Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS:
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite effective antiviral therapies, the risk for HCC is decreased but not eliminated after a sustained virologic response (SVR) to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents, and the risk is higher in patients with advanced fibrosis. We investigated HCV-induced epigenetic alterations that might affect risk for HCC after DAA treatment in patients and mice with humanized livers.
METHODS:
We performed genome-wide ChIPmentation-based ChIP-Seq and RNA-seq analyses of liver tissues from 6 patients without HCV infection (controls), 18 patients with chronic HCV infection, 8 patients with chronic HCV infection cured by DAA treatment, 13 patients with chronic HCV infection cured by interferon therapy, 4 patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, and 7 patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in Europe and Japan. HCV-induced epigenetic modifications were mapped by comparative analyses with modifications associated with other liver disease etiologies. uPA/SCID mice were engrafted with human hepatocytes to create mice with humanized livers and given injections of HCV-infected serum samples from patients; mice were given DAAs to eradicate the virus. Pathways associated with HCC risk were identified by integrative pathway analyses and validated in analyses of paired HCC tissues from 8 patients with an SVR to DAA treatment of HCV infection.
RESULTS:
We found chronic HCV infection to induce specific genome-wide changes in H3K27ac, which correlated with changes in expression of mRNAs and proteins. These changes persisted after an SVR to DAAs or interferon-based therapies. Integrative pathway analyses of liver tissues from patients and mice with humanized livers demonstrated that HCV-induced epigenetic alterations were associated with liver cancer risk. Computational analyses associated increased expression of SPHK1 with HCC risk. We validated these findings in an independent cohort of patients with HCV-related cirrhosis (n = 216), a subset of which (n = 21) achieved viral clearance.
CONCLUSIONS:
In an analysis of liver tissues from patients with and without an SVR to DAA therapy, we identified epigenetic and gene expression alterations associated with risk for HCC. These alterations might be targeted to prevent liver cancer in patients treated for HCV infection.
Keywords: Biomarker, Biopsy, Chemoprevention, Sox9
Graphical Abstract
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the second most common and fastest rising cause of cancer-related death.1 The development of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) with cure rates of higher than 90% has been a major breakthrough in the management of patients with chronic HCV infection. However, although viral cure decreases the overall HCC risk in HCV-infected patients, it does not eliminate virus-induced HCC risk, especially in patients with advanced fibrosis.2,3 Furthermore, convenient biomarkers to robustly predict HCC risk after viral cure and strategies for HCC prevention are absent.2 These unexpected findings pose new challenges for patient management.4-6
Despite more than 2 decades of intensive research efforts, the pathogenesis of HCV-induced HCC and the HCC risk after DAA cure are still incompletely understood.6,7 Although HCV is an RNA virus with little potential for integrating its genetic material into the host genome, HCV contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis through a direct and an indirect way. HCV-mediated liver disease and carcinogenesis are considered multistep processes that include chronic infection-driven hepatic inflammation and progressive liver fibrogenesis with formation of neoplastic clones that arise and progress in the carcinogenic tissue microenvironment.4,6,8 A 186-gene expression signature in liver tissue of HCV-infected patients has been associated with HCC risk and mortality, suggesting that virus-induced transcriptional reprogramming in the liver could play a functional role in hepatocarcinogenesis.9,10
Epigenetic modifications of histones can lead to chromatin opening and compacting and play a major role in gene regulation in health and disease.11 Although epigenetic changes have been identified in established HCC,12 their role in viral hepatocarcinogenesis remains largely unknown.
Methods
Human Subjects
Liver tissues from patients undergoing surgical resection or biopsy examination were collected at the Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinic of the Hiroshima University Hospital (Hiroshima, Japan), the Basel University Hospital (Basel, Switzerland), the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims (Reims, France), and the Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (Strasbourg, France). Protocols for patient tissue collection were reviewed and approved by the hospital ethics committees. Written and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Eligible patients were identified by a systematic review of patient charts. Histopathologic grading and staging of HCV liver biopsy specimens, according to the METAVIR classification system, were performed at the pathology institutes of the respective university hospitals. Overall, we analyzed liver tissue from 6 noninfected control patients, 18 patients with chronic HCV infection, 8 patients with DAA-cured chronic HCV, 13 patients with interferon (IFN)-cured chronic HCV, 4 patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and 7 patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Furthermore, we studied 8 paired HCC samples with HCV-induced liver disease (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of Studied Patients
Biopsy ID |
Sex | Age | Diagnosis | Viral genotype |
Viral load (IU/mL) |
METAVIR grade |
METAVIR stage |
Antiviral treatment |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Controls | C1 | F | 55 | Minimal hepatitis | N/A | N/A | N/A | F0 | N/A |
C2 | M | 46 | Minimal hepatitis | N/A | N/A | N/A | F0 | N/A | |
C3 | F | 40 | Lobular hepatitis | N/A | N/A | N/A | F0 | N/A | |
C4 | F | 53 | Minimal hepatitis | N/A | N/A | N/A | F0 | N/A | |
C5 | M | 56 | Lobular hepatitis | N/A | N/A | N/A | F0 | N/A | |
C6 | F | 58 | Minimal hepatitis | N/A | N/A | N/A | F0 | N/A | |
C7 | F | 51 | Chronic indeterminate hepatitis | N/A | N/A | N/A | F3 | N/A | |
C8 | F | 37 | Acute partially cholestatic hepatitis | N/A | N/A | N/A | F0 | N/A | |
C9 | F | 44 | Cholestatic hepatitis | N/A | N/A | N/A | F1 | N/A | |
C10 | M | 78 | Adjacent liver from CCM resection | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
C11 | F | 58 | Adjacent liver from CCM resection | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
C12 | F | 70 | Adjacent liver from CCM resection | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
C13 | M | 63 | Adjacent liver from CCM resection | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
C14 | M | 70 | Adjacent liver from CCM resection | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
C15 | F | 69 | Adjacent liver from CCM resection | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
C16 | M | 53 | Adjacent liver from CCM resection | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
C17 | M | 71 | Adjacent liver from CCM resection | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
HBV | B1 | F | 46 | HBV | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | NUC |
B2 | M | 65 | HBV and HCC | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | NUC | |
B3 | M | 57 | HBV and HCC | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | NUC | |
B4 | M | 58 | HBV and HCC | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | NUC | |
NASH | N1 | M | 27 | NASH and HCC | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | N/A |
N2 | M | 63 | NASH and HCC | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | N/A | |
N3 | M | 73 | NASH and HCC | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | N/A | |
N4 | M | 76 | NASH and HCC | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | N/A | |
N5 | F | 65 | NASH and HCC | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | N/A | |
N6 | F | 47 | NASH and HCC | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | N/A | |
N7 | F | 68 | NASH and HCC | N/A | N/A | N/A | F4 | N/A | |
HCV infected | H1 | F | 62 | Chronic HCV | 1a | 5140000 | A1 | F1 | Naïve |
H2 | M | 44 | Chronic HCV | 1a | 7.41E + 06 | A1 | F2 | Naïve | |
H3 | F | 23 | Chronic HCV | 3a | 2.46E + 02 | A2 | F2 | Naïve | |
H4 | F | 60 | Chronic HCV | 2 | 2.70E + 06 | A2 | F2 | Naïve | |
H5 | M | 23 | Chronic HCV | 1a | 1.76E + 06 | A1 | F1 | Intolerant to Peg-IFN/RBV | |
H6 | M | 48 | Chronic HCV | 1a | 5.93E + 06 | A1 | F2 | Naïve | |
H7 | F | 38 | Chronic HCV | 1b | 7.95E + 05 | A1 | F2 | Naïve | |
H8 | M | 58 | Chronic HCV | 4 | 4.08E + 06 | A3 | F2 | Nonresponder to Peg-IFN/RBV | |
H9 | M | 52 | Chronic HCV | 1a | 6.60E + 05 | A3 | F3 | Naïve | |
H10 | M | 54 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 1b | 4.40E + 04 | A1 | F4 | Relapse to SOF/DCV/RBV | |
H11 | M | 68 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 2a | 2.51E + 05 | A3 | F3 | Naïve | |
H12 | M | 51 | Chronic HCV | 3a | 3.30E + 06 | A2 | F1 | Naïve | |
H13 | M | 54 | Chronic HCV | 4 | 3.31E + 06 | A2 | F1 | Naïve | |
H14 | F | 48 | Chronic HCV | 3a | 1.15E + 06 | A3 | F4 | Naïve | |
H15 | M | 65 | Chronic HCV | 1b | 2.25E + 06 | A2 | F4 | Naïve | |
H16 | M | 81 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 1b | 1.85E + 06 | A1 | F1 | Nonresponder to Peg-IFN/RBV | |
H17 | M | 51 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 3a | 3.79E + 06 | A2 | F4 | Relapse to SOF/RBV | |
H18 | F | 71 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 1b | 3.93E + 06 | A1 | F1 | Naïve | |
H19 | F | 49 | Chronic HCV | 3a | 3.50E + 06 | A3 | F4 | Naïve | |
H20 | M | 34 | Chronic HCV | N/A | 2.21E + 06 | A3 | F4 | Naïve | |
H21 | M | 53 | Chronic HCV | 1 | 1.35E + 06 | A3 | F4 | Naïve | |
H22 | F | 62 | Chronic HCV | N/A | 6.10E + 06 | A3 | F4 | Naïve | |
H23 | F | 59 | Chronic HCV | 4 | 2.68E + 06 | A3 | F4 | Naïve | |
H24a | M | 79 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 1b | 2.00E + 06 | A2 | F2 | N/A | |
H25a | M | 56 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 1b | 2.00E + 06 | A3 | F4 | N/A | |
H26a | F | 79 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 1b | 5.01E + 05 | A2 | F4 | N/A | |
H27a | M | 85 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 1b | 3.16E + 05 | A3 | F3 | N/A | |
H28a | M | 64 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 2b | 1.00E + 07 | A2 | F4 | N/A | |
H29a | F | 76 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 1b | 6.31E + 06 | A2 | F4 | N/A | |
H30a | F | 84 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 1b | 5.01E + 04 | A2 | F3 | N/A | |
H31a | M | 61 | Chronic HCV and HCC | 1b | 3.98E + 04 | A2 | F2 | N/A | |
HCV cured | D1a | M | 65 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1b | Undetectable | A0 | F2 | SOF/DCV |
D2a | M | 58 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1a | Undetectable | A0 | F4 | SOF/LDV | |
D3a | F | 79 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1b | Undetectable | A2 | F4 | DCV/ASV | |
D4a | M | 63 | Cured HCV and HCC | 2a | Undetectable | A2 | F4 | SOF/RBV | |
D5a | M | 69 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1b | Undetectable | A2 | F3 | DCV/ASV | |
D6a | M | 73 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1b | Undetectable | A2 | F3 | DCV/ASV | |
D7a | M | 75 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1b | Undetectable | A2 | F3 | SOF/LDV | |
D8a | F | 75 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1b | Undetectable | A2 | F3 | SOF/LDV | |
D9a | M | 71 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A3 | F2 | DCV/ASV | |
D10a | M | 73 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A2 | F3 | DCV/ASV | |
D11a | F | 76 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A2 | F2 | DCV/ASV | |
D12a | M | 61 | Cured HCV and HCC | 2A | Undetectable | A2 | F3 | SOF/RBV | |
D13a | F | 71 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A2 | F4 | DCV/ASV | |
D14a | M | 79 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | N/A | N/A | DCV/ASV | |
D15a | M | 64 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A2 | F3 | SOF/LDV | |
D16a | M | 78 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A1 | F1 | SOF/LDV | |
I1 | M | 68 | Cured HCV and HCC | 2A | Undetectable | N/A | F3 | Peg-IFN/RBV | |
I2 | M | 61 | Cured HCV and HCC | 2A | Undetectable | A2 | F4 | Peg-IFN/RBV | |
I3 | F | 74 | Cured HCV and HCC | 2B | Undetectable | A2 | F3 | IFN/RBV | |
I4 | M | 69 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A1 | F2 | Peg-IFN/RBV | |
I5 | M | 66 | Cured HCV and HCC | 2B | Undetectable | A2 | F4 | IFN | |
I6 | F | 68 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A2 | F2 | IFN | |
I7 | M | 54 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A2 | F4 | Peg-IFN/RBV | |
I8 | M | 66 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A1 | F3 | IFN | |
I9 | M | 74 | Cured HCV and HCC | 2A | Undetectable | A2 | F1 | Peg-IFN | |
I10 | M | 80 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A1 | F2 | Peg-IFN/RBV | |
I11 | F | 77 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A1 | F4 | Peg-IFN/RBV | |
I12 | M | 70 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A1 | F1 | Peg-IFN | |
I13 | M | 65 | Cured HCV and HCC | 1B | Undetectable | A2 | F2 | Peg-IFN/RBV |
NOTE. Biopsy identification number, sex, age, pathologic diagnosis, HCV genotype and load, antiviral treatment (for HCV-infected and HCV-cured patients), and METAVIR grade (when applicable) and score are presented.
ASV, asunaprevir; CCM, colon cancer metastasis; DCV, daclatasvir; F, female; IU, international unit; LDV, ledipasvir; M, male; N/A, not applicable; NUC, nucleos(t)ide analogues; Peg, pegylated; RBV, ribavirin; SOF, sofosbuvir.
Paired analysis of HCC and nontumor tissue.
HCV Infection of Human Hepatocyte Chimeric Mice and DAA Treatment
cDNA-uPA+/+/SCID+/+ (uPA/SCID) mice were engrafted with human hepatocytes and intravenously inoculated with serum samples containing approximately 105 HCV particles. HCV-infected mice were treated with a combination of MK-7009 and BMS-788329 DAAs.13 Elimination of HCV in treated mice was confirmed by the absence of HCV viremia 12 weeks after cessation of therapy. See the Supplementary Materials for further details.
ChIPmentation-Based ChIP-Seq
ChIPmentation-based ChIP-Seq on liver tissue using H3K27ac antibody (number 39134, Activ Motif , La Hulpe, Belgium) was performed as described previously14 and adapted as follows. To perform ChIP-Seq on human and mouse livers, tissues were cut in small pieces of 2–3 mm, crosslinked with 0.4% formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature, and quenched with glycine 125 mmol/L for 5 minutes at room temperature. Then, tissue was homogenized using a glass potter and ChIPmentation was performed as described previously.14
Processing of Raw ChIPmentation Data
Reads were aligned to the human genome (hg19) and peaks were called in uniquely mapped reads using MACS2.8 Peaks within all samples were intersected and used for counting reads if they overlapped in at least 2 samples. Read counts of genes were defined as the sum of all reads in peak regions overlapping the gene body or the promoter region, that is, the region up to 1500 bp ahead of the transcription start site. See the Supplementary Materials for further details.
RNA Extraction and Next-Generation Sequencing
Liver tissues were lysed in TRI-reagent (Molecular Research Center; Cincinnati, OH) and RNA was purified using Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) or RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantity and quality were assessed using NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) and Bioanalyzer 2100 (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Libraries of extracted RNA were prepared and sequenced as described previously.3,9
Processing of RNA-Seq Data
Reads were counted with htseq-count, and a differentially expression analysis was performed with DESeq2 applying GENCODE 19.15 Reads were taken from our RNA-Seq experiments as described earlier and from external sources: RNA-Seq from infected (low ISG) vs control patients was retrieved from the GEO dataset GSE84346 (low ISG samples). See the Supplementary Materials for further details.
Pathway Enrichment and Correlation Analyses
Pathway enrichment analyses were performed using gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) with all gene sets included in MSigDB 6.0.16 We used the pre-ranked version of GSEA and genes were ranked for P values of differential expression and modification analyses. Figures showing enriched pathways and gene sets, Spearman correlations, and oncogene log2 fold change (FC) were drawn using ggplot2 and the R environment (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). Gene network analysis was performed based on 3 MSigDB subsets: Hallmark gene sets, curated gene sets, and gene ontology gene sets. See the Supplementary Materials for further details.
Western Blot
Expression of SPHK1 and SOX9 proteins was assessed by western blot and quantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). See the Supplementary Materials for further details.
Association of Hepatic Gene Expression With Prognostic Cox Score for Overall Death
Prognostic association of hepatic gene expression was determined using the Cox score for time to overall death in HCV-infected patients with advanced liver disease and HCC as previously described.17
Gene Expression and Assessment of HCC Risk in HCV Cohorts
Patients with early-stage HCV cirrhosis (n = 21610; GSE15654) and a subgroup of patients who had achieved a sustained virologic response (SVR) before the biopsy (n = 21) were classified into SPHK1-high and -low expression groups based on the cutoff value of 1 sample standard deviation above the mean. Cumulative probabilities of HCC development were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier procedure and compared by log-rank test.
Data Availability
The Sequence Read Archive accession number for the data reported in this study is SRP170244.
Results
Virus-Induced Modifications of Histone Mark H3K27ac Persist in Human Liver After DAA Cure in HCV-Infected Patients
To investigate whether chronic HCV infection triggers persistent epigenetic modifications after cure, we performed a genome-wide analysis using ChIPmentation-based ChIP-Seq14 profiling the well-characterized histone modification H3K27ac in liver tissues from 18 patients with chronic HCV infection, 21 patients with DAA- or IFN-based curative therapy, and 6 noninfected controls (Figure 1A and Table 1). The H3K27ac modification is associated with active promoters and enhancers and with activation of transcription.18 We observed significant changes in specific H3K27ac modifications in HCV-infected patients compared with noninfected controls (Figures 1B and Supplementary Figure 1). To study whether these were etiology specific, we performed comparative analyses of liver tissues with chronic HCV infection (n = 18), chronic HBV infection (n = 4), and NASH (n = 7). Using principal component analysis (PCA), we found that the distribution of H3K27ac changes in the epigenome of livers of noninfected, HCV-infected, HBV-infected, and NASH samples formed distinct clusters on the PCA plot, suggesting that an important part of the changes are etiology specific (Figure 2A). Next, we performed a correlation analysis of H3K27ac changes among HCV-infected, HBV-infected, and NASH samples. Our data showed a positive correlation of H3K27ac changes (Figure 2B) among patients with NASH (r = 0.83; P < 10−10), or patients with HBV infection (r = 0.79; P < 10−10), or HCV infection, suggesting that some epigenetic modifications are shared among etiologies. To analyze the impact of epigenetic changes in genes related to immune responses, we extracted immune-related genes from MSigDB and performed a restricted correlation study that showed lower correlation coefficients (NASH vs HCV, r = 0.75, P < 10−10; HBV vs HCV, r = 0.62, P < 10−10) compared with analyses composed of all genes (Supplementary Figure 2). These findings suggest that epigenetic modifications in immune genes associated with inflammatory responses are only partly responsible for the similarities between etiologies.
Figure 1.
HCV-induced epigenetic changes persist after HCV clearance in patient-derived liver tissue. (A) Approach: HCV-induced H3K27ac histone modifications were measured genome-wide using a ChIPmentation-based ChIP-Seq protocol optimized for low input material such as patient-derived liver biopsy samples and resections. (B) Unsupervised clustering of normalized read counts in ChIP-Seq peaks of 12,700 genes linked with significant (P < .05) H3K27ac modifications in HCV-infected (n = 18), DAA-cured (n = 8), HBV-infected (n = 4), or NASH (n = 7) vs noninfected control (n = 6) patients.
Figure 2.
HCV-infection induces specific epigenetic changes in the liver of HCV-infected patients. (A) PCA for control, noninfected, HCV-infected, DAA-cured, IFN-cured, HBV-infected, and NASH patient samples. Comparative analysis of epigenetic modifications separated based on fibrosis score along the primary component (dimension 1). (B) H3K27ac modifications among HCV-infected patients correlate (Spearman rank correlation coefficients and P values) with H3K27ac modifications among NASH or HBV-infected patients. Common H3K27ac modifications were analyzed. Prognostic association of hepatic gene expression was determined by using Cox score for time to overall death in a cohort of patients as previously described.17 (C) HCV-induced and persistent epigenetic changes after DAA cure in patient-derived liver tissue are associated with a decreased survival and death. H3K27ac modifications among HCV-infected correlate with persistent H3K27ac modifications among DAA-cured patients. (D) H3K27ac modifications correlate with significantly differentially expressed genes in HCV-infected and DAA-cured patients.
Recent studies have reported a correlation between fibrosis and an increased incidence of HCC.6 However, the molecular mechanism of fibrosis-induced HCC is not well understood. Our comparative analysis showed that H3K27ac modifications, separated based on fibrosis score along the primary component (dimension 1), accounted for 42% of the variation between samples. This suggests that a substantial fraction of the observed H3K27ac alterations is related to liver fibrosis. Interestingly, we did not observe any significant correlation between these epigenetic changes and the activity score (ie, reflecting liver inflammation), suggesting that aberrant H3K27 acetylation is less dependent of necro-inflammatory activity but rather dependent on the fibrosis stage (Figure 1B).
By comparing H3K27ac modifications in liver tissue with chronic HCV infection before DAA treatment and in liver tissue with successful DAA cure, we studied whether epigenetic changes persisted in cured patients. Interestingly, we found a significant and positive correlation of H3K27ac modifications after comparing HCV-infected and DAA-cured samples (r = 0.87; P < 10−10; Figure 2C). A comparative analysis showed a strong positive correlation between epigenetic changes in liver samples of DAA-cured and IFN-cured patients (r = 0.91; P < 10−10; Supplementary Figure 1B), suggesting that HCV-induced epigenetic changes persist after DAA- and IFN-based therapies.
To address the potential clinical relevance, we next analyzed genes that were epigenetically modulated by HCV infection by integrating ChIP-Seq data and by assigning a gene expression–based Cox score for overall death based on the clinical outcome of a cohort of 216 HCV-induced cirrhotic patients who later developed HCC.10 We chose this score because it is has been shown to robustly predict clinical outcome of patients with advanced HCV liver disease.10 Importantly, we found that persistent H3K27ac modifications were linked with genes associated with a high Cox score for overall death in HCV-infected patients and advanced liver disease17 (Figure 2C), confirming the clinical impact of these findings. Next, we compared H3K27ac enrichment and transcriptomic changes in HCV-infected and in DAA-cured patients. We found a positive correlation between H3K27ac and gene expression changes in HCV-infected and DAA-cured patients (r = 0.73; P < 10−10 and r = 0.58; P < 10−10, respectively; Figure 2D), supporting the functional relevance of these epigenetic changes for the deregulation of gene transcription that persists after cure.
Persistent Epigenetic Changes Are Associated With Liver Carcinogenesis After Cure
Epigenetic regulation is an indispensable process for normal development and preservation of tissue-specific gene expression profiles. Thus, any perturbation in the epigenetic landscape can lead to shifted gene function and malignant cellular transformation. We addressed the potential functional role of the observed alterations for virus-induced liver disease and hepatocarcinogenesis by performing a pathway enrichment analysis of genes associated with H3K27ac changes in liver tissues from HCV-infected and cured patients. We found that chronic HCV infection induces significant epigenetic H3K27ac changes on genes that belong to pathways related to tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), inflammatory response, and interleukin 2 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 signaling (Figure 3A). Furthermore, we observed lower levels of H3K27ac within genes related to pathways associated with coagulation and metabolism, such as oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid metabolism, or adipogenesis (Figure 3A). Remarkably, several altered pathways persisted after cure (eg, TNFα signaling, inflammatory response, G2M checkpoint, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase, Akt, and mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR]; Figure 3A). We also observed lower levels of H3K27ac mapping to genes related to oxidative phosphorylation pathways (Figure 3A). Overall, our data provide evidence supporting a functional role for H3K27ac changes in establishing gene expression patterns that persist after cure and contribute to carcinogenesis.
Figure 3.
Pathway analysis of epigenetic and transcriptional reprogramming in HCV-infected patients unravels candidate genes driving carcinogenesis after DAA cure. (A) Hallmark pathways significantly enriched for H3K27ac modifications in infected (n = 18) or/and DAA-cured (n = 8) compared with control (n = 6) patient samples. A large overlap of enriched pathways persists in DAA-cured patients. (B) Venn diagram showing HCC risk gene candidates as the overlap of significantly modified genes in HCV-infected (F1–F4) and DAA-cured (F2–F3 and F4) patients derived from the ChIP-Seq experiment shown in Figure 1B. (C) Oncogenes (red) and TSGs (green) from the 2193 potential HCC risk gene candidates, with their biological functions indicated. (D) Heat map depicting transcriptional changes of the oncogenes and TSGs described in C in HCV-infected and DAA-cured patients. (E) Genes with persistent HCV-induced H3K27ac modifications after DAA cure, linked with the 32-gene prognostic liver signature predicting HCC in HCV-infected patients,9,17 and overlapped with the hallmarks of cancer. Oncogenes shown in D are highlighted in black. This network includes 910 potential HCC risk gene candidates, highlighting a strong enrichment for modifications linked to carcinogenesis. EMT, epithelial–mesenchymal transition; IL2, interleukin 2; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; STAT5, signal transducer and activator of transcription 5.
We proceeded to study the impact of fibrosis on persistence of epigenetic modifications. Our analysis showed that H3K27ac changes observed in HCV-infected patients were partly reversed in cured patients with stage F2–3 fibrosis. This group shared 2259 of the 5318 (42.5%) modified genes in the HCV-infected group (Figure 3B). In contrast, in DAA-cured patients with advanced liver disease (F4), the HCV-induced H3K27ac changes largely persisted. The HCV-infected group shared nearly all modified genes (96.6%, 5140 of 5318 genes) with F4 cured patients (Figure 3B). Collectively, we identified significant changes of H3K27ac levels on 2193 genes persisting in the 2 DAA-cured patient groups (Figure 3B and Supplementary Table 1). Among these candidates, we identified oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) that are associated with, respectively, increased or decreased levels of H3K27ac (Figure 3C). These alterations were even more pronounced in patients with advanced fibrosis (Figure 3C), correlating with an enhanced risk for developing HCC in F4 vs F2–F3.2,3 Importantly, we found a clear correlation between transcriptomic and epigenomic changes of the identified oncogenes and TSGs, supporting the biological relevance of the findings (Figure 3D). Among these oncogenes was SPHK1, a lipid kinase mediating the phosphorylation of sphingosine to form SP1, which is a major regulator of cell apoptosis inhibition and proliferation promotion. SPHK1 and SP1 play key roles in the TNFα and nuclear factor κB signaling pathways.19 SPHK1 expression is increased and associated with tumor size and progression in patients with HCC.20 Among the TSGs with significantly decreased H3K27ac level in HCV-infected patient livers were PTPRD, TSC2, and the major regulator of DNA repair, BRCA1. PTPRD has been identified as a candidate tumor suppressor in the liver impaired by HCV infection.21 TSC2 has been reported to be a negative regulator of the mTOR signaling pathway. Its down-regulation is associated with metabolic defects, liver disease progression, and carcinogenesis.7 Collectively, the overexpressed oncogenes and down-regulated TSGs that are enriched or decreased for the H3K27ac mark in chronic HCV infection, respectively, are involved in processes that favor carcinogenesis.
To further confirm that the persistent H3K27ac changes are linked to HCC risk, we referred to the genes of the recently reported 186-gene prognostic liver signature (PLS) and a 32-gene subset thereof for predicting liver disease progression, HCC development, and death for all HCC etiologies.9,17,22 We analyzed functional links, that is, commonly shared pathways in MsigDB, among the 32-gene set, the 2193 genes with persistent epigenetic and transcriptional modifications, and the hallmarks of cancer.23 We found that 1411 of the identified genes are closely connected to the PLS through shared pathways. Then, we assigned categories related to the hallmarks of cancer to the deregulated genes to understand the pathophysiologic impact of chronic HCV infection. Our analyses showed that approximately 900 genes of the genes with epigenetic modifications are directly linked with carcinogenesis. A network of these genes associated with at least 1 hallmark of cancer is shown in Figure 3E.
Next, we investigated whether H3K27ac alterations persist in cancer tissues after cure. We performed pairwise comparison of HCC and adjacent nontumorous tissue from the individual DAA-treated patient. We found a genome-wide H3K27ac enrichment in adjacent nontumorous and in tumorous tissues compared with noninfected samples (Figure 4). Deeper analysis showed that 52% of H3K27ac enriched genes are specific to tumorous tissues, 31% are specific to adjacent nontumorous tissues, and 17% are common to the paired tissue. These data suggest that epigenetic alterations persist from advanced fibrosis to HCC and therefore could play a pathogenic role in hepatocarcinogenesis before and after cure. Furthermore, the presence of epigenetic modifications in adjacent tumor tissue suggests that the epigenetic modifications might precede hepatocarcinogenesis.
Figure 4.
HCV-induced epigenetic changes persisting after DAA-based cure are present in the tumor tissue of patients with DAA-cured HCC. H3K27ac modifications from patient-derived resections of tumor and nontumor adjacent paired tissue samples. Similar to the analysis shown in Figure 1B, we performed an unsupervised clustering of normalized read counts in ChIP-Seq peaks of 7609 genes linked with significant (q < 0.05) H3K27ac modifications in DAA-cured adjacent (n = 8) or paired-tumor (n = 8) tissues vs noninfected control patients (n = 6). The proportions (percentages) of common (yellow) or distinct genes associated with changes in H3K27ac levels in tumor (blue) or nontumor paired-adjacent tissues (orange) are represented as a pie chart. N, nontumor; T, tumor.
Identification of HCV-Specific Epigenetic and Transcriptional Modifications That Are Independent of Inflammation and Fibrosis Using a Human Liver Chimeric Mouse Model
In the HCV-infected patient livers, epigenetic and transcriptional changes are most likely due to direct HCV-hepatocyte interactions and indirect mechanisms caused by chronic inflammation and fibrosis. Furthermore, our analysis is based on bulk tissue in which hepatocyte-related changes are difficult to distinguish from those in non-parenchymal cells. To clarify which fraction of the observed changes is dependent on HCV–hepatocyte interactions, we applied an HCV-permissive human liver chimeric mouse model.13 In this model HCV efficiently infects the engrafted human hepatocytes without detectable liver fibrosis and inflammation. Moreover, human-specific sequencing reads in the ChIP-Seq pipeline are hepatocyte related because in liver bulk tissue only engrafted hepatocytes are of human origin. HCV-infected animals were cured using a combination of DAAs. Measurements of human albumin and HCV viral load in animals confirmed the viability of the engrafted hepatocytes and viral cure, respectively (Figure 5A). Similar to the findings in patients, we observed significant changes in H3K27ac levels in HCV-infected mice persisting after DAA cure (Figure 5B). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes network analysis showed that pathways of genes showing epigenetic alterations included TNF signaling by nuclear factor κB, IFNα/γ responses, complement, apoptosis, and mTOR signaling (Figure 5C). We found a persistence of TNF signaling through the nuclear factor kB pathway, whereas the other HCV-induced pathways (ie, apoptosis, mTORC1 signaling, and IFNα/γ response) were restored to basal level after DAA-mediated cure (Figure 5C).
Figure 5.
Analysis of H3K27ac changes in livers of HCV-infected humanized mice identifies virus-specific modifications in human hepatocytes. (A) Our experimental setup: uPA-SCID mice were infected with HCV for 8 weeks and cured with a combination of DAAs MK7009 (50 or 100 mg/kg/d) and BMS-788329 (20 mg/kg/d) for 16 weeks. Livers were analyzed at week 24 by ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq. Human albumin level (left) and HCV viral load (right) were measured to monitor functional engrafted human hepatocytes and HCV clearance after DAA treatment, respectively. (B) Unsupervised clustering of normalized read counts in ChIP-Seq peaks of 2483 genes linked with significant (q < 0.05) H3K27ac modifications in HCV-infected (n = 5) or DAA-cured (n = 5) vs noninfected control (n = 5) mice. (C) Hallmark pathways significantly enriched for H3K27ac modifications in infected (n = 5) or/and DAA-cured (n = 5) compared with noninfected (n = 5) mice samples. A significant overlap of enriched pathways persists in DAA-cured mice. (D) Venn diagram showing the HCV-induced and persistent genes with H3K27ac changes as the overlap of significantly modified genes in HCV-infected and DAA-cured mice derived from the ChIP-Seq experiment shown in B. (E) Oncogenes (red) and TSGs (green) with persistent HCV-induced H3K27ac modifications identified in the 306 HCV-induced and persistent genes with H3K27ac changes, with their biological functions indicated. (F) Heat map depicting transcriptional changes of the oncogenes and TSGs described in E in HCV-infected humanized and DAA-cured mice. EMT, epithelial–mesenchymal transition; NFκB, nuclear factor κB.
By intersecting genes associated with significant H3K27ac modifications from infected and cured mice, we identified 306 genes with persistent H3K27ac modifications after cure (Figure 5D and Supplementary Table 2). We found SPHK1 and KLF4 oncogenes and SMO TSGs, previously identified in patient samples (Figure 3C), to be associated with increased or decreased level of H3K27ac, respectively, in DAA-cured mice (Figure 5E), supporting the biological relevance of the findings in humanized mice. Similar to the results obtained in patients, we found a strong correlation between transcriptomic and epigenomic changes (Figure 5F).
Next, we identified HCV-specific epigenetic modifications in hepatocytes that are associated with HCC development by integrative analysis of epigenomic and transcriptomic data from patient and mouse liver samples. A comparative analysis of genes with persistent H3K27ac modifications in patients and mice showed a set of 65 commonly modified genes (P = 2.94 × 10−9; Figure 6A). Further analysis identified that some of these 65 genes have their transcripts significantly correlated to epigenetic changes after DAA cure in patients and humanized mice. We ranked their transcript expression based on the FC relative to the noninfected samples. This approach identified 38 genes that were enriched for H3K27ac and that are associated with a significant positive FC of their transcripts after HCV infection and DAA cure compared with noninfected samples (Figure 6B). We further studied the biological function of these 38 genes by performing gene set analysis and found that they are associated to KRas, TNFα, and interleukin 2 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 signaling or to p53, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, apoptosis, glycolysis, and inflammation pathways (Supplementary Figure 3). Because they were identified by integrative analysis of data from patients and immunodeficient humanized mice, we hypothesize that inflammation-related genes derive from the innate response of infected hepatocytes.
Figure 6.
Intersection of ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq analyses from livers of patients and humanized mice uncovers HCV-induced persistent epigenetic changes associated with HCC risk after SVR. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlap of H3K27ac modifications between the human HCC risk gene candidates and significantly modified genes in HCV-infected and DAA-cured mice derived from the ChIP-Seq experiments shown in Figures 1B and 5B, respectively. (B) Expression data of genes with significant H3K27ac changes from livers of HCV-infected and DAA-cured patients (n = 32) and mice (n = 15) were intersected to uncover common genes with HCV-induced and persistent epigenetic and transcriptional changes after DAA. (C) Presence of epigenetic modifications on the 38 identified genes in pairwise liver tissues from DAA-cured patients. H3K27ac modifications (vs control liver samples) were assessed on the corresponding genes in nontumorous adjacent and HCC liver tissues from DAA-cured patients. Dark blue squares represent increased H3K27ac changes and light blue squares represent unchanged status. (D) Analysis of protein level of SPHK1 and SOX9 protein in control, HCV-infected, and DAA-cured mice by western blot. (E) Analysis of SPHK1 and SOX9 protein levels in control (n = 7), HCV-infected (non-HCC and HCC; n = 8) and DAA-cured (non-HCC and HCC; n = 8) patients by western blot. One representative gel of 4 is shown. Graphs show quantification of western blot intensities in arbitrary units normalized to total protein level (Ponceau staining). Results show mean ± standard error of the mean of integrated blot densities. (F) Probability of HCC development according to the gene expression level of SPHK1 among 216 patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis or 21 patients with HCC occurrence after HCV cure.
To obtain further evidence that these alterations play a role in hepatocarcinogenesis after cure, we compared their H3K27ac levels in paired liver tissues of nontumorous adjacent and HCC. We found that most of them already harbored changes in the nontumorous sample that remained in HCC tissue (Figure 6C). For instance, changes were observed for SPHK1 in nontumorous tissue in 7 of 8 patients and persisted in HCC tissue in 4 patients. H3K27ac modifications in SOX9, a gene that is associated to ductular reaction, was found in nontumorous tissue in all DAA-cured patients and remained in HCC tissue in 7 of 8 patients.
HCV and Hepatocyte-Specific Epigenetic Modifications Translate Into Liver Protein Expression Changes and Are Associated With HCC Development in HCV Cirrhosis and SVR Cohorts
To further validate the biological relevance of HCV-induced epigenetic and transcriptional changes, we studied whether the expression of the identified genes correlates with corresponding protein abundance. We quantified the protein expression of SPHK1 and SOX9 genes by immunoblotting in patient and mouse liver samples (Figure 6D and E and Supplementary Figures 4-6). We found increased SPHK1 and SOX9 protein levels at HCV infection that remained increased after DAA cure. Importantly, by comparing pairwise liver tissue from adjacent nontumorous areas and HCC, we found that the expression of SPHK1 and SOX9 were already increased in adjacent nontumorous tissue (Figure 6D and E), suggesting that the up-regulation of these proteins preceded tumor development.
To assess the potential of the expression of these genes as biomarkers to predict HCC risk, we assessed the association of SPHK1 expression with the long-term probability to develop HCC over a decade in a cohort of patients with HCV cirrhosis (n = 216), among which a subset of patients achieved SVR (n = 21). We found that high expression of SPHK1 is significantly associated with HCC risk in the 2 cohorts (P < .034 for HCV cirrhosis and P < .006 for SVR; Figure 6F), identifying a potential predictor of HCC risk post SVR.
Discussion
Our study exposes a previously undiscovered paradigm showing that chronic HCV infection induces H3K27ac modifications that are associated with HCC risk and that persist after HCV cure. Thus far, only limited data have shown that HCV infection can induce epigenetic changes.24 Previous attempts to connect specific histone marks to HCC development were inconclusive because of semi-quantitative approaches.25,26 For the first time, our study provides an integrative genome-wide approach that combines analyses in patient liver tissue and a humanized animal model.
Long-term epigenetic alterations also were observed after Epstein-Barr virus infection27 or after transient hyperglycemia.28 Indeed, latent Epstein-Barr infection triggered persistent epigenetic reprogramming, possibly resulting in the establishment of immortal growth and cancer, whereas transient hyperglycemia resulted in persistent enrichment of H3K4me1 on the p65 gene promoter and subsequently in oxidative stress and increased cancer risk. Importantly, these data suggest that persistent epigenetic changes also can occur through environmental changes, independently from direct viral infection.
Epigenetic changes in patient liver tissue can result from infected hepatocytes and from virus-induced inflammatory or fibrotic responses in the liver microenvironment. Interestingly, PCA showed a clear correlation of epigenetic changes with fibrosis stage (Figure 2A), suggesting that HCV-induced histone modifications and fibrogenesis are interdependent from the progression of liver disease. Indeed, epigenetic changes are considered as orchestrating fibrogenesis,29 including the activation of hepatic stellate cells. In contrast, the induction of fibrosis triggers a liver response to injury, implicating the epigenetic machinery to mediate the activation of dedicated genes,30 and thereby enhancing HCV-established epigenetic changes. Because distinct epigenetic changes were found in patient liver tissue and humanized mouse liver tissue (Figures 3 and 5), where no necro-inflammatory response or fibrosis is present, it is likely that a fraction of the observed changes is caused by direct HCV–hepatocyte interactions. Collectively, our results suggest that direct virus–hepatocyte interactions and indirect mechanisms, such as disease-induced fibrosis mediated by the liver non-parenchymal cells, contribute to the observed epigenetic changes in the livers of HCV-infected patients. Importantly, our data provide a previously undiscovered mechanism for persistent HCC risk after DAA cure in advanced fibrosis and could explain why a small number of patients develop HCC even in the absence of fibrosis.2 However, we point out that this mechanism is not exclusive, and many other factors most likely contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis after cure.
Although we did not perform extensive functional studies, our data provide evidence that HCV-induced H3K27ac modifications on specific genes are causal factors for HCC risk after DAA cure. Our hypothesis is strongly supported by (1) altered expression of genes known to promote and drive carcinogenesis, (2) the correlation of epigenetic changes with a clinical Cox score for overall death and a HCC risk score,17 (3) the positive correlation between the magnitude of epigenetic changes and fibrosis stage, which is the strongest clinical risk factor for HCC,6 and (4) the presence of H3K27ac modifications in HCC tumors of the same patients. Collectively, these findings suggest that epigenetic modifications precede hepatocarcinogenesis. Among the identified genes, functional knockout of SOX9 has been reported to decrease liver cancer cell growth,31 and SPHK1 deletion decreased diethyl-nitrosamine–induced liver cancer in mice,32 whereas ETS translocation variant 4 (ETV4) is up-regulated and is associated to HCC progression.33 Importantly, extended analysis in additional cohorts showed that those genes that were epigenetically changed by HCV infection and that persisted after DAA cure predicted HCC risk in cohorts of patients with HCV cirrhosis and SVR (Figure 6C). Although we do not have experimental evidence that HCV-mediated modulation of SPHK1 or SOX9 gene expression is sufficient to promote cancer, our data combined with published knowledge on the role of these proteins in cancer biology31,32 nevertheless suggest that SPHK1 and SOX9, among additional tumor-associated proteins, participate in HCV-induced HCC. This strongly supports the hypothesis that H3K27ac alterations of the identified genes precede HCC onset.
Other well-known causes for HCC development are chronic HBV infection and NASH.2 Interestingly, we found that H3K27ac modifications also are present in these etiologies (Figures 1B and 2B). In-depth analyses including PCA (Figures 2A and Supplementary Figure 2) showed etiology-independent and etiology-specific epigenetic profiles in liver disease.
Because of the difficulty of obtaining liver tissue after HCV cure, which was available only for patients with concomitant HCC, the number of patient tissues is limited. Because it impossible to obtain healthy liver tissue for ethical reasons, the control samples from patients with nonviral minimal liver disease or adjacent tissue from patients undergoing surgery for metastasis for colorectal cancer exhibited heterogeneity. Furthermore, the H3K27ac mark constitutes only a part of the epigenetic gene regulation program. Nevertheless, the robust results obtained by clustering and statistical analyses combined with consistent results from patients of different cohorts and clinical centers and confirmation of the key concept in humanized mouse engrafted with hepatocytes from the same donor and infected with the same viral inoculum allowed arresting conclusions.
HCC is often asymptomatic and thus remains undiagnosed until the late stage. Therefore, there is an urgent medical need for biomarkers to predict HCC risk. A large body of literature has shown the association between the human epigenome and cancer development.34 In this study, showing that HCV induces persistent epigenetic alterations after DAA cure provides a unique opportunity to uncover novel biomarkers for HCC risk, that is, from plasma through the detection of epigenetic changes of histones bound to circulating DNA complexes. Furthermore, by uncovering virus-induced epigenetic changes as therapeutic targets, our findings offer novel perspectives for HCC prevention—a key unmet medical need.
Supplementary Material
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW.
BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT
Despite effective antiviral therapies, the risk for HCC is not eliminated following a sustained virologic response to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents, and risk is higher in patients with advanced fibrosis.
NEW FINDINGS
In an analysis of liver tissues from patients with and without a sustained virologic response to DAA therapy, and from HCV-infected mice with humanized livers, the authors identified epigenetic and gene expression alterations associated with risk for HCC.
LIMITATIONS
This was a retrospective analysis of liver tissues from patients and mice.
IMPACT
The epigenetic alterations identified in this study might be targeted to prevent liver cancer in patients treated for HCV infection.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the Centre de Ressources Biologiques (Biological Resource Centre; Strasbourg, France) for the management of patient-derived liver tissues. We acknowledge the work of the IGBMC high-throughput sequencing facility and the Quantitative Genomics Facility at the Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering at the scientific central facilities of ETH Zurich. The IGBMC high-throughput sequencing facility is a member of the France Génomique consortium (ANR10-INBS-09-08). The laboratory of Irwin Davidson is an équipe labellisée of the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer.
Funding
This work was supported by the ARC (Paris) and the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (Strasbourg; TheraHCC IHUARC IHU201301187 to Thomas F. Baumert), the Foundation of the University of Strasbourg and Roche Institute (HEPKIN to Thomas F. Baumert and Yujin Hoshida), the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hépatites Virales (2017/1633 to Thomas F. Baumert), the U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-16-1-0363 to Yujin Hoshida and Thomas F. Baumert), the Cancéropôle du Grand-Est (AAP Emergence 2017 to Joachim Lupberger), the National Institutes of Health (DK099558 to Yujin Hoshida), and the Research Program on Hepatitis from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED (17fk0210104h0001 to Kazuaki Chayama). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement 667273 (HEPCAR to Thomas F. Baumert and Joachim Lupberger). This project has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under grant 671231 (HEPCIR to Thomas F. Baumert and Yujin Hoshida). This work has been published under the framework of the LABEX ANR-10-LABX-0028_HEPSYS, and PLAN CANCER 2014–2019 and benefits from a funding from the state managed by the French National Research Agency as part of the Investments for the Future Program, the French National Cancer Institute, and INSERM.
Abbreviations used in this paper:
- DAA
direct-acting antiviral
- FC
fold change
- GSEA
gene set enrichment analysis
- HCC
hepatocellular carcinoma
- HBV
hepatitis B virus
- HCV
hepatitis C virus
- IFN
interferon
- mTOR
mammalian target of rapamycin
- NASH
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
- PCA
principal component analysis
- PLS
prognostic liver signature
- SVR
sustained virologic response
- TNFα
tumor necrosis factor α
- TSG
tumor suppressor gene
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary Material
Note: To access the supplementary material accompanying this article, visit the online version of Gastroenterology at www.gastrojournal.org, and at https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.038.
References
- 1.Ryerson AB, Eheman CR, Altekruse SF, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2012, featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer. Cancer 2016;122:1312–1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fujiwara N, Friedman SL, Goossens N, Hoshida Y. Risk factors and prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of precision medicine. J Hepatol 2018;68:526–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boldanova T, Suslov A, Heim MH, Necsulea A. Transcriptional response to hepatitis C virus infection and interferon-alpha treatment in the human liver. EMBO Mol Med 2017;9:816–834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.El-Serag HB, Kanwal F, Richardson P, Kramer J. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after sustained virological response in veterans with hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 2016;64:130–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kanwal F, Kramer J, Asch SM, et al. Risk of hepatocellular cancer in HCV patients treated with direct-acting antiviral agents. Gastroenterology 2017;153:996–1005 e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.van der Meer AJ, Feld JJ, Hofer H, et al. Risk of cirrhosis-related complications in patients with advanced fibrosis following hepatitis C virus eradication. J Hepatol 2017;66:485–493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sajankila SP, Manthena PV, Adhikari S, et al. Suppression of tumor suppressor Tsc2 and DNA repair glycosylase Nth1 during spontaneous liver tumorigenesis in Long-Evans Cinnamon rats. Mol Cell Biochem 2010;338:233–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 2008;9:R137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nakagawa S, Wei L, Song WM, et al. Molecular liver cancer prevention in cirrhosis by organ transcriptome analysis and lysophosphatidic acid pathway inhibition. Cancer Cell 2016;30:879–890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, Sangiovanni A, et al. Prognostic gene expression signature for patients with hepatitis C–related early-stage cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2013;144:1024–1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jones PA, Issa J-PJ, Baylin S. Targeting the cancer epigenome for therapy. Nat Rev Genet 2016;17:630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cai MY, Hou JH, Rao HL, et al. High expression of H3K27me3 in human hepatocellular carcinomas correlates closely with vascular invasion and predicts worse prognosis in patients. Mol Med 2011;17:12–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Uchida T, Hiraga N, Imamura M, et al. Elimination of HCV via a non–ISG-mediated mechanism by vaniprevir and BMS-788329 combination therapy in human hepatocyte chimeric mice. Virus Res 2016;213:62–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schmidl C, Rendeiro AF, Sheffield NC, Bock C. ChIPmentation: fast, robust, low-input ChIP-seq for histones and transcription factors. Nat Methods 2015; 12:963–965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harrow J, Denoeud F, Frankish A, et al. GENCODE: producing a reference annotation for ENCODE. Genome Biol 2006;7(Suppl 1):S41–S49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:15545–15550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, Kobayashi M, et al. Gene expression in fixed tissues and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1995–2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Calo E, Wysocka J. Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol Cell 2013;49:825–837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rohrbach T, Maceyka M, Spiegel S. Sphingosine kinase and sphingosine-1-phosphate in liver pathobiology. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2017;52:543–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cai H, Xie X, Ji L, et al. Sphingosine kinase 1: A novel independent prognosis biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett 2017;13:2316–2322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Van Renne N, Roca Suarez AA, Duong FHT, et al. miR-135a-5p–mediated downregulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor delta is a candidate driver of HCV-associated hepatocarcinogenesis. Gut 2018;67:953–962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.King LY, Canasto-Chibuque C, Johnson KB, et al. A genomic and clinical prognostic index for hepatitis C-related early-stage cirrhosis that predicts clinical deterioration. Gut 2015;64:1296–1302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Okamoto Y, Shinjo K, Shimizu Y, et al. Hepatitis virus infection affects DNA methylation in mice with humanized livers. Gastroenterology 2014;146:562–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hayashi A, Yamauchi N, Shibahara J, et al. Concurrent activation of acetylation and tri-methylation of H3K27 in a subset of hepatocellular carcinoma with aggressive behavior. PLoS One 2014;9:e91330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ruthenburg AJ, Allis CD, Wysocka J. Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3: intricacy of writing and reading a single epigenetic mark. Mol Cell 2007;25:15–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Scott RS. Epstein-Barr virus: a master epigenetic manipulator. Curr Opin Virol 2017;26:74–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.El-Osta A, Brasacchio D, Yao D, et al. Transient high glucose causes persistent epigenetic changes and altered gene expression during subsequent normoglycemia. J Exp Med 2008;205:2409–2417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moran-Salvador E, Mann J. Epigenetics and liver fibrosis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;4:125–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bae WK, Kang K, Yu JH, et al. The methyltransferases enhancer of zeste homolog (EZH) 1 and EZH2 control hepatocyte homeostasis and regeneration. FASEB J 2015;29:1653–1662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Richtig G, Aigelsreiter A, Schwarzenbacher D, et al. SOX9 is a proliferation and stem cell factor in hepatocellular carcinoma and possess widespread prognostic significance in different cancer types. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0187814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen J, Qi Y, Zhao Y, et al. Deletion of sphingosine kinase 1 inhibits liver tumorigenesis in diethylnitrosamine-treated mice. Oncotarget 2018;9:15635–15649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim E, Kim D, Lee J-S, et al. Capicua suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression by controlling the ETV4–MMP1 axis. Hepatology 2018;67:2287–2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wilson CL, Mann DA, Borthwick LA. Epigenetic reprogramming in liver fibrosis and cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017;121:124–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The Sequence Read Archive accession number for the data reported in this study is SRP170244.