apparent KD values for interaction of Mg2+ with EDTA and citrate are ~3 μM and ~0.6 mM, respectively, at pH 7.5 and an ionic strength of 0.15 M.55 Indeed, we showed that EDTA-chelated Mg2+, with six sites of chelation, has little effect on RNA thermostability and ribozyme activity.27,54 Intermediate-strength chelation of Mg2+ with three or four sites of chelation, such as in citrate, also has little effect on RNA thermostability.27 In contrast, weak chelation of Mg2+ ions with ligands such as glutamate or malate leads to a gain of RNA function.27
As a semi-quantitative guide for the contribution of chelated Mg2+ to the promotion of RNA function, we provide a statistic we call the “expected biological effect (EBE)” in Table 1, which is the product of the dissociation constant and chelated species abundance (KD [chelated Mg2+]). The EBE reflects the requirement that chelated Mg2+ be both weakly chelated and abundant to participate in interactions with RNA in biology. For example, if the KD is too low, the Mg2+ will be too tightly sequestered to interact with the RNA, even if the concentration of the metabolite–Mg2+ complex is high. The low KD will be reflected in a low EBE score. Likewise, if the metabolite is not abundant, there will be little metabolite-Mg2+ complex to interact with the RNA. This too will be reflected by a low EBE score. However, metabolites with a relatively high abundance in cells and a relatively high KD (weakly chelated), will produce high concentrations of the metabolite-Mg2+ complex that can interact with RNA, resulting in a high EBE score. At the top of the EBE ranking in E. coli is L-glutamic acid (EBE of 181), followed by glutathione (EBE of 30), fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (EBE of 25), UDP-GlcNAc (EBE of 15), and glucose-6-phosphate (EBE of 11) (Table 1). The presence of amino acids glutamate (EBE of 181), aspartate (EBE of 8.3), valine (EBE of 8.0), and glutamine (EBE of 7.6) (total EBE of 205), along with the diphosphates UDP-GlcNAC (EBE of 15.2), NAD (EBE of 4.2), UDP-glucose (EBE of 3.1) and UDP (EBE of 1.3) (total EBE of 24), is consistent with our previous studies.27,38 Additionally, it is possible that Mg2+ ions are weakly chelated by clusters of acidic amino acids on the surface of proteins54,70, further increasing the concentration of weakly chelated Mg2+ in the cellular environment.
MECHANISTIC INSIGHTS INTO THE EFFECTS OF MG2+ CHELATION ON RNA: STABILIZATION, PROTECTION, AND PROMOTION OF RNA CATALYSIS
We recently investigated the effects of weakly chelated Mg2+ ions on RNA function. We focused our efforts on glutamate-chelated ions but also looked at the behavior of four of the top amino acids, as well as nucleotide diphosphates.27,38 Our research revealed three effects of metabolite-chelated Mg2+ on RNA function (Figure 4):27,38,47,52: (1) stabilization of RNA folding, (2) protection of RNA from degradation, and (3) promotion of RNA catalysis.
Figure 4 |. Chelated Mg2+ ions stabilize and protect RNA structure, and promote RNA catalysis.

