Abstract
Background
Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels are associated with relapses, MRI lesions, and brain volume in multiple sclerosis (MS).
Objective
To explore the value of early serum neurofilament light (sNfL) measures in prognosticating 10-year regional brain volumes in MS.
Methods
Patients with MS enrolled in the Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigations in MS at Brigham and Women's Hospital (CLIMB) study within five years of disease onset who had annual blood samples from years 1–10 (n = 91) were studied. sNfL was measured with a single molecule array (SIMOA) assay. We quantified global cortical thickness and normalized deep gray matter (DGM) volumes (fractions of the thalamus, caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus) from high-resolution 3 T MRI at 10 years. Correlations between yearly sNfL levels and 10-year MRI outcomes were assessed using linear regression models.
Results
sNfL levels from years 1 and 2 were associated with 10-year thalamus fraction. Early sNfL levels were not associated with 10-year putamen, globus pallidus or caudate fractions. At 10 years, cortical thickness was not associated with early sNfL levels, but was weakly correlated with total DGM fraction.
Conclusions
Early sNfL levels correlate with 10-year thalamic volume, supporting its role as a prognostic biomarker in MS.
Keywords: serum neurofilament light (sNfL), thalamus, caudate, biomarker, deep gray matter
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS),1,2 Progressive disability due to axonal and neuronal loss, resulting from cumulative inflammatory damage is a prominent feature of the disease. 3
Whole-brain and regional atrophy are the result of axonal and neuronal damage, and correlate with disability and disease progression in MS and specific clinical and pathological endpoints.4–6 Thalamic atrophy in MS occurs early in the disease course and is linked to disability and cognitive impairment.4,5 Specific regions of the gray matter (GM), can now be measured efficiently from MRI including cortical areas and the deep gray matter (DGM) structures.
Predictive biomarkers of future atrophy and axonal loss are needed for prognostication. One promising biomarker in MS is neurofilament light chain (NfL), which is a structural component of axons. NfL levels have been shown to correlate with acute CNS inflammation in patients with MS,7–11 and serum NfL levels (sNfL) can be reliably measured with single-molecule array (SIMOA) assays.11,12 sNfL has been shown to correlate with current brain atrophy and several studies have reported that baseline sNfL levels can be used to predict subsequent brain volumes.8,13–16 Two recent reports have demonstrated an association between CSF NfL and sNfL levels and gray matter (GM) volume.17,18
Our prior work showed that early sNfL levels were prognostic of 10 year whole brain atrophy and T2 lesion volumes, 16 and that sNfL is closely associated with new gadolinium enhancing lesions.19,20 We hypothesized that early serum NfL levels is associated with long-term gray matter volumes, supporting the view that axonal damage due to acute new lesion formation in the early phase of disease has long-term consequences. Our study goal was to evaluate the longitudinal association between sNfL and gray matter volumes at 10 years. We used log-transformed yearly sNfL levels to prognosticate 10-year cortical and DGM volumes.
Methods
Subjects
We included patients with MS enrolled in the Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigation of MS at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (CLIMB, www.climbstudy.org). 21 The CLIMB study has enrolled over 2100 patients since 2000. Patients are followed up with biannual standardized clinical exams and annual MRI scans. Patients also provide biosamples, including blood samples annually. The patients included in this study were diagnosed with MS according to the 2010 McDonald criteria, had their first blood sample within five years of their first symptom, had at least 8/10 annual blood draws from first sample collection to year 10, provided consent for sample sharing, and were part of the quality of life (QOL) subgroup of the CLIMB study. We used the year 10 3 T MRI for all analysis. Further details on this patient population are reported in a prior study. 16
Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents
Institutional Review Board approval was granted by the Partners Human Research Committee, and participants provided written informed consent for participation.
Snfl measurements
Serum samples were collected at the time of the annual CLIMB visit and were stored at −80°C following standardized procedures. Serum samples were shipped on dry ice from Boston, MA to Basel, Switzerland in a temperature-controlled container. There, sNfL levels were measured with a SIMOA assay as described in our prior work. 10 Inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) for three native control serum samples were 10.8%, 8.3%, and 5.7% with averaged concentrations of 9.2 pg/mL, 24.4 pg/mL, and 101.4 pg/mL, respectively. The mean intra-assay CV of duplicated determinations for concentration was 5.1%. Repeat measurements were performed for samples with intra-assay CV above 20%. Four samples showed sNfL levels below the lower limit of quantification (i.e. < 1.3 pg/mL). These values were extrapolated from the standard curve, further information can be found in prior work by the same group. 16 We transformed the sNfL levels by changing 0 to 1, for observations with 0 values. The sNFL values were further log transformed for individual year regression analysis.
MRI acquisition and processing
Brain MRI acquisition was performed at 3 T on a consistent platform for all subjects (Siemens Skyra), using a 20-channel head coil, at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH). This included a sagittal 3D T1-weighted gradient echo series covering the whole brain (TE/TR = 2.96/2300 ms, TI = 900 ms, flip angle = 9 deg), with 1 mm 3 isotropic voxel sizes. 22 All MRI scans were analysed in the Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research at BWH. We have previously reported on whole brain atrophy and T2 hyperintense lesion results in these patients. 22 The current study was focused on regional GM volumes. MRI analysis was blinded to clinical and sNfL information.
Deep gray matter volumes and fractions:
MRI scans were analysed by a fully automated pipeline (FSL-FIRST, v.5.0, https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/) to derive volumes of the caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, and thalamus. Regional brain fractions were derived to normalize the raw volumes by calculating the ratio between each subject's structure volume and that subject's intracranial volume. The intracranial volume was obtained from an automated pipeline as previously described. 22 This normalization step was performed to account for differences in head size across individuals. 5
Cortical thickness:
In order to assess the relationship of sNfL levels with cortical pathology, MRI scans were analysed using a fully automated pipeline (FreeSurfer, v.6.0.0, https://surfer.nmrmgh.harvard.edu/) to comprehensively derive average cortical thickness in 34 regions in each hemisphere. The average of these results across the 68 regions was calculated to represent the global cortical thickness a primary outcome measure. The individual cortical regions were also compared to NfL levels, with no significant relationships noted; these regional data are not shown to limit the number of comparisons as these did not represent pre-planned primary outcomes.
Statistical analysis
We assessed the relationship of individual log transformed sNfL values taken at years 1–10 with 10-year DGM fractions and cortical thickness using simple linear regression analysis. We conducted both univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses to assess the association between baseline annual sNfL levels as the main predictor and 10-year total DGM, regional DGM nuclei fractions (thalamus, caudate, putamen and globus pallidus), and global cortical thickness as the outcomes. The multivariate linear regression model included age at first symptom, disease duration, sex, medication status, changes in brain volume in presence of gad lesions and T2 lesion, and total number of relapses for each year as the additional predictors. We adjusted the results from the all univariate and multivariate linear regression with p.adjust function in R with the ‘fdr’ (Benjamini, Hochberg, and Yekutieli) method for the correction due to the multiple comparisons performed. Furthermore, we determined the additional variance in brain volumes explained by sNfL levels by comparing the reduced linear regression model (without sNfL as a predictor) to the full linear regression model (with sNfL as a predictor).
Data availability statement
The datasets generated for the analysis of the study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request to qualified investigators.
Results
Patients and sNfL characteristics
The patient cohort evaluated in this study was described in our previous publication and is outlined in Table 1. 16 There was a majority (73%) female patients (89 females vs 33 males), and the age at first sNfL value was 37.95 ± 9.09 years (mean ± SD). All patients had a short disease duration from the first symptom at the first visit (1.61 ± 1.08 years). Most patients were treated with DMTs, including 66% of patients at the first sNfL measurement (year 1), which increased to 85% at year 2.
Table 1.
Population demographics.
| Characteristic | Feature | N |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with MS | 91 | |
| Race (N, %) | Black | 2 (2.19%) |
| More than one race | 1 (1%) | |
| Unknown/not reported | 2 (2.1%) | |
| White | 86 (94.50%) | |
| Sex (N, %) | Female | 67 (73%) |
| Male | 24 (27%) | |
| Age at the first sample (mean, SD) years | 37.2 ± 9.06 | |
| Age at first symptom (mean, SD) years | 35.6 ± 9.02 | |
| Disease duration at first visit (mean, SD) years | 1.56 ± 1.05 | |
| Year 1 medications (62) | Untreated | 26 (41.9%) |
| Avonex | 14 (22.5%) | |
| Copaxone | 11 (17.7%) | |
| Betaseron | 5 (8%) | |
| Rebif | 5 (8%) | |
Legend: MS = multiple sclerosis; N = patient count; SD = standard deviation; Disease duration is defined as time from MS diagnosis.
Association of sNfL levels with DGM fraction
We evaluated the relationship between log sNfL levels during years 1–10 and 10-year DGM. On adjusted univariate analysis, we found that sNfL levels for years 1, 2 and 5 were significantly associated with 10-year total DGM fraction. Years 2 and 5 were associated with total DGM in the multivariate analysis, however this significance was lost after adjusting for multiple testing correction. The greatest decrease in explained variance between the full and reduced model (without sNfL) was seen for the association in years 2 (14.2% vs 6.5%). Supplementary Table 1 shows both the adjusted univariate and multivariate association for yearly sNFL and 10-year DGM fractions. Figure 1 represent a scatter plot of year 2 log sNFL and 10-year DGM.
Figure 1.
sNFL levels at year 2 correlate with 10-year deep gray matter fraction: regression analysis between year2 log sNFL values and total deep gray matter adjusted for age, sex, disease duration, medication, total number of relapses, changes in the brain due to presence of T2 lesion and GAD lesion showed a negative correlation (multivariate p-value 0.02, adjusted p-value 0.16).
Association of sNfL levels with thalamic fraction
We next assessed the association between log sNfL levels during years 1–10 and specific DGM sub-structure fractions. Only years 1, 2 and 5 sNfL levels were associated with 10-year thalamic fraction in the adjusted univariate analysis. We found years 1 and 2 were associated in the multivariate analysis, however the significance was lost when adjusted for multiple testing correction. Year 2 presented the greatest decrease in the variance (19.9% vs 10.4%) between the full and reduced model (without sNfL). Table 2 shows the both the adjusted univariate and multivariate association for yearly sNFL and 10-year thalamic fraction. Figure 2 represent a scatter plot of year 2 log sNFL and 10-year thalamic fraction.
Table 2.
Association of yearly log transformed sNfL and thalamic fraction.
| Year | N | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% CI | P-value | Adjusted | Estimate | 95% CI | P-value | R2 Full | R2 Reduced | Adjusted | ||
| 1 | 62 | −4.5*10−4 | −7.2*10−4, −1.7*10−4 |
<0.05 | <0.05 | −3.1*10−4 | −6.1*10−4, −6.8*10−6 |
<0.05 | 25.5% | 19.7% | 0.17 |
| 2 | 70 | −6.9*10−4 | −1.2*10−3, −2.7*10−4 |
<0.05 | <0.05 | −6.0*10−4 | −1.0*10−3, −1.5*10−4 |
<0.05 | 19.9% | 10.4% | 0.08 |
| 3 | 76 | −3.2*10−4 | −6.8*10−4, 5.1*10−5 |
0.09 | 0.48 | −3.3*10−4 | −7.3*10−4, 6.3*10−5 |
0.09 | 13.5% | 9.9% | 0.2 |
| 4 | 85 | −1.8*10−4 | −6.1*10−4, 2.4*10−4 |
0.39 | 1 | −1.3*10−4 | 5.7*10−4, 2.9*10−4 |
0.52 | 13.2% | 12.7% | 0.74 |
| 5 | 78 | −4.8*10−4 | −8.2*10−4, −1.4*10−4 |
<0.05 | <0.05 | −3.8*10−4 | −7.7*10−4, −2.8*10−6 |
0.051 | 13.2% | 8.4% | 0.17 |
| 6 | 71 | −5.1*10−4 | −1.1*10−4, 4.2*10−5 |
0.06 | 0.48 | −4.1*10−4 | −9.9*10−4, 1.6*10−4 |
0.16 | 13.5% | 10.8% | 0.27 |
| 7 | 81 | −1.0*10−4 | −5.2*10−4, 3.1*10−4 |
0.61 | 1 | −1.2*10−4 | −5.8*10−4, 3.4*10−4 |
0.59 | 6.8% | 6.5% | 0.74 |
| 8 | 80 | −2.1*10−4 | −8.5*10−4, 4.2*10−4 |
0.5 | 1 | −1.3*10−4 | −8.0*10−4, 5.3*10−4 |
0.69 | 12.2% | 12% | 0.76 |
| 9 | 70 | −3.8*10−4 | −8.0*10−4, 3.4*10−5 |
0.07 | 0.48 | −3.6*10−4 | −8.1*10−4, 7.3*10−5 |
0.1 | 14.8% | 11% | 0.2 |
| 10 | 75 | −9.7*10−5 | −4.7*10−4, 2.7*10−4 |
0.6 | 1 | −1.3*10−5 | −4.2*10−4, 4.0*10−4 |
0.94 | 5.4% | 5.4% | 0.94 |
Legend: 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; N = patient count; sNfL = serum neurofilament light chain;.
Figure 2.
sNFL levels at year 2 correlate with 10-year thalamic fraction: regression analysis between year2 log sNFL values and thalamus fraction adjusted for age, sex, disease duration, medication, total number of relapses, changes in the brain due to presence of T2 lesion and GAD lesion showed a negative correlation (multivariate p-value 0.008, adjusted p-value 0.08).
There was no association between individual year sNfL levels and 10 year caudate, putamen or globus pallidus fractions on multivariate analysis.
Association of sNfL levels with cortical thickness
We assessed the association between yearly log sNfL levels from year 1 to any follow-up time point until year 10 and global cortical thickness. We did not find any associations in the multivariate analysis and after adjusting for multiple testing corrections.
Association of DGM fractions with cortical thickness
We assessed whether cortical atrophy was associated with DGM atrophy. Year 10 cortical thickness was significantly associated with year 10 total DGM fraction (0.32, p = 0.001). Year 10 cortical thickness was also significantly associated with Year 10 fractions of several DGM substructures, including the thalamus (r = 0.28, p = 0.007), caudate nucleus (r = 0.29, p = 0.004), and putamen (r = 0.30, p = 0.003). We did not find any significant association at year 10 between cortical thickness and year 10 globus pallidus fraction (r = 0.12, p = 0.25).
Discussion
In a prior study, we reported that the same patient cohort showed an association between averaged sNfL levels from the first five years of disease onset and 10-year whole-brain atrophy. 16 In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of sNfL for longterm gray matter volumetrics. Individual sNfL yearly levels during years 1 and 2 were associated with thalamic volumes in univariate analyses, but not in multivariate models which included clinical and MRI measures.
sNfL levels in MS best correlate with axonal damage associated with acute new Gd + lesions and are weakly associated with new T2 lesion development on interval imaging. The clinical value of our results is the demonstration that early sNfL values may be able to prognosticate 10-year MRI and potentially clinical outcomes. The value of this approach will need to be validated across different therapies, including higher efficacy therapies that have been more recently introduced.
The thalamus is a region of significant interest in MS, as it is affected by disease onset23,24 and thalamic atrophy is related to disability, 25 cognitive dysfunction,26–28 ambulation impairment 29 and fatigue. 30 Its role as a central relay station suggest its role as a sensitive barometer of inflammation and CNS damage occurring throughout the brain in MS. 31 sNfL levels are strongly associated with neuro-axonal injury caused by new/enlarging T2 lesions and inflammatory gadolinium enhancing lesions,10,20 and our finding associating early NfL levels with thalamic volume suggests that early white matter inflammation contributes to thalamic atrophy. Consistent with this hypothesis, studies have shown a link between white matter damage and DGM atrophy in MS, suggesting that Wallerian degeneration plays a key role.32,33
In contrast, the lack of association between sNfL and cortical thickness suggests that cortical volume may not be driven by the same mechanisms as thalamic volume. For example, cortical volume is not tightly linked to white matter lesion accrual, suggesting that Wallerian degeneration may not play a major role, 34 unlike our findings with the thalamus. A predominant driver of cortical volume may include direct damage from cortical lesions.35,36 Secondly, another direct effect of the disease that may impact the cortex, is leptomeningeal inflammation, part of the “surface-in” hypothesis of MS pathophysiology stemming from CSF and leptomeningeal inflammation overlying the cerebral cortex.37–39 Our findings might also reflect that cortical volume may not be common early in MS, as suggested by prior studies. 40 This could have limited power/effect sizes for identifying cortical atrophy relationships in the present study.
Our results show that sNfL can be useful in predicting future brain atrophy of key structures, although this association is not consistent across all brain regions. In addition to the aforementioned neuroanatomic correlations, these results may have important clinical associations. As sNfL is responsive to high-efficacy DMTs, it is conceivable that switching to a different DMT may lower sNfL levels and possibly affect brain volume.10,41–45
Our results align with the findings of several prior studies, which showed an association between sNfL levels and brain volumes. A few studies have reported that baseline sNfL levels correlated with future whole-brain atrophy.13,15,16 Furthermore, two studies showed a correlation between sNfL levels and both global GM atrophy and DGM atrophy.17,18 In particular, Jakimovski et al. showed that sNfL levels correlated with the development of atrophy in key DGM structures, including the thalamus and globus pallidus. 17 Both studies show an association between sNfL levels and future GM, thalamic, and pallidal atrophy. Our study also confirms the lack of association between longitudinal cortical atrophy and baseline sNfL levels, which Jakimovski et al. also reported. Our study adds to the results of Jakimovski et al. in several ways. We provide a longer duration of follow-up and the addition of cortical thickness measurements.
The strengths of our study include the longitudinal design, annual sNfL measurements, and the implementation of a well-characterized patient population with clinical and MRI outcomes. Further, we used advanced MRI volumetric measurements from high-resolution 3 T images, which allowed us to assess key brain regions. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to assess the association of sNfL and cortical thickness in patients with MS. The main limitation of this study was the presence of a single MRI timepoint, i.e., year 10, and we thus could not assess longitudinal atrophy, but are only able to show associations with year 10 outcomes. Other limitations include a high proportion of patients treated with DMTs during the early stages of disease. Additionally, future studies will need to further explain the high variance in sNfL levels among patients with MS, which may depend on several factors, including age, clinical relapses, and gadolinium-enhancing lesions.19,20
In conclusion, this study supports the role of sNfL as a predictive marker of DGM volumes, including important DGM structures such as the thalamus. These results may indicate additional ways to improve the way we quantify disability accrual in MS patients. Further, our findings support the presence of some divergence in factors leading to cortical vs. thalamic atrophy. Thalamic volume correlates with both cortical thickness and averaged sNfL levels, although sNfL levels do not correlate with cortical thickness. These results are encouraging because they may pave the way toward the implementation of objective biomarkers such as sNfL, which can provide objective correlates to disability progression. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and to assess the role of high-efficacy DMTs in the association between sNfL and whole-brain and regional volumes.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-mso-10.1177_20552173211069348 for Serum NfL levels in the first five years predict 10-year thalamic fraction in patients with MS by Hrishikesh Lokhande, Mattia Rosso, Shahamat Tauhid, Renxin Chu, Brian C. Healy, Shrishti Saxena, Christian Barro, Anu Paul, Mariann Polgar-Turcsanyi, Mark Anderson, Bonnie I. Glanz, Harald Kropshofer, Cristina Granziera, David Leppert, Ludwig Kappos, Jens Kuhle, Howard L. Weiner, Rohit Bakshi and Tanuja Chitnis in Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Defense ((grant number W81XWH-18-1-0648 to TC), Novartis, and the Swiss National Research Foundation (grant number 320030_160221).
ORCID iDs: Brian C. Healy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5272-2425
Christian Barro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7795-7383
Bonnie I. Glanz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4344-3456
Cristina Granziera https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4917-8761
Rohit Bakshi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-5534
Tanuja Chitnis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-4422
Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.
Contributor Information
Mattia Rosso, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA.
Renxin Chu, Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA.
Brian C. Healy, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Shrishti Saxena, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA.
Christian Barro, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Mark Anderson, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA.
Bonnie I. Glanz, Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA.
Harald Kropshofer, Novartis, Neuroscience Development Unit, Basel, Switzerland.
Cristina Granziera, Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jens Kuhle, Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tanuja Chitnis, Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA.
References
- 1.Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2008; 372: 1502–1517. 2008/10/31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baecher-Allan C, Kaskow BJ, Weiner HL. Multiple sclerosis: mechanisms and immunotherapy. Neuron 2018; 97: 742–768. 2018/02/23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bjartmar C, Kidd G, Mork S, et al. Neurological disability correlates with spinal cord axonal loss and reduced N-acetyl aspartate in chronic multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol 2000; 48: 893–901. 2000/12/16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Horakova D, Dwyer MG, Havrdova E, et al. Gray matter atrophy and disability progression in patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a 5-year longitudinal study. J Neurol Sci 2009; 282: 112–119. 2009/01/27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Houtchens MK, Benedict RH, Killiany R, et al. Thalamic atrophy and cognition in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2007; 69: 1213–1223. 2007/09/19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rocca MA, Battaglini M, Benedict RH, et al. Brain MRI atrophy quantification in MS: from methods to clinical application. Neurology 2017; 88: 403–413. 2016/12/18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kuhle J, Disanto G, Lorscheider J, et al. Fingolimod and CSF neurofilament light chain levels in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2015; 84: 1639–1643. 2015/03/27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kuhle J, Nourbakhsh B, Grant D, et al. Serum neurofilament is associated with progression of brain atrophy and disability in early MS. Neurology 2017; 88: 826–831. 2017/02/06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Varhaug KN, Barro C, Bjornevik K, et al. Neurofilament light chain predicts disease activity in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2018; 5: e422. 2017/12/07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Disanto G, Barro C, Benkert P, et al. Serum neurofilament light: a biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2017; 81: 857–870. 2017/05/18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Novakova L, Zetterberg H, Sundstrom P, et al. Monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis using serum neurofilament light protein. Neurology 2017; 89: 2230–2237. 2017/10/29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kuhle J, Barro C, Disanto G, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain in early relapsing remitting MS is increased and correlates with CSF levels and with MRI measures of disease severity. Mult Scler 2016; 22: 1550–1559. 2016/01/13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barro C, Benkert P, Disanto G, et al. Serum neurofilament as a predictor of disease worsening and brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2018: 2382-2391. 2018/06/04. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hakansson I, Tisell A, Cassel P, et al. Neurofilament levels, disease activity and brain volume during follow-up in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation 2018; 15: 209. 2018/07/20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Canto E, Barro C, Zhao C, et al. Association between Serum neurofilament light chain levels and long-term disease course among patients with multiple sclerosis followed up for 12 years. JAMA Neurol 2019: 1359-1366. 2019/08/14. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chitnis T, Gonzalez C, Healy BC, et al. Neurofilament light chain serum levels correlate with 10-year MRI outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2018; 5: 1478–1491. 2018/12/20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jakimovski D, Kuhle J, Ramanathan M, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain levels associations with gray matter pathology: a 5-year longitudinal study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2019; 6: 1757–1770. 2019/08/23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tortorella C, Direnzo V, Ruggieri M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light levels mark grey matter volume in clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2018; 24: 1039–1045. 2017/05/26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rosso M, Healy BC, Saxena S, et al. MRI Lesion state modulates the relationship between serum neurofilament light and age in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2021: 388-393. 2021/01/22. DOI: 10.1111/jon.12826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rosso M, Gonzalez CT, Healy BC, et al. Temporal association of sNfL and gad-enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020; 7: 945–955. 2020/05/27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gauthier SA, Glanz BI, Mandel M, et al. A model for the comprehensive investigation of a chronic autoimmune disease: the multiple sclerosis CLIMB study. Autoimmun Rev 2006; 5: 532–536. Review 2006/10/10.10.1016/j.autrev.2006.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meier DS, Guttmann CRG, Tummala S, et al. Dual-sensitivity multiple sclerosis lesion and CSF segmentation for multichannel 3 T brain MRI. J Neuroimaging 2018; 28: 36–47. 2017/12/14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fadda G, Brown RA, Magliozzi R, et al. A surface-in gradient of thalamic damage evolves in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2019; 85: 340–351. 2019/02/06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mesaros S, Rocca MA, Absinta M, et al. Evidence of thalamic gray matter loss in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2008; 70: 1107–1112. 2008/02/15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Magon S, Tsagkas C, Gaetano L, et al. Volume loss in the deep gray matter and thalamic subnuclei: a longitudinal study on disability progression in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2020: 1536-1546. 2020/02/11. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09740-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schoonheim MM, Hulst HE, Brandt RB, et al. Thalamus structure and function determine severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2015; 84: 776–783. 2015/01/27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bisecco A, Rocca MA, Pagani E, et al. Connectivity-based parcellation of the thalamus in multiple sclerosis and its implications for cognitive impairment: a multicenter study. Hum Brain Mapp 2015; 36: 2809–2825. 2015/04/16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Benedict RH, Hulst HE, Bergsland N, et al. Clinical significance of atrophy and white matter mean diffusivity within the thalamus of multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2013; 19: 1478–1484. 2013/03/06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Motl RW, Zivadinov R, Bergsland N, et al. Thalamus volume and ambulation in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study. Neurodegener Dis Manag 2016; 6: 23–29. 2016/01/20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Capone F, Collorone S, Cortese R, et al. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: the role of thalamus. Mult Scler 2020; 26: 6–16. 2019/05/30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wagenknecht N, Becker B, Scheld M, et al. Thalamus degeneration and inflammation in two distinct multiple sclerosis animal models. J Mol Neurosci 2016; 60: 102–114. 2016/08/06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dupuy SL, Tauhid S, Hurwitz S, et al. The effect of dimethyl fumarate on cerebral gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Ther 2016; 5: 215–229. 2016/10/17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Henry RG, Shieh M, Amirbekian B, et al. Connecting white matter injury and thalamic atrophy in clinically isolated syndromes. J Neurol Sci 2009; 282: 61–66. 2009/04/28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tsagkas C, Chakravarty MM, Gaetano L, et al. Longitudinal patterns of cortical thinning in multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2020: 2198-2215. 2020/02/19. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mike A, Glanz BI, Hildenbrand P, et al. Identification and clinical impact of multiple sclerosis cortical lesions as assessed by routine 3 T MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 515–521. 2011/02/12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Calabrese M, Reynolds R, Magliozzi R, et al. Regional distribution and evolution of gray matter damage in different populations of multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0135428. 2015/08/13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Magliozzi R, Howell OW, Reeves C, et al. A gradient of neuronal loss and meningeal inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2010; 68: 477–493. 2010/10/27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zurawski J, Tauhid S, Chu R, et al. 7T MRI cerebral leptomeningeal enhancement is common in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and is associated with cortical and thalamic lesions. Mult Scler 2020; 26: 177–187. 2019/11/13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bar-Or A, Hintzen RQ, Dale RC, et al. Immunopathophysiology of pediatric CNS inflammatory demyelinating diseases. Neurology 2016; 87: S12–S19. 2016/08/31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ceccarelli A, Jackson JS, Tauhid S, et al. The impact of lesion in-painting and registration methods on voxel-based morphometry in detecting regional cerebral gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 1579–1585. 2012/03/31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gunnarsson M, Malmestrom C, Axelsson M, et al. Axonal damage in relapsing multiple sclerosis is markedly reduced by natalizumab. Ann Neurol 2011; 69: 83–89. 2011/02/01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Axelsson M, Malmestrom C, Gunnarsson M, et al. Immunosuppressive therapy reduces axonal damage in progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2014; 20: 43–50. 2013/05/25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Novakova L, Axelsson M, Khademi M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of inflammation and degeneration as measures of fingolimod efficacy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2017; 23: 62–71. 2016/03/24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sejbaek T, Nielsen HH, Penner N, et al. Dimethyl fumarate decreases neurofilament light chain in CSF and blood of treatment naive relapsing MS patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019; 90: 1324–1330. 2019/10/16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kuhle J, Kropshofer H, Haering DA, et al. Blood neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of MS disease activity and treatment response. Neurology 2019; 92: e1007–e1015. 2019/02/10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-mso-10.1177_20552173211069348 for Serum NfL levels in the first five years predict 10-year thalamic fraction in patients with MS by Hrishikesh Lokhande, Mattia Rosso, Shahamat Tauhid, Renxin Chu, Brian C. Healy, Shrishti Saxena, Christian Barro, Anu Paul, Mariann Polgar-Turcsanyi, Mark Anderson, Bonnie I. Glanz, Harald Kropshofer, Cristina Granziera, David Leppert, Ludwig Kappos, Jens Kuhle, Howard L. Weiner, Rohit Bakshi and Tanuja Chitnis in Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated for the analysis of the study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request to qualified investigators.


