Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):e0262481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262481

Association of human disturbance and gastrointestinal parasite infection of yellow baboons in western Tanzania

Bethan Mason 1,2,*, Alex K Piel 3,4,*, David Modrý 1,5,6, Klára J Petrželková 2,5, Fiona A Stewart 3,4,7, Barbora Pafčo 2
Editor: Nicoletta Righini8
PMCID: PMC8754341  PMID: 35020760

Abstract

Human disturbance is an ongoing threat to many wildlife species, manifesting as habitat destruction, resource overuse, or increased disease exposure, among others. With increasing human: non-human primate (NHP) encounters, NHPs are increasingly susceptible to human-introduced diseases, including those with parasitic origins. As such, epidemiology of parasitic disease is becoming an important consideration for NHP conservation strategies. To investigate the relationship between parasite infections and human disturbance we studied yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) living outside of national park boundaries in western Tanzania, collecting 135 fresh faecal samples from nine troops occupying areas with varying levels of human disturbance. We fixed all samples in 10% formalin and later evaluated parasite prevalence and abundance (of isotrichid ciliates and Strongylida). We identified seven protozoan and four helminth taxa. Taxa showed varied relationships with human disturbance, baboon troop size and host age. In four taxa, we found a positive association between prevalence and troop size. We also report a trend towards higher parasite prevalence of two taxa in less disturbed areas. To the contrary, high levels of human disturbance predicted increased abundance of isotrichid ciliates, although no relationship was found between disturbance and Strongylida abundance. Our results provide mixed evidence that human disturbance is associated with NHP parasite infections, highlighting the need to consider monitoring parasite infections when developing NHP conservation strategies.

Introduction

Parasites can harm host species through a variety of ways, from altering social behaviours [1] to diminishing host physical health and consequently reducing reproductive and foraging success [2]. Parasite infection can further cause damage to neural tissue, reduce fitness, and can even prompt population decline [1, 3], with some infections being fatal to their host [4, 5]. Despite this, parasitic infections in wild animals are often asymptomatic [6, 7], with many hosts coevolving with their parasites overtime [8] and some now believed to be commensals or even mutualists that benefit host physiological functioning, such as aiding digestion [9, 10]. The capacity of parasites to be detrimental to host health may be exacerbated in wild animals that live in fragmented populations or in close contact to human settlements [11], through either increased occurrence of clinical infections [12] or loss of symbiont diversity [10]. This highlights the need to consider the association between human disturbance and parasite infections in wild animals.

Human disturbance has the potential to influence parasite infection of wildlife hosts through multiple indirect mechanisms, such as inducing chronic stress through increased human (predator) encounter rates, urbanisation and noise pollution [1315], with cascading effects resulting from immunosuppression [16]. Reduced food availability, resulting from habitat disturbance, increases susceptibility to parasites by compromising host nutrition [17, 18]. Additionally, human disturbance may influence parasite infections of wild hosts through transmission from domestic animals, with ongoing agricultural expansion, driven by growing human food demands [19], increasing wildlife to livestock exposure [20]. Livestock proximity has been found to correlate with increased parasite infection in a range of species [21]. Humans can also transfer pathogens to wild animals through reliance on common resources, such as water sources, with poor human sanitation heightening this potential [22, 23]. Transmission from humans is even more likely for non-human primates (NHPs) [6, 24], with their close phylogenetic relationship resulting in numerous shared parasite taxa [21]. Expanding human settlements and fragmentation of wildlife habitat increases human:NHP interactions [6], and thus transmission risk, with forest fragmentation previously linked to increased gastrointestinal parasite infections in western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) [25], among others.

While there are many proposed mechanisms of how human disturbance can influence wildlife hosts, mechanisms are typically taxa specific. Papio are known to adapt to anthropogenic environments relatively well [26], in part due to being dietary generalists [27, 28], meaning habitat disturbance is unlikely to influence parasite infections through compromised nutritional status in these hosts. However, higher parasite richness in olive baboons (P. anubis) has previously been linked with their foraging in anthropogenic habitats [29]. Despite being one of the most terrestrial primates, Papio still exhibit arboreal behaviours [30], meaning timber extraction may influence host behaviour. Anthropogenically induced behavioural shifts can increase host exposure risk to parasite infections and consequently shift transmission dynamics, with intensity of timber extraction one factor of human disturbance previously associated with nematode prevalence and infection risk (assessed through a specific index) amongst red colobus (Piliocolobus tephrosceles) [31]. Additionally, through either chronic stress or shared parasite taxa, human presence may also influence parasitic infections in Papio, as found in lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus), where increased parasite prevalence and species richness were explained by human presence [17].

Aside from human disturbance, other factors can also influence parasite transmission dynamics. Group size is positively associated with parasite infection in some populations [32]. A variety of mechanisms are proposed for this, including increased exposure resulting from higher animal densities [32] as well as resource competition increasing susceptibility to infection [33, 34]. Age is also associated with parasite infections, with exposure risk and susceptibility to infection influenced by both behavioural and physiological differences between juvenile and adult hosts [35].

For the current study, we focused on nine troops of baboons living within the Basanza Forests of the Uvinza district and Tongwe East and West Forest Reserves, in western Tanzania. The gastrointestinal parasites of baboons are widely documented across Papio geographic distribution [29, 3639]. Gastrointestinal parasites of baboons in Gombe and Mahale Mountains National Parks (Tanzania) have previously been described, identifying nine metazoan and one protozoan species [40]. Despite this extensive documentation of Papio parasite infections, little research has focused on the potential impact of human disturbance on these infections. Previously, gastrointestinal symbiont richness in yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) showed no variation between troops inhabiting protected and unprotected forests in central Tanzania [10]. We compare gastrointestinal parasites of yellow baboons occupying habitat along a gradient of human disturbance in western Tanzania. We investigated troops of differing group size, comprised of both juvenile and adult individuals. We hypothesised that habitat disturbance would be associated with higher prevalence of parasite taxa, resulting from increased transmission risk of previously documented human: NHP shared parasites. We also predicted human disturbance to be associated with higher parasite abundance, due to behavioural shifts and human presence increasing parasite exposure and susceptibility, respectively.

