Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 25;11(1):47. doi: 10.3390/foods11010047

Table 5.

Sugar profile of I. paraquariensis and various varieties of I. aquifolium.

Compound RI Exp. 1 RI Lit. 2 m/z I. paraguariensis I. aquifolium I. aquifolium Alaska I. aquifolium Ferox Argentea
Concentration (mg/g) d.w.
Fructose (TMS) 1922 1867 73/217/204 0.95 ± 0.13 3,4,a 0.63 ± 0.14 b 0.64 ± 0.12 b 0.37 ± 0.09c
Mannose isomer 1 (TMS) 1933 1944 205/103/160 0.73 ± 0.11 a 0.49 ± 0.12 b 0.45 ± 0.09 b 0.25 ± 0.08 c
Glucose isomer 1(TMS) 1948 1964 204/73/205 1.77 ± 0.21 a 0.89 ± 0.23 b 0.92 ± 0.11 b 0.50 ± 0.05 c
Glucose isomer 2 (TMS) 1963 1980 204/73/205 0.45 ± 0.29 a 0.18 ± 0.08 b 0.18 ± 0.03 b 0.11 ± 0.01 c
Mannose isomer 2 (TMS) 2499 2561 205/103/160 0.37 ± 0.22 a 0.37 ± 0.11 a 0.36 ± 0.06 a 0.21 ± 0.02 b
Sucrose (TMS) 2580 2598 361/73/362 2.05 ± 0.33 a 2.80 ± 0.24c 2.93 ± 0.21d 1.58 ± 0.12 b
D-Cellobiose isomer 1 (TMS) 2641 2631 204/191/217 - 1.13 ± 0.17 1.19 ± 0.17 0.60 ± 0.24
Maltose isomer 1 (TMS) 2656 2657 204/73/191 - 0.29 ± 0.07 0.30 ± 0.09 0.17 ± 0.06
D-Cellobiose isomer 1 (TMS) 2695 2693 204/191/217 - 0.25 ± 0.05 0.26 ± 0.03 0.14 ± 0.07
Maltose isomer 2 (TMS) 2711 2712 204/73/191 - 0.95 ± 0.10 0.96 ± 0.13 0.54 ± 0.12
Gentiobiose 2916 2964 361/190/217 0.58 ± 0.25 a 0.60 ± 0.12a 0.60 ± 0.12d 0.34 ± 0.09 b
TOTAL 6.91 a 8.57 b 8.78 b 4.82 c

1 Experimental retention indices calculated against n-alkanes. 2 Retention indices according to the NIST 20 database. 3 Values are mean ± SEM; values followed by the same letter within a row are not significantly different (p > 0.05, Duncan’s test). 4 Data are relative concentrations expressed per internal standard.