Abstract
Zinc finger CCCH-type containing 15 (ZC3H15), a highly conserved protein involved in several cellular processes, which was responsible for tumorigenesis and may be a promising marker in myeloid leukemia (AML) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little is known about the biological significance and molecular mechanisms of ZC3H15 in GBM. In this study, we revealed that ZC3H15 was overexpressed in GBM and high ZC3H15 expression was associated with poor survival of patients with GBM. We found that ZC3H15 promoted the proliferation, migration, invasion, and tumorigenesis of GBM cells by activating the EGFR signaling pathway. We also revealed that ZC3H15 reduced EGFR ubiquitination, which was responsible for EGFR protein stabilization. In addition, we demonstrated that ZC3H15 inhibited the transcription of CBL, which was an E3 ubiquitin ligase for EGFR proteasomal degradation. And silencing of CBL could partly abrogate the inhibitory effects on cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of GBM cells induced by ZC3H15 knockdown. Thus, our research revealed the important roles of ZC3H15 in GBM development and provided a brand-new insight for improving the treatment of GBMs.
Subject terms: CNS cancer, Prognostic markers, Oncogenes
Introduction
Glioblastoma which is known as GBM, classified as the WHO IV, possesses the most aggressive ability. The prognosis and survival rate are poor and the median survival time of GBM patients is 14.6 months [1, 2]. Due to its high infiltrative nature, traditional maximum safety resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy cannot completely remove the intracranial tumor tissue, and eventually lead to recurrence [3]. Two to three people in 100,000 in Europe and North America developed GBM, and of those affected, 90% died within three years [4]. Hence, it is great urgent to find out new treatments for effective GBM therapy.
Zinc finger CCCH-type containing 15 (ZC3H15) also known as DFRP1, a highly conserved gene located at 2q32.1 [5, 6]. ZC3H15 was demonstrated to ortholog with immediate early response erythropoietin 4 (LEREPO4) in mice and induced by erythropoietin [7]. Both ZC3H15 (DFRP1) and DFRP2 possess the DRG family regulatory protein domain, which is pivotal in the interaction of DRG1 and DRG2 [7]. This indicates that ZC3H15 may involve in signaling transduction. Gianni et al. demonstrated that ZC3H15 regulated the NF-κB signaling pathway by interacting with TRAF-2 [8]. Moreover, ZC3H15 also contains the tandem repeat CCCH zinc finger (TZF) domain, which indicates that it may possess the ability to transcriptional regulation and RNA metabolism [9, 10]. At present, there are few studies on ZC3H15, however, the functions of ZC3H15 protein were relatively rich, which have yet to discover and explore.
Casitas B-lineage (CBL) is commonly expressed in cells and belongs to the RING family, contains the Ring finger domain and tyrosine kinase-binding domain in N-terminal. It has been shown that CBL possesses both signaling transduction activity and E3 ubiquitin ligase activity [10, 11]. Indeed, recent studies reported that CBL enhanced the activity of immune cells by reducing PD-L1 expression via the CBL-STAT-AKT-ERK signaling pathway [12]. And CBL played as an E3 ubiquitin ligase to inhibit receptor tyrosine kinase RTKs signaling pathway to further suppress tumor proliferation [13]. Interestingly, CBL protein acts as a tumor suppressor in most cancers, such as non-small cell lung cancer, GBM, and gastric cancer. However, CBL promotes tumorigenesis in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [12, 14, 15]. Due to the multi-function of CBL, it is worth further studying the detailed mechanisms.
The metastasis and proliferation of numerous cancers are driven by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is a member of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK). Amplification of the EGFR gene and frequent mutations in the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain have recently been demonstrated in cancer patients [16]. Due to the central role of EGFR in cellular progress, the EGFR signaling pathway has become one of the most well-studied signaling pathways in human tumors [17]. As a cross-membrane protein, EGFR is involved in cell to cell communication, cell fate determination, migration, proliferation, and invasion [18–20]. It can also be the substrate for enzymes or the upstream of the signaling pathways. For instance, EGFR promotes tumorigenesis through the EGFR-PI3K/AKT-mTOR-HIF1α signaling pathway. While HIF1α/HIF2α also interacts with EGFR to form a positive feedback [21]. Moreover, in our previous study, the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP, degraded EGFR protein which could be aborted by an onco-protein CSN6 [22]. EGFR activation also combines with RTKs heterodimerization or homodimerization and further leads to the activation of various signaling pathways including the Ras-ERK and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways [23–25]. Small molecular inhibitor erlotinib has been discovered recently, it suppresses tumor growth by inhibiting the activation of EGFR. However, inhibiting EGFR in tumors in vivo by erlotinib may not efficient [26–28]. This indicated that drug therapy alone cannot cure tumors completely, and combination therapy will become the trend.
In this study, we found that ZC3H15 was overexpressed in GBM and high ZC3H15 expression was associated with poor survival of GBM patients. ZC3H15 promoted the proliferation, migration, invasion, and tumorigenesis of GBM cells by reducing EGFR ubiquitination degradation. In addition, we found that ZC3H15 elevated the protein stability of EGFR by inhibiting CBL transcription. Thus, our research revealed the important roles of ZC3H15 in GBM development and provided a brand-new insight for improving the prognosis for GBM patients.
Materials and methods
Cell lines, reagents, and antibodies
Human GBM cell lines (LN-229, U-251 MG, A172, U-118 MG, and U-87 MG) and normal astroglia cells (SVGP12) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA), and all tests were negative for mycoplasma. Cells were cultured by DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin solution in 37 °C and 5% CO2 incubator. The DMEM media, FBS, and antibiotics were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (MA, USA).
Reagents used in this passage including Cycloheximide (CHX) (Merck, America, CAS:66-81-9), proteasome inhibitor (MG-132) (MCE, China, CAS: 133407-82-6), and Erlotinib (MCE, China, CAS: 183319-69-9).
Antibodies used in this passage including anti-ZC3H15 (Novus Biologicals, USA, CAS: NBP1-81312), anti-EGFR (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, CAS: 4267), anti-p-EGFR (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, CAS: 3777), anti-AKT (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, CAS: 4685), anti-p-AKT (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, CAS: 4060), anti-CBL (Proteintech, China, CAS: 25818-1-AP), anti-PARK2 (Proteintech, China, CAS: 14060-1-AP), anti-STUB1 (Proteintech, China, CAS: 55430-1-AP), anti-Tubulin (Proteintech, China, CAS: 11224-1-AP), anti-Flag (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, CAS: 14793), anti-HA (Proteintech, China, CAS: 51064-2-AP), Anti-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, CAS: 3700), anti-Paxillin (Proteintech, China, CAS: 10029-1-Ig), anti-β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, CAS: 8480), anti-ZEB1 (Proteintech, China, CAS: 21544-1-AP), anti-Slug (Proteintech, China, CAS: 12129-1-AP), anti-N-cadherin (Proteintech, China, CAS: 22018-1-AP), anti-E-cadherin (Proteintech, China, CAS: 20874-1-AP), and anti-BrdU (Abcam, USA, CAS: ab6326).
Database analysis and patient tumor samples
The gene expression data of ZC3H15 was downloaded and analyzed from the CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/), GlioVis database (http://gliovis.bioinfo.cnio.es/), and TCGA database (https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccg/research/structural-genomics/tcga). Cutoff separating was based on the expression level of ZC3H15, Kaplan–Meier analysis was plotted by CGGA, GlioVis, and R2 database (http://hgserver1.amc.nl/cgi-bin/r2/main.cgi).
Tumor samples were obtained from Chaoying Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Henan, China). Tissue analysis was approved by the Ethics Committee of Southwest University of China. All the patients provided written informed consent to participate.
Transfection and Infection
shZC3H15, shCBL and control sequences were recombined into pLKO.1-puro plasmid, and the sequences were listed as below:
Scramble: AGCACACTAGAACCATGTGAA
shZC3H15-1: GCAAGAGATGAAGAACTTGAA
shZC3H15-2: CAGATCCCAAGTCTGTAGTAT
shZC3H15-3: CCTAGAATCAACAGGATGTTT
shCBL-1: GACAAGAAGATGGTGGAGAAG
shCBL-2: CCCTCACAATAAACCTCTCTT
shCBL-3: CCAGTGAGTTGGGAGTTATTA
Flag-tagged full length of ZC3H15 and EGFR recombined into the pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-Puro plasmid (Youbio, Hunan, China).
For transfection, lipofectamine2000 (Thermo, USA, CAS:11668019) and specific plasmids were added into the 6-well plate. The medium was changed after 6–8 h. Cells were retrieved after 48 h.
For infection, lentivirus was produced by HEK-293 FT cells. After two times of infection, the medium was refreshed and puromycin was added to screen the cells that are infected.
Western Blot Analysis and Immunoprecipitation
For the western blot assay, cells were retrieved and lysed on ice by RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, China). The supernatant was collected after centrifuge 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. The protein was boiled with loading buffer at 96 °C, followed by SDS-PAGE and transmembrane (Bio-Rad, USA). Secondary antibody was incubated after finishing the incubation of primary antibody. The membrane was exposed in the gel imaging system (Qinxiang, China)
For the immunoprecipitation assay, cells were retrieved and lysed on ice by IP lysis buffer (Beyotime, China), The supernatant was collected after centrifuge 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min, and specific antibodies were added. After 12 h combination, Protein A + G Agarose (Beyotime, China) was added and rotary table for 4 h. Agarose was washed 5 times with PBS followed by loading buffer boiling. Then Western Blot assay was performed.
BrdU and Immunohistochemistry staining (IHC)
For the BrdU assay, 2 × 104 cells were seeded into the 24-well plate. BrdU was added into the well after the cell adheres to the wall and cultured for 4 h, followed by 4% PFA immobilization, 0.2% Triton X-100 punching, 2 M HCl solution uncoiling. BrdU primary antibody incubated at 4 °C overnight followed by Alexa Fluor® 594 secondary antibody incubation. DAPI was stained before microscope examination.
For the IHC staining, the tissue slides were incubated with specific primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C after deparaffinization, rehydration, hydrogen peroxide treatment, citrate buffer for antigen retrieval, and goat serum blocking. Then slides were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibody. Diaminobenzidine treatment for visualizing followed by hematoxylin counterstain.
Ubiquitination assay
Flag-tagged ZC3H15 and HA-tagged Ub plasmids were co-transfected into 293 FT cells, the remaining steps are the same with transfection assay and co-immunoprecipitation assay except the MG-132 was added 8 h before cells were retrieved.
Protein turnover assay
Specific plasmids were transfected into the cells followed by CHX addition at a concentration of 100 μg/ml, cells were harvested in a time gradient and followed by Western Blot analysis.
ChIP assay and qRT-PCR
Cells were transfected with CBL promoter truncated plasmid and Flag-tagged ZC3H15 plasmid and lysed on the ice with SDS lysis buffer after two days. After centrifugation, the supernatant was obtained and the anti-Flag antibody was added. The remaining steps were followed by protocols in ChIP Assay Kit (Beyotime, China). SYBR qPCR SuperMix Plus was used for qRT-PCR (Novoprotein, China). The primer pairs are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Primer pairs for real-time PCR | |
ZC3H15-F | AACAAAATCCACGTCAGGTAGC |
ZC3H15-R | TGCACATACTACAGACTTGGGA |
EGFR-F | AGGCACGAGTAACAAGCTCAC |
EGFR-R | ATGAGGACATAACCAGCCACC |
CBL-F | TAGGCGAAACCTAACCAAACTG |
CBL-R | AGAGTCCACTTGGAAAGATTCCT |
PARK2-F | GTGTTTGTCAGGTTCAACTCCA |
PARK2-R | GAAAATCACACGCAACTGGTC |
STUB1-F | AGCAGGGCAATCGTCTGTTC |
STUB1-R | CAAGGCCCGGTTGGTGTAATA |
Primer pairs for ChIP assays | |
CBL-2589/-2440-F | CTGTACTCCAGCCTGGGTGAC |
CBL-2589/-2440-R | GGCTGAGCGACAAGAGTGAGA |
CBL-2279/-2005-F | GGCCAAGGATGGTCTCGAT |
CBL-2279/-2005-R | CCTTATTCCATCTGCCTGAAGTAT |
CBL-1821/-1559-F | GGTGGCGGGCACTTGTAA |
CBL-1821/-1559-R | CCCATTGCCTCGGGAATAA |
CBL-1640/-1519-F | GTACCAGGGAGTAGTATAAAACTACAAGG |
CBL-1640/-1519-R | GTATAGTTCAGACAGCATCGCAAAA |
CBL-1150/-949-F | GAAGGCGGAACTGATACTGACA |
CBL-1150/-949-R | GCCCAGGGAACAGAAATGC |
CBL-739/-565-F | GTCAAAGGGCCTGGAAGAAGA |
CBL-739/-565-R | GGGAGGATGGTGGGAGAAAA |
CBL-667/-378-F | GGGCCGCAGCATTCATATT |
CBL-667/-378-R | CGCAGTAGCCAGAAACCAAGA |
CBL 79/318-F | TCCTTCACGCCCTGCTTCT |
CBL 79/318-R | GCACTTCTCCACCATCTTCTTGT |
Total mRNA of cells was extracted by the TRIzol method. mRNA was reverse transcripted into cDNA by 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (YEASEN, China). And the cDNA was used to perform qRT-PCR.
MTT Assay
1 × 103 cells were seeded into the 96-well plate. MTT was added and incubated for 2 h and then removed the medium, added 200 μL DMSO. 560 nm absorbency was measured by microplate reader. Repeat the above steps for 6 days. Triplicate was conducted in each sample.
Migration and invasion analysis
Cells were seeded into transwell (Corning, USA) with 100 µl serum-free medium, and 500 µl complete medium was added into the lower chamber. After 9 h, cells in the upper chamber were erased and cells in the lower chamber were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde followed by 0.1% crystal violet staining. The procedure for the invasion assay was similar to that for the migration assay, except that the transwell membranes were pre-coated with Matrigel (R&D Systems, USA) and the cells were incubated for 18 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The stained cells were examined in the microscope and counted by ImageJ.
Soft agar colony formation assay
1.2% Agarose as the lower gel was prepared and 1:1 mixed with 2 × DMEM complete medium followed by addition to 6-well plate. 2 ml 2×DMEM containing 1 × 103 cells complete medium was 1:1 mixed with 0.6% Agarose which was the lower gel and quickly added to the culture plate after the solidification of lower gel. After the solidification of the upper gel, the 6-well plate was cultured in the incubator for 2–3 weeks. 0.1% crystal violet was used for staining and examined in the microscope. The colony was counted by ImageJ.
Dual-luciferase reporter gene assay
The CBL promoter was recombined into pGL3-basic plasmid and co-transfected with indicated plasmids and pGL3-TK plasmid into 293FT cells. The empty vector was considered as the negative control. After 2 days, cells were treated and analyzed by protocol from dual-luciferase reporter assay kit (Promega, USA).
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)
To determine whether ZC3H15 expression was correlated with the EGFR signaling pathway in GBM, GSEA (version 4.0.3) was used. The CGGA database was downloaded from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (http://www.cgga.org.cn/). The gene sets were obtained from the Molecular Signatures Database (MsigDB, http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp).
Xenograft assay
The procedure was performed as described previously [22]. Briefly, 4-week-old female NOD/SCID mice (Beijing Animal Research Center) were purchased and housed in the SPF room. 1 × 105 U-87 MG cells stably transfected with Scramble or shZC3H15 were intracranially injected slowly into the brain of each mouse. Mice were divided into two groups, one group (6 mice for each subgroup) was used for H&E staining, the other group (6 mice for each subgroup) was monitored for survival. Isoflurane anesthesia was used to reduce the pain of the mice when the tumors were harvested. Randomization and single blinding were used for measurement, and the tumor volumes were measured using length (a) and width (b) and calculated using the equation: V = ab2/2. The data represent the means ± SD. The bodies were stored at −20 °C and then incinerated by Laibite Biotech Inc. (Chongqing, China). All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Southwest University.
Statistical process
Triplicates were designed and performed in each experiment mentioned above. Statistical parameters including the sample size and the significance analysis are specified in figure legends. Data was analyzed and shown as mean ± SD. Statistics were analyzed by GraphPad Prism 7.0 whereas the image was analyzed by ImageJ. The Two-tailed Student’s t test was used to analyze the data from two groups. The data was considered as significance if the p-value < 0.05, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Result
ZC3H15 is commonly upregulated in GBM and correlates with poor prognosis
We downloaded the data from the CGGA database and ranked them by the WHO analysis method, the expression level of ZC3H15 increased with the malignant degree of glioma (Fig. 1A). To further determine the role of ZC3H15 in glioma, we analyzed the characteristics of glioma patients related to ZC3H15 expression based on the CGGA database. As shown in Table 2, ZC3H15 expression was dramatically associated with grade and TCGA subtypes in glioma (Table 2). Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation is commonly observed in glioma, and they are proved to possess the ability to improve the survival rate. We observed that ZC3H15 expression in the IDH mutation group was lower than in the wildtype group (Fig. S1A). Moreover, ZC3H15 expression was also correlated with patients’ age (Fig. S1B). The older the patients, the higher the expression of ZC3H15 in the tumor. We also analyzed the data obtained from the TCGA database, the expression of ZC3H15 is the highest in GBM which is the top level of glioma (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, the clinical data from the TCGA database also indicated that gene copy number gain for ZC3H15 was linked to high expression of ZC3H15 in glioma (Fig. 1C). These results suggested that ZC3H15 played as an onco-protein. To further determine whether high expression of ZC3H15 was linked to the prognosis of tumor patients, survival data from CGGA database was analyzed. As shown in Fig. 1D, high expression of ZC3H15 indicated poor prognosis, same results were also obtained in Phillips and Tumor Glioma-kawaguchi-50 database (Fig. 1E, F). Moreover, IHC staining assays revealed that ZC3H15 expression in malignant gliomas was significantly higher than the adjacent/normal brain tissue, and increases along with malignant stages (Fig. 1G). After that, the protein and mRNA expression of ZC3H15 were examined and demonstrated that higher mRNA level and protein level of ZC3H15 were found in LN-229, A172, U-87 MG cells (Fig. 1H). Taken together, we demonstrated that ZC3H15 was overexpressed in GBM and was associated with a poor prognosis of GBM patients.
Table 2.
Clinicopathological features | Cases | ZC3H15 expression | F | P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | High | |||||
Age | ≦40 | 140 | 84 | 56 | 0.271 | 0.603 |
>40 | 159 | 67 | 92 | |||
Gender | Male | 180 | 94 | 86 | 0.791 | 0.375 |
Female | 121 | 58 | 63 | |||
Grade | WHO II | 117 | 66 | 51 | 8.335 | <0.001 |
WHO III | 57 | 38 | 19 | |||
WHO IV | 124 | 48 | 76 | |||
IDH mutation status | Mutation | 134 | 78 | 56 | 1.372 | 0.242 |
Wildtype | 165 | 73 | 92 | |||
1p19q_Codeletion_status | Non-cadel | 76 | 38 | 38 | 1.846 | 0.178 |
Cadel | 16 | 5 | 11 | |||
TCGA_subtypes | Proneural | 86 | 45 | 41 | 3.326 | 0.020 |
Mesenchymal | 111 | 59 | 52 | |||
Neural | 81 | 33 | 48 | |||
Classical | 23 | 15 | 8 | |||
PRS type | Primary | 264 | 135 | 129 | 0.182 | 0.834 |
Secondary | 11 | 4 | 7 | |||
Recurrent | 23 | 13 | 10 |
ZC3H15 is essential for cell proliferation, migration and invasion of GBM cells
According to the expression profile we obtained before (Fig. 1H), U-87 MG and LN-229 cells were utilized in this study. We knocked down the expression of ZC3H15 with three shRNA sequences, shZC3H15 no.1, 2, and 3. The shZC3H15-3 sequence showed more efficiency and was used in the following experiments (Fig. 2A). MTT assays were performed and the data demonstrated that silencing of ZC3H15 significantly inhibited cell proliferation of GBM cells (Fig. 2B). We further examined the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, and the results indicated that ZC3H15 knockdown significantly reduced DNA synthesis ability (Fig. 2C). Next, flow cytometry analysis was performed to detect the cell cycle and apoptosis in ZC3H15 knockdown and control cells (Figs. S2, S3). We found that silencing of ZC3H15 induced the G1 arrest in GBM cells. However, we did not detect obvious cell apoptosis in the ZC3H15 knockdown group. Moreover, cell senescence experiments were performed and showed that the number of senescent cells increased significantly after ZC3H15 knockdown (Fig. S4). Ectoderm cellular matrix (ECM) remodeling is the main mechanism for GBM invasion and is also the difficulty in curing recurrent brain cancer patients. Paxillin is a cytoskeletal protein involved in actin-membrane attachment to extracellular matrix cell adhesion (adhesion spot) sites [29]. We found that the paxillin protein at the actin-membrane attachment site was dissipated after ZC3H15 knockdown (Fig. 2D). It suggested that ZC3H15 participated in the adhesion and metastasis of tumor cells. After that, we detected the variation of proteins related to cell adhesion. The results demonstrated that the protein levels of β-catenin, ZEB1, Slug, N-cadherin were decreased after ZC3H15 knockdown, while the protein expression of E-cadherin was increased (Fig. 2E). In addition, the abilities of migration and invasion were also reduced in ZC3H15 knockdown GBM cells (Fig. 2F and Fig. S5A).
To further investigate whether ZC3H15 was essential for GBM cells, restoration assay was conducted. Both protein level and mRNA level of ZC3H15 were recovered in ZC3H15 knockdown GBM cells after treatment with ZC3H15 overexpression (Fig. 2G). The abilities of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of ZC3H15 knockdown cells were also restored in ZC3H15 restored group compared to control cells (Fig. 2H, I, L and Fig. S5B). Meanwhile, the distribution of paxillin and the related protein levels were also restored (Fig. 2J, K). Therefore, these findings indicated that ZC3H15 was involved in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of GBM cells.
ZC3H15 activates the EGFR-mediated signaling pathway by increasing EGFR protein stability
The protein level of EGFR is highly upregulated in GBM cells, and numerous cellular processes are regulated by EGFR, including cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [30–32]. Interestingly, the GSEA analysis using the CGGA database indicated that high ZC3H15 expression was positively associated with EGFR signaling genes in glioma (Fig. S6). To further validate the data, we next examined the expression and phosphorylation of EGFR and its downstream target protein AKT. The results showed that EGFR and AKT phosphorylation as well as the expression of EGFR were significantly reduced by ZC3H15 knockdown (Fig. 3A). Erlotinib is a small molecular inhibitor that targeted EGFR activation [27, 33]. To determine whether the proliferative effect and the metastatic effect of ZC3H15 on GBM cells were EGFR dependent, we treated ZC3H15-overexpression and control cells with erlotinib. MTT assays demonstrated that erlotinib clearly decreased the promotive effect of ZC3H15 overexpression on cell proliferation (Fig. 3B). Besides, the migration and invasion abilities of GBM cells were also inhibited after treatment with erlotinib (Fig. 3C, D and Fig. S7). Thus, these results demonstrated that ZC3H15 promoted cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by activating EGFR signaling pathway.
We have already shown that the protein level of EGFR was decreased in ZC3H15 knockdown cells, in accordance with expectations, the protein level of EGFR was recovered in ZC3H15-overexpression ZC3H15 knockdown cells (Fig. 3E). In addition, we also detected the mRNA expression of EGFR and found that the mRNA expression of EGFR remained constant (Fig. S8). It has been reported that EGFR may be degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasomal system [34, 35]. Hence, we treated ZC3H15 knockdown cells with the proteasomal inhibitor MG-132. The protein level of EGFR was rescued by treatment with MG-132 (Fig. 3F). Moreover, ZC3H15 overexpression could effectively stabilize EGFR protein from degradation when treating cells with de novo protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) (Fig. 3G, H). To further verify the stabilization ability of ZC3H15 to EGFR, we detected the ubiquitination level of EGFR. ZC3H15 overexpression significantly reduced EGFR ubiquitination (Fig. 3I). Therefore, these results revealed the role of ZC3H15 in activating the EGFR signaling pathway is to reduce the ubiquitination degradation of EGFR.
EGFR overexpression significantly restored cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of ZC3H15-knockdown GBM cells
To confirm whether ZC3H15 regulated GBM progression by targeting EGFR degradation, we overexpressed EGFR in ZC3H15-knockdown U-87 MG and LN-229 cells (Fig. 4A). MTT assays were performed and demonstrated that the inhibition effects of ZC3H15 knockdown on cell proliferation were significantly restored after EGFR overexpression treatment (Fig. 4B). In addition, transwell assays were also performed and indicated that EGFR overexpression dramatically elevated the abilities of migration and invasion of ZC3H15-knockdown GBM cells (Fig. 4C, D). Therefore, these data indicated that ZC3H15 promoted GBM progression by increasing EGFR expression.
ZC3H15 suppressed the transcription of E3 ligase CBL
It has been reported that EGFR can be ubiquitinated for degradation by several E3 ubiquitin ligases, including CBL, STUB1, PARK2 [22, 36, 37]. Meanwhile, ZC3H15 possesses the ability of transcription regulation [5]. We hypothesis that ZC3H15 may regulate the transcription of some E3 ubiquitin ligases. Hence, we detected the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligases mentioned above in ZC3H15 knockdown cells. Unsurprisingly, the protein level of CBL increased significantly while other E3s remained the same (Fig. 5A). To further verify that ZC3H15 knockdown increases CBL expression through transcriptional regulation, qRT-PCR assay was performed. The mRNA level of CBL increased in ZC3H15-knockdown cells, which indicated that ZC3H15 inhibited CBL transcription (Fig. 5B). The dual-luciferase reporter assay also proved it, increased luciferase activity was observed in ZC3H15-downregulation cells, while the luciferase activity was reduced in ZC3H15-overexpression cells (Fig. 5C). Then, we detected the position of ZC3H15 binding CBL promoter through the ChIP assays, and the results demonstrated that ZC3H15 was enriched at the P4 fragment (Fig. 5D). Our previous data revealed that ZC3H15 decreased CBL level and increased EGFR level (Figs. 3A, 5A). To further verify that ZC3H15 stabilized EGFR through transcription inhibition of CBL, we knocked down CBL expression in ZC3H15-downregulation GBM cells. We designed three CBL-knockdown plasmids, and shCBL-3 showed more efficient and was used in the following experiments (Fig. S9). Then, western blot experiments were performed and demonstrated that the EGFR protein level was dramatically increased after CBL-downregulation treatment (Fig. 5E). Consistently, the abilities of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of ZC3H15-knockdown cells were significantly increased after CBL-knockdown treatment (Fig. 5F–I). In general, these findings indicated that ZC3H15 inhibited CBL transcription to further stabilize EGFR and promote cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.
ZC3H15 knockdown inhibits tumor growth and improved prognosis in mice
To investigate the colony formation effects of ZC3H15 in GBM, soft agar assays were performed and demonstrated that the knockdown group exhibited fewer and smaller colonies (Fig. 6A). To further determine the functional role of ZC3H15 in the tumor growth of GBM cells, the intracranial injection assay was performed. The results showed that ZC3H15 downregulation significantly retarded the tumor formation capabilities of GBM cells (Fig. 6B). Moreover, mice in the ZC3H15-knockdown group survived significantly longer than those in the control group (Fig. 6C). Next, in patient samples, the expression of EGFR was positively correlated to ZC3H15, whereas, CBL was negatively correlated to ZC3H15 and EGFR (Fig. 6D). These results indicated that ZC3H15 promoted tumor growth of GBM cells by targeting the CBL/EGFR signaling pathway (Fig. 6E).
Discussion
The chemotherapy and radiotherapy have little effects on GBM and surgical removal of the tumor cannot prevent the recurrence [38, 39]. ZC3H15 possesses the ability to promote cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and tumorigenesis. This indicates that overexpression of ZC3H15 in GBM may invade and migrate further in resistance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Our previous analysis of ZC3H15 overexpression reduced the survival rate is probably, at least in part proved this. Soft agar can simulate the growth environment in vivo. We found that ZC3H15 downregulation reduced the growth and the colony number of GBM cells, which supports the role of ZC3H15 in tumorigenesis.
EGFR is frequently upregulated in various cancers, including GBM [31]. Betacellulin (BTC) EGF and TGF etc. can bind with EGFR and activate downstream pathway [30]. We have shown that cells with high EGFR expression level were correlated with high proliferation ability [22]. Interestingly, ZC3H15 positively regulated the protein ability of EGFR. Given that EGFR can be ubiquitinated by E3 ligases, meanwhile, we found that the ubiquitination level of EGFR was reduced in the existence of ZC3H15 [40, 41]. It is noteworthy that, ZC3H15 has no Ring finger domain or HECT domain, which is crucial for targeting protein degradation [42]. So, we hypothesis that there is an E3 ubiquitin ligase regulated by ZC3H15 and targeted EGFR for its degradation. Our data added a new pathway for ZC3H15 promoting tumorigenesis which was poorly studied. In addition, small molecular inhibitors of EGFR have been developed, such as erlotinib and gefitinib. These drugs can inhibit the activation of EGFR [43]. However, due to the T790M mutation of EGFR, secondary resistance to these drugs will occur in a year. The future treatment tendency will be genes and drugs combination which is still warranted further study.
Casitas B-lineage (CBL), an E3 ligase which has been studied to involve numerous cellular functions, including immune regulation, proliferation, metastasis, and tumor suppressor [12, 44, 45]. However, disputes existed in the role of CBL played in the tumor, research showed that in non-small cell lung cancer, CBL downregulated PD-L1. So that the tumor can’t confuse T cells. CBL possesses a critical role in the regulation of CD8 (+) T cells and CAR T-cell functions to increase immunity against the tumor. Moreover, CBL is also reported as a tumor suppressor gene in gastric cancer [12, 14, 15, 45]. The detailed mechanisms of CBL in immune regulation remain unclear [12, 45]. Interestingly, ZC3H15 is able to decrease the mRNA and protein level of CBL through transcriptional regulation, thereby promoting tumor growth. It is similar to the way ZC3H15 regulates NF-κB signaling [5].
Our results in animal experiments and tumor samples showed that the promotion effect of the ZC3H15-CBL-EGFR axis to the tumor could be reappeared in vivo. Our Kaplan–Meier analysis from different database is the same as we obtained from mice, which is higher ZC3H15 expression correlates with worse survival time.
In conclusion, we illustrated the role of ZC3H15 as a transcription factor that stabilized the EGFR protein level via inhibiting CBL transcription to promote cancer progression. By regulating this axis, ZC3H15 governed the axis, which was critical in tumorigenesis. Taken together, ZC3H15 was an oncogene acting in tumor cells and with its great functional ability to control numerous cellular progressions. Our study of the ZC3H15-CBL pathway on EGFR expression provided a brand-new insight into tumorigenesis. And these proteins we proposed can be the marker for anti-cancer drugs and combination treatment development.
Supplementary information
Author contributions
J.H., M.X., H.G., D.P., Y.L., P.H., H.C., and H.C. have participated in investigation, methodology and validation of data presented in this article. J.H., M.X., H.G., and D.P. are responsible for Formal Analysis of data. J.H. and M.X. wrote and edited this manuscript, and H.C. read and revised this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (No. cstc2019jcyj-zdxmX0033 and No. cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0678), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872071 and 81672502), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU118097), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XYDS201912).
Data availability
All of the data and material in this paper are available when requested.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experiments involving cancer patients’ samples were obtained from Chaoying Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Henan, China), and the studies were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Tongxu County People’s Hospital of Henan Province. All of the patients were informed consent.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Edited by Dr Francesca Bernassola
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41419-021-04496-9.
References
- 1.Stupp R, Brada M, van den Bent MJ, Tonn JC, Pentheroudakis G. High-grade glioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:iii93–101. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stupp R, Tonn JC, Brada M, Pentheroudakis G. High-grade malignant glioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:v190–3. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Claes A, Idema AJ, Wesseling P. Diffuse glioma growth: a guerilla war. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114:443–58. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0293-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Luo JW, Wang X, Yang Y, Mao Q. Role of micro-RNA (miRNA) in pathogenesis of glioblastoma. Eur Rev Med Pharm Sci. 2015;19:1630–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jiang BG, Wan ZH, Huang J, Li LM, Liu H, Fu SY, et al. Elevated ZC3H15 increases HCC growth and predicts poor survival after surgical resection. Oncotarget. 2016;7:37238–49. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gregory RC, Lord KA, Panek LB, Gaines P, Dillon SB, Wojchowski DM. Subtraction cloning and initial characterization of novel epo-immediate response genes. Cytokine. 2000;12:845–57. doi: 10.1006/cyto.2000.0686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ishikawa K, Azuma S, Ikawa S, Semba K, Inoue J. Identification of DRG family regulatory proteins (DFRPs): specific regulation of DRG1 and DRG2. Genes Cells. 2005;10:139–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2005.00825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Capalbo G, Mueller-Kuller T, Koschmieder S, Klein HU, Ottmann OG, Hoelzer D, et al. Characterization of ZC3H15 as a potential TRAF-2-interacting protein implicated in the NFkappaB pathway and overexpressed in AML. Int J Oncol. 2013;43:246–54. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fleischer TC, Weaver CM, McAfee KJ, Jennings JL, Link AJ. Systematic identification and functional screens of uncharacterized proteins associated with eukaryotic ribosomal complexes. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1294–307. doi: 10.1101/gad.1422006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wout PK, Sattlegger E, Sullivan SM, Maddock JR. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rbg1 protein and its binding partner Gir2 interact on Polyribosomes with Gcn1. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8:1061–71. doi: 10.1128/EC.00356-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Venuprasad K. Cbl-b and itch: key regulators of peripheral T-cell tolerance. Cancer Res. 2010;70:3009–12. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang S, Xu L, Che X, Li C, Hou K, Fan Y, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligases Cbl-b and c-Cbl downregulate PD-L1 in EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer. FEBS Lett. 2018;592:621–30. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 2010;141:1117–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dong Q, Ma Y, Zhang Y, Qu X, Li Z, Qi Y, et al. Cbl-b predicts postoperative survival in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:57163–73. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu L, Zhang Y, Qu X, Che X, Guo T, Cai Y, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b prevents tumor metastasis by maintaining the epithelial phenotype in multiple drug-resistant gastric and breast cancer cells. Neoplasia. 2017;19:374–82. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Normanno N, De Luca A, Bianco C, Strizzi L, Mancino M, Maiello MR, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene. 2006;366:2–16. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yarden Y, Shilo BZ. SnapShot: EGFR signaling pathway. Cell. 2007;131:1018. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kang ES, Oh MA, Lee SA, Kim TY, Kim SH, Gotoh N, et al. EGFR phosphorylation-dependent formation of cell-cell contacts by Ras/Erks cascade inhibition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1773:833–43. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Miyamoto Y, Suyama K, Baba H. Recent advances in targeting the EGFR signaling pathway for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Reinehr R, Haussinger D. CD95 death receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in liver cell apoptosis and regeneration. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012;518:2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang P, Zhao L, Gong S, Xiong S, Wang J, Zou D, et al. HIF1alpha/HIF2alpha-Sox2/Klf4 promotes the malignant progression of glioblastoma via the EGFR-PI3K/AKT signalling pathway with positive feedback under hypoxia. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:312. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03598-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hou J, Deng Q, Zhou J, Zou J, Zhang Y, Tan P, et al. CSN6 controls the proliferation and metastasis of glioblastoma by CHIP-mediated degradation of EGFR. Oncogene. 2017;36:1134–44. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:127–37. doi: 10.1038/35052073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bublil EM, Yarden Y. The EGF receptor family: spearheading a merger of signaling and therapeutics. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007;19:124–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li KS, Zhu XD, Liu HD, Zhang SZ, Li XL, Xiao N, et al. NT5DC2 promotes tumor cell proliferation by stabilizing EGFR in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:335. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2549-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Minna JD, Dowell J. Erlotinib hydrochloride. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;Suppl:S14–5. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Yang Z, Hackshaw A, Feng Q, Fu X, Zhang Y, Mao C, et al. Comparison of gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:2805–19. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bareschino MA, Schettino C, Troiani T, Martinelli E, Morgillo F, Ciardiello F. Erlotinib in cancer treatment. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:vi35–41. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vollmann-Zwerenz A, Leidgens V, Feliciello G, Klein CA, Hau P. Tumor cell invasion in glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.An Z, Aksoy O, Zheng T, Fan QW, Weiss WA. Epidermal growth factor receptor and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma: signaling pathways and targeted therapies. Oncogene. 2018;37:1561–75. doi: 10.1038/s41388-017-0045-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Eskilsson E, Rosland GV, Solecki G, Wang Q, Harter PN, Graziani G, et al. EGFR heterogeneity and implications for therapeutic intervention in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20:743–52. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fang R, Chen X, Zhang S, Shi H, Ye Y, Zou Z, et al. EGFR/SRC/ERK-stabilized YTHDF2 promotes cholesterol dysregulation and invasive growth of glioblastoma. Nat Commun. 2021;12:177. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20379-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tagliamento M, Genova C, Rijavec E, Rossi G, Biello F, Dal MG. Bello, et al. Afatinib and Erlotinib in the treatment of squamous-cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19:2055–62. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1540591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shao G, Wang R, Sun A, Wei J, Peng K, Dai Q, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase NEDD4 mediates cell migration signaling of EGFR in lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:24. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0784-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yu JJ, Zhou DD, Yang XX, Cui B, Tan FW, Wang J, et al. TRIB3-EGFR interaction promotes lung cancer progression and defines a therapeutic target. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3660. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17385-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Deng M, Liu B, Song H, Yu R, Zou D, Chen Y, et al. beta-Elemene inhibits the metastasis of multidrug-resistant gastric cancer cells through miR-1323/Cbl-b/EGFR pathway. Phytomedicine. 2020;69:153184. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Duan H, Lei Z, Xu F, Pan T, Lu D, Ding P, et al. PARK2 suppresses proliferation and tumorigenicity in non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;9:790. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vasilev A, Sofi R, Rahman R, Smith SJ, Teschemacher AG, Kasparov S. Using light for therapy of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Brain Sci. 2020;10:E75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Aldape K, Zadeh G, Mansouri S, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A. Glioblastoma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129:829–48. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1432-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhu Q, Dong H, Bukhari AA, Zhao A, Li M, Sun Y, et al. HUWE1 promotes EGFR ubiquitination and degradation to protect against renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. FASEB J. 2020;34:4591–601. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902751R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nguyen LK, Kolch W, Kholodenko BN. When ubiquitination meets phosphorylation: a systems biology perspective of EGFR/MAPK signalling. Cell Commun Signal. 2013;11:52. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-11-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Berndsen CE, Wolberger C. New insights into ubiquitin E3 ligase mechanism. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:301–7. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Roskoski R., Jr Small molecule inhibitors targeting the EGFR/ErbB family of protein-tyrosine kinases in human cancers. Pharm Res. 2019;139:395–411. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liu X, Teng Y, Wu X, Li Z, Bao B, Liu Y, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b predicts favorable prognosis in breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:695. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kumar J, Kumar R, Kumar Singh A, Tsakem EL, Kathania M, Riese MJ, et al. Deletion of Cbl-b inhibits CD8(+) T-cell exhaustion and promotes CAR T-cell function. J Immunother Cancer 2021;9:e001688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All of the data and material in this paper are available when requested.