Diastereoselective Synthesis of 2′-Dihalopyrimidine Ribonucleoside Inhibitors of Hepatitis C Virus Replication

Abstract

We present a newly developed synthetic route to 2-bromo-2-fluoro ribolactone based on our published 2-chloro-2-fluoro ribolactone synthesis. Stereoselective fluorination is key to controlling the 2-diastereoselectivity. We also report a substantially improved glycosylation reaction with both the 2-bromo-2-fluoro and 2-chloro-2-fluoro sugars. These improvements allowed us to prepare 2′-dihalo nucleosides 13 and 14 in an overall 15–20% yield.

Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a global problem with World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) estimate of worldwide chronic HCV infections of at least 71 million people. It is estimated that in 2015 there were 1.75 million newly infected patients, 70% of whom will develop chronic hepatitis. HCV is a major cause of all liver cancer cases and also the leading cause of liver transplants in the developed world.¹ Approximately 400,000 people died in 2016 from hepatitis C, mostly from cirrhosis (326,000) and hepatocellular carcinoma.² Several antiviral drugs have been developed for the treatment of HCV since the discovery of the virus in 1989. Until 2011, the combination of pegylated interferon-α (PEGIFN) with ribavirin was the treatment of choice,^3,4 but it had limited efficacy, significant side effects, and cure rates around 50% for genotype 1 patients. Since then, several direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) targeting the viral NS3/4A protease and NS5A protein were discovered, which exhibited high efficiency for treating genotype 1 or 4 HCV-infected persons but generally showed a low barrier to the selection of the resistance virus.⁵ Significant improvement was achieved with the discovery of sofosbuvir (1), a nucleoside prodrug inhibitor of HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which in combination with the NS3/4A protease inhibitor voxilaprevir and the NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir leads to the development of Vosevi, an all-oral, pan-genotypic, single-tablet regimen for chronic HCV infection.⁶ Even though a new 8 week combination regimen (glecaprevir and pibrentasvir) was approved in 2019, there is still a need to develop a novel DAA that possesses a pan-genotypic more efficacious improved safety profile and a high barrier to resistance in order to develop new ultrashort combination therapies.⁷ During the past 15 years, many attempts were made to modify natural nucleosides to identify selective and potent nucleoside analogues for the treatment of HCV.⁸ However, despite the fact that a multitude of modified nucleoside analogues reached human clinical trials, the 2′-modified uridine derivative sofosbuvir (1) remains the only FDA-approved nucleoside analogue for the treatment of HCV (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Structure of sofosbuvir and 1- and 2′-dihalo nucleoside analogues 2, 3, and 4.

We, and others, recently showed that (S)-2′-chloro-2′-fluoro-deoxyribouridine and (S)-2′-bromo-2′-fluoro-deoxyribouridine prodrugs 2, 3, and 4(9,10) were non-toxic pan-genotypic anti-HCV agents (Figure 1). Because of their favorable antiviral profile, larger quantities of these compounds will be required for further in vitro and in vivo evaluations. To date, the synthesis of such (2′S)-Br (or Cl), 2′-F nucleosides remains challenging, mainly due to the fact that there are no good methods to introduce the two halogen atoms at the 2′-position and also because the glycosylation reaction is not stereoselective. Indeed, in our original approach, electrophilic halogenation of a 2-deoxyribolactone with N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide and then N-chloro- or N-bromosuccinimide in the presence of a base, led to a mixture of difficult to separate isomers in ratios ranging from 1:1 to 4:1, while the glycosylation step under various Vorbrügen-type conditions gave the undesired α-anomer as, again, a difficult to separate major coupling product (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1. Synthetic Routes to (2S)-2-Halo-2-fluoro Nucleoside Derivatives 13 and 14 and Key (2S)-2-Chloro-2-fluoro Ribolactone 26.

After the completion of our work, Voight et al. (Scheme 1) published an approach for the large-scale synthesis of ABBV-168 (4) in which the introduction of the two halogens is achieved through the Reformatsky reaction.¹¹ Despite the fact that the pure isomer 18 could be easily isolated via crystallization, the yield of this reaction was quite low (25%). The glycosylation step was also an unresolved issue since compound 21 was only obtained in 30% yield.

With overall yields between 0.7 and 1.8%, both approaches were suboptimal, and substantial improvements were required for large-scale synthesis. Herein, we wish to report the optimization and extension of our recently published approach for the preparation of (2S)-2-chloro-2-fluoro ribolactone 26via pivotal aldol and diastereoselective fluorination reactions (Scheme 1).¹²

As summarized in Scheme 2, in the work reported herein, we developed a stereoselective fluorination that worked equally well with α-chloro¹² and α-bromo esters. We also substantially improved the glycosylation reactions with both the 2-bromo-2-fluoro and 2-chloro-2-fluoro¹² sugars. These improvements allowed us to prepare 2′-dihalo nucleosides 13 and 14 in an overall 15–20% yield despite adding two to three steps over our previous routes (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2. New Optimized Route to (2S)-2-Halo-2-fluoro Nucleoside Derivatives 13 and 14.

Results and Discussion

The one-pot, two-step synthesis of chiral pentenoate ester 35 was accomplished via oxidative cleavage of commercially available 1,2:5,6-di-O-isopropylidene-D-mannitol 27 with sodium periodate, followed by a Knoevenagel-Doebner-type condensation reaction with commercially available triethyl α-phosphonoacetate at 0 °C in near quantitative yield (Scheme 3).¹³ Treatment of α,β-unsaturated ester 35 with AD-mix-β¹⁴ afforded the desired cis diol 36, in which the more acidic α-hydroxyl group was selectively activated as a nosylate by reaction with nosyl chloride in pyridine.¹⁵ Displacement of the nosylate group with lithium chloride or lithium bromide in dimethylformamide or tetrahydrofuran afforded halo derivatives 38 and 39 in 78 and 90% yields, respectively.¹⁶ It should be noted that these displacement conditions result in some scrambling at the newly formed α-halo stereocenter.

Scheme 3. Synthesis of (2S)-2-Halo-2-fluorodeoxylactones 26 and 40.

Hydroxyl protection of 38 and 39 was first attempted with tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride under a variety of conditions but always resulted in incomplete protection. Ultimately, it was discovered that the reaction with tert-butyldimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate in the presence of 2,6-lutidine gave a complete conversion, cleanly providing compounds 28 and 29. Subsequent diastereoselective introduction of fluorine was accomplished using lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide and N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide as a source of fluorine. It is worth noting that 25 and 30 were obtained as single isomers and that unlike what was observed with previous methods,^12,17 no β-elimination of tert-butyldimethylsiloxide occurred during the fluorination reaction. Finally, the key dihaloribolactones 26 and 40 were readily obtained by cyclization in the presence of acetic acid in water/acetonitrile at reflux, followed by 5-tert-butyldimethylsilyl protection with tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride in dimethylformamide.¹⁸ With overall yields between 32 and 34%, these new procedures to synthesize the key protected dihalo lactones 26 and 40 are 3 to 5 times more efficient versus previously published approaches, respectively.

We then turned our attention to the glycosylation step, which is one of the major limitations in the existing synthetic routes. Indeed, Vorbrüggen-type condensation (S_N1 mechanism) resulted in poor diastereoselectivities with β/α anomer ratios between 1/2¹⁰ and 1/1.¹¹ We, therefore, sought to overcome this selectivity issue by introducing the nucleobase via an S_N2-type reaction. The literature shows that addition of a silylated uracil (without a Lewis acid) on a pure α-1-chloro or -bromo sugar can lead selectively to the formation of β nucleoside anomers.^19,20 Interestingly, in 2011, Reddy et al.¹⁹ were able to isomerize a 2/1 (β/α) 1-lactol mixture to the thermodynamically more stable β-lactol (ratio 20/1) by simply heating the neat material at 50 °C for 20 h; proceeding presumably by crystallization induced dynamic resolution.²¹ From that enriched β lactol, the formation of a 1-α-chloro sugar intermediate (7/1 ratio) was achieved through a modified Appel reaction (triphenylphosphine/N-chlorosuccinimide) before introduction of the nucleobase via an S_N2-type reaction. Based on this precedent, we took lactol 32 (∼1/1, β/α), obtained after reduction of lactone 40 with lithium tri-tert-butoxyaluminum hydride, and heated the neat material at 45 °C for 7 days (Scheme 4). By doing so, the anomer ratio went up to 12:1, as determined by proton NMR integration. However, after careful characterization, we realized that, unlike what was observed by Reddy et al. in the case of a 2-Me-2-F sugar (β-isomer predominant after isomerization), the α-lactol was the major isomer in our case. The anomers were readily assigned 1-position stereochemistry through both proton and fluorine NMR where the 1-proton or 2-fluorine coupling constants were always larger when the coupling partner was in the anti-configuration. The α-configuration of the lactol was further confirmed when we observed the selective formation of the α-nucleoside after bromination of the lactol via the Appel reaction (triphenylphosphine/carbon tetrabromide) and further bromine displacement with silylated uracil. Finally, it is worth noting that while stable when kept as a solid, the α-lactol isomer quickly anomerizes once in solution (as determined by NMR analysis in CDCl₃), which necessitated lower temperatures and quick reaction times when working with these 1-lactols. Reddy et al. had also observed a solvent-dependent rate of anomerization with a preference for β; in contrast, at 1 h in CDCl₃, acetone-d₆, and methanol-d₄, we found β/α ratios less than 1/2, but always favoring the α-anomer. Like Reddy et al., we also found more anomer stability in DMSO-d₆, but in our case, the β/α ratio at 1 day was 1/6. With lactol 32 as a 1/12 β/α mixture in hand, we then focused on the key glycosylation step. Lactol 32 was initially activated with a mesyl group, but unfortunately, the resulting 1-mesylate was too stable and could not be displaced when treated with a solution of silylated uracil (S_N2 conditions). We hypothesized that a better leaving group would be required in order for the glycosylation to be performed and decided to introduce a triflate group instead. Thus, to a solution of 32 (1/12 β/α mixture) in dichloromethane was added sequentially at −78 °C triethylamine (Et₃N) and then trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride (Tf₂O). The triflate intermediate 41 was found to be too reactive to be isolated, so after stirring for 1 h at −78 °C, a precooled solution of silylated uracil was added. After 1 h at −78 °C, followed by 4 h at room temperature (rt), we isolated nucleoside 34 in 88% yield but as a 1/1 mixture of anomers (Table 1, entry 1).

Scheme 4. Reduction and Dynamic Crystallization of α-Lactol 31 and 32.

Table 1. Glycosylation Optimization.

entry	base	34 (β/α)a	isolated yield (%)
1	Et3Nb	1:1	85
2	Et3Nc	1.7:1	85
3	Et3Nd	3.5:1	88
4	NMI	6:1	85
5	DBU	6:1	75
6	DIPEA	7.5:1	88

^aRatio determined by ¹H NMR.

^bAddition of Et₃N at −78 °C, followed by the addition of (TfO)₂O.

^cAddition of (TfO)₂O at −78 °C, followed by the addition of Et₃N after 20 min.

^dSimultaneous addition of (TfO)₂O and Et₃N at −78 °C.

Interestingly, this β/α ratio was improved to 1.7/1 when Tf₂O was added first and the solution stirred for 20 min before addition of Et₃N (Table 1, entry 2). Ultimately, we found that the ratio could further be improved when both Tf₂O and Et₃N were added at the same time (Table 1, entry 3). Under these conditions, compound 34 was isolated as a 3.5/1 mixture, in 88% yield. Based on these preliminary results, the use of different organic bases was then evaluated to further optimize the glycosylation reaction. Replacement of Et₃N with N-methylimidazole (Table 1, entry 4) or 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (Table 1, entry 5) leads to the formation of compound 34 in a 6/1 ratio, while the use of N,N-diisopropylethylamine (Table 1, entry 6) gave us the best outcome with compound 34 being isolated as a 7.5/1 mixture (88% yield). It is worth noting that the glycosylation was achieved under these final conditions on a 5 g scale without any effect on the yield or anomer ratio. Replacing silylated uracil with silylated cytosine, cytosine nucleoside 43 could also be obtained predominantly as a beta isomer (5/1 ratio) (Scheme 5). In addition, treatment of 2-Cl-2-F lactol 31 (7/1) under the same conditions allowed us to isolate in excellent yields the corresponding uracil and cytosine derivatives 33 and 44 as 3/1 and 5/1 mixtures, respectively (Scheme 5). Compounds 33, 34, 43, and 44 were deprotected using the method we previously described^9b,10 (either with Et₃N·3HF or tetra-N-butylammonium fluoride) to afford the corresponding β nucleoside analogues (>95% purity).

Scheme 5. Extension of Our Glycosylation Approach to the Synthesis of Nucleoside Analogues 34, 43, 33, and 44.

Conclusions

In summary, we present herein an improved route to 2-dihalo ribolactones 13 and 14, which hinged on a completely diastereoselective fluorination reaction. These ribolactones were then utilized to prepare all four pyrimidine nucleosides in a newly optimized glycosylation reaction that took advantage of a crystallization-induced dynamic resolution of the intermediate 1-lactols 41 and 42. The improved yields and diastereoselectivity in both phases of the synthesis allowed us to prepare the final nucleosides more efficiently and with elimination of difficult diastereomeric mixture separations.

Experimental Section

Anhydrous solvents were purchased from Millipore Sigma (Milwaukee, WI). All commercially available reagents were used without further purification. Reagents were purchased from commercial sources. All the reactions were carried out under nitrogen in oven-dried glassware unless otherwise noted. Thin-layer chromatography was performed on Analtech GHLF silica gel plates. Column chromatography was accomplished on a Combiflash Rf200 or via reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹⁹F NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Ascend 400 spectrometer at rt (400, 101, and 377 MHz), and residual proton solvent signals were used as internal standards. Deuterium exchange and decoupling experiments were utilized to confirm proton assignments. NMR processing was performed with MestReNova (Mestrelab Research, Compostela, Spain) version 14.1.1 24571 or Topspin (Bruker, Berlin, Germany) version 3.5. Signal multiplicities are represented by s (singlet), d (doublet), dd (doublet of doublets), t (triplet), q (quadruplet), br (broad), bs (broad singlet), and m (multiplet). Coupling constants (J) are in hertz (Hz). Mass spectra were determined on a Waters Acquity UPLC LC spectrometer using an SQ detector with electrospray ionization (ESI). The purity of final compounds was determined to be >95% using ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) analyses performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC System with a Kinetex LC column (2.1 mm Å, 50 mm, 1.7 μm, C18, 100 Å) and further supported by clean NMR spectra. The mobile phase flow was 0.4 mL/min with a 1.20 min gradient from 95% aqueous media (0.05% formic acid) to 95% CH₃CN (0.05% formic acid) and a 4.5 min total acquisition time. Photodiode array detection was from 190 to 360 nm.

Ethyl (S,E)-3-(2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl) Acrylate (35)

To a slurry of 18.9 g (72 mmol) of 1,2:5,6-di-O-isopropylidene-D-mannitol (27) in 150 mL of 5% aqueous NaHCO₃ at 0 °C was added dropwise a solution of 18.9 g (88.5 mmol) of NaIO₄ in 150 mL of water. The bath was removed, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. The mixture was cooled to 0 °C, followed by the addition of triethyl α-phosphonoacetate (67.8 g, 300 mmol) and 450 mL of 6 M K₂CO₃. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to rt and was stirred for 24 h. The reaction mixture was extracted four times with CH₂Cl₂, and the combined extracts were dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by chromatography with a gradient of hexane to 50% ether-hexane to afford 28.0 g (97%) of E-isomer (35) and 0.7 g (2.4%) of Z-isomer. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 6.86 (dd, J = 15.6, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 6.08 (dd, J = 15.6, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (m, 1H), 4.17 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 4.15 (m, 1H), 3.66 (dd, J = 8.2, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.27 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 165.92, 144.56, 122.36, 110.09, 74.87, 68.73, 60.49, 26.38, 25.66, 14.13; high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₀H₁₇O₄, 201.1127; found, 201.1118.

Ethyl (2R,3S)-3-((R)-2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)-2,3-dihydroxypropanoate (36)

To a solution of ^tBuOH (150 mL) and H₂O (150 mL) was added AD-mix-β (42.0 g) at rt. When the two-phase solution became clear (the bottom phase is pale yellow), methanesulfonamide (2.85 g, 30.0 mmol) was added. The mixture was cooled to 0 °C, and when the solution started to form a suspension, 35 (6.0 g, 30.0 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 4 °C for 24 h until completion. Na₂S₂O₃ (45 g) was added at 4 °C, and the mixture was stirred from 4 °C toward rt for 60 min. Ethyl acetate (200 mL) was added and separated. The water phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (60 mL × 3). The extracts were dried over Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (0 to 50% EtOAc in hexane) to give 36 (6.8 g, 96.8%) as a colorless oil. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 4.43 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 4.15–4.04 (m, 3H), 3.88 (m, 1H), 3.14 (m, 1H), 2.27–2.23 (m, 1H), 1.45 (s, 3H), 1.37 (s, 3H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 173.42, 109.38, 75.20, 72.97, 70.40, 66.77, 62.13, 26.82, 25.13, 14.05; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₀H₁₉O₆, 235.1182; found, 235.1191.

Ethyl (2R,3R)-3-((R)-2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)-3-hydroxy-2-(((4-nitrophenyl)sulfonyl)oxy) Propanoate (37)

To a stirred solution of 36 (6.8 g, 29.06 mmol) in pyridine (125 mL) at 0 °C was added NaCl (7.4 g, 33 mmol). After stirring at 4 °C for 18 h, the mixture was quenched with water (5 mL) at 4 °C, treated with Et₂O (500 mL), and washed with pre-cooled 1 M aq. KHSO₄ (100 mL × 3) and saturated brine (100 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (0 to 60% EtOAc in hexane) to give 37 (9.9 g, 83%) as a pale-yellow oil. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 8.38 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 8.20 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 5.27 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.25 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.07–3.98 (m, 3H), 3.85–3.81 (m, 1H), 2.54 (br s, 1H), 1.37 (s, 3H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.20 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 166.98, 150.83, 141.94, 129.60, 124.16, 109.86, 78.63, 74.09, 72.76, 66.63, 62.64, 26.82, 24.88, 13.98; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₆H₂₂NO₁₀S, 420.0964; found, 420.0958.

Ethyl (3R)-2-Chloro-3-((R)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (38)

To a stirred solution of 37 (4.8 g, 11.4 mmol) in DMF (60 mL) was added LiCl (970 mg, 22.8 mmol). The mixture was heated to 85 °C and stirred for 14 h. After the mixture was treated with Et₂O at 0 °C, the ethereal solution was washed with pre-cooled 1 M aq. KHSO₄ (50 mL × 3) and saturated brine (50 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (0 to 35% ethyl ether in hexane) to give 38 (2.25 g, 78%) as a colorless oil. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 4.73 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 0.5H), 4.5 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 0.5H), 4.31 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.20–4.01 (m, 3H), 2.96 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 0.5H), 2.73 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 0.5H), 1.62–1.32 (m, 9H); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 168.77, 167.91, 110.26, 109.85, 75.38, 74.85, 74.26, 72.82, 72.65, 66.91, 66.52, 66.34, 62.60, 62.43, 71.71, 59.17, 57.54, 26.87, 26.54, 25.95, 25.19, 25.01, 4.06, 13.92; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₀H₁₈ClO₅, 253.0843; found, 253.0839.

Ethyl (3R)-3-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-2-chloro-3-((R)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl) Propanoate (28)

To a solution of 38 (3.0 g, 11.8 mmol) in DCM was added 2,6-lutidine (4.1 mL, 35.4 mmol) at 0 °C. To the mixture was added TBSOTf (4.1 mL, 17.7 mmol) dropwise at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was stirred at rt for 3 h. The reaction was quenched with pre-cooled 1 N HCl (30 mL) at 0 °C, extracted with DCM (50 mL × 3), washed with water (50 mL) and brine (50 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, and concentrated in vacuum. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (0–20% ethyl acetate in hexane) to give 28 (4.0 g, 92.4%) as a colorless oil. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 4.65 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 0.5H), 4.59 (d, J = 2.64 Hz, 0.5H), 4.30–4.17 (m, 4H), 4.09–4.04 (m, 1H), 3.92–3.88 (m, 1H), 1.43 (s, 1.5H), 1.39 (s, 1.5H), 1.34–1.32 (m, 6H), 0.89 (s, 4.5H), 0.87 (s, 4.5H), 0.18 (s, 1.5H), 0.14 (s, 1.5H), 0.11 (s, 1.5H), 0.04 (s, 1.5H); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 168.35, 166.83, 109.41, 109.28, 75.95, 75.79, 75.54, 73.99, 66.63, 66.57, 62.39, 62.21, 61.25, 60.41, 26.69, 26.53, 25.68, 25.65, 25.07, 25.03, 18.16, 18.03, 14.06, 13.97, −4.35, −4.38, −4.45, −4.69. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₆H₃₂ClO₅Si, 367.1708; found, 367.1697.

Ethyl (2S,3R)-3-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-2-chloro-3-((R)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)-2-fluoropropanoate (25)

To a solution of 28 (3.95 g, 10.7 mmol) and NSFI (5.08 g, 16.1 mmol) in THF (50 mL) was added LiHMDS (16.1 mL, 16.1 mmol) dropwise at −78 °C. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h, and LDA solution (3.5 mL, 3.5 mmol) was added dropwise at this temperature. The reaction mixture was then stirred from −78 to −10 °C (∼1 h). The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated NH₄Cl (50 mL) and ethyl acetate (200 mL) at −78 °C. The organic layer was washed with saturated NH₄Cl (50 mL × 2), water (50 mL), and brine (50 mL); dried over Na₂SO₄; and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (0–20% ethyl acetate in hexane) to give 25 (3.1 g, 75%) as a colorless oil.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 4.37–4.26 (m, 4H), 4.04 (dd, J = 8.2, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.92 (dd, J = 8.1, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 1.41 (s, 3H), 1.36 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 0.19 (s, 3H), 0.16 (s, 3H); ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl₃): δ −127.14 (d, J = 18.1 Hz). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₆H₃₁ClFO₅S, 385.1613; found, 385.1619.

(3S,4R,5R)-4-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-5-(((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)methyl)-3-chloro-3-fluorodihydrofuran-2(3H)-one (26)

A solution of 25 (2.9 g, 7.5 mmol) in HOAc/H₂O/ACN (4:1:10, 15 mL) was refluxed with a 100 °C oil bath for 2.5 h (monitored by TLC for completion). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and co-evaporated with toluene (10 mL × 3). The residue was dissolved in DMF (20 mL) and cooled to 0 °C, and imidazole (1.22 g, 18 mmol) was added, followed by TBSCl (2.26 g, 15 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred toward rt overnight to completion. The reaction mixture was quenched with water and extracted with ethyl ether (200 mL). The organic layer was washed with water (30 mL × 3), saturated NH₄Cl (50 mL), and brine (50 mL); dried over Na₂SO₄; and concentrated in vacuum. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (0–8% ethyl acetate in hexane) to give 26 (2.4 g, 77%) as a colorless oil.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 4.59 (dd, J = 11.9, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 4.37–4.32 (m, 1H), 3.98 (dd, J = 12.1, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (dd, J = 12.1, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 0.93 (s, 9H), 0.90 (s, 9H), 0.22 (s, 3H), 0.17 (s, 3H), 0.10 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 3H); ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl₃): δ −134.66 (d, J = 12.0 Hz); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 165.11 (d, J = 26.26 Hz), 102.06 (d, J = 260.6 Hz), 83.60, 74.06 (d, J = 16.2 Hz), 59.52, 25.70, 25.50, 18.20, 18.01, −4.45, −5.21, −5.48, −5.52. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₇H₃₅ClFO₄Si₂, 413.1746; found, 413.1736.

Ethyl (3R)-2-Bromo-3-((R)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (39)

To a stirred solution of 37 (5.98 g, 14.3 mmol) in THF (70 mL) was added LiBr (6.4 g, 73.5 mmol). The mixture was heated to 75 °C and stirred overnight. After the mixture was treated with Et₂O (300 mL) at 0 °C, the ethereal solution was washed with pre-cooled 1 M aq. KHSO₄ (50 mL × 3) and saturated brine (50 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (0–35% ethyl ether in hexane) to give 39 (3.8 g, 89.6%) as a colorless oil.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 4.66 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 0.5H), 4.5 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 0.5H), 4.30–4.23 (m, 2H), 4.16–4.01 (m, 3H), 3.93–3.71 (m, 1H), 3.37 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 0.5H), 3.22 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 0.5H), 1.41 (s, 1.5H), 1.40 (s, 1.5H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 1.32 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1.5H), 1.31 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1.5H); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 169.76, 169.07, 109.98, 109.83, 76.10, 75.49, 74.28, 71.74, 66.96, 66.52, 62.54, 62.44, 49.02, 44.56, 26.89, 26.65, 25.03, 13.84; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₀H₁₈BrO₅, 297.0338; found, 297.0343.

Ethyl (3R)-3-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-2-bromo-3-((R)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl) Propanoate (29)

To a solution of 39 (3.8 g, 12.8 mmol) in DCM (60 mL) was added 2,6-lutidine (4.5 mL, 38.8 mmol) at 0 °C. The mixture was added TBSOTf (4.5 mL, 19.4 mmol) dropwise at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was stirred at rt for 3 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with pre-cooled 1 N HCl (30 mL) at 0 °C, extracted with DCM (50 mL × 3), washed with water (50 mL) and brine (50 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (0–20% ethyl acetate in hexane) to give 29 (4.58 g, 87.1%) as a colorless oil.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 4.65 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 0.5H), 4.90 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 0.5H), 4.34–4.11 (m, 4H), 4.08–4.01 (m, 1H), 3.91–3.87 (m, 1H), 1.41 (s, 1.5H), 1.39 (s, 1.5H), 1.33–1.30 (m, 6H), 0.89 (s, 4.5H), 0.87 (s, 4.5H), 0.16 (s, 1.5H), 0.13 (s, 1.5H), 0.11 (s, 1.5H), 0.05 (s, 1.5H); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 168.11, 166.66, 109.24, 109.17, 76.59, 76.32, 74.56, 73.38, 66.49, 65.91, 62.37, 62.29, 51.19, 51.02, 26.62, 26.44, 25.70, 25.67, 25.01, 24.95, 18.17, 18.03, 13.93, −4.40, −4.43, −4.48; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₆H₃₂BrO₅Si, 411.1202; found, 411.1211.

Ethyl (2S,3R)-3-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-2-bromo-3-((R)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)-2-fluoropropanoate (30)

To a solution of 29 (4.45 g, 10.87 mmol) and NSFI (5.12 g, 16.23 mmol) in THF (60 mL) was added LiHMDS (18.5 mL, 18.5 mmol) dropwise at −78 °C. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h, and LDA solution (2 mL, 2 mmol) was added dropwise at this temperature. The reaction mixture was then stirred from −78 to −10 °C for completion (1 h). The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated NH₄Cl (50 mL) and ethyl acetate (200 mL) at −78 °C. The organic layer was washed with saturated NH₄Cl (50 mL × 2), water (50 mL), and brine (50 mL); dried over Na₂SO₄; and concentrated in vacuum. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (0–20% ethyl acetate in hexane) to give 30 (3.5 g, 75.4%) as a colorless oil.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 4.45–4.25 (m, 4H), 4.03 (dd, J = 8.2, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.92 (dd, J = 8.1, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.41 (s, 3H), 1.36 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 0.93 (s, 9H), 0.22 (s, 3H), 0.17 (s, 3H); ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl₃): δ −126.16 (d, J = 18.0 Hz); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 165.24 (d, J = 26.36 Hz), 108.77, 98.75 (d, J = 271.84 Hz), 77.76 (d, J = 20.42 Hz), 75.60 (d, J = 4.16 Hz), 65.48, 63.02, 25.89, 25.86, 24.50, 18.33, 13.78, −3.91, −4.08, −4.10; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₆H₃₀BrFNaO₅Si, 451.0928; found, 451.0921.

(3S,4R,5R)-4-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-5-(((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)methyl)-3-bromo-3-fluorodihydrofuran-2(3H)-one (40)

A solution of 30 (1.54 g, 3.75 mmol) in HOAc/H₂O/ACN (4:1:10, 8 mL) was heated under reflux in a 100 °C oil bath for 2.5 h (monitored by TLC for completion). The solvent was removed in reduced pressure and co-evaporated with toluene (10 mL × 3). The residue was dissolved in DMF (10 mL) and cooled to 0 °C, and imidazole (456 mg, 6.7 mmol) was added, followed by TBSCl (845 mg, 5.6 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred toward rt overnight. The reaction mixture was quenched with water and extracted with ethyl ether (150 mL). The organic layer was washed with water (30 mL × 3), saturated NH₄Cl (50 mL), and brine (50 mL); dried over Na₂SO₄; and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (0–8% ethyl acetate in hexane) to give 40 (1.2 g, 73%) as a colorless oil.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 4.73 (dd, J = 8.6, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 4.41–4.37 (m, 1H), 3.99 (dd, J = 11.7, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (dd, J = 11.7, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 0.93 (s, 9H), 0.90 (s, 9H), 0.22 (s, 3H), 0.18 (s, 3H), 0.10 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 3H); ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl₃): δ −136.63 (d, J = 8.6 Hz); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 165.86 (d, J = 25.5 Hz), 94.05 (d, J = 275.1 Hz), 84.73, 75.13 (d, J = 15.4 Hz), 60.12, 25.74, 25.53, 18.23, 18.05, −4.38, −5.18, −5.46, −5.47; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₇H₃₅BrFO₄Si₂, 457.1241; found, 457.1241.

(3S,4S,5R)-4-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl) oxy)-5-(((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)methyl)-3-chloro-3-fluorotetrahydrofuran-2-ol (31)

To 1 g of lactone 26 (2.42 mmol) in 15 mL of toluene at −78 °C was added DIBAL-H (1M in toluene, 3.63 mL) dropwise. After stirring at −78 °C for 3 h, the mixture was quenched by adding MeOH until gas evolution ceased, then poured into 200 mL of ether, and washed with potassium sodium tartrate solution (0.5 M, 200 mL × 2) and water (200 mL × 2). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed to give the product of 0.98 g (98% yield). The ratio of α/β is about 3–4:1. The lactose can be used directly for the next reaction without purification.

Compound 31 was purified by chromatography on silica gel (0 to 66% ethyl acetate in hexane). The conversion was undertaken in an oven at 30, 37, 40, and 45 °C. Temperature was monitored using a thermometer. The ratio of α to β is 5:1 after 4 days at 40 °C. The best ratio of α to β is about 7:1 when the sample was set at 30 °C for 2 weeks.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) of compound 31 at 40 °C for 4 days, δ 5.17 (ddd, J = 12.0, 3.2, 0.7 Hz, 4H), 5.05 (dd, J = 9.2, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (dd, J = 17.0, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (ddd, J = 8.5, 4.6, 0.7 Hz, 5H), 4.03 (tdd, J = 5.6, 4.3, 1.7 Hz, 5H), 3.98 (dt, J = 6.3, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 3.80–3.61 (m, 12H), 3.45 (dd, J = 12.0, 2.3 Hz, 4H), 0.84 (dd, J = 6.7, 5.0 Hz, 107H), 0.12 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 16H), 0.09–0.02 (m, 23H), −0.00 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 27H); ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl₃): δ −132.98 (d, J = 16.6 Hz), −138.57 (d, J = 8.6 Hz); HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₇H₃₆ClFNaO₄Si₂, 437.1722; found, 437.1730.

1-((3S,4S,5R)-4-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-5-(((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)methyl)-3-chloro-3-fluorotetrahydrofuran-2-yl) Pyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione (33)

Silylated uracil: A mixture of 5.6 g of uracil (50 mmol), 23 mg of ammonium sulfate, and 56 mL of hexamethyldisilazane (267 mmol) was heated at 125 °C overnight. The excess HMDS was removed under high vacuum at 100 °C. The residue was dissolved in 10 mL of DCM and used for the next coupling reaction. A solution of 0.98 g (2.36 mmol) of compound 31 in 30 mL of DCM was prepared at −78 °C. To the solution was added triflic anhydride (0.55 mL, 3.28 mmol) and DIPEA (0.66 mL, 3.79 mmol) quickly (about 10 s) at this temperature. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h. A pre-cooled silylated uracil solution (in step 1) was added using a double-tipped needle at −78 °C. After stirring at −78 °C for 1 h and toward rt for 3 h, the reaction mixture was poured into 200 mL of cold saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, extracted with DCM (200 mL × 2), and dried over Na₂SO₄, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel (0–17% ethyl acetate in hexane) to give product 33 (0.98 g, 81%) as a white foam. ¹H NMR showed that the ratio of α/β is about 1:3.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 7.72 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H) 6.38 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 2H), 5.78 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 5.74 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 4.70 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (dd, 15.6, 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.17 (m, 1H), 4.05 (dd, J = 12.0, 2.0 Hz, 2H), 3.96 (m, 2H), 3.94 (m, 1H), 3.83 (m, 2H), 3.78 (m, 1H), 0.96, 0.95, 0.94 (s, s, s, 48H), 0.24, 0.18, 0.15, 0.14, 0.11 (s, s, s, s, s); ¹³C NMR (CDCl3) d: 162.3, 162.2, 150.0, 149.8, 140.5, 140.4, 139.0, 113.4 (d, J = 255.8 Hz), 109.9 (d, J = 261.3 Hz), 102.8, 102.4, 87.7 (d, J = 40.6 Hz), 87.1 (d, J = 16.5 Hz), 84.3, 81.6, 75.6 (d, J = 16.4 Hz), 74.7 (d, J = 17.1 Hz), 61.1, 59.9, 25.9, 25.8, 25.6, 18.3, 18.2, 18.0; ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl₃): δ −122.95 (t, J = 15.8 Hz, β), −138.40 (d, J = 15.1 Hz, α); HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₂₁H₃₉ClFN₂O₅Si₂, 509.2070; found, 509.2064.

4-Amino-1-((3S,4S,5R)-4-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl) oxy)-5-(((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)methyl)-3-chloro-3-fluorotetrahydrofuran-2-yl) Pyrimidin-2(1H)-one (44)

By the same procedure described above for 33, compound 44 can be obtained (α/β = 1:5) in 92% yield from 31 (α/β = 7:1) as a white solid. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 9.81 (br, NH₂), 7.68 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.6, 1H), 7.35 (dd, J = 7.6, 2.5 Hz, 0.3H), 6.40 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 0.3H) 6.31 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 5.73 (d, J = 7.6, 0.3H), 5.70 (d, J = 7.6, 1H), 4.85 (d, J = 8.4 Hz), 4.53 (dd, J = 14.7, 6.8 Hz, 0.2H), 4.21 (dd, 15.3, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.04 (m, 0.2H), 3.92(dd, J = 11.9, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (dd, J = 11.9, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (dd, J = 11.7, 1.8 Hz, 0.3H), 3.68(dd, J = 11.8, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (dd, J = 11.9, 2.5 Hz, 0.3H), 0.82, 0.80, 0.79, 0.78 (s, s, s, s, 29H), 0.08, 0.07, 0.03, 0.02, 0.00, −0.04 (s, s, s, s, s, s, 19H); ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl₃): δ −121.6 (t, J = 15.1 Hz, β), −136.4 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, α); ¹³C NMR (100.65 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 165.2, 162.3, 160.1, 156.9, 156.4, 156.2, 142.3, 140.8, 123.5 (d), 113.5 (d), 95.6, 95.3, 89.5, 88.1 (d), 84.5, 81.6, 76.0, 74.9 (d), 61.2, 60.0, 25.9, 25.8, 25.6, 25.5, 18.3, 18.2, 18.0, −4.1, −4.3, −5.0, −5.1; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₂₁H₄₀ClFN₃O₄Si₂, 508.2230; found, 508.2224.

(2S,3S,4R,5R)-3-Bromo-4-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-5-(((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)methyl)-3-fluorotetrahydrofuran-2-ol (32)

Compound 40 was reduced with LiAl(OBu)₃H as above for 31. After workup and purification by silica gel column chromatography (0–10% EtOAc/hexane), pure 32 was obtained in 97% as a syrup.

5 g of lactol 32 was then heated at 45 °C in a temperature-controlled oven, and a solid product 32 was obtained after about a week. α/β > 12 is based on ¹H NMR. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 5.38 (dd, J = 12.0, 3.8, 0.93H), 5.18 (dd, J = 9.1, 5.5 Hz, 0.07H), 4.65 (dd, J = 17.9, 6.1 Hz, 0.07H), 4.55 (dd, J = 9.7, 4.8 Hz, 0.93H), 4.10 (ddd, J = 10.2, 5.2, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (dd, J = 11.2, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (dd, 11.2, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.56–3.51 (m, 1H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 0.91 (s, 9H), 0.21 (s, 3H), 0.16 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H); ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl₃): δ −131.12, −138.00; ¹³C NMR (100.65 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 101.61 (d, J = 274.8 Hz), 101.20 (d, J = 19.1 Hz), 83.84, 61.99, 25.86, 25.60, 18.32, 17.99, −4.45, −5.05, −5.36, −5.43; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₇H₃₆BrFNaO₄Si₂, 481.1217; found, 481.1213.

1-((2R,3S,4R,5R)-3-Bromo-4-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-5-(((tert-butyldimethyl silyl)oxy)methyl)-3-fluorotetrahydrofuran-2-yl) Pyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione (34)

Step 1. A mixture of 28 g of uracil, 280 mL of HMDS, and 112 mg of ammonium sulfate was stirred at 125 °C to form a clear solution (normally about 3 h). The excess HMDS was removed under high vacuum (∼5–10 mmHg) at 80–100 °C in an oil bath. The residue was dissolved in 200 mL of DCM and pre-cooled at −78 °C for step 2.

Step 2. A solution of lactol 32 (5 g, α/β (¹H NMR), 12/1) in DCM (30 mL) was prepared at −78 °C. To this solution was quickly added triflic anhydride (2.8 mL) and 3.3 mL of DIPEA (∼10 s) at −78 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 50 min. A pre-cooled silylated uracil solution (in step 1) was added using a double-tipped needle at −78 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h, which was then increased to rt, and the mixture was stirred at rt for 4 h (Rf: 0.1, EtOAc/hex, 3/20). The reaction mixture was cooled with an ice bath and was quenched by addition of sat. NaHCO₃ (10 mL). The solid was filtered through a celite pad, and the celite pad was washed with DCM (2 × 80 mL). The combined filtrates were separated, and the organic layer was washed with sat. NaHCO₃ and brine and dried over sodium sulfate (TLC: one spot, 20% EtOAc/hexane). After removing the solvent, the residue was purified using a silica column (0 to 25% EtOAc/hexane) to give 5.12 g of product 34 in 85% yield (β/α, 5.2:1 based on ¹H NMR).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD₃OD): δ 7.71 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 0.83H), 7.63 (dd, J = 8.2, 3.2 Hz, 0.18H), 6.52 (d, J = 16.6 Hz, 0.16H) 6.35 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 0.82H), 5.74 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 0.16H), 5.71 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 0.84H), 4.55 (dd, J = 17.4, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (dd, J = 12.2, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 4.01–3.96 (m, 1H), 3.87 (dd, J = 12.2, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 0.96, 0.95, 0.94, 0.93 (s, s, s, s, 18H), 0.28, 0.27 (s, s, 3H), 0.22, 0.21 (s, s, 3H), 0.16, 0.15, 0.12, 0.11 (s, s, s, s, 6H); ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CD₃OD): δ −119.8 (β), −137.8 (α); ¹³C NMR (100.66 MHz, CD₃OD): δ 165.60, 165.34, 152.11, 151.86, 142.72, 140.52, 110.4 (d, J = 265.9 Hz), 103.46, 103.04, 89.82 (d, J = 40.0 Hz), 89.02 (d, J = 15.4 Hz), 85.09, 83.04, 78.21 (d, J = 15.5 Hz), 77.63 (d, J = 16.3 Hz), 62.19, 61.24, 26.45, 26.33, 26.17, 26.14, 19.26, 18.94, −3.58, −3.80, −4.36, −4.54, −5.23, −5.30, −5.33; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₂₁H₃₉BrFN₂O₅Si₂, 553.1565; found, 553.1556.

4-Amino-1-((2R,3S,4R,5R)-3-bromo-4-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-5-(((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)methyl)-3-fluorotetrahydrofuran-2-yl) Pyrimidin-2(1H)-one (43)

A similar procedure was employed for preparing nucleoside 34 using lactol 32 in 80% yield (β/α, 5:1 based on ¹H NMR).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD₃OD): δ 7.72 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 0.83H), 7.59 (dd, J = 7.6, 3.2 Hz, 0.17H), 6.66 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 0.17H), 6.43 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 0.83H), 4.54 (dd, J = 17.6, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.13–3.85 (m, 3H), 0.97 (s, 9H), 0.95 (s, 9H), 0.27 (s, 3H), 0.21 (s, 3H), 0.16 (s, 3H), 0.15 (s, 3H); ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CD₃OD): δ −121.15, −139.06 (t, J = 17.3 Hz); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CD₃OD): δ 167.32, 157.58 (d, J = 5.1 Hz), 141.18, 110.63 (d, J = 267.1 Hz), 104.57 (d, J = 273.8 Hz), 96.72, 96.34, 90.23 (d, J = 39.4 Hz), 89.52 (d, J = 15.1 Hz), 84.92, 82.75, 78.36 (d, J = 15.8 Hz), 77.63 (d, J = 16.5 Hz), 62.22, 61.20, 30.75, 26.58, 26.46, 26.35, 26.27, 26.19, 26.16, 19.22, 19.10, 18.93, −3.56, −3.80, −4.36, −4.54, −5.18, −5.23, −5.30, −5.32; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₂₁H₄₀BrFN₃O₄Si₂, 552.1725; found, 552.1717.

(2S)-2′-α-Fluoro-2′-β-bromo-deoxyuridine (14)

To a solution of bis-TBS-protected-nucleoside 34 (6.2 g, 11.23 mmol) in THF (80 mL) was added 3HF·NEt₃ (9.3 mL, 56.5 mmol). After stirring for 16 h at rt, the reaction mixture was filtrated on a short silica gel column and washed with 30% MeOH in DCM. After removal of the solvent in vacuo, the crude was purified by flash column chromatography using CH₂Cl₂/MeOH 9:1 as an eluent to afford the deprotected nucleoside mixture (3.6 g, 99% yield, β/α: 5.2/1) as a white solid. The nucleoside was dissolved in about 14 mL of i-PrOH/H₂O (98:2) under reflux conditions. The solution was cooled to rt, and the formed crystal was collected after 1 day, yielding 1.9 g of pure beta-isomer nucleoside 14. The mother liquid was removed from solvents, and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography using toluene/acetone to afford the second aliquot of 14 (0.5 g). The total yield was 66.7%. Nucleoside 14 was confirmed by NMR and single-crystal X-ray analysis (single crystals obtained from EtOH). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD₃OD): δ 7.94 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 5.75 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (dd, J = 19.7, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 4.01–3.91 (m, 2H), 3.78 (dd, J = 12.7, 2.6 Hz, 1H); ¹⁹F NMR (377 MHz, CD₃OD): δ −121.17; ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CD₃OD): δ 165.64, 152.04, 141.33, 110.69 (d, J = 262.4 Hz), 103.25, 89.82 (d, J = 39.9 Hz), 82.78, 76.60 (d, J = 17.2 Hz), 59.88; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₉H₁₀BrFN₂O₅, 324.9835; found, 324.9825.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.1c06174.

• Copies of ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹⁹F NMR spectra (PDF)

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.