Material and methods

Study site

We conducted sampling in Tongwe East and West Forest Reserves within the Greater Mahale Ecosystem and Basanza Forests (Uvinza District) within the Masito-Ugalla Ecosystem, western Tanzania. We selected the Issa Valley (-5.5, 30.54) as a low disturbance area and the outskirts of Uvinza (-5.1, 30.39), a town of >10,000 people ca. 50 km from Issa Valley, as a high disturbance area (Fig 1). In total, we surveyed an area 146 km2: ca. 45 km2 near Issa Valley and ca. 101 km2 near Uvinza. Issa valley is characterised by large expanses of miombo woodland, separated by broad valleys with steep slopes, lined with riparian forests and intermittent grasslands [41, 42]. Uvinza hosts a sprawling town, surrounded by a similar habitat mosaic interspersed with small-scale agriculture and logging sites [43]. Average altitude of sample collection was 1515.5 m in Issa Valley and 1051.3 m in Uvinza, with yearly rainfall around 1000 mm in both areas [41, 42]. Temperature ranges from 11 to 35 °C in Issa Valley [41] and from 20 to 30 °C in Uvinza [44].

Fig 1. Study area in western Tanzania.

Fig 1

Visual mapping of Tongwe Forest Reserve [45] in Western Tanzania, overlayed with GPS log of faecal collections and transect locations for nine yellow baboon troops, generated in QGIS (v 3.8). Group number is indicated by the boxed number adjacent to transect lines.

Faecal sample collection

We collected all faecal samples between April and May 2018, spanning the transitional period between the wet (November-April) and dry (May-October) seasons, with dry months defined as those with <60 mm of rainfall [42]. We collected 135 faecal samples of baboons from nine troops (Table 1). One troop (group 1) was habituated and we used individual identifications to ensure no individual was repeatedly sampled, for other troops we collected all faecal samples within a 120 min time period, assuming the limited timespan prevented repeated sampling [46]. We estimated group size by counting all visible individuals prior to sampling, assuming the entire group was counted. We collected samples as soon after defecation as possible (when baboons vacated the immediate vicinity) and stored in sealed sampling pots, with only the central faecal matter being collected to avoid environmental contamination [37, 39]. We recorded a GPS location for each sample and assigned baboon age categories based on size of faeces (juvenile <2 cm faecal diameter; adult >2 cm faecal diameter) [47]. For smaller troops (<15 individuals) we sampled at least 80% of individuals and at least 50% in larger troops (>20 individuals), based on a recommended sample size and gastrointestinal parasite prevalence in olive baboons [18, 39]. Within 180 min of initial collection and storage, we mixed each sample and fixed ca. 3 g of faeces with 10% formalin, storing at room temperature before shipment to the University of Veterinary Sciences, Czech Republic, for analyses.

Table 1. Sample collection from yellow baboons in western Tanzania.

Sampling Area Group Group Size Samples Collected
Total Adult Juvenile
Issa Valley 1 13 12 10 2
2 25 19 19 0
(n = 91) 3 37 19 17 2
4 21 21 18 3
8 28 20 19 1
Uvinza District 5 5 4 4 0
6 7 7 6 1
(n = 44) 7 12 10 8 2
9 29 23 19 4
TOTAL 177 135 120 15

Number of samples collected from yellow baboons in western Tanzania split by all relevant factors (sampling area, group, and estimated age).

Assessing human disturbance

Although we selected two localities with presumably low (Issa Valley) and high (Uvinza District) human disturbance, we still evaluated the human impact directly in the areas occupied by the baboon groups at the time of collection. We assessed human disturbance through a general disturbance index adapted from Barelli et al. [48]. We established five northward orientated 2-km long transects for each sampled troop. Transects were spaced 1 km apart, covering a total area of 8 km2 per troop (Fig 1). We recorded all evidence of human disturbance within a five-metre strip of transects, including, but not limited to, roads, livestock, honey production and litter (Fig 2). All signs of tree cutting were also recorded, including cut shrubbery, trees, and any machete marks. We generated transect locations systematically from the faecal collection GPS centroid of each troop, which formed the middle point of the central transect (Fig 1). If natural barriers (e.g., rivers) prevented transect access, we walked additional transects between those that were accessible, ensuring we conducted five transects per troop. If a transect could not be finished due to impassable terrain, the distance completed was used to provide a proportional score. We calculated a mean transect score for each troop then pooled groups by disturbance level based on naturally forming categories: low (< 10 signs) or high (> 300 signs) (Fig 3). Overall, the disturbance levels correspond to the locality which baboon troops inhabit. Areas with high human disturbance are within the Uvinza district (troops assigned high-disturbance level), while low disturbance was observed within the Issa Valley area (groups with low-disturbance level). Interestingly, one group (Group 8, see Fig 3) ranged between these two localities and did not fall into these disturbance categories, (79 signs); we assigned this area with medium disturbance levels, testifying to the declining human activities toward the Issa Valley.

Fig 2. Human disturbances observed in the Basanza Forests miombo woodland surrounding Uvinza, Tanzania.

Fig 2

(a) Crop agriculture; (b) Livestock agriculture; (c) Cutting signs; (d) Constructional timber production; (e) Charcoal production; (f) Vehicle track.

Fig 3. Human disturbances observed in the habitat of yellow baboon troops in western Tanzania.

Fig 3

Average human disturbance score, calculated through five transects, recorded in the habitat of nine troops of yellow baboons in western Tanzania, with fill colour depicting the type of human disturbances encountered.

Faecal sample analysis

We used coproscopic diagnostics by light microscope (Olympus CX40) to determine gastrointestinal parasite diversity and abundance (a proxy for infection intensity) [49]. We diluted samples with water and filtered through gauze before halving sediment to re-fix half (up to 10 ml) in 10% formalin and suspend half (up to 50 ml) in sodium chloride solution [50]. We used the suspended solution to quantify strongylid nematode eggs per gram (EPG), using Mini-FLOTAC apparatus (x100 magnification) and recounting formula. We used the re-fixed sediment to evaluate parasite diversity by Sheather’s flotation [51], documenting all parasite taxa, using cyst, trophozoite and egg morphology for identification [6, 52]. We also examined 0.2 ml of the sediment directly for protozoa diversity (x400 magnification) and evaluation of isotrichid ciliate cyst and trophozoite abundance (CPG = ciliates per gram) [53]. We quantified strongylids and isotrichid ciliates because of their possible pathogenic potential [54].

Statistical analysis

We performed all statistical analyses using the R statistical interface, R v.3.2.2 [55]. We investigated factors influencing parasite infection, with parasite presence/absence and abundance (measured as EPG/CPG) as response variables, using Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). We ran GLMMs using Ime4 package [56] with binomial distribution for presence/absence data and negative binomial distribution for abundance data, to account for the aggregated distribution of parasites within-host population. First of all, our aim was to evaluate the impact of human disturbance level (three categories: low in Issa valley, high in Uvinza district and medium in between these two localities) and further impact of group size and age on the presence/absence and/or abundance of yellow baboon parasites, therefore we set these as explanatory variables. Lastly, as the medium disturbance level was represented by only one group, we set the group affinity as a random factor. We ran a separate model for each parasite and log-transformed the abundance data. Finally, we used Tukey post hoc tests to evaluate differences among levels of factorial explanatory variables in case of disturbance level. We did not use parasite richness to test impact of human disturbance, group size or age, as some parasite taxa (e.g., strongylids and spirurids) comprise multiple species, which are indistinguishable as egg/cysts, which limits the credibility of parasite richness.

Ethics statement

All protocols were approved by The Animal Welfare and Ethics Steering group at Liverpool John Moores University and adhered to the UK Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (ASPA). Research was approved by the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH), permit no. 2017-320-NA-2011-94, and we collected all samples non-invasively, adhering to Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI) regulations.

Results

Parasite taxa

From the 135 samples examined, we found a total of six protozoan taxa and four helminth taxa (Fig 4), with prevalence data shown in Table 2. We identified three protozoa to species level: Entamoeba coli, Iodamoeba buetschlii and Chilomastix mesnili; and two protozoan taxa to genus level: Blastocystis and Entamoeba spp. We also noted unidentified isotrichid ciliates. Entamoeba coli was identified to species based on the presence of at least eight nuclei, whilst identified Entamoeba with alternative nuclei numbers were grouped as Entamoeba spp. [35, 57]. Isotrichid ciliates (95.56% positive) and Entamoeba spp. (91.11% positive) were the most prevalent protozoa. Four samples were negative for all protozoa. We identified the four helminth taxa based on egg presence, two to genus: Strongyloides and Streptopharagus, and two to order/suborder (because of microscopically indistinguishable eggs): Strongylida (later strongylids) and Spirurida (later spirurids). Streptopharagus’ smaller size compared to other spirurids [58] was used for its distinction. Amongst the helminths, strongylids were the most prevalent, confirmed in all collected samples.

Fig 4. Photos of parasites found in yellow baboons’ faeces in western Tanzania.

Fig 4

Unidentified isotrichid ciliate cysts: (a) with thick outer protective sheath; (b) without additional protective sheath. (c) Unidentified isotrichid ciliate trophozoites. (d) Entamoeba coli. (e) Entamoeba sp. (lower cyst) and Blastocystis sp. (upper cyst). (f) Iodamoeba buetschlii. (g) strongylid egg. (h) Strongyloides sp. (i) Spirurid egg. (j) Streptopharagus sp.

Table 2. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of yellow baboons.

Prevalence (%)
Total Low disturbance Medium disturbance High disturbance
(135) (71) (20) (44)
Isotrichid ciliates 95.56 100.00 100.00 86.36
Entamoeba coli 67.41 76.06 55.00 59.09
Entamoeba spp. 91.11 97.18 95.00 79.55
Iodamoeba buetschlii 70.37 84.51 55.00 54.55
Blastocystis sp. 69.63 63.38 95.00 68.18
Chilomastix mesnili 6.67 7.04 0.00 9.09
Strongylids 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Strongyloides sp. 23.70 32.39 20.00 11.36
Spirurids 22.96 22.54 25.00 22.73
Streptopharagus sp. 44.44 33.80 75.00 47.73

Overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of yellow baboons in Issa Valley and Basanza Forests, western Tanzania, as well as prevalence at each of three disturbance levels. Values in parenthesis indicate number of faecal samples examined.

The mean abundance of isotrichid ciliates was 231.5 EPG, SD: 410.6, and of strongylid nematodes 422.5 EPG, SD: 487.2, in all samples.

Association with human disturbance

Our transects confirmed higher occurrences of human disturbance in baboon habitat surrounding Uvinza than in Issa Valley, with medium levels of disturbance encountered between the two sites (Figs 1 and 3, Group 8). While a variety of different types of human disturbance were observed, the majority were signs of tree cutting, with livestock and footpaths also frequently occurring.

All parasite taxa were found across all three disturbance levels. Prevalence of two protist and one helminth taxa were associated with disturbance level. The prevalence of E. coli was significantly associated with disturbance level (GLMM: χ = 126553.0, p < 0.001), whereby the prevalence was higher in low disturbance areas compared to high (p <0.001). Similarly, the prevalence of I. buetschlii was significantly different according to disturbance level (GLMM: χ = 13.384, p = 0.001), due to being higher in low disturbance areas compared to both in medium (p = 0.001) and (although not significant) in high (p = 0.066) disturbance areas. Significant differences were observed in distribution levels according to prevalence of Streptopharagus sp. (GLMM: χ = 10.106, p = 0.006). Significantly higher prevalence of Streptopharagus sp. was observed in medium disturbance areas compared to low disturbance areas (p = 0.011). Prevalence of other parasite taxa was not significantly associated with disturbance level (S1 Table). Increasing disturbance did show a positive association with isotrichid ciliate abundance (GLMM: χ = 15.8, p < 0.001; for results of post hoc tests see Fig 5). Though no significant association with strongylid abundance was found (GLMM: χ = 1.433, p = 0.488; Fig 5).

Fig 5. Parasite abundance in yellow baboons in western Tanzania.

Fig 5

Plots are split by human disturbance of habitat area and show two parasite taxa: (a) unidentified isotrichid ciliate; (b) strongylids.

Impact of group size and age

The prevalence of I. buetschlii, E. coli, Blastocystis sp., and Streptopharagus sp. was positively associated with group size (GLMM: χ = 14.6981, p < 0.001; GLMM: χ = 1024.1, p < 0.001; GLMM: χ = 6.478, p = 0.011; GLMM: χ = 5.084, p = 0.024, respectively) (Fig 6). Additionally, juveniles had increased prevalence of E. coli (66.6% in adults; 73.3% in juveniles; GLMM: χ = 1777.9, p < 0.001) and Strongyloides sp. (20% in adults; 53.3% in juveniles; GLMM: χ = 7.365, p = 0.007). Prevalence of other parasite taxa was not significantly associated with group size or age (S1 Table).

Fig 6. Association between yellow baboon group size and parasite prevalence.

Fig 6

Association between group size and parasite prevalence of four parasite taxa amongst yellow baboons situated in western Tanzania.

Group size was significantly associated with isotrichid ciliate abundance (GLMM: χ = 6.99, p = 0.008), while strongylids abundance was not (GLMM: χ = 0.321, p = 0.571). Age showed no association with abundance of either isotrichid ciliates (GLMM: χ = 0.214, p = 0.644) or strongylids (GLMM: χ = 0.064, p = 0.801).

Discussion

Western Tanzania is a mosaic of varied land status, from national parks to open areas, with multiple NHP species, including yellow baboons, distributed throughout, including adjacent to human settlements. To assess the relationship between human disturbance and gastrointestinal parasite infection of yellow baboons, we examined faecal samples from baboon troops inhabiting areas with different levels of human disturbance. Some troops ranged in intact forest areas with minimal human activities, while others ranged closer to human settlements, with larger disturbance signatures, including tree felling, cattle grazing and charcoal production; in some cases, individuals were observed crop raiding.

In general, all ten parasite taxa found in this study are widely reported in yellow baboons from elsewhere [36, 37, 39, 40] as well as in closely related olive and chacma (P. ursinus) baboons [29, 35]. In Papio, gastrointestinal ciliates are typically identified as Balantioides coli, however, genetic sequencing of microscopically indistinguishable ciliates, obtained from multiple NHP species, suggests numerous species of Balantioides-like and Buxtonella-like ciliates inhabit NHP gastrointestinal tracts [59]. Therefore, we report Balantioides-like ciliates as ‘unidentified isotrichid ciliates’. One noticeable difference was the absence of Trichuris in Issa samples, a parasite widely documented in baboons [29, 3640], though also absent from savannah chimpanzees (P. troglodytes schweinfurthii) surveyed in the Issa Valley region [41]. As Trichuris is a soil-transmitted helminth (STH), the hot and dry conditions of western Tanzania’s dry season may be unsuitable for the Trichuris life cycle, with a low probability of survival during the soil living stage [41]. However, other STH (Strongyloides and strongylids) were present, despite requiring a moist external environment for transmission [41]. Examination of all sympatric NHPs would be required to determine if Trichuris was absent from specific primate taxa or the entire region, only then yielding further explanation.

In addition, while strongylids are commonly reported amongst baboons, our reported 100% prevalence is high compared to previous studies, where prevalence ranged from 5.9% to 75.4% [10, 38, 40].

Association with human disturbance

Prevalence of some parasite taxa varied with disturbance level, with most showing decreased prevalence with increased habitat disturbance. Gastrointestinal protozoans and metazoans have previously shown richness reduction in association with habitat degradation in other NHPs: black howler monkeys (Aloutta pigra) [60] and Udzungwa red colobus (Procolobus gordonorum) [10], although these observations were not mirrored in yellow baboons inhabiting the same area [10]. A reduction in either parasite richness or prevalence could be expected if gastrointestinal protozoans and metazoans respond similarly to human disturbance as many of their animal hosts do, with decreasing population size and diversity [10]. Intuitively, if host numbers, range or densities decrease, the same may be expected for their parasites due to reduced transmission rates [60]. Additionally, conversion of natural habitat for human land use often alters environmental conditions, reducing prevalence of parasite taxa with poor resilience to environmental change [60]. Counterintuitively, reduced gastrointestinal parasite diversity, associated with human disturbance, may be of great concern for wildlife hosts, with many gastrointestinal protozoans and metazoans now considered as vital gut symbionts. These gastrointestinal communities are now believed to be important for maintaining host health and fitness, calling for further research and its inclusion in conservation strategies as a method of endangered species health monitoring [10].

Contrasting findings may be explained by some parasite taxa being more susceptible to the environmental pressures of human disturbance. Convolutions may also arise through microscopic methodologies being unable to reveal all taxa to species or genus level, meaning parasite richness is often a combination of species richness and higher-level taxonomic richness. This calls into question the reliability of parasite richness as a measure for evaluating NHP gastrointestinal parasite communities, with some single parasite taxa in fact representing multiple species.

Besides parasite prevalence, we also evaluated the abundance of strongylids and unidentified isotrichid ciliates according to human disturbance, using EPGs and CPGs respectively. It is debated if intensity of parasite infection is linearly correlated with eggs/cysts shed in faeces, due to temporal variation of egg/cyst output [6163]. However, with various studies identifying a linear relationship between egg output and adult worm burden within the host [6466], and a lack of data for wild baboons, we assume egg/cyst output still provides a reliable insight into parasitic infections, as done previously in parasitic research of both Papio [39] and other NHP hosts [6770].

Strongylid nematodes showed no association with level of human disturbance, however, increasing abundances of isotrichid ciliates significantly associated with increased human disturbance. While parasite abundances are less well documented than prevalence data, previous research has shown increases in abundance of other parasite taxa (Strongyloides and E.histolytica) with increases in human disturbance [17, 71]. Human disturbance could potentially increase parasite abundance indirectly through increased chronic stress, with high cortisol (‘the stress hormone’) levels previously correlated with increased parasite susceptibility in NHPs [18]. Alternatively, previous research found B. coli (an isotrichid ciliate) abundance was higher amongst crop-raiding baboons than wild foraging baboons [29]. While no systematic dietary observations were made here, all troops in the high disturbance area were within one kilometre of cropland and some were seen crop-raiding. Those in the low disturbance area were not in any proximity to cropland. Individuals observed crop raiding were consuming cassava, a highly starch rich crop [72]. Diets high in starch based carbohydrates have been shown to increase B. coli growth within hosts [73], therefore the increased abundance of isotrichid ciliates in the high disturbance area might be explained by starch rich diets resulting from crop-raiding. While habitat disturbance, due to decreased resource availability, may reduce host nutritional status and thus increase parasite susceptibility in some NHPs [74], this is unlikely to be the case in baboons. Papio are typically described as dietary generalists [75], showing adaptability of foraging techniques to anthropogenic food sources [76]. As such, foraging in disturbed areas may in fact be energetically beneficial to Papio hosts [77], with anthropogenic food, such as crops, providing nutrient and energy-rich dietary supplementation [60], highlighting the potential impact of increased starch intake as previously mentioned.

Impact of age and group size

We found group size to be associated with prevalence of some parasite taxa, mostly protozoans, which results from increased animal density and exposure risk amongst larger groups [78]. While sociality, the tendency to form social living groups, has many benefits for wild NHPs [79], increased risk of parasite infection is one well-documented cost [80, 81], with spatial cohesion and contact between individual hosts facilitating parasite transmission [82, 83]. Larger group size may also be associated with higher parasite prevalence due to increased resource competition between group members and social stress amongst host individuals [33, 84] leading to poor nutrition and thus increased parasite susceptibility.

While we found no relationship between age and parasite abundance, we found baboon age to be associated with prevalence of two parasite taxa (Strongyloides sp. and E. coli). Age has previously been linked to parasite prevalence, abundance, and richness in baboons [35, 39], although the direction of these relationships varies between parasite taxa. Increased prevalence in juveniles, as we observed, may be explained by increased susceptibility to parasite infection, less active parasite avoidance or increased exposure risk resulting from age based behavioural differences [35]. Additionally, juveniles may lack fully developed immune systems [85], increasing their susceptibility to parasites [86], while older individuals may acquire immunity to certain parasite stages through repeated exposure [87].

Conservation implications

Some parasite taxa (Strongyloides, Blastocystis, Entamoeba, isotrichid ciliates and strongylids) found in our samples could have zoonotic potential. However, we highlight that we did not examine inter-specific parasite transmission in this study. Balantioides coli, an isotrichid ciliate, is both non-typical and often asymptomatic in humans, though reported in rural areas of some countries [88]. In some cases, B. coli infection of humans results in diarrhoea with potential for colonic invasion, while rare cases report more serious effects of inflammatory infections and pulmonary haemorrhage [88]. Likewise, Strongyloides is also reported in humans and can be asymptomatic [89]. Mixed infections, of multiple Strongyloides species, have been reported in both humans and NHPs [25, 90], suggesting zoonotic potential. Blastocystis is believed to have larger zoonotic potential, resulting from low host specificity [91]. While Blastocystis is commonly reported as part of a healthy human gastrointestinal biome [92], it is also linked to diarrhoea, vomiting and bloating [93]. While Entamoeba infection reported in humans is typically of different species to those reported in NHPs, human:NHP shared species have been identified, flagging the zoonotic potential of Entamoeba [94]. The symptoms of Entamoeba infection are again varied but can cause amebiasis, a potentially fatal intestinal illness [95]. The zoonotic potential of the other parasite taxa found during this study is less understood, although there is still potential for human:NHP transmission [96]. Consequently, shifting patterns of zoonotic parasite infections in wild hosts, resulting from human disturbance, could have implications also for the epidemiology of human parasite infections, heightening the value of considering parasitology within endangered species management.

Conclusions

Yellow baboons of the Tongwe Forest Reserve exhibit parasite fauna similar to other baboons across Tanzania. Factors influencing both parasite prevalence and abundance varied amongst parasite taxa, providing insight into the complexity of a host’s parasite fauna.

Although we hypothesized that parasite prevalence would increase with human disturbance level, we found the opposite trend, with some taxa showing reduced prevalence in the highly disturbed area. This may result from symbiont organisms showing similar responses to habitat disturbance and degradation as many host species. On the other hand, high levels of human disturbance predicted increased isotrichid ciliate abundance, potentially explained by starch rich diets of baboons in the disturbed area. In future, inclusion of nutritional ecology assays would determine dietary shifts [97] associated with human disturbance, potentially linking with changes in gastrointestinal communities. While measurement of glucocorticoids in faecal samples could provide valuable insight into host stress and fitness [98] and attempt to explain how human disturbance may cause observed differences in gastrointestinal parasite communities.

Further research focused on parasite epidemiology and human:NHP transmission, including sampling of humans and livestock inhabiting the same environment, would be useful in determining the zoonotic parasite risk ongoing habitat disturbance poses to humans. In addition, gastrointestinal communities should be considered as a health monitoring method within NHP conservation strategies, particularly when addressing the threat of human disturbance.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Association of age, group size and habitat disturbance with parasite prevalence.

Table showing all statistical results assessing the association between gastrointestinal parasite prevalence in yellow baboons and estimated age, group size and level of habitat disturbance.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Gastrointestinal parasite infections of yellow baboons in western Tanzania.

Table showing raw data on gastrointestinal parasite infections of 135 individuals, assessed through coproscopic analysis of faecal samples.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Human disturbance scores of yellow baboon habitat in western Tanzania.

Table showing transect scores of transects assessing the human disturbance of natural habitat within the home range of nine yellow baboon troops in western Tanzania.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Tanzanian Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI) and Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) for permission to conduct research in Tanzania, as well as the Tanganyka and Uvinza District Governments. We also thank the field assistants of Greater Mahale Ecosystem Research and Conservation (GMERC) for invaluable help with data collection. The UCSD/Salk Center for Academic Research and Training in Anthropogeny (CARTA) provides long-term support to GMERC. We are enormously grateful to constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers on previous versions of this manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files. All raw data is publicly available through two datasets accompanying this manuscript as supplementary tables. The first, ‘S2 Table’ details the results of our coproscopic analysis of faecal samples, while the second, ‘S3 Table’, details the results from our transects to assess human disturbance.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Klein SL. Parasite manipulation of the proximate mechanisms that mediate social behavior in vertebrates. Physiol Behav. 2003;79: 441–9. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00163-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ghai RR, Fugère V, Chapman CA, Goldberg TL, Davies TJ. Sickness behaviour associated with non-lethal infections in wild primates. Proceedings Biol Sci. 2015;282: 20151436. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Smith KF, F. SD, Lafferty KD. Evidence for the Role of Infectious Disease in Species Extinction and Endangerment. Conserv Biol. 2006;20: 1349–1357. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00524.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hilser H, Ehlers Smith YC, Ehlers Smith DA. Apparent Mortality as a Result of an Elevated Parasite Infection in Presbytis rubicunda. Folia Primatol. 2014;85: 265–276. doi: 10.1159/000363740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schneider-Crease I, Griffin RH, Gomery MA, Bergman TJ, Beehner JC. High mortality associated with tapeworm parasitism in geladas (Theropithecus gelada) in the Simien Mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Am J Primatol. 2017;79: e22684. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gillespie TR. Noninvasive Assessment of Gastrointestinal Parasite Infections in Free-Ranging Primates. Int J Primatol. 2006;27. doi: 10.1007/s10764-006-9086-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ghai RR, Chapman CA, Omeja PA, Davies TJ, Goldberg TL. Nodule Worm Infection in Humans and Wild Primates in Uganda: Cryptic Species in a Newly Identified Region of Human Transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8: e2641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Papkou A, Gokhale CS, Traulsen A, Schulenburg H. Host–parasite coevolution: why changing population size matters. Zoology. 2016;119: 330–338. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2016.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Howells ME, Pruetz J, Gillespie TR. Patterns of gastro-intestinal parasites and commensals as an index of population and ecosystem health: the case of sympatric western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) and guinea baboons (Papio hamadryas papio) at Fongoli, Senegal. Am J Primatol. 2011;73: 173–179. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barelli C, Pafčo B, Manica M, Rovero F, Rosà R, Modrý D, et al. Loss of protozoan and metazoan intestinal symbiont biodiversity in wild primates living in unprotected forests. Sci Rep. 2020;10: 10917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67959-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chapman CA, Gillespie TR, Goldberg TL. Primates and the Ecology of their Infectious Diseases: How will Anthropogenic Change Affect Host-Parasite Interactions? Evol Anthropol Issues, News, Rev. 2005;14: 134–144. doi: 10.1002/EVAN.20068 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gillespie TR, Chapman CA, Greiner EC. Effects of logging on gastrointestinal parasite infections and infection risk in African primates. J Appl Ecol. 2005;42: 699–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01049.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bhattacharjee S, Kumar V, Chandrasekhar M, Malviya M, Ganswindt A, Ramesh K, et al. Glucocorticoid Stress Responses of Reintroduced Tigers in Relation to Anthropogenic Disturbance in Sariska Tiger Reserve in India. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0127626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Creel S, Fox JE, Hardy A, Sands J, Garrott B, Peterson RO. Snowmobile Activity and Glucocorticoid Stress Responses in Wolves and Elk. Conserv Biol. 2002;16: 809–814. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00554.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Blickley JL, Word KR, Krakauer AH, Phillips JL, Sells SN, Taff CC, et al. Experimental Chronic Noise Is Related to Elevated Fecal Corticosteroid Metabolites in Lekking Male Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Saino N, editor. PLoS One. 2012;7: e50462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cohen S, Kaplan JR, Cunnick JE, Manuck SB, Rabin BS. Chronic Social Stress, Affiliation, and Cellular Immune Response in Nonhuman Primates. Psychol Sci. 1992;3: 301–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00677.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hussain S, Ram MS, Kumar A, Shivaji S, Umapathy G. Human Presence Increases Parasitic Load in Endangered Lion-Tailed Macaques (Macaca silenus) in Its Fragmented Rainforest Habitats in Southern India. Salice CJ, editor. PLoS One. 2013;8: e63685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chapman CA, Wasserman MD, Gillespie TR, Speirs ML, Lawes MJ, Saj TL, et al. Do food availability, parasitism, and stress have synergistic effects on red colobus populations living in forest fragments? Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;131: 525–534. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chomitz K. At Loggerheads?: Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2007. https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bIbu—faGGgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=africa+forest+fragmentation+driven+by+agriculture&ots=7yXHbqfDAf&sig=l_rqXHJR2BVWfQ7zjuYM7L0medQ#v=onepage&q=africaforestfragmentationdrivenbyagriculture&f=false [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Holechek JL, Cibils AF, Bengaly K, Kinyamario JI. Human Population Growth, African Pastoralism, and Rangelands: A Perspective. Rangel Ecol Manag. 2017;70: 273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.rama.2016.09.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tomley FM, Shirley MW. Livestock infectious diseases and zoonoses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364: 2637–42. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lane-deGraaf KE, Putra IGAA, Wandia IN, Rompis A, Hollocher H, Fuentes A. Human behavior and opportunities for parasite transmission in communities surrounding long-tailed macaque populations in Bali, Indonesia. Am J Primatol. 2014;76: 159–167. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thompson RCA. Parasite zoonoses and wildlife: One health, spillover and human activity. International Journal for Parasitology. Pergamon; 2013. pp. 1079–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wolfe N, Escalante AA, Karesh WB, Kilbourn A, Spielman A, Lal AA. Wild Primate Populations in Emerging Infectious Disease Research: The Missing Link? Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4: 149–158. doi: 10.3201/eid0402.980202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sá RM, Petrášová J, Pomajbíková K, Profousová I, Petrželková KJ, Sousa C, et al. Gastrointestinal symbionts of chimpanzees in Cantanhez National Park, guinea-bissau with respect to habitat fragmentation. Am J Primatol. 2013;75: 1032–1041. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hoffman TS, O’Riain MJ. The Spatial Ecology of Chacma Baboons (Papio ursinus) in a Human-modified Environment. Int J Primatol 2010 322. 2010;32: 308–328. doi: 10.1007/S10764-010-9467-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Norton GW, Rhine RJ, Wynn GW, Wynn RD. Baboon Diet: A Five-Year Study of Stability and Variability in the Plant Feeding and Habitat of the Yellow Baboons (Papio cynocephalus) of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Folia Primatol. 1987;48: 78–120. doi: 10.1159/000156287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Post DG. Feeding behavior of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalusin) the Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Int J Primatol 1982 34. 1982;3: 403–430. doi: 10.1007/BF02693741 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weyher AH, Ross C, Semple S. Gastrointestinal Parasites in Crop Raiding and Wild Foraging Papio anubis in Nigeria. Int J Primatol. 2006;27: 1519–1534. doi: 10.1007/s10764-006-9089-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Raichlen DA. Ontogeny of limb mass distribution in infant baboons (Papio cynocephalus). J Hum Evol. 2005;49: 452–467. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gillespie TR, Chapman CA. Prediction of Parasite Infection Dynamics in Primate Metapopulations Based on Attributes of Forest Fragmentation. Conserv Biol. 2006;20: 441–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00290.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Patterson JEH, Ruckstuhl KE. Parasite infection and host group size: a meta-analytical review. Parasitology. 2013;140: 803–813. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012002259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sapolsky RM. The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2005. pp. 648–652. doi: 10.1126/science.1106477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Alexander RD. The Evolution of Social Behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1974;5: 325–383. doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV.ES.05.110174.001545 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Benavides JA, Huchard E, Pettorelli N, King AJ, Brown ME, Archer CE, et al. From parasite encounter to infection: Multiple-scale drivers of parasite richness in a wild social primate population. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012;147: 52–63. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Myers BJ, Kuntz RE, Malherbe H. Intestinal Commensals and Parasites of the South African Baboon (Papio cynocephalus). Trans Am Microsc Soc. 1971;90: 80. doi: 10.2307/3224900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hahn NE, Proulx D, Muruthi PM, Alberts S, Altmann J. Gastrointestinal Parasites in Free-Ranging Kenyan Baboons (Papio cynocephalus and P. anubis). Int J Primatol. 2003;24: 271–279. doi: 10.1023/A:1023092915171 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ebbert MA, McGrew WC, Marchant LF. Differences between chimpanzee and baboon gastrointestinal parasite communities. Parasitology. 2015;142: 958–967. doi: 10.1017/S0031182015000104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Müller-Graf CD, Collins DA, Woolhouse ME. Intestinal parasite burden in five troops of olive baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis) in Gombe Stream National Park, Tanzania. Parasitology. 1996;112–5: 489–97. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000076952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Murray S, Stem C, Boudreau B, Goodall J. Intestinal parasites of baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in Gombe National Park. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2000;31: 176–8. doi: 10.1638/1042-7260(2000)031[0176:IPOBPC]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kalousová B, Piel AK, Pomajbíková K, Modrý D, Stewart FA, Petrželková KJ. Gastrointestinal Parasites of Savanna Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in Ugalla, Tanzania. Int J Primatol. 2014;35: 463–475. doi: 10.1007/s10764-014-9753-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Piel AK, Strampelli P, Greathead E, Hernandez-Aguilar RA, Moore J, Stewart FA. The diet of open-habitat chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Issa valley, western Tanzania. J Hum Evol. 2017;112: 57–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Makunga JE, Misana SB. The Extent and Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Masito-Ugalla Ecosystem, Kigoma Region, Tanzania. Open J For. 2017;07: 285–305. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2017.72018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mpasiwakomu AR, Nyomora AMS, Gimbi AA. Diversity and Utilization of Wild Edible Plant Species from the Uvinza Miombo Woodlands, Tanzania. Huria J Open Univ Tanzania. 2017;24: 150–168. Available: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/huria/article/view/175356 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kigwangalla HA. The forest (tongwe west local authority forest reserve) (declaration) order. Gazette of the United Republic of Tanzania: 38(100). Sep 2019: Supplement No. 37.
  • 46.Poulsen JR, Clark CJ, Smith TB. Seed Dispersal by a Diurnal Primate Community in the Dja Reserve, Cameroon. J Trop Ecol. 2001;17: 787–808. doi: 10.1017/S0266467401001602 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bradley BJ, Doran-Sheehy DM, Vigilant L. Genetic identification of elusive animals: re-evaluating tracking and nesting data for wild western gorillas. J Zool. 2008;275: 333–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00431.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barelli C, Mundry R, Araldi A, Hodges K, Rocchini D, Rovero F. Modeling Primate Abundance in Complex Landscapes: A Case Study From the Udzungwa Mountains of Tanzania. Int J Primatol. 2015;36: 209–226. doi: 10.1007/s10764-015-9815-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vlčková K, Pafčo B, Petrželková KJ, Modrý D, Todd A, Yeoman CJ, et al. Relationships between gastrointestinal parasite infections and the fecal microbiome in free-ranging western lowland gorillas. Front Microbiol. 2018;9: 1202. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Alvarado-Villalobos MA, Cringoli G, Maurelli MP, Cambou A, Rinaldi L, Barbachano-Guerrero A, et al. Flotation techniques (FLOTAC and mini-FLOTAC) for detecting gastrointestinal parasites in howler monkeys. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10: 586. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2532-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sheather AL. The Detection of Intestinal Protozoa and Mange Parasites by a Floatation Technique. J Pathol Ther. 1923;36. Available: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19241000112 [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pomajbíková K, Modrý D. Principles and limits of microscopic parasite identification. In: Modrý D, Pafčo B, Petrželková K, Hasegawa H, editors. Parasites of Apes: An Atlas of Coproscopic Diagnostics. Frankfurt: Chimaira; 2018. p. 20. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2018.06.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pafčo B, Benavides JA, Pšenková-Profousová I, Modrý D, Červená B, Shutt KA, et al. Do habituation, host traits and seasonality have an impact on protist and helminth infections of wild western lowland gorillas? Parasitol Res. 2017;116: 3401–3410. doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5667-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Modrý D, Šlapeta J. Parasites of non-human apes as zoonotic agents. In: Modrý D, Pafčo B, Petrželková K, Hasegawa H, editors. Parasites of Apes: An Atlas of Coproscopic Diagnostics. Frankfurt: Chimaira; 2018. pp. 83–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67: 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jirku-Pomajbikova K, Čepicka I, Kalousova B, Jirka M, Stewart F, Levecke B, et al. Molecular identification of Entamoeba species in savanna woodland chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Parasitology. 2016;143: 741–748. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016000263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hasegawa H. Spirurids. In: Modrý D, Pafčo B, Petrželková K, Hasegawa H, editors. Parasites of Apes: An Atlas of Coproscopic Diagnostics. Frankfurt: Chimaira; 2018. pp. 164–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pomajbíková K, Oborník M, Horák A, Petrželková KJ, Grim JN, Levecke B, et al. Novel Insights into the Genetic Diversity of Balantidium and Balantidium-like Cyst-forming Ciliates. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Martínez-Mota R, Pozo-Montuy G, Bonilla Sánchez YM, Gillespie TR. Effects of anthropogenic stress on the presence of parasites in a threatened population of black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra). Therya. 2018;9: 161–170. doi: 10.12933/therya-18-572 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cabaret J, Gasnier N, Jacquiet P. Faecal egg counts are representative of digestive-tract strongyle worm burdens in sheep and goats. Parasite. 1998;5: 137–142. doi: 10.1051/parasite/1998052137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Anderson RM, Schad GA. Hookworm burdens and faecal egg counts: an analysis of the biological basis of variation. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1985;79: 812–825. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(85)90128-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Warnick LD. Daily variability of equine fecal strongyle egg counts. Cornell Vet. 1992;82: 453–463. Available: https://europepmc.org/article/med/1424638 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.East IJ, Bourne AS. A comparison of worm burden and faecal egg count for measuring the efficacy of vaccination against Oesophagostomum radiatum. Int J Parasitol. 1988;18: 863–864. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(88)90130-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stear MJ, Bishop SC, Doligalska M, Duncan JL, Holmes PH, Irvine J, et al. Regulation of egg production, worm burden, worm length and worm fecundity by host responses in sheep infected with Ostertagia circumcincta. Parasite Immunol. 1995;17: 643–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1995.tb01010.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Seivwright LJ, Redpath SM, Mougeot F, Watt L, Hudson PJ. Faecal egg counts provide a reliable measure of Trichostrongylus tenuis intensities in free-living red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. J Helminthol. 2004;78: 69–76. doi: 10.1079/joh2003220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shutt-Phillips K, Pafčo B, Heistermann M, Kasim A, Petrželková KJ, Profousová-Pšenková I, et al. Fecal glucocorticoids and gastrointestinal parasite infections in wild western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) involved in ecotourism. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2021;312: 113859. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2021.113859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chapman CA, Speirs ML, Gillespie TR, Holland T, Austad KM. Life on the edge: gastrointestinal parasites from the forest edge and interior primate groups. Am J Primatol. 2006;68: 397–409. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Stoner KE. Prevalence and Intensity of Intestinal Parasites in Mantled Howling Monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in Northeastern Costa Rica: Implications for Conservation Biology. Conserv Biol. 1996;10: 539–546. doi: 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1996.10020539.X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Petrželková KJ, Uwamahoro C, Pafčo B, Červená B, Samaš P, Mudakikwa A, et al. Heterogeneity in patterns of helminth infections across populations of mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei). Sci Rep. 2021;11: 10869. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89283-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ragazzo LJ, Zohdy S, Velonabison M, Herrera J, Wright PC, Gillespie TR. Entamoeba histolytica infection in wild lemurs associated with proximity to humans. Vet Parasitol. 2018;249: 98–101. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tonukari NJ. Cassava and the future of starch. Electron J Biotechnol. 2004;7: 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Schovancová K, Pomajbíková K, Procházka P, Modrý D, Bolechová P, Petrželková KJ. Preliminary Insights into the Impact of Dietary Starch on the Ciliate, Neobalantidium coli, in Captive Chimpanzees. Speybroeck N, editor. PLoS One. 2013;8: e81374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Dias PAD. Effects of habitat fragmentation and disturbance on howler monkeys: A review. Am J Primatol. 2010;72: 1–16. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bentley-Condit VK. Food choices and habitat use by the Tana River yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus): a preliminary report on five years of data. Am J Primatol. 2009;71: 432–436. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fehlmann G, O’Riain MJ, Kerr-Smith C, Hailes S, Luckman A, Shepard ELC, et al. Extreme behavioural shifts by baboons exploiting risky, resource-rich, human-modified environments. Sci Reports 2017 71. 2017;7: 1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14871-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Fürtbauer I, Christensen C, Bracken A, O’Riain MJ, Heistermann M, King AJ. Energetics at the urban edge: Environmental and individual predictors of urinary C-peptide levels in wild chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). Horm Behav. 2020;126: 104846. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Cote IM, Poulinb R. Parasitism and group size in social animals: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol. 1995;6: 159–165. doi: 10.1093/beheco/6.2.159 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ellis S, Snyder-Mackler N, Ruiz-Lambides A, Platt ML, Brent LJN. Deconstructing sociality: the types of social connections that predict longevity in a group-living primate. Proc R Soc B. 2019;286. doi: 10.1098/RSPB.2019.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rimbach R, Bisanzio D, Galvis N, Link A, Di Fiore A, Gillespie TR. Brown spider monkeys (Ateles hybridus): a model for differentiating the role of social networks and physical contact on parasite transmission dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2015;370. doi: 10.1098/RSTB.2014.0110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Deere JR, Schaber KL, Foerster S, Gilby IC, Feldblum JT, VanderWaal K, et al. Gregariousness is associated with parasite species richness in a community of wild chimpanzees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2021 755. 2021;75: 1–11. doi: 10.1007/S00265-021-03030-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Müller-Klein N, Heistermann M, Strube C, Franz M, Schülke O, Ostner J. Exposure and susceptibility drive reinfection with gastrointestinal parasites in a social primate. Funct Ecol. 2019;33: 1088–1098. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13313 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.MacIntosh AJJ, Jacobs A, Garcia C, Shimizu K, Mouri K, Huffman MA, et al. Monkeys in the Middle: Parasite Transmission through the Social Network of a Wild Primate. PLoS One. 2012;7: e51144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chapman CA, Saj TL, Snaith T V. Temporal dynamics of nutrition, parasitism, and stress in colobus monkeys: Implications for population regulation and conservation. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;134: 240–250. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Holsapple MP, West LJ, Landreth KS. Species comparison of anatomical and functional immune system development. Birth Defects Res Part B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2003;68: 321–334. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.10035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kleinschmidt LM, Kinney ME, Hanley CS. Treatment of disseminated Strongyloides spp. infection in an infant Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii). J Med Primatol. 2018;47: 201–204. doi: 10.1111/jmp.12338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Woolhouse MEJ. Patterns in parasite epidemiology: The peak shift. Parasitol Today. 1998;14: 428–434. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(98)01318-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Schuster FL, Ramirez-Avila L. Current world status of Balantidium coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21: 626–38. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00021-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Vadlamudi RS, Chi DS, Krishnaswamy G. Intestinal strongyloidiasis and hyperinfection syndrome. Clin Mol Allergy. 2006;4: 8. doi: 10.1186/1476-7961-4-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Hasegawa H, Sato H, Fujita S, Nguema PPM, Nobusue K, Miyagi K, et al. Molecular identification of the causative agent of human strongyloidiasis acquired in Tanzania: Dispersal and diversity of Strongyloides spp. and their hosts. Parasitol Int. 2010;59: 407–413. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2010.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Doyle PW, Helgason MM, Mathias RG, Proctor EM, Delgado-Viscogliosi P, Ho L-C, et al. Epidemiology and pathogenicity of Blastocystis hominis. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28: 116–21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.1.116-121.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Scanlan PD, Stensvold CR, Rajilić-Stojanović M, Heilig HGHJ, De Vos WM, O’Toole PW, et al. The microbial eukaryote Blastocystis is a prevalent and diverse member of the healthy human gut microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014;90: 326–330. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Stensvold CR, Nielsen H V., Mølbak K, Smith H V. Pursuing the clinical significance of Blastocystis–diagnostic limitations. Trends Parasitol. 2009;25: 23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2008.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Deere JR, Parsons MB, Lonsdorf E V., Lipende I, Kamenya S, Collins DA, et al. Entamoeba histolytica infection in humans, chimpanzees and baboons in the Greater Gombe Ecosystem, Tanzania. Parasitology. 2018; 1–7. doi: 10.1017/S0031182018001397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Fotedar R, Stark D, Beebe N, Marriott D, Ellis J, Harkness J. Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20: 511–532. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00004-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Pafčo B, Kreisinger J, Čížková D, Pšenková-Profousová I, Shutt-Phillips K, Todd A, et al. Genetic diversity of primate strongylid nematodes: Do sympatric nonhuman primates and humans share their strongylid worms? Mol Ecol. 2019;28: 4786–4797. doi: 10.1111/mec.15257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rothman JM, Chapman CA, van Soest PJ. Methods in Primate Nutritional Ecology: A User’s Guide. Int J Primatol. 2012;33: 542–566. doi: 10.1007/s10764-011-9568-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Heistermann M, Palme R, Ganswindt A. Comparison of different enzymeimmunoassays for assessment of adrenocortical activity in primates based on fecal analysis. Am J Primatol. 2006;68: 257–273. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Association of age, group size and habitat disturbance with parasite prevalence.

Table showing all statistical results assessing the association between gastrointestinal parasite prevalence in yellow baboons and estimated age, group size and level of habitat disturbance.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Gastrointestinal parasite infections of yellow baboons in western Tanzania.

Table showing raw data on gastrointestinal parasite infections of 135 individuals, assessed through coproscopic analysis of faecal samples.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Human disturbance scores of yellow baboon habitat in western Tanzania.

Table showing transect scores of transects assessing the human disturbance of natural habitat within the home range of nine yellow baboon troops in western Tanzania.

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files. All raw data is publicly available through two datasets accompanying this manuscript as supplementary tables. The first, ‘S2 Table’ details the results of our coproscopic analysis of faecal samples, while the second, ‘S3 Table’, details the results from our transects to assess human disturbance.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES