NuA4 and H2A.Z control environmental responses and autotrophic growth in Arabidopsis

Tomasz Bieluszewski; Weronika Sura; Wojciech Dziegielewski; Anna Bieluszewska; Catherine Lachance; Michał Kabza; Maja Szymanska-Lejman; Mateusz Abram; Piotr Wlodzimierz; Nancy De Winne; Geert De Jaeger; Jan Sadowski; Jacques Côté; Piotr A Ziolkowski

doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27882-5

. 2022 Jan 12;13:277. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27882-5

NuA4 and H2A.Z control environmental responses and autotrophic growth in Arabidopsis

Tomasz Bieluszewski ^1,^#, Weronika Sura ^1,^#, Wojciech Dziegielewski ^1,^#, Anna Bieluszewska ¹, Catherine Lachance ², Michał Kabza ¹, Maja Szymanska-Lejman ¹, Mateusz Abram ¹, Piotr Wlodzimierz ¹, Nancy De Winne ³, Geert De Jaeger ³, Jan Sadowski ¹, Jacques Côté ^2,^✉, Piotr A Ziolkowski ^1,^✉

PMCID: PMC8755797 PMID: 35022409

Abstract

Nucleosomal acetyltransferase of H4 (NuA4) is an essential transcriptional coactivator in eukaryotes, but remains poorly characterized in plants. Here, we describe Arabidopsis homologs of the NuA4 scaffold proteins Enhancer of Polycomb-Like 1 (AtEPL1) and Esa1-Associated Factor 1 (AtEAF1). Loss of AtEAF1 results in inhibition of growth and chloroplast development. These effects are stronger in the Atepl1 mutant and are further enhanced by loss of Golden2-Like (GLK) transcription factors, suggesting that NuA4 activates nuclear plastid genes alongside GLK. We demonstrate that AtEPL1 is necessary for nucleosomal acetylation of histones H4 and H2A.Z by NuA4 in vitro. These chromatin marks are diminished genome-wide in Atepl1, while another active chromatin mark, H3K9 acetylation (H3K9ac), is locally enhanced. Expression of many chloroplast-related genes depends on NuA4, as they are downregulated with loss of H4ac and H2A.Zac. Finally, we demonstrate that NuA4 promotes H2A.Z deposition and by doing so prevents spurious activation of stress response genes.

Subject terms: Epigenetics, Chloroplasts, Plant molecular biology, Plant stress responses

Function of nucleosomal acetyltransferase of H4 (NuA4), one major complex of HAT, remains unclear in plants. Here, the authors generate mutants targeting two components of the putative NuA4 complex in Arabidopsis (EAF1 and EPL1) and show their roles in photosynthesis genes regulation through H4K5ac and H2A.Z acetylation.

Introduction

One of the characteristic features of plants is the presence of chloroplasts, which carry out photosynthesis¹. As most chloroplast proteins are encoded by nuclear genes, chromatin should, in principle, influence their expression. Molecular and genetic studies have suggested that such a link indeed exists. For example, changes in the acetylation status of histones H3 and H4 associated with genes encoding plastid proteins coincide with changes in light and nutrient availability as well as with the developmental stage^2,3. Likewise, increased levels of H3K9 acetylation (H3K9ac) accompany increased transcriptional activity of these genes⁴. In addition, mutations that disrupt genes involved in controlling histone modifications and chromatin remodeling, such as General Control Non-repressed 5 (GCN5), Histone Acetyltransferase of the TAFII250 Family 2 (HAF2; one of Arabidopsis thaliana homologs of TBP-ASSOCIATED FACTOR 1), Histone Deacetylase 15 (HDA15) and Brahma (BRM), affect the transcript levels of genes encoding plastid proteins^5–7. Light-dependent cell differentiation involves extensive and rapid changes in the chromatin landscape and genome topology in photosynthetic cells^8,9. Mutants of GCN5 and other chromatin factors involved in H2B ubiquitination, H3K36 trimethylation and H2A.Z removal display defects in photomorphogenesis and adaptation to light^5,10–13. Interestingly, the chromatin perturbations described thus far produce only mild photosynthetic phenotypes, despite their often extreme impacts on other processes¹⁴. Here, we show that the expression of the photosynthetic apparatus of the model plant A. thaliana depends on histone acetylation by a highly conserved transcriptional coactivator, the nucleosomal acetyltransferase of H4 (NuA4) complex.

Previous studies on Arabidopsis homologs of NuA4 subunits by affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry (AP-MS/MS) suggested that plant NuA4 resembles its yeast counterpart^15–18. Importantly, the scaffold subunits Esa1-Associated Factor 1A/B (AtEAF1A/B), Transcription-Associated Protein 1 (AtTRA1) and Enhancer of Polycomb-Like 1A/B (AtEPL1A/B) were shown to be physically associated with the catalytic subunit homologs Histone Acetyltransferase of the MYST family 1/2 (HAM1/2)^16–19. Notably, AtTRA1 was also copurified with components of complexes responsible for H2A-H2A.Z exchange, suggesting a link between NuA4-dependent histone acetylation and H2A.Z deposition^20,21. AtEPL1 and AtEAF1 seem to be specific for NuA4, as they were not copurified with other chromatin complexes; thus, they are key to understanding NuA4 function^15,22,23. In genetic studies, plant homologs of NuA4 subunits have been linked to gametogenesis, ABA responses, flowering time regulation, chlorophyll synthesis, cell growth, and ploidy^17,24–26. Some of these functions of plant NuA4 have been confirmed to be mediated by histone acetylation^16,17,26,27.

In this work, we introduce a set of genetic tools that allowed us to explore the consequences of complete loss of NuA4 complex integrity without compromising viability, as occurs with the catalytic subunit mutants described in eukaryotic models^24,28,29. Mutants lacking AtEPL1A/B or AtEAF1A/B consistently display a pleiotropic phenotype that is much more severe than the NuA4 mutant phenotypes described in plants to date. We show that the photosynthetic component of this phenotype is similar to the effects observed in the absence of Golden2-Like (GLK) transcription factors, which specifically promote chloroplast development³⁰. Our genetic and transcriptomic analyses argue against the idea that NuA4 and GLKs act in the same pathway. Instead, we show that loss of NuA4 complex integrity leads to a dramatic global decrease in H4K5 and H2A.Z acetylation, with limited impact on H3K9ac. These chromatin changes strongly correlate with global transcriptomic changes. We provide direct evidence that plant NuA4 is able to efficiently acetylate both H4 and H2A.Z in nucleosomes. In addition, we show that in the absence of NuA4, H2A.Z is lost from nucleosomes across the genome. Loss of gene body H2A.Z leads to upregulation of stress genes, which normally contain large amounts of this histone variant. Transcriptional activation of these genes in the NuA4 mutants may require H3 acetylation to compensate for the lack of H4/H2A.Z acetylation in the +1 nucleosome. Finally, our results suggest a direct link between NuA4 activity and the expression of nuclear-encoded plastid genes, which depends on high levels of H2A.Z in the +1 nucleosome. Based on these findings, we propose that NuA4, by controlling both the acetylation and deposition of H2A.Z, contributes to the switch between the stress response and autotrophic growth.

Results

NuA4 supports chloroplast development

The yeast NuA4 complex consists of the catalytic module piccolo NuA4 (picNuA4) and a regulatory module attached to picNuA4 through the platform subunit EAF1³¹ (Fig. 1a). The EPL1 subunit enables both picNuA4 formation and its binding to the regulatory portion of the NuA4 holocomplex^23,32. Accordingly, a yeast strain lacking the C-terminal enhancer of polycomb B (EPcB) domain of EPL1, through which it binds to EAF1, phenocopied strains lacking functional EAF1²³.

To generate a loss-of-function mutant, we disrupted both tandem copies of the AtEAF1 genes simultaneously by using Cas9-gRNA (Fig. 1b). During mutant screening, we observed the effects of sectorial somatic double knockout of AtEAF1, which manifested as green/pale green mosaicism (Fig. 1c). Microscopic observation revealed a reduction in chloroplast size in the pale green sectors (Fig. 1c), suggesting that the function of AtEAF1 is cell autonomous. We observed Cas9-gRNA-induced mosaicism in plants carrying all three independent Cas9-gRNA combinations, although the construct targeting the region downstream of the Swi3, Ada2, N-Cor, and TFIIIB (SANT) domain produced a weaker effect, suggesting the minor role of this region in chloroplast development (Fig. 1c). The association between the chloroplastic phenotype and the loss of AtEAF1 was confirmed in the Ateaf1-1 homozygous mutant, which showed even, pale green coloration (Fig. 1d). In this mutant line, the 11-kb deletion produced a chimeric AtEAF1A/B gene containing a frameshift upstream of the SANT domain (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1). The SANT domain is vital to the function of yeast EAF1;²³ therefore, we considered Ateaf1-1 to be a loss-of-function mutant.

The Arabidopsis genome encodes two EPL1 orthologs, AtEPL1A (At1g16690) and AtEPL1B (At1g79020) which have not been studied genetically. To investigate the function of AtEPL1, we generated a double T-DNA insertion mutant (hereafter Atepl1-1). The insertions in Atepl1a-1 and Atepl1b-1 are located within the EPcA domain and between the EPcA/EPcB domains, respectively (Fig. 1b). While full-length transcripts were undetectable in the double mutant, both loci still produced aberrant transcripts encoding a polypeptide homologous to the N-terminal portion of EPL1 (Fig. 1b), which is sufficient for picNuA4 activity in yeast but not for binding to the NuA4 regulatory portion²³ (Fig. 1a).

To obtain null alleles, we used Cas9-gRNA to introduce frameshift deletions in the 5’ portions of the coding regions of both genes (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 2). As the double homozygous mutation was expected to be lethal, we first generated two single mutants (Atepl1a-2 and Atepl1b-2) and crossed them to obtain the Atepl1-2 double mutant. In addition, we generated an in-frame deletion spanning the EPcB domain of AtEPL1B (Atepl1b-3, Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 2) and crossed this mutant with Atepl1-2 to obtain the Atepl1a-2 Atepl1b-3 mutant (hereafter Atepl1-3). Since the genomic deletion present at the AtEPL1A locus in the Atepl1-2 mutant ends in an intron, the exact transcript sequence cannot be predicted with confidence. To check whether the splicing of the Atepl1a-2 allele leads to a frameshift, we sequenced 6 independent cDNA clones derived from a homozygous Atepl1-2 mutant. All clones displayed an identical splicing pattern of the truncated intron IV, which led to a frameshift; therefore, this allele is unlikely to produce considerable amounts of an even partially functional AtEPL1A protein (Supplementary Fig. 2). Importantly, the strong pleiotropic Ateaf1-like phenotype shared by the Atepl1 homozygotes was fully rescued in Atepl1-1 homozygotes expressing tagged AtEPL1B (pAtEPL1B::AtEPL1B-TAP, Fig. 1d).

AtEPL1 is not essential for viability but is key to NuA4 function

Unlike in yeast and animals, where EPL1 is an essential gene^33,34, all double Atepl1 mutants described above were viable, although they were completely sterile and clearly exhibited more defects than other plant NuA4 subunit mutants characterized to date (Supplementary Fig. 3). The viability of the Atepl1 mutants gave us an opportunity to compare the relative contributions made by the EAF1-dependent NuA4 holocomplex and EPL1-dependent picNuA4 in plants. Additionally, we included in our analyses the well-characterized glk1-1 glk2-1 mutant (hereafter glk), in which a cell-autonomous reduction in chloroplast size and a significant reduction in rosette diameter have previously been observed^30,35.

We measured the chloroplast and cell sizes and found them to be significantly smaller in all mutants than in wild-type (WT) plants (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 1). The NuA4 mutants indeed showed similarity to the glk mutant in terms of chloroplast size but were less similar in terms of cell size (Fig. 2a). Notably, the Atepl1-2 null mutant displayed a greater reduction in chloroplast size than the Ateaf1-1 mutant, possibly owing to residual nontargeted activity of picNuA4 in this line. It remains unclear why the Atepl1-3 (picNuA4-separated) mutant is more phenotypically similar to Atepl1-2 than to Ateaf1-1.

The pale green coloration of the NuA4 and glk mutants indicates loss of chlorophyll. Indeed, spectrophotometric analysis showed a significant reduction in total chlorophyll content in all mutants, with the strongest effect in glk, followed by Atepl1-2. The Ateaf1-1 mutant again displayed the weakest effect (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Table 3). Interestingly, the significant increase in the chlorophyll a/b ratio reported previously in the glk mutant³⁶ was not observed in the NuA4 mutants (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Table 4).

As histone acetylation is known to be important in photomorphogenesis, we characterized the light adaptation phenotype of the Atepl1-2 mutant. We measured hypocotyl length, apical curvature, and cotyledon development (surface area and angle) at different time points following a dark-to-light transition. Atepl1-2 showed a reduced hypocotyl length and cotyledon surface area (Supplementary Fig. 4). This phenotype was in contrast to other histone acetyltransferase mutants, which showed elongated hypocotyls when grown in light or enhancement of the long-hypocotyl phenotype of light receptor mutants^5,37. However, this result must be considered with caution, as the severe growth phenotypes of NuA4 mutants can affect hypocotyl and cotyledon development.

To characterize the vegetative growth phenotype of the mutants, we measured the rosette radius of plants after 2, 3, and 4 weeks of growth under long-day conditions. In this assay, the glk mutant performed much better than the NuA4 mutants, suggesting that the dwarfism of Atepl1 and Ateaf1 cannot be fully explained by chloroplast dysfunction (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Tables 5–7). Compared with the WT plants, all lines that contained mutations in NuA4 subunits showed a severe reduction in size at all time points (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Tables 5–7). Consistent with its relatively weak effect on cell size, the Ateaf1-1 mutation had a significantly smaller effect on growth than the Atepl1-2 mutation (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Tables 1–7). Collectively, these results support a model in which AtEPL1 cooperates with AtEAF1 for its functionality as a picNuA4 subunit.

NuA4 and GLKs play parallel roles in transcription

Yeast NuA4 requires transcription factors for improved targeting to specific genomic loci^38,39. We hypothesized that the phenotypic similarity between NuA4 subunit and GLK transcription factor mutants was due to the targeting of NuA4 by GLKs. To verify our hypothesis, we generated a quadruple Atepl1a-2 Atepl1b-2 glk1-1 glk2-1 mutant (hereafter Atepl1 glk) by crossing the Atepl1-2 sesquimutant with the previously characterized glk1-1 glk2-1 homozygous mutant³⁰. The quadruple mutant was viable but displayed significantly exacerbated phenotypic effects in most phenotypic assays (Figs. 1–2 and Supplementary Tables 1–7). Notably, the increase in the chlorophyll a/b ratio observed in the glk mutant but not in the NuA4 mutants was significantly diminished in the Atepl1 glk mutant (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Table 4). We also examined the expression of six selected photosynthesis-related genes in the quadruple mutant and found that their expression levels were generally lower than they were in any of the double mutants (Supplementary Fig. 5). These results suggest that NuA4 and GLK have mostly independent functions in the transcription of genes related to growth and photosynthesis.

Seeking an explanation for the mutant phenotypes and genetic interactions described above, we performed transcriptome analysis of Atepl1-2, Ateaf1-1, glk and WT plants. Overall, 4022, 3474, and 1235 genes showed at least a 1.5-fold decrease (downregulated genes) or increase (upregulated genes) in the steady-state transcript level in the Atepl1-2, Ateaf1-1, and glk mutants, respectively (Supplementary Data 1–6). For Atepl1-2 and Ateaf1-1, Gene ontology analysis of the downregulated gene groups (1945 and 1771 uniquely mapped IDs, respectively) revealed significant enrichment with genes associated with chloroplasts, photosynthesis and growth (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Data 7–9). The upregulated gene groups (2077 and 1703 IDs for Atepl1-2 and Ateaf1-1, respectively) were significantly enriched in genes functionally related to responses to biotic and abiotic stimuli (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Data 10–12). Biotic stress marker genes were also induced in Atepl1-1 seedlings, which rationally rules out the possibility of their activation by deteriorating external conditions over extended growth periods (Supplementary Fig. 6). Of the genes downregulated and upregulated in Ateaf1-1, 72.7% and 77.6% were also downregulated and upregulated in Atepl1-2, respectively (Fig. 3b). In contrast to the differential expression pattern in the NuA4 mutants, the genes that were differentially expressed in glk relative to WT control plants were predominantly downregulated (807 vs. 428 IDs, Fig. 3b). The overlap between the genes with changed expression in Atepl1-2 and glk was relatively small: only 31.7% and 46.7% of the genes down- and upregulated, respectively, in glk were also adequately deregulated in Atepl1-2. Surprisingly, the genes that were downregulated in Atepl1-2 and Ateaf1-2 showed a higher association with chloroplasts and photosynthesis than the genes that were downregulated in glk (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 7). Upon closer examination of four manually curated groups of functionally related genes, we found that both NuA4 and GLKs contribute to the expression of nuclear genes encoding proteins involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis and light harvesting, whereas the expression of nuclear plastid ribosomal protein genes (npRPGs) depends only on NuA4 (Fig. 3c). Overall, these observations are in agreement with the results of our genetic analyses, suggesting largely independent roles for NuA4 and GLKs in chloroplast development and maintenance.

Fig. 3 — a Gene ontology enrichment analysis of the down- and upregulated genes in *Atepl1-2* and *Ateaf1-1*. The five representative GO categories displayed in each graph were selected manually from the lists presented in Supplementary Data 8 and 11. Gene enrichment analyses were performed using the PANTHER overrepresentation test. b Area-proportional Venn diagrams illustrating the overlap between genes exhibiting an expression change in the same direction in the *Atepl1-2*, *Ateaf1-1* and *glk1* mutants as well as the gene sets representing particular GO categories. All numeric values indicate the numbers of genes present in a single sector of the diagram rather than the total values for the sets. c Relative transcript levels (log₂ FC) of the genes encoding four selected groups of chloroplast proteins in *Atepl1-2*, *Ateaf1-1*, and *glk*. Empty fields indicate a lack of significant change. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

AtEPL1 is a subunit of the plant NuA4 catalytic module

To further explore the molecular basis of the observed phenotypes of plant NuA4 mutants, we first had to test whether the physical interactions of AtEPL1 and AtEAF1 follow the predictions based on sequence homology to yeast proteins. In yeast, EPL1 interacts directly with the catalytic subunit of the complex, which in Arabidopsis is represented by HAM1 and HAM2⁴⁰. We produced recombinant GST-AtEPL1A, GST-AtEPL1B, His-HAM1, and His-HAM2 in bacteria and performed a pull-down assay. Both AtEPL1 were specifically pulled down by both HAM, as no GST signal was detected in the eluate either after His-GFP was used as bait or when no bait was used (Fig. 4a). We confirmed all interactions detected by pulldown using far western blotting (FWB), which indicated that AtEPL1A and AtEPL1B interact directly and interchangeably with HAM1 and HAM2 (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4 — a Pulldown assay showing the interaction between the recombinant AtEPL1 and HAM paralog pairs expressed in bacteria. Pull-down and input are abbreviated P-D and INP, respectively. b Interactions between AtEPL1s and HAMs were analyzed by far western blotting. After SDS–PAGE and western blotting of free GST and GST-AtEPL1A/B, the upper membranes were sequentially incubated with His-HAM1/2 and anti-His antibodies, whereas the lower membranes were incubated with an anti-GST antibody. The lower bands in the upper panels most likely indicate the interaction of HAM1/2 with partially degraded AtEPL1B. c Purification of recombinant *A. thaliana* picNuA4 from bacteria (Coomassie staining). A 6×His tag fused to HAM1 was used for purification on cobalt affinity resin. The numbers in the brackets indicate the expected molecular weights of the recombinant picNuA4 subunits. d Western blot showing Flag-HAM1 normalized protein levels in purified fractions from bacteria producing At picNuA4 complexes with and without AtEPL1A. Both fractions retained the Flag-HAM1 signal after ING2-His purification, indicating that AtEPL1A is not required for HAM1 binding. e In vitro assay of the HAT activity of recombinant *A. thaliana* (At) picNuA4 toward short oligonucleosomes (SONs) and free core histones (CHs). Recombinant *S. cerevisiae* (Sc) picNuA4 was used as a positive control. At-His corresponds to the purified His-HAM1 complex, and At-Flag indicates two versions of the Flag-HAM1-purified complex (see Supplementary Fig. 8a), with and without AtEPL1A, as shown in d. Autoacetylation on AtEAF6 is highlighted with an asterisk. f Immunoprecipitation (IP) of Flag-conjugated Arabidopsis H2A.Z protein (Flag-HTA9) from chromatin extract resulted in the isolation of human nucleosomes containing Arabidopsis H2A.Z. IP (1) and IP (2) correspond to Flag peptide eluates 1 and 2, respectively. SONs were used as a control. g In vitro assay of the HAT activity of recombinant *A. thaliana* picNuA4 toward Arabidopsis H2A.Z histone (FLAG-HTA9)-containing oligonucleosomes. Three versions of At picNuA4 were used, similar to the procedure in f. Only complexes containing AtEPL1A efficiently acetylated nucleosomal HTA9. Sc picNuA4 was used as a control with no activity towards HTA9. h Pull-down assay showing the interaction between AtEPL1B and a fragment of AtEAF1B corresponding to AAs 430-1322. HAM1 was used for comparison. All proteins were expressed in bacteria as either GST or 6×His fusions. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To determine whether Arabidopsis picNuA4 is capable of nucleosomal histone acetylation, we coexpressed HAM1, AtEPL1A, ING2, and AtEAF6 and used the recombinant complex for an in vitro histone acetylation (HAT) assay (Fig. 4c–g). Notably, the use of HAM1, AtEPL1A, or ING2 as bait for complex purification resulted in the recovery of all recombinant picNuA4 subunits, which confirmed that these four plant proteins interact physically to form a complex homologous to yeast picNuA4 (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 8a). The in vitro HAT assay confirmed the activity of Arabidopsis picNuA4 on native short oligonucleosomes (SONs). As expected, tritium-labeled acetyl groups were more efficiently transferred to histones H2A and H4, showing a significant preference for the latter, seemingly more in the Arabidopsis complex than in the yeast complex (Fig. 4e). When the complex was isolated based on ING2, HAM1 was recovered from both AtEPL1A-expressing bacterial strains and samples lacking this protein (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 8a). However, HAT assays on the obtained isolates showed that the presence of AtEPL1A is essential for the activity of the complex on chromatin (SONs) and that the complex shows significantly reduced activity on free core histones (CHs) (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 8b).

Next, we checked whether plant picNuA4 is also capable of performing H2A.Z acetylation. As mammalian H2A.Z differs from its Arabidopsis counterpart in the N-terminal tail, which is the target for acetylation (Supplementary Fig. 9), we generated a stable K562 cell line expressing the major Arabidopsis H2A.Z gene, HTA9, tagged with 3×FLAG, from the AAVS1 locus⁴¹. Fractionation of chromatin followed by affinity purification with an anti-FLAG antibody proved that Arabidopsis H2A.Z is effectively incorporated into nucleosomes in the mammalian system (Fig. 4f). HAT assays showed that Arabidopsis picNuA4 can efficiently target H2A.Z in chromatin and requires AtEPL1 for this acetyltransferase activity (Fig. 4g). All results of the HAT assays were consistent with observations made in yeast^42,43 and provide strong evidence for the evolutionary conservation of the subunit composition and the activity of the picNuA4 complex between budding yeast and plants.

AtEPL1 interacts with the regulatory module of NuA4

PicNuA4 interacts with the targeting module of yeast NuA4 through contact between the EPcB domain of EPL1 and EAF1. Our phenotypic analyses of the Atepl1-3 and Ateaf1-1 mutants suggested that AtEAF1 and the EPcB domain of AtEPL1 are crucial elements of the plant NuA4 complex. To obtain biochemical confirmation of this observation, we performed tandem AP-MS/MS, in which we used the Atepl1-1 mutant complemented with the pAtEPL1B::AtEPL1B-TAP construct. The experiment was performed twice on hydroponically grown seedlings. Notably, among the 15 proteins that were specifically copurified with AtEPL1B in both experiments, 12 were homologs of yeast NuA4 subunits, including EAF1 and ESA1 (Table 1 and Supplementary Data 13–16). This result confirms and improves on previously published findings regarding potential interacting proteins of AtEPL1B¹⁸ and other putative subunits of A. thaliana NuA4^16–18,44 (Table 1). In particular, tandem AP-MS/MS resulted in a low total number of interacting proteins but a high number of NuA4 subunit homologs, indicating high specificity (Table 1 and Supplementary Data 13–14). In fact, our analysis identified only 5 proteins that showed no homology to yeast NuA4 subunits as potential AtEPL1B interacting proteins. Two of these proteins, AOG2 and BRD6, were previously copurified with A. thaliana NuA4 subunits, albeit within much larger pools of additional interacting proteins (Table 1)^16,18,45. Interestingly, the uncharacterized bromodomain protein BRD6⁴⁰, which was previously copurified with SWC4¹⁶ and HAM1¹⁸ (Table 1), is orthologous to BRD8, a subunit of the human homolog of NuA4⁴⁶, according to the PANTHER classification system^47,48, indicating a possible role of BRD6 as an accessory subunit of plant NuA4.

Table 1.

TAP-MS data for AtEPL1B combined with metaanalysis of the previously published AP-MS experiments using NuA4 subunits as baits.

	Sc name	At gene	At name	AtARP4	AtARP4	AtSWC4	HAM1	HAM2	AtEPL1A	AtEPL1B	AtYAF9A	AtEPL1B
Complexes	–	–	–	NuA4, SWR1, SWI/SNF, INO80	NuA4, SWR1, SWI/SNF, INO80	NuA4, SWR1	NuA4, PEAT	NuA4, PEAT	NuA4	NuA4	NuA4, SWR1	NuA4
Model	–	–	–	Cell culture	Cell culture	Cell culture	Seedlings	Seedlings	Seedlings	Seedlings		Seedlings
Promoter	–	–	–	CaMV35S	UBQ10	UBQ10	Native	Native	Native	Native	CaMV35S	Native
Tag	–	–	–	GS TAP tag	Strep	Strep	Myc	Myc	Flag	Flag	GH TAP tag	GS TAP tag
Reference	–	–	–	Vercruyssen	Bieluszewski	Bieluszewski	Tan	Tan	Tan	Tan	Crevillen	This work
Conserved NuA4 subunits	ARP4	AT1G18450	AtARP4	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	2/1.78
		AT1G73910	AtARP4A	–	+	+	–	–	–	–	–	–
	SWC4	AT2G47210	AtSWC4	–	+	+	+	–	+	+	+	2/1.63
	YAF9	AT5G45600	AtYAF9A	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	2/1.42
		AT2G18000	AtYAF9B	–	–	+	–	–	–	+	–	–
	EAF1	AT3G24880	AtEAF1A	–	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	2/0.42
		AT3G24870	AtEAF1B	–	+	+	+	–	–	–	–	2/0.43
	TRA1	AT2G17930	AtTRA1A	–	–	–	–	–	+	+	–	2/0.37
		AT4G36080	AtTRA1B	–	–	+	–	+	+	+	–	2/0.44
	ESA1	AT5G64610	HAM1	–	+	+	+	–	+	+	+	2/0.95
		AT5G09740	HAM2	–	–	+	–	+	–	–	–	1/0.16
	EPL1	AT1G16690	AtEPL1A	–	–	+	+	–	+	–	–	–
		AT1G79020	AtEPL1B	–	+	+	–	+	–	+	–	2/2.22
	YNG2	AT1G54390	AtING2	–	+	+	+	–	+	+	–	2/1.50
	EAF6	AT4G14385	AtEAF6	–	+	+	+	–	+	+	–	2/1.96
	EAF3	AT4G37280	MRG1	–	–	+	+	–	–	–	–	2/0.29
		AT1G02740	MRG2	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
	EAF5	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
	EAF7	AT1G26470	AtEAF7	–	–	+	–	–	–	–	–	–
Additional AtEPL1B interactors detected here		AT2G31810	AHASS1	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	2/0.21
		AT3G07810	AOG2	–	–	–	+	–	–	–	–	2/0.18
		AT3G60110	BRD6	–	–	+	+	–	–	–	–	2/0.06
		AT1G48520	GATB	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	1/0.06
		AT1G26570	UGD1	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	1/0.04
Number of additional bait-specific hits				2	454	1104	331	280	96	241	114	0

Open in a new tab

NSAF normalized spectral abundance factor.

Numbers in the rightmost column indicate the number of biological replicates (out of two) in which the protein was detected as well as its relative abundance in the final eluate analyzed by mass spectrometry.

Values in bold indicate proteins for which peptides were detected in both biological replicates.

To test whether AtEPL1 interacts with the targeting region of NuA4 through direct binding to AtEAF1, we performed a pulldown assay in which a His-tagged fragment of AtEAF1B corresponding to AAs 430-1322, His-HAM1 (positive control), or His-EGFP (negative control) was used as bait and GST-AtEPL1B was used as prey. Only His-AtEAF1B and His-HAM1 were able to pull-down GST-EPL1B, which confirmed the direct physical interaction between AtEPL1B and AtEAF1B (Fig. 4h). These results support our homology-based model in which AtEPL1 and AtEAF1 interact directly to provide a scaffold for the assembly of the plant NuA4 complex.

NuA4 acetylates H4 and H2A.Z and stimulates H2A.Z deposition

To determine whether Atepl1-2 plants display decreased acetylation of H4 (H4K5ac, H4K8ac, H4K12ac, and H4K16ac) and H2A.Z in vivo, we performed ChIP-qPCR on selected genes whose expression was decreased in Atepl1-2 (Supplementary Fig. 10). As expected, all tested forms of acetylation were significantly reduced in the mutant. Among NuA4-acetylated H4 residues, H4K5ac was the most enriched.

In yeast, H2A.Z incorporation into nucleosomes can be stimulated by NuA4-dependent H4 acetylation⁴⁹. Therefore, we sought to determine whether the lack of functional AtEPL1 results in H2A.Z loss from chromatin, which could affect gene expression. To this end, we checked the levels of HTA9, the major isoform of H2A.Z in Arabidopsis, by ChIP-qPCR at several loci (Supplementary Fig. 10). We found that HTA9 levels were significantly reduced in the Atepl1-2 mutant (Supplementary Fig. 10). We also crossed Atepl1 with mutants of two genes directly involved in H2A.Z deposition, ARP6 and MBD9^20,21,50,51; however, both triple mutations (Atepl1-2 arp6 and Atepl1-2 mbd9) were synthetically lethal (Supplementary Table 8).

To obtain insight into global chromatin changes, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) of Atepl1-2 and WT plants grown under the same conditions as the plants used for RNA-seq. We profiled two modifications that we showed are catalyzed by plant NuA4 (H4K5ac and H2A.Zac) and one activating modification catalyzed primarily by other HATs (H3K9ac). To profile H2A.Zac, we used an antibody raised against human H2A.Zac, which was shown to recognize also Arabidopsis H2A.Zac (Crevillén et al.¹⁷; Supplementary Fig. 8C). In addition, we profiled both total H2A.Z to better understand the relationship between its acetylation and chromatin deposition and unmodified H3 to observe potential alterations in nucleosome occupancy. Due to expected global changes in epitope abundance, we included a predetermined amount of mouse chromatin in our ChIP experiments as a reference (spike-in).

In the Atepl1-2 mutant, the total H2A.Z, H4K5ac, and H2A.Zac levels were dramatically reduced (Fig. 5a). In contrast, the profile of H3K9ac in Atepl1-2 overlapped well with that in WT plants, with only a slight increase within the peak downstream of the TSS (Fig. 5a). Interestingly, the average H3 occupancy in Atepl1-2 showed an increase on both sides of the TSS (Fig. 5a).

As the H2A.Z histone variant and the three acetyl marks were highly enriched downstream of the TSS in WT plants (Fig. 5a), we averaged the signal over the first 500 bp of each transcribed region and used these values to perform comparisons between individual genes. Total H2A.Z showed a global reduction in this window, although it was uneven, likely because of extensive differences among genes in the enrichment of this histone variant (Fig. 5b). Consequently, H2A.Zac also showed an extensive and uneven reduction for most genes (Fig. 5b). These results indicate that NuA4 is critical for H2A.Z deposition onto chromatin. While H4K5ac in Atepl1-2 showed a strong and almost uniform reduction in this window, H3K9ac was preserved in most genes, with few genes showing large changes (Fig. 5b).

Using the same data, we checked the interrelationships between individual histone modifications (Fig. 5d). All three histone acetylations correlate well with each other in WT, with the strongest correlation observed between H2A.Zac and H4K5ac, which is consistent with their dependence on NuA4. On the other hand, we did not observe any significant correlation between total H2A.Z enrichment and histone acetylations (including H2A.Zac). In Atepl1-2, the correlations between histone acetylations generally weakened (Fig. 5e).

Loss of H4ac/H2A.Zac and gain of H3ac correlate with the Atepl1-2 transcriptome changes

Given the general role of histone acetylation in transcriptional activity, we hypothesized that genes dysregulated in Atepl1-2 should be especially noticeable in terms of their acetylation distribution, enrichment or change in the mutant. H4K5ac, H2A.Zac, and H3K9ac showed similar average genic distributions in both the WT and the Atepl1-2 mutant, peaking at the +1 nucleosome, according to our ChIP-seq data. The average levels of all three forms of acetylation in WT plants were lower in dysregulated genes (log₂ fold change < −1.5 or log₂ > 1.5) than in all expressed genes (Fig. 6a). Notably, in the mutant background, the H3K9ac level was significantly increased in upregulated genes, but slightly decreased in downregulated genes (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 11). In addition, all expressed genes exhibited a moderate increase in H3K9ac in the mutant background. This pattern indicates that in the context of decreased acetylation of H4 and H2A.Z, increased H3 acetylation may maintain or even increase the expression of some genes.

Fig. 6 — a Spike-in-normalized H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H2A.Zac, and total H2A.Z profiles at the TSS for all genes expressed in the WT (n = 18,620; blue) as well as for genes downregulated (n = 941; red) and upregulated (n = 1746; green) in *Atepl1-2*. For each pair of plots, the plot on the left shows the acetylation profiles as detected in the WT, while the plot on the right shows the modifications in the *Atepl1-2* mutant. The values on the vertical axes are relative. The values on the horizontal axes indicate the chromosomal position relative to the TSS. The heatmaps show the corresponding three groups of genes ordered according to the average enrichment level on a logarithmic scale. For the all expressed genes category, 2500 randomly selected genes are shown. b Scatter plots showing correlations between chromatin marks (H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H2A.Zac, and unacetylated H2A.Z occupancy in WT) and gene expression change (log₂ fold change) as calculated by percentiles of expression change. Genes dysregulated in *Atepl1-2* (n = 5135) were sorted based on their fold change and divided into percentiles. For each percentile, the mean change in expression and the mean log₂-transformed spike-in normalized ChIP-seq signal were calculated and plotted. To estimate values for non-acetylated H2A.Z, the ChIP-seq signal for acetylated H2A.Z were subtracted from the signal obtained for total H2A.Z. c Scatter plots showing correlations between changes in chromatin marks (H3, H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H2A.Zac, total H2A.Z, and unacetylated H2A.Z occupancy) and gene expression change (log₂ fold change) as calculated by percentiles of expression change. Genes dysregulated in *Atepl1-2* (n = 5135) were divided into percentiles as in b. For each percentile, the mean change in expression and the mean difference in the level of the log₂-transformed spike-in normalized ChIP-seq signal between WT and *Atepl1-2* were calculated and plotted. To estimate values for non-acetylated H2A.Z, the differences for acetylated H2A.Z were subtracted from the differences obtained for total H2A.Z. Spearman rank correlation values are shown below the plots.

In parallel, we observed that all three gene groups (all expressed, downregulated and upregulated) displayed different H4K5ac and H2A.Zac levels in WT plants, with upregulated genes showing the lowest enrichment of the two modifications. In the Atepl1-2 mutant background, all gene groups lost both acetylation marks, but the decreases were greatest in the downregulated genes (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. 11). This finding suggests that in the absence of NuA4, the levels of nucleosomal H4K5ac and H2A.Zac drop below the threshold levels in certain genes, decreasing their transcriptional activity.

We then further investigated how gene expression changes in the Atepl1-2 mutant corresponded to changes in H3, H4K5ac, H2A.Zac, total H2A.Z and H3K9ac enrichment. To this end, genes dysregulated in Atepl1-2 (n = 5135) were sorted based on their fold change (FC) and divided into percentiles. For genes in each percentile, the averaged spike-in normalized signal over the first 500 bp of each transcribed region was used as histone modification enrichment measure. We observed an inverse correlation between histone acetylation and expression FC (Fig. 6b). Interestingly, this relationship was present when the histone modification enrichment was assessed both in WT and in the Atepl1-2 background, and did not depend on the direction of the expression change (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 12). Based on these findings, we concluded that genes dysregulated in Atepl1-2 are characterized by low basal level of histone acetylation in the +1 nucleosome of WT plants.

On the other hand, the level of total H2A.Z showed no significant correlation with the expression change. As H2A.Z can have both activating and repressing effects on gene transcriptional activity⁵², we decided to use our data for total- and acetylated-H2A.Z to estimate the amount of non-acetylated H2A.Z in gene percentiles (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 12). This showed that genes dysregulated in Atepl1-2 are enriched for non-acetylated H2A.Z in the +1 nucleosome.

Based on the average values of chromatin modifications per each percentile, we calculated the difference between the levels of H3, H3K9ac, H4K5ac and both acetylated and unacetylated H2A.Z in WT and the Atepl1-2 mutant (Fig. 6c). Atepl1 – WT signal differences for H3 occupancy showed negative correlation, while all three histone acetylations showed strong positive correlations with gene expression change: For H2A.Zac and H4K5ac, the decrease in modification level was greatest for downregulated genes and smallest for upregulated genes (Fig. 6c). In the case of H3K9ac, we observed an increase in signal strength in the mutant for most percentiles (positive Y-axis values in Fig. 6c), confirming the compensatory role of this acetylation. In turn, we observed an inverse correlation between expression fold change and non-acetylated H2A.Z change (Fig. 6c). This suggests that the dual influence of H2A.Z on gene expression is due to its presence in the acetylated (transcriptional activation) or non-acetylated (repression) form.

Nuclear plastid gene expression depends on NuA4

As shown above, loss of AtEPL1 affected the acetylation levels of H4 and H2A.Z, confirmed herein as genuine NuA4 targets, as well as acetylation of H3 catalyzed by other histone acetyltransferases. We interpreted H3K9ac changes at individual loci as indicative of a transcriptional response to physiological and developmental perturbations observed in the mutant and not as a direct consequence of NuA4 inactivation. Consequently, genes that did not show reduced H3K9ac but displayed large reductions in H4 and H2A.Z acetylation and reduced transcript levels could be viewed as NuA4-dependent. To strictly define this group of genes, we set the following arbitrary criteria: (i) Log₂ FC in the transcript level <−1.5, (ii) Log₂ FC in H4K5ac < −2, and (iii) Log₂ FC in H3K9ac >−0.5 (Supplementary Fig. 13a and Supplementary Data 17). We plotted the log₂-transformed FC values of the two acetylation marks against each other separately for genes down- and upregulated in Atepl1-2 (Fig. 7a). Application of the acetylation fold change criteria (ii) and (iii) to genes downregulated in Atepl1-2 resulted in the identification of 347 potentially NuA4-dependent genes (Supplementary Data 17).

Fig. 7 — a Scatter plot showing the relationships between the log₂-transformed fold changes in the spike-in- and H3-normalized H3K9ac and H4K5ac occupancies and the directionality of the transcript level change. Genes downregulated in *Atepl1* shown within the gray area fulfill all criteria for NuA4 dependency. b Gene structures of the two *Arabidopsis thaliana* genes encoding the TAF1 subunit of TFIID. The black arrows indicate the Cas9-gRNA cut sites, and the black asterisks mark the positions of premature stop codons in the resulting mutant alleles. c Phenotypes of *taf1Δbromo*, *epl1-1* and WT plants. d RT-qPCR analysis of the relative transcript abundance in the double bromodomain mutant (*taf1Δbromo*) and the double *Atepl1a-1 Atepl1b-1* mutant (*Atepl1-1*). The genes were selected on the basis of their distinct transcriptional behavior in the *haf2-1* mutant (as reported in Bertrand et al.³⁷) and in the *Atepl1-1* mutant, as shown in this work by RNA-seq. Average expression levels from three independent replicates ±standard deviations are shown. e Spike-in-normalized H2A.Zac and H2A.Z profiles at the TSS for NuA4-dependent genes (n = 347; orange) as compared to genes downregulated in *Atepl1-2* (n = 941; red) and all genes expressed in the WT (n = 18,620; blue shading). The values on the vertical axes are relative. The values on the horizontal axes indicate the chromosomal position relative to the TSS. The heatmaps show the corresponding NuA4-dependent and Downregulated in *Atepl1-2* groups of genes ordered according to the average enrichment level on a logarithmic scale. f Boxplots showing the difference between the average H2A.Zac and H2A.Z enrichment in the first 500 bp downstream of the TSS for NuA4-dependent genes (n = 347; orange) and all genes expressed in the WT (n = 18,620; blue). The center line indicates the median; upper and lower bounds indicate the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively; and the whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum. An unpaired two-sample Wilcoxon test was used to determine significance. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Gene ontology analysis of the NuA4-dependent gene group vs. all genes downregulated in Atepl1-2 showed significant enrichment of categories related to growth and photosynthesis, including genes encoding components of the chloroplast stroma, thylakoid, and chloroplast envelope (Supplementary Fig. 13b, Supplementary Table 9, and Supplementary Data 18). Interestingly, nearly all nuclear genes coding for plastid ribosomal proteins⁵³ clustered within or near the NuA4-dependent sector (Fig. 7a and Supplementary Data 18). Furthermore, the median log₂ FC in the expression of plastid translation- and ribosome-related NuA4-dependent genes was significantly lower than that of all downregulated genes, as could be expected for the genes that directly depend on NuA4 for efficient transcription (Supplementary Fig. 13b). This finding indicates that the NuA4 complex specifically stimulates the expression of growth- and photosynthesis-related genes in plants.

The presence of H2A.Z determines NuA4 dependency

NuA4-dependent genes were identified as a subgroup of 347 genes that showed significant loss of H4 acetylation. We sought to determine how these genes differ from other H4K5ac-depleted genes that did not display decreased transcript levels in the mutant. Studies in S. cerevisiae have suggested that H4 acetylation plays an important role in the recruitment of the general transcription factor TFIID, especially to genes that lack a TATA box in their core promoters⁵⁴, which is the case for approximately 80% of Arabidopsis npRPGs⁵⁵. The interaction between TFIID and H4ac is mediated in yeast by the double bromodomain protein BDF1⁵⁶. Animals and plants do not have BDF1 homologs and instead harbor bromodomains within the TAF1 subunits of their TFIIDs⁵⁷. We used Cas9-gRNA to eliminate the bromodomains from both Arabidopsis TAF1 homologs to test whether this alteration has an effect on gene expression similar to loss of H4ac in the NuA4 mutants (Fig. 7b). Intriguingly, double taf1Δbromo homozygotes showed no obvious phenotypic effects (Fig. 7c). RT-qPCR analysis of the relative transcript levels of several NuA4-dependent genes also showed no similarity to those in Atepl1 (Fig. 7d). In fact, some transcripts showed significant changes in the opposite direction, consistent with a previous study of a single haf2 mutant (taf1b) (Fig. 7d)³⁷. Assuming functional conservation of the relationship between TFIID and H4 acetylation, these results demonstrate that recruitment of TFIID via TAF1 bromodomains is not the primary mode of action of H4ac at NuA4-dependent loci in plants.

Next, we sought to identify chromatin states that distinguish NuA4-dependent genes from other genes that were downregulated in Atepl1-2. First, we observed that this gene class showed a very high level of H2A.Z and H2A.Zac in the +1 nucleosome, unlike the broader group of all genes that were downregulated in Atepl1-2 (Fig. 7e). In Atepl1-2, NuA4-dependent genes showed a significantly greater decrease in the level of H2A.Zac than did all expressed genes, while the two groups of genes did not differ in the decrease in the level of total H2A.Z (Fig. 7e, f). This pattern may suggest that in the mutant background, the remaining unacetylated H2A.Z in the +1 nucleosome in NuA4-dependent genes inhibits the expression of these genes. In addition, we confirmed these observations by comparing different groups of plastid NuA4-dependent genes with all the genes in their GO groups (Supplementary Fig. 14). We speculate that elevated H2A.Zac levels on +1 nucleosomes determine the NuA4 dependency of gene transcriptional activity.

Upregulation of genes in Atepl1-2 results from H2A.Z loss

Gene body H2A.Z can act as a transcriptional repressor of responsive genes^52,58,59. Since many of the genes upregulated in Atepl1-2 could be classified as responsive (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Data 11), we hypothesized that their increased activity may be a consequence of decreased H2A.Z occupancy. To test this hypothesis, we compared the averaged H2A.Z enrichment profiles in Atepl1-2 and WT for genes upregulated or downregulated in the mutant and for all expressed genes. This analysis showed that genes upregulated in Atepl1-2 were relatively rich in gene body H2A.Z but had little H2A.Zac in the +1 nucleosome in WT plants (Fig. 8a). The averaged H2A.Z profiles of these genes were flattened in the mutant, overlapping other gene classes (Fig. 8a and Supplementary Fig. 15a). Consequently, the changes in gene body H2A.Z levels between WT and Atepl1-2 were greater for the upregulated genes than for all expressed genes (Fig. 8b). A similar comparison for acetylated H2A.Z in gene bodies showed no significant difference. This pattern indicates stimulation of H2A.Z deposition and not H2A.Z acetylation per se as a key contribution of NuA4 to H2A.Z-dependent gene silencing (Fig. 8b).

Fig. 8 — a Spike-in-normalized H2A.Z and H2A.Zac profiles in gene bodies for all genes expressed in the WT (n = 18,620; blue) as well as for genes downregulated (n = 941; red) and upregulated (n = 1746; green) in *Atepl1-2*. TSS, transcription start site; TTS, transcription termination site. b Boxplots showing the differences between the average H2A.Z and H2A.Zac enrichment in gene bodies for all genes expressed in the WT (n = 18,620; green) and for genes upregulated in *Atepl1-2* (n = 1746; blue). The center line indicates the median; the upper and lower bounds indicate the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively; and the whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum. An unpaired two-sample Wilcoxon test was used to determine significance. c Area-proportional Venn diagrams showing the overlaps between genes exhibiting upregulation in the *Atepl1-1* or *Ateaf1-1* mutant and the *pie1* mutant. d Spike-in-normalized H2A.Z, H2A.Zac and H3K9ac profiles across gene bodies for genes upregulated in both *pie1* and *Atepl1-2* (n = 591; red), genes upregulated only in *Atepl1-2* (n = 1836; green), and genes upregulated only in *pie1* (n = 1705; blue), as measured by ChIP in WT plants. The corresponding profiles for all genes expressed in the WT are shown as a reference (dashed lines). e Comparison of spike-in-normalized H3K9ac profiles across gene bodies for gene groups as described in d, as measured by ChIP-seq in WT (blue) and *Atepl1-2* (red) plants.

If loss of gene body H2A.Z was the cause of gene upregulation in the NuA4 mutants, a similar set of genes should be upregulated in mutants that lack H2A.Z in nucleosomes. We found significant overlap between genes upregulated in both NuA4 mutants described here and those upregulated in the pie1-2 mutant, which lacks the catalytic subunit of the SWI2/SNF2-Related 1 chromatin remodeling complex (SWR1-C) responsible for H2A.Z deposition in nucleosomes^60,61 (Fig. 8c). How do the genes upregulated in both Atepl1-2 and pie1 differ from these upregulated only in one of these mutants? To answer this question, we investigated the levels of gene body H2A.Z and H2A.Z/H4K5/H3K9 histone acetylation. We found that gene body H2A.Z enrichment in the three groups of genes followed the order of upregulated in Atepl1-2 and pie1 > upregulated only in pie1 > upregulated only in Atepl1-2, but gene body H2A.Z enrichment in all groups was much higher than the average for all expressed genes (Fig. 8d and Supplementary Fig. 15b). This finding further supports our hypothesis that H2A.Z loss from gene bodies is largely responsible for gene upregulation in Atepl1-2. Conversely, the average histone acetylation levels were lower in the group of genes upregulated in both Atepl1-2 and pie1 than in the other groups (Fig. 8d and Supplementary Fig. 15). In the Atepl1-2 mutant, the levels of H2A.Z, H2A.Zac and H4K5ac in all gene groups decreased in a similar manner (Supplementary Fig. 15c). However, while the H3K9ac level was significantly increased in the Atepl1-2 background in genes upregulated in both mutants and for those upregulated only in Atepl1-2, it was not altered in genes upregulated only in pie1 (Fig. 8e). This pattern again points to H3 acetylation as the driver of gene activation in Atepl1-2. Consequently, those genes that did not gain H3 acetylation upon loss of H2A.Z remained silent in Atepl1-2 despite their activation in pie1 driven by intact NuA4-dependent H4 acetylation. In conclusion, a significant proportion of genes upregulated in the NuA4 mutants require cooperation between NuA4, SWR1 and possibly histone deacetylases for transcriptional repression mediated by deacetylated gene body H2A.Z (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9 — a Regulation of gene expression involving NuA4. Large dashed-line oval represents nucleus, while small dashed-line oval represents chloroplast. Plastid and growth-related genes (green portion of the nucleus) depend on H2A.Zac and H4ac for their high transcriptional activity. Loss of H2A.Zac/H4ac from the +1 nucleosome at these loci cannot be compensated by H3K9ac and results in gene repression. GLK transcription factors function in parallel with NuA4 to activate genes involved in photosynthesis but not RPGs. Stress response genes (red portion of the nucleus) are repressed by hypoacetylated H2A.Z in their gene bodies (represented by +2 nucleosome). Deposition of H2A.Z by the SWR1 complex in the gene body requires NuA4, although it is not known whether acetyl groups are later removed by an unknown HDAC or not deposited at all (not shown). Loss of NuA4 activity triggers transcriptional release of stress genes that have sufficient H3ac levels in the +1 nucleosome. b By controlling H2A.Z acetylation and deposition, NuA4 contributes to the switch between autotrophic growth and the stress response.

Discussion

The Cas9-induced loss-of-function mutant presented here provides evidence supporting a central role of AtEAF1 in plant NuA4 (Figs. 1 and 2). First, the phenotype of the Ateaf1-1 mutant is significantly more severe than the phenotypes of the mrg, eaf7 and yaf9 mutants described previously^17,25,27. We note that lethal effects have been reported for the Atswc4 mutant as well as the double ham mutant^24,62. These effects are probably not NuA4 specific, however, due to the role of AtSWC4 in the SWR1 complex and the potential NuA4-independent roles of HAM in the acetylation of nonhistone substrates^62,63. Furthermore, the Ateaf1-1 mutant displays extreme enhancement of the photosynthetic and reproductive phenotypes previously reported in a double mutant of AtYAF9, a confirmed interacting protein of AtEAF1^16,17.

The severe phenotype of Ateaf1-1, which is most likely caused by the dissociation of the regulatory module of NuA4, suggests that proper targeting of picNuA4 activity is critically important in plants. The phenotype of Ateaf1-1 is not copied by any mutation disrupting a nuclear transcription factor described to date in Arabidopsis, although some aspects were reminiscent of the phenotype of the well-characterized double glk mutant (Fig. 2)^30,35. Our genetic and transcriptomic analyses provide evidence that NuA4 and GLK operate mostly independently.

Since the phenotypes and transcriptomes of the Ateaf1 and Atepl1 mutants differed quantitatively rather than qualitatively (Figs. 1 and 2), we assumed that similarly widespread chromatin changes occurred in these two mutants. Consequently, we focused on the Atepl1-2 mutant, which allowed us to investigate the impact of complete NuA4 inactivation. Interestingly, despite the roughly equal numbers of down- and upregulated genes in Atepl1-2, the levels of total H2A.Z, H2A.Zac, and H4K5ac but not H3K9ac were globally decreased (Figs. 3 and 5). Investigating the reasons for this pattern led us to discover that only those genes with low levels of all three modifications in WT plants show dysregulation in the Atepl1-2 mutant (Fig. 6b). However, the degree of change in their expression is strongly correlated with the degree of change in the level of H2A.Z, H4K5 and H3K9 acetylation in Atepl1-2 (Fig. 6c). These findings indicate that H3K9ac may effectively stimulate transcription in the absence of nucleosomal H4 acetylation in plants. Remarkably, an inverse relationship exists for the level of non-acetylated H2A.Z (Fig. 6c). This shows that the previously described dual role of H2A.Z in the regulation of gene expression^17,64,65 results from its presence in the +1 nucleosome in two forms: acetylated, which activates, and non-acetylated, possibly monoubiquitinylated⁶⁶, which represses transcription.

Several characteristics indicate that the genes that are downregulated in Atepl1-2 can be both directly and indirectly regulated by NuA4. Therefore, we defined genes downregulated as a direct consequence of NuA4 loss in Atepl1-2. We found that these genes were enriched in GO categories related to plastid translation machinery (Supplementary Fig. 14), which is in line with the NuA4 mutant phenotype. We observed that this group of genes showed strong enrichment of the H2A.Z histone variant in the +1 nucleosome (Fig. 7e). The presence of H2A.Z in the +1 nucleosome is known to prepare genes for transcriptional activation^52,67,68, and H2A.Z acetylation is likely required in this process^17,64,65. Hypoacetylated H2A.Z in the +1 nucleosome may constitute a major barrier for RNAPII during transcription⁶⁹. As we showed that NuA4 is responsible for H2A.Z acetylation in plants (Figs. 4g–6), the absence of the complex may specifically affect the expression of genes enriched with H2A.Z: in this scenario, deficiency of both H4 and H2A.Z acetylation cannot be compensated by increased H3 acetylation, leading to transcriptional repression (Fig. 9a).

Although histone acetylation has long been considered a general transcriptional coactivator, our research shows that this view is greatly simplified. Similar to findings in yeast⁴⁹, we found that plant NuA4 enables H2A.Z to be deposited efficiently on chromatin (Figs. 5–6). It is important to note that the role of NuA4 in this process is not limited to the +1 nucleosome but also extends to H2A.Z in gene bodies, which generally has a repressive function in preventing spurious activation of responsive genes^52,58,59. Consequently, NuA4 inactivation in plants leads to a global decrease in H2A.Z deposition and spurious expression of stress-responsive genes (Figs. 8a, b and 9a). The expected overlap between genes upregulated in the absence of NuA4 and those upregulated in the absence of the H2A.Z-depositing complex SWR1 is relatively modest (24.4% and 26.1% for Atepl1-2 and Ateaf1-1, respectively; Fig. 8c). The reason for this may be the simultaneous decrease in histone acetylation in the +1 nucleosome, which seems to be necessary for the transcriptional activation of many responsive genes (Fig. 8d, e). Therefore, while most genes displaying a high gene body H2A.Z level are upregulated in the pie1 mutant, only genes that are able to compensate for the lack of H4/H2A.Z acetylation by H3 hyperacetylation are transcriptionally activated in the NuA4 mutants (Fig. 8e).

Transcriptional inhibition of genes related to photosynthesis frequently coincides with activation of the stress response in plants, allowing survival under conditions that prevent normal development⁷⁰. Our analyses demonstrate upregulation of stress-responsive genes and downregulation of genes related to autotrophic growth in NuA4 mutants deficient in deposition and acetylation of H2A.Z (Fig. 9). We predict that future studies may reveal how the regulation of NuA4 activity switches between growth and stress responses in plants.

Methods

Plant material

All A. thaliana mutants used in this work are in Col-0 background. T-DNA insertion mutants for AtEPL1A (At1g16690, SAIL_239_D12⁷¹, Atepl1a-1) and AtEPL1B (At1g79020, SALK_094941⁷², Atepl1b-1) were obtained from NASC and crossed to produce the double mutant Atepl1-1. The previously characterized double homozygous transposon-insertion mutant glk1-1 glk2-1³⁰ also comes from the NASC collection (NASC ID: N9807). The arp6 and mbd9-1 mutants were kindly provided by Kyuha Choi and Roger Deal, respectively. All other mutants were generated for this work through Cas9-gRNA mediated genome editing of WT Col-0 plants and are described in detail in Supplementary Figs 1–2.

Preparation of genetic constructs for gene editing

The Cas9 expression cassette was created through fusion of the ICU2 promoter sequence cloned from genomic DNA following published instructions⁷³ with the 3 × Flag-NLS-hSpCas9-NLS::NosT cassette which was a gift from Dr Jian-Kang Zhu⁷⁴. Following insertion of the Cas9 expression cassette into the pFGC vector (a gift of Dr Jian-Feng Li⁷⁵), the BamHI site was moved from the 5′- to the 3′-end of the Nos terminator. The BamHI site was subsequently used for linearization of the plasmid and insertion of gRNA cassettes by Gibson assembly-based cloning. The gRNA expression cassette containing U6 promoter was a gift from Dr Jian-Kang Zhu⁷⁴. The U3 expression cassette was created by replacing the U6 promoter with the AtU3C promoter cloned from genomic DNA isolated from A. thaliana Ler ecotype following published sequence data⁷⁶. The target sequences were found with CRISPR-P⁷⁷ (Ateaf1-1, Atepl1-2) or CRISPOR⁷⁸ (Atepl1-3). Targeted mutagenesis of the gRNA expression cassettes was followed by PCR-amplification and recircularization of the pJET1.2-based gRNA vectors. The sequences of the primers used for the mutagenesis can be found in the Supplementary Data 19.

Editing strategy and isolation of the mutants

In order to generate genomic deletions within coding regions of the target genes, double-gRNA-Cas9 constructs were integrated with the genome through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation⁷⁹. Transformed plants were selected on soil by spraying with Basta (Bayer). Two primers flanking the expected deletion were used to identify plants that accumulated somatic mutations apparent from the presence of short PCR products corresponding to deletions between two neighboring cut sites. T2 plants were screened for the absence of Cas9-gRNA T-DNA by PCR and genotyped again for the presence of desired genomic deletions. Any mutations detected in this way were assumed heritable. Subsequently, PCR amplification products were cloned into pJET1.2 vector and plasmids isolated from multiple single colonies were sequenced to determine the sequences of both homologous loci. If plants were confirmed as frame-shift- (Ateaf1-1, Atepl1-2) or in-frame-deletion mutants (Atepl1-3), they were backcrossed to Col-0 and propagated. Sequences of all primers used for genotyping can be found in Supplementary Data 19.

Phenotypic analyses

For all phenotypic analyses plants were grown in peat pellets (Jiffy) in controlled conditions: 22 °C, 80–90 μmol/(m²s) PAR, 60% RH. In course of the growth rate analyses, plants were imaged in one-week intervals with a stereomicroscope or a camera, depending on the size. ImageJ software was used for the image analyses to extract the distance between the tip of the longest rosette leaf and the rosette center⁸⁰.

As an approximation for chloroplast and cell size, we used the surface projection areas of the organelles or cells obtained through live confocal imaging of the palisade mesophyll cell layer of rosette leaves. To eliminate variability resulting from changes in chloroplast size during leaf growth, we measured chloroplasts in the fully expanded 4th leaves of 10-true-leaf rosettes. For plastid- and cell-size measurements, leaves #4 were cut from 10-true-leaf rosettes, vacuum-infiltrated with perfluoroperhydrophenanthrene⁸¹, mounted on a slide and imaged with the A1Rsi confocal microscope (Nikon). Z-stacks spanning the palisade mesophyll cell-layer, acquired in transmitted-light and chlorophyll autofluorescence channels, were used for analysis in ImageJ. Contours of cells and plastids were tracked manually and the surface area of the resulting regions of interest (ROI) was treated as the surface projection area of the measured structures. All calculations and statistical analysis were done using Microsoft Excel.

Chlorophyll was extracted from a single plant for each biological replicate. A 10-leaf rosette was separated from the root, weighed and ground in liquid nitrogen. After obtaining a fine powder, 3 or 5 ml (depending on a rosette size) of Tris-HCl-buffered 80% acetone was added and grinding was continued until homogeneity. The thawed mixture was then transferred to a 10 ml glass tube wrapped in aluminum foil to prevent light access, sealed and kept at 4 °C overnight. Directly before spectroscopic measurements, 1.5 ml of the mixture was transferred to 1.5 ml microtubes (Axygen) and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min to pellet any debris. After centrifugation, the extract was transferred to a spectrophotometer cuvette and the absorbance was measured at 647 nm and 664 nm using BioSpectrometer kinetic (Eppendorf) spectrophotometer against buffered acetone as blank. The number of samples processed in parallel was limited to 4 in order to reduce the influence of the processing time on the measurements. Total chlorophyll content, as well as chlorophyll a/b ratio, were calculated according to published formulas⁸² without correction for the absorbance at 750 nm.

Photomorphogenic response measurement

For analyses of photomorphogenic response, wild-type and Atepl1-2 seeds were stratified and grown in ½ Murashige-Skoog medium for three (apical curvature) or five (hypocotyl length, cotyledon angle and surface) days in the darkness and then transferred to constant light and controlled conditions: 22 °C, 80–90 μmol/(m²s) PAR, 60% RH. Apical curvature and cotyledon angle measurements have been conducted as previously described^83,84. Briefly, plants that were analyzed for hypocotyl length were grown vertically. Pictures have been taken in 0 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 56 h intervals using stereomicroscope. ImageJ software was used for the analyses of captured images.

Pull-down

Recombinant proteins were expressed in E. coli strains BL21-CodonPlus-RP or Lemo21(DE3, New England Biolabs). Bacterial lysates were prepared as previously described⁸⁵ with the following modifications. GST-tag and His-tag fusion proteins were resuspended in PBS or equilibration and wash buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.0, with 0.3 M sodium chloride, 10 mM imidazole) respectively, with addition of 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and cOmplete™ Mini EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche). His-GFP or His-fusion proteins were bound to HIS-Select HF Nickel Affinity Gel (Sigma) for 1 hour, then washed and incubated with the recombinant GST-fusion proteins for additional 1 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed five times with wash buffer containing 0.5% NP40. The protein complexes were analyzed by SDS/PAGE followed by WB analysis with anti-GST (B14; #sc-138; Santa Cruz; 1:500) and anti-His (#R940-25; Life Technology, Waltham, MA, USA; 1:6000) antibodies.

Far western blotting

In Far Western Blotting (FWB), one of the recombinant proteins is subject to SDS–PAGE and western blotting. After renaturation, the bait protein attached to the PVDF membrane is incubated with the potential interactor. Overlap between the bait and prey signals on the membrane after the immunodetection of the prey indicates an interaction. This experiment was performed as previously described⁸⁶ with some modification. Briefly, GST, GST-AtEPL1A and GST-AtEPL1B were purified on Glutathione Sepharose 4 Fast Flow beads (GE Healthcare) for 1 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed five times with PBS containing 1% Triton X-100. The GST-fusion proteins were eluted by heating at 95 °C in SDS/PAGE loading buffer, resolved by SDS/PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membrane. Proteins were renatured by incubation of the membrane in AC buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Tween-20, 2% nonfat milk, 1 mM DTT) containing 6 M guanidine-HCl for 30 min at RT. Subsequently, the membrane was washed with AC buffer containing 3 M guanidine-HCl for 30 min at RT. This step was followed by washing with AC buffer containing 0.1 M- and no-guanidine-HCl AC buffer at 4 °C, for 30 min and overnight respectively. The membrane was blocked for 8 h at 4 °C in 5% nonfat milk in the PBST buffer and subsequently incubated with His-HAM1 or His-HAM2. Next, the membrane was washed with 5% nonfat milk in the PBST buffer followed by three washes with PBST. To detect bait proteins bound to the bait proteins (GST-fusions) on the membrane, standard immunodetection with anti-His antibody (#R940-25; Life Technology, Waltham, MA, USA; 1:6000) was performed.

In vitro acetylation assay

Coding sequences of AtEPL1A, HAM1, AtING2, and AtEAF6 were cloned to the pST44 polycistronic vector for protein expression in E. coli, according to the original pST44 documentation⁸⁷. Three different constructs were prepared: (1) with Flag-tag added to the N-terminus of AtEPL1A and 6×His-tag added to the C-terminus of HAM1, (2) with Flag-tag added to N-terminus of HAM1 and 6×His-tag added to C-terminus of AtING2, and (3) with Flag-HAM1 and ING2-6×His in a pST44 vector without the AtEPL1A sequence. Protein expression was conducted in BL21(DE3)pLysS cells after 0.3 mM IPTG induction and the complex was purified over Talon (Clontech) cobalt affinity resin⁸⁸ via HAM1-6×His, using 150 mM imidazole for the elution. The presence of all subunits was visible on Coomassie-stained SDS-PA gel and the presence of HAM1-His and Flag-AtEPL1A was confirmed by Western blot. For the Flag-HAM1, purification was first performed with cobalt resin (based on ING2-6×His), followed by incubation with anti-Flag M2 resin and elution with 3×FLAG peptides. Human K562 cells were engineered to express FLAG-tagged Arabidopsis HTA9 (a 3×Flag fused to HTA9 C-terminus) from the AAVS1 safe harbor loci using Zinc-Finger Nuclease-mediated recombination as described⁴¹. Chromatin enriched extracts were prepared with micrococcal nuclease as described⁴⁶ and HTA9-containing nucleosomes were purified by incubation with anti-Flag M2 resin, followed by washes and elution with 3×Flag peptides. The gel presented in Fig. 4f shows efficient incorporation of HTA9 into human nucleosomes. HAT assays were performed as described previously⁸⁹ with some changes. Briefly, in liquid HAT assays 0.5 µg of purified human free core histones (CHs) or native H1-depleted short oligonucleotides (SONs) were incubated together with bacterially expressed plant picNuA4 (or yeast picNuA4 as a positive control) complexes with ³H-labeled acetyl-CoA (0.125 µCi) in HAT buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM [KCl+NaCl], 5% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 10 mM sodium butyrate) at 30 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, the reactions were spotted on P81 membrane (Whatman), which were then air-dried, washed three times with 50 mM carbonate buffer pH 9.2, rinsed in acetone and soaked in scintillation cocktail, which was used to count ³H signal. Alternatively, the reactions were resolved by SDS–PAGE. After staining the electrophoresis gel in Coomassie to visualize proteins, it was destained and incubated in EN3HANCE solution (Perkin Elmer). After washing and drying, the gel was exposed to a film. For western blotting, the following antibodies were used: α-Flag (Santa Cruz sc-807, 1:5000), α-acH2A.Z (Diagenode C15410173, 1:1000), and α-H4 (Abcam ab7311, 1:3000).

Tandem affinity purification

The construct used for purification of proteins interacting with AtEPL1B was created by replacing the Gateway cassette in pMDC99 vector with the AtEPL1B expression cassette. The AtEPL1B cassette consisting of the genomic sequence of AtEPL1B (At1g79020) including 969 bp of the native upstream regulatory sequence, C-terminal GSrhino tag⁹⁰, native 3′ UTR of AtEPL1B and Nos terminator was assembled in the pMDC99 backbone through Gibson assembly-based cloning. Growing of seedlings and TAP purifications using 50 g of 6-day-old seedlings as input per experiment, were performed as described in⁹⁰. Bound proteins were digested on-bead after a final wash with 500 µL 50 mM NH₄HCO₃ (pH 8.0). Beads were incubated with 1 µg Trypsin/Lys-C in 50 µL 50 mM NH₄OH and incubated at 37 °C overnight in a thermomixer at 800 rpm. Next day, an extra 0.5 µg Trypsin/Lys-C was added and the digest was further incubated for 2 hours at 37 °C. Finally, the digest was separated from the beads and centrifuged at 20,800 × g in an Eppendorf centrifuge for 5 min, the supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. Peptides were purified on C18 Bond Elut OMIX tips (Agilent) and later dried in a Speedvac and stored at −20 °C until MS analysis. Co-purified proteins were identified by mass spectrometry using a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific) using standard procedures⁹¹). Proteins with at least two matched high confident peptides were retained. Background proteins were filtered out based on frequency of occurrence of the co-purified proteins in a large dataset containing 543 TAP experiments using 115 different baits⁹⁰. True interactors that might have been filtered out because of their presence in the list of non-specific proteins were retained by means of semi-quantitative analysis using the average normalized spectral abundance factors (NSAF) of the identified proteins in the EPL1B TAPs. Proteins identified with at least two peptides in at least two experiments, showing high (at least 10-fold) and significant [-log10(p-value(T-test)) ≥10] enrichment compared to calculated average NSAF values from a large dataset of TAP experiments with non-related bait proteins, were retained⁹².

RT-qPCR

For RT-qPCR WT, Atepl1-1, glk and Ateaf1-2 glk plants were grown under LD photoperiod (16 h light and 8 h darkness) with constant conditions: 22 °C, 80/90 µmol/(m²s) PAR, 70% RH. The material was collected at the developmental stage of 10 leaves.

For each biological repeat, RNA was extracted from 100 mg of rosette leaves with TRI Reagent (Merck) and two rounds of phenol-chloroform extraction, followed by ethanol precipitation. RNA was treated with gDNA wiper (Vazyme) in order to digest genomic DNA. First strand synthesis was carried out with HiScript III 1^st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme). Sequences of primers used for RT-qPCR are shown in Supplementary Data 19.

RNA-seq

For RNA-seq WT, Atepl1-2, Ateaf1-1, and glk plants were grown under LD conditions (16 h light and 8 h darkness), under 80–90 µmol/(m²s) of photosynthetically active radiation. The material was collected at the developmental stage of ca. 10 leaves about 5 h after light onset.

RNA for each biological repeat was extracted from 110 mg of rosette leaves number 5–6 (from at least six plants) with TRI Reagent (Merck) and rounds of phenol-chloroform and chloroform extractions followed by isopropanol precipitation. RNA was treated with RQ1 DNase I (Promega), then extracted with phenol-chloroform and precipitated with ethanol. Pure RNA solution was sent to Macrogen Europe (South Korea), where libraries and sequencing were performed using Illumina chemistry. RNA-seq experiment was also validated by RT-qPCR (Supplementary Figs. 5 and 6).

Adapters, poor-quality regions (mean Phred quality <5) and rRNA sequences were removed from short reads using BBDuk2 program from BBTools suite (https://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bbtools). Filtered reads shorter than 50 bp were excluded from the analysis. Expression values for genes and transcripts (Araport11 annotations) were calculated using Salmon⁹³ with sequence-specific bias and GC content bias correction. Differential expression analysis on both gene and transcript level was performed using limma package^94,95. False discovery rate (FDR) threshold of 0.01 and fold change threshold of 1.5 (Fig. 3) or Log₂ FC = 1.5 (Figs. 6–8) were used in the analyses.

ChIP

ChIP-seq analysis was carried out on WT and Atepl1-2 plants grown in the same conditions as the plants used for RNA-seq and harvested at the same developmental stage. The isolated chromatin (from 2.1 g of fresh tissue per sample) was enriched with 2% chromatin isolated from mouse embryonic fibroblasts as spike-in control and incubated with 6 μg of antibody (α-H3, Abcam ab1791, α-H4K5ac, Millipore 07327, α-H3K9ac Millipore 07352, α-HTA9, Agrisera AS10718, α-H2A.Zac, Diagenode C15410173, pAb-173-050) overnight at 4 °C⁵². 25 μL of Dynabeads Protein A (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added to the samples and incubated for another 2 hours at 4 °C. The slurry was washed twice with low salt buffer (with 150 mM NaCl), twice with high salt buffer (with 500 mM NaCl) and once with LiCl wash buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 0.25 M LiCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM PMSF and protease inhibitor cocktail). Chromatin was eluted through incubation in 1% SDS and 0.8 M NaHCO3 at 65 °C and the cross-links were reversed by overnight incubation at 65 °C. Following Proteinase K treatment and phenol/chloroform extraction, DNA was precipitated and DNA concentration was measured with Qubit dsDNA HS Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 10 ng (H3) or 2 ng (other antibodies) of ChIP-ed DNA was used to prepare DNA libraries with MicroPlex Library Preparation Kit v2 (Diagenode).

Adapters and poor-quality regions (mean Phred quality < 5) were removed from short reads using BBDuk2 program from BBTools suite (https://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bbtools). Filtered reads shorter than 35 bp were excluded from the analysis. Reads were then aligned to the A. thaliana (TAIR10) and mouse (GRCm38) genomes using BWA-MEM aligner⁹⁶. Sambamba⁹⁷ was used to process the aligned data and remove duplicated reads. Mapping statistics, including the percentages of mapped reads and duplicates, were calculated separately for A. thaliana genome (ChIP-Seq data) and mouse genome (spike-in data) using BamTools⁹⁸. Normalized and smoothed coverage data used for ChIP-Seq plots was calculated using DANPOS2⁹⁹ and corrected using the fraction of deduplicated spike-in reads mapped to the mouse genome. Three biological replicates were performed for H3, H3K9ac and H4K5ac ChIP-seq, while two biological replicates were used for H2A.Z and H2A.Zac. In case of four samples one replicate was excluded from further analysis due to significantly lower coverage (Supplementary Table 10). The summary of ChIP-seq data is shown in Supplementary Table 10. The ChIP-seq profiles and the heatmaps were generated using DANPOS2⁹⁹.

ChIP was combined with quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR) to check the relative enrichment within NuA4-dependent genes and At5g15710, At5g16410. Sequences of primers used for ChIP-qPCR can be found in Supplementary Data 19. Real-time qPCR was carried out with Maxima SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacture’s instruction. Relative enrichment was calculated from the relative amount of input samples obtained with standard curves for each primer set. The antibodies used in ChIP-qPCR assays were: α-H3 (Abcam ab1791), α-H4K5ac (Millipore 07327), α-HTA9 (Agrisera AS10718) and α-H2A.Zac (Diagenode C15410173, pAb-173-050), H4K8ac (#07-328, Millipore), H4K12ac (#07-595, Millipore), H4K16ac (#07-329, Millipore). For ChIP-qPCR, 2 μg of antibody was combined with 100 μL of chromatin isolated from 0.7 g of fresh tissue.

Statistics

Calculations and statistical tests not described in RNA-seq or ChIP-seq sections were run and plotted in R (www.R-project.org), except Mann–Whitney U tests run with an online calculator (http://www.statskingdom.com). For creation of the area proportional Venn diagrams presented in Fig. 3b, the gene sets included in Supplementary Data 1-6 were first analyzed for overlaps by BioVenn¹⁰⁰, then plotted with EulerAPE¹⁰¹. Gene set enrichment analyses presented in Fig. 3 were performed with PANTHER Overrepresentation Test⁴⁸ (Supplementary Data 7–12). Gene set enrichment analyses presented in Fig. 3c were performed with DAVID Functional Annotation Tool¹⁰² (Supplementary Data 18).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information^{(24.9MB, docx)}

Peer Review File^{(763.1KB, pdf)}

41467_2021_27882_MOESM3_ESM.pdf^{(405KB, pdf)}

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1^{(223.4KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 2^{(91.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 3^{(202.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 4^{(253.6KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 5^{(56.5KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 6^{(199.6KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 7^{(106.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 8^{(54KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 9^{(31.6KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 10^{(100.3KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 11^{(41.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 12^{(27.5KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 13^{(27.7KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 14^{(27.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 15^{(63.5KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 16^{(60.3KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 17^{(717.5KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 18^{(23.5KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 19^{(16.4KB, xlsx)}

Reporting Summary^{(218.6KB, pdf)}

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Polish National Science Center (NCN) grants 2016/21/B/NZ2/01757 and 2016/22/E/NZ2/00455 to P.A.Z., 2015/17/N/NZ1/00028 to W.S. and the Foundation for Polish Science grant (POIR.04.04.00-00-5C0F/17-00) to P.A.Z. The PhD fellowship of TB was covered by the International PhD Programme of the Foundation for Polish Science (MPD/2010/3) and KNOW RNA Research Centre in Poznan (01/KNOW2/2014). Research in JC lab was supported by a Foundation grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-143314). J.C. holds a Canada Research Chair in Chromatin Biology and Molecular Epigenetics. The four-month stay of W.S. in J.C. group was funded by NCN grant 2017/24/T/NZ1/00165. We thank Kyuha Choi (Postech Biotech Center, Korea) and Roger Deal (Emory University, US) for the arp6 and mbd9-1 mutants, respectively.

Source data

Source Data^{(80.1MB, xlsx)}

Author contributions

Conceptualization: T.B., J.C., J.S., and P.A.Z.; Experimental work: preparation of mutant lines: T.B., W.S., A.B., M.A., P.W., W.D., and M.Sz-L., phenotypic analyses: T.B., W.D., and M.Sz-L., RNA-seq/RT-qPCR: W.S., W.D., and T.B., ChIP-seq/ChIP-qPCR: W.S., W.D., T.B., and M.Sz-L., protein–protein interactions/purification/enzymatic assays: A.B., W.S., C.L., and T.B., AP-MS: N.D.W. and T.B.; Data analysis: T.B., M.K., W.D., and P.A.Z.; Project administration: P.A.Z. and J.S.; Supervision: P.A.Z., J.C. (HAT assays), and G.D.J. (AP-MS); Writing and Editing: T.B., P.A.Z. with contributions from all authors.

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Data availability

All sequencing data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession number GSE152940. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE¹⁰³ partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD030302. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Tomasz Bieluszewski, Weronika Sura, Wojciech Dziegielewski.

Contributor Information

Jacques Côté, Email: jacques.cote@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca.

Piotr A. Ziolkowski, Email: pzio@amu.edu.pl

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-27882-5.

References

1.Jarvis P, López-Juez E. Biogenesis and homeostasis of chloroplasts and other plastids. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;14:787–802. doi: 10.1038/nrm3702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Chua YL, Brown AP, Gray JC. Targeted histone acetylation and altered nuclease accessibility over short regions of the pea plastocyanin gene. Plant Cell. 2001;13:599–612. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.3.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Offermann S, Horst I, Danker T, Jaskiewicz M, Peterhansel C. Developmental and environmental signals induce distinct histone acetylation profiles on distal and proximal promoter elements of the C 4 -Pepc gene in maize. Genetics. 2008;179:1891–1901. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.087411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Guo L, et al. Histone modifications and expression of light-regulated genes in Arabidopsis are cooperatively influenced by changing light conditions. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:2070–2083. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.122929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Benhamed M, Bertrand C, Servet C, Zhou D-X. Arabidopsis GCN5, HD1, and TAF1/HAF2 interact to regulate histone acetylation required for light-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell. 2006;18:2893–2903. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.043489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Zhang D, Li Y, Zhang X, Zha P, Lin R. The SWI2/SNF2 chromatin-remodeling ATPase BRAHMA regulates chlorophyll biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2017;10:155–167. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Jégu T, et al. The Arabidopsis SWI/SNF protein BAF60 mediates seedling growth control by modulating DNA accessibility. Genome Biol. 2017;18:114. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1246-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Bourbousse C, Barneche F, Laloi C. Plant chromatin catches the sun. Front. Plant Sci. 2020;10:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Perrella G, Zioutopoulou A, Headland LR, Kaiserli E. The impact of light and temperature on chromatin organization and plant adaptation. J. Exp. Bot. 2020;71:5247–5255. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Bourbousse, C. et al. Histone H2B monoubiquitination facilitates the rapid modulation of gene expression during arabidopsis photomorphogenesis. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002825 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11.Li Y, et al. The histone methyltransferase SDG8 mediates the epigenetic modification of light and carbon responsive genes in plants. Genome Biol. 2015;16:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0640-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Yang C, et al. AtINO80 represses photomorphogenesis by modulating nucleosome density and H2A.Z incorporation in light-related genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:33679–33688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001976117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Willige BC, et al. PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORs trigger environmentally responsive chromatin dynamics in plants. Nat. Genet. 2021;53:955–961. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00882-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Vlachonasios KE. Disruption mutations of ADA2b and GCN5 transcriptional adaptor genes dramatically affect Arabidopsis growth, development, and gene expression. Plant Cell. 2003;15:626–638. doi: 10.1105/tpc.007922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Espinosa-cores, L. et al. Insights into the function of the NuA4 complex in plants. Front. Plant Sci.11, 125 10.3389/fpls.2020.00125 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16.Bieluszewski T, et al. AtEAF1 is a potential platform protein for Arabidopsis NuA4 acetyltransferase complex. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:75–90. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0461-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Crevillén P, et al. Arabidopsis YAF9 histone readers modulate flowering time through NuA4-complex-dependent H4 and H2A.Z histone acetylation at FLC chromatin. New Phytol. 2019;222:1893–1908. doi: 10.1111/nph.15737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Tan L-M, et al. The PEAT protein complexes are required for histone deacetylation and heterochromatin silencing. EMBO J. 2018;37:e98770. doi: 10.15252/embj.201798770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Lu PYT, Lévesque N, Kobor MS. NuA4 and SWR1-C: two chromatin-modifying complexes with overlapping functions and components. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009;87:799–815. doi: 10.1139/O09-062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Sijacic, P., Holder, D. H., Bajic, M. & Deal, R. B. Methyl-CpG-binding domain 9 (MBD9) is required for H2A.Z incorporation into chromatin at a subset of H2A.Z-enriched regions in the Arabidopsis genome. PLoS Genet.15, e1008326 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21.Potok ME, et al. Arabidopsis SWR1-associated protein methyl-CpG-binding domain 9 is required for histone H2A.Z deposition. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11291-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Searle NE, Pillus L. Critical genomic regulation mediated by Enhancer of Polycomb. Curr. Genet. 2018;64:147–154. doi: 10.1007/s00294-017-0742-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Auger A, et al. Eaf1 is the platform for NuA4 molecular assembly that evolutionarily links chromatin acetylation to ATP-dependent exchange of histone H2A variants. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008;28:2257–2270. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01755-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Latrasse D, et al. The MYST histone acetyltransferases are essential for gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Umezawa T, et al. Genetics and phosphoproteomics reveal a protein phosphorylation network in the abscisic acid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Signal. 2013;6:1–14. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2003509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Zacharaki V, et al. The Arabidopsis ortholog of the YEATS domain containing protein YAF9a regulates flowering by controlling H4 acetylation levels at the FLC locus. Plant Sci. 2012;196:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Xu Y, et al. Arabidopsis MRG domain proteins bridge two histone modifications to elevate expression of flowering genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:10960–10974. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Smith ER, et al. ESA1 is a histone acetyltransferase that is essential for growth in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:3561–3565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Hu Y, et al. Homozygous disruption of the tip60 gene causes early embryonic lethality. Dev. Dyn. 2009;238:2912–2921. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Fitter DW, Martin DJ, Copley MJ, Scotland RW, Langdale JA. GLK gene pairs regulate chloroplast development in diverse plant species. Plant J. 2002;31:713–727. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01390.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Doyon Y, Côté J. The highly conserved and multifunctional NuA4 HAT complex. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2004;14:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2004.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Boudreault AA, et al. Yeast enhancer of polycomb defines global Esa1-dependent acetylation of chromatin. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1415–1428. doi: 10.1101/gad.1056603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Galarneau L, et al. Multiple links between the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex and epigenetic control of transcription. Mol. Cell. 2000;5:927–937. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80258-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Sato T, Russell MA, Denell RE. Homoeosis in Drosophila: a new enhancer of polycomb and related homoeotic mutations. Genetics. 1983;105:357–370. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Waters MT, Moylan EC, Langdale JA. GLK transcription factors regulate chloroplast development in a cell-autonomous manner. Plant J. 2008;56:432–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Waters MT, et al. GLK transcription factors coordinate expression of the photosynthetic aparatus in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21:1109–1128. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.065250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Bertrand C, et al. Arabidopsis HAF2 gene encoding TATA-binding protein (TBP)-associated factor TAF1, is required to integrate light signals to regulate gene expression and growth. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:1465–1473. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409000200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Reid JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO, Struhl K. Coordinate regulation of yeast ribosomal protein genes is associated with targeted recruitment of Esa1 histone acetylase. Mol. Cell. 2000;6:1297–1307. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00128-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Brown CE, et al. Recruitment of HAT complexes by direct activator interactions with the ATM-related Tra1 subunit. Science. 2001;292:2333–2337. doi: 10.1126/science.1060214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Pandey R, et al. Analysis of histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase families of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests functional diversification of chromatin modification among multicellular eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:5036–5055. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Dalvai M, et al. A scalable genome-editing-based approach for mapping multiprotein complexes in human cells. Cell Rep. 2015;13:621–633. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Keogh M, et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A variant Htz1 is acetylated by NuA4 The Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A variant Htz1 is acetylated by NuA4. Genes Dev. 2006;20:660–665. doi: 10.1101/gad.1388106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Babiarz JE, Halley JE, Rine J. Telomeric heterochromatin boundaries require NuA4-dependent acetylation of histone variant H2A.Z in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 2006;20:700–710. doi: 10.1101/gad.1386306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Vercruyssen L, et al. ANGUSTIFOLIA3 Binds to SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes to regulate transcription during Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Cell. 2014;26:210–229. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.115907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Moody, L. A. et al. A musashi-related potein is essential for gametogenesis in Arabidopsis. bioRxiv. 10.1101/579714. (2019).
46.Jacquet K, et al. The TIP60 complex regulates bivalent chromatin recognition by 53BP1 through direct H4K20me bnding and H2AK15 Acetylation. Mol. Cell. 2016;62:409–421. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Mi H, Muruganujan A, Ebert D, Huang X, Thomas PD. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D419–D426. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Mi H, et al. Protocol Update for large-scale genome and gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system (v.14.0) Nat. Protoc. 2019;14:703–721. doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0128-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Altaf M, et al. NuA4-dependent acetylation of nucleosomal histones H4 and H2A directly stimulates incorporation of H2A.Z by the SWR1 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:15966–15977. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.117069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Choi K, et al. SUPPRESSOR OF FRIGIDA3 encodes a nuclear ACTIN-RELATED PROTEIN6 required for floral repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2647–2660. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Deal RB, Kandasamy MK, Mckinney EC, Meagher RB. The nuclear actin-related protein ARP6 is a pleiotropic developmental regulator required for the maintenance of FLOWERING LOCUS C expression and repression of flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2633–2646. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Sura W, et al. Dual role of the histone variant H2A.Z in transcriptional regulation of stress-response genes. Plant Cell. 2017;29:791–807. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Tiller N, Bock R. The translational apparatus of plastids and its role in plant development. Mol. Plant. 2014;7:1105–1120. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Bruzzone MJ, Grünberg S, Kubik S, Zentner GE, Shore D. Distinct patterns of histone acetyltransferase and mediator deployment at yeast protein-coding genes. Genes Dev. 2018;32:1252–1265. doi: 10.1101/gad.312173.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.MacLean D, Jerome CA, Brown APC, Gray JC. Co-regulation of nuclear genes encoding plastid ribosomal proteins by light and plastid signals during seedling development in tobacco and Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008;66:475–490. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9279-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Matangkasombut O, Buratowski S. Different sensitivities of bromodomain factors 1 and 2 to histone H4 acetylation. Mol. Cell. 2003;11:353–363. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00033-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Matangkasombut O, Buratowski RM, Swilling NW, Buratowski S. Bromodomain factor 1 corresponds to a missing piece of yeast TFIID. Genes Dev. 2000;14:951–962. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Coleman-Derr D, Zilberman D. Deposition of histone variant H2A.Z within gene bodies regulates responsive genes. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Dai X, et al. H2A.Z represses gene expression by modulating promoter nucleosome structure and enhancer histone modifications in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2017;10:1274–1292. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Noh YS, Amasino RM. PIE1, an ISWI family gene, is required for FLC activation and floral repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1671–1682. doi: 10.1105/tpc.012161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Berriri S, Gangappa SN, Kumar SV. SWR1 chromatin-remodelling complex subunits and H2A.Z have non-overlapping functions in immunity and gene regulation in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2016;9:1051–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.Gómez-Zambrano Á, et al. Arabidopsis SWC4 binds DNA and recruits the SWR1 complex to modulate histone H2A.Z deposition at key regulatory genes. Mol. Plant. 2018;11:815–832. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Du Z, et al. DNMT1 stability is regulated by proteins coordinating deubiquitination and acetylation-driven ubiquitination. Sci. Signal. 2010;3:ra80. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Millar CB, Xu F, Zhang K, Grunstein M. Acetylation of H2AZ Lys 14 is associated with genome-wide gene activity in yeast. Genes Dev. 2006;20:711–722. doi: 10.1101/gad.1395506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Valdes-Mora F, et al. Acetylation of H2A.Z is a key epigenetic modification associated with gene deregulation and epigenetic remodeling in cancer. Genome Res. 2012;22:307–321. doi: 10.1101/gr.118919.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Gómez-Zambrano Á, Merini W, Calonje M. The repressive role of Arabidopsis H2A.Z in transcriptional regulation depends on AtBMI1 activity. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10773-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Zhang H, Roberts DN, Cairns BR. Genome-wide dynamics of Htz1, a histone H2A variant that poises repressed/basal promoters for activation through histone loss. Cell. 2005;123:219–231. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Guillemette B, et al. Variant histone H2A.z is globally localized to the promoters of inactive yeast genes and regulates nucleosome positioning. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:2100–2110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Giaimo BD, Ferrante F, Herchenröther A, Hake SB, Borggrefe T. The histone variant H2A.Z in gene regulation. Epigenet. Chromatin. 2019;12:1–22. doi: 10.1186/s13072-019-0274-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Mishra NS, Tuteja R, Tuteja N. Signaling through MAP kinase networks in plants. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2006;452:55–68. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Sessions A, et al. A high-throughput Arabidopsis reverse genetics system. Plant Cell. 2002;14:2985–2994. doi: 10.1105/tpc.004630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.Alonso M, et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003;301:653–657. doi: 10.1126/science.1086391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73.Hyun Y, et al. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using dividing tissue-targeted RGEN of the CRISPR/Cas system to generate heritable null alleles. Planta. 2015;241:271–284. doi: 10.1007/s00425-014-2180-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74.Feng Z, et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:4632–4637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400822111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75.Li J-F, et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination–mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:688–691. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76.Marshallsay C, Kiss T, Filipowicz W. Amplification of plant U3 and U6 snRNA gene sequences using primers specific for an upstream promoter element and conserved intragenic regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:3459–3466. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.12.3459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77.Lei Y, et al. CRISPR-P: a web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in Plants. Mol. Plant. 2014;7:1494–1496. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78.Haeussler M, et al. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. 2016;17:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1012-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79.Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80.Rueden CT, et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform. 2017;18:529. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81.Littlejohn GR, et al. An update: improvements in imaging perfluorocarbon-mounted plant leaves with implications for studies of plant pathology, physiology, development and cell biology. Front. Plant Sci. 2014;5:140. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82.Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1989;975:384–394. [Google Scholar]
83.Huang P, et al. Salicylic acid suppresses apical hook formation via NPR1-mediated repression of EIN3 and EIL1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2020;32:612–629. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84.Harada A, Takemiya A, Inoue S, Sakai T, Shimazaki K. Role of RPT2 in leaf positioning and flattening and a possible inhibition of phot2 signaling by phot1. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54:36–47. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85.Steunou A-L, et al. Combined action of histone reader modules regulates NuA4 local acetyltransferase function but not Its Re. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2016;36:2768–2781. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00112-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86.Bieluszewska A, Weglewska M, Bieluszewski T, Lesniewicz K, Poreba E. PKA-binding domain of AKAP8 is essential for direct interaction with DPY30 protein. FEBS J. 2018;285:947–964. doi: 10.1111/febs.14378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87.Tan S, Kern RC, Selleck W. The pST44 polycistronic expression system for producing protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr. Purif. 2005;40:385–395. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88.Selleck W, Fortin I, Sermwittayawong D, Côté J, Tan S. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Piccolo NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex requires the Enhancer of Polycomb A domain and chromodomain to acetylate nucleosomes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:5535–5542. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.13.5535-5542.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89.Grant PA, et al. Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: Characterization of an ada complex and the saga (spt/ada) complex. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1640–1650. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.13.1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90.Van Leene J, et al. An improved toolbox to unravel the plant cellular machinery by tandem affinity purification of Arabidopsis protein complexes. Nat. Protoc. 2015;10:169–187. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91.Nelissen H, et al. Dynamic changes in ANGUSTIFOLIA3 complex composition reveal a growth regulatory mechanism in the maize leaf. Plant Cell. 2015;27:1605–1619. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92.Van Leene J, et al. Capturing the phosphorylation and protein interaction landscape of the plant TOR kinase. Nat. Plants. 2019;5:316–327. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0378-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:417–419. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94.Ritchie ME, et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95.Law CW, Alhamdoosh M, Su S, Smyth GK, Ritchie ME. RNA-seq analysis is easy as 1-2-3 with limma, Glimma and edgeR. F1000Research. 2016;5:1–29. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9005.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96.Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv 1–3 (2013).
97.Tarasov A, Vilella AJ, Cuppen E, Nijman IJ, Prins P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2032–2034. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98.Barnett DW, Garrison EK, Quinlan AR, Str̈mberg MP, Marth GT. Bamtools: A C++ API and toolkit for analyzing and managing BAM files. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1691–1692. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99.Chen K, et al. DANPOS: dynamic analysis of nucleosome position and occupancy by sequencing. Genome Res. 2013;23:341–351. doi: 10.1101/gr.142067.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100.Hulsen T, de Vlieg J, Alkema W. BioVenn-a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:1–6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101.Micallef, L. & Rodgers, P. euler APE: drawing area-proportional 3-Venn diagrams using ellipses. PLoS ONE9, e101717 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
102.Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103.Perez-Riverol Y, et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D442–D450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information^{(24.9MB, docx)}

Peer Review File^{(763.1KB, pdf)}

41467_2021_27882_MOESM3_ESM.pdf^{(405KB, pdf)}

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1^{(223.4KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 2^{(91.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 3^{(202.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 4^{(253.6KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 5^{(56.5KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 6^{(199.6KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 7^{(106.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 8^{(54KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 9^{(31.6KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 10^{(100.3KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 11^{(41.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 12^{(27.5KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 13^{(27.7KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 14^{(27.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 15^{(63.5KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 16^{(60.3KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 17^{(717.5KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 18^{(23.5KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Data 19^{(16.4KB, xlsx)}

Reporting Summary^{(218.6KB, pdf)}

Data Availability Statement

[CR1] 1.Jarvis P, López-Juez E. Biogenesis and homeostasis of chloroplasts and other plastids. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;14:787–802. doi: 10.1038/nrm3702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Chua YL, Brown AP, Gray JC. Targeted histone acetylation and altered nuclease accessibility over short regions of the pea plastocyanin gene. Plant Cell. 2001;13:599–612. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.3.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Offermann S, Horst I, Danker T, Jaskiewicz M, Peterhansel C. Developmental and environmental signals induce distinct histone acetylation profiles on distal and proximal promoter elements of the C 4 -Pepc gene in maize. Genetics. 2008;179:1891–1901. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.087411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Guo L, et al. Histone modifications and expression of light-regulated genes in Arabidopsis are cooperatively influenced by changing light conditions. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:2070–2083. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.122929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Benhamed M, Bertrand C, Servet C, Zhou D-X. Arabidopsis GCN5, HD1, and TAF1/HAF2 interact to regulate histone acetylation required for light-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell. 2006;18:2893–2903. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.043489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.Zhang D, Li Y, Zhang X, Zha P, Lin R. The SWI2/SNF2 chromatin-remodeling ATPase BRAHMA regulates chlorophyll biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2017;10:155–167. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Jégu T, et al. The Arabidopsis SWI/SNF protein BAF60 mediates seedling growth control by modulating DNA accessibility. Genome Biol. 2017;18:114. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1246-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Bourbousse C, Barneche F, Laloi C. Plant chromatin catches the sun. Front. Plant Sci. 2020;10:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Perrella G, Zioutopoulou A, Headland LR, Kaiserli E. The impact of light and temperature on chromatin organization and plant adaptation. J. Exp. Bot. 2020;71:5247–5255. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Bourbousse, C. et al. Histone H2B monoubiquitination facilitates the rapid modulation of gene expression during arabidopsis photomorphogenesis. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002825 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR11] 11.Li Y, et al. The histone methyltransferase SDG8 mediates the epigenetic modification of light and carbon responsive genes in plants. Genome Biol. 2015;16:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0640-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Yang C, et al. AtINO80 represses photomorphogenesis by modulating nucleosome density and H2A.Z incorporation in light-related genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:33679–33688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001976117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR13] 13.Willige BC, et al. PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORs trigger environmentally responsive chromatin dynamics in plants. Nat. Genet. 2021;53:955–961. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00882-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Vlachonasios KE. Disruption mutations of ADA2b and GCN5 transcriptional adaptor genes dramatically affect Arabidopsis growth, development, and gene expression. Plant Cell. 2003;15:626–638. doi: 10.1105/tpc.007922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Espinosa-cores, L. et al. Insights into the function of the NuA4 complex in plants. Front. Plant Sci.11, 125 10.3389/fpls.2020.00125 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR16] 16.Bieluszewski T, et al. AtEAF1 is a potential platform protein for Arabidopsis NuA4 acetyltransferase complex. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:75–90. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0461-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Crevillén P, et al. Arabidopsis YAF9 histone readers modulate flowering time through NuA4-complex-dependent H4 and H2A.Z histone acetylation at FLC chromatin. New Phytol. 2019;222:1893–1908. doi: 10.1111/nph.15737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.Tan L-M, et al. The PEAT protein complexes are required for histone deacetylation and heterochromatin silencing. EMBO J. 2018;37:e98770. doi: 10.15252/embj.201798770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.Lu PYT, Lévesque N, Kobor MS. NuA4 and SWR1-C: two chromatin-modifying complexes with overlapping functions and components. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009;87:799–815. doi: 10.1139/O09-062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Sijacic, P., Holder, D. H., Bajic, M. & Deal, R. B. Methyl-CpG-binding domain 9 (MBD9) is required for H2A.Z incorporation into chromatin at a subset of H2A.Z-enriched regions in the Arabidopsis genome. PLoS Genet.15, e1008326 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR21] 21.Potok ME, et al. Arabidopsis SWR1-associated protein methyl-CpG-binding domain 9 is required for histone H2A.Z deposition. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11291-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR22] 22.Searle NE, Pillus L. Critical genomic regulation mediated by Enhancer of Polycomb. Curr. Genet. 2018;64:147–154. doi: 10.1007/s00294-017-0742-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.Auger A, et al. Eaf1 is the platform for NuA4 molecular assembly that evolutionarily links chromatin acetylation to ATP-dependent exchange of histone H2A variants. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008;28:2257–2270. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01755-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR24] 24.Latrasse D, et al. The MYST histone acetyltransferases are essential for gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR25] 25.Umezawa T, et al. Genetics and phosphoproteomics reveal a protein phosphorylation network in the abscisic acid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Signal. 2013;6:1–14. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2003509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Zacharaki V, et al. The Arabidopsis ortholog of the YEATS domain containing protein YAF9a regulates flowering by controlling H4 acetylation levels at the FLC locus. Plant Sci. 2012;196:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR27] 27.Xu Y, et al. Arabidopsis MRG domain proteins bridge two histone modifications to elevate expression of flowering genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:10960–10974. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR28] 28.Smith ER, et al. ESA1 is a histone acetyltransferase that is essential for growth in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:3561–3565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR29] 29.Hu Y, et al. Homozygous disruption of the tip60 gene causes early embryonic lethality. Dev. Dyn. 2009;238:2912–2921. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Fitter DW, Martin DJ, Copley MJ, Scotland RW, Langdale JA. GLK gene pairs regulate chloroplast development in diverse plant species. Plant J. 2002;31:713–727. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01390.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR31] 31.Doyon Y, Côté J. The highly conserved and multifunctional NuA4 HAT complex. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2004;14:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2004.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.Boudreault AA, et al. Yeast enhancer of polycomb defines global Esa1-dependent acetylation of chromatin. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1415–1428. doi: 10.1101/gad.1056603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.Galarneau L, et al. Multiple links between the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex and epigenetic control of transcription. Mol. Cell. 2000;5:927–937. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80258-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR34] 34.Sato T, Russell MA, Denell RE. Homoeosis in Drosophila: a new enhancer of polycomb and related homoeotic mutations. Genetics. 1983;105:357–370. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR35] 35.Waters MT, Moylan EC, Langdale JA. GLK transcription factors regulate chloroplast development in a cell-autonomous manner. Plant J. 2008;56:432–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR36] 36.Waters MT, et al. GLK transcription factors coordinate expression of the photosynthetic aparatus in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21:1109–1128. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.065250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.Bertrand C, et al. Arabidopsis HAF2 gene encoding TATA-binding protein (TBP)-associated factor TAF1, is required to integrate light signals to regulate gene expression and growth. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:1465–1473. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409000200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Reid JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO, Struhl K. Coordinate regulation of yeast ribosomal protein genes is associated with targeted recruitment of Esa1 histone acetylase. Mol. Cell. 2000;6:1297–1307. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00128-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR39] 39.Brown CE, et al. Recruitment of HAT complexes by direct activator interactions with the ATM-related Tra1 subunit. Science. 2001;292:2333–2337. doi: 10.1126/science.1060214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Pandey R, et al. Analysis of histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase families of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests functional diversification of chromatin modification among multicellular eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:5036–5055. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR41] 41.Dalvai M, et al. A scalable genome-editing-based approach for mapping multiprotein complexes in human cells. Cell Rep. 2015;13:621–633. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR42] 42.Keogh M, et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A variant Htz1 is acetylated by NuA4 The Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A variant Htz1 is acetylated by NuA4. Genes Dev. 2006;20:660–665. doi: 10.1101/gad.1388106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR43] 43.Babiarz JE, Halley JE, Rine J. Telomeric heterochromatin boundaries require NuA4-dependent acetylation of histone variant H2A.Z in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 2006;20:700–710. doi: 10.1101/gad.1386306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR44] 44.Vercruyssen L, et al. ANGUSTIFOLIA3 Binds to SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes to regulate transcription during Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Cell. 2014;26:210–229. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.115907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR45] 45.Moody, L. A. et al. A musashi-related potein is essential for gametogenesis in Arabidopsis. bioRxiv. 10.1101/579714. (2019).

[CR46] 46.Jacquet K, et al. The TIP60 complex regulates bivalent chromatin recognition by 53BP1 through direct H4K20me bnding and H2AK15 Acetylation. Mol. Cell. 2016;62:409–421. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR47] 47.Mi H, Muruganujan A, Ebert D, Huang X, Thomas PD. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D419–D426. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR48] 48.Mi H, et al. Protocol Update for large-scale genome and gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system (v.14.0) Nat. Protoc. 2019;14:703–721. doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0128-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR49] 49.Altaf M, et al. NuA4-dependent acetylation of nucleosomal histones H4 and H2A directly stimulates incorporation of H2A.Z by the SWR1 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:15966–15977. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.117069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR50] 50.Choi K, et al. SUPPRESSOR OF FRIGIDA3 encodes a nuclear ACTIN-RELATED PROTEIN6 required for floral repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2647–2660. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR51] 51.Deal RB, Kandasamy MK, Mckinney EC, Meagher RB. The nuclear actin-related protein ARP6 is a pleiotropic developmental regulator required for the maintenance of FLOWERING LOCUS C expression and repression of flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2633–2646. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR52] 52.Sura W, et al. Dual role of the histone variant H2A.Z in transcriptional regulation of stress-response genes. Plant Cell. 2017;29:791–807. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR53] 53.Tiller N, Bock R. The translational apparatus of plastids and its role in plant development. Mol. Plant. 2014;7:1105–1120. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR54] 54.Bruzzone MJ, Grünberg S, Kubik S, Zentner GE, Shore D. Distinct patterns of histone acetyltransferase and mediator deployment at yeast protein-coding genes. Genes Dev. 2018;32:1252–1265. doi: 10.1101/gad.312173.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR55] 55.MacLean D, Jerome CA, Brown APC, Gray JC. Co-regulation of nuclear genes encoding plastid ribosomal proteins by light and plastid signals during seedling development in tobacco and Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008;66:475–490. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9279-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR56] 56.Matangkasombut O, Buratowski S. Different sensitivities of bromodomain factors 1 and 2 to histone H4 acetylation. Mol. Cell. 2003;11:353–363. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00033-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR57] 57.Matangkasombut O, Buratowski RM, Swilling NW, Buratowski S. Bromodomain factor 1 corresponds to a missing piece of yeast TFIID. Genes Dev. 2000;14:951–962. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR58] 58.Coleman-Derr D, Zilberman D. Deposition of histone variant H2A.Z within gene bodies regulates responsive genes. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR59] 59.Dai X, et al. H2A.Z represses gene expression by modulating promoter nucleosome structure and enhancer histone modifications in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2017;10:1274–1292. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR60] 60.Noh YS, Amasino RM. PIE1, an ISWI family gene, is required for FLC activation and floral repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1671–1682. doi: 10.1105/tpc.012161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR61] 61.Berriri S, Gangappa SN, Kumar SV. SWR1 chromatin-remodelling complex subunits and H2A.Z have non-overlapping functions in immunity and gene regulation in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2016;9:1051–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR62] 62.Gómez-Zambrano Á, et al. Arabidopsis SWC4 binds DNA and recruits the SWR1 complex to modulate histone H2A.Z deposition at key regulatory genes. Mol. Plant. 2018;11:815–832. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR63] 63.Du Z, et al. DNMT1 stability is regulated by proteins coordinating deubiquitination and acetylation-driven ubiquitination. Sci. Signal. 2010;3:ra80. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR64] 64.Millar CB, Xu F, Zhang K, Grunstein M. Acetylation of H2AZ Lys 14 is associated with genome-wide gene activity in yeast. Genes Dev. 2006;20:711–722. doi: 10.1101/gad.1395506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR65] 65.Valdes-Mora F, et al. Acetylation of H2A.Z is a key epigenetic modification associated with gene deregulation and epigenetic remodeling in cancer. Genome Res. 2012;22:307–321. doi: 10.1101/gr.118919.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR66] 66.Gómez-Zambrano Á, Merini W, Calonje M. The repressive role of Arabidopsis H2A.Z in transcriptional regulation depends on AtBMI1 activity. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10773-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR67] 67.Zhang H, Roberts DN, Cairns BR. Genome-wide dynamics of Htz1, a histone H2A variant that poises repressed/basal promoters for activation through histone loss. Cell. 2005;123:219–231. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR68] 68.Guillemette B, et al. Variant histone H2A.z is globally localized to the promoters of inactive yeast genes and regulates nucleosome positioning. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:2100–2110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR69] 69.Giaimo BD, Ferrante F, Herchenröther A, Hake SB, Borggrefe T. The histone variant H2A.Z in gene regulation. Epigenet. Chromatin. 2019;12:1–22. doi: 10.1186/s13072-019-0274-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR70] 70.Mishra NS, Tuteja R, Tuteja N. Signaling through MAP kinase networks in plants. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2006;452:55–68. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR71] 71.Sessions A, et al. A high-throughput Arabidopsis reverse genetics system. Plant Cell. 2002;14:2985–2994. doi: 10.1105/tpc.004630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR72] 72.Alonso M, et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003;301:653–657. doi: 10.1126/science.1086391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR73] 73.Hyun Y, et al. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using dividing tissue-targeted RGEN of the CRISPR/Cas system to generate heritable null alleles. Planta. 2015;241:271–284. doi: 10.1007/s00425-014-2180-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR74] 74.Feng Z, et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:4632–4637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400822111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR75] 75.Li J-F, et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination–mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:688–691. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR76] 76.Marshallsay C, Kiss T, Filipowicz W. Amplification of plant U3 and U6 snRNA gene sequences using primers specific for an upstream promoter element and conserved intragenic regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:3459–3466. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.12.3459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR77] 77.Lei Y, et al. CRISPR-P: a web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in Plants. Mol. Plant. 2014;7:1494–1496. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR78] 78.Haeussler M, et al. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. 2016;17:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1012-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR79] 79.Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR80] 80.Rueden CT, et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform. 2017;18:529. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR81] 81.Littlejohn GR, et al. An update: improvements in imaging perfluorocarbon-mounted plant leaves with implications for studies of plant pathology, physiology, development and cell biology. Front. Plant Sci. 2014;5:140. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR82] 82.Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1989;975:384–394. [Google Scholar]

[CR83] 83.Huang P, et al. Salicylic acid suppresses apical hook formation via NPR1-mediated repression of EIN3 and EIL1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2020;32:612–629. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR84] 84.Harada A, Takemiya A, Inoue S, Sakai T, Shimazaki K. Role of RPT2 in leaf positioning and flattening and a possible inhibition of phot2 signaling by phot1. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54:36–47. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR85] 85.Steunou A-L, et al. Combined action of histone reader modules regulates NuA4 local acetyltransferase function but not Its Re. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2016;36:2768–2781. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00112-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR86] 86.Bieluszewska A, Weglewska M, Bieluszewski T, Lesniewicz K, Poreba E. PKA-binding domain of AKAP8 is essential for direct interaction with DPY30 protein. FEBS J. 2018;285:947–964. doi: 10.1111/febs.14378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR87] 87.Tan S, Kern RC, Selleck W. The pST44 polycistronic expression system for producing protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr. Purif. 2005;40:385–395. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR88] 88.Selleck W, Fortin I, Sermwittayawong D, Côté J, Tan S. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Piccolo NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex requires the Enhancer of Polycomb A domain and chromodomain to acetylate nucleosomes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:5535–5542. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.13.5535-5542.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR89] 89.Grant PA, et al. Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: Characterization of an ada complex and the saga (spt/ada) complex. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1640–1650. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.13.1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR90] 90.Van Leene J, et al. An improved toolbox to unravel the plant cellular machinery by tandem affinity purification of Arabidopsis protein complexes. Nat. Protoc. 2015;10:169–187. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR91] 91.Nelissen H, et al. Dynamic changes in ANGUSTIFOLIA3 complex composition reveal a growth regulatory mechanism in the maize leaf. Plant Cell. 2015;27:1605–1619. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR92] 92.Van Leene J, et al. Capturing the phosphorylation and protein interaction landscape of the plant TOR kinase. Nat. Plants. 2019;5:316–327. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0378-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR93] 93.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:417–419. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR94] 94.Ritchie ME, et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR95] 95.Law CW, Alhamdoosh M, Su S, Smyth GK, Ritchie ME. RNA-seq analysis is easy as 1-2-3 with limma, Glimma and edgeR. F1000Research. 2016;5:1–29. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9005.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR96] 96.Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv 1–3 (2013).

[CR97] 97.Tarasov A, Vilella AJ, Cuppen E, Nijman IJ, Prins P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2032–2034. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR98] 98.Barnett DW, Garrison EK, Quinlan AR, Str̈mberg MP, Marth GT. Bamtools: A C++ API and toolkit for analyzing and managing BAM files. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1691–1692. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR99] 99.Chen K, et al. DANPOS: dynamic analysis of nucleosome position and occupancy by sequencing. Genome Res. 2013;23:341–351. doi: 10.1101/gr.142067.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR100] 100.Hulsen T, de Vlieg J, Alkema W. BioVenn-a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:1–6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR101] 101.Micallef, L. & Rodgers, P. euler APE: drawing area-proportional 3-Venn diagrams using ellipses. PLoS ONE9, e101717 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR102] 102.Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR103] 103.Perez-Riverol Y, et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D442–D450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

NuA4 and H2A.Z control environmental responses and autotrophic growth in Arabidopsis

Tomasz Bieluszewski

Weronika Sura

Wojciech Dziegielewski

Anna Bieluszewska

Catherine Lachance

Michał Kabza

Maja Szymanska-Lejman

Mateusz Abram

Piotr Wlodzimierz

Nancy De Winne

Geert De Jaeger

Jan Sadowski

Jacques Côté

Piotr A Ziolkowski

Abstract

Introduction

Results

NuA4 supports chloroplast development

Fig. 1. Ateaf1 and Atepl1 mutants as tools for genetic analysis of the plant NuA4 complex.

AtEPL1 is not essential for viability but is key to NuA4 function

Fig. 2. Growth- and chloroplast development-related phenotypes of the NuA4 mutants are enhanced by glk mutations.

NuA4 and GLKs play parallel roles in transcription

Fig. 3. NuA4 influences the expression of chloroplast-related and stress-responsive genes.

AtEPL1 is a subunit of the plant NuA4 catalytic module

Fig. 4. AtEPL1 interacts directly with the catalytic and platform subunits of Arabidopsis NuA4 and supports nucleosomal H4 and H2A.Z acetylation in vitro.

AtEPL1 interacts with the regulatory module of NuA4

Table 1.

NuA4 acetylates H4 and H2A.Z and stimulates H2A.Z deposition

Fig. 5. NuA4 acetylates H4 and H2A.Z and stimulates H2A.Z deposition on chromatin.

Loss of H4ac/H2A.Zac and gain of H3ac correlate with the Atepl1-2 transcriptome changes

Fig. 6. Gain of H3ac and loss of H4ac and H2A.Zac shape the Atepl1-2 transcriptome.

Nuclear plastid gene expression depends on NuA4

Fig. 7. H2A.Z enrichment on +1 nucleosomes and not TAF1 bromodomain-mediated TFIID recruitment determines the NuA4 dependence of npRPGs.

The presence of H2A.Z determines NuA4 dependency

Upregulation of genes in Atepl1-2 results from H2A.Z loss

Fig. 8. Upregulation of genes in NuA4 mutants results from both H2A.Z loss from gene bodies and increased levels of H3K9ac.

Fig. 9. Model showing the role of NuA4 in the switch between autotrophic growth and the stress response.

Discussion

Methods

Plant material

Preparation of genetic constructs for gene editing

Editing strategy and isolation of the mutants

Phenotypic analyses

Photomorphogenic response measurement

Pull-down

Far western blotting

In vitro acetylation assay

Tandem affinity purification

RT-qPCR

RNA-seq

ChIP

Statistics

Reporting summary

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

Source data

Author contributions

Peer review information

Peer review information

Data availability

Competing interests

Footnotes

Contributor Information

Supplementary information

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases