Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Jan 12;44(2):507–516. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01374-4

Self medication practices and its determinants in health care professionals during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: cross-sectional study

Ogochukwu Chinedum Okoye 1, Oluseyi Ademola Adejumo 2,, Abimbola Olubukunola Opadeyi 3, Cynthia Roli Madubuko 4, Maureen Ntaji 5, Kenechukwu Chukwuemeka Okonkwo 2, Imuetinyan Rashidat Edeki 4, Uchechukwu Oby Agboje 1, Oladimeji Emmanuel Alli 2, John Oghenevwirhe Ohaju-Obodo 1
PMCID: PMC8754192  PMID: 35022953

Abstract

Background The exposure of health care professionals (HCP) to patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in the course of performing their professional duties may expose them to contracting the virus. This may likely increase their tendency to self-medicate for prevention or treatment of perceived infection. Aim This study determined the prevalence of COVID-19 related self-medication and its determinants among HCPs in three tertiary hospitals in Southern Nigeria. Method This was a cross-sectional study that enrolled 669 adult HCPs from three tertiary hospitals in three Southern Nigerian States using a non-probability convenience sampling method. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Data entry and analysis were done using IBM SPSS version 22. Results The mean age of the respondents was 35.6 ± 8.7 years. Two hundred and forty-three respondents (36.3%) reported having practiced COVID-19 related self-medication. The commonly used medications were ivermectin, azithromycin, vitamin C, chloroquine and zinc. Factors associated with self-medication were older age (p =  < 0.0001), being pharmacist (p = 0.03), higher income (p =  < 0.0001), previous COVID-19 testing (p < 0.001). Predictors of self medication were > 44 years (Adjusted Odd Ratio[AOR]:2.77,95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.62–4.75, p =  < 0.0001), previous COVID-19 testing (AOR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.82–3.94, p =  < 0.0001). Conclusion About one-third of HCPs practiced COVID-19 related self-medication. HCPs that are often assumed to be health literate may not necessarily practice safe health behavior. Regular health education of the HCPs on implications of self-medications is highly recommended. There should also be formulation and effective implementation of policies that regulate purchase of medications.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-021-01374-4.

Keywords: COVID-19, Health care professionals, Nigeria, Self-medication

Impacts on practice

  • Health education on adverse implications of self-medications should focus on both the HCPs and the general population.

  • There should be formulation and/or implementation of policies that will ensure the regulation of purchase of medications in Nigeria.

Introduction

The exposure of health care professionals (HCP) to patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in the course of performing their professional duties may expose them to contracting the virus. This may likely increase their tendency to self-medicate for prevention or treatment of perceived infection [1]. This is in spite of the non-pharmacological and risk stratification measures in place by some institutions [2]. Self-medication is the use of medicinal products, including over the counter (OTC) or non-prescription medicines as well as prescription only medicines (POM) to treat self-diagnosed symptoms or illnesses without obtaining advice from a physician, pharmacist or other HCPs in the diagnosis or treatment. It also includes the continuous or intermittent use of a medication previously prescribed by a physician for chronic or recurring symptoms or diseases [3].

There are benefits associated with self-medication such as the active choice of patients’ utilization of the products, direct and rapid access to treatment and self-care, convenience and reduction in costs associated with hospital visitations [3]. Self-medication is associated with risk that may predispose to increased morbidity and mortality from wrong diagnosis, delay in seeking appropriate medical advice and treatment [4]. There is also a risk of antimicrobial resistance and adverse drug reactions, higher probability of drug-drug interactions, increased medication errors and medical expenditure [4].

The practice of self-medication is common among Nigerian consumers and HCPs [510]. Consumers of medicines in Nigeria access care and purchase medicines from various sources such as patent medicine stores (PMS), pharmacies, public and private hospitals. However, majority would rather patronize PMS and community pharmacies than health care facilities due to poor access to public health facilities, long waiting time, unavailability of essential medicines at hospitals and the high cost associated with visiting private health facilities [11, 12]. Poor and ineffective medicine regulatory system allows the availability and purchase of POM in PMS and community pharmacies without a prescription [13].

HCPs are expected to educate the populace on the dangers of self-medication. However, HCPs have medical needs just like their clients and have personal preferences for treatment. These preferences may be informed by quest for personal satisfaction as against evidence-based knowledge. The nature of their training empowers them to recognize and hopefully seek treatment earlier than the uninformed individual. While this may be beneficial in most instances, it may also adversely affect their health as HCPs have poor health-seeking abilities [14].

During the first wave of SARS-COV2 pandemic, HCPs were globally reported to have a high risk of contracting the infection with attendant morbidity and mortality which were worse in HCPs with pre-morbid conditions [15]. The ensuing anxiety associated with the fear of contracting SARS-COV2 was aggravated by conflicting literature on natural course of the disease, prevention, as well as treatment strategies for the SARS-COV2 virus [16]. Several clinical trials which were not conclusive further worsened the anxiety regarding the treatment of the disease [17, 18].

The Nigerian Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) guidelines advised symptomatic relief of fever, cough and nasal congestion with antipyretics. Also, cough medicines, multivitamins and mineral supplements were recommended in mild cases [19]. The use of empiric antibiotic therapy and conservative fluid management was recommended for treatment of severe cases. The NCDC however, strongly advised against the use of chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, antivirals such as lopinavir/ritonavir, immunomodulators, plasma therapy except in the setting of a clinical trial for treatment of COVID-19 because the efficacy of these medications were not proven.

Some previous studies showed that self-medication was more prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic [1, 13, 20]. A study of community pharmacies in Edo state, Nigeria showed an increase in the purchase of some medications considered useful for COVID-19 treatment or prophylaxis in the COVID-19 era compared to pre-COVID-19 period [21]. It is unclear if the HCPs in Nigeria practiced self medication to treat COVID-19 symptoms during the pandemic as few studies have evaluated self-medication use by HCPs in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aim

This study determined the prevalence of COVID-19 related self-medication and its determinants among HCPs in three tertiary hospitals in Southern Nigeria.

Ethics approval

The Research and Ethics Committee of University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria and Delta State University Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria approved the questionnaire and methodology of this study. The ethical protocol numbers are ADM/E22/A/VOLVII/14831123 and REC/FBMS/DELSU/21/101. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant after explanation of the purpose and procedure of the study and before data collection. All data collection tools were anonymous, restricted within the research team only and stored safely to ensure confidentiality.

Method

Study area

This study was carried out between March and April 2021 in three tertiary hospitals located in Southern Nigeria namely; Delta State University Teaching Hospital Oghara (DELSUTH), University of Benin Teaching Hospital Benin (UBTH), and University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital Complex, Ondo (UNIMEDTHC). These hospitals are teaching hospitals that offer specialized and tertiary medical services.

Study design and participants

This study was cross-sectional and descriptive. Cochran formula for descriptive studies was used in calculating the minimum sample size. The minimum sample size was 422 after inclusion of an assumed non-response rate of 10%. The low non-response rate was adopted because the study population was HCPs which were expected to be easily accessible and more co-operative compared to a general population. Eight hundred questionnaires (approximately twice the minimum sample size) were shared among the three centres in the ratio 1.5:1.5:1 based on their respective staff-strength. The number 800 was chosen for ease of allocation.

The study participants were HCPs which included doctors, nurses, pharmacists, laboratory scientists, and health assistants who were employed by the three hospitals and gave consent to participate in the study. A non-probability convenience sampling method was used to enroll participants with the help of trained research assistants.

Data collection instrument

Data was collected using a researcher-developed semi-structured questionnaire which was piloted among HCPs who did not participate in the study. The questionnaires were self-administered and data collected included socio-demographic data, behavioural history (alcohol and smoking), past medical history including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and any other existing chronic medical illness (open ended question). COVID-19 related questions included knowledge of COVID-19, history of COVID-19 testing, details of self-medication related to COVID-19 done during the period of the pandemic and history of self-medication that was unrelated to COVID-19. The primary outcome was self-medication for COVID-19. This was defined according to the WHO guidelines [3]. The diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and other co-morbidities were based on self-report of participants.

Data analysis

Data were analysed using the SPSS 22.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, New York, USA). Data from all returned questionnaires (n = 669) were entered into Excel spreadsheet and exported to SPSS 22.0. Missing data for individual variables occurred randomly and were automatically excluded during data analysis by the statistical software. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used as appropriate to analyse the data. The occurrence of self-medication for COVID-19 amongst respondents was presented as frequencies and percentages according to socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. The Chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between participants' characteristics and the practice of self-medication for COVID-19. The logistic regression model was used to determine independent risk factors of self-medication.

Results

Characteristics of participants

A total of 669 out of 800 questionnaires were returned giving a response rate of 83.6%. Three hundred and seventy-four out of 638 respondents who provided information on sex were females (58.6%). Overall mean age was 35.6 ± 8.7 years and most respondents (42.4%) were between 30–39 year age group. Over half of the respondents (58.1%) were married and 97.5% had attained tertiary level education. Doctors (55.9%) and nurses (37.0%) were in the majority, while records clerks (0.02%) and pharmacists (0.04%) were in the minority. Table 1 summarises the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents. Sixty-four (9.6%) and 1.6% of respondents reported they were hypertensive and diabetic respectively.

Table 1.

Demographic and characteristics of respondents

Centres A B C Total
n % n % n % n %
Gender
Male 97 41.3 127 41.9 40 40.0 264 41.4
Female 138 58.7 176 58.1 60 60.0 374 58.6
Total 235 100.0 303 100.0 100 100.0 638 100.0
Age (years)
20–29 66 29.1 76 25.4 27 39.1 169 28.4
30–39 88 38.8 134 44.8 30 43.5 252 42.4
40–49 42 18.5 67 22.4 9 13.0 118 19.8
50–59 30 13.2 21 7.0 3 4.3 54 9.1
 ≥ 60 1 0.4 1 0.3 0 0.0 2 0.3
Total 226 100.0 299 100.0 69 100.0 595 100.0
Mean ± SD 36.3 ± 9.5 35.6 ± 8.4 33.0 ± 7.4 35.6 ± 8.7
Marital status
Never married 92 39.5 100 33.0 61 46.9 253 38.0
Currently married 128 54.9 192 63.4 67 51.5 387 58.1
Domestic partner 1 0.4 1 0.3 2 1.5 4 0.6
Separated 3 1.3 4 1.3 0 0.0 7 11
Divorced 0 0.0 2 0.7 0 0.0 2 0.3
Widowed 9 3.9 4 1.3 0 00 13 2.0
Total 233 100.0 303 100.0 130 100.0 666 100.0
Educational status
None 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.8 1 0.1
Primary 6 2.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 2.6
Secondary 4 1.7 6 2.0 0 0.0 10 1.5
Tertiary 225 95.7 297 98.0 129 99.2 651 97.5
Total 235 100.0 303 100.0 130 100.0 664 100.0
Occupation
Doctor 104 44.3 113 37.3 71 55.9 288 55.9
Nurse 61 26.0 121 39.9 47 37.0 229 37.0
Pharm 17 7.2 9 3.0 0 0.0 26 0.0
MLS 8 3.4 14 4.6 2 1.6 24 1.6
Health assistant 12 5.1 9 3.0 6 4.7 27 4.7
Records officers 0 0.0 13 4.3 0 0.0 13 0.0
Others** 33 14.0 24 7.9 1 0.8 58 0.8
Total 235 100.0 303 100.0 127 100.0 665 100.0
Income
 < 600,000 23 10.0 9 3.0 16 14.4 48 7.4
600,000–1.19 M 55 23.8 67 22.1 25 22.5 147 22.8
1.20–2.39 M 94 40.7 101 33.3 38 34.2 233 36.1
2.40–5.99 M 43 18.6 75 24.8 29 26.1 147 22.8
6-12 M 16 6.9 47 15.5 1 0.9 64 9.9
 > 12 M 0 0.0 4 1.3 2 1.8 6 0.9
Total 231 100.0 303 100.0 111 100.0 645 100.0

M = Million |MLSǂ = Medical Laboratory Scientist | Pharm = Pharmacist |Others** = Dietician, Engineer, Dentist, Medical Laboratory Technician, Pharm Tech, Physiotherapist, Psychologist, Social worker

Self-medication for COVID-19

Two hundred and forty-three respondents (36.3%) reported taking medicines for COVID-19 prevention and/or treatment; three-quarters of the respondents did not supply name of medication used (Table 2). Medicines used included ivermectin (9.5%), azithromycin (9.1%), vitamin C (7.4%), chloroquine (5.7%), and zinc (2.0%). The medicines used were obtained from pharmacies (80.8%), patent medicine shops (17%) and friends/family (2.2%). The reasons given for taking the medicines included for prophylaxis (45.6%), definite exposure (31.2%), symptoms (21.3%), and probable exposure (15.2%) amongst others (Table 2). Majority (84.7%) reported that medicines taken were beneficial.

Table 2.

Self-medication for COVID-19 among the HCPs

Parameter Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Self-medication
Yes 243 36.3
No 423 63.2
No response 3 0.5
Total 669 100.0
Names of medications used
Zinc Sulphate 5 2.0
Vitamin C 18 7.4
Chloroquine 14 5.7
Azithromycin 22 9.1
Ivermectin 23 9.5
No response 161 66.2
Total 243 100.0
Reason for taking medication*
Symptoms of COVID 52 21.3
Definite exposure to a patient diagnosed with COVID 76 31.2
Probable exposure to a patientdiagnosed with COVID 37 15.2
Prophylaxis against contracting COVID-19 111 45.6
Psychological assurance 17 6.9
No reason 9 3.7
Was taking the medication beneficial?
Yes 199 81.9
No 31 12.8
No response 13 5.3
Total 243 100.0

*Multiple responses

Factors associated with self-medication for COVID-19

A higher proportion of respondents in older age groups practiced self-medication compared to younger age-groups (p =  < 0.0001); 30.9% and 33.4% of those in the 20–29 years and 30-39 years age-group respectively, practiced self-medication compared to 54.1%, 50% and 100% among those is 40–49,50–59 and > 60 years age-group respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.

Socio-demographic factors affecting self medication for COVID-19

Self-medication No Self-medication Total Test statistics P-value
n % n % n %
Gender
Male 94 40.0 167 42.3 261 41.4 0.315 0.574
Female 141 60.0 228 57.7 369 58.6
TOTAL 235 100.0 395 100.0 630 100.0
Age (years)
20–29 52 22.7 116 32.0 168 28.4 25.855  < 0.0001
30–39 84 36.7 167 46.0 251 42.4
40–49 64 27.9 53 14.6 117 19.8
50–59 27 11.8 27 7.4 54 9.1
 ≥ 60 2 0.9 0 0.0 2 0.3
229 100.0 363 100.0 592 100.0
Marital status
Never married 70 28.9 175 42.4 245 37.4 14.680 0.012
Currently married 159 65.7 225 54.5 384 58.6
Domestic partner 2 0.8 2 0.5 4 0.6
Separated 5 2.1 2 0.5 7 1.1
Divorced 1 0.4 1 0.2 2 0.3
Widowed 5 2.1 8 1.9 13 2.0
242 100.0 413 100.0 655 100.0
Educational status
None 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0.2 4.849 0.183
Primary 1 0.4 5 1.2 6 0.9
Secondary 1 0.4 9 2.2 10 1.5
Tertiary 240 99.2 400 96.4 640 97.4
242 100.0 415 100.0 657 100.0
Occupation
Doctor 94 38.7 185 44.9 279 42.7 32.585 0.037
Nurse 96 39.5 131 31.8 227 34.7
Pharmacist 13 5.4 13 3.2 26 4.0
MLSǂ 7 2.9 17 4.1 24 3.7
Health assistant 4 1.6 23 5.7 27 4.1
Record officers 4 1.6 9 2.2 13 2.0
Others** 25 10.3 33 8.1 58 8.8
243 100.0 411 100.0 654 100.0
House hold size
0–3 106 44.0 158 40.0 264 41.5 1.573 0.455
4–6 120 49.8 204 51.6 324 50.9
7 or more 15 6.2 33 8.4 48 7.5
241 100.0 395 100.0 636 100.0
Income
 < 600,000 8 3.4 37 9.3 45 7.1 30.691  < 0.0001
600,000–1.19 M 51 21.7 95 23.8 146 23.0
1.2 M–2.39 M 78 33.2 150 37.5 228 35.9
2.4 M–5.99 M 54 23.0 92 23.0 146 23.0
6.0 M–11.9 M 42 17.9 22 5.5 64 10.1
 > 12 M 2 0.9 4 1.0 6 0.9
235 100.0 400 100.0 635 100.0

χ2 = Pearson Chi-Square test. | t = Student’s T-test | P-value = Probability value | P = Probability value of statistical significance | M = Million |MLSǂ = Medical Laboratory Scientist | Others** = Dietician, Engineer, Dentist, Medical Laboratory Technician, Pharm Tech, Physiotherapist, Psychologist, Social worker

Self-medication was lowest among HCP who were never married (28.6%) and the widows (38.4%), compared to those currently married (41.4%), divorced (50%) or separated (71%). Self-medication practice varied among the categories of health workers; it was highest among pharmacists (50%) and lowest among health assistants (14.8%), P = 0.03. Self-medication was lowest (17.8%) among those earning the lowest annual income (< N600,000) compared to those with higher annual income -N600,000–1,199,999 (34.9%), N1,200,000–2,399,999 (34.2%), and N6,000,000–11,999,999(65.6%), Table 3.

Self-medication was more common among respondents who had COVID-19 test (45.7%) compared to those who had not (29.7%), P =  < 0.0001. Similarly, self-medication was significantly commoner among hypertensive HCP (51.5%) compared to non-hypertensive HCP (35.4%) p = 0.039; and diabetic HCP (81.8%) compared to non-diabetic HCP (35.9%) p = 0.004 (Table 4).

Table 4.

Behavioural and clinical characteristics and COVID-19 self medication

Self-medication No Self-medication TOTAL χ2 P-value
n % n % n %
Knowledge of the existence of COVID-19
Yes 239 98.8 405 98.1 644 98.3 0.449 0.503
No 3 1.2 8 1.9 11 1.7
Total 242 100.0 413 100.0 655 100.0
Testing for COVID-19
Yes 135 55.6 160 38.6 295 44.8 17.911  < 0.0001
No 108 44.4 255 61.4 363 55.2
Total 243 100.0 415 100.0 658 100.0
History of self-medication
Yes 92 38.2 139 36.7 231 37.3 0.142 0.707
No 149 61.8 240 63.3 389 62.7
Total 241 100.0 379 100.0 620 100.0
Hypertension
Yes 33 13.7 31 7.5 64 9.8 6.510 *0.039
No 208 86.3 380 92.5 588 90.2
Total 241 100.0 411 100.0 652 100.0
Diabetes mellitus
Yes 9 3.8 2 0.5 11 1.7 10.934 *0.004
No 230 96.2 410 99.5 640 98.3
Total 239 100.0 412 100.0 651 100.0

χ2 = Pearson Chi-Square test. | P-value = Probability value |

Independent risk factors of COVID-19 Self-medication

HCP who were > 44 years had greater odds of practicing self-medication compared to younger ones (AOR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.62–4.75, P =  < 0.0001). HCP who had tested for COVID-19 had greater odds of practising self-medication compared to those who had not tested (OR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.82–3.94, P =  < 0.0001). Those with the least annual income had lesser odds of practicing self-medication compared to those who earned more, but this was not statistically significant (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.16–1.01, P = 0.054) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Independent risk factors of COVID-19 self-medication

Parameters B Std. error P-value AOR 95% C.I
Lower Upper
Sex
Male  − 0.193 0.217 0.373 0.82 0.54 1.26
Female (Ref)
Age group (years)
 > 44 1.019 0.275  < 0.0001* 2.77 1.62 4.75
 ≤ 44 (Ref)
Married
Not married  − 0.302 0.206 0.143 0.74 0.49 1.11
Currently married (Ref)
Occupation
Doctor  − 0.225 0.308 0.464 0.79 0.44 1.46
Nurse  − 0.040 0.320 0.900 0.96 0.51 1.80
Pharmacist 0.282 0.509 0.579 1.33 0.49 3.59
MLSǂ  − 0.411 0.560 0.463 0.66 0.22 1.99
Others** (Ref)
Annual income
 < 600,000  − 0.898 0.466 0.054 0.41 0.16 1.01
 > 600,000 (Ref)
Knowledge on COVID
Yes 0.453 0.682 0.506 1.57 0.41 5.99
No (Ref)
Testing for COVID-19
Yes 0.988 0.196  < 0.0001* 2.68 1.82 3.94
No (Ref)
History of hypertension
Yes  − 0.428 1.041 0.681 0.65 0.08 5.01
No (Ref)
History of diabetes
Yes 0.073 1.521 0.962 1.07 0.05 21.18
No (Ref)

B = Unstandardized beta (B) | SE = Standard Error | P-value = Probability value | * = Probability value of statistical significance | OR = adjusted Odd Ratio

Discussion

Our study assessed self-medication practices and determinants among HCPs during the COVID-19 period in three tertiary hospitals in Southern Nigeria. Self-medication for COVID-19 prevention or treatment was practiced by 36.3% of HCPs in this study. This is similar to 36.2% reported among the general population in Kenya by Onchonga et al. [1]. However, this is lower than 51.9% reported by Sadio et al. [22] among HCPs in Togo. Self-medication among HCPs in this study is also lower than the reported prevalence of 41% among general population in Nigeria [10]. The differences in the prevalence of COVID-19 treatment and prevention related self-medication in these studies may be related to differences in the study participants; knowledge, perception and beliefs about COVID-19; accessibility to medications without prescription; and the presence and enforcement of regulations on drug procurement in different countries.

It is important to note that about half of the HCPs in our study practiced COVID-19 related self-medication as prophylaxis despite the fact that no drug was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Inappropriate use of medications for prophylaxis has potential adverse implications [4]. The possible factors that could have influenced high level of self medication for COVID-19 among HCPs in this study include uncertainties about the novel infection, high level of anxiety among the general population, high rate of infection among HCPs, especially the frontline workers and misinformation by the social media [16, 2325].

A higher proportion of those who used COVID-19 related self-medication claimed it was beneficial to them. This is similar to report by Makowska et al. [26] in a study done among general population in Poland. However, the perceived benefit among our respondents may be psychological because only about a third of those that used self-medication had definite exposure to COVID-19 while the others who assumed they had COVID-19 exposure may have a different diagnosis.

The drugs commonly used by our study participants to prevent or treat COVID-19 were ivermectin, azithromycin, vitamin C, chloroquine and zinc. This observation corroborated the report of Osaigbovo et al. [21] which showed that there was increase in sales of anti-malarial, antibiotics and multivitamins in some community pharmacies in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria in the second quarter of year 2020 compared to the first quarter. This second quarter of year 2020 coincided with the period after WHO declared COVID-19 as a pandemic in March 2020 [27].This pattern of self-medication is largely similar to that of previous studies from both Nigeria and Togo, but there were few differences [10, 22]. For example, ivermectin was not part of the commonly used medication in the studies by Wegbon et al. [10] and Sadio et al. [22] which were conducted among the general population in Nigeria and Togo, respectively. This may be due to the fact that different therapies are being developed and explored for the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 daily. In this study, ivermectin was the most commonly used medication despite WHO’s advice that it should only be used to treat COVID-19 in clinical trials [28]. This could potentially expose the HCPs to adverse drug reactions, dangerous drug-drug interactions and drug resistance [4].

In addition, commonly used drugs for self-medications during COVID-19 such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin became scarce and unaffordable for those who genuinely required the medications for their existing medical conditions such as patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis thereby putting their health at risk [29, 30].

Occupation was identified as a significant factor associated with self-medication in this study. A higher proportion of pharmacists self-medicated compared to other HCPs which is similar to the report from a previous study by Galvan et al. [31]. This is not surprising because the pharmacists are directly in charge of medicines in the hospital and may have easier access to these medications compared to other HCPs. In addition, pharmacists have better knowledge about medicines due to their professional training compared to other HCPs and are likely to practice self-medication more confidently. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution because pharmacists constituted a small proportion of our respondents.

Self-medication was more common in older age group than the younger age group. HCPs older than 44 years were 2.7 times more likely to practice self-medication than those below 44 years. This finding differs from some previous reports that showed that young people were more likely to use self-medication [1, 14]. The older age group is more vulnerable to COVID-19 with subsequent adverse outcomes than the younger age group [3234]. In addition, the older HCPs were more likely to have co-morbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus which are contributors to adverse outcomes in COVID-19 [3436]. This is corroborated by our study that showed that hypertensive and diabetic HCPs were more likely to practice self-medication compared to those without these co-morbidities.

There was a significant association between marital status and practice of self-medication in our study. The HCPs who were single were less likely to practice self-medication. This may be because they were less likely to bother about the possibility of spreading the virus to their spouses and children as would have been expected in married HCPs. Self-medication was also found to be more common in high income earners. This may be because those with high income were more likely to afford the cost of drugs used for self-medication than low income earners.

Those who had COVID-19 screening were 2.7 times more likely to practice self-medication compared to those who had not been screened in this study. Anxiety associated with waiting time for the outcome of the COVID-19 screening result may possibly influence self-medication in this group of HCPs [37].

There was no significant association between educational attainment and practice of self-medication in our study. This is different from findings reported from some previous studies [5, 9, 22, 31] which showed that educated individuals were more likely to practice self-medication due to better access to information and knowledge about drugs [5, 9, 22, 31]. However, Wegbom et al. [10] reported that the less educated individuals were more likely to practice self-medication because of little or no understanding of the adverse implications of self-medication. The absence of significant relationship between educational level and self-medication in our study may be explained by the fact that almost all the HCPs who participated in this study had tertiary level of education.

Limitation

The report of self-medication among the HCPs involved recall which may introduce bias in determining the prevalence of self-medication. In addition, some HCPs may be unwilling to give information about their self medication practices.

Conclusion

About one-third of HCPs in our study practiced COVID-19 related self-medication during the pandemic. HCPs that are often assumed to be health literate may not necessarily practice safe health behavior; therefore there is a need for regular health education of the general public including HCPs on the adverse implications of self-medication.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the efforts of all the research assistants that helped in data collection for this study.

Funding

The study was funded by the authors.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Onchonga D, Omwoyo J, Nyamamba D. Assessing the prevalence of self-medication among healthcare workers before and during the 2019 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic in Kenya. Saudi Pharma J. 2020;28:1149–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ogboghodo EO, Osaigbovo II, Obarisiagbon OO, et al. Facility-Based Surveillance Activities for COVID-19 Infection and Outcomes among Healthcare Workers in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. Am J Tropi Med Hyg. 2021;104:1034–1040. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization Guidelines for regulatory assessment of medicinal products for use inself medication: General Information. WHO Drug Inf 2000;14:18–26.
  • 4.Hughes CM, McElnay JC, Fleming GF. Benefits and risks of self medication. Drug Saf. 2001;24:1027–1037. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124140-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bamgboye EA, Amoran OE, Yusuf OB. Self medication practices among workers in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2006;35:411–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Omolase CO, Adeleke OE, Afolabi AO, et al. Self medication amongst general outpatients in a Nigerian community hospital. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2007;5:64–67. doi: 10.4314/aipm.v5i2.64032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bamidele JO, Adebimpe WO, Oladele EA. Knowledge, attitude and use of alternative medical therapy amongst urban residents of Osun State, southwestern Nigeria. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2009;6:281–288. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v6i3.57175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Osemene KP, Lamikanra A. A study of the prevalence of self-medication practice among university students in Southwestern Nigeria. Trop J Pharm Res. 2012;11:683–689. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Babatunde OA, Fadare JO, Ojo OJ, et al. Self-medication among health workers in a tertiary institution in South-West Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2016 doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.24.312.8146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wegbom AI, Edet CK, Raimi O, et al. Self-Medication Practices and Associated Factors in the Prevention and/or Treatment of COVID-19 Virus: A Population-Based Survey in Nigeria. Front Public Health. 2021;9:606801. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.606801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Obuaku C. Essential medicines in Nigeria: foregrounding access to affordable essential medicines. Afr Sociol Rev/Rev Afr Sociol. 2014;18:42–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Onwujekwe O, Onoka C, Uzochukwu B, Hanson K. Constraints to universal coverage: inequities in health service use and expenditures for different health conditions and providers. Int J Equity Health. 2011;10:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Garuba HA, Kohler JC, Huisman AM. Transparency in Nigeria's public pharmaceutical sector: perceptions from policy makers. Global Health. 2009;5:1–13. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-5-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tobin EA, Erhazele J, Okonofua M, et al. Self-medication among health care workers in a tertiary hospital in Southern Nigeria: knowledge, attitude, and practices. Med J Indones. 2020;29:403–409. doi: 10.13181/mji.oa.204223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bandyopadhyay S, Baticulon RE. Kadhum M et al Infection and mortality of healthcare workers worldwide from COVID-19: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5:e003097. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Onchonga D, Ngetich E, Makunda W, et al. Anxiety and depression due to 2019 SARS-CoV-2 among frontier healthcare workers in Kenya. Heliyon. 2021;7:e06351. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Costanzo M, De Giglio MAR, Roviello GN. SARS-CoV-2: recent reports on antiviral therapies based on lopinavir/ritonavir, darunavir/umifenovir, hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, favipiravir and other drugs for the treatment of the new coronavirus. Curr Med Chem. 2020;27:4536–4541. doi: 10.2174/0929867327666200416131117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Principi N, Esposito S. Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prophylaxis of COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:1118. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30296-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nigerian Centre for Disease Control National interim guidelines for clinical management of COVID-19, version 3, June 2020, Abuja. Nigeria Accessed. 2010;24:10. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Quispe-Cañari JF, Fidel-Rosales E, Manrique D, et al. Self-medication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic among the adult population in Peru: A cross-sectional survey. Saudi Pharm J. 2021;29:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Osaigbovo II, Ogboghodo EO, Obaseki D, et al. Pattern of drug sales at community pharmacies in edo state as evidence of self-medication during the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for policy implementation. Niger Health J. 2021;20:150–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sadio AJ, Gbeasor-Komlanvi FA, Konu RY, et al. Assessment of self-medication practices in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak in Togo. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10145-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ahmad AR, Murad HR. The impact of social media on panic during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: online questionnaire study. J Med Int Res. 2020;22:e19556. doi: 10.2196/19556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sabetian G, Moghadami M, Haghighi LH, et al. COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study in southwest Iran. VirolJ. 2021;18:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01532-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zeballos Rivas DR, Lopez Jaldin ML, Nina Canaviri B, et al. Social media exposure, risk perception, preventive behaviors and attitudes during the COVID-19 epidemic in La Paz, Bolivia: A cross sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0245859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Makowska M, Boguszewski R, Nowakowski M, et al. Self-medication-related behaviors and Poland’s COVID-19 lockdown. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(22):8344. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.New York Times Coronavirus has become a pandemic, WHO says 11th March 2020. Accessed. 2021;20:08. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.WHO advises that ivermectin only be used to treat COVID-19 within clinical trials. Available from:https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/who-advises-that-ivermectin-only-be-used-to-treat-covid-19-within-clinical-trials. Accessed 13:08:2021
  • 29.Peschken CA. Possible consequences of a shortage of hydroxychloroquine for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus amid the COVID-19 pandemic. J Rheumatol. 2020;47:787–790. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mendel A, Bernatsky S, Thorne JC, et al. Hydroxychloroquine shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:e31. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Galvan MR, Dal Pai D, Echevarría-Guanilo ME. Self medication among health professionals. Rev Min Enferm. 2016;20:e959. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hu C, Li J, Xing X, et al. The effect of age on the clinical and immune characteristics of critically ill patients with COVID-19: A preliminary report. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0248675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aliberti MJR, Covinsky KE, Garcez FB, et al. A fuller picture of COVID-19 prognosis: the added value of vulnerability measures to predict mortality in hospitalised older adults. Age Ageing. 2021;50:32–39. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li X, Xu S, Yu M, et al. Risk factors for severity and mortality in adult COVID-19 in patients in Wuhan. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146:110–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Albitar O, Ballouze R, Ooi JP, et al. Risk factors for mortality among COVID-19 patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;166:108293. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Huang S, Wang J, Liu F, et al. COVID-19 patients with hypertension have more severe disease: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Hypertens Res. 2020;43:824–831. doi: 10.1038/s41440-020-0485-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sahu DP, Pradhan SK, Sahoo DP, et al. Fear and anxiety among COVID-19 screening clinic beneficiaries of a tertiary care hospital of Eastern India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2021;57:102543. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES