We are in the midst of a persistent pandemic that threatens the health of the population we care for, particularly impacts on the socially disadvantaged, and whose control has been undermined by complacency and failure to generate consensus on adoption of measures to promote behavioral changes to contain its impact. Or perhaps two, because I am now referring to the tobacco pandemic, which in fact continues to be a greater threat than COVID-19. According to the World Health Organization, tobacco kills more than 8 million people a year around the world, 1.2 million of whom are non-smokers being exposed to second-hand smoke [1]. Nonetheless, tobacco use continues to be rampant, reported by 21% of adults in the U.S [2], and 26% in Europe (with significant variation among different countries); lower educational status and household income are important risk factors internationally [3].
The adverse effects of second hand tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) on the health of children has been known for a long time, and the association of TSE with poor lung function and growth in children with CF has been repeatedly documented over the last 30 years [4]. Surprisingly enough, the prevalence of tobacco use among parents of children with CF seems to be fairly similar to that of the general population [5], [6], [7], [8].
Relatively recent analyses of the Early Pseudomonas Infection Control (EPIC) database [5] and of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) [6] quantified the impact of secondhand TSE on pediatric CF populations with an emphasis on its contribution to socioeconomic disparities. They found a similarly high (27%-29%) prevalence of secondhand TSE exposure in children with CF that varied more than two-fold by household income, parental education, and insurance status (private vs public). These studies found FEV1pp to be 4-8% lower in children with second hand TSE compared to those who had no TSE exposure; adjustment for several different measures of socioeconomic status reduced the apparent impact of smoke exposure to some degree, but overall both studies found that second hand TSE exposure was additive to and magnified SES-related disparities in lung function. The EPIC study also reported similar effects in relation to weight percentile [5].
Thus TSE is a highly prevalent risk factor for adverse pulmonary as well as nutritional outcomes in CF, and has a particular impact on low SES populations who are already at a disadvantage. In this context, it should be noted that despite an increased awareness of its existence, socioeconomic disparities in CF outcomes have been unchanged over the several decades since their initial recognition [9]. Counselling that focuses on TSE reduction presents a badly needed and relatively accessible tool in the our attempts to eliminate or at lease reduce these disparities [10]. A paper in this issue of JCF seems to show that attenuation of TSE can make a difference in lung function of people with CF. Oates et al [7] performed an analysis of data on reported TSE in the CFFPR and found a substantial reduction in pulmonary exacerbations in the first year of apparent cessation of TSE (as determined by exposure reported in the registry), with an additional smaller decrease for each additional year of cessation after that. TSE cessation was also associated with similar large improvements in ppFEV1 and BMI in the first year and then ongoing but smaller increases in follow-up years.
A second paper in this issue of JCF by Baker et al [8] addresses how TSE might lead to an even larger relative deficit in lung function and differentially greater impact on socioeconomic disparities in the new era of highly effective CFTR modulators. Extrapolating from data in animals and humans that cigarette smoke inhibits CFTR function [11], they used CFFPR data to examine the benefit of newly prescribed tezacaftor/ivacaftor in pediatric patients 12 years of age and older over a two year period, comparing those who had TSE to those that did not. The study found that tezacaftor/ivacaftor use was associated with an improvement in FEV1pp in those patients who did not have TSE, but no improvement in those with TSE, leading to a small but statistically significant increase in the pre-existing difference in FEV1pp associated with smoke exposure. Of course, treatment of CF with tezacaftor/ivacaftor leads to relatively small increments in lung function, but if TSE similarly blunts the much greater impact of highly effective CFTR modulator treatment, the repercussions are obviously huge.
There are known limitations in self-report of tobacco use, particularly in populations facing possible disapproval [12], as well as known inconsistencies in pediatric providers’ determination of parental smoking habits. The CFFPR data regarding smoke exposure is just starting to be used in analyses and has never been validated, but the consistency of the results of these two studies and the apparent dose-response relationship is reassuring in this regard. Furthermore, potential biases in reporting would most likely lead to under-ascertainment of exposures, which in turn would be more likely to underestimate rather than overestimate the apparent effect of TSE.
In summary, TSE leads to deficits in lung function and weight gain in people with CF and is an important contributor to socioeconomic disparities. There is a real potential concern that TSE will attenuate the effect of highly effective CFTR modulator drugs in people with CF who are exposed to smoke, and therefore lead to a magnification of SES-related disparities as we enter this new era of CF care. An optimistic note, however, is sounded by the findings of Oates et al indicating that cessation of TSE will lead to a reversal of its adverse effects, with a decrease in pulmonary exacerbations and improvements in FEV1 and weight. Feasible programs that can be initiated in the setting of pediatric practices have been shown to reduce second-hand TSE [13] and pediatric practice-based programs to counsel parents on smoking cessation have some (if limited) proven effectiveness [14]. Active intervention for smoking parents has been endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics [15]; surveys of parents show that advice on smoking cessation from their child's physician would be welcomed by most parents [16]. CF care providers, however, rarely offer any structured approach to smoking cessation counselling for parent caregivers, despite previous attempts to bring it to attention [17]; a recent survey of pediatric CF care providers found several reasons for this, including inadequate training, time constraints, reluctance to enter a therapeutic relationship with parents, and lack of attention from CF care guidelines and educational programs [18]. However, this was the state of mental health screening in CF just a few years ago, and sustained efforts on both sides of the Atlantic along with hard work by CF teams have resulted in dramatic improvements in mental health care [19]. Studies of general pediatricians show that education on smoke reduction counselling and a relatively small commitment of time can lead to success in screening, counselling, and behavior change [20]. Despite the barriers, given the large potential impact of eliminating secondhand smoke exposure in our most vulnerable patients, it behooves us to put TSE screening and counselling into CF care guidelines, educate care teams, and promote systematic screening and tobacco cessation counselling. We can do better [10].
No relevant research support
Declaration of Competing Interest
No relevant conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Tobacco. 2020 [cited 2021 04/04/2021]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco.
- 2.Cornelius ME, Wang TW, Jamal A, Loretan CG, Neff LJ. Tobacco product use among adults - United States, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:1736–1742. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6946a4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gallus S, Lugo A, Liu X, Behrakis P, Boffi R, Bosetti C, Carreras G, Chatenoud L, Clancy L, Continente X, Dobson R, Effertz T, Filippidis FT, Fu M, Geshanova G, Gorini G, Keogan S, Ivanov H, Lopez MJ, Lopez-Nicolas A, Precioso J, Przewozniak K, Radu-Loghin C, Ruprecht A, Semple S, Soriano JB, Starchenko P, Trapero-Bertran M, Tigova O, Tzortzi AS, Vardavas C, Vyzikidou VK, Colombo P, Fernandez E, Tack SHSPI. Who Smokes in Europe? Data from 12 european countries in the TackSHS survey (2017-2018) J Epidemiol. 2021;31:145–151. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20190344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kopp BT, Ortega-Garcia JA, Sadreameli SC, Wellmerling J, Cormet-Boyaka E, Thompson R, McGrath-Morrow S, Groner JA. The impact of secondhand smoke exposure on children with cystic fibrosis: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13 doi: 10.3390/ijerph13101003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ong T, Schechter M, Yang J, Peng L, Emerson J, Gibson RL, Morgan W, Rosenfeld M, Group ES. Socioeconomic status, smoke exposure, and health outcomes in young children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 2017:139. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Oates GR, Baker E, Rowe SM, Gutierrez HH, Schechter MS, Morgan W, Harris WT. Tobacco smoke exposure and socioeconomic factors are independent predictors of pulmonary decline in pediatric cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2020;19:783–790. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Oates GR, Baker E, Collaco JM, Rowe SM, Rutland SB, Fowler CM, Harris WT. Cessation of smoke exposure improves pediatric CF outcomes: Longitudinal analysis of CF Foundation Patient Registry data. J Cyst Fibros. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baker E, Harris WT, Rowe SM, Rutland SB, Oates GR. Tobacco smoke exposure limits the therapeutic benefit of tezacaftor/ivacaftor in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schechter MS, Margolis PA. Relationship between socioeconomic status and disease severity in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 1998;132:260–264. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70442-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oates GR, Schechter MS. Social inequities and cystic fibrosis outcomes: we can do better. Ann Am Thoracic Soc. 2021;18:215–217. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202010-1274ED. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Raju SV, Jackson PL, Courville CA, McNicholas CM, Sloane PA, Sabbatini G, Tidwell S, Tang LP, Liu B, Fortenberry JA, Jones CW, Boydston JA, Clancy JP, Bowen LE, Accurso FJ, Blalock JE, Dransfield MT, Rowe SM. Cigarette smoke induces systemic defects in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:1321–1330. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201304-0733OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gorber SC, Schofield-Hurwitz S, Hardt J, Levasseur G, Tremblay M. The accuracy of self-reported smoking: a systematic review of the relationship between self-reported and cotinine-assessed smoking status. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 2009;11:12–24. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntn010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rosen L, Guttman N, Myers V, Brown N, Ram A, Hovell M, Breysse P, Rule A, Berkovitch M, Zucker D. Protecting young children from tobacco smoke exposure: a pilot study of project zero exposure. Pediatrics. 2018;141:S107–s117. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1026N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nabi-Burza E, Drehmer JE, Hipple Walters B, Rigotti NA, Ossip DJ, Levy DE, Klein JD, Regan S, Gorzkowski JA, Winickoff JP. Treating Parents for Tobacco Use in the Pediatric Setting: The Clinical Effort Against Secondhand Smoke Exposure Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173:931–939. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.2639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Committee on Substance A. American Academy of Pediatrics: Tobacco's toll: implications for the pediatrician. Pediatrics. 2001;107:794–798. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Frankowski BL, Weaver SO, Secker-Walker RH. Advising parents to stop smoking: pediatricians' and parents' attitudes. Pediatrics. 1993;91:296–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schechter MS, Margolis P. Improving subspecialty healthcare: lessons from cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2005;147:295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oates GR, Harris WT, Gutierrez HH, Mims C, Rutland SB, Ott C, Niranjan SJ, Scarinci IC, Walley SC. Tobacco smoke exposure in pediatric cystic fibrosis: a qualitative study of clinician and caregiver perspectives on smoking cessation. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55:2330–2340. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Quittner AL, Abbott J, Hussain S, Ong T, Uluer A, Hempstead S, Lomas P, Smith B. Integration of mental health screening and treatment into cystic fibrosis clinics: Evaluation of initial implementation in 84 programs across the United States. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55:2995–3004. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wall MA, Severson HH, Andrews JA, Lichtenstein E, Zoref L. Pediatric office-based smoking intervention: impact on maternal smoking and relapse. Pediatrics. 1995;96:622–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]