Abstract
Background
Adenomyosis is a chronic gynecological disease characterized by invasion of the uterine endometrium into the muscle layer. In assisted reproductive technology (ART), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) is often used to improve pregnancy rates in patients with adenomyosis, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood.
Methods
Eutopic endometrial specimens were collected from patients with adenomyosis before and after GnRHa treatment in the midsecretory phase. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) of these specimens was performed for transcriptome analysis. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of interest were confirmed by real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry.
Results
A total of 132 DEGs were identified in the endometrium of patients with adenomyosis after GnRHa treatment compared with the control group. Bioinformatics analysis predicted that immune system-associated signal transduction changed significantly after GnRHa treatment. Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 (CCL21) was found to be highly expressed in the eutopic endometrium after GnRHa treatment, which may be involved in the improvement of endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis.
Conclusion
This study suggests that molecular regulation related to immune system-associated signal transduction is an important mechanism of GnRHa treatment in adenomyosis. Immunoreactive CCL21 is thought to regulate inflammatory events and participate in endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis.
Keywords: Adenomyosis, Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, Chemokine ligand 21, Endometrial receptivity
Background
Adenomyosis is defined by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium and diffuse enlargement of the uterus. It preferentially affects parous women between the ages of 35 and 50 years, and its incidence range is estimated at 8–27% [1]. Infertile reproductive failures occur in approximately 22% of adenomyosis patients [2]. In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) has become the primary method used to treat adenomyosis-associated infertility [3]. In general, practice, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) is commonly applied in the treatment of adenomyosis patients with assisted reproductive technology (ART). It has been suggested that GnRHa treatment before frozen embryo transfer (FET) is associated with an increased rate of clinical pregnancy in adenomyosis patients [4, 5]. GnRHa treatment is also associated with a dramatic improvement in clinical pregnancy rates in adenomyosis patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) [6]. GnRHa has been found to markedly reduce the inflammatory reaction and angiogenesis of ectopic foci in women with adenomyosis, which might have an effect at the tissue level and be involved in the regression of adenomyosis [7]. However, information regarding the effect of GnRHa on endometrial receptivity in women with adenomyosis is unclear.
Thus, elucidating the systemic role and underlying cellular regulatory mechanisms of GnRHa treatment in adenomyosis is necessary to identify impaired endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis-associated infertility.
Therefore, in the present study, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) of the eutopic endometrium from GnRHa-treated or untreated patients with adenomyosis was conducted. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and molecular pathways/networks enriched in the eutopic endometrium after GnRHa treatment were identified at the transcriptome level. Furthermore, the adenomyosis mice model were employed to explore the function of GnRHa and identified gene CCL21 on the endometrial receptivity. The expression level of the endometrial receptivity marker HOXA10 was significantly increased after combined administration of GnRHa and CCL21 in the uterus of mice with adenomyosis.
Methods
Subjects and sample collection
The subjects recruited into the study were women of reproductive age attending the Reproductive Medicine Center of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital with the complaint of infertility due to adenomyosis from February 2015 to June 2019. Written informed consent was obtained from patients before sampling, and endometrial biopsies were taken solely for research purposes. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. None of the patients received oral contraceptives or any other therapy within 3 months prior to sampling, and none experienced complications related to pelvic inflammatory disease, autoimmune diseases or RIF. Adenomyosis in all of the women was diagnosed by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Eutopic endometrium samples were obtained from all 9 women with adenomyosis, and endometrial samples were taken again after treatment with GnRHa (Decapeptyl, triptorelin acetate, 3.75 mg, Ferring GmbH, Germany) for a variable period of 3–6 months before frozen embryo transfer (FET). All the patients had moderate focal adenomyosis of the outer myometrium (severity scores ranging from 4 to 6) according to the transvaginal ultrasound-based “sonographic classification of adenomyosis” [8]. The phase of the menstrual cycle was determined by follicular monitoring under ultrasound. All the samples used for in vitro experiments were collected during the midsecretory phase (LH + 7 of the menstrual cycle) using an endometrial curette. Samples of at least 300 mg were collected under sterile conditions and divided into three parts. The first part was immediately fixed in 4% v/v paraformaldehyde for immunofluorescence studies, and the second part was preserved in a cryotube and stored at − 80 °C. The remaining part was transported to the laboratory on ice in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F-12 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA).
RNA-Seq and data analysis
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA purity and quantity were evaluated using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RNA integrity was assessed using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Then, libraries were constructed using the TruSeq Stranded mRNA LT Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Transcriptome sequencing and analysis were conducted by OE Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Raw mRNA-seq data were trimmed using Trimmomatic v.0.33. The clean reads were mapped to the human genome (GRCh38) using HISAT2 [9]. Fragments per kilobase per million (FPKM) of each gene were calculated using Cufflinks. The coverage rates of transcripts were obtained by calculating the FPKM based on the length of the transcript and the number of reads mapped to the gene/transcript. mRNAs with an absolute Log2Ratio ≥ 1 and P-value < 0.05 were marked as significant. Hierarchical cluster analysis of DEGs was performed to explore gene expression patterns. GO enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses of the DEGs were performed using R based on the hypergeometric distribution.
Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR)
RT-qPCR was performed to validate the gene expression data obtained from deep sequencing. Total mRNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using primers designed in our laboratory (Table 1). The RT product was amplified using SYBR Green on a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Waltham, MA, USA). All samples were run in triplicate, and relative gene expression was analyzed according to the 2-ΔΔCt method. The housekeeping gene Actb was used for normalization of the expression data.
Table 1.
Gene symbol | Forward primer (5′–3′) | Reverse primer (5′–3′) |
---|---|---|
RAB7B | CTCATTATCGTCGGAGCCATTG | AGTGTGGTCTGGTATTCCTCATA |
GALNT13 | TTGCCCTTAATAGAAGTCTGCCA | TGGGGAACGATTTATCACACTG |
CFD | GACACCATCGACCACGACC | GCCACGTCGCAGAGAGTTC |
LHFPL3 | CCTACTGGATAGGCGACGG | GAGGCCGATAAAGAAGGAGGC |
PLAC9 | GAGCACAGCGTGTGACAGA | GATCCACGGTCTTCTCTACCA |
SCARA5 | AAAGCTATGTACCTACACACCGT | CCGCCGTTTGTGACATGGA |
EBF1 | AAAGCATCCAACGGAGTGGAA | GCCCTGTCTGTCGTAGAGG |
CCL21 | GTTGCCTCAAGTACAGCCAAA | AGAACAGGATAGCTGGGATGG |
EPHA7 | AGAACTATACCCCGATACGAACA | TGGAAATCCAGTTAGTCCGCA |
PCDH10 | TGGATGGTGGAAGGAGTCTTT | TTCAGCGATATTCCCCACGAA |
THEM4 | GAACAAGGACCTAAGACTGCTC | AGAACATCACGTATTCAAAGCCC |
PPP2R3B | TCCGCAGGGACGAGAGTAG | AAGGTCGGAATGCTTTGGCTC |
ACTB | CATGTACGTTGCTATCCAGGC | CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT |
Note: ACTB (β-actin) was used as an internal control
Abbreviation: RT-qPCR quantitative reverse transcription PCR
Immunohistochemistry
Patient endometrial tissue was fixed with 10% formalin at room temperature overnight and embedded in paraffin after dehydration with an ethanol gradient (70, 80, 90, 95, and 100%). The endometrial tissue was sliced into 3-μM-thick sections, deparaffinized with xylene, and then hydrated in an ethanol gradient. After the sections had been permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, antigen retrieval was performed using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 120 °C under high pressure for 15 min. The sections were blocked with goat serum for 30 min at room temperature and then incubated with a primary antibody against chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 (CCL21) (1:100, ab231116, Abcam) at 4 °C overnight. The sections were rinsed with TBST and incubated with goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin after staining with DAB. A nonspecific rabbit IgG was used as a negative control, and the other steps were the same as those described for the experimental group; nonspecific staining was detected in the negative control.
Western blotting
Mouse uterine tissue was ground and lysed with RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6; 150 mM NaCl; and 1.0% NP-40) containing protease inhibitors (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) at 4 °C for 30 min. The protein concentration was measured with a BCA protein assay reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The proteins were electrophoresed through a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Antibodies against Integrin β3 (1:2000, BS3660, Bioworld), FOXO1 (1:1000, 2880S, CST), HOXA10 (1:500, sc-271,953, Santa Cruz) and GAPDH (1:10000, AP0063, Bioworld) were used to detect these proteins.
Animals
All animal experiments were conducted under the guidance of the Laboratory Animal Management Committee (Jiangsu Province, China) and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (SYXK 2014–0052). ICR mice were raised in the Experimental Animal Center of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (Nanjing, China) in a controlled environment at 20 ± 2 °C under SPF-free conditions on a 12:12-h light:dark cycle with a humidity of 50–70% were freely provided food and water. The newborn mice were fed a peanut oil/lecithin/condensed milk mixture (volume ratio 2:0.2:3) in 5 μl (g•body weight) containing 2.7 μmol (kg•body weight) tamoxifen (Shanghai Fudan Forward Pharmaceutical Co, Shanghai, China) every day from days 2–5 after birth to create the adenomyosis model, while mice in the control group were fed vehicle only. Mice in the adenomyosis group were intraperitoneally injected with 8 mg of GnRHa at the age of 3 months. After 4 weeks, the mice treated with GnRHa were mated and infused with CCL21 (58025-M08B, Sino Biological, Beijing, China) recombinant protein into the uterine cavity dpc 1 (the day the vaginal plug formed was day postcoitus 1). The mice were sacrificed on dpc 4 to verify the adenomyosis model and detect endometrial receptivity and Treg cell expression levels.
Results
RNA-Seq analysis and identification of DEGs
To better understand the effect of GnRHa in adenomyotic endometrial tissue, we conducted a comparative transcriptomic analysis of the endometrium in 9 patients before and after GnRHa treatment. We obtained an average of 46 million read pairs from each sample and further compared the expression profiles in the endometrium between the GnRHa-treated and control groups. In total, 20,030 annotated mRNAs were identified, and 132 mRNAs (P-value < 0.05; absolute Log2Ratio ≥ 1) were significantly deregulated (Fig. 1A). Among the identified DEGs mentioned above, 81 genes were upregulated, and 51 genes were downregulated in eutopic endometrium from patients with adenomyosis compared to that from the control subjects.
Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering were performed with the differentially expressed mRNAs. The PCA results illustrated that the GnRHa-treated endometrium from patients with adenomyosis exhibited distinct gene expression profiles compared with those of the control endometrium (Fig. 1B). A heatmap of the DEGs between the GnRHa-treated and control endometrium indicated the profound impact of GnRHa treatment on eutopic endometrial mRNA expression in adenomyosis patients (Fig. 1C).
Functional analysis of DEGs
We performed a functional investigation through KEGG pathway analysis, which identified biological processes significantly enriched in the DEGs (Fig. 2). From the perspective of diseases and disorders, the nervous system and signal transduction were the top two significantly enriched terms.
Moreover, comparative analysis of the top 30 categories for total gene expression regulation in the control and GnRHa-treated groups was performed. GO analysis was used to examine the enrichment of three categories in the total of 20,030 unigenes: biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions.
For the biological process category, the most dominant subcategories were proteolysis, cell redox homeostasis, and the defense response to bacteria, followed by Kupffer’s vesicle development and others. For the cellular component category, the extracellular space and ciliary basal body were the most dominant subgroups. For the molecular function category, unigenes were assigned to serine-type endopeptidase activity, peptidase activity, serine-type peptidase activity, and metallocarboxypeptidase activity (Fig. 3).
Verification of mRNA expression levels
To confirm the accuracy of the RNA-Seq results, 12 upregulated and downregulated genes were selected for further verification. Total RNA was extracted from adenomyotic endometrium with or without GnRHa treatment and used to verify the expression levels of the selected genes by qPCR (Fig. 4). The verification results were consistent with the RNA-Seq results, which suggests that the RNA-Seq results are accurate.
Immunohistochemical analysis of CCL21
Through KEGG pathway classification, we found that the DEGs are mainly enriched in environmental information processing and organismal systems. Among the enriched KEGG pathways, environmental information processing was further divided into signaling molecules and interactions and signaling transduction, and organismal systems included the immune system, sensory system and nervous system (Table 2). CCL21 was noted among signaling molecules and interactions, signal transduction and the immune system, suggesting its potential role in the mechanism of GnRHa in the treatment of adenomyosis (Table 2). To identify chemokines that are differentially expressed in glands from the eutopic endometrium of patients with adenomyosis before and after GnRHa treatment, we collected endometrium from normal control patients and patients with adenomyosis before and after GnRHa treatment for immunohistochemical analysis. The expression of CCL21 was observed in the endometrium at the mid-secretory phase, especially in glandular epithelial cells, while it was significantly decreased in the endometrium of patients with adenomyosis (Fig. 5). After 3–6 months of GnRHa treatment, the expression of CCL21 in the endometrium of adenomyosis patients increased to normal levels, consistent with our RNA-Seq and qPCR results. Therefore, the expression of CCL21 was decreased in patients with adenomyosis, and GnRHa treatment upregulated the expression of CCL21 in patients with adenomyosis. These results suggest that CCL21 plays an important role in adenomyosis.
Table 2.
Classification | Term | DEGs |
---|---|---|
Environmental information processing | Signaling molecules and interaction | AVPR1B; CCL21; CCR8; GABRB2; GRIA3; HTR1B; HTR2A; HTR2C; IL34; NGF; PTGER3 |
Signaling transduction | ATP1A2; AVPR1B; CCL21; FST; GRIA3; HTR1B; HTR2A; HTR2C; MS4A2; NGF; NR4A1; PDGFD; PPP2R3B; PRKG2; PTGER3; PTPN5; SERPINE1; SFRP5; THEM4 | |
Organismal systems | Immune system | CCL21; CCR8; CFD; F5; GRK1; MS4A2; PRKG2; SERPINE1 |
Sensory system | GRK1; HTR1B; HTR2A; HTR2C; NGF; PRKG2; SCN3A; SCNN1G; TAS2R1; TAS2R31 | |
Nervous system | GABRB2; GRIA3; HTR1B; HTR2A; HTR2C; KCNQ3; NGF; PPP2R3B; PRKG2; SLC17A8; TH; UNC13C |
Examination of CCL21 function in adenomyosis in mice
Guo et al. found that GnRHa, as a clinical treatment for adenomyosis, can also improve endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis model mice [10]. To further study the role of CCL21 in adenomyosis, we generated model mice with adenomyosis and treated them with GnRHa. Gland invasion and muscle disorder in the uterus of mice with adenomyosis were observed though HE staining (Fig. 6A). In the uterus of mice with adenomyosis after GnRHa treatment, markers of adenomyosis were alleviated (Fig. 6B) and the expression of receptivity markers increased although there was no statistical difference (Fig. 6C-F). CCL21 can regulate the recruitment of Treg cells, which affect the receptivity of the endometrium in adenomyosis [11]. After combined administration of GnRHa and CCL21 in the uterus of mice with adenomyosis, expression of the endometrial receptivity marker HOXA10 was significantly increased (Fig. 6C, F). The addition of CCL21 may further promote the therapeutic effect of GnRHa on adenomyosis, thereby improving endometrial receptivity.
Discussion
Adenomyosis is detrimental to the clinical outcome of ART [12]. Long-term GnRHa pretreatment promotes embryo implantation and reduces the miscarriage rate [13]. Khan et al. found that GnRHa could reduce inflammation and angiogenesis and inhibit the proliferation and induce the apoptosis of cells derived from ectopic tissue [7, 14]. The clinical outcome of patients with RIF improved after they received GnRHa and hormone replacement therapy (G-HRT), which may be associated with an increase in endometrial receptivity [15].
Through RNA-Seq analysis, this study demonstrates that GnRHa treatment altered the gene expression profile of the eutopic endometrium in adenomyosis. Functional assessment through KEGG pathway analysis illustrated that signal transduction and organismal systems (nervous system, sensory system and immune system) changed significantly upon GnRHa treatment. Signal transduction involves the transmission of biological signals between cells and plays important roles in cell division, differentiation, metabolism and death. Pain is a common symptom of adenomyosis caused by inflammation and associated with abnormal innervation [16]. The autonomic nervous system is distributed in the female reproductive system, where it regulates blood vessels, smooth muscle contraction and neuroendocrine function [17]. Many studies have shown that the imbalance between sympathetic and sensory innervation and subsequent abnormal secretion of cytokines are involved in the neurogenesis of adenomyosis and lead to peripheral nerve inflammation [18]. Lymphocytes and macrophages are increased in the endometrium of patients with adenomyosis, accompanied by abnormal expression of anti-inflammatory and proinflammatory cytokines [19]. Immune abnormalities are associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition, which facilitates the migration of endometrial cells [20].
Hormonal treatment options could also have a direct effect on local immunity in the endometrium in addition to their systemic effect. Khan et al. found that the use of a preoperative GnRH agonist (gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, GnRHa) in patients with adenomyosis induced a decrease in MCP-1 levels and a reduction in the number of macrophages in endometrial and myometrial layers compared to those in untreated patients [7].
Chemokines have been suggested to participate in a series of pathophysiological processes, including cancer metastasis, angiogenesis and epithelial barrier formation [21–23]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that chemokines are abnormally expressed in the endometrium of patients with endometriosis and adenomyosis. The levels of CXCL12 and its receptor, chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4), were found to be significantly increased in both eutopic and ectopic endometrium from patients with adenomyosis [24]. The peritoneal fluid and serum of patients with endometriosis and adenomyosis were found to have elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, IL-8, IL-1b, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, which was associated with natural killer (NK) cell dysfunction [25].
CCL21 is a decoy receptor ligand of chemokines or cytokines, and its dysregulation was reported to be associated with fetal loss through the mediation of increased inflammation in pigs [26]. CCL21 was also reported to take part in the inflammatory reaction in adenomyosis [27]. In addition, microarray analysis showed that CCL21 was upregulated in RIF patients, demonstrating that CCL21 may contribute to impaired endometrial receptivity [28], which suggests that abnormally elevated CCL21 might lead to excessive inflammation and ultimately implantation failure. At the same time, our study has revealed that CCL21 is downregulated in the endometrium of adenomyosis patients. KEGG pathway analysis illustrated the involvement of CCL21 in signaling molecules and interactions, signal transduction and the immune system (Table 2), which suggests the potential influence of CCL21 dysregulation in adenomyosis.
To ensure a conducive immune environment for embryo implantation, maternal immune tolerance mediated by CD4+ Tregs is essential [29]. Tregs support the adaptation of maternal blood vessels through immune regulation and inhibit inflammation, thereby promoting the invasion of trophoblasts [30, 31]. Tregs have been shown to express CCR7 and migrate under the chemotactic effect of CCL21 [32]. Abnormal expression of chemokines in the endometrium may affect embryo implantation and cause infertility in patients with adenomyosis [24]. The expression levels of Tregs are decreased in the peripheral circulation and uterus of patients with adenomyosis [11]. The number of Tregs is decreased in patients with repeated implantation failure and increased after GnRHa treatment, suggesting that GnRHa may have an immunomodulatory effect and improve endometrial receptivity [33]. CCL21 levels were found to increase in the endometrium of patients with adenomyosis after GnRHa treatment, which may affect the outcome of pregnancy by regulating the recruitment of Tregs. The RNA-Seq data provide new evidence for the regulation of chemokines in the endometrium of patients with adenomyosis after GnRHa treatment. A series of studies have shown that several chemokines are expressed in the eutopic and ectopic endometrium of patients with adenomyosis. Some of them exert a proinflammatory function, while others have anti-inflammatory functions. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)/chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) plays important roles in regulating monocyte/macrophage migration and recruiting monocytes to the site of inflammation after tissue damage or infection [34]. The cytokine IL10, which has potential anti-inflammatory effects, has been found to be reduced in expression in the endometrium of patients with adenomyosis [35, 36]. Therefore, to a certain extent, the expression levels of chemokines and their receptors reflect the recruitment of immune cells and the regulation of inflammation in the endometrium after adenomyosis and GnRHa treatment.
The expression level of CCL21 was confirmed through RNA-Seq analysis and further validation, and its potential function was predicted through KEGG analysis and assessment of common chemokine function in adenomyosis. CCL21 was suggested to regulate the endometrial immune environment by recruiting Tregs. Our results indicate that when CCL21 and GnRHa were combined to treat mice with adenomyosis, they enhanced the expression of HOXA10 to promote endometrial receptivity. Meanwhile, CCL21 may also affect the communication between cells by participating in cell signal transduction and interactions. One focus of our next research will be determining whether CCL21 can regulate the endometrial immune environment by recruiting Tregs in adenomyosis and further improve the receptivity of the endometrium. We also look forward to further clarifying the specific molecular mechanisms involved in signal transduction and interactions regulated by CCL21.
Conclusions
Through RNA-Seq analysis of the eutopic endometrium from GnRHa-treated or untreated patients with adenomyosis, we identified 132 DEGs related to immune system-associated signal transduction; these DEGs are predicted to regulate immune regulation of the uterine local microenvironment and therefore affect endometrium receptivity. The immunoreactive chemokine CCL21 was found to be highly expressed after GnRHa treatment, and CCL21 combined with GnRHa is suggested to promote endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- ART
Assisted reproductive technology
- GnRHa
Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists
- RNA-Seq
RNA sequencing
- DEGs
Differentially expressed genes
- CCL21
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2
- IVF-ET
In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
- FET
Frozen-embryo transfer
- RIF
Recurrent implantation failure
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- FPKM
Fragments per kilobase per million
- DPC
Day post coitus
- PCA
Principle component analysis
- KEGG
Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes
- G-HRT
GnRHa and hormone replacement therapy
- CXCL12
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 12
- CXCR4
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4
- MCP-1
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
Authors’ contributions
J.T., N.N.K., C.Y.H. and J.M. contributed to study design, execution, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, manuscript drafting, and critical discussion. J.X.W. and H.X.S. contributed to acquisition and interpretation of data, manuscript drafting, and critical discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81801530, 82071646).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study received ethical approval from the ethics committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Jiao Tian, Nannan Kang and Junxia Wang consider that the first three authors should be regarded as joint first authors.
Contributor Information
Chenyang Huang, Email: dianshui19901562@126.com.
Jie Mei, Email: meijie560@163.com.
References
- 1.Kissler S, Zangos S, Kohl J, Wiegratz I, Rody A, Gatje R, Vogl TJ, Kunz G, Leyendecker G, Kaufmann M. Duration of dysmenorrhoea and extent of adenomyosis visualised by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;137:204–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Puente JM, Fabris A, Patel J, Patel A, Cerrillo M, Requena A, Garcia-Velasco JA. Adenomyosis in infertile women: prevalence and the role of 3D ultrasound as a marker of severity of the disease. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14:60. doi: 10.1186/s12958-016-0185-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Buggio L, Monti E, Gattei U, Dridi D, Vercellini P. Adenomyosis: fertility and obstetric outcome. A comprehensive literature review. Minerva Ginecol. 2018;70:295–302. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04163-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Niu Z, Chen Q, Sun Y, Feng Y. Long-term pituitary downregulation before frozen embryo transfer could improve pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:1026–1030. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2013.824960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Park CW, Choi MH, Yang KM, Song IO. Pregnancy rate in women with adenomyosis undergoing fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016;43:169–173. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2016.43.3.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tremellen K, Russell P. Adenomyosis is a potential cause of recurrent implantation failure during IVF treatment. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51:280–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01276.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Khan KN, Kitajima M, Hiraki K, Fujishita A, Sekine I, Ishimaru T, Masuzaki H. Changes in tissue inflammation, angiogenesis and apoptosis in endometriosis, adenomyosis and uterine myoma after GnRH agonist therapy. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:642–653. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Munro MG. Classification and reporting Systems for Adenomyosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27:296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12:357–360. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guo S, Li Z, Yan L, Sun Y, Feng Y. GnRH agonist improves pregnancy outcome in mice with induced adenomyosis by restoring endometrial receptivity. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018;12:1621–1631. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S162541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gui T, Chen C, Zhang Z, Tang W, Qian R, Ma X, Cao P, Wan G. The disturbance of TH17-Treg cell balance in adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:506–514. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Horton J, Sterrenburg M, Lane S, Maheshwari A, Li TC, Cheong Y. Reproductive, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes of women with adenomyosis and endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:592–632. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Younes G, Tulandi T. Effects of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:483–490. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Khan KN, Kitajima M, Hiraki K, Fujishita A, Nakashima M, Ishimaru T, Masuzaki H. Cell proliferation effect of GnRH agonist on pathological lesions of women with endometriosis, adenomyosis and uterine myoma. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2878–2890. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang X, Huang R, Wang YF, Liang XY. Pituitary suppression before frozen embryo transfer is beneficial for patients suffering from idiopathic repeated implantation failure. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2016;36:127–131. doi: 10.1007/s11596-016-1554-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wei Y, Liang Y, Lin H, Dai Y, Yao S. Autonomic nervous system and inflammation interaction in endometriosis-associated pain. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:80. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01752-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Monica Brauer M, Smith PG. Estrogen and female reproductive tract innervation: cellular and molecular mechanisms of autonomic neuroplasticity. Auton Neurosci. 2015;187:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2014.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu J, Xie H, Yao S, Liang Y. Macrophage and nerve interaction in endometriosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:53. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0828-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bourdon M, Santulli P, Jeljeli M, Vannuccini S, Marcellin L, Doridot L, Petraglia F, Batteux F, Chapron C. Immunological changes associated with adenomyosis: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27:108–129. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.An M, Li D, Yuan M, Li Q, Zhang L, Wang G. Interaction of macrophages and endometrial cells induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like processes in adenomyosis. Biol Reprod. 2017;96:46–57. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.144071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Adekoya TO, Richardson RM. Cytokines and chemokines as mediators of prostate Cancer metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:4449. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ridiandries A, Tan JT, Bursill CA. The role of CC-chemokines in the regulation of angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1856. doi: 10.3390/ijms17111856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zimmerman NP, Vongsa RA, Wendt MK, Dwinell MB. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in mucosal homeostasis at the intestinal epithelial barrier in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1000–1011. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li J, Yin G, Chen M, Yang S, Wu A, Liang J, Yuan Z. Expression of CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 in patients with adenomyosis. Oncol Lett. 2017;13:2731–2736. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.5762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jeung I, Cheon K, Kim MR. Decreased cytotoxicity of peripheral and peritoneal natural killer cell in endometriosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2916070. doi: 10.1155/2016/2916070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wessels JM, Linton NF, van den Heuvel MJ, Cnossen SA, Edwards AK, Croy BA, Tayade C. Expression of chemokine decoy receptors and their ligands at the porcine maternal-fetal interface. Immunol Cell Biol. 2011;89:304–313. doi: 10.1038/icb.2010.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chand AL, Murray AS, Jones RL, Hannan NJ, Salamonsen LA, Rombauts L. Laser capture microdissection and cDNA array analysis of endometrium identify CCL16 and CCL21 as epithelial-derived inflammatory mediators associated with endometriosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2007;5:18. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-5-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shi C, Han HJ, Fan LJ, Guan J, Zheng XB, Chen X, Liang R, Zhang XW, Sun KK, Cui QH, Shen H. Diverse endometrial mRNA signatures during the window of implantation in patients with repeated implantation failure. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2018;21:183–194. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1324180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Robertson SA, Care AS, Moldenhauer LM. Regulatory T cells in embryo implantation and the immune response to pregnancy. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:4224–4235. doi: 10.1172/JCI122182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Care AS, Bourque SL, Morton JS, Hjartarson EP, Robertson SA, Davidge ST. Reduction in regulatory T cells in early pregnancy causes uterine artery dysfunction in mice. Hypertension. 2018;72:177–187. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.10858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nadkarni S, Smith J, Sferruzzi-Perri AN, Ledwozyw A, Kishore M, Haas R, Mauro C, Williams DJ, Farsky SH, Marelli-Berg FM, Perretti M. Neutrophils induce proangiogenic T cells with a regulatory phenotype in pregnancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E8415–E8424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611944114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Piao W, Kasinath V, Saxena V, Lakhan R, Iyyathurai J, Bromberg JS. LTbetaR Signaling Controls Lymphatic Migration of Immune Cells. Cells. 2021;10:747. doi: 10.3390/cells10040747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guo Z, Shi P, Hao C. Effect of GnRHa on Th17/Treg cells in peripheral blood of patients with unexplained repeated implantation failure. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298:1211–1218. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4874-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Deshmane SL, Kremlev S, Amini S, Sawaya BE. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview. J Interf Cytokine Res. 2009;29:313–326. doi: 10.1089/jir.2008.0027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhihong N, Yun F, Pinggui Z, Sulian Z, Zhang A. Cytokine profiling in the Eutopic endometrium of Adenomyosis during the implantation window after ovarian stimulation. Reprod Sci. 2016;23:124–133. doi: 10.1177/1933719115597761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang J, Huang C, Jiang R, Du Y, Zhou J, Jiang Y, Yan Q, Xing J, Hou X, Zhou J, et al. Decreased endometrial IL-10 impairs endometrial receptivity by Downregulating HOXA10 expression in women with Adenomyosis. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2549789. doi: 10.1155/2018/2549789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.