(A) Amino acid- and nucleotide diphosphate-chelated Mg2+ ions have several favorable effects on RNA functions. (B) Chelated Mg2+ ions stabilize HDV-like drz-spur-3 ribozyme structure and increase folding cooperativity, where the red and blue lines are the chelated Mg2+ conditions (glutamate-chelated Mg2+ and amino acid-chelated Mg2+, respectively) and the gray line is the control Mg2+ condition. (C) The chelated Mg2+ protects HDV-like drz-spur-3 ribozyme from heat-mediated degradation. Successive thermal denaturation experiments show RNA degradation: (filled circles) first denaturation experiment and (empty circles) second denaturation experiment. The stronger transition peaks are observed in the second experiment in the presence of the chelated Mg2+ ions because of the RNA protection by the chelated Mg2+. “GluCM” represents glutamate-chelated Mg2+ and “Aa4CM” represents amino acid-chelated Mg2+. Aa4CM is a mixture of 96 mM glutamate, 4.2 mM aspartate, 3.8 mM glutamine, and 2.6 mM alanine. (D) Chelated Mg2+ increases the activity in the hammerhead ribozyme, HH16 (i.e., shorter reaction times). Red-filled circles show 1.63 mM NDPCM and 0.5 mM Mg2+free, and blue-filled circles show 0.5 mM Mg2+total as the control. The SAXS experiment revealed that GluCM promotes HDV-like CPEB3 ribozyme compaction. The bead model represents the SAXS data, while structures are static placeholders to guide the eye. Rg is the radius of gyration, and Dmax is the maximum linear dimension. Original data were obtained from our papers.27,38
Absolute binding constants from Critical Stability Constants were used in our original investigations to calculate experimental CM conditions, without accounting for ionic strength or pH.27,38 Our updated Mg2+ binding constant calculations and isothermal titration calorimetry experiments account for physiological pH and ionic strength, which weaken the interactions of Mg2+ with metabolites (Supplementary table 2), meaning that the actual free Mg2+ concentrations will be higher and the CM concentrations lower than previously reported. For nucleotide phosphates, the change in the level of free Mg2+ is very small, <0.1 mM or a 1.2-fold increase. For amino acids, the increase in the level of free Mg2+ is more significant. For example, 2 mM free magnesium with 11.3 mM glutamate CM, for a total of 13.3 mM total Mg2+ was reported using an uncorrected KD of 15.1 mM.27 The updated concentrations using a KD of 32 mM, adjusted for pH 7.5 and an ionic strength of 0.1 M, are 3.6 mM free magnesium with 9.7 mM glutamate CM, a 1.8-fold increase in the level of free Mg2+. Further interpretation of the estimated amounts of free and chelated Mg2+ concentrations for these experiments, taking into account physiological pH and ionic strength, is provided in Supplementary Table 4. Overall, the increase in free Mg2+ concentrations when accounting for ionic strength and pH is relatively small, less than 2.1-fold for amino acids and 1.2-fold for nucleotide phosphates.
Stabilization of RNA Folding.
Biological small molecules generally destabilize nucleic acid structure in the absence of chelated Mg2+. For example, Lambert and Draper reported that osmolytes have a destabilizing effect on RNA structure via nonspecific interactions with nucleobases, which results in the accumulation of osmolytes at the nucleobase.39,71 In contrast, metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ions stabilize RNA structure. For example, in the presence of glutamate-chelated Mg2+ and top four amino acid-chelated Mg2+, the melting temperature of the HDV-like drz-spur-3 ribozyme is increased by ~5 °C (Figure 4B), the folding free energy (ΔΔG) decreases by ~7 kcal/mol, and the folding enthalpy decreases by 7–20 kcal/mol. These observations indicate that metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ions strongly increase RNA stability and folding cooperativity.27 Moreover, we observed the same trend in a similar experiment using tRNA.47,52 On the basis of our in-line probing analysis of RNA structure, we hypothesize that the stabilizing effects of amino acid-chelated Mg2+, which weakens electrostatic repulsion in RNA structure, outcompete the destabilizing effects of the free amino acid, contributing to a net increase in RNA stability.27 We observed similar effects across HDV-like, hammerhead, and glmS ribozymes, as well as tRNA, suggesting that the effects are likely general.
Protection of RNA from Degradation.
RNA is a chemically unstable molecule because the nucleophilic 2′-OH group on the ribose sugar can initiate self-cleavage with a metal ion that facilitates water deprotonation (Figure 3A).72 We found that amino acid-chelated Mg2+ ions significantly inhibit the background transesterification reaction, especially a mixture of four abundant amino acids (Figure 4C). The mechanism of the protection effect is not totally clear but it is possible that weakly coordinated Mg2+ ions are less likely to have a bound hydroxide ion due to repulsion with the bound anionic ligand(s). Our in-line probing experiments support this hypothesis; Mg2+ chelation protects the RNA from metal ion-dependent degradation.27
Promotion of RNA Catalysis.
Our kinetics experiments on several self-cleaving nucleic acid enzymes including an HDV-like ribozyme, hammerhead ribozyme, glmS ribozyme, and DNAzyme, showed that glutamate-chelated Mg2+ and NDP-chelated Mg2+ species enhance ribozyme catalysis as compared with the control conditions with no chelated Mg2+ ions (Figure 4D).27,38 With respect to nucleotides, tightly chelated Mg2+ ions such as ATP–Mg2+ (KD ~10 μM), do not stimulate RNA catalysis.38 Our biochemical and structural analyses led us to a model of the facilitation effect where metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ions do not participate directly in the catalytic mechanism but do so indirectly by increasing RNA compaction (Figure 4D, right panel).27,40,41,44,45 Notably, molecular crowders increase the fraction of the active ribozyme even in the presence of glutamate-chelated Mg2+,27 suggesting that molecular crowders and chelated Mg2+ ions may have synergetic effects on RNA catalysis.
IMPLICATIONS OF CHELATED MG2+ IONS IN THE ORIGINS OF LIFE
Because it can both contain genetic information and catalyze reactions, RNA may have played important roles in the origins of life.73 The three effects of metabolite-chelated Mg2+ on RNA function, elaborated in the previous section, may relate to the origins of life. In the RNA world, RNA must be protected from hydrolysis. As described, weakly chelated Mg2+ can participate in such RNA protection and extend the half-life of the RNA. Indeed, some of the weakly Mg2+-coordinating metabolites found in extant cells are potentially important in the origins of life.74–76 For example, amino acids including glutamate are known to be synthesized under various simulated early Earth conditions.77–79 Such protection could have been critical to the prebiotic accumulation of RNA and thus to the start and evolution of life.
Environmental pH is critical in evaluating conditions for the origins of life. Life as we know it requires hydrogen bonding, which requires a local pH range from ~5 to 9 so as to not protonate hydrogen bond acceptors and not deprotonate hydrogen bond donors. Indeed, modern acidophiles and alkaliphiles maintain their cytoplasmic pH in the range of 6–9.80 We thus expect life began with an internal pH also near neutrality. The pKa of glutamate, the predominate Mg2+ chelator in modern cells, and indeed of any other carboxylic acid, is near 4 and so would be largely in the functional deprotonated state over this pH range, suggesting that the Mg2+ chelation activity described herein is robust with respect to carboxylates. We previously demonstrated that diphosphates weakly chelate Mg2+ and favor RNA and DNA catalysis, which was performed at pH 7.538. However, at pH 6, a value still compatible with hydrogen bonding and thus life, the terminal phosphate of nucleotides would protonate. The diphosphate nucleotides would then shift from an overall charge of −3 to −2 and bind Mg2+ more weakly; at the same time, the triphosphates would shift from an overall charge of −4 to −3 and thus bind Mg2+ as weakly as diphosphate at higher pH. It is thus possible that NTP-chelated Mg2+ could take over the role of favoring RNA function. Indeed, the concentrations of NTPs are considerably higher than those of NDPs, at least in extant life, potentially leading to higher EBE values.
In addition, we and others have reported that compartmentalization by coacervates increases the local concentrations of RNA and metal ions, which enhances ribozyme folding and activity under otherwise suboptimal enzyme and ion conditions.81–83 Weak chelation could help preserve the stability of the RNA phosphodiester backbone and enhance RNA function under such enriched conditions.
The high concentrations of free Mg2+ that are required for RNA function destabilize compartments created by fatty acid vesicles.53,84,85 Adamala and Szostak revealed that Mg2+ chelation by citrate stabilizes the vesicles (Figure 5).53 Likewise, in collaboration with the Keating lab, we showed that Mg2+-mediated loss of lipid vesicle membranes can be inhibited by the addition of a chelator.86 Adamala and Szostak tested non-enzymatic template-directed RNA primer extension, in which citrate has a slight negative effect on the reaction as compared with the no chelator condition. This is likely because citrate has multiple inner coordination sites on Mg2+ resulting in a relatively low KD value for Mg2+.27 In the early Earth environment, weakly metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ions could have had a similar stabilization effect on lipid compartments while still promoting RNA catalysis and evolution inside primitive lipid compartments. As such, weak chelation could have been essential in the start of life.
Figure 5 |. Chelated Mg2+ stabilizes fatty acid vesicles.

Fatty acids form vesicles that encapsulate RNA inside the vesicles. Unchelated Mg2+ ions interact with fatty acids, which precipitates fatty acids. Such destabilized vesicles leak RNAs and small molecules, which leads to RNA unfolding and degradation, as well as loss of genetic information. On one hand, citrate strongly chelates Mg2+ ions and thereby stabilizes the fatty acid membranes and prevents RNA leakage, but on the other hand, it limits RNA folding. Glutamate-chelated Mg2+ might limit RNA hydrolysis in the vesicles, thus more fully promoting RNA function.
CONCLUSIONS
In cells, the vast majority of Mg2+ is chelated; however, some of these species can still promote RNA folding and function. The total concentration of metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ions reaches nearly 51 mM in E. coli cells, wherein 20% of ~240 mM total metabolites chelate Mg2+. The ability of such Mg2+-chelated species to support RNA function depends on both their concentrations being high and their Mg2+ affinities being low. In this Perspective, we focused on how the cytoplasm is a complicated milieu in which thousands of biological molecules are co-localized in the same compartment and how this messy environment generally promotes RNA function. We reported three surprising effects of amino acid-chelated Mg2+ and nucleotide diphosphate-chelated Mg2+ ions on RNA function, where the chelated Mg2+ stabilizes RNA structure, protects RNA from degradation, and enhances RNA catalysis. We also found that weakly chelated Mg2+ species (KD ≥ 2 mM) can accumulate to relatively high values: ~18 mM in E. coli and ~2 mM in mammalian and yeast cells. Given the appreciable concentrations of weakly bound Mg2+ species as well as the protection they offer RNA from degradation in vivo, these conditions may promote RNA function as well as, or even better than, typical in vitro conditions, especially in E. coli. In many cases, detailed mechanistic insights into how metabolite-chelated Mg2+ ions promote RNA function are still needed. Recent advances in the chemical probing of RNA structure at the single-nucleotide level combined with a massively parallel sequencing technique (such as Structure-seq, SHAPE-MaP, and ILP in protocells)87–89 and metal ion-specific dyes35 will help address these questions. We suggest that the RNA field consider using weakly chelated Mg2+ ion conditions in their experiments to better mimic the cell and to promote RNA function. Finally, weakly chelated Mg2+ may influence the folding and function of proteins, especially in the hundreds of enzymes that use Mg2+ ions in their active sites.90–92
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDMENTS
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R35-GM127064 and NASA Grant 80NSSC17K0034 (to P.C.B.). R.Y. was supported by an Overseas Research Fellowship (201906624) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. We thank McCauley Meyer and Dr. Raghav Poudyal for useful discussions and suggestions.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
REFERENCES
- [1].Cech TR, and Steitz JA (2014) The Noncoding RNA Revolution-Trashing Old Rules to Forge New Ones, Cell 157, 77–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Cooper TA, Wan L, and Dreyfuss G (2009) RNA and Disease, Cell 136, 777–793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Bernat V, and Disney MD (2015) RNA Structures as Mediators of Neurological Diseases and as Drug Targets, Neuron 87, 28–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Tavares RDCA, Mahadeshwar G, Wan H, Huston NC, and Pyle AM (2020) The Global and Local Distribution of RNA Structure Throughout the Sars-Cov-2 Genome, J. Virol 95, e02190–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Rangan R, Zheludev IN, Hagey RJ, Pham EA, Wayment-Steele HK, Glenn JS, and Das R (2020) RNA Genome Conservation and Secondary Structure in SARS-Cov-2 and SARS-Related Viruses: A First Look, RNA 26, 937–959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Mortimer SA, Kidwell MA, and Doudna JA (2014) Insights into RNA Structure and Function from Genome-Wide Studies, Nat. Rev. Genet 15, 469–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Ganser LR, Kelly ML, Herschlag D, and Al-Hashimi HM (2019) The Roles of Structural Dynamics in the Cellular Functions of RNAs, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol 20, 474–489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Manning GS (1972) On the Application of Polyelectrolyte ?Limiting Laws? To the Helix-Coil Transition of DNA. Ii. The Effect of Mg++ Counterions, Biopolymers 11, 951–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Heilman-Miller SL, Thirumalai D, and Woodson SA (2001) Role of Counterion Condensation in Folding of the Tetrahymena Ribozyme. I. Equilibrium Stabilization by Cations, J. Mol. Biol 306, 1157–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Misra VK, and Draper DE (2002) The Linkage between Magnesium Binding and RNA Folding 1 1edited by B. Honig, J. Mol. Biol 317, 507–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Misra VK, Shiman R, and Draper DE (2003) A Thermodynamic Framework for the Magnesium-Dependent Folding of RNA, Biopolymers 69, 118–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Takamoto K, Das R, He Q, Doniach S, Brenowitz M, Herschlag D, and Chance MR (2004) Principles of RNA Compaction: Insights from the Equilibrium Folding Pathway of the P4-P6 RNA Domain in Monovalent Cations, J. Mol. Biol 343, 1195–1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Herschlag D, and Cech TR (1990) Catalysis of RNA Cleavage by the Tetrahymena Thermophila Ribozyme 1. Kinetic Description of the Reaction of an RNA Substrate Complementary to the Active Site, Biochemistry 29, 10159–10171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Smith D, and Pace NR (1993) Multiple Magnesium Ions in the Ribonuclease P Reaction Mechanism, Biochemistry 32, 5273–5281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Murphy FL, and Cech TR (1993) An Independently Folding Domain of RNA Tertiary Structure within the Tetrahymena Ribozyme, Biochemistry 32, 5291–5300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Tanner M, and Cech T (1996) Activity and Thermostability of the Small Self-Splicing Group I Intron in the Pre-tRNA (lle) of the Purple Bacterium Azoarcus, RNA 2, 74–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Cate JH, Hanna RL, and Doudna JA (1997) A Magnesium Ion Core at the Heart of a Ribozyme Domain, Nat. Struct. Biol 4, 553–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Doherty EA, and Doudna JA (1997) The P4-P6 Domain Directs Higher Order Folding of the Tetrahymena Ribozyme Core, Biochemistry 36, 3159–3169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Xia T, SantaLucia J, Burkard ME, Kierzek R, Schroeder SJ, Jiao X, Cox C, and Turner DH (1998) Thermodynamic Parameters for an Expanded Nearest-Neighbor Model for Formation of RNA Duplexes with Watson-Crick Base Pairs, Biochemistry 37, 14719–14735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Sclavi B, Sullivan M, Chance MR, Brenowitz M, and Woodson SA (1998) RNA Folding at Millisecond Intervals by Synchrotron Hydroxyl Radical Footprinting, Science 279, 1940–1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Schroeder SJ, Fountain MA, Kennedy SD, Lukavsky PJ, Puglisi JD, Krugh TR, and Turner DH (2003) Thermodynamic Stability and Structural Features of the J4/5 Loop in a Pneumocystis Carinii Group I Intron, Biochemistry 42, 14184–14196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Altman S, Wesolowski D, Guerrier-Takada C, and Li Y (2005) RNase P Cleaves Transient Structures in Some Riboswitches, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 102, 11284–11289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Kikovska E, Svärd SG, and Kirsebom LA (2007) Eukaryotic RNase P RNA Mediates Cleavage in the Absence of Protein, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 104, 2062–2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Minton AP (2001) The Influence of Macromolecular Crowding and Macromolecular Confinement on Biochemical Reactions in Physiological Media, J. Biol. Chem 276, 10577–10580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Leamy KA, Assmann SM, Mathews DH, and Bevilacqua PC (2016) Bridging the Gap between in vitro and in vivo RNA Folding, Q. Rev. Biophys 49, e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Schmidbaur H, Bach I, Wilkinson DL, and Müller G (1989) Metal Ion Binding by Amino Acids. Preparation and Crystal Structures of Magnesium, Strontium, and Bariuml-Glutamate Hydrates, Chemische Berichte 122, 1433–1438. [Google Scholar]
- [27].Yamagami R, Bingaman JL, Frankel EA, and Bevilacqua PC (2018) Cellular Conditions of Weakly Chelated Magnesium Ions Strongly Promote RNA Stability and Catalysis, Nat. Commun 9, 2149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Moncany ML, and Kellenberger E (1981) High Magnesium Content of Escherichia coli B, Experientia 37, 846–847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].London RE (1991) Methods for Measurement of Intracellular Magnesium: NMR and Fluorescence, Annu. Rev. Physiol 53, 241–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Outten CE, and O’Halloran TV (2001) Femtomolar Sensitivity of Metalloregulatory Proteins Controlling Zinc Homeostasis, Science 292, 2488–2492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Grubbs RD (2002) Intracellular Magnesium and Magnesium Buffering, Biometals 15, 251–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Nies DH (2007) Bacterial Transition Metal Homeostasis, Vol. 6, Springer. [Google Scholar]
- [33].Romani AM (2007) Magnesium Homeostasis in Mammalian Cells, Front. Biosci 12, 308–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Truong DM, Sidote DJ, Russell R, and Lambowitz AM (2013) Enhanced Group II Intron Retrohoming in Magnesium-Deficient Escherichia coli via Selection of Mutations in the Ribozyme Core, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 110, E3800–3809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Tyrrell J, McGinnis JL, Weeks KM, and Pielak GJ (2013) The Cellular Environment Stabilizes Adenine Riboswitch RNA Structure, Biochemistry 52, 8777–8785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Draper DE (2004) A Guide to Ions and RNA Structure, RNA 10, 335–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Woodson SA (2005) Metal Ions and RNA Folding: A Highly Charged Topic with a Dynamic Future, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol 9, 104–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Yamagami R, Huang R, and Bevilacqua PC (2019) Cellular Concentrations of Nucleotide Diphosphate-Chelated Magnesium Ions Accelerate Catalysis by RNA and DNA Enzymes, Biochemistry 58, 3971–3979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Lambert D, and Draper DE (2007) Effects of Osmolytes on RNA Secondary and Tertiary Structure Stabilities and RNA-Mg2+ Interactions, J. Mol. Biol 370, 993–1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Nakano S, Karimata HT, Kitagawa Y, and Sugimoto N (2009) Facilitation of RNA Enzyme Activity in the Molecular Crowding Media of Cosolutes, J. Am. Chem. Soc 131, 16881–16888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Kilburn D, Roh JH, Guo L, Briber RM, and Woodson SA (2010) Molecular Crowding Stabilizes Folded RNA Structure by the Excluded Volume Effect, J. Am. Chem. Soc 132, 8690–8696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Strulson CA, Yennawar NH, Rambo RP, and Bevilacqua PC (2013) Molecular Crowding Favors Reactivity of a Human Ribozyme under Physiological Ionic Conditions, Biochemistry 52, 8187–8197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Strulson CA, Boyer JA, Whitman EE, and Bevilacqua PC (2014) Molecular Crowders and Cosolutes Promote Folding Cooperativity of RNA under Physiological Ionic Conditions, RNA 20, 331–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Kilburn D, Behrouzi R, Lee H-T, Sarkar K, Briber RM, and Woodson SA (2016) Entropic Stabilization of Folded RNA in Crowded Solutions Measured by SAXS, Nucleic Acids Res 44, 9452–9461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Nakano SI, and Sugimoto N (2016) Model Studies of the Effects of Intracellular Crowding on Nucleic Acid Interactions, Mol. Biosyst 13, 32–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Leamy KA, Yennawar NH, and Bevilacqua PC (2017) Cooperative RNA Folding under Cellular Conditions Arises from Both Tertiary Structure Stabilization and Secondary Structure Destabilization, Biochemistry 56, 3422–3433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Leamy KA, Yennawar NH, and Bevilacqua PC (2018) Molecular Mechanism for Folding Cooperativity of Functional RNAs in Living Organisms, Biochemistry 57, 2994–3002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Ishii N, Nakahigashi K, Baba T, Robert M, Soga T, Kanai A, Hirasawa T, Naba M, Hirai K, Hoque A, Ho PY, Kakazu Y, Sugawara K, Igarashi S, Harada S, Masuda T, Sugiyama N, Togashi T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Yugi K, Arakawa K, Iwata N, Toya Y, Nakayama Y, Nishioka T, Shimizu K, Mori H, and Tomita M (2007) Multiple High-Throughput Analyses Monitor the Response of E. coli to Perturbations, Science 316, 593–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Bennett BD, Kimball EH, Gao M, Osterhout R, Van Dien SJ, and Rabinowitz JD (2009) Absolute Metabolite Concentrations and Implied Enzyme Active Site Occupancy in Escherichia coli, Nat. Chem. Biol 5, 593–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Bar-Even A, Noor E, Flamholz A, Buescher JM, and Milo R (2011) Hydrophobicity and Charge Shape Cellular Metabolite Concentrations, PLoS Comput. Biol 7, e1002166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Park JO, Rubin SA, Xu YF, Amador-Noguez D, Fan J, Shlomi T, and Rabinowitz JD (2016) Metabolite Concentrations, Fluxes and Free Energies Imply Efficient Enzyme Usage, Nat. Chem. Biol 12, 482–489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Leamy KA, Yamagami R, Yennawar NH, and Bevilacqua PC (2019) Single-Nucleotide Control of tRNA Folding Cooperativity under near-Cellular Conditions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 116, 23075–23082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Adamala K, and Szostak JW (2013) Nonenzymatic Template-Directed RNA Synthesis inside Model Protocells, Science 342, 1098–1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Nakano S, Kitagawa Y, Miyoshi D, and Sugimoto N (2015) Effects of Background Anionic Compounds on the Activity of the Hammerhead Ribozyme in Mg(2+)-Unsaturated Solutions, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 20, 1049–1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Martell AE, and Smith RM (1974) Critical Stability Constants, Plenum Press, New York and London. [Google Scholar]
- [56].Yarus M (1988) A Specific Amino Acid Binding Site Composed of RNA, Science 240, 1751–1758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Sengupta A, Sung HL, and Nesbitt DJ (2016) Amino Acid Specific Effects on RNA Tertiary Interactions: Single-Molecule Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies, J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 10615–10627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Nicholson DA, Sengupta A, Sung H-L, and Nesbitt DJ (2018) Amino Acid Stabilization of Nucleic Acid Secondary Structure: Kinetic Insights from Single-Molecule Studies, J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 9869–9876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Nakano S, Chadalavada DM, and Bevilacqua PC (2000) General Acid-Base Catalysis in the Mechanism of a Hepatitis Delta Virus Ribozyme, Science 287, 1493–1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Shan S, Kravchuk AV, Piccirilli JA, and Herschlag D (2001) Defining the Catalytic Metal Ion Interactions in the Tetrahymena Ribozyme Reaction, Biochemistry 40, 5161–5171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Latham JA, and Cech TR (1989) Defining the inside and Outside of a Catalytic RNA Molecule, Science 245, 276–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Butcher SE, and Burke JM (1994) Structure-Mapping of the Hairpin Ribozyme. Magnesium-Dependent Folding and Evidence for Tertiary Interactions within the Ribozyme-Substrate Complex, J. Mol. Biol 244, 52–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Shi H, and Moore PB (2000) The Crystal Structure of Yeast Phenylalanine tRNA at 1.93 a Resolution: A Classic Structure Revisited, RNA 6, 1091–1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Beebe JA, Kurz JC, and Fierke CA (1996) Magnesium Ions Are Required by Bacillus subtilis Ribonuclease P RNA for Both Binding and Cleaving Precursor tRNAAsp, Biochemistry 35, 10493–10505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Van Eunen K, Bouwman J, Daran-Lapujade P, Postmus J, Canelas AB, Mensonides FIC, Orij R, Tuzun I, Van Den Brink J, Smits GJ, Van Gulik WM, Brul S, Heijnen JJ, De Winde JH, Teixeira De Mattos MJ, Kettner C, Nielsen J, Westerhoff HV, and Bakker BM (2010) Measuring Enzyme Activities under Standardized in vivo-Like Conditions for Systems Biology, FEBS Journal 277, 749–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Albert A (1952) Quantitative Studies of the Avidity of Naturally Occurring Substances for Trace Metals II. Amino-Acids Having Three Ionizing Groups, Biochem J 50, 690–697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Blaquiere C, and Berthon G (1987) Speciation Studies in Relation to Magnesium Bioavailability. Formation of Mg(II) Complexes with Glutamate, Aspartate, Glycinate, Lactate, Pyroglutamate, Pyridoxine and Citrate, and Appraisal of Their Potential Significance Towards Magnesium Gastrointestin, Inorganica Chimica Acta 135, 179–189. [Google Scholar]
- [68].Case DR, Zubieta J, and Doyle, R. P (2020) The Coordination Chemistry of Bio-Relevant Ligands and Their Magnesium Complexes, Molecules 25, 3172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Sajadi SAA (2010) Metal Ion-Binding Properties of L-Glutamic Acid and L-Aspartic Acid, a Comparative Investigation, Nat. Sci 2, 85–91. [Google Scholar]
- [70].Dudev T, and Doudeva L (2017) How the Extra Methylene Group Affects the Ligation Properties of Glu Vs. Asp and Gln Vs. Asn Amino Acids: A Dft/Pcm Study, J. Mol. Model 23, 45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Lambert D, and Draper DE (2012) Denaturation of RNA Secondary and Tertiary Structure by Urea: Simple Unfolded State Models and Free Energy Parameters Account for Measured M-Values, Biochemistry 51, 9014–9026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Li Y, and Breaker RR (1999) Kinetics of RNA Degradation by Specific Base Catalysis of Transesterification Involving the 2’-Hydroxyl Group, J. Am. Chem. Soc 121, 9. [Google Scholar]
- [73].Joyce GF, and Orgel LE (2006) Progress toward Understanding the Origin of the RNA World, Vol. 43, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]
- [74].Hennet RJ-C, Holm NG, and Engel MH (1992) Abiotic Synthesis of Amino Acids under Hydrothermal Conditions and the Origin of Life: A Perpetual Phenomenon?, Naturwissenschaften 79, 361–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Zaia DAM, Zaia CTBV, and De Santana H (2008) Which Amino Acids Should Be Used in Prebiotic Chemistry Studies?, Origins of Life and Evol. of Biospheres 38, 469–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Burke CR, and Lupták A (2018) DNA Synthesis from Diphosphate Substrates by DNA Polymerases, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 115, 980–985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Nuevo M, Auger G, Blanot D, and D’Hendecourt L (2008) A Detailed Study of the Amino Acids Produced from the Vacuum UV Irradiation of Interstellar Ice Analogs, Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 38, 37–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Yanagawa H, Kobayashi Y, and Egami F (1980) Genesis of Amino Acids in the Primeval Sea: Formation of Amino Acids from Sugars and Ammonia in a Modified Sea Medium, The Journal of Biochemistry 87, 359–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Sojo V, Herschy B, Whicher A, Camprubí E, and Lane N (2016) The Origin of Life in Alkaline Hydrothermal Vents, Astrobiology 16, 181–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Krulwich TA, Sachs G, and Padan E (2011) Molecular Aspects of Bacterial pH Sensing and Homeostasis, Nat. Rev. Microbiol 9, 330–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Frankel EA, Bevilacqua PC, and Keating CD (2016) Polyamine/Nucleotide Coacervates Provide Strong Compartmentalization of Mg2+, Nucleotides, and RNA, Langmuir 32, 2041–2049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Drobot B, Iglesias-Artola JM, Le Vay K, Mayr V, Kar M, Kreysing M, Mutschler H, and Tang TD (2018) Compartmentalised RNA Catalysis in Membrane-Free Coacervate Protocells, Nat. Commun 9, 3643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Poudyal RR, Guth-Metzler RM, Veenis AJ, Frankel EA, Keating CD, and Bevilacqua PC (2019) Template-Directed RNA Polymerization and Enhanced Ribozyme Catalysis inside Membraneless Compartments Formed by Coacervates, Nat. Commun 10, 490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Chen IA, and Szostak JW (2004) A Kinetic Study of the Growth of Fatty Acid Vesicles, Biophys. J 87, 988–998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Chen IA, Salehi-Ashtiani K, and Szostak JW (2005) RNA Catalysis in Model Protocell Vesicles, J. Am. Chem. Soc 127, 13213–13219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Dewey DC, Strulson CA, Cacace DN, Bevilacqua PC, and Keating CD (2014) Bioreactor Droplets from Liposome-Stabilized All-Aqueous Emulsions, Nat. Commun 5, 4670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Ding Y, Tang Y, Kwok CK, Zhang Y, Bevilacqua PC, and Assmann SM (2014) In Vivo Genome-Wide Profiling of RNA Secondary Structure Reveals Novel Regulatory Features, Nature 505, 696–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Busan S, and Weeks KM (2018) Accurate Detection of Chemical Modifications in RNA by Mutational Profiling (Map) with Shapemapper 2, RNA 24, 143–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Cakmak FP, Choi S, Meyer MO, Bevilacqua PC, and Keating CD (2020) Prebiotically-Relevant Low Polyion Multivalency Can Improve Functionality of Membraneless Compartments, Nat. Commun 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Jahnen-Dechent W, and Ketteler M (2012) Magnesium Basics, Clin. Kidney J 5, i3–i14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Swaminathan R (2003) Magnesium Metabolism and Its Disorders, Clin. Biochem. Rev 24, 47–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Saris N-EL, Mervaala E, Karppanen H, Khawaja JA, and Lewenstam A (2000) Magnesium an Update on Physiological, Clinical and Analytical Aspects, Clin. Chim. Acta 294, 1–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
