Skip to main content
JA Clinical Reports logoLink to JA Clinical Reports
. 2022 Jan 13;8:5. doi: 10.1186/s40981-022-00495-7

Frequent tracheal suctioning is associated with extubation failure in patients with successful spontaneous breathing trial: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Junpei Haruna 1,, Hiroomi Tatsumi 1, Satoshi Kazuma 1, Aki Sasaki 2, Yoshiki Masuda 1
PMCID: PMC8758876  PMID: 35024978

Abstract

Background

Extubation failure, i.e., reintubation in ventilated patients, is a well-known risk factor for mortality and prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although sputum volume is a risk factor, the frequency of tracheal suctioning has not been validated as a predictor of reintubation. We conducted this study to examine whether frequent tracheal suctioning is a risk factor for reintubation.

Patients and methods

We included adult patients who were intubated for > 72 h in the ICU and extubated after completion of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). We compared the characteristics and weaning-related variables, including the frequency of tracheal suctioning between patients who required reintubation within 24 h after extubation and those who did not, and examined the factors responsible for reintubation.

Results

Of the 400 patients enrolled, reintubation was required in 51 (12.8%). The most common cause of reintubation was difficulty in sputum excretion (66.7%). There were significant differences in sex, proportion of patients with chronic kidney disease, pneumonia, ICU admission type, the length of mechanical ventilation, and ICU stay between patients requiring reintubation and those who did not. Multivariate analysis showed frequent tracheal suction (> once every 2 h) and the length of mechanical ventilation were independent factors for predicting reintubation.

Conclusion

We should examine the frequency of tracheal suctioning > once every 2 h in addition to the length of mechanical ventilation before deciding to extubate after completion of SBT in patients intubated for > 72 h in the ICU.

Keywords: Reintubation, tracheal suctioning, intensive care unit

Background

Extubation failure, i.e., reintubation, is a known risk factor for mortality and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay in patients who receive mechanical ventilation in the ICU [1, 2]. Incidence of reintubation has been reported to be approximately 10%, and therefore, we should keep in mind the risk of reintubation and aim for safe extubation [3, 4]. Epstein has demonstrated that patients with advanced age, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and chronic respiratory failure, and those undergoing highly invasive surgery carry a risk for reintubation [5]. Moreover, clinical tools for evaluating successful extubation, such as the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) [6], are available for spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Therefore, extubation should be tried carefully after confirming favorable results of SBT in mechanically ventilated patients. However, reintubations sometimes occur despite following established protocols [7].

The main causes of reintubation are difficulty in sputum excretion and airway obstructions [5]. Sputum excretion is challenging owing to the amount of sputum available for extraction and the ability to discharge it [8, 9]. Although it is difficult for ICU healthcare workers to quantitatively evaluate the amount of airway secretion when performing trachea suctioning, the frequency of tracheal suction during mechanical ventilation may be associated with the amount of tracheal secretions [10]. We hypothesized that the frequency of tracheal suctioning is associated with the amount of tracheal secretions. This study, therefore, elucidates whether reintubation is associated with the frequency of tracheal suctioning before extubation.

Methods

We performed a single-center, retrospective, observational study in a university hospital. We collected data from patients admitted to the ICU between January 2011 and December 2017. The study design and protocol were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Sapporo Medical University (IRB authorized number: 322-266). Owing to the observational nature of this study, the information was released on an opt-out basis.

We included patients (≥ 18 years) who had been intubated for > 72 h in the ICU of Sapporo Medical University Hospital and extubated after confirming successful SBT results defined as follows: respiratory rate < 30/min, SpO2 > 94%, heart rate < 140 bpm, no arrhythmia, no excessive increase in blood pressure and no effort breathing, under continuous positive airway pressure ≤ 5 cmH2O or pressure support ≤ 5 cmH2O or T-piece for ≥ 30 min with inspiratory oxygen concentration (FIO2) ≤ 0.4. SBT was performed when the patient fulfilled the condition described in Table 1, and the ultimate decision to extubate was made by the intensive-care clinician based on SBT data, as well as the patient’s hemodynamic stability, responsiveness, ability to follow commands, the strength of cough, and the ability to clear secretions. The exclusion criteria were patients after cardiovascular surgery or those with a tracheostomy. Extubation failure was defined as reintubation within 24 h after extubation.

Table 1.

Criteria for initiating SBT

(1) Oxygenation
 SpO2 >90% under FIO2≤0.5 and PEEP≤8 cmH2O
(2) Circulation
 No acute myocardial ischemia or serious arrhythmia
 Heart rate <140 bpm
 DOA ≦ 5μg/kg/min, DOB ≦ 5μg/kg/min, NAD ≦ 0.05μg/kg/min
(3) Ventilation
 Tidal volume>5 ml/IBW
 Respiratory minute volume<15 L/min
 Rapid shallow breathing index < 105/min/L
 No respiratory acidosis (pH<7.25)
 Normal breathing pattern
 No respiratory effort
(4) General condition
 No serious electrolyte disorders
 No severe anemia
 No serious fluid overload

SBT spontaneous breathing trial, DOA dopamine, DOB dobutamine, NAD noradrenaline, IBW ideal body weight

Information obtained from electronic medical records included age, sex, underlying disease, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), patient category at ICU admission (postoperative or medical), ICU length of stay (LOS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at ICU admission, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at ICU admission, ventilation days, 28-day mortality, delirium, RSBI, and frequency of tracheal suctioning. The primary outcome was the association between reintubation within 24 h after extubation and tracheal suctioning frequency (more than once every 2 h for up to 12 h) [5, 11] before extubation.

The definition of tracheal suctioning is as follows.

  1. The patient’s effortful breathing is increased (increased respiratory workload findings).

  2. Secretions are visible in the tracheal tube.

  3. Coarse crackles that suggest the presence of secretions from the trachea to the right and left main bronchi are heard on chest auscultation, or there is a decrease in breath sounds on chest auscultation.

  4. Palpation of the chest wall reveals vibrations associated with the movement of gas.

  5. Aspiration.

  6. Blood gases and blood oxygen saturation rate (SpO2) show hypoxemia.

  7. An increase in airway pressure or a decrease in ventilation volumes.

Reintubation was performed when the patient had one or more of the following criteria: clinical signs of increased respiratory effort, upper airway obstruction, respiratory acidosis, hypoxemia (SpO2<90%), decreased consciousness with unprotected upper airway (GCS<8), severe tachycardia, and continued tachypnea.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were expressed as means and standard deviations. Chi-square tests were used for the nominal variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables. We hypothesized that the frequency of tracheal suctioning was an independent risk factor for reintubation. To evaluate this hypothesis, logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the odds ratio of the frequency of tracheal suctioning, adjusting for confounding factors that contribute to reintubation. We selected covariates based on the previous literature and clinical experience. Sex, CCI [7, 12], underlying pneumonia, APACHE II score at ICU admission [13], and ventilation days [12] were selected as confounding factors. The results of the multivariable analysis are shown with odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

During the study period, 601 patients received ventilator support for more than 72 h. Fifty-one patients required reintubation within 24 h after extubation (reintubation group) (Fig. 1). The demographics of the patients and a comparison of vital signs and respiratory parameters in the reintubation and no reintubation groups are shown in Table 2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flow diagram of this study

Table 2.

Demographics of patients with and without reintubation

Reintubation group No reintubation group P value
n=51 n=349
Age (years), mean±SD 65.2±13.3 64.3±14.2 0.878
Gender, male, n (%) 24(47.1) 235(67.3) 0.007
Comorbidities
 Immune suppression 4(7.8) 26(2.9) 1
 Chronic liver disease 6(11.8) 27(7.7) 0.4
 Chronic kidney disease 6(11.8) 2(5.7) <.001
 Chronic heart failure 5(9.8) 60(17.2) 0.225
 Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.6±1.8 1.7±1.9 0.73
Underlying diseases
 Pneumonia 17(33.3) 47(13.5) <.001
 Sepsis 7(13.7) 36(10.3) 0.468
 ARDS 4(7.8) 16(4.6) 0.303
 heart failure 3(5.9) 12(3.4) 0.421
 Miscellaneous 20(39.2) 237(67.9) <.001
Admission type
 Surgical 18(35.3) 179(51.0) 0.036
 Medical 33(64.7) 170(49.0) 0.036
SOFA at ICU admission, mean±SD 6.4±2.5 7.0±2.8 0.048
APACHE II at ICU admission, mean±SD 21.1±6.2 20.8±5.8 0.675
Delirium, n (%) 14 (27.5) 105 (30.1) 0.746
RSBI 39.6±12.9 38.6±16.5 0.322
Ventilation days (day) 13.3±11.8 5.0±2.7 <.001
Time to reintubation, mean±SD 492±470.4 -
ICU LOS (days), mean±SD 14.2±12.5 8.7±8.2 <.001
ICU mortality, n (%) 2(3.9) 10(2.9) 0.223
28-day mortality, n (%) 6(11.8) 17(4.9) 0.097
Reason of reintubation, n (%)
 Difficulty in sputum excretion 30 (58.8) -
 Hypoxemia 9 (17.6) -
 Airway obstruction 6 (11.8) -
 Tachypnea 4 (7.8) -
 Consciousness disturbance 1(2.0) -
 Hemosputum 1(2.0) -

ICU intensive care unit, APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, LOS length of stay, RSBI rapid shallow breathing index

Sex (male), admission type, ventilation days, and ICU LOS were significantly higher in the reintubation group. Furthermore, comorbidity of chronic kidney disease and underlying pneumonia was significantly higher in the reintubation group. The mean time to reintubation was 492 min. The most common cause of reintubation was difficulty in sputum excretion, followed by hypoxemia and airway obstruction.

The results of the logistic regression analysis adjusted for the pre-defined covariates to examine the effect of the frequency of tracheal suctioning on reintubation are shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Odds ratios regarding variables for extubation failure

Regression coefficient OR 95%CI P value
Male 0.827 2.287 1.03–5.08 0.042
CCI −0.133 0.875 0.70–1.09 0.242
Pneumonia −0.585 0.557 0.225–1.381 0.207
APACHE II −0.004 0.996 0.93–1.06 0.899
Tracheal suction more than once every 2 h 2.365 10.65 4.60–24.62 <.001
Ventilation days 0.272 1.31 1.19–1.44 <.001

OR odds ratio, CCI Charlson Comorbidity Index, APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation

A higher frequency of tracheal suctioning, defined once every 2 h up to 12 h before the extubation trial, was an independent factor associated with reintubation (OR = 10.65, 95% CI = 4.60–24.62, p<.001). Moreover, ventilation days were also an independent factor associated with reintubation (OR, 1.33; 95% CI = 1.19–1.45, p<.001).

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the association between reintubation and the frequency of tracheal suctioning in ventilated patients for more than 72 h and fulfilled extubation criteria such as SBT. The reintubation rate after extubation with successful SBT was 12.8%, which was similar to a previous report [14]. The most common cause of reintubation was hypoxemia, followed by difficulty in sputum excretion. We found that tracheal suction more than once every 2 h was an independent factor associated with reintubation. The results of this study suggest that it may be useful to include the frequency of tracheal suctioning before extubation as one of the criteria for extubation in ventilator management.

In general, airway problems are a risk factor for reintubation [15]. One of the most common airway problems is the inability to clear airway secretions [14, 16]. The clearance of airway secretions has two components: the intensity of cough and the volume of airway secretions. An association between cough intensity and reintubation has been reported in relation to a decrease in peak expiratory flow (PEF); however, the procedure for measuring PEF [15] is cumbersome and difficult to perform during daily clinical practice. Conversely, it has been reported that a high volume of airway secretion is associated with reintubation [2, 14, 17, 18]. However, it is difficult for ICU healthcare workers to measure the amount of airway secretions when performing tracheal suctioning, thereby limiting the prediction of reintubation based on the amount of sputum secreted. Another way for ICU healthcare workers to determine the amount of airway secretions is the frequency of tracheal suctioning. It has been reported that intensivists use lower levels of airway secretion as an adjunctive indicator of successful extubation [14, 19]. In this study, the frequency of tracheal suctioning was associated with reintubation. Therefore, it may be useful to decide extubation based on the frequency of tracheal suctioning. Respiratory physiotherapy may be useful to prevent reintubation in patients requiring frequent tracheal suctioning to prevent respiratory complications and for excretion training of airway secretions [4, 20].

Our results showed that the duration of mechanical ventilation was longer in the reintubation group than in the no reintubation group. Prolonged mechanical ventilation has been reported to negatively affect respiratory and limb (or extremities) muscle strength [21, 22] and is thought to result in ICU-acquired weakness. This study did not evaluate the onset of ICU-acquired weakness; however, it is important to provide multidisciplinary interventions such as early rehabilitation from the start of mechanical ventilation to achieve no reintubation. Particularly, when extubating patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation and a high volume of sputum, it should be considered that even with a successful SBT, extubation with respiratory physiotherapy is a strategy to reduce reintubation.

This study had several limitations. First, this is a retrospective, single-center, observational study. Therefore, our results may not be generalizable and need to be validated externally in future studies using a different dataset. Second, we used the nursing records obtained from an electronic patient information system, which may not reliably reflect actual clinical symptoms.

Conclusion

We found that a higher frequency of tracheal suctioning and ventilator days were associated with risk factors for reintubation in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation. It is necessary to introduce protocols and other measures, such as clearer extubation criteria, to reduce reintubation in this population.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Tomoko Sonoda for advice on statistical analysis.

Abbreviations

ARDS

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

AW

Acquired weakness

APACHE

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation

CCI

Charlson Comorbidity Index

CI

Confidence interval

FIO2

Fractional inspired oxygen concentration

ICU

Intensive care unit

LOS

Length of stay

OR

Odds ratio

PEF

Peak expiratory flow

RSBI

Rapid shallow breathing index

SBT

Spontaneous breathing trial

SOFA

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

SpO2

Blood oxygen saturation rate

Authors’ contributions

JH, HT, AS, and YM designed the work, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. SK contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version for publication.

Funding

The authors have not received any funding.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study design and protocol were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Sapporo Medical University (IRB authorized number: 322-266). Owing to the observational nature of this study, the information was released on an opt-out basis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

YM reports grants from JIMRO and personal fees from MSD, Japan Blood Products Organization, and Asahi Kasei Pharma outside the submitted work. HT received lecture fees from TSUMURA & CO. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL, Wong JB. Effect of failed extubation on the outcome of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1997;112:186–192. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jaber S, Quintard H, Cinotti R, Asehnoune K, Arnal JM, Guitton C, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for airway failure versus non-airway failure in the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational study of 1514 extubation procedures. Crit Care. 2018;22:236. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2150-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thille AW, Richard JC, Brochard L. The decision to extubate in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:1294–1302. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1523CI. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Girard TD, Alhazzani W, Kress JP, Ouellette DR, Schmidt GA, Truwit JD, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians clinical practice guideline: liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill adults. Rehabilitation protocols, ventilator liberation protocols, and cuff leak tests. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195:120–133. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2075ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Epstein SK. Decision to extubate. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:535–546. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1268-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang KL, Tobin MJ. A prospective study of indexes predicting the outcome of trials of weaning from mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1445–1450. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105233242101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thille AW, Cortés-Puch I, Esteban A. Weaning from the ventilator and extubation in ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013;19:57–64. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32835c5095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cooper RM, O’Sullivan E, Popat M, Behringer E, Hagberg CA. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:217. doi: 10.1111/anae.12139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smailes ST, McVicar AJ, Martin R. Cough strength, secretions and extubation outcome in burn patients who have passed a spontaneous breathing trial. Burns. 2013;39:236–242. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Matilde INE, Eid RAC, Nunes AF, Ambrozin ARP, Moura RH, Carnieli-Cazati D, et al. Bronchial hygiene techniques in patients on mechanical ventilation: what are used and why? Einstein (São Paulo) 2018;16:eAO3856. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082018ao3856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lombardi FS, Cotoia A, Petta R, Schultz M, Cinnella G, Horn J. Prediction of extubation failure in Intensive Care Unit: systematic review of parameters investigated. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85:298–307. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12627-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Thille AW, Boissier F, Ben Ghezala H, Razazi K, Mekontso-Dessap A, Brun-Buisson C. Risk factors for and prediction by caregivers of extubation failure in ICU patients: a prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:613–620. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ferrer M, Valencia M, Nicolas JM, Bernadich O, Badia JR, Torres A. Early noninvasive ventilation averts extubation failure in patients at risk: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:164–170. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200505-718OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khamiees M, Raju P, DeGirolamo A, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA. Predictors of extubation outcome in patients who have ly completed a spontaneous breathing trial. Chest. 2001;120:1262–1270. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.4.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Smina M, Salam A, Khamiees M, Gada P, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA. Cough peak flows and extubation outcomes. Chest. 2003;124:262–268. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.1.262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gonçalves MR, Honrado T, Winck JC, Paiva JA. Effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in preventing respiratory failure after extubation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2012;16:R48. doi: 10.1186/cc11249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Salam A, Tilluckdharry L, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA. Neurologic status, cough, secretions and extubation outcomes. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1334–1339. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2231-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mokhlesi B, Tulaimat A, Gluckman TJ, Wang Y, Evans AT, Corbridge TC. Predicting extubation failure after completion of a spontaneous breathing trial. Respir Care. 2007;52:1710–1717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tulaimat A, Mokhlesi B. Accuracy and reliability of extubation decisions by intensivists. Respir Care. 2011;56:920–927. doi: 10.4187/respcare.00851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang TH, Wu CP, Wang LY. Chest physiotherapy with early mobilization may improve extubation outcome in critically ill patients in the intensive care units. Clin Respir J. 2018;12:2613–2621. doi: 10.1111/crj.12965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.De Jonghe B, Bastuji-Garin S, Durand MC, Malissin I, Rodrigues P, Cerf C, et al. Respiratory weakness is associated with limb weakness and delayed weaning in critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:2007–2015. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000281450.01881.d8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier FJ, Durand-Zaleski I, Boussarsar M, et al. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA. 2002;288:2859–2867. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from JA Clinical Reports are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES