Abstract
Human cerebral organoids, derived from induced pluripotent stem cells, offer a unique in vitro research window to the development of the cerebral cortex. However, a key player in the developing brain, the microglia, do not natively emerge in cerebral organoids. Here we show that erythromyeloid progenitors (EMPs), differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells, migrate to cerebral organoids, and mature into microglia-like cells and interact with synaptic material. Patch-clamp electrophysiological recordings show that the microglia-like population supported the emergence of more mature and diversified neuronal phenotypes displaying repetitive firing of action potentials, low-threshold spikes and synaptic activity, while multielectrode array recordings revealed spontaneous bursting activity and increased power of gamma-band oscillations upon pharmacological challenge with NMDA. To conclude, microglia-like cells within the organoids promote neuronal and network maturation and recapitulate some aspects of microglia-neuron co-development in vivo, indicating that cerebral organoids could be a useful biorealistic human in vitro platform for studying microglia-neuron interactions.
Keywords: cerebral organoid, microglia, neurogenesis, neuronal function, development
1. Introduction
Three-dimensional cell cultures have emerged as a novel platform to study cell functions in a microenvironment resembling native tissue, with particular focus on producing transplants for regenerative medicine and screening drug compounds in biorealistic human in vitro tissue. The advances in bioprinting multiple cell types on biomaterial scaffolds [1], and generation of organoids, derived from embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPCSs) and recapitulating the overall structure and function of the organ of interest, have delivered unprecedented opportunities to study the development and physiology of complex organs such as the gut, the skin and the brain [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Furthermore, drug development programs may employ the technology for drug screening and precision medicine [9,10,11,12,13,14] and functional assays in vitro, such as migration of cancer cells [15,16] and passage of drug candidates through the blood-brain-barrier [17,18].
Human brain organoids recapitulate the tissue architecture of the developing cortex to a remarkable degree of fidelity, even discriminating species differences in the development dynamics of neurons between humans and gorilla [19]. Since the initial nearly parallel work by three research groups [20,21,22], brain organoids have served in modelling various brain diseases [23,24,25,26], including microcephaly [20], glioblastoma [27,28,29], Zika-virus infection [30] and Alzheimer’s disease [31,32,33].
The accumulating body of scientific reports portray brain organoids as a human 3D in vitro platform that achieves remarkable complexity, even resembling its in vivo counterpart, the embryonic human brain [34,35,36,37,38]. The main cell types of the brain, astrocytes and neurons, spontaneously develop through ectodermal lineage in brain organoids and self-assemble to form cortical layers resembling human brain organization [39]. However, microglia, the brain’s immune cells, do not innately populate brain organoids, since they originate from mesodermal lineage, unlike other brain cells [40,41,42]. In addition to their roles in immunity, microglia participate in forming and moulding the CNS at different stages of development from neurogenesis to maturation of synapses and neural networks [43,44,45,46]. During early development, microglia restrict the number of neuron progenitors arising at the subventricular zone (SVZ) [43] and support the differentiation of neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes [47,48]. The dual role of microglia is evident also later in development. Microglia support the formation of synapses through direct contact [45] and indirectly through secretion of cytokines [49,50]. Yet, they restrict the number of neuronal connections by phagocytosing inactive synapses through the complement cascade [44,51]. Microglia are also reported to modulate the formation of neural circuits [46,52]. In addition to neurodevelopment, microglia have a distinguished role in the progression of neurodegenerative diseases [53]. Thus, the past years have seen multiple approaches to incorporate microglia into brain organoids.
The first such report showed microglia, derived from induced pluripotent stem cells, to migrate spontaneously from culture medium to the brain organoid. Therein, they assumed their native functionality by migrating to the site of tissue injury, induced by a needle prick [54]. Recently, the inflammatory functions of incorporated mature embryonic stem cell derived microglia were also assessed in tubular cortical organoids [55]. In an alternative approach, subtle adjustment to one of the original organoid protocols [20] gave rise to a native population of microglia capable of immune response and phagocytosis of synaptic material, as shown by internalisation of post-synaptic density protein 95 (PSD95) [56]. In another report, the incorporation of mesodermal progenitors introduced vasculature into the organoid, and remarkably, also microglia-like cells [57]. Likewise, co-clustering of microglia progenitors and neural progenitor cells gave rise to cortical organoids with microglia-like population capable of immune response and synaptic pruning [58].
Earlier work in characterising the fundamental neurophysiological properties of organoids in absence of microglia have addressed the maturation of sodium/potassium currents [22,30], sustained firing [22,59,60] and synaptic activity [22,30,61,62] in patch-clamp recordings, and of spontaneous bursting [37,60,62,63,64] and oscillatory activities using MEA recordings [64]. A very recent electrophysiological report showed that transplantation of human primary microglia to brain organoids (at 15th week in vitro) gave rise to synchronous network burst activity using a single developmental time point read-out [65].
However, none of previous studies above focused specifically on the emerging, functional, single-cell electrophysiological properties of neuronal entities grown in organoids and the role of microglial enrichment in modulating those functional properties over developmental time in vitro. Thus, while iPCS-derived microglia in organoids have recently been increasingly well characterised, their role in emergance of neuronal functions merits further exploration.
Herein, we carry out a detailed single-neuron interrogation of electrophysiological functions that arise in brain organoids in response to incorporation of microglia-like cells. By evaluating neuronal functions at multiple developmental time points, we show, for the first time, that organoids enriched with microglia-like populations develop neurons that respond to a depolarising stimulus with sustained repetitive firing, while neurons without enrichment are more prone to single spiking and adaptation. Remarkably, neurons co-maturing with microglia-like cells showed a greater diversity in the expression of distinct neuronal currents, including a prominent post-inhibitory low-threshold current leading to post-inhibitory spiking, an action attributed to T-type calcium channels, which have been implicated in a variety of functions, including synaptic plasticity and neuronal differentiation [66,67,68]. We also found that excitatory post-synaptic currents (EPSPs), evidence of synaptically connected neurons, were present only in neurons from organoids with microglia-like cells. Finally, targeted single-cell and multielectrode array recordings revealed that spontaneous and NMDA-induced neuronal bursting activity was stronger and more prevalent in organoids with microglia-like cells, while NMDA-induced spectral changes in local field potentials were more significantly prominent in the γ-band frequency range in organoids enriched with microglia-like cells. Taken together, these data suggest that multiple aspects of single-neuron functional characteristics are strongly impacted by the presence of microglia-like cells. Our work herein consolidates brain organoids as a tool to study the roles of microglia in brain development, in ways not accessible in vivo.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Human iPSC Lines and Ethical Considerations
Four iPSC lines were used and their phenotype and origin are presented in Table 1. Three of the iPSC lines, MBE2968, Bioni010-C2 and Ctrl8 c2, were previously characterized [69,70,71,72]. The Mad6 line was generated from fibroblasts (skin biopsy and subsequent work under Research Ethics of Northern Savo Hospital district (license no. 123/2016)) that were first expanded in Iscove’s DMEM media containing 20% fetal bovine serum, 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin and 1% non-essential amino acids. For reprogramming (all Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) the cells at 90% confluency were transduced using CytoTune™-iPS 2.0 Sendai Reprogramming Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The media was changed 24 h after transduction and then daily. At day 6, fibroblast culture medium was replaced with Essential 6 Medium (E6, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 100 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). The cells were re-plated on the next day to 6-well Matrigel-coated plates with a density of 60,000 cells/well. The individual colonies were picked to 24-well Matrigel-coated plate containing Essential 8 Medium (E8, Thermo Fisher Scientific) between days 17–28 and passaged with 0.5 mM EDTA weekly. One week later, three colonies were selected and expanded on 6-well plates with daily media changes. For RT-qPCR, (Figure S3e), total RNA was extracted (RNeasy Mini kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), cDNA synthesized using Maxima reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Taqman probes (Table 2). For ICC (Figure S3a), the iPCS colonies were fixed (4% paraformaldehyde, 20 min at RT, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 (in case of Nanog and 4 October), blocked in 5% normal goat serum one hour in RT and incubated with the primary antibodies (Table 3) O/N at 4 °C, followed by secondary antibody incubation one hour at RT. Images were taken at Zeiss Axio microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany), scale bar 100 µm (Figure S3a). For embryoid body (EB) generation, iPSCs colonies were detached by a scalpel to ultra-low adherent dishes (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) and cultured in DMEM media (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 20% serum replacement and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin. The EBs were plated onto Matrigel-coated 24-well plates and left to differentiate for two weeks (Figure S3b). Expression of markers for all three embryonic layers was performed by flow cytometry (Figure S3d) (CytoFlexS, Beckman Coulter, IN, USA). The EBs were dissociated using accutase (4 min, at 37 °C followed by trituration into single cell suspension, centrifuged 300× g 5 min, resuspended and filtered through 35 µm strainer. Cell viability was assessed by Zombie Aqua (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), cells fixed in 1% formaldehyde, permeabilised in 0.2% TritonX + 5% FBS, and incubated with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies (Table 3) 30 min at RT. Karyotyping performed at Synlab oy (Finland) (Figure S3c).
Table 1.
Cell Line | MBE2968 c1 | Mad6 | BIONi010-C-2 | Ctrl 8 c2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | F | M | M | F |
Health status | Healthy | Healthy | Healthy | Healthy |
Age, years | 65 | 63 | 15–19 | Adult |
APOE type | ε3/ε3 | ε3/ε3 | ε3/ε3 | ε3/ε3 |
Sample origin | Skin biopsy | Skin biopsy | Skin biopsy | Skin biopsy |
Reprogramming method | Episomal nucleofaction | Sendai virus | Non-integrating episomal | Sendai virus |
Karyotype | 46XX | 46XY | 46XY | 46XX |
Reference | [69] | - | [70,71] | [72] |
Used in experiments | Figure 1 Figure 2c Figure 3 Figure 4, Figure S1a–c |
Figure 1b,e–g,i Figure 2a,b Figure S1c–e Figure S2 Figure S3 |
Figure 1b,e–g,i Figure 5 |
Figure 1b,e–g,i Figure 5 |
Table 2.
Purpose | Target | Company and Cat# |
---|---|---|
Pluripotency markers (qPCR) | Nanog | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hs02387400 g1 |
Lin28 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hs00702808 s1 | |
Sox2 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hs01053049 s1 | |
House-keeping genes (qPCR) | ACTB | Thermo Fisher Scientific, 4326315E |
Sendai virus | SeV | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Mr04269880_mr |
Table 3.
Purpose | Antibody | Dilution | Company and Cat# |
---|---|---|---|
Differentiation markers | SOX17 PE (Endoderm) | As per datasheet | R&D ICI9241P |
OTX2 AF488 (Ectoderm) | As per datasheet | R&D ICI979G | |
BRACHYURY APC (Mesoderm) | As per datasheet | R&D IC2085A | |
Pluripotency markers | Mouse anti-OCT4 | 1:400 | Merck, MAB4401 |
Goat anti-NANOG | 1:100 | R&D Systems, AF1997 | |
Mouse anti-SSEA4 | 1:400 | Merck, MAB4304 | |
Mouse anti-TRA-1-81 | 1:200 | Merck, 4381 | |
Secondary antibodies | Goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 | 1:300 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, A11001 |
Goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568 | 1:300 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, A11004 | |
Donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 568 | 1:300 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, A11057 |
2.2. iPSCs Culture
iPSCs were maintained in serum- and feeder-free conditions in Essential 8 Medium (E8, #A15169-01, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 0.5% penicillin-streptomycin (P/S, #15140122 Thermo Fisher Scientific) on growth factor reduced Matrigel (Corning) at 5% CO2 and 37 °C. Medium was completely changed every 24 h. Twice a week, when cultures reached 80% confluency, the cells were passaged as small colonies with 0.5 mM EDTA (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in Ca2+/Mg2+-free DPBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The medium was supplemented with 5 µM of Y-27632 (#S1049, Selleckchem, Houston, TX, USA), a Rho-Associated Coil Kinase (ROCK) inhibitor (#S1049, Selleckchem,), for the first 24 h to prevent apoptosis after passaging. Cultures were tested for mycoplasma using a MycoAlert Kit (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland)), and for bacteria, mould, fungi and yeast using solid and liquid lysogeny broth (LB, Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) at 30 °C and 37 °C.
2.3. Organoid Differentiation
Cerebral brain organoids were differentiated according to a protocol published earlier [20], with some modifications. Embryoid body differentiation was initiated on day 0 by detaching 70–80% confluent iPSCs with 0.5 mM EDTA and seeding 9000 cells/well on ultra-low attachment U-bottom 96-well plates (CellCarrier-96 Spheroid ULA, #6055330 Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in 150 µL of E8 + 0.5% P/S supplemented with 20 µM ROCK inhibitor. On days 1, 3 and 5, 120 µL of medium was removed and 150 µL fresh E8 + 0.5% P/S was added. Neuroinduction was mediated by a gradual transition from E8 to neuroinduction medium by replacing 150 µL of the medium on days 6, 7, 8 and 10 to neuroinduction medium consisting of DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific #21331-020), 1× N2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific #17502-001), 1× Glutamax (Thermo Fisher Scientific #35050-038), 1× of non-essential amino acids (NEAA; Thermo Fisher Scientific #11140-035), 5 U/mL of Heparin (LEO Pharma, Ballerup, Denmark) and 0.5% P/S. On day 11, the spheroids were embedded to 20µL of Matrigel and cultured in differentiation medium 1 (Diff1, 1:1 mixture of DMEM F12 and Neurobasal (Thermo Fisher Scientific #21103-049), 1× Glutamax, 0.5× NEAA, 0.5× of N2, 1× of B27 without vitamin A (Thermo Fisher Scientific #12587010), 2.5 µg/mL of insulin (#10516-5ml, Merck), 50 µM of 2-mercaptoethanol (Merck) and 0.5% P/S). On d15, organoids were transferred onto 6-well plates (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) in differentiation medium 2 (Diff2) with identical composition with Diff1,but supplemented with B27 containing vitamin A (Thermo Fisher Scientific; #17504001) instead of with B27 minus vitamin A (Thermo Fisher Scientific #12587010). From now on, organoids were maintained on orbital rotators (ThermoFisher Scientific #88881102) adjusted to 75 rpm. Medium was replenished every second day. To promote a good quality of organoids, the morphology of the spheroids was assessed under a microscope one-by-one before embedding to Matrigel. The spheroids accepted for Matrigel embedding were translucent, with some darkening of the core permitted, and maintained sharp edges. Common exclusion criteria were (i) local expansion of tissue bulging out from the spheroid, i.e., not sharp edges (ii) a foreign fibre translodged in the spheroid, (iii) incomplete formation of the embryoid body, where the well housed one main spheroid and one or more smaller spheroids attached to the bigger one. Moreover, on day 15, organoids without visible cortical loop structures were discarded. Finally, at any point on day 15+, organoids where the dense core had disintegrated, leaving a translucent piece of tissue, were also discarded.
2.4. Differentiation of Erythromyeloid Progenitor Cells
To initiate microglial differentiation on day 0, iPSCs were detached with 0.5 mM EDTA at 70–80% confluency, and 60,000–80,000 single cells/dish were seeded on 3.5 cm matrigel coated dish (Sarstedt) in mesodermal differentiation medium consisting of E8, 0.5% P/S, 5 ng/mL BMP4 (PeproTech, London, UK), 25 ng/mL Activin A (PeproTech), 1 μM CHIR 99021 (Axon Medchem, Groningen, The Netherlands) and 10 μM ROCK inhibitor (Selleckchem #S1049). Cultures were maintained in a low oxygen incubator at 5% O2, 5% CO2 and 37 °C. During the differentiation, medium was changed every 24 h. On day 1, the mesodermal medium was replaced but with lower 1 μM Y-27632. On day 2, within 44–46 h from seeding, hemogenic endothelial differentiation was induced by replacing medium with Dif-base medium consisting of DMEM/F-12, 0.5% P/S, 1% GlutaMAX, 0.0543% sodium bicarbonate (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific), 64 mg/L L-ascorbic acid and 14 μg/L sodium selenite (both from Sigma), and supplemented with 100 ng/mL FGF2, 50 ng/mL VEGF (both from PeproTech), 10 μM SB431542 (Selleckchem), and 5 μg/mL insulin (Merck). On day 4, erythromyeloid differentiation was furthered by replacing the media by Dif-base supplemented with 5 μg/mL insulin, 50 ng/mL FGF2, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and thrombopoietin (TPO), 10 ng/mL IL-3 and stem cell factor (SCF; all Peprotech). From now on, cells were maintained at atmospheric 19% O2, 5% CO2 and 37 °C. On day 8, the erythromyeloid progenitors (EMPs) that were blooming into suspension were collected by gentle pipetting through a 100 µm strainer (VWR). The cells were counted and centrifuged at 160× g for 5 min to be ready for incorporation into organoids.
2.5. Incorporation of Microglial Progenitor Cells into Organoids
To incorporate exogenous microglia into the organoids, day 8 microglial progenitors (EMPs) were allowed to spontaneously migrate into day 30 organoids using two comparable methods: either as free-floating cells or inside Matrigel droplet. For free-floating incorporation, single organoids were transferred to ultra-low attachment 96-well U-bottom wells (CellCarrier-96 Spheroid ULA, Perkin Elmer 6,055,330) in carryover medium. Then 500,000 EMPs/organoid, in 100 µL of Diff2, were seeded on the wells. For control, Diff2 was added without progenitors. Organoids with and without microglia, denoted (+)ORG and (−)ORG, respectively, were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 6 h to allow the progenitors to sediment and attach to the surface of the organoid. Then organoids were transferred back to 6-well format and the culture continued according to organoid maintenance protocol. For Matrigel-droplet incorporation method, day 30 organoids were transferred to parafilm cups and day 8 microglial progenitors (EMPs) were resuspended in Matrigel at 10,000 cells/µL density. Then 2 µL of the suspension was added on an organoid, giving 20,000 EMPs/organoid. The assemblies were then incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 to allow the Matrigel to solidify and settle on the organoids. The organoids were transferred to Diff2 the same way as on day 11 and the culture was then continued according to organoid maintenance protocol.
2.6. Organoid Fixation and Immunohistochemistry
Organoids were washed thrice with 0.1 M phosphate buffer and fixed in freshly thawn 4% paraformaldehyde (Merck in phosphate buffer for 4 h at 4 °C. Fixed organoids were cryopreserved in 30% saccharose (VWR) in phosphate buffer at +4 °C overnight. After which, they were embedded in O.C.T. Compound (# 4583, Sakura, Tokyo, Japan) in 1 × 1 × 0.5 cm plastic moulds (, Andwin Scientific, Simi Valley, CA, USA) by incubating at RT for 20 min and freezing on a metal block at −70 °C. Organoids were then cryosectioned to 20 µm thickness on cryotome (CM1950, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), sections were mounted on microscope glasses (Thermo Scientific) and stored in −70 °C. For heat-induced antigen retrieval, 10 mM sodium citrate (citrate (pH = 6.0, VWR) was heated to 92 °C, the slides were submerged and incubated for one hour, as the solution was allowed to cooled down in RT. Sections were blocked and permeabilized in 10% normal goat serum (Merck) and 0.05% Tween20 (Merck) in PBS for 1 h. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted and incubated in the 5% normal goat serum in 0.05% Tween20 in PBS. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies (Table 4) at 4 °C overnight, washed 3× in 0.05% Tween20 in PBS and incubated with species-specific AlexaFluor secondary antibodies (1:500) for 1 h at RT. Slides were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium with or without DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for imaging. Staining controls that omitted the primary antibody were used to confirm staining specificity.
Table 4.
Antibody | Clone | Host | Pretreatment | Dilution | Cat. No | Producer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBA1 | Polyclonal | Rabbit, IgG | - | 1:500 | ab153696 | Abcam |
Polyclonal | Rabbit, IgG | - | 1:500 | 01919741 | WAKO | |
GT10312 | Mouse, IgG2 | Na-citrate | 1:500 | MA5-27726 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | |
PU.1 | Polyclonal | Rabbit | Na-citrate | 1:200 | 2266 | Cell Signaling Technology |
CD41 | M148 | Mouse, IgG2a | - | 1:1000 | ab11024 | Abcam |
TBR2 | WD1928 | Rabbit | Triton | 1:100 | 14-4877-82 | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
DCX | Polyclonal | Rabbit | Triton | 1:200 | 4604 | Cell Signaling Technology |
SATB2 | Polyclonal | Rabbit | Na-citrate | 1:500 | ab34735 | Abcam |
TUJ1 | TUJ1 | Mouse, IgG2a1 k | Triton | 1:200 | 801202 | Biolegend |
PSD95 | D27E11 | Rabbit, IgG | Na-citrate | 1:200 | 3450T | Cell Signaling Technology |
SYP | SP11 | Rabbit, IgG | Na-citrate | 1:250 | MA5-14532 | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
2.7. Fluorescent Microscopy
All confocal images were obtained with a Zeiss Axio Observer inverted microscope (10×, 20×, 40× (oil) or 63× (oil) -objectives) equipped with LSM800 confocal module (Carl Zeiss Microimaging GmbH). DAPI and secondary antibodies were imaged with 405 nm (λex 353 nm/λem 465 nm), 488 nm (λex 495 nm/λem 519 nm) and 561 nm (λex 543 nm/λem 567 nm) lasers, respectively.
For imaging of representative figures, we used Leica Thunder 3D tissue imager, Figure 1b, (Leica microsystems CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), 10× objective using the Leica X application suite version 3.7.2.22383. The Zeiss confocal with 20× objective for Figure 1c–f, 40× for Figure 1g and 63× for Figures 1i, 2, Figures S1c–e and S2.
For quantification of morphology, we employed two imaging devices to acquire whole slice Z-stack tiles, capturing the entire Z-dimensional morphology of the microglia. We imaged the day 120 organoids at the Zeiss confocal, with seven focus planes (merged into maximal orthogonal projection), using the EC Plan-Neofluar 10×/0.30 M27 objective. Day 35 and day 66 organoids we imaged using 3D HISTECH Pannoramic 250 Flash III with 20× objective (3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) and the extended view images exported to TIF for downstream analysis using the Caseviever version 2.4.
2.8. Quantification of Immunohistochemistry
The analysis on microglia morphology was done with the original CZI files (Zeiss LSM800 confocal), or the TIF files (3D HISTECH Pannoramic 250 Flash III). Skeletal analysis was performed using Fiji [73,74]. For the AI-based detection, the images were further compressed to a wavelet file format (Enhanced Compressed Wavelet, ECW, ER Mapper, Intergraph, Atlanta, GA, USA) with a target compression ratio of 1:5. The compressed virtual slides were uploaded to a whole-slide image management server (Aiforia Technologies Oy, Helsinki, Finland). A convolutional neural network-based algorithm was trained to detect ramified, intermediate, rod and spherical cells using cloud-based software (Aiforia version 4.8, Aiforia Create, Aiforia Technologies Oy, Helsinki, Finland). Final results were obtained via Origin 2019b (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).
For quantification of PSD95 puncta, we manually sampled four optical fields per organoid, four organoids per (+)/(−)ORG group, and captured a Z-stack of ten 109.38 µm × 109.38 µm (1580 px × 1580 px) focus planes with 0.28 µm interval, using the Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.40 oil DIC M27 objective. We performed counting of the PSD95 puncta with a set of 12 prominence thresholds, using the Find Maxima algorithm in Fiji [74]. We applied the same imaging parameters for assessing interactions between microglia and synapses, with maximum orthogonal projections acquired at ZEN 2.3 Blue edition or Zen 3.2 lite edition for the representative images in Figures S1d and S2.
2.9. Brain Slice Preparation for Electrophysiology
Brain organoids (107–213 days in culture) were embedded in 2% low melting point agarose and sliced (for whole-cell recordings, 350 μm; for multielectrode recordings, 500 μm) using a vibratome (model 7000 smz, Campden Instruments, Loughborough, UK) in chilled (4 °C), fully carbonated (95%/5%, O2/CO2) aCSF of the following composition (in mM). 92 N-methyl-D-Glucamine, 2.5 KCl, 20 HEPES, 25 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 3 Na-Pyruvate, 2 Thiourea, 5 Na-Ascorbate, 7 MgCl2, 0.5 CaCl2, 25 Glucose (pH adjusted to 7.3 with HCl 10 M). After cutting, slices were placed in a custom-made chamber and allowed first to recover at 34 °C for 30 min in the recording solution (see below for composition, supplemented with 3 Na-Pyruvate, 2 Thiourea and 5 Na-Ascorbate) and then for 60 min in the same solution at room temperature (20–22 °C) before use for electrophysiology.
2.10. Whole-Cell Electrophysiology
A single slice (350 μm) was transferred and secured with a slice anchor in a large volume bath under an Olympus BX50WI microscope (Olympus corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with differential interference contrast (DIC) optics, an ×40 water immersion objective and a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Retiga R1, Q-imaging, Teledyne Photometrics, Tucson, AZ, USA)). Slices were continuously perfused at a rate of 2.5–3 mL/min with a recording solution of the following composition (in mM): 120 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 25 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 25 Glucose. Organoids from both phenotypes were examined on a single experimental day with a blind protocol to the experimenter. Whole-cell current and voltage-clamp recordings were conducted at 32–33 °C with an Axopatch-200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) using 5–8 MOhm glass electrodes filled with an internal solution containing (in mM) 135 Potassium-gluconate, 5 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 2 MgCl2, 1 EGTA, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.25 Na-GTP and 0.5% Biocytin (pH adjusted to 7.3 with osmolarity at 275–285 mOsm/L). Electrophysiological data were low pass filtered at 1 KHz (4-pole Bessel filter) then captured at 10 KHz via a Digidata 1440A A/D board to a personal computer, displayed in Clampex software (version 10.7, Molecular Devices) and stored to disk for further analysis. Single-cell electrophysiological current and voltage-clamp data were analysed in Clampfit (Molecular Devices). Synaptic data were detected and analysed with Mini Analysis software (Synaptosoft Inc., Decatur, GA, USA).
2.11. 60-3D-Multielectrode Electrophysiology
A single slice (500 μm) was transferred and secured with a slice anchor in the chamber of a 60-3D-multielectrode recording array (3D-MEA, Multichannel Systems-MCS, Reutlingen, Germany) with an 8 × 8 configuration (electrode impedance, 100–200 KOhm; spacing, 250 μm; height, 100 μm, conducting area only on top 20 μm) made of titanium nitride (TiN) and insulated with a thin layer of silicon nitride. Recordings were made with a MEA2100-Mini headstage (MCS) under a Leica S APO microscope equipped with a transillumination base and a digital camera (model MC170HD, Leica Microsystems). Slices were continuously perfused at a rate of 3–3.5 mL/min at 32–33 °C with the same recording solution as with whole-cell recordings and were allowed at least 20 min to settle in the MEA before any recordings or pharmacology was attempted. Organoids from both phenotypes were examined on a single experimental day with a blind protocol to the experimenter. Electrophysiological data were band passed between 300 and 3000 Hz (2nd order Butterworth) and were captured at 20 KHz via MCS-IFB 3.0 multiboot (MCS) to a personal computer, displayed in MCS Experimenter software (version 2.15) and stored to disk for further analysis. We used a firing algorithm based on standard deviation (5.5 times the baseline) of the unsmoothed basal firing rate histogram (in 0.1 s bins) and a minimum definition of 2 spikes per burst to detect bursts of spikes in spontaneously firing and NMDA responding channels. Local field potentials (LFPs) from NMDA responding channels of interest (COIs), were extracted from the raw signal using a 200 Hz low pass filter (2nd order Butterworth), were stored in a separate file and were subjected to fast Fourier transformation (FFT) and spectrogram visualisation (Welch windowing, 50% overlapping window) and power spectral density (PSD, normalized as log PSD, in dB) analysis for different frequency bands (delta [δ] 0.5–3 Hz, theta [θ] 4–10 Hz and gamma [γ] 30–100 Hz) for the duration of the recording (in 10 s bins). PSD was also computed in 2-min epochs for the frequency range between 1 to 100 Hz (frequency bins of 0.61 Hz) at baseline, during NMDA application and during wash-out and the mean relative power induced by drug application was calculated by subtraction from the baseline epoch for each individual electrode. A three-bin wide (each 10 s) Boxcar and Gaussian smoothing routine was used for firing/bursting rate and spectral power determinations, respectively. Firing, bursting and LFP PSD analysis of data was conducted in Neuroexplorer software (Plexon Inc, Dallas, TX, USA) while spike sorting for single unit analysis (through principal component analysis) was conducted in spike2 software (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK).
2.12. Statistical Analysis
All data represent mean ± s.e.m. The morphologies of microglia were analysed on Origin (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, UK) with significance tested using the Tukey test. All other statistical tests were performed on Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA), with two-way-ANOVA for time plot comparisons of electrophysiological data, Figure 5j,k, and non-parametric Mann–Whitney unpaired tests for PSD95 puncta and electrophysiology results (except for paired t-test between (+)ORG and (−)ORG + NMDA in Figure 4h). The particulars of appropriate statistical tests used are detailed in text.
3. Results
3.1. Erythromyeloid Progenitors Migrate into Brain Organoids and Mature into IBA1+ Cells
Given that microglia migrate into brain early during embryogenesis, we hypothesized that erythromyeloid progenitors (EMPs) would migrate spontaneously to brain organoids at an early state, as had earlier been shown for more mature induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglia [54,69]. To test this idea, we differentiated iPSC-derived erythromyeloid progenitors (EMPs) according to previously published microglial differentiation protocol [69]. We incorporated them in day 30 cerebral brain organoids generated using an undirected protocol similar to previously published work [20]. The schematic illustration in Figure 1a outlines the merging of the two protocols. The incorporated EMPs establish an IBA1+ population and colonise the organoid, as presented in Figure 1b. The robustness of differentiation was confirmed by performing differentiation using four independent and healthy iPSC lines (Table 1). Immunohistochemical stainings against the EMP marker CD41 revealed the presence of the EMP population suspended in Matrigel adjacent to the organoid tissue still five days after the incorporation, at 35 days in vitro (DIV) (Figure 1c). Cells positive for the microglia marker IBA1 and negative for CD41 had begun to infiltrate the nascent cortical loops, as identified by their tissue architecture shown in immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining against TBR2+ intermediate progenitors and DCX+ young neurons (Figure 1d). Double-staining against IBA1 and the microglia/macrophage specific transcription factor PU.1 revealed the microglia-like cells to be positive for both markers (Figure S1c) [75]. Moreover, IBA1+ cells attained less spherical morphology upon arriving at the organoid tissue, and as the organoids matured, the IBA1+ cells portrayed a spectrum of morphologies (Figure 1e,i, 120 DIV). The organoids showed radial maturation of the cortical plate (Figure 1f, 120 DIV), as shown previously [20,39] and the IBA1+ cells exhibited tangling with neuronal processes (Figure 1f, d66 DIV). Furthermore, in accordance with earlier work, we observed minor native populations of microglia in organoids without incorporated microglia progenitors [56]. However, counting the IBA1+ cells in day 120 organoids with and without incorporated microglia, abbreviated here (+)ORG and (−)ORG, respectively, showed significantly more microglia in the (+)ORG group (Figure S1a).
As the microglia take increasingly complex morphologies during brain development in vivo [76], and given the breadth of variation in the morphologies of IBA1+ cells even within a single organoid, we sought to answer if the relative portions of particular morphologies within the IBA1+ cell population changes as the organoid matures. For this, we employed an artificial intelligence (AI) platform offered by Aiforia and trained the convolutional neural network-based algorithm to annotate four different morphology types (Figure 1i) from images of immunohistological stainings against IBA1 in organoid cryosections. We quantified the numbers of ramified, intermediate, rod-shaped and spheric cells in organoid sections at 35, 66 and 120 DIV (Figure 1h). At 35 DIV, the IBA1+ populations consisted mainly of cells detected as spheric and intermediate. At 66 DIV the portions of ramified and intermediate cells increased and spheric cell decreased. On day 120, the ramified cells were further enriched within the IBA1+ population, while the portion of other types did not significantly change from day 66. In parallel to the AI-based quantification, we performed skeletal analysis using ImageJ [73,74], entailing manual annotation of the cells and yielding per-organoid average counts of branches, junctions, endpoints and triple points (Figure S1b). In agreement with the AI-based detection results, the average complexity of cell morphology increased from day 35 to 66. However, the complexity decreased from day 66 to day 120. Combining the results from the AI-based classification and skeletal analysis suggests that indeed, the IBA1+ cells attain more complex morphologies as they mature within the organoid environment. However, while the average morphological complexity decreased from day 66 to day 120, as shown by skeletal analysis, the portion of the ramified subset increases, as demonstrated by the AI-based detection.
3.2. IBA1+ Cells Interact with Pre- and Post-Synaptic Elements
Immunohistochemical staining against postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95) (Figure S2a–e) showed an assortment of PSD95+ puncta of different sizes, in line with its physiological role as a dynamically regulated scaffolding protein in the dendritic spine [77,78,79,80], and the sizes of representative puncta corresponded to the sizes of PSD95 nanocluster detected in the human brain [81]. Moreover, while most PSD95+ puncta were scattered (Figures S1d and S2b,c), representing the typical spatial arrangement shown earlier [81], distinct areas in the sections portrayed PSD95+ puncta arranged around nuclei (Figure S1d), also shown in earlier reports [82,83], and possibly representing perisomatic synapses [84,85], with no apparent differences in PSD95 localisation between (+)ORG and (−)ORG groups. IHC against synaptophysin (SYP), a protein of synaptic vesicles and denotating presynaptic compartments [86], showed likewise intense punctate staining, though bigger puncta as in PSD95 IHC, and less intense staining localised to stripes resembling neuronal processes (Figure S2f–i).
Inspired by the IHC staining against IBA1 and B-tubulin showing the IBA1+ cells to be intensively intertwined within neurons (Figure 1g), we further investigated physical proximity between the IBA1+ cells and synaptic material. Indeed, double staining for IBA1 and post-synaptic density protein 95 (PSD95), and IBA1 and the presynaptic synaptophysin (SYP) at 120 DIV revealed instances of synaptic material being inserted in an open pocket on the surface of the IBA1+ cells (Figure 2a,b). Orthogonal dissection images revealed SYP-stained material to fill the entire pocket, while PSD95 filled only part of the pocket. Additionally, for both SYP1 and PSD95, we observed partial co-localisation with IBA1 within the pocket. For SYP1, we also observed instances of non-pocketed co-localisation with a process of an IBA1+ cell. Furthermore, at 150 DIV, we observed PSD95+ material within an IBA1+ cell, wherein PSD95 existed as puncta and as diffuse spheres (Figure 2c). Taken together, the images compose immunohistologal evidence of the IBA1+ cells physically interacting with both pre- and post-synaptic particles and internalising post-synaptic material.
Next, to analyse if the interaction between microglia and synapses was reflected in the numbers of PSD95 puncta, we quantified the numbers of PSD95 puncta in the (+)/(−) ORGs at 120 DIV using the FindMaxima algorithm in Fiji [74]. Given the impressive variance in puncta sizes, we applied a series of incrementally increasing prominence thresholds to interrogate the prevalence of different puncta sizes, but saw no significant difference in the PSD95 puncta counts between the (+)/(−) groups at any prominence threshold (Figure S1e).
3.3. IBA1+ Cells Expedite Neuronal Maturation in Cerebral Organoids
To assess whether enrichment of organoids with IBA1+ cells has the capacity to alter single neuron properties in the developing organoids, we performed whole-cell recordings in acute organoid slices at days 107–120 and days 150–165. The recordings were carried out under voltage-clamp conditions to measure the maximal sodium and potassium (holding voltage—70 mV, test voltage −20 mV and +10 mV, respectively) and passive leak current density (holding voltage—50 mV, test voltage −120 mV) as markers of neuronal maturation and stage of development. Currents recorded were normalised to cell size and expressed as pA current per pF of cell capacitance. We detected a statistically larger potassium current density in (+)ORG at the early time point and a significantly larger mean sodium current density in neurons in (+)ORG at both recorded time points (Figure 3a,b). No changes were seen in the background mean maximal leak current density between the two groups (Figure 3a,b) or basal electrophysiological parameters of the neurons measured under current-clamp conditions (input resistance, resting membrane potential or membrane time constant, Figure 3c). We found that the increased sodium current density translated functionally to a significantly larger prevalence of repetitive action potential (AP) firing neurons in (+)ORG (Figure 3d–f) and a larger, albeit marginally insignificant, prevalence of neurons firing non-adaptively during the current steps (Figure 3g). Moreover, neurons from (+)ORG were more likely to express active ionic currents and, in particular, a presumed low-threshold calcium current often leading to a low threshold potential-spike (LTS), following release from a prolonged hyperpolarisation (Figure 3h,i). Furthermore, we only detected spontaneous excitatory post-synaptic currents (sEPSCs) under voltage-clamp in neurons in (+)ORG but not in (−)ORG (Figure 3j–l).
3.4. IBA1+ Cells Mediate Emergence of Spontaneous Bursting Activity in Cerebral Organoids
Next, we looked if microglia would boost the emergence of network activity, previously reported in organoids [34]. 3D-MEA electrophysiological recordings were undertaken from acute slices of day 150–165 organoids to examine the developing characteristics of the neuronal network properties. We detected only a single active electrode track with spontaneously occurring multiunit activity from (−)ORG slices, which was in striking contrast to the (+)ORG slices where we detected 24 spontaneously active electrode tracks under basal conditions (Figure 4a,b). (+)ORG slices exhibited activity patterns in active electrode tracks ranging from irregular firing to regular bursting (Figure 4b–d). Such bursting activity could be often discriminated successfully, through principal component analysis, into single unit activity (SUA; Figure 4c) from presumed single neuron firing, but each unit appeared relatively asynchronous in bursting phase to others and thus mean population spiking plots remained flat (Figure 4e) and did not follow any regular oscillatory activity with typical high amplitude peak spiking-low amplitude silent pause features expected from synchronously bursting networks as described before by others [34]. The differences in the prevalence of activity and functional characteristics were not secondary to slice-MEA placement or viability of the neurons as we could reverse the silent electrode tracks of the (−)ORG slices to active by exciting the neurons with the application of NMDA, resulting in the emergence of brief bursting activity (Figure 4a,h). Whole-cell recordings from organoids that have undergone MEA recordings confirmed the presence of bursting neurons from resting (0 pA) or near resting membrane potential (from +2 to +10 pA current injection, Figure 4g) in slices from (+)ORG but rarely from slices of (−)ORG (Figure 4f).
To further elaborate on our functional findings and to ascertain whether the striking differences seen would persist in time, we examined four organoid-slices per group (taken from two different batches) at DIV 200–213 using 3D-MEA techniques coupled to NMDA pharmacology to induce brief periods of persistent neuronal bursting and local field potential (LFPs) oscillations. Unlike our previous results at DIV 150–165, we found a similar number of spontaneously active channels per organoid-slice under both baseline and under induced conditions via NMDA receptor activation (baseline active channels, Figure 5a). We also found only a small minority (circa 5–10%) of spontaneous active channels that exhibited signs of bursting in baseline condition in both phenotypes (Figure 5b) unlike the high burst prevalence in (+)ORG only at DIV 150–165 (Figure 4b) suggesting that time spent in culture reduced the incidence of finding spontaneous bursting channels in our organoids. To understand the developing dynamics of the network, we focused our analysis on the impact of brief NMDA receptor activation (2 min) on spike firing and spike bursting characteristics during our pharmacological experiments. The mean firing rate during NMDA perfusion (2-min average) was significantly higher in (+)ORG phenotype (Figure 5c,d). Burst firing induced by NMDA was significantly higher in (+)ORG phenotype (Figure 5e,f), while we found significantly more bursting channels induced by NMDA superfusion in (+)ORG than in (−)ORG phenotypes (Figure 5g). Further analysis of the NMDA-induced bursting characteristics revealed that (+)ORG exhibited significantly higher, mean and mean peak intra-burst firing frequency (Figure 5h). To probe further the characteristics of the developing network’s behaviour in organoids, we examined NMDA-induced oscillatory activity in different frequency bands by analysing LFPs from NMDA responding channels (n = 44 vs. 66 responding channels for (+)ORG and (−)ORG phenotypes, Figure 5i–k). Power spectral density (PSD) analysis revealed that NMDA induced a strong, but differential enhancement of specific frequencies, especially in the high frequency γ-band (30–100 Hz) range (Figure 5i). We found that PSD induced by NMDA was significantly different between (+)ORG and (−)ORG phenotypes (Figure 5j). In particular, the power of the induced γ-band component of the LFP was highly significant and larger in (+)ORG than (−)ORG slices (Figure 5k).
4. Discussion
Earlier work has characterised the development of neuronal functions in cerebral organoid in single-cell sequencing and functional recordings, and thus consolidated cerebral organoids as a platform that not only recapitulates the tissue architecture of the developing cortex, but also developmental trajectories of maturing neurons and their electrophysiological properties [19,34,35,37]. In parallel, recent publications report several strategies of including microglia in the organoids, making it a radically more complete platform to model CNS in vitro [54,55,56,58,65]. These two lines of exploration convened in a very recent report that benchmarked the impact of incorporated primary microglia on the transcriptome and electrophysiological properties of cerebral organoids [65].
Here, we push the exploration further, and evaluate at multiple developmental time points the functional characteristics of single neurons and multichannel network properties of cerebral organoids that have co-developed with microglia-like cells.
Our approach of incorporating erythromyeloid progenitors that mature into microglia-like cells within the organoid environment, similar to previous reports [57,58], strike a compromise between the methods reported so far; that of incorporating mature iPCS-derived microglia [54,55,69], adjusting the organoid protocol to give rise native microglia [56], and incorporating primary microglia received from mid-gestation human brain [65]. Each approach enjoys their benefits. Inducing the emergence of native microglia is more likely to align the co-development of microglia and neurons closer to the synchrony observed in vivo development [87], while exogenous incorporation efforts need to determine the right development stages for incorporation to achieve the same. However, exogenous microglia allow for convenient employment of microglia specific reporter genes or mutations, and assessment of the impact of microglia to the organoid functions. Incorporating primary microglia delivers a benchmark for transcriptome signature and functional analysis with high in vivo relevance, while being methodologically far less accessible than iPCS-derived cells.
Our findings of physical contact between microglia-like cells and synaptic components are in line with previous work [55,56,58,65], and encourages future efforts in live-imaging of microglia-neuron contacts to determine if the IBA1+PSD95 contact is transient or if it results in internalisation of synaptic components [88]. Such experiments would effectively dissect the question whether a particular contact is supporting or degrading the synapse [44,51,88,89].
Beyond the close interaction of microglia and synapses, the functional synaptic/network differences seen here between different type of organoids demonstrate a generalized more mature and diverse neuronal phenotype to emerge in organoids with microglia. We recorded both single neurons using whole-cell recordings and spontaneous single and multiunit neural activity using extracellular electrophysiology with multi-electrode arrays, and found an increased prevalence of single neurons with bursting behaviour in (+)ORGs compared to (−)ORGs consistent with the presumed role of microglia in the development of neuronal properties and network formation [50,90]. Our data suggest that neurons from (+)ORG exhibit clear signs of strong and regular, spontaneous and NMDA-induced single-cell bursting characteristics without, however, having developed yet concrete network features such as synchronised population activity [37]. Highly synchronous NMDA-induced bursting and high power γ-band oscillations in LFPs represent further evidence that organoids with microglia can attain more robust properties of physiologically relevant cortical behaviour that requires an intact wired network of neurons, amongst them often interneurons. Although such properties are not completely absent in (−)ORGs, suggesting that (−)ORGs used herein have the tendency to structurally wire into functional networks, microglia-like cells affect the emergence and development of spontaneous and induced network properties by bringing and maintaining them in more dynamic maturational state at an earlier time point. The larger sodium-potassium current density, the more consistent spontaneous and induced firing and bursting characteristics, the presence of greater ion channel diversity, the emergence of synaptic activity as well as the greater power of oscillatory phenomena in slices of (+)ORGs suggest that microglial enrichment has affected the development and the fundamental aspects of maturation of single-cell and network properties of neurons. Admittedly, whole-cell recordings undertaken herein are laborious and have an inherent lower yield than MEA recordings, but they complement the MEA data and shed light on the intricate development of intracellular properties reported here. These data combined show that single-cell sodium and potassium current properties, that are taken as a sign of neuronal maturation [91] are more developed in the neurons in the (+)ORGs which lends a mechanistic insight into the observed differential behaviour (e.g., firing and bursting propensity) of. the two phenotypes of organoids screened in our study. The results obtained herein in slices are in general good agreement with the recent study from Popova and colleagues [65] where late and short-lived incorporation of microglia in organoids resulted in enhanced network activity judged by functional MEA recordings. Our results extend this view and support the notion that the regulation of sodium and potassium channel development by microglial-like cells give rise to more mature neuronal functions that ultimately manifest as increased neuronal network function.
The striking differences in single-cell electrophysiological properties between (+) and (−)ORGs prompt for dissecting the temporal dynamics of the co-development by depletion of microglia. This might help in directing further microglia-neuron interaction studies to the most relevant stages of organoid development. In addition, single-cell sequencing studies will reveal the neuronal populations that are emerging in response to incorporation of microglia-like cells, similarly as previous sequencing work has revealed enrichment of GABAergic interneurons as the organoids mature [37].
Detailed interrogation of the microglia-neuron interaction is mandatory for understanding the aspects of neuronal development, and more importantly, the aspects of neurodevelopmental disorders most amenable to modelling by using the current organoid approaches [92]. However, a key consideration for organoid-based models is to minimise the emergence of the hypoxia-derived necrotic core as the organoid grows in size [59]. This is an important consideration in cerebral organoids, as the introduction of vasculature was shown to boost neuronal development [59,60,62], and especially important for studying microglia-like cells, as in vivo microglia react to tissue damage [93]. Future work will need to employ organoids that have minimal or no necrosis, by committing to an air-liquid-interphase approach, organoids with vasculature, or to a microfluidic system [55,59,60,62,94].
While our work here focuses solely on analysing neuronal functions arising due to presence of microglia-like cells, future key aspects in characterising microglia-containing organoids would be to interrogate the identity and behaviour of the microglia-like cells within. CD11b sorting and single-cell sequencing allow for determining how closely the iPSC-EMP-derived microglia-like cells correspond to the in vivo microglia or to the primary microglia maturing in organoids [65]. While previous work with microglia-containing organoids has shown the microglia to respond to inflammatory insults [55,56,58,65], an intriguing next step is to analyse if the response results in divergent “non-homeostatic” or “disease associated” subpopulations of microglia, as has been shown for example for Alzheimer’s disease or multiple sclerosis [95,96,97]. Microglia-containing organoids serve as a relevant platform to model microglia responses in different brain diseases.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mirka Tikkanen, Antonie Mugnier and Shaila Eamen for their technical help, and Jenni Voutilainen, Ida Hyötyläinen and Sara Wojciechowski for assistance characterising the generated Mad6 iPSC line and Markku Laakso for providing the original fibroblasts. This work was carried out with the support of UEF Cell and Tissue Imaging Unit, part of Biocenter Finland, University of Eastern Finland, Finland, and FIMM Digital Microscopy and Molecular Pathology Unit supported by HiLIFE and Biocenter Finland.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11010124/s1, Figure S1: Supporting characterisation of organoids; Figure S2: Supporting evidence for the immunostaining of PSD95 and SYP; Figure S3: Characterisation of the iPCS line MAD6.
Author Contributions
I.F. and A.D. designed the work, conducted the experiments and interpreted the results with input from A.S., A.P. (Anssi Pelkonen), M.G.-B., P.K., H.K., S.O. and M.F.F. in the experimental work. M.K. trained us to culture cerebral organoids. A.P. (Alice Pebay), D.H., J.K. (Johanna Kuusisto), J.K. (Jari Koistinaho) and Š.L. provided the iPCS lines and T.R. provided help with Aiforia analysis. T.M. directed the project, interpreted data and supervised the work. I.F., A.D., H.K. and T.M. wrote the manuscript and all co-authors read and commented the manuscript and approved the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the Academy of Finland (JPND Co-fund (334801 and 334800), Academy of Finland (298071, 328287, 305516 and 301234), University of Eastern Finland Doctoral programme in molecular medicine, the Finnish brain foundation, and the Finnish cultural foundation.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the use the lines of MAD6 and Ctrl 8 c2 was approved by the committee on Research Ethics of Northern Savo Hospital district (123/2016), and use of the line MBE2968 c1 was approved by the human research ethics committees of the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital (11/1031H, 13/1151H-004), University of Melbourne (1545394), University of Tasmania (H0014124), with the requirements of the National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia. The line BIONi010-C2 was purchased from European Bank for Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (EBiSC), with permission for research use as detailed in the cell line information pack (CLIP), available at https://cells.ebisc.org/BIONi010-C#derivation (accessed on the 1 December 2021).
Informed Consent Statement
No human subjects were included in the work. The ethical approvals for the use of the iPCS lines as stated in the Institutional review board statements include written consents from the donors of the original fibroblasts.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data is available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Vijayavenkataraman S., Yan W.-C., Lu W.F., Wang C.-H., Fuh J.Y.H. 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs for Regenerative Medicine. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018;132:296–332. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim J., Koo B.-K., Knoblich J.A. Human Organoids: Model Systems for Human Biology and Medicine. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:571–584. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0259-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Puschhof J., Pleguezuelos-Manzano C., Martinez-Silgado A., Akkerman N., Saftien A., Boot C., de Waal A., Beumer J., Dutta D., Heo I., et al. Intestinal Organoid Cocultures with Microbes. Nat. Protoc. 2021;16:4633–4649. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00589-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tarassoli S.P., Jessop Z.M., Al-Sabah A., Gao N., Whitaker S., Doak S., Whitaker I.S. Skin Tissue Engineering Using 3D Bioprinting: An Evolving Research Field. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2018;71:615–623. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pourchet L.J., Thepot A., Albouy M., Courtial E.J., Boher A., Blum L.J., Marquette C.A. Human Skin 3D Bioprinting Using Scaffold-Free Approach. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2017;6:1601101. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201601101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sun H., Zhang Y.-X., Li Y.-M. Generation of Skin Organoids: Potential Opportunities and Challenges. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:3176. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.709824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kelley K.W., Pașca S.P. Human Brain Organogenesis: Toward a Cellular Understanding of Development and Disease. Cell. 2022. in press . [DOI] [PubMed]
- 8.Kelava I., Lancaster M.A. Dishing out Mini-Brains: Current Progress and Future Prospects in Brain Organoid Research. Dev. Biol. 2016;420:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.06.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lenin S., Ponthier E., Scheer K.G., Yeo E.C.F., Tea M.N., Ebert L.M., Oksdath Mansilla M., Poonnoose S., Baumgartner U., Day B.W., et al. A Drug Screening Pipeline Using 2D and 3D Patient-Derived In Vitro Models for Pre-Clinical Analysis of Therapy Response in Glioblastoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:4322. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Costamagna G., Comi G.P., Corti S. Advancing Drug Discovery for Neurological Disorders Using IPSC-Derived Neural Organoids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:2659. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Villa C., Combi R., Conconi D., Lavitrano M. Patient-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCs) and Cerebral Organoids for Drug Screening and Development in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Opportunities and Challenges. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:280. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nii T., Makino K., Tabata Y. Three-Dimensional Culture System of Cancer Cells Combined with Biomaterials for Drug Screening. Cancers. 2020;12:2754. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nii T., Makino K., Tabata Y. A Cancer Invasion Model Combined with Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Aggregates Incorporating Gelatin Hydrogel Microspheres Containing a P53 Inhibitor. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods. 2019;25:711–720. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2019.0189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Drost J., Clevers H. Organoids in Cancer Research. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:407–418. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Han P., Liu J., Lei Y., Lin Z., Tian D., Yan W. Netrin-1 Promotes the Collective Cell Migration of Liver Cancer Cells in a 3D Cell Culture Model. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2019;75:489–498. doi: 10.1007/s13105-019-00701-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Azzarelli R., Ori M., Philpott A., Simons B.D. Three-Dimensional Model of Glioblastoma by Co-Culturing Tumor Stem Cells with Human Brain Organoids. Biol. Open. 2021;10:bio056416. doi: 10.1242/bio.056416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hajal C., Le Roi B., Kamm R.D., Maoz B.M. Biology and Models of the Blood–Brain Barrier. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2021;23:359–384. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082120-042814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Campisi M., Shin Y., Osaki T., Hajal C., Chiono V., Kamm R.D. 3D Self-Organized Microvascular Model of the Human Blood-Brain Barrier with Endothelial Cells, Pericytes and Astrocytes. Biomaterials. 2018;180:117–129. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Benito-Kwiecinski S., Giandomenico S.L., Sutcliffe M., Riis E.S., Freire-Pritchett P., Kelava I., Wunderlich S., Martin U., Wray G.A., McDole K., et al. An Early Cell Shape Transition Drives Evolutionary Expansion of the Human Forebrain. Cell. 2021;184:2084–2102.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lancaster M.A., Renner M., Martin C.-A., Wenzel D., Bicknell L.S., Hurles M.E., Homfray T., Penninger J.M., Jackson A.P., Knoblich J.A. Cerebral Organoids Model Human Brain Development and Microcephaly. Nature. 2013;501:373. doi: 10.1038/nature12517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kadoshima T., Sakaguchi H., Nakano T., Soen M., Ando S., Eiraku M., Sasai Y. Self-Organization of Axial Polarity, inside-out Layer Pattern, and Species-Specific Progenitor Dynamics in Human ES Cell-Derived Neocortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:7498. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315710110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Paşca A.M., Sloan S.A., Clarke L.E., Tian Y., Makinson C.D., Huber N., Kim C.H., Park J.-Y., O’Rourke N.A., Nguyen K.D., et al. Functional Cortical Neurons and Astrocytes from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells in 3D Culture. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:671–678. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shou Y., Liang F., Xu S., Li X. The Application of Brain Organoids: From Neuronal Development to Neurological Diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:1092. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.579659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Venkataraman L., Fair S.R., McElroy C.A., Hester M.E., Fu H. Modeling Neurodegenerative Diseases with Cerebral Organoids and Other Three-Dimensional Culture Systems: Focus on Alzheimer’s Disease. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2020:382–403. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-10068-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bhattacharya A., Choi W.W.Y., Muffat J., Li Y. Modeling Developmental Brain Diseases Using Human Pluripotent Stem Cells-Derived Brain Organoids—Progress and Perspective. J. Mol. Biol. 2021:167386. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gulimiheranmu M., Li S., Zhou J. In Vitro Recapitulation of Neuropsychiatric Disorders with Pluripotent Stem Cells-Derived Brain Organoids. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:12431. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ogawa J., Pao G.M., Shokhirev M.N., Verma I.M. Glioblastoma Model Using Human Cerebral Organoids. Cell Rep. 2018;23:1220–1229. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Linkous A., Balamatsias D., Snuderl M., Edwards L., Miyaguchi K., Milner T., Reich B., Cohen-Gould L., Storaska A., Nakayama Y., et al. Modeling Patient-Derived Glioblastoma with Cerebral Organoids. Cell Rep. 2019;26:3203–3211.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li Y., Muffat J., Omer A., Bosch I., Lancaster M.A., Sur M., Gehrke L., Knoblich J.A., Jaenisch R. Induction of Expansion and Folding in Human Cerebral Organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20:385–396.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Qian X., Nguyen H.N., Song M.M., Hadiono C., Ogden S.C., Hammack C., Yao B., Hamersky G.R., Jacob F., Zhong C., et al. Brain-Region-Specific Organoids Using Mini-Bioreactors for Modeling ZIKV Exposure. Cell. 2016;165:1238–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lin Y.T., Seo J., Gao F., Feldman H.M., Wen H.L., Penney J., Cam H.P., Gjoneska E., Raja W.K., Cheng J., et al. APOE4 Causes Widespread Molecular and Cellular Alterations Associated with Alzheimer’s Disease Phenotypes in Human IPSC-Derived Brain Cell Types. Neuron. 2018;98:1141–1154.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alić I., Goh P.A., Murray A., Portelius E., Gkanatsiou E., Gough G., Mok K.Y., Koschut D., Brunmeir R., Yeap Y.J., et al. Patient-Specific Alzheimer-like Pathology in Trisomy 21 Cerebral Organoids Reveals BACE2 as a Gene Dose-Sensitive AD Suppressor in Human Brain. Mol. Psychiatry. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0806-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pérez M.J., Ivanyuk D., Panagiotakopoulou V., Di Napoli G., Kalb S., Brunetti D., Al-Shaana R., Kaeser S.A., Fraschka S.A.-K., Jucker M., et al. Loss of Function of the Mitochondrial Peptidase PITRM1 Induces Proteotoxic Stress and Alzheimer’s Disease-like Pathology in Human Cerebral Organoids. Mol. Psychiatry. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0807-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Trujillo C.A., Gao R., Negraes P.D., Gu J., Buchanan J., Preissl S., Wang A., Wu W., Haddad G.G., Chaim I.A., et al. Complex Oscillatory Waves Emerging from Cortical Organoids Model Early Human Brain Network Development. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25:558–569.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Camp J.G., Badsha F., Florio M., Kanton S., Gerber T., Wilsch-Bräuninger M., Lewitus E., Sykes A., Hevers W., Lancaster M., et al. Human Cerebral Organoids Recapitulate Gene Expression Programs of Fetal Neocortex Development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:15672–15677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520760112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kanton S., Boyle M.J., He Z., Santel M., Weigert A., Sanchís-Calleja F., Guijarro P., Sidow L., Fleck J.S., Han D., et al. Organoid Single-Cell Genomic Atlas Uncovers Human-Specific Features of Brain Development. Nature. 2019;574:418–422. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1654-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fair S.R., Julian D., Hartlaub A.M., Pusuluri S.T., Malik G., Summerfied T.L., Zhao G., Hester A.B., Ackerman IV W.E., Hollingsworth E.W., et al. Electrophysiological Maturation of Cerebral Organoids Correlates with Dynamic Morphological and Cellular Development. Stem Cell Rep. 2020;15:855–868. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pollen A.A., Bhaduri A., Andrews M.G., Nowakowski T.J., Meyerson O.S., Mostajo-Radji M.A., Di Lullo E., Alvarado B., Bedolli M., Dougherty M.L., et al. Establishing Cerebral Organoids as Models of Human-Specific Brain Evolution. Cell. 2019;176:743–756.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Renner M., Lancaster M.A., Bian S., Choi H., Ku T., Peer A., Chung K., Knoblich J.A. Self-organized Developmental Patterning and Differentiation in Cerebral Organoids. EMBO J. 2017;36:1316–1329. doi: 10.15252/embj.201694700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ginhoux F., Greter M., Leboeuf M., Nandi S., See P., Gokhan S., Mehler M.F., Conway S.J., Ng L.G., Stanley E.R., et al. Fate Mapping Analysis Reveals That Adult Microglia Derive from Primitive Macrophages. Science. 2010;330:841–845. doi: 10.1126/science.1194637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kierdorf K., Erny D., Goldmann T., Sander V., Schulz C., Perdiguero E.G., Wieghofer P., Heinrich A., Riemke P., Hölscher C., et al. Microglia Emerge from Erythromyeloid Precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-Dependent Pathways. Nat. Neurosci. 2013;16:273–280. doi: 10.1038/nn.3318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Utz S.G., See P., Mildenberger W., Thion M.S., Silvin A., Lutz M., Ingelfinger F., Rayan N.A., Lelios I., Buttgereit A., et al. Early Fate Defines Microglia and Non-Parenchymal Brain Macrophage Development. Cell. 2020;181:557–573.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cunningham C.L., Martínez-Cerdeño V., Noctor S.C. Microglia Regulate the Number of Neural Precursor Cells in the Developing Cerebral Cortex. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:4216–4233. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3441-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stevens B., Allen N.J., Vazquez L.E., Howell G.R., Christopherson K.S., Nouri N., Micheva K.D., Mehalow A.K., Huberman A.D., Stafford B., et al. The Classical Complement Cascade Mediates CNS Synapse Elimination. Cell. 2007;131:1164–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Miyamoto A., Wake H., Ishikawa A.W., Eto K., Shibata K., Murakoshi H., Koizumi S., Moorhouse A.J., Yoshimura Y., Nabekura J. Microglia Contact Induces Synapse Formation in Developing Somatosensory Cortex. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12540. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mosser C.-A., Baptista S., Arnoux I., Audinat E. Prog. Neurobiol. 149–150. /; 1–20: 2017. Microglia in CNS Development: Shaping the Brain for the Future; pp. 1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Antony J.M., Paquin A., Nutt S.L., Kaplan D.R., Miller F.D. Endogenous Microglia Regulate Development of Embryonic Cortical Precursor Cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 2011;89:286–298. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shigemoto-Mogami Y., Hoshikawa K., Goldman J.E., Sekino Y., Sato K. Microglia Enhance Neurogenesis and Oligodendrogenesis in the Early Postnatal Subventricular Zone. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:2231–2243. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1619-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lim S.-H., Park E., You B., Jung Y., Park A.-R., Park S.G., Lee J.-R. Neuronal Synapse Formation Induced by Microglia and Interleukin 10. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e81218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Parkhurst C.N., Yang G., Ninan I., Savas J.N., Yates J.R., Lafaille J.J., Hempstead B.L., Littman D.R., Gan W.-B. Microglia Promote Learning-Dependent Synapse Formation through Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor. Cell. 2013;155:1596–1609. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tremblay M.Ě., Lowery R.L., Majewska A.K. Microglial Interactions with Synapses Are Modulated by Visual Experience. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Squarzoni P., Oller G., Hoeffel G., Pont-Lezica L., Rostaing P., Low D., Bessis A., Ginhoux F., Garel S. Microglia Modulate Wiring of the Embryonic Forebrain. Cell Rep. 2014;8:1271–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hickman S., Izzy S., Sen P., Morsett L., El Khoury J. Microglia in Neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2018;21:1359–1369. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0242-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Abud E.M., Ramirez R.N., Martinez E.S., Healy L.M., Nguyen C.H.H., Newman S.A., Yeromin A.V., Scarfone V.M., Marsh S.E., Fimbres C., et al. IPSC-Derived Human Microglia-like Cells to Study Neurological Diseases Highlights. Neuron. 2017;94:278–293. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ao Z., Cai H., Wu Z., Song S., Karahan H., Kim B., Lu H.-C., Kim J., Mackie K., Guo F. Tubular Human Brain Organoids to Model Microglia-Mediated Neuroinflammation. Lab Chip. 2021;21:2751–2762. doi: 10.1039/D1LC00030F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ormel P.R., Vieira de Sá R., van Bodegraven E.J., Karst H., Harschnitz O., Sneeboer M.A.M., Johansen L.E., van Dijk R.E., Scheefhals N., Berdenis van Berlekom A., et al. Microglia Innately Develop within Cerebral Organoids. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4167. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06684-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wörsdörfer P., Dalda N., Kern A., Krüger S., Wagner N., Kwok C.K., Henke E., Ergün S. Generation of Complex Human Organoid Models Including Vascular Networks by Incorporation of Mesodermal Progenitor Cells. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:15663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52204-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Xu R., Boreland A.J., Li X., Erickson C., Jin M., Atkins C., Pang Z.P., Daniels B.P., Jiang P. Developing Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Cerebral Organoids with a Controllable Microglia Ratio for Modeling Brain Development and Pathology. Stem Cell Rep. 2021;16:1923–1937. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cakir B., Xiang Y., Tanaka Y., Kural M.H., Parent M., Kang Y.-J., Chapeton K., Patterson B., Yuan Y., He C.-S., et al. Engineering of Human Brain Organoids with a Functional Vascular-like System. Nat. Methods. 2019;16:1169–1175. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0586-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Giandomenico S.L., Mierau S.B., Gibbons G.M., Wenger L.M.D., Masullo L., Sit T., Sutcliffe M., Boulanger J., Tripodi M., Derivery E., et al. Cerebral Organoids at the Air–Liquid Interface Generate Diverse Nerve Tracts with Functional Output. Nat. Neurosci. 2019;22:669–679. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0350-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Birey F., Andersen J., Makinson C.D., Islam S., Wei W., Huber N., Fan H.C., Metzler K.R.C., Panagiotakos G., Thom N., et al. Assembly of Functionally Integrated Human Forebrain Spheroids. Nature. 2017;545:54–59. doi: 10.1038/nature22330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Qian X., Su Y., Adam C.D., Deutschmann A.U., Pather S.R., Goldberg E.M., Su K., Li S., Lu L., Jacob F., et al. Sliced Human Cortical Organoids for Modeling Distinct Cortical Layer Formation. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26:766–781.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Quadrato G., Nguyen T., Macosko E.Z., Sherwood J.L., Min Yang S., Berger D.R., Maria N., Scholvin J., Goldman M., Kinney J.P., et al. Cell Diversity and Network Dynamics in Photosensitive Human Brain Organoids. Nature. 2017;545:48–53. doi: 10.1038/nature22047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yokoi R., Shibata M., Odawara A., Ishibashi Y., Nagafuku N., Matsuda N., Suzuki I. Analysis of Signal Components < 500 Hz in Brain Organoids Coupled to Microelectrode Arrays: A Reliable Test-Bed for Preclinical Seizure Liability Assessment of Drugs and Screening of Antiepileptic Drugs. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2021;28:101148. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.101148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Popova G., Soliman S.S., Kim C.N., Keefe M.G., Hennick K.M., Jain S., Li T., Tejera D., Shin D., Chhun B.B., et al. Human Microglia States Are Conserved across Experimental Models and Regulate Neural Stem Cell Responses in Chimeric Organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28:2153–2166.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Weiss N., Zamponi G.W. T-Type Calcium Channels: From Molecule to Therapeutic Opportunities. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2019;108:34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Leresche N., Lambert R.C. T-Type Calcium Channels in Synaptic Plasticity. Channels. 2017;11:121–139. doi: 10.1080/19336950.2016.1238992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lambert R.C., Bessaïh T., Crunelli V., Leresche N. The Many Faces of T-Type Calcium Channels. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2014;466:415–423. doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1353-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Konttinen H., Cabral-da-Silva M.E.C., Ohtonen S., Wojciechowski S., Shakirzyanova A., Caligola S., Giugno R., Ishchenko Y., Hernández D., Fazaludeen M.F., et al. PSEN1ΔE9, APPswe, and APOE4 Confer Disparate Phenotypes in Human IPSC-Derived Microglia. Stem Cell Rep. 2019;13:669–683. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Schmid B., Prehn K.R., Nimsanor N., Garcia B.I.A., Poulsen U., Jørring I., Rasmussen M.A., Clausen C., Mau-Holzmann U.A., Ramakrishna S., et al. Generation of a Set of Isogenic, Gene-Edited IPSC Lines Homozygous for All Main APOE Variants and an APOE Knock-out Line. Stem Cell Res. 2019;34:101349. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2018.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schmid B., Prehn K.R., Nimsanor N., Garcia B.I.A., Poulsen U., Jørring I., Rasmussen M.A., Clausen C., Mau-Holzmann U.A., Ramakrishna S., et al. Corrigendum to “Generation of a Set of Isogenic, Gene-Edited IPSC Lines Homozygous for All Main APOE Variants and an APOE Knock-out Line” [Stem Cell Res. 34/1873–5061 (2019) 101349–55] Stem Cell Res. 2020;48:102005. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2020.102005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Holmqvist S., Lehtonen Š., Chumarina M., Puttonen K.A., Azevedo C., Lebedeva O., Ruponen M., Oksanen M., Djelloul M., Collin A., et al. Creation of a Library of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Parkinsonian Patients. npj Parknsons’s Dis. 2016;2:16009. doi: 10.1038/npjparkd.2016.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Arganda-Carreras I., Fernández-González R., Muñoz-Barrutia A., Ortiz-De-Solorzano C. 3D Reconstruction of Histological Sections: Application to Mammary Gland Tissue. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2010;73:1019–1029. doi: 10.1002/jemt.20829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., Schmid B., et al. Fiji: An Open-Source Platform for Biological-Image Analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Walton M.R., Gibbons H., MacGibbon G.A., Sirimanne E., Saura J., Gluckman P.D., Dragunow M. PU.1 Expression in Microglia. J. Neuroimmunol. 2000;104:109–115. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(99)00262-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kaur C., Rathnasamy G., Ling E.-A. Biology of Microglia in the Developing Brain. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2017;76:736–753. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlx056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kim E., Sheng M. PDZ Domain Proteins of Synapses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004;5:771–781. doi: 10.1038/nrn1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cane M., Maco B., Knott G., Holtmaat A. The Relationship between PSD-95 Clustering and Spine Stability In Vivo. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:2075–2086. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3353-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gray N.W., Weimer R.M., Bureau I., Svoboda K. Rapid Redistribution of Synaptic PSD-95 in the Neocortex In Vivo. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Taft C.E., Turrigiano G.G. PSD-95 Promotes the Stabilization of Young Synaptic Contacts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014;369:20130134. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Curran O.E., Qiu Z., Smith C., Grant S.G.N. A Single-Synapse Resolution Survey of PSD95-Positive Synapses in Twenty Human Brain Regions. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2021;54:6864–6881. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Odawara A., Katoh H., Matsuda N., Suzuki I. Physiological Maturation and Drug Responses of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cortical Neuronal Networks in Long-Term Culture. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:26181. doi: 10.1038/srep26181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Morigaki R., Goto S. Postsynaptic Density Protein 95 in the Striosome and Matrix Compartments of the Human Neostriatum. Front. Neuroanat. 2015;9:154. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Freund T.F., Katona I. Perisomatic Inhibition. Neuron. 2007;56:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Buzsáki G., Wang X.-J. Mechanisms of Gamma Oscillations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2012;35:203–225. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Thiel G. Synapsin I, Synapsin II, and Synaptophysin: Marker Proteins of Synaptic Vesicles. Brain Pathol. 1993;3:87–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1993.tb00729.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lenz K.M., Nelson L.H. Microglia and Beyond: Innate Immune Cells as Regulators of Brain Development and Behavioral Function. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:698. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Weinhard L., di Bartolomei G., Bolasco G., Machado P., Schieber N.L., Neniskyte U., Exiga M., Vadisiute A., Raggioli A., Schertel A., et al. Microglia Remodel Synapses by Presynaptic Trogocytosis and Spine Head Filopodia Induction. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1228. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03566-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Akiyoshi R., Wake H., Kato D., Horiuchi H., Ono R., Ikegami A., Haruwaka K., Omori T., Tachibana Y., Moorhouse A.J., et al. Microglia Enhance Synapse Activity to Promote Local Network Synchronization. eneuro. 2018;5 doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0088-18.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Rigato C., Buckinx R., Le-Corronc H., Rigo J.M., Legendre P. Pattern of Invasion of the Embryonic Mouse Spinal Cord by Microglial Cells at the Time of the Onset of Functional Neuronal Networks. Glia. 2011;59:675–695. doi: 10.1002/glia.21140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Cambray S., Arber C., Little G., Dougalis A.G., de Paola V., Ungless M.A., Li M., Rodríguez T.A. Activin Induces Cortical Interneuron Identity and Differentiation in Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Telencephalic Neural Precursors. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:841. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Knuesel I., Chicha L., Britschgi M., Schobel S.A., Bodmer M., Hellings J.A., Toovey S., Prinssen E.P. Maternal Immune Activation and Abnormal Brain Development across CNS Disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014;10:643. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kawabori M., Yenari M.A. The Role of the Microglia in Acute CNS Injury. Metab. Brain Dis. 2015;30:381–392. doi: 10.1007/s11011-014-9531-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Ao Z., Cai H., Havert D.J., Wu Z., Gong Z., Beggs J.M., Mackie K., Guo F. One-Stop Microfluidic Assembly of Human Brain Organoids To Model Prenatal Cannabis Exposure. Anal. Chem. 2020;92:4630–4638. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Krasemann S., Madore C., Cialic R., Baufeld C., Calcagno N., El Fatimy R., Beckers L., O’Loughlin E., Xu Y., Fanek Z., et al. The TREM2-APOE Pathway Drives the Transcriptional Phenotype of Dysfunctional Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Immunity. 2017;47:566–581.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Sobue A., Komine O., Hara Y., Endo F., Mizoguchi H., Watanabe S., Murayama S., Saito T., Saido T.C., Sahara N., et al. Microglial Gene Signature Reveals Loss of Homeostatic Microglia Associated with Neurodegeneration of Alzheimer’s Disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2021;9:1. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01099-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Zrzavy T., Hametner S., Wimmer I., Butovsky O., Weiner H.L., Lassmann H. Loss of ‘Homeostatic’ Microglia and Patterns of Their Activation in Active Multiple Sclerosis. Brain. 2017;140:1900–1913. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data is available from the authors upon reasonable request.