Abstract
Background
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a known cause of morbidity and mortality. A diagnosis of PE is made by computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) or a ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan. This study aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with suspected PE.
Methods
This study was a retrospective study including patients with suspected PE who underwent a CTPA and/or a V/Q scan from 2015 to 2020. The patients were grouped into CTPA or V/Q scan. Creatinine levels were obtained before and after the procedure. AKI was defined based on an increased serum creatinine by 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours.
Results
A total of 752 patients were included in the study. The majority (n = 688) underwent a CTPA as a diagnostic modality in patients suspected to have pulmonary embolism (PE), and a V/Q scan was used in 73 patients. Of the 752 patients, there were eight patients who underwent both diagnostic modalities. PE was diagnosed in 121 (16.1%) patients. The incidence of AKI was observed in 15.8%. PE was suspected more frequently in the female group (n = 481, 64%), with a 50% reduction of AKI risk, compared with the male group (p-value = 0.004, OR = 0.522, 95% CI = 0.337-0.81). The presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN) was associated with AKI (p-value < 0.001). Of the AKI group, 43 (36.1%) patients had malignancy. The presence of malignancy was a predictor of increased AKI risk (p-value = 0.014, OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.21-2.70). A small proportion (2.1%, n = 16) required dialysis. Patients who developed AKI had a 30-day mortality of 20.2% compared with 5.1% for the group without AKI.
Conclusion
In our sample, clinicians suspected PE more frequently in the female group. The overall incidence rate of AKI in patients suspected of having PE was 16.1%. The presence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension was associated with AKI. However, DM and HTN were not predictors of AKI. The risk of AKI requiring dialysis was relatively low (2.1%). There was no relationship between the diagnostic modalities and PE, and AKI, suggesting that clinicians overestimate the fear of contrast-induced AKI (CI-AKI).
Keywords: pe, aki, contrast-induced nephropathy, pulmonary embolism, acute kidney injury
Introduction
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined as an abrupt deterioration of the renal parenchymal function that can be reversible over a period of days or weeks [1]. The damage is severe enough to accumulate waste products in the blood, such as urea. In addition, it results in a reduction in urine output to less than 400 mL/day in adult patients [1]. The causes of AKI are classified into three categories, depending on the cause of the injury: prerenal, intrarenal, and post-renal [2]. Approximately 130-140 persons per million population are annually diagnosed with AKI [1], and 10%-15% of hospitalized patients and 50% or more of critically sick patients develop signs of AKI [3]. In the southern province of Saudi Arabia, a study conducted over two years with 150 cases of AKI reported that 38% acquired AKI before hospital admission, and 62% developed the injury during hospital admission [4].
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is an emergency condition in which a fragment of a thrombus travels through the venous system to the lungs via the right ventricle. PE usually originates from a DVT that develops in favorable conditions known as Virchow’s triad, which indicates a hypercoagulable state, decreased endothelial integrity, and blood flow stasis. A clinical and pretest probability assessment is done first in hemodynamically stable patients with suspected PE. However, several imaging studies have been developed to facilitate this process due to the difficulty in diagnosing PE. Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is the imaging modality of choice due to the high sensitivity and specificity for the workup of patients with suspected acute PE. A disadvantage of CTPA is using an intravenous contrast medium, which is considered associated with contrast-induced nephropathy. Another modality used is ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning, which is an alternative to CTPA in patients with renal insufficiency and/or contrast allergy [5].
Since PE is an emergency condition, it requires a rapid diagnosis and management. The term contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) has been a dilemma for physicians. Some overestimate the risk and thus deprive the patients of an accurate diagnosis. On the other hand, if the risk is underestimated, it may result in a nephrotoxic insult and poor outcome. This raises the question “are patients who refuse a CTPA or choose a V/Q scan safe from AKI and its complications?” This study aimed to identify the incidence rate of AKI in patients suspected of having PE and understand its associated factors.
Materials and methods
This was a retrospective cohort study with a sample of 752 patients with suspected PE who had a CTPA, V/Q scan, or both from January 2015 to June 2020 at King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The NGHA is a tertiary center with a total bed capacity of 1973, 104 intensive care unit (ICU) beds with more than 4000 admissions per year, and an emergency department (ED) with 58 beds. In total, 7745 patients underwent imaging, and a sample of 752 was selected randomly. The sample size was calculated using Raosoft (Raosoft Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). The recommended sample size with a 5% margin of error and 95% confidence interval was 367. The inclusion criteria were adults (≥18 years) who underwent CTPA or V/Q scan to confirm the diagnosis. The exclusion criteria were patients on dialysis or without creatinine levels before or after radiological investigation.
Data were gathered through the BESTCare system from the electronic medical records. The research team reviewed the charts to confirm the imaging modalities and the diagnosis of PE and then divided the patients into CTPA or V/Q scan. Data included gender, age, BMI, presence of comorbidities, pregnancy status, history of recent surgery defined as a major operation within one month, mobility status, recent travel, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at the time of suspected PE, dialysis/renal replacement therapy within one month after the radiological imaging, and mortality within one month of suspecting the PE. Creatinine levels were obtained before and after the procedure. Based on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria [6], AKI was defined based on an increased serum creatinine by 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours from the baseline.
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the analysis. Frequency and percentage were generated for the categorical variables, and the distributed data were reported as mean and standard deviation (SD). The groups were compared with a chi-square test and considered statistically significant if the p-value was <0.05. A multivariate logistic regression model was used with a 95% confidence interval to assess AKI predictors and mortality.
Results
In total, 752 patients were included in the study. The majority were female (64%), and 354 (47.1%) patients were ≥60 years old, with a mean age of 56.8 ± 19.5 years (Table 1). The comorbidities identified were diabetes mellitus (DM) in 321 (42.7%) patients, hypertension (HTN) in 359 (47.7%) patients, a history of malignancy in 206 (27.4%) patients, and a history of stroke in 85 (11.3%) patients. The majority (n = 688) underwent a CTPA as a diagnostic modality in patients suspected to have pulmonary embolism (PE), and a V/Q scan was used in 73 (9.7%) patients. Eight patients underwent both diagnostic modalities. The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) was confirmed in 121 (16.1%) patients (Table 1). When PE was suspected, 35 (4.7%) of the sample had a GCS score of ≤8. AKI occurred in 119 patients (15.8%), and 16 (2.1%) required urgent dialysis within one month due to acute kidney injury. The 30-day mortality in the patients with suspected PE was 7.4% (n = 56).
Table 1. Basic demographic data of the sample.
| Variables | Number (%), mean ± SD |
| Age | 56.8 ± 19.5 |
| ≥60 years | 354 (47.1%) |
| <60 years | 398 (52.9%) |
| Gender | |
| Female | 481 (64%) |
| Male | 271 (36%) |
| BMI | 29.4 ± 8.9 |
| ≥30 | 346 (46%) |
| <30 | 406 (54%) |
| DM | 321 (42.7%) |
| HTN | 359 (47.7%) |
| History of stroke | 85 (11.3%) |
| Mobility status | |
| Fully mobile | 497 (66.1%) |
| Restricted to chair | 53 (7%) |
| Restricted to bed | 202 (26.9%) |
| History of malignancy | 206 (27.4%) |
| History of recent surgery | |
| No | 621 (82.6%) |
| Yes | 131 (17.4%) |
| History of travel | 22 (2.9%) |
| Pregnancy status | |
| No | 725 (96.4%) |
| Yes | 6 (0.8%) |
| Within one month postpartum | 21 (2.8%) |
| PE | |
| Negative | 631 (83.9%) |
| Positive | 121 (16.1%) |
| CTPA | |
| Not done | 65 (8.6%) |
| Done, PE confirmed | 110 (14.6%) |
| Done, PE ruled out | 577 (76.7%) |
| V/Q scan | |
| Not done | 679 (90.3%) |
| Done, PE confirmed | 12 (1.6%) |
| Done, PE ruled out | 61 (8.1%) |
| Dialysis within 30 days | 16 (2.1%) |
| Mortality within 30 days | 56 (7.4%) |
| AKI | |
| Yes | 119 (15.8%) |
| No | 633 (84.2%) |
| GCS score | |
| ≤8 | 35 (4.7%) |
| >8 | 717 (95.3%) |
The association between age and AKI was statistically significant (p-value < 0.001), with the incidence of AKI higher in the ≥60-year age group (Table 2). The AKI incidence in relation to gender was statistically significant (p-value = 0.001), and 49.6% of patients with AKI were males. The majority of the AKI group had DM and HTN (Figure 1), and there was a statistical significance between the two comorbidities and AKI (p-value < 0.001) (Table 2). More than a third (n = 43, 36.1%) of the patients with AKI had a history of malignancy. Of the 119 patients with AKI, 16 (13.4%) patients were diagnosed with PE; 14 (11.8%) patients were diagnosed using CTPA and two (1.7%) patients were diagnosed using a V/Q scan. There was no statistical significance between PE and the two diagnostic modalities (Table 2). Concerning the pregnancy status of the patients and the AKI incidence, only one patient was diagnosed with AKI in the postpartum period. Nineteen (16%) patients with AKI had a history of recent surgery, and none of the AKI group had a history of recent travel. The mortality rate in the AKI group was 20.2%, which was statistically significant (p-value < 0.001).
Table 2. AKI in relation to basic demographic data.
| Variables | AKI | P-value | ||
| Yes (number (%)) | No (number (%)) | |||
| Age | ≥60 years | 78 (65.5%) | 276 (43.6%) | <0.001 |
| <60 years | 41 (34.5%) | 357 (56.4 %) | ||
| Gender | Female | 60 (50.4%) | 421 (66.5%) | 0.001 |
| Male | 59 (49.6%) | 212 (33.5%) | ||
| BMI | ≥30 | 45 (37.8%) | 301 (47.6%) | 0.051 |
| <30 | 74 (62.2%) | 332 (52.4%) | ||
| DM | No | 49 (41.2%) | 382 (60.3%) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 70 (58.8%) | 251 (39.7%) | ||
| HTN | No | 41 (34.5%) | 352 (55.6%) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 78 (65.5%) | 281 (44.4%) | ||
| History of stroke | No | 100 (84%) | 567 (89.6%) | 0.08 |
| Yes | 19 (16%) | 66 (10.4%) | ||
| Mobility status | Fully mobile | 68 (57.1%) | 429 (67.8%) | 0.078 |
| Restricted to chair | 10 (8.4%) | 43 (6.8%) | ||
| Restricted to bed | 41 (34.5%) | 161 (25.4%) | ||
| History of malignancy | No | 76 (63.9%) | 470 (74.2%) | 0.20 |
| Yes | 43 (36.1%) | 163 (25.8%) | ||
| History of recent surgery | No | 100 (84%) | 521 (82.3%) | 0.649 |
| Yes | 19 (16%) | 112 (17.7%) | ||
| History of travel | No | 119 (100%) | 611 (96.5%) | 0.039 |
| Yes | 0 (0.0%) | 22 (3.5%) | ||
| Pregnancy status | Not pregnant | 118 (99.2%) | 607 (95.9%) | 0.205 |
| Yes, Pregnant | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (0.9%) | ||
| Within one month postpartum | 1 (0.8%) | 20 (3.2%) | ||
| PE | Negative | 103 (86.6%) | 528 (83.4%) | 0.39 |
| Positive | 16 (13.4%) | 105 (16.6%) | ||
| CTPA | Not done | 14 (11.8%) | 51 (8.1%) | 0.303 |
| Done, Positive PE | 14 (11.8%) | 96 (15.2%) | ||
| Done, Negative PE | 91 (76.5%) | 486 (76.8%) | ||
| V\Q scan | Not done | 104 (87.4%) | 575 (90.8%) | 0.46 |
| Done, Positive PE | 2 (1.7%) | 10 (1.6%) | ||
| Done, Negative PE | 13 (10.9%) | 48 (7.6%) | ||
| Mortality within 30 days | No | 95 (79.8%) | 601 (94.9%) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 24 (20.2%) | 32 (5.1%) | ||
| GCS | ≤8 | 8 (6.7%) | 27 (4.3%) | 0.24 |
| >8 | 111 (93.3%) | 606 (95.7%) | ||
Figure 1. Variables in percentage in relation to AKI.
Table 3 shows patient characteristics and comorbidities as predictors of AKI. Despite the varying incidence of AKI per age group, age was not a predictor of AKI (Table 3). A history of malignancy was a statistically significant predictor of AKI and increased the risk, compared with patients without a history of malignancy (p-value = 0.014, OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.21-2.70). Gender was also a statistically significant predictive variable. The risk of AKI was less in the female group by 48% (p-value = 0.004, OR = 0.522, 95% CI = 0.337-0.81). The comorbidities were not significant predictors of AKI (DM: p-value = 0.208, OR = 1.387, 95% CI = 0.834-2.307; a history of stroke: p-value = 0.650, OR = 1.158, 95% CI = 0.614-2.185). However, hypertension showed a trend toward increasing the risk of AKI (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 0.993-2.992) but did not reach a statistical significance (p-value = 0.053). A history of recent surgery, mobility status, GCS, and BMI were not predictors of AKI (Table 3).
Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression of basic characteristics and comorbidities to AKI.
| Variables | P-value | OR | 95% CI | |
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Age ≥ 60 years | 0.097 | 1.523 | 0.926 | 2.504 |
| Gender (female) | 0.004 | 0.522 | 0.337 | 0.810 |
| BMI ≥ 30 | 0.303 | 0.788 | 0.501 | 1.240 |
| DM | 0.208 | 1.387 | 0.834 | 2.307 |
| HTN | 0.053 | 1.724 | 0.993 | 2.992 |
| Stroke | 0.650 | 1.158 | 0.614 | 2.185 |
| Mobility status (on wheelchair) | 0.580 | 1.240 | 0.578 | 2.659 |
| Mobility status (restricted to bed) | 0.717 | 1.098 | 0.663 | 1.817 |
| Mobility status (fully mobile) | 1.0 | |||
| Malignancy | 0.014 | 1.741 | 1.121 | 2.702 |
| Recent surgery | 0.923 | 0.972 | 0.549 | 1.723 |
| GCS score ≤ 8 | 0.294 | 1.623 | 0.657 | 4.006 |
AKI risk was no different in those with positive PE versus those with negative PE (p = 0.386, OR = 0.778, 95% CI = 0.441-1.373). The risk of AKI was also similar in the group who had exposure to intravenous contrast (CTPA) when compared with those who received no intravenous contrast (V/Q scan) (p = 0.542, OR = 0.606, 95% CI = 0.121-3.034) (Table 4). Based on univariate logistic regression, AKI was a predictor of 30-day mortality among the samples (p-value < 0.001, OR = 4.754, 95% CI = 2.67-8.40) (Table 5).
Table 4. Diagnostic modalities and the presence of PE in the logistic regression model as predictors of AKI.
| Variables | P-value | OR | 95% CI | |
| Lower | Upper | |||
| PE | 0.386 | 0.778 | 0.441 | 1.373 |
| CTPA | 0.542 | 0.606 | 0.121 | 3.034 |
| V/Q scan | 0.917 | 0.921 | 0.194 | 4.367 |
Table 5. Acute kidney injury as a predictor of mortality in univariate logistic regression.
| Variable | P-value | OR | 95% CI | |
| Lower | Upper | |||
| AKI | <0.001 | 4.745 | 2.678 | 8.405 |
Discussion
The study aimed to identify the incidence of AKI in patients suspected to have PE, which was found to be 15.8%. Furthermore, 16 (13.4%) of the AKI group were diagnosed with PE. Similarly, a multicenter study conducted with a large sample of confirmed acute PE reported a higher prevalence of AKI (29.5%) with varying degrees of AKI severity [7]. The setting of the patients and the clinical status may contribute to the incidence of AKI. In our study, patients from different hospital settings were included - the emergency department, inpatients, and ICU. It is believed that critically ill patients are more vulnerable to developing AKI. In the literature, the incidence of AKI in the ICU ranged from 3.2% to 67.2% [8]. The high prevalence of AKI in ICU patients is related to multifactorial etiologies; for example, decreased mean arterial pressure, diuretics, and vasopressors were associated with AKI [9]. The contrast-induced nephropathy incidence in ICU patients ranged from 11.5% to 19% [8]. In comparison to the ICU, according to Cho et al. [10], the rate of AKI in patients in the ED with suspected PE and who went through CTPA was 6.49%. In addition to the setting, the criteria used in defining AKI can contribute to different incidence rates [11]. Despite the settings, the criteria, and the presence of PE, the reported rates of AKI in patients with PE or suspected PE were 4.9% and 29.5%, respectively [7,8,10,12-14].
Our findings showed that of the sample (n = 752) with suspected PE, 121 had a confirmed PE diagnosis with a CTPA (90%) and V/Q scan (9.7%). CTPA was the modality of choice in patients with PE suspicion and was chosen for most of the sample (91.3%). The reason for selecting CTPA is its high sensitivity and specificity, with the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II (PIOPED II) trial demonstrating a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 96% [15,16]. The V/Q scan was only used for a small proportion (8.7%) and only in situations where the CTPA could not be used, such as in patients with renal insufficiency, contrast allergy, or pregnancy. There was no association between CTPA and AKI (p-value = 0.303). Despite a known association between contrast and nephropathy, there was no statistical significance between the groups who underwent CTPA and those who did not do CTPA, and AKI in the multivariate logistic regression. Our findings were similar to a meta-analysis study conducted by McDonald et al. [17]. Another study noted that using a CT scan to diagnose PE was associated with a low risk of AKI [7]. Different diagnostic modalities with contrast may have a different relation to nephropathy; for instance, IV dye administration in stroke patients was not associated with new or worsening AKI [18]. The discrepancies in the findings related to CI-AKI are possibly associated with the multiple definitions of AKI and poorly designed studies, which could have led to the overestimation of the AKI incidence [8].
We compared the AKI incidence and some of the comorbidities in the current study. There was a statistical significance between DM, HTN, and AKI groups (p-value < 0.001). However, although DM and HTN are known to have a chronic and significant effect on renal function, increasing the vulnerability to AKI [19], they were not predictive of AKI in the multivariate logistic regression. The AKI incidence was higher in patients older than 60 years, which was statistically significant (p-value = 0.0001). This statistical finding can be explained by the age-related loss of kidney function, progressive decrease in the glomerular filtration rate, and renal blood flow [20]. Although the KDIGO AKI guideline concludes that being female is a risk factor for AKI [21], the AKI risk of the female group in the current study decreased by 50% compared with the male group (p-value = 0.004, OR = 0.522, 95% CI = 0.337-0.81). Our finding is similar to studies done in the USA [7,22,23]. It has been suggested that the female gender is reno-protective due to the effects of the sex hormones on the cellular processes instrumental in the pathogenesis of AKI [24]. A history of malignancy was a predictor of AKI and increased the risk (p-value = 0.014, OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.21-2.70). We hypothesize the reason might be due to a complication of cancer or the treatment. Patients with cancer are at higher risk of developing infections, sepsis, tumor lysis syndrome, and drug-associated toxicity that significantly increase the risk of developing AKI [25-27]. Other reported factors associated with AKI were heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hematological disorders, and massive/severe PE [7,10,13].
The literature suggested that the hemodynamic changes in patients with PE, such as pulmonary hypertension, increased intra-abdominal pressure, and right ventricular dysfunction, might promote AKI development [28,29]. In a case report, embolectomy reversed the oliguria in a patient with massive PE. This finding supports the hypothesis that PE causes AKI [30]. However, there was no association between AKI and PE in our study. For a long time, AKI was considered a benign condition, which can resolve with supportive care and dialysis. However, recent studies proved that AKI independently increases the risk of mortality and morbidity [7,31,32]. In the current study, 16 (2.1%) patients underwent dialysis within one month of the AKI incidence, and the total mortality rate was 20.2%. AKI was a predictor of mortality within 30 days in our study. It is now accepted that AKI has a substantial negative impact on morbidity and mortality, although the mechanism is unclear. Some studies proposed that AKI leads to acute lung injury (ALI), which may be complicated by cardiogenic/non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema [33]. In addition, respiratory complications requiring mechanical ventilation significantly increase the mortality rate [34-36].
Several limitations have been encountered in this study. We have included patients from different settings, such as inpatient, ED, and ICU, which could contribute to magnifying the incidence rate since critically ill patients are more prone to AKI. The stability of the patients represented by vitals was not included in the study. The type of contrast used, dose, and duration were not assessed.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the overall incidence rate of AKI in patients with suspected PE was 16.1%. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension were associated with AKI, but the risk of AKI requiring dialysis was relatively low (2.1%). We have found that malignancy increases AKI risk, whereas the female gender is protective of AKI. The mortality rate in AKI was higher in the AKI group. There was no relationship between the diagnostic modalities, CTPA or V/Q scan, and PE, and AKI, suggesting that the fear of contrast-induced AKI may be overestimated by clinicians. We believe that multiple factors are implicated in the AKI incidence.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The King Abdullah International Medical Research Center issued approval RC20/592/R. During this study, the patients’ medical information was accessed by the research team members with permission from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center. Data were collected from the BESTCare system while ensuring the confidentiality of patients and not violating their rights. Any information concerning the patients’ identity was concealed and kept in a secured place by coding the data and limiting access to it. In addition, any information in the research about the patients’ names, numbers, ID, and any other personal or irrelevant information regarding the research was treated with high confidentiality. Besides, there were not any judgmental approaches used when obtaining the patients’ records. The required patients’ data were transferred to the appropriate program with a maximum level of confidentiality.
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.Kumar P, Clark M. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2012. Kumar and Clark's clinical medicine 8th edition. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Acute kidney injury: definition, pathophysiology and clinical phenotypes. Makris K, Spanou L. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5198510/ Clin Biochem Rev. 2016;37:85–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Acute kidney injury. Ronco C, Bellomo R, Kellum JA. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31777389/ Lancet. 2019;394:1949–1964. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32563-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Epidemiology of acute renal failure in hospitalized patients: experience from southern Saudi Arabia. Al-Homrany M. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16450538/ East Mediterr Health J. 2003;9:1061–1067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: an update. Moore AJ, Wachsmann J, Chamarthy MR, Panjikaran L, Tanabe Y, Rajiah P. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018;8:225–243. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.12.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Khwaja A. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120:0–84. doi: 10.1159/000339789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Frequency and prognostic impact of acute kidney injury in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Data from the RIETE registry. Murgier M, Bertoletti L, Darmon M, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2019;291:121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. Case J, Khan S, Khalid R, Khan A. Crit Care Res Pract. 2013;2013:479730. doi: 10.1155/2013/479730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Epidemiology of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in ICU patients: a retrospective cohort analysis. Hoste EA, Doom S, De Waele J, Delrue LJ, Defreyne L, Benoit DD, Decruyenaere J. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1921–1931. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2389-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Postcontrast acute kidney injury after computed tomography pulmonary angiography for acute pulmonary embolism. Cho A, Kim MJ, You JS, et al. J Emerg Med. 2019;57:798–804. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ascertainment and epidemiology of acute kidney injury varies with definition interpretation. Zappitelli M, Parikh CR, Akcan-Arikan A, Washburn KK, Moffett BS, Goldstein SL. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:948–954. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05431207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.How many patients recover from acute kidney injury after pulmonary embolism? Murgier M, Fouillet L, Ollier E, et al. Eur Respir J. 2020;56:3450. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Acute kidney injury in patients with pulmonary embolism: a population-based cohort study. Chang CH, Fu CM, Fan PC, et al. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Prospective study of the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy among patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Mitchell AM, Jones AE, Tumlin JA, Kline JA. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19:618–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01374.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Overview of Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II. Gottschalk A, Stein PD, Goodman LR, Sostman HD. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32:173–182. doi: 10.1053/snuc.2002.124177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada. Berdahl CT, Vermeulen MJ, Larson DB, Schull MJ. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62:486–494. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Frequency of acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast medium administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Comin J, Williamson EE, Katzberg RW, Murad MH, Kallmes DF. Radiology. 2013;267:119–128. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Association between acute kidney disease and intravenous dye administration in patients with acute stroke: a population-based study. Demel SL, Grossman AW, Khoury JC, et al. Stroke. 2017;48:835–839. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Identification of risk factors associated with acute kidney injury in patients admitted to acute medical units. Finlay S, Bray B, Lewington AJ, Hunter-Rowe CT, Banerjee A, Atkinson JM, Jones MC. Clin Med (Lond) 2013;13:233–238. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-3-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.The aging kidney: physiological changes. Weinstein JR, Anderson S. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010;17:302–307. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kellum JA, Lameire N, Aspelin P, et al. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1–138. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Exploring potential reasons for the temporal trend in dialysis-requiring AKI in the United States. Hsu RK, McCulloch CE, Heung M, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:14–20. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04520415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Race and mortality after acute renal failure. Waikar SS, Curhan GC, Ayanian JZ, Chertow GM. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:2740–2748. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006091060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sex differences in acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. Neugarten J, Golestaneh L, Kolhe NV. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:131. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0937-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Acute kidney injury in critically ill cancer patients: an update. Lameire N, Vanholder R, Van Biesen W, Benoit D. Crit Care. 2016;20:209. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1382-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Preventive strategies for acute kidney injury in cancer patients. Cosmai L, Porta C, Foramitti M, Perrone V, Mollica L, Gallieni M, Capasso G. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14:70–83. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Acute kidney injury in patients with cancer. Rosner MH, Perazella MA. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1770–1781. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1613984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Intra-abdominal hypertension is an under-appreciated cause of acute renal failure. Shibagaki Y, Tai C, Nayak A, Wahba I. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:3567–3570. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Decreased cardiac output, venous congestion and the association with renal impairment in patients with cardiac dysfunction. Damman K, Navis G, Smilde TD, Voors AA, van der Bij W, van Veldhuisen DJ, Hillege HL. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007;9:872–878. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2007.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Acute kidney injury due to pulmonary embolism: the case for 'congestive renal failure'. Dadfarmay S, Wahba IM. NDT Plus. 2011;4:295–298. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfr093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Renal dysfunction in patients with pulmonary embolism: data from the SIRENA register. Menzorov MV, Filimonova VV, Erlikh AD, Barbarash OL, Berns SA, Shmidt EA, Duplyakov DV. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4422 Russ J Cardiol. 2021;26:4422. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Impact of renal function on the prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Xing X, Liu J, Deng Y, et al. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020:1–8. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1862653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mechanisms and mediators of lung injury after acute kidney injury. Faubel S, Edelstein CL. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:48–60. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.The incidence and prognostic significance of acute kidney injury. Waikar SS, Liu KD, Chertow GM. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2007;16:227–236. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3280dd8c35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Re-evaluation and modification of the Stuivenberg Hospital Acute Renal Failure (SHARF) scoring system for the prognosis of acute renal failure: an independent multicentre, prospective study. Lins RL, Elseviers MM, Daelemans R, et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:2282–2288. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Use of EPO in critically ill patients with acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Park J, Gage BF, Vijayan A. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;46:791–798. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

